
==== Front
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open
tsaco
tsaco
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
2397-5776
BMJ Publishing Group BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR

10.1136/tsaco-2024-001463
tsaco-2024-001463
Commentary
1506
Palliative care and trauma surgery: still too little, too late
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1134-4146
Doberman Danielle J 1ddoberm1@jhmi.edu

CoreyTapper
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9279-5549
Tapper Corey X 1ctapper1@jhmi.edu

1 Section of Palliative Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
DrDanielle JDoberman; ddoberm1@jhmi.edu
None declared.

2024
7 8 2024
9 1 e001463Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

geriatrics
Terminal Care
quality improvement
Palliative Care
==== Body
pmc The retrospective study by Fakhry et al1 is one of a growing number of publications in palliative medicine to use big data.2 A clear strength of this work is its large sample size, and the evaluation of both Surgical and Trauma patients’ experiences in comparison to Medical patients, and also cataloging illness severity. Although its findings are intriguing and add to the general discourse calling for greater participation of palliative care in the treatment of those hospitalized for trauma and surgery,3 4 the results are unfortunately not surprising.5

Widespread underutilization of palliative care has been well documented.6 However, use of the palliative Z51.5 International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision code on Medicare claims is found to undercount specialist palliative consults when compared with direct provider survey of prevalence,7 with a sensitivity ranging from 11% to 84% as a marker for specialist palliative services.8 Further, this code may be applied when palliative services are supplied by non-specialist providers, in situations where comfort measures only are employed, or when a hospice disposition is being pursued.8 Therefore, the authors’ use of the Z51.5 code as a proxy for palliative care services, under-represents specialist palliative care utilization.

This coding challenge was likely distributed evenly across study groups. As such, it is significant that mean Elixhauser Scores for patients across all groups coded as receiving palliative care were almost twice those who did not, and frailty scores were similarly greater; supporting relative comfort engaging palliative care with a specific patient phenotype. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) has advocated for incorporation of palliative principles on initial assessment of all trauma patients, and for further incorporation of the trauma palliative care bundle within the first 72 hours of presentation, including specialist palliative consultation as indicated.9 When coupled with the ACS Geriatric guidelines,10 arguably more of those in the Trauma group should have had exposure to palliative services, and easily most if not all of those in all three groups found to have died in the hospital. Although smaller studies have found suboptimal adherence to TQIP guidelines,6 the magnitude of this data set and volume of patients included shows it is time to move beyond documenting unmet palliative needs and calls for increased palliative services1 5 to actions incorporating increased use, such as protocols and pathways.11 12

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.

Ethics approval: Not applicable.

Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
==== Refs
References

1 Fakhry SM Carrick MM Hoffman MR Shen Y Garland JM Wyse RJ Watts DD Hospice and palliative care utilization in 16 004 232 medicare claims: comparing trauma to surgical and medical inpatients Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2024 9 e001329 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001329 38646618
2 Morin L Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD The promise of big data for palliative and end-of-life care research Palliat Med 2021 35 1638 40 10.1177/02692163211048307 34636263
3 Dunn GP Surgery, palliative care, and the american college of surgeons Ann Palliat Med 2015 4 5 9 10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2015.01.03 25813414
4 Ferre AC DeMario BS Ho VP Narrative review of palliative care in trauma and emergency general surgery Ann Palliat Med 2022 11 936 46 10.21037/apm-20-2428 34551577
5 Baimas-George M Yelverton S Ross SW Rozario N Matthews BD Reinke CE Palliative care in emergency general surgery patients: reduced inpatient mortality and increased discharge to hospice Am Surg 2021 87 1087 92 10.1177/0003134820956942 33316173
6 Pierce JG Ricon R Rukmangadhan S Kim M Rajasekar G Nuño M Curtis E Humphries M Adherence to the TQIP palliative care guidelines among patients with serious illness at a level I trauma center in the US JAMA Surg 2022 157 1125 32 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4718 36260298
7 Kassner CT Bhavsar NA Harker M Bull J Taylor DH Hospital-based palliative care with medicare claims: evidence from colorado Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2018 35 66 8 10.1177/1049909117691020 28260393
8 Heitner R Chambers B Silvers A Bowman B Johnson KS 'Palliative care' as an outcome measure and its impact on our interpretation of racial disparities J Pain Symptom Manage 2024 67 e114 6 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.10.003 37827453
9 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program ACS TQIP palliative care best practices guidelines 2017 Available https://www.facs.org/media/g3rfegcn/palliative_guidelines.pdf Accessed 18-May-2024
10 American College of Surgeons Trauma Programs Best practices guidelines in geriatric trauma management 2023 Available https://www.facs.org/media/ubyj2ubl/best-practices-guidelines-geriatric-trauma.pdf Accessed 18-May-2024
11 Canedo A Robitsek RJ Roth A Canedo A A palliative care consult trigger tool for trauma patients: a machine learning approach (GP714) J Pain Symptom Manage 2020 60 253 4 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.137
12 Hwang F Son J Ensor K Goulet N Brown A Victory J Tyrie L Initiating advance care planning at admission: a brief intervention to increase goals of care discussions in geriatric trauma patients in an urban level I trauma center Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2023 8 e001058 10.1136/tsaco-2022-001058 38020856
