==== Front ACS Omega ACS Omega ao acsodf ACS Omega 2470-1343 American Chemical Society 10.1021/acsomega.3c01656 Article Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Performances of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced PA11/PLA Composites in the X-Band Frequency Range https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4446-6086 Ucpinar Durmaz Bedriye † Salman Alp Oral ‡ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9566-7881 Aytac Ayse *†§ † Department of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli 41380, Türkiye ‡ Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli 41001, Türkiye § Polymer Science and Technology Programme, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli 41001, Türkiye * Email: aaytac@kocaeli.edu.tr. Phone: +90 262 303 35 32. 15 06 2023 27 06 2023 8 25 2276222773 11 03 2023 02 06 2023 © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). To solve the problem of increasing electromagnetic pollution, it is crucial to develop electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials. Using lightweight, inexpensive polymeric composites instead of currently used metal shielding materials is promising. Therefore, bio-based polyamide 11/poly(lactic acid) composites with various carbon fiber (CF) amounts were prepared using commercial extrusion and injection/compression molding methods. The prepared composites’ morphological, thermal, electrical conductivity, dielectric, and EMI shielding characteristics were investigated. The strong adhesion between the matrix and CF is confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. The addition of CF led to an increase in thermal stability. As CFs formed a conductive network in the matrix, direct current (DC) and alternative current (AC) conductivities of the matrix increased. Dielectric spectroscopy measurements showed an increase in the dielectric permittivity/energy-storage capability of the composites. Thus, the EMI shielding effectiveness (EMI SE) has also increased with the inclusion of CF. The EMI SE of the matrix increased to 15, 23, and 28 dB, respectively, with the addition of 10–20–30 wt % CF at 10 GHz, and these values are comparable or higher than other CF-reinforced polymer composites. Further analysis revealed that shielding was primarily accomplished by the reflection mechanism similar to the literature data. As a result, an EMI shielding material has been developed that can be used in commercially practical applications in the X-band region. Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu 10.13039/501100004410 121M155 document-id-old-9ao3c01656 document-id-new-14ao3c01656 ccc-price ==== Body pmc1 Introduction Rapid development of applications like electronics, telecommunications, radar, and so forth causes excessive electromagnetic (EM) waves.1−3 The EM noises create electromagnetic pollution, which is called electromagnetic interference (EMI). The performance of surrounding electronic devices, information communication security, and human health are seriously affected by this EMI.4−6 So, EMI is a serious problem in many industries, including communications, medical instruments, buildings like hospitals, military applications, and broadcasting. Therefore, the development of efficient, lightweight, and economical EMI shielding materials is important and attracts the attention of researchers and scientists.4,7,8 Various magnetic and electrically conductive materials are used in EMI shielding like metallic and polymeric composites and adhesives.9−11 EMI shielding can occur via three mechanisms. The EM waves may be reflected from the front surface of the shielding material, absorbed by the shielding material, or reflected on its internal surfaces. With the contribution of all of these mechanisms, the total EMI shielding effectiveness (EMI SE) of the shielding material is obtained.12,13 The EMI SE depends on several factors such as electrical conductivity, permittivity, permeability, and thickness. One essential factor for high EMI SE is electrical conductivity.7,10,12 Metals have long been employed as shields due to their high electrical conductivity (104–105 S/cm).11 However, they have shortcomings including high density, large size, limited flexibility, poor resistance to corrosion, and expensive and challenging processing.4,13,14 In this context, electrically conductive polymeric composites carry the potential as an alternative to metal-based shielding materials. The usage of these materials in EMI shielding applications is expanding due to their lightness, lower price, simple processing, and environmental stability.5,13,15−17 As EMI shielding materials, a number of polymeric matrices were investigated, including polyaniline,11 poly(phenylene sulfide),18 polyimide,19 polypropylene (PP),5,15,17 polycarbonate (PC),20 polyamide,21,22 and poly(lactic acid) (PLA).15,16,23 Several types of fillers, including silver,18 carbon nanotube,15,20 graphene/graphite,16,22 and carbon fibers,17,19,21,24 were incorporated into various matrices in order to create a conductive polymer composite. Among these fillers, metal particle–polymer composites often suffer from poor mechanical properties. Additionally, despite the fact that carbon nanotubes (CNTs) show potential in terms of conductivity and shielding, their expensiveness prevents their acceptance in the industrial environment.25 In this regard, high aspect ratio carbon fibers (CFs) have attracted attention to use in EMI shielding applications due to their large surface areas, lightness, high mechanical strength, and excellent electrical and thermal conductivity.5,7,13,17,24,26−28 A superior balance between mechanical and electrical properties has reportedly been found in CF-reinforced polymer composites compared to metal-reinforced ones.25 Moreover, CFs are regarded as a less expensive alternative to CNTs with similar characteristics.5 CF-reinforced polymer composites can be obtained using both continuous and discontinuous short CFs. Short CF-reinforced composites offer design flexibility since they may be made with an established, affordable manufacturing technique like injection molding.25 Meanwhile, it is known from our previous work that CF reinforcement significantly improves the mechanical properties and load-bearing capacity of a polymer matrix.29 Consequently, the usage areas of CF-reinforced polymer composites can be extended from high-performance engineering applications (automotive, aerospace) to EMI shielding. Numerous studies have examined the effect of CF addition on the EMI SE of polymers. SE measurements of nylon 6.6/CF composites produced by extrusion and injection molding were carried out by Keith et al.21 The findings demonstrated that SE gradually increased with the increase of CF. In a different study, Kaushal and Singh17 examined the electrical conductivity and EMI SE of PP/CF composites. The results demonstrated that 20 wt % CF loading provided 3.7 × 10–3 S/cm electrical conductivity and −32 dB EMI SE in the X-band region. The mechanical properties, electrical conductivity, and EMI SE values of polymer composites depend on the loading amount, size and shape, orientation, and dispersion of the filler. After a certain loading amount, there is no significant change in the properties, but on the contrary, there may be a decrease in the properties due to agglomeration of the filler.24,30 At high amounts of CFs, fibers agglomerate and become difficult to disperse, which can obstruct the creation of a conductive network and the shielding of EM waves throughout the matrix.24 Therefore, in this study, the highest CF loading amount was chosen as 30 wt %. On the other hand, the majority of commercially used polymers are synthetic, for example, polyethylene (PE), polycarbonate (PC), polystyrene, polypropylene (PP), and polyamide 6, and their waste creates environmental pollution. As in many sectors, the rapid growth and short life cycles of materials in various industries lead to the formation of a large amount of ‘electronic waste’ (e-waste) both during fabrication and at end of life.31 By manufacturing electronic goods with bio-based and environmentally friendly polymers, these e-waste damages can be avoided. In this regard, studies on the production of EMI shielding materials from biopolymers as a matrix have increased in the last few years. Nath et al.23 produced PLA/thermoplastic polyurethane/carbon black biodegradable nanocomposites by a solution mixing method. They achieved EMI SE −27 dB in the X-band for 30 wt % carbon black addition. A study on PLA/poly(ethylene glycol)/MWCNT biodegradable nanocomposites was also conducted by Ahmad et al.32 The findings showed that PLA/PEG/MWCNT nanocomposites with 4 wt % MWCNTs exhibited EMI SE of 42 dB. As is evident, PLA is frequently investigated in these applications due to its biodegradability. PLA is produced from renewable sources, and it is biodegradable. Owing to its high modulus and tensile strength, it can also be utilized as a substitute for PE and PP. However, its shortcomings, including brittleness, slow rate of crystallization, and poor thermal stability, restrict its range of uses.29,32 As far as known, blending PLA with bio-based polyamide 11 (PA11) is a good solution to overcome these disadvantages. PA11 is a renewable bio-based polymer derived from castor oil. It has high flexibility, high impact, and moderate tensile strength, and is light. Additionally, it causes less environmental harm than synthetic polymers.33 In our earlier research, we reported that adding PA11 to PLA increased its flexibility, impact strength, and thermal stability. Moreover, tensile strength and Young’s modulus of PA11 improved by blending.29,34 In a different investigation, we added CF to the 60/40 (wt/wt) PA11/PLA blend that has the desired qualities, to explore the thermo-mechanical, mechanical, morphological, thermal, and rheological features. The findings demonstrated that CF greatly improved the tensile strength and Young’s and storage moduli of the PA11/PLA matrix.29 This investigation led to the hypothesis that high-performance PA11/PLA/CF composites would find use in a wider range of applications. Therefore, it was decided that PA11/PLA/CF should be investigated further. CF-reinforced PA11/PLA composites were manufactured by extrusion and injection molding/compression molding processes. Because of their advantages over alternative processes, extrusion and injection/compression molding are widely used in commercial manufacturing. While extrusion offers benefits including ease of use, rapid production, versatility, and low cost, injection and compression molding also enable the creation of complex-shaped parts in large quantities with precise tolerances.12,25 The electrical, EMI SE, and thermal stability properties of PA11/PLA/CF composites were studied. Additionally, polymeric materials’ fire resistance needs to be increased to minimize the risk of a fire. Therefore, UL-94 vertical burning and limiting oxygen index (LOI) tests were performed to determine the flammability characteristics of the CF-reinforced composites. The impact of CF amounts (10–20–30 wt %) on the characteristics of PA11/PLA composites was also investigated. 2 Experimental Details 2.1 Materials Polymers PA11 and PLA were used as matrix material. PA11 (Arkema, Rilsan-BESNO P40 TL) was obtained from Gültekin Plastik Profil San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti. Istanbul, Turkey. The renewable carbon ratio of PA11 is >89%. The density and melting temperature of PA11 are 1.04 g/cm3 and 181 °C, respectively. The PLA was purchased from NatureWorks with the trade name of Ingeo 2003 D. The density and melting temperature of PLA are 1.24 g/cm3 and 155 °C, respectively. PA-sized chopped CF with a bulk density of 575 g/L was acquired from DowAksa, Turkey. 2.2 Processing The PA11/PLA/CF samples were manufactured utilizing a melt compounding procedure with an Xplore 15 mL co-rotating twin-screw extruder in a nitrogen atmosphere. Before the extrusion process, granules were vacuum-dried in an oven at 80 °C for 12 h. The compounding parameters were barrel temperature 210 °C, screw speed 75 rpm, and 3 min residence time. During the extrusion, polymer granules were fed together into a barrel and premixed for 2.15 min. Then, CF was fed and mixed for another 45 s. A blend of 60/40 (wt/wt) PA11/PLA was used as a matrix, and 10–20–30 wt % CF was added to this matrix. The extrudates were molded by using a mini-injection molder for obtaining ISO 527-2 5A tensile test specimens. The injection pressure was 10 bars, while the mold and melt temperatures were 30 and 210 °C, respectively. For EMI shielding characterization, specimens were formed by a compression molding machine. The molding was carried out under 60 bars, 220 °C, and 10 min. The sizes of the specimens were 10 × 10 × 0.1 cm3, respectively. 2.3 Characterization Tools A scanning electron microscope (SEM, QUANTA 400 F) was used to explore the microstructure of the composites. Samples broken in liquid nitrogen were coated with gold before SEM examination to prevent arching. The thermal stability of the PA11/PLA/CF composite was characterized by thermogravimetric analysis (Mettler Toledo, TGA 1). Under N2, 5–10 mg weight samples were heated at a rate of 10 °C/min from 25 to 600 °C. At the end of the analysis, the temperatures at which 5 wt % (Td5), 50 wt % (Td50), and maximum (Tmax) degradation of the samples’ weight loss occurs, and residual weight were determined. LOI values were measured with Mares Analyzer (M-LOI-01) according to TS 11162-2 standard. Vertical burning test UL-94 was also performed to determine the flammability properties of composites according to ASTM D3801. Five samples of each composite were tested, and average values were reported. The volume resistivity of the matrix and composites was determined by considering the ASTM D257 standard. The measurements were conducted by using a Keithley 6517B electrometer and a Keithley 8009 resistivity chamber. Five measurements were performed on 10 × 10 cm2 samples with a 1 mm average thickness and the average values were reported. Dielectric spectroscopy was conducted in the range of 10–2 and 107 Hz by using a Novocontrol α-A broad-band dielectric spectrometer at room temperature. For dielectric measurements, 2 × 2 cm2 and 1 mm thick samples were covered with a conductive silver paste to form electrodes. The real (εr′) and imaginary (εr″) parts of relative dielectric permittivity and AC conductivities of the composites were determined as a function of frequency. The EMI shielding performances of the samples in the range of 8.2–12.4 GHz were determined by using a two-port vector network analyzer (Rohde & Schwarz ZVB20 VNA) with a WR-90 waveguide setup (Figure 1). Full two-port calibration was applied from the end of the coaxial cables before the measurements on the VNA. The type of calibration was TOSM (true, open, short, match). For the measurement, the compression-molded samples were used with a size of 10 × 10 × 0.1 cm3. Scattering parameters (S-parameters) of S11 (input reflection of port 1) and S21 (transmission of port 1 to port 2) were obtained from the VNA to calculate the EMI SE and the representation of S-parameters is shown in Figure 1a. Figure 1 (a) Schematic representation of scattering parameters and (b) EMI SE measurement setup. Total EMI SE (SETOT) includes the SE resulting from the absorption of EM power (SEA), the reflection from the material (SER), and the multiple internal reflections (SEM). EMI SE of a material can be depicted as follows19,321 PT and PI show the transmitted and incident powers of EM waves, respectively. Multiple reflections can be neglected where the thick shield and therefore SEA are greater than 10 dB.35 The S-parameters were used for the calculation of the power coefficients of absorptivity (A), reflectivity (R), and transmittivity (T) via eq 2(22,36,37)2 The contributions of reflection and absorption mechanisms to the EMI SETOT were calculated by using R, T, and A values obtained through the following equations:22,383 4 5 3 Results and Discussion 3.1 Morphology of the Samples Figure 2 shows the cryo-fractured surfaces of the matrix and composites. The surface of the PA11/PLA blend has a rough surface that contains the PLA phase in the PA11 phase. There are no obvious separated phase morphology or cavities that indicate self-compatibility between PA11 and PLA. The images of the PA11/PLA/CF composites show CF surfaces covered with the matrix. Although there are some voids and pullouts from the matrix in the 10 and 20 CF composites, it is seen that all of the fibers are completely embedded in the matrix. This demonstrates the matrix and polyamide-coated CF’s strong interfacial adhesion. Figure 2 Cryo-fractured surface images of (a) PA11/PLA (×2000), and (b) 10 CF, (c) 20 CF, and (d) 30 CF composites (×2500). 3.2 Thermal and Flammability Properties Thermal stability is the capacity of a material to tolerate heat at a certain temperature without losing its physical characteristics, such as strength, hardness, and elasticity. During its service life, an EMI shield may heat up when exposed to electromagnetic waves, depending on the area of use. Therefore, thermal stability is a critical parameter for EMI applications and for melt processing of polymeric materials.5,16 So, the thermal stabilities of PA11/PLA/CF samples were investigated by TGA. The TGA and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curves are presented in Figure 3a,b. Also, the thermal degradation data of the samples are summarized in Table 1. Figure 3 (a) TGA and (b) DTG results of samples. Table 1 Thermal Degradation Data of the Samples and Chopped CF Sample Td5 (°C) Td50 (°C) Tmax-1 (°C) Tmax-2 (°C) Tmax-3 (°C) Residue (wt %, at 600 °C) PA11 270.7 445.0 278.7 449.8   0.8 PLA 301.4 340.9 347.1     1.2 PA11/PLA 294.7 380.8 257.7 342.9 451.9 4.3 CF       420.9   98.1 10 CF 305.0 425.9 261.1 351.3 456.9 12.2 20 CF 305.2 440.6 262.2 349.2 458.2 21.8 30 CF 308.9 452.4 256.9 341.2 458.6 33.1 According to Figure 3, PA11 exhibited a two-step decomposition curve, the first attributable to the plasticizer in its structure and the other to the major decomposition of the PA. While the first step of degradation took place with a weight loss of about 7% in the range of 245–320 °C, the second step of degradation started at around 426 °C. Levchik et al. reported that mainly lactams, nitriles, and unsaturated hydrocarbons were formed during the main degradation of PA11. In the meantime, it was determined that gaseous species containing C=O, N–H, and CH2 groups were produced. The residue formed as a result of thermal degradation of PA11 was found to be similar to the original polymer with C–N and C=C bonds.39,40 The results demonstrated that PA11 has good thermal stability like PA6 and PA66. On the other hand, neat PLA showed a single-step decomposition starting at 300 °C. Thermal decomposition of PLA involves random main-chain scissions and unzipping depolymerization reactions.41 Three-step TGA curves were obtained showing the decomposition of each polymer. When the results were examined, it was observed that the first step of degradation of PA11 shifted to higher temperatures by blending PLA. When considering the degradation temperature of PLA, it was shown that the thermal stability of PLA improved as the amount of PA11 in the blend increased. Also, residual weight increased with blending. This thermal stability improvement is probably due to the “labyrinth effect” of the PA11 chains, which acts as an insulating barrier that can inhibit the evaporation process of PLA.42 The degradation behavior of CF was also investigated with the same test method applied to polymers. Table 1 shows that CF had a weight loss of 2% starting at 420 °C. This can be assigned to the degradation of the polyamide coating on the surface of CF. It can be observed in Figure 3 and Table 1 that CF effectively improved the thermal stability of the PA11/PLA blend. Td5, Td50, and Tmax values of the PA11/PLA blend increased with increase of CF load, resulting in the addition of more thermally stable material as filler. As can be seen in Table 1, the residual weight of PA11/PLA was measured as 4.3% at 600 °C, which remarkably increased with the increasing CF amount. Since CF inhibits the diffusion of products that are decomposing and slows down the diffusion process, there has been an improvement in thermal stability. In addition, the barrier effect in the matrix increases with the increasing load of CF and thus the thermal decomposition temperature gradually rises.5,43 Flame resistance and self-extinguishing behavior as well as high thermal stability are expected from EMI shielding materials. Therefore, the flammability characteristics of PA11/PLA/CF composites were investigated by UL-94 and LOI, and the obtained data are summarized in Table 2. The PA11/PLA blend has an LOI value of 24.3% and UL-94 classification of V-2. During the vertical UL-94 test, after the combustion process started, dripping occurred and the cotton spread on the floor caught fire. With the addition of CF to the matrix, all of the samples were burned to the clamp in the first ignition. While the V classification did not change, the LOI increased with the increasing amount of CF. Table 2 UL-94 Classification and LOI Values of PA11/PLA and Its Composites   UL 94   sample first burning time (s) second burning time (s) dripping V classification LOI (%) PA11/PLA 15.0 50 yes V-2 24.3 10 CF 76.6 - yes V-2 25.3 20 CF 102.2 - yes V-2 26.2 30 CF 130.4 - yes V-2 27.1 3.3 Electrical Characteristics Figure 4a shows the DC electrical volume resistivity of PA11/PLA/CF as a function of the CF amount. The volume resistivity of the unreinforced PA11/PLA blend was measured as 3.95 × 1011 Ω·m. This result shows that the PA11/PLA blend is a typical electrically insulating material. As expected, the volume resistivity of the matrix decreased with the increase of the CF content. The volume resistivity of the matrix showed a sharp reduction with 10 wt % CF loading (4.38 × 105 Ω·m). The reduction in resistivity was 6 orders of magnitude. This reduction can be explained by the percolation theory. The fibers behave as conductive islands in the electrically insulating polymer matrix at lower CF loading. With increase of CF loading, the possibility of conductive fibers coming into contact with one another in the matrix increases. At the percolation threshold, the fibers are in contact and form some conduction paths. Thus, electric charges or electrons can flow in the polymer matrix via the tunneling/hopping mechanism. The volume resistivity declines dramatically at this stage, and higher CF loadings do not cause any significant change.44 The percolation region for the PA11/PLA/CF composite is defined as the 0–10 wt % CF loading range. The volume resistivity remained almost in the same order of magnitude when the CF content was increased to 20 wt % (2.14 × 105 Ω·m). The volume resistivity of 30 CF composites was 2.98 × 104 Ω·m. As can be seen, there were no sharp changes in resistivity at high CF content. It can be said that the 30 CF composite contains many CF conductive networks and exhibits a semiconducting behavior.45 DC conductivities of PP/CF composites containing 5–20 wt % CF prepared by Kaushal and Singh were in the range of 10–11 to 10–5 S/m (1011 to 105 Ω·m).17 The volume resistivity of a 15 wt % stainless-steel-fiber-reinforced PC/ABS composite, commercially named LNP FARADEX, developed by SABIC for use in EMI shielding applications, is in the range of 104 to 106 Ω·m.46 As can be seen, the volume resistivity of PA11/PLA/CF composites was determined to be at the same level as those in the literature and commercially used products. Figure 4 (a) Electrical volume resistivity and (b) AC conductivity of PA11/PLA/CF composites. Figure 4b shows a plot of the AC conductivities (σAC) of the samples over a frequency range of 10–2 to 107 Hz. It can be noted that the PA11/PLA blend exhibits a typical insulator behavior, including high-frequency dependency and low conductivity in accordance with volume resistivity values. The σAC of the PA11/PLA blend increased from 2.9 × 10–12 S/m at 0.01 Hz to 6.6 × 10–5 S/m at 10 MHz. As expected, CF improved the σAC of the matrix markedly. As can be seen, the conductivity varies with the amount of CF and the conductivity has gradually risen since the inclusion of 10 wt % CF. Conductivity occurs in polymeric composites via two basic mechanisms. One of them is the tunneling or hopping mechanism, in which electrons are transmitted through tunnels between noncontact particles. The amount of electron transport or current flow that can occur in this manner is constrained. This behavior is usually typical of insulating materials, such as the PA11/PLA blend, and electron transport, i.e., conductivity, increases with frequency.5,47,48 At low frequencies, the 10 CF composite demonstrated frequency independence, whereas at higher frequencies, it exhibited frequency dependence. Given that there are fewer free charge carriers in the low-frequency region, electrons move slowly in an electric field. Higher frequencies cause electrons to be compelled to migrate in the direction of the electric field, thus, improving conductivity.48 The other method of electron transmission is the mechanism in which the fibers in the matrix come into contact with each other and create conductive paths.47,48 The increase in conductivity and high conductivity values observed in 20 and 30 CF composites show that conductive paths occur in the composite structure. Also, these composites exhibited frequency-independent behavior. In other words, there is a conductive network formation in the entire measured area and this conductive network is stable.48 The conductivities of the 20 and 30 CF composites at 0.01 Hz are 0.095 and 0.68 S/m, respectively, and these values are at the same level as polystyrene composites containing 6–10% graphene prepared by solution mixing and hot pressing.49 Consequently, the PA11/PLA matrix reached the conductivity level by addition of 20–30 wt % CF. This conductive structure, which is made up of high aspect ratio fibers in contact with one another, is anticipated to have effective EMI shielding. 3.4 Dielectric Properties The dielectric behaviors of the PA11/PLA/CF composite were also investigated. Complex relative dielectric permittivity (εr*) is used to define how a material reacts to changing electric fields. It consists of two parts, real (εr′) and imaginary (εr″), which are important to interpret the EMI shielding performances of the composites.45,48,50 The dielectric constant, or εr′, is a measurement of a material’s capacity to store energy from incident EM waves. It is generally connected to polarization, which is the separation and alignment of electric dipoles in a material caused by an electric field. Additionally, micro-capacitor-like structures that can develop in conductive polymer composites as a result of the filler and matrix serving as the electrode and dielectric insulator material have an impact on εr′.27,45,51 The quantity of energy dissipated in the material exposed to the electric or electromagnetic field is indicated by the imaginary component of the complex dielectric permittivity or dielectric loss (εr″). It primarily has to do with conductivity, ε″ = σ/2πf.45,51 The εr′ and εr″ of the samples were measured at room temperature in a frequency range of 10–2 to 107 Hz and graphed in Figure 5a,b. Figure 5 Variation of (a) real part and (b) imaginary part of dielectric permittivity. As can be seen in Figure 5, εr′ and εr″ exhibited frequency-dependent behavior. Both εr′ and εr″ decreased with increasing frequency. This behavior has been reported to be the same for almost all carbon-doped composites.17,45,47,52−54 The downward tendency of εr′ and εr″ can be assigned to the variation of polarization behavior with frequency. Polarization usually takes place with dipole, electronic, and ionic contributions. All of these contributions have an effect on dielectric permittivity at low frequencies. As the frequency of the incident EM wave increases, the dipoles are unable to keep up with the electromagnetic field’s quickly changing state. Eventually, the dipoles start to lag and a mismatch occurs between dipolar polarization and electrical polarization. Thus, the polarization effect and consequently the dielectric characteristics are reduced.47,50,54,55 On the other hand, it was found that εr″ was higher than εr′ for all frequency ranges. The higher εr″ can be attributed to dipole polarization caused by defects in the CF structure and functional groups, and to conductive losses due to increased electrical conductivity.26,56 Considering the effect of CF amounts on dielectric properties, it is seen that both εr′ and εr″ increase with increasing CF amount in the whole frequency range. On the other hand, the actual increase is more pronounced at low frequencies. The Maxwell–Wagner–Sillars (MWS) effect can explain this rising trend.45,53 The filler–matrix interface alters the dielectric characteristics, according to the MWS effect. Accordingly, when a current passes through the interface of two materials with different relaxation times, charges can collect at the interface. As the amount of CF in the matrix increases, more interfaces will be formed, so more interfacial polarization will occur and thus εr′ and εr″ will increase.17,53,57 Besides, the formation of a micro-capacitance structure also causes an increase in dielectric permittivity. The fibers in the matrix act as microelectrodes and the matrix acts as a dielectric, forming a micro-capacitor in composites. With the increase in the amount of CF added to the matrix, there was an increase in the number of micro-capacitors and thus the εr′ and εr″.54,55 These findings are consistent with those of polymer/CF composites in the literature.5,17,53,54 The enhanced dielectric characteristics are anticipated to improve the material’s EMI shielding capability. 3.5 EMI Shielding Effectiveness As previously mentioned, EMI shielding comprises two fundamental mechanisms, i.e., reflection (SER) and absorption (SEA). The sum of these gives the EMI shielding effectiveness (SETOT) of the material. Figure 6a–d shows the EMI shielding capabilities of the PA11/PLA/CF composites as well as the contribution of SER and SEA to the SETOT. The SETOT values of the samples are nearly frequency independent, as can be seen in Figure 6c. The PA11/PLA matrix shows 0–2 dB SETOT throughout the whole frequency range. Because of its low conductivity and dielectric permittivity, the polymeric matrix is transparent to EM waves, which is generally observed and expected.23,47,51 The SETOT of the matrix increased remarkably with the increasing amount of CF. As shown in Figure 6d, the SETOT value of the matrix is 0.7 dB at 10 GHz and increases to 15, 23, and 28 dB, respectively, when 10–20–30 wt % CF is added. Shielding requirements differ depending on the application. It is generally accepted that EMI SE values of 20 dB and higher are sufficient for practical applications. For instance, the shielding requirement for desktop and laptop computers is 15–20 dB. An EMI SE value of 20 dB means that 99% intensity of incident EM fields can be shielded. When the EMI SE value reaches 30 dB, it can be said that 99.9% of the intensity of EM fields can be shielded.22,24,30,53,54,58 An acceptable level of EMI SE could be achieved by adding 20–30 wt % CF. The rise in conductivity, which is also depicted in Figure 4, the formation of conductive paths within the structure, and the enhancement of the dielectric characteristics are all responsible for the increase. The incident EM waves are reflected or absorbed by the conductive CF network. At low CF amounts, gaps in the network cause wave transitions, whereas with increase of CF, a denser network forms, and wave transitions become increasingly difficult.24,59 The resulting increase is consistent with data in the literature.17,21,24,27,30,53,59 The effects of CF addition (0–10 vol %) on the EMI SE value of the PP composite produced in solid and foam forms were examined in the study by Ameli et al.53 EMI SE values of 3.2 mm thick samples in solid form were measured in the X-band and the maximum EMI SE value was acquired as 16.3 dB at 10 vol % CF loading. It was revealed in another study that 2 mm thick PP/CF composites in the X-band attained EMI SE of 24, 30, and 32 dB at 10–15–20 wt % CF content.17 As can be seen, the EMI SE values of PA11/PLA/CF composites are competitive with those of other CF-reinforced composites. Furthermore, the sample thicknesses in the comparative studies are higher than those in our study. Despite being thinner, the PA11/PLA/CF samples exhibit higher EMI SE values. The thickness of the shield material also affects the EMI SE. The conductive network structure in the thick material can further attenuate the incident EM wave. It is well known that when sample thickness increases, the EMI SE value rises.16,60 According to Luo et al., as the thickness of the MXene/natural rubber nanocomposite increased from 34 to 248 μm, the EMI SE value at 12.4 GHz increased from 12.2 to 29.4 dB. Figure 6 Variation of (a) SER, (b) SEA, and (c) SETOT (EMI SE) of PA11/PLA/CF composites with frequency in X-band, and (d) comparison of SER, SEA, and SETOT as a function of the CF amount at 10 GHz. Contributions of reflection and absorption mechanisms to EMI SE for detailed evaluation are shown in Figure 6a,b. The main cause of EMI shielding through reflection is an impedance mismatch between the shielding material’s surface and free space. Furthermore, the shield must involve mobile charge carriers like electrons and holes that can interact with the incoming EM wave and produce a counter field known as an induced field or a scattering field for reflection to be realized. Metals are common materials that provide shielding by reflection due to their high conductivity.4,27 Since the impedance of the conductive shield is lower than the impedance of free space, a greater impedance mismatch causes significant EM wave reflection.4 To absorb the nonreflective portion of an incoming EM wave, the shield must include magnetic and electric dipoles which can interact with the EM wave’s magnetic and electric fields. Thus, when the EM wave enters the shield, it loses its energy due to dielectric (polarization) and ohmic losses. Absorption is a function of conductivity and permittivity. Conductive networks of a structure increase ohmic losses while materials with high dielectric constant values provide dipoles.4,27 In Figure 6a, low SER values between 3 and 8 dB indicate the impedance matching between composites and free space. The value of SER increased with the increase of the CF amount. With increased CF amount, the conductivity of the matrix increased, causing an impedance mismatch between the shield and the free space and enhancing the contribution of reflection.58,61 On the other hand, the SER curves showed small fluctuations in the X-band frequency. In the composites, when incident EM waves interact with conductive fibers acting as resonators, they can induce electric currents at certain frequencies. If the conductive fibers are aligned in a particular orientation within the matrix, they can resonate at a particular frequency, causing a peak in the SER curve at that frequency.25Figure 6a,b demonstrates that the SEA value always exceeds the SER value in all CF amounts. The fact that SEA is higher than SER indicates that the overall EMI shielding performance of PA11/PLA/CF composites is primarily accomplished through absorption rather than reflection.53,61Figure 6d depicts a more illustrative graph of the individual contributions to SET at a constant frequency of 10 GHz. The SEA value of all composites dominates by a significant margin, making up about 82% of the SET. The assumption that the absorption mechanism is dominant, on the other hand, is not totally accurate. Due to the impedance mismatch, the incident EM wave first strikes the surface of the shield and reflects. The nonreflective portion of the electromagnetic wave keeps moving toward the shield. High SER values of more than 3 dB caused by the wave striking the shield surface indicate that more than half of the incoming EM waves are reflected before penetrating the shield material.58,61 This implies that reflection is dominant. Figure 7a shows the power coefficients (A, R, and T) as a function of the CF amount at 10 GHz computed from the scattering parameters in accordance with eq 2 to assess the EMI shielding mechanism more clearly. The PA11/PLA matrix exhibits a high T value of 0.84, showing that it is transparent to EM waves. The T value dropped drastically as CF was added and its amount was raised, while R and A increased. This could be because of the addition of CF, which increases electrical conductivity and dielectric losses. R continued to increase at high CF amounts while A decreased, because the impedance mismatch between the free space and the shield surface will grow as conductivity increases.47,58,61Figure 7b illustrates the connection between the volume resistivity and the power coefficients of the composites. R increased with the reduction in volume resistivity, that is, with the increase in conductivity. Figure 7 Power coefficients as a function of (a) the CF amount and (b) volume resistivity. (c) EMI SE as a function of volume resistivity. (d) Effective absorbance. On the other hand, A increased first and then reduced slightly as the conductivity increased. This confirms that as the CF amount and conductivity level rise, the impedance mismatch intensifies. The correlation between volume resistivity and SE values is shown in Figure 7c. As can be seen, the reflection power coefficient is higher than the absorption, while the SER value is quite low compared to SEA. This inverse relationship can be explained by the differences in power coefficients and shielding efficiency notions. R, A, and T are quantitative notions of the power balance of the incoming and attenuated EM waves, but SE is a relative notion that does not directly depend on the absolute power.61 SEA is the ability to disperse the EM wave that can enter the shield after reflection, while A represents the ratio of the power attenuated by the shield to the total incoming power. That is, the contribution of absorption to total shielding depends on the material’s capacity to attenuate the nonreflected EM wave and the thickness of the shield material.47,58 In other words, PA11/PLA/CF composites have EM wave absorption capabilities as well, although the shielding occurs primarily through reflection. The ratio of the incoming power to the absorbed power is defined as effective absorbance (Aeff). The Aeff values were computed using eq 5 and are shown in Figure 7d as a function of the amount of CF to more accurately assess the absorption potentials of the composites. The Aeff value of the matrix was 14%, and it increased to 96% with the addition of 10 CF and eventually reached 99% as the amount of CF increased. This indicates that CF considerably improves the matrix’s capacity to absorb EM waves, and this phenomenon is due to increasing polarization and ohmic losses after CF addition. 4 Conclusions In summary, CF-reinforced environmentally friendly PA11/PLA composites were successfully manufactured as EMI shielding material. The composite samples were fabricated by commercial twin-screw extrusion and injection/compression molding methods. The effects of CF amounts on thermal stability, flammability, volume resistivity, AC conductivity, and dielectric and EMI SE performances were examined. According to SEM images, there is a strong interfacial adhesion between the PA11/PLA matrix and CFs. TGA showed that CF improves the thermal stability of the matrix by preventing the diffusion of degrading products and decreasing the diffusion rate. Flammability tests showed that the LOI value increased with the addition of CF, while the UL-94 classification remained V-2. Still, the 30 CF composite exhibited a good LOI of 27%. The volume resistivity of the matrix, which is 3.95 × 1011 Ω·m, decreased to 105 and 104 Ω·m, respectively, by adding 20–30 wt % CF. The obtained volume resistivity values are at the same level with the literature data and commercial products. Moreover, the AC conductivities of the composites were evaluated in the range of 10–2 Hz to 107 Hz, and it was observed that the conductivity level reached 0.095 and 0.68 S/m, respectively, in the composites containing 20–30 wt % CF. Based on this, it was concluded that a conductive network structure was created in the matrix. Besides AC conductivity, the real and imaginary parts of dielectric permittivity of PA11/PLA/CF composites increased by several orders of magnitude with CF loading. It was found that εr″ was higher than εr′. Composites that benefit from the conductive network structure and high dielectric properties exhibited acceptable levels of EMI SE in the X-band frequency. While the matrix was transparent to EM waves, composites containing 10–20–30 wt % CF exhibited EMI SE of 15, 23, and 28 dB, respectively, at 10 GHz. It was observed that the obtained EMI SE values were comparable to the polymer/carbon fiber composites available in the literature and even higher than the thicker composite samples. In the calculations to determine the EMI shielding mechanism, reflection was found to be the dominant mechanism, similar to the literature data. Finally, in this study, as an EMI shield, CF-reinforced bio-based polymeric composites were shown to be promising. The required 20 dB EMI SE value for practical applications has been achieved and an alternative shielding material to metals has been presented for electronic equipment such as computers and radio frequency circuits. The authors declare no competing financial interest. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK) for the financial support with project number 121M155 and the BİDEB 2211-C Domestic Priority Areas Doctoral Scholarship Program. ==== Refs References Zhang K. ; Zheng L. ; Aouraghe M. A. ; Xu F. Ultra-light-weight kevlar/polyimide 3D woven spacer multifunctional composites for high-gain microstrip antenna. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 5 , 872–883. 10.1007/s42114-021-00382-2. Dilli R. ; Chandra M L R. ; Jordhana D. Ultra-Massive Multiple Input Multiple Output Technologies for 6G Wireless Networks. Eng. Sci. 2021, 16 , 308–318. 10.30919/es8d571. Al-Zhrani S. ; Bedaiwi N. M. ; El-Ramli I. F. ; Barasheed A. Z. ; Abduldaiem A. ; Al-Hadeethi Y. ; Umar A. Underwater Optical Communications: A Brief Overview and Recent Developments. Eng. Sci. 2021, 16 , 146–186. 10.30919/es8d574. Gupta S. ; Tai N.-H. Carbon materials and their composites for electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness in X-band. Carbon 2019, 152 , 159–187. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.06.002. Kaushal A. ; Singh V. Analysis of mechanical, thermal, electrical and EMI shielding properties of graphite/carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene composites prepared via a twin screw extruder. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139 , 51444 10.1002/app.51444. Sun M. X. ; Cao W. Q. ; Zhu P. Y. ; Xiong Z. M. ; Chen C. C. ; Shu J. C. ; Huang W. H. ; Wu F. Thermally tailoring magnetic molecular sponges through self-propagating combustion to tune magnetic-dielectric synergy toward high-efficiency microwave absorption and attenuation. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2023, 6 , 54 10.1007/s42114-023-00629-0. Kumar P. ; Maiti U. N. ; Sikdar A. ; Das T. ; Kumar A. ; Sudarsan V. Recent Advances in Polymer and Polymer Composites for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding: Review and Future Prospects. Polym. Rev. 2019, 59 , 687–738. 10.1080/15583724.2019.1625058. Wu B. ; Qian G. ; Yan Y. ; Alam M. M. ; Xia R. ; Qian J. Design of Interconnected Carbon Fiber Thermal Management Composites with Effective EMI Shielding Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14 , 49082–49093. 10.1021/acsami.2c13433.36256731 Wang C. ; Gao H. ; Liang D. ; Liu S. ; Zhang H. ; Guan H. ; Wu Y. ; Zhang Y. Effective fabrication of flexible nickel chains/acrylate composite pressure-sensitive adhesives with layered structure for tunable electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 5 , 2906–2920. 10.1007/s42114-022-00482-7. Liu T. T. ; Zhu Y. H. ; Shu J. C. ; Zhang M. ; Cao M. S. Patterned MXene-enabled switchable health monitoring and electromagnetic protection for architecture. Mater. Today Phys. 2023, 31 , 100988 10.1016/j.mtphys.2023.100988. Xu X. ; Yao F. ; Ali O. A. A. ; Xie W. ; Mahmoud S. F. ; Xie P. ; El-Bahy S. M. ; Huang M. ; Liu C. ; Fan R. ; Guo Z. ; Du A. ; Estevez D. ; Qin F. ; Peng H. ; Young D. P. ; Gu H. Adjustable core-sheath architecture of polyaniline-decorated hollow carbon nanofiber nanocomposites with negative permittivity for superb electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 5 , 2002–2011. 10.1007/s42114-022-00538-8. Tong X. C. Advanced Materials and Design for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding; CRC Press: United States of America, 2009. Kumar R. ; Sahoo S. ; Joanni E. ; Singh R. K. ; Tan W. K. ; Kar K. K. ; Matsuda A. Recent progress on carbon-based composite materials for microwave electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 2021, 177 , 304–331. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.02.091. Dai B. ; Ma Y. ; Dong F. ; Yu J. ; Ma M. ; Thabet H. K. ; El-Bahy S. M. ; Ibrahim M. M. ; Huang M. ; Seok I. ; Roymahapatra G. ; Naik N. ; Xu B. ; Xu B. B. ; Ding J. ; Li T. Overview of MXene and conducting polymer matrix composites for electromagnetic wave absorption. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 5 , 704–754. 10.1007/s42114-022-00510-6. Lecocq H. ; Garois N. ; Lhost O. ; Girard P. F. ; Cassagnau P. ; Serghei A. Polypropylene/carbon nanotubes composite materials with enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding performance: Properties and modeling. Composites, Part B 2020, 189 , 107866 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107866. Zeng Q. ; Du Z. ; Qin C. ; Wang Y. ; Liu C. ; Shen C. Enhanced thermal, mechanical and electromagnetic interference shielding properties of graphene nanoplatelets-reinforced poly(lactic acid)/poly(ethylene oxide) nanocomposites. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 25 , 101632 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101632. Kaushal A. ; Singh V. Development of lightweight polypropylene/carbon fiber composites for its application in shielding of electromagnetic interference in X-band. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2020, 31 , 14088–14100. 10.1007/s10854-020-03963-x. Ren W. ; Yang Y. ; Yang J. ; Duan H. ; Zhao G. ; Liu Y. Multifunctional and corrosion resistant poly(phenylene sulfide)/Ag composites for electromagnetic interference shielding. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 415 , 129052 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129052. Li J. ; Zhang X. ; Ding Y. ; Zhao S. ; Ma Z. ; Zhang H. ; He X. Multifunctional carbon fiber@NiCo/polyimide films with outstanding electromagnetic interference shielding performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427 , 131937 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131937. Pradhan S. S. ; Unnikrishnan L. ; Mohanty S. ; Nayak S. K. Effect of graphite flake and multi-walled carbon nanotube on thermal, mechanical, electrical, and electromagnetic interference shielding properties of polycarbonate nanocomposite. Polym. Compos. 2021, 42 , 4043–4055. 10.1002/pc.26115. Keith J. M. ; Janda N. B. ; King J. A. ; Perger W. F. ; Oxby T. J. Shielding effectiveness density theory for carbon fiber/nylon 6,6 composites. Polym. Compos. 2005, 26 , 671–678. 10.1002/pc.20139. Duan H. ; Zhu H. ; Yang Y. ; Hou T. ; Zhao G. ; Liu Y. Facile and economical fabrication of conductive polyamide 6 composites with segregated expanded graphite networks for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2018, 29 , 1058–1064. 10.1007/s10854-017-8006-z. Nath K. ; Ghosh S. ; Ghosh S. K. ; Das P. ; Das N. C. Facile preparation of light-weight biodegradable and electrically conductive polymer based nanocomposites for superior electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138 , 50514 10.1002/app.50514. Dang B. ; Chen Y. ; Yang N. ; Chen B. ; Sun Q. Effect of carbon fiber addition on the electromagnetic shielding properties of carbon fiber/polyacrylamide/wood based fiberboards. Nanotechnology 2018, 29 , 195605 10.1088/1361-6528/aab243.29480810 Mikinka E. ; Siwak M. Recent advances in electromagnetic interference shielding properties of carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer composites—a topical review. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2021, 32 , 24585–24643. 10.1007/s10854-021-06900-8. Kim I. C. ; Kwon K. H. ; Kim W. N. Effects of hybrid fillers on the electrical conductivity, EMI shielding effectiveness, and flame retardancy of PBT and PolyASA composites with carbon fiber and MWCNT. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136 , 48162 10.1002/app.48162. Lee S. H. ; Kim J. Y. ; Koo C. M. ; Kim W. N. Effects of processing methods on the electrical conductivity, electromagnetic parameters, and EMI shielding effectiveness of polypropylene/nickel-coated carbon fiber composites. Macromol. Res. 2017, 25 , 936–943. 10.1007/s13233-017-5113-x. Tzeng S. S. ; Chang F. Y. EMI shielding effectiveness of metal-coated carbon fiber-reinforced ABS composites. Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 2001, 302 , 258–267. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01824-4. Durmaz B. U. ; Aytac A. Investigation of the mechanical, thermal, morphological and rheological properties of bio-based polyamide11/poly(lactic acid) blend reinforced with short carbon fiber. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 30 , 103030 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.103030. Hwang S. S. Tensile, electrical conductivity and EMI shielding properties of solid and foamed PBT/carbon fiber composites. Composites, Part B 2016, 98 , 1–8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.028. Goosey M. Electronic Waste Management; Hester R. E. ; Harrison R. M. , Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 2008. Ahmad A. F. ; Ab Aziz S. ; Abbas Z. ; Obaiys S. J. ; Matori K. A. ; Zaid M. H. M. ; Raad H. K. ; Aliyu U. S. Chemically reduced graphene oxide-reinforced poly(lactic acid)/poly(ethylene glycol) nanocomposites: Preparation, characterization, and applications in electromagnetic interference shielding. Polymers 2019, 11 , 661 10.3390/polym11040661.30978935 Patel R. ; Ruehle D. A. ; Dorgan J. R. ; Halley P. ; Martin D. Biorenewable Blends of Polyamide-11 and Polylactide. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2014, 54 , 1523–1532. 10.1002/pen.23692. Durmaz B. U. ; Aytac A. In Poly(lactic acid)/Polyamide 11 Bio-Based Polymer Blends, 4th International New York Conference on Evolving Trends, Reuterskiöld C. , Eds.; Liberty Publications: Newyork, 2021; pp 38–44. Zhang Y. P. ; Zhou C. G. ; Sun W. J. ; Wang T. ; Jia L. C. ; Yan D. X. ; Li Z. M. Injection molding of segregated carbon nanotube/polypropylene composite with enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding and mechanical performance. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2020, 197 , 108253 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108253. Devi N. ; Ray S. S. Electromagnetic interference cognizance and potential of advanced polymer composites toward electromagnetic interference shielding: A review. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2022, 62 , 591–621. 10.1002/pen.25876. Zhao B. ; Zhao C. ; Li R. ; Hamidinejad S. M. ; Park C. B. Flexible, Ultrathin, and High-Efficiency Electromagnetic Shielding Properties of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride)/Carbon Composite Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 , 20873–20884. 10.1021/acsami.7b04935.28558470 Rajan A. ; Solaman S. K. ; Ganesanpotti S. Design and Fabrication of Layered Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Materials: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Performance Prediction and Efficiency Tuning. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 15 , 5822–5835. 10.1021/acsami.2c19016. Levchik S. V. ; Costa L. ; Camino G. Effect of the fire-retardant, ammonium polyphosphate, on the thermal decomposition of aliphatic polyamides. I. Polyamides 11 and 12. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1992, 36 , 31–41. 10.1016/0141-3910(92)90045-7. Levchik S. V. ; Weil E. D. ; Lewin M. Thermal decomposition of aliphatic nylons. Polym. Int. 1999, 48 , 532–557. 10.1002/(sici)1097-0126(199907)48:7<532::aid-pi214>3.0.co;2-r. Zhao X. ; de Juan S. ; Guerrero F. R. ; Li Z. ; Llorca J. ; Wang D. Y. Effect of N,N′-diallyl-phenylphosphoricdiamide on ease of ignition, thermal decomposition behavior and mechanical properties of poly (lactic acid). Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 127 , 2–10. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.01.014. Renzi A. I. ; Verdoliva A. ; Filippone G. ; Acierno D. Fully Bio-Based Nanocomposite: Formulations For Packaging Application. J. Appl. Packag. Res. 2016, 8 , 43–46. Lin G. ; Li D. ; Liu M. ; Zhang X. ; Zheng Y. Rheology, non-isothermal crystallization behavior, mechanical and thermal properties of PMMA-modified carbon fiber-reinforced poly(ethylene terephthalate) composites. Polymers 2018, 10 , 594 10.3390/polym10060594.30966628 Saleem A. ; Frormann L. ; Iqbal A. High performance thermoplastic composites: Study on the mechanical, thermal, and electrical resistivity properties of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone and polyethersulphone. Polym. Compos. 2007, 28 , 785–796. 10.1002/pc.20297. Mergen Ö. B. ; Umut E. ; Arda E. ; Kara S. A comparative study on the AC/DC conductivity, dielectric and optical properties of polystyrene/graphene nanoplatelets (PS/GNP) and multi-walled carbon nanotube (PS/MWCNT) nanocomposites. Polym. Test. 2020, 90 , 106682 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106682. SABIC Reliable Cost Effective LNP Faradex Compounds for EMI Shielding 2021. Kashi S. ; Gupta R. K. ; Baum T. ; Kao N. ; Bhattacharya S. N. Dielectric properties and electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of graphene-based biodegradable nanocomposites. Mater. Des. 2016, 109 , 68–78. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.062. Shin B. ; Mondal S. ; Lee M. ; Kim S. ; Huh Y. Il ; Nah C. Flexible thermoplastic polyurethane-carbon nanotube composites for electromagnetic interference shielding and thermal management. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 418 , 129282 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129282. Zhang Z. ; Liu M. ; Ibrahim M. M. ; Wu H. ; Wu Y. ; Li Y. ; Mersal G. A. M. ; El Azab I. H. ; El-Bahy S. M. ; Huang M. ; Jiang Y. ; Liang G. ; Xie P. ; Liu C. Flexible polystyrene/graphene composites with epsilon-near-zero properties. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 5 , 1054–1066. 10.1007/s42114-022-00486-3. Pan F. ; Cai L. ; Shi Y. ; Dong Y. ; Zhu X. ; Cheng J. ; Jiang H. ; Wang X. ; Zhong S. ; Lu W. Phase engineering reinforced multiple loss network in apple tree-like liquid metal/Ni-Ni3P/N-doped carbon fiber composites for high-performance microwave absorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 435 , 135009 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135009. Kasgoz A. ; Korkmaz M. ; Alanalp M. B. ; Durmus A. Effect of processing method on microstructure, electrical conductivity and electromagnetic wave interference (EMI) shielding performance of carbon nanofiber filled thermoplastic polyurethane composites. J. Polym. Res. 2017, 24 , 148 10.1007/s10965-017-1312-6. Ahmad H. S. ; Hussain T. ; Nawab Y. ; Salamat S. Effect of various dielectric and magnetic nanofillers on microwave absorption properties of carbon fiber reinforced composites structures. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48 , 19882–19890. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.263. Ameli A. ; Jung P. U. ; Park C. B. Electrical properties and electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of polypropylene/carbon fiber composite foams. Carbon 2013, 60 , 379–391. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.050. Sohi N. J. S. ; Rahaman M. ; Khastgir D. Dielectric property and electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of ethylene vinyl acetate-based conductive composites: Effect of different type of carbon fillers. Polym. Compos. 2011, 32 , 1148–1154. 10.1002/pc.21133. Huang Y. ; Tan L. ; Zheng S. ; Liu Z. ; Feng J. ; Yang M. B. Enhanced dielectric properties of polyamide 11/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132 , 42642 10.1002/app.42642. Cao M. S. ; Song W. L. ; Hou Z. L. ; Wen B. ; Yuan J. The effects of temperature and frequency on the dielectric properties, electromagnetic interference shielding and microwave-absorption of short carbon fiber/silica composites. Carbon 2010, 48 , 788–796. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.028. Ge Y. ; Li Y. ; Bai Y. ; Yuan C. ; Wu C. ; Hu Y. Intelligent gelatin/oxidized chitin nanocrystals nanocomposite films containing black rice bran anthocyanins for fish freshness monitorings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155 , 1296–1306. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.101.31751683 Ahmad A. F. ; Ab Aziz S. ; Obaiys S. J. ; Zaid M. H. M. ; Matori K. A. ; Samikannu K. ; Aliyu U. S. Biodegradable poly (lactic acid)/poly (ethylene glycol) reinforced multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposite fabrication, charactarization, Properties, and Applications. Polymers 2020, 12 , 427 10.3390/polym12020427.32059368 Rahaman M. ; Chaki T. K. ; Khastgir D. High-performance EMI shielding materials based on short carbon fiber-filled ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, acrylonitrile butadiene copolymer, and their blends. Polym. Compos. 2011, 32 , 1790–1805. 10.1002/pc.21212. Luo J. Q. ; Zhao S. ; Zhang H.-B. ; Deng Z. ; Li L. ; Yu Z. Z. Flexible, stretchable and electrically conductive MXene/natural rubber nanocomposite films for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 182 , 107754 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107754. Guo Z. ; Ren P. ; Zhang Z. ; Dai Z. ; Lu Z. ; Jin Y. ; Ren F. Fabrication of carbonized spent coffee grounds/graphene nanoplates/cyanate ester composites for superior and highly absorbed electromagnetic interference shielding performance. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 102 , 123–131. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.05.082.