
==== Front
Jt Dis Relat Surg
Jt Dis Relat Surg
Joint Diseases and Related Surgery
2687-4784
2687-4792
Bayçınar Medical Publishing

10.52312/jdrs.2024.1720
39189580
Original Article
Characterization and mapping of upper extremity fractures in children by a tertiary hospital quarantine and post-quarantine period
Çelik Malik http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3696-9644
1
Kantarcı Mirachan http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0119-4623
2
Sapmaz İbrahim Esad http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6135-5532
1
Öztürk Vedat http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2412-9725
1
Baca Emre http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8882-1943
1
Duramaz Altuğ http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-2079
1
1 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
2 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Training and Research Hospital, Rize, Türkiye
Malik Çelik, MD. Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniği, 34147 Bakırköy, İstanbul, Türkiye. drmalikcelik@hotmail.com.
9 2024
08 7 2024
35 3 692698
05 3 2024
13 4 2024
Copyright © 2024, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation
2024
Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Objectives

This study aims to categorize and map the incidence and patterns of upper extremity fractures in children during and after novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) quarantine and to identify changes in the demographic characteristics and mechanisms of these fractures.

Patients and methods

Between April 2020 and April 2022, a total of 3,549 upper extremity fractures occurring in 1,028 pediatric patients (682 males, 346 females; median age: 7 years; range, 0 to 18 years) were retrospectively analyzed. Those who presented between the dates of April 1st, 2020 and April 1st, 2021 (quarantine) were included in Group 1, whereas those who presented between April 1st, 2021 and April 2nd, 2022 (post-quarantine) were included in Group 2. The fracture map also showed the fracture density and location.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in terms of age range between Groups 1 and 2 (p<0.01). The 6-11 age range was significantly higher in Group 1, and the 12-18 age range was significantly higher in Group 2.

Conclusion

Reducing physical activity during quarantine reduces fractures, particularly in adolescents. The removal of restrictions increases fractures in children in this age range. These findings highlight the importance of considering age ranges and physical activity levels while planning safety measures to prevent injuries in children.

Children
COVID-19
fracture heat mapping
quarantine
upper extremity fracture.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) classified novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an epidemic on March 11th, 2020.[1] Similar to other countries worldwide, our nation has implemented certain steps. Examples of measures include practices such as social isolation, the utilization of masks in public spaces, the closure of schools, and the suspension of sporting activities and events. Changes in lifestyles have an impact on children. It is well known that the incidence of fractures is significantly high in individuals under the age of 18, with more than half of these fractures occurring in the upper extremities.[2,3]

During the quarantine and pre-quarantine phases in children, several studies assessed pediatric injuries, particularly fractures.[4-9] The majority of them were created by utilizing short intervals. Furthermore, it failed to provide information regarding the period post-lockdown. In the present study, we, therefore, aimed to evaluate the upper extremity fractures in pediatric patients during the interval following the post-quarantine measures and to assess fractures of the upper extremities in children whose daily lifestyles, sports activities, and social areas changed throughout the quarantine and post-quarantine periods.

Patients and Methods

This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted at Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology between April 2020 and April 2022. Pediatric patients who presented to our center with fractures of the upper extremities during the COVID-19 quarantine (Group 1) and patients who presented post-quarantine (Group 2) at the same institution were included. Those who presented between the dates of April 1st, 2020 and April 1st, 2021 were included in Group 1, whereas those who presented between April 1st, 2021 and April 2nd, 2022 were included in Group 2. Patients aged above 18 years and who did not have the fractures of upper extremities and those with missing data were excluded from the study. Finally, a total of 3,549 fractures occurring in 1,028 patients (682 males, 346 females; median age: 7 years; range, 0 to 18 years) were included in the study (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Study flowchart.

Patient demographics included age (0-2 years old, 2-5 years old, 6-11 years old, 12-18 years old),[10] sex, fracture mechanism, type, re-reduction, complication, fracture region, and treatment.

Heat mapping

A technique that involves the identification and classification of fractures that occur within the skeletal system is referred to as bone fracture mapping. This method is frequently utilized in the field of medical imaging to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of fractures.[11,12] The pre-designed upper extremity model (including the clavicle, humerus, radius-ulna, carpal, metacarpal, and phalanx) was used to construct the fracture line density map, also known as heat mapping. This was done by employing Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Inc., CA, USA). A blue-red coloration was assigned to it in accordance with the rarity-frequency status (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Heat map of pediatric upper extremity fractures (post-quarantine and quarantine periods).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the NCSS version 2022 (NCSS LLC, Kaysville, UT, USA). Descriptive data were expressed in median (min-max) or number and frequency, where applicable. The Pearson chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and Fisher Freeman-Halton test were used to compare qualitative data. The fracture heat map illustrated the fracture location, while the frequency spectra illustrated the fracture line majorities. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic data regarding the entire cohort and a comparison of the quarantine and post-quarantine periods are presented in Table I. There were statistically significant differences in age between Groups 1 and 2 (p=0.001; p<0.01). The 6-11 age range was found to be significantly higher in Group 1, and the 12-18 age range was significantly higher in Group 2. There were no significant differences in sex (p>0.05) between the groups.

Table 1 Demographics of pediatric upper extremity fracture patients in post-quarantine and quarantine periods

 	Post-quarantine	Quarantine	Total	p*	
n	%	n	%	n	%	
Age (year)	54	10.4	57	11.3	111	10.9	0.001**	
0-2	187	36.2	187	36.5	374	36.3	 	
2-5	183	35.4	133	26.0	316	30.7	 	
6-11	93	18.0	134	26.2	227	22.1	 	
12-18	351	67.9	331	64.8	682	66.4	 	
Sex	 	 	 	 	 	 	0.301	
Male	351	67.9	331	64.8	682	66.4	 	
Female	166	32.1	180	35.2	346	33.6	 	
* Pearson chi-square test; ** p<0,01.	

The descriptive characteristics of pediatric upper extremity fracture patients in Groups 1 and 2 are presented in Table II. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of the trauma mechanism and fracture type (p>0.5). In addition, there was a higher prevalence of home/low-energy falls and close-type fractures in both groups. When the re-reduction rates compared in the subgroups, the need for re-reduction was frequently observed in distal radius ulna fractures. There was no statistically significant difference regarding complications or reductions between the groups and fracture subgroups (p>0.05).

Table 2 Descriptive characteristics of pediatric upper extremity fracture patients in post-quarantine and quarantine period

 	Post-quarantine period	Quarantine period	Total	 	
 	n	%	n	%	n	%	p	
Mechanism of fracture	 	 	 	 	 	 	1.000*	
Home/low-energy fall	515	96.6	510	99.8	1025	99.7	 	
High-energy fall	1	0.2	0	0.0	1	0.1	 	
Direct blow	1	0.2	1	0.2	2	0.2	 	
Fracture type	 	 	 	 	 	 	0.545†	
Close	513	99.2	505	98.8	1018	99.0	 	
Open	4	0.8	6	1.2	10	1.0	 	
Re-reduction	 	 	 	 	 	 	0.124‡	
No	503	97.3	488	95.5	991	96.4	 	
Yes	14	2.7	23	4.5	37	3.6	 	
Complication	 	 	 	 	 	 	0.471*	
No	508	98.3	506	99.0	1014	 	 	
Vascular	6	1.2	2	0.4	8	 	 	
Neurological	3	0.6	2	0.4	5	 	 	
Tendon	0	0.0	1	0.2	1	 	 	
Fracture region	 	 	 	 	 	 	0.312‡	
Clavicula	53	10.3	38	7.4	91	8.9	 	
1/3 medial	3	0.6	1	0.2	4	0.4	 	
Shaft	48	9.3	34	6.6	81	7.9	 	
1/3 lateral	2	0.4	3	0.6	5	5	 	
Humerus	120	23.2	114	22.5	234	22.9	 	
1/3 proximal	32	6.2	26	5.1	58	5.7	 	
Shaft	4	0.7	6	1.2	10	1	 	
Supracondylar	84	16.3	82	16.2	166	16.2	 	
Radius-ulna	249	48.2	263	51.5	512	49.8	 	
1/3 proximal	38	7.3	41	8.1	79	7.7	 	
Shaft	59	11.5	64	12.5	123	11.9	 	
1/3 distal	152	29.4	158	30.9	310	30.2	 	
Carpal-metacarpal	39	7.5	30	5.9	69	6.7	 	
Phalanx	56	10.8	65	12.7	121	11.8	 	
Treatment	 	 	 	 	 	 	a0.871	
Cast-brace	478	92.6	472	92.4	951	92.5	 	
Surgery	38	7.4	39	7.6	77	7.5	 	
* Fisher Freeman-Halton test; † Fisher exact test; ‡ Pearson chi-square test.	

The most common fracture regions were the distal part of the radius-ulna, supracondylar humerus fracture, and radius-ulna shaft (29.4%, 16.3%, and 11.5%, respectively). Although clavicula, humerus and carpal-metacarpal fractures were higher in Group 2, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. There were no significant differences in the treatment. However, the patients were treated more with castbrace in both groups.

Discussion

As in the rest of the world, the restrictions imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Türkiye have brought about important changes in many aspects of life. The narrowing of the living space, the decrease in mobilization, and a more sedentary lifestyle naturally led to a decrease in trauma exposure. After the end of the period of combating the pandemic, a mobilized and active period began with the removal of all social restrictions. All these changes have enabled individuals to be more active and to return to their profession, social, and sports activities.

The main finding of our study was that the frequency of fractures in the 6-11 age group was significantly higher in the quarantine period compared to the post-quarantine period. In the postquarantine period, the frequency of fractures was more common in the 12-18 age group. Turgut et al.[8] reached a similar conclusion in their study. The incidence of fractures differs between age groups, as schools are closed and children are prevented from going out after the measures and restriction decisions taken during the quarantine period.[13] When the decrease in sports activities and the children's going out was limited, the frequency of trauma decreased and the possible fractures decreased. No significant difference was observed in fracture rates in the preschool age group.[14] It was thought that the fact that children in this age group continued their activities at home was effective. We observed that the frequency of fractures increased in the adolescent age group with the removal of restrictions (post-quarantine period). Therefore, trauma exposure was found to be relatively less in school-age children compare to do adolescents due to prolonged restrictions in sport activities, games, and social activities for those children.

Johnson et al.[5] and Bram et al.[9] did not observe a significant difference in sex distribution during quarantine and before the quarantine period. Similarly, no significant difference was observed in our study regarding sex distribution during and after the quarantine periods. More trauma injuries were observed in boys compared to girls in the post-quarantine and quarantine periods, consistent with the literature.[15] Daily activities, games, and sports for men and women vary according to age groups. Although there are different opinions about the reasons for this, there is no consensus in the literature. There are differences between sexes in many areas, such as social environment, lifestyle, nutrition style, and participation in sports activities, which can lead to these conditions.[16,17] Although it is thought that boys take risks and increase in activity compared to girls, we do not have data to prove this in our study.

Gornick et al.[18] investigated the mechanism of injury in children in a recent study they published and stated that many of the cases occurred after low-energy traumas. In both periods, home or low-energy falls were observed more frequently in the present study. There is a decrease in high-energy traumas, since all age groups are restricted from going out during the quarantine period. Presentations with fractures in the quarantine period and post-quarantine period were mostly caused by low-energy injuries in our study. This finding suggests that the life habits and protective measures gained during the quarantine period may have protected patients against high-energy trauma.

Although vascular injuries were higher in the post-quarantine period, no statistically significant difference was observed. However, the rate of reduction was observed to increase during the quarantine period.

Similar to many studies in the literature,[8,14,15] the most common fracture localization was radius ulna distal region fractures (30.2%) in our study. It is thought that there is a decrease in the frequency of fractures in adolescence due to the closure of schools, restrictions on going out, and a decrease in contact sports. However, in our study, these were followed by supracondylar humerus fractures (16.3%) and radius shaft fractures (11.5%), respectively. Although there are publications in the literature[19,20] showing that finger and clavicle fractures are the most common localizations after radius ulna distal fractures, there are also publications that give similar results to our study.

While 472 (92.2%) of 512 patients admitted during the quarantine period were followed conservatively, this rate was 92.6% (478/516) in the post-quarantine period. In this respect, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. Similarly, Bram et al.,[9] in their study, observed no significant difference in the rate of surgical or conservative follow-up during and before the quarantine. On the other hand, Turgut et al.[8] reported that the surgical/conservative ratio increased during the quarantine period. Therefore, they cited the fact that families were hesitant to apply to the hospital for minor traumas due to the fear of transmission of the COVID-19 infection and the relative increase in cases requiring surgery among admissions. During the quarantine period, the rotation of health teams and their assignments in COVID-19 services increased. In addition, it is thought that the frequency of surgery performed in central hospitals may increase during this period due to the increase in patient referrals from peripheral hospitals to central hospitals. In our study, surgical and conservative rates were found to be statistically similar in the quarantine and post-quarantine periods. We believe that most fractures result from straightforward injuries, which is the reason for the similar surgical and conservative rates.

With the return of life to its normal course after the quarantine, the risk of exposure to trauma has increased. This has led to a significant increase in orthopedic trauma cases. Although the opening of schools, parks, and living spaces, and the re-release of social activities, there has been no significant increase in the diversity of cases in the pediatric age group.

Using an upper extremity model, we calculated the patients' fracture densities in our investigation. As shown in Figure 2, we created a heat map to visually represent the locations of the fracture sites. The heat map has a color gradient ranging from blue to red. We believe that this recently acclaimed strategy, which has garnered attention in the literature,[21-23] would be beneficial for clinicians in both diagnosing and treating patients.

The main strengths of this study are that it includes a simultaneous one-year quarantine and post-quarantine period. In addition, the heat mapping of the fracture locations of the patients who came in both periods still, it has some limitations that should be acknowledged. The study has a single-center and retrospective design. Patient data were scanned retrospectively. Further multi-center, larger-scale, prospective studies may provide more reliable conclusions on this subject.

In conclusion, changing activity areas in pediatric patients also affect fracture rates and regions. Additionally, it is of utmost importance to consider the age and developmental stage of pediatric patients while implementing safety measures. Younger children may require more supervision and protective measures, whereas older children may benefit from education on safe play and proper use of equipment. By addressing these factors, we can further decrease the likelihood of fractures in pediatric patients.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was approved by the Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital Ethics Committee (date: 20.12.2021, no: 2021-24-08). The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Patient Consent for Publication: A written informedconsent was obtained from the parents and/or legal guardiansof the patients.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Author Contributions: Idea, study design, figures: M.Ç.; Data collection, materials: M.K., İ.E.S.; Control/supervision: V.Ö.; Analysis and/or interpretation: M.Ç., E.B.; Literature review, critical review: M.Ç., A.B., E.B.

Citation: Çelik M, Kantarcı M, Sapmaz İE, Öztürk V, Baca E, Duramaz A. Characterization and mapping of upper extremity fractures in children by a tertiary hospital quarantine and postquarantine period. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2024;35(3):692-698. Doi: 10.52312/ jdrs.2024.1720.
==== Refs
1 Atik OŞ Corticosteroid-induced avascular necrosis of the femoral head is increased in the treatment of COVID-19 pandemic Jt Dis Relat Surg 2023 34 757 758 10.52312/jdrs.2023.57917 37750285
2 Faulkner RA Davison KS Bailey DA Mirwald RL BaxterJones AD Size-corrected BMD decreases during peak linear growth: Implications for fracture incidence during adolescence J Bone Miner Res 2006 21 1864 1870 10.1359/jbmr.060907 17002589
3 Çimen O Öztürk K Akdeniz HE Köksal A Mert M Kargın D Pediatric infrafossal fracture of the humerus: A case series Jt Dis Relat Surg 2022 33 645 657 10.52312/jdrs.2022.717 36345194
4 Ruzzini L De Salvatore S Lamberti D Maglione P Piergentili I Crea F COVID-19 changed the incidence and the pattern of pediatric traumas: A singlecentre study in a pediatric emergency department Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021 18 6573 6573 10.3390/ijerph18126573 34207263
5 Johnson MA Halloran K Carpenter C Pascual-Leone N Parambath A Sharma J Changes in pediatric sports injury presentation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicenter analysis Orthop J Sports Med 2021 9 23259671211010826 23259671211010826 10.1177/23259671211010826 33997072
6 Gumina S Proietti R Villani C Carbone S Candela V The impact of COVID-19 on shoulder and elbow trauma in a skeletally immature population: An Italian survey JSES Int 2021 5 3 8 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.003 32984859
7 Bolzinger M Lopin G Accadbled F Sales de Gauzy J Compagnon R Pediatric traumatology in “green zone” during Covid-19 lockdown: A single-center study Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2023 109 102946 102946 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102946 33901717
8 Turgut A Arlı H Altundağ Ü Hancıoğlu S Egeli E Kalenderer Ö Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the fracture demographics: Data from a tertiary care hospital in Turkey Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2020 54 355 363 10.5152/j.aott.2020.20209 32812872
9 Bram JT Johnson MA Magee LC Mehta NN Fazal FZ Baldwin KD Where have all the fractures gone. The epidemiology of pediatric fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic J Pediatr Orthop 2020 40 373 379 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001600 32433260
10 Williams K Thomson D Seto I Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG Ioannidis JP Curtis S Standard 6: Age groups for pediatric trials Pediatrics 2012 129 Suppl 3 S153-60 10.1542/peds.2012-0055I
11 Armitage BM Wijdicks CA Tarkin IS Schroder LK Marek DJ Zlowodzki M Mapping of scapular fractures with three-dimensional computed tomography J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009 91 2222 2228 10.2106/JBJS.H.00881 19724000
12 Molenaars RJ Mellema JJ Doornberg JN Kloen P Tibial plateau fracture characteristics: Computed tomography mapping of lateral, medial, and bicondylar fractures J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2015 97 1512 1520 10.2106/JBJS.N.00866 26378267
13 Zacay G Modan-Moses D Tripto-Shkolnik L Levy-Shraga Y Decreases in pediatric fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic - a nationwide epidemiological cohort study Eur J Pediatr 2022 181 1473 1480 10.1007/s00431-021-04323-5 34993624
14 Markiewitz ND Garcia-Munoz J Lilley BM Oduwole S Shah AS Williams BA Epidemiologic changes in pediatric fractures presenting to emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic J Pediatr Orthop 2022 42 e815-20 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002194
15 Lempesis V Rosengren BE Nilsson JÅ Landin L Tiderius CJ Karlsson MK Time trends in pediatric fracture incidence in Sweden during the period 1950-2006 Acta Orthop 2017 88 440 445 10.1080/17453674.2017.1334284 28562146
16 Oguzkaya S Misir A Ozcamdalli M Eken G Kizkapan TB Kurk MB Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopedic fracture characteristics in three hospitals in Turkey: A multi-center epidemiological study Jt Dis Relat Surg 2021 32 323 332 10.52312/jdrs.2021.20 34145807
17 Valerio G Gallè F Mancusi C Di Onofrio V Colapietro M Guida P Pattern of fractures across pediatric age groups: Analysis of individual and lifestyle factors BMC Public Health 2010 10 656 656 10.1186/1471-2458-10-656 21034509
18 Gornick BR Mostamand M Thomas ES Weber M Schlechter JA COVID-19 pandemic restrictions unmasks dangers of frequent injury mechanisms for common surgically treated pediatric fractures J Child Orthop 2022 16 83 87 10.1177/18632521221090135 35620129
19 Lee A Colen DL Fox JP Chang B Lin IC Pediatric hand and upper extremity injuries presenting to emergency departments in the United States: Epidemiology and health care-associated costs Hand (N Y) 2021 16 519 527 10.1177/1558944719866884 31441332
20 Park MS Chung CY Choi IH Kim TW Sung KH Lee SY Incidence patterns of pediatric and adolescent orthopaedic fractures according to age groups and seasons in South Korea: A population-based study Clin Orthop Surg 2013 5 161 166 10.4055/cios.2013.5.3.161 24009900
21 Angthong C Veljkovic A Angthong W Rajbhandari P Talar-sided osteochondral lesion of the subtalar joint following the intra-articular calcaneal fracture: Study via a modified computed tomography mapping analysis Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019 29 1331 1336 10.1007/s00590-019-02445-z 31037405
22 Yimam HM Dey R Rachuene PA Kauta NJ Roche SJL Sivarasu S Identification of recurring scapular fracture patterns using 3-dimensional computerized fracture mapping J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022 31 571 579 10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.036 34628033
23 Öğümsöğütlü E Kılınçoğlu V Fracture mapping of adult femoral neck fractures with three dimensional computed tomography Int Orthop 2023 47 1323 1330 10.1007/s00264-023-05742-9 36856859
