
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39300164
72085
10.1038/s41598-024-72085-9
Article
Characteristic differences between full-term and premature infants with intermittent exotropia
Lee Dong Cheol 1
Park Jihyun 2
Park Hye Sung 3
Paik Hae Jung 4
Lee Joo Yeon 5
Oh Shin Yeop 6
Lee Soo Jung 7
http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3004-8511
Lee Se Youp tking33@dsmc.or.kr

1
1 https://ror.org/00tjv0s33 grid.412091.f 0000 0001 0669 3109 Department of Ophthalmology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Dalgubeol-Daero, Dalseo-Gu, Daegu, 103542601 Korea
2 https://ror.org/0427wbh59 grid.459850.5 Nune Eye Hospital, Daegu, 41940 Korea
3 https://ror.org/05ancvs60 grid.482911.7 Siloam Eye Hospital, Seoul, 07668 Korea
4 grid.411653.4 0000 0004 0647 2885 Department of Ophthalmology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, 21565 Korea
5 grid.488421.3 0000000404154154 Hallym University Medical College, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, 14068 Korea
6 Department of Ophthalmology, Changwon Fatima Hospital, Changwon, Korea
7 https://ror.org/04xqwq985 grid.411612.1 0000 0004 0470 5112 Department of Ophthalmology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, 48108 Korea
19 9 2024
19 9 2024
2024
14 218795 2 2024
3 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Strabismus is prevalent among preterm infants of low gestational age and birth weight in Southeast Asian countries, with intermittent exotropia (IXT) being the most common type in South Korea. In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, we investigated the differences between full-term and premature infants with IXT. IXT patients with available childbirth history were divided into two groups: preterm vs. full-term and low birth weight (LBW) vs. normal birth weight (NBW). Parameters related to exotropia including parental heredity, surgical history, and treatment options were investigated. In univariate regression for gestational age, a result of ≥ 100 s in the Titmus test was 1.352 times more frequent in preterm than in full-term infants. When birth weight was considered instead, a result of ≥ 100 s in the Titmus test was 1.412 times more frequent in the LBW compared to the NBW group. In multivariate regression for birth weight, the frequency of a result of ≥ 100 s in the Titmus test for the LBW group was 2.032 times higher than that for the NBW group. It is particularly important to examine stereopsis in preterm and LBW patients affected by IXT to ensure timely surgical planning and avoid potential recurrence after surgery.

Keywords

Strabismus
Exotropia
Low gestational age
Low birth weight
Preterm infants
Subject terms

Medical research
Risk factors
KAPOSissue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Visual defects, cerebral visual impairment, refractive errors, strabismus, color vision, and visual field defects are more commonly encountered in preterm infants than in full-term infants owing to the unfavorable effects of prematurity on neurological and visual development1. The prevalence of strabismus among preterm infants of low gestational age (LGA) and low birth weight (LBW) has been reported to be up to 42%2–9. The main risk factors for strabismus associated with LGA and LBW have been repeatedly discussed in the literature8,10–16. This topic has become increasingly significant with the increase in the survival rate of extremely preterm infants in recent years, necessitating further exploration17,18.

Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is the most common type of strabismus in South Korea (prevalence of 1.1% ± 0.1% according to the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data)19 and several other Asian countries20–23. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the differences between full-term and preterm infants with IXT by analyzing the age at admission, sex, onset of strabismus, diagnosis period, dominant eye, degree of control, stereopsis, presence of refractive error, parental heredity, surgery, and degree of refraction.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study. Participants were recruited from March 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020, by 65 strabismus specialists in 53 institutions, among which secondary or tertiary referral centers accounted for 98.1%. The study protocol conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Keimyung University Hospital (approval number: 2020-06-083). The Korean Intermittent Exotropia Multicenter Study (KIEMS), initiated by the Korean Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (KAPOS), is a nationwide cross-sectional study investigating IXT in Korea. Questionnaires and examination forms were pre-distributed to the investigators to standardize data collection. Each investigator collected questionnaires and examination forms (Figs. 1, 2) from each patient with IXT24. The questionnaires and examination forms were collected by the KIEMS committee and handled centrally24. The IRB of Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital waived the requirement to obtain written informed consent due to the retrospective nature of the study. All institutions participating in the study were exempted from the requirement to obtain written informed consent through their respective IRB, and all received approval.Fig. 1 Questionnaire form for patients with intermittent exotropia.

Fig. 2 Examination form for patients with intermittent exotropia.

Study population

The KIEMS multicenter study included 5385 patients with IXT24. The present study included patients with childbirth history (type of delivery, gestational age, and birth weight) described either by their parents or themselves.

A total of 4,066 patients were divided into two groups according to their gestational age. Infants with a gestational age of ≥ 37 weeks were classified as full-term, whereas those with a gestational age of < 37 weeks were classified as preterm.

A total of 4599 patients were divided into two groups according to birth weight. Infants weighing less than 2.5 kg were classified as LBW, while those with a birth weight of ≥ 2.5 kg were considered to have a normal birth weight (NBW).

Variables

The age at exotropia onset, sex, presence of refractive error, near and distance combined with vertical strabismus, near and distance exodeviation angle, degree of near and distance control, near and distance dominant eye, stereopsis (Worth 4 dots, Titmus, and Randot), parental heredity, surgical history, and treatment options were analyzed for each patient. The outcomes of the Titmus and Randot tests were divided according to their median value into two subgroups per test. The refraction data of the right and left eyes were converted into spherical equivalents (SE) and categorized into the myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia groups. SE were calculated as Sphere + Cylinder/2. SE ≤ −0.5 D, − 0.5 D < SE < 1.0 D, and SE ≥ 1.0 D were defined as myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia, respectively.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables are expressed as percentages (%) to the extent of occupancy. Continuous variables (age, onset of exotropia, far prism diopter, and near prism diopter) are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The significance level (α level) was determined using a two-tailed test at 0.05. Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test (only for paternal operation history) was used to ascertain whether an association existed between the preterm and full-term groups based on birth week. An independent t-test was used to identify significant differences in continuous variables between the groups.

Patients were divided into two groups according to their GA (Gestational Age) and BW (Birth Weight). Logistic regression analysis was performed subsequently to identify variables with significant associations. Birth weight or week, age at the onset of strabismus, parental strabismus, and parental strabismus surgery were adjusted for in the analysis.

Results

Among the enrolled patients, the average number of weeks for those with a GA over 37 weeks was 39.11 ± 1.43 weeks (range: 37 – 53 weeks), whereas for those with a GA under 37 weeks it was 32.99 ± 4.79 weeks (range: 20.0 – 36.4 weeks). The average weight for those with a BW over 2.5 kg was 3.24 ± 0.40 kg (range: 2.5 – 6.2 kg), whereas for those with a BW under 2.5 kg it was 2.00 ± 0.42 kg (range: 0.66 – 2.49 kg). There was a slight predominance of female patients in the study population (52% female versus 47% male). The refractive error results showed that myopia was less prevalent in the preterm and in the LBW groups compared to the full-term and NBW groups, whereas hyperopia was more prevalent instead. The results were only statistically significant in the case of the left eye, although the same pattern was revealed in all patient categories. Patient demographics are shown in Table 1.Table 1 Patient distribution and demographics.

	Gestational age	Birth weight	
Full-term (n = 3493)	Premature (n = 573)	p-value	Full-term (n = 4227)	Premature (n = 388)	p-value	
N (%) (mean)	(SD)	N (%) (mean)	(SD)	N (%) (mean)	(SD)	N (%) (mean)	(SD)	
Age, years (mean ± SD)	6.661	4.129	7.101	5.094	0.022*	7.028	4.598	6.865	5.195	0.509	
Onset of exotropia (mean ± SD)	4.699	3.526	4.929	4.890	0.200	4.925	3.720	4.861	5.262	0.769	
Sex	Male	1646	47.12	265	46.25	0.697	2021	47.81	162	41.75	0.022*	
Female	1847	52.88	308	53.75		2206	52.19	226	58.25		
Hx of strabismus in mother	Yes	170	4.97	23	4.09	0.365	199	4.81	18	4.70	0.920	
Hx of strabismus in father	Yes	168	4.94	20	3.57	0.157	188	4.58	16	4.20	0.732	
Surgical Hx of mother	Yes	68	4.62	7	2.78	0.185	76	4.08	6	3.70	0.818	
Surgical Hx of father	Yes	43	2.89	5	2.04	0.455	52	2.76	2	1.25	0.435	
Refraction (Rt.)	Myopia	1063	42.03	166	39.34	0.245	1323	43.04	111	39.78	0.094	
Emmetropia	1027	40.61	169	40.05		1226	39.88	106	37.99		
Hyperopia	439	17.36	87	20.62		525	17.08	62	22.22		
Refraction (Lt.)	Myopia	954	42.51	155	40.36	0.037*	1195	43.89	105	39.62	0.029*	
Emmetropia	940	41.89	149	38.80		1102	40.47	102	38.49		
Hyperopia	350	15.60	80	20.83		426	15.64	58	21.89		
Far hypertropia	Yes	379	10.85	60	10.47	0.786	476	11.26	42	10.82	0.794	
Near hypertropia	Yes	242	6.93	31	5.41	0.178	300	7.10	27	6.96	0.919	
Far prism diopter	8.388	23.04	7.903	23.18	0.708	8	23.13	8.492	23.33	0.660	
Near prism diopter	8.848	24.46	8.979	23.82	0.109	9	24.64	9.321	23.67	0.043	
Far control	Good	852	27.22	131	25.84	0.800	1038	27.45	81	23.48	0.238	
Fair	1312	41.92	215	42.41		1560	41.25	155	44.93		
Poor	966	30.86	161	31.76		1184	31.31	109	31.59		
Near control	Good	1319	43.94	201	41.44	0.582	1561	43.15	132	39.52	0.380	
Fair	1088	36.24	185	38.14		1326	36.65	134	40.12		
Poor	595	19.82	99	20.41		731	20.20	68	20.36		
Far dominant	Alternative	1455	48.13	236	47.77	0.883	1761	48.15	161	48.49	0.906	
One eye	1568	51.87	258	52.23		1896	51.85	171	51.51		
Near dominant	Alternative	1752	60.98	284	61.74	0.757	2105	60.93	197	61.76	0.771	
One eye	1121	39.02	176	38.26		1350	39.07	122	38.24		
W4D	Normal	1222	49.78	189	47.97	0.506	1520	50.45	119	47.04	0.297	
Abnormal	1233	50.22	205	52.03		1493	49.55	134	52.96		
Titmus (s)	 ≤ 80	1293	55.37	178	47.85	0.007**	1605	55.44	111	46.84	0.010*	
 ≥ 100	1042	44.63	194	52.15		1290	44.56	126	53.16		
Randot	 ≤ 50	367	57.25	48	52.17	0.358	448	58.26	28	46.67	0.080	
 ≥ 63	274	42.75	44	47.83		321	41.74	32	53.33		
Operation plan	Yes	1734	49.64	300	52.36	0.228	2163	51.17	180	46.39	0.072	
Glasses plan	Yes	953	27.28	172	30.02	0.175	1172	27.73	126	32.47	0.047*	
Patch plan	Yes	1070	30.63	164	28.62	0.332	1225	28.98	117	30.15	0.626	
Observation plan	Yes	829	23.73	125	21.82	0.315	983	23.26	85	21.91	0.547	
Hx history, W4D worth 4 dot, SD standard deviation.

*p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

Gestational age

Patients were divided into two groups according to the gestational age: ≥ 37 weeks (G1) and < 37 weeks (G2). Among the 4066 patients included in this study, 3493 belonged to the G1 group, whereas 573 belonged to the G2 group. The proportion of male infants in the G1 and G2 groups was 47.1 and 46.2%, respectively. The proportion of mothers with strabismus in the G1 and G2 groups was 5.0 and 4.1%, respectively. The proportion of mothers with a history of surgery in the G1 and G2 groups was 4.9 and 3.6%, respectively. The proportion of fathers with strabismus in the G1 and G2 groups was 4.9 and 3.5%, respectively. The proportion of fathers with a surgical history in the G1 and G2 groups was 2.9 and 2.0%, respectively; however, none of these differences were statistically significant. The ratios of far/near hypertropia were 10.9%/6.9% and 10.5%/5.4% in the G1 and G2 groups, with no significant differences observed between the two groups. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the far/near control, far/near dominant eye, and the Worth 4 dot test. In the Titmus test, the proportion of infants with ≤ 80 s in the G1 and G2 groups was 55.4 and 47.8%, respectively, indicating statistical significance (p = 0.007). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the Randot test. Similarly, no significant difference was observed between the ratio of surgical to nonsurgical treatments in the two groups. Regarding refraction, there was no significant difference in the right eye; however, the percentage of myopia in the left eye was 42.5 and 40.4% in the G1 and G2 groups, respectively, and the percentage of myopia in G1 was significantly higher (p = 0.037). The distance/near deviation angles in the G1 group were 23.04 ± 8.39/24.46 ± 8.85 PD, respectively, and that in G2 group were 23.18 ± 7.90/23.82 ± 8.98 PD. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (Table 1).

No statistically significant differences were observed in either the univariate and the multivariate regression analyses, except for those corresponding to the refractive error, Titmus test results, and far dominant eye. After adjusting for birth weight in the univariate analysis, the risk of hyperopia was 1.4420 times higher in the preterm group compared to the full-term group (p = 0.016), but only in the left eye. The probability of attaining a Titmus result of ≥ 100 s was 1.3524 times higher in the preterm compared to the full-term group (p = 0.007). After adjusting for birth weight, the age of strabismus onset, parental strabismus, and parental strabismus surgery in the multivariate analysis, the number of cases in which the far dominant eye alternated was 0.69 times lower in the preterm compared to the full-term group (p = 0.046; Table 2).Table 2 Logistic regression analysis by gestational age.

Characteristics	Univariate	Multivariate	
OR	95% CI	p-value	OR	CI	p-value	
Weight (kg)	0.0718	(0.057, 0.090)	 < 0.0001**				
Onset age (years)	1.0153	(0.992, 1.039)	0.2016				
Mother

Strabismus

	No	Ref						
Yes	0.8145	(0.522, 1.271)	0.3661				
Mother

Operation hx

	No	Ref						
Yes	0.5895	(0.268, 1.299)	0.1897				
Father

Strabismus

	No	Ref						
Yes	0.7123	(0.444, 1.143)	0.1593				
Father

Operation hx

	No	Ref						
Yes	0.7011	(0.275, 1.788)	0.4571				
Refraction (Rt.)	Myopia	Ref						
Emmetropia	0.9490	(0.754, 1.195)	0.6564	1.5044	(0.976, 2.318)	0.0642	
Hyperopia	1.2043	(0.909, 1.596)	0.1959	1.4360	(0.828, 2.491)	0.1978	
Refraction (Lt.)	Myopia	Ref						
Emmetropia	1.0250	(0.805, 1.306)	0.8416	1.4747	(0.923, 2.355)	0.1040	
Hyperopia	1.4420	(1.070, 1.943)	0.0161*	1.3006	(0.713, 2.373)	0.3915	
Far hypertropia	No	Ref						
Yes	0.9610	(0.721, 1.282)	0.7864	0.7982	(0.458, 1.390)	0.4260	
Near hypertropia	No	Ref						
Yes	0.7684	(0.523, 1.129)	0.1795	0.5872	(0.272, 1.269)	0.1756	
Far prism diopter	1.0020	(0.992, 1.013)	0.7083	1.0027	(0.983, 1.023)	0.7912	
Near prism diopter	0.9918	(0.982, 1.002)	0.1091	0.9991	(0.981, 1.017)	0.9231	
Far control	Good	0.9383	(0.743, 1.185)	0.5931	1.2387	(0.798, 1.924)	0.3407	
Fair	Ref						
Poor	1.0171	(0.816, 1.268)	0.8805	1.1978	(0.796, 1.803)	0.3868	
Near control	Good	0.8962	(0.723, 1.111)	0.3183	1.1015	(0.733, 1.655)	0.6415	
Fair	Ref						
Poor	0.9785	(0.752, 1.274)	0.8719	1.1652	(0.725, 1.873)	0.5278	
Far dominant	One eye	Ref						
Alternative	0.9858	(0.815, 1.193)	0.8827	0.6941	(0.485, 0.993)	0.0455*	
Near dominant	One eye	Ref						
Alternative	1.0325	(0.843, 1.264)	0.7570	0.7420	(0.510, 1.080)	0.1190	
W4D	Normal	Ref						
Abnormal	1.0750	(0.869, 1.330)	0.5056	0.8136	(0.544, 1.216)	0.3147	
Titmus	 ≤ 80	Ref						
 ≥ 100	1.3524	(1.086, 1.684)	0.0069**	1.0588	(0.703, 1.594)	0.7842	
Randot	 ≤ 50	Ref						
 ≥ 63	1.2278	(0.792, 1.903)	0.3584	1.0941	(0.471, 2.544)	0.8346	
Operation plan	No	Ref						
Yes	1.1147	(0.934, 1.330)	0.2286	0.8539	(0.615, 1.186)	0.3461	
Glasses plan	No	Ref						
Yes	1.1432	(0.942, 1.387)	0.1753	1.1961	(0.833, 1.716)	0.3313	
Patch plan	No	Ref						
Yes	0.9080	(0.747, 1.103)	0.3319	1.2866	(0.907, 1.825)	0.1573	
Observation plan	No	Ref						
Yes	0.8966	(0.725, 1.110)	0.3154	1.2308	(0.833, 1.819)	0.2974	
Multivariate analysis: Adjusted birth week, onset age, presence/absence of strabismus in the parents, Parents’ surgical history.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, W4D worth 4 dot, hx history.

Birth weight

The patients were divided into two groups according to the birth weight: ≥ 2.5 kg (G1) and < 2.5 kg (G2), with a total cohort of 4615 (4227 were G1 and 388 G2). Regarding sex, the proportion of males in the G1 and G2 groups was 47.8 and 41.8%, respectively, indicating statistical significance (p = 0.022).

The proportion of mothers with strabismus was 4.8 and 4.7% in the G1 and G2 groups, respectively. The proportion of fathers with strabismus was 4.1 and 3.7% in the G1 and G2 groups, respectively; however, the difference was not statistically significant. The proportion of mothers who underwent strabismus surgery was 4.6 and 4.2% in the G1 and G2 groups, respectively; however, this minor difference was not statistically significant. The percentage of fathers who underwent strabismus surgery was 2.8 and 1.3% in the G1 and G2 groups, respectively; however, no significant differences were observed between the groups. The ratios of far/near hypertropia were 11.3%/7.1% and 10.8%/7.0% in the G1 and G2 groups, respectively, with no significant differences observed between the two groups. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the far/near control, far/near dominant eyes, or Worth 4 dot test. The proportion of infants with < 80 s in the Titmus test was 55.4 and 46.8% in the G1 and G2 groups, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference (p = 0.010). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the Randot test, ratio of surgery, occlusion, and follow-up between the surgical and nonsurgical treatments. The proportion of patients who required glasses was 27.7 and 32.5% in the G1 and G2 groups, respectively, indicating that the prescription rate of glasses was significantly higher in the G2 group (p = 0.047). Regarding refraction, no significant difference was observed in the right eye; however, the ratio of myopia in the left eye was significantly higher in G1 compared with that in G2 (43.9 vs. 39.6%; p = 0.029). The distance/near deviation angles in the G1 group were 23.13 ± 8.43/24.64 ± 9.00 PD, respectively, and those in G2 were 23.33 ± 8.50/23.67 ± 9.32 PD. No significant difference was observed in the distance angle of deviation; however, the G1 deviation angle at the near angle was statistically significantly larger (p = 0.043; Table 1).

In the logistic regression analysis, a statistically significant difference was identified in the univariable test for refractive error, near prism diopter, Titmus test results, and wearing glasses. In the multivariate regression analysis, distant control, Titmus, and patch treatment differed significantly (Table 3).Table 3 Logistic regression analysis by gestational age.

Characteristics	Univariate	Multivariate	
OR	95% CI	p-value	OR	CI	p-value	
Birth week	0.668	(0.642, 0.695)	 < 0.0001 **				
Onset age (years)	0.996	(0.967, 1.025)	0.7688				
Mother

Strabismus

	No	Ref						
Yes	0.975	(0.595, 1.598)	0.9205				
Mother

Surgical hx

	No	Ref						
Yes	0.905	(0.388, 2.112)	0.8181				
Father

Strabismus

	No	Ref						
Yes	0.913	(0.542, 1.538)	0.7319				
Father

Surgical hx

	No	Ref						
Yes	0.447	(0.108, 1.851)	0.2665				
Refraction (Rt.)	Myopia	Ref						
Emmetropia	0.970	(0.735, 1.281)	0.8318	0.925	(0.530, 1.613)	0.7838	
Hyperopia	1.366	(0.982, 1.899)	0.0637	0.998	(0.497, 2.003)	0.9954	
Refraction (Lt.)	Myopia	Ref						
Emmetropia	0.949	(0.714, 1.262)	0.7200	0.921	(0.514, 1.654)	0.7840	
Hyperopia	1.471	(1.046, 2.069)	0.0266*	1.106	(0.539, 2.267)	0.7834	
Far hypertropia	No	Ref						
Yes	0.957	(0.685, 1.336)	0.7945	1.207	(0.620, 2.348)	0.5795	
Near hypertropia	No	Ref						
Yes	0.979	(0.651, 1.473)	0.9190	0.728	(0.272, 1.950)	0.5275	
Far prism diopter	1.003	(0.991, 1.015)	0.6598	1.008	(0.983, 1.033)	0.5319	
Near prism diopter	0.988	(0.977, 1.000)	0.0424*	0.997	(0.975, 1.020)	0.8063	
Far control	good	0.785	(0.594, 1.039)	0.0908	0.706	(0.411, 1.214)	0.2084	
fair	Ref						
poor	0.927	(0.717, 1.197)	0.5598	0.488	(0.288, 0.829)	0.0079**	
Near control	good	0.837	(0.651, 1.076)	0.1645	0.718	(0.440, 1.171)	0.1843	
fair	Ref						
poor	0.921	(0.678, 1.249)	0.5951	0.605	(0.334, 1.097)	0.0978	
Far dominant	One eye	Ref						
Alternative	1.014	(0.810, 1.269)	0.9056	0.682	(0.439, 1.061)	0.0900	
Near dominant	One eye	Ref						
Alternative	1.036	(0.818, 1.311)	0.7714	0.770	(0.486, 1.219)	0.2646	
W4D	Normal	Ref						
Abnormal	1.146	(0.887, 1.482)	0.2974	1.212	(0.724, 2.029)	0.4653	
Titmus (s)	 ≤ 80	Ref						
 ≥ 100	1.412	(1.083, 1.842)	0.0108*	2.032	(1.182, 3.494)	0.0103*	
Randot	 ≤ 50	Ref						
 ≥ 63	1.595	(0.942, 2.702)	0.0825	1.445	(0.553, 3.778)	0.4523	
Operation plan	No	Ref						
Yes	0.826	(0.670, 1.017)	0.0719	0.889	(0.591, 1.337)	0.5718	
Glasses plan	No	Ref						
Yes	1.254	(1.003, 1.567)	0.0469*	1.172	(0.751, 1.830)	0.4845	
Patch plan	No	Ref						
Yes	1.058	(0.843, 1.327)	0.6260	0.557	(0.344, 0.902)	0.0173*	
Observation plan	No	Ref						
Yes	0.926	(0.720, 1.190)	0.5469	0.968	(0.588, 1.592)	0.8977	
Multivariate analysis: Adjusted birth week, onset age, presence/absence of strabismus in the parents, Parents’ surgical history.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

W4D worth 4 dot, hx history, CI confidence interval, OR, odds ratio.

After adjusting for gestational age in the univariate analysis, the risk of hyperopia was 1.4710 times higher in the LBW than in the NBW group (p = 0.027), especially in left eye refraction. Near prism diopter was 0.9880 times lower in the LBW compared to the NBW group (p = 0.042). Furthermore, Titmus result of ≥ 100 s in the LBW was 1.4123 times higher than that of the NBW (p = 0.011). And LBW glass plan is 1.2536 times more than NBW (p = 0.047).

After adjusting for gestational age, the age of strabismus onset, parental strabismus, and parental strabismus surgery in the multivariate analysis, the risk of “poor” far control in the LBW group was 0.4883 times lower than in the NBW group (p = 0.008). The frequency of a Titmus test result of ≥ 100 s in the LBW group was 2.032 times higher than that in the NBW group (p = 0.010). A patch plan was 0.557 times less frequent in the LBW group.

Discussion

Previous studies have reported that the prevalence of strabismus in LBW children (< 1500 g) is 12–36%, compared to 2–6% in the general population13,14,25–32.

Another study conducted by the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children examined the effects of gestational age alone after adjusting for birth weight and found that prematurity (gestational age of < 37 weeks) increased the risk of esotropia by 2.5-fold but did not affect the risk of exotropia13.

The KIEMS, initiated by the KAPOS, is a nationwide cross-sectional study investigating IXT in Korea24. Based on previous research, this study compared the variables of age at admission, sex, strabismus onset time, diagnosis period, dominant eye, degree of control, stereopsis, presence of refractive error, parental heredity, surgery, degree of refraction, and treatment options using gestational age and weight in patients with IXT.

The results of this study showed that the ratio of Titmus < 80 s in the full-term group was 1.352 times that of the preterm group. The Titmus test and the Randot test were used to measure stereoacuity at each hospital participating in this multicenter study. In general, the Titmus test was preferred, leading to a higher number of Titmus test results. Therefore, although in both cases the outcome suggested that stereoacuity was lower in premature infants, statistical significance was only achieved in the case of the Titmus test. Unification of the test used to evaluate stereoacuity is recommended for the future. Myopia was also higher in the full-term group in the left eye refraction test than that in the preterm group. Furthermore, multivariate regression analysis revealed that the number of cases in which the far dominant eye alternated was 0.69 times lower in the pre-term group compared to the full-term group. Due to the fact that this was a retrospective study, we only determined whether the IXT patients exhibited alternate fixation or not, but not which eye was the dominant one. Therefore, the analysis of the laterality was incomplete in future studies, additional information regarding stereoacuity will be obtained by determining the dominant eye, and its relationship with refraction and visual acuity.

The above findings reveal that preterm infants, based on gestational age or birth weight, tend to use one eye more than normal infants, and have poor stereoscopic vision. Some studies have shown that preterm infants requiring treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and/or neurological problems at 2.5 years are more likely to have slightly poorer stereoacuity. Preterm infants without these problems also had reduced stereoacuity compared with controls, possibly caused by undetected cerebral lesions in the early neonatal period, as cerebral problems are associated with poor stereoacuity33,34. Since this was a retrospective study and the questionnaire used to collect the data did not include a question about ROP, it was not possible to determine which of the participants had a history of ROP. However, if the ROP treatment can be assessed in future prospective studies, its potential relationship with stereoscopic vision problems may be evaluated. Determining whether these problems are caused by a developmental impairment in the brain is a potentially interesting avenue for future research. Previous papers have reported lower stereoacuity in individuals with strabismus, amblyopia, or anisometropia35,36. Hellgren et al.37 reported that preterm infants with very LBW had significantly worse stereoacuity than controls at adolescence. This is comparable to a study by Lindqvist et al.28, where 74% of LBW adolescents had normal stereoacuity compared with 83% of the controls. The findings of our study align with those of the study by Petursdottir et al.38, as preterm-born young adults were more likely to manifest strabismus than full-term-born controls. These individuals also had impaired stereoacuity, even after excluding individuals with heterotropia and neurological problems at 2.5 years38. These results suggested that stereopsis in preterm infants was worse compared to healthy infants, regardless of the presence of strabismus or neurological problems. This finding is consistent with the results of our thesis, where patients with IXT were corrected for strabismus. Thus, the presence or absence of a preterm birth must be evaluated when a patient with IXT visits a hospital. If the patient is a preterm baby, even after treatment, such as strabismus correction, stereopsis should be well managed to reduce the number of recurrences by using only one eye with additional occlusion treatment or supplementary treatments that can improve stereopsis. Since it could be hypothesized that the postoperative recurrence rate is high in premature infants due to lack of stereoacuity, future studies should focus on measuring this recurrence rate in patients with IXT. Additionally, in this multicenter study, the presence and timing of patches according to the angle of strabismus were determined at the first visit in patients with intermittent exotropia. As this was a retrospective study, the patch was determined separately from amblyopia, and therefore it did not reflect it. It would be be interesting to evaluate patch plans in relation to amblyopia in future prospective studies.

Our results also consistently showed that the incidence of hyperopia was higher in the left eye in preterm infants, with a statistically significant difference in the average age observed between the preterm and full-term groups using gestational age (p = 0.022). In terms of weight, no statistically significant difference in the average age was observed between the preterm and full-term groups using birth weight (p = 0.509). O’Connor et al.1 reported that ophthalmological defects are more common in preterm than full-term children, with lower visual acuity and increased risk of refractive errors, as well as ROP observed in the neonatal period. Although full-term infants demonstrated higher myopia rates in our study, including an increased risk of refractive errors, this was a retrospective study. The age at the initial visit was approximately 7 years old (range 0.3–70 years old), and the results may have been affected by the presence of other diseases not recorded in the study. Future studies must include patients with additional axial length and implement age restrictions.

Some additional results were obtained in addition to birth weight and gestational age. First, the proportion of women with LBW (< 2.5 kg) was high, indicating that women with IXT might be LBW. There was a trend towards a higher proportion of women among patients with intermittent exotropia, and although this was not statistically significant in terms of genetics, it suggests that strabismus and a history of strabismus surgery on the mother’s side rather than on the father’s side may have a slightly greater effect on intermittent exotropia. Prospective research on genetics is warranted in the future. If a genetic relationship is confirmed, it will contribute to explain the influence of strabismus and surgical history in the parents on the prevalence and prognosis of IXT. Collecting data on the incidence of IXT in the parents of children affected by IXT would also be important to shed light on this issue.

Although previous studies have reported that the prevalence of strabismus is higher in premature infants25–32, the probability of developing strabismus and the size of the angle of strabismus may be separate, and the near angle of strabismus can be approximately 1D less in premature infants. The number of patients who required glasses in the preterm group was 1.254 times that of the full-term group. This is similar to the findings of a previous report that revealed more severe visual problems in preterm children than in children born at full term, with lower visual acuity and an increased risk of refractive errors being observed in the neonatal period1. Furthermore, the operation plan was 49% in the full-term group versus 52% in the preterm group (although the difference was not statistically significant). This could be a reflection of poorer stereoacuity in the preterm group, leading to an early decision for surgery. However, the operation plan in the LBW group was lower than that in the NBW group (46% versus 51%, p-value: 0.07). In our study, the decision to perform surgery was based on objective criteria (degree, angle, and age of stereoacuity) as well as in the subjective judgment of the practitioner at the time of the first visit. Some differences in stereoacuity were identified in premature infants in terms of age and angle at the time of visit, among others. Since subjective judgment partially relies on these differences, this introduces a potential source of bias. In the future, it will be more appropriate to conduct research by prospectively determining not only the time of the first visit but also the extent of future surgeries.

Fusion control of IXT of the eyes was ‘normal’ rather than ‘poor’ and stereoacuity was worse in premature infants; however, Rosenbaum and Santiago39 reported that near stereoacuity did not differ significantly between patients with intermittent exotropia and normal controls. No correlation was observed with the degree of fusion control. As in the present study, although the babies were born preterm, the degree of strabismus was normal rather than poor. In addition, a higher risk of occlusion treatment was observed, consistent with our findings that premature babies have poor stereopsis and mainly use only one eye according to the number of weeks and weight.

Previous studies have mainly explained the high probability of strabismus in preterm babies. However, to the best of our knowledge, no large-scale studies on IXT have been conducted. Nevertheless, this study has some limitations. First, only patients with IXT were included in this study, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other types of strabismus. Second, the study relied on cross-sectional data, which limits its ability to draw conclusions regarding causality or temporality. Lastly, this study relied on self-reported data, which may have introduced bias or measurement errors. Despite these limitations, this study is the first to compare premature infants with healthy infants diagnosed with IXT. IXT is prevalent in most Asian countries, including Korea19–23. The survival rate of premature babies is increasing with the recent developments in technology and medical care; therefore, this study is of great significance. Gestational age and birth weight must be determined in patients with IXT. It is particularly important to examine stereopsis in preterm and LBW patients affected by IXT to ensure timely surgical planning and avoid potential recurrence after surgery.

Acknowledgements

KIEMS Writing Committee (listed in alphabetical order of last name): Seung-Hee Baek, Hee-Young Choi, Dong Gyu Choi, Dae Hee Kim, Dong Cheol Lee, Se-Youp Lee, Han Woong Lim, Hyun Taek Lim, Key Hwan Lim, Won Yeol Ryu, and Hee Kyung Yang. Names of Investigators (listed in the order of the number of patients enrolled by each investigator): Hee-young Choi (Pusan National University), Hyun Taek Lim (Asan Medical Center), Jae Ho Jung (Seoul National University), Seung-Hee Baek (Kim’s Eye Hospital), Mi Young Choi (Chungbuk National University), Jeong-Min Hwang (Seoul National University), Su Jin Kim (Pusan National University), Yeon-hee Lee (Chungnam National University), Sueng-Han Han (Yonsei University), Shin Hae Park (The Catholic University of Korea), Haeng-Jin Lee (Jeonbuk National University), Sook-Young Kim (Daegu Catholic University), Se-Youp Lee (Keimyung University), Hyo Jung Gye (Nune Eye Hospital), So Young Kim (Soonchunhyang University), Sun Young Shin (The Catholic University of Korea), Jihyun Park (Nune Eye Hospital), Won Yeol Ryu (Dong-A University), Hye Sung Park (Siloam Eye Hospital), Dae Hee Kim (Kim’s Eye Hospital), Hae Jung Paik (Gachon University), Dong Gyu Choi (Hallym University), Joo Yeon Lee (Hallym University), Hee Kyung Yang (Seoul National University), Shin Yeop Oh (Sungkyunkwan University), Soo Jung Lee (Inje University), Seung Ah Chung (Ajou University), Jin Choi (Inje University), Sei Yeul Oh (Sungkyunkwan University), Mirae Kim (Nune Eye Hospital), Young-Woo Suh (Korea University), Nam Yeo Kang (The Catholic University of Korea), Hae Ri Yum (The Catholic University of Korea), Sun A Kim (Sungmo Eye Hospital), Hyuna Kim (Soonchunhyang University), Jinu Han (Yonsei University), Yoonae A. Cho (Nune Eye Hospital), Hyunkyung Kim (Hangil Eye Hospital), Helen Lew (CHA University), Dong Cheol Lee (Keimyung University), Sang Hoon Rah (Yonsei University), Yung-Ju Yoo (Kangwon National University), Key Hwan Lim (Ewha Womans University), Hyosook Ahn (Asan Medical Center), Ungsoo S. Kim (Kim’s Eye Hospital), Jung Ho Lee (Daegu Premier Eye Center), Hokyung Choung (Seoul National University), Seong-Joon Kim (Seoul National University), Hyeshin Jeon (Pusan National University), Hyun Jin Shin (Konkuk University), So Young Han (Sungkyunkwan University), Hwan Heo (Chonnam National University), Soochul Park (Saevit Eye Hospital), Songhee Park (Soonchunhyang University), Sung Eun Kyung (Magok Dream Light Eye Clinic), Changzoo Kim (Kosin University), Kyung-Ah Park (Sungkyunkwan University), Eun Hye Jung (Eulji University), Eun Hee Hong (Hanyang University), Han Woong Lim (Hanyang University), Daye Choi (Kim’s Eye Hospital), Youn Joo Choi (Hallym University), Nam Ju Moon (Chung Ang University), In Jeong Lyu (Korea Cancer Center Hospital), and Soon Young Cho (Dongguk University).

Author contributions

Dongcheol Lee: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Data curation, Writing- Original draft preparation, Visualization, Investigation, Reviewing and Editing. Jihyun Park: Data curation. Hye Sung Park: Data curation. Hae Jung Paik: Data curation. Joo Yeon Lee: Data curation. Shin Yeop Oh: Data curation. Soo Jung Lee: Data curation. Se Youp Lee: Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision.

Funding

The KIEMS study was initiated and financially supported by KAPOS. The sponsor or funding organization participated in data collection and managed the data for the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. O’Connor AR Wilson CM Fielder AR Ophthalmological problems associated with preterm birth Eye (London) 2007 21 1254 1260 10.1038/sj.eye.6702838
O’Connor, A. R., Wilson, C. M. & Fielder, A. R. Ophthalmological problems associated with preterm birth. Eye (London) 21, 1254–1260. 10.1038/sj.eye.6702838 (2007).
2. Cats BP Tan KE Prematures with and without regressed retinopathy of prematurity: Comparison of long-term (6–10 years) ophthalmological morbidity J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 1989 26 271 275 10.3928/0191-3913-19891101-05 2621545
Cats, B. P. & Tan, K. E. Prematures with and without regressed retinopathy of prematurity: Comparison of long-term (6–10 years) ophthalmological morbidity. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 26, 271–275. 10.3928/0191-3913-19891101-05 (1989).2621545
3. VanderVeen DK Prevalence and course of strabismus in the first year of life for infants with prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity: Findings from the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity study Arch. Ophthalmol. 2006 124 766 773 10.1001/archopht.124.6.766 16769828
VanderVeen, D. K. et al. Prevalence and course of strabismus in the first year of life for infants with prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity: Findings from the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity study. Arch. Ophthalmol. 124, 766–773. 10.1001/archopht.124.6.766 (2006).16769828
4. VanderVeen DK Prevalence and course of strabismus through age 6 years in participants of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial J. AAPOS 2011 15 536 540 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.07.017 22153396
VanderVeen, D. K. et al. Prevalence and course of strabismus through age 6 years in participants of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial. J. AAPOS 15, 536–540. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.07.017 (2011).22153396
5. Gallo JE Lennerstrand G A population-based study of ocular abnormalities in premature children aged 5 to 10 years Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1991 111 539 547 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73695-5 2021159
Gallo, J. E. & Lennerstrand, G. A population-based study of ocular abnormalities in premature children aged 5 to 10 years. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 111, 539–547. 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73695-5 (1991).2021159
6. Holmström G Rydberg A Larsson E Prevalence and development of strabismus in 10 year-old premature children: A population-based study J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2006 43 346 352 10.3928/01913913-20061101-04 17162971
Holmström, G., Rydberg, A. & Larsson, E. Prevalence and development of strabismus in 10 year-old premature children: A population-based study. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 43, 346–352. 10.3928/01913913-20061101-04 (2006).17162971
7. Laws D Retinopathy of prematurity: A prospective study Review at six months Eye (London) 1992 6 477 483 10.1038/eye.1992.101
Laws, D. et al. Retinopathy of prematurity: A prospective study Review at six months. Eye (London) 6, 477–483. 10.1038/eye.1992.101 (1992).
8. Schalij-Delfos NE de Graaf ME Treffers WF Engel J Cats BP Long term follow up of premature infants: Detection of strabismus, amblyopia, and refractive errors Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2000 84 963 967 10.1136/bjo.84.9.963 10966945
Schalij-Delfos, N. E., de Graaf, M. E., Treffers, W. F., Engel, J. & Cats, B. P. Long term follow up of premature infants: Detection of strabismus, amblyopia, and refractive errors. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 84, 963–967. 10.1136/bjo.84.9.963 (2000).10966945
9. O’Connor AR Strabismus in children of birth weight less than 1701 g Arch. Ophthalmol. 2002 120 767 773 10.1001/archopht.120.6.767 12049582
O’Connor, A. R. et al. Strabismus in children of birth weight less than 1701 g. Arch. Ophthalmol. 120, 767–773. 10.1001/archopht.120.6.767 (2002).12049582
10. Robaei D Factors associated with childhood strabismus: Findings from a population-based study Ophthalmology 2006 113 1146 1153 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.019 16675019
Robaei, D. et al. Factors associated with childhood strabismus: Findings from a population-based study. Ophthalmology 113, 1146–1153. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.019 (2006).16675019
11. Cotter SA Risk factors associated with childhood strabismus: The multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease and Baltimore pediatric eye disease studies Ophthalmology 2011 118 2251 2261 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.032 21856012
Cotter, S. A. et al. Risk factors associated with childhood strabismus: The multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease and Baltimore pediatric eye disease studies. Ophthalmology 118, 2251–2261. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.032 (2011).21856012
12. Torp-Pedersen T Perinatal risk factors for strabismus Int. J. Epidemiol. 2010 39 1229 1239 10.1093/ije/dyq092 20525734
Torp-Pedersen, T. et al. Perinatal risk factors for strabismus. Int. J. Epidemiol. 39, 1229–1239. 10.1093/ije/dyq092 (2010).20525734
13. Williams C Prevalence and risk factors for common vision problems in children: Data from the ALSPAC study Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008 92 959 964 10.1136/bjo.2007.134700 18480306
Williams, C. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for common vision problems in children: Data from the ALSPAC study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 92, 959–964. 10.1136/bjo.2007.134700 (2008).18480306
14. Chew E Risk factors for esotropia and exotropia Arch. Ophthalmol. 1994 112 1349 1355 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090220099030 7945039
Chew, E. et al. Risk factors for esotropia and exotropia. Arch. Ophthalmol. 112, 1349–1355. 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090220099030 (1994).7945039
15. Gulati S Effect of gestational age and birth weight on the risk of strabismus among premature infants JAMA Pediatr. 2014 168 850 856 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.946 25048624
Gulati, S. et al. Effect of gestational age and birth weight on the risk of strabismus among premature infants. JAMA Pediatr. 168, 850–856. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.946 (2014).25048624
16. Cumberland PM Pathai S Rahi JS Millennium Cohort Study Child Health Group Prevalence of eye disease in early childhood and associated factors: Findings from the millennium cohort study Ophthalmology 2010 117 2184 90.e1 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.004 20561688
Cumberland, P. M., Pathai, S., Rahi, J. S., Millennium Cohort Study Child Health Group. Prevalence of eye disease in early childhood and associated factors: Findings from the millennium cohort study. Ophthalmology 117, 2184–90.e1. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.004 (2010).20561688
17. Spencer R Long-term visual outcomes in extremely low-birth-weight children. An American Ophthalmological Society thesis Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 2006 104 493 516 17471358
Spencer, R. Long-term visual outcomes in extremely low-birth-weight children. An American Ophthalmological Society thesis. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 104, 493–516 (2006).17471358
18. Zin A The increasing problem of retinopathy of prematurity Community Eye Health 2001 14 58 59 17491934
Zin, A. The increasing problem of retinopathy of prematurity. Community Eye Health 14, 58–59 (2001).17491934
19. Yoon KC Prevalence of eye diseases in South Korea: Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination survey 2008–2009 Korean J. Ophthalmol. 2011 25 421 433 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.6.421 22131780
Yoon, K. C. et al. Prevalence of eye diseases in South Korea: Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination survey 2008–2009. Korean J. Ophthalmol. 25, 421–433. 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.6.421 (2011).22131780
20. Chia A Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in young Singaporean Chinese children Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010 51 3411 3417 10.1167/iovs.09-4461 20207979
Chia, A. et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in young Singaporean Chinese children. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51, 3411–3417. 10.1167/iovs.09-4461 (2010).20207979
21. Matsuo T Matsuo C The prevalence of strabismus and amblyopia in Japanese elementary school children Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005 12 31 36 10.1080/09286580490907805 15848918
Matsuo, T. & Matsuo, C. The prevalence of strabismus and amblyopia in Japanese elementary school children. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 12, 31–36. 10.1080/09286580490907805 (2005).15848918
22. Goseki T Ishikawa H The prevalence and types of strabismus, and average of stereopsis in Japanese adults Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2017 61 280 285 10.1007/s10384-017-0505-1 28229342
Goseki, T. & Ishikawa, H. The prevalence and types of strabismus, and average of stereopsis in Japanese adults. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 61, 280–285. 10.1007/s10384-017-0505-1 (2017).28229342
23. Pan CW Epidemiology of intermittent exotropia in preschool children in China Optom. Vis. Sci. 2016 93 57 62 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000754 26583796
Pan, C. W. et al. Epidemiology of intermittent exotropia in preschool children in China. Optom. Vis. Sci. 93, 57–62. 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000754 (2016).26583796
24. Kim DH An overview of the Korean intermittent exotropia multicenter study by the Korean Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Korean J. Ophthalmol. 2021 35 355 359 10.3341/kjo.2021.0097 34237205
Kim, D. H. et al. An overview of the Korean intermittent exotropia multicenter study by the Korean Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Korean J. Ophthalmol. 35, 355–359. 10.3341/kjo.2021.0097 (2021).34237205
25. Holmström G el Azazi M Kugelberg U Ophthalmological follow up of preterm infants: A population based, prospective study of visual acuity and strabismus Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1999 83 143 150 10.1136/bjo.83.2.143 10396188
Holmström, G., el Azazi, M. & Kugelberg, U. Ophthalmological follow up of preterm infants: A population based, prospective study of visual acuity and strabismus. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 83, 143–150. 10.1136/bjo.83.2.143 (1999).10396188
26. Keith CG Kitchen WH Ocular morbidity in infants of very low birth weight Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1983 67 302 305 10.1136/bjo.67.5.302 6687689
Keith, C. G. & Kitchen, W. H. Ocular morbidity in infants of very low birth weight. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 67, 302–305. 10.1136/bjo.67.5.302 (1983).6687689
27. Bremer DL Strabismus in premature infants in the first year of life. Cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity Cooperative Group Arch. Ophthalmol. 1998 116 329 333 10.1001/archopht.116.3.329 9514486
Bremer, D. L. et al. Strabismus in premature infants in the first year of life. Cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity Cooperative Group. Arch. Ophthalmol. 116, 329–333. 10.1001/archopht.116.3.329 (1998).9514486
28. Lindqvist S Vik T Indredavik MS Skranes J Brubakk AM Eye movements and binocular function in low birthweight teenagers Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 86 265 274 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01133.x 18221495
Lindqvist, S., Vik, T., Indredavik, M. S., Skranes, J. & Brubakk, A. M. Eye movements and binocular function in low birthweight teenagers. Acta Ophthalmol. 86, 265–274. 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01133.x (2008).18221495
29. Graham PA Epidemiology of strabismus Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1974 58 224 231 10.1136/bjo.58.3.224 4834596
Graham, P. A. Epidemiology of strabismus. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 58, 224–231. 10.1136/bjo.58.3.224 (1974).4834596
30. Squint NW The frequency of onset at different ages, and the incidence of some associated defects in a Swedish population Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh) 1964 42 1015 1037 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1964.tb03667.x 14247244
Squint, N. W. The frequency of onset at different ages, and the incidence of some associated defects in a Swedish population. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh) 42, 1015–1037 (1964).14247244
31. Frandsen AD Some results from a clinical-statistical survey on strabismus among Copenhagen children Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh) 1958 36 488 498 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1958.tb00825.x 13594354
Frandsen, A. D. Some results from a clinical-statistical survey on strabismus among Copenhagen children. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh) 36, 488–498. 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1958.tb00825.x (1958).13594354
32. McNeil NL Patterns on visual defects in children Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1955 39 688 701 10.1136/bjo.39.11.688 13269697
McNeil, N. L. Patterns on visual defects in children. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 39, 688–701. 10.1136/bjo.39.11.688 (1955).13269697
33. Schaadt AK Perceptual relearning of binocular fusion and stereoacuity after brain injury Neurorehabilit. Neural Repair 2014 28 462 471 10.1177/1545968313516870
Schaadt, A. K. et al. Perceptual relearning of binocular fusion and stereoacuity after brain injury. Neurorehabilit. Neural Repair 28, 462–471. 10.1177/1545968313516870 (2014).
34. Kozeis N Visual function and visual perception in cerebral palsied children Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2007 27 44 53 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00413.x 17239189
Kozeis, N. et al. Visual function and visual perception in cerebral palsied children. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 27, 44–53. 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00413.x (2007).17239189
35. Guo DD Stereoacuity and related factors: The Shandong Children Eye Study PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0157829 10.1371/journal.pone.0157829 27391873
Guo, D. D. et al. Stereoacuity and related factors: The Shandong Children Eye Study. PLoS ONE 11, e0157829. 10.1371/journal.pone.0157829 (2016).27391873
36. Read JC Stereo vision and strabismus Eye (London) 2015 29 214 224 10.1038/eye.2014.279
Read, J. C. Stereo vision and strabismus. Eye (London) 29, 214–224. 10.1038/eye.2014.279 (2015).
37. Hellgren K Aring E Jacobson L Ygge J Martin L Visuospatial skills, ocular alignment, and magnetic resonance imaging findings in very low birth weight adolescents J. AAPOS 2009 13 273 279 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.11.008 19285889
Hellgren, K., Aring, E., Jacobson, L., Ygge, J. & Martin, L. Visuospatial skills, ocular alignment, and magnetic resonance imaging findings in very low birth weight adolescents. J. AAPOS 13, 273–279. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.11.008 (2009).19285889
38. Pétursdóttir D Holmström G Larsson E Strabismus, stereoacuity, accommodation and convergence in young adults born premature and screened for retinopathy of prematurity Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 100 e791 e797 10.1111/aos.14987 34313013
Pétursdóttir, D., Holmström, G. & Larsson, E. Strabismus, stereoacuity, accommodation and convergence in young adults born premature and screened for retinopathy of prematurity. Acta Ophthalmol. 100, e791–e797. 10.1111/aos.14987 (2022).34313013
39. Rosenbaum AL Santiago AP Clinical Strabismus Management: Principles and Surgical Techniques 1999 Saunders
Rosenbaum, A. L. & Santiago, A. P. Clinical Strabismus Management: Principles and Surgical Techniques (Saunders, 1999).
