
==== Front
RSC Adv
RSC Adv
RA
RSCACL
RSC Advances
2046-2069
The Royal Society of Chemistry

d4ra05426a
10.1039/d4ra05426a
Chemistry
Electrochemical performance and structural evolution of spray pyrolyzed Mn3O4 thin films in different aqueous electrolytes: effect of anions and cations†
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra05426a

Adoor. Pramitha a
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2678-7481
Hegde Shreeganesh Subraya b
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8169-1055
H-6910-2017
Bhat Badekai Ramachandra b
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-2613
George Sajan D. c
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1766-5394
Yeenduguli Raviprakash a
a Semiconductor and Photovoltaics Lab, Department of Physics, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education Manipal 576104 Karnataka India raviprakash.y@manipal.edu

b Catalysis and Materials Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal Mangalore 575025 Karnataka India
c Centre for Applied Nanosciences, Department of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Manipal Academy of Higher Education Manipal 576104 Karnataka India
18 9 2024
18 9 2024
18 9 2024
14 41 2974829762
26 7 2024
13 9 2024
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry
2024
The Royal Society of Chemistry
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.
This work presents the impact of cycling in different cationic and anionic aqueous electrolytes on the electrochemical storage performance of the Mn3O4 thin film electrode prepared using the chemical pyrolysis method. Studies on the as-deposited electrode confirmed the formation of Mn3O4 phase. Extensive electrochemical analysis was performed using Na2SO4, NaCl, Li2SO4, K2SO4, and MgSO4 electrolytes to examine the influence of cations and anions on charge storage behaviour. Considerable changes were observed in the specific capacitances owing to different ionic sizes as well as hydrated ionic radius of the electrolyte ions. Accordingly, the electrode unveiled a good performance showing a specific capacitance of around 187 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1 in K2SO4 electrolyte. Further, the electrode properties are examined after 500 CV cycles to trace the changes in the structural and morphological properties. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopic studies illustrate a partial phase transformation of electrodes from Mn3O4 to MnO2 irrespective of the electrolytes. These results are further corroborated with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis where there was an increment in the oxidation state of manganese. It has been observed that the surface properties were significantly changed with cycling, as manifested by the wettability studies of the electrodes. The obtained results brings out the significance of electrolyte ions on the charge storage characteristics of Mn3O4 thin film electrodes in light of their possible application in electrochemical capacitors.

Storage performance of spray-pyrolyzed Mn3O4 electrode varied significantly with electrolytes and maximum specific capacitance was achieved in K2SO4. Phase transformation from Mn3O4 to MnO2 was observed with cycling, regardless of the electrolyte.

Manipal Academy of Higher Education 10.13039/100019305 Unassigned National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal 10.13039/501100008788 Unassigned pubstatusPaginated Article
==== Body
pmc1. Introduction

In the realm of energy storage, supercapacitors (SCs) or electrochemical capacitors (ECs) play a pivotal role owing to their high power density, high cyclic stability, fast charge/discharge rate, moderate energy density, etc.1–4 Compared to other frontrunners in the field, such as conventional capacitors and batteries, supercapacitors cover a large area on the Ragone plot, making them highly significant in the research community.5 From the viewpoint of storage mechanism, SCs are classified as electric double-layer capacitors (EDLCs), pseudocapacitors (PCs), and hybrid capacitors.6 In EDLCs, storage is achieved through the electrostatic attraction of electrolyte ions on the electrode surface, which is a non-faradaic process. In contrast, PCs operate via fast redox reactions occurring at the interface of electrode and electrolyte, characteristic of faradaic processes. Hybrid capacitors synergistically incorporate both faradaic and non-faradaic processes, combining the benefits of electrostatic charge accumulation with rapid redox reactions.7–9 Transition metal oxides (TMOs) and conducting polymers are among the primary electrode options employed in pseudocapacitors.10,11 TMOs are particularly advantageous due to their cost effectiveness, superior electrical conductivity, as well as excellent electrochemical stability, and the potential to afford higher energy density.12 Additionally, TMOs exhibit a variety of oxidation states and possess rich redox chemistry, enabling diverse and efficient energy storage mechanisms.13 To date, various studies have been performed on many TMOs to assess their suitability as potential electrode materials. Among these, manganese oxide is regarded as one of the promising candidate as it has very good electrochemical behaviour alongside their cost-effectiveness and environmental friendliness.14,15 They have a variety of phases due to their multiple oxidation states, among which Mn3O4 (hausmannite) is most stable at higher temperatures. Mn3O4 usually finds applications in catalysis, Li-ion batteries, supercapacitors etc.16–19 Moreover, the mixed valence of Mn2+ and Mn3+ in Mn3O4 results in rich redox chemistry with high theoretical capacitance.20,21

However, it is a familiar fact that the specific capacitance of an electrode is also altered by the type of electrolyte used.22–24 It has been observed that electrodeposited Mn3O4 exhibited great pseudocapacitance and stability over a potential window of −0.1 V to 1 V in 1 M Na2SO4 compared to 1 M NaOH and 1 M KOH mixed with 0.04 M K4Fe (CN)6. 25 This is because, when Na2SO4 is used as the electrolyte, the phase has been altered from tetragonal Mn3O4 to tetragonal MnO2 with a significant change in the morphology as well. On the other hand, Mn3O4 on carbon cloth (CC) showed higher specific capacitance and low resistance in KOH, while better rate capability and cyclic stability in Na2SO4. 26 The low resistance in KOH is attributed to its better ionic conductivity as compared to Na2SO4. In another work, the electrolyte cation effect was tested on the electrochemical activation of the Mn3O4 electrode prepared through the hydrothermal method.27 The electrode exhibited different activation or phase transitions in Li2SO4, MgSO4, and K2SO4 electrolytes. A reasonably good capacitive performance was observed in K2SO4, whereas poor cyclic stability was noticed in MgSO4. Similarly, Mn3O4 nanoparticles showed enhanced electrochemical performance in KOH electrolyte when compared with KCl because of the lesser anion size of OH− than that of Cl−.28 Thus, it is evident that both anion and cation of the electrolyte can effectively determine the storage performance.

The charge storage mechanism in Mn3O4 involves surface redox reactions with electrolyte ions. Many studies have been done on predicting the storage mechanism in Mn3O4. Previously, it was seen that, during charging Mn3O4 nanofibers will transform into NaδMnOx·nH2O through surface adsorption of solvated ions.29 Mn3O4 thin films treated at a high temperature (900 °C) showed a phase transformation to a layered birnessite structure by cycling in Na2SO4 electrolyte.30 This transformation brought a significant change in the specific capacitance owing to the electrochemical activation. Thus a significant research emphasis has been on the study of phase transformation upon cycling.31–33 However, the impact of different electrolytes in the phase transformation is rarely investigated. On the other hand, Mn3O4 has been synthesized in various forms including different nanostructures and thin films.34–37 Most of the nanostructures are in powder form which imposes the use of binders that cause extra resistance and stability issues with the current collector.38 To avoid these limitations, thin film electrodes are gaining attention which ensures good stability and shorter ion diffusion length with good charge transport.39 In this direction, different synthesis techniques were explored for the preparation of Mn3O4 thin films, involving, physical methods as well as chemical methods.40–44 Spray pyrolysis is a low-cost, chemical, and solution-based technique that has a high demand when it comes to industrial purposes.45 However, deposition technique significantly impact the electrode properties, mainly the morphology and other surface parameters, and to the best of our knowledge, no studies have reported on the electrochemical properties of spray-pyrolyzed thin films in different electrolytes.

From this perspective, this work focuses on understanding the consequences of various aqueous electrolytes on the electrochemical behaviour of Mn3O4 thin film electrodes synthesized using the chemical spray pyrolysis technique. To realize a better understanding, some of the characterizations were done that promote the interpretation of electrode properties before and after electrochemical testing. Subsequently, the structural and morphological changes brought by the electrochemical testing in different electrolytes were presented.

2. Experimental

All the chemicals utilised were of analytical grade and used without further purification. Mn3O4 thin film electrodes were deposited over the conducting fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) coated glass substrate employing spray pyrolysis technique as described in our previous work.46 Initially, the substrate was subjected to cleaning through ultrasonication in isopropyl alcohol and then by UV-Ozone treatment for a time interval of 10 min. Manganese acetate tetrahydrate (Mn(CH3COO)2·4H2O) (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99%) was dissolved in double distilled water to make the optimized molar concentration of 0.06 M and the solution was made to stir at room temperature. Meanwhile, the cleaned substrate was kept on the hot plate maintained at an optimized temperature of 325 °C. The precursor was sprayed on the hot substrate at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1 using compressed air at a pressure of 1 bar as the carrier gas. The spray nozzle to substrate distance was retained at 14.5 cm. The active mass loading of the film was observed to be around 0.4 mg cm−2 and the film thickness was around 0.790 μm.47 Then the films were characterized to study their structural, topographical, morphological, elemental as well as electrochemical properties. A set of electrodes was then subjected to electrochemical testing in various aqueous electrolytes. The cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) studies were performed in electrolytes with different anions (Na2SO4 and NaCl) as well as different cations (Li2SO4, MgSO4, and K2SO4). All the electrolytes were made to the concentration of 0.1 M using double distilled water.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was acquired using Cu Kα radiation of wavelength, λ = 1.5405 Å within 2θ between 10° to 70° (Rigaku Miniflex 600) to probe the structural properties of the deposited film. Raman spectrum was obtained with the Renishaw-inVia Raman microscope at the excitation wavelength of 532 nm. Surface morphology studies were done using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV (Oxford Zeiss Sigma Microscope). Further, compositional studies were carried out through energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were acquired using an Axis Supra spectrometer with a non-monochromatic source of Al Kα (hν = 1486.6 eV). CASAXPS was used for the analysis with Shirley background subtraction for the charge-corrected data. Additionally, a wettability test was done to measure the contact angle using a water droplet. All electrochemical characterizations (cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)) were conducted using Metrohm, Autolab PGSTAT204 workstation in three-electrode setup with the as-prepared electrode as working electrode, Ag/AgCl as reference electrode and platinum as counter electrode. The CV tests were carried out at different scan rates ranging from 5 to 100 mV s−1, and the GCD analyses were conducted at current densities from 0.5 to 2 A g−1. The EIS measurements were conducted in the frequency range from 10 mHz to 1 MHz. All the measurements were done at ambient temperature.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Characterizations of the electrode before cycling

The phase as well as crystal structure of the as-prepared electrode was validated using XRD. Fig. 1a depicts the XRD pattern of the Mn3O4 thin film coated over the FTO substrate. All the peaks were identified and indexed comparing with the standard JCPDS card (Mn3O4: 24-0734, FTO: 44-1445). The observed pattern resembles with the tetragonal phase of Mn3O4 with the space group 141/amd.48 Major peaks at 32.8° and 36.3° is due to the reflections from (103) and (211) planes respectively. However, intense reflections from the FTO substrates also appeared in the pattern owing to the higher penetration of X-rays. The crystallite size (D) was estimated utilizing Scherrer's equation:1

where β represents the peak broadening in radians, θ indicates the position of the peak in radians, λ = 0.15405 nm is the wavelength of Cu-Kα radiation used for diffraction, and K = 0.9 denotes the shape factor. The calculated D value was approximately 8.5 nm. Furthermore, the micro-strain (ε) and dislocation density (δ) were estimated employing the following relations:2

3

Fig. 1 (a) X-ray diffractogram, (b) Raman spectra, (c) SEM micrograph (magnification: 20KX), and (d) contact angle measurement of Mn3O4 thin film electrode.

The values obtained were approximately 12.9 × 10−3 and 1.4 × 1016 m−2 respectively.

Fig. 1b illustrates the Raman spectrum of the Mn3O4 electrode, revealing three characteristic vibrational modes indicative of spinel Mn3O4 formation. The peak with high intensity at 651 cm−1 (A1g mode) corresponds to the Mn–O symmetric stretching vibration, while the peaks at 310 cm−1 and 363 cm−1 (Eg and T2g(2) modes, respectively) are attributed to the asymmetric bending vibrations of the Mn–O bond. The phase purity of the deposited film is confirmed by the absence of additional peaks in the spectrum. Fig. 1c presents the SEM micrograph (Fig. S4† shows the images with different magnifications) of the Mn3O4 electrode, showcasing a fibre-like morphology with a uniform coating across the substrate, free of voids, cracks, or pinholes. Additionally, Fig. 1d displays the wettability test of the Mn3O4 thin film electrode surface, indicating its hydrophilic nature with a contact angle of around 56°.49

3.2. Electrochemical characterizations: effect of electrolyte anions and cations

The impact of different electrolyte anions and cations on the electrochemical performance of the synthesized Mn3O4 thin film electrodes was investigated using CV in a three-electrode setup. Na2SO4 and NaCl were chosen as electrolytes with different anions. Fig. 2a and b represent the CV curves of the Mn3O4 thin film electrodes in Na2SO4 and NaCl, respectively, over a potential window (PW) of −0.2 V to 0.8 V at different scan rates. The electrodes demonstrated pseudocapacitive behaviour in both electrolytes, with the current increasing with the scan rate, consistent with previous CV results obtained in Na2SO4.46Fig. 2c compares the CVs at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1, showing no significant differences in shape or peak current values. From the figure, it is apparent that the oxidation and reduction processes were roughly similar in both electrolytes, regardless of the anions (SO42− and Cl−). The specific capacitance was estimated by making use of the following formula:4

where ∫I(v)dV implies the area enclosed under the CV curve, m denotes the active mass deposited, ν refers to the scan rate and ΔV represents the applied PW. Notably, at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1 in Na2SO4 and NaCl electrolytes, the estimated values are strikingly similar, measuring 94 F g−1 and 93.5 F g−1, respectively.

Fig. 2 Cyclic voltammograms of Mn3O4 thin film electrode in (a) Na2SO4, and (b) NaCl. (c) Comparison of CVs at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1.

To delve into the kinetic differences induced by varying anions, electrochemical impedance spectroscopic studies were executed. Fig. 3 portrays the Nyquist plots of the Mn3O4 electrode in Na2SO4 and NaCl electrolytes. It is evident from the figure that the storage kinetics were notably superior in the Na2SO4 electrolyte, presenting lower solution resistance and charge transfer resistance compared to NaCl. Additionally, the slope or inclination of the curve in the lower frequency region, indicating the Warburg impedance related to the ion diffusion process, suggests excellent capacitive behaviour in the Na2SO4 electrolyte, despite the larger size of SO42− ions compared to Cl− ions. This trend may be ascribed to the higher concentration of Na+ ions in Na2SO4 compared to NaCl. Upon dissociation, Na2SO4 yields two Na+ ions and one SO42− ion, whereas NaCl yields only one Na+ ion and one Cl− ion. Given that these ions directly participate in redox reactions, the surplus of Na+ ions in Na2SO4 provides more opportunities for adsorption and redox reactions. Consequently, the electrode in Na2SO4 exhibits better storage behaviour compared to NaCl.

Fig. 3 Nyquist plots of Mn3O4 thin film in Na2SO4 and NaCl.

Furthermore, the GCD processes were investigated in Na2SO4 and NaCl electrolytes at various current densities, as depicted in Fig. 4a–c shows the comparison at a particular current density. The linear relation between the charge/discharge potential and time indicates good capacitive behaviour.50 The observed outcomes were found to be in good agreement with the findings obtained from CV and EIS analyses. The specific capacitance was derived from the GCD plot employing the following formula:5

where I represent the discharge current, m indicates the mass of the deposited material, Δt signifies the discharge time, and ΔV denotes the applied potential window. The highest specific capacitance attained was around 131 F g−1 for the Na2SO4 electrolyte, whereas a specific capacitance of 122 F g−1 was observed for the NaCl electrolyte.

Fig. 4 Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves of Mn3O4 thin film electrode in (a) Na2SO4, and (b) NaCl. (c) Comparison of GCDs at a current density of 0.5A g−1.

Likewise, with anion fixed as sulphate ions, the influence of varying cations on electrochemical properties was investigated. Consequently, Li2SO4, MgSO4, and K2SO4 were employed as electrolytes, and Fig. 5a–d depicts the corresponding CVs obtained across a PW of −0.2 V to 0.8 V at different scan rates. Consistently, similar to the findings across different anions, all electrodes displayed pseudocapacitive behaviour, with the current trending increased with scan rate. Upon closer examination at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1, it becomes evident that K2SO4 electrolyte yielded the highest curve area, indicative of superior capacitive behaviour, while MgSO4 exhibited the lowest. This disparity in curve areas hints at varying degrees of charge storage capability among the different cationic species.

Fig. 5 Cyclic voltammograms of Mn3O4 thin film electrode in (a) Li2SO4, (b) MgSO4, (c) K2SO4, and (d) comparison of CVs at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1.

Further analysis of specific capacitance values, calculated using eqn (4), revealed distinct trends. The values varied as 94 F g−1, 112 F g−1, 132 F g−1 and 73 F g−1 for Na2SO4, Li2SO4, K2SO4, and MgSO4, respectively. This order of specific capacitance (K+ > Li+ > Na+ > Mg2+) can be rationalized by considering the ionic radii of these cations. Also, it is well known fact that, ions in the electrolyte are surrounded by water molecules, forming a hydration shell. The size of this hydration sphere impacts the ion's effective size. Larger hydration spheres can hinder ion mobility, thus slowing the charge transfer process at the electrode surface. Specifically, the larger size of K+ ions enables easier diffusion and adsorption owing to their smaller hydration sphere radius.28,51,52 Conversely, the lower specific capacitance observed in MgSO4 electrolytes may be attributed to the lower ionic size and higher hydration sphere radius of Mg2+ ions. However, an intriguing observation arises when comparing Na+ and Li+. Despite Na+ offering better ionic conductivity and a smaller hydration sphere compared to Li+, Li2SO4 demonstrated a higher specific capacitance. This discrepancy suggests that smaller size of Li+ may facilitate more favourable adsorption and desorption/intercalation processes. A comparable trend was seen for hydrothermally grown Mn3O4 on carbon cloth.26

Fig. 6 presents Nyquist plots of the Mn3O4 thin film electrode in various electrolytes, obtained from the EIS experiments. The electrodes in Na2SO4, K2SO4, and Li2SO4exhibit a similar capacitive trend with a vertical profile in the low-frequency region, indicating low diffusion resistance. Nevertheless, a significant deviation is witnessed in the inclination of the vertical line for the MgSO4 electrolyte, suggesting its high ionic resistance. This can be related to the lower mobility of Mg2+ ions due to their large hydration sphere radius.53 Additionally, the high charge density of Mg2+ ions also results in strong electrostatic interactions with surrounding electrolyte molecules, contributing to the high solution resistance and charge transfer resistance observed for MgSO4.54

Fig. 6 Nyquist plots of Mn3O4 thin film in electrolytes with different cations.

Fig. 7a–d displays the GCD curves of electrodes processed in electrolytes containing different cations with a comparison at a current density of 0.5 A g−1. The trends observed in the CV and EIS measurements are consistent here as well. Furthermore, it is apparent that the charge/discharge processes are linear with time irrespective of the cations. The specific capacitance values, determined using eqn (5), are 131 F g−1 for Na2SO4, 136 F g−1 for Li2SO4, 187 F g−1 for K2SO4, and 96 F g−1 for MgSO4 at 0.5A g−1.

Fig. 7 GCD curves of Mn3O4 thin film electrode in (a) Li2SO4, (b) MgSO4, (c) K2SO4, and (d) comparison of GCDs at a current density of 0.5 A g−1.

3.3. Characterization of the electrodes after cycling

The electrode properties were further investigated post-cycling to assess the structural and morphological changes. The electrodes were cycled for 500 CV cycles at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1 and then subjected to various characterizations. Fig. 8 presents the XRD pattern of the electrodes after cycling in different electrolytes. As initially discussed with reference to Fig. 1, the electrode exhibited the Mn3O4 phase before cycling. However, cycling induced changes in the electrode structure, evidenced by a decrease in the intensities of the Mn3O4 planes. Additionally, new manganese oxide phases emerged, as reflected in the XRD patterns. For electrodes cycled in Na2SO4 electrolyte, MnO2, and Na–MnO2 (sodium birnessite) phases were detected, while in NaCl, only MnO2 phases were observed. Previous literature has reported the conversion of Mn3O4 to MnO2 (termed as electrochemical activation) after certain CV and GCD cycles.25,55,56 This phase transformation is due to the continuous redox reactions or intercalation/deintercalation of electrolyte ions within the spinel structure of Mn3O4.57 According to the studies, this electrochemical activation will generally enhance the specific capacitance by creating new adsorption sites.58 However, there was no complete phase transformation observed which might be due to the insufficient number of CV cycles.

Fig. 8 XRD patterns of Mn3O4 thin films after cycling in different electrolytes.

To further validate the partial phase transformations, Raman spectra of the processed/activated electrodes were examined. Fig. 9a–e presents the deconvoluted Raman spectra of electrodes that underwent 500 CV cycles in various electrolytes, with the peak positions summarized in Table 1. Significant differences were seen in the activated electrodes when compared to the Raman spectra of the electrode prior to cycling (shown in Fig. S1†). Notably, there are intense peaks at 640–645 cm−1, along with peaks at around 490 cm−1 and 580 cm−1, which are the features of vibrations in birnessite.27 The vibrational mode in the lower wavenumber region (P1) is associated with the external vibration caused by the translational motion of MnO6 octahedra.59 Additionally, there were significant shifts in the Eg and T2g(2) peaks, indicating variations in the Mn–O bending vibrations. These shifts are attributed to the formation of new phases during the electrochemical activation process.

Fig. 9 Raman spectra of electrode processed in (a) Na2SO4, (b) NaCl, (c) Li2SO4, (d) K2SO4, and (e) MgSO4 for 500 CV cycles at 50 mV s−1.

Peak position in the Raman spectra of electrodes subjected to CV in different electrolytes

Mode	Peak position (cm−1)	
Before CV	Na2SO4	NaCl	Li2SO4	MgSO4	K2SO4	
Translational vibration of MnO6 octahedra	—	141	168	161	157	167	
Eg	310	292	290	300	296	287	
T2g (2)	363	352	358	357	—	350	
—	—	—	487	—	497	—	
—	—	573	580	609	590	570	
Ag	651	640	644	646	648	640	

XPS survey spectra of the electrodes cycled in different electrolytes are shown in Fig. S3.† The spectra reveal the presence of Mn 2p, O 1s along with C 1s in all the samples. In addition to that, as a consequence of cycling some of the peaks related to Na, K, and Mg also appeared in their respective spectra indicating the presence of surface adsorbed ions. Further, auger peaks of Mn and O have appeared in the spectra around the binding energy (BE) of 903.7 eV and 972.4 eV respectively.

Further, Fig. 10a shows the high-resolution C 1s spectra, which have been resolved into three peaks resembling with C <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.0" width="13.200000pt" height="16.000000pt" viewBox="0 0 13.200000 16.000000" preserveAspectRatio="xMidYMid meet"><metadata> Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 </metadata><g transform="translate(1.000000,15.000000) scale(0.017500,-0.017500)" fill="currentColor" stroke="none"><path d="M0 440 l0 -40 320 0 320 0 0 40 0 40 -320 0 -320 0 0 -40z M0 280 l0 -40 320 0 320 0 0 40 0 40 -320 0 -320 0 0 -40z"/></g></svg> C, C–O, and CO positioned in the rages of 284.46–284.61 eV, 285.33–286.11 eV and 288.02–288.26 eV respectively after charge correction. Here the third component (CO) in the higher binding energy appeared as a result of cycling. This peak was absent in the C 1s spectra of the electrode before cycling as shown in Fig. S2a.† These changes were also reflected in the O 1s core spectra as represented in Fig. 10b. The spectra have been deconvoluted into three peaks lying in the range of 529.46–529.79 eV, 530.76–531.07 eV, and 532.10–533.24 eV. The peak at the lower binding energy features the lattice oxygen associated with the Mn–O covalent bond and the peak between 530.76-531.07 eV represents some surface adsorbed hydroxyl groups. The higher binding energy peak indicates the surface adsorbed water 60 or some carboxyl groups 61 as a result of continuous CV cycles. This intern supports the CO component observed in C 1s spectra. However, this component was not observed in the electrode prior to the cycling (Fig. S2b†). The peak area under each component varies with the electrolyte used implying a variation of compositions with respect to the electrolytes.

Fig. 10 Core level spectra of (a) C 1s and (b) O 1s for electrodes processed in different electrolytes.

The Mn 2p spectra as shown in Fig. 11 exhibit the spin–orbit coupling, resulting in two peaks, Mn 2p3/2 and Mn 2p1/2 with an BE separation ranging from 11.69–11.79 eV for all the electrodes. In general, any energy separation greater than 11.05 eV (for metallic Mn) indicates the oxidative state of Mn.61 Moreover, the BE difference between Mn 2p3/2 and O 1s spectra (given in Table S1†) indicates an increment in the Mn4+ state in the electrodes after cycling. It can be discerned that for the electrode before cycling the value of ΔE(Mn 2p3/2–O 1s) was 111.58 eV, which implies the electrode was rich in Mn2+. But electrochemical cycling resulted in a change in energy difference ranging from 112.31–112.5 eV, pointing out the evolution of the Mn4+ state.62 These observations are in accordance with the XRD as well as Raman results where there was evidence of MnO2 phase as a consequence of cycling. Further, the Mn 2p3/2 and Mn 2p1/2 peaks are deconvoluted into three peaks each revealing the presence of Mn2+, Mn3+ as well as Mn4+ states. The peak positions, FWHM, and area under each peak are tabulated in Table S1.† However, for the electrode before cycling, the presence of Mn4+ was evident (shown in Fig. S2c†), which was not the case for a pure Mn3O4. It is known that, for manganese oxide, surface cation defects are common along with oxygen defects.63 Thus, the appearance of Mn4+ might be due to the cation vacancies.64 Notably, for all the electrodes, after cycling there was an increase in the Mn4+ state and a decrease in the Mn2+ state, which suggests that cycling causes the oxidation of Mn thereby tending to form MnO2 as seen in XRD.

Fig. 11 Mn 2p core level spectra of the electrodes processed in different electrolytes.

Fig. 12 displays the SEM images of electrodes activated in different electrolytes (Fig. S5† shows SEM images with different magnifications). It is evident from the figures that CV cycling significantly affected the surface of the electrodes which might be due to the phase transformation as seen in XRD and Raman studies. For the Na2SO4-activated electrode, the morphology was changed from fibrous (before cycling) to a dense thin nanosheet-like structure whereas these nanosheets were more defined in the case of NaCl electrolyte. For Li2SO4 the morphology was somewhat similar to that of Na2SO4. In case of MgSO4, the nanosheets were more compact with lesser pore size whereas the K2SO4-activated electrode exhibited a very thin layer of nanosheets. These layered nanosheets indicate the formation of birnessite (α-MnO2) as reported in the earlier report.27

Fig. 12 SEM images of the electrodes processed in (a) Na2SO4, (b) NaCl, (c) Li2SO4, (d) K2SO4, and (e) MgSO4 for 500 CV cycles at 50 mV s−1.

Further, Fig. 13 shows the contact angle measurements of electrodes processed in different electrolytes for 500 CV cycles at 50 mV s−1. Compared to the Mn3O4 electrode before cycling (as shown in Fig. 3c), all the electrodes exhibit very good wettability, where there was a significant decrease in the contact angle. The hydrophilicity of the electrodes was improved and the electrode processed in K2SO4 electrolyte was found to be highly hydrophilic. This can be witnessed from the SEM image of the K2SO4 processed electrode where there are very thin layered structures. This further implies that the K2SO4 processed electrode has higher surface energy and surface area compared to other electrodes.65 On the other hand, MgSO4 processed electrode has high contact angle which might be due to its lesser surface area and surface roughness. However, surface wettability was significantly improved after cycling which indicates better storage performance.

Fig. 13 Contact angle measurements of the electrodes processed in (a) Na2SO4, (b) NaCl, (c) Li2SO4, (d) K2SO4 and (e) MgSO4 for 500 CV cycles at 50 mV s−1.

3.3.1 Electrode performance after cycling

To see the changes in the storage performance after 500 CV cycles, cyclic voltammograms were collected for each electrode. Fig. S6† shows the comparison between the 1st and 500th cycles and the calculated areal capacitance is tabulated in Table 2. It has been perceived that the storage performance of all the electrodes improved after cycling which might be due to phase transformation as seen earlier. This type of phase transformation after cycling which enhances the specific capacitance is termed electrochemical activation.58 However, in this case, there is no complete phase transformation of Mn3O4 to MnO2 during 500 cycles. The increment in the specific capacitance may be accredited to the modification in the morphology and thus the surface roughness. This may induce new adsorption sites for more reactions to occur. Notably, when comparing with different electrolytes, the electrode in MgSO4 showed good storage performance with cycling, even though it has poor specific capacitance. Compared to the first cycles, the capacitance improved up to 1.8 times for the MgSO4 processed electrode after 500 cycles. This can be explained on the basis of XPS where for the MgSO4 processed electrode there was more amount of Mn in higher oxidation states (high Mn3+/Mn2+ ratio and low Mn2+/Mn4+ ratio). On the other hand, with cycling more Mn2+ ions are getting oxidised into Mn3+ and Mn4+ in MgSO4. This in turn suggests that the efficiency for electrochemical activation is higher in MgSO4 than in other electrolytes.

Areal capacitance of the electrode calculated at 1st and 500th cycle

Electrolyte	Areal capacitance (mF cm−2)	
1st cycle	500th cycle	Increment (times)	
Na2SO4	28.34	37.48	1.3	
NaCl	22.20	35.52	1.6	
Li2SO4	29.40	40.66	1.4	
MgSO4	19.95	36.60	1.8	
K2SO4	33.12	42.94	1.3	

4. Conclusions

In summary, the Mn3O4 thin film electrodes were synthesised using the chemical spray pyrolysis technique, and its electrochemical properties in different aqueous electrolytes were examined. The as-synthesized electrode is crystalized in a tetragonal crystal structure and the observed Raman modes are agreeing with the spinel Mn3O4. Electrochemical testing in electrolytes with dissimilar anions and cations revealed the consequences of ion size and hydration sphere radius on the charge storage kinetics. Accordingly, the electrode processed in K2SO4 electrolytes exhibited the highest specific capacitance of around 187 F g−1 at a current density of 0.5 A g−1. Moreover, post-cycling structural studies implied that there was a partial phase transformation of the electrodes from Mn3O4 to MnO2 phase after 500 CV cycles. Consequently, XPS results support this by showing higher oxidation states of Mn. Also, the electrochemical cycling significantly altered the morphology from fibrous to layered, whereas the wettability of the electrodes was also improved accordingly. A comparison of capacitance between the first and 500th cycle illustrate that, the electrode processed in MgSO4 electrolyte has more tendency to undergo oxidation with cycling as evidenced by its capacitance value which improved 1.8 times of its initial capacitance. The results outlined here thus help to access the influence of cations and anions on the electrochemical performance of Mn3O4 thin films in aqueous electrolytes, thereby pointing their suitability for supercapacitor application.

Data availability

Data can be made available on a reasonable request to the corresponding author. The most data pertaining to this article is mentioned in the article itself. Additionally, the data supporting this article have been included as part of the ESI.†

Author contributions

Pramitha A: conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis, writing – original draft. Shreeganesh Subraya Hegde: validation, writing – review & editing. Badekai Ramachandra Bhat: validation, resources, writing – review & editing. Sajan D. George: validation, resources. Raviprakash Y: conceptualization, visualization, validation, writing – review & editing, resources, supervision.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

RA-014-D4RA05426A-s001

Pramitha Adoor is thankful to Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE) for supporting the work through Dr TMA Pai Scholarship and instrument facilities. The author, Shreeganesh Subraya Hegde acknowledges the National Institute of Technology Karnataka for the essential research and library facilities. Pramitha Adoor also acknowledges Mr Lozil Denzil Mendonca and Mr Pramod R Nadig, for their helpful suggestions on the XPS analysis.
==== Refs
References

Simon P. Gogotsi Y. Dunn B. Science 2014 343 1210 1211 10.1126/science.1249625 24626920
Lukatskaya M. R. Dunn B. Gogotsi Y. Nat. Commun. 2016 7 12647 10.1038/ncomms12647 27600869
Hegde S. S. Bhat B. R. RSC Adv. 2024 14 8028 8038 10.1039/D3RA08910J 38454946
Hegde S. S. and Bhat B. R. , in Sustainable Materials for Electrochemical Capacitors, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2023, pp. 19–31
Zhong C. Deng Y. Hu W. Qiao J. Zhang L. Zhang J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015 44 7484 7539 10.1039/C5CS00303B 26050756
Kim B. K. , Sy S. , Yu A. and Zhang J. , Handbook of Clean Energy Systems, 2015, pp. 1–25
Pramitha A. Raviprakash Y. J. Energy Storage 2022 49 104120 10.1016/j.est.2022.104120
Simon P. Gogotsi Y. Nat. Mater. 2020 19 1151 1163 10.1038/s41563-020-0747-z 32747700
Augustyn V. Simon P. Dunn B. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014 7 1597 1614 10.1039/C3EE44164D
Mohd Abdah M. A. A. Azman N. H. N. Kulandaivalu S. Sulaiman Y. Mater. Des. 2020 186 108199 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108199
Fleischmann S. Mitchell J. B. Wang R. Zhan C. Jiang D. E. Presser V. Augustyn V. Chem. Rev. 2020 120 6738 6782 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00170 32597172
Shi F. Li L. Wang X. L. Gu C. D. Tu J. P. RSC Adv. 2014 4 41910 41921 10.1039/C4RA06136E
Liu R. Zhou A. Zhang X. Mu J. Che H. Wang Y. Wang T. T. Zhang Z. Kou Z. Chem. Eng. J. 2021 412 128611 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128611
Sakib M. N. Ahmed S. Rahat S. M. S. M. Shuchi S. B. J. Energy Storage 2021 44 103322 10.1016/j.est.2021.103322
Wei W. Cui X. Chen W. Ivey D. G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011 40 1697 1721 10.1039/C0CS00127A 21173973
Tian Z. Y. Mountapmbeme Kouotou P. Bahlawane N. Tchoua Ngamou P. H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013 117 6218 6224 10.1021/jp312444s
Raha S. Mohanta D. Ahmaruzzaman M. Sci. Rep. 2021 11 1 19 10.1038/s41598-020-79139-8 33414495
Kozawa T. Kitabayashi F. Fukuyama K. Naito M. Sci. Rep. 2022 12 1 11 10.1038/s41598-021-99269-x 34992227
Hu Y. Guan C. Feng G. Ke Q. Huang X. Wang J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015 25 7291 7299 10.1002/adfm.201503528
Beknalkar S. A. Teli A. M. Bhat T. S. Pawar K. K. Patil S. S. Harale N. S. Shin J. C. Patil P. S. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022 130 227 248 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.03.036
Seliem A. F. Mohammed A. Y. A. Attia A. Aman S. Ahmad N. Ibrahim M. M. ACS Omega 2024 9 17563 17576 38645369
Pal B. Yang S. Ramesh S. Thangadurai V. Jose R. Nanoscale Adv. 2019 1 3807 3835 10.1039/C9NA00374F 36132093
Sajjad M. Khan M. I. Cheng F. Lu W. J. Energy Storage 2021 40 102729 10.1016/j.est.2021.102729
Subraya Hegde S. Ramachandra Bhat B. Fuel 2024 371 131999 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131999
Sayyed S. G. Pathan H. M. Shaikh A. V. Shaikh S. F. Al-Enizi A. M. J. Energy Storage 2021 33 102076 10.1016/j.est.2020.102076
Jiang H. Zhou C. Yan X. Miao J. You M. Zhu Y. Li Y. Zhou W. Cheng X. J. Energy Storage 2020 32 101898 10.1016/j.est.2020.101898
Liu C. Chen Y. Sun X. Chen B. Situ Y. Huang H. Electrochim. Acta 2019 324 134894 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134894
Sankar K. V. Kalpana D. Selvan R. K. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2012 42 463 470 10.1007/s10800-012-0424-2
Suktha P. Phattharasupakun N. Dittanet P. Sawangphruk M. RSC Adv. 2017 7 9958 9963 10.1039/C6RA28499J
Dai Y. Wang K. Xie J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007 90 3 6
Dubal D. P. Dhawale D. S. Salunkhe R. R. Lokhande C. D. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010 157 A812 10.1149/1.3428675
San X. Y. Zhang B. Wang J. Wu B. Ma X. L. Electrochem. Commun. 2016 72 166 170 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.09.026
Hao J. Mou J. Zhang J. Dong L. Liu W. Xu C. Kang F. Electrochim. Acta 2018 259 170 178 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.166
Gao M. Wu X. Qiu H. Zhang Q. Huang K. Feng S. Yang Y. Wang T. Zhao B. Liu Z. RSC Adv. 2018 8 20661 20668 10.1039/C8RA00092A 35542330
Qiao Y. Sun Q. Cui H. Wang D. Yang F. Wang X. RSC Adv. 2015 5 31942 31946 10.1039/C5RA02395E
Lesel B. K. Ko J. S. Dunn B. Tolbert S. H. ACS Nano 2016 10 7572 7581 10.1021/acsnano.6b02608 27472531
Xia H. Meng Y. S. Li X. Yuan G. Cui C. J. Mater. Chem. 2011 21 15521 15526 10.1039/C1JM12767E
Govindarajan D. Kirubaharan K. Selvaraj M. Sanni A. Theerthagiri J. Yong Choi M. Kheawhom S. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023 630 157475 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157475
Yu M. Feng X. Joule 2019 3 338 360 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.012
Pan W. Zhang J. Feng L. Xie J. Xiao Q. Xie Q. Mater. Res. Express 2020 7 106408 10.1088/2053-1591/abbf83
Bigiani L. Hassan M. Peddis D. Maccato C. Varvaro G. Sada C. Bontempi E. Martí-Sánchez S. Arbiol J. Barreca D. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019 2 1704 1712 10.1021/acsanm.9b00141
Ramírez A. Hillebrand P. Stellmach D. May M. M. Bogdanoff P. Fiechter S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014 118 14073 14081 10.1021/jp500939d
Gasparotto A. Maccato C. Petala A. Bebelis S. Sada C. Kondarides D. I. Barreca D. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019 2 8294 8302 10.1021/acsaem.9b01773
Adoor P. Hegde S. S. Bhat B. R. Yethadka S. N. Yeenduguli R. ACS Omega 2023 0 12
Guild C. Biswas S. Meng Y. Jafari T. Gaffney A. M. Suib S. L. Catal. Today 2014 238 87 94 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.03.056
Pramitha A. Subraya S. Ramachandra B. George S. D. Sudhakar Y. N. Raviprakash Y. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023 307 128213 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128213
Adoor Y. Hegde S. S. Ramachandra Bhat B. Yadav C. Chakraborty S. Ravikumar A. George S. D. Sudhakar Y. N. Y R. Phys. Scr. 2024 99 105922 10.1088/1402-4896/ad7206
Reddy I. N. Reddy C. V. Ravindranadh K. Cho M. Kim D. Shim J. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020 874 114488 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114488
Dubal D. P. Dhawale D. S. Salunkhe R. R. Pawar S. M. Fulari V. J. Lokhande C. D. J. Alloys Compd. 2009 484 218 221 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.135
Xiao Y. Cao Y. Gong Y. Zhang A. Zhao J. Fang S. Jia D. Li F. J. Power Sources 2014 246 926 933 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.118
Vadiyar M. M. Bhise S. C. Patil S. K. Kolekar S. S. Shelke A. R. Deshpande N. G. Chang J. Y. Ghule K. S. Ghule A. V. Chem. Commun. 2016 52 2557 2560 10.1039/C5CC08373G 26744745
Vadiyar M. M. Bhise S. C. Patil S. K. Kolekar S. S. Chang J. Y. Ghule A. V. ChemistrySelect 2016 1 959 966 10.1002/slct.201600151
Barzegar F. Momodu D. Y. Fashedemi O. O. Bello A. Dangbegnon J. K. Manyala N. RSC Adv. 2015 5 107482 107487 10.1039/C5RA21962K
Yu T. Chen S. J. Biophys. J. 2018 114 1274 1284 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.01.040 29590585
Xia H. Zhu X. Liu J. Liu Q. Lan S. Zhang Q. Liu X. Seo J. K. Chen T. Gu L. Meng Y. S. Nat. Commun. 2018 9 5100 10.1038/s41467-018-07595-y 30504861
Zhang Y. Liu L. Jamil S. Xie J. Liu W. Xia J. Nie S. Wang X. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019 494 1156 1165 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.247
Liu C. Chen Y. Huang W. Situ Y. Huang H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018 458 10 17 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.243
Lu Y. T. Jao W. Y. Tai C. W. Hu C. C. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2024 154 104978 10.1016/j.jtice.2023.104978
Roychaudhuri R. , Acharyya D. and Bhattacharyya P. , 2018 Int. Symp. Devices, Circuits Syst. ISDCS 2018, 2018, 4 , pp. 1–4
Barai H. R. Lopa N. S. Ahmed F. Khan N. A. Ansari S. A. Joo S. W. Rahman M. M. ACS Omega 2020 5 22356 22366 10.1021/acsomega.0c02740 32923793
Moulder J. F. , Muilenberg Perkin-Elmer Corp G. E. , Wanger C. D. , Riggs W. M. and Davis L. E. , Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, 1979
Decorse P. Caboche G. Dufour L. C. Solid State Ionics 1999 117 161 169 10.1016/S0167-2738(98)00260-4
He T. Zhou Y. Ding D. Rong S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021 13 29664 29675 10.1021/acsami.1c06679 34142801
Bose V. C. Biju V. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2015 38 865 873 10.1007/s12034-015-0906-z
Kozbial A. Li Z. Conaway C. McGinley R. Dhingra S. Vahdat V. Zhou F. Durso B. Liu H. Li L. Langmuir 2014 30 8598 8606 10.1021/la5018328 24983409
