
==== Front
Bioact Mater
Bioact Mater
Bioactive Materials
2452-199X
KeAi Publishing

S2452-199X(24)00392-X
10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.09.005
Review Article
Advancements in hydrogel design for articular cartilage regeneration: A comprehensive review
Hashemi-Afzal Fariba a
Fallahi Hooman bc
Bagheri Fatemeh f.bagheri@modares.ac.ir
a⁎⁎⁎
Collins Maurice N. d
Eslaminejad Mohamadreza Baghaban eslami@royaninstitute.org
e⁎⁎
Seitz Hermann hermann.seitz@uni-rostock.de
fg⁎
a Biotechnology Department, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-111, Iran
b Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-111, Iran
c School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104 USA
d School of Engineering, Bernal Institute and Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland
e Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Sciences Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, 16635-148, Iran
f Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, University of Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, 18059 Rostock, Germany
g Department Life, Light & Matter, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Straße 25, 18059 Rostock, Germany
⁎ Corresponding author. hermann.seitz@uni-rostock.de
⁎⁎ Corresponding author. eslami@royaninstitute.org
⁎⁎⁎ Corresponding author. f.bagheri@modares.ac.ir
14 9 2024
1 2025
14 9 2024
43 131
11 6 2024
3 9 2024
3 9 2024
© 2024 The Authors
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
This review paper explores the cutting-edge advancements in hydrogel design for articular cartilage regeneration (CR). Articular cartilage (AC) defects are a common occurrence worldwide that can lead to joint breakdown at a later stage of the disease, necessitating immediate intervention to prevent progressive degeneration of cartilage. Decades of research into the biomedical applications of hydrogels have revealed their tremendous potential, particularly in soft tissue engineering, including CR. Hydrogels are highly tunable and can be designed to meet the key criteria needed for a template in CR. This paper aims to identify those criteria, including the hydrogel components, mechanical properties, biodegradability, structural design, and integration capability with the adjacent native tissue and delves into the benefits that CR can obtain through appropriate design. Stratified-structural hydrogels that emulate the native cartilage structure, as well as the impact of environmental stimuli on the regeneration outcome, have also been discussed. By examining recent advances and emerging techniques, this paper offers valuable insights into developing effective hydrogel-based therapies for AC repair.

Graphical abstract

Image 1

Highlights

• Design parameters for hydrogels used in cartilage regeneration are reviewed.

• The influence of environmental stimuli within hydrogels is discussed.

• Stratified structural hydrogels that mimic cartilage structures are highlighted.

• Challenges and future prospects of hydrogel-based therapies are explored.

Keywords

Articular cartilage
Hydrogel design
Environmental stimuli
Tissue engineering
==== Body
pmc1 Introduction

Articular cartilage (AC) is a highly specialized tissue that plays a crucial role in joint functions by providing a low-friction, load-bearing surface [1]. Unfortunately, due to its limited intrinsic regenerative capacity, cartilage lesions caused by trauma or aging often lead to osteoarthritis and are accompanied by pain, functional impairment, and a reduced quality of life for patients. Although both palliative and surgical treatments are available to address cartilage defects, they have not yet been shown to be capable of completely regenerating healthy cartilage in the affected joint [1].

In recent years, tissue engineering techniques for cartilage have emerged as promising alternatives to overcome the limitations of traditional treatments. These innovative approaches utilize novel engineering and biological methods to accelerate the development of neo-tissue to replace damaged tissue. Due to its complex nature and high water content, AC repair requires a biomaterial matrix that possesses similar viscoelastic properties [2].

Hydrogels, three-dimensional (3D) networks of hydrophilic polymers, have emerged as attractive scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering due to their unique properties, including their biocompatibility, tunable mechanical characteristics, and excellent permeability for crucial elements such as oxygen, nutrients, and water-soluble metabolites [3]. Hydrogels play a pivotal role in preserving the rounded morphology and phenotype of chondrocytes or stromal cells while also establishing an optimal 3D local microenvironment that fosters interactions among cells and networks [4,5]. Understanding the interactions between hydrogels and encapsulated cells is complex. In addition to soluble signals, cells can also sense their milieu through mechanical and physical cues, such as the rigidity of the extracellular matrix (ECM) nearby [6].

Depending on the cross-linking chemistry, the manufactured hydrogel could be either implantable or injectable (Fig. 1) [7,8]. Implantable hydrogel scaffolds offer significant clinical benefits, including high mechanical strength and customizable shapes. These scaffolds, pre-fabricated using methods like 3D printing techniques (extrusion or direct ink writing (DIW)), are surgically implanted at the target site, demonstrating significant potential in therapeutic applications [8]. Injectable hydrogels, thanks to their sol-gel properties, can easily fill cartilage defects. These hydrogels, responsive to temperature or shear force, ensure proper filling of irregular knee joint shapes, even cell distribution, and enable minimally invasive surgeries [9,10] (Table 1). Hydrogels have the advantage of being adjustable and their properties can be tuned depending on the application.Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of approach employing hydrogels in cartilage tissue regeneration and different hydrogels designed to be placed at the injury site within the knee joint. Implantable hydrogel scaffolds produced via 3D-bioprinting that provide a structured support for tissue regeneration. Injectable hydrogels that can be administered directly into the injury site.

Fig. 1

Table 1 A comparative analysis of various hydrogels.

Table 1Type of hydrogel	Properties	References	
Implantable	- Customization

- Easily adjustable shape

- High mechanical strength

- Suitable for load-bearing tissue

	[8,11,12]	
Injectable	- Minimally invasive

- Suitable for irregularly shaped defects

- Reduces the need for extensive surgical procedures

- Adjustable rheological characteristics

	[9,13]	

Key parameters including type of materials, mechanical strength, matrix stiffness and elasticity, biodegradability, integrity, porosity, and interconnectivity are crucial in regulating cell fate, particularly in terms of proliferation and differentiation. This opens a large area of investigation to determine how these factors individually or in combination with one another, contribute to better reconstruction of the tissue. However, there is a paucity of studies addressing the essential processing parameters in this domain. Current review papers provide a different perspective on the research of hydrogels in this field [14,15]. The primary objective of this review is to showcase the most recent advancements in the critical factors involved in designing hydrogels for CR. Hydrogel components, mechanical properties, biodegradability, structural design, and integration capability with the adjacent native tissue are the hydrogel design parameters that are covered in the following sections. The paper begins with a thorough overview of the current knowledge in the field, highlighting the challenges and limitations of existing hydrogel-based cartilage tissue engineering approaches. Section 2 explores the recent advancements and breakthroughs in hydrogel design, and section 3 explores stratified-structural hydrogels that mimic the native cartilage architecture. This is followed by a section that discusses environmental stimuli and how they are engineered to modulate cellular responses and tissue regeneration by elucidating the interplay between hydrogel structures. Fig. 2 provides a comprehensive summary of the entire review's content. This paper aims to underscore that biomimetic hydrogels can restore the composition, structure, and biomechanical functions of articular cartilage. We conclude by sharing our perspective on the future of hydrogel design for joint cartilage restoration. Such advancements hold significant promise in addressing the yet unmet clinical needs for cartilage tissue engineering and improvement in the quality of life for individuals suffering from cartilage-related disorders, thus directly impacting the United Nations's Sustainable Development Goal 3.Fig. 2 Schematic illustration of key parameters in designing hydrogels for CR, including hydrogel components, mechanical properties, biodegradability, porosity and interconnectivity, and integration with adjacent native tissue. Additionally, it highlights other essential factors such as stratified-structural hydrogels and the influence of environmental stimuli.

Fig. 2

2 Hydrogel design parameters

Designing hydrogels with specific characteristics and functions is a complex task that requires meticulous manipulation of various factors. For cartilage regeneration (CR), the primary focus should be on selecting the appropriate hydrogel components, as the material composition directly influences the hydrogel's properties and performance. The mechanical properties of the hydrogel scaffold must align with the target tissue to ensure proper support and functionality [16]. Tuning stiffness, elasticity, and load-bearing capacity is crucial for developing a material that mimics natural cartilage, enabling effective load distribution, tissue integration, and functional restoration. Integration with native tissue ensures immediate function and long-term stability of restored cartilage. Biodegradability is another key factor, as the hydrogel must degrade at an optimal rate to maintain structural integrity while allowing cell infiltration and tissue integration. Rapid degradation can compromise support, while slow degradation may impede cell infiltration and trigger foreign body reactions. Achieving the right degradation rate is essential for successful tissue engineering. Additionally, developing porous and interconnected structures within hydrogels is vital for cellular infiltration, nutrient diffusion, and waste removal. This supports cell growth and functionality within the hydrogel. In the following section, we provide a detailed overview of these parameters and illustrate their impact on cell-hydrogel interactions. By considering these significant factors, researchers can optimize hydrogel design to meet the specific requirements for cartilage repair.

2.1 Hydrogel components

Biomaterials, including natural and synthetic polymers, have been widely employed as the foundational elements of hydrogels in cartilage tissue engineering (Table 2). While this review does not delve deeply into these biomaterials, it does highlight some of the most commonly used and contemporary materials. Natural hydrogels, composed of collagen (Col), hyaluronic acid (HA), alginate (Alg), silk fibroin (SF), gelatin (Gel), chitosan (Ch), chondroitin sulfate (CS), and dextran (DEX), are highly valued for their inherent biocompatibility, environmental sensitivity, and abundance [[17], [18], [19], [20]]. They also contain degradation moieties like hydrolyzable ester and enzyme-mediated hydrolytic amide groups, providing natural binding sites for cell interaction. However, they suffer from low stability, poor mechanical properties, and rapid degradation [2,14]. In contrast, synthetic hydrogels such as poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), polylactide acid (PLA), poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA), poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG), Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNiPAAm), and polycaprolactone (PCL) offer tunable chemistry, allowing optimization of physicochemical and mechanical properties [[21], [22], [23], [24], [25]]. They can be designed with various molecular weights, block structures, and degradable linkages to meet specific mechanical and degradation requirements. Despite these advantages, synthetic hydrogels lack adhesion sites, biocompatibility, and produce undesirable degradation products [26]. Indeed, combining natural and synthetic biomaterials can leverage the strengths of both types. This synergy can result in hydrogel scaffolds that are both functional and adaptable for cartilage tissue engineering [15].Table 2 A summary of hydrogels with different polymer types and their features for CR.

Table 2	Biomaterial	Other components	Cell type	Strength (kPa)	Degradation (day)	Pores (μm)	References	
Natural	Col	HA	rBMSCs	∼12	14	–	[20]	
SF	RBMSCs	8	≥2	–	[27]	
HA	Col short nanofibers, Ch	rBMSCs	9.54	≥30	10–65	[19]	
Col	RBMSCs	∼700	≥7 (in vivo)	–	[28]	
Alg	HA, icariin, extracellular vesicles	rBMSCs	319.6	≥11	–	[18]	
Ch, PVA	–	141000	–	2.5	[29]	
SF	RGD, DNA	rBMSCs	–	28	35.1	[17]	
Gel	RBMSCs	4980	–	22.01	[30]	
Gel	Glucosamine	Rabbit chondrocytes	–	≥10	50–200	[31]	
	BC, LAP	Auricular chondrocytes	∼1400	–	172.8	[32]	
Ch	GelMA	–	169.3	1	–	[33]	
	Alg-nHap, HA	hMSCs	108.33	–	156	[34]	
CS	Hydroxypropyl chitin	rBMSCs	∼6	≥25	–	[35]	
SF	SF	Human chondrocyte	100	∼7	143	[36]	
DEX	HA- tyramine	hMSCs, bCHs	3.2	–	–	[37]	
Synthetic	PLGA	PEG, Gel, TGF-β1	hDPSCs	16000	≥21	202.05	[21]	
PLA	GelMA, autologous auricle cartilage	–	∼50	≥18		[22]	
PVA	Ch, graphene oxide	L929 mouse fibroblasts	2150	–	7.86	[23]	
PEG	PLGA	rBMSCs	–	≥35	–	[38]	
KGN, Ch	PB-MSCs	1620	≥42	202.69	[39]	
PNiPAAm	CS, DEX	Human articular chondrocyte	–	≥21	68	[24]	
PCL	β-CD-modified Alg/cartilage ECM, KGN, starch	hADSCs	17200	≥30	300	[25]	
Abbreviations: GelMA: methacrylated gelatin, TGF-β: transforming growth factor-β, rBMSCs: rat bone marrow MSCs, RGD: arginine-glycine-aspartic acid, RBMSCs: rabbit BMSCs, nHap: nanohydroxyapatite, hMSCs: human MSCs, bCHs: bovine chondrocytes, hDPSCs: human dental pulp stem cells, β-CD: beta cyclodextrin, KGN: kartogenin, hADSCs: human adipose-derived stem cells, LAP: lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate, PB-MSCs: peripheral blood MSCs.

To ensure bioactivity and biocompatibility in practical applications, polymers used for hydrogels can be sourced from endogenous substances within organisms. These include glycosaminoglycans, macromolecular proteins, and DNA nucleotides. Zhao et al. introduced DNA-SF DN hydrogels with adjustable surface stiffness [40]. These hydrogels, formed through DNA base-pairing, promote β-sheet structure formation by constraining and aggregating SF molecules. The second network was established through enzyme-mediated SF cross-linking. It was found that DNA-SF DN hydrogels were highly effective in promoting chondrogenic differentiation. Building on this, Shen et al. developed RGD-SF-DNA hydrogel microspheres (RSD-MSs) capable of loading BMSCs [17]. Initially, microfluidic technology, silk methacrylate, and supramolecular DNA hydrogel techniques were used to create SF-DNA DN hydrogel microspheres (SD-MSs). These microspheres were then surface-modified via photopolymerization with Pep-RGDfKA. The results indicated that RSD-MSs are ideal for fabricating and maintaining cartilage organoids long-term, offering an innovative strategy and biomaterial choice for CR (Fig. 3A).Fig. 3 A) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of RGD-SF-DNA microspheres and their use in creating cartilage organoid precursor and CR. Reproduced under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license [17]. Copyright 2024, The Authors, published by Elsevier. B) Schematic illustration of a cartilage lacuna-biomimetic hydrogel scaffold for multifunctional CR, featuring TGFβ3-loaded MSN@pDA microspheres with IGF-1 and PDGF-BB, fabricated using microfluidic technology. Reproduced under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license [41]. Copyright 2024, The Authors, published by Elsevier.

Fig. 3

Recent advancements have led to the development of novel bioinspired hydrogels. For instance, hydrogels enhanced with polydopamine (pDA) improve cell adhesion and tissue integrity. Li et al. developed a composite microsphere system for CR by integrating TGF-β3 into mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) and encapsulating them with insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in pDA microspheres [41]. These were blended with a Ch hydrogel containing platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) using microfluidic technology. The pDA reduced initial inflammation, while the sustained release of GFs promoted stem cell attraction, chondrogenesis, and matrix formation. The microspheres were incorporated into an acellular cartilage extracellular matrix and combined with a pDA-modified PCL scaffold, enhancing cartilage repair and protection (Fig. 3A). Additionally, those incorporating sugar-based additives like Manuka honey offer antibacterial properties and enhance mechanical and biological characteristics [42]. Aloe vera gel, enriched with glycoprotein fractions, has also demonstrated a significant chondrogenic effect [43].

2.2 Mechanical properties of hydrogels

2.2.1 Mechanical strength

Native AC possesses unique mechanical properties, including a specific range of compressive strength, elastic modulus, and viscoelastic behavior [16,44]. The mechanical characteristics of the hydrogel scaffold play a crucial role in providing appropriate support, load distribution, and functionality, which are all essential for successful 10.13039/100017626 CR [[45], [46], [47]]. Several studies have focused on tuning the mechanical properties of hydrogels to mimic those of the native cartilage. AC is both stiff and tough, unlike conventional hydrogels which deform under mechanical forces and lack the necessary properties for cartilage repair [48]. More often a stiffening process is achieved at the expense of lowering the capability of adsorbing and holding gel water, which can compromise the embedded cell viability by impeding cell migration and biomolecule diffusion. Additionally, their brittleness inhibits force distribution, reducing lubrication functionality. However, parameters like pore size, swelling ratio, strength, and toughness can be improved without compromising stiffness [49,50]. Gan et al. developed a hydrogel by incorporating dopamine methacrylate oligomers into GelMA, resulting in two key mechanical advantages over single-network GelMA hydrogels [51]. First, the increased distance between GelMA chains enhanced the hydrogel's failure strain. Second, dopamine created a secondary cross-linking network that dissipated energy through physical sacrificial bonds under load (Fig. 4A). Current efforts focus on developing tough hydrogels that maintain stiffness and distribute energy to prevent force concentration in damaged zone [52,53]. A promising approach in cartilage repair involves using multiple polymers and cross-linking mechanisms, each serving a specific purpose [54].Fig. 4 A) (I) Synthesis of dopamine methacrylate and its oligomers (ODMA). (II) Mechanical behavior of the ODMA–GelMA hydrogel. Reproduced with permission [51]. Copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry. B) (I) Formation of injectable PEG-Col/SF DN network by covalent cross-linking of PEG-Tz and Col-Nb. (II) Cyclic compression stress–strain curves of hydrogels and compression-recovery of the Col5-PEG5/SF5 hydrogel. Reproduced with permission [55]. Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry.

Fig. 4

Double network (DN) hydrogels, introduced by Gong's group in 2003, enhance mechanical properties by combining a brittle, densely cross-linked polymer with a soft, loosely cross-linked one [56,57]. After several studies examining the potential candidates in cartilage repair, they reached the conclusion that poly (2-acrylamide-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid)/poly (N, N0-dimethyl acrylamide) (PAMPS/PDMAAm) prepared in two steps in the existence of initiator and UV lamps is the most promising one. Furthermore, the negatively charged PAMPS resemble the abundant proteoglycans (PGs) in articular cartilage, making the hydrogel a bioactive material for chondrogenesis. Yasuda et al. demonstrated that the chondrogenesis ability of (PAMPS/PDMAAm) hydrogel in terms of high expression of collagen II (Col II), aggrecan (Agc), and SRY-Box transcription factor9 (Sox9) when implanted in the rabbit's femoral groove was much higher compared to PVA hydrogel [58]. Still, several factors must be taken into account when designing a DN hydrogel serving as an ideal cell carrier in CR. First, if the first network is permanently covalent, which means it is not able to recover after removing the load, the utilization of this kind of hydrogel in articular cartilage, which encounters millions of cycling loads, will be restrained [56]. Webber et al. observed significant hysteresis in PAMPS/PDMAAm hydrogels with two covalently cross-linked networks under compression [59]. In subsequent cycles, the loading curve matched the unloading curve of the previous cycle, indicating that the brittle cross-linking bonds could not revert to their original state after dissipating energy. To address this, the first network could use dynamic covalent or supramolecular bonds that recover after energy dissipation [60]. Zhou et al. developed a DN hydrogel with a first network formed by the Schiff reaction between Gel and oxidized dextran (DEX), and a second network of GelMA under UV illumination [61]. This dynamic covalent bond resulted in higher energy loss and significant hysteresis after five cycles compared to a single network GelMA hydrogel. However, full recovery was not achieved unless the first network could rapidly and almost completely return to its original state. Supramolecular interactions, which act as sacrificial bonds, can distribute energy during loading and recover to their original state after the force is removed. Zhang et al. developed an injectable DN hydrogel for cartilage repair, composed of Col-norbornene (Col-Nb), tetrazine-modified polyethylene glycol (PEG-Tz), and SF [55]. The first network, Col-PEG, was formed by rapid cross-linking of bioorthogonal groups, norbornene and tetrazine. The second network consisted of SF β-sheets cross-linked by ultrasonication. This Col-PEG/SF hydrogel demonstrated superior compression resistance and recovery compared to the Col-PEG hydrogel (Fig. 4B). The combination of polyacrylamide (PAAm) and ionically cross-linked Alg marked a breakthrough in DN hydrogels achieving high stiffness (∼1 MPa) and super high fracture energy (∼16 kJ m−2) [62]. This network, responsible for self-recovery, showed varying behavior based on storage medium and resting time. Maximum recovery (74 % of initial toughness) was achieved after one day in 80 °C mineral oil [63]. However, this did not meet the fatigue-resistant conditions needed for CR. Recent studies have reduced recovery time by using iron (III) ions and citrate solution, achieving full recovery in 3 min [64]. A new hydrogel with hydrophobic ionic monomers and UV illumination showed complete recovery in 2 h [65]. Another hydrogel with PAM and self-assembling peptide fibers demonstrated rapid self-recovery, high fracture energy (∼2670 J m−2), and high strength (∼1.6 MPa), suitable for CR. Chemically cross-linking the second network to the first improved self-recovery efficiency [66]. Second, DN hydrogels used in cartilage face durability challenges when ionic cross-link comprises one or both networks. Traces of mobile ions are present in synovial fluid [67] that is in direct contact with articular cartilage, exchanging its ions with those in cross-linked hydrogel, thus jeopardizing the stability of the implanted hydrogel [56]. Third, despite mechanical advances in photoinduced hydrogels like methacrylate and acrylate derivatives, their harsh preparation environments limit their use as 3D cell-encapsulated materials for cartilage defects. Sequential polymerization can leave toxic components that threaten cell viability [68]. A mixture of 10.13039/501100010368 PEG and poly (ethylene oxide)-methacrylate forms a gel under low-intensity 10.13039/100008457 UV light (2–3 mW cm−2), which can trap and support chondrocytes. After two weeks, the chondrocytes produce a new matrix rich in PGs, essential for cartilage structure and function. Although the cell-hydrogel mixture reached a stiffness of 70 kPa after six weeks of static incubation, similar to natural cartilage, its initial stiffness was only 1 kPa, much lower than in vivo constructs for cartilage repair [69]. The stiffening observed in static culture may not occur in vivo, where the construct faces various forces that could cause rupture. Efforts to balance UV intensity and cytotoxicity have led to more reliable methods like Schiff-base reactions [61,70] and Michael addition, reducing gel time to 20 min in a cell-friendly environment [71].

Combining toughness and injectability in hydrogels has garnered significant interest. Reversible interactions that enable self-healing at the microscopic level can be incorporated into multi-cross-linking hydrogels at the macroscopic level, resulting in injectable hydrogels with similar properties [60]. Rodell et al. created an injectable hydrogel using guest-host (GH) interactions by incorporating β-cyclodextrin and adamantane into methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA), achieving a toughness of 13 kJ m−³. GH interactions involve a host molecule binding a guest molecule inside its cavity [71]. DN tough hydrogel bioinks, composed of GelMA, o-nitrobenzyl (NB)-grafted hyaluronic acid (HA-NB), and elastin, were developed for bioprinting complex elastic tissues. These GHE hydrogels exhibited high toughness (∼45 kJ m−³), stretchability (∼170 % strain), elasticity, anti-fatigue ability, viscoelasticity, and resilience [72]. However, there is still room for improvement, as sheep cartilage toughness is around 110 kJ m−3 [73].

2.2.2 Stiffness and elasticity

Substrate elasticity can determine stem cell fate or lineage commitment [74]. On stiffer substrates, MSCs [75], fibroblasts [76], and endothelial cells [77] have all shown improved cell adherence, spreading and proliferation. As previously indicated, natural gels are not ideal for studying the mechanosensing of chondrocytes to substrates that require precisely controlled stiffness because of their limited ability to adjust mechanical properties. By changing the type of cross-link, the concentration ratio of composite materials, external stimulation, molecular weight and adding nanoparticles (NPs), researchers created stiffness-tunable hydrogels [78]. Kwon and Yasuda developed sulfonate-coated polyacrylamide (S-PAAm) gels with elastic moduli of 1, 15, and 150 kPa. MSCs cultured on high-stiffness gels exhibited strong stress fiber expression, while those on low-stiffness gels had round shapes with more cortical actin. Notably, lower stiffness gels led to higher mRNA levels of chondrogenic markers (Col 2a1, Agc, Sox9) even without differentiation supplements (Fig. 5A) [79]. Lin et al. created hydrogels with varying mechanical properties by adjusting the molecular weight of PEG-diacrylate (PEGDA) precursors from 3.4 to 20 kDa [80]. Higher molecular weight PEGDA increased the hydrogel's swelling ratio and mesh size. PEGDA-6 kDa and −10 kDa hydrogels had the highest glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content at week four, while PEGDA-20 kDa had greater Col content. PEGDA-10 kDa showed the highest overexpression of Col II. Schuh et al. investigated the effects of substrate stiffness, adhesion site density, and porosity independently using agarose hydrogels modified with RGD [81]. Cells retained the chondrogenic phenotype regardless of the stiffness of the substrate or the availability of adhesion sites. The amount of GAG and DNA in softer gels modified with RGD and RGE (arginyl-glycyl-glutamyl) was found to be significantly higher, as determined by quantification. However, the amount of GAG per DNA was unaffected by the stiffness of the substrate or the availability of adhesion sites. The average diameter of cell ECM clusters in softer gels was significantly larger than in stiffer gels, according to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (Fig. 5B).Fig. 5 A) (I) F-actin structures in MSCs on S-PAAm gels with different stiffness. (II) Gene expression of Col 2a1, Agc, Sox9 and Sca1 in MSCs after 1 week on PS (control) and S-PAAm gels. Reproduced with permission [79]. Copyright 2013, Elsevier Ltd. B) (I) DNA and GAG quantification. (II) H&E stain of day 14 sections. (III) Cell cluster size, and Cell number per cluster. Reproduced with permission [81]. Copyright 2011, John Wiley and Sons.

Fig. 5

For a variety of regenerative medicine applications, flexible methods for selectively manipulating the biomaterial microenvironment are required to find synergies between biochemical and mechanical cues [82]. Park et al. demonstrated that matrix stiffness and GFs—two significant stimuli in the cellular microenvironment—have an impact on MSC differentiation [83]. When MSCs were grown on Col gels as opposed to stiff substrates, Col II rose significantly. Col II expression was further elevated by TGF-β on Col gels, but not on stiff substrates. Separating the effects of matrix elasticity and biochemical signals on cells is challenging due to the unique properties of natural materials [84]. Chen et al. studied chondrocyte mechanoresponses to external forces, biochemical variables, and substrate elasticity using polyacrylamide hydrogels (1, 11, and 90 kPa) treated with TGF-β1 [85]. TGF-β1 enhanced chondrocyte responses, increasing traction force, cellular stiffness, and expression of Col II and Agc, especially on stiffer substrates.

2.2.3 Load-bearing capacity

AC is a flexible tissue that covers bone ends in joints, enabling smooth, low-friction movements and distributing mechanical loads. Hydrogels are promising for CR due to their water-rich, soft nature. However, they must have high load-bearing capacity and low deformation under stress to match cartilage performance [86,87]. Reinforcing hydrogels with fibers or other components can enhance their strength and toughness. Fiber-reinforced hydrogels also reduce joint friction and wear by providing lubrication and cushioning [88]. AC has a complex structure, primarily composed of cartilage-specific Cols and charged PGs, with varying compositions across different regions and developmental stages [89]. Advanced imaging techniques, such as light, confocal, and electron microscopy, reveal distinct compartments within the cartilage matrix: the pericellular matrix (PCM), territorial matrix (TM), and interterritorial matrix (ITM) [90]. The PCM, lacking fibrillar Col, mainly consists of PGs and concentrated Col VI, which stabilizes Cols, PGs, and glycoproteins and interacts with cell receptors to initiate signaling pathways [91]. The TM is characterized by Col fibrils and increased PGs in the interfibrillar space. The ITM has a lower density of unevenly distributed Col fibrils, with interfibrillar PGs and link protein (LP) combined with HA. Matrix vesicles in the ITM play a role in calcification and mineralization within the ECM [92].

Winter et al. used a tracer to study the assembly of newly synthesized Agc in the PCM before its transport to the ECM. Agc forms complexes with HA, providing cartilage with load-bearing properties [93,94]. The PCM facilitates these complexes' formation and influences the mechanical environment of chondrocytes by affecting fluid flow and load transmission, protecting them from excessive compression [92]. Williamson et al. found that Col content increases while CS content decreases in bovine AC during development, improving compressive properties [95,96]. The ECM's amount and distribution affect cartilage's mechanical properties, becoming functional when connecting the neo-matrix associated with each cell. Matrix proteins and PGs are slowly deposited and remodeled in adult cartilage, with PG deposition more restricted to the PCM early in culture and higher matrix protein deposition outside the PCM later [[97], [98], [99]].

Mauck et al. showed that chondrocytes cultured in agarose hydrogels with intermittent loading and higher seeding densities had stronger material properties than those without loading [100]. They found no significant differences in PG and Col content between different loaded and unloaded hydrogels, suggesting that loading may affect material properties by changing the structure, the production of small ECM molecules or the size of PG aggregates. Erickson et al. showed that increasing the MSC seeding density in low-concentration HA constructs increased the biomechanical properties [101]. They hypothesized that this was due to a shorter diffusion distance for the matrix production. In Table 3, a summary of hydrogels’ investigations with various mechanical properties is provided.Table 3 Summary of hydrogels’ investigations with various mechanical properties and crosslinking methods in CR.

Table 3Biomaterial	Crosslinking approach	Mechanical properties	Effects on cell behaviors	References	
PEGDMA, CS, HA, and HS	Photo-crosslinking	• Adjusting the matrix stiffness (3, 30, and 90 kPa)

	• Increasing expression of chondrogenic genes in soft hydrogels (3 kPa) with increasing HA concentration

	[102]	
PDMS		• Stiffness Range: 1.4–135 kPa

	• Increased chondrocyte phenotype and higher expression of Col II at 6 kPa stiffness

	[103]	
GelMA, and iron oxide NPs (Fe2O3)	Chemical	• Adjusts stiffness of Fe₂O₃/GelMA hybrid hydrogel by varying the concentration of MNPs (1.30–1.80 MPa)

	• Modulates chondrocyte properties

• Enhances mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and lipid catabolism

• Validates hybrid hydrogel's regenerative potential in a rat cartilage defect model

	[104]	
Alg	Physical (CaCl2) and chemical	• DC-Alg hydrogels have significantly higher mechanical properties than singly cross-linked hydrogels, with a maximum compressive stress of 1600 kPa and a compressive modulus of 3400 kPa

	• Expresses chondrogenic genes

• Develops cartilage tissue

	[105]	
PDLLA, PEG, and HA	Microwave irradiation	• Over 4 weeks, constructs with HA and TGF-β see their Young's modulus rise to 400 kPa

	• Adding HA and TGF-β to in vitro cultures increases sulfated GAG production

	[106]	
BC and SF	Physical	• The BC/SF hydrogel has a higher compressive strength (1.49 MPa at 55.21 % strain) and better shape recovery than pure BC hydrogel

	• The blended scaffold enhances cell viability and alignment

	[107]	
FGMA	Photo-crosslinking (UV)	• The compression modulus of FGMAs increases with higher MA substitution

• 4 % FGMA3 has a modulus 41 times higher than GelMA (230.80 kPa)

• FGMA3 shows higher compression strength at maximum strain compared to GelMA (1035.00 kPa)

	• FGMA hydrogels support favorable cell viability

• After 8 weeks, the compressive stiffness of regenerated cartilage tissue is similar to that of normal cartilage

	[108]	
Acrylamide-acrylic acid and SNPs	Chemical, and physical	• Adding 0.6 wt% of SNPs increases the hydrogel's compressive strength to 1.4 MPa and doubles its elastic modulus to 240 kPa

• Samples can withstand up to 85 % strain without breaking

• All nanocomposite hydrogels show improved viscoelastic responses by halving stress

• Improved stress relaxation is observed due to the enhanced elastic modulus

	• A 570 μm thick lubricious layer with uniform funnel-like porosity can be created

	[109]	
4-arm star PEG	Chemical (vinyl sulfone and short dithiol)	• Compressive strength ∼20 MPa

	• Chondrocytes encapsulated in hydrogel show proliferation and abundant ECM production in subcutaneous culture in SCID mice

	[110]	
Alg, CS, and Sr	Physical (SrCl2)	• Tunable stiffness in the range of 50–120 kPa by changing the SrCl2 concentration

	• High compatibility with cells

• Positive effect on the inhibition of apoptosis

	[111]	
PVA, and PGF	Physical (PGF)	• Improvement of mechanical properties of hydrogel with maximum tensile strength of 12.44 MPa and Young's modulus of 68.35 MPa

	• Improvement of cell adhesion and proliferation with PGF

	[112]	
HA, Col I, and Col II	Photo-crosslinking (blue light)	• Significant reduction of compressive and dynamic modulus of hydrogel scaffolds by incorporating Col II (∼8 kPa, 16 kPa)

	• High biocompatibility of hydrogels

• Increase sGAG deposition in chondrogenic culture

	[20]	
MASO3	Radical polymerization (BAP, MBAA)	• Compressive moduli from 2.5 0.1 to 1708.7 67.7 kPa

	-

	[113]	
PEG and LP NPs	Chemical (Butane diamine)	• Increasing storage and loss modulus due to the addition of LP NPs

• High mechanical properties with a storage modulus of about 500 kPa without LP addition

	• Biocompatibility of hydrogels (cell viability is more than 80 %)

	[114]	
GE and PSBMA	Chemical cross-linking and transesterification	• Excellent compressive stress at approximately 3.50 MPa and low loss factors (0.023–0.049)

	• Safe for cells, and excellent lubricity

	[115]	
PVA, nHap, HACC, Ch	Dual physically cross-linked (simply freezing/thawing technique and an immersing process)	• Fracture tensile stress (2.70 ± 0.24 MPa), toughness (14.09 ± 2.06 MJ/m3) and compressive modulus (0.88 ± 0.09 MPa)

	• Excellent cytocompatibility because of the existence of nHA

	[116]	
PVA, glycerol, and BC	-	• Compressive modulus: 19.56 MPa; friction coefficient: 0.057 at joint-equivalent load and low sliding speed

	-

	[117]	
Abbreviations: HS: heparan sulfate, PDMS: polydimethylsiloxane, DC-Alg: double cross-linked alginate, sGAG: sulfated glycosaminoglycan, PDLLA: poly-d, l-lactic acid, BC: bacterial cellulose, FGMA: methacrylated flaxseed gum, SNPs: silica NPs, Sr: strontium, PGF: phosphate glass fiber, MASO3: 3-sulfopropylmethacrylate potassium, BAP: N, N0-Bis-(acryloyl)-piperazin, MBAA: N, N′-methylenebis(acrylamide), LP: laponite, GE: glycerol ethoxylate, PSBMA: zwitterionic polysulfobetaine methacrylate, HACC: 2-hydroxypropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride.

2.3 Biodegradability

The other noteworthy property of hydrogels is their degradability pattern, which influences the cross-link density and biomechanics of hydrogels and the behavior of cells. Hydrogels need to degrade gradually and be metabolized by the body to support tissue regeneration and avoid long-term implant issues. A continuous network enhances the biochemical and biomechanical properties of tissue constructs. However, in cartilage tissue engineering, matrix deposition often occurs only near the cells, creating isolated cartilage islands within the hydrogel [118]. To improve matrix distribution in hydrogels, two main strategies can be employed: The first solution is to add specific segments or organic biopolymers that degrade enzymatically or hydrolytically, allowing large ECM molecules like Col to diffuse through the network [119]. The second solution is to use viscoelastic hydrogels that mimic the mechanical properties of natural cartilage [120]. These hydrogels reduce forces through mechanical yielding and matrix remodeling, promoting larger areas of cartilage matrix formation per chondrocyte [118]. Sridhar et al. theorized that local ECM “pockets” can connect before the bulk hydrogel reaches reverse gelation, provided the weak pericellular regions overlap. However, if hydrogel degradation is too slow, it impedes neo-tissue growth, while too rapid degradation can lead to loss of mechanical integrity [119,121,122].

To control degradation rates in line with matrix production, cell-mediated degradation was developed. Bahney et al. studied gene expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and ADAMTS during MSC chondrogenesis in semi-interpenetrating networks PEGDA-based hydrogel [122]. They found that MMP-7, expressed by encapsulated hMSCs, had a temporal profile matching chondrogenesis. By embedding specific peptide substrates (MMP-7 substrates) into the polymer backbone, they created enzymatically degradable hydrogels. This improved the intercellular distribution of the Col II matrix and increased the dynamic modulus in neo-cartilage constructs. Parmar et al. developed degradable Col-mimetic hydrogels using HA or CS-binding peptides, cross-linked with an MMP7-sensitive peptide. The hydrogel with CS bind showed the greatest improvement in AC deposition/degradation ratio and significantly influenced MMP7 gene expression and activity. They further enhanced the hydrogels by adding peptide sequences that bound heparin, integrin, and HA, along with a mix of MMP7 and aggrecanase cleavable peptides. This combination significantly improved hMSC chondrogenesis and maintained mechanical integrity during the culture period [123,124].

By using ester linkage in polymers such as PLA or PGA in various MW, distribution, crystallinity and scaffold porosity, the degradation of hydrogels could be controlled [125,126]. Bryant et al. designed photo-encapsulated hydrogels with chondrocytes by incorporating degradable triblock copolymer PEG-LA-DA into PEGDMA. The fastest degradable group, containing 85 % PEG-LA-DA, showed significantly higher total Col content throughout the neo-tissue [127]. To address challenges in scaffold degradation synchronization and cell adhesion, a novel microcavity gel (MCG) model was developed. This model, inspired by the dynamic outgrowth of chondrocytes at the gel edge, facilitates cell proliferation and ECM secretion through multiple gel edges and microspherical cavities, termed Phase Transfer Cell Culture (PTCC) [128]. Fan et al. compared TPT-MCG with conventional TPT-DA-based hydrogels and found that the micro-cavitary structure accelerated degradation, benefiting cell proliferation and cartilage-specific ECM production. After 21 days, cell density in TPT-MCG constructs was 5.6 times higher than in TPT-G constructs, with increased total collagen and GAG content [129].

Bryant et al. developed PEG hydrogels with varying compressive moduli and incorporated PLA to enhance ECM molecule dispersion. They found an optimal cross-linking density that balances mesh size, water content, and gel mechanics for cell viability [130]. Tho et al. created hyaluronic acid-tyramine hydrogels with tunable properties and observed that lower cross-linked samples supported higher cell density and sGAG biosynthesis, with cells showing a chondrocyte-like appearance after 21 days [131].

Natural hydrogels are gaining attention for their biodegradability and biocompatibility. However, Ch-based hydrogels often suffer from poor mechanical strength and elasticity. Shen et al. addressed this by creating Ch-Gel hydrogels through in situ precipitation, achieving mechanical properties comparable to or better than human cartilage [132]. These hydrogels showed 65.9 % degradation in 70 days, aligning with synthetic CR rates. They also demonstrated a compressive toughness of approximately 75.8 J m−2 and superior adhesion and proliferation of human thyroid cartilage cells. The pore size varied, with Ch hydrogels having 180–300 μm pores, while those with 4 % Gel had pores around 100 μm.

2.4 Porosity and interconnectivity

Developing porous and interconnected structures within hydrogels is crucial for cellular infiltration, nutrient diffusion, waste removal, and functional tissue formation. Although the ideal pore size for polymer scaffolds is debated, cartilage scaffolds typically have over 70 % porosity with interconnected pores between 100 and 500 μm [133]. The best scaffold balances interconnectivity and mechanical stability, ensuring enough void volume to support chondrocyte adaptation while maintaining strength, as higher porosity reduces mechanical strength [134,135].

Optimizing porosity and interconnectivity in hydrogel scaffolds can be achieved through various methods. One approach is sacrificial templating, where a material is incorporated into the hydrogel and later removed to create pores. For example, Konka et al. used Gel microspheres in hydroxyapatite scaffolds, resulting in a porous structure suitable for tissue engineering (Fig. 6A) [136]. Another method is particulate leaching, where water-soluble particles are dispersed in the hydrogel and then dissolved to form pores. Additionally, PLGA sponges were used as templates to create Col scaffolds with interconnected pores. These scaffolds supported uniform chondrocyte distribution, rapid cell division, and increased cartilaginous gene expression and extracellular matrix secretion. The most effective results were seen with Col scaffolds templated by PLGA sponges with a high weight ratio and large salt particles (Fig. 6B) [137].Fig. 6 A) Developing hierarchical porous biomimetic hydroxyapatite scaffolds using DIW technique. (I) incorporating Gel microspheres as sacrificial templates, and SEM images of the filaments, showing the concave pores after Gel microspheres dissolve partially. Reproduced under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license [136]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier Ltd. B) (I) Schematic illustration of interconnected Col porous scaffolds prepared with sacrificial PLGA sponge templates. (II) SEM images of PLGA templates, PLGA–Col constructs and Col scaffolds cross-sections. Reproduced with permission [137]. Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry.

Fig. 6

Various other methods, including 3D-printing [51], lyophilization [138], gas foaming [139], polymer phase separation [140], and emulsified droplets, or polymer microspheres [141] have been developed to create macroporous structures. Among the diverse array of 3D bioprinting strategies, extrusion-based printing, inkjet-based printing, and laser-based bioprinting are the most commonly used (Fig. 7). Each method has its own strengths and challenges, such as cost, accuracy, and time efficiency. The primary distinction between these standard 3D bioprinting techniques lies in their ability to precisely control the microstructure geometry [142,143]. Before printing, a CAD software system designs the 3D models and sets the parameters. Different inks and methods require specific parameters. The hydrogel ink is mixed and placed in the ink storage box, then applied layer by layer to the building platform by the 3D-printer. Each layer hardens before the next is added, gradually building up the 3D hydrogel precursor, which is then linked together [144,145]. However, printing soft biological materials in the air can lead to deformation and loss of shape. To address this, the Free Reversible Embedding of Suspended Hydrogels (FRESH) technique prints bioinks within a yield-stress support bath, which holds the bioinks in place until they cure [146]. This method involves embedding the printed hydrogel within a secondary hydrogel that acts as temporary, thermoreversible, and biocompatible support [147]. Table 4 shows a summary of hydrogels’ investigations with different pore sizes for 10.13039/100017626 CR .Fig. 7 Schematic illustration of the steps for bioprinting and different printing methods. (A) An extrusion printer dispensing cell-loaded solutions or hydrogels by air pressure or hand force, (B) an inkjet printer drops small bioink droplets to build a tissue layer by layer, and (C) a laser-assisted printer transfers the bioink to the substrate as droplets with a laser pulse.

Fig. 7

Table 4 Summary of hydrogels’ investigations with different pore sizes and porosity for CR.

Table 4Method	Biomaterial	Crosslinking approach	Pore size	Porosity (%)	Reference	
Porogen leaching (sucrose particles)	Gel, HA, and Alg	Chemical (EDAC), physical (CaCl2)	100 μm	70	[148]	
3D printing (extrusion)	b-TPUe, and PCL	–	1.5 mm	73	[149]	
Porogen leaching (NaCl particles)	PCL	–	100–150 μm	–	[150]	
Lyophilization	SF, and Col	Physical (ethanol)	112 μm	89	[151]	
Lyophilization	Col II, Col I, and HA	Chemical (EDAC/NHS)	155 μm	99	[152]	
Porogen leaching (NaCl particles)	PEG	Photo-crosslinking with UV	15–82 μm	30	[153]	
3D printing (extrusion)	Silica, PTHF, and PCL	–	210 μm	42	[154]	
Abbreviations: EDAC: 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride, b-TPUe: 1,4-butanediol thermoplastic polyurethane, PTHF: poly(tetrahydrofuran), NHS: N-hydroxysuccinimide.

Different stages of tissue development require varying macropore densities and sizes. Low porosity provides structural stability and preserves transplanted cells, while increased porosity over time aids nutrient diffusion, cell proliferation, and matrix formation [155]. Zhang et al. developed a bilayered 3D-printed scaffold with a swelling-dependent gate, featuring a lower layer with smaller pores and an upper matrix with larger pores. This design allows bone marrow MSCs to infiltrate initially and later block excess blood support, aiding stable chondrogenesis (Fig. 8A) [156]. Biodegradable polymers can create scaffolds that increase porosity over time, but controlling the timing and degree of macropore formation remains challenging [157]. Existing methods often expose cells to harsh conditions, reducing survival rates. Seeding cells on prefabricated macroporous scaffolds can result in low efficiency and uneven distribution [158]. Encapsulating cells with non-cytotoxic porogens offers better control over cell distribution [159]. Han et al. used stimuli-responsive porogens to create dynamic hydrogels with tunable macropores, responding to stimuli like temperature, chelation, and enzymatic digestion [160].Fig. 8 A) Schematic illustration of bilayered scaffolds with two pore sizes for cartilage repair. Post-implantation, they swell from bone marrow blood, allowing BMSC infiltration before pore closure, while the upper layer houses BMSCs. Reproduced with permission [156]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V. B) Schematic illustration of multifunctional PCCGA hydrogel design for OA alleviation and cartilage protection. Reproduced with permission [161]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons.

Fig. 8

Manipulating pore sizes in hydrogels can be achieved through various techniques, such as modifying polymer concentration, adjusting gelation conditions, and using rapid freeze-drying [162]. Li et al. showed that changing the concentration of PVA can regulate pore size, with an initial increase followed by a decrease as the concentration rises [163]. Lyophilized Alg hydrogel can significantly increase pore size to 200–300 μm [164]. Cross-linking density within the hydrogel network is another method to adjust pore size and porosity [165]. Cross-linking agents form covalent bonds between polymer chains, affecting the hydrogel's structure. By varying the concentration of these agents, researchers can control pore size and distribution. Yen et al. found that increasing methacrylate modification in BSAGMA (bovine serum albumin glycidyl methacrylate) hydrogels reduced pore sizes [166]. Wang et al. created a multifunctional polycitrate-based hydrogel (PCCGA) that retained its porous structure after freeze-drying, with pore size decreasing as concentration increased (Fig. 8B) [161]. In contrast, PEGDA hydrogel had fewer pores and more cracks due to lower cross-linking density. A hydrogel with lower cross-linking density absorbs more water, resulting in larger pore sizes [167].

2.5 Integration capacity

Integrating implants with native tissue is crucial for immediate functionality and long-term performance of repaired cartilage [168]. A strong interface between a scaffold and biological surface ensures a uniform arrangement of new tissue [169]. Conventional treatments like auto and allografts and microfracture often result in poor lateral integration with surrounding tissue [170]. Integrating hydrogels into cartilage is particularly challenging due to the slippery nature of dense ECM and the mechanically harsh joint environment, making cartilage bonding difficult [171,172]. While integration with host bone is more achievable, inadequate adhesion between hydrogels and biological surfaces limits their biomedical applications [173].

Integrating neo-cartilage with natural cartilage includes using sutures and bioadhesives like fibrin glue [174]. However, fibrin glue degrades quickly, especially with chondrocytes [175], prompting research into more durable bioadhesives that can withstand joint mechanical forces and provide long-term integration [168,[176], [177], [178], [179], [180]]. Hydrogel-tissue integration offers secure biological fixation and reduces infection risks, protecting neo-tissue and aiding the repair process [169]. Studies show that lack of integration can lead to the failure of cartilage repair [168,181,182].

One challenge in cartilage repair is cell death at the interface between the host and repair cartilage, as seen in treatments like autologous chondrocyte implantation [183]. Using inhibitors of necrosis (Nec-1) and apoptosis (ZVF) in the culture medium can reduce cell death [184,185]. Increasing cellular density at the interface, either by repopulating the scaffold with chondrocytes or attracting adjacent cells, can also help [186]. Dense ECM in AC hinders cell migration, for this reason, through chemical modification of biomaterials with cell-attracting components such as heparin [187] or intercalating oligomer of dopamine methacrylamide (ODMA) [188], enzymatic treatment of cartilage removing the Col networks and PGs barriers [189,190] or implanting hydrogels synergically with further microfracture creating a pathway for cell invasion and deposition [171], researchers stimulate this crucial cellular migration for achieving better integration. Even with adequate cell density in the interface zone, the environment must allow for proper diffusion of newly synthesized Col, which is crucial for integration [191]. Researchers can achieve this by selecting an appropriate macromer concentration when designing hydrogels. Erickson et al. found that seeding MSCs in methacrylated HA at a lower concentration (1 %) led to the strongest integration, likely due to increased Col production and better fiber contribution [192].

Injectable hydrogels, known for their ease of administration and stimuli-responsiveness, facilitate integration with surrounding cartilage by evenly dispersing cells and biomolecules and filling irregular tissue defects [[193], [194], [195]]. Tailoring the gel time is crucial for strong integration; it should be neither too long nor too short to prevent material flow or compromised integration [176,196]. Injectable hydrogels are also used for complex diseases like osteoarthritis, with shear-thinning properties preventing cell sedimentation [197,198]. Hou et al. incorporated Ureido-pyrimidinone (UPy) units into DEX polymer, creating a shear-thinning hydrogel that integrates two hydrogels embedded with chondrocytes and BMSCs within minutes due to dynamic hydrogen bonding (Fig. 9A) [199].Fig. 9 A) Design of a DEX-UPy hydrogel for multi-tissue complex regeneration. (I) schematic illustration of DEX-UPy hydrogel formation and the mechanisms of the shear-thinning and self-recovery properties. (II) Formation of DEX-UPy hydrogel, its injectability and self-integrating property. Reproduced with permission [199]. Copyright 2015, Wiley-VCH. B) Schematic illustration of the adhesive design of the hydrogel. (I) The dissipative matrix consists of PEGDMA interpenetrated with an ionically crosslinked natural polymer (Alg), reinforced by cellulose fibers. (II) The custom-made adhesion setup for evaluating hydrogel-tissue attachment in traction mode. Reproduced (adapted) with permission [200]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.

Fig. 9

The importance of hydrogel-cartilage integration is twofold. In a cell-free approach, seamless integration allows adjacent cells to migrate into the defect site. In a cell-laden approach, strong adhesion ensures the hydrogel retains embedded cells and their derivatives effectively during healing [201]. One promising method is targeting cartilage matrix proteins for covalent binding with chemically modified hydrogels. Teixeira et al. used horseradish peroxidase to incorporate tyramine into DEX polymer, enabling the hydrogel to bind with tyrosine residues in cartilage. Increasing tyramine residues strengthened the adhesion between the hydrogel and surrounding tissue, enhancing the role of covalent binding in adhesion strength [187].

Wang et al. developed a photo-initiated hydrogel that covalently integrates into cartilage Col networks [189]. After removing surface PGs with chondroitinase ABC to expose Col, tyrosine residues are oxidized and then exposed to UV light, initiating a reaction with PEGDA. This hydrogel showed strong interface strength in mechanical torsion tests, similar to pure gel, while unoxidized cartilage constructs slipped under small torsional strain. Strehin et al. used a similar mechanism to develop a CS-based hydrogel that binds to proteins in cartilage [176]. The strength of this hydrogel depends on pH; higher pH reduces gelation time, leading to fewer amide bonds and a softer hydrogel. At neutral pH, the hydrogel's adhesion strength was ten times stronger than fibrin glue. Another aspect of hydrogels that is a determinant of establishing a stable integration is whether the hydrogel dissipates the applied load efficiently or the forces concentrate on a region leading to crack propagation. With that in mind, more recently Karami et al. developed a DN hydrogel that, in addition to the high toughness due to chemical cross-linking of PEGDA and incorporating fiber reinforcement, which is critical for retarding crack initiation, a wide-range of physical interactions, including ionic and hydrogen bonds play two crucial roles in improving crack propagation [200]. First, because of their reversible nature, they considerably increase hysteresis manifesting energy dissipation through sacrificial bonds under loading, while unloading leads to elevated interfacial strength. Second, these physical interactions provide available sites in the hydrogel to interact with the tissue underneath (Fig. 9B).

2.6 Summary

The mechanical properties of hydrogels, such as stiffness and elasticity, must closely align with native cartilage to effectively distribute load and integrate with surrounding tissues. Balancing stiffness, toughness, and elasticity is challenging because improving one often compromises another. For example, increasing stiffness can reduce water retention, which is vital for cell viability. Innovative approaches, such as multi-network hydrogels or dynamic covalent bonds, are needed to create hydrogels that can endure the complex mechanical environment of joints while supporting tissue regeneration. Additionally, these materials must be compatible with cell encapsulation and non-cytotoxic. Biodegradability is also critical; the hydrogel must degrade at a rate that allows for structural support while gradually being replaced by a new ECM. Porosity and interconnectivity are key for cellular infiltration, nutrient diffusion, and waste removal, which are essential for functional tissue formation. Advanced hydrogels incorporate strategies like enzymatically degradable segments and microcavity structures to enhance matrix distribution and chondrocyte proliferation. However, integration with host tissue remains a major challenge, particularly due to the dense ECM of cartilage and the demanding mechanical environment of joints. Research is focused on improving integration through bioadhesives, modifying hydrogels with cell-attracting components, and optimizing pore architecture to support cell migration and ECM deposition. Overcoming these challenges is crucial to unlocking the full potential of hydrogels in cartilage repair and ensuring their successful clinical application.

3 Design of stratified-structural hydrogels

The zonal organization is crucial for the structure and function of cartilage, yet most current tissue engineering approaches regenerate cartilage with uniform properties. Stratified-structural hydrogels offer an innovative solution by mimicking the complex, layered structure of natural cartilage. These hydrogels can be designed as layered scaffolds (with two or three layers) or gradient scaffolds, each tailored to replicate specific areas of cartilage. In this section, we delve deeper into these types of hydrogels.

AC is segmented into four zones, each characterized by distinct levels of collagen fibers, PG content, and variations in chondrocyte count and shape (Fig. 10). The superficial (top) zone is characterized by the densest cell population with flattened morphology. The ECM mainly consists of Col II, while the concentration of GAGs and PGs is the lowest compared to the three other layers except PG4, which has a high concentration [[202], [203], [204]]. Moreover, this zone has a high expression of Sox9 and superficial zone protein (SZP) [205]. By shifting from a superficial to a middle zone, not only do cells gradually turn into larger chondrocytes, but they also alter from a flattened to a more spherical shape, and cell density decreases substantially [90,206]. There are also some alterations in biochemical composition. As the sulfated GAGs and PG start to increase, the Col II, PG4, and water amounts start to decrease [207]. Lastly, calcified (bottom) cartilage has less active chondrocytes with hypertrophic cartilage markers such as Col X and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Chondrocytes, distributed across these zones, are each nestled within a dense PCM [206,207].Fig. 10 Schematic illustration of the anatomical structure of AC with four histological zones. The extracellular matrix (ECM) of AC is a complex assembly of Col II and PGs. This intricate composition influences the alignment of Col fibers, cellular density, and cytomorphology, fostering a cartilage structure with a hierarchical organization. Progressing from the superficial to the calcified zones, there's a discernible shift in cell density and phenotype, accompanied by changes in the tissue's architecture and chemical makeup.

Fig. 10

It is worth mentioning that this stratified structure gives particular properties and functionalities to each layer. The superficial zone has the highest tensile strength according to high Col content [208]. Additionally, PG4 and SZP play an important role in joint lubrication which is the main characteristic of this zone [205]. Increasing GAG content with depth causes an augmentation of the compressive modulus in the deep zone [209]. Finally, the presence of Col X and ALP makes it possible for the transition zone to anchor to the underlying subchondral bone [210]. Conventional tissue engineering methods for reproducing cartilage did not consider this zonal architecture and as a result, the fabricated neo-cartilage may lack full functionality with respect to load distribution, lubrication, and integration with natural tissue [211]. To imitate the stratified structure of cartilage, Klein et al. used subpopulations of chondrocytes from different cartilage zones, knowing that isolated chondrocytes from each layer show distinct biosynthetic activities. Although they attempted to construct a layer resembling the superficial zone with lower compressive properties and a high concentration of SZP [212], it should be noted that isolation of chondrocytes from different zones can be arduous [213,214].

Another strategy for recapitulating the zonal organizations is using biomaterials with varying biomechanical and biochemical properties to resemble the microenvironment of natural cartilage for embedded cells inside them [215]. These variable properties include gradients in stiffness [215], topography [216], diffusive biomolecules [[217], [218], [219]], composition [220], and pore size [221]. Besides, dissimilar cell density could be loaded in each layer corresponding to each layer's density in natural cartilage [[217], [218], [219]]. Furthermore, to imitate the microenvironment cells encounter in natural cartilage, attempts have been made to make gradient oxygen tension in fabricated constructs and many studies have been done to evaluate the effect of applied mechanical forces on the zonal organization of final tissue during cell culture [214,222]. Hydrogel is a cell-friendly template that not only resembles natural cartilage in terms of the water ratio trapped in its structure but also can be tuned for establishing one or more of the gradients.

The average modulus of superficial, middle and calcified zones are 0.08, 2.1, and 320 MPa, respectively [217]. The PEG-based hydrogels are the most practical platform that has been used for creating gradient stiffness. Modifying this synthetic hydrogel with a natural polymer such as HA and CS benefits the scaffold by better-directing cells to ones that can synthesize the specific-layer ECM [220,223]. Moreover, RGD is incorporated into the PEG-based hydrogel to enhance the ability of chondrocytes to detect changes in mechanical properties [224]. While increasing matrix stiffness led to higher expression of the genes encoding Agc, Col II was also expressed more in the stiffer zone. The most recent trend contrasts with that of natural cartilage. Results from this study demonstrate that a sole gradient may not necessarily result in the stratified organization like natural cartilage and the authors claim additional cues are required to achieve that aim [215].

The results from previous studies should be treated with caution since different cell types may respond differently to biomechanical and biomechanical cues [220]. Chondrocytes are more capable of degrading hydrogels during the embedded time and are more likely to proliferate in the stiffer zones [215]. Besides extrinsic cues, concerning intrinsic properties of cells could lead to better choices of encapsulated cells in each layer. Levato et al. have shown that articular cartilage-resident chondroprogenitor cells (APCs) offer greater benefits than MSCs and chondrocytes in terms of populating the template within the superficial zone. This type of cell not only has a differentiation capacity after extensive culture expansion [225] but also has a high expression of PG4 and the lowest expression of Col X [226]. To reach a neo-cartilage comparable to native cartilage regarding the amount of ECM, the appropriate cell density should be loaded. PRG4 expression increased when 50 × 106 cells ml−1 were seeded on the hydrogels rather than 20 × 106 cell ml−1 [214].

Not only does Col fibrils alignment play a pivotal role in the biomechanical properties of natural cartilage, but various sizes and orientations through the depth of adult AC also guide the cells in expressing more zone-specific ECM. One of the beneficial features of the decellularized matrix being used as a biomaterial is that it can preserve the nanostructure of initial tissue after removing cells [227]. Given that skeletal maturity establishes Col fibril alignment and increases its diameter, which supports cell proliferation, Luo et al. explored how this alignment impacts chondrogenesis by comparing Col and GAG produced by mature and immature decellularized explants repopulated by fat pad-derived stem cells [228]. They observed more proliferation (13-fold increase to 5-fold increase in DNA content) and a higher Col: GAG ratio (1.4 vs 0.4) in mature scaffolds.

The manipulation of cells' fate through micro and nanostructures is a well-known fact. In the utilization of hydrogel, there are two distinct approaches for fabricating biomimetic structures that closely resemble the ones encountered by cells in their natural environment. These approaches are composite hydrogels and micropatterned hydrogels. Whilst the primary aim of incorporating fibril into hydrogel is advancing its mechanical properties, it also mimics the composite structure of natural cartilage [229,230]. Mellati et al. used photolithography techniques to create 3D patterned microstructures to direct cell organization [231]. They observed that among 50, 100, and 150 µm wide micro constructs, the smaller channel width had the higher cell alignment, which resembles the geometry of chondrocytes in the superficial zone. The induced phenotype corresponds to the synthesis of zone-specific ECM [232].

The size of cell-seeded in hydrogels matters when biomimetic microenvironments such as hypoxia and mechanical load on respective tissue are applied to engineered tissue. Hydrogels infused with fibro chondrocyte-like stem cells (FPSCs) were employed, with variations in height (either 2 mm or 4 mm), and subjected to two distinct boundary conditions: confinement to half of their thickness and/or dynamic compression (DC). It was theorized that confining FPSC-laden hydrogels would serve to accentuate the oxygen tension gradient within the constructs. Specifically, this would result in higher oxygen levels at the top and lower oxygen levels towards the bottom of the hydrogels. This, in turn, was anticipated to promote an upswing in the synthesis of GAG and Col, particularly in the 2 mm high constructs. Moreover, when exposed solely to dynamic compression (DC), both GAG and Col accumulation displayed an upward trajectory within the unconfined 2 mm high constructs. This was accompanied by a noteworthy elevation in the dynamic modulus of the constructs, rising from 0.96 MPa to 1.45 Mpa following the application of DC. Nonetheless, when considering the combined influence of confinement and DC, no synergistic advantages were discerned regarding the overall levels of matrix accumulation. Notably, the superficial region of these constructs exhibited a striking resemblance to native tissue. It exhibited weak staining for GAG, strong staining for Col II, and in the case of the 4 mm high tissues, a more pronounced staining intensity for PG4 [222]. The Jabbari group conducted several studies attempting to recapitulate the zonal organization of natural cartilage by utilizing a combination of variable stiffness, cell density, GFs and fiber orientation so that each factor encourages the particular layer to resemble more than the respective layer in natural cartilage [217,218].

Multi-layered hydrogels based on the photo-polymerization technique is the most common technique that has been used for creating hierarchical hydrogels. In this technique, each material composition is placed on a mold sequentially and combined with a photo initiator then exposed to the UV light for a specific period. The next layer is then added on top of the previous layer, and the same approach is repeated until a single unit is acquired [220,233]. One potential limitation of the constructs made by this technique is lack of integrity, which leads to delamination under mechanical stress. To overcome this limitation, Zhu et al. set up a process in which two different concentrations of cell-containing precursor solutions combined in the mixing chamber were entered into a mold and subsequently exposed to the UV light in a way that the stiffness of the final construct ranged from 2 kPa to 60 kPa [215]. They also assessed the viability and cell distribution among their constructs by live-dead staining analysis and observed high viability and homogenous cell distribution throughout the hydrogel. In 3D-printing, a platform can be used to create area-dependent hydrogels by applying multiple gradients simultaneously [226,233]. Table 5 summarizes the cartilage scaffolds with stratified structure and regional characteristics of the cartilage region, including cellular properties and phenotypes, region-specific GFs, matrix compositions and porosity, Col fiber orientation, and mechanical properties.Table 5 A summary of cartilage scaffolds with different stratified strategies and regional characteristics of the cartilage region.

Table 5Stratified-structural type	Material	Hydrogel type	Outcome	References	
Cell properties and phenotypes	Col II	3D-bioprinted (trilayered)	• Zonal distribution of ECM

	[234]	
F-CarMa, and a-CarMa	Injectable	• Increased differentiation to the superficial zone phenotype in high cell density in f-CarMa by sequential addition of IGF-1 and IHH and to the calcified zone in a-CarMa in low cell density

	[235]	
8-arm PEG-norbornene, PEG-dithiol, and CS-MA	Gradient	• Faster cartilage deposition occurs for MSCs in a soft matrix (Young's modulus <5 kPa) and for chondrocytes in a stiffer matrix (Young's modulus >20 kPa)

	[236]	
Zone-specific GFs	AC of bovine legs	Multi-layered photopolymerizing gels	• Differentiation of hMSCs into the middle zone phenotype due to the addition of IGF-1 to cartilage medium/TGF-β1

• Differentiation of hMSCs into calcified zone phenotype due to the addition of IHH to cartilage medium/TGF-β1

	[237]	
F-CarMa, and a-CarMa	Injectable	• Differentiation to the middle zone phenotype by adding IGF-1 to chondrogenic medium/TGF-β1 and BMP-7

• Differentiation to the calcified zone phenotype by adding IHH to chondrogenic medium/TGF-β1 and BMP-7 and IGF-1

	[235]	
Porosity	PEGSA	3D-printing (bilayered hydrogel)	• Swelling altered the pore size of the small-pore layer and let BMSCs infiltrate at an early stage

• The large-pore layer enhances BMSCs' chondrogenic differentiation by providing a soft, viscoelastic, and biocompatible environment

	[156]	
Matrix composition	CS, HA, and PEGDA	Multi-layered hydrogel	• Directing hBMSCs to distinct and zone-specific cell phenotypes by layer-specific composition

	[220]	
Fibril orientation	HA, PLA	Zonal scaffold (tri-layer)	• Aligned nanofiber mesh in the superficial zone caused cell elongation, lower GAG and Col II, and higher proliferation and Col I than the middle zone cells

• Random nanofiber mesh in the middle zone grouped cells and raised Col II

• The deep zone scaffold had the highest GAG, lowest proliferation and Col I of all zones

	[238]	
PEG, cellulose nanofiber	Composite hydrogel (trilayered)	• The morphologies and Col II content distribution of cells cultured on each zone of the hydrogel composite resemble those of natural articular cartilage

• The deep zone frame's nutrition and cell transport behaviors facilitated the CR process

	[239]	
Ch, Gel	Multizonal scaffold (- Top zone with horizontal pores
- Deep zone with vertically aligned pores
- The transition with zone randomly oriented pores)	• Under cyclic compression, these scaffolds showed high viscoelasticity and their pore orientation affected how much energy they dissipated

	[240]	
Mechanical properties	8-arm PEG-norbornene, PEG-dithiol, CS-MA	Gradient Hydrogel	• Faster cartilage deposition for MSCs in a soft matrix with a Young's modulus less than 5 kPa and for chondrocyte cells in a stiffer matrix (Young's modulus >20 kPa)

	[236]	
Ch, Gel	Multizonal scaffold	• The lowest moduli for the horizontal layer

• The highest moduli for the vertical layer

• The moderate moduli for the random layer

	[240]	
Col, Ch–PCL	Low-temperature deposition processing technique (four-layered scaffold)	• 10 % increase in compressive modulus and stress from the upper layer to the lower layer

• Creating a swelling index gradient

	[241]	
PEG, cellulose nanofiber	Composite hydrogel (trilayered)	• The compressive moduli of the superficial zone 298 kPa

• The compressive moduli of the middle zone 182 kPa

• The compressive moduli of the deep zone 9.8 MPa

	[239]	
Agarose	bilayered construct	• More mechanical strength in the bottom layer

• More Col production in the top layer

	[242]	
Abbreviations: F-CarMa: Methacrylated fetal cartilage, a-CarMa: Methacrylated adult cartilage, CS-MA: chondroitin sulfate methacrylate, PEGSA: acrylated-poly(glycerol sebacate)-co-PEG.

Stratified-structural hydrogel scaffolds can be expanded with a bone layer to create osteochondral scaffolds for repairing osteochondral defects. These scaffolds need to support both cartilage and subchondral bone formation. Lin et al. used a solvent-free urethane cross-linking method to create PEGylated poly (glycerol subcategory) (PEGS) scaffolds with controllable porosity and cross-linking degrees [243]. The low cross-linked PEGS-12 h variant promoted chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage matrix secretion. Additionally, PEGS-12 h was combined with osteoinductive bioactive mesoporous glass (MBG) to form PEGS/MBG bilayered scaffolds. Gao et al. used 3D-printing to create bilayered scaffolds with GelMA for the cartilage layer and a GelMA-HAp mix for the subchondral layer, which showed potential for in vivo CR [244]. Gong et al. developed a double-layer 3D-printed scaffold with interleukin-4 in the upper GelMA layer and a porous PCL-hydroxyapatite lower layer [245]. In another study conducted by Rajzer et al., a synergistic approach involving two scaffolding techniques—3D-printing via fused deposition modeling (FDM) and electrospinning—was adopted to create a layered scaffold. The resulting hybrid layered scaffolds consisted of a top layer composed of Gel nanofibers and a 3D-printed porous poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) material [220]. Pasty calcium phosphate cement (CPC) and a bioink based on Alg-methylcellulose (AlgMC) were also applied in a monophasic and combinatory design to recreate osteochondral tissue layers. The chondrogenic fate of cells in co-fabricated and biphasic CPC-AlgMC patterns was also evaluated. Most cells survived and redifferentiated in the AlgMC hydrogel, producing ECM components after 3 weeks [246].

Delamination of the two layers often leads to tissue disjunction and limited clinical applications. To address this, Li et al. developed a PCL-based scaffold with a strong interface [247]. The upper layer was an ECM-coated 3D-printed composite scaffold (E-co-E/PCL), while the bottom layer was a MgO@PDA incorporated 3D-printed composite scaffold (MD/PCL). This bilayered scaffold exhibited suitable physicochemical and mechanical properties. Xing et al. reported an integrated bilayered hydrogel with a strong interface (40 kPa), facilitating calcium ion diffusion into the secondary cross-linking of the bilayered hydrogel [248]. The cartilage layer consisted of gellan gum (GG) and Alg, while the subchondral layer comprised GG and hydroxyapatite. This structure demonstrated high cell compatibility and could be seeded with MSCs that expressed various proteins for cartilage and bone formation. In a rabbit model with a critical osteochondral defect, the calcium-rich hydrogel served as a calcium source, induced neovascularization by week 4, and repaired the defect by week 8. Multiphasic scaffolds also play a role in inducing angiogenesis in the subchondral bone. Wang et al. employed a triphasic GelMA hydrogel scaffold with a CS and hydroxyapatite gradient, along with covalent bonding, to repair osteochondral defects [249]. This scaffold induced chondrogenesis of BMSCs, angiogenesis, and osteogenesis and had gradient mechanical strength. Evaluated in a rabbit model, it accelerated osteochondral regeneration, suggesting a novel treatment strategy.

The emergence of stratified-structural hydrogels offers a promising alternative by mimicking the layered architecture of cartilage, which is crucial for load distribution, lubrication, and integration with surrounding tissues. These hydrogels can be designed with distinct layers or gradients that reflect the varying mechanical and biochemical properties across the cartilage zones, such as differences in Col content, GAG levels, and cell morphology. Recent advancements in hydrogel design incorporate gradients in stiffness, topography, and biochemical cues, aiming to recreate the natural environment that cells encounter within the cartilage matrix. Techniques such as 3D printing have enabled the creation of multi-layered scaffolds that can better mimic the mechanical and functional properties of native cartilage. However, challenges remain in achieving strong layer integration and optimizing cell and matrix distribution for effective tissue regeneration.

4 The influence of environmental stimuli on hydrogel design

Hydrogels have been recognized as potential scaffolds for articular CR. Environmental stimuli, both biochemical and biophysical, significantly influence their performance and function [250]. Designing hydrogels requires careful consideration of these external factors to optimize their characteristics and functionality. This section explores how external stimuli impact hydrogel design for articular CR. By understanding this relationship, we aim to develop better strategies for cartilage repair, ultimately improving clinical outcomes and quality of life for individuals with cartilage damage or degeneration.

4.1 Biochemical stimuli

Biochemical stimuli play crucial roles in cartilage tissue regeneration by regulating cellular activities such as proliferation, differentiation and matrix synthesis. In the context of hydrogel design, incorporating these biochemical agents within the hydrogel matrix can enhance the biological response and promote CR. Different types of biochemical stimuli that are used include GFs, cytokines, small molecules and molecules derived from the extracellular ECM [251]. One of the main challenges in cartilage tissue engineering is delivering biochemical stimuli to cells within the hydrogel matrix in a controlled spatiotemporal manner [252]. Integrating these stimuli into hydrogel matrices and developing strategies for their controlled release and spatial distribution is crucial for enhancing the efficacy and safety of cartilage tissue engineering. Several methods have been developed to incorporate biochemical stimuli into hydrogel matrices, including.• Physical entrapment: Biochemical agents are physically incorporated into the hydrogel network, typically releasing at a slow and steady rate, though sometimes exhibiting an initial rapid burst [252,253].

• Covalent attachment: Functional groups of hydrogel precursors bind biochemical agents covalently, helping to keep them in place and/or release them in a controlled manner [254]. Amphiphilic polyurethanes with amine groups were created to form amide bonds with Kartogenin's (KGN) carboxyl group. The resulting KGN-conjugated polyurethane NPs were uniform spheres, averaging 25 nm in size, and demonstrated controlled KGN release in vitro [255].

• Affinity binding or encapsulation: Biochemical stimuli can be encapsulated within micro- or nano-carriers or loaded into electrospun fibers, offering more control and longer duration of release. These carriers can be designed with various sizes, compositions, biodegradability, surface shapes, and functions to adjust release rates for different applications [256,257].

These methods protect biochemical stimuli from degradation and clearance, allowing for sustained or stimuli-responsive release based on factors like the degradation rate of the hydrogel or carrier, the diffusion coefficient of the stimuli, or environmental cues such as pH, temperature, enzymes, or light [252,253]. Additionally, the spatial distribution of biochemical stimuli within hydrogel matrices can be achieved using techniques like gradient generators, microfluidic devices, layer-by-layer assembly, or 3D-printing. These techniques create spatially varying concentrations or patterns of biochemical stimuli within hydrogel matrices, mimicking the natural gradient of signaling molecules in tissues and inducing directional cell migration, alignment, or differentiation [253,258].

4.1.1 Growth factors

Growth factors (GFs) are crucial in regulating cell behavior, proliferation, and differentiation. Key GFs used in CR studies include TGF-β, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), IGF-1, and PDGF. Clinically, GFs can be administered through direct injection into the affected area or systemically as recombinant variants. However, their use is limited by factors such as large molecular size, slow tissue penetration, short half-life, and potential systemic toxicity [252,259]. To address these challenges, Guo et al. developed a dynamic hydrogel (Pep-GelSH) using thiol-modified Gel and thiol-capped TGF-β1-affinity peptide through Au-S coordination. This hydrogel showed superior attachment to host tissues and facilitated rapid penetration of host cells. It significantly increased the local concentration of endogenous TGF-β1, effectively attracting stem cells (Fig. 11A) [260]. Research indicates that a combination of GFs can effectively attract cells. Liebesny et al. found that neither PDGF nor TGF-β1 alone could induce MSC migration, but their combination successfully did [261]. Another study demonstrated that combining microgels with GFs and enzymatic cross-linking formed heterogeneous granular hydrogels embedded with GFs. Sulfated microislands loaded with GFs directed cell migration and significantly promoted chondrogenesis [262].Fig. 11 Schematic illustration of A) The function of the TGF-β1-affinity peptide modified dynamic proteinaceous hydrogel (Pep-GelSH) in in-situ CR. Reproduced with permission [260]. Copyright 2024, published by John Wiley and Sons. B) The fabrication of the composite hydrogel loaded with BMSCs, CM-10, KGN@Lipo, and GelMA for the repair of the osteochondral defect. Reproduced with permission [263]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. C) Integrated drug delivery system for CR. Reproduced under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license [264]. Copyright 2021, published by John Wiley and Sons. D) The preparation of HA/GG DN hydrogel as a biomimetic ECM for rabbit cartilage defect regeneration. Reproduced with permission [265]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.

Fig. 11

4.1.2 Small molecules

Small molecules can significantly influence cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and matrix synthesis. They offer advantages over GFs in terms of stability and cost, making them attractive for CR [266]. KGN is a notable small biomolecule that specifically promotes the chondrogenesis of MSCs. Other small molecules used in CR include melatonin (MEL), glucosamine (GlcN), and resveratrol (RSV) [267]. Shi et al. developed a hydrogel incorporating KGN-loaded PLGA microparticles using photo-crosslinked HA for CR [268]. Complementing this, Wang et al. created an injectable HA hydrogel with RSV-loaded PLGA microspheres designed for sustained release over one month (Fig. 11B) [264]. Liu et al. found that combining small molecules with TGF-β enhances chondrogenesis. They studied the combined effect of KGN in liposomes (KGN@Lipo) and Cytomodulin-10 (CM-10), a TGF-β-like peptide, in GelMA hydrogel (Fig. 11C). Their results showed that CM-10 on GelMA hydrogels was as effective as TGF-β1 in promoting chondrogenesis, an effect further amplified with KGN. Additionally, CM-10 and KGN synergistically boosted chondrogenesis in bone marrow stem cells by increasing RUNX1 and SOX9 expression at the mRNA and protein levels [263].

4.1.3 ECM-derived molecules

Native cartilage ECM contains various biochemical agents that can be utilized to enhance CR [227]. ECM-derived molecules such as Col, CS, HA, and cartilage acellular matrix (CAM) fragments can mimic the natural microenvironment and promote chondrogenesis [269]. Barthold et al. engineered an innovative ink composed of particulate extracellular matrix (pECM) and functionalized hyaluronan [270]. This bio-ink can be smoothly extruded and has been shown to enhance the survival rate of embedded cells by 10 %. Additionally, research has unveiled a DN hydrogel crafted from HA/GG. This hydrogel stands out for its high compressive strength, toughness, stiffness, and good self-recovery properties. It also fosters the proliferation and preservation of cartilage cells and the formation of new ECM (Fig. 11D) [265].

Selected published works are summarized in Table 6 to exemplify the exploitation of these biochemical stimuli in designing hydrogels for articular CR.Table 6 A summary of biochemical stimuli in hydrogel design for cartilage applications.

Table 6Biochemical stimuli	Name	Incorporation methods	Release profile	Performance	References	
Growth factor	TGF-β	Physical	Sustainable release without the initial burst (after 120 h, about 30 % of the drug remained inside)	• Enhance cartilage production in rat knee joint model

	[271]	
Physical	–	• Stimulate the proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs in vitro

• Enhance synthesis of GAGs

• Full-thickness cartilage defect repair by hyaline cartilage in rat model

	[272]	
Covalent attachment	Sustainable release within 21 days without initial burst (Only a 7–8% overall release was detectable after 21 days.)	• Enhance synthesis of GAGs and Col II

	[254]	
Encapsulation within nanocarriers	Sustainable release within 21 days without the initial burst	• Increase expression of Sox9, Col II and Agc genes

• High adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation in hDPSCs

	[273]	
BMPs	loading into fibrous scaffolds in the form of NPs	Initial burst release within 12 h and continuous release during 2 weeks	• Increase in cartilaginous micro-tissue formation and increase in sulfated PGs

• High induction of PG and Col II formation of thick hyaline cartilage in rabbit osteochondral defect

	[274]	
Transfected BMSCs with lentivirus loaded with BMP's gene	Sustainable release of more than 28 days	• Enhance adhesion and proliferation of BMSCs

• Reconstruction of defects during 12 weeks after implantation in knee joints of beagle dog model

	[275]	
Physical	Sustainable release	• Enhance cartilage production in rat knee joint model

	[276]	
IGF-1	Encapsulation within the bilayered microsphere	Sustainable release within 20 days without the initial burst	• The ability to inhibit the tube formation of HUVECs

• Decrease in osteogenic and vasculogenic gene expression and an increase in chondrogenic gene expression

	[277]	
Physical	Sustainable release within 3 weeks	• Increase glycosaminoglycan deposition and expression of cartilage-related genes in ADSCs

• Reconstruction of defects during 12 weeks after implantation in a rabbit full-thickness osteochondral defect model

	[278]	
PDGF	Physical	70 % release within two weeks	• Enhance adhesion and proliferation of ADSCs

• Increase expression of Sox9, Col II and Agc genes

	[279]	
Physical	Initial burst release during a week (20 %) followed by sustainable over 4 weeks (30 %)	• Enhance adhesion and proliferation of BMSCs

• Increase expression of Sox9, Col II and Agc genes

• Enhance cartilage production in rat knee joint model

	[141]	
Physical	35 % release within a week	• Stimulate progressive migration of MSC

• Creating an amenable microenvironment for cartilage production after subcutaneous implantation in athymic mice

	[280]	
Small molecules	KGN	Covalent attachment	41 % release within a week	• Increase expression of Sox9, Col II and Agc genes

• Increase the level of defect regeneration after 12 weeks in the rabbit osteochondral defect model

	[256]	
Encapsulation within the microsphere	Initial burst release during 3 days and continuous during 28 days	• Enhance cell viability, proliferation, and adhesion of SMSCs

• Enhance synthesis of GAGs and Col II

	[281]	
Covalent attachment	Sustainable release during 192 h	• Increased expression of chondrogenic genes and protein markers in DPSCs

	[282]	
MEL	Encapsulation within the NPs	Initial burst release during 3 days (60 %) followed by sustainable during 15 days (90 %)	• Enhance chondrocyte proliferation, differentiation, and preservation of its phenotype

• Increase expression of chondrocyte-specific genes

	[283]	
Encapsulation within microparticle	Initial burst release during 10 days (25 %) followed by sustainable of the remaining during 90 days	• Decrease in expression of Col I gene and increase in expression of Sox9, Col II, and Agc genes

• Enhance synthesis of GAGs

• Increase defect regeneration in the rabbit knee joint model

	[284]	
GlcN	Covalent attachment	Significant increase within the first 2 h, reaching the maximum value after 4 h	• Good biocompatibility

• Increase defect regeneration in the rabbit knee joint model

	[285]	
Physical	Sustainable release	• Significant decrease of swelling and inflammatory factors and increased defect regeneration in the rabbit knee joint model

	[286]	
RSV	Encapsulation within microparticle	Sustainable release during 32 days (78 %)	• Increase expression of Sox9, Col II, and Agc genes

	[264]	
Encapsulation within microparticle	Reaching a plateau in the first week (3 %)	• Increase expression of Col II and Agc genes

	[287]	
ECM-derived molecules	Col	Physical combination	–	• Enhance synthesis of GAGs

• Increase defect regeneration in the rabbit femur model

	[288]	
CS	Covalent attachment	–	• Excellent adhesion and/or bio-integration of the hydrogel/BMSCs composite

	[289]	
HA	Covalent attachment	–	• Increase cell viability and proliferation

• Increase expression of Sox9, Col II, and Agc genes

	[290]	
CAM	Physical loading in the form of powder	–	• Increase cell viability

• Increase chondrogenic-like differentiation of hASCs and enhance the synthesis of GAGs

• Increase expression of Sox9, Col II, and Agc genes

	[291]	
Abbreviations: HUVECs: human umbilical vein endothelial cells, SMSCs: synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells, hASCs: human adipose-derived stem cells.

4.2 Biophysical stimuli

Environmental biophysical stimuli are crucial in cartilage tissue engineering alongside cells, scaffolds, and GFs/cytokines [292]. Mechanical, electrical, and electromagnetic stimuli significantly influence cartilage behavior, affecting cell migration, differentiation, morphology, proliferation, and gene expression [293]. These stimuli play a vital role in regulating cartilage under both normal and pathological conditions [294,295].

Research indicates that the application of pulsed electromagnetic fields as a form of biophysical stimulation enhances the recovery of patients with cartilage damage in the knee, showing positive effects in both short and long-term outcomes. Consequently, biophysical stimulation emerges as an effective tool for improving the clinical results of regenerative medicine [296,297]. Biophysical stimuli can be used in particular in matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). In MACI, autologous chondrocytes are harvested from the patient and cultivated on a three-dimensional biocompatible scaffold [298]. Once a sufficient number of cells has been obtained, they are implanted into the damaged cartilage area in a second surgical procedure. During cultivation, the proliferation and differentiation of the cells can be supported by various biophysical stimuli using a bioreactor. Furthermore, the significance of physical stimuli extends to the development of hydrogels that mimic the intricate microenvironment of natural cartilage. Hydrogels designed with this understanding have the potential to significantly enhance tissue regeneration.

4.2.1 Mechanical stimuli

Mechanical stimuli involve applying forces, movements, or deformations to a material or structure. In hydrogel design, this means subjecting the hydrogel to physical forces such as compression, tension, or shear (Fig. 12A) [295]. By applying these mechanical stimuli to hydrogels containing cartilage cells, researchers can enhance the formation and quality of new cartilage tissue. Cells within the hydrogel respond to mechanical cues, leading to changes in cell morphology, alignment, and the production of extracellular matrix components [299]. Integrating mechanical stimuli into hydrogel design is crucial for creating biomimetic materials that closely mimic the mechanical environment of native tissues.Fig. 12 Schematic illustration of different A) mechanical stimuli on cell-encapsulated hydrogels. Cells experience compressive, tensile, and shear stresses due to external mechanical stimuli. Compressive and tensile forces act perpendicularly to the cell membrane, whereas shear stress causes a change in the angle between the cell's opposite sides; B) designs of bioreactors mimicking the biomechanical characteristics of articular cartilage. (a) A stirred bioreactor system, (b) a perfusion bioreactor system, (c) a hydrostatic pressure bioreactor, (d) a compression bioreactor system, (e) a stretch bioreactor system, and (f) a rotating wall vessel bioreactor. Reproduced under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license [208]. Copyright 2021, The Authors, published by Elsevier.

Fig. 12

Mechanical stimuli can influence the cell-encapsulated hydrogels in various ways, such as.• Improving the mechanical properties of the hydrogels, such as stiffness, strength, and elasticity [300];

• Increasing the adhesion of the hydrogels to the native cartilage tissue, which is important for integration and stability;

• Stimulating the production of cartilage-specific molecules, such as Col and PGs, by the cells within the hydrogels;

• Regulating the gene expression and signaling pathways of the cells within the hydrogels can affect their differentiation, proliferation, and survival [250,300,301].

Bioreactors are specialized systems designed to apply controlled mechanical forces to cells and tissues, playing a crucial role in tissue engineering [302]. They can control factors such as strain, frequency, duration, and loading modes, simulating the physiological loading conditions of native cartilage [303]. By using bioreactors to apply mechanical forces to hydrogel scaffolds, researchers can influence cell behavior, enhance extracellular matrix production, and direct tissue development toward more natural cartilage phenotypes [302,304]. They come in various configurations, including stirred, perfusion, rotating wall vessel, stretch, compression, hydrostatic pressure, and combined systems (Fig. 12B) [208]. These systems facilitate nutrient and waste exchange and control oxygen tension, ensuring optimal cell viability and metabolic activity within hydrogel constructs [304,305]. Bioreactors are essential in cartilage tissue engineering for their ability to apply noncontact forces, such as magnetic or electric fields, and control environmental conditions like hydrogel type, composition, ion concentrations, pH levels, and temperatures. They offer two main advantages: One is to mimic the physical and biomechanical conditions for cartilage growth and development. The other is to measure tissue status and chondrocyte behavior using digital image processing technology, allowing for the refinement of in vitro cartilage development by evaluating different culture conditions [306].

Biomechanical loading has been shown to preserve articular cartilage in several studies. Tran et al. created tissue-engineered cartilage from porcine chondrocytes without a scaffold by centrifuging a high-density chondrocyte resuspension on an agarose layer. They improved the biomechanical and biochemical properties of their constructs by using a bioreactor with biomechanical stimulation, producing large tissue-engineered cartilage [307]. Bian et al. used agarose hydrogel with adult canine chondrocytes and applied dynamic loading to test its effectiveness. They used bioreactors to apply unconfined axial compressive deformational loading and sliding contact loading methods for 3 h per day [308].

The scaffold can withstand various frequencies and loads, which should be selected based on the specific target tissues. For cartilage tissue, the load and frequency of loading should mimic human walking. Natenstedt et al. found that the optimal condition for cartilage tissue was 5–10 MPa with a frequency of 1 Hz for a week or more [309]. Kowsari-Esfahan et al. used a microfluidic device for unidirectional compressive stimulation of cells and demonstrated that 10 % strain (among 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 %) was the best to induce chondrogenesis in ADSCs encapsulated in Alg hydrogel [310]. On the other hand, AC has different zones with different properties. The biomechanical load condition in the cartilage differs in the zones, with the highest strain in the superficial zone and the lowest in the deep zone. Chondrocytes on the surface experience both compressive and shear strains, while stimulation in the deeper layers is mainly compressive. This biomechanical load results in a different elastic modulus; it is lower in the superficial zone than in the deep zone [301,311]. The integration of bioreactors with hydrogel systems for cartilage tissue engineering allows for the application of physiologically relevant mechanical forces, which are known to modulate cellular behavior, stimulate matrix synthesis and guide tissue formation. Furthermore, the use of bioreactors enables the customization of mechanical stimulation parameters, including magnitude, frequency and duration, tailored to specific tissue engineering goals and experimental requirements [302].

Meinert et al. developed a system for controlled uniaxial or biaxial mechanical stimulation to grow cartilage tissues. Using GelMA and methacrylated HA hydrogels, they showed that mechanical stimulation increased the expression of hyaline cartilage-specific genes and enhanced matrix production [312]. Stokovska et al. tested a bioreactor to evaluate cell-hydrogel interactions under in vivo-like conditions. They used Alg hydrogels in disc and microbead shapes, applying various mechanical stimulations. They found that hydrogel mechanical properties depended on Alg concentration, composition, and shape. Bovine calf cartilage cells cultured on microbeads under dynamic compression grew and compacted the microbeads, slightly increasing hydrogel mechanical strength [313]. Daly et al. explored dynamic bioreactor culture under different oxygen levels for developing large cartilage tissues using hydrogels with MSCs. They found that at 20 % O2, dynamic culture inhibited chondrogenesis in all hydrogel sizes. However, at 3 % O2, dynamic culture enhanced cartilage matrix component distribution and amount in larger hydrogels compared to static culture [314]. Zhou et al. created tissue-engineered cartilage in vitro using a hybrid hydrogel and human ADSCs (hADSCs) cultured in both dynamic and static settings [315]. They used Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to verify mathematical simulations of glucose and TGF-β2 mass transfer in a rotating wall vessel bioreactor (RWVB) and static culture conditions during the early stages. The RWVB was then used to create 3D hydrogel cell-cartilaginous structures dynamically. The findings showed that RWVB achieved mass transfer equilibrium faster than static culture.

4.2.2 Electrical stimuli

Electrical stimuli in hydrogel design for cartilage repair involve applying electric fields or currents to influence the hydrogel and the cells within it [316]. This is important for cartilage because AC has inherent electrical properties, coming from the free electrolytes (K+, Ca2+, Na+) flowing through the carboxyl and sulfate groups with fixed negative charges on the GAGs in the PG side chains. The uneven distribution of fixed charges in the tissue also generates diffusion potentials, while fluid flow across the charged tissue causes a streaming potential. Chondrocytes in the local area respond to these electrical signals, transforming them into intracellular signaling. This leads to a signal transduction cascade that produces Sox9, a transcription factor that stimulates the synthesis of typical cartilage ECM components such as Agc and Col II [293,316]. Various types of electrical stimuli, such as direct current, alternating current, capacitive coupling, or electromagnetic fields, can be applied in different intensities, durations, and frequencies. These stimuli can affect the cell-encapsulated hydrogels in various ways, such as.• Modulating the electrical conductivity and charge of the hydrogels, which can affect cell adhesion, migration, and alignment [316];

• Activating the ion channels and receptors on the cell membrane, which can affect cell signaling, gene expression, and metabolism [317];

• Inducing the electrophoresis and electro-osmosis of the ions and water within the hydrogels can affect nutrient transport, pH balance, and swelling behavior [316].

Conductive materials, such as conductive polymers [318,319], metal NPs [320], graphene, and carbon nanotubes [321,322], can be incorporated with hydrogels to make electrically conductive scaffolds. These scaffolds are crucial for cartilage tissue engineering as they mimic the physical properties of native tissue and respond to electrical stimulation. Distler et al. developed a 3D-printable hydrogel combining oxidized Alg–Gel (ADA-Gel) with polypyrrole:polystyrenesulfonate (PPy:PSS) (Fig. 13A) [323]. Hydrogels with 0.1 M PPy exhibited the best mechanical properties and conductivity, similar to native cartilage. Although the PPy-modified hydrogel slightly reduced ATDC5 cell (pre-chondrogenic cell line) attachment and proliferation due to increased stiffness, 3D-printing improved cell seeding efficiency throughout the scaffold.Fig. 13 A) Schematic illustration of ADA-Gel-PPy:PSS conductive hydrogel formation. I) ADA-Gel hydrogel precursor with varying Py and PSS molarities is made. II) After 3D-printing, PPy is formed by oxidizing Py in FeCl3 solution. III) Final ADA-Gel-PPy:PSS scaffolds are cross-linked with Ca2+ and microbial transglutaminase to crosslink ADA and Gel network in the hydrogel. Reproduced with permission [323]. Copyright 2024, John Wiley and Sons. B) Schematic illustration of devices for electrical and mechanical stimulation on PEDOT:PSS scaffolds with GOPS (3 wt %, PG3) and scaffold illustration for chondrogenesis. Reproduced (adapted) with permission [324]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society.

Fig. 13

Liu et al. studied the effects of electrical and mechanical stimulation on cartilage tissue formation in a scaffold made of the conductive polymer PEDOT:PSS and GOPS. They found that electrical stimulation promotes MSC chondrogenesis, while mechanical stimulation enhances MSC chondrogenic differentiation (Fig. 13B) [324]. Another study showed that electric fields enhance Col II and aggrecan expression in human chondrocytes under hypoxia, with a similar but weaker effect in BMSCs and co-cultures [325].

4.2.3 Electromagnetic stimuli

Electromagnetic stimuli in hydrogel design for cartilage involve the controlled application of electromagnetic fields or waves to affect the properties and behavior of the hydrogel and the cells within it. The purpose of electromagnetic stimuli is to modulate cellular activities within the hydrogel to induce specific responses that favor CR [326,327]. As a safe, non-invasive biophysical strategy with minimal or no side effects for tissue repair, electromagnetic fields could not only benefit cartilage-related cells in vitro by promoting proliferation, increasing anabolic activities, and antagonizing the catabolic effects of inflammation, but could also provide chondro-protective and chondro-regenerative effects on AC in vivo [328,329]. Compared to other biophysical stimulations, electromagnetic fields offer unique advantages as a non-contact non-invasive stimulation. Moreover, compared to optical, acoustic and electrical fields as well as mechanical forces, electromagnetic fields have advantages because of their large force output, high precision and deep tissue penetration [330]. During the preparation of tissue engineered constructs in vitro, electromagnetic field treatment offers chondro-inductive effects without any increased risk of contamination [331]. These stimuli can influence the properties and behavior of the hydrogels and the cells within them in different aspects, such as.• Enhancing the formation of cartilage tissue from stem cells encapsulated in hydrogels;

• Electromagnetic stimuli can also be used to create ordered structures in magnetic hydrogels, which can improve their mechanical strength and biocompatibility [305,332];

• Electromagnetic stimuli are one type of intelligent stimuli that can make hydrogels responsive to the environment [333].

Several groups have reported that an electromagnetic field promotes cartilage formation in vitro and in vivo. Li et al. developed an injectable adhesive hydrogel with self-healing properties, consisting of Alg-dialdehyde/acrylated β-cyclodextrins/Gel (Alg-DA/Ac-β-CD/Gel) (Fig. 14) [334]. This hydrogel featured both physical and chemical cross-linking as well as self-healing mechanisms. The researchers conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the hydrogel, assessing parameters such as gelation time, swelling ratio, biodegradability and biocompatibility. Their findings indicated the hydrogel's potential for cartilage repair. To enhance versatility, a pre-gel state was established before photo-cross-linking, allowing the hydrogel to accommodate various delivery methods and adapt to diverse clinical scenarios. In further experimentation, the hydrogel was applied in a rat osteochondral defect model, coupled with pulsed electromagnetic fields. The results demonstrated that PEMF not only enhanced the quality of engineered chondrogenic constructs in vitro but also promoted chondrogenesis and facilitated cartilage repair in vivo.Fig. 14 Schematic illustration of Alg-DA/Ac-β-CD/Gel hydrogels design and pulsed electromagnetic field use in vitro and in vivo. Reproduced under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license [334]. Copyright 2023, The Authors, published by Elsevier.

Fig. 14

In general, magnetic hydrogels are composed of a hydrogel matrix and a magnetic component. A variety of magnetic NPs (MNPs) have been incorporated into hydrogel networks, such as γ-Fe2O3, Fe3O4, and transition metal ferrite NPs (CoFe2O4, MnFe2O4, etc.) [[335], [336], [337]]. MNPs offer the advantage of applying remote magnetic-induced physical stimulation, allowing for targeted treatment. In studies involving hMSCs, exposure to a static magnetic field and magnetic-derived shear stress via MNPs resulted in higher chondrogenic differentiation efficiency [338]. In another innovative approach, MNPs-vesicle assemblies were created by cross-linking phospholipid vesicles and MNPs. When immobilized with chondrocytes within a calcium Alg hydrogel, this biomaterial responded to alternating magnetic fields by translating non-invasive magnetic signals into cellular responses. Notably, the chondrocytes in the gel responded to the magnetic release of ascorbic acid-2-phosphate (AAP), applied as an additive, by producing a high level of Col [339]. Similarly, DEX-coated MNPs integrated into distinct layers of agarose constructs formed trilayered ferrogels. The application of an external magnetic field resulted in increased sGAG content over time in bovine chondrocytes seeded within the ferrogels. These findings collectively underscore the promising potential of electromagnetic stimuli in hydrogel design for CR [334].

As stated, one of the key aspects of electromagnetic actuation is the fabrication of smart hydrogels. These stimuli can control the drug release, shape change, alignment, or differentiation of the hydrogel and the cells within it. For example, Wang et al. developed a smart hydrogel based on PNiPAAm and iron oxide NPs, which had a thermo-responsive and magnetic-responsive behavior [340]. Chen et al. fabricated hydrogel scaffolds that incorporated cellulose nanocrystals and SF and labeled them with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) [341]. This scaffold enhanced chondrogenic gene expression in vitro and AC tissue formation and also tracked scaffold degradation during the articular CR process.

In summary, we have reviewed the recent advances in the use of biophysical stimuli on the hydrogels for cartilage tissue repair, which are summarized in Table 7.Table 7 A summary of biophysical stimuli on the hydrogels for cartilage tissue repair.

Table 7Hydrogel	Type of stimulation	Duration/Condition	Results	References	
Agarose	Mechanical (compression)	1 h/day, 28 days	• Enhance Agc and Col 2a1 expression

• Inhibit hypertrophy markers such as Col 1a1, Col 10a1, MMP-13, and RUNX2

	[342]	
PANa	Electrical	20 days	• Ionic conductivity of 1.65 S m−1

• Excellent mechanical strength with a fracture stress of over 7 MPa

	[343]	
Gel, CS, HA, and Ch	Mechanical (cyclic dynamic compressive, 20 % strain)	3 h/day, 14 days, 1 Hz	• Enhance neo-cartilage formation in dynamic culture during subcutaneous implantation in nude mice

	[344]	
Fibrin	Mechanical (Static and perfusion bioreactor)	3 weeks, 2.5 μL/s	• Integration with native tissue as a result of preimplantation bioreactor perfusion treatment

• Increase secretion of cartilage matrix components

	[345]	
Gel, β-cyclodextrin, GPTMS, and Fe3O4 MNPs	Electromagnetic (constant static magnetic field)	100 mT	• Promote the differentiation of BMSCs into cartilage

• Strong regenerative effect of magnetic hydrogel and BMSCs combined with pulsed electromagnetic field in the results of animal experiments.

	[346]	
HA, and Gel	Electrical	30 min every 6 h/day, 21 days with 10 mV/cm at 60 kHz	• Increase the mechanical properties of hydrogels

• Improve the morphology of the cells inside the stimulated hydrogels toward roundness

• Enhance Sox9, and Agc

• Increase normalized content of GAGs and Col to DNA in stimulated samples

	[347]	
Starch, PCL, Fe3O4, MNPs	Electromagnetic	0–5 T	• Promote cellular differentiation

		
Ch-ΒGP, and Opy	Electrical	–	• Decrease pore size, and increase gelation time, swelling ratio, conductivity and degradation time with increasing content OPy

• A significant increase in scaffold conductivity to 1.9 S m−1 with the addition of OPy (close to the value reported for native cartilage)

	[348]	
PEG, CS-SH, Genscript, and Irgacure 2959	Mechanical (intermittent unconfined dynamic compressive strains applied at 5 % peak to peak strain)	1 h/day, 3 weeks, 1 Hz with 23 h of rest under a tare strain of <0.1 %	• Dynamic loading and TGF-β3 synergistically induced stable chondrogenesis and prevented hypertrophy

• Promotion of a stable chondrogenic phenotype (Agc + Col II) with reduced Col X by dynamic loading with TGF-β3

	[349]	
Fibrin, and HA	10 %/0.5 Hz compression, 25°/0.5 Hz rotation	1 h/day, 14 days	• sGAG/DNA upregulation in loaded samples both in the presence or absence of fibroblast growth factor-18 variant

	[350]	
Fibrin	Mechanical (1 Hz to an amplitude of 10 % strain, after a 0.01 N preload)	2 h/day, 5 days per week/2 weeks	• Increase mRNA expression of Col 2a1 and ACAN genes after more than 2 weeks of priming samples

• Increase Col 2a1 and Col 10a1 and decrease Sox9 expression due to immediate mechanical loading

• Increase of GAG and Col deposition and mechanical properties due to priming time

	[351]	
PLGA, PEG, and PLGA	Electromagnetic (sinusoidal)	4 h/day, 15 Hz, 1 mT	• Enhance proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs by activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Wnt1/LRP6/β-catenin signaling pathways under the influence of electromagnetic field

• Increase repair of osteochondral defects in rabbits and especially cartilage repair by scaffolds

	[352]	
HA, Gel, and SPIOs NPs	Electromagnetic (sinusoidal)	1 h/day, 5 days, 0.22 T	• Enhance sGAG synthesis through magnetic stimulation

• Upregulate expression of cartilage-specific genes

	[338]	
Abbreviations: PANa: PVA sodium phytate, MMP13: matrix metalloproteinase-13, RUNX2: Runt-related transcription factor2, iPSCs: induced pluripotent stem cells, Ch-ΒGP: chitosan-β-glycerophosphate, Opy: oligopyyrole, CS-SH: thiolated chondroitin sulfate, SPIOs: superparamagnetic iron oxide.

These stimuli are essential for optimizing hydrogel design and improving clinical outcomes in cartilage tissue engineering. Biochemical stimuli enhance cellular activities such as proliferation and differentiation, although controlled spatiotemporal release remains a challenge. Advanced techniques like 4D-bioprinting and gene therapy could further enhance the efficacy of chemical signal-based approaches. Biophysical stimuli, particularly mechanical forces, improve hydrogel mechanical properties and stimulate cartilage-specific matrix production. Electrical and electromagnetic stimuli further enhance cellular behavior and tissue regeneration, offering non-invasive methods to replicate native cartilage environments. However, while these advancements are promising, further research is needed to optimize application parameters and ensure the long-term stability and safety of these hydrogel systems in vivo. The potential for combining electrical and electromagnetic stimuli with other biophysical cues, such as mechanical forces, also warrants exploration to create more holistic and effective strategies for cartilage repair.

5 Future perspectives and challenges

Advancements in the field of designing hydrogels for articular CR have shown great promise, but there are still important future perspectives and challenges that need to be addressed. This section discusses several areas of focus that can drive the field forward and overcome existing limitations.

One area of future exploration lies in the advancement of biomaterial design. Researchers can continue to investigate and develop novel biomaterials with improved properties for hydrogel-based CR. These materials may possess enhanced mechanical strength, improved biocompatibility and the ability to provide controlled release of bioactive factors, such as GFs or cytokines. Additionally, the utilization of advanced fabrication techniques, such as nanotechnology or 4D-bioprinting, can enable the creation of precise and customizable hydrogel structures that closely mimic the native cartilage environment. Bioinspired approaches hold significant potential for future advancements in hydrogel design. By incorporating bioinspired cues into hydrogel scaffolds, researchers can aim to enhance chondrogenic differentiation and tissue development. This may include incorporating ECM-mimicking components or providing mechanical stimulation to guide cell behavior and promote tissue organization. Exploring topographical cues or biochemical gradients within hydrogel constructs can further enhance the functionality and regenerative potential of the engineered cartilage tissue. The integration of stem cells and tissue engineering is another area that warrants attention. Understanding the intricate interactions between hydrogels and stem cells is crucial for optimizing hydrogel properties to support stem cell viability, proliferation, and differentiation towards the chondrogenic lineage. Researchers can explore strategies to improve the retention, survival and functionality of transplanted stem cells within hydrogel-based constructs, thereby enhancing the overall regenerative capacity of the engineered cartilage. Personalized medicine and patient-specific approaches are also important for future advancements in hydrogel design. Considering individual variations in cartilage properties or disease characteristics can help tailor hydrogel-based therapies to specific patients. The integration of imaging techniques and computational modeling can aid in the development of patient-specific hydrogel constructs, thereby optimizing treatment outcomes and enhancing patient satisfaction. Translation to clinical applications remains a critical challenge. While preclinical studies have shown promising results, further research is required to evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy and functional outcomes of hydrogel-based approaches in clinical settings. The development of robust regulatory frameworks and standardized protocols is essential to facilitate the clinical translation of hydrogel-based CR therapies and ensure their successful implementation. Overcoming challenges associated with hydrogel degradation, stability and long-term performance in the dynamic joint environment is another important area of focus. It is essential to enhance hydrogels' mechanical characteristics to meet the strict specifications of load-bearing joints. Additionally, addressing immunological responses and inflammatory reactions to synthetic hydrogel materials is necessary to ensure successful integration and long-term viability of the engineered cartilage tissue. Collaborative and multidisciplinary approaches will play a pivotal role in driving future advancements in hydrogel design for articular CR. Encouraging collaboration among scientists, engineers, clinicians and regulatory bodies can foster the exchange of knowledge and expertise from various fields. This interdisciplinary research approach will accelerate the development and translation of hydrogel-based therapies, bringing us closer to effective treatments for cartilage defects and improving the quality of life for individuals suffering from articular cartilage-related conditions. To summarize, exploring future perspectives and addressing existing challenges in the design of hydrogels for articular CR is crucial for advancing the field. Through advancements in biomaterial design, bioinspired approaches, integration of stem cells, personalized medicine, clinical translation, overcoming challenges and with collaborative efforts, researchers can pave the way for the development of effective and biomimetic hydrogel-based strategies that restore the structure, function and biomechanical properties of articular cartilage.

6 Conclusion

The hydrogel design for articular CR holds great promise as an advanced approach to addressing the limitations of traditional treatments for cartilage defects. Hydrogels, with their unique properties, are promising scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. They offer a suitable 3D microenvironment that maintains cell shape and function while facilitating cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. By understanding and optimizing the design parameters, such as type of material, mechanical properties, biodegradability, porosity and interconnectivity, and integration capability with the adjacent native tissue, scientists can create hydrogels that effectively restore the structure, function and biomechanics of articular cartilage. Moreover, the design of stratified-structural hydrogels that mimic the native cartilage structure and the application of environmental stimuli (such as biophysical and biochemical cues) is essential for achieving optimal CR results. These innovations can significantly enhance the quality of life for people suffering from cartilage defects and related conditions, paving the way for more successful and biomimetic cartilage tissue engineering approaches.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval and consent to participate do not apply to this review manuscript.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Fariba Hashemi-Afzal: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Hooman Fallahi: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization. Fatemeh Bagheri: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Maurice N. Collins: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. Mohamadreza Baghaban Eslaminejad: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Hermann Seitz: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This study is based upon research funded by 10.13039/501100003968 Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) under project NO. 4015025 . The study was also financially supported by the 10.13039/501100001659 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - SFB 1270/1,2–299150580 .

Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
==== Refs
References

1 Wei W. Ma Y. Yao X. Zhou W. Wang X. Li C. Advanced hydrogels for the repair of cartilage defects and regeneration Bioact. Mater. 6 4 2021 998 1011 33102942
2 Zhu S. Li Y. He Z. Ji L. Zhang W. Tong Y. Advanced injectable hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10 2022
3 Lewns F.K. Tsigkou O. Cox L.R. Wildman R.D. Grover L.M. Poologasundarampillai G. Hydrogels and bioprinting in bone tissue engineering: creating artificial stem‐cell niches for in vitro models Adv. Mater. 35 52 2023 2301670
4 Li X. Sheng S. Li G. Hu Y. Zhou F. Geng Z. Research progress in hydrogels for cartilage organoids Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2024 2400431
5 Collins M.N. Cagney L. Thanusha A.V. Chapter 6 - hydrogel functionalization and crosslinking strategies for biomedical applications Oliveira J.M. Silva-Correia J. Reis R.L. Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 2024 Academic Press 105 137
6 Vieira S. Silva-Correia J. Reis R.L. Oliveira J.M. Engineering hydrogels for modulation of material-cell interactions Macromol. Biosci. 22 10 2022 2200091
7 Hafezi M. Nouri Khorasani S. Zare M. Esmaeely Neisiany R. Davoodi P. Advanced hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering: recent progress and future directions Polymers 13 23 2021 4199 34883702
8 Xue X. Hu Y. Deng Y. Su J. Recent advances in design of functional biocompatible hydrogels for bone tissue engineering Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 19 2021 2009432
9 Zhu S. Li Y. He Z. Ji L. Zhang W. Tong Y. Advanced injectable hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10 2022 954501
10 Narciso NdP. Navarro R.S. Gilchrist A. Trigo M.L. Rodriguez G.A. Heilshorn S.C. Design parameters for injectable biopolymeric hydrogels with dynamic covalent chemistry crosslinks Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2023 2301265
11 Liang Q. Ma Y. Yao X. Wei W. Advanced 3D-printing bioinks for articular cartilage repair International Journal of Bioprinting 8 3 2022
12 Altunbek M. Afghah S.F. Fallah A. Acar A.A. Koc B. Design and 3D printing of personalized hybrid and gradient structures for critical size bone defects ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 6 5 2023 1873 1885
13 Ouyang C. Yu H. Wang L. Ni Z. Liu X. Shen D. Tough adhesion enhancing strategies for injectable hydrogel adhesives in biomedical applications Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023 102982
14 Yang X. Li S. Ren Y. Qiang L. Liu Y. Wang J. 3D printed hydrogel for articular cartilage regeneration Compos. B Eng. 237 2022 109863
15 Wang W. Shi Y. Lin G. Tang B. Li X. Zhang J. Advances in mechanical properties of hydrogels for cartilage tissue defect repair Macromol. Biosci. 23 7 2023 2200539
16 Weizel A. Distler T. Schneidereit D. Friedrich O. Bräuer L. Paulsen F. Complex mechanical behavior of human articular cartilage and hydrogels for cartilage repair Acta Biomater. 118 2020 113 128 33080391
17 Shen C. Wang J. Li G. Hao S. Wu Y. Song P. Boosting cartilage repair with silk fibroin-DNA hydrogel-based cartilage organoid precursor Bioact. Mater. 35 2024 429 444 38390528
18 Li S. Yuan Q. Yang M. Long X. Sun J. Yuan X. Enhanced cartilage regeneration by icariin and mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles combined in alginate-hyaluronic acid hydrogel Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 55 2024 102723
19 Karimizade A. Hasanzadeh E. Abasi M. Enderami S.E. Mirzaei E. Annabi N. Collagen short nanofiber-embedded chondroitin sulfate–hyaluronic acid nanocomposite: a cartilage-mimicking in situ-forming hydrogel with fine-tuned properties Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 266 2024 131051
20 O'Shea D.G. Hodgkinson T. Curtin C.M. O'Brien F.J. An injectable and 3D printable pro-chondrogenic hyaluronic acid and collagen type II composite hydrogel for the repair of articular cartilage defects Biofabrication 16 1 2023 015007
21 Ghandforoushan P. Hanaee J. Aghazadeh Z. Samiei M. Navali A.M. Khatibi A. Novel nanocomposite scaffold based on gelatin/PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogels embedded with TGF-β1 for chondrogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells in vitro Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 201 2022 270 287 34998887
22 Gui X. Peng Z. Song P. Chen L. Xu X. Li H. 3D printing of personalized polylactic acid scaffold laden with GelMA/autologous auricle cartilage to promote ear reconstruction Bio-Design and Manufacturing 6 4 2023 451 463
23 Jalageri M.B. Kumar G.M. Graphene oxide reinforced polyvinyl alcohol/Chitosan composite hydrogel for cartilage regeneration Polym. Bull. 2024 1 18
24 Thomas J. Chopra V. Rajput S. Guha R. Chattopadhyay N. Ghosh D. Post-implantation stiffening by a bioinspired, double-network, self-healing hydrogel facilitates minimally invasive cell delivery for cartilage regeneration Biomacromolecules 24 7 2023 3313 3326 37376790
25 Mohsenifard S. Mashayekhan S. Safari H. A hybrid cartilage extracellular matrix-based hydrogel/poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffold incorporated with Kartogenin for cartilage tissue engineering J. Biomater. Appl. 37 7 2023 1243 1258 36217954
26 Wei W. Ma Y. Yao X. Zhou W. Wang X. Li C. Advanced hydrogels for the repair of cartilage defects and regeneration Bioact. Mater. 6 4 2021 998 1011 33102942
27 Long S. Huang D. Ma Z. Shi S. Xiao Y. Zhang X. A sonication-induced silk-collagen hydrogel for functional cartilage regeneration J. Mater. Chem. B 10 26 2022 5045 5057 35726720
28 Gao Y. Wang J. Dai W. Li S. Liu Q. Zhao X. Collagen-based hydrogels induce hyaline cartilage regeneration by immunomodulation and homeostasis maintenance Acta Biomater. 2024
29 Luo C. Guo A. Zhao Y. Sun X. A high strength, low friction, and biocompatible hydrogel from PVA, chitosan and sodium alginate for articular cartilage Carbohydr. Polym. 286 2022 119268
30 Ma H. Xie B. Chen H. Song P. Zhou Y. Jia H. High-strength and high-elasticity silk fibroin-composite gelatin biomaterial hydrogels for rabbit knee cartilage regeneration Frontiers in Materials 11 2024 1390372
31 Huang Y.-H. Chen H.-A. Chen C.-H. Liao H.-T. Kuo C.-Y. Chen J.-P. Injectable gelatin/glucosamine cryogel microbeads as scaffolds for chondrocyte delivery in cartilage tissue engineering Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 253 2023 126528
32 Zeng J. Jia L. Wang D. Chen Z. Liu W. Yang Q. Bacterial nanocellulose-reinforced gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel enhances biomechanical property and glycosaminoglycan content of 3D-bioprinted cartilage Int J Bioprint 9 1 2023 631 36636133
33 Paul S. Schrobback K. Tran P.A. Meinert C. Davern J.W. Weekes A. Photo‐cross‐Linkable, injectable, and highly adhesive GelMA‐glycol chitosan hydrogels for cartilage repair Adv. Healthcare Mater. 12 32 2023 2302078
34 Banihashemian S.A. Benisi S.Z. Hosseinzadeh S. Shojaei S. Abbaszadeh H.A. Chitosan/hyaluronan and alginate-nanohydroxyapatite biphasic scaffold as a promising matrix for osteoarthritis disorders Adv. Pharmaceut. Bull. 14 1 2024 176
35 Yuan X. Li G. Huang L. Zheng M. Su J. Wan J. Hydroxypropyl chitin-oxidized chondroitin sulfate double-network hydrogel assists microfracture technique to enhance cartilage regeneration Mater. Des. 238 2024 112656
36 Farokhi M. Solouk A. Mirzadeh H. Herbert Teuschl A. Redl H. An injectable enzymatically crosslinked and mechanically tunable silk fibroin/chondroitin sulfate chondro‐inductive hydrogel Macromol. Mater. Eng. 308 3 2023 2200503
37 Fu Y. Both S. Plass J. Dijkstra P. Zoetebier B. Karperien M. Injectable cell-laden polysaccharide hydrogels: in vivo evaluation of cartilage regeneration Polymers 14 2022 4292 s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published; 2022 36297870
38 Li S. Niu D. Shi T. Yun W. Yan S. Xu G. Injectable, in situ self-cross-linking, self-healing poly (l-glutamic acid)/polyethylene glycol hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 9 5 2023 2625 2635 37068303
39 Chen Y.R. Yan X. Yuan F.Z. Lin L. Wang S.J. Ye J. Kartogenin‐conjugated double‐network hydrogel combined with stem cell transplantation and tracing for cartilage repair Adv. Sci. 9 35 2022 2105571
40 Zhou Z. Song P. Wu Y. Wang M. Shen C. Ma Z. Dual-network DNA–silk fibroin hydrogels with controllable surface rigidity for regulating chondrogenic differentiation Mater. Horiz. 11 6 2024 1465 1483 38221872
41 Li H. Zhao T. Yuan Z. Gao T. Yang Y. Li R. Cartilage lacuna-biomimetic hydrogel microspheres endowed with integrated biological signal boost endogenous articular cartilage regeneration Bioact. Mater. 41 2024 61 82 39104774
42 Scalzone A. Cerqueni G. Bonifacio M.A. Pistillo M. Cometa S. Belmonte M.M. Valuable effect of Manuka Honey in increasing the printability and chondrogenic potential of a naturally derived bioink Materials Today Bio 14 2022 100287
43 Jithendra P. Mohamed J.M.M. Annamalai D. Al-Serwi R.H. Ibrahim A.M. El-Sherbiny M. Biopolymer collagen-chitosan scaffold containing Aloe vera for chondrogenic efficacy on cartilage tissue engineering Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 248 2023 125948
44 Azizi P. Drobek C. Budday S. Seitz H. Simulating the mechanical stimulation of cells on a porous hydrogel scaffold using an FSI model to predict cell differentiation Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11 2023
45 Andreu I. Falcones B. Hurst S. Chahare N. Quiroga X. Le Roux A.-L. The force loading rate drives cell mechanosensing through both reinforcement and cytoskeletal softening Nat. Commun. 12 1 2021 4229 34244477
46 Zhou Y. Qiu J. Wan L. Li J. The effect of matrix stiffness on the chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells J. Mol. Histol. 53 5 2022 805 816 36029427
47 Weizel A. Distler T. Detsch R. Boccaccini A. Seitz H. Budday S. Time-dependent hyper-viscoelastic parameter identification of human articular cartilage and substitute materials J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 138 2023 105618
48 Mostakhdemin M. Nand A. Ramezani M. Articular and artificial cartilage, characteristics, properties and testing approaches-A review Polymers 13 12 2021
49 de Melo B.A.G. Jodat Y.A. Mehrotra S. Calabrese M.A. Kamperman T. Mandal B.B. 3D printed cartilage-like tissue constructs with spatially controlled mechanical properties Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 51 2019 1906330
50 Yang F. Zhao J. Koshut W.J. Watt J. Riboh J.C. Gall K. A synthetic hydrogel composite with the mechanical behavior and durability of cartilage Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 36 2020 2003451
51 Gan D. Xu T. Xing W. Wang M. Fang J. Wang K. Mussel-inspired dopamine oligomer intercalated tough and resilient gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels for cartilage regeneration J. Mater. Chem. B 7 10 2019 1716 1725 32254913
52 Vega S.L. Kwon M.Y. Burdick J.A. Recent advances in hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering Eur. Cell. Mater. 33 2017 59 75 28138955
53 Wang W. Narain R. Zeng H. Rational design of self-healing tough hydrogels: a mini review Front. Chem. 6 497 2018
54 Wang Y. Yu W. Liu S. Physically cross-linked gellan gum/hydrophobically associated polyacrylamide double network hydrogel for cartilage repair Eur. Polym. J. 167 2022 111074
55 Zhang Y. Liu M. Pei R. An in situ gelling BMSC-laden collagen/silk fibroin double network hydrogel for cartilage regeneration Materials Advances 2 14 2021 4733 4742
56 Yin Y. Gu Q. Liu X. Liu F. McClements D.J. Double-network hydrogels: design, fabrication, and application in foods and biomedicines Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023 102999
57 Sinad K.V.G. Ebubechukwu R.C. Chu C.K. Recent advances in double network hydrogels based on naturally-derived polymers: synthesis, properties, and biological applications J. Mater. Chem. B 2023
58 Yasuda K. Kitamura N. Gong J.P. Arakaki K. Kwon H.J. Onodera S. A novel double-network hydrogel induces spontaneous articular cartilage regeneration in vivo in a large osteochondral defect Macromol. Biosci. 9 4 2009 307 316 19031389
59 Webber R.E. Creton C. Brown H.R. Gong J.P. Large strain hysteresis and mullins effect of tough double-network hydrogels Macromolecules 40 8 2007 2919 2927
60 Xue K. Liow S.S. Karim A.A. Li Z. Loh X.J. A recent perspective on noncovalently formed polymeric hydrogels Chem. Rec. 18 10 2018 1517 1529 29791779
61 Zhou F. Hong Y. Zhang X. Yang L. Li J. Jiang D. Tough hydrogel with enhanced tissue integration and in situ forming capability for osteochondral defect repair Appl. Mater. Today 13 2018 32 44
62 Li J. Illeperuma W.R.K. Suo Z. Vlassak J.J. Hybrid hydrogels with extremely high stiffness and toughness ACS Macro Lett. 3 6 2014 520 523 35590722
63 Sun J.-Y. Zhao X. Illeperuma W.R.K. Chaudhuri O. Oh K.H. Mooney D.J. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels Nature 489 7414 2012 133 136 22955625
64 Wang M. Luo L. Fu L. Yang H. Ion responsiveness of polyacrylamide/sodium alginate (PAM/SA) shape memory hydrogel Soft Mater. 17 4 2019 418 426
65 Sun T.L. Kurokawa T. Kuroda S. Ihsan A.B. Akasaki T. Sato K. Physical hydrogels composed of polyampholytes demonstrate high toughness and viscoelasticity Nat. Mater. 12 10 2013 932 937 23892784
66 Sun W. Xue B. Li Y. Qin M. Wu J. Lu K. Polymer-supramolecular polymer double-network hydrogel Adv. Funct. Mater. 26 48 2016 9044 9052
67 Palmieri B. Conrozier T. vadalà M. Laurino C. Synoviology: a new chapter entitled to joints care Asian J. Med. Sci. 8 2017 1
68 Williams C.G. Malik A.N. Kim T.K. Manson P.N. Elisseeff J.H. Variable cytocompatibility of six cell lines with photoinitiators used for polymerizing hydrogels and cell encapsulation Biomaterials 26 11 2005 1211 1218 15475050
69 Elisseeff J. McIntosh W. Anseth K. Riley S. Ragan P. Langer R. Photoencapsulation of chondrocytes in poly(ethylene oxide)-based semi-interpenetrating networks J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51 2 2000 164 171 10825215
70 Yan Y. Li M. Yang D. Wang Q. Liang F. Qu X. Construction of injectable double-network hydrogels for cell delivery Biomacromolecules 18 7 2017 2128 2138 28557440
71 Rodell C.B. Dusaj N.N. Highley C.B. Burdick J.A. Injectable and cytocompatible tough double‐network hydrogels through tandem supramolecular and covalent crosslinking Adv. Mater. 28 38 2016 8419 8424 27479881
72 Wang D. Zeng J. Zhu H. Liu S. Jia L. Liu W. Extrusion bioprinting of elastin‐containing bioactive double‐network tough hydrogels for complex elastic tissue regeneration Aggregate 2024 e477
73 Walter C. Leichtle U. Lorenz A. Mittag F. Wülker N. Müller O. Dissipated energy as a method to characterize the cartilage damage in large animal joints: an in vitro testing model Med. Eng. Phys. 35 9 2013 1251 1255 23375506
74 Zhang W. Chu G. Wang H. Chen S. Li B. Han F. Effects of matrix stiffness on the differentiation of multipotent stem cells Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 15 5 2020 449 461 32268870
75 Doron G. Temenoff J.S. Culture substrates for improved manufacture of mesenchymal stromal cell therapies Adv. Healthcare Mater. 10 15 2021 2100016
76 Scott R.A. Robinson K.G. Kiick K.L. Akins R.E. Human adventitial fibroblast phenotype depends on the progression of changes in substrate stiffness Adv. Healthcare Mater. 9 8 2020 1901593
77 James B.D. Allen J.B. Sex‐specific response to combinations of shear stress and substrate stiffness by endothelial cells in vitro Adv. Healthcare Mater. 10 18 2021 2100735
78 Luo T. Tan B. Zhu L. Wang Y. Liao J. A review on the design of hydrogels with different stiffness and their effects on tissue repair Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10 2022 39
79 Kwon H.J. Chondrogenesis on sulfonate-coated hydrogels is regulated by their mechanical properties J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 17 2013 337 346 23127629
80 Lin S. Sangaj N. Razafiarison T. Zhang C. Varghese S. Influence of physical properties of biomaterials on cellular behavior Pharmaceut. Res. 28 6 2011 1422 1430
81 Schuh E. Hofmann S. Stok K.S. Notbohm H. Müller R. Rotter N. The influence of matrix elasticity on chondrocyte behavior in 3D Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine 6 10 2012 e31 e42 22034455
82 Banks J.M. Mozdzen L.C. Harley B.A.C. Bailey R.C. The combined effects of matrix stiffness and growth factor immobilization on the bioactivity and differentiation capabilities of adipose-derived stem cells Biomaterials 35 32 2014 8951 8959 25085859
83 Park J.S. Chu J.S. Tsou A.D. Diop R. Tang Z. Wang A. The effect of matrix stiffness on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in response to TGF-beta Biomaterials 32 16 2011 3921 3930 21397942
84 Han F. Zhu C. Guo Q. Yang H. Li B. Cellular modulation by the elasticity of biomaterials J. Mater. Chem. B 4 1 2016 9 26 32262805
85 Chen C. Xie J. Deng L. Yang L. Substrate stiffness together with soluble factors affects chondrocyte mechanoresponses ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 18 2014 16106 16116 25162787
86 Ulici V. Chen A.F. Cheng A.W.M. Tuan R.S. Anatomy: cartilage McCarthy J.C. Noble P.C. Villar R.N. Hip Joint Restoration: Worldwide Advances in Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Osteotomy and Joint Preservation Surgery 2017 Springer New York New York, NY 15 22
87 Rong M. Liu H. Scaraggi M. Bai Y. Bao L. Ma S. High lubricity meets load capacity: cartilage mimicking bilayer structure by brushing up stiff hydrogels from subsurface Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 39 2020 2004062
88 Zhang R. Wu Y. Lin P. Jia Z. Zhang Y. Liu F. Extremely tough hydrogels with cotton fibers reinforced Adv. Eng. Mater. 22 11 2020 2000508
89 Gu Z. Wang J. Fu Y. Pan H. He H. Gan Q. Smart biomaterials for articular cartilage repair and regeneration Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 10 2023 2212561
90 Poole A.R. Kojima T. Yasuda T. Mwale F. Kobayashi M. Laverty S. Composition and structure of articular cartilage: a template for tissue repair Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 391 Suppl 2001 S26 S33
91 Belluzzi E. Todros S. Pozzuoli A. Ruggieri P. Carniel E.L. Berardo A. Human cartilage biomechanics: experimental and theoretical approaches towards the identification of mechanical properties in healthy and osteoarthritic conditions Processes 11 4 2023 1014
92 Gilbert S.J. Bonnet C.S. Blain E.J. Mechanical cues: bidirectional reciprocity in the extracellular matrix drives mechano-signalling in articular cartilage Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 24 2021 13595
93 Winter Gm Poole C.A. Ilic M.Z. Ross J.M. Robinson H.C. Handley C.J. Identification of distinct metabolic pools of aggrecan and their relationship to type VI collagen in the chondrons of mature bovine articular cartilage explants Connect. Tissue Res. 37 3–4 1998 277 293 9862227
94 Sandy J.D. O'Neill J.R. Ratzlaff L.C. Acquisition of hyaluronate-binding affinity in vivo by newly synthesized cartilage proteoglycans Biochem. J. 258 3 1989 875 880 2730571
95 Williamson A.K. Chen A.C. Sah R.L. Compressive properties and function-composition relationships of developing bovine articular cartilage J. Orthop. Res. : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 19 6 2001 1113 1121
96 Thonar E.J. Sweet M.B. Maturation-related changes in proteoglycans of fetal articular cartilage Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 208 2 1981 535 547 7259202
97 Khoshgoftar M. Wilson W. Ito K. van Donkelaar C.C. Influence of tissue- and cell-scale extracellular matrix distribution on the mechanical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 12 5 2013 901 913 23160844
98 Sengers B.G. Van Donkelaar C.C. Oomens C.W. Baaijens F.P. The local matrix distribution and the functional development of tissue engineered cartilage, a finite element study Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32 12 2004 1718 1727 15675683
99 Quinn T.M. Schmid P. Hunziker E.B. Grodzinsky A.J. Proteoglycan deposition around chondrocytes in agarose culture: construction of a physical and biological interface for mechanotransduction in cartilage Biorheology 39 1–2 2002 27 37 12082264
100 Mauck R.L. Wang C.C. Oswald E.S. Ateshian G.A. Hung C.T. The role of cell seeding density and nutrient supply for articular cartilage tissue engineering with deformational loading Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11 12 2003 879 890 14629964
101 Erickson I.E. Kestle S.R. Zellars K.H. Farrell M.J. Kim M. Burdick J.A. High mesenchymal stem cell seeding densities in hyaluronic acid hydrogels produce engineered cartilage with native tissue properties Acta Biomater. 8 8 2012 3027 3034 22546516
102 Wang T. Lai J.H. Han L.-H. Tong X. Yang F. Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stromal cells in combinatorial hydrogels containing cartilage matrix proteins with decoupled mechanical stiffness Tissue Eng. 20 15–16 2014 2131 2139
103 Zhang T. Gong T. Xie J. Lin S. Liu Y. Zhou T. Softening substrates promote chondrocytes phenotype via RhoA/ROCK pathway ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 35 2016 22884 22891 27534990
104 Zhou C. Wang C. Xu K. Niu Z. Zou S. Zhang D. Hydrogel platform with tunable stiffness based on magnetic nanoparticles cross-linked GelMA for cartilage regeneration and its intrinsic biomechanism Bioact. Mater. 25 2023 615 628 37056264
105 Chu Y. Huang L. Hao W. Zhao T. Zhao H. Yang W. Long-term stability, high strength, and 3D printable alginate hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering application Biomed. Mater. 16 6 2021 064102
106 Deng Y. Sun A.X. Overholt K.J. Gary Z.Y. Fritch M.R. Alexander P.G. Enhancing chondrogenesis and mechanical strength retention in physiologically relevant hydrogels with incorporation of hyaluronic acid and direct loading of TGF-β Acta Biomater. 83 2019 167 176 30458242
107 Wang K. Ma Q. Zhang Y.-M. Han G.-T. Qu C.-X. Wang S.-D. Preparation of bacterial cellulose/silk fibroin double-network hydrogel with high mechanical strength and biocompatibility for artificial cartilage Cellulose 27 2020 1845 1852
108 Shu K. Huang Z. Pei X. Yew P.Y.M. Wei S. Yang Y. 3D printing of high-strength photo-crosslinking flaxseed gum bioink for cartilage regeneration Compos. B Eng. 2023 110864
109 Mostakhdemin M. Nand A. Ramezani M. A novel assessment of microstructural and mechanical behaviour of bilayer silica-reinforced nanocomposite hydrogels as a candidate for artificial cartilage J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 116 2021 104333
110 Wang J. Zhang F. Tsang W.P. Wan C. Wu C. Fabrication of injectable high strength hydrogel based on 4-arm star PEG for cartilage tissue engineering Biomaterials 120 2017 11 21 28024231
111 Ma F. Ge Y. Liu N. Pang X. Shen X. Tang B. In situ fabrication of a composite hydrogel with tunable mechanical properties for cartilage tissue engineering J. Mater. Chem. B 7 15 2019 2463 2473 32255123
112 Zhu C. Zhang W. Shao Z. Wang Z. Chang B. Ding X. Biodegradable glass fiber reinforced PVA hydrogel for cartilage repair: mechanical properties, ions release behavior and cell recruitment J. Mater. Res. Technol. 23 2023 154 164
113 Romischke J. Scherkus A. Saemann M. Krueger S. Bader R. Kragl U. Swelling and mechanical characterization of polyelectrolyte hydrogels as potential synthetic cartilage substitute materials Gels 8 5 2022 296 35621594
114 Nojoomi A. Tamjid E. Simchi A. Bonakdar S. Stroeve P. Injectable polyethylene glycol-laponite composite hydrogels as articular cartilage scaffolds with superior mechanical and rheological properties International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials 66 3 2017 105 114
115 Arjmandi M. Maziar R. Mechanical and tribological assessment of silica nanoparticle-alginate-polyacrylamide nanocomposite hydrogels as a cartilage replacement J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 95 2019 196 31015137
116 Gan S. Lin W. Zou Y. Xu B. Zhang X. Zhao J. Nano-hydroxyapatite enhanced double network hydrogels with excellent mechanical properties for potential application in cartilage repair Carbohydr. Polym. 229 2020 115523
117 Chen Y. Song J. Wang S. Liu W. Cationic modified PVA hydrogels provide low friction and excellent mechanical properties for potential cartilage and orthopedic applications Macromol. Biosci. 23 1 2023 2200275
118 Lee H-p Gu L. Mooney D.J. Levenston M.E. Chaudhuri O. Mechanical confinement regulates cartilage matrix formation by chondrocytes Nat. Mater. 16 2017 1243 28967913
119 Nicodemus G.D. Bryant S.J. Cell encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications Tissue Eng. B Rev. 14 2 2008 149 165
120 Chaudhuri O. Gu L. Klumpers D. Darnell M. Bencherif S.A. Weaver J.C. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity Nat. Mater. 15 3 2016 326 334 26618884
121 Lalitha Sridhar S. Schneider M.C. Chu S. de Roucy G. Bryant S.J. Vernerey F.J. Heterogeneity is key to hydrogel-based cartilage tissue regeneration Soft Matter 13 28 2017 4841 4855 28613313
122 Bahney C.S. Hsu C.W. Yoo J.U. West J.L. Johnstone B. A bioresponsive hydrogel tuned to chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells Faseb. J. : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 25 5 2011 1486 1496
123 Parmar P.A. Chow L.W. St-Pierre J.-P. Horejs C.-M. Peng Y.Y. Werkmeister J.A. Collagen-mimetic peptide-modifiable hydrogels for articular cartilage regeneration Biomaterials 54 2015 213 225 25907054
124 Parmar P.A. Skaalure S.C. Chow L.W. St-Pierre J.P. Stoichevska V. Peng Y.Y. Temporally degradable collagen-mimetic hydrogels tuned to chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells Biomaterials 99 2016 56 71 27214650
125 Spain T.L. Agrawal C.M. Athanasiou K.A. New technique to extend the useful life of a biodegradable cartilage implant Tissue Eng. 4 4 1998 343 352 9916167
126 Lu L. Peter S.J. Lyman M.D. Lai H.L. Leite S.M. Tamada J.A. In vitro degradation of porous poly(L-lactic acid) foams Biomaterials 21 15 2000 1595 1605 10885732
127 Bryant S.J. Anseth K.S. Controlling the spatial distribution of ECM components in degradable PEG hydrogels for tissue engineering cartilage J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 64 1 2003 70 79
128 Gong Y. Su K. Lau T.T. Zhou R. Wang D.-A. Microcavitary hydrogel-mediating phase transfer cell culture for cartilage tissue engineering Tissue Eng. 16 12 2010 3611 3622
129 Fan C. Wang D.-A. A biodegradable PEG-based micro-cavitary hydrogel as scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering Eur. Polym. J. 72 2015 651 660
130 Bryant S.J. Anseth K.S. Hydrogel properties influence ECM production by chondrocytes photoencapsulated in poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 59 1 2002 63 72 11745538
131 Toh W.S. Lim T.C. Kurisawa M. Spector M. Modulation of mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis in a tunable hyaluronic acid hydrogel microenvironment Biomaterials 33 15 2012 3835 3845 22369963
132 Shen Z.-S. Cui X. Hou R.-X. Li Q. Deng H.-X. Fu J. Tough biodegradable chitosan–gelatin hydrogels via in situ precipitation for potential cartilage tissue engineering RSC Adv. 5 69 2015 55640 55647
133 Han Y. Lian M. Wu Q. Qiao Z. Sun B. Dai K. Effect of pore size on cell behavior using melt electrowritten scaffolds Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9 2021 629270
134 Tran H.D. Park K.D. Ching Y.C. Huynh C. Nguyen D.H. A comprehensive review on polymeric hydrogel and its composite: matrices of choice for bone and cartilage tissue engineering J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 89 2020 58 82
135 Ma Y. Wang X. Su T. Lu F. Chang Q. Gao J. Recent advances in macroporous hydrogels for cell behavior and tissue engineering Gels 8 10 2022 606 36286107
136 Konka J. Buxadera-Palomero J. Espanol M. Ginebra M.-P. 3D printing of hierarchical porous biomimetic hydroxyapatite scaffolds: adding concavities to the convex filaments Acta Biomater. 134 2021 744 759 34358699
137 Xie Y. Lee K. Wang X. Yoshitomi T. Kawazoe N. Yang Y. Interconnected collagen porous scaffolds prepared with sacrificial PLGA sponge templates for cartilage tissue engineering J. Mater. Chem. B 9 40 2021 8491 8500 34553735
138 Sun W. Yang Y. Wang L. Tang H. Zhang L. She Y. Utilization of an acellular cartilage matrix‐based photocrosslinking hydrogel for tracheal cartilage regeneration and circumferential tracheal repair Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 31 2022 2201257
139 Foudazi R. Zowada R. Manas-Zloczower I. Feke D.L. Porous hydrogels: present challenges and future opportunities Langmuir 39 6 2023 2092 2111 36719086
140 Wang Y. Ouyang H. Xie Y. Jiang Y. Zhao L. Peng W. Mechanically robust, biocompatible, and durable PHEMA-based hydrogels enabled by the synergic effect of strong intermolecular interaction and suppressed phase separation Polymer 254 2022 125083
141 Li X. Li X. Yang J. Lin J. Zhu Y. Xu X. Living and injectable porous hydrogel microsphere with paracrine activity for cartilage regeneration Small 19 17 2023 2207211
142 Kirchmajer D.M. Gorkin Iii R. An overview of the suitability of hydrogel-forming polymers for extrusion-based 3D-printing J. Mater. Chem. B 3 20 2015 4105 4117 32262288
143 Liu C. Xu N. Zong Q. Yu J. Zhang P. Hydrogel prepared by 3D printing technology and its applications in the medical field Colloid and Interface Science Communications 44 2021 100498
144 Sun W. Schaffer S. Dai K. Yao L. Feinberg A. Webster-Wood V. 3D printing hydrogel-based soft and biohybrid actuators: a mini-review on fabrication techniques, applications, and challenges Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8 2021 673533
145 Ghorbani F. Ghalandari B. Khajehmohammadi M. Bakhtiary N. Tolabi H. Sahranavard M. Photo-cross-linkable hyaluronic acid bioinks for bone and cartilage tissue engineering applications Int. Mater. Rev. 68 7 2023 901 942
146 Shiwarski D.J. Hudson A.R. Tashman J.W. Feinberg A.W. Emergence of FRESH 3D printing as a platform for advanced tissue biofabrication APL Bioeng. 5 1 2021
147 Hinton T.J. Jallerat Q. Palchesko R.N. Park J.H. Grodzicki M.S. Shue H.-J. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels Sci. Adv. 1 9 2015 e1500758
148 Haung S.-M. Lin Y.-T. Liu S.-M. Chen J.-C. Chen W.-C. In vitro evaluation of a composite gelatin–hyaluronic acid–alginate porous scaffold with different pore distributions for cartilage regeneration Gels 7 4 2021 165 34698179
149 Martínez-Moreno D. Jiménez G. Chocarro-Wrona C. Carrillo E. Montañez E. Galocha-León C. Pore geometry influences growth and cell adhesion of infrapatellar mesenchymal stem cells in biofabricated 3D thermoplastic scaffolds useful for cartilage tissue engineering Mater. Sci. Eng. C 122 2021 111933
150 Abpeikar Z. Milan P.B. Moradi L. Anjomshoa M. Asadpour S. Influence of pore sizes in 3D-scaffolds on mechanical properties of scaffolds and survival, distribution, and proliferation of human chondrocytes Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 29 26 2022 4911 4922
151 Feng X. Xu P. Shen T. Zhang Y. Ye J. Gao C. Influence of pore architectures of silk fibroin/collagen composite scaffolds on the regeneration of osteochondral defects in vivo J. Mater. Chem. B 8 3 2020 391 405 31599917
152 Intini C. Lemoine M. Hodgkinson T. Casey S. Gleeson J.P. O'Brien F.J. A highly porous type II collagen containing scaffold for the treatment of cartilage defects enhances MSC chondrogenesis and early cartilaginous matrix deposition Biomater. Sci. 10 4 2022 970 983 35018931
153 Chiu Y.-C. Larson J.C. Isom Jr A. Brey E.M. Generation of porous poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels by salt leaching Tissue Eng. C Methods 16 5 2010 905 912
154 Li S. Tallia F. Mohammed A.A. Stevens M.M. Jones J.R. Scaffold channel size influences stem cell differentiation pathway in 3-D printed silica hybrid scaffolds for cartilage regeneration Biomater. Sci. 8 16 2020 4458 4466 32100748
155 Hollister S.J. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering Nat. Mater. 4 7 2005 518 524 16003400
156 Zhang A. Sun L. Chen K. Liu C. Yuan Y. 3D printing viscoelastic hydrogel-based scaffolds with a swelling-dependent gate for cartilage injury regeneration Chem. Eng. J. 480 2024 147260
157 Saygili E. Kaya E. Ilhan-Ayisigi E. Saglam-Metiner P. Alarcin E. Kazan A. An alginate-poly (acrylamide) hydrogel with TGF-β3 loaded nanoparticles for cartilage repair: biodegradability, biocompatibility and protein adsorption Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 172 2021 381 393 33476613
158 Hwang C.M. Sant S. Masaeli M. Kachouie N.N. Zamanian B. Lee S.-H. Fabrication of three-dimensional porous cell-laden hydrogel for tissue engineering Biofabrication 2 3 2010 035003
159 Scott E.A. Nichols M.D. Kuntz-Willits R. Elbert D.L. Modular scaffolds assembled around living cells using poly (ethylene glycol) microspheres with macroporation via a non-cytotoxic porogen Acta Biomater. 6 1 2010 29 38 19607945
160 Han L.-H. Lai J.H. Yu S. Yang F. Dynamic tissue engineering scaffolds with stimuli-responsive macroporosity formation Biomaterials 34 17 2013 4251 4258 23489920
161 Wang M. Li S. Zhang L. Tian J. Ma J. Lei B. Injectable bioactive antioxidative one‐component polycitrate hydrogel with anti‐inflammatory effects for osteoarthritis alleviation and cartilage protection Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2023 2301953
162 Schloss A.C. Williams D.M. Regan L.J. Protein-based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering 2016 Protein-Based Engineered Nanostructures 167 177
163 Li Y. Zhu C. Fan D. Fu R. Ma P. Duan Z. A Bi‐layer PVA/CMC/PEG hydrogel with gradually changing pore sizes for wound dressing Macromol. Biosci. 19 5 2019 1800424
164 Gao X. Gao L. Groth T. Liu T. He D. Wang M. Fabrication and properties of an injectable sodium alginate/PRP composite hydrogel as a potential cell carrier for cartilage repair J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 107 9 2019 2076 2087
165 Al-Sabah A. Burnell S.E. Simoes I.N. Jessop Z. Badiei N. Blain E. Structural and mechanical characterization of crosslinked and sterilised nanocellulose-based hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering Carbohydr. Polym. 212 2019 242 251 30832854
166 Lantigua D. Nguyen M.A. Wu X. Suvarnapathaki S. Kwon S. Gavin W. Synthesis and characterization of photocrosslinkable albumin-based hydrogels for biomedical applications Soft Matter 16 40 2020 9242 9252 32929420
167 Zhang H. Wang L. Song L. Niu G. Cao H. Wang G. Controllable properties and microstructure of hydrogels based on crosslinked poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylates with different molecular weights J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 121 1 2011 531 540
168 Wang D.A. Varghese S. Sharma B. Strehin I. Fermanian S. Gorham J. Multifunctional chondroitin sulphate for cartilage tissue-biomaterial integration Nat. Mater. 6 5 2007 385 392 17435762
169 Yang Y. Zhang J. Liu Z. Lin Q. Liu X. Bao C. Tissue-integratable and biocompatible photogelation by the imine crosslinking reaction Adv. Mater. 28 14 2016 2724 2730 26840751
170 Tiku M.L. Sabaawy H.E. Cartilage regeneration for treatment of osteoarthritis: a paradigm for nonsurgical intervention Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease 7 3 2015 76 87 26029269
171 Sharma B. Fermanian S. Gibson M. Unterman S. Herzka D.A. Cascio B. Human cartilage repair with a photoreactive adhesive-hydrogel composite Sci. Transl. Med. 5 167 2013 167ra6
172 Huey D.J. Hu J.C. Athanasiou K.A. Unlike bone, cartilage regeneration remains elusive Science 338 6109 2012 917 921 23161992
173 Karami P. Wyss C.S. Khoushabi A. Schmocker A. Broome M. Moser C. Composite double-network hydrogels to improve adhesion on biological surfaces ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 45 2018 38692 38699 30335947
174 Mehdizadeh M. Yang J. Design strategies and applications of tissue bioadhesives Macromol. Biosci. 13 3 2013 271 288 23225776
175 Homminga G.N. Buma P. Koot H.W. van der Kraan P.M. van den Berg W.B. Chondrocyte behavior in fibrin glue in vitro Acta Orthop. Scand. 64 4 1993 441 445 8213124
176 Strehin I. Nahas Z. Arora K. Nguyen T. Elisseeff J. A versatile pH sensitive chondroitin sulfate-PEG tissue adhesive and hydrogel Biomaterials 31 10 2010 2788 2797 20047758
177 Okada M. Nakai A. Hara E.S. Taguchi T. Nakano T. Matsumoto T. Biocompatible nanostructured solid adhesives for biological soft tissues Acta Biomater. 57 2017 404 413 28483692
178 Roy C.K. Guo H.L. Sun T.L. Ihsan A.B. Kurokawa T. Takahata M. Self-adjustable adhesion of polyampholyte hydrogels Adv. Mater. 27 45 2015 7344 7348 26459267
179 Yang Y.H. Ard M.B. Halper J.T. Barabino G.A. Type I collagen-based fibrous capsule enhances integration of tissue-engineered cartilage with native articular cartilage Ann. Biomed. Eng. 42 4 2014 716 726 24362632
180 Ivarsson M. Prenkert M. Cheema A. Wretenberg P. Andjelkov N. Mussel adhesive protein as a promising alternative to fibrin for scaffold fixation during cartilage repair surgery CARTILAGE 2019 1947603519887319
181 Liu X. Yang Y. Niu X. Lin Q. Zhao B. Wang Y. An in situ photocrosslinkable platelet rich plasma - complexed hydrogel glue with growth factor controlled release ability to promote cartilage defect repair Acta Biomater. 62 2017 179 187 28501713
182 Yu F. Cao X. Du J. Wang G. Chen X. Multifunctional hydrogel with good structure integrity, self-healing, and tissue-adhesive property formed by combining diels-alder click reaction and acylhydrazone bond ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 43 2015 24023 24031 26466997
183 Hunziker E.B. Quinn T.M. Surgical removal of articular cartilage leads to loss of chondrocytes from cartilage bordering the wound edge J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. Vol. 85-A Suppl 2 2003 85 92
184 Gilbert S.J. Singhrao S.K. Khan I.M. Gonzalez L.G. Thomson B.M. Burdon D. Enhanced tissue integration during cartilage repair in vitro can be achieved by inhibiting chondrocyte death at the wound edge Tissue Eng. 15 7 2009 1739 1749
185 Khan I.M. Gilbert S.J. Singhrao S.K. Duance V.C. Archer C.W. Cartilage integration: evaluation of the reasons for failure of integration during cartilage repair A review. European cells & materials 16 2008 26 39 18770504
186 Peretti G.M. Randolph M.A. Caruso E.M. Rossetti F. Zaleske D.J. Bonding of cartilage matrices with cultured chondrocytes: an experimental model J. Orthop. Res. : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 16 1 1998 89 95
187 Moreira Teixeira L.S. Bijl S. Pully V.V. Otto C. Jin R. Feijen J. Self-attaching and cell-attracting in-situ forming dextran-tyramine conjugates hydrogels for arthroscopic cartilage repair Biomaterials 33 11 2012 3164 3174 22265787
188 Gan D. Xu T. Xing W. Wang M. Fang J. Wang K. Mussel-inspired dopamine oligomer intercalated tough and resilient gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels for cartilage regeneration J. Mater. Chem. B 7 10 2019 1716 1725 32254913
189 Wang D.A. Williams C.G. Yang F. Elisseeff J.H. Enhancing the tissue-biomaterial interface: tissue-initiated integration of biomaterials Adv. Funct. Mater. 14 12 2004 1152 1159
190 Seol D. Yu Y. Choe H. Jang K. Brouillette M.J. Zheng H. Effect of short-term enzymatic treatment on cell migration and cartilage regeneration: in vitro organ culture of bovine articular cartilage Tissue Eng. 20 13–14 2014 1807 1814
191 DiMicco M.A. Sah R.L. Integrative cartilage repair: adhesive strength is correlated with collagen deposition J. Orthop. Res. : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 19 6 2001 1105 1112
192 Erickson I.E. Kestle S.R. Zellars K.H. Dodge G.R. Burdick J.A. Mauck R.L. Improved cartilage repair viain vitropre-maturation of MSC-seeded hyaluronic acid hydrogels Biomed. Mater. 7 2 2012 024110
193 Li J. Chen G. Xu X. Abdou P. Jiang Q. Shi D. Advances of injectable hydrogel-based scaffolds for cartilage regeneration Regen Biomater 6 3 2019 129 140 31198581
194 Hou S. Wang X. Park S. Jin X. Ma P.X. Rapid self-integrating, injectable hydrogel for tissue complex regeneration Adv. Healthcare Mater. 4 10 2015 1491 1495 23
195 Elisseeff J. Injectable cartilage tissue engineering Expet Opin. Biol. Ther. 4 12 2004 1849 1859
196 Kwon J.S. Yoon S.M. Kwon D.Y. Kim D.Y. Tai G.Z. Jin L.M. Injectable in situ-forming hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering J. Mater. Chem. B 1 26 2013 3314 3321 32261040
197 Guvendiren M. Lu H.D. Burdick J.A. Shear-thinning hydrogels for biomedical applications Soft Matter 8 2 2012 260 272
198 Yan C. Altunbas A. Yucel T. Nagarkar R.P. Schneider J.P. Pochan D.J. Injectable solid hydrogel: mechanism of shear-thinning and immediate recovery of injectable beta-hairpin peptide hydrogels Soft Matter 6 20 2010 5143 5156 21566690
199 Hou S. Wang X. Park S. Jin X. Ma P.X. Rapid self-integrating, injectable hydrogel for tissue complex regeneration Adv. Healthcare Mater. 4 10 2015 1491
200 Karami P. Wyss C.S. Khoushabi A. Schmocker A. Broome M. Moser C. Composite double-network hydrogels to improve adhesion on biological surfaces ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 45 2018 38692 38699 30335947
201 Liu X. Yang Y. Li Y. Niu X. Zhao B. Wang Y. Integration of stem cell-derived exosomes with in situ hydrogel glue as a promising tissue patch for articular cartilage regeneration Nanoscale 9 13 2017 4430 4438 28300264
202 Malda J. Benders K.E. Klein T.J. de Grauw J.C. Kik M.J. Hutmacher D.W. Comparative study of depth-dependent characteristics of equine and human osteochondral tissue from the medial and lateral femoral condyles Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20 10 2012 1147 1151 22781206
203 Zhou L. Guo P. D'Este M. Tong W. Xu J. Yao H. Functionalized hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering Engineering 13 2022 71 90
204 Zhu D. Trinh P. Liu E. Yang F. Cell–cell interactions enhance cartilage zonal development in 3D gradient hydrogels ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 9 2 2023 831 843 36629329
205 Andrades J.A. Motaung S.C. Jimenez-Palomo P. Claros S. Lopez-Puerta J.M. Becerra J. Induction of superficial zone protein (SZP)/lubricin/PRG 4 in muscle-derived mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells by transforming growth factor-beta1 and bone morphogenetic protein-7 Arthritis Res. Ther. 14 2 2012 R72 22490392
206 Pettenuzzo S. Arduino A. Belluzzi E. Pozzuoli A. Fontanella C.G. Ruggieri P. Biomechanics of chondrocytes and chondrons in healthy conditions and osteoarthritis: a review of the mechanical characterisations at the microscale Biomedicines 11 7 2023 1942 37509581
207 Temenoff J.S. Mikos A.G. Review: tissue engineering for regeneration of articular cartilage Biomaterials 21 5 2000 431 440 10674807
208 Wei W. Dai H. Articular cartilage and osteochondral tissue engineering techniques: recent advances and challenges Bioact. Mater. 6 12 2021 4830 4855 34136726
209 Klein T.J. Chaudhry M. Bae W.C. Sah R.L. Depth-dependent biomechanical and biochemical properties of fetal, newborn, and tissue-engineered articular cartilage J. Biomech. 40 1 2007 182 190 16387310
210 Tatman P.D. Gerull W. Sweeney-Easter S. Davis J.I. Gee A.O. Kim D.H. Multiscale biofabrication of articular cartilage: bioinspired and biomimetic approaches Tissue Eng. B Rev. 21 6 2015 543 559
211 Lin W. Klein J. Recent progress in cartilage lubrication Adv. Mater. 33 18 2021 2005513
212 Klein T.J. Schumacher B.L. Schmidt T.A. Li K.W. Voegtline M.S. Masuda K. Tissue engineering of stratified articular cartilage from chondrocyte subpopulations Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11 8 2003 595 602 12880582
213 Darling E.M. Athanasiou K.A. Rapid phenotypic changes in passaged articular chondrocyte subpopulations J. Orthop. Res. : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 23 2 2005 425 432
214 Thorpe S.D. Nagel T. Carroll S.F. Kelly D.J. Modulating gradients in regulatory signals within mesenchymal stem cell seeded hydrogels: a novel strategy to engineer zonal articular cartilage PLoS One 8 4 2013 e60764
215 Danqing Z. Xinming T. Pavin T. Fan Y. Mimicking cartilage tissue zonal organization by engineering tissue-scale gradient hydrogels as 3D cell niche Tissue Eng. 24 1–2 2018 1 10
216 Smith Callahan LA. Gradient material strategies for hydrogel optimization in tissue engineering applications High-throughput 7 1 2018 1 29485612
217 Karimi T. Barati D. Karaman O. Moeinzadeh S. Jabbari E. A developmentally inspired combined mechanical and biochemical signaling approach on zonal lineage commitment of mesenchymal stem cells in articular cartilage regeneration Integr. Biol. 7 1 2015 112 127
218 Moeinzadeh S. Pajoum Shariati S.R. Jabbari E. Comparative effect of physicomechanical and biomolecular cues on zone-specific chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells Biomaterials 92 2016 57 70 27038568
219 Moeinzadeh S. Monavarian M. Kader S. Esmaiel J. Sequential zonal chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in cartilage matrices Tissue Eng. 2018
220 Parratt K. Smerchansky M. Stiggers Q. Roy K. Effect of hydrogel material composition on hBMSC differentiation into zone-specific neo-cartilage: engineering human articular cartilage-like tissue with spatially varying properties J. Mater. Chem. B 5 31 2017 6237 6248 32264439
221 Woodfield T.B. Van Blitterswijk C.A. De Wijn J. Sims T.J. Hollander A.P. Riesle J. Polymer scaffolds fabricated with pore-size gradients as a model for studying the zonal organization within tissue-engineered cartilage constructs Tissue Eng. 11 9–10 2005 1297 1311 16259586
222 Luo L. O'Reilly A.R. Thorpe S.D. Buckley C.T. Kelly D.J. Engineering zonal cartilaginous tissue by modulating oxygen levels and mechanical cues through the depth of infrapatellar fat pad stem cell laden hydrogels Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine 11 9 2017 2613 2628 27138274
223 Zhu D. Trinh P. Liu E. Yang F. Biochemical and mechanical gradients synergize to enhance cartilage zonal organization in 3D ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4 10 2018 3561 3569 33465918
224 Smith Callahan L.A. Ganios A.M. Childers E.P. Weiner S.D. Becker M.L. Primary human chondrocyte extracellular matrix formation and phenotype maintenance using RGD-derivatized PEGDM hydrogels possessing a continuous gradient in modulus Acta Biomater. 9 4 2013 6095 6104 23291491
225 Khan I.M. Bishop J.C. Gilbert S. Archer C.W. Clonal chondroprogenitors maintain telomerase activity and Sox9 expression during extended monolayer culture and retain chondrogenic potential Osteoarthritis Cartilage 17 4 2009 518 528 19010695
226 Levato R. Webb W.R. Otto I.A. Mensinga A. Zhang Y. van Rijen M. The bio in the ink: cartilage regeneration with bioprintable hydrogels and articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells Acta Biomater. 61 2017 41 53 28782725
227 Rastegar Adib F. Bagheri F. Sharifi A.M. Osteochondral regeneration in rabbit using xenograft decellularized ECM in combination with different biological products; platelet‐rich fibrin, amniotic membrane extract, and mesenchymal stromal cells J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 110 9 2022 2089 2099 35383398
228 Luo L. Chu J.Y.J. Eswaramoorthy R. Mulhall K.J. Kelly D.J. Engineering tissues that mimic the zonal nature of articular cartilage using decellularized cartilage explants seeded with adult stem cells ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3 9 2017 1933 1943 33440551
229 Castilho M. Hochleitner G. Wilson W. van Rietbergen B. Dalton P.D. Groll J. Mechanical behavior of a soft hydrogel reinforced with three-dimensional printed microfibre scaffolds Sci. Rep. 8 1 2018 1245 29352189
230 Abalymov A.A. Santos C.A.B. Van der Meeren L. Van de Walle D. Dewettinck K. Parakhonskiy B.V. Nanofibrillar hydrogels by temperature driven self-assembly: new structures for cell growth and their biological and medical implications Adv. Mater. Interfac. 8 15 2021 2002202
231 Mellati A. Fan C.-M. Tamayol A. Annabi N. Dai S. Bi J. Microengineered 3D cell-laden thermoresponsive hydrogels for mimicking cell morphology and orientation in cartilage tissue engineering Biotechnol. Bioeng. 114 1 2016 217 231 27477393
232 Yang Y. Wimpenny I. Ahearne M. Portable nanofiber meshes dictate cell orientation throughout three-dimensional hydrogels Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 7 2 2011 131 136
233 Liu G. Ding Z. Yuan Q. Xie H. Gu Z. Multi-layered hydrogels for biomedical applications Front. Chem. 6 2018 439 30320070
234 Ren X. Wang F. Chen C. Gong X. Yin L. Yang L. Engineering zonal cartilage through bioprinting collagen type II hydrogel constructs with biomimetic chondrocyte density gradient BMC Muscoskel. Disord. 17 2016 1 10
235 Moeinzadeh S. Monavarian M. Kader S. Jabbari E. Sequential zonal chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in cartilage matrices Tissue Eng. 25 3–4 2018 234 247
236 Liu E. Zhu D. Gonzalez Diaz E. Tong X. Yang F. Gradient hydrogels for optimizing niche cues to enhance cell-based cartilage regeneration Tissue Eng. 27 13–14 2021 929 939
237 Kim T.-K. Sharma B. Williams C. Ruffner M. Malik A. McFarland E. Experimental model for cartilage tissue engineering to regenerate the zonal organization of articular cartilage Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11 9 2003 653 664 12954236
238 Owida H. Yang R. Cen L. Kuiper N. Yang Y. Induction of zonal-specific cellular morphology and matrix synthesis for biomimetic cartilage regeneration using hybrid scaffolds J. R. Soc. Interface 15 143 2018 20180310
239 Wang D. Xu H. Liu J. Chen Z. Li Y. Hu B. Bio-inspired cellulose reinforced anisotropic composite hydrogel with zone-dependent complex mechanical adaptability and cell recruitment characteristics Compos. B Eng. 202 2020 108418
240 Arora A. Kothari A. Katti D.S. Pore orientation mediated control of mechanical behavior of scaffolds and its application in cartilage-mimetic scaffold design J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 51 2015 169 183 26256472
241 Zhu Y. Wu H. Sun S. Zhou T. Wu J. Wan Y. Designed composites for mimicking compressive mechanical properties of articular cartilage matrix J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 36 2014 32 46 24793172
242 Ng K.W. Wang C.C.B. Mauck R.L. Kelly T.A.N. Chahine N.O. Costa K.D. A layered agarose approach to fabricate depth‐dependent inhomogeneity in chondrocyte‐seeded constructs J. Orthop. Res. 23 1 2005 134 141 15607885
243 Lin D. Cai B. Wang L. Cai L. Wang Z. Xie J. A viscoelastic PEGylated poly (glycerol sebacate)-based bilayer scaffold for cartilage regeneration in full-thickness osteochondral defect Biomaterials 253 2020 120095
244 Gao J. Ding X. Yu X. Chen X. Zhang X. Cui S. Cell‐free bilayered porous scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration fabricated by continuous 3D‐printing using nascent physical hydrogel as ink Adv. Healthcare Mater. 10 3 2021 2001404
245 Gong L. Li J. Zhang J. Pan Z. Liu Y. Zhou F. An interleukin-4-loaded bi-layer 3D printed scaffold promotes osteochondral regeneration Acta Biomater. 117 2020 246 260 33007484
246 Kilian D. Ahlfeld T. Akkineni A.R. Bernhardt A. Gelinsky M. Lode A. 3D Bioprinting of osteochondral tissue substitutes–in vitro-chondrogenesis in multi-layered mineralized constructs Sci. Rep. 10 1 2020 8277 32427838
247 Li C. Zhang W. Nie Y. Jiang D. Jia J. Zhang W. Integrated and bifunctional bilayer 3D printing scaffold for osteochondral defect repair Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 20 2023 2214158
248 Xing J. Peng X. Li A. Chen M. Ding Y. Xu X. Gellan gum/alginate-based Ca-enriched acellular bilayer hydrogel with robust interface bonding for effective osteochondral repair Carbohydr. Polym. 270 2021 118382
249 Wang W. Li H. Song P. Guo Y. Luo D. Li H. Photo-crosslinked integrated triphasic scaffolds with gradient composition and strength for osteochondral regeneration J. Mater. Chem. B 2024
250 Dehghan‐Baniani D. Mehrjou B. Chu P.K. Lee W.Y.W. Wu H. Recent advances in “Functional engineering of articular cartilage zones by polymeric biomaterials mediated with physical, mechanical and biological/chemical cues” Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2022 2202581
251 Zhu M. Zhong W. Cao W. Zhang Q. Wu G. Chondroinductive/chondroconductive peptides and their-functionalized biomaterials for cartilage tissue engineering Bioact. Mater. 9 2022 221 238 34820567
252 Lou J. Mooney D.J. Chemical strategies to engineer hydrogels for cell culture Nat. Rev. Chem 6 10 2022 726 744 37117490
253 Cao H. Duan L. Zhang Y. Cao J. Zhang K. Current hydrogel advances in physicochemical and biological response-driven biomedical application diversity Signal Transduct. Targeted Ther. 6 1 2021 426
254 Böck T. Schill V. Krähnke M. Steinert A.F. Tessmar J. Blunk T. TGF-β1-Modified hyaluronic acid/poly(glycidol) hydrogels for chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells Macromol. Biosci. 18 7 2018 1700390
255 Fan W. Li J. Yuan L. Chen J. Wang Z. Wang Y. Intra-articular injection of kartogenin-conjugated polyurethane nanoparticles attenuates the progression of osteoarthritis Drug Deliv. 25 1 2018 1004 1012 29667446
256 Chen C. Huang S. Chen Z. Liu Q. Cai Y. Mei Y. Kartogenin (KGN)/synthetic melanin nanoparticles (SMNP) loaded theranostic hydrogel scaffold system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided cartilage regeneration Bioengineering & Translational Medicine 8 1 2023 e10364
257 Silva J.C. Udangawa R.N. Chen J. Mancinelli C.D. Garrudo F.F. Mikael P.E. Kartogenin-loaded coaxial PGS/PCL aligned nanofibers for cartilage tissue engineering Mater. Sci. Eng. C 107 2020 110291
258 Nguyen M.K. Alsberg E. Bioactive factor delivery strategies from engineered polymer hydrogels for therapeutic medicine Prog. Polym. Sci. 39 7 2014 1235 1265
259 Shan B.-H. Wu F.-G. Hydrogel-based growth factor delivery platforms: strategies and recent advances Adv. Mater. 36 5 2024 2210707
260 Guo Q. Yin W. Wang H. Gao J. Gu Y. Wang W. Dynamic proteinaceous hydrogel enables in‐situ recruitment of endogenous TGF‐β1 and stem cells for cartilage regeneration Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024 2403055
261 Liebesny P.H. Byun S. Hung H.-H. Pancoast J.R. Mroszczyk K.A. Young W.T. Growth factor-mediated migration of bone marrow progenitor cells for accelerated scaffold recruitment Tissue Eng. 22 13–14 2016 917 927
262 Puiggalí-Jou A. Asadikorayem M. Maniura-Weber K. Zenobi-Wong M. Growth factor–loaded sulfated microislands in granular hydrogels promote hMSCs migration and chondrogenic differentiation Acta Biomater. 166 2023 69 84 37030622
263 Liu G. Guo Q. Liu C. Bai J. Wang H. Li J. Cytomodulin-10 modified GelMA hydrogel with kartogenin for in-situ osteochondral regeneration Acta Biomater. 169 2023 317 333 37586447
264 Wang X. Li X. Duffy P. McMahon S. Wang X. Lyu J. Resveratrol‐loaded poly (d, l‐lactide‐Co‐glycolide) microspheres integrated in a hyaluronic acid injectable hydrogel for cartilage regeneration Advanced NanoBiomed Research 2 1 2022 2100070
265 Cai Z. Tang Y. Wei Y. Wang P. Zhang H. Double – network hydrogel based on exopolysaccharides as a biomimetic extracellular matrix to augment articular cartilage regeneration Acta Biomater. 152 2022 124 143 36055611
266 Asgari N. Bagheri F. Eslaminejad M.B. Ghanian M.H. Sayahpour F.A. Ghafari A.M. Dual functional construct containing kartogenin releasing microtissues and curcumin for cartilage regeneration Stem Cell Res. Ther. 11 2020 1 15 31900237
267 Patel J.M. Saleh K.S. Burdick J.A. Mauck R.L. Bioactive factors for cartilage repair and regeneration: improving delivery, retention, and activity Acta Biomater. 93 2019 222 238 30711660
268 Shi D. Xu X. Ye Y. Song K. Cheng Y. Di J. Photo-cross-linked scaffold with kartogenin-encapsulated nanoparticles for cartilage regeneration ACS Nano 10 1 2016 1292 1299 26757419
269 Nie X. Chuah Y.J. Zhu W. He P. Peck Y. Wang D.-A. Decellularized tissue engineered hyaline cartilage graft for articular cartilage repair Biomaterials 235 2020 119821
270 Barthold J.E. McCreery K.P. Martinez J. Bellerjeau C. Ding Y. Bryant S.J. Particulate ECM biomaterial ink is 3D printed and naturally crosslinked to form structurally-layered and lubricated cartilage tissue mimics Biofabrication 14 2 2022 025021
271 Zhou T. Li X. Li G. Tian T. Lin S. Shi S. Injectable and thermosensitive TGF-β1-loaded PCEC hydrogel system for in vivo cartilage repair Sci. Rep. 7 1 2017 1 13 28127051
272 Zhang Y. Cao Y. Zhao H. Zhang L. Ni T. Liu Y. An injectable BMSC-laden enzyme-catalyzed crosslinking collagen-hyaluronic acid hydrogel for cartilage repair and regeneration J. Mater. Chem. B 8 19 2020 4237 4244 32270838
273 Ghandforoushan P. Hanaee J. Aghazadeh Z. Samiei M. Navali A.M. Khatibi A. Enhancing the function of PLGA-collagen scaffold by incorporating TGF-β1-loaded PLGA-PEG-PLGA nanoparticles for cartilage tissue engineering using human dental pulp stem cells Drug Delivery and Translational Research 2022 1 19
274 Kim H.J. Han M.A. Shin J.Y. Jeon J.H. Lee S.J. Yoon M.Y. Intra-articular delivery of synovium-resident mesenchymal stem cells via BMP-7-loaded fibrous PLGA scaffolds for cartilage repair J. Contr. Release 302 2019 169 180
275 Sun J. Lyu J. Xing F. Chen R. Duan X. Xiang Z. A biphasic, demineralized, and Decellularized allograft bone‐hydrogel scaffold with a cell‐based BMP‐7 delivery system for osteochondral defect regeneration J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 108 9 2020 1909 1921
276 Li Y. Cao J. Han S. Liang Y. Zhang T. Zhao H. ECM based injectable thermo-sensitive hydrogel on the recovery of injured cartilage induced by osteoarthritis Artif. Cell Nanomed. Biotechnol. 46 sup2 2018 152 160
277 Qiang L. Fan M. Wang Y. Liu Y. Zhuang H. Guo R. Injectable hydrogel loaded with bilayer microspheres to inhibit angiogenesis and promote cartilage regeneration for repairing growth plate injury Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11 2023 1181580
278 Cho H. Kim J. Kim S. Jung Y.C. Wang Y. Kang B.-J. Dual delivery of stem cells and insulin-like growth factor-1 in coacervate-embedded composite hydrogels for enhanced cartilage regeneration in osteochondral defects J. Contr. Release 327 2020 284 295
279 Valipour F. Valipour F. Rahbarghazi R. Navali A.M. Rashidi M.R. Davaran S. Novel hybrid polyester-polyacrylate hydrogels enriched with platelet-derived growth factor for chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro J. Biol. Eng. 15 2021 1 14 33407741
280 Vainieri M.L. Lolli A. Kops N. D'atri D. Eglin D. Yayon A. Evaluation of biomimetic hyaluronic-based hydrogels with enhanced endogenous cell recruitment and cartilage matrix formation Acta Biomater. 101 2020 293 303 31726249
281 Li H. Liao Z. Yang Z. Gao C. Fu L. Li P. 3D printed poly (ε-caprolactone)/meniscus extracellular matrix composite scaffold functionalized with kartogenin-releasing PLGA microspheres for meniscus tissue engineering Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9 2021 662381
282 Song C. Wu X. Wei Z. Xu Y. Wang Y. Zhao Y. Dental pulp stem cells-loaded kartogenin-modified hydrogel microspheres with chondrocyte differentiation property for cartilage repair Chem. Eng. J. 496 2024 153930
283 Kouhi M. Varshosaz J. Hashemibeni B. Sarmadi A. Injectable gellan gum/lignocellulose nanofibrils hydrogels enriched with melatonin loaded forsterite nanoparticles for cartilage tissue engineering: fabrication, characterization and cell culture studies Mater. Sci. Eng. C 115 2020 111114
284 Naghizadeh Z. Karkhaneh A. Nokhbatolfoghahaei H. Farzad‐Mohajeri S. Rezai‐Rad M. Dehghan M.M. Cartilage regeneration with dual‐drug‐releasing injectable hydrogel/microparticle system: in vitro and in vivo study J. Cell. Physiol. 236 3 2021 2194 2204 32776540
285 Suo H. Li L. Zhang C. Yin J. Xu K. Liu J. Glucosamine‐grafted methacrylated gelatin hydrogels as potential biomaterials for cartilage repair J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 108 3 2020 990 999 31369700
286 Zhang T. Chen S. Dou H. Liu Q. Shu G. Lin J. Novel glucosamine-loaded thermosensitive hydrogels based on poloxamers for osteoarthritis therapy by intra-articular injection Mater. Sci. Eng. C 118 2021 111352
287 Bonifacio M.A. Cochis A. Cometa S. Gentile P. Scalzone A. Scalia A.C. From the sea to the bee: gellan gum-honey-diatom composite to deliver resveratrol for cartilage regeneration under oxidative stress conditions Carbohydr. Polym. 245 2020 116410
288 Kilmer C.E. Battistoni C.M. Cox A. Breur G.J. Panitch A. Liu J.C. Collagen type I and II blend hydrogel with autologous mesenchymal stem cells as a scaffold for articular cartilage defect repair ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 6 6 2020 3464 3476 33463160
289 Uzieliene I. Bironaite D. Pachaleva J. Bagdonas E. Sobolev A. Tsai W.-B. Chondroitin sulfate-tyramine-based hydrogels for cartilage tissue repair Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 4 2023 3451 36834862
290 Davachi S.M. Haramshahi S.M.A. Akhavirad S.A. Bahrami N. Hassanzadeh S. Ezzatpour S. Development of chitosan/hyaluronic acid hydrogel scaffolds via enzymatic reaction for cartilage tissue engineering Mater. Today Commun. 30 2022 103230
291 Najafi R. Chahsetareh H. Pezeshki-Modaress M. Aleemardani M. Simorgh S. Davachi S.M. Alginate sulfate/ECM composite hydrogel containing electrospun nanofiber with encapsulated human adipose-derived stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 238 2023 124098
292 Giannoudis P.V. Einhorn T.A. Marsh D. Fracture healing: the diamond concept Injury 38 2007 S3 S6
293 Vaca-González J.J. Guevara J.M. Moncayo M.A. Castro-Abril H. Hata Y. Garzón-Alvarado D.A. Biophysical stimuli: a review of electrical and mechanical stimulation in hyaline cartilage Cartilage 10 2 2019 157 172 28933195
294 Chao P.-H.G. Roy R. Mauck R.L. Liu W. Valhmu W.B. Hung C.T. Chondrocyte translocation response to direct current electric fields J. Biomech. Eng. 122 3 2000 261 267 10923294
295 Fahy N. Alini M. Stoddart M.J. Mechanical stimulation of mesenchymal stem cells: implications for cartilage tissue engineering J. Orthop. Res. 36 1 2018 52 63 28763118
296 Brittberg M. Cell carriers as the next generation of cell therapy for cartilage repair: a review of the matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation procedure Am. J. Sports Med. 38 6 2010 1259 1271 19966108
297 Collarile M. Sambri A. Lullini G. Cadossi M. Zorzi C. Biophysical stimulation improves clinical results of matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment of chondral lesions of the knee Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 26 2018 1223 1229 28624853
298 De Mattei M. Fini M. Setti S. Ongaro A. Gemmati D. Stabellini G. Proteoglycan synthesis in bovine articular cartilage explants exposed to different low-frequency low-energy pulsed electromagnetic fields Osteoarthritis Cartilage 15 2 2007 163 168 16905341
299 Xie M. Fritch M. He Y. Fu H. Hong Y. Lin H. Dynamic loading enhances chondrogenesis of human chondrocytes within a biodegradable resilient hydrogel Biomater. Sci. 9 14 2021 5011 5024 34109952
300 Paul S. Schrobback K. Tran P.A. Meinert C. Davern J.W. Weekes A. GelMA-glycol chitosan hydrogels for cartilage regeneration: the role of uniaxial mechanical stimulation in enhancing mechanical, adhesive, and biochemical properties APL Bioeng. 7 3 2023
301 Paggi C.A. Hendriks J. Karperien M. Le Gac S. Emulating the chondrocyte microenvironment using multi-directional mechanical stimulation in a cartilage-on-chip Lab Chip 22 9 2022 1815 1828 35352723
302 Fu L. Li P. Li H. Gao C. Yang Z. Zhao T. The application of bioreactors for cartilage tissue engineering: advances, limitations, and future perspectives Stem Cell. Int. 2021 2021
303 Zhao J. Griffin M. Cai J. Li S. Bulter P.E. Kalaskar D.M. Bioreactors for tissue engineering: an update Biochem. Eng. J. 109 2016 268 281
304 Zhang H. Wu S. Chen W. Hu Y. Geng Z. Su J. Bone/cartilage targeted hydrogel: strategies and applications Bioact. Mater. 23 2023 156 169 36406248
305 Taheri S. Ghazali H.S. Ghazali Z.S. Bhattacharyya A. Noh I. Progress in biomechanical stimuli on the cell-encapsulated hydrogels for cartilage tissue regeneration Biomater. Res. 27 1 2023 1 17 36597149
306 Taheri S. Ghazali H.S. Ghazali Z.S. Bhattacharyya A. Noh I. Progress in biomechanical stimuli on the cell-encapsulated hydrogels for cartilage tissue regeneration Biomater. Res. 27 1 2023 22 36935512
307 Tran S.C. Cooley A.J. Elder S.H. Effect of a mechanical stimulation bioreactor on tissue engineered, scaffold‐free cartilage Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108 6 2011 1421 1429 21274847
308 Bian L. Fong J.V. Lima E.G. Stoker A.M. Ateshian G.A. Cook J.L. Dynamic mechanical loading enhances functional properties of tissue-engineered cartilage using mature canine chondrocytes Tissue Eng. 16 5 2010 1781 1790
309 Natenstedt J. Kok A.C. Dankelman J. Tuijthof G.J. What quantitative mechanical loading stimulates in vitro cultivation best? Journal of experimental orthopaedics 2 2015 1 15 26914869
310 Kowsari-Esfahan R. Jahanbakhsh A. Saidi M.S. Bonakdar S. A microfabricated platform for the study of chondrogenesis under different compressive loads J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 78 2018 404 413 29223037
311 Roseti L. Desando G. Cavallo C. Petretta M. Grigolo B. Articular cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis Cells 8 11 2019 1305 31652798
312 Meinert C. Schrobback K. Hutmacher D.W. Klein T.J. A novel bioreactor system for biaxial mechanical loading enhances the properties of tissue-engineered human cartilage Sci. Rep. 7 1 2017 16997
313 Stojkovska J. Bugarski B. Obradovic B. Evaluation of alginate hydrogels under in vivo–like bioreactor conditions for cartilage tissue engineering J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 21 2010 2869 2879 20717710
314 Daly A.C. Sathy B.N. Kelly D.J. Engineering large cartilage tissues using dynamic bioreactor culture at defined oxygen conditions J. Tissue Eng. 9 2018 2041731417753718
315 Zhu Y. Song K. Jiang S. Chen J. Tang L. Li S. Numerical simulation of mass transfer and three-dimensional fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilages based on chitosan/gelatin hybrid hydrogel scaffold in a rotating bioreactor Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 181 2017 250 266 27526111
316 Vaiciuleviciute R. Uzieliene I. Bernotas P. Novickij V. Alaburda A. Bernotiene E. Electrical stimulation in cartilage tissue engineering Bioengineering 10 4 2023 454 37106641
317 Miguel F. Barbosa F. Ferreira F.C. Silva J.C. Electrically conductive hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering Gels 8 11 2022 710 36354618
318 Nambiar S. Yeow J.T. Conductive polymer-based sensors for biomedical applications Biosens. Bioelectron. 26 5 2011 1825 1832 21030240
319 Li W. Liu J. Wei J. Yang Z. Ren C. Li B. Recent progress of conductive hydrogel fibers for flexible electronics: fabrications, applications, and perspectives Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 17 2023 2213485
320 Amina S.J. Guo B. A review on the synthesis and functionalization of gold nanoparticles as a drug delivery vehicle Int. J. Nanomed. 2020 9823 9857
321 Dong C. Lu J. Qiu B. Shen B. Xing M. Zhang J. Developing stretchable and graphene-oxide-based hydrogel for the removal of organic pollutants and metal ions Appl. Catal. B Environ. 222 2018 146 156
322 Comba F.N. Romero M.R. Garay F.S. Baruzzi A.M. Mucin and carbon nanotube-based biosensor for detection of glucose in human plasma Anal. Biochem. 550 2018 34 40 29649474
323 Distler T. Polley C. Shi F. Schneidereit D. Ashton M.D. Friedrich O. Electrically conductive and 3D‐printable oxidized alginate‐gelatin polypyrrole: PSS hydrogels for tissue engineering Adv. Healthcare Mater. 10 9 2021 2001876
324 Liu C.-T. Yu J. Lin M.-H. Chang K.-H. Lin C.-Y. Cheng N.-C. Biophysical electrical and mechanical stimulations for promoting chondrogenesis of stem cells on PEDOT:PSS conductive polymer scaffolds Biomacromolecules 24 8 2023 3858 3871 37523499
325 Hiemer B. Krogull M. Bender T. Ziebart J. Krueger S. Bader R. Effect of electric stimulation on human chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells under normoxia and hypoxia Mol. Med. Rep. 18 2 2018 2133 2141 29916541
326 Varani K. Vincenzi F. Pasquini S. Blo I. Salati S. Cadossi M. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation in osteogenesis and chondrogenesis: signaling pathways and therapeutic implications Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 2 2021 809 33467447
327 Babaniamansour P. Salimi M. Dorkoosh F. Mohammadi M. Magnetic hydrogel for cartilage tissue regeneration as well as a review on advantages and disadvantages of different cartilage repair strategies BioMed Res. Int. 2022 2022
328 Mattei M.D. Caruso A. Pezzetti F. Pellati A. Stabellini G. Sollazzo V. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on human articular chondrocyte proliferation Connect. Tissue Res. 42 4 2001 269 279 11913771
329 Chang C.H. Loo S.T. Liu H.L. Fang H.W. Lin H.Y. Can low frequency electromagnetic field help cartilage tissue engineering? J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials 92 3 2010 843 851
330 Wang X. Law J. Luo M. Gong Z. Yu J. Tang W. Magnetic measurement and stimulation of cellular and intracellular structures ACS Nano 14 4 2020 3805 3821 32223274
331 Martinez-Rondanelli A. Martinez J.P. Moncada M.E. Manzi E. Pinedo C.R. Cadavid H. Electromagnetic stimulation as coadjuvant in the healing of diaphyseal femoral fractures: a randomized controlled trial Colomb. Méd. 45 2 2014 67 71
332 Xue L. Sun J. Magnetic hydrogels with ordered structure for biomedical applications Front. Chem. 10 2022 1040492
333 Zhang Y. Wu B.M. Current advances in stimuli-responsive hydrogels as smart drug delivery carriers Gels 9 10 2023 838 37888411
334 Li Y. Li L. Li Y. Feng L. Wang B. Wang M. Enhancing cartilage repair with optimized supramolecular hydrogel-based scaffold and pulsed electromagnetic field Bioact. Mater. 22 2023 312 324 36263100
335 Naderi Z. Azizian J. Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl chitosan/Fe3O4 and MnFe2O4 nanocomposites hydrogels for loading and release of curcumin J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 185 2018 206 214
336 Ganguly S. Margel S. Design of magnetic hydrogels for hyperthermia and drug delivery Polymers 13 23 2021 4259 34883761
337 Bustamante-Torres M. Romero-Fierro D. Estrella-Nuñez J. Arcentales-Vera B. Chichande-Proaño E. Bucio E. Polymeric composite of magnetite iron oxide nanoparticles and their application in biomedicine: a review Polymers 14 4 2022 752 35215665
338 Hou K.-T. Liu T.-Y. Chiang M.-Y. Chen C.-Y. Chang S.-J. Chen S.-Y. Cartilage tissue-mimetic pellets with multifunctional magnetic hyaluronic acid-graft-amphiphilic gelatin microcapsules for chondrogenic stimulation Polymers 12 4 2020 785 32252253
339 Liao J. Shi K. Ding Q. Qu Y. Luo F. Qian Z. Recent developments in scaffold-guided cartilage tissue regeneration J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 10 10 2014 3085 3104 25992430
340 Bardajee G.R. Khamooshi N. Nasri S. Vancaeyzeele C. Multi-stimuli responsive nanogel/hydrogel nanocomposites based on κ-carrageenan for prolonged release of levodopa as model drug Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 153 2020 180 189 32135252
341 Chen Z. Yan C. Yan S. Liu Q. Hou M. Xu Y. Non-invasive monitoring of in vivo hydrogel degradation and cartilage regeneration by multiparametric MR imaging Theranostics 8 4 2018 1146 29464005
342 Ge Y. Li Y. Wang Z. Li L. Teng H. Jiang Q. Effects of mechanical compression on chondrogenesis of human synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells in agarose hydrogel Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9 2021 697281
343 Zhang S. Li Y. Zhang H. Wang G. Wei H. Zhang X. Bioinspired conductive hydrogel with ultrahigh toughness and stable antiswelling properties for articular cartilage replacement ACS Mater. Lett. 3 6 2021 807 814
344 Chen C.-H. Kuo C.-Y. Chen J.-P. Effect of cyclic dynamic compressive loading on chondrocytes and adipose-derived stem cells co-cultured in highly elastic cryogel scaffolds Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 2 2018 370 29373507
345 Dufour A. Mallein-Gerin F. Perrier-Groult E. Direct perfusion improves redifferentiation of human chondrocytes in fibrin hydrogel with the deposition of cartilage pericellular matrix Appl. Sci. 11 19 2021 8923
346 Huang J. Jia Z. Liang Y. Huang Z. Rong Z. Xiong J. Pulse electromagnetic fields enhance the repair of rabbit articular cartilage defects with magnetic nano-hydrogel RSC Adv. 10 1 2020 541 550 35492543
347 Vaca-González J.J. Clara-Trujillo S. Guillot-Ferriols M. Ródenas-Rochina J. Sanchis M.J. Ribelles J.L.G. Effect of electrical stimulation on chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells cultured in hyaluronic acid – gelatin injectable hydrogels Bioelectrochemistry 134 2020 107536
348 Kashi M. Baghbani F. Moztarzadeh F. Mobasheri H. Kowsari E. Green synthesis of degradable conductive thermosensitive oligopyrrole/chitosan hydrogel intended for cartilage tissue engineering Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 107 2018 1567 1575 29030197
349 Aisenbrey E.A. Bilousova G. Payne K. Bryant S.J. Dynamic mechanical loading and growth factors influence chondrogenesis of induced pluripotent mesenchymal progenitor cells in a cartilage-mimetic hydrogel Biomater. Sci. 7 12 2019 5388 5403 31626251
350 Antunes B.P. Vainieri M.L. Alini M. Monsonego-Ornan E. Grad S. Yayon A. Enhanced chondrogenic phenotype of primary bovine articular chondrocytes in Fibrin-Hyaluronan hydrogel by multi-axial mechanical loading and FGF18 Acta Biomater. 105 2020 170 179 31982592
351 McDermott A.M. Eastburn E.A. Kelly D.J. Boerckel J.D. Effects of chondrogenic priming duration on mechanoregulation of engineered cartilage J. Biomech. 125 2021 110580
352 Yan J. Liu C. Tu C. Zhang R. Tang X. Li H. Hydrogel-hydroxyapatite-monomeric collagen type-I scaffold with low-frequency electromagnetic field treatment enhances osteochondral repair in rabbits Stem Cell Res. Ther. 12 2021 1 21 33397467
