
==== Front
J Anim Sci Technol
J Anim Sci Technol
J Anim Sci Technol
jast
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
2672-0191
2055-0391
Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology

10.5187/jast.2023.e105
jast-66-3-543
Research Article
Correlation between reproductive performance and sow body weight change during gestation
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3779-1144
Ha Sang Hun 1 #
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-4731
Choi Yo Han 2 #
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-7157
Mun Jun Young 1
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1413-5853
Park Se Rin 1
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1848-0399
Kinara Elick 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5143-355X
Park Hyun Ju 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2142-9888
Hong Jun Seon 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3163-8077
Kim Yong Min 2 *
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9518-7917
Kim Jin Soo 1 *
1 Department of Animal Industry Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
2 Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea
* Corresponding author: Yong Min Kim, Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea. Tel: +82-41-580-3305 E-mail: silveraz@korea.kr
* Corresponding author: Jin Soo Kim, Department of Animal Industry Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea. Tel: +82-33-250-8616 E-mail: Kjs896@kangwon.ac.kr
# These authors contributed equally to this work.

5 2024
31 5 2024
66 3 543554
22 8 2023
27 9 2023
04 10 2023
© Copyright 2024 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract

This study investigated the correlation between piglet performance and sow body weight change (BWC) during two gestational periods: 35–70, 70–105, and 35–105 days. A cohort of 70 sows was evaluated for BWC, backfat thickness change (BFC), caliper score change (CALC), feed intake, and weaning-to-estrus interval (WEI). The collected data were then analyzed according to the two specified periods. Our findings highlighted that piglet birth weight, weaning weight, and average daily weight gain (ADG) correlated with sow body characteristics, including BFC and CALC. The strongest correlation was observed with BWC. Piglet mortality was intimately associated with BFC. Piglet birth weight, weaning weight, and ADG showed a positive correlation with sow BWC, particularly during the 35–70 day period. Furthermore, sows displaying a higher BWC during the 70–105 day period, and also exhibiting a higher BW gain from 35-70 days, registered greater piglet weight gains and higher weaning weights. These trends became more apparent as the sow’s BWC increased during the 70–105 day period. Piglet mortality increased when the sow exhibited a lower BWC during both the 35–70 and 70–105 day periods. No significant observations were found concerning the number of stillborn piglets, live-born piglets, or weaned piglets, and no interaction effects were detected between these periods. In conclusion, our findings underscore the significance of sow BWC during the early stages of gestation (d 35–70) for enhancing piglet performance from birth to weaning.

Body weight
Backfat thickness
Correlation
Birth weight
Average daily weight gain
Mortality
crossmark2024-06-30
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Understanding the alterations in sow body characteristics during crucial intervals is pivotal for optimizing reproductive performance and enhancing the efficacy and profitability of swine production [1-3]. Variations in sow body characteristics can serve as health indicators, management markers, and indicators of feed intake status [4]. Such changes are predominantly dependent on feed intake, a critical factor for livestock animals. There are several methods to assess a sow’s body condition, including backfat thickness changes (BFC), caliper score changes (CALC), body condition score and body weight changes (BWC). These parameters offer valuable insights into the sow’s nutritional status, body condition, and energy accumulation, all of which can influence the sow’s capacity to support fetal growth and lactation after birth [5,6]. BWC is a significant indicator for management adjustments. The primary controller of body weight is feed intake. Historically, efforts have been made to improve sow condition and piglet performance by regulating feeding strategies [4,7,8]. Numerous studies report that sows with high feed intake and substantial weight mobility during gestation yield larger litter sizes and superior growth performance [9,10]. Sows experience a consistent increase in weight during gestation for various reasons, including recovery, growth, fetal development, and uterine expansion. Hence, monitoring these body characteristics at farrowing time can help identify potential health issues and nutritional deficiencies, which could affect feed intake [8,11,12].

Throughout the lactation period, sows produce milk for their litters, utilizing the stored energy. Various studies indicate that sows experience significant body loss when considerable changes occur during gestation [13-15]. Some reports suggest that milk production increases when sows endure greater body weight and backfat loss [10,11,15]. However, excessive body feature loss can have a negative impact on reproductive performance and the weaning to estrus interval (WEI) [16,17]. This effect is particularly noticeable in young sows, which often display reduced farrowing rates and piglet growth, attributable to insufficient recovery [18]. Therefore, managing sow body characteristics is crucial for optimizing sow productivity and reproductive success.

Recent studies have suggested the underestimation of the early and mid-stages of gestation. Certain reports indicate that effective management during early gestation can have a positive impact on piglet birth rates, mortality, and growth [5,19]. Evidence suggests that high feed intake during the early gestation period can help ensure an appropriate composition of body conditions at farrowing and weaning [5,20]. The importance of early-stage feeding strategies has been emphasized, proposing that BFC should be sufficiently replenished during early gestation [21].

For several decades, the late gestation period was considered the most effective for piglet performance. However, numerous studies have shown that the early to mid-term gestation periods are more crucial for fetal growth and survival than the late gestation period. Therefore, this experiment was designed to determine which gestation period has the most substantial impact on sow performance and reproductive outcomes by analyzing sow BWC throughout different stages of pregnancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals, housing, and experimental protocol

The protocol for this study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Rural Development Administration (No. NIAS-2022-554). The experiment was conducted in a commercial farm, located in Ham-an, Kyung sang nam-do, Republic of Korea. In all, 1,725 sets of data from 70 crossbred sows (Landrace × Yorkshire, parity ranged from 1 to 9) with the average litter size of 14.11 were taken. The BWC, BFC, and CALC were measured on days 35, 70, and 105 of gestation and at the weaning period (21-day of lactation). The management protocol was according to Kim et al. [22]. Briefly, artificial insemination was performed two times after the onset of estrus, and pregnancy was confirmed at day 30 post-breeding using an ultrasonic device (Agroscan A16, Echo Control Medical, Angouleme, France). During gestation, all sows were housed in individual gestation stalls (2.05 × 1.08 m) with fully slatted concrete flooring. On day 105 of gestation, all sows were moved to farrowing crates (2.14 × 2.15 m). Each crate had a single feeder, and water was always available through a nipple drinker. Room temperature and relative humidity located at a sow’s head level were recorded using a temperature/humidity data logger (TM-305U, Tenmars Electronics, Neihu, Taiwan), and skilled workers were recorded daily. The average ambient temperature was kept between 17°C and 22°C and relative humidity range between 53.8% to 96.9% (average of 61.1%) was recorded. After farrow, a heated lid (35°C) equipped with a feeder and nipple trough for the sow, and two water nipples for the piglets were used to house and separate sows until their offspring was weaned at 3 weeks. At this point, both the sows and piglets were switched to a lactation diet, which was provided ad libitum until weaning. During the lactation period, feed intake was recorded and used for calculating average daily feed intake (ADFI) during lactation. After weaning, all of the individual data were categorized according to gestation days (days from 35 to 70, 70 to 105, and 35 to 105) and re-grouped as BWC during d 35 to 70 (BWC low and high), and 70–105 (BWC low and high) based on BWC. After sows were moved from the delivery room, the WEI was measured, which was days taken from weaning to until re-estrus.

Sow body characteristic measurements

The BWC, BFC, and CALC were measured using CIMA control pig (CIMA, Correggio, Italy), ultrasonic device (Agroscan A16, Echo Control Medical), caliper measurer (Purina, Richmond, IN, USA), respectively, at day 35, 70, 105 of gestation and weaning (21 d of lactation period). The BWC, BFC, and CALC were measured by the difference of between the sampling times. The BFC was measured on 65 mm to the left side of the dorsal mid-line at the level of the last rib (P2).

Reproductive performance

After farrowing, litter traits recorded including the number of totally piglet born and born alive, stillborn, number of piglets weaned and mortality. Piglet and litter’s weight measurement was taken at birth and weaning period. To calculate average daily gain (ADG) of piglet and litters, calculated as the difference between the weaning and initial weights, divided by the number of days from birth to weaning, and multiplied by the number of piglets weaned.

Statistical analysis

All of data were collected for each sow and analyzed by GLM procedure using the SAS statistical software (SAS Institute– Cary, NC, USA) to determine the mean and standard deviation of the parameters. A 2 × 2 factorial arrangement was considered according to body weight differences for day 35 to 70 (high, 16.85 < kg; low, 16.85 > kg) and day 70 to 105 (high, 15.75 <; low, 15.75 >) as main effects. The Tukey’s honestly significant difference test partitioned significant differences and interactions between the treatment means at the 0.05 statistical level, and 0.05 to 0.10 was regarded as a trend towards significance. An individual sow was used as an experimental unit for analysis of all variables. Spearman correlation was utilized to assess the relationships between the changes in body features, such as BWC or BFC, and CALC, which are factors associated with performance in lactating sows and their litters. This evaluation was conducted with a false discovery rate (FDR) threshold of less than 0.05. To control for the risk of false positives in multiple comparisons, a FDR correction was applied. This approach was implemented to balance the detection of significant findings against the risk of type I errors, with a set FDR threshold of less than 0.05.

RESULTS

Sow and reproductive performance

Table 1 displays the changes in sow body characteristics in accordance with sow BWC during the gestation period. The results highlight significant differences in sow BWC from day 35 to day 105 (p < 0.001) of gestation, with the highest BWC recorded between day 35 to day 70. However, no significant differences were observed for BFC, CALC, feed intake (FI) during lactation, and based on BWC between day 35 and day 70 of gestation. An increase in sow BWC from day 70 to day 105 was significantly associated with an increase in BFC from day 35 to day 70 (p < 0.001), from day 70 to day 105 (p = 0.033), and from day 35 to day 105 (p < 0.001). Similarly, CALC from day 35 to day 70 (p = 0.009) and from day 35 to day 105 (p = 0.020) also increased when sow BWC was higher from day 70 to day 105. However, no significant difference was detected in FI during lactation and WEI.

Table 1. Sow performance according to sow body weight change during gestation period

Variable	BWC (d 35–70)	SEM	p-value	
Low	High	
BWC (d 70–105)	35–70	70–105	Interaction	
Low	High	Low	High	
BWC (kg)	
 35–70	10.68	12.14	23.94	25.92	3.375	< 0.001	0.016	< 0.001	
 70–105	9.25	21.86	11.59	21.29	2.608	0.498	0.529	0.619	
 35–105	19.93	34.00	35.53	47.21	4.233	< 0.001	0.363	0.405	
 Lactation loss	10.53	22.33	13.84	19.58	7.302	0.938	0.082	0.811	
BFC (mm)	
 35–70	1.60	2.76	1.56	2.42	0.495	0.442	< 0.001	0.006	
 70–105	0.60	1.05	0.88	1.50	0.492	0.144	0.033	0.002	
 35–105	2.20	3.81	2.44	3.92	0.738	0.642	< 0.001	< 0.001	
 Lactation loss	3.60	4.33	3.94	4.58	1.192	0.624	0.251	< 0.001	
CALC	
 35–70	1.20	2.14	1.53	1.92	0.491	0.831	0.009	0.019	
 70–105	1.13	1.26	0.88	1.50	0.512	0.982	0.142	0.014	
 35–105	2.33	3.40	2.41	3.42	0.877	0.916	0.020	< 0.001	
 Lactation loss	2.88	3.79	3.78	4.75	1.107	0.096	0.094	< 0.001	
 FI during lactation (kg/d)	5.37	5.23	5.34	5.20	0.263	0.254	0.301	0.501	
 WEI (d)	5.40	5.29	5.19	5.25	0.396	0.533	0.896	0.903	
BWC, body weight change; BFC, backfat thickness change; CALC, caliper score change; FI, feed intake; WEI, weaning to estrus interval.

Table 2 demonstrates reproductive performance differences according to sow BWC during the gestation period. An increase in sow BWC from day 35 to day 70 was significantly associated with a decrease in piglet mortality (p = 0.046) and an increase in piglet birth weight (p = 0.032). There was also a trend indicating increased piglet body weight at weaning (p = 0.055) and ADG (p = 0.067) when sows had a higher BWC from day 35 to day 70. No significant differences were observed concerning the number of total piglets born, stillborn, born alive, weaned piglets, litter weight at birth and weaning, and ADG relative to BWC from day 35 to day 70 of gestation. Higher sow BWC from day 70 to day 105 was significantly associated with decreased mortality (p = 0.032), and increased litter ADG (p = 0.038). A trend was detected indicating an increase in the total number of piglets born (p = 0.070) and piglet ADG (p = 0.071) when sows experienced a higher BWC from day 70 to day 105. No significant differences were detected for the number of stillborn, born alive, weaned piglets, litter and piglet weight at birth and weaning relative to BWC from day 70 to day 105. No interactional differences were observed concerning reproductive performances, although a trend was detected suggesting that high BWC improves piglet mortality (p = 0.070) and ADG (p = 0.086).

Table 2. Reproductive performance according to sow body weight change during gestation period

Variable	BWC (d 35–70)	SEM	p-value	
Low	High	
BWC (d 70–105)	35–70	70–105	Interaction	
Low	High	Low	High	
Reproduction (n)	
 Total born	14.10	14.43	13.81	14.00	1.214	0.729	0.070	0.908	
 Stillborn	0.95	1.00	0.69	1.25	0.390	0.326	0.240	0.194	
 Born alive	13.15	13.43	13.13	12.75	1.154	0.375	0.104	0.573	
 Weaned piglet	12.25	12.62	12.38	12.08	1.041	0.860	0.578	0.528	
 Mortality (%)	6.49	5.84	5.61	5.15	2.135	0.046	0.032	0.130	
Litter weight (kg)	
 At birth	15.34	16.43	16.82	15.55	1.564	0.167	0.272	0.136	
 At weaning	56.17	59.39	58.69	57.39	5.299	0.488	0.341	0.397	
 ADG (kg/d)	1.95	2.05	1.99	1.99	0.075	0.725	0.038	0.617	
Piglet weight (kg)	
 At birth	1.18	1.23	1.28	1.22	0.068	0.032	0.270	0.115	
 At weaning	4.58	4.70	4.73	4.77	0.155	0.055	0.240	0.603	
 ADG (kg/d)	0.16	0.17	0.16	0.17	0.007	0.067	0.071	0.186	
BWC, body weight change; ADG, average daily weight gain.

Correlation analysis

Fig. 1 depicts the correlation between sow body characteristics and piglet birth weight. The results indicate that sow BWC is positively related to piglet birth weight with a significant difference (r = 0.247, n = 70, p = 0.039). Also results reveal a trend where sow BWC at day 35 to 70 is positively related to piglet birth weight (r = 0.222, n = 70, p = 0.064). However, no associations were found between sow BWC from day 70 to 105, BFC and CALC during gestation and piglet birth weight.

Fig. 1. Correlation between sow body characteristics and piglet birth weight.

BWC, body weight change during gestation period (35–105); BFC, backfat thickness change during gestation period (35–105); CALC, caliper score changes during gestation period (35–105) (n = 70 sows).

Fig. 2 presents the correlation between sow body characteristics and piglet weaned weight. The results suggest that both sow BWC (r = 0.404, n = 70, p < 0.001) and BFC (r = 0.296, n = 70, p = 0.013) are positively related to piglet weaned weight with significant differences. Sow BWC at day 35 to 70 (r = 0.297, n = 70, p = 0.012) and at day 70 to 105 (r = 0.293, n = 70, p = 0.014) are both positively related to piglet weaned weight with significant differences. However, no associations were found between sow CALC during gestation and piglet weaned weight.

Fig. 2. Correlation between sow body characteristics and piglet weaned weight.

BWC, body weight change during gestation period (35–105); BFC, backfat thickness change during gestation period (35–105); CALC, caliper score changes during gestation period (35–105) (n = 70 sows).

Fig. 3 illustrates the correlation between sow body characteristics and piglet ADG. The results suggest that sow BWC (r = 0.297, n = 70, p = 0.013) and BFC (r = 0.268, n = 70, p = 0.025) are positively related to piglet ADG with significant differences. Also results suggest that sow BWC at day 70 to 105 is positively related to piglet ADG with a significant difference (r = 0.238, n = 70, p = 0.047). Furthermore, a positive trend was observed where BWC from day 35 to 70 was positively related to piglet ADG (r = 0.200, n = 70, p = 0.097). No associations were identified between sow CALC during gestation and piglet ADG.

Fig. 3. Correlation between sow body characteristics and piglet ADG (21d).

BWC, body weight change during gestation period (35–105); BFC, backfat thickness change during gestation period (35–105); CALC, caliper score changes during gestation period (35–105) (n = 70 sows); ADG, average daily weight gain.

Fig. 4 presents the correlation between sow body characteristics and piglet mortality. The results show that sow BFC (r = −0.244, n = 70, p = 0.042) is negatively related to piglet mortality with a significant difference. However, no associations were found between sow BWC and CALC during gestation and piglet mortality.

Fig. 4. Correlation between sow body characteristics and piglet mortality.

BWC, body weight change during gestation period (35–105); BFC, backfat thickness change during gestation period (35–105); CALC, caliper score changes during gestation period (35–105) (n = 70 sows).

DISCUSSION

The significant changes in sow body characteristics during gestation cannot be overstated, given their profound impact on the performance of both the sows and their offspring. Research has largely concentrated on modifications in sow BWC during late gestation, a period associated with peak fetal growth. A positive correlation has been established between litter weight and sow BW at the end of gestation [23]. The effects of BWC at various stages of gestation on reproductive performance and litter traits have also been extensively investigated [1,5]. Recently, the impact of mid-gestation changes has come under the spotlight. Greater BWC early and mid-gestation has been linked to larger litter sizes and weights at birth. However, late gestation significant BWC appears to yield higher litter weights both at birth and weaning [23]. Given its importance for mammalian gland development and fetal muscle growth, mid-gestation feeding strategies were traditionally adjusted according to the sow’s body condition. Increased feed intake during mid-gestation could reportedly improve progeny secondary fiber development [24]. This period has been related to the fetal fiber number, which in turn, correlates with birth weight [22]. Several studies have underscored the vital role of piglet birth weight, highlighting a relationship between piglet birth weight and mortality [13,25]. It was reported that birth weight significantly influences piglet growth, feed conversion ratio and the time required to reach market weight [26,27]. Our results suggest that sow BWC from day 70 to 105 of gestation positively impacts birth weight and ADG, indicating that BWC during this period could contribute to fetal secondary fiber development and nutrient accumulation during gestation for lactation.

However, the extent of weight gain during gestation might have varying effects on piglet mortality rates [13]. In our study, although there was no significant difference in mortality, a slight decrease was observed in the higher BWC group. This could be due to the accumulation of backfat thickness (BF). The BF indicates the energy status of sows. Less BF accumulation during gestation may reduce milk production and recovery during the lactation period [10,15]. As reported by Thongkhuv et al. [11], BF is positively related to milk yield during lactation. Therefore, reduced BF accumulation during gestation may negatively affect piglet performance and hinder sow recovery and WEI.

During the gestation period from day 35 to 70, the lower BWC group exhibited higher mortality. This outcome could be attributed to diminished nutrient accumulation during gestation. In result of Wang et al. [6], sows with less BWC during gestation had lower colostrum and milk protein and fat content. However, Mallmann et al. [28] reported no notable difference in reproductive performance during this stage. As a result of these varied outcomes, a more in-depth examination is required to understand the relationship between sow BWC and reproductive performance in relation to gestational weight gain.

Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of sow BWC during gestation on reproductive performance and litter outcomes. Strathe et al. [10] discovered that sows with higher BWC during gestation had increased milk production and piglet growth rates, leading to higher weaning weights and reduced pre-weaning mortality rates. Another study by Gonçalves et al. [29] examined the effects of different feeding strategies on sow BWC during gestation and their impact on litter outcomes. Similarly, a study by Lavery et al. [30] investigated the effects of sow BWC and BFC during gestation on reproductive performance. They found that sows with higher BWC and BFC during early and mid-gestation had larger litter sizes and higher birth weights. Conversely, some of results indicate that excessive BWC during gestation could negatively affect reproductive performance and litter outcomes, as it increased stillbirth rates and decreased piglet birth weights [31,32]. In summary, these studies suggest that managing sow BWC during gestation can significantly influence litter outcomes and reproductive performance. However, the optimal BWC and feeding strategies may vary based on factors such as sow genetics, parity, and environmental conditions [15].

Numerous studies have probed the relationship between sow BWC during gestation and piglet production performance [8,28]. Hypothetically, sows with higher BWC during this period may produce larger litters, which could result in a decrease in individual piglet weight at weaning [33]. However, this study did not detect a relationship between sow BWC and litter size. The connection between sow BWC during different gestation periods and piglet birth weight has been the focus of various studies, suggesting that maternal nutrition during late gestation is instrumental for piglet birth weight.

In terms of piglet ADG, our study discerned a positive correlation between sow BWC during days 70 to 105 and 35 to 105 of gestation. This outcome echoes the findings of Mallmann et al. [28], who posited that maternal BWC during gestation can positively impact piglet growth and development. Zhou et al. [8] further reported that enhanced maternal nutrition during late gestation augmented piglet growth performance. These findings underscore the crucial role of maternal nutrition during gestation for piglet growth and development. Additionally, several factors, such as parity, litter size, and season, have been identified to influence sow BWC during gestation. Wang et al. [33] reported that litter size considerably affected sow BWC during gestation, with sows carrying larger litters experiencing more significant BW loss. Pedersen et al. [17] mentioned that BW loss can be larger due to produce higher milk for feeding large litters and usage for maintain their energy requirement.

Multiple studies have examined the correlation between sow BWC during gestation and piglet mortality, although results vary. Some studies found a negative association between sow BWC during gestation and piglet mortality, while others found no significant relationship. Li et al. [19] discovered that sows with higher BWC during late gestation had a lower risk of piglet mortality, potentially due to enhanced milk production and nutrient transfer to piglets. Nonetheless, Vernunft et al. [23] found no significant association between sow BWC during gestation and stillborn, but did find a positive correlation between sow BWC and litter weight at birth. As a result, other factors not considered in these studies may influence this relationship.

According to our correlation analysis, the most influential factor affecting piglet birth weight was sow BWC during gestation. In particular, sow BWC during days 35–70 significantly influenced piglet birth weight, compared to sow BWC during days 70–105. Our results further demonstrated that sows with higher BWC during days 35–70 produced piglets with higher birth weight. Additionally, the weight at weaning and the ADG of piglets were also found to increase, correlating with higher sow BWC during the same period. The introduction of hyper-prolific sows has led to an increase in the number of piglets born; however, their low birth weight presents a significant challenge to address. It is well-established that piglets born with higher weights experience greater weight gain, consume more feed, and exhibit lower mortality [27]. Therefore, lower sow BWC during days 35-70 might contribute to reduced growth in piglets, attributed to the disadvantages of low birth weight.

On the other hand, our correlation analysis found that weaning weight is affected not only by BWC but also by sow BFC. Sow BFC serves as an indication of energy accumulation in pigs. Previous studies have reported a relationship between BFC and piglet performance [4,11]. The BFC also plays a critical role in determining the characteristics of colostrum and milk, contributing to the production of more beneficial nutrients in milk and supplying energy for milk production [11,34]. Furthermore, milk production has been reported to be positively associated with high body BWC, possibly due to increased feed intake, which affects sow nutrient accumulation, leading to more milk production [6,9]. Although we did not investigate milk profiles in our study, we can hypothesize that the body reserves in mid-late gestation may influence milk production. Our results also indicated that BFC is negatively associated with mortality. This might be due to its influence on milk production and nutrient profiles [35]. Similarly, result of Thonkhuy et al. [11] shows high BFC of sows at late gestation have better reproduction performances and milk yield.

CONCLUSION

BWC during gestation constitute a crucial factor in swine production, significantly influencing reproductive performance and litter growth. Our results demonstrate that sows displaying higher BWC during gestation have a positive correlation with reproductive performance, which in turn enhances piglet birth weight, growth, and survivability. Notably, sow BWC during the day 35 to 70 period displayed a positive correlation with piglet birth weight and a negative correlation with mortality, while sow BWC during the 70–105 day period seemed to contribute to an increase in the total number of piglets born. Based on our findings, we propose that improving piglet growth and survivability could be achievable by enhancing sow BWC during the earlier phase of gestation. Nevertheless, further research is needed to pinpoint the precise factors affecting sow health and reproductive performance. This will ensure more targeted strategies for promoting better outcomes in swine production.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by 2023 the RDA Fellowship Program of National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Korea.

Competing interests

Funding sources

Availability of data and material

Authors’ contributions

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ01681002)” Rural Development Administration, Korea.

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Conceptualization: Ha SH, Choi YH.

Data curation: Ha SH, Kim YM, Kim JS.

Formal analysis: Ha SH, Park SR, Park HJ.

Methodology: Ha SH, Choi YH, Mun JY.

Validation: Ha SH, Mun JY, Hong JS.

Investigation: Ha SH, Kinara E, Park HJ.

Writing - original draft: Ha SH, Kim JS.

Writing - review & editing: Ha SH, Choi YH, Mun JY, Park SR, Kinara E, Park HJ, Hong JS, Kim YM, Kim JS.

This study was approved by IACUC of Rural Development Administration (No. NIAS-2022-554).

Correlation between reproductive performance and sow body weight change during gestation
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1. Kim JS Yang X Baidoo SK Relationship between body weight of primiparous sows during late gestation and subsequent reproductive efficiency over six parities Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016 29 768 74 10.5713/ajas.15.0907 26954198
2. Kim JS Yang X Pangeni D Baidoo SK Relationship between backfat thickness of sows during late gestation and reproductive efficiency at different parities Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 2015 65 1 8 10.1080/09064702.2015.1045932
3. Theil PK Krogh U Bruun TS Feyera T Feeding the modern sow to sustain high productivity Mol Reprod Dev. 2023 90 517 32 10.1002/mrd.23571 35451142
4. Mallmann AL Camilotti E Fagundes DP Vier CE Mellagi APG Ulguim RR Impact of feed intake during late gestation on piglet birth weight and reproductive performance: a dose-response study performed in gilts J Anim Sci. 2019 97 1262 72 10.1093/jas/skz017 30649395
5. Carrión-López MJ Madrid J Martínez S Hernández F Orengo J Effects of the feeding level in early gestation on body reserves and the productive and reproductive performance of primiparous and multiparous sows Res Vet Sci. 2022 148 42 51 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.05.002 35660544
6. Wang J Yang M Cao M Lin Y Che L Duraipandiyan V Moderately increased energy intake during gestation improves body condition of primiparous sows, piglet growth performance, and milk fat and protein output Livest Sci. 2016 194 23 30 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.09.012
7. Pereira LP Hilgemberg JO Mass APH Lehnen CR Implications of nutritional modulators in productive performance of pregnant and lactating sows Livest Sci. 2020 232 103919 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103919
8. Zhou YF Zhang XM Wang C Wei HK Jiang SW Peng J Effects of North American and Danish feeding strategies on the reproductive performance of American Landrace-Yorkshire crossbred sows during gestation Livest Sci. 2019 228 67 71 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.07.025
9. Hong J Fang LH Kim YY Effects of dietary energy and lysine levels on physiological responses, reproductive performance, blood profiles, and milk composition in primiparous sows J Anim Sci Technol. 2020 62 334 47 10.5187/jast.2020.62.3.334 32568263
10. Strathe AV Bruun TS Hansen CF Sows with high milk production had both a high feed intake and high body mobilization Animal. 2017 11 1913 21 10.1017/S1751731117000155 28196552
11. Thongkhuy S Chuaychu SB Burarnrak P Ruangjoy P Juthamanee P Nuntapaitoon M Effect of backfat thickness during late gestation on farrowing duration, piglet birth weight, colostrum yield, milk yield and reproductive performance of sows Livest Sci. 2020 234 103983 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103983
12. Muhizi S Cho S Palanisamy T Kim IH Effect of dietary salicylic acid supplementation on performance and blood metabolites of sows and their litters J Anim Sci Technol. 2022 64 707 16 10.5187/jast.2022.e25 35969704
13. Hawe SJ Scollan N Gordon A Magowan E Impact of sow lactation feed intake on the growth and suckling behavior of low and average birthweight pigs to 10 weeks of age Transl Anim Sci. 2020 4 655 65 10.1093/tas/txaa057 32705053
14. Lee JJ Choi SH Cho JH Choe J Kang J Kim S Effects of dietary carbohydrases on productive performance and immune responses of lactating sows and their piglets J Anim Sci Technol. 2019 61 359 65 10.5187/jast.2019.61.6.359 31844546
15. Sun H de Laguna FB Wang S Liu F Shi L Jiang H Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii on sows’ farrowing duration and reproductive performance, and weanling piglets’ performance and IgG concentration J Anim Sci Technol. 2022 64 10 22 10.5187/jast.2021.e106 35174339
16. Hoving LL Soede NM Feitsma H Kemp B Lactation weight loss in primiparous sows: consequences for embryo survival and progesterone and relations with metabolic profiles Reprod Domest Anim. 2012 47 1009 16 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02007.x 22420822
17. Pedersen TF Bruun TS Feyera T Larsen UK Theil PK A two-diet feeding regime for lactating sows reduced nutrient deficiency in early lactation and improved milk yield Livest Sci. 2016 191 165 73 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.08.004
18. Lee S Hosseindoust A Choi Y Kim M Kim K Lee J Age and weight at first mating affects plasma leptin concentration but no effects on reproductive performance of gilts J Anim Sci Technol. 2019 61 285 93 10.5187/jast.2019.61.5.285 31602307
19. Li J Xia H Yao W Wang T Li J Piao X Effects of arginine supplementation during early gestation (day 1 to 30) on litter size and plasma metabolites in gilts and sows J Anim Sci. 2015 93 5291 303 10.2527/jas.2014-8657 26641049
20. Upadhaya SD Seok WJ Kumar SS van der Veen RH Kim IH Marine derived Ca-Mg complex supplementation basal diet during four subsequent parities improved longevity and performance of sows and their litters J Anim Sci Technol. 2023 65 562 78 10.5187/jast.2022.e121 37332279
21. Mallmann AL Oliveira GS Ulguim RR Mellagi APG Bernardi ML Orlando UAD Impact of feed intake in early gestation on maternal growth and litter size according to body reserves at weaning of young parity sows J Anim Sci. 2020 98 skaa075 10.1093/jas/skaa075 32150274
22. Kim JS Hosseindoust A Ju IK Yang X Lee SH Noh HS Effects of dietary energy levels and β-mannanase supplementation in a high mannan-based diet during lactation on reproductive performance, apparent total tract digestibility and milk composition in multiparous sows Ital J Anim Sci. 2018 17 128 34 10.1080/1828051X.2017.1345663
23. Vernunft A Maass M Brüssow KP Placental characteristics of German Landrace sows and their relationships to different fertility parameters Czech J Anim Sci. 2018 63 339 46 10.17221/23/2017-CJAS
24. Gatford KL De Blasio MJ Roberts CT Nottle MB Kind KL van Wettere WHE Responses to maternal GH or ractopamine during early-mid pregnancy are similar in primiparous and multiparous pregnant pigs J Endocrinol. 2009 203 143 54 10.1677/JOE-09-0131 19654144
25. Moreira LP Menegat MB Barros GP Bernardi ML Wentz I Bortolozzo FP Effects of colostrum, and protein and energy supplementation on survival and performance of low-birth-weight piglets Livest Sci. 2017 202 188 93 10.1016/j.livsci.2017.06.006
26. Liu J Cao S Liu M Chen L Zhang H A high nutrient dense diet alters hypothalamic gene expressions to influence energy intake in pigs born with low birth weight Sci Rep. 2018 8 5514 10.1038/s41598-018-23926-x 29615796
27. Zotti E Resmini FA Schutz LG Volz N Milani RP Bridi AM Impact of piglet birthweight and sow parity on mortality rates, growth performance, and carcass traits in pigs Rev Bras Zootec. 2017 46 856 62 10.1590/s1806-92902017001100004
28. Mallmann AL Betiolo FB Camilloti E Mellagi APG Ulguim RR Wentz I Two different feeding levels during late gestation in gilts and sows under commercial conditions: impact on piglet birth weight and female reproductive performance J Anim Sci. 2018 96 4209 19 10.1093/jas/sky297 30169599
29. Gonçalves MAD Gourley KM Dritz SS Tokach MD Bello NM DeRouchey JM Effects of amino acids and energy intake during late gestation of high-performing gilts and sows on litter and reproductive performance under commercial conditions J Anim Sci. 2016 94 1993 2003 10.2527/jas.2015-0087 27285697
30. Lavery A Lawlor PG Magowan E Miller HM O’Driscoll K Berry DP An association analysis of sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth as indicators of sow productivity Animal. 2019 13 622 30 10.1017/S1751731118001799 30017016
31. Peltoniemi O Han T Yun J Coping with large litters: management effects on welfare and nursing capacity of the sow J Anim Sci Technol. 2021 63 199 210 10.5187/jast.2021.e46 33987599
32. Theil PK Farmer C Feyera T Physiology and nutrition of late gestating and transition sows J Anim Sci. 2022a 100 skac176 10.1093/jas/skac176 35708593
33. Wang J Feng C Liu T Shi M Wu G Bazer FW Review: physiological alterations associated with intrauterine growth restriction in fetal pigs: causes and insights for nutritional optimization Mol Reprod Dev. 2017 84 897 904 10.1002/mrd.22842 28661576
34. Chem V Mun HS Ampode KMB Lagua EB Dilawar MA Kim YH Milk supplementation: effect on piglets performance, feeding behavior and sows physiological condition during the lactation period J Anim Behav Biometeorol. 2023 11 e2023007 10.31893/jabb.23007
35. Sureshkumar S Liu YJ Chen NB Kim IH Dietary inclusion of glucose oxidase supplementation to corn-wheat-based diet enhance growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile of lactating sows J Anim Sci Technol. 2021 63 778 89 10.5187/jast.2021.e66 34447955
