
==== Front
Indian J Dermatol
Indian J Dermatol
IJD
Indian J Dermatol
Indian Journal of Dermatology
0019-5154
1998-3611
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow India

IJD-69-306
10.4103/ijd.ijd_485_23
Original Article
Clinicomycological Pattern of Dermatophytosis in Odisha, a Coastal State of Eastern India
Gaba Sakshi
Panigrahi Kumudini 1
Kar Hemanta K.
Sethy Mitanjali
From the Department of Dermatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
1 Department of Microbiology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Address for correspondence: Dr. Sakshi Gaba, C/o Dr. O.P Singh, Gai Bazar, Sonpur, Saran, Bihar - 841101, India. E-mail: sakshigaba5@gmail.com
Jul-Aug 2024
19 8 2024
69 4 306311
5 2023
4 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Indian Journal of Dermatology
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Background:

Dermatophytosis is a fungal infection that targets the skin and its appendages, such as the nails and hair. It affects all age groups and is estimated to affect approximately 20–25% of the population across the world. There are insufficient data on the clinic-mycological pattern of dermatophytosis in Odisha, a coastal state in eastern India. The study aims to explore the clinico-mycological pattern of prevailing superficial cutaneous fungal infections and to identify the specific species as per the site of skin involvement.

Methods:

This is a cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Dermatology in collaboration with the Department of Microbiology at a tertiary health care centre, Odisha, for a period of 2 years, from October 2020 to September 2022. Participants aged 18–65 years with active dermatophyte infections of the skin were included in the study. Clinical examination and mycological workup were performed, and the collected samples were divided into two parts, one for direct microscopy and the other for fungal culture.

Results:

According to our study, the most common isolate was Trichophyton mentagrophytes (21.7%), followed by T. rubrum (11.7%), and 5.3% of cultures showed T. schoenleinii isolates, whereas Microsporum canis and Microsporum gypseum constituted 2.7% and 0.7%, respectively.

Conclusion:

The present study focuses on the prevalence and clinical trends of different dermatophyte species associated with dermatophytosis in eastern India. Due to the favourable climate of Odisha, superficial mycoses are prevalent here, and according to our study, Trichophyton mentagrophytes is the predominate isolate in this region.

KEY WORDS:

Dermatophytosis
direct microscopy
Epidermophyton floccosum
fungal culture
tinea corporis
tinea cruris
Trichophyton mentagrophytes
Trichophyton rubrum
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The term “dermatophytosis” is used to describe a cluster of fungal infections that primarily target the horny layer of the skin and its associated appendages, such as the nails and hair.[1]

Dermatophytes have been traditionally classified into three broad genera, that is, Trichophyton, Microsporum, and Epidermophyton. They can readily infect any site on the body and have been named accordingly. A few of the manifestations include tinea corporis, tinea cruris, tinea pedis, tinea manuum, tinea unguium, and tinea capitis.[2]

Dermatophytosis has become a major public health concern that affects all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly population. It is estimated that approximately 20–25% of the population across the world suffers from superficial fungal infections.[3] Fungal infections are mostly prevalent in hot and humid countries like India.[4]

Numerous studies have been carried out on the clinical and species patterns of dermatophytosis across the nation, but there are insufficient data in Odisha, a coastal state in eastern India. This prompted us to conduct this cross-sectional study to explore the clinico-mycological pattern of prevailing superficial cutaneous fungal infections along with the identification of specific species as per the site of skin involvement. Moreover, Trichophyton mentagrophytes was discovered to be the most prevalent isolate in the eastern section of the country during the pre-COVID era.[2] We also hope to see if the pattern has changed since the outbreak through this investigation.

Materials and Methods

This study was conducted in the Department of Dermatology in collaboration with the Department of Microbiology for a period of 2 years, from October 2020 to September 2022, at a tertiary health care centre, Odisha. This study included participants aged 18–65 years and of both sexes with active dermatophyte infections of the skin with a clinically characteristic skin lesion with a sharply marginated red, scaly, elevated border studded with vesicles and an area of central clearing.

Patients with contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, or any other disease and those who were using antifungal agents or topical steroid agents for the disease in the past month were excluded from the study.

Informed consent was obtained from all the patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria and became a part of our study. All included participants were subjected to a clinical examination and mycological workup as per the standard protocol of the study.

Clinical examination

It included clinical assessment as per the site of involvement for classification, morphological pattern, and finally the activity of the skin lesions of dermatophytosis based on three main parameters, including erythema, scaling, and itching.

Sample collection

We selected an appropriate site for the collection of the sample, which was first cleaned with 70% ethanol and left for a few minutes so that it completely dries up. After this, an active edge of the lesion was chosen, from which skin scrapings were obtained with the help of a sterile surgical blade. We divided the collected sample into two parts, one of which was meant for direct microscopy, and the other half was further processed for fungal culture.

Direct microscopy

Skin scrapings were collected in sterile containers and sent to laboratories, where they were then treated with 10% KOH. For easy identification of fungal elements, keratin from the sample should be digested, and for that purpose, 10% KOH was added. It was then examined under a microscope with low magnification (10x) and high magnification (40x) for the determination of fungal elements. Positive scrapings were indicated by the presence of smooth, branching, long, and refractile hyphae with or without arthroconidiospores.

Fungal culture

Fungal culture was performed on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) as well as Dermatophytes Test Medium (DTM) to see fungal growth and identify the species. We incubated the fungal culture at 280 Celsius for 3–4 weeks, and fungal growth was checked at every 3–4-day interval.

Identification of fungus

The characteristics of the colony, the microscopic morphology, and the form of the macroconidia were used to differentiate between different types of dermatophytes. The cultural features, texture, rate of growth, size of colony, and colour produced on both the reverse and obverse sides of slants were used in the identification of the dermatophyte species.

The characteristics of microconidia and macroconidia on the LPCB mount were studied to identify different genera and species.

The ethical committee approval has been obtained on 3 November 2020.

Observations and Results

A total of 300 cases of dermatophytosis were included in this study. Out of 300 cases, 58.3% were males and 41.7% were females. The predominant age group was between 31 and 40 years old (41%).

Among the different types of clinical presentations, tinea corporis et cruris (TCC) was the most prevalent (63.7%), followed by only tinea corporis (22.7%) and only tinea cruris (13.7%) [Graph 1]. The majority of the infected people were field workers (31%), followed by students (28.3%) and housewives (26.7%) [Table 1].

Graph 1 Bar graph depicting clinical presentation wise distribution

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study

	Number	Percentage	
Gender			
 Male	175	58.3%	
 Female	125	41.7%	
Age groups (in years)			
 18-30	87	29%	
 31-40	123	41%	
 41-50	46	15.3%	
 >50	44	14.7%	
Occupation			
 Students	85	28.3%	
 Housewives	80	26.7%	
 Field workers	93	31%	
 Businessmen	9	3%	
 Others	33	11%	
Clinical presentation			
 Tinea corporis et cruris (TCC)	191	63.7%	
 Tinea corporis	68	22.7%	
 Tinea cruris	41	13.7%	

Of 300 clinically proven cases, 288 (96%) showed fungal filaments by direct microscopy, and 162 (54%) showed fungal culture positivity. 127 (42.3%) were culture-positive for dermatophytes, and 35 (11.7%) were culture-positive for nondermatophytes [Table 2]. Out of 127 dermatophytes isolated, Trichophyton species were implicated in 116 (91.2%) cases, while Microsporum and Epidermophyton species were isolated in 10 (7.87%) and 1 (0.78%) cases, respectively.

Table 2 KOH and fungal culture status of 300 patients

	Number	Percentage	
KOH wet mount			
 Positive	288	96%	
 Negative	12	4%	
Fungal culture			
 Positive	162	54%	
 Negative	138	46%	

Trichophyton mentagrophytes was the predominant dermatophyte isolated in 65 out of 127 dermatophytes (51.1%), followed by Trichophyton rubrum, which was isolated in 35 (27.5%) cases. Among the 35 nondermatophyte isolates, Candida albicans was the most common nondermatophyte isolated in 21 cultures (60%), followed by Aspergillus in 9 isolates (25.7%) followed by a few isolates of Fusarium and a single isolate of Penicillium [Table 3].

Table 3 Species-wise distribution

Name of species	Total dermatophyte=127	Name of species	Total nondermatophyte=35	
		
Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	
T.mentagrophytes	65	51.18%	C.albicans	21	60%	
T.rubrum	35	27.55%	Aspergillus	9	25.71%	
T.schoenleinii	16	12.59%	Fusarium	4	11.42%	
M.canis	8	6.29%	Penicillium	1	2.85%	
M.gypseum	2	1.57%				
E.floccosum	1	0.78%				
Total	127	100%	Total	35	100%	

The correlation of KOH as well as culture positivity suggests that out of 300 patients, 150 patients (50%) were positive for both KOH and fungal culture, whereas 138 patients (46%) were KOH-positive but culture-negative and 12 patients (4%) were KOH-negative but found out to be culture-positive [Table 4, Graph 2].

Table 4 Correlation between KOH and fungal culture

Correlation	KOH and culture positive	KOH positive, culture negative	KOH negative, culture positive	Total	
			
(n)	%	(n)	%	(n)	%	
Total	150	50%	138	46%	12	4%	300	

Graph 2 Pie chart depicting correlation between KOH and fungal culture status

The correlation of species with clinical presentation revealed that T. mentagrophytes was the commonest species in tinea corporis et cruris presentations, whereas T. rubrum was the commonest causative organism in tinea corporis patients [Table 5, Graph 3]. Among the nondermatophytes, C. albicans remains the most prevalent isolate in all types of clinical presentations [Table 6, Graph 4].

Table 5 Clinical presentation-wise dermatophyte species distribution

	Tinea corporis et cruris (TCC)	Tinea corporis	Tinea cruris	Total	
			
n	%	n	%	n	%	
T.mentagrophytes	61	60.39%	2	10.52%	2	28.57%	65	
T.rubrum	20	19.80%	14	73.68%	1	14.28%	35	
T.schoenleinii	13	12.87%	1	5.26%	2	28.57%	16	
M.canis	6	5.94%	1	5.26%	1	14.28%	8	
M.gypseum	1	0.99%	0	0%	1	14.28%	2	
E.floccosum	0	0%	1	5.26%	0	0%	1	
Total	101	100%	19	100%	7	100%	127	

Graph 3 Bar graph depicting clinical presentation wise dermatophyte species distribution

Table 6 Clinical presentation-wise nondermatophyte species distribution

	Tinea corporis et cruris (TCC)	Tinea corporis	Tinea cruris	Total	
			
n	%	n	%	n	%	
C.albicans	10	62.5%	9	64.2%	2	40%	21	
Aspergillus	3	18.75%	5	35.71%	1	20%	9	
Fumigatus	2	12.5%	0	0%	2	40%	4	
Penicillium	1	6.25%	0	0%	0	0%	1	
Total	16	100%	14	100%	5	100%	35	

Graph 4 Bar graph depicting clinical presentation wise non dermatophyte species distribution

Discussion

In the present study, we included 300 cases of dermatophytosis. We observed male predominance in this study, with a male: female ratio of 1.4. Several researchers from different parts of India also found similar results.[56] The male preponderance might be due to increased outdoor exposure, enhanced strenuous activity, more involvement in fields, a hot and humid climate, and a greater tendency to wear tight inner dresses (vests and briefs) for prolonged periods of time in males. The lesser presentation of females in the study group may be due to lower educational status, less awareness, and less utilisation of locally available traditional medicaments.

Our study revealed that dermatophytic infection is common in the 31–40 age group (41% cases), which is well correlated with the other studies.[78] It has been observed that people of this age group tend to have more outdoor exposure, which results in excessive perspiration and favours the growth of fungus.

In the present study, the majority of the participants were field workers (31%), followed by students (28.3%) and housewives (26.7%). Previous studies by Hanumanthappa et al.[9] also showed similar results. Dermatophytoses are common among active workers, mostly engaged in field activities, following increased perspiration and exposure to infection. In contrast to our study, Pires et al.[10] reported housewives as the most common group presenting with dermatophytosis due to long hours of working in the kitchen in a hot and humid climate. However, Kucheria et al.[11] found that the incidence of dermatophytosis in students is the highest owing to longer periods of use of occlusive tight dresses.

We observed that tinea corporis et cruris was the commonest clinical presentation, followed by tinea corporis and then tinea cruris, which is also very well corroborated with several other studies.[1213] However, studies done by Jain et al.[8] and Lakshmanan et al.[14] suggested tinea corporis to be the most common clinical presentation, whereas Jegadeesan et al.[5] and Hosthota et al.[15] found tinea cruris to be the most common clinical presentation. This significant change in the pattern of presentation may be due to the hesitation of patients to expose their crural areas in front of a dermatologist, thereby preventing a correct and timely diagnosis. Also, the use of OTC drugs delays diagnosis and aids in the spread of infection.

According to our study, 288 out of 300 patients (96%) were positive for KOH in the wet mount. This is similar to the findings of studies done by Singh et al.[2] and Surenderan et al.[16] However, as low as 50% KOH positivity has also been reported by Lakshmanan et al.[14] and in contrast, Tigga et al.[12] reported 98% KOH positivity in their study. This reflects the variability in KOH positivity, ranging from 50% to almost 99% in various studies.[1117]

Figure 1 Microscopic images of: (a) KOH wet mount showing thin,long fungal hyphae (b) Aspergillus fumigatus species, LPCB (40×) (c) Tear drop shaped microconidia of T.rubrum, LBCB mount (d) Culture of microconidia and spiral hyphae of T.mentagrophytes, LPCB (40×) (e) Sickle shaped macroconidia suggestive of Fusarium species, LPCB mount (40×), (f) Round to oval budding yeast cells with pseudohyphae suggestive of C.albicans (100×) (g) Clusters of microconidia and spiral hyphae of T.mentagrophytes, LBCB mount (40×)

Figure 2 Culture on SDA media: (a) Penicillium (b) Candida albicans (c) Trichophyton schoenleini (d) Microsporum canis (e) Aspergillus fumigatus (f) Trichophyton mentagrophytes

In the present study, 162 out of 300 patients (54%) showed growth in fungal culture, which is similar to the results shown by Kucheria et al.,[11] Hosthotha et al.[15] and Pradhan et al.[17]

Out of 54% of patients who showed fungal culture positivity, 42.3% had dermatophyte growth, whereas 11.7% revealed growth of nondermatophyte species in the isolate that may be due to contamination. Fungal culture positive rates range from as low as 39% in studies done by Surenderan et al.[16] and Noronha et al.[6] to as high as 74% as suggested by studies done by Nenoff et al.[18] and Jegadeesan et al.[5] Good and efficient laboratory support could be a contributing factor to the high positivity rate in our study.

According to our study, the most common isolate was Trichophyton mentagrophytes (21.7%), followed by T. rubrum (11.7%), and 5.3% of cultures showed T. schoenleinii isolates, whereas Microsporum canis and Microsporum gypseum constituted 2.7% and 0.7%, respectively. Similar reports have been suggested by Singh et al.[2] and Tigga et al.,[12] whereas T. rubrum has been the most common isolate in studies done by Surenderan et al.[16] and Hosthota et al.[15]

It is well documented from published literature that Trichophyton is the most common dermatophyte isolate in most of the studies, out of which T. mentagrophytes and T. rubrum have been the two most common. T. mentagrophytes was the most prevalent isolate in our study, possibly due to an epidemiological switch observed in recent studies. Singh et al. reported comparable findings in this area for the first time in 2019. The epidemiological switch may be attributed to “anthropopization,” whereby the fungus shows increased survival capabilities in highly stressful environments owing to its increased keratinase enzyme levels. This property has been a major cause of the emergence of T. mentagrophytes as the most common isolate in recent years.[192021] Various other factors, like topical steroid use and host immunity, have also been shown to be major contributors.[18]

Nondermatophyte growth accounted for 11.7% of our study. Candida albicans was the most commonly isolated organism, which is similar to the findings of studies done by Lakshmanan et al.[14] and Garg et al.[22]

Our study also highlights that the most prevalent isolate in tinea corporis at cruris and tinea cruris was T. mentagrophyte, whereas tinea corporis patients showed T. rubrum as the most prevalent causative isolate. Our findings are in contrast with the study done by Bhatia and Sharma,[23] which shows T. mentagrophyte to be the predominant species with both tinea cruris and tinea corporis. Another study reveals T. rubrum to be the most prevalent isolate in tinea corporis as well as tinea cruris.[24]

Conclusion

The present study focuses on the prevalence and clinical trends of different dermatophyte species associated with dermatophytosis in eastern India. Due to the favourable climate of Odisha, superficial mycoses are prevalent here.

Despite numerous therapeutic advancements and modernisations in recent decades, the frequency is rising. Although dermatophytosis is a simple clinical diagnosis for an experienced dermatologist, mistakes are possible because the skin lesions of dermatophytosis mimic many other skin disorders. As a result, antifungal medications or steroids may be used inappropriately. As these organisms may be easily identified with only the most minimal equipment, laboratory diagnosis of these fungal infections should be promoted before starting antifungal therapy.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
==== Refs
1 Agarwal U Saran J Agarwal P Clinico-mycological study of dermatophytes in a tertiary care centre in northwest India Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2014 80 194
2 Singh BSTP Tripathy T Kar B Ray A Clinicomycological study of dermatophytosis in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India: A cross-sectional study Indian Dermatol Online J 2020 11 46 50 32055508
3 Verma SB Panda S Nenoff P Singal A Rudramurthy SM Uhrlass S The unprecedented epidemic-like scenario of dermatophytosis in India: I. Epidemiology, risk factors and clinical features Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2021 87 154 75 33769736
4 Havlickova B Czaika VA Friedrich M Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide Mycoses 2008 51 (Suppl 4) 2 15 18783559
5 Jegadeesan M Kuruvila S Nair S Clinico-etiological Study of Tinea Corporis: Emergence of Trichophyton mentagrophytes Int J Sci Study 2017 5 161 5
6 Noronha T Tophakhane R Nadiger S Clinico-microbiological study of dermatophytosis in a tertiary-care hospital in North Karnataka Indian Dermatol Online J 2016 7 264 71 27559499
7 Deshmukh G Vishwanath V Londhe P Tare D Dhoot D Effectiveness and safety of combination of Itraconazole and Amorolfine in management of patients with recalcitrant multi-site dermatophytosis who failed previous combination antifungal therapy IP Indian J Clin Exp Dermatol 2020 6 391 6
8 Jain N Sharma M Saxena V Clinico-mycological profile of dermatophytosis in Jaipur, Rajasthan Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008 74 274 5 18583809
9 Hanumanthappa H Sarojini K Shilpashree P Muddapur S Clinicomycological study of 150 cases of dermatophytosis in a tertiary care hospital in South India Indian J Dermatol 2012 57 322 3 22837576
10 Pires CAA da Cruz NFS Lobato AM de Sousa PO Carneiro FRO Mendes AMD Clinical, epidemiological, and therapeutic profile of dermatophytosis An Bras Dermatol 2014 89 259 64 24770502
11 Kucheria M Gupta SK Chhina DK Gupta V Hans D Singh K Clinico-mycological profile of dermatophytic infections at a tertiary care hospital in North India Int J Community Health Med Res 2016 2 17 22
12 Tigga RA Das S Bhattacharya SN Saha R Pandhi D Datt S Burden of chronic dermatophytosis in a tertiary care hospital: Interaction of fungal virulence and host immunity Mycopathologia 2018 183 951 9 30386967
13 Bhatia A Kanish B Badyal D Kate P Choudhary S Efficacy of oral terbinafine versus itraconazole in treatment of dermatophytic infection of skin –A prospective, randomized comparative study Indian J Pharmacol 2019 51 116 9 31142947
14 Lakshmanan A Ganeshkumar P Mohan SR Hemamalini M Madhavan R Epidemiological and clinical pattern of dermatomycoses in rural India Indian J Med Microbiol 2015 33 (Suppl) S134 6
15 Hosthota A Gowda T Manikonda R Clinical profile and risk factors of dermatophytoses: A hospitalbased study Int J Res Dermatol 2018 4 508 13
16 Surendran K Bhat R Boloor R Nandakishore B Sukumar D A clinical and mycological study of dermatophytic infections Indian J Dermatol 2014 59 262 7 24891657
17 Pradhan MB Paudel V Clinico-mycological study of dermatophytosis and their antifungal susceptibility, a hospital based study Nepal J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2021 19 30 6
18 Nenoff P Verma SB Vasani R Burmester A Hipler U Wittig F The current Indian epidemic of superficial dermatophytosis due to Trichophyton mentagrophytes — A molecular study Mycoses 2019 62 336 56 30561859
19 de Hoog GS Dukik K Monod M Packeu A Stubbe D Hendrickx M Toward a novel multilocus phylogenetic taxonomy for the dermatophytes Mycopathologia 2017 182 5 31 27783317
20 Martinez-Rossi NM Peres NTA Rossi A Pathogenesis of dermatophytosis: Sensing the host tissue Mycopathologia 2017 182 215 27 27590362
21 Verma SB Panda S Nenoff P Singal A Rudramurthy SM Uhrlass S The unprecedented epidemic-like scenario of dermatophytosis in India: II. Diagnostic methods and taxonomical aspects Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2021 87 326 32 33871195
22 Garg J Tilak R Garg A Prakash P Gulati AK Nath G Rapid detection of dermatophytes from skin and hair BMC Res Notes 2009 2 60 19374765
23 Bhatia VK Sharma PC Epidemiological studies on dermatophytosis in human patients in Himachal Pradesh, India Springerplus 2014 3 134 25674437
24 Balakumar S Rajan S Thirunalasundari T Jeeva S Epidemiology of dermatophytosis in and around Tiruchirapalli, Tamilnadu, India Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2012 2 286 9
