
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

39100939
121299
10.26603/001c.121299
Original Research
Acute Effects of Handheld Vibration Massage on Posterior Shoulder Soft Tissues
Imai Takaki 1
Nagamatsu Takashi 1
Yoshizato Yushin 1
Miyara Kodai 1
Sumizono Megumi 1
Nakamura Masatoshi 2
1 Department of Rehabilitation Kyushu University of Nursing and Social Welfare https://ror.org/050r2qc20
2 Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences Nishi Kyushu University
Corresponding Author: Takaki Imai, PT, PhD Department of Rehabilitation, Kyushu University of Nursing and Social Welfare 888, Tomino, Tamana, Kumamoto, 865-0062, Japan Tel: +81-968-75-1800　Fax: +81-968-75-1811 Email address: t-imai@kyushu-ns.ac.jp
2 8 2024
2024
19 8 10031011
1 2 2024
17 6 2024
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Interventions using vibration stimulation have been recognized for their potential for increasing range of motion (ROM) without compromising muscle strength. Handheld vibration massagers can efficiently deliver vibration therapy to the shoulder joint and may be a potential treatment.

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of vibration massage using a handheld device on the soft tissues of the posterior shoulder joint, particularly on internal rotation (IR) passive ROM and external rotation (ER) muscle strength.

Study Design

Crossover study design.

Methods

A crossover study with a 5-min vibration massage and passive control condition was conducted in healthy male volunteers (mean age 20.5 ± 1.7 years). Vibration massage was applied to the posterior shoulder soft tissues of the dominant arm, with no intervention under control conditions. IR-ROM (vertebral level and in abduction) and strength of the external rotators (isometric and isokinetic) were measured before and immediately after the intervention. Vertebral levels were calculated as a ratio of lengths (ratio decreases with increased mobility). IR-ROM in abduction, the angle was measured. Statistical analysis was performed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA and paired t-test (Bonferroni correction).

Results

Vibration application decreased (improved) vertebral level IR ROM by −4.1% (p < 0.01, d = 0.445) and increased abduction position IR ROM by 11.4° (p < 0.01, d = 0.694). These changes exceeded the 95% confidence interval for the minimum detectable change. By contrast, the control condition produced no changes. IR-ROM (vertebral level and abduction) immediately after the intervention showed significant differences between the control and vibration conditions (p = 0.036, d = 0.273; p = 0.048, d = 0.483, respectively). Muscle strength did not show any interaction, time, or between-condition effects.

Conclusions

A massage using a handheld vibration massager applied to the posterior shoulder soft tissues increased IR-ROM without negatively affecting muscle strength, suggesting its potential use as a means of warming up.

Level of Evidence

Level 3

crossover design
muscle strength
range of motion
shoulder joint
vibration massage
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Posterior shoulder tightness (PST) is defined as soft tissue tightness in the posterior region of the glenohumeral joint, including the infraspinatus, teres minor, and posterior glenohumeral joint capsule.1 This condition has been observed in so-called shoulder range of motion (ROM) disorders, such as frozen shoulder and stiff shoulder, impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tears, anterior instability, and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), among overhead athletes.2,3

PST induces abnormal humeral head motion during shoulder flexion and abduction and is involved in subacromial pain syndrome, thereby affecting shoulder ROM.4–6 It also can cause scapular malposition, which has been identified as a factor in shoulder disorders.7 Aside from pain, this condition also is present in numerous pathological processes in the shoulder, highlighting the importance of treatment, including preventive measures. However, aggressive treatment, such as manipulation or capsular release, is rarely necessary, with most cases showing improvement following with conservative treatment such as physical therapy, massage, and stretching.8,9

Massage and static stretching are typical approaches for improving soft tissue flexibility. However, self-massage may be challenging to perform in certain areas, such as the shoulder region, inhibiting continuous and preventive intervention. Furthermore, several previous studies have reported that 45–60 s of static stretching interventions can potentially decrease muscle force generating capacity, a phenomenon referred to as stretch-induced force deficit.10,11 Therefore, as alternatives to stretching and massage, approaches using vibration have attracted considerable attention in recent years. In fact, recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed that vibration therapy for lower extremity muscles reduces stiffness and increases ROM.12,13 Similarly, other authors have suggested that vibration therapy improves flexibility, muscle activation, and maximal voluntary contractility.14,15

Despite the increase in attention directed toward vibration therapy, most studies showing the effects of vibration therapy on stiffness and ROM have been conducted using whole-body vibration or vibrating foam rollers. Moreover, unlike handheld devices, which can easily target specific areas, whole-body vibration or vibration foam rollers make targeting specific areas, such as the soft tissues of the posterior shoulder, quite difficult. A handheld massager is a portable tool that can be used in any environment, including sports stadiums and homes. However, only a few previous studies have investigated the effectiveness of a handheld vibration massager. Konrad et al.,16 who investigated the acute effects of a handheld vibration massager on calf muscles, reported that patients increased their ankle dorsiflexion ROM while maintaining ankle plantar flexion torque. These results are similar to those observed with other vibration therapies, such as whole-body vibration and vibrating foam rollers, and indicate that handheld devices can improve ROM without decreasing muscle activity and maximum voluntary contractile force. The current study extends previous findings and may facilitate the establishment of a new treatment for PST. The authors hypothesized that massage using a handheld vibration tool would increase ROM without decreasing muscle strength.

Thus, the purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effects of vibration massage using a handheld device on the soft tissues of the posterior shoulder joint, particularly on internal rotation (IR) passive ROM and external rotation (ER) muscle strength.

METHODS

Study design

This crossover study examined the effects of vibration massage over the soft tissues of the posterior shoulder on ROM and muscle strength. The dependent variables included IR-ROM and ER muscle strength, whereas the independent variables included the presence or absence of intervention (vibration vs. control) and the time effects before (PRE) and immediately after the intervention (POST).

Participants

This study enrolled 15 healthy men (aged 20.5 ± 1.7 years; height, 169.9 ± 6.3 cm; weight, 62.9 ± 7.4 kg). Participants who had no experience with regular resistance training over the prior six months and had no history of neuromuscular disease or orthopedic neck and upper extremity pain/injury were included. Based on previous studies,16 the sample size required for a two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) [effect size = 0.40 (large), α error = 0.05, power = 0.80] was calculated using G∗ power 3.1 software (Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany). After calculating the sample size, >14 participants were ultimately needed for analysis.

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Review Board and was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines for Life Sciences and Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. All participants provided written informed consent after being fully informed of the study procedures and objectives.

Procedures

The procedures are illustrated in Figure 1.

236508 Figure 1. Study Procedures.

ROM, range of motion; VIR, internal rotation at vertebral level; AIR, internal rotation in abduction position; MVC, maximum voluntary contraction; ISO, isometric; CON, concentric. PRE, before intervention; POST, immediately after intervention

Participants were instructed to visit the laboratory twice, at least 72 h apart. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either handheld vibration massage (vibration) or the control condition (no vibration) using the permuted block method. Participants who received the vibration intervention at their first visit were provided the control condition on their second visit. Conversely, participants who received the control condition at the first visit were subsequently provided the vibration intervention at their second visit. Shoulder exercises, including elevation and internal and external rotations, were performed for five minutes prior to measurement. Moreover, isometric and concentric contractions were practiced once each at approximately 30% effort. All outcome variables were measured before (PRE) and after (POST) the intervention. The intervention (vibration or control) was administered immediately after the PRE measurement, and the POST measurement was taken immediately after the intervention. The time taken for participants to complete the PRE measurement, intervention (vibration or control), and POST measurement in one visit was <20 min. The two examiners performing the measurements were blinded to grouping of the participants. In both PRE and POST measurements, (1) passive IR-ROM at the vertebral level reached by the extended thumb (VIR-ROM); (2) passive IR-ROM of the shoulder joint at 90° abduction (AIR-ROM); (3) maximum voluntary contraction in isometric (MVC-ISO); and (4) concentric isokinetic contraction torque (MVC-CON), was measured following this order.

IR-ROM evaluation

Two shoulder IR-ROM tests, namely VIR-ROM and AIR-ROM, were performed. VIR-ROM is recommended by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons as a measure of shoulder IR-ROM, with reports showing moderate to high intraexaminer reliability.17,18 To obtain normality, VIR-ROM measurements were obtained based on the method described by Mitsukane et al.19 The ratio of “the length between the thumb and the seventh cervical spinous process” to “the length between the middle position of both superior posterior iliac spines and the seventh cervical spinous process” was calculated (Figure 2), with lower ratios indicating greater the ROM. VIR-ROM involves the extension and IR of the glenohumeral joint and is influenced by the extensibility and flexibility of the infraspinatus muscle. It is a static stretching method for the infraspinatus muscle.20 Given that VIR-ROM is also affected by factors other than the glenohumeral joint, such as the elbow, wrist, and thumb, AIR-ROM was also evaluated. AIR-ROM was measured using a digital inclinometer (BEVEL BOX; Niigataseiki, Niigata, Japan) with the patient in the prone position and their shoulder joint in 90° abduction, after which the angle of IR was recorded in 1° increments (Figure 3). The digital inclinometer has a minimum reading of 0.1°, a reading accuracy of ±0.2°, and a repeatability of 0.1°. AIR-ROM was believed to involve stretching only the inferior fiber of the middle and inferior fibers of the infraspinatus.20 AIR-ROM showed high reproducibility as a method of measuring glenohumeral joint IR-ROM given that it controls scapulothoracic joint motion through scapular fixation.21 In this study, the examiner stabilized the coracoid process (scapular movement) using their forearm while also supporting the subject’s distal upper arm with their other hand to measure AIR-ROM with a measurement assistant (Figure 3). These considerations ensured that scapular movement was minimized as much as possible avoid tension in the subject’s periscapular muscles and avoid a shift in the horizontal abduction angle of the glenohumeral joint. In all participants, ROM measurements and measurement assistance were performed by two physical therapists with >10 years of experience in orthopedics.

236509 Figure 2. Passive Vertebral IR-ROM measurements method.

Reference line and distance measurements. (A) Palpation of the C7 spinous process. (B) Thumb position. (C, D): Palpation of the superior posterior iliac spine. (E) Midpoint of the C–D line. C7–thumb, distance between A and B. C7-PSIS, distance between A and E, and VIR-ROM was calculated as the ratio of C7–thumb to C7–PSIS. VIR-ROM, vertebral level range of motion

236510 Figure 3. Passive Abduction IR-ROM measurement method.

IR-ROM was measured with a digital inclinometer in the 90° abduction position of the shoulder joint using the scapular fixation technique. AIR, abduction position range of motion; IR-ROM, internal rotation range of motion

MVC-ISO and MVC-CON evaluation

Shoulder ER muscle strength measurements for MVC-ISO and MVC-CON were performed using a dynamometer (Primus RS; BTE Technologies, Hanover, MD, USA) and depicted in Figure 4. According to the Primus RS manual, measurements were obtained in the standing position with their feet shoulder width apart. To ensure that postural changes did not influence PRE and POST measurements, a tape was placed on the floor to standardize the standing position. Participants were also instructed to avoid compensatory movements during measurements. MVC-ISO measurements were performed with the shoulder joint in 45° of abduction, in a neutral position of IR and ER, and with the elbow joint flexed at 90°. MVC-ISO was performed twice, for 6 seconds, with a 60-s rest between efforts, and the maximum value was analyzed. MVC-CON measurements were performed at an angular velocity of 60°/s from 55° IR to 55° ER with the shoulder joint in 45° abduction and the elbow joint in 90° flexion. The examiner encouraged the participants to maximize their effort during muscle contraction. The peak (maximum) torque in three concentric contractions was used as the MVC-CON torque.

236511 Figure 4. External Rotator strength measurement set up on isokinetic device.

MVC-ISO measurements were performed with the shoulder joint in 45° of abduction, in a neutral position of IR and ER, and with the elbow joint flexed at 90°. MVC-CON measurements were performed at an angular velocity of 60°/s from 55° IR to 55° ER with the shoulder joint in 45° abduction and the elbow joint in 90° flexion. ER, external rotation; MVC, maximum voluntary contraction; ISO, isometric; CON, concentric.

Vibration massage

Using the spherical attachment of a handheld vibration massager (Recovery Gun RG-01; Dream Factory, Inc., Osaka, Japan), a vibration frequency of 58 Hz and amplitude of 5 mm, vibration massage was applied over the infraspinatus fossa for five minutes. The frequency and amplitude settings were based on reports showing increases in ROM and muscle strength.14,16,22 The five minute intervention time was based on a previous study in which a handheld vibration massager was used to improve the flexibility of the lower limb muscles.16 Vibration massage was performed in a relaxed prone position (neutral IR and ER positions with 90° shoulder joint abduction) (Figure 5) and initiated just below the scapular spine (head side of the infraspinatus muscle). The vibration massager was moved linearly from distal to proximal and then from proximal to distal within 20 s. The vibration massage started from the head side and ended at the caudal side. The pressure of the vibrating massager was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The degree of pressure was numerically quantified by the following descriptors: 0, no pressure; 1, slight pressure; 5, moderate pressure; and 10, very strong pressure. During the massage, the participants were asked to confirm the pressure level through verbal responses while maintaining a consistent pressure level of NRS 5 (moderate pressure). Vibration massage was administered to all participants by one physical therapist (YY) who did not perform ROM and muscle strength measurements. Participants receiving the control condition maintained the same relaxed prone position for five minutes, similar to that in the intervention condition, except that no vibration massage was performed during that time. The instructions for the control condition were provided by the same single physical therapist who performed the vibration massage.

236512 Figure 5. Handheld vibration massage.

The vibration massage was performed in a relaxed prone position (shoulder joint in 90° abduction with neutral internal and external rotation).

Test–retest reliability of measurements

The test–retest reliability values of VIR-ROM, AIR-ROM, MVC-ISO, and MVC-CON were determined by the coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on the interconnection PRE measurement data of all participants. The CVs were 4.9% ± 3.8%, 3.2% ± 2.8%, 4.1% ± 3.5%, and 6.5% ± 4.4%, whereas the ICCs (1, 1) of the measurements were 0.97, 0.99, 0.93, and 0.82, respectively. Based on the reliability coefficient, the standard error of the measurement (SEM) (Eq. 1) and the 95% confidence interval of the minimum detectable change (MDC), MDC95 (Eq. 2), were calculated.

(1)SEM=SD1−ICC

(2)MDC95=1.96SEM2

VIR-ROM had an SEM of 1.2% and MDC95 of 3.2%. AIR-ROM had an SEM of 2.6° and MDC95 of 7.1°.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to confirm the normality of all variables. To analyze interactions and main effects, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA [condition (vibration vs. control) vs. time (PRE vs. POST)] were performed on all variables. After confirming the interaction or main effect, a paired t-test (Bonferroni-corrected) was performed to compare the changes in PRE and POST values in both conditions, PRE and POST values between conditions, and POST and POST values between conditions. The effect size [partialη2 (ηp2), Cohen’s d] was calculated as the difference in means divided by the pooled standard deviation (SD), with effect sizes of 0.00–0.19, 0.20–0.49, 0.50–0.79, and ≥0.80 being considered trivial, small, moderate, and large, respectively.23 A p value of <0.05 indicated statistically significant differences. Descriptive data were reported as mean ± SD.

RESULTS

The results are presented in Table 1. Shapiro–Wilk test confirmed normality of all variables. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed a significant interaction [F = 17.6, p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.556] and time (F = 42.9, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.754) effect for VIR-ROM; however, no between-condition effect (F = 2.64, p = 0.127, ηp2 = 0.159) was observed. The posthoc test showed a significant change in VIR-ROM (−4.1%, p < 0.001, d = 0.445) in the vibration condition but not in the control condition (−1.7%, p = 0.052, d = 0.169). Preintervention comparison of the two conditions showed no significant difference (p = 1.000), whereas postintervention comparison showed significantly greater ROM in the vibration condition than in the control condition (p = 0.036, d = 0.273).

236513 Table 1. Changes in internal rotation ROM and external rotation muscle strength before (PRE) and immediately after the intervention (POST).

		Vibration		Control		Interaction effect	
		PRE	POST	Δ		PRE	POST	Δ		p-value	ηp2	
VIR-ROM (%)		22.3 ± 9.4	18.2 ± 9.1*†	− 4.1		22.4 ± 9.8	20.7 ± 9.2	− 1.7		0.001	0.556	
AIR-ROM (° )		52.5 ± 14.8	63.9 ± 18.0*†	+ 11.4		53.7 ± 12.8	56.5 ± 11.8	+ 2.8		0.002	0.523	
MVC-ISO (Nm)		91.7 ± 16.5	89.3 ± 15.3	− 2.4		91.4 ± 16.6	89.0 ± 18.0	− 2.4		0.951	< 0.001	
MVC-CON (Nm)		70.7 ± 12.5	70.0 ± 10.8	− 0.7		73.1 ± 16.5	71.5 ± 15.8	− 1.6		0.755	0.007	
Data are presented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, significant difference between PRE and POST. †p < 0.05, significantly different between Vibration POST and Control POST. Δ, Changes in PRE and POST. range of motion; ROM, internal rotation by the vertebral level reached by the extended thumb; VIR, internal rotation of the shoulder joint in 90° abduction position; AIR, maximal voluntary contraction; MVC, isometric; ISO, concentric; CON	

AIR-ROM ANOVA revealed significant interaction (F = 15.3, p = 0.002, ηp2 = 0.523) and time (F = 48.9, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.777) effects; however, a between-condition effect (F = 2.68, p = 0.124, ηp2 = 0.161) was not observed. The posthoc test showed a significant change in AIR-ROM (+11.4°, p < 0.001, d = 0.694) in the vibration condition but not in the control condition (+2.8°, p = 0.096, d = 0.232). Preintervention comparison of the two conditions showed no significant difference (p = 1.000), whereas postintervention comparison showed significantly greater ROM in the vibration condition than in the control condition (p = 0.048, d = 0.483).

MVC-ISO ANOVA showed no significant interaction (F = 0.004, p = 0.951, ηp2 < 0.001), time (F = 2.79, p = 0.117, ηp2 = 0.166), or between-condition (F = 0.019, p = 0.892, ηp2 = 0.001) effects. MVC-CON ANOVA showed no significant interaction (F = 0.101, p = 0.755, ηp2 = 0.007), time (F = 1.061, p = 0.321, ηp2 = 0.07), or between-condition (F = 0.651, p = 0.433, ηp2 = 0.044) effects.

DISCUSSION

The current study examined the effects of a handheld vibration massage to the posterior shoulder soft tissues on IR-ROM and ER MVC torque. Notably, the results indicate that a handheld vibration massage increased the IR-ROM without negatively effecting the MVC torque. The current study demonstrates of the usefulness of a handheld vibration massage device as an intervention for shoulder joint stiffness and extends previous research focused on whole-body vibration stimulation and lower extremity muscles.

Conventional mechanisms proposed to explain the increase in ROM after massage include biomechanical (decreased muscle contraction), physiological (increased blood flow), neurological (decreased pain perception), and psychophysiological (increased relaxation) changes.24 Vibration massage also creates pressure and friction in the treated skin, fascia, and muscles, which may affect tissue viscosity and decrease resistance to joint motion. Moreover, studies have shown that vibration therapy had an effect on decreasing pain perception.25,26 Despite the unknown details regarding the mechanism underlying increased ROM, ROM changes after a handheld vibration massage may be associated with decreased muscle stiffness and pain perception changes.

Cross-body stretching and sleeper stretching are common interventional strategies that have been shown to improve IR-ROM by 3.1°–11.0° immediately after the intervention.27,28 Furthermore, one report showed that combining soft tissue mobilization and stretching promoted a 12.1° improvement of IR-ROM after the intervention.29 The current study demonstrated that a 5 minute application of a vibration massage to the soft tissues of the posterior shoulder promoted an ROM expansion of 4.1% in VIR-ROM and 11.4° in AIR-ROM, with the changes in both variables exceeding the MDC95 range. These results demonstrate improvements comparable to those reported in previous studies, further indicating the potential for expanding interventions targeting the soft tissues of the posterior shoulder. Vibration interventions for shoulder joint ROM have been reported to be as effective in improving ROM as stretching and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.30 However, these reports differ from the present study in that they applied vibration to the shoulder joint from a vibration table via the hand or forearm, (i.e., indirectly to the shoulder joint). In the present study, vibration massage was applied directly to the posterior shoulder soft tissues, after which ROM increase was confirmed. Based on these findings, vibration has the potential to increase ROM through both direct and indirect stimulation methods to the intervention site.

The present study found no MVC changes after the handheld vibration massage, which supports the results of a previous study using a similar device on the calf.16 However, the mechanical vibration theory states that handheld vibration massage can induce tonic vibration reflex contraction of the muscle.15 This mechanism is stimulated by a sequence of rapid muscle stretches that occur during vibration, triggering muscle spindles, which subsequently induce involuntary muscle force production.15 However, no significant changes in muscle strength were found after the vibration intervention. Although this study provided the intervention at a frequency of 58 Hz, amplitude of 5 mm, and stimulation duration of 5 minutes, changes in these parameters may have influenced the effects on muscle strength.14 Therefore, future studies are needed to investigate the effects of various vibration parameters on muscle strength.

Previous authors have shown that the throwing side of overhead athletes presents with reduced IR-ROM compared to their non-throwing side and that of normal individuals.31 Furthermore, restrictions in shoulder joint ROM and reduced ER strength have been identified as risk factors for overhead athletes,32 and PST has been shown to influence kinematic changes in the glenohumeral joint.5,33,34 Thus, massage and static stretching are commonly employed to address ROM and stiffness. However, self-massage may be difficult in certain areas, such as the shoulders, hindering ongoing and preventive interventions. Moreover, although static stretching has been commonly implemented to improve ROM and muscle stiffness, the decrease in muscle strength for a certain duration during warm-up has remained a primary concern.10,11 The infraspinatus and teres minor muscles (the target soft tissues of the posterior shoulder) exhibit high muscle activity reaching 74% and 71% of the maximum voluntary muscle contraction during the cocking phase of the overhead throwing motion, respectively, when pain and injury are likely to occur in the throwing motion.35 Therefore, the soft tissues of the posterior shoulder should be the focus of injury prevention given that they are required for both flexibility and stability. Considering these factors, improving flexibility without causing muscle weakness is imperative during warm-up. The results of the current study indicate that a handheld vibration massage is effective in improving ROM without negatively affecting muscle strength. In other words, it can be used for warming up.

The handheld device is easy to carry, can be used in any setting, including sports stadiums and homes, and is easily used in sports and rehabilitation settings. In the current study, the intervention was conducted by only one examiner to achieve reproducibility of the intervention. In practice, however, the described intervention is intended for individuals to employ for self-care. In essence, self-management is important and should be further investigated using self-administration of a vibrational device.

The current study has several limitations worth noting. First, the study population included only healthy men. As such, further investigations are required on athletes, those who perform overhead activity, or those with PST and GIRD, who may demonstrate different results. In the current study, vibration massage was applied to the entire infraspinatus fossa. Therefore, the possibility that the applied vibration may have affected not only the infraspinatus muscle but also the posterior articular capsule via the teres minor and scapula cannot be overlooked. Regarding stimulation pressure, moderate pressure (NRS 5) was used as the standard and this standardization relied on the subjective reports of the participants. Therefore, slight differences in the sensation of pressure reported between participants could have been present. Finally, this study only examined the acute effects of vibration massage on ROM and muscle strength. Previous studies on interventions aiming to improve flexibility, such as stretching and massage, have examined duration of improvement, long-term intervention effects, pain relief, and muscle stiffness. These effects of handheld vibration massage remain unclear and require further investigations.

CONCLUSIONS

A single five minute session with a handheld vibration massage device applied to the soft tissues of the posterior shoulder increased IR ROM without negatively affecting muscle strength. The results presented herein indicate that a handheld vibration massage can be used for warming up.
==== Refs
Reliability and validity of a new method of measuring posterior shoulder tightness J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Tyler T.F. Roy T. Nicholas S.J. Gleim G.W. 1999
29 5 262 74 10.2519/jospt.1999.29.5.262 10342563
The presence and influence of posterior capsule tightness on different shoulder problems J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil Duzgun I. Turgut E. Çinar-Medeni Ö.. 2017
30 2 187 93 10.3233/BMR-160731 27392845
Posterior shoulder capsules are thicker and stiffer in the throwing shoulders of healthy college baseball players: a quantitative assessment using shear-wave ultrasound elastography Am J Sports Med Takenaga T. Sugimoto K. Goto H.. 2015
43 12 2935 42 10.1177/0363546515608476 26473012
Path of glenohumeral articulation throughout the rotational range of motion in a thrower's shoulder model Am J Sports Med Huffman G. R. Tibone J. E. McGarry M. H. et al 2006
34 10 1662 9 10.1177/0363546506287740 16685095
Effect of shoulder tightness on glenohumeral translation, scapular kinematics, and scapulohumeral rhythm in subjects with stiff shoulders J Orthop Res Lin J. J. Lim H. K. Yang J. L. 2006
24 5 1044 51 10.1002/jor.20126 16602114
Effects of posterior capsule tightness on subacromial contact behavior during shoulder motions J Shoulder Elbow Surg Muraki T. Yamamoto N. Zhao K.D. 2012
21 9 1160 7 10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.042 22079765
Posterior shoulder tightness can be a risk factor of scapular malposition: a cadaveric biomechanical study J Shoulder Elbow Surg Mihata T. McGarry M. H. Akeda M.. 2020
29 1 175 84 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.040 31420224
Glenohumeral internal rotation deficits in professional pitchers enrolled in an internal rotation stretching program Am J Sports Med Lintner D. Mayol M. Uzodinma O. Jones R. Labossiere D. 2007
35 4 617 21 10.1177/0363546506296736 17293473
Effectiveness of soft tissue massage and exercise for the treatment of non-specific shoulder pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis Br J Sports Med van den Dolder P. A. Ferreira P. H. Refshauge K. M. 2014
48 16 1216 26 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090553 22844035
Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Behm D.G. Blazevich A.J. Kay A.D. McHugh M. 2016
41 1 1 11 26642915
Effect of acute static stretch on maximal muscle performance: a systematic review Med Sci Sports Exerc Kay A. D. Blazevich A. J. 2012
44 1 154 64 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318225cb27 21659901
A comparison of the effects of foam rolling and stretching on physical performance. a systematic review and meta-analysis Front Physiol Konrad A. Tilp M. Nakamura M. 2021
12 720531 10.3389/fphys.2021.720531 34658909
Effect of vibration foam rolling on the range of motion in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Exerc Rehabil Park S. J. Lee S. I. Jeong H. J. Kim B. G. 2021
17 4 226 33 10.12965/jer.2142322.161 34527633
Effect of localised vibration on muscle strength in healthy adults: a systematic review Physiotherapy Alghadir A. H. Anwer S. Zafar H. Iqbal Z. A. 2018
104 1 18 24 10.1016/j.physio.2017.06.006 28947078
Effects of local vibration therapy on various performance parameters: a narrative literature review J Can Chiropr Assoc Germann D. El Bouse A. Shnier J. Abdelkader N. Kazemi M. 2018
62 3 170 81 30662072
The acute effects of a percussive massage treatment with a hypervolt device on plantar flexor muscles' range of motion and performance J Sports Sci Med Konrad A. Glashüttner C. Reiner M. M. Bernsteiner D. Tilp M. 2020
19 4 690 4 33239942
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the measurement of shoulder internal rotation by vertebral level J Shoulder Elbow Surg Edwards T. B. Bostick R. D. Greene C. C. Baratta R. V. Drez D. 2002
11 1 40 2 10.1067/mse.2002.119853 11845147
How reliably do rheumatologists measure shoulder movement? Ann Rheum Dis Hoving J. L. Buchbinder R. Green S.. 2002
61 7 612 6 10.1136/ard.61.7.612 12079902
Normalized hand-behind-back for the measurement of shoulder internal rotation JSES Int Mitsukane M. Suzuki K. Tabe R. Hasumi F. Fukushima D. 2022
6 2 287 91 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.001 35252928
The effect of arm position on stretching of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and posterior portion of deltoid muscles: a cadaveric study Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Muraki T. Aoki M. Uchiyama E. Murakami G. Miyamoto S. 2006
21 5 474 480 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.014 16481080
Glenohumeral internal rotation measurements differ depending on stabilization techniques Sports Health Wilk K. E. Reinold M. M. Macrina L. C.. 2009
1 2 131 6 10.1177/1941738108331201 23015864
Effects of different magnitudes of whole-body vibration on arm muscular performance J Strength Cond Res Marín P. J. Herrero A. J. Sáinz N. Rhea M. R. García-López D. 2010
24 9 2506 11 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e38188 20802289
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Cohen J. Routledge 1988
9780805802832
The mechanisms of massage and effects on performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention Sports Med Weerapong P. Hume P. A. Kolt G. S. 2005
35 3 235 56 10.2165/00007256-200535030-00004 15730338
Comparison of a vibration roller and a nonvibration roller intervention on knee range of motion and pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial J Sport Rehabil Cheatham S.W. Stull K.R. Kolber M.J. 2019
28 1 39 45 10.1123/jsr.2017-0164 28787233
Vibration therapy in management of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) J Clin Diagn Res Veqar Z. Imtiyaz S. 2014
8 6 Le01 4 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7323.4434 25121012
The acute effects of sleeper stretches on shoulder range of motion J Athl Train Laudner K. G. Sipes R. C. Wilson J. T. 2008
43 4 359 63 10.4085/1062-6050-43.4.359 18668168
Effect of scapular stabilization during horizontal adduction stretching on passive internal rotation and posterior shoulder tightness in young women volleyball athletes: a randomized controlled trial Arch Phys Med Rehabil Salamh P. A. Kolber M. J. Hanney W. J. 2015
96 2 349 56 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.038 25450120
Effectiveness of manual therapy and stretching for baseball players with shoulder range of motion deficits Sports Health Bailey L.B. Thigpen C.A. Hawkins R.J. Beattie P.F. Shanley E. 2017
9 3 230 7 10.1177/1941738117702835 28402756
The acute effects of hold-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation with vibration therapy on glenohumeral internal-rotation deficit J Sport Rehabil Tucker W. S. Slone S. W. 2016
25 3 248 54 10.1123/jsr.2014-0329 26457571
Changes in passive range of motion and development of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) in the professional pitching shoulder between spring training in two consecutive years J Shoulder Elbow Surg Shanley E. Thigpen C. A. Clark J. C. 2012
21 11 1605 12 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.035 22835630
Risk factors of overuse shoulder injuries in overhead athletes: a systematic review Sports Health Tooth C. Gofflot A. Schwartz C. 2020
12 5 478 87 10.1177/1941738120931764 32758080
Posterior capsular plication constrains the glenohumeral joint by drawing the humeral head closer to the glenoid and resisting abduction Orthop J Sports Med DeAngelis J. P. Hertz B. Wexler M. T. 2015
3 8 2325967115599347 10.1177/2325967115599347 26535390
Posterior shoulder tightness and subacromial impingement characteristics in baseball pitchers: a blinded, matched control study Int J Sports Phys Ther Laudner K. Wong R. Latal J. Meister K. 2020
15 2 188 95 10.26603/ijspt20200188 32269851
Shoulder muscle recruitment patterns and related biomechanics during upper extremity sports Sports Med Escamilla R. F. Andrews J. R. 2009
39 7 569 90 10.2165/00007256-200939070-00004 19530752
