==== Front Surg Case Rep Surg Case Rep Surgical Case Reports 2198-7793 Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg 37382836 1699 10.1186/s40792-023-01699-4 Case Report Endoscopic stent placement with laparoscopic stent fixation in a patient with obstruction at a gastrojejunostomy anastomosis site Son Kiwa Shindo Koji shindo.koji.038@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp Ouchida Kenoki Moriyama Taiki Tamura Koji Nagayoshi Kinuko Mizuuchi Yusuke Ikenaga Naoki Nakata Kohei Nakamura Masafumi grid.177174.3 0000 0001 2242 4849 Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan 29 6 2023 29 6 2023 12 2023 9 12119 3 2023 13 6 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Background Palliative endoscopic stent placement may be considered in patients with malignant gastrointestinal obstruction. Stent migration is a potential complication, particularly for those placed at a surgical anastomosis or across a stricture caused by extra-alimentary tract factors. We report a patient with left renal pelvis cancer and gastrojejunostomy obstruction who underwent endoscopic stent placement and laparoscopic stent fixation. Case presentation A 60-year-old male with peritoneal dissemination of a left renal pelvis cancer was admitted for treatment of upper gastrointestinal obstruction. A laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy had been previously performed for cancer invasion of the duodenum. Imaging showed gastroduodenal dilation and impaired passage of contrast medium through the efferent loop of the gastrojejunostomy. Gastrojejunostomy anastomosis site obstruction due to dissemination of left renal pelvis cancer was diagnosed. Conservative treatment failed and endoscopic stent placement with laparoscopic stent fixation was performed. After surgery, the patient was able to tolerate oral intake and he was discharged without complications. The patient gained weight and was able to resume chemotherapy, indicating the procedure was effective. Conclusions Endoscopic stent placement with laparoscopic stent fixation for malignant upper gastrointestinal obstruction appears effective in patients with a high risk of stent migration. Keywords Laparoscopic stent fixation Stent migration Anastomosis site obstruction Gastrojejunostomy External alimentary tract compression Recurrent malignancy Palliative surgery issue-copyright-statement© Japan Surgical Society 2023 ==== Body pmcBackground In patients with gastrointestinal obstruction due to an unresectable malignant tumor, stent placement is frequently performed when surgery is not indicated [1]. Stent migration is one of the most frequent stent-related complications; others include intestinal obstruction, bleeding, and perforation [2, 3]. Endoscopic suture fixation and stent fixation using an over-the-scope clip can prevent stent migration in patients with esophageal cancer [4–6]. However, to the best of our knowledge, laparoscopic stent fixation (LSF) has not been previously reported. We report a patient with disseminated cancer of the left renal pelvis and obstruction at the site of a gastrojejunostomy (GJ) anastomosis in whom we performed endoscopic stent placement with LSF. Case presentation A 60-year-old male with cT4N0M1 stage IV left renal pelvis cancer with peritoneal dissemination and a history of laparoscopic GJ performed for cancer invasion of the duodenum presented with vomiting and was admitted to the hospital. His renal cancer had been treated with chemotherapy as radical surgery was not indicated. Computed tomography of the abdomen showed significant gastroduodenal dilation. GJ obstruction (Fig. 1a, b) and renal cancer progression were suspected. On fluoroscopic examination, the stomach was dilated and contrast medium did not pass into the efferent loop of the GJ (Fig. 2a, b). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed no abnormalities of the mucosal surface. The scope was able to pass through the efferent loop and no obvious hard stricture was found. Because fluoroscopy showed a stricture of the GJ anastomosis but the endoscopic findings were unremarkable, we suspected the stricture was caused by external compression of the alimentary tract (Fig. 3a, b). GJ anastomosis site obstruction owing to disseminated left renal pelvis cancer was diagnosed.Fig. 1 Computed tomography on admission. a Stomach and duodenum are prominently dilated. b Obstruction at the gastrojejunostomy anastomosis was caused by disseminated left renal pelvis cancer (arrowhead) Fig. 2 Upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy before surgery. a Niveau formations were visualized in the stomach, duodenum, and proximal jejunum. b Contrast medium was retained in the stomach; only a small volume passed into the efferent loop of the gastrojejunostomy (arrowhead) Fig. 3 a Endoscope was able to pass with only slight resistance. The afferent loop (arrow) and efferent loop (blue arrowhead) had no mucosal abnormalities. b Stricture of the gastrojejunostomy was revealed on fluoroscopy (yellow arrowhead) Conservative treatment including tube decompression failed and endoscopic stenting was considered; however, we were concerned about stent migration, because the stricture was not hard. Therefore, endoscopic stent placement was performed in conjunction with LSF. First, a self-expanding metal stent was placed endoscopically into the stomach across the stricture under general anesthesia (Fig. 4). Then, LSF was performed using four laparoscopy ports (Fig. 5a). Multiple peritoneal nodules were observed in the upper abdominal cavity. A hard nodule of the greater omentum was adherent to the GJ anastomosis site, which was thought to be the cause of the stricture (Fig. 5b). The efferent loop with the stent was fixed using three 3–0 prolene sutures placed at 3 cm intervals (Fig. 5c). Fixation was confirmed using intraoperative endoscopy (Fig. 5d). Gastrostomy was performed at the end of the operation for gastric decompression and enteral nutrition administration as a precautionary measure. Operation time was 125 min. Intraoperative bleeding was minimal.Fig. 4 Self-expanding metal stent was placed into the stomach across the anastomosis to the efferent loop Fig. 5 a Port placement. b Hard nodule of the greater omentum was adherent to the gastrojejunostomy anastomosis (arrowhead). c Stent was fixed using three 3–0 prolene sutures placed at 3 cm intervals. d Fixation was confirmed using intraoperative endoscopy (arrowhead) After surgery, fluoroscopic examination showed release of the stricture and appropriate stent placement (Fig. 6). Oral intake was initiated on postoperative day (POD) 3. The patient was discharged on POD 17 without complications. He continued chemotherapy after discharge and his body weight had increased by 3 kg on POD 30, indicating procedural success. Plain radiography on POD 47 (Fig. 7b) and computed tomography POD 88 (Fig. 7b) showed the stent was open and had not migrated. The patient died of renal cancer 3 months after stent placement/LSF without symptoms of upper gastrointestinal obstruction.Fig. 6 Upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy after surgery. a Stent was open and did not migrate. A clip beside the stent was placed endoscopically during surgery to mark the best site to open the stent. b Contrast medium passed through the efferent loop of the gastrojejunostomy. No stricture was observed Fig. 7 a Plain radiography 47 days after surgery confirmed the stent was open and had not migrated. b Computed tomography 88 days after surgery showed the stent was open and located at the gastrojejunostomy anastomosis (arrow). A staple at the site is visible (arrowhead). However, ascites had increased and the cancer had progressed Discussion In the palliative setting, surgical GJ may be considered to treat gastric outlet obstruction in patients with > 2 months life expectancy and good functional status [7]. Laparoscopic GJ is favored over open, because it is less invasive and associated with a shorter hospital stay [8]. Since the introduction of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy [9], several studies have shown its effectiveness [10–13]; however, it is not yet widely performed. Other reports have described interventions for obstruction caused by GJ anastomosis stenosis [14–18]. To the best of our knowledge, intervention for obstruction caused by factors outside the alimentary tract following GJ, as in our patient, has not been reported. Gastrointestinal obstruction by a recurrent malignancy after palliative GJ usually reflects tumor progression and poor general condition; rarely is it an indication for further surgery [19]. Repeated surgeries for recurrent malignancy could cause significant morbidity and mortality. In our patient, endoscopic stenting was selected, because he had a history of palliative GJ. However, the success rate of endoscopic stenting for anastomotic stricture is lower than that for gastric outlet or duodenal obstruction [20]. In addition, his stricture was caused by extra-alimentary tract compression, not locally recurrent gastric or intestinal cancer, and the scope was able to pass through. In general, stents do not migrate when the stricture was severe, but stent migration may have been more likely in such a case of soft stricture. The role of colonic stents in treating obstruction in patients with extracolonic malignancy is controversial [21]. Success rates vary between reports [22–24]. In a study of patients with malignant colon obstruction undergoing colonic stenting, stent migration was more likely in patients with extracolonic malignancy than those with colon cancer; furthermore, the clinical success rate of stenting was lower in patients with extracolonic malignancy (20% vs. 89%) [22]. Our patient’s stricture was caused by external pressure from his left renal pelvis cancer. In addition, the mucosa at the GJ anastomosis appeared normal on endoscopy. Both suggested that the risk of stent migration was high. Chemotherapy after stent placement is also associated with stent migration, as chemotherapy reduces the tumor burden [20]. Our patient was scheduled for chemotherapy after stenting, which was another risk factor for stent migration. Endoscopic stent suturing and over-the-scope clipping are promising measures to prevent stent migration which have a high success rate [4–6]. However, these techniques are not yet widely used. The risk of stent migration was high in our patient for the reasons mentioned above, plus his stricture was soft enough to allow passage of an endoscope. Therefore, we performed LSF, a technique which has not been previously reported. After surgery, he was able to tolerate oral intake, gain weight, and continue chemotherapy. LSF can be a suitable procedure for patients with the risks of stent migration as previously mentioned. It can offer an alternative option for palliative treatment of upper gastrointestinal obstruction, especially when endoscopic fixation is not feasible. Conclusions Endoscopic stent placement with LSF for malignant upper gastrointestinal obstruction appears effective in patients with a high risk of stent migration. Future studies are warranted to further investigate and determine its durability. Abbreviations LSF Laparoscopic stent fixation GJ Gastrojejunostomy POD Post-operative day Acknowledgements We thank Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript. Author contributions KiS wrote the manuscript. KoS supervised the writing of the manuscript. KO, TM, KoS, and KiS performed the surgical procedures. KoS, KN, YM, NI, and KN discussed the surgical treatment and patient management. MN provided final approval of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Funding Not applicable. Availability of data and materials Not applicable. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. Competing interests The authors have no competing interests to declare. Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. ==== Refs References 1. Krouse RS The international conference on malignant bowel obstruction: a meeting of the minds to advance palliative care research J Pain Symptom Manage 2007 34 1 1 6 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.04.005 17509815 2. Mashar M Mashar R Hajibandeh S Uncovered versus covered stent in management of large bowel obstruction due to colorectal malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Colorectal Dis 2019 34 5 773 785 10.1007/s00384-019-03277-3 30903271 3. Park S Cheon JH Park JJ Moon CM Hong SP Lee SK Comparison of efficacies between stents for malignant colorectal obstruction: a randomized, prospective study Gastrointest Endosc 2010 72 2 304 310 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.046 20561619 4. Yang J Siddiqui AA Kowalski TE Loren DE Khalid A Soomro A Esophageal stent fixation with endoscopic suturing device improves clinical outcomes and reduces complications in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer prior to neoadjuvant therapy: a large multicenter experience Surg Endosc 2017 31 3 1414 1419 10.1007/s00464-016-5131-3 27495331 5. Law R Prabhu A Fujii-Lau L Shannon C Singh S Stent migration following endoscopic suture fixation of esophageal self-expandable metal stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis Surg Endosc 2018 32 2 675 681 10.1007/s00464-017-5720-9 28726147 6. Watanabe K Hikichi T Nakamura J Takagi T Suzuki R Sugimoto M Feasibility of esophageal stent fixation with an over-the-scope clip for malignant esophageal strictures to prevent migration Endosc Int Open 2017 5 11 E1044 E1049 10.1055/s-0043-111793 29090243 7. Jeurnink SM Steyerberg EW van Hooft JE van Eijck CHJ Schwartz MP Vleggaar FP Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial Gastrointest Endosc 2010 71 3 490 499 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.042 20003966 8. Bergamaschi R Mårvik R Thoresen JEK Ystgaard B Johnsen G Myrvold HE Open versus laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for palliation in advanced pancreatic cancer Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1998 8 2 92 96 10.1097/00019509-199804000-00002 9. Khashab MA Kumbhari V Grimm IS Ngamruengphong S Aguila G el Zein M EUS-guided gastroenterostomy: the first U.S. clinical experience (with video) Gastrointest Endosc 2015 82 5 932 938 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.017 26215646 10. Iqbal U Khara HS Hu Y Kumar V Tufail K Confer B EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 9 1 16 23 10.4103/eus.eus_70_19 31898587 11. Ge PS Young JY Dong W Thompson CC EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stent placement for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction Surg Endosc 2019 33 10 3404 3411 10.1007/s00464-018-06636-3 30725254 12. Chen YI Itoi T Baron TH Nieto J Haito-Chavez Y Grimm IS EUS-guided gastroenterostomy is comparable to enteral stenting with fewer re-interventions in malignant gastric outlet obstruction Surg Endosc 2017 31 7 2946 2952 10.1007/s00464-016-5311-1 27834024 13. Perez-Miranda M Tyberg A Poletto D Toscano E Gaidhane M Desai AP EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy versus laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy: an international collaborative study J Clin Gastroenterol 2017 51 10 896 899 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887 28697151 14. Patton JT Carter R Endoscopic stenting for recurrent malignant gastric outlet obstruction Br J Surg 1997 84 6 865 866 9189112 15. Wayman J Bliss R Richardson DL Griffin SM Self-expanding metal stents in the palliation of small bowel stenosis secondary to recurrent gastric cancer Gastrointest Endosc 1998 47 3 286 290 10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70328-1 9540884 16. Jeong JY Kim YJ Han JK Lee JM Lee KH Choi BI Palliation of anastomotic obstructions in recurrent gastric carcinoma with the use of covered metallic stents: clinical results in 25 patients Surgery 2004 135 2 171 177 10.1016/S0039-6060(03)00346-5 14739852 17. Cheung HY Chung SCS Covered metal stent for tumor obstruction of efferent loop recurrence after gastrectomy Surg Endosc 1997 11 9 936 938 10.1007/s004649900491 9294277 18. Lee JM Han YM Lee SY Kim CS Doo HY Palliation of postoperative gastrointestinal anastomotic malignant strictures with flexible covered metallic stents: preliminary results Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001 24 1 25 30 10.1007/s002700000385 11178709 19. Song GA Kang DH Kim TO Heo J Kim GH Cho M Endoscopic stenting in patients with recurrent malignant obstruction after gastric surgery: uncovered versus simultaneously deployed uncovered and covered (double) self-expandable metal stents{A figure is presented} Gastrointest Endosc 2007 65 6 782 787 10.1016/j.gie.2006.08.030 17324410 20. Kim JH Song HY Shin JH Choi E Kim TW Jung HY Metallic stent placement in the palliative treatment of malignant gastroduodenal obstructions: prospective evaluation of results and factors influencing outcome in 213 patients Gastrointest Endosc 2007 66 2 256 264 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.017 17643698 21. Ahmed O Lee JH Thompson CC Faulx A AGA clinical practice update on the optimal management of the malignant alimentary tract obstruction: expert review Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021 19 9 1780 1788 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.03.046 33813072 22. Keswani RN Azar RR Edmundowicz SA Zhang Q Ammar T Banerjee B Stenting for malignant colonic obstruction: a comparison of efficacy and complications in colonic versus extracolonic malignancy Gastrointest Endosc 2009 69 3 675 680 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.009 19251009 23. Moon SJ Kim SW Lee BI Lim CH Kim JS Cho YK Palliative stent for malignant colonic obstruction by extracolonic malignancy: a comparison with colorectal cancer Dig Dis Sci 2014 59 8 1891 1897 10.1007/s10620-013-2876-6 24077942 24. Kim JY Kim SG Im JP Kim JS Jung HC Comparison of treatment outcomes of endoscopic stenting for colonic and extracolonic malignant obstruction Surg Endosc 2013 27 1 272 277 10.1007/s00464-012-2439-5 22773238