==== Front Front Aging Neurosci Front Aging Neurosci Front. Aging Neurosci. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 1663-4365 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1181558 Neuroscience Review The neural correlates of apathy in the context of aging and brain disorders: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies Yan Hongjie 1 * † Wu Huijun 2 3 † Cai Zenglin 4 5 † Du Shouyun 6 Li Lejun 7 Xu Bingchao 1 * Chang Chunqi 2 8 * Wang Nizhuan 9 * 1Department of Neurology, Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, China 2School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China 3Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China 4Department of Neurology, Suzhou Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Suzhou, China 5Department of Neurology, Gusu School, Suzhou Science and Technology Town Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China 6Department of Neurology, Guanyun People’s Hospital, Guanyun, China 7Department of Neurology, Suzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, China 8Pengcheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China 9School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China Edited by: Amer M. Burhan, Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Canada Reviewed by: Corinne E. Fischer, St. Michael’s Hospital, Canada; Shankar Tumati, University of Toronto, Canada *Correspondence: Nizhuan Wang, wangnizhuan1120@gmail.com Chunqi Chang, cqchang@szu.edu.cn Bingchao Xu, bingcx@hotmail.com Hongjie Yan, yanhjns@gmail.com †These authors have contributed equally to this work 16 6 2023 2023 15 118155807 3 2023 05 6 2023 Copyright © 2023 Yan, Wu, Cai, Du, Li, Xu, Chang and Wang. 2023 Yan, Wu, Cai, Du, Li, Xu, Chang and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Introduction Apathy is a prevalent mood disturbance that occurs in a wide range of populations, including those with normal cognitive aging, mental disorders, neurodegenerative disorders and traumatic brain injuries. Recently, neuroimaging technologies have been employed to elucidate the neural substrates underlying brain disorders accompanying apathy. However, the consistent neural correlates of apathy across normal aging and brain disorders are still unclear. Methods This paper first provides a brief review of the neural mechanism of apathy in healthy elderly individuals, those with mental disorders, neurodegenerative disorders, and traumatic brain injuries. Further, following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the structural and functional neuroimaging meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimation method is performed on the apathy group with brain disorders and the healthy elderly, aiming at exploring the neural correlates of apathy. Results The structural neuroimaging meta-analysis showed that gray matter atrophy is associated with apathy in the bilateral precentral gyrus (BA 13/6), bilateral insula (BA 47), bilateral medial frontal gyrus (BA 11), bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, left caudate (putamen) and right anterior cingulate, while the functional neuroimaging meta-analysis suggested that the functional connectivity in putamen and lateral globus pallidus is correlated with apathy. Discussion Through the neuroimaging meta-analysis, this study has identified the potential neural locations of apathy in terms of brain structure and function, which may offer valuable pathophysiological insights for developing more effective therapeutic interventions for affected patients. apathy meta-analysis mental disorder neurodegenerative disorder traumatic brain injury normal cognitive aging National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809 82001160 This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82001160), “HaiYan Plan” Scientific Research Funding Project of Lianyungang City (No. 2017-QD-009), The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang–Advanced Technology Support Project (No. XJ1811), Project of Huaguoshan Mountain Talent Plan - Doctors for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Special Project for Diagnosis and Treatment of Key Clinical Diseases in Suzhou (No. LCZX202029), Suzhou City Medical Device and New Medicine Clinical Trial Institutional Capacity Improvement Project (No. SLT202001), Suzhou Science and Technology Development Plan (No. SS2019048), Scientific research project of Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University (No. GSKY20210240), and Research Projects on Aging Health of Lianyungang City (No. L202201). section-at-acceptanceAlzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias ==== Body pmcHighlights - Structural gray matter atrophy in the precentral gyrus, bilateral insula, medial/inferior frontal gyrus, left caudate, and right anterior cingulate is associated with apathy; - Functional connectivity in the putamen and lateral globus pallidus is correlated with apathy; - The identified neural locations may serve as therapeutic targets for individuals with apathy. 1. Introduction Apathy is commonly defined as a state of reduced feeling, emotion, and interest (Mann, 1990; Marin, 1991), where its association with the aging process (Fazio et al., 2016; Jang et al., 2021), various mental disorders (MD) (Alexopoulos et al., 2013; Yuen et al., 2014), neurodegenerative disorders (NDD) (Reijnders et al., 2010; Wei et al., 2020; Miller et al., 2021; Azocar et al., 2022), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) (Knutson et al., 2014; Hogeveen et al., 2021) suggests that it can serve as an independent risk factor for a range of diseases, including those affecting healthy elderly individuals (Eurelings et al., 2014). In this section, we first provide a concise review of the neural mechanisms underlying apathy, focusing on neuroimaging findings in the context of normal cognitive aging, mental disorder, neurodegenerative disorder, and traumatic brain injury. We also present a summary of key findings related to apathy across the healthy elderly and brain disorders in Table 1. TABLE 1 A neuroimaging summary of the negative effects of apathy on normal cognitive aging, mental disorders, neurodegenerative disorders, and traumatic brain injury. References Diseases N Imaging technique Apathy measure Key findings Normal cognitive aging Yan et al., 2015 Healthy elderly 36 sMRI AS Right putamen Fazio et al., 2016 Healthy elderly 311 task-fMRI AS Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex Jang et al., 2021 Healthy elderly 100 rs-fMRI AS Bilateral paracingulate gyrus; right insula; right temporal pole; anterior cingulate Mental disorders Alexopoulos et al., 2013 Depression 26 rs-fMRI AES Amygdala; caudate; putamen; globus pallidus; thalamus; dorsolateral; ventrolateral prefrontal cortices Yuen et al., 2014 Depression 16 rs-fMRI AES Right anterior insula; dorsal anterior cingulate Lavretsky et al., 2007 Depression 43 sMRI AES Right anterior cingulate Caravaggio et al., 2018 Schizophrenia 20 sMRI SANS Bilateral frontal inferior operculum; left precentral; left middle frontal gyrus Neurodegenerative disorders Tunnard et al., 2011 AD 111 sMRI NPI Left caudal anterior cingulate cortex; left lateral orbitofrontal cortex; left superior/ventrolateral frontal regions Kazui et al., 2017 AD 98 SPECT; sMRI NPI Right caudate nucleus; left posterior medial frontal lobe; right superior frontal lobe; bilateral culmen-fusiform gyri; left occipital lobe Marshall et al., 2007 AD 41 PET SANS Bilateral anterior cingulate; medial orbitofrontal cortex; bilateral medial thalamus Migneco et al., 2001 AD 41 SPECT NPI Bilateral anterior cingulate Marshall et al., 2019 AD 40 PET AES Right anterior cingulate; dorsolateral prefrontal cortices Bruen et al., 2008 AD 31 sMRI NPI Bilateral anterior cingulate; bilateral frontal cortex; bilateral putamen; left caudate Kang et al., 2012 AD 18 SPECT NPI Right amygdala; right temporal gyrus; right posterior cingulate; right superior frontal gyrus; left inferior frontal gyrus; bilateral precentral Stanton et al., 2013 AD 34 sMRI IA Ventromedial orbitofrontal cortex; left insula; anterior cingulate; ventrolateral orbitofrontal cortex Wei et al., 2020 AD; bvFTD 92 sMRI DAS Bilateral frontal pole; left putamen; left orbitofrontal cortex; left insula; left inferior frontal gyrus García-Alberca et al., 2019 AD 46 sMRI NPI Medial temporal lobe Alzahrani et al., 2016 PD 65 sMRI NPI Left insula; left inferior/middle/medial frontal gyrus; left superior temporal gyrus; right anterior cingulate Reijnders et al., 2010 PD 55 sMRI AES; LARS Bilateral precentral gyrus; bilateral inferior parietal/frontal gyrus; bilateral insula; bilateral posterior cingulate gyrus; right precuneus Robert et al., 2006 PD 31 SPECT AES Right anterior cingulate Baggio et al., 2015 PD 62 sMRI AS Left limbic frontal lobe; left precentral; left frontal pole; left paracingulate; left orbitofrontal cortex Shin et al., 2017 PD 124 sMRI; FDG-PET AS Left precentral; left precuneus; left inferior parietal lobule Shen et al., 2018 PD 42 rs-fMRI AS Bilateral superior frontal gyrus; left orbital middle frontal gyrus Peters et al., 2006 fv-FTD 41 FDG-PET NPI Posterior orbitofrontal cortex Kumfor et al., 2018 AD; bvFTD 150 sMRI NPI Bilateral insula; bilateral caudate; left putamen; left superior frontal gyrus; right medial frontal gyrus; right temporal pole Traumatic brain injury Knutson et al., 2014 pTBIs 176 VLSM NPI Left insula; left middle frontal gyrus; left inferior frontal triangular; left superior frontal Hogeveen et al., 2021 TBI 98 rs-fMRI FrSBe Right paracingulate gyrus N, numbers; PD, Parkinson disease; AD, Alzheimer disease; TBI, traumatic brain injury; bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; fv-FTD, frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia; pTBIs, penetrating traumatic brain injuries; VLSM, voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping; sMRI, structural magnetic resonance imaging; rs-fMRI, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging; task-fMRI, task functional magnetic resonance imaging; FDG-PET, fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography; SPECT, single-photon emission computerized tomography; AS, apathy scale; AES, apathy evaluation scale; LARS, lille apathy rating scale; NPI, neuropsychiatric inventory; SANS, scale for assessment of negative symptoms; FrSBe, frontal systems behavior scale; DAS, dimensional apathy scale; IA, apathy inventory. As the global elderly population continues to increase rapidly, maintaining a “healthy” aging life has become an important concern. Unfortunately, apathy is a neuropsychiatric symptom with the prevalence rates ranging from 2 to 4.8% among cognitively normal older adults (Onyike et al., 2007; Geda et al., 2008; Lanctôt et al., 2017), which may affect their activities of daily living functioning and quality of life. Moreover, a 6 years follow-up study of 3,427 community-dwelling older people found that apathy was significantly associated with the risk of dementia, especially in individuals without cognitive impairment (van Dalen et al., 2018a). At the neural circuit level, research has revealed that apathy symptoms were associated with the gray matter volume in the prefrontal-basal-ganglia network (Yan et al., 2015), and the integrity of the frontal-subcortical network (Lanctôt et al., 2017). Studies have also demonstrated that healthy elderly individuals with apathy had smaller gray matter volumes in the frontal and temporal regions, parietal white matter volumes, thalamus volumes, and higher numbers of frontal white matter lesions (Grool et al., 2014). Therefore, age-related changes in the prefrontal cortex may make the elderly more vulnerable to apathy (Kawagoe et al., 2017). Apathy is also a commonly observed symptom across various mental disorders (Steffens et al., 2022). For example, apathy is a negative symptom in schizophrenia, significantly reducing bilateral frontal lobe volumes happened in the high apathy group (Roth et al., 2004). Further, a replication neuroimaging study conducted by Burrer et al. (2020) showed that apathy is not only associated with reduced ventral striatal volume in schizophrenia, which also suggests that functional and structural striatal neuroimaging correlates of apathy can occur independently in schizophrenia (Burrer et al., 2020). Additionally, a negative correlation between the domain of apathy and the resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in the default mode network (DMN) has been observed (Forlim et al., 2020). Besides, it has been found that an increased level of apathy symptom mediates the relationship between cognition and depression (Funes et al., 2018). In depressed elderly patients with high levels of apathy, a decrease in rsFC of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) with the amygdala, caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, and thalamus was observed, along with an increase in rsFC with the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dACC), superior frontal cortex, and insula compared to non-apathetic patients (Alexopoulos et al., 2013). Additionally, the apathetic subjects with late-life depression had lower saliency network rsFC and altered network FC patterns in right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) nodes of the cognitive control network com-pared to older depressive patients without apathy (Yuen et al., 2014). Moreover, there is growing neuroimaging evidence to suggest that apathy plays a significant role in various neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), etc. Based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) technology, the study by Baggio et al. (2015) showed that the PD patients with apathy had decreased FC between the left striatal and frontal areas, and amongst PD patients’ apathy was inversely correlated with FC between the subdivisions of the left frontal lobe. Apart from PD, the MCI represents a transitional stage between healthy aging and dementia, with the prevalence of MCI estimated between 5.0 and 36.7% in the general older population (Sachdev et al., 2015; Ma, 2020), and apathy prevalence reported to range from 10.7 to 44.8% (Palmer et al., 2010; Richard et al., 2012). In a recent study conducted by Raimo et al. (2019), an activation likelihood estimation (ALE)-based meta-analysis (Eickhoff et al., 2009) was employed to investigate the neural underpinnings of apathy among individuals diagnosed with neurodegenerative disorders such as Fronto-Temporal Dementia (FTD), AD, and PD. The findings revealed a significant association between apathy and both hypometabolism and reduced gray matter volume specifically localized in the left inferior frontal gyrus (Raimo et al., 2019). A systematic review found that the apathy was associated with an approximately 2-fold increased risk of dementia in memory clinic patients (van Dalen et al., 2018b). Robert et al. (2006) and colleagues observed that MCI patients with apathy were more likely to develop into AD more than those without apathy. In the AD population, apathy has been linked to the reduced daily functioning, caregiver distress, and poor outcome. The study by Onyike et al. (2007) suggested that apathy is an early sign of cognitive decline. The emergence of an MCI plus apathy phenotype progresses to dementia (Bruen et al., 2008), and it is also possible that apathy precedes MCI, implying apathy as a potential target for treatment in AD (Mortby et al., 2022). Besides, apathy is a prevalent symptom that occurs following TBI, which can cause severe cognitive impairment and negative psychosocial outcomes. Estimates of apathy following TBI range widely from 15 to 71% (Skidmore et al., 2015). It can be challenging to differentiate dysexecutive disorders from apathy after TBI because the cognitive aspects of apathy usually include executive functions associated with goal-directed behavior (Green et al., 2022). Alternatively, as the apathy is often characterized by a loss of interest in activities, some authors have suggested that deficits in sustained attention after frontal injury may be the main underlying factor (Daffner et al., 2000). TBI typically results in damage to orbitofrontal regions and often involves ventromedial areas of the prefrontal cortex, which can lead to decision-making deficits, as argued by Bechara (2004). In addition, different apathy profiles may arise from lateral prefrontal and medial prefrontal damage (Knutson et al., 2014). The brief review presented above suggests that apathy may serve as an independent risk factor for a variety of brain diseases, as well as being observed in healthy elderly individuals. Building upon this literature, it is hypothesized that apathy may share a common neurophysiological mechanism among apathetic healthy elderly individuals and individuals affected by various brain diseases. In order to investigate the neurophysiological basis of apathy further, the present study next aims to conduct a meta-analysis utilizing neuroimaging studies related to apathy. 2. Meta-analyses of neuroimaging apathy A systematic selection of appropriate peer-reviewed studies was undertaken by searching the databases of PubMed, Google scholar, Web of Science and by checking references cited in each paper according to the standard preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) procedure (Moher et al., 2009). The keyword combination is “apathy” AND “neuroimaging” OR “magnetic resonance imaging” OR “MRI” OR “functional magnetic resonance imaging” OR “fMRI” AND “Parkinson” OR “Alzheimer” OR “Dementia” OR “Huntington” OR “Mild Cognitive Impairment” OR “Mental disorder” OR “Psychiatric” OR “Depression” OR “Schizophrenia” OR “Traumatic Brain Injury” OR “Healthy Aged People.” The detailed procedure was presented in Figure 1. FIGURE 1 Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of study selection. HC, healthy controls. 2.1. ALE meta-analysis Activation likelihood estimation is a widely-used meta-analytic technique in neuroimaging to combine multiple studies, and to identify brain regions that consistently show activation across experiments (Turkeltaub et al., 2002; Laird et al., 2005, 2009a,b). Briefly, the ALE procedure involves the following steps: 1. Data collection: Gather a set of studies that investigate a specific condition using neuroimaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional MRI (fMRI) or positron emission tomography (PET). 2. Coordinate extraction: Identify the peak coordinates of activation reported in each study. These coordinates represent the locations of maximum brain activity associated with the task or condition of interest. 3. Modeling activation: Create three-dimensional Gaussian probability distributions centered on each peak coordinate. The size of these distributions represents the spatial uncertainty associated with the reported activations. 4. Spatial modeling: Combine the individual activation models to create an overall activation likelihood map. This map represents the likelihood of activation at each voxel in the brain across all studies. 5. Activation likelihood estimation calculation: Calculate the ALE score for each voxel by determining the proportion of overlapping activation likelihoods from different studies. 6. Thresholding: Establish a significance threshold to determine which voxels show activation beyond what would be expected by chance. Various statistical methods can be used to determine the threshold, such as permutation testing, false discovery rate correction, etc. 7. Cluster analysis: Identify clusters of significant activation by grouping adjacent activated voxels. This step helps to reduce the likelihood of false-positive findings. 8. Interpretation: Analyze the clusters of significant activation to infer brain regions that consistently exhibit activation across the included studies. Studies were included in this meta-analysis compared subjects with or without apathy (e.g., healthy elderly with apathy vs. healthy elderly without apathy, AD with apathy vs. AD without apathy, etc.). Studies focused on functional connectivity/gray matter volume alterations associated with apathy. The criterion of apathy diagnosis was clearly reported in the involved studies (listed in Tables 2, 3) in this meta-analysis, which was subject to different apathy evaluation questionnaires such as Apathy Scale (AS) (Starkstein et al., 1992), Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) (Marin et al., 1991), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) (Cummings, 2020), etc. We performed an ALE analysis using the GingerALE software (Version 3.0.2) (Eickhoff et al., 2009, 2011, 2012; Turkeltaub et al., 2012). The resulting p-values were threshold at p = 0.05 with 1,000 threshold permutations, cluster-level family-wise error (cFWE) with cluster-forming threshold at p < 0.001. Based on a recent simulation study (Eickhoff et al., 2016), a recommendation was made to include at least 17–20 experiments in ALE meta-analyses in order to have sufficient power to detect smaller effects and to also make sure that results are not driven by single experiments. The ALE mapping results were displayed on the MNI template using Mircron1. TABLE 2 Original structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies included in the structural neuroimaging meta-analysis. References Population N (F) Apathy cases (F) Age (SD) Imaging technique Analysis Apathy measure Foci Alzahrani et al., 2016 PD 89 (52) 25 68.7 (8.4) sMRI VBM; WB NPI 9 Apostolova et al., 2007 AD 35 (20) 17(10) 73.9 (2.25) sMRI VBM; WB NPI 3 Bertoux et al., 2012 bvFTD 20 (10) – 68.5 (9.1) sMRI VBM; ROI SEA 1 Bruen et al., 2008 AD 31 (12) 31 (12) 77.1 (8.6) sMRI VBM; WB NPI 11 Caga et al., 2021 ALS 109 (39) 30 63.1 (1.5) sMRI VBM; WB DAS 7 Caravaggio et al., 2018 Schizophrenia 20 (0) 20 (0) 42.75 (11.82) sMRI VBM; WB SANS 15 De Paepe et al., 2021 HD 45 (31) 45 (31) 45.56 (11.9) sMRI VBM; ROI PBA-s 5 Eslinger et al., 2012 FTD 42 26 65.3(12.6) sMRI VBM; WB AES 4 Kumfor et al., 2018 AD; bvFTD 150 (73) 90 62.9 (7.9) sMRI WB NPI 25 Martinez-Horta et al., 2017 PD 36 (20) 18 (10) 68.8 (10.1) sMRI VBM; WB UPDRS 7 Massimo et al., 2009 FTLD 67 (29) 9 (2) 63 (10.6) sMRI WB NPI 10 Nour et al., 2021 AD 105 (50) 24 (8) 77.5 (6.8) sMRI VBM; WB NPI-Q 7 Powers et al., 2014 bvFTD 45 11 60.5 (2) sMRI; DWI VBM; WB NPI 2 Prange et al., 2019 PD 39 (14) 14 (3) 62.5 (10.2) sMRI; DTI VBM; WB LARS; AS 3 Reijnders et al., 2010 PD 55 55 62 (10.1) sMRI VBM; WB LARS; AES; NPI 28 Rosen et al., 2005 FTD; PSP 148 – 64.8 (9.4) sMRI VBM; ROI NPI 1 Shin et al., 2017 PD 31 (13) 12 (6) 73.8 (3.4) sMRI; FDG-PET VBM; WB AS 4 Stanton et al., 2013 AD; PSP 34 (16) 17 (7) 73.9 (6.5) sMRI VBM; WB AES; NPI 4 Terada et al., 2018 PD 110 (59) 40 (24) 64.7 (8) sMRI VBM; WB FrSBe 1 Wei et al., 2020 AD; bvFTD 92 (32) 73 67.44 (9.5) sMRI VBM; WB DAS 21 Yan et al., 2015 Healthy elderly 36 (17) 19 (8) 63.7 (3) sMRI VBM; WB AS 2 Zamboni et al., 2008 FTD 76 (40) 62 (33) 61.2 (1) sMRI VBM; WB FrSBe 12 N, numbers; F, females; SD, standard deviation; PD, Parkinson disease; AD, Alzheimer disease; bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy; FTLD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; HD, Huntington’s disease; sMRI, structural magnetic resonance imaging; FDG-PET, fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography; DWI, diffusion weighted imaging; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; VBM, voxel-based morphometry; AS, apathy scale; AES, apathy evaluation scale; LARS, lille apathy rating scale; NPI, neuropsychiatric inventory; SANS, scale for assessment of negative symptoms; FrSBe, frontal systems behavior scale; DAS, dimensional apathy scale; NPI-Q, neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire; UPDRS, unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale; PBA-s, short-problem behavior assessment; SEA, social cognition and emotional assessment. TABLE 3 Original functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies included in the functional neuroimaging meta-analysis. References Population N (F) Apathy cases (F) Age (SD) Imaging technique Analysis Apathy measure Foci Alexopoulos et al., 2013 Depression 26 7 69.9 (4.9) rs-fMRI rsFC; ROI AES 17 Baggio et al., 2015 PD 62 (25) 25 (5) 65.6 (12.89) rs-fMRI rsFC; ROI AS 11 Büyükgök et al., 2020 AD 20 (12) 10 (6) 73 rs-fMRI rsFC; ROI AES 3 Fazio et al., 2016 Healthy elderly 311 (165) – 27.3 (6.79) task-fMRI PPI/FC; ROI AS 2 Forlim et al., 2020 Schizophrenia 76 (31) 35 (14) 35.3 (10.8) rs-fMRI ICA; ROI SANS 1 Hamada et al., 2021 Healthy elderly 36 (16) 18 (7) 63.7 (3) rs-fMRI rsFC; ROI AS 1 Hogeveen et al., 2021 TBI 98 (39) 70 (25) 32.6 (12) rs-fMRI rsFC; ROI FrSBe 1 Jang et al., 2021 Healthy elderly 48 (18) – 70.9 (7.88) rs-fMRI rsFC; ROI AES 2 Joo et al., 2017 aMCI 100 (55) 50 (27) 72.1 (3.8) rs-fMRI rsFC; ROI IA 1 Kawagoe et al., 2017 Healthy elderly 100 (56) 25 (18) 72.6 (3.9) rs-fMRI rsFC; ROI AS 1 Shen et al., 2018 PD 61 (20) 20 (4) 63.35 (8.52) rs-fMRI ALFF; WB AS 3 Skidmore et al., 2013 PD 15 (3) – 62 (9) rs-fMRI ALFF; WB LARS 5 Sun et al., 2020b PD 46 (18) 20 (6) 59.85 (8.92) rs-fMRI Reho; WB AS 2 Sun et al., 2020a PD 46(18) 20(6) 59.85(8.92) rs-fMRI ALFF; WB AS 8 Yuen et al., 2014 Depression 26 7 69.9 (4.9) rs-fMRI rsFC; ROI AES 10 Zhao et al., 2014 AD 13 7 72.3 (7.55) task-fMRI Facial Expression; ROI NPI; AES–C; LARS 4 N, numbers, F, females; PD, Parkinson disease; AD, Alzheimer disease; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; TBI, traumatic brain injury; AS, apathy scale; AES, apathy evaluation scale; AES–C, apathy evaluation scale-clinical version; LARS, lille apathy rating scale; NPI, neuropsychiatric inventory; IA, apathy inventory; SANS, scale for assessment of negative symptoms; FrSBe, frontal systems behavior scale; FC, functional connectivity; Reho, regional homogeneity; ALFF, amplitude of low frequency fluctuations; ICA, independent component analysis; PPI, psychophysiological interactions; WB, whole brain; ROI, regions of interest. According to the PRISMA flow diagram, there are 22 studies included 31 experiments from 1,578 patients and reported 182 foci of gray matter volume decreases associated with apathy (see Table 2). According to the PRISMA flow diagram, there are 16 studies included 20 experiments from 706 patients and reported 73 foci of functional connectivity/ALFF decreases associated with apathy (see Table 3). 3. Results Our meta-analysis of structural MRI studies revealed six cluster of significant convergence between the studies, and they were in left Precentral Gyrus (BA 13/6), right Insula (BA 47), right Medial Frontal Gyrus (BA 11), left Inferior Frontal Gyrus and left Caudate (Putamen), which are shown in Table 4, Figure 2. TABLE 4 Strengthened activation results in the apathy-free group in contrast to the apathy group in structural neuroimaging meta-analysis. Volume (mm3) MNI Label Brodmann area x y z 1,656 −44 14 4 L insula/precentral gyrus/middle frontal gyrus BA 13/44 1,640 44 20 0 R insula/inferior frontal gyrus/precentral gyrus BA 13/47 912 2 50 −22 R medial frontal gyrus/anterior cingulate BA 11/10 816 −34 22 −10 L inferior frontal gyrus/insula BA 47 712 −12 14 −8 L caudate Caudate Head/Putamen 656 −52 −8 36 L precentral gyrus/postcentral gyrus BA 6/4 R, right hemisphere; L, left hemisphere; BA, brodmann areas; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute. FIGURE 2 Activation activation likelihood estimation (ALE) map for gray matter atrophy associated with apathy. The ALE map significance was tested by using 1,000 permutations with a cluster-forming threshold of p < 0.001, and was corrected with a cluster-level family-wise error threshold of p < 0.05. Our analysis of functional neuroimaging techniques revealed that Lentiform (Putamen) was correlated with apathy. The results indicated one significant cluster in this contrast, and they were located in Putamen and Lateral Globus Pallidus, shown in Table 5, Figure 3. TABLE 5 Strengthened activation results in the apathy-free group in contrast to the apathy group in functional neuroimaging meta-analysis. Volume (mm3) MNI Label Brodmann area x y z 704 −26 6 4 L lentiform nucleus Putamen −20 −6 4 L lentiform nucleus Lateral globus pallidus R, right hemisphere; L, left hemisphere; BA, brodmann areas; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute. FIGURE 3 Activation activation likelihood estimation (ALE) map for the decreased brain functional connectivity associated with apathy. The ALE map significance was tested by using 1,000 permutations with a cluster-forming threshold of p < 0.001, and was corrected with a cluster-level family-wise error threshold of p < 0.05. 4. Discussion Apathy is a prevalent mood disturbance, being widely distributed among the normal aging, mental disorders, neurodegenerative disorders and traumatic brain injuries. The aim of our study was to reveal the neural basis of apathy between the non-apathy and apathy groups across diverse populations, including healthy elderly, mental disorders, neurodegenerative disorders, acquired brain injuries. Despite the differences among these populations, the manifestations of apathy symptoms are generally consistent, and apathy is widely recognized as a common and incapacitating condition in various disorders, including AD, PD, FTD, TBI and so on Kos et al. (2016). 4.1. Altered structural and functional correlation of apathy In our study, the apathy group exhibited structural atrophy in brain regions including the bilateral insula, precentral gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, medial frontal gyrus, left caudate, postcentral gyrus, and right anterior cingulate, compared to the non-apathy group. Furthermore, we observed inverse correlations between apathy and brain functional connectivity, specifically in regions such as the left putamen and lateral globus pallidus. These findings suggest significant atrophy and dysfunction in the intrinsic neural activity of these regions in apathetic patients. A recent ALE meta-analysis investigated the neural correlates of apathy in patients with neurodegenerative disorders, revealing a link between apathy and hypometabolism as well as reduced gray matter volume in the left inferior frontal gyrus (Raimo et al., 2019). Our study expands upon this research in several notable ways. Firstly, we included a larger subgroup of subjects with apathy, encompassing healthy elderly individuals, those with acquired brain injury, mental disorders, in addition to neurodegenerative disorder patients. Secondly, we employed stricter selection criteria by focusing exclusively on MRI/fMRI-based studies for the meta-analysis. Lastly, our study identified additional brain regions associated with apathy, extending beyond the left inferior frontal gyrus, through structural neuroimaging meta-analysis. The putamen, particularly the caudate head, plays a role in the executive function of the fronto-striatal network (Baggio et al., 2015; Lucas-Jiménez et al., 2018). A SPECT study found dopaminergic neuronal loss in the bilateral putamen of patients with apathy, including those with Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies (David et al., 2008). Additionally, the anterior cingulate circuit, part of the frontal-striatal circuits described in the model by Tekin and Cummings (2002), consists of a feed-forward loop from frontal cortical areas to the caudate nucleus and putamen (Mesulam, 2000). Another study observed abnormalities in the left putamen/ventral striatum following negative feedback (Waltz et al., 2013). Together, these findings partially support our results and suggest that apathy may arise from aberrant processing of reward stimuli and anticipation. Our findings also revealed atrophy in the bilateral insula, a frontal lobe region involved in inhibitory control, body representation, and subjective emotional experience (Damasio, 1996). The observed insular damage in our study aligns with previous findings on apathy in neurodegenerative disorders and normal aging (Yuen et al., 2014; Kumfor et al., 2018; Jang et al., 2021). For instance, Moon et al. (2014) identified a negative correlation between apathy and volume of the bilateral anterior insular cortex. Moreover, a task-based fMRI study investigating cognitive and emotional empathy identified the precentral gyrus (BA 4) and right insula (BA 13) as potentially important components of emotional empathy (Kim et al., 2020). Additionally, mutism has been associated with right insula damage in stroke patients (Berthier et al., 1987; Gasquoine, 2014). Significantly decreased volumes were observed in the bilateral precentral gyrus (more prominently in the left hemisphere), inferior frontal gyrus, and medial frontal gyrus in our study. According to Frijda (2010), emotions play a role in both the generation and execution/control of actions. Furthermore, Reijnders et al. (2010) found a correlation between high apathy scores and decreased gray matter density in the bilateral precentral gyrus. These brain imaging findings suggest the involvement of the precentral gyrus in both emotional and cognitive processes. Raimo et al. (2019) investigated structural and metabolic alterations associated with apathy across AD, FTD, and PD, and demonstrated that apathy was mainly associated with the left inferior frontal gyrus, which is strongly connected to a frontal-subcortical circuit involved in action planning and purpose generation (Levy and Dubois, 2006). The medial frontal gyrus (BA 10) is believed to play a crucial role in linking affect or emotional information with planned or ongoing behaviors (Kringelbach, 2005). The right medial frontal gyrus (BA 11/10) may also have a fundamental role in the development of apathy due to its functional and structural connectivity (Moayedi et al., 2015; Ray et al., 2015). Hence, abnormal changes in these brain areas may be associated with apathy symptoms. 4.2. Target areas for apathy-related neuroplasticity modulation The structural and functional changes associated with apathy may indicate crucial brain regions for the treatment of apathy-related brain disorders. Our research robustly identified certain brain regions (refer to Figures 2, 3) through meta-analysis that consistently exhibited apathy-related alterations across both healthy elderly individuals and those with brain disorders. These commonly identified regions, displaying structural or functional changes, could be targeted for treatment of apathy-related brain disorders using neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) (Kobayashi and Pascual-Leone, 2003; Hallett, 2007) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (Paulus, 2011). For instance, Reis et al. (2008) conducted a comprehensive review of relevant studies and observed that these stimulation techniques could regulate memory formation and motor learning in healthy individuals. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of these stimulation techniques in treating mental disorders such as major depressive disorder and schizophrenia (Reis et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2017; Kennedy et al., 2018; Osoegawa et al., 2018), traumatic brain injury (Dhaliwal et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2020), and neurodegenerative disorders (Elder and Taylor, 2014; Di Lorenzo et al., 2022). Specifically, Levkovitz et al. (2011) found that deep TMS applied over the prefrontal cortex led to remission of apathy in one-third of depressive patients with moderate apathy. Conversely, Suemoto et al. (2014) found no effect on apathy in elderly patients with moderate Alzheimer’s disease following repeated anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Hence, based on previous studies, the brain regions identified (listed in Tables 4 and 5) are likely to be targeted for neural modulation of apathy-related neuroplasticity at the individual or group level in future. 4.3. Other neuroimaging studies of apathy Other neuroimaging techniques used in studying apathy among the aging population include positron emission tomography (PET) (Marshall et al., 2007), single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) (Benoit et al., 2004; David et al., 2008), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (Prange et al., 2019). Early SPECT studies have shown a correlation between apathy and reduced regional cerebral blood flow in the orbitofrontal cortex (DeKosky and Scheff, 1990) and anterior cingulate (Migneco et al., 2001). Additionally, PET amyloid imaging using (11C) PiB has indicated a link between apathy and the accumulation of fibrillar amyloid in specific subregions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), including the orbital, ventromedial, and polar PFC, as well as the anterior cingulate (Mori et al., 2014). Moreover, DTI analysis has demonstrated lower fractional anisotropy values in the left anterior cingulate of the apathy group compared to the non-apathy group (Kim et al., 2011; Tighe et al., 2012). 4.4. Limitations and future research This study focuses exclusively on identifying the shared neural mechanism underlying apathy in normal aging and brain disorders, providing potential neural correlates for apathy. However, further investigations are necessary to address the following aspects: (1) Understanding the interaction between functional and structural changes is essential, as our analysis revealed apathy-related alterations in separate domains. (2) Exploring the evolving mechanism and role of apathy in the aging process and progression of brain disorders is crucial. (3) Although our ALE meta-analysis employed strict criteria for literature selection, the reliability of the findings may still be influenced by factors such as sample size, populations, comorbidities, medications, and number of studies. Therefore, careful validation of these apathy-related findings is required in future research. (4) Future studies should consider exploring the neural correlates of apathy specific to individual brain disorders through meta-analysis, once a sufficient number of related studies have been accumulated. 5. Conclusion In summary, our meta-analysis study indicates that the neural correlates of apathy exist across normal aging and various brain disorders, suggesting that it may serve as an independent risk factor for brain disorders. Specifically, we noted that the putamen area was significantly activated in both the structural and functional meta-analysis, indicating a close correlation with apathy. Additionally, our structural meta-analysis revealed that gray matter atrophy in the Precentral Gyrus, Insula, Medial Frontal Gyrus, and Inferior Frontal Gyrus was also associated with apathy. These observed changes in structural/functional activation associated with apathy provide promising pathophysiological insights that have the potential to guide the development of more efficacious therapeutic interventions for brain disorders. Author contributions HY, HW, and ZC: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, and writing–original draft. ZC and HY: funding acquisition. SD and LL: investigation, idea discussion, and writing–review and editing. BX, CC, and NW: conceptualization, resources, writing–review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition, and project administration. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. Conflict of interest The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Publisher’s note All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. 1 https://www.nitrc.org/projects/mricron ==== Refs References Alexopoulos G. S. Hoptman M. J. Yuen G. Kanellopoulos D. Seirup J. K. Lim K. O. (2013). Functional connectivity in apathy of late-life depression: A preliminary study. J. Affect. Disord. 149 398–405.23261142 Alzahrani H. Antonini A. Venneri A. (2016). Apathy in mild Parkinson’s disease: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence. J. Parkinsons Dis. 6 821–832. 10.3233/JPD-160809 27567885 Apostolova L. G. Akopyan G. G. Partiali N. Steiner C. A. Dutton R. A. Hayashi K. M. (2007). Structural correlates of apathy in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 24 91–97.17570907 Azocar I. Rapaport P. Burton A. Meisel G. Orgeta V. (2022). Risk factors for apathy in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review of longitudinal evidence. Ageing Res. Rev. 79 :101672 . 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101672 35714852 Baggio H. C. Segura B. Garrido-Millan J. Marti M. Compta Y. Valldeoriola F. (2015). Resting-state frontostriatal functional connectivity in Parkinson’s disease–related apathy. Mov. Disord. 30 671–679. 10.1002/mds.26137 25600482 Bechara A. (2004). The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage. Brain Cogn. 55 30–40. 10.1016/j.bandc.2003.04.001 15134841 Benoit M. Clairet S. Koulibaly P. M. Darcourt J. Robert P. H. (2004). Brain perfusion correlates of the apathy inventory dimensions of Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 19 864–869.15352144 Berthier M. Starkstein S. Leiguarda R. (1987). Behavioral effects of damage to the right insula and surrounding regions. Cortex 23 673–678. 10.1016/s0010-9452(87)80057-6 3443001 Bertoux M. Volle E. Funkiewiez A. de Souza L. C. Leclercq D. Dubois B. (2012). Social cognition and emotional assessment (SEA) is a marker of medial and orbital frontal functions: A voxel-based morphometry study in behavioral variant of frontotemporal degeneration. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 18 972–985. 10.1017/S1355617712001300 23158228 Bruen P. D. McGeown W. J. Shanks M. F. Venneri A. (2008). Neuroanatomical correlates of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 131 2455–2463.18669506 Burrer A. Caravaggio F. Manoliu A. Plitman E. Gütter K. Habermeyer B. (2020). Apathy is not associated with reduced ventral striatal volume in patients with schizophrenia. Schizoph. Res. 223 279–288. Büyükgök D. Bayraktaroğlu Z. Buker H. Kulaksızoğlu M. Gurvit İH. (2020). Resting-state fMRI analysis in apathetic Alzheimer’s disease. Diagnost. Int. Radiol. 26 :363 . Caga J. Tu S. Dharmadasa T. Nga Y. T. Zoing M. C. Huynh W. (2021). Apathy is associated with parietal cortical-subcortical dysfunction in ALS. Cortex 145 341–349. 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.029 33867121 Caravaggio F. Fervaha G. Menon M. Remington G. Graff-Guerrero A. Gerretsen P. (2018). The neural correlates of apathy in schizophrenia: An exploratory investigation. Neuropsychologia 118 34–39. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.027 29079398 Cummings J. (2020). The neuropsychiatric inventory: Development and applications. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 33 73–84. 10.1177/0891988719882102 32013737 Daffner K. R. Mesulam M. M. Holcomb P. J. Calvo V. Acar D. Chabrerie A. (2000). Disruption of attention to novel events after frontal lobe injury in humans. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 68 18–24.10601395 Damasio A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Series B Biol. Sci. 351 1413–1420. David R. Koulibaly M. Benoit M. Garcia R. Caci H. Darcourt J. (2008). Striatal dopamine transporter levels correlate with apathy in neurodegenerative diseases: A SPECT study with partial volume effect correction. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 110 19–24. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.08.007 17900799 De Paepe A. E. Ara A. Garcia-Gorro C. Martinez-Horta S. Perez-Perez J. Kulisevsky J. (2021). Gray matter vulnerabilities predict longitudinal development of apathy in Huntington’s disease. Mov. Disord. 36 2162–2172. 10.1002/mds.28638 33998063 DeKosky S. T. Scheff S. W. (1990). Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer’s disease: Correlation with cognitive severity. Ann. Neurol. 27 457–464.2360787 Dhaliwal S. K. Meek B. P. Modirrousta M. M. (2015). Non-invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of symptoms following traumatic brain injury. Front. Psychiatry 6 :119 . 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00119 26379560 Di Lorenzo F. Oliviero A. Guerra A. Fried P. J. (2022). Non-invasive brain stimulation for neurodegenerative disorders: From investigation to therapeutic application. Front. Neurol. 13 :820942 . 10.3389/fneur.2022.820942 35309570 Eickhoff S. B. Bzdok D. Laird A. R. Kurth F. Fox P. T. (2012). Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage 59 2349–2361.21963913 Eickhoff S. B. Bzdok D. Laird A. R. Roski C. Caspers S. Zilles K. (2011). Co-activation patterns distinguish cortical modules, their connectivity and functional differentiation. Neuroimage 57 938–949. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.021 21609770 Eickhoff S. B. Laird A. R. Grefkes C. Wang L. E. Zilles K. Fox P. T. (2009). Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: A random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30 2907–2926. 10.1002/hbm.20718 19172646 Eickhoff S. B. Nichols T. E. Laird A. R. Hoffstaedter F. Amunts K. Fox P. T. (2016). Behavior, sensitivity, and power of activation likelihood estimation characterized by massive empirical simulation. Neuroimage 137 70–85. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.072 27179606 Elder G. J. Taylor J. P. (2014). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation: Treatments for cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms in the neurodegenerative dementias? Alzheimers Res. Ther. 6 :74 . 10.1186/s13195-014-0074-1 25478032 Eslinger P. J. Moore P. Antani S. Anderson C. Grossman M. (2012). Apathy in frontotemporal dementia: Behavioral and neuroimaging correlates. Behav. Neurol. 25 127–136.22425723 Eurelings L. S. Ligthart S. A. van Dalen J. W. Moll van Charante E. P. van Gool W. A. Richard E. (2014). Apathy is an independent risk factor for incident cardiovascular disease in the older individual: A population-based cohort study. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 29 454–463.24105658 Fazio L. Logroscino G. Taurisano P. Amico G. Quarto T. Antonucci L. A. (2016). Prefrontal activity and connectivity with the basal ganglia during performance of complex cognitive tasks is associated with apathy in healthy subjects. PLoS One 11 :e0165301 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0165301 27798669 Forlim C. G. Klock L. Bächle J. Stoll L. Giemsa P. Fuchs M. (2020). Reduced resting-state connectivity in the precuneus is correlated with apathy in patients with schizophrenia. Sci. Rep. 10 :2616 . 10.1038/s41598-020-59393-6 32054907 Frijda N. H. (2010). Impulsive action and motivation. Biol. Psychol. 84 570–579.20064583 Funes C. M. Lavretsky H. Ercoli L. Cyr N. S. Siddarth P. (2018). Apathy mediates cognitive difficulties in geriatric depression. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 26 100–106.28755989 García-Alberca J. Florido M. Cáceres M. Sánchez-Toro A. Lara J. P. García-Casares N. (2019). Medial temporal lobe atrophy is independently associated with behavioural and psychological symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychogeriatrics 19 46–54.30084177 Gasquoine P. G. (2014). Contributions of the insula to cognition and emotion. Neuropsychol. Rev. 24 77–87.24442602 Geda Y. E. Roberts R. O. Knopman D. S. Petersen R. C. Christianson T. J. Pankratz V. S. (2008). Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in mild cognitive impairment and normal cognitive aging: Population-based study. Arch. Gene. Psychiatry 65 1193–1198. Green S. L. Gignac G. E. Watson P. A. Brosnan N. Becerra R. Pestell C. (2022). Apathy and depression as predictors of activities of daily living following stroke and traumatic brain injuries in adults: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychol. Rev. 32 51–69.33759039 Grool A. M. Geerlings M. I. Sigurdsson S. Eiriksdottir G. Jonsson P. V. Garcia M. E. (2014). Structural MRI correlates of apathy symptoms in older persons without dementia: Ages-reykjavik study. Neurology 82 1628–1635. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000378 24739783 Hallett M. (2007). Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A primer. Neuron 55 187–199.17640522 Hamada C. Kawagoe T. Takamura M. Nagai A. Yamaguchi S. Onoda K. (2021). Altered resting-state functional connectivity of the frontal-striatal circuit in elderly with apathy. PLoS One 16 :e0261334 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0261334 34898646 Hogeveen J. Aragon D. F. Rogge-Obando K. Campbell R. A. Shuttleworth C. W. Avila-Rieger R. E. (2021). Ventromedial prefrontal-anterior cingulate hyperconnectivity and resilience to apathy in traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotr. 38 2264–2274. 10.1089/neu.2020.7363 33787328 Jang J. Y. Han S. D. Yew B. Blanken A. E. Dutt S. Li Y. (2021). Resting-state functional connectivity signatures of apathy in community-living older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13 :691710. . 10.3389/fnagi.2021.691710 34248608 Joo S. H. Lee C. U. Lim H. K. (2017). Apathy and intrinsic functional connectivity networks in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 13 :61 . 10.2147/NDT.S123338 28096673 Kang J. Y. Lee J. S. Kang H. Lee H. W. Kim Y. K. Jeon H. J. (2012). Regional cerebral blood flow abnormalities associated with apathy and depression in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 26 217–224.21959363 Kawagoe T. Onoda K. Yamaguchi S. (2017). Apathy and executive function in healthy elderly—resting state fMRI study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 9 :124 . 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00124 28536519 Kazui H. Takahashi R. Yamamoto Y. Yoshiyama K. Kanemoto H. Suzuki Y. (2017). Neural basis of apathy in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J. Alzheimers Dis. 55 1403–1416. 10.3233/JAD-160223 27858707 Kennedy N. I. Lee W. H. Frangou S. (2018). Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on the symptom dimensions of schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur. Psychiatry 49 69–77.29413808 Kim E. J. Son J. W. Park S. K. Chung S. Ghim H. R. Lee S. (2020). Cognitive and emotional empathy in young adolescents: An fMRI study. J. Korean Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 31 :121 . Kim J. W. Lee D. Y. Choo I. H. Seo E. H. Kim S. G. Park S. Y. (2011). Microstructural alteration of the anterior cingulum is associated with apathy in Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 19 644–653.21709610 Knutson K. M. Dal Monte O. Raymont V. Wassermann E. M. Krueger F. Grafman J. (2014). Neural correlates of apathy revealed by lesion mapping in participants with traumatic brain injuries. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35 943–953. 10.1002/hbm.22225 23404730 Kobayashi M. Pascual-Leone A. (2003). Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurol. 2 145–156.12849236 Kos C. van Tol M. J. Marsman J. B. C. Knegtering H. Aleman A. (2016). Neural correlates of apathy in patients with neurodegenerative disorders, acquired brain injury, and psychiatric disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 69 381–401. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.012 27527825 Kringelbach M. L. (2005). The human orbitofrontal cortex: Linking reward to hedonic experience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6 691–702.16136173 Kumfor F. Zhen A. Hodges J. R. Piguet O. Irish M. (2018). Apathy in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia: Distinct clinical profiles and neural correlates. Cortex 103 350–359.29704671 Laird A. R. Eickhoff S. B. Kurth F. Fox P. M. Uecker A. M. Turner J. A. (2009a). ALE meta-analysis workflows via the brainmap database: Progress towards a probabilistic functional brain atlas. Front. Neuroinform. 3 :23 . 10.3389/neuro.11.023.2009 19636392 Laird A. R. Eickhoff S. B. Li K. Robin D. A. Glahn D. C. Fox P. T. (2009b). Investigating the functional heterogeneity of the default mode network using coordinate-based meta-analytic modeling. J. Neurosci. 29 14496–14505. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4004-09.2009 19923283 Laird A. R. Fox P. M. Price C. J. Glahn D. C. Uecker A. M. Lancaster J. L. (2005). ALE meta-analysis: Controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts. Hum. Brain Mapp. 25 155–164. 10.1002/hbm.20136 15846811 Lanctôt K. L. Agüera-Ortiz L. Brodaty H. Francis P. T. Geda Y. E. Ismail Z. (2017). Apathy associated with neurocognitive disorders: Recent progress and future directions. Alzheimers Dement. 13 84–100.27362291 Lavretsky H. Ballmaier M. Pham D. Toga A. Kumar A. (2007). Neuroanatomical characteristics of geriatric apathy and depression: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 15 386–394. 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3180325a16 17463189 Levkovitz Y. Sheer A. Harel E. V. Katz L. N. Most D. Zangen A. (2011). Differential effects of deep TMS of the prefrontal cortex on apathy and depression. Brain Stimul. 4 266–274. 10.1016/j.brs.2010.12.004 22032742 Levy R. Dubois B. (2006). Apathy and the functional anatomy of the prefrontal cortex–basal ganglia circuits. Cereb. Cortex 16 916–928.16207933 Liu S. Sheng J. Li B. Zhang X. (2017). Recent advances in non-invasive brain stimulation for major depressive disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11 :526 . 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00526 29163106 Lucas-Jiménez O. Ojeda N. Peña J. Cabrera-Zubizarreta A. Díez-Cirarda M. Gómez-Esteban J. C. (2018). Apathy and brain alterations in Parkinson’s disease: A multimodal imaging study. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 5 803–814.30009198 Ma L. (2020). Depression, anxiety, and apathy in mild cognitive impairment: Current perspectives. Front. Aging Neurosci. 12 :9 . 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00009 32082139 Mann R. S. (1990). Differential diagnosis and classification of apathy. Am. J. Psychiatry 147 22–30.2403472 Marin R. S. (1991). Apathy: A neuropsychiatric syndrome. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 3 243–254. 10.1176/jnp.3.3.243 1821241 Marin R. S. Biedrzycki R. C. Firinciogullari S. (1991). Reliability and validity of the apathy evaluation scale. Psychiatry Res. 38 143–162.1754629 Marshall G. A. Gatchel J. R. Donovan N. J. Muniz M. C. Schultz A. P. Becker J. A. (2019). Regional tau correlates of instrumental activities of daily living and apathy in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease dementia. J. Alzheimers Dis. 67 757–768. 10.3233/JAD-170578 30689584 Marshall G. A. Monserratt L. Harwood D. Mandelkern M. Cummings J. L. Sultzer D. L. (2007). Positron emission tomography metabolic correlates of apathy in Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 64 1015–1020.17620493 Martinez-Horta S. Sampedro F. Pagonabarraga J. Fernandez-Bobadilla R. Marin-Lahoz J. Riba J. (2017). Non-demented Parkinson’s disease patients with apathy show decreased grey matter volume in key executive and reward-related nodes. Brain Imaging Behav. 11 1334–1342. 10.1007/s11682-016-9607-5 27730477 Massimo L. Powers C. Moore P. Vesely L. Avants B. Gee J. (2009). Neuroanatomy of apathy and disinhibition in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 27 96–104. 10.1159/000194658 19158440 Mesulam M. M. (2000). Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Migneco O. Benoit M. Koulibaly P. M. Dygai I. Bertogliati C. Desvignes P. (2001). Perfusion brain SPECT and statistical parametric mapping analysis indicate that apathy is a cingulate syndrome: A study in Alzheimer’s disease and nondemented patients. Neuroimage 13 896–902. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0741 11304085 Miller D. S. Robert P. Ereshefsky L. Adler L. Bateman D. Cummings J. (2021). Diagnostic criteria for apathy in neurocognitive disorders. Alzheimers Dement. 17 1892–1904.33949763 Moayedi M. Salomons T. V. Dunlop K. A. M. Downar J. Davis K. D. (2015). Connectivity-based parcellation of the human frontal polar cortex. Brain Struct. Funct. 220 2603–2616. 10.1007/s00429-014-0809-6 24927720 Moher D. Liberati A. Tetzlaff J. Altman D. G. Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 151 264–269.19622511 Moon Y. Moon W. J. Kim H. Han S. H. (2014). Regional atrophy of the insular cortex is associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Eur. Neurol. 71 223–229.24480815 Mori T. Shimada H. Shinotoh H. Hirano S. Eguchi Y. Yamada M. (2014). Apathy correlates with prefrontal amyloid β deposition in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 85 449–455.24133289 Mortby M. E. Adler L. Agüera-Ortiz L. Bateman D. R. Brodaty H. Cantillon M. (2022). Apathy as a treatment target in Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for clinical trials. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 30 119–147. 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.06.016 34315645 Nour M. Jiao Y. Teng G. J. (2021). Neuroanatomical associations of depression, anxiety and apathy neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurol. Belg. 121 1469–1480. 10.1007/s13760-020-01349-8 32319015 Onyike C. U. Sheppard J. M. E. Tschanz J. T. Norton M. C. Green R. C. Steinberg M. (2007). Epidemiology of apathy in older adults: The cache county study. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 15 365–375.17463187 Osoegawa C. Gomes J. S. Grigolon R. B. Brietzke E. Gadelha A. Lacerda A. L. (2018). Non-invasive brain stimulation for negative symptoms in schizophrenia: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizoph. Res. 197 34–44. 10.1016/j.schres.2018.01.010 29397282 Palmer K. Di Iulio F. Varsi A. E. Gianni W. Sancesario G. Caltagirone C. (2010). Neuropsychiatric predictors of progression from amnestic-mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease: The role of depression and apathy. J. Alzheimers Dis. 20 175–183. 10.3233/JAD-2010-1352 20164594 Paulus W. (2011). Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES–tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 21 602–617. 10.1080/09602011.2011.557292 21819181 Peters F. Perani D. Herholz K. Holthoff V. Beuthien-Baumann B. Sorbi S. (2006). Orbitofrontal dysfunction related to both apathy and disinhibition in frontotemporal dementia. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 21 373–379.16534207 Powers J. P. Massimo L. McMillan C. T. Yushkevich P. A. Zhang H. Gee J. C. (2014). White matter disease contributes to apathy and disinhibition in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 27 :206 . 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000044 25539040 Prange S. Metereau E. Maillet A. Lhommée E. Klinger H. Pelissier P. (2019). Early limbic microstructural alterations in apathy and depression in de novo Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 34 1644–1654. 10.1002/mds.27793 31309609 Raimo S. Santangelo G. D’Iorio A. Trojano L. Grossi D. (2019). Neural correlates of apathy in patients with neurodegenerative disorders: An activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis. Brain Imaging Behav. 13 1815–1834. 10.1007/s11682-018-9959-0 30238208 Ray K. L. Zald D. H. Bludau S. Riedel M. C. Bzdok D. Yanes J. (2015). Co-activation based parcellation of the human frontal pole. Neuroimage 123 200–211. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.072 26254112 Reijnders J. S. Scholtissen B. Weber W. E. Aalten P. Verhey F. R. Leentjens A. F. (2010). Neuroanatomical correlates of apathy in Parkinson’s disease: A magnetic resonance imaging study using voxel-based morphometry. Mov. Disord. 25 2318–2325.20669264 Reis J. Robertson E. Krakauer J. W. Rothwell J. Marshall L. Gerloff C. (2008). Consensus: Can tDCS and TMS enhance motor learning and memory formation? Brain Stimul. 1 363–369. 10.1016/j.brs.2008.08.001 Richard E. Schmand B. Eikelenboom P. Yang S. C. Ligthart S. A. Van Charante E. M. (2012). Symptoms of apathy are associated with progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease in non-depressed subjects. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 33 204–209. 10.1159/000338239 22722671 Robert P. H. Berr C. Volteau M. Bertogliati C. Benoit M. Sarazin M. (2006). Apathy in patients with mild cognitive impairment and the risk of developing dementia of Alzheimer’s disease: A one-year follow-up study. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 108 733–736. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2006.02.003 16567037 Rosen H. J. Allison S. C. Schauer G. F. Gorno-Tempini M. L. Weiner M. W. Miller B. L. (2005). Neuroanatomical correlates of behavioural disorders in dementia. Brain 128 2612–2625.16195246 Roth R. M. Flashman L. A. Saykin A. J. McAllister T. W. Vidaver R. (2004). Apathy in schizophrenia: Reduced frontal lobe volume and neuropsychological deficits. Am. J. Psychiatry 161 157–159. 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.1.157 14702265 Sachdev P. S. Lipnicki D. M. Kochan N. A. Crawford J. D. Thalamuthu A. Andrews G. (2015). The prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in diverse geographical and ethnocultural regions: The COSMIC collaboration. PLoS One 10 :e0142388 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0142388 26539987 Shen Y. T. Li J. Y. Yuan Y. S. Wang X. X. Wang M. Wang J. W. (2018). Disrupted amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations and causal connectivity in Parkinson’s disease with apathy. Neurosci. Lett. 683 75–81. 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.06.043 29953925 Shin J. H. Shin S. A. Lee J. Y. Nam H. Lim J. S. Kim Y. K. (2017). Precuneus degeneration and isolated apathy in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 653 250–257. 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.061 28579482 Skidmore E. R. Whyte E. M. Butters M. A. Terhorst L. Reynolds I. C. F. (2015). Strategy training during inpatient rehabilitation may prevent apathy symptoms after acute stroke. PMR 7 562–570. 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.12.010 25595665 Skidmore F. M. Yang M. Baxter L. Von Deneen K. Collingwood J. He G. (2013). Apathy, depression, and motor symptoms have distinct and separable resting activity patterns in idiopathic Parkinson disease. Neuroimage 81 484–495. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.012 21782030 Stanton B. R. Leigh P. N. Howard R. J. Barker G. J. Brown R. G. (2013). Behavioural and emotional symptoms of apathy are associated with distinct patterns of brain atrophy in neurodegenerative disorders. J. Neurol. 260 2481–2490.23793818 Starkstein S. E. Mayberg H. S. Preziosi T. Andrezejewski P. Leiguarda R. Robinson R. G. (1992). Reliability, validity, and clinical correlates of apathy in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 4 134–139.1627973 Steffens D. C. Fahed M. Manning K. J. Wang L. (2022). The neurobiology of apathy in depression and neurocognitive impairment in older adults: A review of epidemiological, clinical, neuropsychological and biological research. Transl. Psychiatry 12 1–16. 10.1038/s41398-022-02292-3 35013113 Suemoto C. K. Apolinario D. Nakamura-Palacios E. M. Lopes L. Leite R. E. P. Sales M. C. (2014). Effects of a non-focal plasticity protocol on apathy in moderate Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 7 308–313. 10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.003 24262299 Sun H. H. Hu J. B. Chen J. Wang X. Y. Wang X. L. Pan P. L. (2020a). Abnormal spontaneous neural activity in Parkinson’s disease with “pure” apathy. Front. Neurosci. 14 :830 . 10.3389/fnins.2020.00830 32848582 Sun H. H. Pan P. L. Hu J. B. Chen J. Wang X. Y. Liu C. F. (2020b). Alterations of regional homogeneity in Parkinson’s Disease with “pure” apathy: A resting-state fMRI study. J. Affect. Disord. 274 792–798. 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.145 32664016 Tekin S. Cummings J. L. (2002). Frontal–subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: An update. J. Psychos. Res. 53 647–654. 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00428-2 12169339 Terada T. Miyata J. Obi T. Kubota M. Yoshizumi M. Murai T. (2018). Reduced gray matter volume is correlated with frontal cognitive and behavioral impairments in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 390 231–238.29801896 Tighe S. K. Oishi K. Mori S. Smith G. S. Albert M. Lyketsos C. G. (2012). Diffusion tensor imaging of neuropsychiatric symptoms in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s dementia. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 24 484–488.23224456 Tunnard C. Whitehead D. Hurt C. Wahlund L. O. Mecocci P. Tsolaki M. (2011). Apathy and cortical atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 26 741–748.20872914 Turkeltaub P. E. Eden G. F. Jones K. M. Zeffiro T. A. (2002). Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: Method and validation. Neuroimage 16 765–780.12169260 Turkeltaub P. E. Eickhoff S. B. Laird A. R. Fox M. Wiener M. Fox P. (2012). Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33 1–13. 10.1002/hbm.21186 21305667 van Dalen J. W. Van Wanrooij L. L. van Charante E. P. M. Richard E. van Gool W. A. (2018a). Apathy is associated with incident dementia in community-dwelling older people. Neurology 90 e82–e89.29196576 van Dalen J. W. van Wanrooij L. L. van Charante E. P. M. Brayne C. van Gool W. A. Richard E. (2018b). Association of apathy with risk of incident dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 75 1012–1021.30027214 Waltz J. A. Kasanova Z. Ross T. J. Salmeron B. J. McMahon R. P. Gold J. M. (2013). The roles of reward, default, and executive control networks in set-shifting impairments in schizophrenia. PLoS One 8 :e57257 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0057257 23468948 Wei G. Irish M. Hodges J. R. Piguet O. Kumfor F. (2020). Disease-specific profiles of apathy in Alzheimer’s disease and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia differ across the disease course. J. Neurol. 267 1086–1096. 10.1007/s00415-019-09679-1 31873787 Yan H. Onoda K. Yamaguchi S. (2015). Gray matter volume changes in the apathetic elderly. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9 :318 . 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00318 26082708 Yuen G. S. Gunning-Dixon F. M. Hoptman M. J. AbdelMalak B. McGovern A. R. Seirup J. K. (2014). The salience network in the apathy of late-life depression. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 29 1116–1124.24990625 Zamboni G. Huey E. D. Krueger F. Nichelli P. F. Grafman J. (2008). Apathy and disinhibition in frontotemporal dementia: Insights into their neural correlates. Neurology 71 736–742.18765649 Zhang X. Liu B. Li N. Li Y. Hou J. Duan G. (2020). Transcranial direct current stimulation over prefrontal areas improves psychomotor inhibition state in patients with traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Front. Neurosci. 14 :386 . 10.3389/fnins.2020.00386 32508560 Zhao H. Tang W. Xu X. Zhao Z. Huang L. (2014). Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of apathy in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 26 134–141.24570144