
==== Front
J Minim Invasive Surg
J Minim Invasive Surg
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2234-778X
2234-5248
The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery

39300727
10.7602/jmis.2024.27.3.177
jmis-27-3-177
Video/Multimedia Article
Robotic single-port plus one-port splenic vessel-conserving spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a case report
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7683-9687
Kim Sung Hyun 12
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7268-8543
Kim Na Reum 12
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-4658
Kang Chang Moo 12
1 Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
Corresponding author Chang Moo Kang, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea, E-mail: cmkang@yuhs.ac, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-4658
Supplementary video file: This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2024.27.3.177).

15 9 2024
15 9 2024
15 9 2024
27 3 177180
9 1 2024
11 6 2024
24 6 2024
© 2024 The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is a safe and effective surgical approach for the treatment of distal pancreatic tumors. Recently, the da Vinci single-port (SP) system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) was introduced to overcome the previously known limitations of this approach. Here, we report our experience with robotic SP plus one-port splenic vessel-conserving spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (RSP + 1 SVc-SpDP). A 38-year-old male patient was incidentally found to have a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. On May 12, 2023, RSP + 1 SVc-SpDP was performed. The robotic SP was placed at the transumbilical site, and an additional 12-mm port was placed on the left side of the patient’s abdomen. The surgical procedure was based on splenic vessel-conserving, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. The operative time was 350 minutes, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 8 without any complications. The initial experience of RSP + 1 SVc-SpDP using the da Vinci SP system showed the possibility of an alternative operation for distal pancreatectomy.

Minimally invasive surgical procedures
Pancreatectomy
Robotic surgical procedures
Surgical wound
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is considered a safe and effective surgical approach for treating benign and borderline malignant pancreatic tumors. Moreover, recent data have shown the oncologic safety and feasibility of MIDP for patients with pancreatic cancer compared to open distal pancreatectomy [1].

Based on these results, surgeons have attempted to perform single-port (SP) or single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (LDP) [2]. Although these procedures demonstrated the technical feasibility of SP LDP, this method remains controversial. Some studies have shown that SP LDP requires a longer operation time and has a learning curve [3].

However, spleen preservation is difficult during SP LDP. As a result, the indication for SP LDP has been confined to pancreatic tail masses abutting the spleen or splenic vessels that require splenectomy. To overcome this drawback and expand the indication, robotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy (RSS + 1 DP) was introduced, and its feasible outcomes in the early experience period were observed to be favorable [4,5].

However, the previous robotic platform specialized in multiport systems, and the RSS + 1 DP could only partially exploit the technical advantages of the robotic platform [6]. Due to these limitations, it is not generally accepted in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) field.

Recently, a newly released da Vinci SP system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) was introduced to overcome the aforementioned limitations of the SP MIDP. Using this system, SP robotic distal pancreatectomy plus one-port was performed. Some surgeons have published their initial experiences and have reported favorable early outcomes [7,8]. In some cases, a spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy was performed.

According to the trend, herein, we report our experience with robotic SP plus one-port splenic vessel-conserving spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (RSP + 1 SVc-SpDP) using the da Vinci SP system.

CASE

A 38-year-old male patient was incidentally found with a mass in the body of the pancreas (Fig. 1A). After endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy, the pancreatic mass was pathologically confirmed to be a neuroendocrine tumor. On May 12, 2023, RSP + 1 SVc-SpDP was performed using the da Vinci SP system.

After general anesthesia, the patient was laid in a supine position with a 30° left-up tilting and reverse-Trendelenburg position. There was no table position change during the surgery. The robotic SP was replaced at a transumbilical site, and an additional 12-mm port was placed on the left side of the robotic SP (Fig. 1B). Usual robotic instruments such as hook, bipolar, scissor, forceps, and clip were used. The general surgical procedure was based on a splenic vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Kimura technique).

The gastrocolic ligament was divided, and the pancreatic surface was approached. The stomach was hung using nylon and the operative view was obtained. The splenic artery and vein were identified by dissecting the inferior and superior borders of the pancreas. After isolation of these vessels, the pancreas was separated from the vessels. Through the additional 12-mm port, an intraoperative sonographic probe was inserted and the tumor location was identified. The pancreas was divided using endoscopic gastro-intestinal anastomosis (endo-GIA), and the remaining pancreas was carefully dissected from the splenic artery and vein (Fig. 1C). During dissection, the perforating vessels in the pancreas were ligated using endoscopic metal clips and then cut. After detachment, the specimen was delivered through the umbilicus, and a drain was inserted through the 12-mm port site (Supplementary Video 1).

The operative time was 350 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 100 mL. The final pathology of the pancreatic tumor was a grade 1 neuroendocrine tumor (according to the 2019 World Health Organization classification) (Fig. 1D). The patient was discharged on postoperative day 8 without any complications.

DISCUSSION

Unlike conventional MIDP, vessel-conserving SP distal pancreatectomy has technical demands, which is a hurdle to the popularization of this procedure in the HBP field [2]. However, these hurdles have been reduced with advances in surgical techniques and the development of novel instruments. Based on our experience with single-site robotic distal pancreatectomy, this platform has several strengths and weaknesses compared with previous single-site platforms.

An outstanding aspect of the da Vinci SP system is its flexible joint compared to previous systems (da Vinci Xi or Si system). The da Vinci single-site system is a semi-rigid design and has the limitations of angulation and a meticulous approach [9]. However, the SP system increases the degree of freedom and enables surgeons to perform important procedures more freely [10]. These advantages are maximized in borderline malignant pancreas body and tail tumors candidate spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Meticulous dissection using the SP system might enable the preservation of the spleen with vessels more efficiently during the pancreatectomy, especially at the splenic hilar area.

However, this procedure still has several limitations. Firstly, specific instruments for this system, such as staplers, suction, and small metal clips, are not commonly available. Considering the procedure of vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy, pancreatic division and vascular dissection are crucial steps related to surgical outcomes. From this perspective, the lack of instruments is a critical drawback when performing RSP + 1 SVc-SpDP in the SP system [7].

Consequently, an additional port was required. In this case, division of the pancreas was performed using endo-GIA, and ligation of a small branch of the vessels was performed using endoscopic clips. Occasionally, the bleeding was cleared using endosuction. Therefore, some critical parts of the surgery are performed through an additional port, which means that the surgical ability of the first assistant near the patient is also as important as that of the operator. In other words, several crucial steps are routinely performed by the operator during surgery and should be performed by the first assistant.

In RSP + 1 SVc-SpDP, surgical comprehension of the first assistant is as important as case selection; this could be another hurdle to the popularization of this technique. However, in the selected cases, better postoperative outcomes, including spleen preservation, might be expected to focus on the delicate procedures. To do that, a stable operative field is necessary by traction of the stomach and colon. For example, more splenocolic ligament dissection is recommended compared to conventional distal pancreatectomy. With more experience and the addition of novel instruments, this technique can be generalized, and its indications can be expanded.

In conclusion, the initial experience of RSP + 1 SVc-SpDP using the da Vinci SP system showed the possibility of an alternative operation for splenic vessel-conserving spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Further experience is mandatory.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary materials can be found via https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2024.27.3.177.

Acknowledgment

Medical Illustration & Design (MID), a member of the Medical Research Support Services of Yonsei University College of Medicine, provided excellent support with medical illustrations.

Notes

Fig. 1 (A) Preoperative computed tomography showing enhanced pancreas body mass (arrow). (B) Position of the assistant and ports placement. (C) Operative view after docking and insertion of the additional trocar. (D) Operative view after division of the pancreas. (E) Gross specimen containing pancreatic mass (arrow) that was revealed as a neuroendocrine tumor. SP, single port.

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Health System (No. 4-2024-0501) and individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Visualization: SHK

Data curation: NRK

Project administration: SHK, NRK

Supervision: CMK

Writing–original draft: SHK

Writing–review & editing: All authors

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding/support

None.

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
==== Refs
References

1 Yang DJ Xiong JJ Lu HM 2019 The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sci Rep 9 1159 10.1038/s41598-018-37617-0 30718559
2 Han HJ Yoon SY Song TJ Single-port laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: initial experience J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014 24 858 863 10.1089/lap.2014.0151 25495252
3 Park P Han HJ Song TJ 2019 Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score matched analysis and a learning curve of single-port approach J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 26 401 409 10.1002/jhbp.646 31211913
4 Kim SH Kang CM Lee WJ 2017 Robotic single-site plus ONE port distal pancreatectomy Surg Endosc 31 4258 4259 10.1007/s00464-017-5476-2 28342127
5 Han HJ Kang CM 2019 Reduced port minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: single-port laparoscopic versus robotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy Surg Endosc 33 1091 1099 10.1007/s00464-018-6361-3 29998392
6 Chuang SH Chuang SC 2022 Single-incision laparoscopic surgery to treat hepatopancreatobiliary cancer: a technical review World J Gastroenterol 28 3359 3369 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3359 36158268
7 Choi YJ Jo HS Kim DS Yu YD 2022 Single-port robot plus one port (SP + 1) distal pancreatectomy using the new da Vinci SP system Langenbecks Arch Surg 407 1271 1276 10.1007/s00423-022-02477-w 35284953
8 Liu R Liu Q Zhao G Zhao Z Li M Gao Y 2022 Single-port (SP) robotic pancreatic surgery using the da Vinci SP system: a retrospective study on prospectively collected data in a consecutive patient cohort Int J Surg 104 106782 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106782 35918008
9 Morelli L Guadagni S Di Franco G Palmeri M Di Candio G Mosca F 2016 Da Vinci single site© surgical platform in clinical practice: a systematic review Int J Med Robot 12 724 734 10.1002/rcs.1713 26525827
10 Cruz CJ Yang HY Kang I Kang CM Lee WJ 2019 Technical feasibility of da Vinci SP single-port robotic cholecystectomy: a case report Ann Surg Treat Res 97 217 221 10.4174/astr.2019.97.4.217 31620396
