
==== Front
Crit Care
Critical Care
1364-8535
1466-609X
BioMed Central London

39294706
4974
10.1186/s13054-024-04974-4
Correspondence
Further support for the intracranial compartmental syndrome concept
Godoy Daniel Agustin dagodoytorres@yahoo.com.ar

14
Brasil Sergio 24
Rubiano Andres M. 234
1 Neurointensive Care Unit, Sanatorio Pasteur, Chacabuco 675, 4700 Catamarca, Argentina
2 https://ror.org/036rp1748 grid.11899.38 0000 0004 1937 0722 LIM 62, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
3 https://ror.org/04m9gzq43 grid.412195.a 0000 0004 1761 4447 Professor of Neurosciences and Neurosurgery, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
4 Medical and Research Director, MEDITECH Foundation, Cali, Colombia
18 9 2024
18 9 2024
2024
28 31111 3 2024
27 5 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcTo the editor

The current approach to severe neuro-injury monitoring, especially traumatic brain injury (TBI), has experienced paradigm shifts that open a broad outlook for the future [1]. On one hand, advances in pathophysiological knowledge have made possible establishing today that intracranial pressure (ICP) control is just one more epiphenomenon within other serious events that occur simultaneously such as tissue hypoxia, metabolic crises and cerebral energy dysfunction [1]. On the other hand, the advent of new monitoring techniques (invasive and noninvasive) have allowed a deeper analysis in real time of what is happening in the injured brain [1]. One of the most important advancements in neuromonitoring was the recent popularization of the analysis of the ICP wave (ICPw) morphology. Current studies pointed the changes in ICPw as reliable markers of cerebrospinal compliance and to be followed in clinical environments. In this regard, ICPw was considered the pillar of the intracranial compartmental syndrome (ICCS) concept [2]. So, “ICCS occurs when the compliance of the intracranial system is compromised as a result of the exhaustion of the compensating mechanisms that try to keep it within normal limits’’. ‘’Perfusion, oxygenation and energy utilization compromise are its consequences’’ [2].

Further enlightenments raised from the recent study of Kazimierska et al., which evaluated a series of 130 patients who were victims of severe TBI from the CENTER-TBI database. Those authors analyzed the relationship between parameters obtained from the neuroimaging Computed Tomography (CT) scan upon admission and variables collected from invasive ICP monitoring [3]. Injury mass volume, degree of midline shift, Marshall’s and Rotterdam classifications were the data provided by the CT scans, while mean ICP values, wave amplitude and indices derived from the analysis of ICP recordings. A neural network model (previously tested with 93% accuracy) was applied in order to automatically group ICP waveforms into 4 classes [3]. As a main finding, the pulse shape index—PSI was strongly correlated with the analyzed tomographic parameters (p = 0.001), while mean ICP was correlated with ICPw amplitude, indicating that the morphology of the ICP pulse wave reflects a decrease in the cerebrospinal compensatory reserve therefore of cerebral compliance [3].

ICP waveform is a result of complex interaction between volumes (blood, brain and cerebrospinal fluid) restrained by meninges and the bony skull box, interacting with dynamic phenomena as blood viscosity, cardiac and respiratory cycles per example [1]. Therefore, several are the ways of exploring and translating ICPw into parameters readable at the bedside to assess compensatory reserve status. Prior to PSI, the compensatory reserve index (RAP) was described by Czosnyka et al. as the moving correlation between ICP values and ICP pulse amplitude variation [4]. Both the PSI and RAP can be assessed imputing ICP and further variables to the ICM + software (Cambridge Enterprise Ltd., Cambridge, UK). More recently, based on ICP waveform peak relationship changes following cerebral compliance status, Brasil et al. observed the P2/P1 ratio (the second peak amplitude elevation) and time-to-peak (the time length from pulse triggering to its highest peak amplitude) variations following an induced mild ICP variation in neurocritical patients, demonstrating that these parameters may also translate the pressure/volume intracranial relationship [5]. The latter parameters acquisition and assessment are available by means of noninvasive hardware, with potential to widening intracranial compliance applications beyond severe acute brain injuries.

With the infinite contribution which newer hardware and software offer in data acquisition and analysis, we reach assessment options to support the ICCS hypothesis, raising the foundations for developing multicenter prospective clinical studies and validate the concept on a large scale.

Abbreviations

TBI Traumatic brain injury

ICP Intracranial pressure

CT Computed tomography

ICCS Intracranial compartmental syndrome

PSI Pulse shape index

RAP Compensatory reserve index

ICM Intensive care monitor

Acknowledgements

None.

Author contributions

All author's contribute equally

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors give the consent to publish.

Competing interests

DAG and AMR claim no competing interest or conflict of interest. SB serves as a scientific advisor for brain4care.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Lazaridis C Foreman B Management strategies based on multi-modality neuromonitoring in severe traumatic brain injury Neurotherapeutics 2023 20 6 1457 1471 10.1007/s13311-023-01411-2 37491682
Lazaridis C, Foreman B. Management strategies based on multi-modality neuromonitoring in severe traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2023;20(6):1457–71. 10.1007/s13311-023-01411-2.37491682
2. Godoy DA Brasil S Iaccarino C The intracranial compartmental syndrome: a proposed model for acute brain injury monitoring and management Crit Care 2023 27 137 10.1186/s13054-023-04427-4 37038236
Godoy DA, Brasil S, Iaccarino C, et al. The intracranial compartmental syndrome: a proposed model for acute brain injury monitoring and management. Crit Care. 2023;27:137. 10.1186/s13054-023-04427-4.37038236
3. Kazimierska A Uryga A Mataczyński C Relationship between the shape of intracranial pressure pulse waveform and computed tomography characteristics in patients after traumatic brain injury Crit Care 2023 27 447 10.1186/s13054-023-04731-z 37978548
Kazimierska A, Uryga A, Mataczyński C, et al. Relationship between the shape of intracranial pressure pulse waveform and computed tomography characteristics in patients after traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2023;27:447. 10.1186/s13054-023-04731-z.37978548
4. Czosnyka M Smielewski P Timofeev I Lavinio A Guazzo E Hutchinson P Intracranial pressure: more than a number Neurosurg Focus 2007 22 5 E10 10.3171/foc.2007.22.5.11 17613228
Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Timofeev I, Lavinio A, Guazzo E, Hutchinson P, et al. Intracranial pressure: more than a number. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22(5):E10. 10.3171/foc.2007.22.5.11.17613228
5. Brasil S Solla DJF Nogueira RC Teixeira MJ Malbouisson LMS Paiva WDS A novel noninvasive technique for intracranial pressure waveform monitoring in critical care J Pers Med 2021 11 12 1302 10.3390/jpm11121302 34945774
Brasil S, Solla DJF, Nogueira RC, Teixeira MJ, Malbouisson LMS, Paiva WDS. A novel noninvasive technique for intracranial pressure waveform monitoring in critical care. J Pers Med. 2021;11(12):1302. 10.3390/jpm11121302.34945774
