==== Front ACS Omega ACS Omega ao acsodf ACS Omega 2470-1343 American Chemical Society 10.1021/acsomega.3c02069 Article Monitoring of Hypochlorite Level in Fruits, Vegetables, and Dairy Products: A BODIPY-Based Fluorescent Probe for the Rapid and Highly Selective Detection of Hypochlorite Suna Garen †‡∥ Erdemir Eda †§∥ Gunduz Simay † https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3777-5320 Ozturk Turan †‡ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2691-8704 Karakuş Erman *† † Organic Chemistry Laboratory, Chemistry Group, The Scientific & Technological Research Council of Turkey, National Metrology Institute (TUBITAK UME), 41470 Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey ‡ Department of Chemistry, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey § Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Istanbul University, 34134 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey * Email: erman.karakus@tubitak.gov.tr. 09 06 2023 27 06 2023 8 25 2298422991 28 03 2023 29 05 2023 © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Hypochlorite/hypochlorous acid (ClO–/HOCl), among the diverse reactive oxygen species, plays a vital role in various biological processes. Besides, ClO– is widely known as a sanitizer for fruits, vegetables, and fresh-cut produce, killing bacteria and pathogens. However, excessive level of ClO– can lead to the oxidation of biomolecules such as DNA, RNA, and proteins, threatening vital organs. Therefore, reliable and effective methods are of utmost importance to monitor trace amounts of ClO–. In this work, a novel BODIPY-based fluorescent probe bearing thiophene and a malononitrile moiety (BOD–CN) was designed and constructed to efficiently detect ClO–, which exhibited distinct features such as excellent selectivity, sensitivity (LOD = 83.3 nM), and rapid response (<30 s). Importantly, the probe successfully detected ClO– in various spiked water, milk, vegetable, and fruit samples. In all, BOD–CN offers a clearly promising approach to describe the quality of ClO–-added dairy products, water, fresh vegetables, and fruits. Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi 10.13039/501100007504 PTA-2022-43876 Ulusal Metroloji Enstitüsü, Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu 10.13039/501100017481 NA document-id-old-9ao3c02069 document-id-new-14ao3c02069 ccc-price ==== Body pmc1 Introduction Fruits and vegetables, which are essential parts of human diet, are the sources of vitamins, minerals, carbohydrates, and fiber. They contain low fat and protein.1 According to the World Health Organization, insufficient consumption of fruits and vegetables can cause various diseases such as cardiovascular and some digestive system neoplasms.2 One of the challenges of improving fruit and vegetable consumption is extending their shelf-life.3 In addition to events such as transport, natural disasters, and unexpected epidemics (i.e., COVID-19), the increasing population and demand for food make fruits and vegetables having extended shelf-life more important.4,5 Hypochlorite (ClO–), which is a strong oxidizing agent, is widely used in food, vegetable, and dairy products to destroy microbial activity, delay food spoilage, and extend the shelf-life.6,7 Additionally, because of its critical antimicrobial properties, ClO– is also used as a disinfectant for drinking water, wastewater, industrial waste treatment, and swimming pool treatment.8−10 On the other hand, the acceptable chlorine level ranges from 50 to 200 mg/L for fruits and vegetables, excess amount of which could damage organs and tissues resulting in several diseases such as cardiovascular, neuron degeneration, kidney, arthritis, and cancer.11−16 Therefore, development of a rapid and efficient method for the selective and sensitive determination of ClO– is in high demand. Compared to traditional methods, fluorescent probes have many advantages, such as sensitivity, selectivity, fast response, and real-time monitoring, thus garnering tremendous attention from researchers.17−25 Although some fluorescent probes have been developed to detect ClO–, they have drawbacks, such as slow response, high detection limits, low quantum yields, turn-off response, cumbersome synthesis, and, especially, inability to be applied in actual food samples, which prompted us to develop a fluorescent probe with superior properties of selective and sensitive detection of ClO– to overcome such drawbacks.26−35 BODIPY-based fluorescent probes have drawn extensive attention due to their important properties, such as emission at longer wavelengths, high molar absorption coefficients, high quantum yields, and versatile modification possibilities to obtain the desired properties.36−41 In this report, considering that the C=C double bond is readily cleaved by ClO– for the use of this strategy, BOD–CN was synthesized from BODIPY and malononitrile via Knoevenagel condensation.42,43 BODIPY core was used as a signal reporter unit, and the malononitrile moiety was used as a recognition site that allowed sensitive and selective ClO– detection. This work reports a novel BODIPY-based fluorescent probe, BOD–CN, possessing a malononitrile moiety to detect ClO– in various environments. BOD–CN has manifested distinct features for sensing ClO–, such as superior sensitivity, selectivity, and ultra-rapid response. More importantly, BOD–CN successfully detected the amount of ClO– in complex water, disinfectant, fruit, and vegetable samples and dairy products. 2 Experimental Section 2.1 Materials and Instruments 2,4-Dimethylpyrrole (≥ 97.0, Sigma-Aldrich), 4-bromobenzaldehyde (≥ 99.0, Sigma-Aldrich), trifluoroacetic acid (≥ 99.0, Sigma-Aldrich), DDQ (≥ 98.0, Sigma-Aldrich), boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (≥ 98.0, TCI), 5-formyl-2-thienylboronic acid (≥ 95.0, Sigma-Aldrich), bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride (≥ 98.0, Sigma-Aldrich), n-hexane (HPLC grade, ≥ 99.0, Sigma-Aldrich), dichloromethane (anhydrous, ≥ 99.9, Sigma-Aldrich), acetonitrile (anhydrous, ≥ 99.9, Sigma-Aldrich), ethanol (≥ 99.8, Sigma-Aldrich), chloroform (≥ 99.8, Sigma-Aldrich), and ethyl acetate (anhydrous, ≥ 99.8, Sigma-Aldrich) were used. All metal salts were used as their water-soluble sulfate, nitrate, or chloride salts, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (≥ 95). A Varian VNMRJ 600 nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer was used for 1H NMR and 13C NMR measurements. Mass analysis was conducted with a Thermo Q-Exactive Orbitrap device. Ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) absorption spectra were obtained with a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 1900i). Fluorescence emission measurements were obtained using a Varian Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer. Quantum yield measurements were conducted with a Hamamatsu Quantaurus-QY absolute PL quantum yield spectrometer. 2.2 Preparation of Absorption and Emission Measurement Solutions The stock solution of BOD–CN (1 mM) was prepared in a mixture of CH3CN and THF (1:1, v/v). The preparation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is provided in the Supporting Information in more detail. Stock solutions of other analytes (20 mM) were prepared in triple distilled deionized water. During the measurements, other analyte solutions were added to the probe solution (2 mL) using a micropipette. The concentration of BOD–CN for UV–vis and emission measurements was kept at 2.5 μM in 1:1 CH3CN:PBS (v/v) at pH = 7.4. The samples were introduced into quartz cuvettes (1.0 cm) for fluorescence measurements. The emission spectra were recorded in the range of 485–700 nm upon excitation at 470 nm (both excitation and emission slit widths of 5 nm/5 nm). All the measurements were repeated at least three times. 2.3 Synthesis Section 2.3.1 Synthesis of BOD–AL BOD–Br was synthesized according to the literature procedure with slight modifications.19 To a mixture of BOD–Br (100 mg, 0.248 mmol), 5-formyl-2-thienylboronic acid (50.3 mg, 0.322 mmol), and K2CO3 (5.00 mL, 2 M) in a Schlenk tube and under nitrogen was added THF (20 mL). After the mixture was degassed, bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride (17.4 mg, 0.0248 mmol) was introduced, and the mixture was heated overnight at 60 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere. Then, the mixture was filtered through celite and washed with THF. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (hexane/DCM, 5/1) to obtain the desired product BOD–AL (66.7 mg, 62%) as an orange solid. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.92 (s, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 6.01 (s, 2H), 2.55 (s, 6H), 1.44 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 185.4, 158.5, 155.5, 145.6, 143.0, 140.0, 138.8, 136.3, 133.8, 131.8, 129.6, 127.3, 124.1, 17.4. HRMS (ESI): m/z: Calcd. for (C24H21BF2N2OS) [M]+: 434.14357; found, 434.14108. 2.3.2 Synthesis of BOD–CN A mixture of BOD–AL (50 mg, 0.11 mmol), malononitrile (22.8 mg, 0.345 mmol), and β-alanine (0.98 mg, 0.011 mmol), dissolved in a mixture of ethanol:chloroform (5 mL, 1:1 v/v), was refluxed overnight. Then, the product was precipitated in cold methanol to obtain the desired product BOD–CN (52 mg, 94%) as a red solid. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.84 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H), 7.75 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.99 (s, 2H), 2.55 (s, 6H), 1.43 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.7, 157.4, 153.2, 145.4, 142.7, 142.6, 137.4, 135.5, 133.8, 132.0, 129.8, 127.8, 124.1, 116.6, 115.8, 17.4, 17.3. HRMS (ESI): m/z: Calcd. for (C27H21BF2N4S) [M]+: 482.15480; found, 482.15561. 2.3.3 Synthesis of BOD–AL via Oxidation of BOD–CN with ClO– To a solution of BOD–CN (50 mg, 0.103 mmol) in CH3CN/PBS (20 mL, 1:1) was added NaClO (2.06 mmol) and stirred at room temperature for 1 h. After the completion of the reaction (one spot on TLC), the solvent of the mixture was evaporated under reduced pressure. The product was purified by column chromatography using (hexane/DCM, 2/1) mixture as an eluting solvent to obtain BOD–AL (28 mg, 63%) as an orange solid. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.92 (s, 1H), 7.88–7.78 (m, 3H), 7.51 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.01 (s, 2H), 2.55 (s, 6H), 1.44 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 185.5, 158.5, 155.5, 145.5, 143.9, 140.0, 138.8, 136.3, 133.8, 131.7, 129.5, 127.3, 124.1, 17.4. HRMS (ESI): m/z: Calcd. for (C24H21BF2N2OS) [M + H]+: 435.15140; found, 435.15100. 2.4 Preparation of Real Samples The recovery experiments were performed to determine ClO– in pool water, spring water, wastewater, disinfectants, fruits, vegetables, and dairy products. All water samples were collected from the district of Gebze in Kocaeli Province in Turkey. To the spring and wastewater samples, a certain amount (100 μM) of various metal species, i.e., Al3+, Ba2+, Ca2+, Cd2+, Co2+, Cr3+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Hg2+, K+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Na+, Ni2+, Pb2+, and Zn2+ was introduced to obtain complex water systems. The disinfectant sample was purchased from a local market and diluted 10 times with distilled water. Similarly, fruit and vegetable samples were obtained from a local market. After obtaining the vegetable samples, i.e., strawberry, tomato, cucumber, lettuce, and spinach, they were squeezed, and their juices were centrifuged at 13,200 rpm for 10 min and filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane. Finally, the dairy products were procured from a local market, pretreated with acetic acid, and filtered with a 0.45 μm filter. The pH of all the samples was adjusted to 7.4 and stored at 4 °C. The known quantities of ClO– were spiked into the juices to determine the ClO– level in real samples using BOD–CN as a fluorescent probe (λem = 511 nm), through a linear regression equation (external calibration curve). All the experiments were repeated five times to obtain an average value of the detected ClO– concentrations. Then, the recovery percentages were calculated to assess the degree of deviation of the detected value compared to the amount of added ClO–. 3 Results and Discussion The probe, BOD–CN, was prepared in a concise two-step reaction (Scheme 1). Suzuki coupling of the readily available BOD–Br(36) with the commercially available 5-formyl-2-thienylboronic acid produced the aldehyde BOD–AL, Knoevenagel condensation of which with malononitrile gave the desired probe BOD–CN. Its structure was confirmed by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS techniques (see Supporting Information). Scheme 1 Synthetic Route of BOD–CN Initially, the ideal solvent system was determined by examining various solvent systems, i.e., DMSO–H2O, EtOH–H2O, THF–H2O, and CH3CN–H2O, among which CH3CN–H2O was found to be the most effective system (Figure S1). When the amount of CH3CN in the mixture was less than 50%, fluorescence intensity was dramatically diminished, and the mixture of CH3CN–H2O (1:1, v/v) was found to be the best solvent system (Figure S2). The probe showed remarkable stability over a wide pH range (pH = 2–10), and the sensing occurred in a pH range of 6–10. Then, the pH of the reaction medium was set to 7.4, and a phosphate buffer solution (PBS, 10 mM) was used under physiological conditions (Figure S3). The optical responses of BOD–CN in the absence and presence of ClO– were measured. The absorption peak at 400 nm could be attributed to the push–pull effect of BODIPY through the malononitrile moiety. However, the addition of ClO– to BOD–CN led to the formation of a new product (BOD–AL) which caused a blue shift in the absorption maxima from 400 to 332 nm with a slight decrease in absorbance intensity. The color of the solution became light yellow in a few seconds, easily observable with the naked eye (Figure 1a). Figure 1 (a) Absorption and (b) emission spectra of BOD–CN (2.5 μM) and ClO– (20 equiv, 50 μM) in 1:1 CH3CN/PBS at pH = 7.4. (c) Fluorescence titration spectra of BOD–CN (2.5 μM) in 1:1 CH3CN/PBS at pH = 7.4 in the presence of ClO– (0–20 equiv, 0–50 μM). (d) Fluorescence intensity changes depending on the mole equivalents of ClO– = 0–20 equiv. As we expected, the free BOD–CN was nonfluorescent (φF = 0.02) due to photoinduced electron transfer (PET) from the donor part of the molecule (BODIPY) to the acceptor part of the molecule (malononitrile). The PET process was blocked upon the addition of ClO– to the BOD–CN solution, and a new emission (φF = 0.36) peak became centered at 511 nm in the fluorescence spectrum (Figure 1b). The fluorescence intensity achieved a plateau with the addition of 20 equiv ClO– for a 200-fold enhancement (Figure 1c,d). Although the fluorescence response was rapid (<30 s), a complete saturation was observed after 5 min (Figure S4). The detection limit of BOD–CN for ClO– was calculated to be 83.3 nM, based on the linear regression analysis (Figure S5 and Table S1). As the selectivity is an indispensable parameter for an efficient fluorescent probe, BOD–CN was tested for ClO– in the presence of various analytes. Thus, the addition of 100 equiv of other analytes, i.e., F–, Cl–, Br–, I–, NO3–, N3–, HCO3–, AcO–, ClO4–, CN–, PO42–, SO32–, SO42–, PO43–, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Hg2+, Pb2+, Cys, Hcy, GSH, H2S, l-valine, l-alanine, l-arginine, l-phenylalanine, l-glycine, l-lysine, and 20 equiv of ROS such as hydroxyl radical (HO·), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP), superoxide radical (O2·–), peroxyl radical (ROO·), and nitric oxide (NO·) did not cause any change in the fluorescence spectrum (Figure 2a). The malononitrile unit is commonly used with various fluorophores for the detection of CN– ions.44−49 Although it is a highly popular and known strategy for that purpose, surprisingly, in our sensing system, CN– ions did not induce any alteration in the fluorescence intensity. This result showed that our sensing strategy has outstanding selectivity over other reported studies in the literature (Figure 2a). Then, to prove that the probe is unaffected by the presence of other analytes, fluorescence measurements were recorded by adding 20 equiv of ClO– in the presence of 100 equiv of other analytes. The evaluation revealed that BOD–CN could smoothly detect ClO– even in the presence of other competing analytes in high concentrations (Figure 2b). Figure 2 (a) Fluorescence intensities of BOD–CN (2.5 μM) in 1:1 CH3CN/PBS at pH = 7.4 at λmax: 511 nm in the presence of ClO– (20 equiv) and other analytes (100 equiv) or ROS (20 equiv) separately. (b) Fluorescence intensities of BOD–CN (2.5 μM) in 1:1 CH3CN/PBS at pH = 7.4 in the presence of ClO– (20 equiv) and other analytes (100 equiv) or ROS (20 equiv) together: 1, ClO–; 2, F–; 3, Cl–; 4, Br–; 5, I–; 6, NO3–; 7, N3–; 8, HCO3–; 9, AcO–; 10, ClO4–; 11, PO42–; 12, SO32–; 13, SO42–; 14, PO43–; 15, Na+; 16, K+; 17, Ca2+;18, Mg2+ ;19, Hg2+; 20, Pb2+; 21, Cys; 22, Hcy; 23, GSH; 24, H2S; 25, l-valine; 26, l-alanine; 27, l-arginine; 28, l-phenylalanine; 29, l-glycine; 30, l-lysine; 31, HO·; 32, NO·; 33, TBHP; 34, ROO·; and 35, O2·–. The sensing mechanism of BOD–CN was investigated through computational studies before and after the addition of ClO–. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations at B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level were used for the optimization of the ground states (Scheme 2). Scheme 2 (a) Proposed Mechanism for the Detection of ClO–; (b) Optimized Structures and the Molecular Orbitals of BOD–CN and BOD–AL While the electrons of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of BOD–CN were localized on the BODIPY unit, they were delocalized significantly over the thiophene and dicyano-vinyl groups at LUMO, suggesting a PET from BODIPY to the dicyano-vinyl group. On the other hand, addition of ClO– resulted in the localization of the electrons on the BODIPY unit at both the HOMO and LUMO of BOD-AL. An increase in the fluorescence intensity after the oxidation of the dicyano-vinyl moiety also correlated with the localization of the electrons on BODIPY and the inhibition of the PET process. This explains the sensing mechanism of formation of aldehyde upon oxidation of the malonitrile unit with ClO–, which was also proved by HRMS and NMR analyses of the probe solution (BOD–CN + ClO–). Detection of the molecular ion peak of the aldehyde BOD–AL, i.e., m/z 434.14203, indicated the oxidation of nonfluorescent BOD–CN to produce fluorescent BOD–AL (Scheme 2a, see Supporting Information). Encouraged by the outstanding analytical performance and optical features of the probe BOD–CN toward ClO– detection, its applications in spring water, wastewater, pool water, dairy products, and disinfectants were examined. Since the improper release of industrial wastes containing ClO– can pollute water resources, and the increase in the use of ClO– in foods and dairy products reduces the microbial activity, it is highly important to develop appropriate methods for monitoring the presence of ClO– in those samples. Therefore, after adding the known quantities of ClO– to the water samples, dairy products, and disinfectants, an external calibration curve was created for each sample containing 2.5 μM BOD–CN separately to observe the matrix effect (Figures S6 and S8). Recovery values were calculated to be in the range of 98.1–100.5%. The recovery values and relative standard deviations (RSDs) between 0.40 and 3.58% demonstrated that the probe BOD–CN accurately detects the amount of ClO– in complex water samples, dairy products, and disinfectants (Table 1). Table 1 Results for the Detection of ClO– in Different Water Samples and Disinfectants samples ClO– spiked (μM) ClO– found (μM) recovery (%) RSD (%) (n = 5) spring water 12.50 12.41 ± 0.05 99.3 0.40 wastewater 12.50 12.34 ± 0.15 98.7 1.22 pool water 12.50 12.26 ± 0.18 98.1 1.47 disinfectant 12.50 12.21 ± 0.16 97.7 1.31 milk 25.00 24.86 ± 0.45 99.4 1.81 yogurt 25.00 25.13 ± 0.90 100.5 3.58 The ability of BOD–CN to determine the amount of ClO– in different fruit and vegetable samples was investigated. Washing fruits and vegetables with ClO– solution prolongs their shelf-life by slowing down microbial activities on their surface. However, any possible ClO– residue can endanger human health. For this reason, monitoring the amount of ClO– in fruits and vegetables is essential. Thus, known quantities of ClO– were added into 10 μM BOD–CN samples to generate an external calibration curve for each sample (Figures 3 and S7) to observe the matrix effect. Recovery values were calculated to be between nearly 98.0 and 102.0%, indicating that BOD–CN can feasibly determine the amount of ClO– in various fruit and vegetable samples (Table 2). Figure 3 Sensing pathway of ClO– contents with the BOD–CN probe in fresh food samples. Table 2 Results for the Detection of ClO– in Fruit and Vegetable Samples samples ClO– spiked (μM) ClO– found (μM) recovery (%) RSD (%) (n = 5) strawberry 25.00 25.09 ± 0.75 100.4 2.99 tomato 25.00 25.35 ± 0.73 101.4 2.88 cucumber 25.00 25.52 ± 0.32 102.1 1.25 lettuce 25.00 24.79 ± 0.76 99.2 3.07 spinach 25.00 24.63 ± 0.67 98.5 2.72 4 Conclusions A novel BODIPY-based fluorescent probe BOD–CN was designed and synthesized for rapid, sensitive, and selective ClO– detection. The probe demonstrated outstanding features of low detection limit (83.3 nM), superior selectivity, and rapid response (<30 s). The sensing mechanism of BOD–CN was explained to rely on the aldehyde formation by the cleavage of the C=C bond through oxidation with ClO–. The application of the probe to ClO–-spiked water, disinfectants, fruits, vegetables, and dairy products gave satisfactory results, demonstrating great sensitivity toward ClO– in actual food samples. In summary, the sensing mechanism of BOD–CN offers a fast, reliable, and convenient method for ClO– detection in various samples in daily life. Supporting Information Available The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c02069.Preparation of reactive oxygen species (ROS); optimization studies; calibration curves of the sample application; comparison with other reported ClO– fluorescent probes; and 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS measurements (PDF) Supplementary Material ao3c02069_si_001.pdf Author Contributions ∥ G.S. and E.E. contributed equally. The authors declare no competing financial interest. Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge TUBITAK UME for the financial support, Muhiddin ÇERGEL for NMR analysis, and Dilara GÜNTÜRKÜN for DFT calculations. The authors also thank Istanbul Technical University Scientific Research Projects (Project No: PTA-2022-43876). ==== Refs References Slavin J. L. ; Lloyd B. Health Benefits of Fruits and Vegetables. Adv. Nutr. 2012, 3 , 506–516. 10.3945/an.112.002154.22797986 World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation; Geneva, 28 January - 1 February 2002; World Health Organization: Geneva PP – Geneva, 2003. Ma L. ; Zhang M. ; Bhandari B. ; Gao Z. Recent Developments in Novel Shelf Life Extension Technologies of Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 64 , 23–38. 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.03.005. De Corato U. Improving the Shelf-Life and Quality of Fresh and Minimally-Processed Fruits and Vegetables for a Modern Food Industry: A Comprehensive Critical Review from the Traditional Technologies into the Most Promising Advancements. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60 , 940–975. 10.1080/10408398.2018.1553025.30614263 Anze A. ; Granato Malpass A. C. ; Malpass G. ; Okura M. Evaluation of the Influence of UV Radiation and Sodium Hypochlorite on the Shelf Life of Strawberries. Res. Soc. Dev. 2021, 10 , e134101119311 10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19311. Waghmare R. B. ; Annapure U. S. Integrated Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite and Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Quality and Shelf Life of Fresh-Cut Cilantro. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2015, 3 , 62–69. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2014.11.001. Nascimento C. F. ; Santos P. M. ; Pereira-Filho E. R. ; Rocha F. R. P. Recent Advances on Determination of Milk Adulterants. Food Chem. 2017, 221 , 1232–1244. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.034.27979084 Zhou X. ; Zhao J. ; Li Z. ; Song J. ; Li X. ; Yang X. ; Wang D. Enhancement Effects of Ultrasound on Secondary Wastewater Effluent Disinfection by Sodium Hypochlorite and Disinfection By-Products Analysis. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2016, 29 , 60–66. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.09.001.26584985 Li H. ; Xiong J. ; Zhang G. ; Liang A. ; Long J. ; Xiao T. ; Chen Y. ; Zhang P. ; Liao D. ; Lin L. ; Zhang H. Enhanced Thallium(I) Removal from Wastewater Using Hypochlorite Oxidation Coupled with Magnetite-Based Biochar Adsorption. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 698 , 134166 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134166.31494421 Cheng X. ; Wang S. ; Huang W. ; Wang F. ; Fang S. ; Ge R. ; Zhang Q. ; Zhang L. ; Du W. ; Fang F. ; Feng Q. ; Cao J. ; Luo J. Current status of hypochlorite technology on the wastewater treatment and sludge disposal: Performance, principals and prospects. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 803 , 150085 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150085.34525771 Perez-Vilar J. ; Boucher R. C. Reevaluating Gel-Forming Mucins’ Roles in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2004, 37 , 1564–1577. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.07.027.15477008 Steinbeck M. J. ; Nesti L. J. ; Sharkey P. F. ; Parvizi J. Myeloperoxidase and Chlorinated Peptides in Osteoarthritis: Potential Biomarkers of the Disease. J. Orthop. Res. 2007, 25 , 1128–1135. 10.1002/jor.20400.17474133 Stanley N. R. ; Pattison D. I. ; Hawkins C. L. Ability of Hypochlorous Acid and N-Chloramines to Chlorinate DNA and Its Constituents. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2010, 23 , 1293–1302. 10.1021/tx100188b.20593802 Reja S. I. ; Bhalla V. ; Sharma A. ; Kaur G. ; Kumar M. A Highly Selective Fluorescent Probe for Hypochlorite and Its Endogenous Imaging in Living Cells. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50 , 11911–11914. 10.1039/C4CC05356G. Wu Y. ; Wang J. ; Zeng F. ; Huang S. ; Huang J. ; Xie H. ; Yu C. ; Wu S. Pyrene Derivative Emitting Red or Near-Infrared Light with Monomer/Excimer Conversion and Its Application to Ratiometric Detection of Hypochlorite. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 , 1511–1519. 10.1021/acsami.5b11023.26701212 Li J.-P. ; Xia S. ; Zhang H. ; Qu G.-R. ; Guo H.-M. Three-Input “AND-Type” Fluorescent Logic Gate as Ratio Probe for Specific Imaging of Hypochlorite in Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum. Sens. Actuators, B 2018, 255 , 622–629. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.08.076. Suna G. ; Gunduz S. ; Topal S. ; Ozturk T. ; Karakuş E. A Unique Triple–Channel Fluorescent Probe for Discriminative Detection of Cyanide, Hydrazine, and Hypochlorite. Talanta 2023, 257 , 124365 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124365.36827939 Erdemir E. ; Suna G. ; Liv L. ; Eğlence-Bakır S. ; Şahin M. ; Karakuş E. Smartphone-Assisted Dual-Channel Discriminative Detection of Hg(II) and Cu(II) Ions with a Simple, Unique, Readily Available Probe. Sens. Actuators, B 2023, 382 , 133487 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133487. Erdemir E. ; Suna G. ; Gunduz S. ; Şahin M. ; Eğlence-Bakır S. ; Karakuş E. Rapid, Ultrasensitive, Highly Selective Detection of Toxic Hg(II) Ions in Seabass, Swordfish and Water Samples. Food Chem. 2022, 371 , 131309 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131309.34638014 Suna G. ; Erdemir E. ; Liv L. ; Gunduz S. ; Ozturk T. ; Karakuş E. Multi-Channel Detection of Au(III) Ions by a Novel Rhodamine Based Probe. Sens. Actuators, B 2022, 360 , 131658 10.1016/j.snb.2022.131658. Karakuş E. ; Gunduz S. ; Liv L. ; Ozturk T. Fluorescent and Electrochemical Detection of Cu (II) Ions in Aqueous Environment by a Novel, Simple and Readily Available AIE Probe. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2020, 400 , 112702 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112702. Erdemir E. ; Suna G. ; Gunduz S. ; Şahin M. ; Eğlence-Bakır S. ; Karakuş E. Tetraphenylethylene–Thiosemicarbazone Based Ultrafast, Highly Sensitive Detection of Hypochlorite in Aqueous Environments and Dairy Products. Anal. Chim. Acta 2022, 1218 , 340029 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340029.35701038 Zeng L. ; Zeng H. ; Jiang L. ; Wang S. ; Hou J.-T. ; Yoon J. A Single Fluorescent Chemosensor for Simultaneous Discriminative Detection of Gaseous Phosgene and a Nerve Agent Mimic. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91 , 12070–12076. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03230.31414590 Hu Q. ; Qin C. ; Huang L. ; Wang H. ; Liu Q. ; Zeng L. Selective Visualization of Hypochlorite and Its Fluctuation in Cancer Cells by a Mitochondria-Targeting Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe. Dyes Pigm. 2018, 149 , 253–260. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.10.002. Zeng L. ; Chen T. ; Zhu B. ; Koo S. ; Tang Y. ; Lin W. ; James T. D. ; Kim J. S. A Molecular Recognition Platform for the Simultaneous Sensing of Diverse Chemical Weapons. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13 , 4523–4532. 10.1039/D2SC00299J.35656136 Ma C. ; Zhong G. ; Zhao Y. ; Zhang P. ; Fu Y. ; Shen B. Recent Development of Synthetic Probes for Detection of Hypochlorous Acid/Hypochlorite. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 240 , 118545 10.1016/j.saa.2020.118545.32521447 Malkondu S. ; Erdemir S. ; Karakurt S. Red and Blue Emitting Fluorescent Probe for Cyanide and Hypochlorite Ions: Biological Sensing and Environmental Analysis. Dyes Pigm. 2020, 174 , 108019 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.108019. Zhang K. ; Dai Y. ; Li Q. ; Su Y. ; Lv Y. Unimolecular Chemo-Fluoro-Luminescent Probe for Simultaneous Detection and Imaging of Peroxynitrite and Hypochlorite in Vitro and in Vivo. Sens. Actuators, B 2021, 347 , 130609 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130609. Gan Y. ; Yin G. ; Zhang X. ; Zhou L. ; Zhang Y. ; Li H. ; Yin P. Turn-on fluorescent probe for sensing exogenous and endogenous hypochlorous acid in living cells, zebrafishes and mice. Talanta 2021, 225 , 122030 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.122030.33592759 Wu P. ; Zhu Y. ; Chen L. ; Tian Y. ; Xiong H. A Fast-Responsive OFF–ON Near-Infrared-II Fluorescent Probe for In Vivo Detection of Hypochlorous Acid in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93 , 13014–13021. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02831.34524814 Hou J.-T. ; Wang B. ; Zou Y. ; Fan P. ; Chang X. ; Cao X. ; Wang S. ; Yu F. Molecular Fluorescent Probes for Imaging and Evaluation of Hypochlorite Fluctuations during Diagnosis and Therapy of Osteoarthritis in Cells and in a Mouse Model. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 , 1949–1958. 10.1021/acssensors.0c00270.32586093 Fang H. ; Chen Y. ; Geng S. ; Yao S. ; Guo Z. ; He W. Super-Resolution Imaging of Mitochondrial HClO during Cell Ferroptosis Using a Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94 , 17904–17912. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03887.36480812 Baruah M. ; Kwon H.-Y. ; Cho H. ; Chang Y.-T. ; Samanta A. A Photoinduced Electron Transfer-Based Hypochlorite-Specific Fluorescent Probe for Selective Imaging of Proinflammatory M1 in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Model. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95 , 4147–4154. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05218.36800528 Pham T. C. ; Heo S. ; Nguyen V.-N. ; Lee M. W. ; Yoon J. ; Lee S. Molecular Design toward Heavy-Atom-Free Photosensitizers Based on the C=S Bond and Their Dual Functions in Hypoxia Photodynamic Cancer Therapy and ClO– Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 , 13949–13957. 10.1021/acsami.0c22174.33729767 Kim K. H. ; Kim S. J. ; Singha S. ; Yang Y. J. ; Park S. K. ; Ahn K. H. Ratiometric Detection of Hypochlorous Acid in Brain Tissues of Neuroinflammation and Maternal Immune Activation Models with a Deep-Red/Near-Infrared Emitting Probe. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 , 3253–3261. 10.1021/acssensors.1c00930.34467757 Emrullahoğlu M. ; Üçüncü M. ; Karakuş E. A BODIPY Aldoxime-Based Chemodosimeter for Highly Selective and Rapid Detection of Hypochlorous Acid. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49 , 7836–7838. 10.1039/C3CC44463E. Üçüncü M. ; Karakuş E. ; Emrullahoğlu M. A BODIPY/Pyridine Conjugate for Reversible Fluorescence Detection of Gold(III) Ions. New J. Chem. 2015, 39 , 8337–8341. 10.1039/C5NJ01664A. Üçüncü M. ; Karakuş E. ; Emrullahoğlu M. A Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe for Gold and Mercury Ions. Chem. −A Eur. J. 2015, 21 , 13201–13205. 10.1002/chem.201502411. Üçüncü M. ; Karakuş E. ; Emrullahoğlu M. A BODIPY-Based Fluorescent Probe for Ratiometric Detection of Gold Ions: Utilization of Z-Enynol as the Reactive Unit. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52 , 8247–8250. 10.1039/C6CC04100K. Sayar M. ; Karakuş E. ; Güner T. ; Yildiz B. ; Yildiz U. H. ; Emrullahoğlu M. A BODIPY-Based Fluorescent Probe to Visually Detect Phosgene: Toward the Development of a Handheld Phosgene Detector. Chem. −A Eur. J. 2018, 24 , 3136–3140. 10.1002/chem.201705613. Shi W.-J. ; Feng L.-X. ; Wang X. ; Huang Y. ; Wei Y.-F. ; Huang Y.-Y. ; Ma H.-J. ; Wang W. ; Xiang M. ; Gao L. A Near-Infrared-Emission Aza-BODIPY-Based Fluorescent Probe for Fast, Selective, and “Turn-on” Detection of HClO/ClO–. Talanta 2021, 233 , 122581 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122581.34215073 Shangguan M. ; Jiang X. ; Lu Z. ; Zou W. ; Chen Y. ; Xu P. ; Pan Y. ; Hou L. A Coumarin-Based Fluorescent Probe for Hypochlorite Ion Detection in Environmental Water Samples and Living Cells. Talanta 2019, 202 , 303–307. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.04.074.31171186 Wang L. ; Zhang R. ; Bu Y.-C. ; Huang Z. ; Kong L. ; Yang J.-X. Two Novel “Turn on” Fluorescent Probes for Monitoring Hypochlorite in Living HeLa Cells. Dyes Pigm. 2021, 196 , 109749 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109749. Reddy T. S. ; Choi M.-S. Dicyanovinylcoumarin as a Turn-on Fluorescent Sensor for Cyanide Ion. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2018, 351 , 108–114. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.10.021. Zhao S. ; Liu H. ; Wu F. ; Zhu L. An NIR Molecule-Based “On–Off” Fluorescent and Colorimetric Sensor for Cyanide Anions. Chem. Lett. 2016, 45 , 570–572. 10.1246/cl.160058. Thanayupong E. ; Suttisintong K. ; Sukwattanasinitt M. ; Niamnont N. Turn-on Fluorescent Sensor for the Detection of Cyanide Based on a Novel Dicyanovinyl Phenylacetylene. New J. Chem. 2017, 41 , 4058–4064. 10.1039/C6NJ03794A. Wu H. ; Chen M. ; Xu Q. ; Zhang Y. ; Liu P. ; Li W. ; Fan S. Switching to a “Turn-on” Fluorescent Probe for Selective Monitoring of Cyanide in Food Samples and Living Systems. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55 , 15137–15140. 10.1039/C9CC07492A. Li Q. ; Wang Z. ; Song W. ; Ma H. ; Dong J. ; Quan Y.-Y. ; Ye X. ; Huang Z.-S. A Novel D-π-A Triphenylamine-Based Turn-on Colorimetric and Ratiometric Fluorescence Probe for Cyanide Detection. Dyes Pigm. 2019, 161 , 389–395. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.09.074. Ozdemir A. ; Erdemir S. Phenanthroimidazole and Dicyanovinyl-Substituted Triphenylamine for the Selective Detection of CN–: DFT Calculations and Practically Applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2020, 390 , 112328 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112328.