==== Front BMC Neurol BMC Neurol BMC Neurology 1471-2377 BioMed Central London 3298 10.1186/s12883-023-03298-0 Study Protocol Study protocol for an online lifestyle modification education course for people living with multiple sclerosis: the multiple sclerosis online course (MSOC) Reece Jeanette C 1 Yu Maggie 1 Bevens William 1 Simpson-Yap Steve 12 Jelinek George 1 Jelinek Pia 1 Davenport Rebekah 3 Nag Nupur 1 Gray Kathleen 4 Neate Sandra sandra.neate@unimelb.edu.au 1 1 grid.1008.9 0000 0001 2179 088X Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population & Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 3, 207 Bouverie St Carlton, Melbourne, VIC 3053 Australia 2 grid.1009.8 0000 0004 1936 826X Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia 3 grid.1008.9 0000 0001 2179 088X Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 4 grid.1008.9 0000 0001 2179 088X Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 29 6 2023 29 6 2023 2023 23 24919 4 2023 20 6 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Background People living with multiple sclerosis (plwMS) seek access to information on evidence-based lifestyle-related risk factors associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). As the internet has made delivery of lifestyle information increasingly accessible and cost-effective, we designed the Multiple Sclerosis Online Course (MSOC) to deliver a multimodal lifestyle modification program for plwMS. Two MS online courses were developed: the intervention course based on lifestyle recommendations of the Overcoming Multiple Sclerosis (OMS) program and the standard-care course representing standard lifestyle recommendations from other MS websites. We examined for feasibility in a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT), where satisfactory completion and accessibility were achieved across both study arms. From this success, a protocol for a larger RCT was developed to examine the effectiveness of MSOC in improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and other health outcomes in plwMS. Methods/design This single-blinded RCT will recruit n = 1,054 plwMS. Participants in the intervention arm will receive access to a MSOC with seven modules providing evidence-based information on the OMS program. Participants in the control group will receive access to a MSOC of identical format, with seven modules providing general MS-related information and lifestyle recommendations sourced from popular MS websites, e.g. MS societies. Participants will complete questionnaires at baseline and at 6, 12, and 30 months after course completion. The primary endpoint is HRQoL, as measured by MSQOL-54 (both physical and mental health domains) at 12 months following course completion. Secondary outcomes are changes to depression, anxiety, fatigue, disability, and self-efficacy as measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Patient-Determined Disease Steps and University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale, respectively, assessed at each timepoint. Further assessments will include quantitative post-course evaluation, adoption and maintenance of behaviour change from follow-up survey data, and qualitative analysis of participants’ outcomes and reasons for course completion or non-completion. Discussion This RCT aims to determine whether an online intervention course delivering evidence-based lifestyle modification recommendations based on the Overcoming Multiple Sclerosis program to plwMS is more effective at improving HRQoL, and other health outcomes post-intervention, compared with an online standard-care course. Trial registration This trial was registered prospectively with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, www.anzctr.org.au, identifier ACTRN12621001605886. Date of registration 25 November 2021. Keywords Multiple sclerosis Randomised controlled trial Multiple sclerosis online course Lifestyle Behaviour change Health-related quality of life issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 ==== Body pmcBackground Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune degenerative disease of the central nervous system estimated to affect approximately 2.8 million people worldwide, with rising incidence [1]. Over 230 genetic variants [2] and multiple environmental factors, in particular Epstein-Barr virus [3], have been associated with MS onset, and multiple clinical and environmental risk factors have been associated with disease progression [2]. Several observational studies indicate modification of lifestyle-related risk factors, including smoking cessation, high diet quality, physical activity, adequate vitamin D level and sun exposure, and stress reduction, are associated with improved health outcomes, including improved quality of life [4–9] and disability and symptom burden [10–12], and reduced relapse rate [13, 14], depressive symptoms [10, 15], and fatigue [10, 16]. Therefore, a program presenting information on modification of these lifestyle risk factors may represent an effective, low cost and low risk intervention that could potentially improve outcomes for people living with MS (plwMS). Previously, plwMS participating in an residential face-to-face lifestyle modification program based on the Overcoming MS (OMS) program [17], providing evidence-based recommendations regarding diet, exercise, stress management, sun exposure, and vitamin D [17], were found to have 11.3% and 19.5% improved overall quality of life at one and 5-year timepoints after workshop delivery, respectively [18]. Importantly, a study of a subgroup with more complete exposure and outcome data to the 3-year timepoint found that the participants demonstrated signifcantly improved health behaviours and reported clinically meaningful increases in quality of life at 1- and 3-year follow-up [19]. These findings suggest that participants at these face to face interventions implemented and sustained lifestyle changes and improvements in health outcomes were observed. However face-to-face interventions are resource-intensive and present multiple potential barriers to participation, including financial, geographical, and disease-specific factors such as fatigue and mobility impairment [20]. The COVID-19 pandemic also highlighted that travel may not always be possible, and there are barriers to face-to-face learning for plwMS such as potential medication-associated immunosuppression and infection risk. Existing online-based interventions have shown great efficacy at promoting positive lifestyle changes in a range of populations for a variety of medical conditions [21–26], including MS [27–30]. PlwMS are generally considered a highly motivated population who prioritise wellness and seek information on lifestyle [31], with favourable levels of engagement and retention demonstrated in learning programs both in the short- and long-term [32]. Therefore, alternative modes of delivery of education programs for plwMS such as an online resource could be both effective at delivering MS-related information and may overcome barriers of inaccessibility and cost. Currently there are few online resources available for plwMS regarding modification of lifestyle related risk factors. In addition, no MS-related online program has incorporated multiple risk factor modification recommendations into the one program, with previous online resources focused on interventions to increase MS-related knowledge and resilience [33] or single interventions such as physical activity [34, 35]. Moreover, none of the current MS-related online interventions have previously been tested for effectiveness in a large randomised controlled trial (RCT) with long-term follow-up. As a result, our research team, together with a community advisory group of plwMS and an industry partner, developed the Multiple Sclerosis Online Course (MSOC) to test a comprehensive online program providing lifestyle-related risk factor modification information to plwMS, with the aim of improving quality of life and other health outcomes in plwMS. We developed two novel MSOCs that were designed to provide MS-related knowledge and teach skills and strategies for multiple lifestyle modifications. We used the established behavioural change theory of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) based on four factors (self-efficacy, outcome expectations, goals and social-structural variables) [36], to assist participants to engage in health behaviour change [37]. The intervention course (IC) provides educational modules regarding the biological basis of MS and current best available evidence-based recommendations from the medical literature regarding diet, exercise, stress and stress-reducing activities, sunlight and vitamin D, omega 3, smoking cessation and alcohol intake based on the OMS program. The standard-care course (SCC) provides standard MS health recommendations from international MS websites. Both arms are identical in format and will be delivered in seven modules in an asynchronous manner via the same website. Information will be delivered multimodally via a mixture of written text, videos, and animations. The MSOC IC and SCC were piloted for feasibility in a small RCT (the MSOC-Feasibility RCT) of 31 plwMS from Australia, New Zealand, USA, UK, Ireland and Canada (The University of Melbourne HREC 1851781.1). This study found comparable and satisfactory participant engagement in both the IC and SCC, with participants reporting course content to be readily accessible and enjoyable across both study arms [38–40]. Information obtained from quantitative and qualitative analyses of data from the MSOC-Feasibility RCT was then used to inform the redevelopment of course content and recruitment strategies, based on identified motivations for participation, to enable the MSOC to be tested for effectiveness in a larger RCT (the MSOC-Effectiveness RCT). The MSOC-Effectiveness RCT aims to investigate the effect of the online education tool (MSOC) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and other health outcomes including depression, anxiety, fatigue, and disability in plwMS in the short- and long-term. Specifically, the MSOC-Effectiveness RCT will evaluate whether the MSOC IC results in improved HRQoL (the primary outcome) and other health outcomes (the secondary outcomes) compared with the MSOC SCC. Additionally, we will evaluate participants’ self-efficacy, engagement, adherence to lifestyle modification, course experience, and facilitators and barriers to course commencement and completion. Aims and hypotheses We hypothesise that participants completing either arm of the MSOC will have improved physical and mental HRQoL due to the adoption of healthier lifestyle behaviours that address lifestyle related risk factors. However, participants in the RCT IC arm compared with the SCC arm will: have clinically significant increased HRQoL at 6, 12 and 30 months, supporting previous reports of increased HRQoL following participation in a face-to-face lifestyle modification workshop based on the OMS program [19]. have clinically significant improvements in depression, anxiety, and fatigue at 6, 12 and 30 months. The cumulative effects of lifestyle modifications on reducing disability and relapses may not become evident until 30 months due to the time taken to reverse central inflammatory pathways [41]. adopt and adhere to some or all lifestyle recommendations in the short-term (6 and 12 months). In the SCC, there will be minimal changes in diet and physical exercise but there may be reduced smoking in current smokers. demonstrate significant increases in self-efficacy as determined by quantitative analyses, as the course development was based on SCT [36]. Additionally, qualitative analyses may identify increased self-efficacy, control and confidence by IC participants, as these attributes have previously been identified as mediators of SCT and behaviour change [37]. The aims of the MSOC-Effectiveness RCT are to assess and compare the following between IC and SCC arms: changes in HRQOL between baseline and the 6-, 12-, and 30-month follow-up (primary outcome). changes in other health outcomes (depression, anxiety, fatigue, disability, and self-efficacy) between baseline and the 6-, 12-, and 30-month follow-up (secondary outcomes). The secondary aims will be to: 3. assess changes in individual and collective lifestyle behaviours (defined as adherence to the recommended diet, omega-3 and vitamin D supplementation, moderate physical activity, sun exposure, and stress-reduction activities) between baseline and at the 6-, 12-, and 30-month follow-up. Additional aims will be to: 4. assess changes in self-efficacy between baseline and at the 6-, 12-, and 30-month follow-up. 5. assess participant feedback of course by post-course evaluation surveys. 6. explore participants’ self-efficacy, control and confidence, as well as the facilitators and barriers to course completion through qualitative interviewing of a subset of participants across both study arms. Methods/design The present study is a CONSORT-R compliant RCT that is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Registry (ACTRN12621001605886). The trial (named the MSOC-Effectiveness RCT) will be carried out as a single-blinded RCT study design comparing the MSOC IC and SCC. The 33-item Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines were followed in the development of the study protocol [43]. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. This study was approved by The University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics subcommittee (ID: 22,140). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Participants Participants will comprise people over the age of 18 years with a self-reported medically confirmed diagnosis of MS. Participants will be recruited online and the MSOC and questionnaires will be delivered online. Although participants will be internationally recruited, this is a single-site study as the study will be administered and conducted solely at the Neuroepidemiology Unit at the Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne. The single-site nature of the study guarantees that all participant data will be securely stored in one location, The University of Melbourne server. Patient and public involvement, and partnerships To ensure representation of the MS community during course design and development, a community advisory group was assembled by invitation through the Australian Facebook group ‘People Living with MS’. This group of volunteers, with representatives across MS types and disease duration, met face-to-face and online with one researcher (WB) throughout the study design and development phase. They discussed and assisted with decision-making regarding key features of the MSOC including design, content, and delivery. The MSOC was then developed in partnership with this community advisory group, the research team, and a web design and development partner. Participant recruitment Participant recruitment will be via online invitations published on MS society websites throughout Australia, New Zealand, USA, UK, Ireland, and Canada, and via Facebook support groups (e.g., MS Peer Support Group), research newsletters (e.g., Clinical Trials Australia), and Instagram. Study news and information were posted on a study Facebook page available to the public (https://www.facebook/MSOCresearch). Interested participants will provide their name, email address, and answer two questions; (1) I am over 18 years of age (yes or no) and (2) I have a neurologist’s diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (yes or no). Participants will be screened for eligibility on the registration website. Inclusion criteria Be 18 years old or over; Have a neurologist-confirmed diagnosis of MS. Exclusion criteria Participants fulfilling the following criteria will be able to complete the course but will not be utilised in analyses. Experiencing any serious comorbid chronic illness or neurological illness/injury other than MS that would threaten regular participation or significantly affect the outcome measures in its own right, such as motor neurone disease or stroke, as determined by the study investigators; Currently participating in another RCT. Participant information sheet Information regarding the nature of the RCT was provided in a participant information sheet provided to plwMS interested in participating in the RCT. This information outlines that two courses have been developed (an IC and SCC), and the RCT aims to test the effectiveness of the IC, and that participants will be randomised to one of the two courses and remain blinded to their allocation. Randomisation Study advertisements will contain a link to the study landing webpage (https://www.msonlinecourse.com.au/). There, the registration form requires the name and email address and asks questions assessing inclusion criteria. Those meeting the inclusion criteria will be registered as ‘pending’ participants and emailed a link to set up a password to the course. Registered participants will be assigned to either the IC or SCC group at a ratio of 1:1 using simple randomisation. The randomisation sequence is computer-generated and implemented through the course website (https://app.msonlinecourse.com.au/). Baseline assessment and consent Upon account setup, participants can access the ‘Welcome to the MSOC study’ module in the course platform (https://app.msonlinecourse.com.au/login). The Welcome to the MSOC study module contains the Plain Language Statement and a link to the baseline survey (https://melbourneuni.au1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cHNCN0bwKWn3cq2) which participants are encouraged to complete before the course starts. Participants are asked to affirm their consent to participate in the research study on the first page of the baseline survey. The baseline survey comprises 166 questions and has been estimated to take 45–60 min to complete. This survey queries participant demographics, health behaviours, and clinical outcome measures, and will form the baseline data which subsequent data will be compared with. Participants can commence Module 1 (‘Welcome to the MSOC study’) after completing the baseline survey (Table 1). Table 1 Summary of recommendations of the Intervention Course (IC) arms and Standard Care Course (SCC) arms Week Modules IC content and recommendations SCC content and recommendations 1 1. Introduction to the course Welcome to the course, including how to proceed, and navigate what to expect, and to outline the endpoints for participants. An overview of MS will also be provided. Welcome to the course, including how to proceed, how to navigate, what to expect, and to outline the endpoints for participants. An overview of MS will also be provided. 2. Eat well Evidence behind the role of diet in MS risk, disease activity, and QOL, including saturated fat and its relationships with MS onset and progression. Recommends a plant-based wholefood diet plus seafood, with < 20 g/day saturated fat, as well as omega-3 fatty acid supplement use, or 20–40 ml of flaxseed oil (or equivalent) per day. Evidence supporting moderate caffeine and alcohol intake in MS Information regarding the importance of a balanced diet. Public Health England Eatwell guide presented. Information from the US National MS society presenting a selection of diets used by people with MS including gluten free, Palaeolithic diet, McDougal diet, Mediterranean diet and Swank diet. Alcohol consumption should follow national guidelines. 2 3. Sunlight and vitamin D Detailed information about how vitamin D is made from skin exposure to sunlight, along with evidence supporting the potential role of vitamin D in MS risk and progression Recommendations for optimal levels of vitamin D supplementation and blood levels are presented. Recommends sun exposure of at least 15 min per day, 3–5 times a week, and vitamin D3 supplement use of at least 5,000 IU per day. Information regarding Vitamin D and MS development, latitude gradient of MS and how the body produce vitamin D from sunlight. No specific recommendations on sun exposure or supplementation described. Three options presented: wait until more information is available, supplement ‘blindly’ or supplement if blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are low. 4. Exercise The benefits of exercise (neurological, cognitive, physical), how and why to implement an exercise plan with video examples provided. Recommends 20–30 min, 5 times/week exercise outdoor preferably. Presented the critical role exercise plays in MS. Recommend 30 min or more of moderate aerobic activity and strength training at least twice per week 3 5. Meditation and use the mind-body connection Introduction to mental health and relevance in MS, to the science behind stress and its link to inflammation/MS. Mind-body connection, meditation and other stress reduction techniques along with a guided meditation video are delivered along with how to develop a mental health and wellbeing improvement strategy. Recommends 30 min or more of daily meditation. No conclusive link between stress and MS, as the evidence to date is contradictory. Introduction to the associations between MS and chronic distress and stressful life events. 6. Medication and family prevention Genetic, smoking, dietary and vitamin D related risks in MS development/progression. MS and pregnancy and breast feeding. Role of medication in MS discussed. Recommends minimize risks to self, family and during pregnancy via diet and vitamin D, no tobacco smoking and avoid passive smoke exposure Genetic risk of getting MS. Smoking increases the risk of MS. The role of medication in MS discussed. 4 7. Review and consolidation Program overview and recap, and an outline of next steps to take. Follow-up questionnaires for longitudinal follow-up discussed and participants asked to complete, and link to forums for further engagement (aimed at enhancing retention). Concluding remarks and closing ceremony. Program overview and recap. Follow-up questionnaires for longitudinal follow-up discussed and participants asked to complete, and link to forums for further engagement (aimed at enhancing retention). 5/6 Catch-up Participants have 2 weeks to complete any modules missed. Participants have 2 weeks to complete any modules missed. Study arms Intervention vs. standard care course The IC and SCC were each designed and developed by the research team. The study arms differed only in content as shown in a summary of course material presented in the separate study arms (Table 1). Both courses are delivered in 7-module, self-administered programs in an asynchronous manner over a 6-week period. Modules are released as per a pre-defined schedule, 2 modules per week for 3 weeks and one module in week 4, with 2 weeks added for completion. Future modules are gated until completion of preceding modules, but completed modules are available for review throughout the entire 6-week period. Intervention course content The IC content was adapted from the evidence-based lifestyle modification program, the OMS program [17]. Content across the seven modules includes an introduction to MS pathophysiology followed by the lifestyle recommendations: diet, exercise, stress and stress-reducing activities, sunlight and vitamin D, omega 3, smoking cessation, moderate alcohol intake. Additionally, there is a module with information to assist in preventing MS in family members. (Table 1) Standard care course content The content of the SCC was sourced entirely from MS Society websites in the public domain, including Multiple Sclerosis Australia, Multiple Sclerosis Research Australia, National MS Society, Multiple Sclerosis Society UK, Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada with text, video, and image/animation content compiled into modules to mirror the IC modules. The SCC aims to reproduce the advice that plwMS typically receive during medical consultations and online advice from MS Societies (Table 1). In both the IC and SCC, participants can create their own profiles with photos and any personal information they wish to share for purposes of building of an online community. Community insights deliver results of polls of participants motivations to undertake the MSOC and where they heard about the study from within modules for interest only. A community forum is moderated by one researcher in each arm where participants are encouraged to engage with the moderator and other participants, ask questions, and share experiences. A resources tab enables the sharing of interesting resources. Outcomes and assessments The number of questions asked of participants and the timing of these queries is described in Table 2. Table 2 Number and timing of querying of demographics, exposures and outcomes Timeframe after completion of MSOC Assessment/Measure No. Questions Screening Baseline Completion One month 6 months 12 months 30 months Informed consent 1 X Demographics Age 1 X X MS type diagnosed 2 X X X X X MS duration 2 X X X X X Do you follow a MS-specific lifestyle program? 2 X X X X X Do you follow a MS-specific diet 2 X X X X X Sex and gender 2 X Residential address and country 1 X X Country of birth 1 X Height/weight 2 X X X X Comorbidities (yes and specify) 2 X X X X Marital status 1 X X X X Education 1 X Employment status 1 X X X X Alcohol and smoking 5 X X X X Medications 4 X X X X Perceived Social Support 12 X X X X Exposures Physical activity: IPAQ-SF 7 X X X X Meditation: MAQ 3 X X X X Sun exposure 4 X X X X Diet quality: DHQ 22 X X X X Consumption of meat or dairy 2 X X X X Omega-3 intake: dose, frequency 2 X X X X Vitamin D intake: dose, frequency 2 X X X X Health outcomes HRQOL: MSQOL-54 54 X X X X Disability: PDDS 1 X X X X Anxiety and depression: HADS 14 X X X X Fatigue: FSS 9 X X X X Self-efficacy: UWSE-6 6 X X X X Qualitative interviewing (7) X X If clinically significant improvement in HRQOL subset scores in Intervention group from baseline, we will consider an amendment to the RCT to provide participants in the SCC access to the IC X If no clinically significant improvement in HRQOL subset scores in IC from baseline, the RCT will not be amended X Total no. quantitative data questions 166 154 162 158 (not including qualitative) Quantitative assessments of exposures and outcomes Participants will complete a baseline questionnaire at the commencement of the course. The same questionnaire will be administered 6-, 12-, and 30-months after course completion. Demographics Demographic data date of birth, sex, self-defined gender, current location of residence, country of birth, cultural background (Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic Groups [44]), highest education level, marital status, and employment status will be queried. Exposures Body mass index (BMI; weight/height2) calculated from self-reported height (cm or in) and weight (kg or lb.) and categorised according to World Health Organisation cut-offs [45]. Diet quality measured using a modified DHQ [46], with three questions related to salt and alcohol intake and one on alcohol omitted, as described previously [4, 8, 47]. For questions related to meat consumption and the trimming of fat from meat and the frequency of consuming processed meat, an option of “I do not consume meat” was added. An option of “I do not consume dairy” for the question related to low-fat dairy intake was also added. These questions enable dichotomous terms for meat and dairy consumption to be generated. Responses for each DHQ question are scored and summated and the total DHQ score expressed as a scores of 100. In addition to the total DHQ score, 8 subscores are calculated and expressed as scores out of 100: Cereal, Fruit/Vegetable, Takeaway foods, Fat, Omega-3, Fibre, Food Choices, and Food Preparation. Physical activity measured using the 7-item International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) used in other MS studies [48], to estimate the frequency and duration of vigorous and moderate intensity activities, as well as walking. Total physical activity is measured by weighting each type of activity according to respective energy requirements defined by METs (multiples of the resting metabolic rate). MET estimates of IPAQ are categorised as Inactive, Minimally Active, and Active according to IPAQ guidelines [48]. Omega-3 and vitamin D supplementation type and daily dosage of omega-3 supplementation used on average in the last 6 months will be queried. Types of omega-3 supplementation include fish oil, high potency fish oil, and plant-based omega-3 sources such as flaxseed oil. Vitamin D supplementation is queried by dosage and frequency of vitamin D supplement intake. Sun exposure number of days per week and average duration of time (none, 1–15 min to > 60 min) spent in summer and winter. Participants will also be asked whether they deliberately increased their sun exposure with the goal of increasing their vitamin D levels. Tobacco smoking and alcohol assessed by querying self-reported tobacco smoking status (never/ex-smoker/current smoker) by querying age of commencing smoking, numbers of cigarettes smoked per day (< 1 to > 20), and for ex-smokers, age of smoking cessation (< 6 months to 10 years or longer). Alcohol consumption frequency (15 categories from never drank alcohol to everyday) and quantity (11 categories of average number of standard drinks from 0 to 10 + when drinking alcohol) will be queried and then categorised as none/limited/heavy according to World Health Organisation cut-offs [49]. Stress management two questions of the Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ) [50], a 6-item subset of the main questionnaire, will be used to measure the type and frequency of meditation. Health outcomes HRQoL HRQoL will be measured by MSQOL-54 which has been psychometrically validated in plwMS and will be used to assess a spectrum of HRQOL outcomes. The two primary outcome measures will be change in Physical Health Composite (PHC) and Mental Health Composite (MHC), estimated from MSQOL-54 scores of relevant subscales as per MSQOL-54 guidelines [51]. Although minimal clinically important differences have not been established for the MSQOL-54 composite scores, differences of at least five points have previously been determined as the minimum clinically meaningful change in a HRQOL measure [52, 53]. This is based on recommendations that a difference equivalent to half the standard deviation be universally considered an important magnitude for all HRQOL tools [54]. Fatigue Clinically significant fatigue will be assessed by the 9-item Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) [55]. The FSS has good internal consistency, stability, and sensitivity to change over time [56, 57]. A mean score > 5 is widely used for plwMS to indicate clinically significant fatigue [57–59]. A meaningful change in the FSS has been reported as a change of ≥ 1.9 points in plwMS [60] and will be considered clinically meaningful here. Anxiety and depression The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [61] will be used to assess the presence and severity of anxiety and depression symptoms and provides scores for anxiety and depression, with a 2-point change in subscores indicating a clinically relevant change [62]. Patient-reported disability Disability will be assessed using the Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) [63], a self-reported measure of ambulatory disability that correlates well with the Expanded Disability Status Scale [64]. The PDDS is considered a practical tool to assess changes in disability over time and scored ordinally from 0 (normal) to 8 (bed bound) with detailed descriptors [65]. One step will be considered a clinically meaningful change in the PDDS. PDDS will also be used to estimate the disease duration-adjusted Patient-determined MS Severity Score (P-MSSS) [66] that will be evaluated as both a continuous and categorised variable [normal/mild (P-MSSS ≤ 3), moderate (P-MSSS > 3–6), and severe (P-MSSS > 6)]. Self-efficacy Self-efficacy, the perception that behaviour change could result in improved outcomes and personal recognition that people have the ability to bring about behaviour change [37], has been recognised as an important component of behaviour change. Self-efficacy will be measured using the University of Washington Self-Efficacy (UWSE) survey, a psychometrically sound instrument that includes 6 items and which has been validated in plwMS [67]. Self-efficacy using the UWSE-6 will be assessed as a continuous term and dichotomised at the median as there is no established cut off point indicating sufficient self-efficacy. Other clinical characteristics MS type will be queried as benign/relapsing-remitting/secondary-progressive/primary-progresive/progressive-relapsing or unsure. Date of MS diagnosis and disease onset will be queried and used to calculate disease duration from MS diagnosis and onset, respectively. At baseline, number of treated comorbidities will be queried using the Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire [68]. Medications Medications used will be queried, including currently used disease modulating therapies (DMTs) immunomodulatory medications for MS (alemtuzumab, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, interferon-beta, laquinimod, natalizumab, rituximab, teriflunomide, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and other DMT), as well as prescription antidepressant, medications used for fatigue, and anxiolytic/sedative medications. Quantitative assessment of course completion and satisfaction A 5-minute evaluation survey will be emailed to registered participants at the completion of the course to rate their experience with the study. Participants are first asked if they have (1) started and (2) (if started) completed the course. Three series of questions are then asked depending on their answers: non-starters, non-completers, and completers. Non-starters: barriers to commencement Participants who did not start the course are asked: Barriers or issues that hindered you from starting the course [e.g., technical issues, difficulty with the enrolment process, MS-related health issues, or/and other (specify)] Non-completers: barriers, satisfaction, and outcomes Participants who started the course but did not complete the modules are asked: Barriers or issues that hindered you from completing the course [e.g., technical issues, irrelevant course content, content not pitched at a suitable level, course presentation, health, time, family, or work issues, or/and other (specify)] Course evaluation: The overall experience of the course. How likely are you to recommend the course to a family/friend with MS? Topics about which you would have liked some or additional information. Participation in and usefulness of forums. How familiar were you with the content of each module prior to the course? How likely are you to change each lifestyle behaviour in the course modules (e.g., diet, exercise) because of taking the course? Completers: motivation, satisfaction, and outcomes Questions for participants who completed the course include: Where did you first hear about the study (e.g., MS society websites). Motivations for completing the course (e.g., to gain information MS and/or lifestyle behaviour, opportunity to participate in MS research, etc.) Course evaluation: The overall experience of the course. How likely are you to recommend the course to a family/friend with MS? Topics about which you would have liked some or additional information. Participation and usefulness of forums. How familiar were you with the content prior to the course? How likely are you to change lifestyle behaviours (e.g., diet, exercise) because of completing the course? Qualitative assessments Two qualitative studies, using semi-structured interviews, will be conducted as part of the broader project, which aim to explore participants’ self-efficacy, control and confidence, as well as the facilitators and barriers to course completion through qualitative interviewing of a subset of participants across both study arms. Course completers: motivation and outcomes The first qualitative study is an investigation of the motivations and outcomes experienced by participants who completed the course. Eligibility includes completion of the MSOC and the baseline and post-course evaluation surveys. Interviews will be undertaken 4–8 weeks and then 12 months after completing the course. Eligible participants from the IC and SCC arms will receive an email requesting their participation in a 30–60 min semi-structured interview until there are approximately 25 interviewees from each arm. Interviews will be conducted online by four trained interviewers. The 4–8-week interview will cover the following domains: Participants’ motivations to undertake the course. Views about the content of the course. Description of modification of lifestyle behaviors undertaken since course completion. Changes in self-efficacy including changes to motivation, confidence, control, and attitudes to MS. Changes in perceptions of wellbeing, and physical and mental health. Engagement with the community forum. The 12-month interview will cover the following domains: Adoption and maintenance of lifestyle recommendations of respective courses. Changes in self-efficacy including changes to motivation, confidence, control and attitudes to MS. Changes in perceptions of wellbeing, and physical and mental health. Course non-completers: reasons for non-completion The second qualitative study will explore reasons for non-completion of the MSOC at different timepoints. Interviews will be undertaken at the completion of the 6-week course (to give all participants the opportunity to start and complete the course within the 6-week period that the course is running). For this analysis, purposive sampling will be used to engage with participants in four distinct categories from participants in the IC and SCC arms: Signed up but did not create a profile. Created a profile but did not commence the course. Created a profile but only completed module 1. Created a profile but only completed module 2. These interviews will cover the domains: Reasons for non-completion. Motivations and expectations of the course. Digital health experience and literacy. How people gather information about MS. Strategies/MSOC amendments how the course could be improved to increase completion rates. The flow chart of the conduct of the RCT and follow up assessments is shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1 Flow-chart of RCT MS - multiple sclerosis; IC - intervention course; SCC - standard care course; PLS - plain language statement Data collection, management, and analysis Quantitative data Analytic data will be collected via the backend of the course platform and Google Analytics. Excel files of administrative data such as number of participant logins and course progress will be downloaded from the course platform (https://app.msonlinecourse.com.au/admin/). Google Analytics also provides data tracking on how participants interact with the online course, such as average time spent per page, what interactive elements participants engaged with, and what pages participants commonly exited the course on, among others. The analytics integrated into the platform itself will allow investigators to analyse the number of participants that drop out over the length of the course and at what points they do so. Exposures and health outcome quantitative data will be collected via validated questionnaires completed by participants at specified timepoints (Fig. 1; Table 1). Participants who experienced another comorbid chronic illness other than MS or participated in another lifestyle intervention will be excluded from analysis. Sample size Numbers of participants necessary for sufficient statistical power (80%) were calculated to detect a 5-point difference in the PHC and MHC between the IC and SCC. To further account for loss-to-follow-up across the study period, based upon results from the MSOC-Feasibility RCT, we anticipate a 42% loss-to-follow-up between randomisation and 12-month follow-up. It is likely this is an overestimate of what will be observed in the proposed MSOC–Effectiveness RCT due to redevelopment of the MSOC based upon feasibility data. Taking these factors into account, we estimate 1,054 participants, 527 in each arm (1:1 allocation) with data at baseline and follow-up would give 80% power to detect a 5-point change in HRQOL across both PHC and MHC, allowing for 42% attrition. This estimation of power was undertaken with Bonferroni correction and is based on the mean (and SD) of PHC and MHC scores between groups at baseline. Statistical methods Linear regression will be used to determine cross-sectional and prospective relationships with HRQOL. Characteristics of disability will be assessed using linear regression. Characteristics of dichotomous clinically significant fatigue, depression, and anxiety, will be assessed by log-binomial regression. Characteristics of self-efficacy composite scores will be assessed by linear and log-binomial regression for continuous and dichotomised terms, respectively. All models will be assessed for potential confounders and appropriate adjustments will be made in analyses. Qualitative data Participants will be invited by email to participate in a 30-45-minute researcher-developed qualitative interview, commencing four weeks after course completion. Interviews will be conducted via telephone or video conference. Audio recordings of interviews will be de-identified and transcribed for analysis via voice recognition software (www.temi.com), edited by researchers and stored securely on The University of Melbourne server. Nvivo Software (www.qsrinternational.com) will be used to facilitate data management. Data analysis will be conducted within a qualitative paradigm using reflexive thematic analysis [69]. Reflexive thematic analysis is considered the most appropriate analytic process due its lack of grounding in a particular philosophy [70], and as a method suitable to exploring people’s experiences, views, and perceptions, and allowing expression of results in a way accessible to those in the wider community [71]. Reflexive thematic analysis also emphasises the importance of the researcher being deeply involved in the research. Data will be analysed by the process of data familiarisation, coding, and theme development and refining. Data extracts (quotes) will illustrate themes. Trial status The RCT was registered at Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621001605886) on 25 November 2021. Protocol version 4.0, dated 16 March 2023. Recruitment commenced on 23 June 2022. As of June 2023, four rounds of recruitment for participants in the MSOC trial have been completed, and further rounds will be scheduled until the estimated sample size is fulfilled. Recruitment for qualitative evaluation will occur in June and December 2023. Discussion The MSOC was developed to translate an intensive face-to-face residential workshop delivering lifestyle modifications based on the OMS program for plwMS into an online format to overcome resource and accessibility barriers. We outline the protocol of a large international RCT aimed to examine the effectiveness of the MSOC in improving HRQoL (the primary outcome) and other health outcomes (the secondary outcomes) in the IC compared with the SCC. The MSOC is the only online education resource providing information on comprehensive lifestyle-related risk factor modification available and this RCT will be the first to examine the long-term effects of the online intervention on HRQoL and other health outcomes in quantitative analyses. Additionally, qualitative analyses will explore participants’ self-efficacy, control and confidence, as well as the facilitators and barriers to course completion. Before commencing online course development, a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs (n = 32) describing digital health self-management interventions for plwMS was conducted to inform likely participant attrition. The pooled attrition rates for the intervention and control arms were 14.7% and 15.6%, respectively [72], demonstrating no significant difference in attrition between groups. A second systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of lifestyle interventions in other chronic diseases found no evidence of differential attrition between intervention and control arms, increasing confidence in conducting such studies with minimal potential of attrition bias [73]. After development of the MSOC, the pilot feasibility study (MSOC-Feasibility RCT) was conducted to quantitatively assess the feasibility of the MSOC using Likert scales [39] and found the MSOC performed well in accessibility, learnability, and desirability domains. Analysis of the primary outcome of feasibility (whether plwMS completed the MSOC) found 59% completion rates in the IC arm vs. 50% in the SCC arm, which confirmed course feasibility. Qualitative analysis of participant interviews indicated that several had implemented some lifestyle behaviour recommendations, however differences between the IC and SCC were not examined [38, 40]. Collectively, these results were used to inform the course redevelopment and recruitment strategies. The present RCT was designed to assess differences in HRQoL and health outcomes between participants in the IC compared with the SCC. However, design of this RCT presented challenges. As information provided in the IC is freely available on the internet, there is the possibility of contamination of information to those in the SCC. A further issue may arise, because in some peoples’ eyes, participants in the SCC may be denied access to the best standard of care available or, in this case, the most up-to-date and complete knowledge base. However, we argue that the information provided in the IC has not been previously proven in an RCT to be more effective at improving health outcomes than the information in the SCC. Hence, we will conduct the present RCT to address this question. Further, as it is generally considered that if a state of ‘clinical equipoise’ exists, where there is a state of ‘honest professional disagreement’ among healthcare professionals about which treatment (in this case, knowledge) is best [74], then randomisation to the SCC arm will constitute a ‘fair bet’ that both arms are a priori equally valuable [75]. As such, the concept of clinical equipoise was adopted by the researchers to ethically rationalise the randomisation process. All SCC participants will be provided with a link to the IC at trial completion to ensure that all participants have access to the IC. Moreover, consent to participate in the RCT will be voluntary and participants will be adequately informed [76]. While the concept of adequate information is difficult to define, and should generally include the understanding of the risks and benefits of the IC and also the concept of blinding and randomisation [76], participants will be provided with all the information practically possible in the participant information sheet for informed consent, while also balancing the risk of patient unblinding, as supported by the approval of the Human Research Ethics Committee [75]. HRQoL was chosen as a primary endpoint for several reasons. We acknowledge that HRQoL may be influenced by factors not related to lifestyle changes. However, HRQoL has been used extensively as a patient-reported outcome measure in MS-related observational studies [8, 18, 19, 77, 78] and is a well-established measure in MS-related clinical trials [79]. Further, observational studies of heterogeneous MS cohorts found lifestyle risk factors were robustly associated with HRQoL, independent of other factors such as disability, fatigue, and relapse rate [8, 80]. Studies indicate HRQoL assessments are a broader measure of the impact of MS than tools measuring MS activity, and can identify elements of disease not considered by standard clinical tools [9, 79]. As the MSOC is a participant-centred intervention which aims to empower plwMS to self-manage their MS, HRQoL was considered a suitable primary outcome as it enables comprehensive measures of the effect of the disease, including aspects of health that cannot be evaluated using observer-based or clinical outcome measures. Importantly, HRQoL is most likely to show material and significant differences in the allotted timeframe of the study. Participants from the MSOC-feasibility trial who participated in two focus groups emphasised the importance of examining wellbeing and HRQoL in future studies (in addition to monitoring MS symptoms), further justifying HRQoL as a primary outcome [38]. However, changes in other clinical outcomes, such as disability and relapse rates, which are expected to take longer due to the time taken to affect relevant biological and inflammatory pathways [41], will also be examined. Notably, while acknowledging both HRQoL and other health outcomes may be influenced by factors not related to lifestyle changes, we anticipate the randomisation process will ensure factors not related to lifestyle will be equally represented between the IC and SCC groups. Conclusion PlwMS have expressed the need for more information on lifestyle modification [81], and an online course could assist in providing consistent, comprehensive and consolidated information and in overcoming resource and accessibility barriers to provide this information. This RCT protocol ultimately aims to examine whether the MSOC is effective at improving the HRQoL and other health outcomes in plwMS. If found to be effective at one or more of these outcomes, the online IC will be made freely available via an MS charitable organisation which could be of immense benefit to members of the MS community. In the event there is minimal or no improvement in health outcomes, the quantitative and qualitative analyses performed as part of this study may inform future MS-related online course development. Acknowledgements The MSOC was developed and feasibility tested as part of Dr Will Bevens’ PhD project, undertaken within the Neuroepidemiology Unit, the University of Melbourne. The systematic reviews and meta-analyses underpinning the development of the MSOC were also undertaken as part of the PhD project. Dr Bevens’ co-authors acknowledge his enormous contribution to this trial. We thank the plwMS who have participated in our community advisory group, participants in the MSOC Feasibility Trial, those who participated in qualitative interviews post feasibility testing and those people currently participating in the MSOC Effectiveness RCT. We thank our industry partners, JMA Creative, who created the platform and developed content. We express our gratitude to the Overcoming MS Charity (UK) who financially supported the technical development of the MSOC via JMA Creative. Authors’ contributions All authors contributed to the conception and/or design of the study protocol. W.B., G.J. and S.N. designed the materials for the interventions. J.C.R., S.N., M.Y., W.B., R.D, and P.J. are investigators on this trial. J.C.R drafted the protocol. J.C.R. and S.N. drafted the original manuscript. All authors reviewed, edited and approved the final manuscript. Funding This project is funded by the Neuroepidemiology Unit at The University of Melbourne which is funded by publicly anonymous philanthropic funders. Data Availability Not applicable. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. This study was approved by The University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics subcommittee (ID: 22140). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests GAJ is the author of “Overcoming Multiple Sclerosis”. GAJ and SN are co-editors of “Overcoming Multiple Sclerosis Handbook. Roadmap to Good Health”, and facilitators of past residential lifestyle modification workshops. PJ is a contributor to “Overcoming Multiple Sclerosis Handbook. Roadmap to Good Health”. The other authors declare no competing interests. Abbreviations DHQ Dietary Habits Questionnaire FSS Fatigue Severity Scale HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HRQoL Health Related Quality of life IPAQ-SF International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form MAQ Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire MHC Mental Health Composite MS Multiple Sclerosis MSOC Multiple Sclerosis Online Course MSPSS Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support PDDS Patient-Determined Disease Steps PHC Physical Health Composite PlwMS People living with multiple sclerosis QoL Quality of life RCT randomised controlled trial UWSE University of Washington Self-Efficacy Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. ==== Refs References 1. Walton C King R Rechtman L Kaye W Leray E Marrie RA Robertson N La Rocca N Uitdehaag B Van Der Mei I Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition Multiple Scler J 2020 26 14 1816 21 10.1177/1352458520970841 2. Zarghami A Li Y Claflin SB van der Mei I Taylor BV Role of environmental factors in multiple sclerosis Expert Rev Neurother 2021 21 12 1389 408 10.1080/14737175.2021.1978843 34494502 3. Soldan SS, Lieberman PM. Epstein–Barr virus and multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2022. 4. Hadgkiss EJ Jelinek GA Weiland TJ Pereira NG Marck CH van der Meer DM The association of diet with quality of life, disability, and relapse rate in an international sample of people with multiple sclerosis Nutr Neurosci 2015 18 3 125 36 10.1179/1476830514Y.0000000117 24628020 5. Marck CH Hadgkiss EJ Weiland TJ van der Meer DM Pereira NG Jelinek GA Physical activity and associated levels of disability and quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: a large international survey BMC Neurol 2014 14 143 10.1186/1471-2377-14-143 25016312 6. Jelinek GA Hadgkiss EJ Weiland TJ Pereira NG Marck CH van der Meer DM Association of fish consumption and omega 3 supplementation with quality of life, disability and disease activity in an international cohort of people with multiple sclerosis Int J Neurosci 2013 123 11 792 800 10.3109/00207454.2013.803104 23713615 7. Marck CH Probst Y Chen J Taylor B van der Mei I Dietary patterns and associations with health outcomes in australian people with multiple sclerosis Eur J Clin Nutr 2021 75 1506 14 10.1038/s41430-021-00864-y 33531638 8. Simpson-Yap S Nag N Probst Y Reece JC Jelinek GA Neate S Prospective associations of better quality of the diet with improved quality of life over 7.5 years in people with multiple sclerosis Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022 60 103710 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103710 35219239 9. Jelinek GA De Livera AM Marck CH Brown CR Neate SL Taylor KL Weiland TJ Lifestyle, medication and socio-demographic determinants of mental and physical health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis BMC Neurol 2016 16 1 235 10.1186/s12883-016-0763-4 27876009 10. Fitzgerald KC Tyry T Salter A Cofield SS Cutter G Fox R Marrie RA Diet quality is associated with disability and symptom severity in multiple sclerosis Neurology 2018 90 1 e1 e11 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004768 29212827 11. Jelinek GA De Livera AM Marck CH Brown CR Neate SL Taylor KL Weiland TJ Associations of Lifestyle, Medication, and Socio-Demographic factors with disability in people with multiple sclerosis: an International Cross-Sectional Study PLoS ONE 2016 11 8 e0161701 10.1371/journal.pone.0161701 27560626 12. Simpson-Yap S, Nag N, Probst Y, Jelinek G, Neate S. Higher-quality diet and non-consumption of meat are associated with less self-determined disability progression in people with multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal cohort study. Eur J Neurol 2021. 13. D’Hooghe MB Nagels G Bissay V De Keyser J Modifiable factors influencing relapses and disability in multiple sclerosis Mult Scler 2010 16 7 773 85 10.1177/1352458510367721 20483884 14. Simpson-Yap S Oddy WH Taylor B Lucas RM Black LJ Ponsonby AL Blizzard L van der Mei I Ausimmune/AusLong investigators G: high prudent diet factor score predicts lower relapse hazard in early multiple sclerosis Mult Scler 2021 27 7 1112 24 10.1177/1352458520943087 32701031 15. Taylor KL Simpson S Jr Jelinek GA Neate SL De Livera AM Brown CR O’Kearney E Marck CH Weiland TJ Longitudinal Associations of modifiable lifestyle factors with positive depression-screen over 2.5-Years in an International Cohort of People living with multiple sclerosis Front Psychiatry 2018 9 526 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00526 30425659 16. Weiland TJ Jelinek GA Marck CH Hadgkiss EJ van der Meer DM Pereira NG Taylor KL Clinically significant fatigue: prevalence and associated factors in an international sample of adults with multiple sclerosis recruited via the internet PLoS ONE 2015 10 2 e0115541 10.1371/journal.pone.0115541 25692993 17. Jelinek GA. Overcoming Multiple Sclerosis, The evidence-based 7 step recovery program, 2nd edition edn. 83 Alexander Street, Crows Nest NSW 2065 Australia: Allen and Unwin; 2016. 18. Hadgkiss EJ Jelinek GA Weiland TJ Rumbold G Mackinlay CA Gutbrod S Gawler I Health-related quality of life outcomes at 1 and 5 years after a residential retreat promoting lifestyle modification for people with multiple sclerosis Neurol Sci 2013 34 2 187 95 10.1007/s10072-012-0982-4 22367222 19. Marck CH De Livera AM Brown CR Neate SL Taylor KL Weiland TJ Hadgkiss EJ Jelinek GA Health outcomes and adherence to a healthy lifestyle after a multimodal intervention in people with multiple sclerosis: three year follow-up PLoS ONE 2018 13 5 e0197759 10.1371/journal.pone.0197759 29791509 20. Liyanagunawardena TR Aboshady OA Massive open online courses: a resource for health education in developing countries Global Health Promotion 2018 25 3 74 6 10.1177/1757975916680970 28134014 21. Kohl LFM Crutzen R de Vries NK Online Prevention aimed at Lifestyle Behaviors: a systematic review of reviews J Med Internet Res 2013 15 7 e146 10.2196/jmir.2665 23859884 22. Olson CM Behavioral Nutrition Interventions using e- and m-Health Communication Technologies: a narrative review Annu Rev Nutr 2016 36 1 647 64 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071715-050815 27022772 23. Knittle K, Nurmi J, Crutzen R, Hankonen N, Beattie M, Dombrowski SU. How can interventions increase motivation for physical activity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 2018:1–48. 24. Bardus M Smith JR Samaha L Abraham C Mobile and web 2.0 interventions for weight management: an overview of review evidence and its methodological quality Eur J Pub Health 2016 26 4 602 10 10.1093/eurpub/ckw090 27335330 25. Bossen D Veenhof C Dekker J de Bakker D The effectiveness of self-guided web-based physical activity interventions among patients with a chronic disease: a systematic review J Phys Activity Health 2014 11 3 665 77 10.1123/jpah.2012-0152 26. Neve M Morgan PJ Jones PR Collins CE Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis Obes Rev 2010 11 4 306 21 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00646.x 19754633 27. Moss-Morris R McCrone P Yardley L van Kessel K Wills G Dennison L A pilot randomised controlled trial of an internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy self-management programme (MS Invigor8) for multiple sclerosis fatigue Behav Res Ther 2012 50 6 415 21 10.1016/j.brat.2012.03.001 22516321 28. van Kirsten K Trecia W Rona M-M A New Zealand pilot randomized controlled trial of a web-based interactive self-management programme (MSInvigor8) with and without email support for the treatment of multiple sclerosis fatigue Clin Rehabil 2015 30 5 454 62 25952587 29. Fischer A Schröder J Vettorazzi E Wolf OT Pöttgen J Lau S Heesen C Moritz S Gold SM An online programme to reduce depression in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial The Lancet Psychiatry 2015 2 3 217 23 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00049-2 26359900 30. Hind D Cotter J Thake A Bradburn M Cooper C Isaac C House A Cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Psychiatry 2014 14 5 5 10.1186/1471-244X-14-5 24406031 31. Motl RW Mowry EM Ehde DM LaRocca NG Smith KE Costello K Shinto L Ng AV Sullivan AB Giesser B Wellness and multiple sclerosis: the National MS Society establishes a Wellness Research Working Group and research priorities Mult Scler 2018 24 3 262 7 10.1177/1352458516687404 28080254 32. Jongen PJ Kremer IEH Hristodorova E Evers SMAA Kool A van Noort EM Hiligsmann M Adherence to web-based self-assessments in Long-Term Direct-to-patient research: two-year study of multiple sclerosis patients J Med Internet Res 2017 19 7 e249 10.2196/jmir.6729 28733272 33. Claflin SB Gates R Maher M Taylor BV Building a successful massive Open Online Course about multiple sclerosis: a process description J Med Internet Res 2020 22 7 e16687 10.2196/16687 32723726 34. Motl RW Sandroff BM Wingo BC McCroskey J Pilutti LA Cutter GR Bollaert RE McAuley E Phase-III, randomized controlled trial of the behavioral intervention for increasing physical activity in multiple sclerosis: Project BIPAMS Contemp Clin Trials 2018 71 154 61 10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.017 29959105 35. Dlugonski D Motl RW Mohr DC Sandroff BM Internet-delivered behavioral intervention to increase physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis: sustainability and secondary outcomes Psychol Health Med 2012 17 6 636 51 10.1080/13548506.2011.652640 22313192 36. Bandura A Health promotion by social cognitive means Health Educ Behav 2004 31 2 143 64 10.1177/1090198104263660 15090118 37. Bandura A Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change Psychol Rev 1977 84 2 191 215 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 847061 38. Bevens W Reece J Jelinek PL Weiland TJ Nag N Simpson-Yap S Gray K Jelinek GA Neate SL The feasibility of an online educational lifestyle program for people with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative analysis of participant semi-structured interviews Digit Health 2022 8 20552076221123713 36081754 39. Bevens W Weiland TJ Gray K Neate SL Nag N Simpson-Yap S Reece J Yu M Jelinek GA The feasibility of a web-based Educational Lifestyle Program for people with multiple sclerosis: a Randomized Controlled Trial Front Public Health 2022 10 852214 10.3389/fpubh.2022.852214 35570898 40. Neate SL, Bevens W, Jelinek PL, Gray KM, Weiland TJ, Nag N, Simpson-Yap S, Jelinek GA, Yu M, Reece JC. A multiple sclerosis lifestyle behavior online course: Qualitative analysis of participants’ motivations, expectations and experiences. Front Public Health 2022, 10. 41. Khaibullin T Ivanova V Martynova E Cherepnev G Khabirov F Granatov E Rizvanov A Khaiboullina S Elevated levels of Proinflammatory Cytokines in Cerebrospinal Fluid of multiple sclerosis patients Front Immunol 2017 8 531 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00531 28572801 42. O’Kearney EL Brown CR Jelinek GA Neate SL Taylor KT Bevens W De Livera AM Simpson S Jr Weiland TJ Mastery is associated with greater physical and mental health-related quality of life in two international cohorts of people with multiple sclerosis Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020 38 101481 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101481 31756608 43. Chan AW Tetzlaff JM Altman DG Dickersin K Moher D SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols Lancet 2013 381 9861 91 2 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62160-6 23305999 44. Australian standard classification of cultural and ethnic groups. [http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/allprimarymainfeatures/388FA150E28D57E2CA257FF1001E65F6?opendocument]. 45. Body mass index - BMI. : https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi. 46. McKellar S Horsely P Chambers R Development of the diet habits questionnaire for use in cardiac rehabilitation Austr J Prim Health 2008 14 3 43 7 10.1071/PY08035 47. Simpson-Yap S Nag N Probst Y Jelinek G Neate S Higher quality diet and non-consumption of meat are associated with less self-determined disability progression in people with multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal cohort study Eur J Neurol 2021 29 225 36 10.1111/ene.15066 34390078 48. Craig CL Marshall AL Sjostrom M Bauman AE Booth ML Ainsworth BE Pratt M Ekelund U Yngve A Sallis JF International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003 35 8 1381 95 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB 12900694 49. World Health Organisation. : International guide for monitoring alcohol consumption and related harm. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66529. In. Edited by World Health Organisation. Geneva; 2000. 50. Hassed C Flighty A Chambers R Hosemans D Bailey N Connaughton S Lee S Kazantzis N Advancing the Assessment of Mindfulness-Based meditation practice: psychometric evaluation of the Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire Cogn Therapy Res 2021 45 190 204 10.1007/s10608-020-10150-z 51. Vickrey BG Hays RD Harooni R Myers LW Ellison GW A health-related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis Qual Life Res 1995 4 3 187 206 10.1007/BF02260859 7613530 52. Osoba D Rodrigues G Myles J Zee B Pater J Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores J Clin Oncol 1998 16 1 139 44 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139 9440735 53. Taphoorn MJ Bottomley A Health-related quality of life and symptom research in glioblastoma multiforme patients Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2005 5 6 763 74 10.1586/14737167.5.6.763 19807618 54. Norman GR Sloan JA Wyrwich KW Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation Med Care 2003 41 5 582 92 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C 12719681 55. Krupp LB LaRocca NG Muir-Nash J Steinberg AD The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus Arch Neurol 1989 46 10 1121 3 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022 2803071 56. Amato MP Ponziani G Rossi F Liedl CL Stefanile C Rossi L Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: the impact of depression, fatigue and disability Mult Scler 2001 7 5 340 4 10.1177/135245850100700511 11724451 57. Smedal T Beiske AG Glad SB Myhr KM Aarseth JH Svensson E Gjelsvik B Strand LI Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: associations with health-related quality of life and physical performance Eur J Neurol 2011 18 1 114 20 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03090.x 20491899 58. Marrie RA Cutter G Tyry T Hadjimichael O Campagnolo D Vollmer T Validation of the NARCOMS registry: fatigue assessment Mult Scler 2005 11 5 583 4 10.1191/1352458505ms1216oa 16193897 59. Lerdal A Celius EG Moum T Fatigue and its association with sociodemographic variables among multiple sclerosis patients Mult Scler 2003 9 5 509 14 10.1191/1352458503ms943oa 14582778 60. Learmonth Y, Dlugonski D, Pilutti LA, Sandroff BM, Moti RW, Klaren RE. Reliability, Precision and Clinically Meaningful Change Of Fatigue Outcomes In MS. In: ACTRIMS Orlando, Florida USA; 2013. 61. Zigmond AS Snaith RP The hospital anxiety and depression scale Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983 67 6 361 70 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x 6880820 62. Lemay KR Tulloch HE Pipe AL Reed JL Establishing the minimal clinically important difference for the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with Cardiovascular Disease J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2019 39 6 E6 E11 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000379 30489438 63. Hohol MJ Orav EJ Weiner HL Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: a simple approach to evaluate disease progression Neurology 1995 45 2 251 5 10.1212/WNL.45.2.251 7854521 64. Learmonth YC Motl RW Sandroff BM Pula JH Cadavid D Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis BMC Neurol 2013 13 1 37 10.1186/1471-2377-13-37 23617555 65. Hohol MJ Orav EJ Weiner HL Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study comparing disease steps and EDSS to evaluate disease progression Mult Scler 1999 5 5 349 54 10.1177/135245859900500508 10516779 66. Kister I Chamot E Salter AR Cutter GR Bacon TE Herbert J Disability in multiple sclerosis: a reference for patients and clinicians Neurology 2013 80 11 1018 24 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872855 23427319 67. Amtmann D Bamer AM Cook KF Askew RL Noonan VK Brockway JA University of Washington self-efficacy scale: a new self-efficacy scale for people with disabilities Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012 93 10 1757 65 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.001 22575393 68. Sangha O Stucki G Liang MH Fossel AH Katz JN The self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research Arthritis Rheum 2003 49 2 156 63 10.1002/art.10993 12687505 69. Thematic analysis., a reflexive approach https://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/thematic-analysis.html. 70. Braun V Clarke V Using thematic analysis in psychology Qualitative Res Psychol 2006 3 2 77 101 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa 71. Braun V Clarke V What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2014 9 26152 10.3402/qhw.v9.26152 25326092 72. Bevens W Weiland T Gray K Jelinek G Neate S Simpson-Yap S Attrition within Digital Health Interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and Meta-analysis J Med Internet Res 2022 24 2 e27735 10.2196/27735 35138262 73. Bevens W, Shoushtari A, Jelinek P, Jelinek GA, Weiland TJ. Systematic review and meta analysis of differential attrition between active and control arms in randomized controlled trials of lifestyle interventions in chronic disease. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021, 21(1). 74. Freedman B Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research N Engl J Med 1987 317 3 141 5 10.1056/NEJM198707163170304 3600702 75. Edwards SJ Lilford RJ Braunholtz DA Jackson JC Hewison J Thornton J Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomised controlled trials Health Technol Assess 1998 2 15 i vi 10.3310/hta2150 10194615 76. Nardini C The ethics of clinical trials Ecancermedicalscience 2014 8 387 24482672 77. Bisht B Darling WG Shivapour ET Lutgendorf SK Snetselaar LG Chenard CA Wahls TL Multimodal intervention improves fatigue and quality of life in subjects with progressive multiple sclerosis: a pilot study Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis 2015 5 19 35 30728736 78. Leong TI Weiland TJ Jelinek GA Simpson S Brown CR Neate SL Taylor KL O’Kearney E Milanzi E De Livera AM Longitudinal Associations of the healthy lifestyle index score with quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: a prospective cohort study Front Neurol 2018 9 874 10.3389/fneur.2018.00874 30450074 79. Ysrraelit MC Fiol MP Gaitan MI Correale J Quality of Life Assessment in multiple sclerosis: different perception between patients and neurologists Front Neurol 2017 8 729 10.3389/fneur.2017.00729 29375468 80. Marck CH Probst Y Chen J Taylor B van der Mei I Dietary patterns and associations with health outcomes in australian people with multiple sclerosis Eur J Clin Nutr 2021 75 10 1506 14 10.1038/s41430-021-00864-y 33531638 81. MS Australia. MS Nurse Care in Australia. https://www.msaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/msa_ms-nurses-report_web.pdf, 2022, accessed 15 May, 2022 (p.37).