
==== Front
Ann Surg Open
Ann Surg Open
AS9
Annals of Surgery Open
2691-3593
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103

AOSO-D-24-00159
00033
10.1097/AS9.0000000000000484
3
Response to Letter
Response to Comment on: Age Matters: What Affects the Cumulative Lifespan of a Transplanted Liver? Continued Yet Cautious Expansion of Donor Age in US-Based Liver Transplantation
Wehrle Chase J. MD *
Miller Charles MD *
Pinna Antonio MD †
Hashimoto Koji MD, PhD *‡
Schlegel Andrea MD, MBA *‡
* From the Department of Liver Transplantation, Transplant Research Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
† Department of Liver Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic Weston Hospital, Weston, FL
‡ Department of Immunology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Reprints: Andrea Schlegel, MD, MBA, Department of Immunology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Transplantation Center, 9500 Euclid Ave, A12 Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195. Email: schlega4@ccf.org.
20 8 2024
9 2024
5 3 e484e484
23 7 2024
26 7 2024
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

OPEN-ACCESSTRUE
==== Body
pmcWe thank Drs Akabane, Sasaki, and their team for their thoughtful review of our article “Age Matters: What Affects the Cumulative Lifespan of a Transplanted Liver?”1 We appreciate their insights2 and commend their work on donor–recipient age differences in liver transplantation outcomes.3 A few points should be addressed:

The supply–demand mismatch in liver transplants has driven interest in using traditionally “high-risk” grafts to expand the donor pool.4–6 Dynamic preservation techniques are facilitating these practices, as seen with routine use of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion in Europe for many years7,8 and more recently here in the United States with the implementation of normothermic machine perfusion.9,10 However, as the Stanford team noted in their 2023 study, proper donor–recipient matching remains key.3,11,12 They identified a difference comparing their analysis to ours, which we are not able to explain with our current data. While perhaps our conclusion has been optimistic, we highlight encouraging evidence, supporting the use of older and very old donors. Akabane et al noted that transplanted livers often achieve longevity like the general population despite the transplant injury. This finding while not directly guiding donor or recipient selection offers valuable insights into subcellular liver injury. Our analysis of the national cohort showed no impaired graft survival for donors over 70 years, compared to younger livers, even when used for recipients under the age of 70 years (Fig. 1).

FIGURE 1. Graft survival and distribution of liver transplants in donors and recipients beyond the age of 70 years. There were 5949 transplants originating from donors >70 years and 4991 to recipients >70 years; 993 were from donor >70 years transplanted to a recipient <70 years.

We also highlight interesting parallels from European practices where the use of older donors is more routine. Italian surgeons recently transplanted the first case from a 100-year-old donor.13 In 2008, Italian practice had employed a 94-year-old donor and was advocating for “no donor age limit” in liver transplantation.14 More recently, outcomes have been generally reassuring with the use of octogenarian donors with remarkable patient and graft survivals, despite a higher rate of biliary complications in this group when preserved with static cold storage.15–17 Specifically relevant to US practice, Ghinolfi et al report a set of risk factors that are associated with biliary complications in octogenarian donors, including cardiovascular donor instability and recipient disease severity (lab Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score).17 These findings, along with the expanding use of machine perfusion and robust viability testing, suggest that donor age may be cautiously expanded in the US population, as currently seen at our center. The Food and Drug Administration approval of devices for hypothermic oxygenated perfusion techniques is eagerly anticipated to further expand the aged donor pool while limiting biliary complications, and the needed interventions, as seen in Italy.8

We acknowledge the selection biases in our approach, which aim to generate preliminary data supporting the use of older donors. Each liver is metabolically unique and affected by the donor’s lifestyle and environment. Thus, a 70-year-old graft from a particular donor may function like a 30-year-old graft from another. Predicting these differences remains challenging limiting the expanded use of older donors. We hope markers of metabolic and mitochondrial injury, such as flavin mononucleotide, might help.18,19 Our group is working on projects to identify hepatocellular and cholangio-cellular senescence before transplant.

We appreciate the follow-up time recommended by Akabane et al. We included data up to 2022 to reflect the modern practices of using older donors in the United States, despite potential bias compared to earlier eras. Our study aimed to highlight the oldest achievable ages in various categories and assess graft outcomes in higher risk populations as “hypothesis-forming” rather than “practice-changing” research. Among the 34,656 grafts transplanted in the final 4.7 years of follow-up, up to 700 (2.0%) achieved a cumulative age of >80 years, 103 (0.3%) over 90 years, and 5 achieved an age of >100 years. While this inclusion introduces limitations, it also provides valuable insights.

In conclusion, we thank Akabane et al for their thoughtful review. We look forward to further exploration in liver aging and transplant injury. While our study has limitations and aims to generate new hypotheses rather than guide clinical decisions, we believe it raises important questions about the future of transplantation and hope it inspires ongoing research in this field.

Acknowledgment

C.J.W. and A.S. designed the study from inception and conceptualized approaches and were responsible for writing and editing of the manuscript. C.M., A.P. and K.H. were responsible for editing the final manuscript.

Disclosure: The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1. Wehrle CJ Maspero M Pinna AD . Age matters: what affects the cumulative lifespan of a transplanted liver? Ann Surg. Published online March 11, 2024. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006259.
2. Akabane MIY Nakayama T Sasaki K . Comment on “age matters: what affects the cumulative lifespan of a transplanted liver?”. Ann Surg Open. 2024:5:e475. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000475.
3. Snyder A Kojima L Imaoka Y . Evaluating the outcomes of donor-recipient age differences in young adults undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2023;29 :793–803.36847140
4. Goldaracena N Cullen JM Kim D-S . Expanding the donor pool for liver transplantation with marginal donors. Int J Surg. 2020;82S :30–35.32422385
5. Kubal C Roll GR Ekser B . Donation after circulatory death liver transplantation: What are the limits for an acceptable DCD graft? Int J Surg. 2020;82S :36–43.32389812
6. Trotter JF . Expanding the donor pool for liver transplantation. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2000;2 :46–54.10981003
7. Eden J Brüggenwirth IMA Berlakovich G . Long-term outcomes after hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion and transplantation of 1,202 donor livers in a real-world setting (HOPE-REAL study) [published online ahead of print]. J Hepatol. 2024:S0168-8278(24)02341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.06.035.
8. Patrono D Cussa D Sciannameo V . Outcome of liver transplantation with grafts from brain-dead donors treated with dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion, with particular reference to elderly donors. Am J Transplant. 2022;22 :1382–1395.35150050
9. Wehrle CJ Zhang M Khalil M . Impact of back-to-base normothermic machine perfusion on complications and costs: a multi-center, real-world risk-matched analysis. Ann Surg. 2024;280 :300–310.38557793
10. Wehrle CJ Hong H Gross A . The impact of normothermic machine perfusion and acuity circles on waitlist time, mortality, and cost in liver transplantation: A multicenter experience [published online ahead of print]. Liver Transpl. 2024. doi: 10.1097/LVT.00000000000004.
11. Schlegel A van Reeven M Croome K ; DCD Collaborator Group. A multicentre outcome analysis to define global benchmarks for donation after circulatory death liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2022;76 :371–382.34655663
12. Durand F Levitsky J Cauchy F . Age and liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2019;70 :745–758.30576701
13. De Simone P Ghinolfi D Palladino S . First-in-human liver transplantation from a centenarian deceased donor after brain death. Am J Transplant. 2024;24 :304–307. Erratum in: Am J Transplant. 2024;24 :881–883.37757913
14. Verzaro R Minervini M Gridelli B . Toward “no age limit” for liver transplant donors. Transplantation. 2008;85 :1869–1870.18580486
15. Domagala P Takagi K Ijzermans JN . Grafts from selected deceased donors over 80 years old can safely expand the number of liver transplants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Rev. 2019;33 :209–218.
16. Rabelo AV Alvarez MJ Méndez CSM . Liver transplantation outcomes using grafts from donors older than the age of 80 years. Transplant Proc. 2015;47 :2645–2646.26680060
17. Ghinolfi D De Simone P Lai Q . Risk analysis of ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplant using octogenarian donors. Liver Transpl. 2016;22 :588–598.26784011
18. Eden J Breuer E Birrer D . Screening for mitochondrial function before use-routine liver assessment during hypothermic oxygenated perfusion impacts liver utilization. EBioMedicine. 2023;98 :104857.37918219
19. Schlegel A Muller X Mueller M . Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion protects from mitochondrial injury before liver transplantation. EBioMedicine. 2020;60 :103014.32979838
