
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39289423
72429
10.1038/s41598-024-72429-5
Article
Assessment of perineal body properties in women with stress urinary incontinence using Transperineal shear wave elastography
Li Xiumei 1
Zhang Limin 2
Li Yong 3
Jiang Yushan 4
Zhao Cheng 1
Fang Shibao 1
Yang Zongli qingyichaosheng@126.com

1
Sun Liwen 1
1 https://ror.org/026e9yy16 grid.412521.1 0000 0004 1769 1119 Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003 China
2 Department of Ultrasound, Maternity and Child Health Care of Zaozhuang, Zaozhuang, 277100 China
3 https://ror.org/026e9yy16 grid.412521.1 0000 0004 1769 1119 Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003 China
4 Department of Ultrasound, Jimo District People’s Hospital of Qingdao, Qingdao, 266200 China
17 9 2024
17 9 2024
2024
14 2164729 2 2024
6 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Limited data on the correlation between the perineal body (PB) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are available. The objectives of this study were to quantify the PB using shear wave elastography (SWE) technology with a high-frequency linear array probe to evaluate the relationship between the properties of PB and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This study included 64 women with SUI and 70 female control participants. The length, height, perimeter, and area of PB in all participants were calculated using transperineal ultrasound, and the elasticity of PB was assessed by SWE at rest and during the maximal Valsalva maneuver, respectively. In addition, the comparison of PB parameters between the patients with SUI and the healthy participants was conducted. The transperineal ultrasound and SWE examination was performed in 134 participants, and the elastic modulus values were significantly increased from participants at rest to those during the maximal Valsalva maneuver in all participants (Emax: 35.59 versus 53.13 kPa, P < 0.001; and Emean: 26.97 versus 40.25 kPa, P < 0.001). Emax and Emean of PB exhibited significant differences during the maximal Valsalva maneuver between the SUI group and the control group (47.73 versus 58.06 kPa, P < 0.001; and 35.78 versus 44.33 kPa, P < 0.001) and had a negative correlation with SUI. The BMI and PB height during the maximal Valsalva maneuver in the SUI group were found to be significantly higher than that in healthy volunteers. Emax and Emean of PB negatively correlated with BMI during the maximal Valsalva maneuver (r = -0.277, P = 0.001 and r = -0.211, P = 0.014). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PB perimeter of less than 12.68mm was strongly associated with SUI during the maximal Valsalva maneuver, and an Emax of less than 55.76 kPa had a 100% specificity in predicting SUI. SWE can quantify the elasticity of PB, identifying a significant difference between participants at rest and during Valsalva maneuver. In addition, the stiffness of the PB was significantly lower in women with SUI than in healthy women, which may provide a noninvasive clinical practice in SUI prediction.

Keywords

Shear wave elastography
Perineal body
Stress urinary incontinence
Transperineal
Stiffness
Linear array probe
Subject terms

Risk factors
Urology
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the complaint of involuntary urine leakage on increased abdominal pressure. SUI is a common gynecological urinary system disease, which has a significant impact on the quality of life. The prevalence of SUI greatly varies and is highly population-dependent1,2. SUI is more common in women. It has been reported that the urethral support structure has been confirmed as an important factor in the pathophysiology of SUI3,4. The urethrovaginal sphincter attaches to the perineal body (PB), and both spontaneous or deliberate injury of PB might be associated with SUI5–7.

The PB, a complex fibromuscular mass, was first named by MacAlister in 18898. It is the confluence of many pelvic floor structures insert and serves as the central anchor for the urogenital and anal triangles of the perineum9. The levator ani muscle and urethral vaginal sphincter play an important role in the pathogenesis of urinary incontinence, and they are all attached to the PB7,10. The PB, an extremely important structure, not only prevents expansion of the urogenital hiatus but also maintains urinary and fecal continence9. The PB could decrease its stiffness significantly during delivery with minimal injury and return to its predelivery state by the end of puerperium11,12. Because of its small size and superficial location, the PB makes it difficult to assess in detail using MRI and CT13. Ultrasound might be a more suitable approach to observe PB using a high-frequency linear array probe.

Emerging ultrasound technologies, such as strain elastography (SE) and shear wave elastography (SWE), can access tissue or mass stiffness based on different imaging principles. SE is performed using internal physiologic pulsation such as respiratory motion, cardiovascular pulsation or muscular contractions, and very small manual mechanical compression14. So, the operator repeatability of SE was poor to moderate15,16. Meanwhile, reproducibility is vital for the broad clinical application of elastography. For SWE, acoustic pressure waves produce transverse waves in tissue and the propagation velocity of the shear wave is related to softness for shear waves travel more quickly in harder tissue17,18. Unlike SE operation, the mechanical impulse is operator-independent in SWE and the tissue stiffness measurement is reliable. The PB plays an important role in supporting the pelvic floor, therefore the stiffness of the PB might be different in women with and without SUI. However, the current state of knowledge about the relationship between PB and SUI is limited. Accordingly, our primary objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of estimating PB elasticity using a quantitative SWE technology. Our secondary objective was to assess whether there is a relationship between PB parameters, including elasticity, and SUI patients, and to evaluate whether poor PB quality is a risk factor and predictor for SUI.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

The study population comprised 134 participants between December 2018 and August 2021 at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. This study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (committee numbers: QYFYWZLL26065) approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their enrolment. All participants had a clinical assessment by an experienced gynecologist according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP). Of these seventy healthy parous volunteers without SUI had normal pelvic support and all vaginal points above the hymen ≥ 1cm. The inclusion criteria for women with SUI were cough stress test ( +), involuntary loss of urine during increased abdominal pressure caused by coughing, laughing, sneezing, exercising, or walking and without POP above the hymen ≥ 1cm19,20. Exclusion criteria for all participants were a medical history of neurogenic urinary incontinence, prior pelvic or pelvic floor surgery, pelvic floor muscle avulsion, presence of a pelvic mass ≥ 5 cm, recent use of medications that affect mules function, genital anomalies, neurologic disorder, urinary infection, and inability to perform an acceptable Valsalva maneuver.

Transperineal ultrasound examination

Transperineal ultrasound (US) examination was performed by an operator who had more than 5 years of experience in pelvic floor US. A Resona 8T system (Mindray Medical International, Shenzhen, China) equipped with an L14-5WU linear transducer was used. Before the examination, all participants were asked to empty their bladder and scan in the lithotomy position with hip and knees flexed, and knees and ankles apart. The distance between the knees was kept the same between measurements. The probe was lightly positioned on the tissue between the vaginal and anal sphincter complexes and the depth of the image was adjusted to 3-4cm. A midsagittal view of PB was clearly visualized as hyperechoic wedge-shaped tissue between the vaginal opening and anal sphincter complex. Once the PB was clearly identified, the length, height, perimeter, and area of PB were measured thrice at rest and during the maximal Valsalva maneuver, respectively (Fig. 1).Fig. 1 Measurements of PB on the pelvic floor midsagittal plane at rest (a) and during the maximal Valsalva maneuver (b) using transperineal US with a linear array probe.

The SWE procedures

The SWE examination was performed after the transperineal US examination. The other two sonographers, who performed the SWE and the analysis, had more than 5 years of experience in pelvic floor US and more than 2 years of experience in SWE. Both sonographers were blinded to the clinical history and the transperineal US findings.

The transducer was placed lightly on the PB, avoiding any tissue pressure. The SWE imaging mode was initiated after the PB was clearly identified. The valid SWE area was shown as green and invalid areas were shown as purple in the region of interest box. A stable and high-quality SWE image with a movement-stability (M-STB) index of 4 or 5 green stars and > 90% validity could be stored in the system. Three high-quality images were stored for each participant. The region of interest (ROI) for SWE was drawn along the edge of the PB for automatic measurement of Young’s modulus (kPa).

To evaluate intra- and inter-observer repeatability, 20 randomly selected women with SUI were independently assessed by two operators. The first operator performed the SWE measurement on the PB twice in one week for the intra-observer test. The second operator performed the same measurement on the same day to reduce the risk of inter-observer bias. Each operator was blinded to the measurements of the other.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSSAU project (version 21.0) (Online Application Software; https://www.spssau.com]). Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and comparisons between groups were made using the Student’s T test or Mann–Whitney U test. All significant variables were correlated with SUI by a Spearman correlation analysis and SWE findings were correlated with BMI by a Pearson correlation analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off values of PB measurements during the maximal Valsalva maneuver for predicting SUI. The intra- and inter-observer repeatability of SWE measurements was assessed by Bland–Altman analysis and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

During the study period, 134 women were enrolled. Out of these participants, 64 were consecutive patients on the waiting list for SUI. The control group consisted of 70 healthy volunteers who had given birth and with normal pelvic support. As shown in Table 1, the average patient age was 50.2 ± 9.0 (range, 27–65) years in the SUI group and 49.0 ± 8.6 (range, 28–69) years in the control group (P = 0.460). A significant difference in BMI (P < 0.001) was observed between the control and SUI groups. Spearman analysis exhibited a positive correlation between BMI and SUI In addition, no significant difference was found in the PB measurements, including length, height, perimeter, area, Emax, and Emean elastic modulus values at rest between the SUI and the healthy participants. During the maximal Valsalva maneuver, significant differences in all PB measurements, including 2D measurements (length, height, perimeter, and area), Emax, and Emean elastic modulus values, were observed between the control and the SUI participants. The value of PB height in patients with SUI was significantly higher than in healthy participants. While the values of other measurements were significantly lower in the SUI patients than in the healthy participants. Furthermore, during the maximal Valsalva maneuver, Spearman analysis exhibited a positive correlation between PB height and SUI (Table 1).Table 1 Characteristics of the study groups and measurements.

Characteristic	SUI group
N = 70	Control group
N = 64	T	P	Spearman
r	
Age, y	50.2 ± 9.0	49.0 ± 8.6	− 0.740	0.460		
BMI, kg/m2	25.24 ± 1.63	23.70 ± 1.90	− 5.014	< 0.001*	0.402	
Resting	
PB length, mm	15.78 ± 0.92	16.11 ± 0.77	2.273	0.590		
PB height, mm	8.50 ± 0.46	8.62 ± 0.59	1.293	0.198		
PB perimeter, mm	9.78 ± 0.85	10.55 ± 0.43	1.190	0.082		
PB area, cm2	2.23 ± 0.64	2.43 ± 0.38	1.768	0.063		
Emax, kPa	36.61 ± 9.81	34.66 ± 10.38	1.504	0.822		
Emean, kPa	26.97 ± 4.84	26.97 ± 5.03	− 0.009	0.993		
Valsalva maneuver	
PB length, mm	16.98 ± 0.87	18.77 ± 0.79	12.538	< 0.001*	− 0.758	
PB height, mm	7.97 ± 0.45	6.59 ± 0.57	− 15.708	< 0.001*	0.826	
PB perimeter, mm	11.46 ± 0.95	13.87 ± 0.67	3.178	< 0.001*	− 0.842	
PB area, cm2	2.55 ± 0.65	3.18 ± 0.79	2.908	0.008*	− 0.362	
Emax, kPa	47.73 ± 4.96	58.06 ± 7.11	9.821	< 0.001*	− 0.644	
Emean, kPa	35.78 ± 6.51	44.33 ± 6.59	7.548	< 0.001*	− 0.574	
SUI stress urinary incontinence, BMI body mass index, PB perineal body

*P < 0.05.

We also compared the PB parameter between participants at rest and during the maximal Valsalva maneuver. The length and perimeter of PB were significantly increased from the participants at rest to those during the maximal Valsalva maneuver in all subjects (P < 0.001). Although the height of PB decreased and the area increased, the results were not statistically significant (P = 0.994 and P = 0.615, respectively). The elastic modulus values were significantly increased from participants at rest to those during the maximal Valsalva maneuver in all participants (Emax: 35.59 versus 53.13 kPa, P < 0.001; and Emean: 26.97 versus 40.25 kPa, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2). All elastic modulus values of PB were further analyzed with BMI in all patients using Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. Emax and Emean of PB had no significant association with BMI at rest (P = 0.367 and P = 0.799) while had a negative correlation with BMI during the maximal Valsalva maneuver (r = -0.277, P = 0.001 and r = -0.211, P = 0.014).Fig. 2 Stability and validity of shear waves and the elastographic image of the PB. The validity was 92% (a) at rest and 94% during the maximal Valsalva maneuver (d); (b) and (e) shown the outlined PB and the calculation of the E values; (c) and (f) shown good stability with an M-STB index of 5 stars at rest and the maximal Valsalva maneuver, respectively.

We further analyzed elastic modulus values of PB during the maximal Valsalva maneuver in predicting women with SUI using the ROC curve (Fig. 3). The area under curves (AUCs) for Emax and Emean of PB were 0.872 and 0.832, respectively. The cut-off of Emax and Emean was 55.76 kPa and 33.88 kPa, with a sensitivity of 62.9% and 81.4%, and specificity of 100.0% and 68.8%, respectively. Among two-dimensional ultrasound measurements of PB, the AUC and cut-off for PB perimeter were 0.986 and 12.68mm, respectively, with a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 92.2% (Table 2).Fig. 3 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Table 2 Results of ROC optimal cut-off values for the elastic modulus of PB during the maximal Valsalva maneuver in the SUI group.

Elastic modulus	Sensitivity, %	Specificity, %	Cut-off	Youden index	AUC	95%CI	P	
Emax

Emean

PB length

PB height

PB perimeter

PB area

	62.9

81.4

75.7

0

97.1

48.6

	100.0

68.8

96.9

100.0

92.2

89.1

	55.76 kPa

38.88 kPa

18.16 mm

8.89 mm

12.68 mm

3.21 cm2

	0.629

0.502

0.726

0

0.893

0.376

	0.872

0.832

0.938

0.023

0.986

0.709

	0.815, 0.929

0.765, 0.898

0.902, 0.974

0.005, 0.041

0.973, 1.000

0.622, 0.797

	 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

	
ROC Receiver operating characteristic curve, PB perineal body, SUI stress urinary incontinence, AUC the area under the curve, CI confidence interval, Emax the maximum elastic modulus, Emean the mean elastic modulus.

*P < 0.05.

Intra-observer differences for the same operator and inter-observer differences between two different operators were evaluated using Bland–Altman plots (Fig. 4). There were no significant differences between intra- and inter-observer variability for PB measurements using SWE (Table 3). Whether the measurements with SWE were performed by the same operator or between the two different operators, ICC values were all greater than 0.75, indicating excellent consistency (Table 3).Fig. 4 Bland–Altman plots show intra-observer difference between two operators (a–d) and inter-observer difference for the same operator (e–h). Blue lines represent the means, and red lines represent the 95% confidence interval.

Table 3 Inter- and intra-observer variability for SWE of PB in the control group.

	Elastic modulus	N	Mean ± SD	T	P	ICC	95% CI	
Inter-observer variability	EmaxRest	20	− 0.493 ± 4.046	− 0.544	0.593	0.762	0.398, 0.906	
EmeanRest	20	− 0.256 ± 3.205	− 0.356	0.725	0.781	0.446, 0.913	
EmaxVal	20	1.102 ± 3.924	1.256	0.224	0.884	0.706, 0.954	
EmeanVal	20	− 0.120 ± 4.816	− 0.111	0.913	0.834	0.581, 0.934	
Intra-observer variability	EmaxRest	20	0.995 ± 2.328	1.911	0.071	0.787	0.461, 0.916	
EmeanRest	20	0.694 ± 1.862	1.668	0.112	0.943	0.857, 0.978	
EmaxVal	20	0.409 ± 2.704	0.676	0.507	0.762	0.399, 0.906	
EmeanVal	20	0.721 ± 2.770	1.164	0.259	0.802	0.499, 0.922	
SWE shear wave elastography, CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation, ICC intra-class correlation coefficient, PB perineal body.

Discussion

SUI is a significant health problem for women, negatively affecting their quality of life, including physical activity, social relationships, and emotional health21,22. PB, which serves as the anchor of the pelvis, is a functionally and anatomically complex tissue that maintains urinary continence9. However, the current state of knowledge about the correlation between PB and SUI is limited, and further investigation is needed to understand the role of PB in SUI pathogenesis. In this study, we comprehensively measured the PB using 2D ultrasound and SWE technology to assess whether the two-dimensional measurements and elasticity may differ between the SUI and the healthy participants at rest and during the maximal Valsalva maneuver.

To our knowledge, this study was the first to quantitatively evaluate the elasticity of the PB by SWE using a high-frequency linear array probe in parous women to compare the PB properties between healthy and SUI participants. First, we evaluated the repeatability of elastic quantitative values of PB between- and within- two operators. Emax and Emean of PB had excellent reproducibility with ICC values of higher than 0.75. This demonstrated the feasibility of the use of transperineal elastography in clinical settings. A previous study by Victoria Asfour et al.13 showed poor repeatability for PB measurement, which may be due to them acquiring the entire pelvic floor images using a low-frequency curved probe. So, they maximally zoomed-in images optimized specifically for the PB using a 7-MHz curved linear probe. And their measurements of PB showed satisfactory repeatability. Based on this study and owing to PB being a small and superficial tissue, we used a high-frequency linear array probe, with a central frequency of 12 MHz, to optimize images to acquire an accurate and repeatable measurement of PB in our study.

We also exhibited that using transperineal elastography has a satisfactory repeatability to that reported for evaluating levator ani muscle stiffness in SUI and uterine cervix stiffness in order to evaluate outcome of labor induction23–25. Previously, Chen et al.26 have shown that it is feasible to calculate the compressive elastic modulus of the nulliparous PB in vivo.

We then compared the PB characteristics between the SUI patients and the healthy participants at rest and during the maximal Valsalva maneuver. We found that the stiffness of PB was significantly increased from the participants at rest to those during the maximal Valsalva maneuver in all participants using the SWE approach. In 2D measurements, the length and perimeter of PB were also significantly increased. These findings indicated that the PB increased hardness by increasing the length against the compression of intra-abdominal pressure on the pelvic floor support structure. The study by Chen et al.26 showed that the mean elasticity modulus in nulliparous women was 28.0 ± 4.7 kPa. We found that the Emean of PB in parous women was 26.97 ± 4.7 kPa. Our findings were consistent with a previous study demonstrating that the mean elasticity modulus of PB was decreased in multiparous women (the estimated elastic moduli was 21.5 kPa)27.

Consistent with the results of Digesu et al.28 in POP, we also found 2D PB measurements, including length, perimeter, and area, to be smaller in the SUI patients. Furthermore, the stiffness of PB during the maximal Valsalva maneuver was found to be softer in the SUI patients than in the control group. However, the stiffness of PB at rest had no significant difference between the healthy and the SUI participants. These findings help understand changes in PB from participants at rest to those during the maximal Valsalva maneuver and suggested that the differences in the PB hardness between the two groups can only be identified during the Valsalva maneuver. In addition, the elasticity of PB negatively correlated with BMI during the maximal Valsalva maneuver. The reason might be that a higher BMI increases the intramuscular adipose tissue, which could decrease the hardness of PB. This claim is supported by a previous study that determined the structural and mechanical parameters of the PB29.

The interlocking muscular, fascial, and fibrous components make the echo complex, to that extent, the PB is a heteroplasmic hyperechoic tissue in our high-frequency 2D imaging. It is covered with subcuticular fatty tissue on its surface. The PB is ovate round or wedge-shaped at rest and gradually becomes elongated to a long oval during the Valsalva maneuver. In our study, the height of PB during the maximal Valsalva maneuver was significantly higher in the SUI patients than in the control group with normal pelvic support. The PB is commonly injured during labor9,30, so we conjecture that this finding may be attributed to the damage of muscular, fascial, or fibrous components. When pelvic floor muscle contraction acts against increased intra-abdominal pressure, the injured PB in SUI cannot be pulled entirely and thin. Therefore, a PB height of greater than 8.89 mm during the maximal Valsalva maneuver might be a predictor of SUI.

In the study by Asfour et al.13, a small PB area of less than 2.4 cm2 was strongly associated with posterior compartment prolapse. In our study, the PB area obtained during Valsalva maneuver is less than 3.2cm2 in women with SUI. The disease type, probe frequency, sample size, and race might be causing the change. Compared with the PB area, a PB perimeter of less than 12.68 mm during the maximal Valsalva maneuver with a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 92.2% has been shown to be strongly associated with SUI. Additionally, a retrospective study with more than 400 women demonstrated that the perimeter of PB measured during the Valsalva maneuver was a superior predictor of POP31. Hence, we recommend using the perimeter of PB obtained during the Valsalva maneuver rather than the area to assess SUI.

The strength of this study is employing the novel ultrasound method to assess the PB characteristics and determine the difference in PB parameters between the SUI patients and the healthy participants at rest and during the maximal Valsalva maneuver. Using a high-frequency linear transducer to acquire a clear and optimized image makes the SWE procedure more refined and enables the accurate measurement of the PB. Further studies with more subjects are needed to extend and confirm our study. Notably, SWE has been used to assess PB stiffness during labor, showing that primiparous women in the late stage of labor have softer PB than women in early labor27. Furthermore, studies on PB can be considered to address other clinical issues, including POP, fecal incontinence, predicting labor induction, and prevention of perineal lacerations during delivery.

In conclusion, our studies demonstrate that a high-frequency linear transducer can obtain clear PB imaging, and the elasticity of the PB can be quantitatively assessed by SWE to compare PB properties between the healthy and the SUI participants at rest and during maximal Valsalva maneuver. This method provides an additional approach for quantitative measurement of PB, which can be employed in comprehensive pelvic floor assessment.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-72429-5.

Author contributions

ZongLi Yang: Conceptualization and Methodology; XiuMei Li and LiMin Zhang: Writing- Original draft preparation and Software; Yong Li: Data curation and Writing- Reviewing and Editing; Yushan Jiang: Prepared Figs. 1–4; Cheng Zhao and ShiBao Fang: Supervision and Validation; LiWen Sun: Writing- Reviewing and Editing; All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Data availability

Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the ethics review committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These author contributed equally: Limin Zhang.
==== Refs
References

1. Haylen BT An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction Neurourol. Urodyn. 2010 29 4 20 10.1002/nau.20798 19941278
Haylen, B. T. et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol. Urodyn. 29, 4–20. 10.1002/nau.20798 (2010).19941278
2. Rubilotta E Pure stress urinary incontinence: analysis of prevalence, estimation of costs, and financial impact BMC Urol. 2019 19 44 10.1186/s12894-019-0468-2 31164133
Rubilotta, E. et al. Pure stress urinary incontinence: analysis of prevalence, estimation of costs, and financial impact. BMC Urol. 19, 44. 10.1186/s12894-019-0468-2 (2019).31164133
3. van Veelen A Schweitzer K van der Vaart H Ultrasound assessment of urethral support in women with stress urinary incontinence during and after first pregnancy Obstet. Gynecol. 2014 124 249 256 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000355 25004336
van Veelen, A., Schweitzer, K. & van der Vaart, H. Ultrasound assessment of urethral support in women with stress urinary incontinence during and after first pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 124, 249–256. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000355 (2014).25004336
4. Ling C Shek KL Gillor M Caudwell-Hall J Dietz HP Is location of urethral kinking a confounder of association between urethral closure pressure and stress urinary incontinence? Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021 57 488 492 10.1002/uog.22153 32672377
Ling, C., Shek, K. L., Gillor, M., Caudwell-Hall, J. & Dietz, H. P. Is location of urethral kinking a confounder of association between urethral closure pressure and stress urinary incontinence?. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 57, 488–492. 10.1002/uog.22153 (2021).32672377
5. DeLancey JO Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele Am. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. 1999 180 815 823 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70652-6
DeLancey, J. O. Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. 180, 815–823. 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70652-6 (1999).
6. Sleep J Grant A West Berkshire perineal management trial: three year follow up Br. Med. J. (Clin Res Ed) 1987 295 749 751 10.1136/bmj.295.6601.749 3119022
Sleep, J. & Grant, A. West Berkshire perineal management trial: three year follow up. Br. Med. J. (Clin Res Ed) 295, 749–751. 10.1136/bmj.295.6601.749 (1987).3119022
7. Oelrich TM The striated urogenital sphincter muscle in the female Anat. Rec. 1983 205 223 232 10.1002/ar.1092050213 6846873
Oelrich, T. M. The striated urogenital sphincter muscle in the female. Anat. Rec. 205, 223–232. 10.1002/ar.1092050213 (1983).6846873
8. Oh C Kark AE Anatomy of the perineal body Dis. Colon. Rectum. 1973 16 444 454 10.1007/BF02588867 4769218
Oh, C. & Kark, A. E. Anatomy of the perineal body. Dis. Colon. Rectum. 16, 444–454. 10.1007/BF02588867 (1973).4769218
9. Woodman PJ Graney DO Anatomy and physiology of the female perineal body with relevance to obstetrical injury and repair Clin. Anat. 2002 15 321 334 10.1002/ca.10034 12203375
Woodman, P. J. & Graney, D. O. Anatomy and physiology of the female perineal body with relevance to obstetrical injury and repair. Clin. Anat. 15, 321–334. 10.1002/ca.10034 (2002).12203375
10. DeLancey JO Stress urinary incontinence: relative importance of urethral support and urethral closure pressure J. Urol. 2008 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.098 18423707
DeLancey, J. O. et al. Stress urinary incontinence: relative importance of urethral support and urethral closure pressure. J. Urol.10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.098 (2008).18423707
11. Feola A Impact of pregnancy and vaginal delivery on the passive and active mechanics of the rat vagina Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2011 39 549 558 10.1007/s10439-010-0153-9 20824342
Feola, A. et al. Impact of pregnancy and vaginal delivery on the passive and active mechanics of the rat vagina. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39, 549–558. 10.1007/s10439-010-0153-9 (2011).20824342
12. Weli HK Advanced glycation products' levels and mechanical properties of vaginal tissue in pregnancy Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017 214 78 85 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.037
Weli, H. K. et al. Advanced glycation products’ levels and mechanical properties of vaginal tissue in pregnancy. Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 214, 78–85. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.037 (2017).
13. Asfour V Digesu GA Fernando R Khullar V Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: A useful clinical tool Int. Urogynecol. J. 2020 31 1197 1202 10.1007/s00192-019-04166-7 31828399
Asfour, V., Digesu, G. A., Fernando, R. & Khullar, V. Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: A useful clinical tool. Int. Urogynecol. J. 31, 1197–1202. 10.1007/s00192-019-04166-7 (2020).31828399
14. Ophir J Elastography: Ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 1999 213 203 233 10.1243/0954411991534933 10420776
Ophir, J. et al. Elastography: Ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 213, 203–233. 10.1243/0954411991534933 (1999).10420776
15. Dong Y Breast strain elastography: Observer variability in data acquisition and interpretation European journal of radiology 2018 101 157 161 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.025 29571790
Dong, Y. et al. Breast strain elastography: Observer variability in data acquisition and interpretation. European journal of radiology 101, 157–161. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.025 (2018).29571790
16. Park CS Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions Breast Cancer 2015 22 153 160 10.1007/s12282-013-0465-3 23584596
Park, C. S. et al. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions. Breast Cancer 22, 153–160. 10.1007/s12282-013-0465-3 (2015).23584596
17. Sarvazyan AP Rudenko OV Swanson SD Fowlkes JB Emelianov SY Shear wave elasticity imaging: A new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1998 24 1419 1435 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00110-0 10385964
Sarvazyan, A. P., Rudenko, O. V., Swanson, S. D., Fowlkes, J. B. & Emelianov, S. Y. Shear wave elasticity imaging: A new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24, 1419–1435. 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00110-0 (1998).10385964
18. Athanasiou A Breast lesions: Quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging–preliminary results Radiology 2010 256 297 303 10.1148/radiol.10090385 20505064
Athanasiou, A. et al. Breast lesions: Quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging–preliminary results. Radiology 256, 297–303. 10.1148/radiol.10090385 (2010).20505064
19. Al Adem KM Implantable Systems for Stress Urinary Incontinence Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2017 45 2717 2732 10.1007/s10439-017-1939-9 29022114
Al Adem, K. M. et al. Implantable Systems for Stress Urinary Incontinence. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45, 2717–2732. 10.1007/s10439-017-1939-9 (2017).29022114
20. Committee Opinion No 603: Evaluation of uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence in women before surgical treatment Obstet. Gynecol. 2014 123 1403 1407 10.1097/01.AOG.0000450759.34453.31 24848922
Committee Opinion No. 603: Evaluation of uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence in women before surgical treatment. Obstet. Gynecol. 123, 1403–1407. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000450759.34453.31 (2014).24848922
21. Sangsawang B Sangsawang N Stress urinary incontinence in pregnant women: a review of prevalence, pathophysiology, and treatment Int. Urogynecol. J. 2013 24 901 912 10.1007/s00192-013-2061-7 23436035
Sangsawang, B. & Sangsawang, N. Stress urinary incontinence in pregnant women: a review of prevalence, pathophysiology, and treatment. Int. Urogynecol. J. 24, 901–912. 10.1007/s00192-013-2061-7 (2013).23436035
22. Xu P Barriers and enablers of pelvic floor rehabilitation behaviours in pregnant women with stress urinary incontinence: A qualitative analysis using the theoretical domains framework BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023 23 300 10.1186/s12884-023-05633-2 37118702
Xu, P. et al. Barriers and enablers of pelvic floor rehabilitation behaviours in pregnant women with stress urinary incontinence: A qualitative analysis using the theoretical domains framework. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 300. 10.1186/s12884-023-05633-2 (2023).37118702
23. Li XM Usefulness of transperineal shear wave elastography of levator ani muscle in women with stress urinary incontinence Abdom. Radiol. (NY) 2022 47 1873 1880 10.1007/s00261-022-03478-5 35290481
Li, X. M. et al. Usefulness of transperineal shear wave elastography of levator ani muscle in women with stress urinary incontinence. Abdom. Radiol. (NY) 47, 1873–1880. 10.1007/s00261-022-03478-5 (2022).35290481
24. Li X Usefulness of Transperineal Virtual Touch Quantification in the Cervix for Predicting Outcome of Labor Induction Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2020 46 2207 2214 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.037 32565129
Li, X. et al. Usefulness of Transperineal Virtual Touch Quantification in the Cervix for Predicting Outcome of Labor Induction. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 46, 2207–2214. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.037 (2020).32565129
25. Zhou M Shui W Bai W Wu X Ying T Ultrasonographic study of female perineal body and its supportive function on pelvic floor Front Med (Lausanne) 2023 10.3389/fmed.2023.1176360 38384316
Zhou, M., Shui, W., Bai, W., Wu, X. & Ying, T. Ultrasonographic study of female perineal body and its supportive function on pelvic floor. Front Med (Lausanne)10.3389/fmed.2023.1176360 (2023).38384316
26. Chen L Low LK DeLancey JO Ashton-Miller JA In vivo estimation of perineal body properties using ultrasound quasistatic elastography in nulliparous women J. Biomech. 2015 48 1575 1579 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.056 25801422
Chen, L., Low, L. K., DeLancey, J. O. & Ashton-Miller, J. A. In vivo estimation of perineal body properties using ultrasound quasistatic elastography in nulliparous women. J. Biomech. 48, 1575–1579. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.056 (2015).25801422
27. Rostaminia G Shear wave elastography to assess perineal body stiffness during labor Female Pelvic. Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2019 25 443 447 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000585 29794544
Rostaminia, G. et al. Shear wave elastography to assess perineal body stiffness during labor. Female Pelvic. Med. Reconstr. Surg. 25, 443–447. 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000585 (2019).29794544
28. Digesu GA Chaliha C Salvatore S Hutchings A Khullar V The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life BJOG 2005 112 971 976 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00568.x 15958002
Digesu, G. A., Chaliha, C., Salvatore, S., Hutchings, A. & Khullar, V. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 112, 971–976. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00568.x (2005).15958002
29. Kochova P The histological microstructure and in vitro mechanical properties of the human female postmenopausal perineal body Menopause 2019 26 66 77 10.1097/GME.0000000000001166 29994970
Kochova, P. et al. The histological microstructure and in vitro mechanical properties of the human female postmenopausal perineal body. Menopause 26, 66–77. 10.1097/GME.0000000000001166 (2019).29994970
30. Kamisan Atan I Shek KL Furtado GI Caudwell-Hall J Dietz HP The association between levator-urethra gap measurements and symptoms and signs of female pelvic organ prolapse Female Pelvic. Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2016 22 442 446 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000311 27465815
Kamisan Atan, I., Shek, K. L., Furtado, G. I., Caudwell-Hall, J. & Dietz, H. P. The association between levator-urethra gap measurements and symptoms and signs of female pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic. Med. Reconstr. Surg. 22, 442–446. 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000311 (2016).27465815
31. Ow LL Should Genital Hiatus/Perineal Body Be Measured at Rest or on Valsalva? Female Pelvic. Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2019 25 415 418 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000608 29979358
Ow, L. L. et al. Should Genital Hiatus/Perineal Body Be Measured at Rest or on Valsalva?. Female Pelvic. Med. Reconstr. Surg. 25, 415–418. 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000608 (2019).29979358
