
==== Front
Chem Sci
Chem Sci
SC
CSHCBM
Chemical Science
2041-6520
2041-6539
The Royal Society of Chemistry

39176246
d4sc04011b
10.1039/d4sc04011b
Chemistry
A simple N-heterocyclic carbene for the catalytic up-conversion of aldehydes into stoichiometric super electron donors†
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4sc04011b

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5984-6254
Assani Nadhrata a
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3629-4218
Delfau Ludivine b
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9267-4018
Smits Preslav b
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-0845
R-9214-2016
Redon Sébastien a
Kabri Youssef a
Tomás-Mendivil Eder b
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9946-829X
Vanelle Patrice a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3257-9876
N-7040-2015
Martin David b
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4309-8004
N-4768-2018
Broggi Julie a
a Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ICR, Institut de Chimie Radicalaire, Faculté de Pharmacie 13005 Marseille France julie.broggi@univ-amu.fr

b Univ. Grenoble-Alpes, UMR CNRS-UGA 5250 CS 40700 38058 Grenoble France david.martin@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr

16 8 2024
18 9 2024
16 8 2024
15 36 1469914704
18 6 2024
9 8 2024
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry
2024
The Royal Society of Chemistry
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.
Catalytic amounts of 1,3-di(methyl)imidazole-2-ylidene, one of the simplest and most prototypical N-heterocyclic carbenes, can up-convert aldehydes into powerful stoichiometric sources of electrons (Super Electron Donors) for reductive transformations of iodoaryls (Ered < −2 V). In particular, the hydroarylation of 1,1′-diarylethylenes, which may require high temperatures and inherently generate stoichiometric amounts of oxidized waste, was performed at room temperature, with the concomitant formation of esters as oxidized co-products.

The catalytic up-conversion of aldehydes into stoichiometric super electron donors.

LABoratoires d'EXcellence ARCANE 10.13039/100013349 Unassigned Agence Nationale de la Recherche 10.13039/501100001665 ANR-20-CE07-0010 pubstatusPaginated Article
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The development of Organic Electron Donors (OEDs) has allowed for a broad range of selective metal-free reductive transformations.1 The design of compounds with increasingly reducing power, termed Super Electron Donors (SEDs), has culminated so far in the report of tetra(iminophosphorano)-substituted bispyridinylidene A, which can undergo reversible oxidation at E1/2(A/A2+) = −1.7 V versus SCE and perform the challenging reduction of iodoarenes (Fig. 1a).2

Fig. 1 (a) Reduction of aryl halides with a stoichiometric organic Super Electron Donors (SED, 2 equiv.) A or (b–d) with catalytically up-converted SEDs C–F.

Note that, similarly to other OEDs with dimeric patterns,3A can be generated in situ by the deprotonation of precursor B, which is air-stable and easier to handle. More generally, a variety of reductant up-conversions4,5 of weak reagents into various SEDs have been considered, ranging from in situ stoichiometric chemical reactions3 to photoactivation.6 Several groups described reactions involving catalytic amounts of chemically upconverted SEDs, such as benzimidazole radical C7 (Eoxp = −2.1 V),8 dioxane-derived radical anion D,9 diketopiperazine bis-enolate E,10 or phenanthroline-based anion F,11 which promote the reductive transformations of halogenoaryls at high temperatures (Fig. 1b–d). In these processes, the stoichiometric sacrificial electron donors are solvents or metallic hydrides. They are required for feeding electrons into the catalytic cycle, but yield wasteful oxidized co-products and can cause side reactions.

On the other hand, aldehydes are ubiquitous synthons in organic synthesis, some of which are available from biomass resources, and they represent a valuable source of electrons. They are up-converted by N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) into Breslow intermediates G·H (Fig. 2a).12,13 The oxidation of the latter into acyliums G+ yields numerous valuable products upon reaction with nucleophiles.14 Yet, very few studies have considered the fate of the oxidative partner. In 1980, Inoue and Higashiuba showed that phenazine (Ered = −0.6 V)15 and azobenzene (Ered = −1.3 V)16 are reduced in the presence of aldehydes under NHC catalysis, yielding dihydrophenazine and benzidine, respectively.17 The group of Chi also designed a few NHC-catalyzed reductive functionalization reactions of activated nitrobenzyl bromides (Ered < −0.8 V) or nitroalkenes (Ered < −0.6 V)18 in the presence of methanol, with the concomitant formation of a methyl ester.19 More recently, NHC-catalysed radical transformations of aldehydes20 have advanced to include the activation of more challenging substrates, such as iodoaryls (Ered < −2 V),21via single electron transfer (SET) from Breslow-type enolates G22 stemming from thiazol-2-ylidenes (Ohmiya group),23 1,3,4-triazol-2-ylidenes (Chi group)24 or meso-ionic 1,4,5-triazol-2-ylidenes (Bertrand and Yan groups).25 However, so far, these radical reactions have remained redox-neutral overall, because the transient radicals are intercepted by persistent Breslow-type radicals G˙, affording ketone derivatives (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2 (a) Reductant up-conversion of aldehydes under NHC catalysis. (b) Interception of G˙ by transient radicals in the redox-neutral NHC-catalysed acylarylation of styrenes.

Herein, we show that catalytic amounts of 1,3-di(methyl) imidazole-2-ylidene, one of the simplest and most prototypical N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs), can up-convert aldehydes into strong SED reagents for the light-free reductive transformations of iodoaryls (Ered < −2 V) at room temperature, with the concomitant formation of esters as oxidized co-products.

Results and discussion

We were intrigued by electrochemical26 and computational27 studies, indicating that imidazole-2-ylidene NHCs should provide some of the strongest electron-donor enolates G− with oxidation potentials (ca. −2.1 V) lower than those of enolates stemming from thiazolylidenes (−1.4 V) or mesoionic carbenes (−1.8 V), which are known to perform the reductive radical activation of iodoaryls. Thus, although imidazolylidenes have been disregarded as mediocre catalysts for the radical transformations of aldehydes,19b,28 we attempted the reductive addition of iodobenzene 2a to 1,1′-diphenylethylene 3a, in the presence of benzaldehyde 1a, potassium tert-butoxide and a catalytic amount of the imidazolium precursor of NHC C2, featuring bulky 1,3-di(isopropyl)phenyl N-substituents (Fig. 3a). After one day at room temperature, NMR monitoring of the crude mixture indicated the presence of 1,1,2-triphenylethane 5aa with a low, but encouraging, 11% conversion, and the concomitant formation of tert-butyl benzoate ester 4a.

Fig. 3 Optimization of NHC-catalyzed reductive anti-Markovnikov hydroarylation of 1,2-diphenylethylene with phenyl iodide; standard reaction conditions were: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (0.36 mmol), 3a (0.20 mmol), C1·HI (10 mol%), and KOtBu (0.3 mmol) in dry MTBE (0.6 mL) under an argon atmosphere for 24 h at 25 °C. Percentages are for the conversion of 3a into product 5aa, unless otherwise noted. Values in brackets are yields.

The use of NHCs C1–6 with decreasing steric bulk increased the conversion of 5aa, up to 76% with 1,3-di(methyl)imidazolylidene C1. The reaction also worked with N-methyl substituted NHCs C5 and C6 (with 3,4-dimethylimidazole and benzimidazole backbones, respectively), though with slightly lower conversions. The clear reactivity difference of NHCs C1–6 could not be attributed to the similar reducing power of their Breslow derivative (Ep ≈ −1.1, −1.8 V vs. SCE, see the ESI†). The deleterious effect of steric hindrance at the N-substituents of the NHC catalyst was interpreted as resulting from a significant decrease of the nucleophilicity of the NHC, therefore precluding the fast formation of the Breslow intermediate G·H. The steric hindrance of G·H itself could also impede the formation of a tight charge transfer complex (CTC) with the substrate, leading to slow electron transfers. Interestingly, 28% conversion was observed in the absence of the NHC, indicating the existence of some background reactions, likely promoted by stoichiometric potassium tert-butoxide.29 In the absence of aldehyde 1a, starting iodoarene 2a was recovered (<2% 5aa).

Further optimization established tert-butyl methyl ether (MTBE) as the solvent and the reaction performed better at room temperature (25 °C) with a 10 mol% catalyst loading (Fig. 3b and c). The best conversion rates were obtained with non-polar solvents. Note that the conversion rate was not influenced by their C–H bond dissociation energy (BDEC–H). Solvents with high BDEC–H (benzene: 113 kcal mol−1 and pentane: 100 kcal mol−1) exhibited the same reactivity as solvents with lower BDEC–H (diethyl ether: 93 kcal mol−1 and toluene: 89 kcal mol−1). No conversion was observed with sodium tert-butoxide as a base, likely due to its poor solubility in MTBE.

Other aryl aldehyde partners were tolerated, provided that they were neither too electron-rich nor too electron-poor (Fig. 3d). This balance is in line with the expected necessity for the aldehyde to be both electrophilic enough for fast addition of the NHC and electron-rich enough to yield a highly reducing Breslow enolate. Satisfyingly, the ester co-product was easily removed from the crude reaction and recovered in good yields by saponification, followed by acidic precipitation of the corresponding carboxylic acid 4′ from the aqueous solution.

Next, we considered various substrates under these optimized conditions (Fig. 4). Aryl iodides bearing electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups reacted well, affording the corresponding arylation products 5aa–5ma in moderate to good yields. Sterically hindered aryl iodides (2f, 2h, and 2j–l) were also tolerated. Substrate 2m, featuring both iodoaryl and alkene moieties, underwent intramolecular cyclisation to afford dihydro-benzofuran 5ma, which was isolated in a modest 30% yield.

Fig. 4 Substrate scope of the NHC-catalysed hydroarylation of 1,1′-diarylethylenes with aryl iodides under pre-optimized conditions. Conversions were evaluated from the 1H NMR spectra of the crude reaction. Values in brackets are yields.

A limitation was reached with heterocycles: 2-iodo thiophene 2n and 4-iodopyridine 2o were reduced, but less than 10% of the desired addition products 5na and 5oa was observed. Indeed, the 1,1′-diphenylethylene 3a was not sufficiently electron-rich to trap these electrophilic pyridyl and thienyl radicals under our mild room-temperature conditions.30 On the other hand, the reduction of the more challenging iodoester 2p failed and the starting materials were mainly recovered.

The reductive coupling of iodobenzene also performed well with geminal diaryl- and heteroaryl-ethylenes 3a–g. Addition to trisubstituted ethylene 3e was also possible, albeit sluggish (5ae conv. 15%). However, neither trans-stilbene 3h nor aliphatic counterparts 3i–k could trap the phenyl radical, as the formation of the corresponding products 5ah–5ak was not observed. Note that in the case of the electron poor α-(trifluoromethyl)styrene 3k, broad band shapes in the 1H NMR spectra of the crude mixture suggested the formation of oligomers.

Importantly, when styrene was introduced as a radical trap, aryl-acylation products 6 were obtained, indicating the interception of the persistent Breslow-type radical G˙ (Fig. 5a). Although the conditions have not been optimized for this specific reaction, compounds 6 were isolated in 26–45% yields, which compared well with the results of the previously reported methodology of Ohmiya et al., employing thiazolylidene NHC catalysts in DMSO at 80 °C (6aa: 34%; 6ja: 52%; 6ab: 34%).23

Fig. 5 (a) NHC-catalysed (redox-neutral) aryl-acylation of styrene. (b) NHC-catalysed reduction of iodoaryls to arenes with benzaldehyde as a source of electron. Values in brackets are yields.

When the reaction was performed in the absence of alkene and in methanol, two main products could be observed in the 1H NMR spectra of crude reaction mixtures: the arene 7 resulting from the reduction of iodoaryl 2 and the oxidized ester 8 (Fig. 5b). Using one equivalent of methanol as a nucleophile to release the NHC catalyst C1 from the oxidized acyliums G+ maintains the catalytic cycle and leads to the formation of the methyl benzoate 8 (59% yield consecutively to the formation of 54% of 7j). Both oxidative and reductive cycles were concomitant and interdependent, allowing the formation of two distinct redox products in a similar ratio. Arenes 7g–l were isolated in good yields, after purification by column chromatography.

We performed isotopic labeling experiments in order to get further mechanistic insights. The reduction of iodonaphthalene 2j with deuterated aldehyde d-1a in the presence of one equivalent of deuterated methanol CD3OD yielded naphthalene with no incorporation of deuterium (Fig. 6a). These protons are likely transferred by the conjugate acid of the base within the catalytic cycle. Therefore, this suggested that aryl radicals Ar˙ stemming from the reduction of iodoaryls were not further reduced to aryl anions Ar−, which would incorporate acidic protons, but most likely abstracted H˙ from solvent or other molecules.

Fig. 6 (a) Experiments with deuterated substrates and additives. (b) Ensuing mechanistic proposition. (c) Cyclic voltammograms of chloride salts of G1+ and G2+ in 0.1 M nBu4NPF6 electrolyte at 100 mV s−1 rates in acetonitrile.

In contrast, the hydroarylation of 1,1′-diphenylethylene 3a with iodobenzene 2a and d-1a yielded 5aa with 20% deuterium incorporation6d at the C1 position. The incorporation increased to 39% when the reaction was performed with an additional equivalent of CD3OD. This indicated that radical Y˙, stemming from the trapping of Ar˙ by 3a, could be further reduced by Breslow-type enolate G˙ to yield anion Y− and acylium G+ (Fig. 6b). Conversely, in the case of styrene, the reduction of Y˙ is slower than its radical coupling with G˙, leading to aryl-acylation products 6.31

To test this mechanistic proposition further, we synthesized chloride salts of Breslow-type acyliums G1+ and G2+, stemming from benzoyl chloride and NHC catalysts C1 and C2, respectively. Cyclic voltammograms in acetonitrile indicated a first reversible reduction to radical G˙ at −1.1 and −0.9 V, respectively. These values indicate that Breslow-type radicals G˙ could, indeed, reduce radicals Y˙ stemming from 1,1′-diarylethylenes (for diphenylmethyl radicals: E1/2 (Y−/Y˙) = −1.3–−0.7 V),32 whereas SET to radicals Y˙ stemming from styrene would be disfavoured (for benzyl and cumyl radicals: E1/2 (Y−/Y˙) = −1.8–−1.4 V).32

Cyclic voltammograms feature a second reduction wave, which confirmed the strong reducing power of enolates G− stemming from imidazole-2-ylidenes, although the −1.8 V values for Ep(G1−/G1˙) and E1/2 (G2−/G2˙) in acetonitrile are slightly less negative than that reported in the literature (about −2.1 V in dichloromethane).26 Of course, the reducing properties of enolates G− are expected to depend on the nature of the solvent because polarity stabilizes charged molecules. As a matter of fact, a computational study by Bertrand et al. showed that the oxidation potentials of enolates G− increase with polarity. These compounds are predicted to be especially reducing in low polarity solvents, including MTBE.27 Indeed, compared to MTBE, we observed a drastic drop in the reactivity in polar solvents, which are known to favor electron-transfer reactions (DMF, CH3CN or THF, Fig. 3b). Note that SET from G− to aryl iodides is not necessarily favored in non-polar solvents, since the reduction potentials of aryl iodides also increase with polarity. Importantly, despite the necessary caution in interpreting electrochemical data, they once again allowed for rationalizing the main mechanistic outlines of the NHC-catalysed redox processes and must provide useful guidelines for further improvements.

Conclusions

We showed that catalytic amounts of 1,3-di(methyl)imidazole-2-ylidene up-convert aldehydes into powerful stoichiometric sources of electrons, allowing light-free reductive transformations of iodoaryls at room temperature and leading to isolable organic oxidized co-products instead of inorganic wastes. This preliminary study shows the efficiency of this NHC in the reduction of iodoaryls to the corresponding arenes 7, as well as the hydroarylation of 1,1′-diarylethylenes 3. In the latter case, electrochemical data and isotopic labeling suggest that the outcome of the reaction is determined by the ability of Breslow-type persistent radicals G˙ to further reduce radicals Y˙. In particular, this mechanistic proposition accounts for the formation of aryl-acylation products 6 when styrene is the co-reactant, with Y˙ being then a more difficult-to-reduce benzylic radical.

Prior to our investigations, imidazole-2-ylidenes had been unsuccessfully tested and considered unfit for the promotion of radical transformations of aldehydes. In contrast, this work reveals the unforeseen potential of these NHCs for the generation of strong SED enolates. We are currently reinvestigating the use and scope of this family of organic catalysts for the reductive activation of challenging substrates.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the ESI.†

Author contributions

J. B. and D. M. conceived the project and acquired funding. J. B., D. M., E. T.-M. and P. V. provided resources and supervised the project. N. A., L. D., E. T.-M. and P. S. conducted the investigation and formal analysis of the methodology. All authors contributed to the reviewing and editing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

SC-015-D4SC04011B-s001

This work was funded by the French National Agency for Research (ANR-20-CE07-0010). P. Smits acknowledges Labex Arcane and CBHEUR-GS (ANR-17-EURE-0003) for funding. We thank the ICMG analytic platform of Grenoble (FR 2607) and the Spectropole of the Fédération des Sciences Chimiques de Marseille for spectroscopic analyses.
==== Refs
Notes and references

For reviews, see:

(a) Broggi J. Terme T. Vanelle P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014 53 384 413 10.1002/anie.201209060
(b) Murphy J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2014 79 3731 3746 10.1021/jo500071u 24605904
(c) Doni E. Murphy J. A. Chem. Commun. 2014 50 6073 6087 10.1039/C3CC48969H
Hanson S. S. Doni E. Traboulsee K. T. Coulthard G. Murphy J. A. Dyker C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015 54 11236 11239 10.1002/anie.201505378
For the in situ formation of organic electron donors from air-stable precursors, see:

(a) Tintori G. Nabokoff P. Buhaibeh R. Bergé-Lefranc D. Redon S. Broggi J. Vanelle P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018 57 3148 3153 10.1002/anie.201713079
(b) Tintori G. Fall A. Assani N. Zhao Y. Bergé-Lefranc D. Redon S. Vanelle P. Broggi J. Org. Chem. Front. 2021 8 1197 1205 10.1039/D0QO01488E
“Reductant up-conversion” was originally introduced in a broader context by analogy with photon up-conversion:

(a) Syroeshkin M. A. Kuriakose F. Saverina E. A. Timofeeva V. A. Egorov M. P. Alabugin I. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019 58 5532 5550 10.1002/anie.201807247
(b) Eckhardt P. Elliot Q. Alabugin I. V. Opatz T. Chem.–Eur. J. 2022 28 e202201637 10.1002/chem.202201637 35880945
(c) Balycheva V. A. Chabuka B. K. Kuhn L. R. Shangin P. G. Akyeva A. Y. Krylova I. V. Korolev V. A. Lalov A. V. Egorov M. P. Alabugin I. V. Syroeshkin M. A. J. Phys. Chem. C 2024 128 4581 4599 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00538
See also:

(a) Studer A. Curran D. P. Nat. Chem. 2014 6 765 773 10.1038/nchem.2031 25143210
(b) Luca O. R. Gustafson J. L. Maddox S. M. Fenwick A. Q. Smith D. C. Org. Chem. Front. 2015 2 823 848 10.1039/C5QO00075K
(c) Studer A. Curran D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016 55 58 102 10.1002/anie.201505090 26459814
(a) Prier C. K. Rankic D. A. MacMillan D. W. C. Chem. Rev. 2013 113 5322 5363 10.1021/cr300503r 23509883
(b) Ghosh I. Ghosh T. Bardagi J. I. König B. Science 2014 346 725 728 10.1126/science.1258232 25378618
(c) MacKenzie I. A. Wang L. Onuska N. P. R. Williams O. F. Begam K. Moran A. M. Dunietz B. D. Nicewicz D. A. Nature 2020 580 76 80 10.1038/s41586-020-2131-1 32238940
(d) Wang H. Gao Y. Zhou C. Li G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020 142 8122 8129 10.1021/jacs.0c03144 32309942
(e) Mao X. Li M.-M. Wang P. Cao Q. Zhou W. Ding W. Org. Lett. 2024 26 1265 1270 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c00106 38319734
Rohrbach S. Shah R. S. Tuttle T. Murphy J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019 58 11454 11458 10.1002/anie.201905814
Ogawa K. A. Boydston A. J. Chem. Lett. 2014 43 907 909 10.1246/cl.140162
Hokamp T. Dewanji A. Lübbesmeyer M. Mück-Lichtenfeld C. Würthwein E.-U. Studer A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017 56 13275 13278 10.1002/anie.201706534
(a) Doni E. Zhou S. Murphy J. A. Molecules 2015 20 1755 1774 10.3390/molecules20021755 25621421
(b) Zhou S. Doni E. Anderson G. M. Kane R. G. MacDougall S. W. Ironmonger V. Tuttle T. Murphy J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014 136 17818 17826 10.1021/ja5101036 25474411
Nozawa-Kumada K. Onuma S. Ono K. Kumagai T. Iwakawa Y. Sato K. Shigeno M. Kondo Y. Chem.–Eur. J. 2023 29 e202203143 10.1002/chem.202203143 36599804
(a) Breslow R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958 80 3719 3726 10.1021/ja01547a064
(b) Breslow R. Schmuck C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996 37 8241 8242 10.1016/0040-4039(96)01878-3
(c) Pareek M. Reddi Y. Chem. Sci. 2021 12 7973 7992 10.1039/D1SC01910D 34194690
(a) Berkessel A. Yatham V. R. Elfert S. Neudörfl J.-M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013 52 11158 11162 10.1002/anie.201303107 24038872
(b) Paul M. Sudkaow P. Wessels A. Schlörer N. E. Neudörfl J.-M. Berkessel A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018 57 8310 8315 10.1002/anie.201801676 29645334
(c) Paul M. Neudörfl J.-M. Berkessel A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019 58 10596 10600 10.1002/anie.201904308 31131519
(d) Paul M. Peckelsen K. Thomulka T. Martens J. Berden G. Oomens J. Neudörfl J.-M. Breugst M. Meijer A. J. H. M. Schäfer M. Berkessel A. Chem.–Eur. J. 2021 27 2662 2669 10.1002/chem.202003454 32893891
Selected reviews on NHC catalysis:

(a) Enders D. Niemeier O. Henseler A. Chem. Rev. 2007 107 5606 5655 10.1021/cr068372z 17956132
(b) Bugaut X. Glorius F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012 41 3511 3522 10.1039/C2CS15333E 22377957
(c) De Sarkar S. Biswas A. Samanta R. C. Studer A. Chem.–Eur. J. 2013 19 4664 4678 10.1002/chem.201203707 23436489
(d) Hopkinson M. N. Richter C. Schedler M. Glorius F. Nature 2014 510 485 496 10.1038/nature13384 24965649
(e) Flanigan D. M. Romanov-Michailidis F. White N. A. Rovis T. Chem. Rev. 2015 115 9307 9387 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00060 25992594
(f) Wang M. H. Scheidt K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016 55 14912 14922 10.1002/anie.201605319 27763702
Hollas A. Wei X. Murugesan V. Nie Z. Li B. Reed D. Liu J. Sprenkle V. Wang W. Nat. Energy 2018 3 508 514 10.1038/s41560-018-0167-3
Sadler J. L. Bard A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968 90 1979 1989 10.1021/ja01010a010
Inoue H. Higashiuba K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980 12 549 550 10.1039/C39800000549
Squella J. A. Sturm J. C. Weiss-lopez B. Bonta M. Nunez-Vergara L. J. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1999 466 90 98 10.1016/S0022-0728(99)00132-1
(a) Du Y. Wang Y. Li X. Shao Y. Li G. Webster R. D. Chi Y. R. Org. Lett. 2014 16 5678 5681 10.1021/ol5027415 25343564
(b) Li S. Wang Y. Proctor R. S. J. Zhang Y. Webster R. D. Yang S. Song B. Chi Y. R. Nat. Commun. 2016 7 12933 10.1038/ncomms12933 27671606
(c) Wang Y. Du Y. Huang X. Wu X. Zhang Y. Yang S. Chi Y. R. Org. Lett. 2017 19 632 635 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03792 28121453
(d) Wang Y. Wu X. Chi Y. R. Chem. Commun. 2017 53 11952 11955 10.1039/C7CC07208B 29052683
For reviews, see:

(a) Bay A. V. Scheidt K. A. Trends Chem. 2022 4 277 290 10.1016/j.trechm.2022.01.003 36204676
(b) Liu K. Schwenzer M. Studer A. ACS Catal. 2022 12 11984 11999 10.1021/acscatal.2c03996
Pause L. Robert M. Savéant J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999 121 7158 7159 10.1021/ja991365q
(a) Mahoney J. K. Martin D. Thomas F. Moore C. Rheingold A. L. Bertrand G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015 137 7519 7525 10.1021/jacs.5b04414 26011769
(b) Delfau L. Nichilo S. Molton F. Broggi J. Tomás-Mendivil E. Martin D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021 60 26783 26789 10.1002/anie.202111988
Matsuki Y. Ohnishi N. Kakeno Y. Takemoto S. Ishii T. Nagao K. Ohmiya H. Nat. Commun. 2021 12 3848 10.1038/s41467-021-24144-2 34158509
Su F. Zou J. Lv X. Lu F. Long Y. Tang K. Li B. Chai H. Wu X. Chi Y. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023 62 e202303388 10.1002/anie.202303388
(a) Liu C. Liu W. Vianna A. Zhang Z. Huang S. Huang L. Melaimi M. Bertrand G. Yan X. Chem Catal. 2021 1 196 206 10.1016/j.checat.2021.03.004
(b) Zhang Z. Zhao L.-L. Bertrand G. Yan X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023 62 e202303478 10.1002/anie.202303478
(c) Su F. Lu F. Tang K. Lv X. Luo Z. Che F. Long H. Wu X. Chi Y. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023 62 e202310072 10.1002/anie.202310072
Deardorff C. L. Sikma E. R. Rhodes C. P. Hudnall T. W. Chem. Commun. 2016 52 9024 9027 10.1039/C5CC06322A
Mulks F. F. Melaimi M. Yan X. Baik M.-H. Bertrand G. J. Org. Chem. 2023 88 2535 2542 10.1021/acs.joc.2c02978 36719963
For examples, see:

(a) Liu W.-D. Lee W. Shu H. Xiao C. Xu H. Chen X. Houk K. N. Zhao J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022 144 22767 22777 10.1021/jacs.2c11209 36423331
(b) Liu Y. Q. Li Q.-Z. Kou X.-X. Zeng R. Qi T. Zhang X. Peng C. Han B. Li J.-L. J. Org. Chem. 2022 87 5229 5241 10.1021/acs.joc.2c00037 35349296
(c) She K. Liang F. Tian S. Wang H. Tsui G. C. Wang Q. Org. Lett. 2022 24 4840 4844 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c02093 35758320
(d) Zhang Z. Zou X. Li Z. Gao Y. Qu Y. Quan Y. Zhou Y. Li J. Sun J. Guo K. Org. Chem. Front. 2021 8 6074 6079 10.1039/D1QO01015H
(e) Ota K. Nagao K. Ohmiya H. Org. Lett. 2020 22 3922 3925 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01199 32339457
(f) Ishii T. Kakeno Y. Nagao K. Ohmiya H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019 141 3854 3858 10.1021/jacs.9b00880 30785739
Stoichiometric OED species can be in situ formed upon the reaction of KOtBu with electrophiles:

(a) Zhou S. Anderson G. M. Mondal B. Doni E. Ironmonger V. Kranz M. Tuttle T. Murphy J. A. Chem. Sci. 2014 5 476 482 10.1039/C3SC52315B
(b) Cuthbertson J. Gray V. J. Wilden J. D. Chem. Commun. 2014 50 2575 2578 10.1039/C3CC49019J
(c) Nocera G. Young A. Palumbo F. Emery K. J. Coulthard G. McGuire T. Tuttle T. Murphy J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018 140 9751 9757 10.1021/jacs.8b06089 29996048
In the literature, the addition of these electrophilic radicals to electron-rich alkenes is at high temperatures or under photoirradiation, see:

Mirizzi D. Hilton S. T. Jones K. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 2010 100 101 143 10.1016/S0065-2725(10)10004-X
A more detailed mechanism scheme for the formation of ketone 6 is given in the supporting information.†

Sim B. A. Milne P. H. Griller D. Wayner D. D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990 112 6635 6638 10.1021/ja00174a027
