
==== Front
bioRxiv
BIORXIV
bioRxiv
2692-8205
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

39282255
10.1101/2024.08.31.610597
preprint
1
Article
Evolution of lateralized gustation in nematodes
Mackie Marisa 1
Le Vivian Vy 1
Carstensen Heather R. 1
Kushnir Nicole R. 1
Castro Dylan L. 1
Dimov Ivan M. 1
Quach Kathleen T. 2
Cook Steven J. 34
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-2854
Hobert Oliver 3
Chalasani Sreekanth H. 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1870-8659
Hong Ray L. 1*
1 Department of Biology California State University, Northridge, CA, USA
2 Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA
3 Department of Biological Sciences Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
4 Present address: Neural Coding Department Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA
* Corresponding author: ray.hong@csun.edu
02 9 2024
2024.08.31.610597https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
nihpp-2024.08.31.610597.pdf
Animals with small nervous systems have a limited number of sensory neurons that must encode information from a changing environment. This problem is particularly exacerbated in nematodes that populate a wide variety of distinct ecological niches but only have a few sensory neurons available to encode multiple modalities. How does sensory diversity prevail within this neuronal constraint? To identify the genetic basis for patterning different nervous systems, we demonstrate that sensory neurons in the Pristionchus pacificus respond to various salt sensory cues in a manner that is partially distinct from that of the distantly related nematode C. elegans. By visualizing neuronal activity patterns, we show that contrary to previous expectations based on its genome sequence, the salt responses of P. pacificus are encoded in a left/right asymmetric manner in the bilateral ASE neuron pair. Our study illustrates patterns of evolutionary stability and change in the gustatory system of nematodes.

calcium imaging
lateral asymmetry
chemosensory neurons
Pristionchus pacificus
==== Body
pmcIntroduction:

Nematodes form a vast array of ecological relationships, from specialized parasite-host dependencies to nematode-microbial interactions, each one demanding exquisitely fine-tuned sets of sensory palates that span multiple modalities (1–8). Yet, the number of sensory neurons across diverse nematode species seems to be constrained (9–11). Several free-living and parasitic nematode species examined by serial section electron microscopy have nearly identical numbers of 12–13 pairs of head sensory neurons, known as the amphid neurons (11–15). How does sensory diversity arise within this neuronal constraint? When coupled with well-described neuronal anatomy, this conserved neuron count allows for detailed comparisons at the single-cell resolution and represents an opportunity to interrogate how sensory cues are processed by anatomically similar nervous systems to produce species-specific or developmental stage-dependent behavioral outputs. To identify the genetic basis for patterning different nervous systems and to understand the processes that underlie evolutionary changes in adapting to different environments, several comparative model systems have been developed to promote comparisons to the well-studied nematode Caenorhabditis elegans at the genetic and cellular levels, including the predatory entomophilic nematode, Pristionchus pacificus (11, 16–19).

As expected from their association with insects in the wild, the olfactory preferences of P. pacificus are distinct from those of C. elegans and the human parasite Strongyloides stercoralis (2, 3, 20), but little is known about P. pacificus responses to water-soluble compounds. In C. elegans, the main salt receptor neuron class comprises of a bilateral pair of left and right ASE neurons (ASEL and ASER), which serve to induce an attractive locomotory response toward an increase in salt concentration (21). The gene che-1 (chemosensory defective) encodes a transcription factor that is exclusively expressed in the ASE neurons and is required for their proper differentiation, such that a che-1 mutant results in defective salt attraction (22–25).

One major role of C. elegans CHE-1 is to promote lateral asymmetry in the ASE neurons. The left and right ASE neurons asymmetrically express receptor-type guanylyl cylases (rGCs, encoded by gcy genes) (26). This finding led to the realization that the ASE neurons are lateralized, such that the left and the right ASE neurons differentially respond to distinct salt ions (27–30). This observation led in turn to the identification of a complex gene regulatory network that genetically programs the distinct sensory potentials of the left and right ASE neurons (31), which includes a miRNA, lsy-6, at the top of this gene regulatory network (31–33). However, the lsy-6 miRNA evolved selectively in the Caenorhabditis genus (34) and is absent in P. pacificus. Moreover, P. pacificus does not show an expansion of the ASEL-type and ASER-type rGCs, as C. elegans does (Hong et al., 2019). With these two genomic observations in mind, we had previously proposed that the ASE neurons are unlikely to be lateralized in P. pacificus (11).

However, we now revise this view in light of our work on mapping chemosensory responses in P. pacificus on the level of behavior and neuronal activity. We demonstrate that P. pacificus does in fact show lateralized chemosensory profiles, indicating that P. pacificus must have evolved independent means to establish ASE laterality. We also show that the tastant palate of P. pacificus is distinct from that of C. elegans, and that its dependence on ASE, as well as its terminal selector transcription factor che-1, have also diverged.

Results

P. pacificus and C. elegans differ in their behavioral responses to salts

Previous cross-species comparisons between P. pacificus and C. elegans indicated strong differences in olfaction preferences that reflect their divergent evolutionary histories and ecology (2). To identify the neurons that mediate gustation, we first compared the chemosensory profiles of these two species toward water-soluble ions. In this survey, we found ammonium salts to be the strongest attractants to wildtype P. pacificus adult hermaphrodites (NH4Br, NH4Cl, NH4I), with NH4I significantly more attractive to P. pacificus compared to C. elegans (Fig. 1). Notably, in contrast to C. elegans (35), we find that P. pacificus is only moderately and weakly attracted to NaCl and LiCl, respectively (Fig. 1). Also, P. pacificus is repulsed by acetate salts (NaAc, NH4Ac), which induce attractive responses in C. elegans (36). We conclude that P. pacificus and C. elegans display differences in their salt preferences.

Ppa che-1 shows similarities and difference to Cel che-1 in both expression and function

The C. elegans che-1 mutant (chemotaxis-defective) was originally isolated for its inability to respond to a broad panel of salt tastants (22, 35), including those described above (29, 30, 36). Che-1 was found to encode for a Zn finger transcription factor that is exclusively expressed in the ASE neuron pair (25), which through laser ablations had been found to be the main salt receptor neurons (37). che-1 was found to control the entire differentiation of the ASE neurons, including the expression of putative receptors of the GCY receptor guanylyl cyclase family (23–25, 38).

To assess whether che-1 performs a similar function in salt perception for P. pacificus as for C. elegans, we analyzed the expression and function of the P. pacificus che-1 ortholog. In a previous paper, we reported that the 5’ region of the sole Pristionchus che-1 ortholog directs reporter expression to the Ppa ASE and Ppa ASG neuron classes (11). Re-examination of our provisional cell identifications using a newly-generated che1-p::GFP strain with stronger neurite expression revealed highly elaborated finger-like dendritic endings in the more anterior amphid neuron that could unambiguously be assigned to the AFD neurons (Fig. 2A–C), prompting us to reassign expression of che-1 to ASE and AFD.

We confirmed that the che-1 reporter transgene indicates the full expression of the endogenous che-1 locus by tagging the endogenous che-1 locus with an ALFA-tag (39). The che-1::ALFA animals showed staining in 2 pairs of head neurons whose position is consistent with being the ASE and AFD neurons (Fig. 2D–E). By crossing the che-1 reporter transgene into a che-1 mutant background (see below), we also found that che-1 autoregulates its own expression (Fig. 2F), as it does in C. elegans (25).

Next, we examined whether P. pacificus salt responsiveness shows similar che-1 dependence as in C. elegans. We generated two putative null alleles in the P. pacificus che-1 homolog using CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering, through introduction of small deletions in the first exon of the gene, thereby resulting in frameshift and premature stops (Fig. 3A). Both Ppa che-1 alleles exhibited defects in attraction towards NH4Cl and LiCl compared to wildtype (Fig. 3B). However, unlike in C. elegans, Ppa-che-1 mutants showed no detectable difference in responses to NH4l, NaCl, and NaAc.

We considered two different possibilities for the behavioral differences of Ppa che-1 and Cel che-1 mutants. P. pacificus may use sensory neurons other than ASE to sense these cues, or alternatively, Ppa-che-1 may not have the same fundamental impact on ASE function in P. pacificus as it does in C. elegans. To explore these different possibilities, we silenced che-1 expressing neurons by expressing codon-optimized HisCl channel under control of the che-1 promoter. Histamine-treated che-1p::HisCl animals showed complete loss of attraction to NH4Br, NH4Cl, and NH4I. Histamine treatment did not significantly alter their repulsive response to NaAc (Fig. 3C). These findings corroborate that NaAc is sensed by neurons other than ASE (or AFD, in which the che-1 promoter also drives HisCl). Since NH4I sensation is affected by silencing of che-1(+) neurons but is unaffected in che-1 mutants, ASE differentiation may be more greatly impacted by the silencing of ASE than by the loss of che-1.

The ASE neurons show left/right asymmetric responses to salt

To assess whether Ppa ASE neurons show the same lateralized response to salt ions as Cel ASE neurons, we generated transgenic P. pacificus lines that express RCaMP in ASE neurons and assessed calcium responses to attractive salts (Fig. 4, S1–S2). Specifically, we looked for changes in calcium levels immediately after the addition and removal of specific salts. When 250 mM NH4Cl is administered, an ‘ON’ response is observed as calcium transiently increases in the left ASE neuron (ASEL). In contrast, an ‘OFF’ response was observed as calcium sharply dips in the right ASE neuron (ASER) before quickly returning to baseline when the salt was removed, which suggests hyperpolarization of this neuron (Fig. 4A–B)(29). However, when presented with a 10-fold lower concentration of 25 mM NH4Cl, the ‘OFF’ response completely disappeared in ASER while the ‘ON’ response became more pronounced in ASEL. The ASER responses to 250 mM and 25 mM NaCl (Fig. 4D) were very similar to the ‘OFF’ response (including hyperpolarization) observed for NH4Cl, but the ASEL responses differ between the two salts: instead of the ‘ON’ response expected of ASEL, we observed a relatively weak ‘OFF’ response without the characteristic hyperpolarization but accompanied by an attenuated ‘bump’, a profile that we classify as an ‘OFF-2’ response (Fig. 4C). Finally, we examined the response to NH4l and found that it also elicited laterally asymmetric responses, but yet again distinct from the responses to both NH4Cl and NaCl, with ASEL showing a strong ‘ON’ response, and ASER showing an ‘ON-OFF’ biphasic response to 250 mM NH4l (Fig. 4E–F)(40, 41). Interestingly, the ASER exhibited an ‘OFF’-only response to 25 mM NH4l, which was not observed for the same concentration of NH4Cl and NaCl, and thus may reflect the higher response to NH4l than to NH4Cl and NaCl in the behavior assays. Altogether, P. pacificus ASE neurons clearly show left/right asymmetric responses to salt attractants and these asymmetric responses show similarities and differences to the C. elegans ASE taste neurons (see Discussion).

The AFD neurons also respond to salts in P. pacificus

The RCaMP line that we used to assess calcium responses in ASE is also expressed in AFD, allowing us to simultaneously examine the calcium responses in the AFD (AM12) neurons (Fig. 5, S1, S3–S5). Surprisingly, we detected a distinctly ‘ON-OFF’ biphasic response to all 3 salt types at both concentrations. Specifically, although we observed weaker or comparable responses in AFD neurons when compared to either ASE neuron’s response towards 250 mM NH4Cl, NaCl and NH4l (Fig. 5A–B, 5E–F, 5I–J), the AFD responses were more robust than ASER toward 25 mM NH4Cl, NaCl, and NH4I (Fig. 5D, 5H, 5L). Specifically, AFD neurons responded strongly to 25 mM NaCl when neither one of the ASE neurons showed a positive response (Fig. 5G–H). Averaging the calcium transients separately by AFD left versus right did not result in significant differences in the shape of the neuronal calcium responses, with the exception of the AFDR responses to higher versus lower concentrations of NH4I (Fig. S4–S5). We have not further pursued whether these AFD responses are a reflection of a direct perception of salt or a secondary consequence of communication of salt-perceptive neurons (like ASE) to AFD.

A target of che-1, the guanylyl cyclase gcy-22.3 is required for chemotaxis

We further explored the asymmetric salt perception by the ASE neurons, which in C. elegans is largely mediated through distinct receptor-type guanylyl cyclases (rGC proteins, encoded by gcy genes), which confer salt specificity via their extracellular domains (Ortiz 2009, Smith 2013). Our previous genome survey of Ppa homologs of gcy genes has revealed patterns that made us question whether Ppa gcy genes are convincing candidates for lateralized chemotactic responses. Specifically, we noted that ASER-expressed C. elegans gcy genes and ASEL-expressed C. elegans gcy genes have only expanded in the Caenorhabditis genus (11). One outlier to this pattern is the Cel gcy-22 gene, which is expressed in ASER, but has not expanded in C. elegans (11, 42). However, this gene has duplicated several times in P. pacificus, resulting in 5 putative Ppa-gcy-22 paralogs (11). We fused the promoter of one of these paralogs, Ppa-gcy-22.3, to gfp and found that transgenic animals express GFP exclusively in ASER (Fig. 6A), identical to the C. elegans gcy-22 ortholog (42). We confirmed its expression in ASER by analyzing animals that carry both the Ppa gcy-22p::gfp reporter and the Ppa che-1p::rfp reporter, showing a unilateral overlap of these reporters in ASER (Fig. 6B).

To assess whether Ppa-gcy-22.3 is a potential effector of Ppa che-1 function, we crossed the gcy-22.3 reporter into che-1(ot5012) mutants. We found expression of gcy-22.3 was eliminated (Fig. 6C), leading us to conclude that gcy-22.3 is a potential effector of che-1 function, identical to its homolog in C. elegans.

To determine whether and which of the observed salt responses is mediated by the ASER-expressing gcy-22.3, we generated a putative gcy-22.3 null mutant through CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing (2 bp complex deletion that introduces frameshift)(Fig. 7A) and examined its response to the higher salt concentration. The ‘OFF’ response to 250 mM NH4Cl was notably abolished in the ASER neuron in the loss-of-function gcy-22.3 mutant, while the ‘ON’ response in the ASEL remained intact (Fig. 7B–C). However, the responses to 250 mM NaCl were not significantly reduced in the either the ASEL or ASER neuron in the gcy-22.3 mutant (Fig. 7D–E). Furthermore, the gcy-22.3 mutation also reduced the ‘ON’ portion of the AFD biphasic response following presentation of 250 mM NH4Cl and NaCl (Fig. 7F–G). Our findings suggest GCY-22.3 is possibly a P. pacificus salt receptor that can affect the physiological responses to salt in the ASER gustatory neuron, as well as other gustatory neurons that do not express this receptor (AFDs).

Discussion

Our study has revealed several insights into the substrates of evolutionary changes between two distantly related nematode species, P. pacificus and C. elegans. We used intracellular calcium levels as our readout for neuronal activity with a genetically encoded calcium sensor in two pairs of che-1-expressing amphid sensory neurons– the first calcium imaging study in P. pacificus. We show that three neuron types (ASE left, ASE right and AFD neurons) each have distinct calcium responses to specific ion concentrations, revealing diversity at the single neuron level. We have identified the first laterally asymmetric marker in P. pacificus, gcy-22.3p::GFP, with its expression limited to ASER homolog (AM7). Our unexpected discovery that neuronal asymmetry is present in the ASE homologs between two distantly related nematode species, despite the lack of a lsy-6 homolog, suggests that functional lateralization in P. pacificus may be mediated by a different genetic pathway compared to C. elegans.

P. pacificus and C. elegans have diverged taste palates.

We have shown that while C. elegans is attracted to acetate salts, P. pacificus avoids these acetates. Previous studies have shown that ammonium acetate (NH4Ac) is sensed both as a water-soluble compound as well as a volatile odorant and is mediated by different signaling pathways (36). Like C. elegans, it is therefore likely that ammonium and acetate ions involve a different set of neurons in P. pacificus (i.e. non-che-1 expressing neurons), based on the finding that histamine-treated che-1p::HisCl animals did not significantly attenuate their repulsive response to NaAc. We find that sodium chloride is a common attractant for both P. pacificus and C. elegans, although the magnitude of response is lower than previously published results (29). This result is likely due to differences in generating the salt gradients. Nevertheless, we find that P. pacificus neurons have a distinct response to this salt when compared to those observed in C. elegans neurons. The P. pacificus ASEL neuron responds to a decrease in NaCl concentration (likely sodium), as evidenced by the ‘OFF-2’ response profile, whereas the C. elegans ASEL neuron responds to an increase in sodium concentration. However, in both nematodes, the ASER neuron responds to a decrease in chloride concentration. Additionally, the P. pacificus ASER neuron exhibits a unique ON-OFF response to ammonium iodide, whereas in C. elegans, no ON-OFF type of response is seen in the ASE neurons– the C. elegans ASER neuron responds only to a decrease in iodide concentration. Collectively, our findings highlight the divergence of the P. pacificus salt-sensory neurons compared to those observed in C. elegans.

P. pacificus ASE neurons have narrower sensitivity range

The sensitivity range of the P. pacificus ASER responses is significantly less compared to the ASEL responses, as well as to C. elegans ASER responses. Whereas the C. elegans ASER has a 40-fold sensitivity range in the ‘OFF’ response to the removal of various concentrations of NaCl (1–40 mM)(29, 43–45), the P. pacificus ASER showed the ‘OFF’ response only to 250 mM NH4Cl but not to a 10-fold reduction concentration of NH4Cl (25 mM). For the ASEL in contrast, the response to 25 mM was just as strong as to 250 mM NH4Cl (10-fold) and comparable to the 8-fold concentration range observed for C. elegans ASEL towards NaCl. Alternatively, the magnitude of these sensitivity differences may be also partially due to differences among calcium indicators (i.e. GCaMP and Cameleon), but multiple P. pacificus che-1p::GCaMP strains did not exhibit sufficient basal fluorescence to allow for image tracking and direct comparison. The narrower sensitivity range in P. pacificus chemosensation was also observed for attraction to volatile odors (2), which span only 10-fold, versus up to 10,000-fold in attractive odors for C. elegans (21).

P. pacificus taste neurons exhibit a unique biphasic response

Although the left-ON and right-OFF responses are conserved in the ASE neurons in both species, the biphasic response of ASER to 250 mM NH4I has not been observed in either of the ASE neurons towards salts. In C. elegans, hyperosmotic stimulus such as 1M glycerol, or high concentrations or long duration of CuSO4 exposure both result in biphasic responses by the ASH neurons that sense noxious chemicals (41, 46). Olfactory neurons that mediate avoidance behavior such as the AWB neurons can also exhibit a biphasic response to the presence and removal of a high concentration isoamyl alcohol that normally elicits avoidance behavior (47). The neuron-specific response can also be dependent on the concentration of the chemical compound, since the ASER to 25 mM NH4I was a weak ‘OFF’ rather than a biphasic one. In contrast to the salt-dependent response types by P. pacificus ASE neurons, the P. pacificus AFD neurons also show exclusively biphasic responses with various amplitudes. Further characterization will help determine if biphasic responses can also be found in other sensory neuron types in P. pacificus, specifically those neurons mediating avoidance behavior.

AFD are potentially polymodal neurons

Broadly speaking, C. elegans chemosensory neurons have been classically characterized as specialized neurons for dedicated modalities such as water-soluble chemicals (ASE), volatile odorants (AWA, AWB, AWC), noxious chemicals (ASH), pheromones (ADL, ADF, ASK), as well as light (ASJ) and temperature (AFD)(1, 37, 48–51). Advances in multi-neuron calcium recordings have since shown that a given odor within a certain concentration range is detected by different ensembles of the 12 amphid neuron classes, including the AFD neurons (52–54). Unexpectedly, we found that the P. pacificus AFD neurons exhibit a distinctive biphasic response to all three salts tested (NH4Cl, NaCl, and NH4I), which differ from the C. elegans AFD calcium responses (54, 55). Moreover, the loss of the receptor gcy-22.3 reduced the AFD ‘ON’ response to NH4Cl and NaCl, indicating ASER has only a limited contribution to the AFD response. The strong positive AFD response to 25 mM NaCl that is absent in both ASE neurons further supports the likelihood that AFD receives inputs, possibly neuropeptidergic, from other amphid neurons. The integration of thermosensation and chemosensation is important for memory-regulated behavior. In C. elegans, maximum chemotaxis indices toward NH4Cl occurs when there is concordance between cultivation temperature and assay temperature (56). The C. elegans AFD neurons are also important for gustatory aversive learning in NaCl avoidance (45). Given the influence of environmental temperature on the P. pacificus mouth-form plasticity and the wide range of micro-climates that wild strains P. pacificus have been isolated from (57–59), temperature and taste preferences could be regulated at multiple genetic levels during crucial developmental decisions.

Changes in the gene regulatory architecture of sensory neuron specification

We found that the key regulator of Cel ASE identity, che-1, is also expressed in Ppa ASE and may play a similar role as a terminal selector in this neuron, based on its effect on ASE-mediated behavior and regulation of the Ppa-gcy-22.3 gene. However, the stronger behavioral effect of silencing of che-1 expressing neurons compared to a che-1 mutant background could either indicate that che-1 does not have as broad a role in controlling ASE differentiation in P. pacificus versus C. elegans. It is also possible that a developmental loss of ASE differentiation may result in compensatory changes in the chemosensory system during early development, as was observed in the C. elegans mating pheromone response by males (60).

Unexpectedly, we found that unlike in C. elegans, the Ppa che-1 gene is also expressed in the AFD neurons. Since we cannot record neural activity in AFD in a che-1 mutant (the che-1p::RCaMP driver fails to be expressed properly in che-1 mutants due to autoregulation), and do not yet have molecular markers for Ppa AFD neurons, we cannot assess whether che-1 affects AFD neuron differentiation.

Perhaps the most striking difference in the gene regulatory architecture of ASE neuron specification is the apparent lack of the key regulator of ASE asymmetry in P. pacificus, the miRNA lsy-6. In C. elegans, the expression of lsy-6 exclusively in ASEL is prepatterned via an early embryonic Notch signal (33) and serves to downregulate the homeodomain transcription factor cog-1 in the ASEL neuron (61). Through a network of downstream regulatory events, asymmetry of rGCs eventually becomes established (31). cog-1 and several asymmetrically expressed downstream effectors of cog-1, such as the die-1, lim-6 and fozi-1 transcription factors are conserved in P. pacificus, but whether the function of these factors in controlling P. pacificus ASE laterality is conserved remains to be determined. In this context it is intriguing to note that another prominent gene regulatory pathway that is controlled by miRNAs in C. elegans, the heterochronic pathway (let-7s, lin-4), appears to have diverged in P. pacificus as well, despite the conservation of the overall physiological readouts of this pathway (temporal patterning of cell lineage divisions)(62). It is tempting to speculate that miRNA-meditated regulatory process is particularly labile.

In conclusion, our work illustrates how comparative behavioral and genetic analyses in nematodes is a powerful strategy to uncover substrates of evolutionary change in simple nervous systems.

Materials and Methods:

Nematode Strains

P. pacificus and other nematode strains were maintained at ~20°C on NGM plates seeded with E. coli OP50 for food as described previously (63); these are derived from standard C. elegans culture methods (64). P. pacificus and other nematode strains used are listed in Table S1.

Chemotaxis assays

The assay for assessing response to salt gradients was adapted from C. elegans and P. pacificus chemotaxis assays (2, 21, 42). Overnight salt gradients were established on 10 cm chemotaxis plates containing 20 ml agar (5 mM KPO4, 1 M CaCl2, 3% Bacto-agar, 1 mM MgSO4) by adding 10 μl of 2.5 M salt solutions for 16 hours. Then, another 4 μl of the same salt solution or water control was added to reinforce the gradient 4 hours before the assay. Just prior to the assay, 1.5 μl of 1 M sodium azide was added to both the attractive salt (A) and the control (C) spots. Young P. pacificus adult hermaphrodite from near-saturated cultures were washed 3x with distilled water and collected by centrifuging at 2000 rpm for 2 minutes. Approximately 200 worms were loaded onto the edge of each assay plate between the gradient sources, and at least 10 combined worms have to reach the scoring arenas to be considered. At least 12 assays constituted each experimental trial, and multiple trials were conducted and averaged for each condition. The Chemotaxis Index (CI) for each end-point assay plate is defined as (A − C)/(A + C). To conduct conditional knockdowns of neurons, 5 M histamine dihydrochloride (Sigma Aldrich H7250) stock solution in sterilized deionized water (Arrowhead CA) was filter-sterilized and top plated onto the agar plates to a final histamine concentration of 25 mM histamine approximately 10 minutes before loading the worms to commence the assay. Most assays lasted ~3.5 hours at room temperature in line with the speed of P. pacificus without food, with ~40% of the animals participating. When using the Ppa-che-1-p::optHisCl(csuEx83) strain, only animals expressing Ppa-egl-20p::RFP tail marker from the extrachromosomal array were scored. Because of P. pacificus’ strong aversion to acetate, we could not easily assess the individual contributions of salt ions in a saturated background of ammonium acetate as conventionally practiced in C. elegans studies (30).

Ppa-che-1p::HisCl strain

make the Ppa-che-1p::optHisCl, the P. pacificus codon-optimized histamine-gated chloride channel sequence used in C. elegans (HisCl)(65, 66) was designed using (https://hallemlab.shinyapps.io/Wild_Worm_Codon_Adapter/) and custom synthesized (Twist Bioscience), and subsequently inserted behind the che-1 promoter (3.1 kb containing the first exon and intron)(11) to create the pHC30 plasmid construct. This Ppa-che-1p::optHisCl plasmid (2 ng/μl) along with PS312 genomic DNA (80 ng/μl) and Ppa-egl-20p::RFP co-injection marker (2 ng/μl) were individually digested with HindIII and assembled as the injection mix to create csuEx83.

Ppa-che-1p::RCaMP reporter strain

To make the Ppa-che-1p::optRCaMP, we generated a transgenic worm strain expressing the codon-optimized genetically-encoded calcium indicator (GECI), jRCaMP1a, in the neurons of interest (67, 68). jRCaMP1a is an improved red GECI based on mRuby with comparable sensitivity to GCaMP6 (69). The codon-optimized RCaMP sequence was custom synthesized (Twist Bioscience), and then subcloned using the plasmid pJET1.2/blunt (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to create the pMM2 plasmid construct. Using Gibson Assembly (E2611, New England Biolab), the codon-optimized RCaMP sequence was introduced downstream of the Ppa-che-1 promoter sequence to create the pMM5 plasmid construct. Separately, we also generated a Ppa-che-1p::optGFP transcriptional reporter with codon-optimized GFP (pMM3) to enable the localization of the che-1-expressing neurons during video acquisition (70). The Ppa-che-1p::optRCaMP (2 ng/μl) and Ppa-che-1p::optGFP constructs (1 ng/μl), along with PS312 genomic DNA (80 ng/μl) and Ppa-egl-20p::RFP (1.5 ng/μl) were individually digested with HindIII and assembled as the injection mix to create csuEx93. Despite multiple attempts, we were unable to generate an equivalent che-1p::GCaMP transgenic line with sufficient basal level of GCaMP expression for a comparison to the RCaMP calcium dynamics.

CRISPR mutagenesis generated mutants

CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis was used to generate mutations (70, 71). crRNA and primer sequences, and induced mutations, are included in Table S3 and Fig. S6.

che-1 alleles (PPA01143):

Target crRNA, tracrRNA, and Cas9 nuclease were purchased from IDT Technologies (San Diego, CA). crRNA and tracrRNA were hydrated to 100 μM with IDT Duplex Buffer, and equal volumes of each (0.61 μl) were combined and incubated at 95°C for 5 minutes, then 25°C for 5 minutes. Cas9 protein (0.5 μl of 10 μg/μl) was added, then the mix was incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes. Ppa-egl-20p::RFP was used as a co-injection marker. To reach a final total volume of 40 μl, the Cas9-crRNA-tracrRNA complex was combined with pZH009 (Ppa-egl-20p::RFP) DNA to reach 50 ng/μl final concentration using nuclease-free water. F1 progeny were screened for the presence of Ppa-egl-20p::RFP expression in the tail and candidate F1’s were sequenced to identify heterozygotes (71). ot5012 has a 4 bp insertion while ot5013 has an 8 bp complex insertion/deletion, and both mutations cause frameshift mutations and premature stop codons. Each allele was outcrossed two times to wildtype before characterization.

gcy-22.3 alleles (PPA04454):

Target crRNA, tracrRNA, and Cas9 nuclease were purchased from IDT Technologies (San Diego, CA). crRNA (RHL1400) and tracrRNA were hydrated to 100 μM with IDT Duplex Buffer, and equal volumes of each (0.61 μl) were combined and incubated at 95°C for 5 minutes, then 25°C for 5 minutes. Cas9 protein (0.5 μl of 10 μg/μl) was added, then the mix was incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes. Ppa-egl-20p::RFP was used as a co-injection marker. To reach a final total volume of 40 μl, the Cas9-crRNA-tracrRNA complex was combined with pZH009 (Ppa-egl-20p::RFP) DNA to reach 50 ng/μl final concentration using nuclease-free water. F1 progeny were screened for the presence of Ppa-egl-20p::RFP expression in the tail and candidate F1’s were sequenced to identify heterozygotes (71). csu181 has a 2 bp complex deletion, while csu182 has a 22 bp complex deletion, both mutations cause frameshifts and premature stop codons. Each allele was outcrossed two times to wildtype before characterization.

CHE-1:ALFA C-terminal tagging and immunostaining:

For induction of site-specific insertions via CRISPR/Cas-9 mediated mutagenesis, target crRNA, tracrRNA, and Cas9 nuclease were treated as described above. Single-stranded DNA repair template containing the ALFA nanobody tag (RHL1551) with 35 bp of homology arms on the 5’ and 3’ sides were purchased from IDT. To minimize sequence identity, the two copies of the ALFA sequence contain silent mutations. The crRNA (RHL1396) and tracrRNA were hydrated to 100 μM with IDT Duplex Buffer, and equal volumes of each (0.61 μl) were combined and incubated at 95°C for 5 minutes, then 25°C for 5 minutes. F1 animals expressing the co-injection marker egl-20::optRFP were lysed and checked by PCR for insertions.

Non-starved healthy cultures of ALFA-tagged CHE-1 (csu226[Ppa-che-1::2xALFA]) (from six 6 cm plate cultures) were washed with M9 and filtered (Sartorius 84g/m2, Grade 392) and processed as previously described (39). In brief, mixed stage worms were fixed overnight at 4°C on a nutator with 500 μl fixation buffer (4% paraformaldehyde in PBS). The worms were then incubated overnight at 37°C with 500 μl 4% β-mercaptoethanol dissolved in 1% Triton-X100 in 0.1M Tris pH 7.4, and digested in 200 μl of collagenase buffer with 200 units of collagenase type IV (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37°C for ~3.5 hours. The partially digested worms were subsequently washed three times with 500 μl PBST. After collagenase treatment the centrifugation between the washes was done at low speed, 1000 RCF. After washes, the worms were stained in 50 μl 1% BSA in PBST with the primary antibody (1:100 FluoTag-X2 anti-ALFA-AZdye568, N1502, NanoTag Biotechnologies, Göttigen, Germany), overnight at 4°C in a nutator. Following the washes, worms were resuspended in 50 μl VectaShield mounting medium (H-1000, Vector Laboratories, USA) containing DAPI (Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and gently mounted on freshly prepared 3% Noble agar pads. Images were acquired on a Leica DM6000 microscope.

Calcium Imaging

To conduct calcium imaging, worms were trapped and imaged within a microfluidic PDMS chip as previously described while delivering stimuli directly to the nose of an immobilized worm (46, 72). The microfluidic chip was connected to a programmable valve controller (ValveBank) that enables the user to toggle between “stimulant ON” and “stimulant OFF” states. Specifically, the ValveBank allows controlled switching of flow from the two outer buffer channels in the chip such that either the control solution (stimulant OFF) or the stimulant solution (stimulant ON) flows over the worm nose (Fig. S7). Buffer solution (for the outer two channels) consisted of M9 buffer with 0.1% Tween-20 and 1 μg/ml fluorescein (73, 74). The worm loading solution consisted of M9 buffer with 0.1% Tween-20 and 1.5 mM tetramisole hydrochloride to immobilize the animal. Water-soluble stimulant solutions consisted of the following water-soluble compounds dissolved in nanopure/milli-Q water: ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), ammonium iodide (NH4I), and sodium chloride (NaCl) at concentrations of 250 mM and 25 mM. 750 mM NaCl elicited very inconsistent responses. The water-soluble stimulant solution was made by diluting the water-soluble compound in nanopure/milli-Q water with 0.1% Tween-20. The control solution consisted of 0.1% Tween-20 nanopure/milli-Q water. Worms were exposed to the control solution, stimulant solution, and then control solution using a 60-second program: 10 seconds stimulant OFF, 20 seconds stimulant ON, and 30 seconds stimulant OFF. As a negative control, animals were exposed only to the control solution, without switching channels, for the duration of the recording. Images were captured using a Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 inverted fluorescence microscope and a pco.panda 4.2 SCMOS camera. Changes in fluorescence intensity were measured in the neurons of interest while the worm was exposed to green light. Images were processed using MetaMorph software version 7.10.5.476. Images were captured at 500 ms exposure time at 2 fps because the baseline fluorescence in Ppa-che-1p::optRCaMP worms was too dim to capture viable data using the standard 100 ms exposure time. Baseline F₀ was measured as the average background-subtracted fluorescence from the first 9 seconds of each recording and change in fluorescence intensity was calculated as dF/F = (F - F₀) / F₀, as described (74). Data were analyzed and plotted using custom scripts generated in MATLAB versions R2021a–R2024a. This code is available at https://github.com/honglabcsun/Calcium-Imaging.

For bar plot comparisons between wildtype and gcy-22.3 mutants, we calculated minimum pre-stimulus and maximum post-stimulus % dF/F values using custom scripts generated in MATLAB. Min-Max data were exported as text files, manually converted and organized into an XLSX file (Microsoft Excel Office16) and imported into Prism GraphPad software (version 10) for data visualization and statistical analysis.

Nomenclature:

Throughout the results section, P. pacificus genes will be referred to without the Ppa- prefix; if necessary for comparison to another species such as C. elegans (Cel-) will the Ppa- prefix be used.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1

Acknowledgement

This research is funded by NIH SC1GM140970 to RLH, NIH R56MH096881 to SHC. OH is funded by the HHMI. MM and RLH contributed in conception, design and acquisition of work. VL, HRC, DLC, IMD, NRK, KTQ, and SJC contributed to data acquisition. RLH, OH, and SHC contributed to the analysis and writing of the work. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. We would to also thank I. Martinez and C. Igreja for technical assistance. All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and the Supplementary Materials.

Figure 1. A comparison of chemotaxis responses to water-soluble ions between P. pacificus and C. elegans.

The J4/L4 larvae and young adult hermaphrodites from the two species responded to NH4I, LiCl, and acetates significantly differently. ****P<0.0001, **P<0.01 significant difference found between wildtype P. pacificus and C. elegans by unpaired t-test. Each assay involves a minimum of 10 J4/adult hermaphrodites.

Figure 2. P. pacificus che-1 expression in ASE and AFD amphid neurons.

(A-B) The che-1::GFP marker in the che-1::RCaMP reporter strain is expressed in the ASE and AFD amphid neurons. (C) che-1::GFP expression is detectable in the morphologically distinct AFD neurons with ‘finger’-like dendritic endings. (D-E) Immunostaining of CHE-1::ALFA shows two pairs of amphid neuron cell bodies corresponding to the ASE and AFD neurons; dorsal-ventral view (n=114). (F) The loss of che-1 results in loss che-1::RFP expression in the ASE (circle) while retaining AFD expression. Anterior is left and the scale bar in (C) represents 50 μm for all panels.

Figure 3. Che-1 expressing amphid neurons are required for sensing water-soluble ions in P. pacificus.

(A) The che-1 locus with CRISPR/Cas9- induced mutations in Exon 1. (B) The che-1 mutants show defects in attraction towards NH4Br, NH4Cl, and LiCl. (C) The che-1p::HisCl animals lose attraction towards NH4Br, NH4Cl, and NH4I in a histamine dependent manner. (D) A schematic map of the P. pacificus AM7(ASE) and AM12(AFD) amphid neurons that express the che-1p::RCaMP used in calcium imaging. The ASE axons are the only amphid axons in P. pacificus to cross each other over the dorsal lateral midline contralaterally. **P<0.01, *P<0.05 Dunnett’s post-hoc comparison showing alleles with significant difference to wildtype P. pacificus (PS312).

Figure 4. ASEL and ASER responses to different concentrations of NH4Cl, NaCl, and NH4I.

Average percent change in RCaMP fluorescence (dF/F) over time (seconds) of tracked ASE (left and right) sensory neurons in P. pacificus. Salts were presented at 10s (“ON”, left vertical line) for a duration of 20s, and then removed (“OFF”, right vertical line) for the remaining 30s; the total recording time was 60s. (A-B) ASEL and ASER neuron responses to high (250 mM, red) compared to low (25 mM, blue) concentrations of NH4Cl. (C-D) ASEL and ASER neuron responses to NaCl. (E-F) ASEL and ASER neuron responses to NH4I. Shaded ribbons represent 95% confidence intervals. Shaded ribbons in (E-F) have been cropped to maintain consistent y-axes across the plots, allowing for easier comparison. Sample sizes are indicated (n).

Figure 5. Combined AFD responses in comparison to ASE left or right neuron responses to NH4Cl, NaCl, and NH4I.

Average percent change in RCaMP fluorescence (dF/F) over time (seconds) as described in Fig. 4. Averaged combined AFD (left and right neurons, orange) compared to left or right ASE (green) responses to (A-B) 250mM NH4Cl (C-D) 25mM NH4Cl (E-F) 250mM NaCl (G-H) 25mM NaCl (I-J) 250mM NH4I (K-L) 25mM NH4I. Shaded ribbons represent 95% confidence intervals. Shaded ribbons in (J-K) have been cropped to maintain consistent y-axes across the plots, allowing for easier comparison. Sample sizes are indicated (n).

Figure 6. The laterally asymmetric expression of gcy-22.3 is dependent on the zinc finger transcription factor CHE-1.

(A) The gcy-22.3::GFP marker is expressed exclusively in the right ASE neuron (ASER)(n>200). (B) The gcy-22.3::GFP marker co-localizes with che-1::RFP expression in the ASER. (C) gcy-22.3::GFP expression is absent in the che-1(ot5012) mutant (n=55). Anterior is left and dorsal is top. Scale bar in (A) represents 50 μm for all panels.

Figure 7. ASE and AFD responses in wildtype compared to gcy-22.3 mutants.

Average percent change in RCaMP fluorescence (dF/F) over time (seconds) as described in Fig. 4. (A) WormBase JBrowse view of the gcy-22.3 locus with CRISPR/Cas9- induced mutations in Exon 5. (B-C) ASEL and ASER neuron responses to 250 mM NH4Cl wildtype (gray) and gcy-22.3 mutants (magenta). (D-E) ASEL and ASER neuron responses to 250 mM NaCl in wildtype (gray) and gcy-22.3 mutants (magenta). AFD (combined left and right neurons) responses (F) to 250 mM NH4Cl and (G) to 250 mM NaCl in wildtype (orange) and gcy-22.3 mutants (magenta). Shaded ribbons represent 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are indicated (n). For ASEL/R comparisons, bar plots represent the difference between the minimum % dF/F value 10s pre-stimulus and maximum % dF/F value 10s post-stimulus for either the (B) ON or (C-E) OFF stimulus. For AFD comparisons, bar plots represent maximum % dF/F values 10s after the ON and OFF stimulus. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 indicate significant difference. “ns” indicate no significant difference. Comparisons between different genotypes were analyzed using unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney test; comparisons within the same genotype were analyzed using paired t-test.

Table 1. Comparison of ASEL/R responses between P. pacificus and C. elegans.

	P. pacificus	C. elegans	
ASEL	ASER	ASEL	ASER	
NH4Cl (1 – 80mM)	ON	x	x29,30	OFF29,30	
NH4Cl (81 – 250mM)	ON	OFF	?	?	
NaCl (1 – 80mM)	x	OFF	ON29,43–45	OFF29,43–45	
NaCl (81 – 250mM)	OFF-2	OFF	ON44	OFF44	
NH4I (1 – 80mM)	ON	OFF	X30	OFF30	
NH4I (81 – 250mM)	ON	ON-OFF	?	?	
“x” minimal to no response

“?” represents unknown

Animals with small nervous systems have evolved left and right asymmetry in their neurons to process various salts at different concentrations.
==== Refs
References

1. Bargmann C. , “Chemosensation in C elegans” in WormBook, Jorgensen E. , Ed. (2006).
2. Hong R. L. , Sommer R. J. , Chemoattraction in Pristionchus Nematodes and Implications for Insect Recognition. Curr Biol 16 , 2359–2365 (2006).17141618
3. Chaisson K. E. , Hallem E. A. , Chemosensory behaviors of parasites. Trends Parasitol 28 , 427–436 (2012).22921895
4. Wheeler N. J. , Heimark Z. W. , Airs P. M. , Mann A. , Bartholomay L. C. , Zamanian M. , Genetic and functional diversification of chemosensory pathway receptors in mosquito-borne filarial nematodes. Plos Biol 18 , e3000723 (2020).32511224
5. Rengarajan S. , Hallem E. A. , Olfactory circuits and behaviors of nematodes. Curr Opin Neurobiol 41 , 136–148 (2016).27668755
6. Koneru S. L. , Salinas H. , Flores G. E. , Hong R. L. , The bacterial community of entomophilic nematodes and host beetles. Mol. Ecol. 25 , 2312–2324 (2016).26992100
7. Lo W.-S. , Sommer R. J. , Vitamin B12 and predatory behavior in nematodes. Vitam. Horm. 119 , 471–489 (2022).35337632
8. Lo W.-S. , Sommer R. J. , Han Z. , Microbiota succession influences nematode physiology in a beetle microcosm ecosystem. Nat. Commun. 15 , 5137 (2024).38879542
9. White J. G. , Southgate E. , Thomson J. N. , Brenner S. , The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philosophical Transactions Royal Soc Lond B Biological Sci 314 , 1–340 (1986).
10. Schafer W. , Nematode nervous systems. Curr. Biol. 26 , R955–R959 (2016).27780068
11. Hong R. L. , Riebesell M. , Bumbarger D. J. , Cook S. J. , Carstensen H. R. , Sarpolaki T. , Cochella L. , Castrejon J. , Moreno E. , Sieriebriennikov B. , Hobert O. , Sommer R. J. , Evolution of neuronal anatomy and circuitry in two highly divergent nematode species. Elife 8 , e47155 (2019).31526477
12. Ward S. , Thomson N. , White J. G. , Brenner S. , Electron microscopical reconstruction of the anterior sensory anatomy of the nematodecaenorhabditis elegans. J Comp Neurology 160 , 313–337 (1975).
13. Li J. , Zhu X. , Ashton F. T. , Gamble H. R. , Schad G. A. , Sensory neuroanatomy of a passively ingested nematode parasite, Haemonchus contortus: amphidial neurons of the third-stage larva. J Parasitol 87 , 65–72 (2001).11227904
14. Bumbarger D. J. , Wijeratne S. , Carter C. , Crum J. , Ellisman M. H. , Baldwin J. G. , Three-dimensional reconstruction of the amphid sensilla in the microbial feeding nematode, Acrobeles complexus (nematoda: Rhabditida). J Comp Neurol 512 , 271–281 (2009).19003904
15. Zhu H. , Li J. , Nolan T. J. , Schad G. A. , Lok J. B. , Sensory neuroanatomy of Parastrongyloides trichosuri, a nematode parasite of mammals: Amphidial neurons of the first-stage larva. J Comp Neurology 519 , 2493–2507 (2011).
16. Loer C. M. , Rivard L. , Evolution of neuronal patterning in free-living rhabditid nematodes I: Sex-specific serotonin-containing neurons. J Comp Neurol 502 , 736–767 (2007).17436291
17. Baiocchi T. , Lee G. , Choe D.-H. , Dillman A. R. , Host seeking parasitic nematodes use specific odors to assess host resources. Sci Rep-uk 7 , 6270 (2017).
18. Gang S. S. , Castelletto M. L. , Yang E. , Ruiz F. , Brown T. M. , Bryant A. S. , Grant W. N. , Hallem E. A. , Chemosensory mechanisms of host seeking and infectivity in skin-penetrating nematodes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117 , 17913–17923 (2020).32651273
19. Bryant A. S. , Ruiz F. , Lee J. H. , Hallem E. A. , The neural basis of heat seeking in a human-infective parasitic worm. Curr Biol 32 , 2206–2221.e6 (2022).35483361
20. Hallem E. A. , Dillman A. R. , Hong A. V. , Zhang Y. , Yano J. M. , DeMarco S. F. , Sternberg P. W. , A Sensory Code for Host Seeking in Parasitic Nematodes. Curr Biol 21 , 377–383 (2011).21353558
21. Bargmann C. I. , Horvitz H. R. , Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron 7 , 729–742 (1991).1660283
22. Dusenbery , Sheridan , Russell , Chemotaxis Defective Mutants of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics (1975).
23. Uchida O. , Nakano H. , Koga M. , Ohshima Y. , The C. elegans che-1 gene encodes a zinc finger transcription factor required for specification of the ASE chemosensory neurons. Development 130 , 1215–1224 (2003).12588839
24. Chang S. , Johnston R. J. , Hobert O. , A transcriptional regulatory cascade that controls left/right asymmetry in chemosensory neurons of C. elegans. Gene Dev 17 , 2123–2137 (2003).12952888
25. Etchberger J. F. , Lorch A. , Sleumer M. C. , Zapf R. , Jones S. J. , Marra M. A. , Holt R. A. , Moerman D. G. , Hobert O. , The molecular signature and cis-regulatory architecture of a C. elegans gustatory neuron. Gene Dev 21 , 1653–1674 (2007).17606643
26. Yu S. , Avery L. , Baude E. , Garbers D. L. , Guanylyl cyclase expression in specific sensory neurons: A new family of chemosensory receptors. Proc National Acad Sci 94 , 3384–3387 (1997).
27. Pierce-Shimomura J. T. , Faumont S. , Gaston M. R. , Pearson B. J. , Lockery S. R. , The homeobox gene lim-6 is required for distinct chemosensory representations in C. elegans. Nature 410 , 694–698 (2001).11287956
28. Chang S. , Johnston R. J. , Frøkjær-Jensen C. , Lockery S. , Hobert O. , MicroRNAs act sequentially and asymmetrically to control chemosensory laterality in the nematode. Nature 430 , 785–789 (2004).15306811
29. Suzuki H. , Thiele T. R. , Faumont S. , Ezcurra M. , Lockery S. R. , Schafer W. R. , Functional asymmetry in Caenorhabditis elegans taste neurons and its computational role in chemotaxis. Nature 454 , 114–117 (2008).18596810
30. Ortiz C. O. , Faumont S. , Takayama J. , Ahmed H. K. , Goldsmith A. D. , Pocock R. , McCormick K. E. , Kunimoto H. , Iino Y. , Lockery S. , Hobert O. , Lateralized Gustatory Behavior of C. elegans Is Controlled by Specific Receptor-Type Guanylyl Cyclases. Curr Biol 19 , 996–1004 (2009).19523832
31. Hobert O. , Development of left/right asymmetry in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system: From zygote to postmitotic neuron. genesis 52 , 528–543 (2014).24510690
32. Johnston R. , Hobert O. , A microRNA controlling left/right neuronal asymmetry in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 426 , 845–849 (2003).14685240
33. Cochella L. , Hobert O. , Embryonic Priming of a miRNA Locus Predetermines Postmitotic Neuronal Left/Right Asymmetry in C. elegans. Cell 151 , 1229–1242 (2012).23201143
34. Ahmed R. , Chang Z. , Younis A. E. , Langnick C. , Li N. , Chen W. , Brattig N. , Dieterich C. , Conserved miRNAs Are Candidate Post-Transcriptional Regulators of Developmental Arrest in Free-Living and Parasitic Nematodes. Genome Biol Evol 5 , 1246–1260 (2013).23729632
35. Ward S. , Chemotaxis by the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: Identification of Attractants and Analysis of the Response by Use of Mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 70 , 817–821 (1973).4351805
36. Frøkjær-Jensen C. , Ailion M. , Lockery S. R. , Ammonium-Acetate Is Sensed by Gustatory and Olfactory Neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. Plos One 3 , e2467 (2008).18560547
37. Bargmann C. I. , Hartwieg E. , Horvitz H. R. , Odorant-selective genes and neurons mediate olfaction in C. elegans. Cell 74 , 515–527 (1993).8348618
38. Etchberger J. F. , Flowers E. B. , Poole R. J. , Bashllari E. , Hobert O. , Cis-regulatory mechanisms of left/right asymmetric neuron-subtype specification in C. elegans. Development 136 , 147–160 (2009).19060335
39. Igreja C. , Loschko T. , Schäfer A. , Sharma R. , Quiobe S. P. , Aloshy E. , Witte H. , Sommer R. J. , Application of ALFA-Tagging in the Nematode Model Organisms Caenorhabditis elegans and Pristionchus pacificus. Cells 11 , 3875 (2022).36497133
40. Kato S. , Xu Y. , Cho C. E. , Abbott L. F. , Bargmann C. I. , Temporal Responses of C. elegans Chemosensory Neurons Are Preserved in Behavioral Dynamics. Neuron 81 , 616–628 (2014).24440227
41. Wang W. , Xu Z.-J. , Wu Y.-Q. , Qin L.-W. , Li Z.-Y. , Wu Z.-X. , Off-response in ASH neurons evoked by CuSO4 requires the TRP channel OSM-9 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 461 , 463–468 (2015).25871795
42. Ortiz C. O. , Etchberger J. F. , Posy S. L. , Frøkjær-Jensen C. , Lockery S. , Honig B. , Hobert O. , Searching for Neuronal Left/Right Asymmetry: Genomewide Analysis of Nematode Receptor-Type Guanylyl Cyclases. Genetics 173 , 131–149 (2006).16547101
43. Rabinowitch I. , Chatzigeorgiou M. , Zhao B. , Treinin M. , Schafer W. R. , Rewiring neural circuits by the insertion of ectopic electrical synapses in transgenic C. elegans. Nat Commun 5 , 4442 (2014).25026983
44. Shindou T. , Ochi-Shindou M. , Murayama T. , Saita E. , Momohara Y. , Wickens J. R. , Maruyama I. N. , Active propagation of dendritic electrical signals in C. elegans. Sci. Rep. 9 , 3430 (2019).30837592
45. Watteyne J. , Peymen K. , der Auwera P. V. , Borghgraef C. , Vandewyer E. , Damme S. V. , Rutten I. , Lammertyn J. , Jelier R. , Schoofs L. , Beets I. , Neuromedin U signaling regulates retrieval of learned salt avoidance in a C. elegans gustatory circuit. Nat. Commun. 11 , 2076 (2020).32350283
46. Chronis N. , Zimmer M. , Bargmann C. I. , Microfluidics for in vivo imaging of neuronal and behavioral activity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Methods 4 , 727–731 (2007).17704783
47. Yoshida K. , Hirotsu T. , Tagawa T. , Oda S. , Wakabayashi T. , Iino Y. , Ishihara T. , Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3 , 739 (2012).22415830
48. Mori I. , Ohshima Y. , Neural regulation of thermotaxis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 376 , 344–348 (1995).7630402
49. Sengupta P. , Chou J. H. , Bargmann C. I. , odr-10 Encodes a Seven Transmembrane Domain Olfactory Receptor Required for Responses to the Odorant Diacetyl. Cell 84 , 899–909 (1996).8601313
50. Macosko E. Z. , Pokala N. , Feinberg E. H. , Chalasani S. H. , Butcher R. A. , Clardy J. , Bargmann C. I. , A hub-and-spoke circuit drives pheromone attraction and social behaviour in C. elegans. Nature 458 , 1171–1175 (2009).19349961
51. Liu J. , Ward A. , Gao J. , Dong Y. , Nishio N. , Inada H. , Kang L. , Yu Y. , Ma D. , Xu T. , Mori I. , Xie Z. , Xu X. Z. S. , C. elegans phototransduction requires a G protein-dependent cGMP pathway and a taste receptor homolog. Nat. Neurosci. 13 , 715–722 (2010).20436480
52. Leinwand S. G. , Chalasani S. H. , Neuropeptide signaling remodels chemosensory circuit composition in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Neurosci. 16 , 1461–1467 (2013).24013594
53. Lin A. , Qin S. , Casademunt H. , Wu M. , Hung W. , Cain G. , Tan N. Z. , Valenzuela R. , Lesanpezeshki L. , Venkatachalam V. , Pehlevan C. , Zhen M. , Samuel A. D. T. , Functional imaging and quantification of multineuronal olfactory responses in C. elegans. Sci Adv 9 , eade1249 (2023).36857454
54. Yemini E. , Lin A. , Nejatbakhsh A. , Varol E. , Sun R. , Mena G. E. , Samuel A. D. T. , Paninski L. , Venkatachalam V. , Hobert O. , NeuroPAL: A Multicolor Atlas for Whole-Brain Neuronal Identification in C. elegans. Cell 184 , 272–288.e11 (2021).33378642
55. Zaslaver A. , Liani I. , Shtangel O. , Ginzburg S. , Yee L. , Sternberg P. W. , Hierarchical sparse coding in the sensory system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 , 1185–1189 (2015).25583501
56. Kuhara A. , Okumura M. , Kimata T. , Tanizawa Y. , Takano R. , Kimura K. D. , Inada H. , Matsumoto K. , Mori I. , Temperature Sensing by an Olfactory Neuron in a Circuit Controlling Behavior of C. elegans. Science 320 , 803–807 (2008).18403676
57. Leaver M. , Kienle S. , Begasse M. L. , Sommer R. J. , Hyman A. A. , A locus in Pristionchus pacificus that is responsible for the ability to give rise to fertile offspring at higher temperatures. Biol Open 5 , 1111–1117 (2016).27432478
58. Sieriebriennikov B. , Markov G. V. , Witte H. , Sommer R. J. , The Role of DAF-21/Hsp90 in Mouth-Form Plasticity in Pristionchus pacificus. Mol Biol Evol 34 , 1644–1653 (2017).28333289
59. Leaver M. , Moreno E. , Kayhan M. , McGaughran A. , Rödelsperger C. , Sommer R. J. , Hyman A. A. , Adaptation to environmental temperature in divergent clades of the nematode Pristionchus pacificus. Evolution 76 , 1660–1673 (2022).35696526
60. White J. Q. , Nicholas T. J. , Gritton J. , Truong L. , Davidson E. R. , Jorgensen E. M. , The Sensory Circuitry for Sexual Attraction in C. elegans Males. Curr. Biol. 17 , 1847–1857 (2007).17964166
61. Johnston R. J. , Chang S. , Etchberger J. F. , Ortiz C. O. , Hobert O. , MicroRNAs acting in a double-negative feedback loop to control a neuronal cell fate decision. Proc National Acad Sci 102 , 12449–12454 (2005).
62. Sharma D. R. , Röseler W. , Witte H. , Werner M. S. , Sommer R. J. , Developmental small RNA transcriptomics reveals divergent evolution of the conserved microRNA miR-100 and the let-7-complex in nematodes. bioRxiv, 2024.07.19.604269 (2024).
63. Cinkornpumin J. K. , Wisidagama D. R. , Rapoport V. , Go J. L. , Dieterich C. , Wang X. , Sommer R. J. , Hong R. L. , A host beetle pheromone regulates development and behavior in the nematode Pristionchus pacificus. Elife 3 , e03229 (2014).25317948
64. Brenner S. , The Genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77 , 71–94 (1974).4366476
65. Pokala N. , Liu Q. , Gordus A. , Bargmann C. I. , Inducible and titratable silencing of Caenorhabditis elegans neurons in vivo with histamine-gated chloride channels. Proc National Acad Sci 111 , 2770–2775 (2014).
66. Pokala N. , Flavell S. W. , C. elegans, Methods and Applications. Methods Mol Biology 2468 , 357–373 (2022).
67. Kerr R. , Lev-Ram V. , Baird G. , Vincent P. , Tsien R. Y. , Schafer W. R. , Optical Imaging of Calcium Transients in Neurons and Pharyngeal Muscle of C. elegans. Neuron 26 , 583–594 (2000).10896155
68. Nakai J. , Ohkura M. , Imoto K. , A high signal-to-noise Ca2+ probe composed of a single green fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 19 , 137–141 (2001).11175727
69. Dana H. , Mohar B. , Sun Y. , Narayan S. , Gordus A. , Hasseman J. P. , Tsegaye G. , Holt G. T. , Hu A. , Walpita D. , Patel R. , Macklin J. J. , Bargmann C. I. , Ahrens M. B. , Schreiter E. R. , Jayaraman V. , Looger L. L. , Svoboda K. , Kim D. S. , Sensitive red protein calcium indicators for imaging neural activity. eLife 5 , e12727 (2016).27011354
70. Han Z. , Lo W.-S. , Lightfoot J. W. , Witte H. , Sun S. , Sommer R. J. , Improving Transgenesis Efficiency and CRISPR-Associated Tools Through Codon Optimization and Native Intron Addition in Pristionchus Nematodes. Genetics 216 , genetics.303785.2020 (2020).
71. Nakayama K. , Ishita Y. , Chihara T. , Okumura M. , Screening for CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations using a co-injection marker in the nematode Pristionchus pacificus. Dev Genes Evol, 1 –8 (2020).
72. Chalasani S. H. , Chronis N. , Tsunozaki M. , Gray J. M. , Ramot D. , Goodman M. B. , Bargmann C. I. , Dissecting a circuit for olfactory behaviour in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 450 , 63–70 (2007).17972877
73. Stiernagle T. , Maintenance of C. elegans. WormBook : online Rev. C elegans Biol., 1–11 (2006).
74. Liu Z. , Kariya M. J. , Chute C. D. , Pribadi A. K. , Leinwand S. G. , Tong A. , Curran K. P. , Bose N. , Schroeder F. C. , Srinivasan J. , Chalasani S. H. , Predator-secreted sulfolipids induce defensive responses in C. elegans. Nat Commun 9 , 1128 (2018).29555902
