
==== Front
J Neuroeng Rehabil
J Neuroeng Rehabil
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
1743-0003
BioMed Central London

1456
10.1186/s12984-024-01456-0
Research
The inertial-based gait normalcy index of dual task cost during turning quantifies gait automaticity improvement in early-stage Parkinson’s rehabilitation
Meng Lin linmeng@tju.edu.cn

13
Shi Yu 1
Zhao Hongbo 1
Wang Deyu 1
Zhu Xiaodong zxd3516@tmu.edu.cn

2
Ming Dong 1
1 https://ror.org/012tb2g32 grid.33763.32 0000 0004 1761 2484 Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072 China
2 https://ror.org/003sav965 grid.412645.0 0000 0004 1757 9434 Department of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052 China
3 Present Address: Haihe Laboratory of Brain-computer Interaction and Human-machine Integration, No. 26 Ziyuan Road, Xiqing District, Tianjin, 300392 China
19 9 2024
19 9 2024
2024
21 16626 3 2024
2 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Background

The loss of gait automaticity is a key cause of motor deficits in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, even at the early stage of the disease. Action observation training (AOT) shows promise in enhancing gait automaticity. However, effective assessment methods are lacking. We aimed to propose a novel gait normalcy index based on dual task cost (NIDTC) and evaluate its validity and responsiveness for early-stage PD rehabilitation.

Methods

Thirty early-stage PD patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the AOT or active control (CON) group. The proposed NIDTC during straight walking and turning tasks and clinical scale scores were measured before and after 12 weeks of rehabilitation. The correlations between the NIDTCs and clinical scores were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficient analysis to evaluate the construct validity. The rehabilitative changes were assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA, while the responsiveness of NIDTC was further compared by t tests.

Results

The turning-based NIDTC was significantly correlated with multiple clinical scales. Significant group-time interactions were observed for the turning-based NIDTC (F = 4.669, p = 0.042), BBS (F = 6.050, p = 0.022) and PDQ-39 (F = 7.772, p = 0.011) tests. The turning-based NIDTC reflected different rehabilitation effects between the AOT and CON groups, with the largest effect size (p = 0.020, Cohen’s d = 0.933).

Conclusion

The turning-based NIDTC exhibited the highest responsiveness for identifying gait automaticity improvement by providing a comprehensive representation of motor ability during dual tasks. It has great potential as a valid measure for early-stage PD diagnosis and rehabilitation assessment.

Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300067657

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-024-01456-0.

Keywords

Parkinson’s disease
Rehabilitation assessment
Gait analysis
Dual task cost
Gait normalcy index
Inertial sensors
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809 National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372083 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100012166 National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFF1202500 Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction ProjectTJYXZDXK-060B Zhu Xiaodong Tianjin Natural Science Foundation23JCYBJC00690 Zhu Xiaodong issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

Motor automaticity refers to the ability to coordinate movement with minimal attention-demanding executive control resources [1]. It is an important mobility function in healthy adults. The loss of gait automaticity is a key cause of motor deficits in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients due to abnormal basal ganglia circuits. Patients with PD shift their locomotor control strategy from automatic to attentional executive control, resulting in common motor symptoms, such as bradykinesia, postural instability and gait disorders [2]. Novel rehabilitation approaches (i.e., action observation training (AOT) and dual-task training) have been proven to be effective at improving gait automaticity and enhancing patients’ quality of life [3]. However, an efficient assessment approach for these interventions against normal physical practice is still lacking.

Clinical scales are commonly used for the evaluation of rehabilitation effects [4, 5]. The scale scores are generated based on the doctor’s subjective observations and the patient’s self-reports, which may result in lower sensitivity to subtle changes [6]. Physical measures (i.e., the 10 m walking test and Time Up and Go Test) have also been widely employed in clinical assessments where walking speed and stride length are usually evaluated [7]. Inertial sensors have great potential for providing reliable and quantitative spatiotemporal gait parameters because of their unique advantages of good wearability and lack of laboratory environment constraints [8, 9]. However, due to PD patients would exhibit gait disorders in various perspectives, a single parameter may be insufficient to reflect gait changes in specific rehabilitation intervention for PD patients. Bezerra et al. [10] demonstrated that the AOT intervention reduced freezing of gait (FoG) episodes, but there was no significant difference in walking speed between the experimental group and controls. Similar results were reported by Jaywant et al. [11]. This suggests that the absence of a notable effect on walking speed does not necessarily render the intervention ineffective but may influence aspects such as gait automaticity. The assessment of motor control capability should not rely solely on a single gait parameter.

The dual task paradigm is a powerful method for evaluating motor automaticity in which a participant performs a primary motor task with a secondary cognitive or motor task. The dual task condition yields a deterioration in both task performances compared to the single-task condition. The performance decrements are interpreted as resulting from a competition of executive control resources, so-called “dual task cost” (DTC) [12, 13]. Although the determinants of DTC are multifactorial and complicated in that the given instructions, task priorities, and task difficulties are known to impact DTCs [14], complex primary motor tasks may guarantee an unavoidable demand for attentional executive control resources. The neural response underlying gait automaticity was investigated in a turning-based dual task test [15, 16]. Koçer et al. reported that PD patients exhibited an increased DTC of turning-based dual task duration [13]. The DTCs of the turning peak velocity, turning duration, and number of turning steps were used to identify patients with and without FoG [17, 18]. Our previous study developed an inertial-based quantitative gait assessment model that enables the estimation of gait spatiotemporal parameters and joint kinematics in various domains [19]. The gait spatiotemporal parameters significantly represent postural instability and gait abnormalities in early-stage PD. Early-stage PD patients exhibit more discriminative gait variables (i.e., stride length and joint range of motion) during turning than healthy controls [20, 21]. The fusion of gait variables during turning significantly improved the classification accuracy of early PD patients. Current studies have mostly focused on PD classification using machine learning methods [22–24]. A general comprehensive indicator for evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for early-stage PD is still lacking [25].

This study aimed to propose a novel normalcy index based on the DTC (NIDTC) during turning-based dual tasks and to evaluate its validity and responsiveness for early-stage PD rehabilitation intervention assessment. The NIDTC integrates the DTCs of gait spatiotemporal parameters derived from a complex motor task comprising straight walking and turning with/without a secondary serial-3 subtraction task. As the effectiveness for alleviating FOG by improving the patient’s gait automaticity of the AOT approach has been proven [26, 27], a 12-week AOT intervention was administered to a group of early-stage PD patients. AOT works by enhancing motor learning [28, 29] specifically to improve gait automaticity by leveraging the Mirror Neuron System (MNS) [30] and promoting neuroplastic changes [27]. Meanwhile, an active control group engaged in 12-week stretching exercises to counteract the rehabilitation effects of physical activity. We hypothesized that both interventions could improve the severity of motor impairment but that only the AOT intervention is effective at improving gait automaticity. We assessed the validity of the NIDTC by calculating its correlation with clinical scales before the intervention. The responsiveness of the NIDTC was evaluated by comparing the rehabilitation changes between the two groups. Sensitivity was then assessed by comparing the effect sizes.

Methods

Participants

Thirty-five idiopathic PD outpatients were recruited from the Unit of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Hoehn & Yahr (H &Y) score between 0.5 and 2.5; (2) age between 55 and 75 years; and (3) stable dopaminergic medication for at least 4 weeks. Participants were excluded if they had (1) a diagnosis of other neurological diseases, (2) severe orthopedic disease that affects gait performance, (3) any previous AOT rehabilitation experience, or (4) ongoing participation in other rehabilitation programs. At entry, all patients underwent neurological evaluations and MRI scans by a neurological specialist to rule out other neurological diseases. A total of thirty patients were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into an experimental group (AOT) and a control group (CON) at a 1:1 ratio using the Research Randomizer website (https://www.randomizer.org), and the participants were assigned to different groups by an independent researcher who was not involved in any other aspects of the study.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (IRB2022-KY-300) and Tianjin University (TJUE-2023-003). The clinical rehabilitation part of this study has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300067657). All the patients provided written informed consent before participating but were blinded to the intervention hypothesis of each group. The clinical rehabilitation in this study was conducted following the CONSORT guidelines to standardize the process, as shown in Fig. 1.Fig. 1 CONSORT flow diagram

Rehabilitation interventions

The AOT group underwent an action observation training program that involved an eight-form routine based on 24-form Tai Chi, which gradually increased movement difficulty from simple to complex [31]. Each form was split into a 2-min video clip. Patients were instructed to observe and imitate the movements in a structured format consisting of “2 min of observation—5 min of execution”, which was repeated five times followed by a 15-min movement practice session. To eliminate the impact of physical activity on rehabilitation, patients in the control group were instructed to perform 1-h stretching training twice a week. Both groups underwent a 12-week intervention at the Intelligent Rehabilitation Lab of Tianjin University. All patients who participated in the trials were in the “medication-ON” state. More details are provided in the supplementary materials.

Clinical assessment

At enrollment, an experienced neurologist performed physical examinations and evaluations of the H &Y score for all patients in the “medication-OFF” state. The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS-III), Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test (Mini-BESTest), and Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire 39-item version (PDQ-39) were evaluated in the “medication-ON” state (approximately 2 h after regular dopaminergic medication) by standardized trained physicians before and after 12 weeks of rehabilitation. The physicians were blinded to the group allocation.

Dual-task protocol

The patients performed a single motor task first as a baseline, where they were instructed to walk along a 5-m pathway with two 180° turns at their self-selected comfortable walking speed for 5 laps. In the dual task paradigm, participants were given a three-digit number below 300 and were required to subtract 3 sequentially from the given number when performing the “straight walking—180° turn” motor task and to speak out the calculation results. The serial-3 subtraction task performance (calculation number and accuracy) was recorded by a blinded assessor. The experiment was conducted in a controlled indoor environment. Five inertial sensors (myoMOTION, Noraxon, USA) were placed on the pelvis, shanks, and feet on both sides of each patient for motion data collection. Video of gait performance was also recorded for data quality assurance and compliance checking.

DTC calculation

The orientational angles and acceleration data of lower limb segments were used to derived gait spatiotemporal parameters, namely stride length (STL), stride time (SRT), stance phase time (STT), swing phase time (SWT), and walking speed (WAS) based on our proposed inertial-based gait spatiotemporal model [21]. The data was segmented into straight walking and turning tasks using the gait task recognition algorithm [32]. The STL and WAS were normalized to the individual’s height. Each patient completed a total of 11 straight walking segments and 10 turning segments. The first and last segments of the straight walking and turning tasks were excluded because of gait transitions. Eight segments of each gait task were selected for further data analysis.

The DTCs of the individual gait parameters were calculated as follows:1 DTC(%)=ParamDT-ParamSTParamST100%

where ParamST represents the gait parameters in a single-task condition and ParamDT represents the gait parameters derived in the dual-task condition. Two gait tasks were considered in our study: straight walking (SW) or turning (T).

NIDTC calculation

Figure 2 visualizes the procedures of the gait protocol and data analysis for the NIDTC calculations. The means of DTCs based on gait cycles were calculated respectively for the left and right sides and then constructed into a 16 × 5 matrix. The covariance matrix was first computed to obtain eigenvalue-eigenvector pairs [33]. Uncorrelated variables were calculated [34]:2 yi=DTC·1λi·αi

where DTC is the constructed 16×5 matrix, λi and αi are the ith eigenvalue-eigenvector pair, and yi is the ith uncorrelated new vector.Fig. 2 Flowchart of the gait experimental protocol and feature calculation. All participants completed the single and dual tasks, and motion data were recorded by five inertial sensors placed on the pelvis, shanks, and feet of both legs. The data were segmented into straight walking and turning tasks, and gait spatiotemporal parameters were estimated. The dual task cost (DTC) of the five parameters was calculated based on those during the single task. The normalcy index based on dual task cost (NIDTC) was obtained via principal component analysis

The vectors yi with contributions of less than 1% to the variance were excluded based on the Variance Accounted For (VAF) criterion [35]. The NIDTC was calculated as the total Euclidean distance of yi:3 NIDTC=∑i=15yi2

The NIDTC during the overall motor task (NIDTC_MT) was calculated with the combination of the 10 DTC parameters during straight walking and turning tasks.

Sample size calculation

Based on Sarasso et al.’s study [36], an effect size d of 1.087 was calculated using G*Power 3.1 software by comparing significant changes in dual task turning velocity between the AOT and control groups. A sample size of n = 15 per group, including a 10% dropout rate, was used to detect a significant interaction between time and group, with an α of 0.05 and a power of 80%.

Statistical analysis

Independent-sample t tests were conducted to compare the demographic differences between the two groups at baseline. The normality of the clinical scale, DTC, and NIDTC results at both time points was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test, while Levene’s test was used to assess the homogeneity of variance. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) was calculated to assess the correlation between the NIDTC and clinical scale scores at baseline, thereby assessing the construct validity. The outcomes of the rehabilitation interventions were examined using a 2-factor mixed repeated-measures ANCOVA (2 groups × 2 time points). Covariates in the model included disease duration, age, levodopa equivalent dose (LEDD), and baseline assessment data. The group × time interaction represents the outcome difference between the interventions over time and therefore was considered an indicator of the intervention effect difference. We conducted independent samples t tests comparing the rehabilitation changes between the two groups to evaluated the responsiveness of the NIDTC. Cohen’ s d effect size was calculated to evaluate the indicator sensitivity in the rehabilitation assessment . We also use PCC to investigate the correlation between functional improvements and changes in the NIDTC induced by the two rehabilitation interventions. The strength of the correlation was categorized as poor (r < 0.30), moderate (0.30 ≤ r < 0.50), good (0.50 ≤ r < 0.70), or strong (r ≥ 0.7). Cohen’s d effect size was classified as small, medium, or large for values of 0.20, 0.50, and 0.80, respectively. Statistical significance was set as p < 0.05. Missing data caused by the dropouts was excluded for further analysis. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM V.25).

Results

Participants

A total of 35 patients were recruited, 30 of whom met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled and randomly assigned to the AOT or CON group in our study. As shown in Fig. 1, all patients received a baseline assessment and completed a 12-week rehabilitation intervention. One patient in each group dropped out at the post-rehabilitation assessment, leaving a total of 28 patients (14 patients in each group) for data analysis. Table 1 shows that the demographic and baseline clinical characteristics in the AOT and CON groups were similar.Table 1 Demographic characteristics of PD patients at baseline

Characteristics	AOT (n = 14)	CON (n = 14)	p	
Gender (M/F)	6/8	7/7	–	
Age (years)	65.29 ± 4.60	63.86 ± 5.91	0.357	
Height (m)	1.63 ± 0.09	1.65 ± 0.07	0.489	
PD duration (years)	4.07 ± 2.16	2.86 ± 1.51	0.139	
H &Y OFF	1.60 ± 0.57	1.50 ± 0.97	0.097	
LEDD (mg)	433.81 ± 238.07	368.21 ± 182.81	0.565	
UPDRS-III ON	14.29 ± 9.60	16.21 ± 5.89	0.213	
BBS ON	48.64 ± 2.53	48.57 ± 2.14	0.907	
Mini-BESTest ON	23.07 ± 1.86	23.57 ± 2.41	0.888	
PDQ-39 ON	23.00 ± 10.62	23.64 ± 11.14	0.927	
All values are represented as the mean ± standard deviation. ON and OFF represent the medication states

Correlations between baseline NIDTC and clinical scale scores

Figure 3 shows that the NIDTC during turning (NIDTC_T) exhibited stronger correlations with clinical scales than did the NIDTC during straight walking (NIDTC_SW), NIDTC during the overall motor task (NIDTC_MT), and the DTCs of gait spatiotemporal parameters. The NIDTC_T demonstrated a strong positive correlation with the UPDRS-III score (r = 0.787, p < 0.001), a good negative correlation with the BBS score (r = − 0.649, p < 0.001) and Mini-BESTest score (r = − 0.581, p = 0.001), and a moderate negative correlation with the MoCA score (r = − 0.443, p = 0.009) and MMSE score (r = − 0.432, p = 0.011), indicating a good construct validity. On the other hand, the NIDTC_SW exhibited only a moderate positive correlation with the UPDRS-III score (r = 0.326, p = 0.045). The NIDTC_MT exhibited a good positive correlation with the UPDRS-III score (r = 0.509, p = 0.003), a moderate negative correlation with the BBS score (r = − 0.498, p = 0.004) and Mini-BESTest score (r = − 0.369, p = 0.027), however, all of these correlations are weaker compared to those observed for NIDTC_T.Fig. 3 Correlation analysis of clinical scores and gait indicator values in all patients at baseline. A Heatmap of the Pearson correlation coefficient matrix between clinical scores and gait indicators. B–G Scatter plots of the Pearson correlation coefficient between the clinical scores and NIDTC during turning. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001. DTC1-5 represent the stride length, stride time, stance phase time, swing phase time, and walking speed during straight walking, respectively, and DTC6-10 represent the DTCs during turning

Rehabilitation outcome differences between the interventions

Considering baseline variables as covariates, we observed a decrease in NIDTC_T in the AOT group and an increase in the CON group, with a significant group × time interaction (F = 4.669, p = 0.042, η2 = 0.175). This indicates that the NIDTC_T can be used to distinguish rehabilitation outcomes effectively between AOTs and active control interventions. BBS (F = 6.050, p = 0.022, η2 = 0.216) and PDQ-39 (F = 7.772, p = 0.011, η2 = 0.261) also exhibited significant group × time interactions. Both groups had positive trends in changes in BBS and PDQ-39 scores, while the AOT group demonstrated more substantial improvements (AOT: BBS, 48.64 ± 2.53 vs 51.14 ± 1.35; PDQ-39, 23.00 ± 10.62 vs 5.64 ± 3.05; CON: BBS, 48.57 ± 2.14 vs 49.43 ± 2.59; PDQ-39, 23.64 ± 11.14 vs 15.14 ± 12.42). No significant group × time interactions were detected for single gait spatiotemporal parameters, single DTCs, cognitive scales or cognitive task performance (Table 2).Table 2 Results of the rehabilitation effect assessment using NIDTC and other indicators

Indicators	AOT (n = 14)	CON (n = 14)	Group × Time	
Pre	Post	Pre	Post	F	p	η2	
NIDTC	
 Straight walking	3.58±1.30	3.15±0.92	3.96±1.94	3.58±1.17	0.987	0.331	0.043	
 Turning	5.97±1.41	5.15±0.97	5.37±1.34	5.81±1.16	4.669	0.042*	0.175	
Clinical scales	
 UPDRS-III	14.29±9.60	11.29±7.91	16.21±5.89	16.36±8.20	2.498	0.128	0.102	
 MoCA	24.50±2.95	25.86±2.77	25.21±2.01	25.43±2.50	1.325	0.262	0.057	
 MMSE	27.07±2.06	28.71±1.94	28.43±1.34	28.14±1.56	1.766	0.198	0.074	
 BBS	48.64±2.53	51.14±1.35	48.57±2.14	49.43±2.59	6.050	0.022*	0.216	
 Mini-BESTest	23.07±1.86	24.57±2.03	23.57±2.41	23.79±2.46	2.541	0.127	0.103	
 PDQ-39	23.00±10.62	5.64±3.05	23.64±11.14	15.14±12.42	7.772	0.011*	0.261	
Spatiotemporal parameters (straight walking)	
 Stride length	0.64±0.08	0.65±0.07	0.65±0.06	0.66±0.07	0.012	0.913	0.001	
 Stride time (s)	1.13±0.12	1.10±0.09	1.10±0.08	1.08±0.07	0.808	0.379	0.035	
 Stance phase time (s)	0.79±0.09	0.76±0.07	0.77±0.06	0.75±0.06	0.241	0.629	0.011	
 Swing phase time (s)	0.34±0.03	0.35±0.02	0.33±0.02	0.34±0.02	2.203	0.152	0.091	
 Walking speed (/s)	0.57±0.09	0.59±0.07	0.59±0.07	0.61±0.07	0.342	0.565	0.015	
Spatiotemporal parameters (turning)	
 Stride length	0.44±0.06	0.44±0.05	0.46±0.05	0.45±0.06	0.037	0.849	0.002	
 Stride time (s)	1.17±0.13	1.14±0.11	1.16±0.10	1.14±0.09	0.153	0.699	0.007	
 Stance phase time (s)	0.83±0.11	0.80±0.09	0.82±0.09	0.80±0.07	0.001	0.981	< 0.001	
 Swing phase time (s)	0.34±0.03	0.34±0.03	0.33±0.02	0.34±0.03	1.432	0.244	0.061	
 Walking speed (/s)	0.38±0.07	0.39±0.04	0.40±0.07	0.40±0.06	0.006	0.939	< 0.001	
DTC (straight walking)	
 Stride length (%)	-9.69±11.28	-9.22±7.20	-7.91±6.65	-6.91±5.22	0.015	0.902	0.001	
 Stride time (%)	6.55±8.25	4.64±3.70	2.79±4.30	2.12±3.46	0.549	0.467	0.024	
 Stance phase time (%)	8.31±10.20	5.91±4.53	3.84±4.74	2.91±3.78	0.484	0.494	0.022	
 Swing phase time (%)	2.45±4.96	1.83±2.77	0.41±4.30	0.37±3.11	0.423	0.522	0.019	
 Walking speed (%)	-14.00±14.50	-12.43±8.75	-10.22±8.90	-8.72±6.12	0.008	0.928	0.001	
DTC (turning)	
 Stride length (%)	-39.09±6.50	-35.15±6.86	-39.26±4.87	-39.26±6.30	2.021	0.169	0.084	
 Stride time (%)	11.86±11.09	7.33±10.98	9.07±4.82	9.45±5.14	0.633	0.435	0.028	
 Stance phase time (%)	16.42±12.44	11.20±14.57	12.76±5.32	12.64±5.71	0.255	0.619	0.011	
 Swing phase time (%)	1.30±9.64	0.49±4.41	0.69±4.29	2.35±4.71	2.570	0.123	0.105	
 Walking speed (%)	-44.50±6.81	-38.19±10.17	-43.78±5.39	-43.96±6.71	2.340	0.140	0.096	
Cognitive task	
 Accuracy (%)	94.49±11.58	96.09±5.21	92.22±9.70	96.26±7.35	0.770	0.390	0.034	
 Number	19.29±7.18	20.36±4.53	21.50±7.00	21.64±6.46	0.146	0.706	0.007	
All values are represented as the mean ± standard deviation. The * symbol represents a significant group×time interaction (p < 0.05)

Figure 4A–F compares the correlation of clinical scale scores and NIDTC_T between the AOT and CON groups. There was a greater significant positive correlation between the NIDTC_T and UPDRS-III score (r = 0.575, p = 0.001) in the AOT group than in the CON group (r = 0.433, p = 0.011). A similar trend was also observed in the correlation between NIDTC and BBS (AOT: r = − 0.624, p < 0.001; CON: r = − 0.480, p = 0.005), MMSE (AOT: r = − 0.477, p = 0.005; CON: r = − 0.326, p = 0.045), and Mini-BESTest (AOT: r = − 0.449, p = 0.008; CON: r = − 0.361, p = 0.030). Moreover, NIDTC_T showed a moderate positive correlation with PDQ-39 in the AOT group (r = 0.332, p = 0.042) and MOCA (r = − 0.393, p = 0.019) in the AOT group, while no significant correlation was observed in the CON group.Fig. 4 Comparison of clinical scale scores and NIDTC_T between the AOT and CON groups. A–F Scatter plots of Pearson correlation coefficients between the NIDTC_T and clinical scale scores (UPDRS-III, MOCA, MMSE, BBS, Mini-BESTest, and PDQ-39) in the two groups. G–J Comparison of changes in the NIDTC_T and clinical scale scores between the two groups. K Effect sizes of NIDTC_T and clinical scales. * = p < 0.05

NIDTC_T (95% CI − 2.319/− 0.212, p = 0.020), BBS (95% CI 0.007/3.278, p = 0.049), and PDQ-39 (95% CI − 17.629/− 0.085, p = 0.048) had significant intergroup differences, as shown in Fig. 4G–J. However, only NIDTC_T showed a significant opposite trend of changes between the two groups and had the largest effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.968).

Discussion

This study presented a novel complex dual-task gait indicator for assessing gait automaticity improvement in early-stage PD patients. The construct validity and responsiveness to rehabilitation interventions were evaluated. We found that the turning-based NIDTC demonstrated good construct validity and effectively revealed different rehabilitation effects between the AOT and CON groups with a large effect size. This suggests that the NIDTC_T provides a comprehensive representation of gait automaticity beyond traditional clinical scales for early PD.

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first attempt to employ a dual-task gait normalcy index in the rehabilitation assessment of early PD patients. Gait normalcy index indicators have been used for the assessment of gait abnormalities in patients with cerebral palsy [33], Guillain-Barré syndrome [37], lower limb amputees [38], and anterior cruciate ligament deficiency combined with meniscus injury [39]. Wang et al. developed an IMU-based method of gait pattern analysis to classify three different neurological diseases (healthy control, peripheral neuropathy, poststroke and Parkinson’s disease) [40]. They further proposed an inertial-based gait normalcy index to evaluate the overall gait performance of patients with n-hexane neuropathy during the rehabilitation process at different time points [34]. The selection of gait variables varied among these studies, and gait variables of healthy controls were usually used as a baseline to estimate gait abnormalities. However, a large sample size of healthy controls is needed to obtain a reliable baseline [41, 42]. Our study was the attempt to propose the evaluation of dual task gait performance with single-task gait performance as baseline. The NIDTC efficiently reflects changes of gait performance caused by dual task paradigm which is potential for gait automaticity assessment in early-stage PD.

Motor task complexity improved NIDTC performance in assessing motor symptoms in early-stage PD patients. As shown in Fig. 3, the NIDTC_T was significantly correlated with the UPDRS-III score, BBS score, and Mini-BESTest score, while the NIDTC_SW was significantly correlated with only the UPDRS-III score. The NIDTC_MT incorporates 10 parameters for both straight walking and turning, but its correlations with clinical scales were worse than those with the NIDTC_T. It suggests that the turning task contributes significantly to the validity of NIDTC while the inclusion of additional parameters may not improve the NIDTC performance. The complex motor task increased the continuous demand for attentional executive resources. PD patients have a significant loss of attention allocation capacity due to the decreased connectivity of the dorsal attention network [43] and experience more gait deficits at turns [13, 44]. Therefore, the NIDTC_T could provide a more comprehensive representation of the motor abilities of early-stage PD patients. Moreover, the NIDTC_T also showed significant correlations with the MOCA and MMSE scores. This indicates that the turning-based NIDTC reflects gait automaticity, which is related to not only motor but also cognitive functions in PD patients.

Correlations between NIDTC_T and PDQ-39 were higher in the AOT group compared to the CON group. As shown in Fig. 4, the NIDTC_T and PDQ-39 exhibited a significant positive correlation (r = 0.332, p = 0.042) in the AOT group, indicating that changes in NIDTC_T reflect not only improvements in gait but also enhancements in overall quality of life. The absence of significant correlation in the control group may be attributed to less improvement in PDQ-39. It is important to note that the PDQ-39 evaluates various dimensions of health-related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease patients, extending beyond motor abilities [45]. As a subjective measure, it can vary depending on the patient’s condition at the time, leading to high variability between individuals. This might explain the lack of significant correlation between NIDTC_T and PDQ-39 before rehabilitation. However, as gait automaticity improved, so did patients’ quality of life, which likely explains the significant correlation observed post-rehabilitation.

The turning-based NIDTC distinguished the different rehabilitation effects between the AOT and CON groups. Strong clinical evidence has shown that AOT intervention is a reliable and effective rehabilitation approach for improving gait automaticity in PD patients by inducing reorganization of the cerebello-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical network [46–48]. Level 1 evidence supported the effects of AOT interventions on improving BBS scores, PDQ-39 scores, and UPDRS-III scores [49]. However, significant differences between the AOT and active control groups were not observed when the TUG test was used for gait assessment [26, 50]. This may be because the TUG test, when performed conventionally, also evaluates turning activity, but this activity is not assessed separately. Our results for clinical scales, gait spatiotemporal parameters and single DTCs were consistent with those of previous studies (Table 2). The AOT and CON groups showed opposite changes in the proposed NIDTC_T, as shown in Fig. 4D. This suggested that the turning-based NIDTC is sensitive to improvements in gait automaticity induced by the AOT intervention.

The turning-based NIDTC demonstrated the largest effect size in the comparison of intergroup differences. Although the BBS and PDQ-39 also had medium to large effect sizes, this might be because the AOT intervention significantly improved participants’ balance function and self-reported quality of life (Fig. 4I and J). In particular, the PDQ-39 is a subjective questionnaire for patients. Studies have shown that the PDQ-39 may underestimate dyskinesia and is not sufficient for patients with milder symptoms [51, 52]. These indicators did not detect the rehabilitation differences between the AOT and CON groups. Figure 4H indicates that the CON group did not have an improvement in the UPDRS-III score; however, the effect size of the UPDRS-III score was relatively low (Cohen’s d = 0.536). Overall, our proposed turning-based NIDTC is more effective than clinical scales in evaluating gait automaticity in early-stage PD patients.

One limitation of this study is the relatively small sample size, which may affect the generalizability of the results. A multicenter rehabilitation study will be performed in the future to validate the proposed NIDTC in a larger group of early-stage PD patients. The inter-rater and test-retest reliability were not considered in the experiment, since the study’s aim is to propose a novel index to evaluate the rehabilitation outcomes for PD patients, we will validate the proposed NIDTC in a larger study in future. Moreover, gait characteristics, such as joint kinematics, gait variability, and stability, can be considered in the calculation of the NIDTC, providing a more comprehensive evaluation of gait ability.

Conclusions

This study proposed a novel rehabilitation indicator method for evaluating gait automaticity in early-stage PD patients and evaluated its construct validity and responsiveness in a 12-week rehabilitation intervention. The results demonstrated that the turning-based NIDTC not only had significant correlations with multiple clinical scales but also exhibited greater sensitivity to identify gait automaticity improvement in the AOT rehabilitation compared to the active control group. This indicator has great potential for early-stage PD diagnosis and rehabilitation assessment in the clinic.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1.

Abbreviations

AOT Action observation training

BBS Berg balance scale

CON Control group

DTC Dual task cost

FoG Freezing of gait

H &Y Hoehn & Yahr score

LEDD Levodopa equivalent daily dosage

Mini-BESTest Mini-balance evaluation system test

MMSE Mini-mental state examination

MoCA Montreal cognitive assessment

NIDTC Normalcy index of dual task cost

NIDTC_MT Normalcy index of dual task cost during the overall motor task

NIDTC_SW Normalcy index of dual task cost during straight walking

NIDTC_T Normalcy index of dual task cost during turning

PD Parkinson’s disease

PDQ-39 Parkinson’s disease questionnaire 39-item version

SRT Stride time

STL Stride length

STT Stance phase time

SWT Swing phase time

UPDRS-III Unified parkinson’s disease rating scale part III

VAF Variance Accounted For

WAS Walking speed

Acknowledgements

We thank all patients for their participation in this study. We thank Jun Pang and Xiaofei Zhang for their assistance in data processing and Jia Fu for her physical rehabilitation work.

Author contributions

LM conceptualized the study, assisted in drafting the manuscript, and oversaw the data analyses. YS analyzed, interpreted the data, prepared figures/tables, and wrote the manuscript. DW assisted in ethics preparation, participant screening, and data collection. HZ assisted in data collection. XZ and DM conceptualized the study, assisted in data management, and provided research resources. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82372083), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1202500, 2022YFF1202503), the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (23JCYBJC00690), and the Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project (TJYXZDXK-060B).

Availibility of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (IRB2022-KY-300) and Tianjin University (TJUE-2023-003). The clinical rehabilitation part of this study has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300067657). All participants were provided written informed consent before their participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare no potential Conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lin Meng and Yu Shi contributed equally to this work.
==== Refs
References

1. Fasano A Plotnik M Bove F Berardelli A The neurobiology of falls Neurol Sci 2012 33 6 1215 23 10.1007/s10072-012-1126-6 22673818
Fasano A, Plotnik M, Bove F, Berardelli A. The neurobiology of falls. Neurol Sci. 2012;33(6):1215–23. 10.1007/s10072-012-1126-6.22673818
2. Clark DJ Automaticity of walking: functional significance, mechanisms, measurement and rehabilitation strategies Front Hum Neurosci 2015 9 246 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00246 25999838
Clark DJ. Automaticity of walking: functional significance, mechanisms, measurement and rehabilitation strategies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:246. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00246.25999838
3. Bloem BR Okun MS Klein C Parkinson’s disease Lancet 2021 397 10291 2284 2303 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00218-x 33848468
Bloem BR, Okun MS, Klein C. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2021;397(10291):2284–303. 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00218-x.33848468
4. Goetz CG Tilley BC Shaftman SR Stebbins GT Fahn S Martinez-Martin P Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results Mov Disord 2008 23 15 2129 70 10.1002/mds.22340 19025984
Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord. 2008;23(15):2129–70. 10.1002/mds.22340.19025984
5. Goetz CG Fahn S Martinez-Martin P Poewe W Sampaio C Stebbins GT Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan Mov Disord 2007 22 1 41 7 10.1002/mds.21198 17115387
Goetz CG, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan. Mov Disord. 2007;22(1):41–7. 10.1002/mds.21198.17115387
6. Regnault A Boroojerdi B Meunier J Bani M Morel T Cano S Does the MDS-UPDRS provide the precision to assess progression in early Parkinson’s disease? Learnings from the Parkinson’s progression marker initiative cohort J Neurol 2019 266 8 1927 1936 10.1007/s00415-019-09348-3 31073716
Regnault A, Boroojerdi B, Meunier J, Bani M, Morel T, Cano S. Does the MDS-UPDRS provide the precision to assess progression in early Parkinson’s disease? Learnings from the Parkinson’s progression marker initiative cohort. J Neurol. 2019;266(8):1927–36. 10.1007/s00415-019-09348-3.31073716
7. Pelosin E Avanzino L Barella R Bet C Magioncalda E Trompetto C Treadmill training frequency influences walking improvement in subjects with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized pilot study Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017 53 2 201 208 10.23736/s1973-9087.16.04301-x 27434611
Pelosin E, Avanzino L, Barella R, Bet C, Magioncalda E, Trompetto C, et al. Treadmill training frequency influences walking improvement in subjects with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized pilot study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(2):201–8. 10.23736/s1973-9087.16.04301-x.27434611
8. Nguyen A Roth N Ghassemi NH Hannink J Seel T Klucken J Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson’s disease J Neuroeng Rehabil 2019 16 1 77 10.1186/s12984-019-0548-2 31242915
Nguyen A, Roth N, Ghassemi NH, Hannink J, Seel T, Klucken J, et al. Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):77. 10.1186/s12984-019-0548-2.31242915
9. Lim ACY Natarajan P Fonseka RD Maharaj M Mobbs RJ The application of artificial intelligence and custom algorithms with inertial wearable devices for gait analysis and detection of gait-altering pathologies in adults: A scoping review of literature Digit Health 2022 8 20552076221074128 10.1177/20552076221074128 35111331
Lim ACY, Natarajan P, Fonseka RD, Maharaj M, Mobbs RJ. The application of artificial intelligence and custom algorithms with inertial wearable devices for gait analysis and detection of gait-altering pathologies in adults: A scoping review of literature. Digit Health. 2022;8:20552076221074130. 10.1177/20552076221074128.35111331
10. Bezerra PT Santiago LM Silva IA Souza AA Pegado CL Damascena CM Action observation and motor imagery have no effect on balance and freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled trial Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2022 10.23736/s1973-9087.22.07313-0 36052889
Bezerra PT, Santiago LM, Silva IA, Souza AA, Pegado CL, Damascena CM, et al. Action observation and motor imagery have no effect on balance and freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022. 10.23736/s1973-9087.22.07313-0.36052889
11. Jaywant A Ellis TD Roy S Lin CC Neargarder S Cronin-Golomb A Randomized controlled trial of a home-based action observation intervention to improve walking in Parkinson disease Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016 97 5 665 73 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.029 26808782
Jaywant A, Ellis TD, Roy S, Lin CC, Neargarder S, Cronin-Golomb A. Randomized controlled trial of a home-based action observation intervention to improve walking in Parkinson disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(5):665–73. 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.029.26808782
12. Vitorio R Hasegawa N Carlson-Kuhta P Nutt JG Horak FB Mancini M Dual-task costs of quantitative gait parameters while walking and turning in people with Parkinson’s disease: beyond gait speed J Parkinsons Dis 2021 11 2 653 664 10.3233/jpd-202289 33386812
Vitorio R, Hasegawa N, Carlson-Kuhta P, Nutt JG, Horak FB, Mancini M, et al. Dual-task costs of quantitative gait parameters while walking and turning in people with Parkinson’s disease: beyond gait speed. J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11(2):653–64. 10.3233/jpd-202289.33386812
13. Koçer B Gülşen C Söke F Özcan Gülşen E Ersoy N Tunca Yılmaz O Comparison of dual-task costs during different types of walking in people with Parkinson’s disease: a controlled study Acta Neurol Belg 2023 10.1007/s13760-023-02271-5 37036604
Koçer B, Gülşen C, Söke F, Özcan Gülşen E, Ersoy N, Tunca Yılmaz O, et al. Comparison of dual-task costs during different types of walking in people with Parkinson’s disease: a controlled study. Acta Neurol Belg. 2023. 10.1007/s13760-023-02271-5.37036604
14. Patel P Bhatt T Task matters: influence of different cognitive tasks on cognitive-motor interference during dual-task walking in chronic stroke survivors Top Stroke Rehabil 2014 21 4 347 57 10.1310/tsr2104-347 25150667
Patel P, Bhatt T. Task matters: influence of different cognitive tasks on cognitive-motor interference during dual-task walking in chronic stroke survivors. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(4):347–57. 10.1310/tsr2104-347.25150667
15. Moreira-Neto A Ugrinowitsch C Coelho DB de Lima-Pardini AC Barbosa ER Teixeira LA Freezing of gait, gait initiation, and gait automaticity share a similar neural substrate in Parkinson’s disease Hum Mov Sci 2022 86 103018 10.1016/j.humov.2022.103018 36334382
Moreira-Neto A, Ugrinowitsch C, Coelho DB, de Lima-Pardini AC, Barbosa ER, Teixeira LA, et al. Freezing of gait, gait initiation, and gait automaticity share a similar neural substrate in Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mov Sci. 2022;86: 103018. 10.1016/j.humov.2022.103018.36334382
16. Belluscio V Stuart S Bergamini E Vannozzi G Mancini M The association between prefrontal cortex activity and turning behavior in people with and without freezing of gait Neuroscience 2019 416 168 176 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.07.024 31330231
Belluscio V, Stuart S, Bergamini E, Vannozzi G, Mancini M. The association between prefrontal cortex activity and turning behavior in people with and without freezing of gait. Neuroscience. 2019;416:168–76. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.07.024.31330231
17. Bertoli M Croce UD Cereatti A Mancini M Objective measures to investigate turning impairments and freezing of gait in people with Parkinson’s disease Gait Posture 2019 74 187 193 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.001 31539800
Bertoli M, Croce UD, Cereatti A, Mancini M. Objective measures to investigate turning impairments and freezing of gait in people with Parkinson’s disease. Gait Posture. 2019;74:187–93. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.001.31539800
18. de Souza Fortaleza AC Mancini M Carlson-Kuhta P King LA Nutt JG Chagas EF Dual task interference on postural sway, postural transitions and gait in people with Parkinson’s disease and freezing of gait Gait Posture 2017 56 76 81 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.006 28521148
de Souza Fortaleza AC, Mancini M, Carlson-Kuhta P, King LA, Nutt JG, Chagas EF, et al. Dual task interference on postural sway, postural transitions and gait in people with Parkinson’s disease and freezing of gait. Gait Posture. 2017;56:76–81. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.006.28521148
19. Meng L Pang J Yang Y Chen L Xu R Ming D Inertial-based gait metrics during turning improve the detection of early-stage Parkinson’s disease patients IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2023 10.1109/tnsre.2023.3237903 37938959
Meng L, Pang J, Yang Y, Chen L, Xu R, Ming D. Inertial-based gait metrics during turning improve the detection of early-stage Parkinson’s disease patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023. 10.1109/tnsre.2023.3237903.37938959
20. Wu Z Jiang X Zhong M Shen B Zhu J Pan Y Mild gait impairment and its potential diagnostic value in patients with early-stage Parkinson’s disease Behav Neurol 2021 2021 6696454 10.1155/2021/6696454 33884040
Wu Z, Jiang X, Zhong M, Shen B, Zhu J, Pan Y, et al. Mild gait impairment and its potential diagnostic value in patients with early-stage Parkinson’s disease. Behav Neurol. 2021;2021:6696454. 10.1155/2021/6696454.33884040
21. Yang Y Chen L Pang J Huang X Meng L Ming D Validation of a spatiotemporal gait model using inertial measurement units for early-stage Parkinson’s disease detection during turns IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2022 10.1109/tbme.2022.3172725 35622786
Yang Y, Chen L, Pang J, Huang X, Meng L, Ming D. Validation of a spatiotemporal gait model using inertial measurement units for early-stage Parkinson’s disease detection during turns. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022. 10.1109/tbme.2022.3172725.35622786
22. Gupta R Kumari S Senapati A Ambasta RK Kumar P New era of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based detection, diagnosis, and therapeutics in Parkinson’s disease Ageing Res Rev 2023 90 102013 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102013 37429545
Gupta R, Kumari S, Senapati A, Ambasta RK, Kumar P. New era of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based detection, diagnosis, and therapeutics in Parkinson’s disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;90: 102013. 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102013.37429545
23. Cai G Shi W Wang Y Weng H Chen L Yu J Specific distribution of digital gait biomarkers in Parkinson’s disease using body-worn sensors and machine learning J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2023 78 8 1348 1354 10.1093/gerona/glad101 37067827
Cai G, Shi W, Wang Y, Weng H, Chen L, Yu J, et al. Specific distribution of digital gait biomarkers in Parkinson’s disease using body-worn sensors and machine learning. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023;78(8):1348–54. 10.1093/gerona/glad101.37067827
24. Ferreira M Barbieri FA Moreno VC Penedo T Tavares J Machine learning models for Parkinson’s disease detection and stage classification based on spatial-temporal gait parameters Gait Posture 2022 98 49 55 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.014 36049418
Ferreira M, Barbieri FA, Moreno VC, Penedo T, Tavares J. Machine learning models for Parkinson’s disease detection and stage classification based on spatial-temporal gait parameters. Gait Posture. 2022;98:49–55. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.014.36049418
25. Pike A McGuckian TB Steenbergen B Cole MH Wilson PH How reliable and valid are dual-task cost metrics? A meta-analysis of locomotor-cognitive dual-task paradigms Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2023 104 2 302 314 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.07.014 35940246
Pike A, McGuckian TB, Steenbergen B, Cole MH, Wilson PH. How reliable and valid are dual-task cost metrics? A meta-analysis of locomotor-cognitive dual-task paradigms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;104(2):302–14. 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.07.014.35940246
26. Pelosin E Avanzino L Bove M Stramesi P Nieuwboer A Abbruzzese G Action observation improves freezing of gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 8 746 52 10.1177/1545968310368685 20453155
Pelosin E, Avanzino L, Bove M, Stramesi P, Nieuwboer A, Abbruzzese G. Action observation improves freezing of gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(8):746–52. 10.1177/1545968310368685.20453155
27. Agosta F Gatti R Sarasso E Volonté MA Canu E Meani A Brain plasticity in Parkinson’s disease with freezing of gait induced by action observation training J Neurol 2017 264 1 88 101 10.1007/s00415-016-8309-7 27778161
Agosta F, Gatti R, Sarasso E, Volonté MA, Canu E, Meani A, et al. Brain plasticity in Parkinson’s disease with freezing of gait induced by action observation training. J Neurol. 2017;264(1):88–101. 10.1007/s00415-016-8309-7.27778161
28. Nonnekes J Ružicka E Nieuwboer A Hallett M Fasano A Bloem BR Compensation strategies for gait impairments in Parkinson disease: a review JAMA Neurol 2019 76 6 718 725 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0033 30907948
Nonnekes J, Ružicka E, Nieuwboer A, Hallett M, Fasano A, Bloem BR. Compensation strategies for gait impairments in Parkinson disease: a review. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(6):718–25. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0033.30907948
29. Bassett DS Yang M Wymbs NF Grafton ST Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems Nat Neurosci 2015 18 5 744 51 10.1038/nn.3993 25849989
Bassett DS, Yang M, Wymbs NF, Grafton ST. Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(5):744–51. 10.1038/nn.3993.25849989
30. Bonini L Rotunno C Arcuri E Gallese V Mirror neurons 30 years later: implications and applications Trends Cogn Sci 2022 26 9 767 781 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.003 35803832
Bonini L, Rotunno C, Arcuri E, Gallese V. Mirror neurons 30 years later: implications and applications. Trends Cogn Sci. 2022;26(9):767–81. 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.003.35803832
31. Li F Harmer P Fitzgerald K Eckstrom E Stock R Galver J Tai chi and postural stability in patients with Parkinson’s disease N Engl J Med 2012 366 6 511 9 10.1056/NEJMoa1107911 22316445
Li F, Harmer P, Fitzgerald K, Eckstrom E, Stock R, Galver J, et al. Tai chi and postural stability in patients with Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(6):511–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1107911.22316445
32. Meng L Huang X Yang Y Pang J Chen L Ming D An inertial sensor-based algorithm for turning detection during gait Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2021 2021 6372 6375 10.1109/embc46164.2021.9630374 34892570
Meng L, Huang X, Yang Y, Pang J, Chen L, Ming D. An inertial sensor-based algorithm for turning detection during gait. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021;2021:6372–5. 10.1109/embc46164.2021.9630374.34892570
33. Schutte LM Narayanan U Stout JL Selber P Gage JR Schwartz MH An index for quantifying deviations from normal gait Gait Posture 2000 11 1 25 31 10.1016/s0966-6362(99)00047-8 10664482
Schutte LM, Narayanan U, Stout JL, Selber P, Gage JR, Schwartz MH. An index for quantifying deviations from normal gait. Gait Posture. 2000;11(1):25–31. 10.1016/s0966-6362(99)00047-8.10664482
34. Wang L Sun Y Li Q Liu T Yi J IMU-based gait normalcy index calculation for clinical evaluation of impaired gait IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2021 25 1 3 12 10.1109/jbhi.2020.2982978 32224469
Wang L, Sun Y, Li Q, Liu T, Yi J. IMU-based gait normalcy index calculation for clinical evaluation of impaired gait. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021;25(1):3–12. 10.1109/jbhi.2020.2982978.32224469
35. Boe D Portnova-Fahreeva AA Sharma A Rai V Sie A Preechayasomboon P Dimensionality reduction of human gait for prosthetic control Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021 9 724626 10.3389/fbioe.2021.724626 34722477
Boe D, Portnova-Fahreeva AA, Sharma A, Rai V, Sie A, Preechayasomboon P, et al. Dimensionality reduction of human gait for prosthetic control. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9: 724626. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.724626.34722477
36. Sarasso E Agosta F Piramide N Gardoni A Canu E Leocadi M Action observation and motor imagery improve dual task in Parkinson’s disease: a clinical/FMRI study Mov Disord 2021 36 11 2569 2582 10.1002/mds.28717 34286884
Sarasso E, Agosta F, Piramide N, Gardoni A, Canu E, Leocadi M, et al. Action observation and motor imagery improve dual task in Parkinson’s disease: a clinical/FMRI study. Mov Disord. 2021;36(11):2569–82. 10.1002/mds.28717.34286884
37. Syczewska M Święcicka A Szczerbik E Kalinowska M Dunin-Wąsowicz D Łukowicz M Types of gait deviations in children and adolescents with Guillain-Barre syndrome identified using cluster analysis Biomed Signal Process Control 2021 66 102496 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102496
Syczewska M, Święcicka A, Szczerbik E, Kalinowska M, Dunin-Wąsowicz D, Łukowicz M. Types of gait deviations in children and adolescents with Guillain-Barre syndrome identified using cluster analysis. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2021;66: 102496. 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102496.
38. Kark L Vickers D McIntosh A Simmons A Use of gait summary measures with lower limb amputees Gait Posture 2012 35 2 238 43 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.013 22000790
Kark L, Vickers D, McIntosh A, Simmons A. Use of gait summary measures with lower limb amputees. Gait Posture. 2012;35(2):238–43. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.013.22000790
39. Liu X Huang H Ren S Rong Q Ao Y Use of the normalcy index for the assessment of abnormal gait in the anterior cruciate ligament deficiency combined with meniscus injury Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2020 23 14 1102 1108 10.1080/10255842.2020.1789119
Liu X, Huang H, Ren S, Rong Q, Ao Y. Use of the normalcy index for the assessment of abnormal gait in the anterior cruciate ligament deficiency combined with meniscus injury. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2020;23(14):1102–8. 10.1080/10255842.2020.1789119.
40. Wang L Sun Y Li Q Liu T Yi J Two shank-mounted IMUs-based gait analysis and classification for neurological disease patients IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2020 5 2 1970 1976 10.1109/LRA.2020.2970656
Wang L, Sun Y, Li Q, Liu T, Yi J. Two shank-mounted IMUs-based gait analysis and classification for neurological disease patients. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2020;5(2):1970–6. 10.1109/LRA.2020.2970656.
41. Cimolin V Galli M Summary measures for clinical gait analysis: a literature review Gait Posture 2014 39 4 1005 10 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.02.001 24613461
Cimolin V, Galli M. Summary measures for clinical gait analysis: a literature review. Gait Posture. 2014;39(4):1005–10. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.02.001.24613461
42. Gonçalves SB Lama SBC Silva MTD Three decades of gait index development: a comparative review of clinical and research gait indices Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2022 96 105682 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105682 35640522
Gonçalves SB, Lama SBC, Silva MTD. Three decades of gait index development: a comparative review of clinical and research gait indices. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2022;96: 105682. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105682.35640522
43. Maidan I Jacob Y Giladi N Hausdorff JM Mirelman A Altered organization of the dorsal attention network is associated with freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019 63 77 82 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.02.036 30827838
Maidan I, Jacob Y, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM, Mirelman A. Altered organization of the dorsal attention network is associated with freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019;63:77–82. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.02.036.30827838
44. Guo Y Yang J Liu Y Chen X Yang GZ Detection and assessment of Parkinson’s disease based on gait analysis: a survey Front Aging Neurosci 2022 14 916971 10.3389/fnagi.2022.916971 35992585
Guo Y, Yang J, Liu Y, Chen X, Yang GZ. Detection and assessment of Parkinson’s disease based on gait analysis: a survey. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14: 916971. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.916971.35992585
45. Morley D Dummett S Kelly L Dawson J Jenkinson C An electronic version of the PDQ-39: acceptability to respondents and assessment of alternative response formats J Parkinsons Dis 2014 4 3 467 72 10.3233/jpd-140358 24670486
Morley D, Dummett S, Kelly L, Dawson J, Jenkinson C. An electronic version of the PDQ-39: acceptability to respondents and assessment of alternative response formats. J Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4(3):467–72. 10.3233/jpd-140358.24670486
46. Mizuguchi N Kanosue K Changes in brain activity during action observation and motor imagery: Their relationship with motor learning Prog Brain Res 2017 234 189 204 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.008 29031463
Mizuguchi N, Kanosue K. Changes in brain activity during action observation and motor imagery: Their relationship with motor learning. Prog Brain Res. 2017;234:189–204. 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.008.29031463
47. Giannakopoulos I Karanika P Papaxanthis C Tsaklis P The effects of action observation therapy as a rehabilitation tool in Parkinson’s disease patients: a systematic review Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 10.3390/ijerph19063311 35329000
Giannakopoulos I, Karanika P, Papaxanthis C, Tsaklis P. The effects of action observation therapy as a rehabilitation tool in Parkinson’s disease patients: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. 10.3390/ijerph19063311.35329000
48. Caligiore D Pezzulo G Baldassarre G Bostan AC Strick PL Doya K Consensus paper: towards a systems-level view of cerebellar function: the interplay between cerebellum, basal ganglia, and cortex Cerebellum 2017 16 1 203 229 10.1007/s12311-016-0763-3 26873754
Caligiore D, Pezzulo G, Baldassarre G, Bostan AC, Strick PL, Doya K, et al. Consensus paper: towards a systems-level view of cerebellar function: the interplay between cerebellum, basal ganglia, and cortex. Cerebellum. 2017;16(1):203–29. 10.1007/s12311-016-0763-3.26873754
49. Ryan D Fullen B Rio E Segurado R Stokes D O’Sullivan C Effect of action observation therapy in the rehabilitation of neurologic and musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2021 3 1 100106 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100106 33778479
Ryan D, Fullen B, Rio E, Segurado R, Stokes D, O’Sullivan C. Effect of action observation therapy in the rehabilitation of neurologic and musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021;3(1): 100106. 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100106.33778479
50. Mezzarobba S Grassi M Pellegrini L Catalan M Kruger B Furlanis G Action observation plus sonification. A novel therapeutic protocol for Parkinson’s patient with freezing of gait Front Neurol 2017 8 723 10.3389/fneur.2017.00723 29354092
Mezzarobba S, Grassi M, Pellegrini L, Catalan M, Kruger B, Furlanis G, et al. Action observation plus sonification. A novel therapeutic protocol for Parkinson’s patient with freezing of gait. Front Neurol. 2017;8:723. 10.3389/fneur.2017.00723.29354092
51. Balzer-Geldsetzer M Klotsche J Dodel R Riedel O Quality of life in a German cohort of Parkinson’s patients assessed with three different measures J Neurol 2018 265 11 2713 2722 10.1007/s00415-018-9047-9 30209651
Balzer-Geldsetzer M, Klotsche J, Dodel R, Riedel O. Quality of life in a German cohort of Parkinson’s patients assessed with three different measures. J Neurol. 2018;265(11):2713–22. 10.1007/s00415-018-9047-9.30209651
52. Hagell P Nygren C The 39 item Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39) revisited: implications for evidence based medicine J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007 78 11 1191 8 10.1136/jnnp.2006.111161 17442762
Hagell P, Nygren C. The 39 item Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39) revisited: implications for evidence based medicine. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(11):1191–8. 10.1136/jnnp.2006.111161.17442762
