
==== Front
Oncol Lett
Oncol Lett
OL
Oncology Letters
1792-1074
1792-1082
D.A. Spandidos

10.3892/ol.2024.14667
OL-28-5-14667
Articles
Impact of ACEI/ARB use on the survival of hypertensive patients with cancer: A meta‑analysis
Xiao Yao 1
Chen Xinlong 2
Li Wancheng 3
Li Xin 4
Zhou Wence 4
1 Department of General Surgery, The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, P.R. China
2 Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shanxi 710061, P.R. China
3 Department of General Surgery, The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, P.R. China
4 Department of General Surgery, The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, P.R. China
Correspondence to: Dr Xin Li or Professor Wence Zhou, Department of General Surgery, The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, 82 Cuiyingmen, Linxia Road, Chengguan, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, P.R. China, E-mail: lix19@lzu.edu.cn zhouwc@lzu.edu.cn
11 2024
05 9 2024
05 9 2024
28 5 53407 4 2024
01 7 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Xiao et al.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used antihypertensive drugs. However, the impact that the use of ACEI and ARB drugs will have on the survival of patients with hypertension and cancer is still unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of ACEI and ARB use on the survival of patients with cancer. The Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were used to systematically analyze the survival of hypertensive patients with cancer treated with ACEIs or ARBs. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association between ACEI and ARB use and patient survival. The relationship between the survival of patients with certain types of cancer and ACEI and ARB use was evaluated using the calculated HRs. Patients with ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, hepatocellular, lung, esophageal, gastric, colon, nasopharyngeal, head and neck tumors, gallbladder and rectal cancers that used ACEI and ARB analogs had significantly increased survival times, except for patients with breast cancer (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90–1.19; P<0.01) and uroepithelial carcinoma (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.69–1.94; P<0.01), who had significantly decreased survival times, when compared with patients who did not use these drugs. Analysis of the relationship between the use of ACEIs or ARBs alone or in combination on the overall survival of hypertensive patients with cancer demonstrated that the use of ACEIs alone (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93–1.08; P<0.01) did not have a significant effect on the survival of these patients. By contrast, the survival time was increased in hypertensive patients with cancer who used either ARBs alone (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84–0.94; P<0.01) or a combination of ACEIs and ARBs (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78–0.91; P<0.01). The present meta-analysis demonstrated the potential effects of ACEI and ARB use on the overall survival of patients with cancer. Therefore, investigation of the underlying mechanisms of action of ACEIs and ARBs, as well as the identification of specific groups of patients who may benefit from these interventions, could potentially lead to novel therapeutic options and improve the prognosis of patients with cancer in the future.

angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor
angiotensin receptor blocker
hypertension
tumor
cancer
Funding: No funding was received.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Hypertension is a common risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (1). A previous multi-center prospective cohort study that included 17,712 patients from the US population with prostate cancer, respiratory cancer, breast cancer, digestive system cancers, gynecological cancers, urinary system cancers, and head and neck cancers reported that 37% of the patients with cancer were diagnosed with hypertension and needed to take both anti-cancer drugs and antihypertensive drugs (2). Previous studies have shown that the use of antihypertensive drugs during cancer treatment is correlated to a certain extent with prognosis and may affect the occurrence and development of tumors (3,4). The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) serves a critical role in the maintenance of cardiovascular homeostasis and the RAAS of local tissues may also be involved in the development of tumors (5). Lung, thyroid, breast, stomach and colorectal cancer have been reported to express components of the RAAS, renin and angiotensin (Ang) II receptors (6,7). According to the classical viewpoint, angiotensin II (Ang II) is the main element of the RAAS generated by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), and its various effects, mainly mediated by the angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor, include vasoconstriction, detrimental remodeling, and oxidative stress in various tissues (8). It has been reported that Ang II can also serve as a growth factor, promoting tumor cell proliferation through paracrine signal transduction, and can facilitate angiogenesis by stimulating VEGF expression through activation of the angiotensin I receptor (AT1) (9). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and AT1 receptor antagonists (ARBs), which inhibit the generation of angiotensin II, are classical inhibitors of the RAAS (10). Previous experimental and clinical investigations have reported the potential impact of these medications on tumor development and progression. For example, in a mouse model of colon cancer with liver metastases, the co-administration of ACEI, captopril, and the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) irbesartan, reduced the size of metastatic foci (11). However, in clinical studies, results regarding the relationship between the use of ACEIs and cancer prognosis in randomized trials and observational studies are contradictory. In a 2003 clinical trial the impact of ARB (candesartan) on the morbidity and mortality of patients with heart failure reported that the cancer incidence increased in patients using candesartan compared with those treated with placebo (12). By contrast, a retrospective study of 287 patients conducted in 2009 reported that the addition of an ACEI or an ARB to platinum-based chemotherapy could extend the survival of patients with advanced lung cancer (13). This indicates that the application of RAAS inhibitors, such as ACEI/ARB drugs, may have certain effects on the survival and prognosis of tumor patients.

Therefore, the present meta-analysis analyzed cohort and case-control studies that investigated the relationship of the use of ACEIs and ARBs, and the prognosis of patients with cancer and aimed to evaluate whether the use of ACEIs and ARBs alone or in combination can influence the overall survival (OS) of patients with cancer.

Materials and methods

Protocol registration and guidance

The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (registration no. CRD42023487852; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero). The present study was performed in accordance with the Cochrane handbook (14) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (15).

Literature retrieval

Literature published in English was retrieved from the Embase (https://www.embase.com), PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Web of Science databases (https://access.clarivate.com) and studies that examined the association between the use of ACEIs and ARBs and the OS of patients with cancer were selected. The retrieval period was from the establishment of the aforementioned databases to July 10 2023. Databases with the following search algorithm: (‘ACE inhibitor’ or ‘angiotensin converting enzyme inhibiting agent’ or ‘angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor’ or ‘angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors’ or ‘angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor’ or ‘angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors’ or ‘converting enzyme inhibitor’ or ‘angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers’ or ‘angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors’ or ‘captopril’ or ‘cilazapril’ or ‘enalapril’ or ‘fosinopril’ or ‘imidapril’ or ‘lisinopril’ or ‘moexipril’ or ‘perindopril’ or ‘perindopril’ or ‘quinapril’ or ‘ramipril’ or ‘trandolapril’ or ‘eprosartan’ or ‘irbesartan’ or ‘irbesartan’ or ‘Olmesartan’ or ‘telmisartan’ or ‘valsartan’ or ‘candesartan’ or ‘ARB’ or ‘angiotensin receptor antagonists’) and (‘cancer’ or ‘cancers’ or ‘malignant neoplasia’ or ‘malignant neoplastic disease’ or ‘malignant tumor’ or ‘malignant tumour’ or ‘neoplasia’ or ‘malignan’ or ‘neoplasmic malignancy’ or ‘neoplastic malignancy’ or ‘oncologic malignancy’ or ‘oncological malignancy’ or ‘tumor’ or ‘malignant’ or ‘tumoral malignancy’ or ‘tumorous malignancy’ or ‘tumour’ or ‘malignant’ or ‘malignant neoplasm’).

A comprehensive literature search of published studies was performed in January 2016 based on PubMed, Web of Science, and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases with the following search algorithm: (‘hypertension’ or ‘blood pressure’ or ‘systolic pressure’ or ‘diastolic pressure’) and (‘prostate cancer’ or ‘prostate neoplasm’) and (‘cohort’ or ‘case control’ or ‘case-control’). In addition, the lists of references from retrieved articles and reviews were also checked to identify any additional eligible studies. No limitations on language or publication date were applied. This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed, performed, and reported based on the standards of quality for reporting meta-analyses.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The present meta-analysis included studies in which: i) Participants were diagnosed with tumors by pathological examination; ii) the relationship between ACEI and ARB use and the OS of patients with cancer with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs were reported, or studies in which the HRs and CIs could be calculated from the data provided in the studies; and iii) cohort and case-control studies.

The following studies were excluded: i) Reviews, conference minutes, case reports and systematic reviews; ii) The use of non-standard scoring criteria for outcome indicators; iii) studies in which the participants had distant metastasis or other malignant tumors at the time of diagnosis; and iv) studies for which the full text could not be accessed.

Literature screening and data extraction

The literature was independently screened by two investigators, who extracted the data and cross-checked the results. In cases of disagreement, a third party was consulted to arbitrate discrepancies and, when possible, the authors of the included studies were contacted to supplement missing information. Literature was screened through the removal of duplicate studies, reading of the titles and abstracts to exclude publications irrelevant to the research topic and evaluation of the full text to determine whether each study should be included. The extracted data included: Author(s), tumor type, country, year, sex, sample size, follow-up duration, types of drugs used, study type, HRs and 95% CIs. The quality of the screened literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) (16) with a total score of 9 points, which included assessments on the selection of study groups (4 points), comparability between groups (2 points) and outcome measures (3 points). Studies with a score of ≥6 points were considered to be of high quality.

Data analysis

The STATA software (version 16.0; StataCorp LP) was used to perform the meta-analysis. The HR and 95% CI of each outcome measure were weighted and combined by calculating the log HR and SElog HR, which used the general inverse variance method to construct a forest plot. The heterogeneity of the studies were assessed quantitatively based on I2 values. Due to the potential heterogeneity in the intervention effects across different populations and geographic locations, a random effects model was used and subgroup analyses was performed. Egger's funnel plots and linear regression tests were used to assess publication bias. The robustness and reliability of the obtained results were tested through sensitivity analysis. All statistical tests performed were two-sided and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Literature retrieval

A total of 19,480 articles were obtained during the initial retrieval (Fig. 1). Following the initial screening process, 4,393 articles were identified for the present meta-analysis. Subsequently, 644 articles were selected after reading the titles and abstracts. After reading the full texts, 48 articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the present meta-analysis.

Characteristics of the included studies

The present meta-analysis included a total of 48 studies, which involved 923,134 participants (13,17–63). All included studies reported the HRs and 95% CIs which were calculated using the Cox regression model. The included studies were published between 2011 and 2023. Among these, 12 studies were conducted in the United States, 7 in Japan, 7 in Finland, 6 in China, 2 in England, 2 in Canada, 2 in the Czech Republic, 3 in Italy and 1 each in Denmark, Germany, South Korea, North Korea, Norway, Oman and Poland (Table I). Furthermore, there were 34 cohort studies and 14 case-control studies among the included studies. Of the total included studies, 7 reported the use of ACEIs alone, 8 on the use of ARBs alone and 33 on the combined use of ACEIs and ARBs. Based on the NOS, all included studies scored ≥6 points, which indicated the included studies were of high quality.

Impact of ACEI and ARB use on the OS of patients with cancer

The use of ACEIs or ARBs alone and in combination on the OS of patients with cancer over the past decade was analyzed in the 48 included studies (Fig. 2). Meta-analysis indicated that patients who used ACEIs or ARBs, either alone or in combination, had a significantly increased OS compared with that of patients with cancer who did not use ACEI or ARB drugs (HR, 0.91; 95% CI; 0.87–0.95; P<0.01).

Impact of ACEI and ARB use on the OS of patients in specific types of cancer

A subgroup analysis was performed on the data from the included studies according to the site of tumor (Fig. 3). Among patients with ovarian (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74–0.971; P<0.01), pancreatic (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73–1.01; P<0.01), prostate (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89–1.07; P<0.01), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70–1.06; P<0.01), lung (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77–1.12; P<0.01), esophageal (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78–1.00; P<0.01), gastric (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77–0.92; P<0.01), colonic (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81–0.93; P<0.01), nasopharyngeal (HR, 0.79, 95% CI, 0.50–1.24; P<0.01), head and neck (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77–0.94; P<0.01), gallbladder (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.44–1.23; P<0.01) and rectal (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87–0.95; P<0.01) cancers, patients who used ACEIs or ARBs, either alone or in combination, had a significantly increased OS compared with that of patients who did not use the aforementioned drugs. By contrast, the use of ACEIs or ARBs, either alone or in combination, did not show no significant benefit in the OS of patients with renal cancer (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83–1.20; P<0.01) and significantly decreased the OS of patients with breast cancer (HR, 1.04; 95%CI, 0.90–1.19; P<0.01).

Impact of ACEI and ARB use alone or in combination on the OS of patients with cancer

Subgroup analysis was performed on the included studies according to the use of the drugs, either alone or in combination (Fig. 4). The use of ACEI drugs alone did not lead to an significant extension of the overall survival period of cancer patients (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93–1.08; P<0.01), while the use of ARB drugs alone (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84–0.94; P<0.01) or the combined application of ACEI/ARB drugs (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78–0.91; P<0.01) significantly improved the survival period of tumor patients compared with patients with hypertension and cancer who did not use ARB drugs or who were not taking ACEI/ARB drugs.

Impact of ACEI and ARB use on the OS of patients with cancer according to study type

Subgroup analysis was performed on the included studies according to study type (Fig. 5). Among the 34 cohort studies, the use of ACEIs or ARBs, alone or in combination, significantly increased the OS of patients with cancer (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88–0.97; P<0.01) compared with those who were not treated. The use of ACEIs or ARBs, alone or in combination, significantly increased the OS of patients with cancer among the 14 case-control studies (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79–0.94; P<0.01).

Sensitivity and publication bias analyses

Sensitivity analysis was performed through the individual elimination of each included study from the merged studies (Fig. 6). The results of this analysis indicated no significant change in the combined effect size.

Egger's regression test was used to conduct a publication bias analysis of the 48 articles that explored the correlation between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and the OS and no significant publication bias was demonstrated (Fig. 7; P=0.321).

Discussion

Hypertension is a common and frequently occurring disease (64), and in clinical practice, the prognosis of a number of patients with cancer with concurrent hypertension is subject to potential effects of the antihypertensive drugs, such as ACEIs and ARBs (65). However, the impact of ACEIs and ARBs on prognosis is currently unclear. The present meta-analysis included 48 studies, which involved the data of 923,134 patients and demonstrated that patients who used ACEIs and ARBs had a significantly increased OS compared with patients with cancer who did not use these drugs. The increase in OS was significant in patients with ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, hepatocellular, lung, esophageal, gastric, colon, nasopharyngeal, head and neck, gallbladder and rectal cancers. However, the OS of patients with breast tumors and urothelial carcinoma, was significantly decreased with the use of ACEIs and ARBs compared with the OS of patients who did not use them. No significant differences in overall survival were observed among patients with renal tumors, regardless of whether they were treated with ACEI or ARB drugs. In terms of the specific drugs used and the method of administration, the use of ACEIs alone did not significantly change the OS of patients with cancer; however, the use of ARBs alone and the combined use of ACEIs and ARBs significantly increased the OS of patients.

The effects of antihypertensive drugs on the development and progression of tumors is a topic of notable importance. Previous studies have shown that Ang II and AT1 are upregulated in a number of types of cancer tissues and that RAAS disorders are closely associated with hypertension (66). Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate whether the administration of RAAS-inhibiting antihypertensive drugs in hypertensive patients with cancer affects their prognosis. In comparison with a number of previous studies on the effect of RAAS inhibitors on the prognosis of patients with cancer (21,32), the present study incorporated data from a large number of types of cancer, which included ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung, esophageal gastric, colon, nasopharyngeal, head and neck, gallbladder cancer, rectal, renal, urothelial carcinoma and breast cancers. The impact of ACEI and ARB use on the OS of hypertensive patients with various types of cancer was systematically analyzed. The present study evaluated the survival rate following the diagnosis of cancer, collecting information on the use of medication in patients with cancer, which may provide a better reflection of the impact of hypertension treatment drugs on cancer risk and prognosis. In 2019, Cui et al (25) utilized a time-dependent Cox regression model to examine the association between common antihypertensive drugs and the OS in breast, colorectal, lung and gastric cancers, and used data from 2 large prospective cohort studies in Shanghai, China. By contrast, the present study included sample information on patients with different types of cancer from the United States, Japan, Finland, China, England, Canada, the Czech Republic, Italy, Denmark, Germany, South Korea, North Korea, Norway, Oman and Poland. This approach was used to minimize the analytical errors that could result from different races of the patients included in the studies. In contrast to the study conducted by Mc Menamin et al (67), which assessed the impact of RAAS inhibitors on overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, and multiple myeloma by assessing 10 relevant studies, the present study included 48 relevant studies and used a larger sample to conduct a more comprehensive analysis of overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, and multiple myeloma who had used ACEI/ARB drugs, making the results more generalizable. In contrast to a number of studies on that evaluated the impact of antihypertensive drugs on the prognosis of cancer patients (68,69), in terms of drug type, the present study investigated RAAS inhibitors, which have a well-established mechanism of action in tumor tissues. However, ACEIs and ARBs, which both act as inhibitors in the various steps of the RAAS cascade reaction, may not have the same effect on tumors. By analyzing the impact of using ACEI/ARB drugs alone or in combination on the overall survival of cancer patients, it was found that inhibiting different steps of the RAAS cascade may have different effects on the overall survival of cancer patients of different types, these results may help to guide future research.

The RAAS is an endocrine pathway that participates in the regulation of cardiovascular and neuroendocrine functions and is closely associated with the pathogenesis of hypertension (70). In the RAAS, the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is a key enzyme that primarily converts Ang I into Ang II. Ang II binds to the AT1 and AT2 receptors, playing a role in various physiological pathways, including vasoconstriction, aldosterone and vasopressin release, sodium and water retention, and sympathetic activation (71,72). Previous studies have reported that some tumor cells express renin and Ang II receptors, and the activation or deactivation of these receptors plays distinct physiological roles in the development of cancer through various signaling pathways (73). The activation of AT1 receptor and PRR receptor signaling leads to the activation of MAPK, PI3K/AKT/MTOR, NF-κB and JAK/STAT signaling pathways, as well as an increase in VEGF, TGFβ1, EGFR, and fibronectin, ultimately leading to cell proliferation, angiogenesis, fibrosis, tumor invasion and metastasis (74). These pathways are inhibited by the AT2 receptor and angiotensin-(1–7)-mediated Mas signaling. Therefore, the AT1 receptor is considered to serve a role in the promotion of tumorigenesis (7,66). By contrast, the AT2 receptor has a direct antiproliferative effect (75,76) and Ang (1–7) directly inhibits angiogenesis and cell proliferation (77). ACEIs inhibit ACE, which thereby prevents the conversion of Ang I into Ang II and indirectly inhibits the binding of Ang II to AT1 and AT2. By contrast, ARBs directly block the binding of Ang II to AT1. Both ACEIs and ARBs may exert their effects by directly or indirectly inhibiting the signaling pathways of AT1 and AT2 receptors, which leads to the inhibition of tumor cell growth and formation of peripheral vessels (78).

A previous analysis of various types of cancer demonstrated that patients with breast cancer had a decreased survival period after the use of ACEIs or ARBs (32). However, a cohort analysis including 1,435 cases of breast cancer, 1,511 cases of colorectal cancer and 1,184 cases of prostate cancer demonstrated that in all patients, the use of ACEIs or ARBs did not increase the cancer-specific risk of death; therefore, ACEIs and ARBs drugs were considered to be safe for patients diagnosed with breast, colorectal and prostate cancer (21). A previous meta-analysis suggested that ARBs have antiproliferative effects on breast cancer (79). There are a number of molecular types of breast cancer, and the specific type is determined from the expression levels of indicators such as estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER2 and Ki-67 through IHC; the clinical features, degree of malignancy, treatment and prognosis vary among the different molecular types of breast cancer (80). It could be suggested that the differential results reported on the prognosis and OS of hypertensive patients with breast cancer after treatment with ACEI and ARB analogs may be because endocrine therapy is preferred in patients with high levels of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the molecular typing of breast cancer (81). In the present study, analysis of ACEIs and ARBs use, alone or in combination, on the OS of patients with cancer, ACEIs alone had no significant effect on the survival of these patients, whereas the use of ARBs or ACEI and ARB in combination increased patient survival. The mechanism of action of ACEIs against hypertension is to inhibit the ACE and bradykinin-degrading enzymes, reduce the conversion of Ang I to Ang II, and through vasodilatory effects, slow down the degradation of bradykinin through and promote the release of prostaglandins, which together leads to vasodilatation and blood pressure reduction (82). However, it has been reported that kinins are not only involved in blood pressure regulation, but also serve a role in the regulation of physiological functions of the cardiovascular system, kidneys and nervous system. Kinins are closely related to the occurrence of diseases such as heart disease, kidney disease, inflammatory reactions and cancer (83). Previous studies reported that bradykinin mediates the migration and invasion of various human cancer cells (84,85). Hsin-Shan Yu et al found that bradykinin induced VEGF expression and promoted angiogenesis in human prostate cancer through activation of the B2 receptor and the Akt, mTOR, and NF-k AP-1 signaling pathways. Bradykinin promotes gastric cancer cell proliferation, migration, invasion and tumor growth through the ERK signaling pathway (86). The mechanism of action of ARBs against hypertension, by contrast, is to selectively block the binding of Ang II to AT1, which leads to a dose-dependent reduction in peripheral vascular resistance and a decrease in blood pressure (87). This could potentially be due to the previous studies on breast or gynecological cancers on the impact of hormones and hormone therapies where the status of estrogen receptors were unclear, which may have impacted the subsequent analysis. Analysis of the impact of the use of ACEIs and ARBs alone or in combination on the OS of patients with cancer in the present study demonstrated that the use of ACEIs alone did not significantly affect the OS of these patients. ACEIs block Ang II production by suppressing ACE and indirectly inhibiting Ang II binding to AT1 and AT2 (88). ARBs selectively block the binding of Ang II to AT1, the AT1 receptor is upregulated in cancer tissues and promotes cell proliferation and angiogenesis (89). Previous studies have reported that AT1 receptor antagonists can significantly slow the progression of tumors, and in the maintenance of blood pressure, water and electrolyte homeostasis, AT1 and AT2 receptors antagonize each other to maintain a regulatory balance (89). The present analysis demonstrated no significant impact of the use of ACEIs alone on the OS of patients with cancer, whereas the use of ARBs alone significantly the OS of these patients. Therefore, determining the specific roles of AT1 and AT2 receptors in tumors could potentially increase the understanding of the increased OS of patients with cancer who used ARBs alone or in combination with an ARB or ACEI. Hence, conducting further investigation into the involvement of the RAAS in local tumors by selectively inhibiting AT1 and AT2 receptors in hypertensive cancer patients through experimental studies may yield deeper insights into this mechanism.

The impact of antihypertensive drugs on the prognosis of cancer patients may be influenced by multiple factors, with a key constraint being heterogeneity, as well as factors such as race, lifestyle, geographical environment, underlying diseases, comorbidities, health status and therapeutic methods. Simultaneously, specific types of bias should be considered, for example, in a previous study where hypertension history was collected through self-report, there may be a few cases of recall bias among patients; the data collected in this way will be partially biased (90). Additionally, the potential effects of changes in the therapeutic regimen for hypertension on the analysis results should be considered. For example, in a previous study, a number of patients started using thiazide diuretics or calcium channel blockers due to poor blood pressure control or the subsequent development of other diseases (91). However, the effect of other antihypertensive drugs on the previous stages of cancer is currently unclear. Furthermore, the present study demonstrated that the inclusion and exclusion criteria for single tumor studies varied among populations. A study by Wilk et al (58) with stringent exclusion criteria included 93 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had received docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy and had developed metastases, all of whom had a clear pathological diagnosis and radiological evidence of metastasis, and had received docetaxel prior to the start of ABI to evaluate the impact of prior chronic diseases and concomitant medications on the abiraterone acetate treatment process in this patient cohort. It was reported that the use of ACEI/ARB drugs may prolong the survival of these patients; however, the aforementioned study requires further support through prospective studies. Another previous study investigated the relationship between antihypertensive drugs and prostate cancer prognosis through a survey of 8,253 patients with prostate cancer and reported that the use of RAS inhibitors, ACEIs and AT receptor blockers were associated with improved survival rates in patients with prostate cancer (52). Although the aforementioned study had a large sample size, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were not set for the study population's age, disease stage or treatment received. Therefore, the aforementioned study may only represent the overall prognosis trend of patients with prostate cancer who use antihypertensive drugs to a certain extent and cannot accurately reflect the impact of antihypertensive drugs use on the prognosis of certain specific groups of prostate cancer patients (52). The present meta-analysis is a preliminary study of the prognostic impact of ACEIs and ARBs in hypertensive patients with cancer; therefore, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were set broadly. With an increase in the number of randomized controlled trials and clinical studies on the use of ACEIs and ARBs in hypertensive patients with different types of cancers, meta-analyses for a single type of tumors could be performed with more stringent exclusion criteria to obtain accurate study conclusions in the future. For instance, to further investigate the impact of ACEI/ARB drugs on the overall survival of a specific subtype of breast cancer patients with comorbid hypertension undergoing endocrine therapy, establishing inclusion criteria for individuals diagnosed with this subtype of breast cancer and receiving endocrine therapy. Subsequently, it would be possible to prospectively assess the prognosis of this cohort to yield more valuable research findings.

ACEIs and ARBs may increase the survival of hypertensive patients with cancers and the specific mechanism underlying this effect may be associated with the promotion of cell proliferation and angiogenesis by AT1 (73). In the future, further clinical and biological research could potentially improve the understanding of the mechanisms underlying the anticancer effects of ACEIs and ARBs, demonstrate the potential of ACEIs and ARBs in adjunctive cancer therapy, identify the patient populations that benefit the most from these treatments and provide novel treatment options to improve the prognosis of hypertensive patients with cancer.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.

Authors' contributions

YX was responsible for the study methodology, software use, data curation, manuscript writing, review and editing. YX and XC contributed to study conceptualization. XC contributed to formal analysis of the data. WL participated in data investigation. WL and XC curated the data. YX, XC and WL performed data validation. WZ and XL contributed significantly to the conceptualization and design of the study, and supervised the research activities, and validated the integrity of all primary data. WZ and XL confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figure 1. Flowchart of the literature screening process.

Figure 2. Forest plot of the impact of the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers on the overall survival of tumor patients over the past decade. Within this graphical representation, each block corresponds to an individual study, with the size of the block reflecting its relative weight in the analysis. The horizontal line through each block represents the 95% CI for the observed effect. At the bottom of the plot, the diamond represents the pooled effect calculated across all included studies, with the width of the diamond indicating the 95% CI. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error.

Figure 3. Forest plot of the impact of the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers on the overall survival of patients with different tumors. (A) Outlines the impact of the use of ACEI/ARB drugs on the overall survival of patients with ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, HCC, lung, oesophageal, gastric and breast cancers. (B) Outlines the impact of the use of ACEI/ARB drugs on the overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer, kidney cancer, nasopharyngeal, head＆neck, bladder, upper tract urothelial and rectal cancers. Within this graphical representation, each block corresponds to an individual study, with the size of the block reflecting its relative weight in the analysis. The horizontal line through each block represents the 95% CI for the observed effect. At the bottom of the plot, the diamond represents the pooled effect calculated across all included studies, with the width of the diamond indicating the 95% CI. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error.

Figure 4. Forest plot of the impact of the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers alone or in combination on the overall survival of patients with tumors. Within this graphical representation, each block corresponds to an individual study, with the size of the block reflecting its relative weight in the analysis. The horizontal line through each block represents the 95% CI for the observed effect. At the bottom of the plot, the diamond represents the pooled effect calculated across all included studies, with the width of the diamond indicating the 95% CI. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error.

Figure 5. Forest plot of the impact of the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers on the overall survival of patients according to data from different study types. Within this graphical representation, each block corresponds to an individual study, with the size of the block reflecting its relative weight in the analysis. The horizontal line through each block represents the 95% CI for the observed effect. At the bottom of the plot, the diamond represents the pooled effect calculated across all included studies, with the width of the diamond indicating the 95% CI. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error.

Figure 6. Hazard ratio for the primary outcome in prespecified Subgroups. Within this graphical representation, each block corresponds to an individual study, with the size of the block reflecting its relative weight in the analysis. The horizontal line through each block represents the 95% CI for the observed effect. At the bottom of the plot, the diamond represents the pooled effect calculated across all included studies, with the width of the diamond indicating the 95% CI. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error.

Figure 7. Funnel plot for publication bias. Circles, an individual study; diagonal lines, pseudo 95% CI; middle vertical line, pooling hazard ratio.

Table I. Characteristics of the studies included in the present meta-analysis.

First author, year	Type of cancer	Patient sex	Median age, years ± SD (range)	Country of residence	Study population, n	Diagnosis period	Follow-up period	Treatment	Study design	Newcastle-Ottawa quality score	(Refs.)	
Anderson et al, 2021	Lung	Mix	60.2±15.1	United States	187,060	1996-2018	7.1 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(17)	
Aydiner et al, 2015	Non-small cell lung	Mix	61±1 (42–75)	Japan	117	2003-2011	18.9 months	ACEI/ARB	Case-control	≥6	(18)	
Balkrishnan et al, 2021	Colorectal	Mix	(365)	United States	13,982	2007-2012	6.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(19)	
Botteri et al, 2013	Breast	Female	62 (48–80)	Italy	800	1997-2008	72 months	ARB	Case-control	≥6	(20)	
Busby et al, 2017	Gastro-esophageal	Mix	-	England	5,124	1998-2012	1.4 years	ARB	Cohort	≥6	(21)	
Cardwell et al, 2014	Multi-cancer	Mix	-	England	51,507	1998-2006	6.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(22)	
Chae et al, 2013	Breast	Female	58	United States	1,449	1995-2007	55 months	ACEI	Case-control	≥6	(23)	
Cho et al, 2020	Ovarian	Female	-	Korea	878	2001-2014	120 months	ARB	Cohort	≥6	(24)	
Cui et al, 2019	Multi-cancer	Mix	(40–74)	China	2,891	1996-2006	3.4 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(25)	
Engineer et al, 2013	Colorectal	Mix	66.48 (318)	United States	262	2000-2009	4,364 days	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(26)	
Eskelinen et al, 2022	Renal	Mix	-	Finland	13,873	1995-2012	6.2 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(27)	
Fiala et al, 2019	Colorectal	Mix	62.3 (28.0–86.1)	Czech Republic	514	2005-2019	22.3 months	ACEI	Cohort	≥6	(28)	
Fiala et al, 2021	Renal cell carcinoma	Mix	37.5–83.1	Czech Republic	343	2007-2020	96 months	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(29)	
Fryzek et al, 2005	Renal cell carcinoma	Mix	62 (30–85)	Denmark	113,298	1989-2002	10.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(30)	
Ganz et al, 2011	Breast	Female	-	United States	1779	1997-2000	8.2 years	ACEI	Cohort	≥6	(31)	
Harding et al, 2019	Ovarian	Female	(366)	United States	2,195	2007-2012	12 months	ACEI	Cohort	≥6	(32)	
Holmes et al, 2013	Multi-cancer	Mix	(365)	Canada	15,582	2004-2008	6.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(33)	
Huang et al, 2021	Ovarian	Female	-	United States	743	1994-2017	1.0 years	ACEI	Cohort	≥6	(34)	
Keith et al, 2022	Pancreatic	Mix	74.4 (66.3–81.5)	Italy	8,158	2003-2011	6.2 months	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(35)	
Keizman et al, 2011	Renal cell carcinoma	Mix	66 (47–79)	United States	127	2004-2010	60 months	ARB	Case-control	≥6	(36)	
Kim et al, 2012	Gastric	Mix	67 (37–85)	South Korea	63	2002-2010	60 months	ACEI/ARB	Case-control	≥6	(37)	
Iede et al, 2022	Pancreatic	Mix	73 (42–80)	Japan	56	2015-2020	50 months	ACEI/ARB	Case-control	≥6	(38)	
Li et al, 2022	Gastro-esophageal	Mix	(350)	China	4,577	2008-2016	10.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(39)	
Lin et al, 2021	Nasopharyngeal carcinoma	Mix	-	China	927	2008-2017	5.0 years	ARB	Cohort	≥6	(40)	
Lorona et al, 2021	Breast	Female	(20–69)	United States	4,557	2004-2015	5.0 years	ACEI	Cohort	≥6	(41)	
Mafiana et al, 2019	Colorectal	Mix	-	Oman	301	2006-2014	8.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Case-control	≥6	(42)	
Ho et al, 2018	Hepatocellular carcinoma	Mix	-	China	15,597	2005-2014	9.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(43)	
Morris et al, 2016	Rectal	Mix	-	United States	216	1999-2012	4.1 years	ACEI/ARB	Case-control	≥6	(44)	
Nakai et al, 2010	Pancreatic	Mix	71 (53–87)	Japan	155	2001-2009	9.5 months	ACEI/ARB	Case-control	≥6	(45)	
Nakai et al, 2015	Pancreatic	Mix	67 (39–89)	Japan	349	2001-2014	9.6 months	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(46)	
Nayan et al, 2018	Kidney	Mix	(≥65)	Canada	9,124	1997-2013	16.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(47)	
Osumi et al, 2015	Colorectal	Mix	61.5 (38–75)	Japan	181	2007-2010	70 months	ARB	Case-control	≥6	(48)	
Ozawa et al, 2019	Colorectal	Mix	-	Japan	461	2009-2014	57 months	ACEI/ARB	Case-control	≥6	(49)	
Santala et al, 2019	Urothelial	Mix	75 (44–96)	Finland	14,065	1995-2012	4.1 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(50)	
Santala et al, 2020	Breast	Female	67 (27–102)	Finland	73,170	1995-2013	20.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(51)	
Santala et al, 2019	Prostate	Male	63 (40–93)	Finland	14,422	1995-2013	9.9 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(52)	
Siltari et al, 2020	Prostate	Male	68 (64–72)	Finland	8,253	1996-2016	7.6 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(53)	
Santala et al, 2021	Ovarian	Female	70 (18–101)	Finland	12,122	1995-2013	19.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(54)	
Siltari et al, 2018	Prostate	Male	59 (55–63)	Finland	78,615	1996-2015	20.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(55)	
Støer et al, 2021	Pancreatic adenocarcinoma	Mix	67 (60–74)	Norway	2,614	2007-2015	7.0 years	ARB	Cohort	≥6	(56)	
Stokes et al, 2021	Head and neck	Mix	(366)	United States	5,000	2008-2015	24 months	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(57)	
Tamburrino et al, 2021	Pancreatic adenocarcinoma	Mix	-	Italy	430	2015-2019	3.0 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(13)	
Wilk et al, 2021	Prostate	Male	69 (43–88)	Poland	93	2014-2018	9.8 months	ACEI/ARB	Case-control	≥6	(58)	
Wilop et al, 2009	Non-small cell lung	Mix	62 (31–83)	Germany	287	1996-2007	8.1 months	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(59)	
Wu et al, 2021	Oral squamous cell carcinoma	Mix	58 (51.7–66)	China	714	2007-2018	11.0 years	ARB	Case-control	≥6	(60)	
Yoshida et al, 2017	Bladder	Mix	70 (39–91)	Japan	269	1995-2014	44.5 months	ACEI/ARB	Case-control	≥6	(61)	
Zhang et al, 2022	Colorectal	Mix	-	United States	2,343	1976-2014	28.0 years	ACEI	Cohort	≥6	(62)	
Yang et al, 2022	Multi-cancer	Mix	-	China	253,491	2002-2019	6.5 years	ACEI/ARB	Cohort	≥6	(63)	
ACEI, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; -, age group not indicated.
==== Refs
References

1 Wang MC Lloyd-Jones DM Cardiovascular risk assessment in hypertensive patients Am J Hypertens 34 569 577 2021 10.1093/ajh/hpab021 33503227
2 Małyszko J Małyszko M Kozlowski L Kozlowska K Małyszko J Hypertension in malignancy-an underappreciated problem Oncotarget 9 20855 20871 2018 10.18632/oncotarget.25024 29755695
3 Raimondi S Botteri E Munzone E Cipolla C Rotmensz N DeCensi A Gandini S Use of beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers and breast cancer survival: Systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Cancer 139 212 219 2016 10.1002/ijc.30062 26916107
4 Deng Y Xie Y Wang M Xu P Wei B Li N Wu Y Yang S Zhou L Hao Q Effects of antihypertensive drugs use on risk and prognosis of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 37 observational studies Front Pharmacol 12 670657 2022 10.3389/fphar.2021.670657 35087400
5 Allen AM Role of angiotensin in the rostral ventrolateral medulla in the development and maintenance of hypertension Curr Opin Pharmacol 11 117 123 2011 10.1016/j.coph.2010.12.003 21269877
6 Dinh DT Frauman AG Johnston CI Fabiani ME Angiotensin receptors: Distribution, signalling and function Clin Sci (Lond) 100 481 492 2001 10.1042/cs1000481 11294688
7 Downward J Targeting RAS signalling pathways in cancer therapy Nat Rev Cancer 3 11 22 2003 10.1038/nrc969 12509763
8 Arendse LB Danser AHJ Poglitsch M Touyz RM Burnett JC Jr Llorens-Cortes C Ehlers MR Sturrock ED Novel therapeutic approaches targeting the renin-angiotensin system and associated peptides in hypertension and heart failure Pharmacol Rev 71 539 570 2019 10.1124/pr.118.017129 31537750
9 Escobar E Rodríguez-Reyna TS Arrieta O Sotelo J Angiotensin II and cell proliferation and angiogenesis regulator: Biologic and therapeutic implications in cancer Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2 385 399 2004 10.2174/1570161043385556 15320819
10 Ram CV Antihypertensive drugs: An overview Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2 77 89 2002 10.2165/00129784-200202020-00002 14727984
11 Neo JH Malcontenti-Wilson C Muralidharan V Christophi C Effect of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists in a mouse model of colorectal cancer liver metastases J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22 577 584 2007 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04797.x 17376054
12 Pfeffer MA Swedberg K Granger CB Held P McMurray JJ Michelson EL Olofsson B Ostergren J Yusuf S Pocock S CHARM Investigators Committees Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: The CHARM-Overall programme Lancet 362 759 766 2003 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14282-1 13678868
13 Tamburrino D Guarneri G Partelli S Crippa S Falconi M Capurso G Does chronic consumption of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors affect survival after surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? Dig Liver Dis 53 1065 1067 2021 10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.027 34011483
14 Higgins JPT Green S Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [Updated March 2011] The Cochrane Collaboration 2011 Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org
15 Moher D Liberati A Tetzlaff J Altman DG PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement PLoS Med 6 e1000097 2009 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 19621072
16 Wells GA Shea B O'Connell D Peterson J Welch V Losos M Tugwell P The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses Available from URL: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm [cited 2009 Oct 19]
17 Anderson JL Knowlton KU Muhlestein JB Bair TL Le VT Horne BD Evaluation of treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and the risk of lung cancer: ERACER-an observational cohort study J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 26 321 327 2021 10.1177/1074248420987054 33514290
18 Aydiner A Ciftci R Sen F Renin-angiotensin system blockers may prolong survival of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving erlotinib Medicine (Baltimore) 94 e887 2015 10.1097/MD.0000000000000887 26039117
19 Balkrishnan R Desai RP Narayan A Camacho FT Flausino LE Chammas R Associations between initiating antihypertensive regimens on stage I–III colorectal cancer outcomes: A medicare SEER cohort analysis Cancer Med 10 5347 5357 2021 10.1002/cam4.4088 34184420
20 Botteri E Munzone E Rotmensz N Cipolla C De Giorgi V Santillo B Zanelotti A Adamoli L Colleoni M Viale G Therapeutic effect of β-blockers in triple-negative breast cancer postmenopausal women Breast Cancer Res Treat 140 567 575 2013 10.1007/s10549-013-2654-3 23912960
21 Busby J McMenamin Ú Spence A Johnston BT Hughes C Cardwell CR Angiotensin receptor blocker use and gastro-oesophageal cancer survival: A population-based cohort study Aliment Pharmacol Ther 47 279 288 2018 10.1111/apt.14388 29105106
22 Cardwell CR Mc Menamin ÚC Hicks BM Hughes C Cantwell MM Murray LJ Drugs affecting the renin-angiotensin system and survival from cancer: A population based study of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer patient cohorts BMC Med 12 28 2014 10.1186/1741-7015-12-28 24521426
23 Chae YK Brown EN Lei X Melhem-Bertrandt A Giordano SH Litton JK Hortobagyi GN Gonzalez-Angulo AM Chavez-Macgregor M Use of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers and primary breast cancer outcomes J Cancer 4 549 556 2013 10.7150/jca.6888 23983819
24 Cho MA Jeong SY Sohn I Kim MS Kang JH Paik ES Lee YY Choi CH Impact of angiotensin receptor blockers, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers and thiazide diuretics on survival of ovarian cancer patients Cancer Res Treat 52 645 654 2020 10.4143/crt.2019.509 32019281
25 Cui Y Wen W Zheng T Li H Gao YT Cai H You M Gao J Yang G Zheng W Use of antihypertensive medications and survival rates for breast, colorectal, lung, or stomach cancer Am J Epidemiol 188 1512 1528 2019 10.1093/aje/kwz106 31062847
26 Engineer DR Burney BO Hayes TG Garcia JM Exposure to ACEI/ARB and β-blockers is associated with improved survival and decreased tumor progression and hospitalizations in patients with advanced colon cancer Transl Oncol 6 539 545 2013 10.1593/tlo.13346 24151534
27 Eskelinen T Veitonmäki T Kotsar A Tammela TLJ Pöyhönen A Murtola TJ Improved renal cancer prognosis among users of drugs targeting renin-angiotensin system Cancer Causes Control 33 313 320 2022 10.1007/s10552-021-01527-w 34921656
28 Fiala O Ostasov P Sorejs O Liska V Buchler T Poprach A Finek J Incidental use of beta-blockers is associated with outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab-based therapy: A single-institution retrospective analysis of 514 patients Cancers (Basel) 11 1856 2019 10.3390/cancers11121856 31769417
29 Fiala O Ostašov P Rozsypalová A Hora M Šorejs O Šustr J Bendová B Trávníček I Filipovský J Fínek J Büchler T Impact of concomitant cardiovascular medication on survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with sunitinib or pazopanib in the first line Target Oncol 16 643 652 2021 10.1007/s11523-021-00829-y 34363554
30 Fryzek JP Poulsen AH Johnsen SP McLaughlin JK Sørensen HT Friis S A cohort study of antihypertensive treatments and risk of renal cell cancer Br J Cancer 92 1302 1306 2005 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602490 15812478
31 Ganz PA Habel LA Weltzien EK Caan BJ Cole SW Examining the influence of beta blockers and ACE inhibitors on the risk for breast cancer recurrence: Results from the LACE cohort Breast Cancer Res Treat 129 549 556 2011 10.1007/s10549-011-1505-3 21479924
32 Harding BN Delaney JA Urban RR Weiss NS Post-diagnosis use of antihypertensive medications and the risk of death from ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 154 426 431 2019 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.05.030 31178150
33 Holmes S Griffith EJ Musto G Minuk GY Antihypertensive medications and survival in patients with cancer: A population-based retrospective cohort study Cancer Epidemiol 37 881 885 2013 10.1016/j.canep.2013.09.001 24075077
34 Huang T Townsend MK Dood RL Sood AK Tworoger SS Antihypertensive medication use and ovarian cancer survival Gynecol Oncol 163 342 347 2021 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.009 34556331
35 Keith SW Maio V Arafat HA Alcusky M Karagiannis T Rabinowitz C Lavu H Louis DZ Angiotensin blockade therapy and survival in pancreatic cancer: A population study BMC Cancer 22 150 2022 10.1186/s12885-022-09200-4 35130875
36 Keizman D Huang P Eisenberger MA Pili R Kim JJ Antonarakis ES Hammers H Carducci MA Angiotensin system inhibitors and outcome of sunitinib treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective examination Eur J Cancer 47 1955 1961 2011 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.019 21600760
37 Kim ST Park KH Oh SC Seo JH Kim JS Shin SW Kim YH How does inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system affect the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy? Oncology 83 354 360 2012 10.1159/000337979 23052034
38 Iede K Yamada T Ueda M Tsuda Y Nakashima S Ohta K Tanida T Matsuyama J Ikenaga M Tominaga S Do antihypertensive drugs really have antitumor effects? Baseline differences in hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer Medicine (Baltimore) 101 e29532 2022 10.1097/MD.0000000000029532 35866833
39 Li PC Huang RY Yang YC Hsieh KP Yang YH Prognostic impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptors blockers in esophageal or gastric cancer patients with hypertension-a real-world study BMC Cancer 22 430 2022 10.1186/s12885-022-09513-4 35443635
40 Lin YT Wang HC Tsai MH Su YY Yang MY Chien CY Angiotensin II receptor blockers valsartan and losartan improve survival rate clinically and suppress tumor growth via apoptosis related to PI3K/AKT signaling in nasopharyngeal carcinoma Cancer 127 1606 1619 2021 10.1002/cncr.33391 33405241
41 Lorona NC Cook LS Tang MTC Hill DA Wiggins CL Li CI Antihypertensive medications and risks of recurrence and mortality in luminal, triple-negative, and HER2-overexpressing breast cancer Cancer Causes Control 32 1375 1384 2021 10.1007/s10552-021-01485-3 34347212
42 Mafiana RN Al-Kindi MS Mafiana N Al Lawati AS Al Moundhri M Impact of metabolic syndrome diagnosis and its treatment on survival of colorectal cancer patients J Cancer Epidemiol 2019 6527457 2019 31139216
43 Ho CM Lee CH Lee MC Zhang JF Wang JY Hu RH Lee PH Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in chemoprevention of hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide high-risk cohort study BMC Cancer 18 401 2018 10.1186/s12885-018-4292-y 29631561
44 Morris ZS Saha S Magnuson WJ Morris BA Borkenhagen JF Ching A Hirose G McMurry V Francis DM Harari PM Increased tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy among rectal cancer patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers Cancer 122 2487 2495 2016 10.1002/cncr.30079 27203227
45 Nakai Y Isayama H Ijichi H Sasaki T Sasahira N Hirano K Kogure H Kawakubo K Yagioka H Yashima Y Inhibition of renin-angiotensin system affects prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine Br J Cancer 103 1644 1648 2010 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605955 20978506
46 Nakai Y Isayama H Sasaki T Takahara N Saito K Ishigaki K Hamada T Mizuno S Miyabayashi K Yamamoto K The inhibition of renin-angiotensin system in advanced pancreatic cancer: An exploratory analysis in 349 patients J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 141 933 939 2015 10.1007/s00432-014-1873-2 25398651
47 Nayan M Juurlink DN Austin PC Macdonald EM Finelli A Kulkarni GS Hamilton RJ Canadian Drug Safety and Effectiveness Research Network (CDSERN): Medication use and kidney cancer survival: A population-based study Int J Cancer 142 1776 1785 2018 10.1002/ijc.31204 29226327
48 Osumi H Matsusaka S Wakatsuki T Suenaga M Shinozaki E Mizunuma N Angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers enhance the effects of bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients Mol Clin Oncol 3 1295 1300 2015 10.3892/mco.2015.630 26807236
49 Ozawa T Hashiguchi Y Yagi T Fukushima Y Shimada R Hayama T Tsuchiya T Nozawa K Iinuma H Ishihara S Matsuda K Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers may reduce tumor recurrence in left-sided and early colorectal cancers Int J Colorectal Dis 34 1731 1739 2019 10.1007/s00384-019-03379-y 31478086
50 Santala EEE Kotsar A Veitonmäki T Tammela TLJ Murtola TJ Risk of urothelial cancer death among people using antihypertensive drugs-a cohort study from Finland Scand J Urol 53 185 192 2019 10.1080/21681805.2019.1634147 31250699
51 Santala EEE Murto MO Artama M Pukkala E Visvanathan K Murtola TJ Angiotensin receptor blockers associated with improved breast cancer survival-a nationwide cohort study from Finland Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 29 2376 2382 2020 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0711 32917663
52 Santala EE Rannikko A Murtola TJ Antihypertensive drugs and prostate cancer survival after radical prostatectomy in Finland-A nationwide cohort study Int J Cancer 144 440 447 2019 10.1002/ijc.31802 30110124
53 Siltari A Murtola TJ Talala K Taari K Tammela TLJ Auvinen A Antihypertensive drug use and prostate cancer-specific mortality in Finnish men PLoS One 15 e0234269 2020 10.1371/journal.pone.0234269 32598349
54 Santala EEE Artama M Pukkala E Visvanathan K Staff S Murtola TJ Antihypertensive drug use and the risk of ovarian cancer death among Finnish ovarian cancer patients-a nationwide cohort study Cancers (Basel) 13 2087 2021 10.3390/cancers13092087 33925829
55 Siltari A Murtola TJ Talala K Taari K Tammela TLJ Auvinen A Antihypertensive drugs and prostate cancer risk in a Finnish population-based cohort Scand J Urol 52 321 327 2018 10.1080/21681805.2018.1559882 30698056
56 Støer NC Bouche G Pantziarka P Sloan EK Andreassen BK Botteri E Use of non-cancer drugs and survival among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A nationwide registry-based study in Norway Acta Oncol 60 1146 1153 2021 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1953136 34338111
57 Stokes WA Molina E McDermott JD Morgan RL Bickett T Fakhoury KR Amini A Karam SD Survival impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists in head and neck cancer Head Neck 43 3255 3275 2021 10.1002/hed.26809 34289190
58 Wilk M Waśko-Grabowska A Skoneczna I Szmit S Angiotensin system inhibitors may improve outcomes of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer during abiraterone acetate treatment-a cardio-oncology study Front Oncol 11 664741 2021 10.3389/fonc.2021.664741 33869068
59 Wilop S von Hobe S Crysandt M Esser A Osieka R Jost E Impact of angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 135 1429 1435 2009 10.1007/s00432-009-0587-3 19399518
60 Wu CN Wu SC Chen WC Yang YH Chin JC Chien CY Fang FM Li SH Luo SD Chiu TJ Angiotensin II receptor blockers and oral squamous cell carcinoma survival: A propensity-score-matched cohort study PLoS One 16 e0260772 2021 10.1371/journal.pone.0260772 34855858
61 Yoshida T Kinoshita H Fukui K Matsuzaki T Yoshida K Mishima T Yanishi M Komai Y Sugi M Inoue T Prognostic impact of renin-angiotensin inhibitors in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy Ann Surg Oncol 24 823 831 2017 10.1245/s10434-016-5534-3 27730369
62 Zhang Y Song M Chan AT Meyerhardt JA Willett WC Giovannucci EL Long-term use of antihypertensive medications and hypertension and colorectal cancer risk mortality: A prospective cohort study Br J Cancer 127 1974 1982 2022 10.1038/s41416-022-01975-4 36138074
63 Yang A Wu H Lau ESH Shi M Fan B Kong APS Ma RCW Luk AOY Chan JCN Chow E Effects of RAS inhibitors on all-site cancers and mortality in the Hong Kong diabetes surveillance database (2002–2019) EBioMedicine 83 104219 2022 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104219 35970023
64 Israili ZH Hernández-Hernández R Valasco M The future of antihypertensive treatment Am J Ther 14 121 134 2007 10.1097/01.pap.0000249915.12185.58 17414579
65 Li XY Sun JF Hu SQ The renin-angiotensin system blockers as adjunctive therapy for cancer: A meta-analysis of survival outcome Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 21 1375 1383 2017 28387887
66 Deshayes F Nahmias C Angiotensin receptors: A new role in cancer? Trends Endocrinol Metab 16 293 299 2005 10.1016/j.tem.2005.07.009 16061390
67 Mc Menamin ÚC Murray LJ Cantwell MM Hughes CM Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in cancer progression and survival: A systematic review Cancer Causes Control 23 221 230 2012 10.1007/s10552-011-9881-x 22116540
68 Li J Lam ASM Yau STY Yiu KKL Tsoi KKF Antihypertensive treatments and risks of lung cancer: A large population-based cohort study in Hong Kong BMC Cancer 21 1202 2021 10.1186/s12885-021-08971-6 34763668
69 Mehrdad SA Mirzavi F Seyedi SMR Asoodeh A The effect of angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on progression of gastric cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis Anticancer Drugs 33 983 988 2022 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001345 35946519
70 Te Riet L van Esch JH Roks AJ van den Meiracker AH Danser AH Hypertension: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system alterations Circ Res 116 960 975 2015 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303587 25767283
71 Timmermans PB Wong PC Chiu AT Herblin WF Benfield P Carini DJ Lee RJ Wexler RR Saye JA Smith RD Angiotensin II receptors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists Pharmacol Rev 45 205 251 1993 8372104
72 Burnier M Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers Circulation 103 904 912 2001 10.1161/01.CIR.103.6.904 11171802
73 Hassani B Attar Z Firouzabadi N The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) signaling pathways and cancer: Foes versus allies Cancer Cell Int 23 254 2023 10.1186/s12935-023-03080-9 37891636
74 Imai N Hashimoto T Kihara M Yoshida S Kawana I Yazawa T Kitamura H Umemura S Roles for host and tumor angiotensin II type 1 receptor in tumor growth and tumor-associated angiogenesis Lab Invest 87 189 198 2007 10.1038/labinvest.3700504 17318197
75 Judd SJ Alderman J Bowden J Michailov L Evidence against the involvement of opiate neurons in mediating the effect of clomiphene citrate on gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons Fertil Steril 47 574 578 1987 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59105-5 3106096
76 Pei N Mao Y Wan P Chen X Li A Chen H Li J Wan R Zhang Y Du H Angiotensin II type 2 receptor promotes apoptosis and inhibits angiogenesis in bladder cancer J Exp Clin Cancer Res 36 77 2017 10.1186/s13046-017-0542-0 28599664
77 Xu J Fan J Wu F Huang Q Guo M Lv Z Han J Duan L Hu G Chen L The ACE2/angiotensin-(1–7)/Mas receptor axis: Pleiotropic roles in cancer Front Physiol 8 276 2017 10.3389/fphys.2017.00276 28533754
78 Ferreira AJ Santos RA Cardiovascular actions of angiotensin-(1–7) Braz J Med Biol Res 38 499 507 2005 10.1590/S0100-879X2005000400003 15962175
79 Rhodes DR Ateeq B Cao Q Tomlins SA Mehra R Laxman B Kalyana-Sundaram S Lonigro RJ Helgeson BE Bhojani MS AGTR1 overexpression defines a subset of breast cancer and confers sensitivity to losartan, an AGTR1 antagonist Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106 10284 10289 2009 10.1073/pnas.0900351106 19487683
80 Weigelt B Geyer FC Reis-Filho JS Histological types of breast cancer: How special are they? Mol Oncol 4 192 208 2010 10.1016/j.molonc.2010.04.004 20452298
81 Harbeck N Gnant M Breast cancer Lancet 389 1134 1150 2017 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31891-8 27865536
82 Cushman DW Ondetti MA History of the design of captopril and related inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme Hypertension 17 589 592 1991 10.1161/01.HYP.17.4.589 2013486
83 Burch RM Farmer SG Steranka LR Bradykinin receptor antagonists Med Res Rev 10 237 269 1990 10.1002/med.2610100204 2158607
84 Montana V Sontheimer H Bradykinin promotes the chemotactic invasion of primary brain tumors J Neurosci 31 4858 4867 2011 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3825-10.2011 21451024
85 Cheng CY Kuo CT Lin CC Hsieh HL Yang CM IL-1beta induces expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and cell migration via a c-Src-dependent, growth factor receptor transactivation in A549 cells Br J Pharmacol 160 1595 1610 2010 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00858.x 20649564
86 Yu HS Lin TH Tang CH Involvement of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 up-regulation in bradykinin promotes cell motility in human prostate cancers Int J Mol Sci 14 13329 13345 2013 10.3390/ijms140713329 23803661
87 Hill RD Vaidya PN Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) StatPearls [Internet] StatPearls Publishing Treasure Island, FL 2024
88 Piepho RW Overview of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors Am J Health Syst Pharm 57 (Suppl 1) S3 S7 2000 10.1093/ajhp/57.suppl_1.S2 11030016
89 Colin M Delaitre C Foulquier S Dupuis F The AT1/AT2 receptor equilibrium is a cornerstone of the regulation of the renin angiotensin system beyond the cardiovascular system Molecules 28 5481 2023 10.3390/molecules28145481 37513355
90 Kidoguchi S Sugano N Yokoo T Kaneko H Akazawa H Mukai M Node K Yano Y Nishiyama A Antihypertensive drugs and cancer risk Am J Hypertens 35 767 783 2022 10.1093/ajh/hpac066 35595533
91 Tsioufis C Thomopoulos C Combination drug treatment in hypertension Pharmacol Res 125 266 271 2017 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.09.011 28939201
