
==== Front
Orthop J Sports Med
Orthop J Sports Med
OJS
spojs
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
2325-9671
SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA

10.1177/2325967124S00361
10.1177_2325967124S00361
Article
Poster 396: Performing Sports Medicine Procedures in Ambulatory Surgery Centers Is More Cost Effective than Hospital Outpatient Departments for Medicare Recipients
Khan Zeeshan BA
McCormick Johnathon MD
Federico Vincent
Morgan Vince MD
Browning Robert MD
Harkin William
Salazar Luis
Jackson Garrett
Kaplan Daniel MD
Verma Nikhil MD
Cole Brian MD, MBA
Chahla Jorge
RUSH Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Rush University, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
20 9 2024
7 2024
12 7 suppl2 AOSSM 2024 Annual Meeting 2325967124S00361© The Author(s) 2024
2024
SAGE Publications
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
Objectives:

To compare the overall cost of sports medicine procedures for Medicare beneficiaries in both ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) and hospital outpatient department (HOPD) settings. Secondary aims were to compare facility fees, surgeon fees, Medicare payments, and patient payments between ASCs and HOPDs.

Methods:

Publicly available data from The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) was accessed via the Medicare Procedure Price Lookup Tool. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify sports medicine procedures approved for the outpatient setting by CMS. Facility fees, surgeon fees, total costs, Medicare payment, and patient payment were extracted. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate means and standard deviations. Cost differences were analyzed using Mann Whitney U tests.

Results:

Sixty-two CPT codes were identified. Shoulder procedures (n=25) at ASCs had lower total costs (3,622±1,156 vs 6,262±1,759; p<0.001), facility fees (2,777±1,020 vs 5,416±1,606; p<0.001), Medicare payments (2,898±928 vs 5,009±1,407 p<0.001), and patient payments (724±232 vs 1,252±352; p<0.001) compared to HOPDs. Knee procedures (n=31) at ASCs had lower total costs (4,236±2,741 vs 6,668±3,341; p=0.006), facility fees (3,408±2,507 vs 5,840±3,116; p=0.006), Medicare payments (3,389±2,193 vs 5,458±2,955; p=0.006), and patient payments (847±548 vs 1,209±429; p=0.011). Hip procedures (n=6) at ASCs had lower total costs (3,583±698 vs 6,671±1,451; p=0.025), facility fees (2,725±6689 vs 5,813±1,431; p=0.025), Medicare payments (2,866±558 vs 5,336±1,161; p=0.025), and patient payments (716±139 vs 1,333±290; p=0.025).

Conclusions:

Sports medicine procedures performed at ASCs for Medicare recipients were found to have overall average total cost savings of 40% compared to those performed at HOPDs (42% savings for shoulder, 36% for knee, and 46% for hip procedures). ASC use conferred lower facility fees, patient payments, and Medicare payments in all cohorts. These results inform surgeons, patients, and insurance officials of the cost-effectiveness of outpatient surgical facilities for Medicare recipients undergoing sports medicine procedures.

typesetterts1
==== Body
pmc
