
==== Front
Open Forum Infect Dis
Open Forum Infect Dis
ofid
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
2328-8957
Oxford University Press US

10.1093/ofid/ofae502
ofae502
Infectious Diseases in Special Populations
Brief Report
AcademicSubjects/MED00290
Gender Disparities in Statin Prescriptions in People With HIV With Low/Moderate to High Cardiovascular Risk
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5566-8628
Abela Irene A Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8959-2724
Chammartin Frédérique Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1716-993X
Amstutz Alain Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Oslo Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1402-974X
Surial Bernard Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-3011
Ballif Marie Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2312-7050
Marzolini Catia Service and Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9337-900X
Aebi-Popp Karoline Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-9995
Notter Julia Clinic for Infectious Diseases, Infection Prevention and Travel Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3996-8663
Segeral Olivier HIV Unit, Infectious Diseases Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Stoeckle Marcel Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0933-7833
Cavassini Matthias Infectious Diseases Service, University Hospital Lausanne, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9724-8373
Bernasconi Enos Division of Infectious Diseases, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, University of Geneva and University of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1142-6723
Günthard Huldrych F Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9220-8348
Kouyos Roger D Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8730-790X
Pasin Chloé Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

the Swiss HIV Cohort Study Abela I
Aebi-Popp K
Anagnostopoulos A
Battegay M
Bernasconi E
Braun D L
Bucher H C
Calmy A
Cavassini M
Ciuffi A
Dollenmaier G
Egger M
Elzi L
Fehr J
Fellay J
Furrer H
Fux C A
Günthard H F
Hachfeld A
Haerry D
Hassec B
Hirsch H H
Hoffmann M
Hösli I
Huber M
Jackson-Perry D
Kahlert C R
Keiser O
Klimkait T
Kouyos R D
Kovari H
Kusejko K
Labhardt N
Leuzinger K
Martinez de Tejada B
Marzolini C
Metzner K J
Müller N
Nemeth J
Nicca D
Notter J
Paioni P
Pantaleo G
Perreau M
Rauch A
Salazar-Vizcaya L
Schmid P
Speck R
Stöckle M
Tarr P
Trkola A
Wandeler G
Weisser M
Yerly S

Correspondence: Chloé Pasin, PhD, Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland (chloe.pasin@usz.ch).
Potential conflicts of interests . I.A.A. has received honoraria from MSD and Sanofi, a travel grant from Gilead Sciences, and a grant from the Promedica foundation. R.D.K. has received research fundings from Gilead unrelated to this work. K.A.P.'s institution has received travel grants and advisory fees from MSD, Gilead, and ViiV healthcare unrelated to this work. H.F.G. has received grants from the SNF, SHCS, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, University of Zurich's Clinical Research Priority Program, viral disease; Zurich Primary HIV Infection; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; National Institutes of Health; Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare; and Roche; and personal fees from Merck, Gilead Sciences, ViiV, GSK, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, and Novartis, for consultancy or DSMB membership and a travel grant from Gilead. C.M. received speaker honoraria from Gilead and ViiV unrelated to this work. M.S. received advisory fees from Gilead, MSD, Moderna, Pfizer, and ViiV healthcare unrelated to this work and a travel grant from Gilead. E.B.'s institution received research grants from SHCS, Swiss National Science Foundation, Gilead, and Merck; advisory fees and travel grants from Gilead, Merck, ViiV, Pfizer, Abbvie, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, and Ely Lilly unrelated to the present work. B.S. reports support to his institution for travel grants from Gilead Sciences and ViiV healthcare, and for advisory boards from MSD.

9 2024
09 9 2024
09 9 2024
11 9 ofae50230 7 2024
27 8 2024
06 9 2024
18 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Abstract

The REPRIEVE trial suggests that primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention could be considered among people with HIV at low CVD risk. We found cisgender women with low/moderate and high CVD risk are less likely to receive statins than cisgender men. Efforts are needed to guarantee equal access to statin-based CVD prevention.

Cardiovascular prevention
gender disparities
people with HIV
prescription
statin
Swiss HIV Cohort Study 10.13039/501100010474 Swiss National Science Foundation 10.13039/501100001711 #201369 SHCS 10.13039/100006057 SHCS research foundation Swiss university Promedica Foundation University of Zurich 10.13039/501100006447
==== Body
pmcWith the availability of potent antiretroviral therapy, life expectancy in people with HIV in high-income countries is now in the range of the general population [1]. However, people with HIV experience higher rates of comorbidities, including cardiovascular diseases (CVD), even when accounting for traditional risk factors [2, 3]. The recent REPRIEVE clinical trial demonstrated that among people with HIV with a low to moderate CVD risk, statin use reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events by 35% [4]. Consequently, the latest interim European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS) guidelines recommend high-intensity statin therapy for individuals with a 10-year CVD risk above 10%, moderate-intensity statin therapy for those with a risk between 5% and 10%, and individualized consideration for those with a risk below 5%.

Previous work has shown that statins are often underprescribed in people with HIV [5, 6]. Demographic and socioeconomic factors also influence statins prescription patterns, including ethnic and gender disparities in people with HIV [7, 8]. Exploratory analyses of the REPRIEVE trial have shown that the risk of CVD might be underestimated in Black people and cisgender women with HIV [9], underlining the importance of considering these factors in clinical care.

Here, we aimed to explore whether gender and ethnicity influence statin prescriptions for CVD prevention in people with HIV in Switzerland, a high-income country with a high standard of care and more equitable access compared to countries such as the United States—where health insurance significantly impacts medication prescriptions.

METHODS

The Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) is a prospective multicenter cohort study enrolling people with HIV in Switzerland [10]. The SHCS is approved by the local ethical committees of the participating centers and written informed consent is obtained from all participants. Participants are followed-up biannually with clinical and behavioral data collection.

We computed the CVD risk at each follow-up visit using SCORE2 for participants between ages 40 and 70 years, and SCORE2-OP for participants aged >70 years of age [11, 12], as recommended by the most recent EACS guidelines [13]. We classified the CVD risk in 3 categories: low/moderate, high, or very high—as previously described (see Supplementary Section 1). The risk was calculated only if data on age, systolic blood pressure, and non–high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol values were available.

We included in the analysis participants who were not receiving a statin and whose first CVD risk score in a given category (low/moderate, high, or very high) occurred after 2015, when the systematic collection of comedications started in the SHCS. Of note, some participants could be classified into different risk categories over time (eg, initially receiving a low/moderate risk assessment, followed by a first high risk assessment a few years later). Participants who had experienced a previous cardiovascular event (see Supplementary Section 2) before the inclusion date were excluded from the analysis.

For each CVD risk category separately (low/moderate, high, very high), we employed a multivariable Cox regression to assess the impact of sociodemographic and HIV-related factors on the time between first available risk assessment until statin prescription or administrative censoring (date of the last follow-up visit until 31 October 2023). These factors include gender (cisgender women, cisgender men, transgender women—results on transgender women are not reported in the main result section because of insufficient data but are included in the Supplementary Materials), ethnicity as reported in the SHCS (White, Black, Hispano-American, Asian), age (per 10 years), intravenous drug use (yes/no), education level (mandatory school or less vs apprenticeship or any degree), body mass index (<18.5, between 18.5 and 25, between 25 and 30, and >30 kg/m2), living alone (yes/no), current smoker (yes/no; imputed from the most recent value available if missing), physical activity (more vs less than twice per month), previous exposure to protease inhibitors, diabetes, non-HDL value (total cholesterol minus HDL), and family history of CVD. We report the corresponding adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 12 253 SHCS participants had at least one follow-up visit after 2015. Of those, 2300 (18.8%) were included in the low/moderate CVD risk score analysis (1557 cisgender men; 721 cisgender women; median age, 43 years); 2226 (18.1%) in the high CVD risk score analysis (1846 cisgender men; 365 cisgender women; median age, 46 years); and 698 (5.70%) in the very high CVD risk score analysis (646 cisgender men; 52 cisgender women; median age, 60 years) (Supplementary Sections 3, 4.1, 5.1, and 6.1).

Statins were not commonly prescribed in the low/moderate and high-risk categories, with respectively 7.9% and 13.7% of SHCS participants receiving a statin prescription at some point following the risk assessment. Statin prescriptions were higher in people at very high CVD risks versus those at low/moderate and high risk, with 29.4% of them receiving a statins prescription at some point after the risk assessment.

We found no significant differences in statin prescription between people of White and Black ethnicity across all CVD risk categories, with aHR ranging from 1.01 (95% CI, .65-1.56) in the high-risk category to 1.34 (95% CI, .67-2.69) in the very high-risk category (Figure 1 and Supplementary Sections 4.2, 5.2, and 6.2). In the low/moderate risk category, Asian people were more likely to receive a statin than White people (aHR 2.22; 95% CI, 1.19-4.16).

Figure 1. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for statins prescriptions by gender (cisgender women vs cisgender men) and ethnicity (people of Black, Hispano-American, and Asian ethnicity vs White ethnicity) in each CVD risk category: low/moderate (blue), high (yellow), and very high (red)). CVD risk was calculated using the SCORE2 or SCORE2-OP. Adjusted for age (per 10 y), intravenous drug use (yes/no), education level (mandatory school or less vs apprenticeship or any degree), body mass index (less than 18.5, between 18.5 and 25, between 25 and 30, and more than 30 kg/m2), living alone (yes/no), current smoker (yes/no; imputed from the most recent value available if missing), physical activity (more vs less than twice a month), previous exposure to protease inhibitors, diabetes, non-HDL value (total cholesterol minus HDL), and family history of CVD. CM, cisgender men, CW, cisgender women.

Importantly, among people with a low/moderate and high CVD risk, cisgender women were less likely to be prescribed a statin compared to cisgender men, with aHR of 0.47 (0.31-0.72) and 0.53 (0.37-0.75), respectively (Figure 1 and Supplementary Sections 4.2, 5.2, and 6.2). However, in the very high CVD risk category, there were no significant gender-related prescription differences, with an aHR of 0.76 (0.36-1.60).

DISCUSSION

In the SHCS, the proportion of people with HIV receiving statins (8%-30%) was low compared to international figures, but similar to the general Swiss population [14]. We found that cisgender women with HIV and at low/moderate or high CVD risk were approximately half as likely to receive statin therapy than cisgender men. At very high CVD risk, prescription patterns were similar across gender. Gender differences in statin prescriptions have been reported in the general population [15–17]. This could result from a combination of systemic factors, prescription differences in healthcare provider prescriptions, and patient acceptance and medication adherence. Previous studies have shown that statins discontinuation rates are higher in women versus men, and mostly because of a higher rate of adverse events experienced by women [18, 19]. Consequently, medical doctors might be more hesitant to prescribe a statin to female patients. Acceptance of statin medication is also lower among women compared to men [20], potentially because of concerns about muscle pain, a common side effect, or reluctance toward polypharmacy. Additionally, CVD risk perception has been shown to be lower in women, both from women themselves [21] and their care providers [22, 23], therefore affecting the choice of CVD prevention strategies. Statin prescriptions were also shown to depend on socioeconomic parameters [24, 25], potentially affecting gender-related patterns in statins prescription given that women in the SHCS have on average lower socioeconomic positions than men [26]. Cisgender women with HIV at low/moderate and high CVD risk are not only half as likely to receive statins, but their CVD risk might also be underestimated [9], suggesting that they receive suboptimal care for CVD.

Although disparities in statin prescriptions among different ethnicities have been previously reported [7, 16], we found no significant differences between White and Black people with HIV in the SHCS. Interestingly, we found that Asian people were more likely to be prescribed statins than White people in the low/moderate CVD risk category. Conflicting results have been reported when comparing people of White and Asian ethnicity [16, 27]. This could be explained by different country-specific healthcare systems, and variations in the communities included under the “Asian” ethnicity umbrella.

Our study has limitations because it only assessed the time between a first CVD risk assessment in a given category (low/moderate, high, very high) until statin prescription. To gain a fuller picture, it would be interesting to analyze longitudinal trajectories for each patient because CVD risk is assessed at each follow-up visit. This would allow us to also understand the role of lifestyle adjustments in CVD prevention (eg, smoking cessation, physical activity). Although our study identified gender differences in statin therapy, the current analysis does not elucidate the underlying reasons for these disparities. This study is observational by design, and it is therefore not possible to draw conclusions on the causality between these gender differences and statin prescription. Finally, given the recency of the new EACS guidelines, follow-up analyses will be needed to evaluate whether they have initiated changes in clinical practice.

In conclusion, our findings provide opportunities to address inequalities in CVD management across gender in people with HIV and ensure equal access to adequate treatments. Given the REPRIEVE results, the ideal strategy for prescribing statins in primary prevention needs to be defined in clinical care. Efforts are needed to ensure a good communication between clinicians and people with HIV to ensure that people at risk initiate therapy. Finally, further research is needed to understand the gender gap in statin prescription and to develop methods to address it.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.

Supplementary Material

ofae502_Supplementary_Data

Notes

Acknowledgments. We thank the participants of the SHCS, the physicians and study nurses for excellent patient care, and the SHCS data center for excellent data management.

Authors contributions. C.P.: conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revision of the article. I.A.A.: conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, interpretation of data, drafting and revision of the article. All other co-authors: acquisition of data and revision of the article.

Members of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study: Abela I, Aebi-Popp K, Anagnostopoulos A, Battegay M, Bernasconi E, Braun DL, Bucher HC, Calmy A, Cavassini M, Ciuffi A, Dollenmaier G, Egger M, Elzi L, Fehr J, Fellay J, Furrer H, Fux CA, Günthard HF (President of the SHCS), Hachfeld A, Haerry D (deputy of “Positive Council”), Hasse B, Hirsch HH, Hoffmann M, Hösli I, Huber M, Jackson-Perry D (patient representatives), Kahlert CR (Chairman of the Mother & Child Substudy), Keiser O, Klimkait T, Kouyos RD, Kovari H, Kusejko K (Head of Data Centre), Labhardt N, Leuzinger K, Martinez de Tejada B, Marzolini C, Metzner KJ, Müller N, Nemeth J, Nicca D, Notter J, Paioni P, Pantaleo G, Perreau M, Rauch A (Chairman of the Scientific Board), Salazar-Vizcaya L, Schmid P, Speck R, Stöckle M (Chairman of the Clinical and Laboratory Committee), Tarr P, Trkola A, Wandeler G, Weisser M, Yerly S.

Financial support. This work has been financed within the framework of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant #201369), by SHCS project #914 and by the Swiss HIV Cohort Study Research Foundation. The data were gathered by the 5 Swiss university hospitals, 2 cantonal hospitals, 15 affiliated hospitals, and 36 private physicians (listed at http://www.shcs.ch/180-health-care-providers). I.A.A. is supported by a research grant of the Promedica Foundation. C.P. is supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the University of Zurich.

Data availability. The individual level datasets generated or analyzed during the current study do not fulfill the requirements for open data access: (1) The SHCS informed consent states that sharing data outside the SHCS network is only permitted for specific studies on HIV infection and its complications, and to researchers who have signed an agreement detailing the use of the data and biological samples; and 2) the data is too dense and comprehensive to preserve patient privacy in persons living with HIV.

According to the Swiss law, data cannot be shared if data subjects have not agreed or data are too sensitive to share. Investigators with a request for selected data should send a proposal to the respective SHCS address (www.shcs.ch/contact). The provision of data will be considered by the Scientific Board of the SHCS and the study team and is subject to Swiss legal and ethical regulations and is outlined in a material and data transfer agreement.
==== Refs
References

1 Wandeler  G, Johnson  LF, Egger  M. Trends in life expectancy of HIV-positive adults on antiretroviral therapy across the globe: comparisons with general population. Curr Opin HIV AIDS  2016; 11 :492–500.27254748
2 Nüesch  R, Wang  Q, Elzi  L, et al  Risk of cardiovascular events and blood pressure control in hypertensive HIV-infected patients: Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS). JAIDS  2013; 62 :396–404.23288033
3 Periard  D, Cavassini  M, Taffé  P, et al  High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in HIV-infected persons. Clin Infect Dis  2008; 46 :761–7.18230043
4 Grinspoon  SK, Fitch  KV, Zanni  MV, et al  Pitavastatin to prevent cardiovascular disease in HIV infection. N Engl J Med  2023; 389 :687–99.37486775
5 Todd  JV, Cole  SR, Wohl  DA, et al  Underutilization of statins when indicated in HIV-seropositive and seronegative women. AIDS Patient Care STDS  2017; 31 :447–54.29087746
6 Clement  ME, Park  LP, Navar  AM, et al  Statin utilization and recommendations among HIV- and HCV-infected veterans: a cohort study. Clin Infect Dis  2016; 63 :407–13.27143663
7 Riestenberg  RA, Furman  A, Cowen  A, et al  Differences in statin utilization and lipid lowering by race, ethnicity, and HIV status in a real-world cohort of persons with human immunodeficiency virus and uninfected persons. Am Heart J  2019; 209 :79–87.30685678
8 Al-Kindi  SG, Zidar  DA, McComsey  GA, Longenecker  CT. Gender differences in statin prescription rate among patients living with HIV and hepatitis C virus. Clin Infect Dis  2016; 63 :993–4.27369319
9 Grinspoon  SK, Ribaudo  HJ, Triant  VA, et al  Performance of the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations for Risk Prediction in the Global REPRIEVE Trial. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in Denver, Colorado 2024.
10 Scherrer  AU, Traytel  A, Braun  DL, et al  Cohort profile update: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS). Int J Epidemiol  2022; 51 :33–4j.34363666
11 SCORE2 working group, ESC Cardiovascular risk collaboration . SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Eur Heart J  2021; 42 :2439–54.34120177
12 SCORE2-OP working group, ESC Cardiovascular risk collaboration . SCORE2-OP risk prediction algorithms: estimating incident cardiovascular event risk in older persons in four geographical risk regions. Eur Heart J  2021; 42 :2455–67.34120185
13 Ambrosioni  J, Levi  L, Alagaratnam  J, et al  Major revision version 12.0 of the European AIDS Clinical Society guidelines 2023. HIV Med  2023; 24 :1126–36.37849432
14 Reinau  D, Schur  N, Twerenbold  S, et al  Utilisation patterns and costs of lipid-lowering drugs in Switzerland 2013–2019. Swiss Med Wkly  2021; 151 :w30018.34495601
15 Metser  G, Bradley  C, Moise  N, Liyanage-Don  N, Kronish  I, Ye  S. Gaps and disparities in primary prevention statin prescription during outpatient care. Am J Cardiol  2021; 161 :36–41.34794616
16 Raeisi-Giglou  P, Jabri  A, Shahrori  Z, et al  Disparities in the prescription of statins in the primary care setting: a retrospective observational study. Curr Probl Cardiol  2022; 47 :101329.35870548
17 Ballo  P, Balzi  D, Barchielli  A, Turco  L, Franconi  F, Zuppiroli  A. Gender differences in statin prescription rates, adequacy of dosing, and association of statin therapy with outcome after heart failure hospitalization: a retrospective analysis in a community setting. Eur J Clin Pharmacol  2016; 72 :311–9.26581760
18 Hsue  PY, Bittner  VA, Betteridge  J, et al  Impact of female sex on lipid lowering, clinical outcomes, and adverse effects in atorvastatin trials. Am J Cardiol  2015; 115 :447–53.25637322
19 Karalis  DG, Wild  RA, Maki  KC, et al  Gender differences in side effects and attitudes regarding statin use in the Understanding Statin Use in America and Gaps in Patient Education (USAGE) study. J Clin Lipidol  2016; 10 :833–41.27578114
20 Brown  CJ, Chang  L-S, Hosomura  N, et al  Assessment of sex disparities in nonacceptance of statin therapy and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels among patients at high cardiovascular risk. JAMA Netw Open  2023; 6 :e231047-e.36853604
21 Monsuez  J-J, Pham  T, Karam  N, et al  Awareness of individual cardiovascular risk factors and self-perception of cardiovascular risk in women. Am J Med Sci  2017; 354 :240–5.28918829
22 Kim  I, Field  TS, Wan  D, Humphries  K, Sedlak  T. Sex and gender bias as a mechanistic determinant of cardiovascular disease outcomes. Can J Cardiol  2022; 38 :1865–80.36116747
23 Leifheit-Limson  EC, D’Onofrio  G, Daneshvar  M, et al  Sex differences in cardiac risk factors, perceived risk, and health care provider discussion of risk and risk modification among young patients with acute myocardial infarction: the VIRGO study. J Am Coll Cardiol  2015; 66 :1949–57.26515996
24 Ohlsson  H, Lynch  K, Merlo  J. Is the physician's adherence to prescription guidelines associated with the patient's socio-economic position? An analysis of statin prescription in south Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health  2010; 64 :678–83.19692716
25 Thomsen  RW, Johnsen  SP, Olesen  AV, et al  Socioeconomic gradient in use of statins among Danish patients: population-based cross-sectional study. Br J Clin Pharmacol  2005; 60 :534–42.16236044
26 Gueler  A, Schoeni-Affolter  F, Moser  A, et al  Neighbourhood socio-economic position, late presentation and outcomes in people living with HIV in Switzerland. Aids  2015; 29 :231–8.25396262
27 Eastwood  SV, Mathur  R, Sattar  N, Smeeth  L, Bhaskaran  K, Chaturvedi  N. Ethnic differences in guideline-indicated statin initiation for people with type 2 diabetes in UK primary care, 2006–2019: a cohort study. PLoS Med  2021; 18 :e1003672.34185782
