==== Front PeerJ PeerJ PeerJ PeerJ 2167-8359 PeerJ Inc. San Diego, USA 15568 10.7717/peerj.15568 Oncology Otorhinolaryngology Surgery and Surgical Specialties The relation between human papillomavirus (HPV) and oropharyngeal cancer: a review http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-4434 Ferreira Chrystiano Campos 12chrystiano_campos@yahoo.com.br 1 Department of Medicine, Federal University of Rondonia, Porto Velho, Rondonia, Brazil 2 Head and Neck Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Porto Velho, Rondonia, Brazil Andaloro Claudio 26 6 2023 2023 11 e155687 2 2023 25 5 2023 © 2023 Ferreira 2023 Ferreira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) represent a major public health challenge. In 2020, the international agency for research on cancer (IARC) recorded 98,421 cases of OPSCC worldwide. Over the past decade, the epidemiological profile of patients with OPSCC has shifted, mainly due to a change in etiological factors. Previously, alcohol and tobacco were considered the primary contributors, but the human papillomavirus (HPV) is now recognized as the leading cause of these tumors. This study aimed to conduct a literature review on the relationship between OPSCC and HPV for the general practitioner. The review examined the primary clinical differences between HPV+ and HPV− OPSCC, their prognosis and treatment. In addition, the various HPV diagnostic methods were analyzed. Although there is a vast amount of literature on HPV, this review is unique in its ability to present the key information in an organized and accessible way and enables healthcare professionals to gain a better understanding of the relationship between HPV and oropharyngeal cancer. This, in turn, can contribute to the prevention of various cancers caused by the HPV virus, including oropharyngeal cancer. Human papillomavirus HPV Cancer Oropharyngeal Oropharynx Squamous cell carcinomas The author received no funding for this work. ==== Body pmcIntroduction Oropharynx squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) represent a major public health challenge. In 2020, the international agency for research on cancer (IARC) recorded 98,421 cases of OPSCC worldwide (Ferlay et al., 2020). Over the past decade, the epidemiological profile of patients with OPSCC has shifted, mainly due to a change in etiological factors. Previously, alcohol and tobacco were considered the primary contributors, but the human papillomavirus (HPV) is now recognized as the leading cause of these tumors (Wyss et al., 2013; Menezes et al., 2020). HPV-related OPSCC have different clinical presentation and prognoses when compared to non-HPV-related tumors. Thus, knowledge of the relationship between different epidemiological and clinical variables and HPV positivity in these tumors is crucial for better understanding and knowledge of this disease. For oropharyngeal cancer, there is insufficient data in the literature, to date, to support the presence or absence of HPV/p16 as a relevant pathological variable in the diagnosis and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (Wyss et al., 2013; Bouvard et al., 2009). The relationship between HPV and oropharyngeal cancer is already well-established in the literature. However, there is still a need to better understand the clinical differences in the treatment of HPV+ and HPV− OPSCC patients. The number of sexual partners is the primary determinant of anogenital HPV infection in both men and women (Bouvard et al., 2009). The prevalence of HPV in OPSCC varies according to the studied population, the methodology applied in its detection, and the decade in which the study was carried out. More current studies tend to show higher rates of HPV prevalence compared to older studies (Kreimer et al., 2005). Developed countries generally exhibit higher incidences of HPV-related OPSCC than developing countries. For instance, Chaturvedi et al. (2011), Anantharaman et al. (2017) and D’Souza et al. (2007) reported incidences of 44.1%, 59% and 72%, respectively, in US casuistry. Näsman et al. (2009) studied 98 patients with OPSCC in Sweden and found an HPV incidence of 79%. By contrast, populations from developing countries show lower incidences of HPV in OPSCC. For example, López et al. (2014) studied 91 patients in Brazil and found an incidence of 6.6% while Anantharaman et al. (2017) compared cases from the USA, Europe, and Brazil, finding an incidence of only 4.1% in 171 Brazilian cases. Petito et al. (2017) studied 82 cases in Brazil and found an incidence of 25.6%. A meta-analysis recently published in 2022, comprising data from 38 studies carried out in South American countries, revealed a prevalence of 24.31% of HPV in oropharyngeal tumors (Oliveira et al., 2022). Although there is a vast amount of literature on HPV, this review is unique in its ability to present the key information (Guadiana, Kavanagh & Squarize, 2021) in an organized and accessible way and enables healthcare professionals to gain a better understanding of the relationship between HPV and oropharyngeal cancer. This, in turn, can contribute to the prevention of various cancers caused by the HPV virus, including oropharyngeal cancer. This study aimed to conduct a literature review for the general practitioner analyzing the relationship between OPSCC and HPV. This review focuses on the main clinical differences between HPV+ and HPV− OPSCC, their prognosis and treatment. Survey methodology In August 2022, a literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE/PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. The following keywords were used in the search (“HPV” OR “papillomavirus”) AND (“oropharynx” OR “oropharyngeal”) AND (“cancer” OR “tumor” OR “neoplasms”) to identify articles reporting on HPV and its relation to oropharyngeal cancer. Articles published in English, Portuguese or Spanish were included, regardless of study design or publication date. The studies considered most relevant were selected for inclusion in this review and additional articles on HPV vaccination were also included to complement the analysis. Table 1 summarizes the key studies included in this review. 10.7717/peerj.15568/table-1 Table 1 Characteristics of studies. Study Methods Key findings Anantharaman et al. (2017) Case-control study. The proportion of OPSCC caused by HPV16 varies by geographic region with low proportions in Brazil, moderate proportions in Western Europe, and the majority in the U.S. being HPV16-positive. Ang et al. (2010) Retrospective study. HPV status is a strong and independent prognostic factor for survival among patients with OPSCC. Carpén et al. (2018) Retrospective study. OPSCC can be dichotomized in two distinct disease entities as defined by HPV status. Chaturvedi et al. (2011) Cross-sectional study. Increases in the population-level incidence and survival of oropharyngeal cancers in the United States since 1984 are caused by HPV infection. Chaturvedi et al. (2018) Cross-sectional study. HPV vaccination was associated with reduction in vaccine-type oral HPV prevalence among young US adults. Chera et al. (2019) Phase II Trial. Clinical outcomes with a de-intensified chemoradiotherapy regimen of 60 Gy intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent low-dose cisplatin are favorable in patients with human papillomavirus–associated OPSCC. de Ferreira et al. (2021) Cross-sectional study. Drinkers and current smokers were less likely to be p16+. D’Souza et al. (2007) Case-control study Oral HPV infection is strongly associated with oropharyngeal cancer among subjects with or without the established risk factors of tobacco and alcohol use. D’Souza et al. (2009) Cross-sectional study. Oral sex and open-mouthed kissing are associated with the development of oral HPV infection. D’Souza et al. (2014) Multicenter prospective study. Oral HPV16 DNA is commonly detected among patients with HPV-OPC at diagnosis, but not among their partners. Fakhry et al. (2008) Prospective study. HPV status is associated with therapeutic response and survival on OPSCC patients. Gillison et al. (2008) Case-control study. HPV+ HNSCCs and HPV- head and neck cancer have different risk factor profiles. Gillison et al. (2012) Cross-sectional study. Among men and women aged 14 to 69 years in the United States, the overall prevalence of oral HPV infection was 6.9%. Kreimer et al. (2013) Cohort study. HPV16 E6 seropositivity was present more than 10 years before diagnosis of oropharyngeal cancers. Lassen et al. (2009) Cohort study. Expression of p16 has a major impact on treatment response and survival in patients with head and neck cancer treated with conventional radiotherapy. López et al. (2014) Cohort study. Seropositivity for HPV16 E6 antibodies was correlated with improved Head and neck cancer survival and oropharyngeal cancer. Menezes et al. (2020) Population-based study Emerging risk for HPV-related OPSCC in young people, which supports prophylactic HPV vaccination in this group. Näsman et al. (2009) Retrospective study. A increase in tonsillar cancer mainly due to HPV infection. Petito et al. (2017) Retrospective study. Posner et al. (2011) HPV+ OPSCC has a different biology compared with HPV-. Raman et al. (2019) Retrospective study. The increased awareness and complexity of treatment decisions related to OPSCC may affect times to diagnosis and treatment initiation in patients with HPV-positive disease. Literature review Relationship between HPV and head and neck cancer HPV represents the most common sexually transmitted infection caused by a virus in the world (Muñoz et al., 2006; Bouvard et al., 2009). HPV infections are transmitted primarily through direct skin-to-skin or skin-to-mucosa contact and the number of sexual partners is the main determinant of anogenital HPV infection in both men and women (Bouvard et al., 2009). More than 200 types of HPV are known, and the eight most common types of HPV worldwide are HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58. Type 16 is the most common of all, followed by type 18 in various parts of the world (Muñoz et al., 2006; Bouvard et al., 2009). The prevalence of HPV in the oropharynx and oral cavity varies widely across different populations. A study by Gillison et al. (2012) investigated the presence of the HPV virus in the oral mucosa of 5,579 individuals and showed a prevalence of 6.9%, with higher prevalence in men than in women. Another study, by D’Souza et al. (2014), looked for the presence of HPV through mouthwashes of patients with oropharyngeal cancer associated with HPV. The presence of HPV was detected in 65% of the cases. Among the partners of the patients, an incidence of HPV of 4% was obtained, suggesting that most partners can clear the virus when exposed. In a meta-analysis performed by Kreimer et al. (2005), positivity for HPV in tumor biopsies was found in 35.6% of cases of OPSCC, with type 16 being the most common type, present in 30.9% (86.8% of positive cases). Type 18 was found in only 1.0% of tumors and type six was found in 2.5% of tumors. Smoking and alcohol consumption are the most important risk factors for head and neck cancer. However, many patients with OPSCC do not have any of the traditional risk factors. Many studies have correlated HPV as an etiological agent in many of these patients (Vokes, Agrawal & Seiwert, 2015). HPV is present in head and neck mucosal regions at a rate of 7% in healthy individuals (Gillison et al., 2012). Most HPV infections typically end spontaneously within 12 months (Plummer et al., 2007; Rodríguez et al., 2008) and the time between exposure to HPV and the development of oropharyngeal cancer varies but is likely to exceed 10 years (Kreimer et al., 2013; Robbins et al., 2022). In 2007, the international agency for research on cancer (IARC) considered HPV as a known carcinogenic for the oral cavity and oropharynx. However, the evidence linking HPV to cancer in the larynx was found to be limited (Bouvard et al., 2009). Several studies point to HPV type 16 as the etiological agent in many patients with head and neck cancer and HPV 16 is present in 90% of cases of HPV+ (D’Souza et al., 2007; Bouvard et al., 2009; Gillison et al., 2012). Mehanna et al. (2013) found an increase in the number of HPV positivity cases in oropharyngeal cancers over the past decades, but this has not been accompanied by an overall increase in the number of OPSCC cases in the general population. One factor related to the increase in cases of oropharyngeal cancer is the change in the population’s sexual behavior. According to D’Souza et al. (2009), engaging in kissing and oral sex are considered risk factors for HPV infection in the oral cavity and oropharynx. Furthermore, having more than six partners who have engaged in oral sex was identified as a risk factor for OPSCC. Clinical presentation Clinical symptoms of patients with OPSCC may include dysphagia, odynophagia, neck mass or otalgia. Compared with non-HPV+, these are more likely to have cervical lymph node enlargement at presentation (Raman et al., 2019). Clinical presentation of HPV+ and HPV− individuals are listed in Table 2. 10.7717/peerj.15568/table-2 Table 2 Clinical characteristics of patients HPV+ and HPV−. HPV+ HPV− Age Younger patients Older patients Sex More frequent in men Frequent in men Sexual behavior Oral sex, high number of sexual partners Variable Primary tumor and metastasis Small primary tumors in contrast to large metastases Variable Alcohol and tobacco Frequent patients who do not smoke or drink Frequent patients who smoke or drink Prognosis Better survival outcomes and better response to treatment Worse Patients with HPV-positive OPSCC display distinct characteristics compared to those who are HPV-negative. Typically, HPV-positive patients are younger and predominantly male, as evidenced by the ICON-S study, which found that 84% of HPV-positive patients were male, compared to only 76% of HPV-negative patients (O’Sullivan et al., 2016). Additionally, HPV-positive patients tend to present with initial tumors (T1 or T2) that are associated with advanced cervical metastasis (N2 or N3), according to research by Chaturvedi et al. (2011) and O’Sullivan et al. (2016). Another distinguishing characteristic of HPV-positive OPSCC is its more frequent location in the tonsils or at the base of the tongue. According to Posner et al. (2011), who studied 111 patients with OPSCC, HPV-positive patients tend to be younger (with a median age of 54 compared to 58 for HPV-negative patients) and are more likely to be diagnosed with early-stage tumors. Specifically, 49% of HPV-positive patients had T1 or T2 tumors, compared to only 20% of HPV-negative patients (Posner et al., 2011). In a study carried out by Gillison et al. (2012) at Johns Hopkins Hospital, 240 patients diagnosed with OPSCC were divided into two groups based on their HPV status, determined by in situ hybridization and negative group. Of the 240 cases, 92 were HPV+. The study found that compared with patients with HPV negative tumors, patients with HPV+ were younger (mean age 54 years compared to 58 years), with a higher predominance of caucasian, more years of education, higher family income and more likely to be married. The ICON-S study found that the mean age of HPV-positive OPSCC patients was 57 years, which is younger than the mean age of 61 years for HPV-negative patients. This difference in age may be attributed to a decrease in smoking and alcohol use among HPV-positive patients, which is associated with better treatment tolerance and improved prognosis (O’Sullivan et al., 2016). In general, HPV+ patients have lower rates of smoking and alcoholism when compared to HPV− patients and generally report a greater number of sexual partners and/or frequency of oral sex (Gillison et al., 2008; D’Souza et al., 2009). Furthermore, tumors associated with HPV infection are often detected through asymptomatic cervical metastasis. Patients with HPV-positive OPSCC may not present with complaints related to the primary tumor. Instead, the most common presentation is the detection of cervical metastasis without any associated symptoms (Carpén et al., 2018). Propedeutics and diagnosis When approaching a patient with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), a comprehensive medical history is crucial to identify risk factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and sexual behavior. A physical examination is also necessary, including inspection of the oropharynx, palpation of all lymph node levels in the neck, and nasolaryngoscopy or laryngoscopy to evaluate the extent of the tumor. Biopsy of the suspicious lesion in the oropharynx and fine needle aspiration biopsy of cervical masses should be performed. For accurate staging, a CT scan of the neck and thorax is required. Additionally, it is important to determine whether the tumor is positive for human papillomavirus (HPV). In general, immunohistochemistry for p16 is performed on the biopsy to detect the presence of HPV (Alabi & O’Neill, 2020). HPV can be diagnosed using two methods: detection of viral DNA or RNA and detection of cellular markers. However, the most common method used for OPSCC is immunohistochemical detection of p16, an oncoprotein related to HPV activity (Lassen et al., 2009; Ferreira et al., 2023; de Ferreira et al., 2021). The advantages of using p16 overexpression research by immunohistochemistry include its practicality, simplicity, and low cost (Robinson et al., 2012; Fakhry et al., 2018). A study of 316 OPSCC patients who underwent p16 and HPV research by in situ hybridization found that 10% of p16-positive patients were HPV-negative, while 7% of p16-negative patients were HPV-positive (Fakhry et al., 2018). Several major guidelines, such as the national comprehensive cancer network (NCCN), recommend the clinical use of p16 immunohistochemistry to characterize cases as HPV-positive and HPV-negative cases (Robinson et al., 2012; Fakhry et al., 2018). The 8th edition of the AJCC staging system also incorporates HPV status, leading to changes in both the staging and prognosis of OPSCC (Robinson et al., 2012; Fakhry et al., 2018). It is therefore recommended that all patients undergoing biopsy of tumors in the oropharynx region be asked to carry out a p16 immunohistochemistry test in addition to an anatomopathological examination of the specimen. This will help to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment selection for OPSCC patients. Prognosis HPV-positive OPSCC has a better prognosis compared to HPV-negative OPSCC (Fakhry et al., 2008; Lassen et al., 2009; Schiller & Lowy, 2012). The 8th edition of the TNM staging system proposed a new staging for OPSCC, with distinct staging criteria for p16-positive and p16-negative tumors. This change in staging reflects the significant difference in prognosis between these two subtypes of OPSCC. In the 7th edition, only T1 or T2 N0, M0 were considered early stage, regardless of HPV status. However, in the 8th edition, HPV-negative tumors continue to be considered early stage T1 or T2 N0, M0, but positive HPV T3 and N2 were also considered initial (Robinson et al., 2012; Fakhry et al., 2018). Ang et al. (2010) conducted a study on 323 patients with stage III and IV OPSCC, using both hybridization for viral DNA and immuno-histochemical analysis of p16. The results indicated that 206 patients (63.8%) were HPV positive. The 3-year survival rate was 82.4% in the HPV+ group and 57.1% in the HPV-negative group, while the 3-year disease-free rate was 73.7% in the HPV+ group and 43.4% in the HPV− group. Furthermore, the study revealed that the 3-year survival rate was 83.6% for the HPV+ group and 51.3% for the HPV− group, and the 3-year disease-free rate was 74% for the HPV+ group and 38.4% for the HPV− group. The study identified an intermediate-risk group of patients with OPSCC who were HPV+ and had more than 10 pack-years of tobacco smoking, which had an intermediate prognosis (Ang et al., 2010). In a study conducted by Fakhry et al. (2008), 96 patients with stage III or IV cancer of the oropharynx and larynx were evaluated for the presence of HPV DNA using PCR and in situ hybridization. HPV DNA was positive in 38 patients (40%). The study showed that disease-free survival in HPV+ patients was 91% in the first year and 86% in the second year, while it was 69% in the first year and 53% in the second year for HPV- patients. Patients with HPV+ tumors had higher response rates after induction chemotherapy (82% vs 55%) and after radiochemotherapy treatment (84% vs 57%) compared to those with HPV− tumors. Overall 2-year survival was 95% for HPV+ patients compared to 62% for HPV− patients. Vaccination against HPV The risk behavior most associated with HPV-related OPSCC is oral sex. Thus, prevention should promote actions such as the use of condoms and a reduction in the number of sexual partners. Prevention for HPV-related OPSCC includes vaccination against HPV, which is recommended for people aged 9 to 26 years old. Currently, there are three types of HPV vaccines approved by the FDA: Gardasil-9, approved in 2014 (which prevents types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58), Cervarix, approved in 2009 (which prevents types 16 and 18), and Gardasil, approved in 2006 (which prevents types 6, 11, 16 and 18) (Krajden et al., 2011; Romanowski et al., 2011; Schiller & Lowy, 2012). The recommended age for vaccination is between 9 and 26 years, with Cervarix indicated for girls and Gardasil and Gardasil-9 indicated for both boys and girls (see Table 3). While vaccination is not recommended for individuals over the age of 26, some adults aged 27 through 45 years may still receive the HPV vaccine based on a discussion with their doctor, especially if they have not been previously vaccinated (Zhang, Fakhry & D’Souza, 2021). While all three vaccines have been shown to be effective in preventing anogenital infections and malignancies caused by the HPV types included in the vaccines, there is limited evidence to suggest that they can decrease the incidence of head and neck tumors (Schiller & Lowy, 2012). 10.7717/peerj.15568/table-3 Table 3 FDA-approved types of vaccines for HPV. Vaccine HPV type Sex and age Cervarix (bivalent) (GlaxoSmithKline) 16 and 18 Female (9–25 years)* Gardasil (quadrivalent) (Merck) 6, 11, 16, and 18 Male and female (9–26 years)* Gardasil-9 (9-valent) (Merck) 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58 Male and female (9–26 years)* Note: * Some adults ages 27 through 45 years might get the HPV vaccine based on discussion with their doctor. The HPV vaccine has demonstrated a reduction in the prevalence of oral HPV infection. In a study of 2,627 participants aged 18 to 33 years, both men and women were analyzed for the presence or absence of HPV in mouthwashes 4 years after vaccination. Of the participants, 18.3% received one or more doses of the vaccine. The study observed a prevalence of HPV types 16, 18, 6 or 11 in the oral cavity of 0.11 in vaccinated individuals vs 1.61% in non-vaccinated individuals (Gillison et al., 2008). It has been reported that the effects of the HPV vaccine on reducing oral HPV infections may persist for over 10 years after vaccination (Rowhani-Rahbar et al., 2009). Another important point is the potential for health professionals to be contaminated with HPV during procedures that emit aerosols, such as excision or electrocoagulation of HPV-related lesions. Although the level risk is still uncertain, evidence suggest a real risk may exist (Harrison & Huh, 2020). Treatment of oropharyngeal cancer The treatment of oropharyngeal cancer requires a multidisciplinary team. Treatment options may include radiotherapy, surgery and/or chemotherapy and the choice of treatment depends on the clinical stage of the tumor and the clinical condition of the patient. Typically, radiotherapy or surgery are indicated for early-stage T1 and T2 tumors without cervical metastasis, and radiotherapy associated with chemotherapy is recommended for more advanced cases. Although assessing the patient’s HPV status is important for staging and predicting prognosis, there is still insufficient support to carry out different treatment options. Therefore, the treatment for OPSCC associated with HPV should be the same for HPV-negative cases except in clinical trials. Some studies have investigated the de-escalation of RT and/or chemotherapy treatment showing encouraging results in phase II non-randomized studies (Marur et al., 2017; Chera et al., 2019). Due to the favorable prognosis of patients after standard therapy, further research is needed to better evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment de-escalation as a standard practice. Conclusions This review described the relationship between the HPV virus and OPSCC. The various HPV diagnostic methods were analyzed and an explanation was given for p16 being used as a marker for HPV infection. The clinical differences between HPV+ and HPV− OPSCC were also discussed, including their impact on prognosis and treatment. This information is crucial as OPSCC is a significant public health issue and preventive measures can be taken in most cases if the virus is identified early. While there is a wealth of literature on HPV, this review presents key information in an organized and accessible way that can help increase awareness and understanding among health professionals on the relationship between HPV and oropharyngeal cancer. This can lead to a reduction in the incidence of HPV-related cancers, including OPSCC, and improve patient outcomes. We thank the Barretos Cancer Hospital. Additional Information and Declarations Competing Interests Author Contributions Data Availability The author declares that he has no competing interests. Chrystiano Campos Ferreira conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft. The following information was supplied regarding data availability: This is a literature review. ==== Refs References Alabi & O’Neill (2020) Alabi O O’Neill JP ‘Good cancer gone bad’: a narrative review of HPV oropharyngeal cancer and potential poor outcomes European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2020 277 8 2185 2191 10.1007/s00405-020-05991-z 32333138 Anantharaman et al. (2017) Anantharaman D Abedi-Ardekani B Beachler DC Gheit T Olshan AF Wisniewski K Wunsch-Filho V Toporcov TN Tajara EH Levi Jé E Moyses RA Boccia S Cadoni G Rindi G Ahrens W Merletti F Conway DI Wright S Carreira C Renard H Chopard P McKay-Chopin S Scelo G Tommasino M Brennan P D’Souza G Geographic heterogeneity in the prevalence of human papillomavirus in head and neck cancer International Journal of Cancer 2017 140 9 1968 1975 10.1002/ijc.30608 28108990 Ang et al. (2010) Ang KK Harris J Wheeler R Weber R Rosenthal DI Nguyen-Tân PF Westra WH Chung CH Jordan RC Lu C Kim H Axelrod R Silverman CC Redmond KP Gillison ML Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer The New England Journal of Medicine 2010 363 1 24 35 10.1056/NEJMoa0912217 20530316 Bouvard et al. (2009) Bouvard V Baan R Straif K Grosse Y Secretan B El Ghissassi F Benbrahim-Tallaa L Guha N Freeman C Galichet L Cogliano V WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group A review of human carcinogens—part B: biological agents The Lancet Oncology 2009 10 4 321 322 10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70096-8 19350698 Carpén et al. (2018) Carpén T Sjöblom A Lundberg M Haglund C Markkola A Syrjänen S Tarkkanen J Mäkitie A Hagström J Mattila P Presenting symptoms and clinical findings in HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer patients Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2018 138 5 513 518 10.1080/00016489.2017.1405279 29161981 Chaturvedi et al. (2011) Chaturvedi AK Engels EA Pfeiffer RM Hernandez BY Xiao W Kim E Jiang B Goodman MT Sibug-Saber M Cozen W Liu L Lynch CF Wentzensen N Jordan RC Altekruse S Anderson WF Rosenberg PS Gillison ML Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States Journal of Clinical Oncology 2011 29 32 4294 4301 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.4596 21969503 Chaturvedi et al. (2018) Chaturvedi AK Graubard BI Broutian T Pickard RKL Tong ZY Xiao W Kahle L Gillison ML Effect of prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on oral HPV infections among young adults in the United States Journal of Clinical Oncology 2018 36 3 262 267 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.0141 29182497 Chera et al. (2019) Chera BS Amdur RJ Green R Shen C Gupta G Tan X Knowles M Fried D Hayes N Weiss J Grilley-Olson J Patel S Zanation A Hackman T Zevallos J Blumberg J Patel S Kasibhatla M Sheets N Weissler M Yarbrough W Mendenhall W Phase II trial of de-intensified chemoradiotherapy for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma Journal of Clinical Oncology 2019 37 29 2661 2669 10.1200/JCO.19.01007 31411949 de Ferreira et al. (2021) de Ferreira CC Dufloth R de Carvalho AC Reis RM Santana I Carvalho RS Gama RR Chang JS Correlation of p16 immunohistochemistry with clinical and epidemiological features in oropharyngeal squamous-cell carcinoma PLOS ONE 2021 16 6 e0253418 10.1371/journal.pone.0253418 34138935 D’Souza et al. (2009) D’Souza G Agrawal Y Halpern J Bodison S Gillison ML Oral sexual behaviors associated with prevalent oral human papillomavirus infection The Journal of Infectious Diseases 2009 199 9 1263 1269 10.1086/597755 19320589 D’Souza et al. (2014) D’Souza G Gross ND Pai SI Haddad R Anderson KS Rajan S Gerber J Gillison ML Posner MR Oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in HPV-positive patients with oropharyngeal cancer and their partners Journal of Clinical Oncology 2014 32 23 2408 2415 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1341 24778397 D’Souza et al. (2007) D’Souza G Kreimer AR Viscidi R Pawlita M Fakhry C Koch WM Westra WH Gillison ML Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer The New England Journal of Medicine 2007 356 19 1944 1956 10.1056/NEJMoa065497 17494927 Fakhry et al. (2018) Fakhry C Lacchetti C Rooper LM Jordan RC Rischin D Sturgis EM Bell D Lingen MW Harichand-Herdt S Thibo J Zevallos J Perez-Ordonez B Human papillomavirus testing in head and neck carcinomas: ASCO clinical practice guideline endorsement of the college of American pathologists guideline Journal of Clinical Oncology 2018 36 31 3152 3161 10.1200/JCO.18.00684 30188786 Fakhry et al. (2008) Fakhry C Westra WH Li S Cmelak A Ridge JA Pinto H Forastiere A Gillison ML Improved survival of patients with human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 100 4 261 269 10.1093/jnci/djn011 18270337 Ferlay et al. (2020) Ferlay J Ervik M Lam F Colombet M Mery L Piñeros M Global cancer observatory: cancer today 2020 Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer 2020 https://gco.iarc.fr/today Ferreira et al. (2023) Ferreira CDC Gama RR De Carvalho AC Santana I Carvalho RS Debora SDA De Jesus LM Reis RM Dufloth R Role of genetic ancestry in oropharyngeal squamous-cell carcinoma: a cross-sectional study in Brazil Journal of Biosciences and Medicines 2023 11 1 150 161 10.4236/jbm.2023.111015 Gillison et al. (2012) Gillison ML Broutian T Pickard RK Tong ZY Xiao W Kahle L Graubard BI Chaturvedi AK Prevalence of oral HPV infection in the United States, 2009–2010 JAMA 2012 307 7 693 703 10.1001/jama.2012.101 22282321 Gillison et al. (2008) Gillison ML D’Souza G Westra W Sugar E Xiao W Begum S Viscidi R Distinct risk factor profiles for human papillomavirus type 16-positive and human papillomavirus type 16-negative head and neck cancers Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 100 6 407 420 10.1093/jnci/djn025 18334711 Guadiana, Kavanagh & Squarize (2021) Guadiana D Kavanagh NM Squarize CH Oral health care professionals recommending and administering the HPV vaccine: understanding the strengths and assessing the barriers PLOS ONE 2021 16 3 e0248047 10.1371/journal.pone.0248047 33662007 Harrison & Huh (2020) Harrison R Huh W Occupational exposure to human papillomavirus and vaccination for health care workers Obstetrics and Gynecology 2020 136 4 663 665 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004021 32925610 Krajden et al. (2011) Krajden M Cook D Yu A Chow R Mei W McNeil S Money D Dionne M Karunakaran KP Palefsky JM Dobson S Ogilvie G Petric M Human papillomavirus 16 (HPV 16) and HPV 18 antibody responses measured by pseudovirus neutralization and competitive Luminex assays in a two-versus three-dose HPV vaccine trial Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 2011 18 3 418 423 10.1128/CVI.00489-10 21248158 Kreimer et al. (2005) Kreimer AR Clifford GM Boyle P Franceschi S Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas worldwide: a systematic review Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2005 14 467 475 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0551 Kreimer et al. (2013) Kreimer AR Johansson M Waterboer T Kaaks R Chang-Claude J Drogen D Tjønneland A Overvad K Quirós JR González CA Sánchez MJ Larrañaga N Navarro C Barricarte A Travis RC Khaw K-T Wareham N Trichopoulou A Lagiou P Trichopoulos D Peeters PHM Panico S Masala G Grioni S Tumino R Vineis P Bueno-de-Mesquita HB Laurell G Hallmans G Manjer J Ekström J Skeie G Lund E Weiderpass E Ferrari P Byrnes G Romieu I Riboli E Hildesheim A Boeing H Pawlita M Brennan P Evaluation of human papillomavirus antibodies and risk of subsequent head and neck cancer Journal of Clinical Oncology 2013 31 21 2708 2715 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.2738 23775966 Lassen et al. (2009) Lassen P Eriksen JG Hamilton-Dutoit S Tramm T Alsner J Overgaard J Effect of HPV-associated p16INK4A expression on response to radiotherapy and survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009 27 12 1992 1998 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2853 19289615 López et al. (2014) López RV Levi JE Eluf-Neto J Koifman RJ Koifman S Curado MP Michaluart-Junior P Figueiredo DL Saggioro FP de Carvalho MB Kowalski LP Abrahão M de Góis-Filho F Tajara EH Waterboer T Boffetta P Brennan P Wünsch-Filho V Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and the prognosis of head and neck cancer in a geographical region with a low prevalence of HPV infection Cancer Causes & Control 2014 25 4 461 471 10.1007/s10552-014-0348-8 24474236 Marur et al. (2017) Marur S Li S Cmelak AJ Gillison ML Zhao WJ Ferris RL Westra WH Gilbert J Bauman JE Wagner LI Trevarthen DR Balkrishna J Murphy BA Agrawal N Colevas AD Chung CH Burtness B E1308: phase II trial of induction chemotherapy followed by reduced-dose radiation and weekly cetuximab in patients with HPV-associated resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx-ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017 35 5 490 497 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.3300 28029303 Mehanna et al. (2013) Mehanna H Beech T Nicholson T El-Hariry I McConkey C Paleri V Roberts S Prevalence of human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal and nonoropharyngeal head and neck cancer--systematic review and meta-analysis of trends by time and region Head & Neck 2013 35 5 747 755 10.1002/hed.22015 22267298 Menezes et al. (2020) Menezes FDS Latorre MDRDO Conceição GMS Curado MP Antunes JLF Toporcov TN The emerging risk of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer in HPV-related subsites in young people in Brazil PLOS ONE 2020 15 5 e0232871 10.1371/journal.pone.0232871 32407339 Muñoz et al. (2006) Muñoz N Castellsagué X Berrington de González A Gissmann L Chapter 1: HPV in the etiology of human cancer Vaccine 2006 24 Suppl 1 S3/1 S3/10 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.115 Näsman et al. (2009) Näsman A Attner P Hammarstedt L Du J Eriksson M Giraud G Ahrlund-Richter S Marklund L Romanitan M Lindquist D Ramqvist T Lindholm J Sparén P Ye W Dahlstrand H Munck-Wikland E Dalianis T Incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) positive tonsillar carcinoma in Stockholm, Sweden: an epidemic of viral-induced carcinoma? International Journal of Cancer 2009 125 2 362 366 10.1002/ijc.24339 19330833 O’Sullivan et al. (2016) O’Sullivan B Huang SH Su J Garden AS Sturgis EM Dahlstrom K Lee N Riaz N Pei X Koyfman SA Adelstein D Burkey BB Friborg J Kristensen CA Gothelf AB Hoebers F Kremer B Speel E-J Bowles DW Raben D Karam SD Yu E Xu W Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the international collaboration on oropharyngeal cancer network for staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study The Lancet Oncology 2016 17 4 440 451 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00560-4 26936027 Oliveira et al. (2022) Oliveira AC Cavalcanti de Lima IC Frez Marques VM Alves de Araújo WH de Campos Ferreira C Human papillomavirus prevalence in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in South America: a systematic review and meta-analysis Oncology Reviews 2022 16 1 552 10.4081/oncol.2022.552 35432780 Petito et al. (2017) Petito G Carneiro MA Santos SH Silva AM Alencar RC Gontijo AP Saddi VA Human papillomavirus in oral cavity and oropharynx carcinomas in the central region of Brazil Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2017 83 1 38 44 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.01.004 27117892 Plummer et al. (2007) Plummer M Schiffman M Castle PE Maucort-Boulch D Wheeler CM Group ALTS A 2-year prospective study of human papillomavirus persistence among women with a cytological diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion The Journal of Infectious Diseases 2007 195 11 1582 1589 10.1086/516784 17471427 Posner et al. (2011) Posner MR Lorch JH Goloubeva O Tan M Schumaker LM Sarlis NJ Haddad RI Cullen KJ Survival and human papillomavirus in oropharynx cancer in TAX 324: a subset analysis from an international phase III trial Annals of Oncology 2011 22 5 1071 1077 10.1093/annonc/mdr006 21317223 Raman et al. (2019) Raman A Sen N Ritz E Fidler MJ Revenaugh P Stenson K Al-Khudari S Heterogeneity in the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment initiation of p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer American Journal of Otolaryngology 2019 40 5 626 630 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.05.004 31174931 Robbins et al. (2022) Robbins HA Ferreiro-Iglesias A Waterboer T Brenner N Nygard M Bender N Schroeder L Hildesheim A Pawlita M D’Souza G Visvanathan K Langseth H Schlecht NF Tinker LF Agalliu I Wassertheil-Smoller S Ness-Jensen E Hveem K Grioni S Kaaks R Sánchez M-J Weiderpass E Giles GG Milne RL Cai Q Blot WJ Zheng W Weinstein SJ Albanes D Huang W-Y Freedman ND Kreimer Aée R Johansson M Brennan P Absolute risk of oropharyngeal cancer after an HPV16-E6 serology test and potential implications for screening: results from the human papillomavirus cancer cohort consortium Journal of Clinical Oncology 2022 40 31 3613 3622 10.1200/JCO.21.01785 35700419 Robinson et al. (2012) Robinson M Schache A Sloan P Thavaraj S HPV specific testing: a requirement for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients Head and Neck Pathology 2012 6 Suppl 1 S83 S90 10.1007/s12105-012-0370-7 22782227 Rodríguez et al. (2008) Rodríguez AC Schiffman M Herrero R Wacholder S Hildesheim A Castle PE Solomon D Burk R On behalf of the Proyecto Epidemiologico Guanacaste Group Rapid clearance of human papillomavirus and implications for clinical focus on persistent infections Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 100 7 513 517 10.1093/jnci/djn044 18364507 Romanowski et al. (2011) Romanowski B Schwarz TF Ferguson LM Peters K Dionne M Schulze K Ramjattan B Hillemanns P Catteau G Dobbelaere K Schuind A Descamps D Immunogenicity and safety of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine administered as a 2-dose schedule compared with the licensed 3-dose schedule: results from a randomized study Human Vaccines 2011 7 12 1374 1386 10.4161/hv.7.12.18322 22048171 Rowhani-Rahbar et al. (2009) Rowhani-Rahbar A Mao C Hughes JP Alvarez FB Bryan JT Hawes SE Weiss NS Koutsky LA Longer term efficacy of a prophylactic monovalent human papillomavirus type 16 vaccine Vaccine 2009 27 41 5612 5619 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.027 19647066 Schiller & Lowy (2012) Schiller JT Lowy DR Understanding and learning from the success of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines Nature Reviews Microbiology 2012 10 10 681 692 10.1038/nrmicro2872 22961341 Vokes, Agrawal & Seiwert (2015) Vokes EE Agrawal N Seiwert TY HPV-associated head and neck cancer Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2015 107 12 djv344 10.1093/jnci/djv344 26656751 Wyss et al. (2013) Wyss A Hashibe M Chuang S-C Lee Y-CA Zhang Z-F Yu G-P Winn DM Wei Q Talamini R Szeszenia-Dabrowska N Sturgis EM Smith E Shangina O Schwartz SM Schantz S Rudnai P Purdue MP Eluf-Neto J Muscat J Morgenstern H Michaluart P Jr Menezes A Matos E Mates IN Lissowska J Levi F Lazarus P La Vecchia C Koifman S Herrero R Hayes RB Franceschi S Wünsch-Filho V Fernandez L Fabianova E Daudt AW Dal Maso L Curado MP Chen C Castellsague X de Carvalho MB Cadoni G Boccia S Brennan P Boffetta P Olshan AF Cigarette, cigar, and pipe smoking and the risk of head and neck cancers: pooled analysis in the international head and neck cancer epidemiology consortium American Journal of Epidemiology 2013 178 5 679 690 10.1093/aje/kwt029 23817919 Zhang, Fakhry & D’Souza (2021) Zhang Y Fakhry C D’Souza G Projected association of human papillomavirus vaccination with oropharynx cancer incidence in the US, 2020–2045 JAMA Oncology 2021 7 10 e212907 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2907 34473210