
==== Front
Crit Care Explor
Crit Care Explor
CC9
Critical Care Explorations
2639-8028
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Hagerstown, MD

CCE-D-24-00379
00013
10.1097/CCE.0000000000001158
3
Erratum
Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study: Erratum
17 9 2024
9 2024
17 9 2024
6 9 e1158Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

OPEN-ACCESSTRUE
==== Body
pmcIn the article on page e1130 of the August 2024 compendium, the wrong abstract was listed.

It should have been as follows:

Importance: Invasive procedures are commonly performed during cardiac arrest when the etiology is suspected to be cardiac tamponade or tension pneumothorax, but procedures have not been comprehensively investigated for nontraumatic in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Objectives: This study evaluated patients who received an invasive procedure (pericardiocentesis [PC]), chest tube insertion [CTI], and/or needle thoracostomy [NT]) during nontraumatic in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Design, Setting, Participants: This analysis leverages 18 years of data from the multicenter prospectively collected Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry and includes adults with nontraumatic in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient characteristics, trends over time, and outcomes were evaluated.

Results: Of the 427,965 patients included with IHCA, 7,609 (1.8%) had a procedure performed (2,778 [36.5%] with PC, 3,952 [51.9%] with CTI, and 1,653 [21.7%] with NT). The proportion of arrests that received a procedure decreased across the study period (215 [2.7%] in 2001 to 453 [1.3%] in 2019), driven by a decrease in the proportion of PC (125 [1.6%] in 2001 to 111 [0.3%] in 2019). Patients who received any procedure had an 8% lower adjusted odds for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (3,233 [42.5%] vs. 261,040 [62.1%], aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90–0.93) and a 2% lower adjusted odds of survival to discharge (1,043 [13.7%] vs. 91,863 [21.9%], aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–0.98). Results for ROSC and survival were mixed across the individual procedures examined. Those who had a procedure performed had neurologically favorable survival close to that predicted by validated scoring systems.

Conclusions and Relevance: In this novel description of patients who received an invasive procedure during nontraumatic IHCA, those receiving procedures had slightly worse adjusted odds of ROSC and survival to discharge, although outcomes varied across individual procedures. Identifying reversible causes of cardiac arrest, including those that require an invasive procedure, is a critical component of an IHCA resuscitation event, and continued research is needed to identify when a procedure is needed, and how best to implement that care.
==== Refs
REFERENCE

Andrea L Rahmanian M Bangar M : Pericardiocentesis, chest tube insertion, and needle thoracostomy during resuscitation of nontraumatic adult in-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care Explor 2024; 6 :e1130 39132988
