
==== Front
Heliyon
Heliyon
Heliyon
2405-8440
Elsevier

S2405-8440(24)13228-8
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37197
e37197
Research Article
Associations of C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index with cardiorenal syndrome: Insights from a population-based study
Xu Zhehao b1
Tang Jiao a1
Xin chen a
Jin Yian b
Zhang Huanji a
Liang Ruiyun lruiy@mail.sysu.edu.cn
c⁎
a Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, China
b Department of General Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, China
c Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, China
⁎ Corresponding author. lruiy@mail.sysu.edu.cn
1 Co-first authors.

03 9 2024
15 9 2024
03 9 2024
10 17 e3719730 7 2024
24 8 2024
29 8 2024
© 2024 The Authors
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Background

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a complex condition characterized by the interplay of immune imbalance and inflammation. The C-reactive protein-Albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) CALLY index serves as a new immune-nutritional scoring system, but its predictive value for CRS remains to be established.

Methods

In this study, we analyzed data from 27,978 participants in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2010. The CALLY index was calculated as the ratio of albumin to lymphocyte, divided by C-reactive protein (CRP) multiplied by 104. CRS was defined by the coexistence of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Multivariate weighted logistic regression models were employed to determine the odds ratio and 95 % confidence interval for the association between the CALLY index and CRS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves were used to assess the predictive efficacy and nonlinear relationship, respectively.

Results

The prevalence of CRS in the study population was 1.22 %. Our findings revealed a significant inverse relationship between the CALLY index and CRS risk, with lower CALLY index values being associated with a higher likelihood of CRS (OR = 0.95, 95 % CI = 0.94–0.96, P < 0.001). Participants in higher quartiles of the CALLY index showed a progressively reduced risk of CRS (P for trend <0.001). Moreover, the CALLY index demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to other inflammatory indicators, such as systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil/high-density lipoprotein ratio (NHR), lymphocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio (LHR), monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR), and platelet/high-density lipoprotein ratio (PHR) (AUC = 0.672, 95 % CI = 0.643–0.701).

Conclusions

This study underscores the significant negative correlation between the CALLY index and the risk of cardiorenal syndrome. The CALLY index emerges as a robust and independent predictor of CRS, outperforming traditional inflammatory markers. This finding highlights the potential utility of the CALLY index as a clinical tool for identifying individuals at risk for CRS.

Highlights

• CALLY index inversely associated with cardiorenal syndrome risk.

• CALLY index predicts CRS more effectively than other inflammatory markers.

• Lower CALLY index indicates higher risk of CRS.

• CALLY index serves as a novel immune-nutritional scoring system.

Keywords

Cardiorenal syndrome
Inflammation
NHANES
C-reactive protein
Albumin
Lymphocyte
==== Body
pmc1 Introduction

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) denotes a reciprocal relationship between the heart and kidneys, where the compromised function of one, whether sudden or ongoing, can trigger a similar decline in the other [1]. More than 50 % of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) combine with renal insufficiency. It is estimated that 20–60 % of moderate to severe renal failure patients have heart failure [2]. The high prevalence of CRS presents a significant challenge to public health and healthcare systems. Currently, the early diagnosis and prognostic assessment of CRS are not adequate, so searching for effective biomarkers is important [3].

With the development of pathophysiology, studies have revealed that a variety of pathophysiologic processes are implicated in CRS, with immune imbalance and inflammation being pivotal in both the onset and progression of the condition [4,5]. Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with CRS and negatively impacts clinical outcomes in CRS [6]. The C-reactive protein -Albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index serves as a new immune-nutritional scoring system, which is calculated based on albumin level multiplied by lymphocyte count divided by C-reactive protein level multiplied by 10,000 [7,8]. Previous retrospective studies have examined the association of CALLY with prognosis in patients with colorectal and hepatocellular carcinoma, and it is better than other inflammation-based biomarkers [7,9,10]. However, studies on the correlation between CALLY index and CRS are quite limited.

Albumin reflects nutritional status, lymphocyte count reflects the immune system, and C-reactive protein serves as a classic inflammatory marker. In addition to influencing CRS initiation and progression, these markers may also influence its prognosis [4,7,11]. Consequently, leveraging data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we investigated the potential independent link between the CALLY index and CRS, with the goal of addressing the gap in understanding risk factors and predictors for CRS and to inform the development of effective preventative measures.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Data and study participants

We performed a cross-sectional analysis utilizing NHANES dataset spanning from 1999 to 2010. This extensive program, administered by the National Center for Health Statistics, serves as a vital source for evaluating the health and nutritional profiles of the American population. NHANES encompasses comprehensive interviews that delve into demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, dietary habits, and various health aspects, complemented by meticulous examinations involving medical tests and blood marker evaluations conducted by qualified healthcare professionals.

From the total of 62,160 individuals who participated in the six consecutive NHANES cycles during the specified timeframe, we implemented rigorous exclusion criteria to ensure the accuracy and reliability of our analysis. This led to the exclusion of 26,781 participants under the age of 18, as they were not considered eligible for our study's focus. In addition, 4,063 individuals were excluded since insufficient data was available to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), a crucial parameter for assessing chronic kidney disease (CKD). Furthermore, we excluded 2,756 participants who lacked information on cardiovascular disease (CVD), as well as 582 individuals who were missing either the CALLY index values or relevant covariates required for our analysis. The detailed selection process, including these exclusions, is illustrated in Fig. 1.Fig. 1 Inclusion and exclusion process of the study participants. Abbreviations: NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CALLY, C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte.

Fig. 1

2.2 Assessment of C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index

Blood cell counts were analyzed utilizing the Coulter HMX Hematology Analyzer, with results for neutrophils, platelets, monocytes, and lymphocytes reported in standardized units of ×10³ cells per microliter. Our primary focus was on the CALLY index, a novel metric derived from preoperative albumin levels, lymphocyte counts, and CRP values. Specifically, the CALLY index was calculated as [(Albumin in g/L) * (Lymphocyte count in 1000 cells/uL)]/(CRP in mg/dL), providing a holistic evaluation of inflammatory and nutritional status [7].

Additionally, we investigated the relationship between SII, MHR, NHR, PHR, and LHR and cardiorenal syndrome.CALLYindex=Albumin×LymphocyteCRP

systemicimmune−inflammationindex(SII)=Plateletcounts×neutrophilcountslymphocytecountsmonocyte/high−densitylipoproteinratio(MHR)=monocytecountsHDL−Cneutrophil/high−densitylipoproteinratio(NHR)=neutriphilcountsHDL−Cplatelet/high−densitylipoproteinratio(PHR)=plateletcountsHDL−Clymphocyte/high−densitylipoproteinratio(LHR)=lymphocytecountsHDL−C

2.3 Cardiorenal syndrome ascertainment

Expanding on the previous study, CRS encompass a wide spectrum of conditions where impairments in the function of one organ—either the heart or the kidneys—can trigger dysfunction in the other [7]. This interplay can manifest as acute kidney injury in the context of acute heart failure or CKD secondary to CHF [12]. Therefore, the diagnosis of CHF and CKD concomitantly was defined as CRS. We utilized information on CHF history was collected using the standardized question: ‘During the past 12 months, has a doctor or other health professional ever told you had congestive heart failure?’. And CKD was defined by the eGFR, with eGFR values below 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 indicating CKD. We used Creatinine and Cystatin C-based equations to estimate GFR without taking race into account [13].: eGFR = 142 × (Serum Creatinine/A) B x (0.9938) Age x C, where Serum Creatinine (Scr) denotes serum creatinine concentration (mg/dL); （1）Female C：1.012; Scr≤0.7 mg/dL，A = 0.7，B = −0.241; Scr>0.7 mg/dL，A = 0.7，B = −1.2; （2）Male C：1,Scr≤0.9 mg/dL，A = 0.9，B = −0.302; Scr>0.9 mg/dL，A = 0.9，B = −1.2 [14].eGFR=142×(ScrA)B×(0.9938)Age×C(1)Female:C=1.012;Scr≤0.7mg/dL:A=0.7,B=−0.241Scr>0.7mg/dL:A=0.7,B=−1.2(2)Male:C=1.000;Scr≤0.7mg/dL:A=0.9,B=−0.302Scr>0.7mg/dL:A=0.9,B=−1.2

2.4 Covariates assessment

We incorporated demographic details, lifestyle factors, and potential confounders into our analysis as covariates. Demographic factors included age, gender, ethnicity, and educational attainment. Lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption were also considered. Additionally, we accounted for comorbidities like hypertension and diabetes. Age was the sole continuous variable, with categorization details provided in Supplementary Table 2.

2.5 Statistical analysis

Considering the complex sampling design of the survey, we conducted weighted analyses in line with the NHANES guidelines. The statistical evaluation of the CALLY index was performed according to the database's protocols. We depicted continuous and categorical variables using mean (±SD) and percentage, respectively. The continuous CALLY index was categorized into quartiles for initial analysis. For categorical variables, we determined the p-value using the chi-squared test with Rao & Scott's second-order correction, while for continuous variables, we applied the Kruskal-Walli's rank-sum test, tailored for complex survey samples.

The association between the CALLY index and CRS was examined using three weighted linear regression models: Model 1 (unadjusted), Model 2 (adjusted for sex, age, and race), and Model 3 (further adjusted for gender, age, race, education, PIR, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes, HDL, TC, and TG). Additionally, we utilized three-knot restricted cubic splines (RCS) to investigate potential non-linear relationships between the CALLY index and CRS, employing the generalized additive model to create a smooth curve based on the penalty spline approach. Segmented regression models were also used to determine whether the CALLY index and the CRS were linear or nonlinear and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) values and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to evaluate other inflammatory markers (SII, MHR, NHR, PHR, LHR). Missing data for these variables were imputed using the modal value for categorical variables or the median for continuous ones.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we performed several sensitivity analyses: 1) analyzing data prior to multiple imputation to assess its potential impact; 2) to mitigate the potential for over-adjustment bias when incorporating key variables as covariates after the calculation of sampling weights, we conducted an analysis without applying weights to the data.; 3) identifying cut-off points via ROC curves and dividing them into two groups for trend analysis.

All statistical analyses were performed using R software, version 4.2.0, along with relevant R packages. A p-value threshold of less than 0.05 was considered to denote statistical significance in our study.

3 Results

3.1 Baseline characteristics

In the NHANES 1999–2010 cycles, 27,978 subjects (48.2 % men) met the criteria for this cross-sectional study, with mean age of 46.13 ± 16.65 years. The baseline characteristics of the study cohort, stratified by CALLY index groups, are presented in Table 1. The majority of the participants excluded from the analysis were minors, as they were either not surveyed on relevant medical conditions or were ineligible for the assessment of the index measurements. Among the participants included in the study, the majority were white (13,907, 71.2 %), and a significant portion had achieved a high school education or higher (5,493, 25.8 %). A considerable number of individuals (3,794, 53.8 %) reported never having smoked. The Q1 group of the CALLY index, indicating the lowest values, consisted of older individuals who were more likely to smoke, be obese, and have elevated blood pressure. This group also exhibited a higher prevalence of conditions such as CHF and CKD. The prevalence of CHF and CKD among the participants was 2.3 % and 5.3 %, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in all baseline variables when comparing the groups categorized by the CALLY index. (all p < 0.05).Table 1 Weighted patient demographics and baseline characteristics of participants according to CALLY index.

Table 1Characteristic	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	p-value	
[1.71,167)	[167,400)	[400,1010)	[1010,13000]	
CALLY	90.88 ± 43.17	270.64 ± 66.77	647.76 ± 175.86	2,829.19 ± 2,272.91	<0.001b	
Age	49.27 ± 16.98	48.60 ± 16.62	46.41 ± 16.28	41.51 ± 15.74	<0.001b	
Gender					<0.001c	
 Female	4,494 (64.9 %)	3,790 (54.9 %)	3,202 (45.7 %)	3,015 (45.0 %)		
 Male	2,499 (35.1 %)	3,191 (45.1 %)	3,794 (54.3 %)	3,993 (55.0 %)		
BMI	32.29 ± 8.03	29.65 ± 6.04	27.67 ± 5.23	24.99 ± 4.31	<0.001b	
Race					<0.001c	
 Mexican American	1,484 (8.1 %)	1,501 (7.8 %)	1,475 (7.9 %)	1,328 (7.4 %)		
 Other Hispanic	418 (4.8 %)	470 (5.6 %)	494 (5.0 %)	488 (5.0 %)		
 Non-Hispanic White	3,320 (69.2 %)	3,486 (71.7 %)	3,548 (72.2 %)	3,553 (71.4 %)		
 Non-Hispanic Black;	1,575 (14.0 %)	1,292 (10.6 %)	1,163 (9.0 %)	1,233 (9.2 %)		
 Other race	196 (3.9 %)	232 (4.3 %)	316 (5.9 %)	406 (7.0 %)		
Education					<0.001c	
 Less Than 9th Grade	2,467 (25.2 %)	2,310 (22.2 %)	2,114 (20.6 %)	1,959 (18.5 %)		
 9–11th Grade	3,440 (55.3 %)	3,401 (54.0 %)	3,450 (52.5 %)	3,344 (50.5 %)		
 High school grade and more	1,086 (19.5 %)	1,270 (23.7 %)	1,432 (27.0 %)	1,705 (31.0 %)		
PIR					<0.001c	
 <1	1,141 (12.2 %)	1,446 (16.1 %)	1,198 (12.5 %)	1,153 (12.7 %)		
 ≥1	5,301 (87.8 %)	5,029 (83.9 %)	5,184 (87.5 %)	5,287 (87.3 %)		
Hypertension					<0.001c	
 No	4,058 (60.4 %)	4,433 (67.8 %)	4,796 (73.0 %)	5,430 (81.5 %)		
 Yes	2,935 (39.6 %)	2,548 (32.2 %)	2,200 (27.0 %)	1,578 (18.5 %)		
Diabetes					<0.001c	
 No	5,854 (86.2 %)	6,059 (90.4 %)	6,231 (92.4 %)	6,452 (94.6 %)		
 Yes	1,139 (13.8 %)	922 (9.6 %)	765 (7.6 %)	556 (5.4 %)		
Alcohol					<0.001c	
 Yes	4,578 (69.2 %)	4,915 (73.9 %)	5,216 (77.7 %)	5,409 (80.2 %)		
 No	2,415 (30.8 %)	2,066 (26.1 %)	1,780 (22.3 %)	1,599 (19.8 %)		
Smoke					0.002c	
 Yes	3,372 (49.6 %)	3,403 (49.4 %)	3,403 (48.8 %)	3,214 (46.2 %)		
 No	3,621 (50.4 %)	3,578 (50.6 %)	3,593 (51.2 %)	3,794 (53.8 %)		
Moderate-intensity activity					0.037c	
 No	4,829 (67.0 %)	4,724 (66.5 %)	4,626 (65.1 %)	4,548 (64.4 %)		
 Yes	2,164 (33.0 %)	2,257 (33.5 %)	2,370 (34.9 %)	2,460 (35.6 %)		
Chronic Heart Failure					<0.001c	
 No	6,600 (95.5 %)	6,741 (97.6 %)	6,816 (98.4 %)	6,884 (98.7 %)		
 Yes	393 (4.5 %)	240 (2.4 %)	180 (1.6 %)	124 (1.3 %)		
Chronic Kidney Diseases					<0.001c	
 No	6,210 (91.6 %)	6,335 (93.8 %)	6,483 (95.2 %)	6,699 (97.2 %)		
 Yes	783 (8.4 %)	646 (6.2 %)	513 (4.8 %)	309 (2.8 %)		
Cardiorenal Syndrome					<0.001c	
 No	6,835 (98.3 %)	6,891 (99.2 %)	6,942 (99.6 %)	6,973 (99.7 %)		
 Yes	158 (1.7 %)	90 (0.8 %)	54 (0.4 %)	35 (0.3 %)		
eGFR mL/(min·1.73m2)	90.94 ± 20.577	92.57 ± 19.088	94.54 ± 18.477	98.13 ± 17.798	<0.001b	
HDL (mg/dl)	51.08 ± 15.602	51.14 ± 15.397	51.83 ± 15.593	55.91 ± 16.366	<0.001b	
TC (mg/dl)	199.71 ± 41.551	204.31 ± 42.320	201.09 ± 41.238	191.96 ± 37.920	<0.001b	
TG (mg/dl)	156.48 ± 109.348	161.38 ± 128.488	155.02 ± 136.631	126.26 ± 107.678	<0.001b	
Creatinine (mg/dL)	0.87 ± 0.547	0.87 ± 0.351	0.88 ± 0.281	0.87 ± 0.263	<0.001b	
Albumin (g/L)	40.58 ± 3.566	42.51 ± 3.019	43.53 ± 2.993	44.58 ± 2.932	<0.001b	
Lymphocyte (1000 cells/dL)	1.97 ± 0.671	2.10 ± 0.843	2.16 ± 0.791	2.21 ± 1.295	<0.001b	
C-reactive protein (mg/dL)	1.27 ± 1.359	0.35 ± 0.156	0.16 ± 0.069	0.05 ± 0.034	<0.001b	
PLT (1000 cells/dL)	280.30 ± 76.939	267.70 ± 66.666	260.88 ± 63.383	254.70 ± 62.270	<0.001b	
WBC (1000 cells/dL)	7.77 ± 2.373	7.34 ± 2.148	7.15 ± 2.046	6.96 ± 2.426	<0.001b	
Monocyte (1000 cells/dL)	0.58 ± 0.20	0.56 ± 0.18	0.55 ± 0.18	0.54 ± 0.19	<0.001b	
Neutrophils (1000 cells/dL)	4.96 ± 1.996	4.43 ± 1.646	4.19 ± 1.537	3.94 ± 1.453	<0.001b	
aMean ± SD; n (unweighted) (%).

bKruskal-Walli’s rank-sum test for complex survey samples

cchi-squared test with Rao & Scott's second-order correction

3.2 The relationships of CALLY index and CRS

The prevalence of CRS was 1.22 % (337 VS 27,641) among the 27,978 participants included in the study. As depicted in Supplemental Table 1, the optimal threshold value at the maximum value of Youden index is 255.3, selected through rigorous ROC analysis to ensure clinical relevance. Table 2 illustrates that after accounting for covariates, weighted logistic regression analysis indicates that a lower CALLY index is correlated with an increased likelihood of CRS (OR = 0.95, 95 % CI = 0.94–0.96, p < 0.001). When comparing the first quartile of the CALLY index as a reference, an increment in each subsequent quartile of the CALLY index is significantly linked to a reduced odds ratio for CRS, demonstrating a marked trend (p for trend <0.001). Fig. 2 displays the distribution of CALLY index and reveals no nonlinear association of CALLY index with CRS through RCS analysis (adjusted or unadjusted). Furthermore, the analysis revealed non-linear relationships with CRS, as evidenced by the Generalized Additive Model (GAM) and the application of smooth curve fitting techniques.Table 2 Cross-sectional association between CALLY index and CRS.

Table 2Continuous or categories	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	
OR (95%CI)	p	OR (95%CI)	p	OR (95%CI)	p	
Cally as continuous variable	0.97 (0.96, 0.98)	<0.001	0.97 (0.96, 0.98)	0.03	0.95 (0.94, 0.96)	0.03	
Low（＜255.3）							
high（≥255.3）	0.37 (0.30, 0.47)	<0.001	0.47 (0.38, 0.59)	<0.001	0.55 (0.43, 0.47)	<0.001	
Q1							
Q2	0.48 (0.35, 0.66)	<0.001	0.51 (0.35, 0.66)	<0.001	0.60 (0.42, 0.85)	0.004	
Q3	0.24 (0.17, 0.35)	<0.001	0.35 (0.23, 0.53)	<0.001	0.39 (0.26, 0.56)	<0.001	
Q4	0.17 (0.11, 0.26)	<0.001	0.30 (0.21, 0.44)	<0.001	0.38 (0.24, 0.64)	<0.001	
p for trend	<0.001		<0.001		<0.001		

Fig. 2 Nonlinear associations of CALLY index with CRS. A. Unadjusted. B Adjusted for age, gender, education levels, race and BMI C. Generalized additive model curve; CALLY: C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte; CRS cardiorenal syndrome.

Fig. 2

3.3 Stratification connection of CALLY index and CRS

Supplemental Figure 2 delineates our in-depth analysis of the stratified relationship between the CALLY index and CRS across various subgroups, categorized by sex, BMI, smoking status, alcohol intake, and the presence of hypertension and diabetes. The stratified analysis indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in the association between the CALLY index and CRS among any of the examined subgroups (p for interaction >0.05).

3.4 ROC analysis

To assess and compare the predictive power of CALLY with other inflammatory biomarkers, namely SII, MHR, NHR, PHR and LHR, for the prediction of CRS, we computed AUC values, as illustrated in Fig. 3. Our findings reveal that CALLY exhibited higher AUC values than the remaining inflammatory biomarkers, highlighting its superior performance in predicting CRS. Furthermore, Supplemental Table 3 demonstrates that the AUC values for CALLY are statistically significantly different from those of the other inflammatory biomarkers. Collectively, these findings indicate that the CALLY index demonstrates superior discriminatory power and precision in predicting CRS compared to other inflammatory biomarkers discussed. This suggests that the CALLY index could serve as a valuable clinical instrument for assessment and decision-making processes in the context of CRS.Fig. 3 ROC curves and the AUC values of the six inflammatory biomarkers (CALLY, SII, NHR, PHR, MHR, and LHR) in diagnosing CRS. CALLY: C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte; SII: systemic immune-inflammation index; NHR, neutrophil/high-density lipoprotein ratio; MHR, monocyte-high-density lipoprotein ratio; LHR, lymphocyte high-density lipoprotein ratio, PHR, platelet high-density lipoprotein ratio. ROC Curve, receiver operating characteristic curve.

Fig. 3

4 Discussion

This study's findings indicate a significant and negative correlation between the CALLY index and the risk of CRS, a relationship that persists after accounting for various potential confounding factors. This suggests that the CALLY index could serve as an independent predictor for the risk of CRS. The consistency of the subgroup analyses further validated the validity of the CALLY index as a predictor of CRS risk and provided superior predictive ability compared with other inflammation-based composite indexes such as SII, NHR, LHR, MHR, and PHR.

The CALLY index is a novel inflammatory index with albumin levels, lymphocyte counts and CRP as components [7]. Albumin serves as a critical measure for evaluating nutritional status, and the deterioration of renal function not only reduces serum albumin but also diminishes its capacity to bind with uremic toxins [15]. Immune cells play an important role in cardiac injury and repair [16,17]. In addition, the immune system participates in regulating the severity of kidney injury [18]. Inflammation stands out as a key mechanism in CRS and is acknowledged for its potential to induce stress on both acute and chronic cardiorenal systems [4]. Studies in mouse models of acute CRS have highlighted the significant role of inflammation in the transition from acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease [19]. An exacerbated inflammatory state can exacerbate renal damage, and renal insufficiency has a direct impact on the clinical outcomes of both acute and chronic heart diseases [20]. CRP, recognized as a traditional marker of inflammation, has been found to be significantly correlated with an elevated cardiorenal risk [21]. Consequently, the CALLY index can be seen as a more responsive indicator that mirrors systemic immune and inflammatory reactions.

Systemic, ongoing inflammation is recognized as a pivotal initiator of both heart failure and renal impairment [22]. The SII, MHR, NHR, PHR and LHR are composite inflammatory indicators [23]. Elevated levels of SII, NHR, LHR, MHR and PHR are significantly associated with an increased risk of heart failure and chronic kidney disease [[24], [25], [26]]. A retrospective study has established the correlation between MHR and CRS, and MHR can be used as a tool for early prevention and intervention of CRS [10]. Presently, the CALLY index's application is predominantly in the prognostication of oncology patients [7,9]. The CALLY index was independently associated with patients with colorectal cancer [8]. Research has also uncovered a substantial negative correlation between the CALLY index and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates in the elderly [27]. Moreover, a retrospective, single-center observational study has identified the CALLY index as an autonomous risk predictor for the onset of acute kidney injury (AKI) [28].

In this research, we conducted a pioneering exploration of the CALLY index's utility in forecasting outcomes for individuals afflicted with CRS. This research marks the pioneering effort to scrutinize the CALLY index's efficacy in forecasting CRS incidence, revealing its superior predictive capacity over SII, NLR, LMR, MHR, and PHR. The CALLY index, as an innovative nutritional immune-inflammatory scoring system, encompasses diminished albumin indicative of nutritional standing and hepatic functionality [29]. A decline in lymphocyte counts may be associated with immune system disequilibrium [30]. Furthermore, heightened CRP levels signify an aggravated inflammatory reaction [31]. Therefore, the CALLY index comprehensively reflects the systemic inflammatory response and provides superior ability to predict the occurrence of CRS.

This study has certain limitations. Firstly, due to its retrospective nature, the potential for bias cannot be entirely ruled out, and the cross-sectional design limits the ability to infer causal relationships. Secondly, the reliance on self-reported cardiovascular events introduces the possibility of reporting bias. Consequently, there is a need for future large-scale prospective studies to ascertain the longitudinal relationship between the CALLY index and CRS, as well as for clinical data-based studies to thoroughly evaluate the predictive and practical value of the CALLY index. In conclusion, our study revealed that the CALLY index was significantly negatively correlated with cardiorenal syndrome and was a powerful independent predictor of CRS.

5 Conclusions

This study underscores the significant negative correlation between the CALLY index and the risk of cardiorenal syndrome. The CALLY index emerges as a robust and independent predictor of CRS, outperforming traditional inflammatory markers. This finding highlights the potential utility of the CALLY index as a clinical tool for identifying individuals at risk for CRS.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability statement

The data of this study associated with your study been deposited into NHANES. The NHANES data and survey methodology are publicly available and accessible on the website (https//www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm). Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.List of abbreviations

NHANES	National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey	
SII	systemic immune-inflammation index	
NHR	neutrophil/high-density lipoprotein ratio	
LHR	lymphocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio	
MHR	monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio	
PHR	platelet/high-density lipoprotein ratio	
CALLY	C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte	
CRS	cardiorenal syndrome	
CRP	C-reactive protein	
RCS	Restricted cubic spline	
ROC	Receiver operating characteristic	
eGFR	estimated glomerular filtration rate	
CKD	chronic kidney disease	
CVD	cardiovascular disease	
HDL	high density lipoprotein	
TG	triglyceride	
TC	total cholesterol	
AUC	area under the curve	
GAM	Generalized Additive Model	
BMI	Body mass index	

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zhehao Xu: Writing – original draft, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. Jiao Tang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Resources, Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization. Xin chen: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Methodology. Yian Jin: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation. Huanji Zhang: Writing – original draft, Software, Resources. Ruiyun Liang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Resources, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:Multimedia component 1

Multimedia component 1

Acknowledgements

We are immensely grateful and deeply appreciative for the invaluable contribution made by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) program in sharing their extensive and meticulously collected data with us.

Appendix A Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37197.
==== Refs
References

1 Rangaswami J. Cardiorenal syndrome: classification, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment strategies: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Circulation 139 16 2019 e840 e878 30852913
2 Mentz R.J. Lewis E.F. Epidemiology of cardiorenal syndrome Cardiol. Clin. 29 2 2011 301 314 21459251
3 Karabağ Y. The C-reactive protein to albumin ratio predicts acute kidney injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention Heart Lung Circ. 28 11 2019 1638 1645 30293924
4 Clementi A. Neurohormonal, endocrine, and immune dysregulation and inflammation in cardiorenal syndrome Cardiorenal Med. 9 5 2019 265 273 31266023
5 Rencuzogullari I. Assessment of the relationship between preprocedural C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and stent restenosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction Rev. Port. Cardiol. 38 4 2019 269 277 31104927
6 Gigante A. Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with cardiorenal syndrome and negatively influences clinical outcome J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 32 1 2018 163 166
7 Iida H. Superiority of CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index (CALLY index) as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma HPB : the Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association 24 1 2022 101 115 34244053
8 Yang M. Association between C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer: from the investigation on nutrition status and clinical outcome of common cancers study Front. Immunol. 14 2023 1131496
9 Müller L. Immunonutritive scoring for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization: evaluation of the CALLY index Cancers 13 19 2021
10 Lin J. Independent and joint associations of monocyte to high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio and body mass index with cardiorenal syndrome: insights from NHANES 2003-2020 Lipids Health Dis. 23 1 2024 153 38783361
11 Kumar U. Wettersten N. Garimella P.S. Cardiorenal syndrome: pathophysiology Cardiol. Clin. 37 3 2019 251 265 31279419
12 Ronco C. Di Lullo L. Cardiorenal syndrome in western countries: epidemiology, diagnosis and management approaches Kidney Dis. 2 4 2017 151 163
13 Levey A.S. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate Ann. Intern. Med. 150 9 2009 604 612 19414839
14 Ronco C. Cardio-renal syndromes: report from the consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative Eur. Heart J. 31 6 2010 703 711 20037146
15 Watanabe I. Prognostic significance of serum indoxyl sulfate and albumin for patients with cardiovascular disease Int. Heart J. 60 1 2019 129 135 30464134
16 Rurik J.G. Aghajanian H. Epstein J.A. Immune cells and immunotherapy for cardiac injury and repair Circ. Res. 128 11 2021 1766 1779 34043424
17 Karakayali M. The prognostic value of HALP score in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention Coron. Artery Dis. 34 7 2023 483 488 37799045
18 Vernier I.C.S. Immune cells are differentially modulated in the heart and the kidney during the development of cardiorenal syndrome 3 Cells 12 4 2023
19 Matsushita K. The acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease transition in a mouse model of acute cardiorenal syndrome emphasizes the role of inflammation Kidney Int. 97 1 2020
20 Kingma J.G. The physiopathology of cardiorenal syndrome: a review of the potential contributions of inflammation Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 4 4 2017
21 Marchiori G.N. Interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein for optimal immunometabolic profiling of the lifestyle-related cardiorenal risk Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) 11 1 2024 82 90 38154057
22 Wang Z. Systemic immune-inflammation index as a prognostic marker for advanced chronic heart failure with renal dysfunction ESC Heart Failure 10 1 2023 478 491 36316302
23 Karakayali M. The relationship between the systemic immune-inflammation index and ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries in patients undergoing coronary angiography Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 121 2 2024 e20230540
24 Li X. Cui L. Xu H. Association between systemic inflammation response index and chronic kidney disease: a population-based study Front. Endocrinol. 15 2024 1329256
25 Zheng H. Associations between systemic immunity-inflammation index and heart failure: evidence from the NHANES 1999-2018 Int. J. Cardiol. 395 2024 131400
26 Zhang Y. Association between blood inflammatory indices and heart failure: a cross-sectional study of NHANES 2009-2018 Acta Cardiol. 79 4 2024 473 485 38771356
27 Luo L. C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index as a feasible nutrition-immunity-inflammation marker of the outcome of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in elderly Clinical Nutrition ESPEN 63 2024 346 353 38985666
28 Zhang J. Clinical predictive value of the CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index for prognosis of critically ill patients with sepsis in intensive care unit: a retrospective single-center observational study Front. Public Health 12 2024 1395134
29 Kuwahata M. An oxidized/reduced state of plasma albumin reflects malnutrition due to an insufficient diet in rats J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 60 1 2017 70 75 28163385
30 Liu Z. Immunosenescence: molecular mechanisms and diseases Signal Transduct. Targeted Ther. 8 1 2023 200
31 Zimmerman M.A. Diagnostic implications of C-reactive protein Arch. Surg. 138 2 2003 220 224 12578424
