
==== Front
J Epidemiol Community Health
J Epidemiol Community Health
jech
jech
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
0143-005X
1470-2738
BMJ Publishing Group BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR

38955463
jech-2022-220162
10.1136/jech-2022-220162
Essay
1506
1507
Intergenerational transmission of health inequalities: towards a life course approach to socioeconomic inequalities in health – a review
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6090-4376
Houweling Tanja A J 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7034-1922
Grünberger Ilona 2
1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Correspondence to Dr Tanja A J Houweling, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; a.j.houweling@erasmusmc.nl
10 2024
2 7 2024
78 10 641649
05 12 2022
19 4 2024
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Adult health inequalities are a persistent public health problem. Explanations are usually sought in behaviours and environments in adulthood, despite evidence on the importance of early life conditions for life course outcomes. We review evidence from a broad range of fields to unravel to what extent, and how, socioeconomic health inequalities are intergenerationally transmitted.

We find that transmission of socioeconomic and associated health (dis)advantages from parents to offspring, and its underlying structural determinants, contributes substantially to socioeconomic inequalities in adult health. In the first two decades of life—from conception to early adulthood—parental socioeconomic position (SEP) and parental health strongly influence offspring adult SEP and health. Socioeconomic and health (dis)advantages are largely transmitted through the same broad mechanisms. Socioeconomic inequalities in the fetal environment contribute to inequalities in fetal development and birth outcomes, with lifelong socioeconomic and health consequences. Inequalities in the postnatal environment—especially the psychosocial and learning environment, physical exposures and socialisation—result in inequalities in child and adolescent health, development and behavioural habits, with health and socioeconomic consequences tracking into adulthood. Structural factors shape these mechanisms in a socioeconomically patterned and time-specific and place-specific way, leading to distinct birth-cohort patterns in health inequality.

Adult health inequalities are for an important part intergenerationally transmitted. Effective health inequality reduction requires addressing intergenerational transmission of (dis)advantage by creating societal circumstances that allow all children to develop to their full potential.

Health inequalities
PUBLIC HEALTH
HEALTH POLICY
Life course epidemiology
CHILD HEALTH
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006636 Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2018-00211 Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences (KNAW) NA Norwegian Research Council 288638 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001826 ZonMw 531003013 NWO NWA.1238.18.001 special-featureunlocked
special-featureeditors-choice
==== Body
pmcWHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

There is a long research tradition of quantifying and explaining socioeconomic inequalities in adult health. Despite growing evidence on the importance of early life factors for adult health and social outcomes, explanations for adult health inequalities are usually sought in adulthood.

To what extent are adult health inequalities the consequence of early life inequalities? We critically discuss the empirical evidence on early life inequalities and how they contribute to adult health inequalities.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Socioeconomic inequalities in adult health can for an important part be explained by inequalities in the first two decades of life.

Broadly the same mechanisms in early life strongly influence both adult health and adult SEP.

Structural factors shape inequalities in the fetal and postnatal environment and contribute to birth cohort-specific patterns in adult health inequality.

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

Socioeconomic health inequalities can be effectively reduced by providing supportive environments to (expectant) families.

Introduction

Socioeconomic health inequalities are a persistent public health problem. Even in welfare states, low socioeconomic position (SEP) remains associated with worse health outcomes.1 Several factors may contribute to this.2 An important factor that has received insufficient attention is intergenerational transmission.

What is the role of intergenerational transmission in explaining health inequalities? Socioeconomic health inequalities have been observed across birth cohorts for many health outcomes.1 However, this does not necessarily imply intergenerational transmission. Adult health inequalities could possibly also arise out of factors in adulthood that are largely independent of early life (dis)advantages. Yet, there are good reasons to believe that intergenerational transmission of health inequalities is important or, in other words, that transmission of socioeconomic and associated health (dis)advantages from parents to offspring—through the in utero environment and postnatal environment and the underlying structural drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in these environments—contributes to socioeconomic inequalities in adult health.

First, parental and offspring relative positions in the social hierarchy are closely related, as observed for educational attainment, income, wealth, and occupational class—although with time and place variations (figure 1).3–5 For intergenerational transmission of health inequalities to occur, it is sufficient that SEP is intergenerationally transmitted, provided that adult SEP influences adult health. Second, many health determinants and health problems associated with SEP are intergenerationally transmitted, through latent, cumulative and pathway effects of early life (dis)advantage.6 Parents of low SEP, on average, live in less healthy environments, exhibit less healthy behaviours and have worse health status than better-off parents.1 By shaping fetal, child and adolescent health and development, and childhood and adolescent socialisation, these disadvantages—and their underlying structural determinants—affect offspring health determinants and health outcomes as well as SEP.7

Figure 1 Educational attainment (25–44 years) by parental education, 2012. Figure based on OECD data; data relate to men and women combined.5

Indeed, studies have reported persistent relationships between parental SEP and offspring adult health, partly mediated by offspring SEP, with the relative contributions of parental and offspring SEP varying between outcomes.8–10 While these studies do not directly answer the methodologically more complex question of what proportion of adult health inequalities is explained by parental SEP and how this proportion varies across contexts, they are indicative of the importance of parental SEP for understanding adult health inequalities.

Recent advances in neuroscience, genetics and research on the fetal environment—when combined with evidence from epidemiology, sociology, economics, developmental psychology and education sciences—can further our understanding of the intergenerational transmission of health inequalities. Our paper builds on earlier work6 11–13 and seeks to bridge disciplinary gaps by bringing together these disparate lines in the literature to answer the question of the extent to which, and the mechanisms through which, socioeconomic health inequalities are intergenerationally transmitted. We discuss the fetal and postnatal environment as main ‘channels’ through which SEP and associated health (dis)advantages are transmitted from parents to children. We also discuss the role of genetics. We conclude with a section on the important role of structural drivers of these transmission channels and policy implications. Figure 2 illustrates our findings. In a companion paper, we propose an analytical framework and agenda for research on the intergenerational transmission of health inequalities.14

Figure 2 Intergenerational transmission of health inequalities: contributing factors. The figure describes the factors that contribute to the intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic and health (dis)advantage at the family level, leading to the persistence of health inequalities at the population level. Fewer socioeconomic resources and—on average—worse health make it more difficult for lower socioeconomic position (SEP) (lower line) parents (generation 1) to provide a nurturing environment for their children than for higher SEP parents (upper line). Inequalities in direct exposures in the fetal period (eg, maternal health and health behaviours) contribute to worse birth outcomes in children (generation 2) born to parents of low SEP, with subsequent effects for child health and development. Inequalities in the postnatal environment (especially the psychosocial and learning environment, physical exposures and socialisation) further contribute to inequalities in child and adolescent health, development, behavioural habits, educational attainment and subsequently to adult health and the ability to make healthy choices throughout the life course. The conditions in which low SEP parents live, and their structural drivers, make it more difficult to provide a nurturing environment for children. These structural drivers pull, as it were, the upper line up and the lower line down. For example, economies are structured such that incomes and job security are better for jobs requiring a higher education, leaving children of less educated parents at greater risk of growing up in poverty. On reaching adulthood, attained health, SEP and behavioural habits in generation 2, in turn, influence the odds of leading a flourishing life in generation 3. Developed by Liesbeth Smith, The Online Scientist, commissioned by and in collaboration with the authors.

Fetal environment

The fetal environment is a channel through which health inequalities are transmitted intergenerationally. Research on the developmental origins of health and disease in low-income countries15 and historical and contemporary cohorts in high-income countries shows that the fetal environment influences adult health and SEP.16 17 The fetal environment is influenced by circumstances before and during pregnancy. For example, there is evidence that lifetime trauma and history of maternal childhood trauma affect fetal development via dysregulation of the maternal stress response system and may render exposed infants more vulnerable to future illness.18 19 Studies on the Dutch World War II famine have shown that undernutrition in pregnancy can lead to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in offspring,20 with effects possibly spanning multiple generations.21 22

In contemporary high-income countries, women of low SEP are more likely to be overweight/obese and to smoke in the preconception period than women of high SEP.23 24 During pregnancy, they are more likely to continue smoking,25 and if they smoke, they usually smoke more.26 They are also more likely to be exposed to passive smoking,27 suffer from gestational hypertension,24 mental health problems28 and unhealthy weight gain during pregnancy,29 and are less likely to, in a timely manner, take folic acid supplementation (fortification of grain flour is currently uncommon in European countries).30 Inequalities in such risk factors are substantial. Over 43% of lower-educated pregnant women in the generation R cohort (Netherlands) smoked during pregnancy, compared with 5% of high-educated women.25 In France, only 23% of women with primary education took folic acid supplementation, compared with 53% of women with a master’s degree.30

These risk factors have important effects on perinatal health, including fetal growth, brain development,31–35 preterm birth31 and low birth weight19 (due to intrauterine growth restriction and/or preterm birth). Even in the first weeks of pregnancy, embryos are smaller when mothers smoke and do not take folic acid supplementation.36 Fetal growth is more heavily restricted when mothers smoke more (dose-response relationship).32 37

Fetal growth is slower in fetuses of women with lower education.25 38 In some recent European cohorts, socioeconomic inequalities in fetal growth were primarily explained by smoking inequalities.25 26 A Dutch cohort study, for example, found that 15.5% of infants of low-educated mothers were born small for gestational age, compared with 8.5% among high-educated mothers. Two-thirds of this difference was explained by maternal smoking.26

Adverse fetal circumstances and adverse perinatal outcomes can have long-term effects on adult SEP and health. Fetal growth rate and length of gestation can have latent health effects, resulting from environmental influences experienced during critical or sensitive periods.6 39 Fetal growth is associated with health in adult life and old age, and these associations are well documented for cardiovascular health.40–42 The risk of hypertension, for example, is higher as birth weight declines.43 Birth outcomes can also become part of the life course processes of accumulation of risk and multiple pathway effects, in that they are also associated with motor development, child and adult cognitive functioning and educational attainment,28 44–48 with possibly stronger effects at lower ends of the (eg, birth weight) distribution.49 50

Research on possible postnatal confounding of the associations between fetal circumstances and adult SEP and health remains scarce. For childhood cognitive function, there is some evidence that its association with fetal conditions is partly confounded by the family environment.48 Nevertheless, sibling studies—in which associations between and within families are compared—suggest that fetal growth remains associated with child and adult cognitive function independently from fixed maternal and family factors.44

The effect of the fetal environment may be modified by the postnatal environment. For cognitive development, evidence remains limited and mixed, with some studies showing stronger negative effects of preterm birth on cognitive outcomes for low SEP children and other studies showing no interaction.51 Evidence on effect modification is, however, substantial for blood pressure, CVD and diabetes: impaired fetal growth is more strongly associated with these outcomes in overweight/obese adults and/or those with an unhealthy lifestyle.52–54

Research on mediation of the effect of parental SEP on offspring health and development by fetal conditions in contemporary cohorts remains scarce. One study found that birth weight only modestly explained socioeconomic inequalities in childhood blood pressure and prehypertension, but fetal growth was not examined.55 Another study found that inequalities in all-cause mortality by parental SEP were not explained by gestational age at birth and birth weight, but no formal mediation analysis was done.56 Limited evidence on cognitive development suggests that the mediating effect of fetal conditions is small, absent or only observed in the lowest SEP,57–59 although third-trimester fetal growth was arguably not adequately captured. Furthermore, the magnitude of the effect of, and part of the variance in cognitive development explained by, fetal factors appears moderate compared with that of parental SEP, suggesting that the postnatal environment may be more important for cognitive functioning than fetal growth.44 45 48

Summarising, substantial inequalities in the fetal environment—and the structural drivers of these inequalities discussed further below—contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in adult health and SEP. The magnitude of this contribution remains uncertain; the limited evidence available suggests it may be moderate compared with the contribution of the postnatal environment.

The postnatal child and adolescent environment

The postnatal environment strongly influences child and adolescent health and development. The physical and (psycho)social environment becomes literally embodied,60 for example, by influencing brain development. Through socialisation, the social and physical environment become embedded in the child’s and adolescents’ repertoire of beliefs, values and behavioural habits, which track into adulthood. Socioeconomic inequalities in the postnatal environment are substantial, with enduring consequences for health and SEP through a combination of latent, cumulative and pathway effects.6 61 62

Physical environment

The physical environment is strongly socioeconomically patterned, shaping inequalities in child health and development, and adult health and educational attainment. Children in poor households are, for example, more likely to be exposed to outdoor and indoor air pollution and toxins such as lead,63 64 impacting neurological and lung development.65 They are exposed to poorer food environments, at home, school and in their neighbourhoods,66 affecting health via nutrition-related outcomes.67 Physical environments also indirectly affect health, by influencing the learning of (un)healthy eating habits.68

Psychosocial and learning environment

In the first years of life, the brain develops most rapidly and is highly sensitive to external influences. The early childhood psychosocial environment and the quality of stimulation in particular affect socioemotional and cognitive development. Cognitive development includes, among others, language development and executive functions69 and the underlying brain functions of self-control, working memory and mental flexibility.70–72 In turn, these influence educational attainment, mental health and ability to make healthy choices throughout the life course.69 73 Research on high-quality early child development interventions shows that the psychosocial and learning environment can have substantial causal effects on child development and later life health and social outcomes.61 62

Socioeconomic inequalities in cognitive stimulation and the psychosocial home environment have been observed in UK cohort studies,70 71 possibly partly explained by parental stress and mental health problems associated with low SEP.74–76 Experimental and non-experimental longitudinal research has shown that improvements in family income are associated with improvements in child executive functions and school achievement,77 78 possibly partly mediated by improved maternal mental health.79 Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are more common in children growing up in poorer households.80 81 These experiences become embodied, through neural sculpting of the developing brain.82 83 ACEs, including child maltreatment, are associated with lower adulthood SEP, higher prevalence of mental and physical health problems and harmful behaviours, and greater ACE risks for the subsequent generation.84–86 Inequalities in the psychosocial and home learning environment are compounded by lower participation in high-quality early childhood education programmes among children of disadvantaged households.87

Socialisation

Childhood and adolescent socialisation—the process by which patterns of beliefs, values and behaviours that are acceptable in a social context are learnt and internalised, first from direct care takers and then from peers and their wider social environment—is another mechanism through which health inequalities are reproduced across generations.88 It leads to intergenerational similarity in health-related behaviours.88 Adolescents are, for example, more likely to start smoking when their parents smoke.89 Contemporary socioeconomic inequalities in childhood smoking uptake are largely explained by parental smoking.90 And (un)healthy behaviours, such as smoking, diet and physical (in)activity track from childhood into adulthood.68 91

Inequalities in the postnatal environment translate into inequalities in child and adolescent health and development. Socioeconomic inequalities in physical child health, including body mass index, dental health and asthma, are substantial.92 There are also socioeconomic inequalities in childhood brain development, especially in areas linked to memory, self-regulation and emotion, although the sample size of these studies is generally small.82 Similarly, socioeconomic inequalities in child cognitive and social-emotional development and mental health have been observed.77 92–95 Child and adolescent cognitive and socioemotional development, in turn, affect educational attainment,73 future labour market participation, occupational status and income.73 96

Mediation analyses suggest that contemporary socioeconomic inequalities in childhood cognitive and social-emotional development can for a substantial part be explained by the psychosocial and home learning environment70 77 97 and only for a small part by prenatal smoking, alcohol use and low birth weight.95 Yet, little is known about how this contribution varies across contexts. Also, little is known about the extent to which adult health inequalities are mediated by inequalities in the childhood and adolescent environment. A substantial literature links parental SEP to offspring adult health.8 9 98 The effect of parental SEP on stomach cancer is partly mediated by childhood infection with Helicobacter pylori, whereas its effect on lung cancer is partly mediated by adult SEP and associated smoking behaviours.98 Yet, the contribution of early life inequalities to social inequalities in different specific health outcomes in adulthood is rarely quantified.

Summarising, there is substantial evidence that the postnatal environment plays an important role in the intergenerational transmission of health inequalities, through the effects of the physical, psychosocial and learning environment, and of socialisation, and their underlying structural determinants. Yet, few studies quantify their contribution to adult health inequalities, let alone the extent to which this contribution varies across contexts.

Genetic factors

Genetics may, to some extent, also contribute to the intergenerational transmission of health inequalities. Adult SEP has consistently been associated with genetic factors in large twin studies and genome-wide association studies.99–106 Also the degree of similarity in educational attainment between parents and offspring has been partly explained by genetics.107–110 While it has been hypothesised that heritability estimates for educational attainment are higher in more meritocratic societies, evidence remains mixed.105 111–114 In addition to transmitted alleles, also non-transmitted parental alleles are associated with offspring educational attainment, possibly by shaping the nurturing environment, so-called genetic nurture or social genetic effects.115–118

Furthermore, genetic risk factors for health outcomes that affect SEP might contribute to the intergenerational transmission of health inequalities.119 For example, genetic factors contribute to the risk of developing schizophrenia,120 which in turn can, for example, lead to job loss.121 Inheritance of genetic risk factors for such conditions may reproduce the negative health-SEP link in subsequent generations.

Importantly, heritability estimates are not fixed properties but are context specific, dependent on country, birth cohort, and age,110 and only capture variance around a context-specific mean (eg, in educational attainment)109 and not the large differences in that mean across countries and time periods induced by social-structural factors. Heritability estimates are thus not a global measure of modifiability or importance of genetic versus environmental factors.100 110 122 Moreover, heritability estimates of complex social traits such as educational attainment can be substantially biased by population-level phenomena such as population stratification.123 124 Even if part of the observed correlations represent underlying causal effects, their pathways of influence are far from clear-cut. The genetic correlates of complex traits result from the combined effect of ‘thousands (and probably millions) of genetic variants’, with each a ‘tiny effect size’.125 126 The pathways are complex and operate via environmental mediators and moderators.100 125 For example, the expression of genetic risk factors for certain mental health problems like schizophrenia and psychotic disorders is influenced by environmental conditions such as adverse life events,127 implying that sensitivity to unfavourable circumstances is partly genetically inherited.127 Consequently, when social environments become reproduced across generations due to structural inequalities in society, such genetic factors might reinforce the intergenerational transmission of health inequalities.

Summarising, while the intergenerational transmission of genetic factors associated with SEP, and of genetic factors associated with health outcomes that affect SEP, may play a role in highly complex interrelation with the broader social environment, genetic associations may also be confounded by structural societal inequalities. Moreover, they do not explain the large variation across countries and time periods in educational attainment, health outcomes and social mobility associated with social-structural factors, which are more relevant for policy-making.

Structural determinants of the transmission channels

Why are unhealthy behaviours and maternal health problems in pregnancy more prevalent in lower SEP groups? And why are children of low SEP families more often exposed to unhealthy physical environments, less nurturing psychosocial and home learning environments and socialisation processes that make it more difficult to adopt health-promoting behaviours?

Poverty, low education, job insecurity, low housing quality, unsafe and unhealthy neighbourhoods and lower quality (pre)schooling make it more difficult for families to provide a nurturing fetal and postnatal environment.72 They make it more difficult to purchase healthy meals, books and computer and provide a quiet room to study and a safe and stimulating space for outdoor playing.128 129 And poverty, insecurity and debts may reduce the cognitive bandwidth needed to make healthy choices and provide a nurturing environment.130

These ‘instantaneous’ effects of low SEP are amplified by the effects of the ‘long arm’ of adverse fetal and postnatal conditions in previous generations.131 132 (Expectant) parents’ ability to make healthy choices and provide a nurturing environment is influenced by their own socialisation, mental health, cognitive ability and executive functions, as shaped by their own childhood circumstances. Grandparental SEP influences their grandchildren’s cognitive ability through its influence on parental cognitive ability and education and their effects on parenting practices (eg, stimulating learning environment, lack of coercive discipline and parental aspirations).70 Experiences of child maltreatment or other ACEs increase the risk of adulthood mental health problems and addiction86 and of maltreatment in the next generation.133 Mediation of these effects by intergenerational transmission of consequences of environmental insults through epigenetic changes, that is, changes in gene expression, has been proposed by some authors, although direct evidence from studies in humans remains scarce.134 135

There are more structural factors behind these mechanisms. Social segregation is an important one. Socioeconomic inequalities between families are shaped by the similarity between partners in educational attainment, which has increased during the second half of the 20th century in Western Europe and the USA.136–138 Educational homogamy will arguably reinforce the intergenerational transmission of health inequalities, largely through biological embodiment in utero and social and biological pathways in childhood. Not only partners but also friends tend to resemble each other socioeconomically, that is, there is a social network homophily.139 And, low-income families tend to live together with similar families in the least healthy neighbourhoods—with less green space, fewer safe places to play and more fast food stores66—and their children are more likely to attend more deprived schools.140 Social segregation, through homogamy, social network homophily and residential and school segregation, shapes the socioeconomic patterning of social learning, that is, the learning of behavioural habits and styles of thinking from the social environment, through observation, modelling and imitation.141 The higher prevalence of unhealthy behaviours in the social environment of low SEP pregnant families makes it more difficult for them to behave healthily.142 So the social environment, in which low socioeconomic families live, can reinforce the intergenerational transmission of disadvantage.

Furthermore, economies are currently structured such that incomes are higher for jobs requiring higher education, with greater financial returns to education in more unequal countries.143 Rapid technological breakthroughs have benefited high-skilled workers most, at the detriment of low-skilled workers.144 Furthermore, the rates of return on capital are greater than economic growth, leading to an increasing share of capital incomes in national income,4 with consequent rising income and wealth inequalities in high-income countries in the last decades.144 The gap between top and bottom income earners has increased due to a sharp rise in top salaries, and stagnation at the middle and bottom, whereas tax systems have become less progressive.144 Hence, children of less educated parents are at greater risk of growing up in poverty.145 Across European countries, poverty and severe material and housing deprivation are especially high in single-parent households.145 Combined with the educational gradient in single parenthood observed in Northern Europe and North America,146 this leads to a triple disadvantage for children in such households: less educated parents, family disruption and poverty.

Policies and institutions can reduce, or reinforce, these inequalities. Childhood poverty, for example, can be reduced through family-friendly social protection policies and labour market conditions that allow people to make a healthy living through work while combining this with care for children.147 This would arguably reduce the intergenerational transmission of health inequalities, by reducing parental stress and increasing resources available to children. Also health protection and promotion policies and legislation, including antismoking legislation and universal policies to support a healthy diet, can plausibly reduce the intergenerational transmission of health inequalities.148 The sugar levy in the UK has swiftly led to strong reduction in the sugar content of soft drinks.148 Similarly, mandatory folic fortification of wheat flour has potential to reduce inequalities in birth outcomes.149

Finally, whereas education systems can be a ‘powerful driver of social selection’,96 when set up well, they may also reduce the intergenerational transmission of disadvantage. High-quality preschool education and child care, including targeted language support, can reduce cognitive disparities between socioeconomic groups when made accessible and affordable to all150 and can have long-run effects on behavioural and socioeconomic outcomes.87 151 Intergenerational social mobility is generally higher, that is, the link between parental and offspring SEP is weaker, in countries with lower-income inequality.143 This is linked to the greater accessibility to high-quality education.143

Other social forces may be more difficult to influence for governments. For instance, the earlier timing of female emancipation in Northern compared with Southern Europe—combined with the vicious promotion of cigarettes as ‘torches of freedom’152 and a lack of government regulation—was associated with an earlier start of the smoking epidemic in women in Northern countries. The female smoking epidemic started among higher SEP groups—who were also the first to give up smoking—and spread to lower SEP groups.153 These patterns—over time, place, SEP and gender—are also reflected in variations in the intergenerational transmission of smoking.154 Differential diffusion by SEP has also been observed for obesity155 and formula-feeding of infants,156 arguably giving rise to similarly complex intergenerational patterns over time and place as for smoking. More broadly speaking, social forces, such as female emancipation, urbanisation, changing food systems and changing global economic systems, shape the postnatal and childhood environment. Their influence is socioeconomically patterned, shaping the intergenerational transmission of health inequalities. Recognising these dynamics, which lead to time and place variations in the magnitude of health inequalities and their intergenerational transmission, is important and requires an understanding of the social and epidemiological context.

Policy-making

To what extent should policies to reduce adult health inequalities be aimed at the early years of life rather than at adults? In a way, this is a false contrast. The circumstances in which adults—often (future) parents—live, influence offspring outcomes. Yet, our analysis helps us understand why it can be so difficult to address unhealthy lifestyles in adulthood.157 Early life circumstances become embodied and lay the foundation for living circumstances and socioeconomic and health trajectories in adulthood. Furthermore, the structural drivers of early life inequalities persist into adulthood.

Our analysis suggests it is important to provide supportive environments to (expectant) families. Health inequalities, and their intergenerational transmission, can be reduced through policies that soften—rather than harden—the class structure: family friendly social protection policies, education systems that allow all children to flourish, and fair employment conditions.158 Importantly, health inequalities can be reduced through a legislative and policy environment that supports healthy living conditions and through programmes that support parents to enable their children to develop to their full potential.147 159 160

Conclusion

The first two decades of life—from conception to early adulthood—play a critical role in the development of socioeconomic health inequalities and contribute to the persistence of these inequalities. It is time to give more attention to these early years in research on, and policies to tackle, health inequalities. Obviously, SEP and health are not fully predetermined in early life, and children can be resilient to adversity.133 161 At the same time, systemic inequalities lower the odds of children of low SEP parents to lead a long, healthy life. This is important to address, so that all children can develop to their full potential.147 It is the right thing to do, and it is arguably much more effective than remedial action in adulthood.162

We thank Professor Johan P Mackenbach for his comments on an outline of this paper and for helpful discussions during preparation of the International Symposium on the Intergenerational Transmission of Health Inequalities that TH organised with him on 25 and 26 October 2018, in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. We thank presenters and participants at this symposium for their presentations and their contributions to the discussions. We thank Dr Patrik Magnusson and Professor Frank van Lenthe for the discussions and helpful comments on this manuscript. We acknowledge Liesbeth Smith, The Online Scientist, for developing Figure 2 in collaboration with the authors. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on our manuscript.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

X @TanjaHouweling

Contributors: TAJH conceived of and drafted the manuscript. IG critically reviewed the draft manuscript and contributed to revisions. Both authors have approved of the final manuscript before submission. TAJH acts as guarantor of the paper.

Funding: The International Symposium on the Intergenerational Transmission of Health Inequalities was financially supported by the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences (KNAW). TAJH is supported by NWO grant number NWA.1238.18.001 and through a grant awarded by the Norwegian Research Council (project number 288638) to the Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN) at the Norwegian University for Science and Technology (NTNU). TAJH is also member of a ZonMW-funded project on socioeconomic inequalities in child development (grant number 531003013). IG is supported by a grant from the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (FORTE project number 2018-00211). The funders had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the articles; and in the decision to submit it for publication.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
==== Refs
References

1 Mackenbach JP . Health Inequalities: Persistence and Change in European Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. Available: https://academic.oup.com/book/32324
2 Phelan JC , Link BG , Tehranifar P . Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: theory, evidence, and policy implications. J Health Soc Behav 2010;51 Suppl :S28–40. 10.1177/0022146510383498 20943581
3 Stuhler J . A Review of Intergenerational Mobility and Its Drivers. JRC Technical Report, JRC11224 7. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018. Available: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC112247/jrc112247_ec_educational_mobility_report_final.pdf
4 Piketty T . Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014. Available: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.4159/9780674369542/html
5 OECD . Intergenerational mobility in education. Available: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=EAG_MOB [Accessed 22 May 2024].
6 Hertzman C , Wiens M . Child development and long-term outcomes: a population health perspective and summary of successful interventions. Soc Sci Med 1996;43 :1083–95. 10.1016/0277-9536(96)00028-7 8890409
7 Maggi S , Irwin LJ , Siddiqi A , et al . The social determinants of early child development: an overview. J Paediatr Child Health 2010;46 :627–35. 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01817.x 20796183
8 Galobardes B , Smith GD , Lynch JW . Systematic review of the influence of childhood socioeconomic circumstances on risk for cardiovascular disease in adulthood. Ann Epidemiol 2006;16 :91–104. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.06.053 16257232
9 Galobardes B , Lynch JW , Smith GD . Is the association between childhood socioeconomic circumstances and cause-specific mortality established? Update of a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62 :387–90. 10.1136/jech.2007.065508 18413449
10 Hossin MZ , Koupil I , Falkstedt D . Early life socioeconomic position and mortality from cardiovascular diseases: an application of causal mediation analysis in the Stockholm public health cohort. BMJ Open 2019;9 :e026258. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026258
11 Graham H , Power C . Childhood disadvantage and health inequalities: a framework for policy based on lifecourse research. Child Care Health Dev 2004;30 :671–8. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00457.x 15527477
12 Kuh D , Ben-Shlomo Y . Socioeconomic pathways between childhood and adult health. In: Kuh D , Shlomo YB , eds. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
13 Early Child Development Knowledge Network of the Commission on the Social Determinants of Health . Early child development: A powerful equalizer. Vancouver. 2007. Available: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/69729
14 Houweling TAJ , Grünberger I . Intergenerational transmission of health inequalities: research agenda for a life course approach to socioeconomic inequalities in health. J Epidemiol Community Health 2024;78 :650–3. 10.1136/jech-2022-220163 38991761
15 Victora CG , Adair L , Fall C , et al . Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet 2008;371 :340–57. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61692-4 18206223
16 Hossin MZ , Björk J , Koupil I . Early-life social and health determinants of adult socioeconomic position: associations and trends across generations. J Epidemiol Community Health 2020;74 :412–20. 10.1136/jech-2019-213209 31988239
17 Gluckman PD , Hanson MA , Beedle AS . Early life events and their consequences for later disease: a life history and evolutionary perspective. Am J Hum Biol 2007;19 :1–19. 10.1002/ajhb.20590 17160980
18 Broeks CW , Molenaar N , Brouwer M , et al . Intergenerational impact of childhood trauma on hair cortisol concentrations in mothers and their young infants. Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol 2023;14 :100167. 10.1016/j.cpnec.2023.100167 36819463
19 Flom JD , Chiu Y-HM , Hsu H-HL , et al . Maternal lifetime trauma and birthweight: effect modification by in utero cortisol and child sex. The Journal of Pediatrics 2018;203 :301–8. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.069 30197200
20 Painter RC , Roseboom TJ , Bleker OP . Prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine and disease in later life: an overview. Reprod Toxicol 2005;20 :345–52. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2005.04.005 15893910
21 Painter RC , Osmond C , Gluckman P , et al . Transgenerational effects of prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine on neonatal adiposity and health in later life. BJOG 2008;115 :1243–9. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01822.x 18715409
22 Veenendaal MVE , Painter RC , de Rooij SR , et al . Transgenerational effects of prenatal exposure to the 1944–45 Dutch famine. BJOG 2013;120 :548–54. 10.1111/1471-0528.12136 23346894
23 Holowko N , Chaparro MP , Nilsson K , et al . Social inequality in pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain in the first and second pregnancy among women in Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health 2015;69 :1154–61. 10.1136/jech-2015-205598 26219888
24 Silva L , Coolman M , Steegers E , et al . Maternal educational level and risk of gestational hypertension: the Generation R Study. J Hum Hypertens 2008;22 :483–92. 10.1038/jhh.2008.22 18418401
25 Silva LM , Jansen PW , Steegers EA , et al . Mother’s educational level and fetal growth: the genesis of health inequalities. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39 :1250–61. 10.1093/ije/dyq069 10.1093/ije/dyq069 20478844
26 van den Berg G , van Eijsden M , Vrijkotte TGM , et al . Educational inequalities in perinatal outcomes: the mediating effect of smoking and environmental tobacco exposure. PLoS One 2012;7 :e37002. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037002 22590643
27 Baron R , Manniën J , te Velde SJ , et al . Socio-demographic inequalities across a range of health status indicators and health behaviours among pregnant women in prenatal primary care: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15 :261. 10.1186/s12884-015-0676-z 26463046
28 Field T . Prenatal depression risk factors, developmental effects and interventions: a review. J Pregnancy Child Health 2017;4 :4:301. 10.4172/2376-127X.1000301
29 Holowko N , Mishra G , Koupil I . Social inequality in excessive gestational weight gain. Int J Obes 2014;38 :91–6. 10.1038/ijo.2013.62
30 Camier A , Kadawathagedara M , Lioret S , et al . Social inequalities in prenatal folic acid supplementation: results from the ELFE cohort. Nutrients 2019;11 :1108. 10.3390/nu11051108 31109064
31 Bada HS , Das A , Bauer CR , et al . Low birth weight and preterm births: etiologic fraction attributable to prenatal drug exposure. J Perinatol 2005;25 :631–7. 10.1038/sj.jp.7211378 16107872
32 Reeves S , Bernstein I . Effects of maternal tobacco-smoke exposure on fetal growth and neonatal size. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol 2008;3 :719–30. 10.1586/17474108.3.6.719 19881889
33 Jaddoe VWV , Verburg BO , de Ridder MAJ , et al . Maternal smoking and fetal growth characteristics in different periods of pregnancy: the Generation R Study. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165 :1207–15. 10.1093/aje/kwm014 17329715
34 Bakker R , Steegers EAP , Hofman A , et al . Blood pressure in different gestational trimesters, fetal growth, and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: the Generation R Study. Am J Epidemiol 2011;174 :797–806. 10.1093/aje/kwr151 21859836
35 Roza SJ , Verburg BO , Jaddoe VWV , et al . Effects of maternal smoking in pregnancy on prenatal brain development. Eur J Neurosci 2007;25 :611–7. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05393.x 17298594
36 Mook-Kanamori DO , Steegers EAP , Eilers PH , et al . Risk factors and outcomes associated with first-trimester fetal growth restriction. JAMA 2010;303 :527–34. 10.1001/jama.2010.78 20145229
37 Bakker H , Jaddoe VWV . Cardiovascular and metabolic influences of fetal smoke exposure. Eur J Epidemiol 2011;26 :763–70. 10.1007/s10654-011-9621-2 21994150
38 Mortensen LH , Diderichsen F , Arntzen A , et al . Social inequality in fetal growth: a comparative study of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden in the period 1981-2000. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62 :325–31. 10.1136/jech.2007.061473 18339825
39 Kuh D , Ben-Shlomo Y , eds. A Life Course Approach to Chronic Disease Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
40 Crispi F , Miranda J , Gratacós E . Long-term cardiovascular consequences of fetal growth restriction: biology, clinical implications, and opportunities for prevention of adult disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218 :S869–79. 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.012 29422215
41 Risnes KR , Vatten LJ , Baker JL , et al . Birthweight and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40 :647–61. 10.1093/ije/dyq267 21324938
42 Leon DA , Lithell HO , Vâgerö D , et al . Reduced fetal growth rate and increased risk of death from ischaemic heart disease: cohort study of 15 000 Swedish men and women born 1915-29. BMJ 1998;317 :241–5. 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.241 9677213
43 Bergvall N , Iliadou A , Johansson S , et al . Genetic and shared environmental factors do not confound the association between birth weight and hypertension: a study among Swedish twins. Circulation 2007;115 :2931–8. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.674812 17515462
44 Bergvall N , Iliadou A , Tuvemo T , et al . Birth characteristics and risk of low intellectual performance in early adulthood: are the associations confounded by socioeconomic factors in adolescence or familial effects? Pediatrics 2006;117 :714–21. 10.1542/peds.2005-0735 16510651
45 Silva A , Metha Z , O’callaghan FJ . The relative effect of size at birth, postnatal growth and social factors on cognitive function in late childhood. Ann Epidemiol 2006;16 :469–76. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.06.056 16165368
46 Oudgenoeg-Paz O , Mulder H , Jongmans MJ , et al . The link between motor and cognitive development in children born preterm and/or with low birth weight: A review of current evidence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017;80 :382–93. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.009 28642071
47 Tanskanen P , Valkama M , Haapea M , et al . Is prematurity associated with adult cognitive outcome and brain structure Pediatr Neurol 2011;44 :12–20. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.07.002 21147382
48 Shenkin SD , Starr JM , Deary IJ . Birth weight and cognitive ability in childhood: a systematic review. Psychol Bull 2004;130 :989–1013. 10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.989 15535745
49 Susser E , Eide MG , Begg M . Invited commentary: the use of sibship studies to detect familial confounding. Am J Epidemiol 2010;172 :537–9. 10.1093/aje/kwq196 20631043
50 McEwen EC , Guthridge SL , He VY , et al . What birthweight Percentile is associated with optimal perinatal mortality and childhood education outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218 :S712–24:S0002-9378(17)32339-6. 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.574 29268938
51 Beauregard JL , Drews-Botsch C , Sales JM , et al . Preterm birth. Poverty, and Cognitive Development Pediatrics 2018;141. 10.1542/peds.2017-0509
52 Li Y , Ley SH , Tobias DK , et al . Birth weight and later life adherence to unhealthy lifestyles in predicting type 2 diabetes: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2015;351 :h3672. 10.1136/bmj.h3672 26199273
53 Leon DA , Koupilova I , Lithell HO , et al . Failure to realise growth potential in utero and adult obesity in relation to blood pressure in 50 year old Swedish men. BMJ 1996;312 :401–6. 10.1136/bmj.312.7028.401 8601110
54 McKeigue PM , Lithell HO , Leon DA . Glucose tolerance and resistance to insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in men aged 70 years in relation to size at birth. Diabetologia 1998;41 :1133–8. 10.1007/s001250051042 9794098
55 van den Berg G , van Eijsden M , Galindo-Garre F , et al . Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in childhood blood pressure and prehypertension: the ABCD study. Hypertension 2013;61 :35–41. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00106 23129697
56 Juárez SP , Goodman A , Koupil I . From cradle to grave: tracking socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in a cohort of 11 868 men and women born in Uppsala, Sweden, 1915-1929. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016;70 :569–75. 10.1136/jech-2015-206547 26733672
57 Hillemeier MM , Farkas G , Morgan PL , et al . Disparities in the prevalence of cognitive delay: how early do they appear? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009;23 :186–98. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.01006.x 19775380
58 Chin-Lun Hung G , Hahn J , Alamiri B , et al . Socioeconomic disadvantage and neural development from infancy through early childhood. Int J Epidemiol 2015;44 :1889–99. 10.1093/ije/dyv303 26675752
59 Playford CJ , Dibben C , Williamson L . Socioeconomic disadvantage, fetal environment and child development: linked Scottish administrative records based study. Int J Equity Health 2017;16 :203. 10.1186/s12939-017-0698-4 29166913
60 Krieger N . Embodiment: a conceptual glossary for epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59 :350–5. 10.1136/jech.2004.024562 15831681
61 Barnett WS . Effectiveness of early educational intervention. Science 2011;333 :975–8. 10.1126/science.1204534 21852490
62 Burger K . How does early childhood care and education affect cognitive development? An international review of the effects of early interventions for children from different social backgrounds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 2010;25 :140–65. 10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.11.001
63 Evans GW , Kantrowitz E . Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annu Rev Public Health 2002;23 :303–31. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.112001.112349 11910065
64 WHO regional office for Europe . Environmental health inequalities in Europe. Second assessment report. Copenhagen, 2019. Available: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/325176
65 World Health Organisation Regional office for Europe . Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution – REVIHAAP project: technical report. Copenhagen World Health Organisation Regional office for Europe; 2013. Available: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/341712
66 Ranjit N , Wilkinson AV , Lytle LM , et al . Socioeconomic inequalities in children’s diet: the role of the home food environment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015;12 Suppl 1 :S4. 10.1186/1479-5868-12-S1-S4 26222785
67 Darnton-Hill I , Nishida C , James WPT . A life course approach to diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Public Health Nutr 2004;7 :101–21. 10.1079/phn2003584 14972056
68 Craigie AM , Lake AA , Kelly SA , et al . Tracking of obesity-related Behaviours from childhood to adulthood: A systematic review. Maturitas 2011;70 :266–84. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.08.005 21920682
69 Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University . “Building the brain’s “air traffic control” system: how early experiences shape the development of executive function: working paper N”. Cambridge, MA Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University; 2011. Available: https://developingchild.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/How-Early-Experiences-Shape-the-Development-of-Executive-Function.pdf
70 Byford M , Kuh D , Richards M . Parenting practices and Intergenerational associations in cognitive ability. Int J Epidemiol 2012;41 :263–72. 10.1093/ije/dyr188 22422461
71 Hernández-Alava M , Popli G . Children’s development and parental input: evidence from the UK millennium cohort study. Demography 2017;54 :485–511. 10.1007/s13524-017-0554-6 28233235
72 ECDKN . Total environment assessment model for early child development. evidence report. background document of the early child development knowledge network of the Commission on social determinants of health. Geneva World Health Organization; 2007. Available: https://www.thecentrehki.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Total-Environment-Assessment-Model-for-Early-Childhood-Development_2007.pdf
73 Schoon I , Nasim B , Sehmi R , et al . The impact of early life skills on later outcomes: report for the OECD (early childhood education and care). London UCL Insittute of Education; 2015. Available: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10051902/1/Schoon_2015%20The%20Impact%20of%20Early%20Life%20Skills%20on%20Later%20Outcomes_%20Sept%20fin2015.pdf
74 de Laat SAA , Huizink AC , Hof MH , et al . Socioeconomic inequalities in psychosocial problems of children: mediating role of maternal depressive symptoms. Eur J Public Health 2018;28 :1062–8. 10.1093/eurpub/cky125 30007318
75 Schoon I , Parsons S , Rush R , et al . Children’s language ability and psychosocial development: a 29-year follow-up study. Pediatrics 2010;126 :e73–80. 10.1542/peds.2009-3282 20587683
76 Ng-Knight T , Schoon I . Disentangling the influence of socioeconomic risks on children’s early self-control. J Pers 2017;85 :793–806. 10.1111/jopy.12288 27943287
77 Hackman DA , Gallop R , Evans GW , et al . Socioeconomic status and executive function: developmental trajectories and mediation. Dev Sci 2015;18 :686–702. 10.1111/desc.12246 25659838
78 Duncan GJ , Morris PA , Rodrigues C . Does money really matter? Estimating impacts of family income on young children’s achievement with data from random-assignment experiments. Dev Psychol 2011;47 :1263–79. 10.1037/a0023875 21688900
79 Milligan K , Stabile M . Do child tax benefits affect the well-being of children? Evidence from Canadian child benefit expansions. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2011;3 :175–205. 10.1257/pol.3.3.175
80 Halfon N , Larson K , Son J , et al . Income inequality and the differential effect of adverse childhood experiences in US children. Acad Pediatr 2017;17 :S70–8. 10.1016/j.acap.2016.11.007 28865663
81 Lacey RE , Howe LD , Kelly-Irving M , et al . The clustering of adverse childhood experiences in the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children J Interpers Violence 2022;37 :2218–41. 10.1177/0886260520935096 32639853
82 Brito NH , Noble KG . Socioeconomic status and structural brain development. Front Neurosci 2014;8 :276. 10.3389/fnins.2014.00276 25249931
83 Hackman DA , Farah MJ , Meaney MJ . Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010;11 :651–9. 10.1038/nrn2897 20725096
84 Houtepen LC , Heron J , Suderman MJ , et al . Associations of adverse childhood experiences with educational attainment and adolescent health and the role of family and socioeconomic factors: a prospective cohort study in the UK. PLoS Med 2020;17 :e1003031. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003031 32119668
85 Hughes K , Bellis MA , Hardcastle KA , et al . The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2017;2 :e356–66. 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4 29253477
86 Bellis MA , Hughes K , Ford K , et al . Life course health consequences and associated annual costs of adverse childhood experiences across Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2019;4 :e517–28. 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30145-8 31492648
87 Parveva T , Horváth, A , Krémó A , et al . Equity in school education in Europe – structures, policies and student performance Eurydice report. Luxembourg Publications Office of the European Union; 2020. Available: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/658266
88 Singh-Manoux A , Marmot M . Role of socialization in explaining social inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med 2005;60 :2129–33. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.070 15743660
89 Leonardi-Bee J , Jere ML , Britton J . Exposure to parental and sibling smoking and the risk of smoking uptake in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax 2011;66 :847–55. 10.1136/thx.2010.153379 21325144
90 Taylor-Robinson DC , Wickham S , Campbell M , et al . Are social inequalities in early childhood smoking initiation explained by exposure to adult smoking? findings from the UK millennium cohort study. PLoS One 2017;12 :e0178633. 10.1371/journal.pone.0178633 28575096
91 Elhakeem A , Hardy R , Bann D , et al . Intergenerational social mobility and leisure-time physical activity in adulthood: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2017;71 :673–80. 10.1136/jech-2016-208052 27979970
92 Pillas D , Marmot M , Naicker K , et al . Social inequalities in early childhood health and development: a European-wide systematic review. Pediatr Res 2014;76 :418–24. 10.1038/pr.2014.122 25122581
93 Bradbury B , Corak M , Waldfogel J , et al . Inequality during the early years: child outcomes and readiness to learn in Australia, Canada, United kingdom, and United States. SSRN Journal 2011. 10.2139/ssrn.1965137
94 Houweling TAJ , Oude Groeniger J , Jansen PW , et al . Trajectories of socioeconomic inequality in early child development: a cohort analysis. Int J Equity Health 2022;21 :79. 10.1186/s12939-022-01675-8 35668449
95 Larson K , Russ SA , Nelson BB , et al . Cognitive ability at kindergarten entry and socioeconomic status. Pediatrics 2015;135 :e440–8. 10.1542/peds.2014-0434 25601983
96 Machin S . Social disadvantage and education experiences. In: OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. Paris: OECD, 2006.
97 Kelly Y , Sacker A , Del Bono E , et al . What role for the home learning environment and parenting in reducing the socioeconomic gradient in child development? Findings from the millennium cohort study. Arch Dis Child 2011;96 :832–7. 10.1136/adc.2010.195917 21666278
98 Vohra J , Marmot MG , Bauld L , et al . Socioeconomic position in childhood and cancer in adulthood: a rapid-review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016;70 :629–34. 10.1136/jech-2015-206274 26715591
99 Lee JJ , Wedow R , Okbay A , et al . Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nat Genet 2018;50 :1112–21. 10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3 30038396
100 Cesarini D , Visscher PM . Visscher PM: Genetics and educational attainment. NPJ Sci Learn 2017;2 :4. 10.1038/s41539-017-0005-6 30631451
101 de Zeeuw EL , Kan K-J , van Beijsterveldt CEM , et al . The moderating role of SES on genetic differences in educational achievement in the Netherlands. NPJ Sci Learn 2019;4 :13. 10.1038/s41539-019-0052-2 31508241
102 de Zeeuw EL , de Geus EJC , Boomsma DI . Meta-analysis of twin studies highlights the importance of genetic variation in primary school educational achievement. Trends in Neuroscience and Education 2015;4 :69–76. 10.1016/j.tine.2015.06.001
103 Branigan AR , McCallum KJ , Freese J . Variation in the heritability of educational attainment: an international meta-analysis. Social Forces 2013;92 :109–40. 10.1093/sf/sot076
104 Reichenberg A , Cederlöf M , McMillan A , et al . Discontinuity in the genetic and environmental causes of the intellectual disability spectrum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113 :1098–103. 10.1073/pnas.1508093112 26711998
105 Rimfeld K , Krapohl E , Trzaskowski M , et al . Genetic influence on social outcomes during and after the Soviet era in Estonia. Nat Hum Behav 2018;2 :269–75. 10.1038/s41562-018-0332-5 29881783
106 Hyytinen A , Ilmakunnas P , Johansson E , et al . Heritability of lifetime earnings. J Econ Inequal 2019;17 :319–35. 10.1007/s10888-019-09413-x
107 Conley D , Domingue BW , Cesarini D , et al . Is the effect of parental education on offspring biased or moderated by genotype Sociol Sci 2015;2 :82–105. 10.15195/v2.a6 29051911
108 Ayorech Z , Krapohl E , Plomin R , et al . Genetic influence on Intergenerational educational attainment. Psychol Sci 2017;28 :1302–10. 10.1177/0956797617707270 28715641
109 Visscher PM , Hill WG , Wray NR . Heritability in the genomics era--concepts and misconceptions. Nat Rev Genet 2008;9 :255–66. 10.1038/nrg2322 18319743
110 Haworth CMA , Davis OSP . From observational to dynamic genetics. Front Genet 2014;5 :6. 10.3389/fgene.2014.00006 24478793
111 Silventoinen K , Jelenkovic A , Sund R , et al . Genetic and environmental variation in educational attainment: an individual-based analysis of 28 twin cohorts. Sci Rep 2020;10 :12681. 10.1038/s41598-020-69526-6 32728164
112 Knigge A , Maas I , Stienstra K , et al . Delayed tracking and inequality of opportunity: gene-environment interactions in educational attainment. NPJ Sci Learn 2022;7 :6. 10.1038/s41539-022-00122-1 35508471
113 Engzell P , Tropf FC . Heritability of education rises with Intergenerational mobility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019;116 :25386–8. 10.1073/pnas.1912998116 31792187
114 Colodro-Conde L , Rijsdijk F , Tornero-Gómez MJ , et al . Equality in educational policy and the heritability of educational attainment. PLoS One 2015;10 :e0143796. 10.1371/journal.pone.0143796 26618539
115 Domingue BW , Belsky DW . The social genome: current findings and implications for the study of human genetics. PLoS Genet 2017;13 :e1006615. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006615 28301508
116 Koellinger PD , Harden KP . Using nature to understand nurture. Science 2018;359 :386–7. 10.1126/science.aar6429 29371452
117 Kong A , Thorleifsson G , Frigge ML , et al . The nature of nurture: effects of parental genotypes. Science 2018;359 :424–8. 10.1126/science.aan6877 29371463
118 Belsky DW , Domingue BW , Wedow R , et al . Genetic analysis of social-class mobility in five longitudinal studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115 :E7275–84. 10.1073/pnas.1801238115 29987013
119 Thompson O . Genetic mechanisms in the Intergenerational transmission of health. J Health Econ 2014;35 :132–46. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.02.003 24674912
120 Hilker R , Helenius D , Fagerlund B , et al . Heritability of schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum based on the nationwide Danish twin register. Biol Psychiatry 2018;83 :492–8. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.08.017 28987712
121 Marwaha S , Johnson S . Schizophrenia and employment - a review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004;39 :337–49. 10.1007/s00127-004-0762-4 15133589
122 Lewontin RC . The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35 :520–5. 10.1093/ije/dyl062 16645033
123 Morris TT , Davies NM , Hemani G , et al . Population phenomena inflate genetic associations of complex social traits. Sci Adv 2020;6 :eaay0328. 10.1126/sciadv.aay0328 32426451
124 Donovan BM . Ending genetic essentialism through genetics education. HGG Adv 2022;3 :100058. 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100058 35047848
125 Okbay A , Beauchamp JP , Fontana MA , et al . Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature 2016;533 :539–42. 10.1038/nature17671 27225129
126 Benjamin DJ , Cesarini D , Chabris CF , et al . FAQs for "Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies 74 Loci Associated with Educational Attainment; No place. Social Science Genetic Association Consortium; 2016. Available: https://www.thessgac.org/faqs
127 Guloksuz S , Pries L-K , Delespaul P , et al . Examining the independent and joint effects of molecular genetic liability and environmental exposures in schizophrenia: results from the EUGEI study. World Psychiatry 2019;18 :173–82. 10.1002/wps.20629 31059627
128 Kornrich S . Inequalities in parental spending on young children: 1972 to 2010. AERA Open 2016;2 :233285841664418. 10.1177/2332858416644180
129 OECD . Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. Available: 10.1787/a2e8796c-en
130 Mullainathan S , Shafir E . Scarcity: why having too little means so much. New York: Times Books, 2013.
131 Cohen AK , Lê-Scherban F . Invited commentary: Multigenerational social determinants of health-opportunities and challenges. Am J Epidemiol 2015;182 :579–82. 10.1093/aje/kwv145 26283087
132 Hayward MD , Gorman BK . The long arm of childhood: the influence of early-life social conditions on men’s mortality. Demography 2004;41 :87–107. 10.1353/dem.2004.0005 15074126
133 van IJzendoorn MH , Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ , Coughlan B , et al . Annual research review: umbrella synthesis of meta-analyses on child maltreatment antecedents and interventions: differential susceptibility perspective on risk and resilience. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2020;61 :272–90. 10.1111/jcpp.13147 31667862
134 Scorza P , Duarte CS , Hipwell AE , et al . Research review: Intergenerational transmission of disadvantage: Epigenetics and parents' Childhoods as the first exposure. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2019;60 :119–32. 10.1111/jcpp.12877 29473646
135 Ambeskovic M , Roseboom TJ , Metz GAS . Transgenerational effects of early environmental insults on aging and disease incidence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2020;117 :297–316. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.08.002 28807754
136 Eika L , Mogstad M , Zafar B . Educational assortative mating and household income inequality. Journal of Political Economy 2019;127 :2795–835. 10.1086/702018
137 Mäenpää E , Jalovaara M . Achievement replacing ascription? Changes in homogamy in education and social class origins in Finland. Advances in Life Course Research 2015;26 :76–88. 10.1016/j.alcr.2015.09.001
138 Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek . Relatie en Gezin Aan Het begin Van de 21Ste Eeuw. den Haag/Heerlen. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek; 2009. Available: https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/imported/documents/2009/44/2009-b70-pub.pdf?la=nl-nl
139 Rivera MT , Soderstrom SB , Uzzi B . Dynamics of dyads in social networks: assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annu Rev Sociol 2010;36 :91–115. 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743
140 Ridao-Cano C , Bodewig C . Growing United. In: Growing United: Upgrading Europe’s Convergence Machine. 2 . Washington, D.C: World Bank Group, 2018. Available: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29448
141 Bandura A . The evolution of social cognitive theory. In: Smith K , Hitt M , eds. In great minds in management: the process of theory development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005: 9–33.
142 Richmond CAM , Ross NA . Social support, material circumstance and health behaviour: influences on health in first nation and Inuit communities of Canada. Soc Sci Med 2008;67 :1423–33. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.028 18676079
143 Jerrim J , Macmillan L . Income inequality, intergenerational mobility, and the great Gatsby curve: is education the key? Social Forces 2015;94 :505–33. 10.1093/sf/sov075
144 United Nations Department of economic and social affairs (UN DESA). World social report 2020: inequality in a rapidly changing world. New York UN DESA. Available: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/02/World-Social-Report2020-FullReport.pdf
145 Eurostat . Being young in Europe today. Luxembourg Publications Office of the European Union; 2015. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/6776245/KS-05-14-031-EN-N.pdf
146 Härkönen J . Single-mother poverty: how much do educational differences in single motherhood matter? In: Rense N , Maldonado LC , eds. The triple bind of single-parent families: resources, employment and policies to improve well-being. Bristol: Policy Press, 2018.
147 Commission on Social Determinants of Health . Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva. World Health Organization; 2008. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-IER-CSDH-08.1
148 Scarborough P , Adhikari V , Harrington RA , et al . Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK soft drinks industry levy on sugar content price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis. PLoS Med 2020;17 :e1003025.32045418
149 World Health Organization . Geneva World Health Organization; 2022. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240043398
150 Magnuson KA , Meyers MK , Ruhm CJ , et al . Inequality in preschool education and school readiness. American Educational Research Journal 2004;41 :115–57. 10.3102/00028312041001115
151 Anderson LM , Shinn C , Fullilove MT , et al . The effectiveness of early childhood development programs. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2003;24 :32–46. 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00655-4 12668197
152 Amos A , Haglund M . From social taboo to "torch of freedom": the marketing of cigarettes to women. Tob Control 2000;9 :3–8. 10.1136/tc.9.1.3 10691743
153 Schooling M , Kuh D . A life course perspective on women’s health behaviours. In: Kuh D , Hardy R , eds. A life course approach to women’s health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002: 279–303.
154 Power C , Graham H , Due P , et al . The contribution of childhood and adult socioeconomic position to adult obesity and smoking behaviour: an international comparison. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34 :335–44. 10.1093/ije/dyh394 15659473
155 Monteiro CA , Conde WL , Lu B , et al . Obesity and inequities in health in the developing world. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004;28 :1181–6. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802716 15211362
156 Rogers EM . Diffusion of Innovations. London: Free Press, 2003.
157 Magnée T , Burdorf A , Brug J , et al . Equity-specific effects of 26 Dutch obesity-related Lifestyle interventions. Am J Prev Med 2013;44 :e57–66. 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.041 23683991
158 Benach J , Muntaner C , Chung H , et al . The importance of government policies in reducing employment related health inequalities. BMJ 2010;340 . 10.1136/bmj.c2154
159 Hertzman C , Siddiqi A , Hertzman E , et al . Bucking the inequality gradient through early child development. BMJ 2010;340 . 10.1136/bmj.c468
160 Clark H , Coll-Seck AM , Banerjee A , et al . A future for the world’s children? A WHO-UNICEF-lancet Commission. Lancet 2020;395 :605–58. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32540-1 32085821
161 Bartley M , ed. Capability and resilience. In: Beating the Odds. London: UCL Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, 2006.
162 Heckman JJ . Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science 2006;312 :1900–2. 10.1126/science.1128898 16809525
