==== Front BMC Nutr BMC Nutr BMC Nutrition 2055-0928 BioMed Central London 37386551 732 10.1186/s40795-023-00732-x Research Milk kefir drink may not reduce depression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: secondary outcome analysis of a randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial Mohsenpour Mohammad Ali 12 Mohammadi Farzaneh 12 Razmjooei Nadia 2 Eftekhari Mohammad Hassan 2 Hejazi Najmeh najmehhejazi@gmail.com 2 1 grid.412571.4 0000 0000 8819 4698 Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran 2 grid.412571.4 0000 0000 8819 4698 Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran 29 6 2023 29 6 2023 2023 9 8017 1 2023 19 6 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Background Depression is prevalent among individuals with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and can cause poor health outcomes. Moreover, a solid bilateral association between NAFLD and depression has been shown, which may alleviate by kefir consumption. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effect of milk kefir drinks on the depression status of individuals with NAFLD. Methods In a secondary outcome analysis of a randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial, 80 adults with grades 1 to 3 of NAFLD were included in an 8-week intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to Diet or Diet + kefir groups to either follow a low-calorie diet or a low-calorie diet along with a 500 cc milk kefir drink daily. The participants’ demographic, anthropometric, dietary, and physical data were recorded before and after the study. Depression status was assessed using the Persian format of the second version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II-Persian) at the baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. Results Overall, 80 participants aged 42.87 ± 10.67 years were included in the analysis. The data on the baseline demographic, dietary, and physical activity of the groups were not significantly different. During the study, participants in Diet + Kefir group had a significantly decreased energy (P = 0.02), carbohydrate (P = 0.4), and fat consumption (P = 0.4). However, during the study, the depression score was not significantly reduced in the Diet group, the Diet + Kefir group showed a significant reduction in depression (P = 0.02). However, between-group analyses for changes in depression were not significant (P = 0.59). Conclusion Consumption of milk kefir drink for 8 weeks may not reduce depression symptoms in adults with NAFLD. Trial registration The trial was registered at IRCT.ir as IRCT20170916036204N6 (August 2018). Keywords Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Depression Depressive disorder Milk Kefir http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013041 Vice-Chancellor for Research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 13759 issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 ==== Body pmcBackground Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is caused by over-accumulation of fat in the liver [1]. Progression of NAFLD can increase the odds of cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), extra-hepatic cancer, and can eventually lead to higher mortality and morbidity [1]. The co-occurrence between depression and physical illnesses has been established [2]. NAFLD and depression are shown to have a solid bilateral association [3]. It was observed that depression is highly prevalent among NAFLD patients in which 18.21% of patients suffer from depression [3]. In addition, the 10-year incidence rate of depression was 21.2% in NAFLD patients in comparison to 18.2% in non-NAFLD individuals [4]. Depression is one of the mental disorders that is considered one of the serious concerns in today’s modern society [5]. It is predicted to be the second cause of the burden of disease by 2030 [5]. Depression can lead to suicide, increased mortality risk, and chronic status, and lower occupational potential and the quality of life of the depressed individual [6]. This mental disorder affects 12.9% of individuals globally, where the prevalence differs based on the region, human development index of countries, gender, and other socioeconomic factors [6]. In Asian countries, 16.7% of the population suffer from depression [6]. In 2019, the total prevalence of depression in Iran was 4.1% [7]. It is stated that depression inversely affects health outcomes and the progression of the disease [8, 9]. Based on the findings of community-based studies, metabolic syndrome incidence is 2 times higher in individuals with depression [10, 11]. Conducting a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies has resulted in a reciprocal causal relationship between depression and abnormal weight [12]. Also, NAFLD patients with depression showed a lower rate of improvement [13] and higher odds of 1-year mortality compared to non-depressed patients [14]. Thus, the central role of depression in multimorbidity and the increase in the incidence of chronic diseases justify the screening and intervention programs for those who suffer and are at risk of chronic diseases [15]. Several dietary interventions have been investigated to reduce depressive symptoms including adherence to the Mediterranean diet [16], the Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet [17], Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet [18], milk [19], and kefir consumption [20]. Kefir is a fermented dairy beverage generated after the lactose content of milk is fermented by bacteria and yeasts [21]. Kefir drink contains various favorable compounds such as essential amino acids, vitamins, folic acid, bioactive substances, and minerals [22], which exert health promoting effects such as anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, anti-hypertensive, anti-inflammatory, and hypo-cholesterolemic property [21]. In addition, depression was seen to be prevented and treated by consumption of kefir [20], which is proposed to act through gut microbiota [23] and neural pathways [24]. Although pieces of evidence have shown the causal relationship between NAFLD and depression, the adverse effects of depression in the treatment of chronic diseases, and the favorable effects of milk and kefir in improving depression symptoms, no studies have been conducted to assess the effect of kefir on depressive disorders in NAFLD patients. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effect of milk kefir drink on depression status in individuals with NAFLD. Methods Study design The present study is a secondary outcome analysis of a randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial to investigate the effect of milk kefir drink on the depression status of adults with NAFLD. The study was done in Motahari Fatty Liver Clinic affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in accordance with the Helsinki Declarations of ethics and approved by the Ethics committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Shiraz, Iran (Code: IR.SUMS.REC.1397.107). The study protocol was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT.ir) under the registration code: IRCT20170916036204N6. The study reporting adheres to the CONSORT guidelines for reporting clinical trials. Study population The study population was obtained from the original study [25]. The original study sample size was calculated 40 based on the changes for aspartate transaminase (AST) in a previous study [26]. Consented adults to participate aged 18 to 65 years old were eligible if they: (1) suffered from grades 1 to 3 of NAFLD based on the confirmation by physicians in regard to sonography results, (2) had elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) (over 30 IU/L for male and 19 IU/L for female participants), (3) were overweight or obese (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2), (4) were under control for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) or dyslipidemia (if available), (5) were not suffering from other hepatic disorders including cirrhosis, Wilson’s disease, hepatitis B or C, (6) were not diagnosed with cardiovascular, renal, autoimmune, inflammatory bowel diseases, cystic fibrosis, hypothyroidism, or Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency, (7) did not consume any nutritional supplements or probiotics 3 months prior to the study, (8) did not lose weight for more than 3 kg in 3 months before the study, (9) did not participate in any interventional study for 6 months before the initiation of the present investigation, and (10) were not pregnant or lactating. After inclusion in the study, any participant who used nutritional supplements or changed the dosage of anti-hyperglycemic or anti-hyperlipidemia medications, or did not adhere to the prescribed diet, recommendations, or study protocol was excluded from the study. The threshold of consuming 85% of milk kefir drinks was considered as the least adherence to the study protocol. Moreover, in the case of unwillingness to continue cooperation in the research, the participants were free to leave the study and it did not affect following the common NAFLD medical care. Study protocol After the referral from the physician, the participants were assessed for eligibility. In the case of eligibility, each participant was informed about the study, its aims and protocol, and their own rights; then, an informed consent form was signed by those who were willing to participate in the study. Subsequently, according to the randomization sequence that was generated using computer based on the block randomization method (blocks of 4 with 2:2 ratio) prior to the study, the participants were allocated to either the Diet + Kefir or Diet groups. The groups were named A or B to blind the participants and researchers. Opaque closed envelopes were used to conceal the participants’ allocated group until the initiation of the study period. After the allocation was completed, the participants entered into a 2-week run-in period to unify their nutritional behavior and remove its confounding effect. For this purpose, a pamphlet was given to them containing general nutritional information for NAFLD patients. Participants were also asked not to change their usual physical activity. At the end of the run-in period, the participants attended the Fatty liver Clinic. The demographic, nutritional, anthropometric, and physical activity data and the depression status of the participants were assessed and recorded. Afterward, the allocated group for each participant was revealed to the investigator to prescribe the intervention. The participants were asked to follow the study protocol and the prescribed intervention for 8 weeks. They were also asked to attend the Fatty liver Clinic following completing the eight-week study period to assess their nutritional, physical activity, anthropometry, and depression status. Intervention A low-calorie diet was designed for the participants in face-to-face visits for both groups of Diet + Kefir and Diet. The Estimated Energy Requirement formula was used to calculate the daily energy [27]. A 500-calorie was reduced to design the low-calorie diet. Then, a diet with 55% carbohydrate, 17% protein, and 28% fat was prescribed. Participants in the Diet + Kefir group also consumed 500 cc milk kefir drink daily for 8 weeks (Fars Pegah Dairy Co., Shiraz, Iran), so that these dairy products were a part of their daily diet as 2 dairy servings per day. The energy, carbohydrate, fat, and protein content of milk kefir drink was 118 kcal, 10, 5, and 8 g, respectively, and 300 mg calcium per serving (250 cc). Participants brought empty containers of their milk kefir drink every 2 weeks to determine their adherence and took their quota for the next 2 weeks. Demographic assessments The demographic assessment was done using a questionnaire that included data about age, gender, disease and medication history, food allergies, and smoking. Anthropometric assessments Weight was assessed with the minimum possible clothing using the Seca scale (Germany) with 100-gram accuracy; the participant stood straight in the middle of the scale. Height was recorded using a measuring tape attached to the wall with a barefoot, no hat or scarf, in a standing position, while heels, buttocks, and shoulders touched the wall, and the head was in the Frankfurt position. The height was recorded to the nearest 0.5 cm. BMI was calculated using the standard formula [27]. Waist circumference was assessed by an inelastic tape measure with an accuracy of 0.1 cm in the standing position. It was measured at the end of a usual expiration at the narrowest circumference between iliac crest and the lowest rib. Participants were had the lightest possible clothing, and the tape did not put any pressure on the skin. Dietary assessment A 3-day food recall (2 weekdays and one weekend) was used to record the dietary intake of the participants before and after the study. Food recalls were converted to grams using common household scales of Iranians for each food item and analyzed using Nutritionist 4 software (N4, First Databank Inc., San Bruno, CA, USA). The daily energy, protein, carbohydrate, fat, micronutrient, and fiber consumption were extracted. Physical activity The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to assess the physical activity habits of the participants. This 7-item questionnaire asks about the intensity and duration of physical activity during the past 7 days. The duration of each activity was multiplied by the metabolic equivalent (3.3, 4, and 8 for light, moderate and intense, respectively) to calculate the physical activity of the participants (MET.min/week) [28]. Depression assessment The Persian form of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II-Persian) was used to assess the depression status of the participants. The BDI-II-Persian asks about depression symptoms’ severity over the past 2-weeks using 21 questions. The BDI-II-Persian includes multiple choice questions with four answers ranging from absent or mild to severe which scored from 0 to 3. The overall score is calculated by summing up the scores (0 to 63). This Persian version of the questionnaire has been checked for validity in the Iranian population [29]. Based on their results in BDI-II-Persian, individuals are categorized as not- or minimally depressed (scored less than 10), mildly depressed (scored 10 to 18), moderately depressed (scored 19 to 29), and severely depressed (scored 30 or higher). Statistical analysis The normal distribution of data was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Categorical and quantitative data were summarized as frequency (percent) and mean ± standard deviation (SD), respectively. Between-group analyses were done using an independent sample t-test. Paired sample t-test was conducted for within-group comparison. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was carried out to adjust the effect of covariates. Energy, fat, and carbohydrates were considered as covariates in ANCOVA test for adjustments. For dropout participants, the last observation carried forward method was used for imputing the missing data. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS software version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results Of 345 individuals assessed for eligibility, 254 were not eligible and 11 did not consent to participate. Eighty adults with NAFLD were allocated to either Diet + Kefir or Diet group. In each Diet + Kefir and Diet group, 4 participants did not finish the study (3 because of travel, 2 participants showed side effects (gastric cramps and bloating), 2 stated personal reasons for leaving the study, and 1 did not adhere to the study protocol). Thus, in each group, 36 subjects successfully completed the study. Figure 1 shows the consort flow diagram for the study procedure. Fig. 1 Consort flow diagram of the study procedure Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics of the participants. Overall, participants enrolled in the study with a mean age of 42.87 ± 10.67 in males and females and 43.8% (n = 35) were male. Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the participants (n = 80) Diet (n = 40) Diet + Kefir (n = 40) P-value Age year (mean ± SD) 43.50 ± 11.00 42.25 ± 10.44 0.52# Gender 0.07† Male 13 (32.5) 22 (55.0) Female 27 (67.5) 18 (45.0) Marital Status 0.57† Single 6 (15.0) 5 (12.5) Married 33 (82.5) 32 (80.0) Widowed 1 (2.5) 3 (7.5) Smoking 0.17† Yes 7 (17.5) 3 (7.5) No 33 (82.5) 37 (92.5) Medication history 0.36† Yes 18 (45.0) 14 (35.0) No 22 (55.0) 26 (65.0) Disease history 0.25† Yes 27 (67.5) 22 (55.0) No 13 (35.2) 18 (45.0) * Data are reported as n (%), otherwise, it is stated # Independent Sample t-test † Chi-square test P-value less than 0.05 considered significant Table 2 shows the dietary intake, physical activity, and anthropometric characteristics of participants. Baseline results of the dietary intake and physical activity showed no significant differences between the groups (P < 0.05). Although between-group analysis for dietary intake and physical activity at the 8th week did not show any statistically significant differences, the mean changes for energy (P = 0.02), carbohydrate (P = 0.04), and fat (P = 0.04) consumption during the study period showed a higher decrease in the Diet + Kefir group. Anthropometric measures of the participants were not different between the groups at baseline and 8th week (P > 0.05), but after the 8 weeks of intervention, within-group comparison indicated a significant difference in weight (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02 for Diet and Diet + Kefir, respectively), BMI (P = 0.01 for both groups), and waist circumference (P = 0.01 for both groups). Table 2 Dietary intake, physical activity, and anthropometric indices of the participants (n = 80) Diet (n = 40) Diet + Kefir (n = 40) P-value Energy (kcal/day) Baseline 2050.52 ± 552.41 2182.80 ± 561.49 0.29* 8th week 1938.29 ± 510.84 1815.42 ± 418.58 0.24* P-value 0.18# < 0.01# Mean differences − 112.22 ± 521.57 − 367.37 ± 461.63 0.02* Protein (g/day) Baseline 70.01 ± 19.24 71.04 ± 25.36 0.83* 8th week 63.02 ± 17.47 60.37 ± 21.56 0.54* P-value 0.03# < 0.01# Mean differences − 6.98 ± 19.62 − 10.67 ± 20.75 0.41* Carbohydrate (g/day) Baseline 301.97 ± 93.99 314.29 ± 88.43 0.54* 8th week 286.95 ± 92.09 246.33 ± 73.42 0.22* P-value 0.26# < 0.01# Mean differences − 15.01 ± 84.28 − 49.96 ± 71.02 0.04* Fat (g/day) Baseline 63.66 ± 20.75 70.79 ± 22.19 0.14* 8th week 61.60 ± 18.18 58.86 ± 10.76 0.41* P-value 0.55# < 0.01# Mean differences − 2.06 ± 21.69 − 11.93 ± 21.29 0.04* Fiber (g/day) Baseline 12.04 ± 4.27 14.09 ± 6.60 0.10* 8th week 13.43 ± 10.18 15.96 ± 20.64 0.48* P-value 0.41# 0.59# Mean differences 1.38 ± 10.56 1.87 ± 21.94 0.90* Physical Activity (MET.min/week) Baseline 437.51 ± 86.34 302.23 ± 69.43 0.22* 8th week 475.32 ± 84.28 322.51 ± 57.25 0.13* P-value 0.63# 0.75# Mean differences 37.81 ± 497.81 20.27 ± 401.96 0.86* Weight (kg) Baseline 80.31 ± 13.52 85.02.95 ± 12.99 0.11* 8th week 79.49 ± 13.47 84.49 ± 13.11 0.09* P-value 0.01# 0.02# Mean differences − 0.82 ± 2.06 − 0.53 ± 1.39 0.13† Height (cm) Baseline 164.10 ± 10.04 168.95 ± 9.65 0.03* 8th week - - - P-value - - Mean differences - - - BMI (kg/m2) Baseline 29.71 ± 3.07 29.72 ± 3.50 0.98* 8th week 29.40 ± 3.08 29.53 ± 3.55 0.86* P-value 0.01# 0.01# Mean differences − 0.30 ± 0.75 − 0.19 ± 0.47 0.11† Waist circumference (cm) Baseline 100.80 ± 8.27 100.55 ± 7.28 0.88* 8th week 100.15 ± 8.20 99.47 ± 7.39 0.70* P-value 0.01# < 0.01# Mean differences − 0.65 ± 1.67 − 1.07 ± 1.45 0.58† Data are reported as mean ± SD, except for pre and post for physical activity (mean ± standard error (SE)) * Independent Sample t-test # Paired t-test † ANCOVA adjusted for changes in energy, carbohydrate, and fat intake P-value less than 0.05 considered significant Table 3 displays the BDI-II-Persian scores and depression status of the participants at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. Between-group analysis for the BDI-II-Persian score did not show any statistical differences at baseline or after 8 weeks of intervention (P > 0.05). While within-group analysis for the Diet group did not show a significant reduction in depression score (P = 0.10), it was significantly reduced in the Diet + Kefir group (mean ± SD for a baseline: 15.35 ± 10.44 and 8th week: 13.05 ± 9.30, P = 0.02). Although the BDI-II-Persian score was reduced in both groups, between-group comparison was not significant. Table 3 BDI-II-Persian score and depression status of the participants at the baseline and 8th week (n = 80) Diet (n = 40) Diet + Kefir (n = 40) P-value Depression score Mean ± SD Baseline 17.52 ± 10.41 15.35 ± 10.44 0.35* 8th week 16.15 ± 9.63 13.05 ± 9.30 0.14* P-value 0.10# 0.02# Mean differences − 1.37 ± 5.22 − 2.30 ± 6.16 0.59† Depression Status Baseline N (%) No or minimal 13 (32.5) 14 (35.0) 0.33‡ Mild 7 (17.5) 12 (30.0) Moderate 16 (40.0) 9 (22.5) Severe 4 (10.0) 5 (12.5) 8th week N (%) No or minimal 13 (32.5) 18 (45.0) 0.71‡ Mild 10 (25.0) 8 (20.0) Moderate 14 (35.0) 12 (30.0) Severe 3 (7.5) 2 (5.0) Data are reported as mean ± SD for BDI-II-Persian score and number (%) for depression status * Independent Sample t-test # Paired t-test † ANCOVA adjusted for changes in energy, carbohydrate, and fat intake ‡ Chi-square test P-value less than 0.05 considered significant Discussion In our study, depression score as a secondary outcome of a randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial was assessed after milk kefir consumption in NAFLD patients. Our results indicated that depression score was reduced after 8 weeks of following the diet and milk kefir consumption, but the reduction was not significantly different compared to a low-calorie diet. Our study did not show any beneficial effects of milk kefir drink on depression scores. In contrast to our findings, a study done by Ozcan et al. [30] reported the positive effect of 500 cc kefir intervention for 30 days in postmenopausal women on Beck’s depression score, sleep disorders, and quality of life. In the study conducted by Ozcan et al. [30], post-menopausal female participants were included. The observed discrepancies could be due to the population and regulating hormonal status by kefir drinks in the above-mentioned study [30]. Nikolova and colleagues [31] conducted a meta-analysis which resulted in the beneficial effect of probiotics on depression. In addition, in the study of Akkashe et al. [32], probiotic supplementation (containing Bifidobacterium bifidio, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lactobacillus caseai) in patients with severe depressive disorder led to a decrease in Beck’s depression score. The source of discrepancies with our study can be related to the difference between the enrolled populations in the study. NAFLD patients suffer from dysbiosis [33], which can be a cause of both NAFLD and depression. A regulated immune response and consequently modulated brain process can be due to a balanced intestinal microbial community which ultimately leads to improved mental state, mood, and behavior [34]. NAFLD patients show degrees of gut inflammation [35]. Thus, various pro-inflammatory cytokines are produced and transferred to the brain by systemic blood circulation. By passing the blood-brain barrier, these molecules can affect states of behavior. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and Interleukin 6 (IL-6) can attach to their receptors and trigger cerebral Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) signaling, which can upregulate the production of secondary cytokines, and finally induce depression symptoms. In addition, a higher risk of depression has been linked to higher levels of Interferon gamma (IFN-γ), Interleukin 2 (IL-2), TNF-α as pro-inflammatory cytokines, and inflammatory markers as C-reactive protein (CRP) [34]. Milk was the main ingredient of our intervention. Milk has a dual effect on depressive symptoms. Thus, skimmed milk reduces these symptoms, but whole milk increases them [19]. Milk is a good source of essential amino acids (such as tryptophan), minerals including calcium, magnesium, and zinc, and vitamins including vitamin B2 [19]. In order to produce serotonin, which can lower depression [36], tryptophan is needed as a precursor [37], and calcium is an activator for tryptophan hydrolase [38]. Magnesium and zinc with their anti-inflammatory properties can down-regulate CRP, and consequently can reduce depression [19]. Moreover, milk can provide the required magnesium to prevent magnesium deficiency which affects hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) dysregulation and mood changes [39]. Vitamin B2 with its role in lowering homocysteine levels by transsulfuration and remethylation pathways can lead to lower inflammation [40]. Thus, as depression is linked to inflammation, HPA dysfunction, and lower levels of serotonin, milk consumption can reduce depression symptoms [19]. Kefir drinks are also a good source for tryptophan which can modulate serotonin metabolism [41]. Thus, as depression changes the neuroplasticity, the upregulated serotonin might develop neuroplasticity [42]. On the other hand, kefir is capable of protecting the neurons from being degraded by its anti-inflammatory properties [41]. Also, the activation of receptors for learning and memory by kefir can increase cognitive improvement and finally affects depression [31]. Other pathways for depression alleviation by kefir is due to its positive effects on the gut-brain axis [43]. This pathway consists of the gamma aminobutyricacid (GABA) production after converting 2-oxoglutarate to glutamate by Lactobacillus reuteri [43]. Thus, the non-significant result could be due to reporting the changes in depression as a secondary outcome, while the sample size was calculated based on the changes in AST. Further investigations considering psychological profile as the principal outcome are needed to shed light on the possible effect of Kefir. The present study was the first to assess the effect of milk kefir drink on depression in NAFLD patients. In addition, assessing the physical activity and 3-day food recalls enabled us to adjust the confounding effect of physical activity and diet. However, there were several limitations. First, as this study was an analysis of the secondary outcome, the sample size was not calculated in regard to the investigation of depression. Second, as NAFLD patients face different metabolic dysregulations such as abnormal lipid and glucose metabolism, altered gut microbiota, and dysbiosis, in the baseline, these may have a synergic effect. Moreover, for identification of individuals with NAFLD, sonography result was used, while the Fibroscan test, as a noninvasive technique, has higher accuracy than sonography in identification of NAFLD. Thus, the results of this study cannot be generalized to depressed individuals or any NAFLD patients with depression. However, it shed light on this aspect of NAFLD, and further investigations are suggested with adequate sample size, considering different abnormalities in populations, and assessment of gut microbiota population in participants. Conclusion Milk kefir drink consumption for 8 weeks may not reduce depression symptoms in NAFLD patients. Further randomized controlled clinical trials with longer durations and sufficient sample size are suggested to clarify the possible effect. Abbreviations ALT Alanine transaminase ANCOVA Analysis of covariance AST Aspartate transaminase BDI-II-Persian Beck Depression Inventory-II-Persian BMI Body mass index CRP C-reactive protein DASH Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension GABA Gamma aminobutyricacid HPA Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal IFN-γ Interferon gamma IL-2 Interleukin 2 IL-6 Interleukin 6 IPAQ International Physical Activity Questionnaire IRCT Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IU International unit MIND the Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay NAFLD Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease NF-kB Nuclear factor kappa B SD Standard deviation SUMS Shiraz University of Medical Sciences T2DM Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus TNF-α Tumor necrosis factor alpha Acknowledgements The Authors send warm regards to the participants of the study. The research team would like to thank the staff of Motahari Clinic for their cooperation and the vice-chancellor for research of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for financial support of the study. The authors would like to thank Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran and also Center for Development of Clinical Research of Nemazee Hospital and Dr. Nasrin Shokrpour for editorial assistance. Authors’ contributions NH, NR, and MAM conceived the study. NR and FM conducted the study. MAM and FM conducted statistical analysis. MAM and MHE provided the first draft. MAM, FM, and NH revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Funding This study was funded by vice-chancellor for research of the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (code: 13759). The funding body played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and in writing the manuscript. Data Availability The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. To access the dataset, please contact Dr. Najmeh Hejazi via email (najmehhejazi@gmail.com). Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The study was done in accordance with the Helsinki Declarations of ethics and approved by the Ethics committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Shiraz, Iran (Code: IR.SUMS.REC.1397.107). Participants were informed about the study prior to participation. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. ==== Refs References 1. Mantovani A Scorletti E Mosca A Alisi A Byrne CD Targher G Complications, morbidity and mortality of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Metabolism 2020 111 154170 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154170 2. Clarke DM Currie KC Depression, anxiety and their relationship with chronic diseases: a review of the epidemiology, risk and treatment evidence Med J Aust 2009 190 54 S60 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02471.x 19236287 3. Xiao J Lim LKE Ng CH Tan DJH Lim WH Ho CS Is fatty liver associated with depression? A meta-analysis and systematic review on the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of depression and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Front Med 2021 8 691696 10.3389/fmed.2021.691696 4. Labenz C Huber Y Michel M Nagel M Galle PR Kostev K Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease increases the risk of anxiety and depression Hepatol Commun 2020 4 9 1293 301 10.1002/hep4.1541 32923833 5. Mathers CD Loncar D Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030 PLoS Med 2006 3 11 e442 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442 17132052 6. Lim GY Tam WW Lu Y Ho CS Zhang MW Ho RC Prevalence of depression in the community from 30 countries between 1994 and 2014 Sci Rep 2018 8 1 1 10 10.1038/s41598-018-21243-x 29311619 7. Gharraee B Tajrishi KZ Sheybani F Tahmasbi N Mirzaei M Farahani H Prevalence of major depressive disorder in the general population of Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis Med J Islamic Repub Iran 2019 33 151 8. Moussavi S Chatterji S Verdes E Tandon A Patel V Ustun B Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World health surveys The Lancet 2007 370 9590 851 8 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61415-9 9. Gawlik-Kotelnicka O Strzelecki D Adiposity in depression or depression in adiposity? The role of immune-inflammatory-microbial overlap Life 2021 11 2 117 10.3390/life11020117 33557031 10. Goldbacher EM Bromberger J Matthews KA Lifetime history of major depression predicts the development of the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged women Psychosom Med 2009 71 3 266 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318197a4d5 19188528 11. Roriz-Cruz M Rosset I Wada T Sakagami T Ishine M Roriz‐Filho JS Stroke‐independent association between metabolic syndrome and functional dependence, depression, and low quality of life in elderly community‐dwelling brazilian people J Am Geriatr Soc 2007 55 3 374 82 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01068.x 17341239 12. Luppino FS, Leonore M, de Wit PF, Bouvy T, Stijnen P, Cuijpers, Brenda WJH, Penninx. and Frans G. Zitman. 2010.“Overweight, obesity, and Depression: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Longitudinal Studies.”. Arch Gen Psychiatry.67(3):220–29. 13. Tomeno W Kawashima K Yoneda M Saito S Ogawa Y Honda Y Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease comorbid with major depressive disorder: the pathological features and poor therapeutic efficacy J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015 30 6 1009 14 10.1111/jgh.12897 25619308 14. Sayiner M Arshad T Golabi P Paik J Farhat F Younossi ZM Extrahepatic manifestations and healthcare expenditures of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Medicare population Hep Intl 2020 14 4 556 66 10.1007/s12072-020-10038-w 15. Birk JL Kronish IM Moise N Falzon L Yoon S Davidson KW Depression and multimorbidity: considering temporal characteristics of the associations between depression and multiple chronic diseases Health Psychol 2019 38 9 802 10.1037/hea0000737 31008648 16. Fresán U Bes-Rastrollo M Segovia-Siapco G Sanchez-Villegas A Lahortiga F de la Rosa P-A Does the MIND diet decrease depression risk? A comparison with Mediterranean diet in the SUN cohort Eur J Nutr 2019 58 3 1271 82 10.1007/s00394-018-1653-x 29516224 17. Salari-Moghaddam A Keshteli AH Mousavi SM Afshar H Esmaillzadeh A Adibi P Adherence to the MIND diet and prevalence of psychological disorders in adults J Affect Disord 2019 256 96 102 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.056 31170621 18. Cherian L Wang Y Holland T Agarwal P Aggarwal N Morris MC DASH and Mediterranean-Dash intervention for neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diets are associated with fewer depressive symptoms over time The Journals of Gerontology: Series A 2021 76 1 151 6 10.1093/gerona/glaa044 19. Sun J Wang W Zhang D Associations of different types of dairy intakes with depressive symptoms in adults J Affect Disord 2020 274 326 33 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.095 32469823 20. Peluzio MdCG Dias MdMe, Martinez JA Milagro FI Kefir and intestinal microbiota modulation: implications in human health Front Nutr 2021 8 638740 10.3389/fnut.2021.638740 33693024 21. Azizi NF Kumar MR Yeap SK Abdullah JO Khalid M Omar AR Kefir and its biological activities Foods 2021 10 6 1210 10.3390/foods10061210 34071977 22. Garofalo C Ferrocino I Reale A Sabbatini R Milanović V Alkić-Subašić M Study of kefir drinks produced by backslopping method using kefir grains from Bosnia and Herzegovina: microbial dynamics and volatilome profile Food Res Int 2020 137 109369 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109369 33233071 23. Sun Y Geng W Pan Y Wang J Xiao P Wang Y Supplementation with Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 from tibetan kefir improves depression-like behavior in stressed mice by modulating the gut microbiota Food Funct 2019 10 2 925 37 10.1039/C8FO02096E 30698577 24. Chen H-L Lan Y-W Tu M-Y Tung Y-T Chan MN-Y Wu H-S Kefir peptides exhibit antidepressant-like activity in mice through the BDNF/TrkB pathway J Dairy Sci 2021 104 6 6415 30 10.3168/jds.2020-19222 33741171 25. Mohammadi F, Razmjooei N, Mohsenpour MA, Nejati M, Eftekhari MH, Hejazi N. The effects of milk kefir drink on liver aminotransferases and metabolic indicators in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial. [Manuscript submitted for publication]. 2023. 26. Nabavi S Rafraf M Somi M Homayouni-Rad A Asghari-Jafarabadi M Effects of probiotic yogurt consumption on metabolic factors in individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease J Dairy Sci 2014 97 12 7386 93 10.3168/jds.2014-8500 25306266 27. Mahan LK, Raymond JL. Krause’s food & the nutrition care process-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016. 28. Lee PH Macfarlane DJ Lam TH Stewart SM Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review Int J Behav Nutr Phys activity 2011 8 1 1 11 10.1186/1479-5868-8-115 29. Ghassemzadeh H Mojtabai R Karamghadiri N Ebrahimkhani N Psychometric properties of a persian-language version of the Beck Depression Inventory‐Second edition: BDI‐II‐PERSIAN Depress Anxiety 2005 21 4 185 92 10.1002/da.20070 16075452 30. Özcan H Oskay Ü Bodur AF Effects of kefir on quality of life and sleep disturbances in postmenopausal women Holist Nurs Pract 2019 33 4 207 13 10.1097/HNP.0000000000000310 30768439 31. Nikolova V Zaidi SY Young AH Cleare AJ Stone JM Gut feeling: randomized controlled trials of probiotics for the treatment of clinical depression: systematic review and meta-analysis Therapeutic Adv Psychopharmacol 2019 9 2045125319859963 10.1177/2045125319859963 32. Akkasheh G Kashani-Poor Z Tajabadi-Ebrahimi M Jafari P Akbari H Taghizadeh M Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic administration in patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Nutrition 2016 32 3 315 20 10.1016/j.nut.2015.09.003 26706022 33. Aron-Wisnewsky J Vigliotti C Witjes J Le P Holleboom AG Verheij J Gut microbiota and human NAFLD: disentangling microbial signatures from metabolic disorders Nat Reviews Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020 17 5 279 97 10.1038/s41575-020-0269-9 34. Waclawiková B El Aidy S Role of microbiota and tryptophan metabolites in the remote effect of intestinal inflammation on brain and depression Pharmaceuticals 2018 11 3 63 10.3390/ph11030063 29941795 35. He L-H, Yao D-H, Wang L-Y, Zhang L, Bai X-L. Gut microbiome-mediated alteration of immunity, inflammation, and metabolism involved in the regulation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Front Microbiol. 2021;12. 36. Daut RA Fonken LK Circadian regulation of depression: a role for serotonin Front Neuroendocr 2019 54 100746 10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.04.003 37. KALUZNA V GATAREK C MS how important is tryptophan in human health Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2019 59 1 72 88 10.1080/10408398.2017.1357534 28799778 38. Knapp S Mandell AJ Bullard WP Calcium activation of brain tryptophan hydroxylase Life Sci 1975 16 10 1583 93 10.1016/0024-3205(75)90076-4 566 39. Katritch V Kufareva I Abagyan R Structure based prediction of subtype-selectivity for adenosine receptor antagonists Neuropharmacology 2011 60 1 108 15 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.07.009 20637786 40. Ganji V Kafai MR Frequent consumption of milk, yogurt, cold breakfast cereals, peppers, and cruciferous vegetables and intakes of dietary folate and riboflavin but not vitamins B-12 and B-6 are inversely associated with serum total homocysteine concentrations in the US population Am J Clin Nutr 2004 80 6 1500 7 10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1500 15585761 41. Noori N, Bangash MY, Motaghinejad M, Hosseini P, Noudoost B. Kefir protective effects against nicotine cessation-induced anxiety and cognition impairments in rats. Adv Biomedical Res. 2014;3. 42. Kraus C Castrén E Kasper S Lanzenberger R Serotonin and neuroplasticity–links between molecular, functional and structural pathophysiology in depression Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews 2017 77 317 26 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.007 43. van de Wouw M Walsh AM Crispie F van Leuven L Lyte JM Boehme M Distinct actions of the fermented beverage kefir on host behaviour, immunity and microbiome gut-brain modules in the mouse Microbiome 2020 8 1 1 20 31901242