==== Front Eur J Med Res Eur J Med Res European Journal of Medical Research 0949-2321 2047-783X BioMed Central London 37381038 1172 10.1186/s40001-023-01172-w Review First reported double drug–drug interaction in a cancer renal patient under everolimus treatment: therapeutic drug monitoring and review of literature Fort-Casamartina Eduard efort@iconcologia.net 1 Muñoz-Sanchez Carme cms@iconcologia.net 1 Rigo-Bonnin Raul Francisco raulr@bellvitgehospital.cat 2 del Valle-Celiz Pamela Maria pceliz@iconcologia.net 3 Gonzalo-Diego Núria ngonzalo_ext@iconcologia.net 1 Otero-Torres Sara saraotero@iconcologia.net 1 Bleda-Perez Carmen cbleda@iconcologia.net 1 Prats-Jimenez Judith jprats@iconcologia.net 1 Fontanals-Martínez Sandra sfontanals@iconcologia.net 1 1 grid.414660.1 Pharmacy Service, Hospital Duran and Reynals (Catalan Institute of Oncology), Gran Via de l’Hospitalet 199–203, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain 2 grid.411129.e 0000 0000 8836 0780 Clinical Laboratory, University Bellvitge Hospital, Carrer de La Feixa Llarga S/N, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain 3 grid.414660.1 Medical Oncology, Hospital Duran and Reynals (Catalan Institute of Oncology), Gran Via de l’Hospitalet 199–203, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain 29 6 2023 29 6 2023 2023 28 20230 3 2023 14 6 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Everolimus is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) used in both transplantation and cancer treatment (breast, renal and neuroendocrine). In transplantation, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended due to the potential drug–drug interactions with chronic medications, which can affect everolimus pharmacokinetics. In cancer treatment, everolimus is used at higher doses than in transplantation and without a systematic drug monitoring. We present a case report of a 72-year-old woman with epilepsy history to whom everolimus 10 mg QD was prescribed as third line of treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The potential drug interactions between everolimus and the patient's chronic medications, carbamazepine and phenytoin, are significant as both are known as strong inducers CYP3A4 metabolism, potentially leading to underexposure to everolimus. TDM of everolimus was recommended by the pharmacist. The literature suggests that a minimum plasma concentration (Cminss) of everolimus over 10 ng/ml is associated with better response to treatment and progression-free survival (PFS). The patient’s everolimus dose had to be increased until 10 mg BID, and regular monitoring of everolimus levels showed an increase in Cminss from 3.7 ng/ml to 10.8 ng/ml. This case highlights the importance of checking for potential drug interactions and monitoring everolimus levels in patients on chronic medication, especially those with several inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4 metabolism. TDM can help to ensure that patients are treated with their optimal dose, which can improve the effectiveness of the treatment or minimize the risk of toxicities. Keywords Everolimus Pharmaceutical care Therapeutic drug monitoring Pharmacokinetic Drug–drug interaction CYP3A4 metabolism Targeted drugs Personalized treatment issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 ==== Body pmcBackground RCC is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults, representing 3% of all cancers in women and 5% in men with an incidence of around 400.000 cases worldwide (30% of patients are metastatic at diagnosis) [1]. The first-line treatment options for metastatic RCC have improved significantly over the past 20 years, with the development of targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In recent clinical trials, combination therapy with antiangiogenic drugs and ICI, or two ICI’s may represent a promising approach for first-line treatment of metastatic RCC [2–5]. The choice of subsequent lines of therapy depends on several factors, including the patient’s prior treatment history, performance status, and comorbidities [1]. In METEOR and RECORD-1 trial everolimus increase PFS in RCC when was used as second- or third-line therapy [6]. Everolimus is an orally administered rapamycin derivate inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). This is a key signaling molecule in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway which is involved in the regulation, growth, proliferation, metabolism, survival and angiogenesis of cells that is often dysregulated in cancer (Fig. 1). Nowadays it is used for cancer treatment at a fixed dose of 10 mg/daily for metastatic renal cell cancer and in neuroendocrine tumors, and in combination with exemestane for advanced hormone receptor positive (HR +), negative human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2-) breast cancer. [7–9]Fig. 1 mTOR signaling pathway Everolimus is also used in transplant patients as immunosuppressant. Due to its narrow therapeutic index and pharmacokinetic inter-individual variability, routine TDM is recommended to maintain a Cminss between 3–8 ng/ml [10, 11]. In cancer patients, Cminss below 10 ng/ml have been associated with worse response to treatment while Cminss higher than 26.3 ng/ml has been related to higher incidence of adverse events. However, in cancer setting, TDM is not currently performed. Variability in everolimus blood exposure may be influenced by several factors, including age, sex, body composition, genetic factors and drug–drug interactions which could affect its hepatic metabolism by cytochrome CYP3A4 [12–14]. We present the first double interaction with everolimus in a case report of a 72-year-old woman with a history of RCC and previous nephrectomy. Treatment with everolimus as third-line treatment was started. She was also taking carbamazepine and phenytoin for epilepsy, two majors inducers of CYP3A4 resulting in heavily decreased everolimus levels. This interaction was confirmed by TDM and everolimus dosage had to be increased, from 10 mg QD until 10 mg BID. Finally optimal Cminss was achieved. Case presentation A 72-year-old woman with smoking and epilepsy history was diagnosed from a stage pT3a renal carcinoma in December 2015. Radical right nephrectomy was performed in February 2016. In September 2018, a right lung segmentectomy was practiced due to lepidic adenocarcinoma growth. On February 2021 progression was detected with right adrenal massive bleeding, hilar adenopathy and left renal adrenal metastasis. Nivolumab was initiated as first-line treatment in May 2021 for intermediate-risk clear-cell RCC. As adverse events dry mouth, grade II anorexia and grade I astheny were reported, with no immune-mediated toxicities. In December 2021, new progression was detected and second-line treatment with cabozantinib 60 mg daily was started. Enalapril was prescribed due to hypertension grade I (with no cabozantinib dose reduction), and patient also referred nausea and diarrhea grade I. A new progression was detected and third-line treatment with everolimus at 10 mg QD in fasted conditions (1 h before breakfast) was started in the 21st of March, 2022. Patient chronic medication plan was checked by the hospital pharmacist: carbamazepine 400 mg BID, phenytoin 100 mg BID and acetaminophen 650 mg plus tramadol 75 mg TID. By using two databases (lexicomp and drugs), two drug interactions were detected: carbamazepine and phenytoin are classified as strong inducers of CYP3A4 metabolism and could lead to decrease everolimus Cminss. This finding was discussed within the multidisciplinary team, including the oncologist and the pharmacist, and a TDM plan was planned. Method used for analysis was ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Four weeks after starting treatment, patient had no toxicities and first TDM result showed a Cminss of 3.7 ng/ml, which was considered to be an underexposure to everolimus. Everolimus dose was increased from 10 mg QD to 15 mg daily (administered 10 mg, 1 h before breakfast and 5 mg, 1 h before dinner). Four weeks later TDM showed higher Cminss, from 3.7 to 6.4 ng/ml, without relevant toxicities. However, a second dose adjustment was needed, 10 mg BID, administered before meals. Two weeks and a month later, new TDM were planned and Cminss were 10.6 ng/ml and 8.7 ng/ml, respectively (Fig. 2). During everolimus treatment, stable disease was achieved, and no relevant toxicities were observed. Unfortunately, everolimus treatment was stopped on July 2022, due to lung progression, pleural effusion, and respiratory insufficiency, and finally patient died.Fig. 2 Everolimus dosage and Cminss evolution Discussion Everolimus is an oral mTOR inhibitor that binds with high affinity to the FK506 binding protein-12 (FKBP-12), and activation of mTOR is inhibited by this complex. Due to several factors could affect its pharmacokinetic profile, TDM is routinely established when everolimus is used in transplant patients to achieve the optimal Cmins, whereas in cancer patients is not established [15]. According to product label, in oncology, everolimus is prescribed as a standard fixed oral dose of 10 mg QD. It is absorbed rapidly and peak concentration is reached after 1.3–1.8 h. The systemic availability of a single oral 10 mg dose of everolimus is significantly reduced by co-administration with a meal compared with fasting conditions. Maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration–curve time (AUC) were reduced by 42% and 22% after low-fat meals; this reduction increased until 54% and 33% after a high-fat meal [16]. We recommended our patient to take everolimus every day in fasting conditions, at least 1 h before breakfast. Everolimus steady (SS) state is reached within 7–14 days, and steady-state peak and trough concentrations, and AUC are proportional to dosage. Five studies with 945 patients treated with everolimus (lung, renal and neuroendocrine tumors) were included in a meta-analysis by Ravaud et al. where the mean everolimus Cminss was 15.65 ng/ml (90%CI 14,79–16.55 ng/ml) [17]. Better response and major reduction in tumor size were observed with a twofold increase in Cminss. In conclusion, Cminss ≥ 10 ng/ml could be used as target value for optimal response, while Cminss > 26.3 ng/ml was associated with a fourfold increased risk of toxicity compared to Cminss < 26.3 ng/ml. Only 45% of patients with neuroendocrine tumors achieved optimal everolimus plasmatic concentrations (10-30 ng/ml), while in lung and renal cancer were 55.2% and 62.9%, respectively. Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors increased everolimus Cminss by 10%, while CYP3A4 inducers decreased Cminss by 7%. In another study by Hirabatake et al. median PFS was 13.7 months (1.7–55.8 months) and 50% of breast cancer patients treated with everolimus showed Cminss below 10 ng/ml. PFS was significantly longer in the 10-20 ng/ml group (p = 0.0078) and the median of Cminss in patients with dose-limiting toxicities was 19 ng/ml (11.3–64.6 ng/ml) [18]. Inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability of everolimus can be explained by different activities of the drug efflux pump P-glycoprotein and of metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, 3A5 and 2C8 [13]. The critical role of the CYP3A4 system for everolimus biotransformation leads to drug–drug interactions with other drugs metabolied by this cytochrome system and could affect its efficacy or toxicity. Six main metabolites have been detected, but with 100 times less activity than parent drug (Fig. 3).Fig. 3 Everolimus metabolism in human liver Two single-sequences, crossover studies with verapamil and erythromycin have quantified the influence of both drugs on the pharmacokinetics of everolimus. In a study in 16 healthy subjects reported by Kovarik et al., verapamil (a relatively potent inhibitor of P-glycoprotein, and a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4) administered as 80 mg three times daily, during 6 days, was added to a single 2 mg dose of everolimus [19]. During verapamil co-administration, everolimus Cmax increased 2.3-fold (90% CI 1.9,2.7) and AUC increased 3.5-fold (90% CI 3.1, 3.9). In the other study by Kovarik et al., erythromycin 500 mg (a CYP3A inhibitor) administered TID, for 9 days and a single 2-mg dose of everolimus were co-administered [20]. Everolimus C max was raised up 2.0-fold (90% CI 1.8–2.3) and AUC was increased 4.4-fold (90% CI 3.5–5.4) during erythromycin co-administration. A single drug–drug interaction between verapamil, clarithromycin and voriconazole with everolimus [21–23] has been reported in three case reports. Verapamil, clarithromycin, and voriconazole are known inhibitors of the CYP3A4 and their administration increased plasma concentration of everolimus (40 ng/ml –110 ng/ml) and its toxicities like mucositis, acute kidney injury, proteinuria or nephrotic syndrome. An interaction between fenofibrate and everolimus has been also reported. As CYP3A4 inducer, fenofibrate decreased the plasma concentration of everolimus (from 10.1 ng/ml to 4.2 ng/ml) [24]. To our knowledge, this is the first case report in the literature with two major interactions (carbamazepine and phenytoin) which can affect everolimus metabolism through strong induction of CYP3A4. First TDM Cminss was 3.7 ng/ml and everolimus dose was increase from 10 mg QD to 10mb BID to achieve optimal Cminss (> 10 ng/ml). Two months later, our patient finally achieved an optimal Cminss with a stabilization disease and PFS of 3.7 months. The study by Verheijen et al. [25] investigated the pharmacokinetic optimization of everolimus dosing in oncology. The study was conducted as a crossover trial in 10 patients, and compared everolimus 10 mg once daily with 5 mg twice daily. The results of the study showed that the twice daily dosage regimen significantly decreased the maximum concentration (Cmax) of everolimus from 61.5 ng/ml to 40.3 ng/ml (p = 0.013), and significantly increased the minimum steady-state concentration (Cminss) from 9.6 ng/ml to 13.7 ng/ml (p = 0.018). However, there were no significant differences in the AUC between the two dosing regimens (435 ng*h/ml vs 436 ng*h/ml) (p = 0.952). These findings suggest that a twice daily dosing regimen of everolimus may be more effective in optimizing drug levels in oncology patients, compared to a once daily dosing regime. In METEOR trial median PFS was 3.8 months when everolimus was used in renal cancer patients as second or third-line therapy, 73% and 27%, respectively [26]. In a perspective subanalysis in RECORD-1 trial, median PFS dropped from 5.4 months to 4 months when everolimus was used as third line in renal cancer patients who where previously treated with two anti-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor [27]. The limitations of this paper are only a case report and our findings cannot be generalized to larger groups of patients. TDM prospective studies are needed, specially in patients with different risk factors that may affect pharmacokinetic of everolimus. Nowadays the use of everolimus in metastatic RCC has recently decreased due to development of other TKIs and ICI, cabozantinib and nivolumab. The evidence about two new molecules, cabozantinib and nivolumab, successfully tested head-to-head with everolimus in recently published Phase III trials, will determine the shift of the drug to the third-line setting and subsequent lines of treatment. Promising data for its association with lenvatinib probably support the opportunity of everolimus to still remain in second-line setting for RCC treatment [28]. Conclusion Everolimus is metabolized by CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein, and drug interactions at these levels can affect its blood concentrations, potentially leading to underexposure/overexposure and poor treatment outcomes in oncological patients. Major drug interactions are generally not allowed in clinical trials but in clinical practice TDM of everolimus could be essential in cancer patients receiving several concomitant medications or have other risk factors that may affect drug metabolism and elimination. Collaborative efforts between healthcare providers, can help to identify potential drug interactions and optimize the use of everolimus to achieve Cminss over 10 ng/ml. To realize the full potential of personalized medicine, we should treat each patient with the correct drug and its optimal dose. Acknowledgements We thank CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support Author contributions EF-C: Oncohematological Clinical Pharmacist in Out-patient unit. Checking and validation everolimus prescriptions, checking interactions and Pharmaceutical Care. CM-S: Oncohematological Clinical Pharmacist in pharmacokinetic laboratory. Searching bibliography about TDM and bibliography. RFR-B: Processing blood samples and everolimus determinations. PMdV-C: Medical Oncology. Patient’s follow-up, evaluation of response, toxicities and everolimus prescription. NG-D: Technician pharmacokinetic laboratory, searching bibliography about TDM and everolimus. SO-T: Oncohematological Clinical Pharmacist in Out-patient unit. Checking and validation everolimus prescriptions, checking interactions and Pharmaceutical Care. CB-P: Technician Out-Patient Unit of Pharmacy Service, everolimus deliveries and follow-up patient’s adherence. JP-J: Technician Out-Patient Unit of Pharmacy Service, everolimus deliveries and follow-up patient’s adherence. SF-M: Oncohematological Clinical Pharmacist. Reviewer of paper. Funding No funding has been received. Availability of data and materials Everolimus treatment data were obtained from electronic prescription software. Medical and analytic data were obtained from electronic medical history. Declarations Ethics approval consent to participate When everolimus treatment was started verbal patient consent to participate was obtained after Pharmaceutical Care. It was recorded on electronical medical history. Verbal consent of the patient’s daughter to publish was obtained before submitting paper and was recorded on electronic medical history. Competing interests No interests to disclose. Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. ==== Refs References 1. Deleuze Immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma: the future Is now Int J Mol Sci 2020 21 7 2532 10.3390/ijms21072532 32260578 2. Albiges L Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 4-year follow-up of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial ESMO Open 2020 5 6 e001079 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-001079 33246931 3. Choueri Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma N Engl J Med 2021 384 9 829 841 10.1056/NEJMoa2026982 33657295 4. Choueri Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (CLEAR): extended follow-up from the phase 3, randomised, open-label study Lancet Oncol 2023 24 3 228 238 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00049-9 36858721 5. Powles Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-426): extended follow-up from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 2020 21 12 1563 1573 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30436-8 33284113 6. Buti Everolimus in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy Core Evidence 2016 11 23 36 10.2147/CE.S98687 27621699 7. Motzer RJ Escudier B Oudard S Hutson TE Porta C Bracarda S Grünwald V Thompson JA Figlin RA Hollaender N Urbanowitz G Berg WJ Kay A Lebwohl D Ravaud A RECORD-1 Study Group Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial Lancet 2008 372 9637 449 456 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61039-9 18653228 8. Yao JC Shah MH Ito T Bohas CL Wolin EM Van Cutsem E Hobday TJ Okusaka T Capdevila J de Vries EGE Tomassetti P Pavel ME Hoosen S Haas T Lincy J Lebwohl D Öberg K RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine TumorsThird Trial (RADIANT-3) Study Group Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors N Engl J Med 2011 364 6 514 523 10.1056/NEJMoa1009290 21306238 9. Jerusalem G de Boer RH Hurvitz S Yardley DA Kovalenko E Ejlertsen B Blau S Özgüroglu M Landherr L Ewertz M Taran T Fan J Noel-Baron F Louveau AL Burris H Everolimus Plus exemestane vs everolimus or capecitabine monotherapy for estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: the BOLERO-6 randomized clinical trial JAMA Oncol 2018 4 10 1367 1374 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2262 29862411 10. Lorber MI Ponticelli C Whelchel J Mayer HW Kovarik J Li Y Schmidli H Therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus in kidney transplantation using 12-month exposure, efficacy, and safety data Clin Transpl 2005 19 2 145 152 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00326.x 11. Shipkova M Hesselink DA Holt DW Billaud EM van Gelder T Kunicki PK Brunet M Budde K Barten MJ De Simone P Wieland E López OM Masuda S Seger C Picard N Oellerich M Langman LJ Wallemacq P Morris RG Thompson C Marquet P Therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus: a consensus report Ther Drug Monit 2016 38 2 143 169 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000260 26982492 12. Kovarik JM Beyer D Schmouder RL Everolimus drug interactions: application of a classification system for clinical decision making Biopharm Drug Dispos 2006 27 9 421 426 10.1002/bdd.524 16955532 13. Grabowsky JA Drug interactions and the pharmacist: focus on everolimus Ann Pharmacother 2013 47 7–8 1055 1063 10.1345/aph.1R769 23757385 14. Molenaar-Kuijsten L Van Balen DEM Beijnen JH Steeghs N Huitema ADR A review of CYP3A drug-drug interaction studies: practical guidelines for patients using targeted oral anticancer drugs Front Pharmacol 2021 12 670862 10.3389/fphar.2021.670862 34526892 15. Falkowski S Woillard J-B Therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus in oncology: evidences and perspectives Ther Drug Monit 2019 41 5 568 574 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000628 30913132 16. W Cheung , C Ligia , A Jappe , O. Anak. Pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of a single dose of everolimus (10 mg) administered with a low- or high-fat meal and under fasting conditions in healthy subjects. Meeting Abstract | 2011 Annual Meeting I. 2011. 17. Ravaud A Urva SR Grosch K Cheung WK Anak O Sellami DB Relationship between everolimus exposure and safety and efficacy: meta-analysis of clinical trials in oncology Eur J Cancer 2014 50 3 486 495 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.022 24332451 18. Hirabatake M Mizuno T Kato H Hashida T Everolimus pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship in Japanese patients with advanced breast cancer Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2019 75 9 1309 1318 31175385 19. Kovarik JM Beyer D Bizot MN Jiang Q Allison MJ Schmouder RL Pharmacokinetic interaction between verapamil and everolimus in healthy subjects Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005 60 4 434 437 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02434.x 16187976 20. Kovarik JM Beyer D Bizot MN Jiang Q Shenouda M Schmouder RL Effect of multiple-dose erythromycin on everolimus pharmacokinetics Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005 61 1 35 38 10.1007/s00228-004-0866-5 15785960 21. Strobbe G Pannier D Sakji I Villain A Feutry F Marliot G Advantages of everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology when drug-drug interaction is suspected: a case report J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020 26 7 1743 1749 10.1177/1078155220904761 32070198 22. Miesner AR Ausman M Dagraedt B Zieminski J Probable drug interaction between everolimus and clarithromycin Ann Pharmacother 2016 50 8 689 690 10.1177/1060028016648342 27199495 23. Tran PN Pinter-Brown LC Everolimus-induced nephrotic syndrome precipitated by interaction with voriconazole in a patient with Hodgkin’s lymphoma J Clin Pharm Ther 2017 42 6 776 779 10.1111/jcpt.12572 28661568 24. Mir O Poinsignon V Arnedos M Delaloge S Paci A Pharmacokinetic interaction involving fenofibrate and everolimus Ann Oncol 2015 26 1 248 249 10.1093/annonc/mdu492 25361989 25. Verheijen RB Atrafi F Schellens JHM Beijnen JH Huitema ADR Mathijssen RHJ Steeghs N Pharmacokinetic optimization of everolimus dosing in oncology: a randomized crossover trial Clin Pharmacokinet 2018 57 637 644 10.1007/s40262-017-0582-9 28762135 26. Choueiri TK Escudier B Powles T Tannir NM Mainwaring PN Rini BI Hammers HJ Donskov F Roth BJ Peltola K Lee JL Heng DYC Schmidinger M Agarwal N Sternberg CN McDermott DF Aftab DT Hessel C Scheffold C Schwab G Hutson TE Pal S Motzer RJ METEOR investigators Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (METEOR): final results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 2016 17 7 917 927 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30107-3 27279544 27. Calvo E Escudier B Motzer RJ Everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: subgroup analysis of patients with 1 or 2 previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies enrolled in the phase III RECORD-1 study Eur J Cancer 2012 48 3 333 339 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.027 22209391 28. Motzer RJ Lenvatinib, everolimus, and the combination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial Lancet Oncol 2015 16 15 1473 1482 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00290-9 26482279