
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

36518841
55757
10.26603/001c.55757
Original Research
Application of Shear-Wave Elastography in the Evaluation of Hamstring Stiffness in Young Basketball Athletes
Cummings Paige 1 2
Schilaty Nathan D. 1 3 4
Nagai Takashi 5
Rigamonti Luca 6
Ueno Ryo 8
Bates Nathaniel A. 1 7
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery Mayo Clinic https://ror.org/03zzw1w08
2 Alix School of Medicine Mayo Clinic https://ror.org/03zzw1w08
3 Department of Neurosurgery & Brain Repair University of South Florida https://ror.org/032db5x82
4 Center for Neuromusculoskeletal Research University of South Florida https://ror.org/032db5x82
5 United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
6 School of Medicine and Surgery University of Milano-Bicocca https://ror.org/01ynf4891
7 Department of Orthopaedics The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center https://ror.org/00c01js51
8 Department of Sport Science University of Innsbruck
Corresponding Author: Nathaniel Bates 410 W 10th Ave Columbus, OH 43210 nate.bates@osumc.edu
1 12 2022
2022
17 7 12361248
5 11 2021
9 8 2022
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Previous literature has postulated a relationship between greater hamstring stiffness and a higher risk of sustaining injury. Shear wave elastography (SWE) presents a relatively new means for non-invasive evaluation of soft tissue elasticity pre- and post- injury or intervention.

Purpose

1. To establish baseline hamstring stiffness measures for young competitive athletes and (2) determine effect of targeted neuromuscular training (TNMT) on shear wave stiffness of the hamstring.

Study Design

Un-blinded, prospective, non-randomized, cohort study.

Methods

Six-hundred forty-two lower extremities from 321 high school and collegiate basketball athletes (177 F: 139 M) were examined for hamstring stiffness prior to the start of their competitive basketball season. Teams were cluster assigned to either the control or intervention (TNMT) group. Subjects in the control group underwent regular season activities as directed, with no influence from the research team. For the TNMT group, the research team introduced a hamstring targeted dynamic warm-up program as an intervention focused on activating the hamstring musculature.

Results

Collegiate status was significant to hamstring stiffness for both sexes (p ≤ 0.02), but hamstring stiffness did not correlate to age or sex (r2 ≤ 0.08). Intervention was a significant factor to hamstring stiffness when the hip was positioned in extension (p ≤ 0.01), but not in deeper flexion (p = 0.12). This effect was sex-specific as TNMT influenced hamstring stiffness in females (p = 0.03), but not in males (p ≥ 0.13). Control athletes suffered three HAM injuries; TNMT athletes suffered 0 hamstring injuries.

Conclusion

Higher SWE measurements correlated with increased risk of injury, male sex, and collegiate athletics. TNMT intervention can lessen muscle stiffness which may reduce relate to injury incidence. Intervention effectiveness may be sex specific.

Level of Evidence

II

hamstring stiffness
shear wave elastography
targeted neuromuscular training
hamstring quadriceps ratio
ultrasonography
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Hamstring strain injuries are among the most prevalent injuries sustained by basketball athletes.1 Previous epidemiological studies show the most common type of injury sustained by professional basketball athletes is a strain, with the hamstring muscle group being the most frequently strained muscle.1 An evaluation of injuries of the National Basketball Association showed strains comprised up to 57% of reported injuries.1 Of these strain injuries, 23% related to the hamstring muscle group. Universally, hamstring injuries are one of the most prevalent non-contact injuries in sports with approximately 96% of hamstring injuries occurring in non-contact situations.2,3 Although hamstring injuries are common, they can result in a substantial loss of playing time and an increased re-injury rate.2 The average number of days missed for basketball players who sustained a strain was 7.4 days, with nearly one-third of hamstring strains recurring within the first year of returning to play1,4 High rates of re-injury (12-14% within two years)5–7 cause more concern for athletes as re-injuries present with worsening severity and more lost play time upon re-injury.2 Previous authors have shown a near doubling of play time lost after hamstring re-injury.8

Many variables may play a role in an athlete’s susceptibility to initial hamstring injury and re-injury. Previous literature has postulated a relationship between greater hamstring stiffness and a higher risk of sustaining a hamstring injury.9 More recent literature has established a connection between increased hamstring stiffness and injury with male sex and past hamstring strain history.10,11 Male athletes routinely exhibit greater hamstring stiffness overall when compared to their female counterparts.10 Hamstring stiffness measurements (kPa) in male athletes are nearly double that of females on both the athlete’s dominant and non-dominant leg.10 Increased hamstring stiffness is a risk factor in male athletes as it associates with higher hamstring injury rates and a greater proportion of recurrent hamstring injuries.7 Compared to female athletes, male athletes participating in intercollegiate soccer are 64% more likely to sustain a hamstring injury and are nearly twice as susceptible to hamstring re-injury.4,12 In addition, initial hamstring injury can alter the length-tension relationship of the hamstring muscle group, which increases hamstring stiffness.9 On average, athletes with hamstring injury exhibit 11% higher hamstring stiffness than uninjured counterparts. This mechanical change places greater tension on the hamstring muscle group and may increase the re-injury rate after initial hamstring injury.9 Additionally, hamstring muscles in a lengthened state exhibit reduced strength and returning to sport without engaging eccentric strengthening in a lengthened muscle state predisposes secondary injury.13 In correlation with this increased stiffness, athletes with previous hamstring injury are also two to three times more likely to encounter a future hamstring strain than non-injured counterparts.8,14 However, increased hamstring stiffness is not universally observed after injury.15 Apart from associating with injury, muscle stiffness is also modifiable as dynamic stretching, which is known to decrease soft tissue injuries, has also been shown to decrease hamstring stiffness.16

Despite this data, findings that correlate injury prevention with hamstring stiffness based on sex are not unilateral. Female college basketball athletes suffer hamstring strains at higher rate than their male counterparts7 and, as noted, demonstrate decreased hamstring stiffness compared to their male counterparts. Decreases in passive stiffness are unfavorably associated with peak knee flexion torque generation,17 and knee flexion torque is subsequently associated with injury prevention.17 Indeed, greater hamstring stiffness has been associated with reduced knee ligament loading and reduced ligament injury risk18,19 Further, patients experiencing back pain exhibit reduced hamstring stiffness compared to matched controls.20 Accordingly, insufficient muscle stiffness can affect the stability of the surrounding joints. Thus, there is meritorious data to support injury prevention through both increased and decreased hamstring stiffness, but excessive hamstring stiffness is directly related to increased risk of injury to the muscle itself.

In addition to sex differences and hamstring injury history, increasing age and competition level correlate with increased hamstring injury incidence.9 Previous authors have found that in both football and soccer, surpassing 23 years of age was associated with a higher risk of hamstring injury in athletes compared to their younger counterparts.3,21 An estimated 1.78 increase in risk of hamstring injury is associated with every year increase in age after an athlete turns 23.22 The variation in hamstring injury rate by age is associated with an overall decrease in hamstring strength as individuals age resulting in a muscle imbalance between the quadriceps and hamstring muscle groups, ultimately leading to an increased risk of hamstring injury.6,23 Recently Alfuraih et al. showed decreasing hamstring shear-wave elastography (SWE) stiffness associated with aging in which elderly participants (77-94 years) had on average 16.5% lower hamstring stiffness compared to their young counterparts (20-35 years).24 Changes in SWE stiffness correlate with muscle weakness associated with aging.23,24 The epidemiology of collegiate injuries versus high school injuries shows a more drastic increase in injury rate than those associated with age.25 The rate of overuse injury in college athletes is 3.28 times higher than in high school athletes.25 In both high school and college athletes, muscle strain is the most common injury.25

The mechanisms of hamstring injury are essential starting points for developing injury prevention programs. Preventative biomechanical techniques are an increasingly popular means of decreasing the risk and incidence of musculoskeletal injuries.26 Targeted neuromuscular training (TNMT) is a preventative biomechanical technique that consists of exercises designed to activate deficient muscle groups and encourage muscle co-activation that may be related to injury through movements that mimic those experienced during sport.26,27 Monajati el al. demonstrated that hamstring-based neuromuscular training increases hamstring strength and flexibility over time.28 As a prevention technique, TNMT addresses muscle stiffness and hamstring to quadriceps strength ratio (H:Q) as plausible risk factors for hamstring injury.28 This biomechanical technique accomplishes neuromodulation using motor learning principles to focus on optimal control of 3D body positions and movement symmetry.27 Ultimately, re-establishing connections between nerves and muscles after injury leads to a reduced risk of re-injury.27 Accordingly, extrapolation of TNMT to non-contact hamstring injuries may prove efficacious in decreasing hamstring strain prevalence and severity by altering baseline biomechanics.

Commonly, hamstring injury is evaluated and diagnosed via dynamic ultrasonography. Classic clinical implementation of ultrasonography, relative to musculoskeletal injury, provides high-resolution imaging of fluid collection around an injured muscle or tendon.11 These images are highly accurate in the determination of the location and extent of a hamstring injury. Beyond diagnosis and localization, these images have limited use for risk prevention as they fail to provide feedback on mechanical properties or quality of individual muscle.10 Shear wave elastography (SWE) is a relatively new ultrasound technology that can provide a non-invasive evaluation of soft tissue elasticity.29 Accordingly, interest in musculoskeletal applications for SWE has grown in the past several years.10,11,29 Ultrasound SWE uses variation in wave propagation to create images that provide an objective measure of tissue elasticity with anatomic specificity.29 Past researchers have used SWE to evaluate and provide an initial characterization pathologic conditions and injuries of the musculoskeletal system, including, but not limited to, the hamstring muscle group, neck/back muscles, the Achilles’ tendon, and the anterior cruciate ligament.10,11,24,29,30 SWE can be used to assess hamstring stiffness at the time of injury, pre, and post-injury providing feedback on injury risk associated with increased stiffness and decreased hamstring stiffness post- injury prevention facilitation.27,28 Sex differences in SWE for adolescent basketball athletes have previously been explored,10 but further study into the relationship between hamstring stiffness and injury rate is necessary to determine whether hamstring stiffness is a primary causal factor for increased injury rate by age and competition level. It is known that increased stiffness at the muscle-tendon unit correlates with greater work absorption, muscle force, and power during countermovement jumps.31,32 As muscle stretch is necessary to induce injury and muscle failure occurs at forces greater than maximal isometric contractions,33 it remains that excessive passive muscle stiffness may predispose muscle tissue to injury. Subsequently, viscoelastic muscle stiffness can be reduced through passive and active stretching which increases both the force and energy absorption till failure.33 Additional investigation may also elucidate whether alteration of hamstring stiffness is a primary mechanism for injury prevention techniques such as TNMT. Finally, strong correlation between hamstring stiffness and injury may provide data that suggests that SWE is an optimal tool for determining injury risk and intervention efficacy.

This study’s objectives were to (1) To establish baseline hamstring stiffness measures for young competitive athletes and (2) determine effect of targeted neuromuscular training (TNMT) on shear wave stiffness of the hamstring. Regarding the first objective, it was hypothesized that hamstring stiffness would increase with age in high school basketball and college basketball athletes. Finally, it was hypothesized that TNMT intervention would decrease SWE stiffness in basketball athletes.

METHODS

Population

Six hundred forty-two lower extremities from 321 high school and collegiate basketball athletes (177 F: 139 M; Table 1) were examined for hamstring stiffness across a range of passive hip and knee flexibility prior to the start of their competitive basketball season. Two subjects were excluded from this cohort due to a lack of demographic data. The subject population was a cohort of convenience, recruited from high school and college basketball teams that compete near Rochester, MN, USA. Teams were contacted via a clinical coordinator and offered the opportunity to participate in research with no remuneration. Teams who agreed to participate in the study were cluster assigned to either the Control or intervention (TNMT) group prior to arriving for their first data collection. In this manner, all individuals from the same team were assigned to the same group, intended to reduce potential for data cross-contamination. This design has previously been employed for other training intervention studies.34–36 Group assignments occurred in a predetermined order and were assigned to a team based on when they accrued into the investigation. Subject recruitment spanned a three-year period. The current investigation was unblinded to both investigator and participant. Subjects knew they would either receive a targeted training intervention during regular practice warmups or that they would proceed through their season activities unchanged. Pre-season data collection was completed after the start of team activities, but prior to the first competitive game. Post-season testing was completed after the last competitive game. All activities in this study were approved by the institution’s Institutional Review Board (IRB 17-003905). Informed consent was obtained for all subjects over 18 years old. Informed consent and parent/guardian assent were obtained for all subjects under 18 years old.

120359 Table 1. Demographics by total number of lower extremities assessed

	Control	Targeted Neuromuscular Training	
N	450	192	
Female	270	92	
Male	180	100	
Average Age	16.18	15.5	
Collegiate Lower Extremities	60	0	
HS Lower Extremities	390	192	
*N = total number of lower extremities

Procedure

For the control group, no intervention was enacted. These subjects underwent regular season activities as directed by their teams and coaches, with no influence from the research team. For the TNMT group, the research team introduced a hamstring targeted dynamic warm-up program as an intervention focused on activating the hamstring musculature. This intervention was substituted in place of each team’s regular warm-up activities for 15 minutes twice weekly. Intervention dynamic warm-ups were initiated at the start of the season immediately following the preseason evaluation session and continued until the team was eliminated from playoff contention. As multiple teams were training at the same time, warm-up sessions were overseen either by the lead athletic trainer on the research team (TN) or by additional athletic training staff assigned to the participating schools. These additional staff received instruction from the lead athletic trainer prior to enacting the interventional dynamic warm-up protocol. For the TNMT group, the intervention period lasted approximately 10 weeks in duration for each team. Selection of dynamic warm-up activities were orchestrated by the lead athletic trainer and the program was designed to incorporate elements known to positively affect the hamstring musculature.37–40 Specifically, the dynamic warm-up was designed around the incorporation of elements of stretching, skipping/hopping, lunging, jumping/landing, concentric/eccentric hamstring loading, balance, and dynamic range of motion at the core, hip, and knee (APPENDIX 1). Static stretching remains controversial relative to its efficacy for injury prevention; however, multiple studies have indicated that static stretching aides in the reduction of hamstring injuries.41–45 Warm-up drills are known to improve neuromuscular control during running.40 While the value of flexibility and dynamic range of motion remain controversial to hamstring injury prevention, incorporation of eccentric hamstring loading has shown efficacy due to its’ ability to affect hamstring to quadricep (H:Q) muscle deficits.38,39,41 Lumbopelvic exercises were incorporated as they have demonstrated importance to lower extremity neuromuscular control and injury recovery.39

Data Collection

Ultrasound SWE was used to measure shear wave velocity (kPa) of the biceps femoris muscle at three leg positions (40%, 60%, and 80%) of the maximum passive 90-90 straight-leg raise position for each leg as previously described.10 Briefly, hamstring flexibility was assessed by a clinician who used a passive knee extension test and a digital inclinometer. Neutral position was considered to be ipsilateral hip and knee flexion both positioned at 90°.46 The three leg positions (40%, 60%, and 80%) were subject-specific and calculated from the maximum flexibility observed by the clinician. The greater trochanter and femoral condyle were then marked, and the midpoint was identified by the clinician for repeatable placement of the ultrasound transducer both within and between subjects. While lying supine, an assistant moved and held the athlete’s leg at each position for the clinician to measure the biceps femoris stiffness using ultrasound SWE at each position (GE Logiq E9, 9L-D transducer, GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI). Ultrasound SWE captures the Young’s Modulus of soft tissues in kPa based on displacements of the shear wave beam the propagation across the tissue. The Young’s Modulus equation is as follows:

E=3ρ(αD/tmax)

where ρ is the density of the medium, α is the Gaussian profile of the beam, D is a dimensionless diffraction parameter, and tmax is the rising time.47 Three SWE images were acquired at each position for average values. Prior to lower limb manipulation, each subject was instructed to fully relax their muscles and allow the assistant to fully support the leg. To ensure that passive muscle stiffness was being obtained, random subjects were selected to be monitored by surface electrodes placed on the medial hamstring muscle. These electrodes would provide real-time audio feedback to ensure the subject did not actively engage the hamstring muscles and that the ultrasound SWE measurements were of passive muscle stiffness. Electrode subject selection was randomized based on the availability of the sensors as several subjects could be undergoing evaluation simultaneously. Throughout pilot testing and the first year of randomly selected subjects, electrodes confirmed that the hamstrings musculature was maintained in a passive state. Beyond this, electrode monitoring was determined to be redundant and ceased. Copious ultrasound gel and minimal pressure was applied to the ultrasound transducer probe to minimize tissue compression and artifact error in tissue stiffness induced from externally applied pressure. Muscle stiffness (kPa) was measured using shear wave velocities from the SWE elastogram calculated via custom designed MATLAB software.10 Following completion of preseason testing, 103 athletes (206 lower extremities) returned for post-season evaluations that repeated the identical process. Post-season evaluations were conducted within two weeks following each team’s playoff elimination. Whether or not an athlete returned for post-season testing, the Mayo Clinic athletic training staff embedded at each school tracked participants for occurrence of hamstring strain during the basketball season.

Statistical Analysis

For statistical analysis, data were separated by sex and a one-way ANOVA was used to assess hamstring stiffness differences between ages (14-18 years) with a Tukey’s post-hoc test to assess individual differences within each age year. A Student’s t-test was used to assess differences in hamstring stiffness relative to competitive level (high school vs. collegiate). Pearson correlations were used to assess association between age and stiffness at each orientation. A 2x2 ANOVA of Intervention (TNMT, Control) vs. Time (Pre-, Post-Season) was used to assess for statistical differences among these groups. Individual differences within groups were assessed via Tukey’s post-hoc test. All statistical analyses were performed in JMP Pro (version 14, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Significance was set a priori at α < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 321 total athletes recruited into this investigation, 103 athletes returned for post-season testing. Of these 103 athletes who completed both preseason and post-season evaluations, 22 athletes were assigned to the Control group and 81 athletes were assigned to the TNMT group (Table 1).

Age was a significant factor for hamstring stiffness in females at all three orientations (p ≤ 0.03) and in males at the 60% extended orientation (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant linear correlation between age and hamstring stiffness for either sex at any orientation (r2 ≤ 0.08). In females, hamstring stiffness peaked at ages 15 and 16 for the 80% orientation and age 15 for the 60% and 40% orientations (Table 2). In males, hamstring stiffness decreased by age 17 relative to age 14 and 15 in the 80% and 60% orientations (Table 2). Collegiate status was significant to hamstring stiffness for females at all orientations and for males at the 80% and 60% orientations. In each of these orientations, the collegiate athletes had significantly greater hamstring stiffness than their high school counterparts (Figure 1).

120360 Table 2. Mean (SD) female hamstring stiffness (kPa) by age and limb orientation

	Age (Years)	80% Orientation	60% Orientation	40% Orientation	
Females	14	37.0 (26.3)	43.4 (28.2)	37.0 (20.7)	
15	52.4 (35.7)	58.5 (35.8)	50.0 (28.8)	
16	53.5 (38.8)	52.2 (32.0)	44.2 (26.5)	
17	35.8 (22.9)	44.3 (30.2)	43.2 (26.7)	
18	46.5 (38.3)	45.0 (27.7)	44.3 (28.9)	
Males	14	71.3 (37.3)	73.1 (39.2)	55.3 (33.0)	
15	71.6 (38.4)	80.3 (37.7)	59.5 (32.2)	
16	63.0 (39.5)	60.1 (34.0)	47.1 (27.3)	
17	53.9 (33.1)	52.6 (31.0)	50.8 (29.7)	
18	64.9 (37.6)	69.8 (37.6)	62.4 (31.7)	

120361 Figure 1. Hamstring stiffness as recorded by SWE at orientations of 80% (blue), 60% (red), and 40% (green) of peak passive flexion.

At the 80% and 60% position, collegiate basketball players have significantly increased hamstring stiffness relative to their high school counterparts.

TNMT intervention was a significant factor at the 80% and 60% flexibility orientation (p ≤ 0.01), but not at the 40% orientation (p = 0.12). Time was not a significant factor when sampled across the whole cohort (p ≥ 0.28). However, within the TNMT group, Time was significant for the 80% and 60% orientation (p ≤ 0.05). In all cases where Time was significant, the TNMT group exhibited a decrease in hamstring stiffness from pre-season to post-season testing (Table 3, Figure 2). Despite being measured with the same SWE machine with the same collection settings, pre-season SWE stiffness was higher in the TNMT group than the control group (p < 0.01).

120362 Table 3. SWE stiffness of hamstring (mean ± SD) by Intervention and Time

Flexibility	Targeted Neuromuscular Training	Control	
 	Pre	Post	Flexibility p-value	Time p-value	Pre	Post	Flexibility p-value	Time p-value	
80%	69.4 ± 35.4†	62.0 ± 33.4†*	<0.01	0.05	43.3 ± 31.4	45.5 ± 29.4	0.96	0.79	
60%	67.7 ± 32.4†	60.2 ± 33.4†*	<0.01	0.04	54.3 ± 31.3	53.5 ± 34.4	0.41	0.73	
40%	56.1 ± 29.4	50.8 ± 27.3	---	0.12	48.8 ± 25.7	47.9 ± 25.9	---	0.95	
† = Significant difference (α < 0.05) from 40% flexibility orientation

* = Significant difference (α < 0.05) from pre-season evaluation

120363 Figure 2. Hamstring stiffness at 80% of peak passive flexion (top) and 40% of peak passive flexion (bottom).

TNMT reduced hamstring stiffness at the 80% orientation but exhibited no effect at 40%.

For female athletes, intervention was a significant factor as hamstring stiffness at the 60% flexibility orientation decreased after TNMT (p = 0.04). TNMT intervention with female athletes approached significance at the 80% flexibility orientation (p = 0.07). TNMT intervention in male athletes did not show a significant change in hamstring stiffness at any orientation (p ≥ 0.13; Table 4).

120365 Table 4. SWE stiffness of hamstring (mean ± SD) Pre- and Post-Season for the TNMT Group separated by Sex

Position	Males	Females	
	Pre	Post	p-value	Pre	Post	p-value	
80%	70.8 ± 35.2	66.5 ± 32.5	0.60	57.6 ± 36.0	51.5 ± 32.3	0.07	
60%	66.7 ± 32.3	63.8 ± 34.5	0.55	63.2 ± 32.8	54.4 ± 32.5*	0.04	
40%	54.5 ± 30.2	48.2 ± 24.8	0.13	54.6 ± 27.6	52.0 ± 28.7	0.58	
* = Significant difference (α < 0.05) from pre-season evaluation

Across the whole population cohort, the embedded Mayo Clinic athletic training staff were able to track hamstring injury status on 286 athletes (89%). Due to COVID interruption, injury tracking on all collegiate athletes was lost to follow-up. Of the injury-tracked cohort, 193 athletes assigned to the Control group suffered three hamstring injuries, while 93 athletes assigned to the TNMT group suffered zero hamstring injuries. All three injured athletes were female (age = 16.7 ± 1.5 years; height = 173.0 ± 2.2 cm; mass = 79.4 ± 13.3 kg). The mean pre-season SWE hamstring stiffness among the three injured athletes was 27.1 ± 15.7 kPa at the 40% flexibility orientation, 26.9 ± 16.1 kPa at the 60% flexibility orientation, and 18.8 ± 5.1 kPa at the 80% flexibility orientation.

DISCUSSION

Within the baseline stiffness measures, there were significant sex differences in hamstring stiffness.10 Males showed significantly greater hamstring stiffness than females for all three flexibility orientations across all ages, 14-18. Neither males nor females showed linear correlation between age and hamstring stiffness. This data rejects the hypothesis that hamstring stiffness would increase with age in high school basketball athletes. Based on this data, hamstring stiffness does not appear to be directly associated with maturational or athletic development.

Researchers have determined that SWE muscle stiffness decreases with ageing from 20 to 94 years along with changes in muscle composition and dysfunction in extracellular fibers24,48; however, hamstring stiffness in adolescent athletes has not previously been disseminated. While neuromuscular efficiency muscle size and contractile force has been shown to increase as adolescents age, data regarding changes in elastic properties remains scarce.49–51 Past findings measuring musculotendinous stiffness, joint stiffness, and series elastic component (SEC) stiffness show differences in development and changes to muscle stiffness between the lower and upper extremities in adolescence.49,52,53 Previous data showed knee extensor stiffness decreasing as children age and identical measures for elbow flexor stiffness between children and adults.49,52,53 Similar studies have yet to be conducted using SWE stiffness as the primary measure of muscle stiffness in adolescence during development. The lack of association between hamstring stiffness and age during adolescence likely indicates a limited influence of pubertal status on muscle stiffness; however, pubertal status was not assessed in the present investigation and further validation is warranted.49,54 Likewise, strength was not directly assessed in this study, so it was not possible to determine if SWE stiffness was directly correlated with athlete strength.

Unlike age, level of competition was a significant indicator for increased hamstring stiffness in both sexes. The present data supports the hypothesis that collegiate athletes would have greater hamstring stiffness than high school athletes. In conjunction with increased hamstring stiffness, musculoskeletal injury incidence and sport-specific performance attributes also associate with higher levels of competition.25,55 Accordingly, muscle stiffness may be relevant to both injury prevention and sports performance as data from the current study demonstrated that hamstring stiffness is modifiable in female athletes through a minimal regimen of TNMT. Despite these fiindings, further investigation is warranted to determine whether muscle stiffness has a causal influence on injury prevention within sports as musculoskeletal injuries increase dramatically between high school and collegiate levels.27,55

The present data indicates that a TNMT hamstring warm-up program is likely to decrease hamstring stiffness. The results of the study show lower postseason hamstring stiffness compared to the control group. This supports the hypothesis that TNMT intervention would decrease shear wave stiffness in basketball athletes. Throughout this study three hamstring injuries occurred. Each reported injury occurred in a female high school athlete who was not assigned to the TNMT group. Further investigation is necessary to determine whether dynamic warm-ups targeted to specific muscle groups can offer prevention against soft-tissue injuries in females during athletic participation.

Further, regarding the three injured subjects, the SWE hamstring stiffness in this sub-cohort was different than the whole study cohort, as the three injured athletes individual SWE values were below the cohort mean. This fact remained true regardless of what age bracket the injured subjects were compared against. Relative to the position and limb where SWE was measured, the first injured subject was between 0.12-1.09 standard deviations below the cohort mean, the second injured subject was 0.44-1.02 deviations below the mean, and the third injured subject was 1.12-1.40 deviations below the mean. While this granular data demonstrates that injuries only occurred in athletes with hamstring stiffness deficiencies, the current results are unable to conclusively prove that hamstring stiffness is a primary cause of predisposing athletes to injury during a competitive season.

Optimal hamstring stiffness for basketball athletes is likely to lie along a Bell curve where extremes of extremes of high and low stiffness increase injury risk. It is also interesting to note that overall subject population increased hamstring stiffness with increased extension in the passively manipulated straight leg extension (Table 3), but the injured cohort did not exhibit this trend. Additional investigation is necessary to determine whether these functional mechanics have clinical implications. Further study is also warranted due to preseason differences in the Control and TNMT groups. Measurements were recorded with identical methodology between groups, so it remains unknown as to why the control group was initially less stiff than the TNMT group. It is possible that the TNMT group would have been more susceptible to influence due to their higher initial stiffness.

The current intervention program, TNMT, included eccentric resistance exercise such as Nordic hamstring (NH) eccentric strength training which is associated with reduced injury.56–58 However, studies show while NH strength training lowered future hamstring strain injury post-intervention, data showed no significant changes to muscle fascicle length, stiffness, or eccentric hamstring strength occur.56 The results of this study compliment these previous data and demonstrate that mechanical variables outside increased strength or muscle length56–58 may contribute to muscle strain prevention. Thus, further studies are warranted to determine if the decrease in injury rate related to TNMT is directly associated with changes in muscle stiffness or occurs through other biomechanical modifications.9

Data from this study support past literature that indicates TNMT effectively reduces injury rate and muscle stiffness.27,28 Furthermore, the present data demonstrates that the magnitude of response to TNMT varies by sex. Compared to female athletes, hamstring stiffness in males responded less significantly to TNMT at all flexibility orientations. Reduced stiffness response seen in male athletes is exacerbated by a substantially higher risk of hamstring injury and re-injury.4,12 Thus, additional study into the utility of injury prevention programs for male athletes may be warranted. More research is needed to determine the cause for sex differences associated with TNMT effectiveness. Future studies may look at TNMT intervention in male and female college athletes who show higher overall hamstring stiffness than their high school counterparts, to elucidate whether the magnitude of hamstring stiffness plays a role in TNMT effectiveness while isolating sex differences.

As with all investigations, the current study had several limitations. The stiffnesses measured by SWE are orders of magnitude lower than the elastic modulus and yield stress for hamstring tissue.59 Therefore, we are using hamstring stiffness measurements as a surrogate, as opposed to an absolute measure of hamstring tissue properties. The use of surrogate measures instead of yield stress or elastic modulus may distort the significance of TNMT influence and its relative association with risk of hamstring injury.60 Given that multiple schools underwent TNMT training simultaneously, a single universal athletic trainer could not be used for this study. This introduces potential variation in facilitation of TNMT intervention, but improved generalizability. To combat any variations in administration of intervention across trainers, all schools implemented the same program, each school trainer was taught by the same interventionalist, and a written protocol was provided. While the population cohort for this study encompassed athletes between ages 13-22 years, data was captured on an insufficient number of athletes aged 13 (n = 3), 19 (n = 9), 20 (n = 3), 21 (n = 8), and 22 (n = 3) to include them as separate groups within the age-based statistical analysis.

In addition, this investigation experienced limitations in the collection of post-season data that accounts for the large number of athletes unable to be tested at follow-up. Post-season data collection was deterred by two events: 1) teams that were assigned to the control group felt a lack of investment in the investigation and subjects were reluctant to return for post-season testing, 2) government mandated shutdowns due to the COVID pandemic prevented the capture of post-season data in Spring 2020. These unfortunate events contributed to substantial attrition in participants in postseason data collection, limiting the internal validity of the study. Unfortunately, this limitation was unavoidable, but the captured cohort was deemed acceptable for statistical analysis as each group had a minimum of 21 athletes that completed full analysis. This outbreak also impeded the planned implementation of collegiate TNMT groups for the 2020-2021 basketball season, which resulted in zero collegiate TNMT subjects (Table 1). Lastly, the GE Logiq E9 had a ceiling of SWE of 120 kPa. As hamstring elastic modulus exceeds 2500 kPa,59 even in a passively flexed state, many SWE stiffness values for the hamstring stiffness were saturated during imaging, which likely increased variability and standard deviations observed in this study. Future studies should incorporate SWE technology with a larger range of measurement for improved precision. Finally, the clinical significance of SWE stiffness measurements remain undescribed. SWE measurements on muscle tissue are reliable within a session but lack precision and offer substantial variability within a whole population,61 as is herein observed with the standard deviations. Intra-session standard error of the mean for SWE stiffness on lower extremity muscles are between 8-12 kPa,61 which should be considered when accounting for clinical applicability of statistical findings.

CONCLUSION

Higher SWE measurements have been correlated with increased risk of injury and groups at higher risk of hamstring injury (i.e., males and collegiate athletes). As such, potential exists to utilize SWE stiffness as a surrogate for injury risk; however, further study is necessary to substantiate these claims. Age did not factor into hamstring stiffness or injury. The current findings contradicted previous research citing correlation between increased hamstring injury and decreased stiffness with increased age and may be indicative of a separate trend in adolescent cohorts. Data from this study reiterated that TNMT intervention can lessen muscle stiffness and incidence of re-injury. However, the current data uniquely exhibited that females showed greater response to TNMT, and that intervention effectiveness can be sex specific.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Material

Appendix 1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This investigation was funded by and NBA / GE Collaborative Grant, as well as National Institute of Health grants from National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases R01-AR055563 and L30-AR070273 and the National Institute of Children and Human Development K12-HD065987. We also acknowledge the contributions of Rena F. Hale, PhD, to the early stages of data collection for this project.
==== Refs
Epidemiology of hip injuries in the National Basketball Association: A 24-year overview Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Jackson Timothy J. Starkey Chad McElhiney Danielle Domb Benjamin G. 1 8 2013
1 3 2325967113499130 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967113499130 10.1177/2325967113499130 26535239
Injury rate, mechanism, and risk factors of hamstring strain injuries in sports: A review of the literature Journal of Sport and Health Science Liu Hui Garrett William E. Moorman Claude T. Yu Bing 9 2012
1 2 92 101 2095-2546 10.1016/j.jshs.2012.07.003 10.1016/j.jshs.2012.07.003
Epidemiology of muscle injuries in professional football (soccer) The American Journal of Sports Medicine Ekstrand Jan Hägglund Martin Waldén Markus 18 2 2011
39 6 1226 1232 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546510395879 10.1177/0363546510395879
Rehabilitation and return to sport after hamstring strain injury Journal of Sport and Health Science Erickson Lauren N. Sherry Marc A. 9 2017
6 3 262 270 2095-2546 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.04.001 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.04.001 30356646
Reinjury after acute posterior thigh muscle injuries in elite track and field athletes The American Journal of Sports Medicine Malliaropoulos Nikolaos Isinkaye Tomide Tsitas Kostas Maffulli Nicola 2011
39 2 304 310 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546510382857 10.1177/0363546510382857 21051422
Eccentric hamstring strength deficit and poor hamstring-to-quadriceps ratio are risk factors for hamstring strain injury in football: A prospective study of 146 professional players Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Lee Justin W.Y. Mok Kam-Ming Chan Hardaway C.K. Yung Patrick S.H. Chan Kai-Ming 8 2018
21 8 789 793 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.11.017 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.11.017 29233665
Epidemiology of hamstring strains in 25 NCAA sports in the 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 academic years The American Journal of Sports Medicine Dalton Sara L. Kerr Zachary Y. Dompier Thomas P. SAGE Publications 1 9 2015
43 11 2671 2679 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546515599631 10.1177/0363546515599631
Incidence, risk, and prevention of hamstring muscle injuries in professional rugby union The American Journal of Sports Medicine Brooks John H. M. Fuller Colin W. Kemp Simon P. T. Reddin Dave B. SAGE Publications 8 2006
34 8 1297 1306 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546505286022 10.1177/0363546505286022 16493170
A prospective study of the relationship between lower body stiffness and hamstring injury in professional Australian rules footballers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Watsford Mark L. Murphy Aron J. McLachlan Ken A. Bryant Adam L. Cameron Matt L. Crossley Kay M. Makdissi Michael SAGE Publications 1 7 2010
38 10 2058 2064 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546510370197 10.1177/0363546510370197
High school male basketball athletes exhibit greater hamstring muscle stiffness than females as assessed with shear wave elastography Skeletal Radiology McPherson April L. Nagai Takashi Schilaty Nathan D. Hale Rena Hewett Timothy E. Bates Nathaniel A. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 3 3 2020
49 8 1231 1237 0364-2348 10.1007/s00256-020-03397-w 10.1007/s00256-020-03397-w 32123955
Thigh musculature stiffness during active muscle contraction after anterior cruciate ligament injury BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders McPherson April L. Bates Nathaniel A. Haider Clifton R. Nagai Takashi Hewett Timothy E. Schilaty Nathan D. 21 5 2020
21 1 320 1471-2474 10.1186/s12891-020-03342-x 10.1186/s12891-020-03342-x 32438905
Comparison of hamstring strain injury rates between male and female intercollegiate soccer athletes The American Journal of Sports Medicine Cross Kevin M. Gurka Kelly K. Saliba Susan Conaway Mark Hertel Jay SAGE Publications 13 2 2013
41 4 742 748 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546513475342 10.1177/0363546513475342
Rehabilitation after hamstring-strain injury emphasizing eccentric strengthening at long muscle lengths: Results of long-term follow-up Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Tyler Timothy F. Schmitt Brandon M. Nicholas Stephen J. McHugh Malachy P. 2015
26 2 131 140 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.2015-0099 10.1123/jsr.2015-0099
Predicting hamstring strain injury in elite athletes Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Brockett CAMILLA L. Morgan DAVID L. Proske UWE 3 2004
36 3 379 387 0195-9131 10.1249/01.mss.0000117165.75832.05 10.1249/01.mss.0000117165.75832.05 15076778
Hamstring strains in professional rugby players result in increased fascial stiffness without muscle quality changes as assessed using shear wave elastography Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Kawai Tomonori Takahashi Masayasu Takamoto Kouichi Bito Itsumu 7 2021
27 34 41 1360-8592 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.03.009 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.03.009 34391255
Acute effects of different dynamic exercises on hamstring strain risk factors PLoS ONE Chen Che Hsiu Xin Ye Lee Kuang Wu Lin Ming Ju Lin Jiu Jenq 1 2 2018
13 2 e0191801 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0191801 10.1371/journal.pone.0191801 29390001
Effect of change in passive stiffness following low-intensity eccentric hamstring exercise on peak torque angle Journal of Physical Therapy Science Nishida Satoru Tomoto Tsubasa Kunugi Shun Miyakawa Shumpei Society of Physical Therapy Science 2018
30 12 1434 1439 0915-5287 10.1589/jpts.30.1434 10.1589/jpts.30.1434 30568330
Geometric and architectural contributions to hamstring musculotendinous stiffness Clinical Biomechanics Blackburn J. Troy Pamukoff Derek N. 1 2014
29 1 105 110 0268-0033 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.10.011 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.10.011
Hamstrings stiffness and landing biomechanics linked to anterior cruciate ligament loading Journal of Athletic Training Blackburn J. Troy Norcross Marc F. Cannon Lindsey N. Zinder Steven M. 14 6 2013
48 6 764 772 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-1050-48.4.1 10.4085/1062-1050-48.4.1
Mechanical behaviour of hamstring muscles in low-back pain patients and control subjects Clinical Biomechanics Tafazzoli F Lamontagne M 1 1996
11 1 16 24 0268-0033 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00038-0 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00038-0
The Football Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football--analysis of hamstring injuries British Journal of Sports Medicine Woods C Hawkins R D Maltby S Hulse M Thomas A Hodson A 1 2 2004
38 1 36 41 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.2002.002352 10.1136/bjsm.2002.002352 14751943
Factors associated with increased propensity for hamstring injury in English Premier League soccer players Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Henderson Gary Barnes Christopher A. Portas Matthew D. 7 2010
13 4 397 402 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.08.003 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.08.003 19800844
Hamstring muscle strain injury caused by isokinetic testing Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine Orchard John Steet Elizabeth Walker Craig Ibrahim Ameer Rigney Luke Houang Michael 10 2001
11 4 274 276 1050-642X 10.1097/00042752-200110000-00011 10.1097/00042752-200110000-00011
The effect of ageing on shear wave elastography muscle stiffness in adults Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Alfuraih Abdulrahman M. Tan Ai Lyn O’Connor Philip Emery Paul Wakefield Richard J. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 14 2 2019
31 12 1755 1763 1720-8319 10.1007/s40520-019-01139-0 10.1007/s40520-019-01139-0 30762201
Epidemiology of overuse injuries incollegiate and high school athletics in the United States The American Journal of Sports Medicine Roos Karen G. Marshall Stephen W. Kerr Zachary Y. Golightly Yvonne M. Kucera Kristen L. Myers Joseph B. Rosamond Wayne D. Comstock R. Dawn 30 4 2015
43 7 1790 1797 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546515580790 10.1177/0363546515580790 25930673
Preventive Biomechanics: A paradigm shift with a translational approach to injury prevention The American Journal of Sports Medicine Hewett Timothy E. Bates Nathaniel A. SAGE Publications 15 2 2017
45 11 2654 2664 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546516686080 10.1177/0363546516686080 28199800
Neuromuscular training to target deficits associated with second anterior cruciate ligament injury Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Di Stasi Stephanie Myer Gregory D. Hewett Timothy E. 11 2013
43 11 777 792, a1 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2013.4693 10.2519/jospt.2013.4693 24175599
The effectiveness of injury prevention programs to modify risk factors for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament and hamstring injuries in uninjured team sports athletes: A systematic review PLoS One Monajati Alireza Larumbe-Zabala Eneko Goss-Sampson Mark Naclerio Fernando 12 5 2016
11 5 e0155272 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0155272 10.1371/journal.pone.0155272 27171282
Shear-wave elastography: Basic Physics and musculoskeletal applications Radiographics Taljanovic Mihra S. Gimber Lana H. Becker Giles W. Latt L. Daniel Klauser Andrea S. Melville David M. Gao Liang Witte Russell S. 5 2017
37 3 855 870 0271-5333 10.1148/rg.2017160116 10.1148/rg.2017160116 28493799
Sex differences in ultrasound-based muscle size and mechanical properties of the cervical-flexor and -extensor muscles Journal of Athletic Training Nagai Takashi Schilaty Nathan D. Krause David A. Crowley Eric M. Hewett Timothy E. 1 3 2020
55 3 282 288 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-482-18 10.4085/1062-6050-482-18 31967864
Nonisometric behavior of fascicles during isometric contractions of a human muscle Journal of Applied Physiology Ito Masamitsu Kawakami Yasuo Ichinose Yoshiho Fukashiro Senshi Fukunaga Tetsuo 1 10 1998
85 4 1230 1235 8750-7587 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.4.1230 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.4.1230
Acute effects of static and ballistic stretching on muscle-tendon unit stiffness, work absorbtion, strength, power, and vertical jump performance Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Gesel Francis J. Morenz Emily K. Cleary Christopher J. LaRoche Dain P. 16 11 2020
36 8 2147 2155 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003894 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003894
Muscle strain injuries: clinical basic aspects Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Garrett William E., Jr. 8 1990
22 4 436 443 0195-9131 10.1249/00005768-199008000-00003 10.1249/00005768-199008000-00003 2205779
Effectiveness of neuromuscular training based on the neuromuscular risk profile The American Journal of Sports Medicine Hewett Timothy E. Ford Kevin R. Xu Yingying Y. Khoury Jane Myer Gregory D. SAGE Publications 25 4 2017
45 9 2142 2147 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546517700128 10.1177/0363546517700128 28441059
A school-based neuromuscular training program and sport-related injury incidence: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial Journal of Athletic Training Foss Kim D. Barber Thomas Staci Khoury Jane C. Myer Gregory D. Hewett Timothy E. 1 1 2018
53 1 20 28 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-173-16 10.4085/1062-6050-173-16 29332470
Utilization of ACL injury biomechanical and neuromuscular risk profile analysis to determine the effectiveness of neuromuscular training The American Journal of Sports Medicine Hewett Timothy E. Ford Kevin R. Xu Yingying Y. Khoury Jane Myer Gregory D. SAGE Publications 30 7 2016
44 12 3146 3151 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546516656373 10.1177/0363546516656373 27474385
Static stretching of the hamstring muscle for injury prevention in football codes: A systematic review Asian J Sports Med Rogan S. Wüst D. Schwitter T. Schmidtbleicher D. 2013
4 1 1 9 23785569
A 10-week randomized trial comparing eccentric vs. concentric hamstring strength training in well-trained soccer players Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports Mjolsnes Roald Arnason Arni Osthagen Tor Raastad Truls Bahr Roald Wiley 10 2004
14 5 311 317 0905-7188 10.1046/j.1600-0838.2003.367.x 10.1046/j.1600-0838.2003.367.x
Hamstring strain injuries: recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, and injury prevention Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Heiderscheit Bryan C. Sherry Marc A. Silder Amy Chumanov Elizabeth S. Thelen Darryl G. 2 2010
40 2 67 81 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2010.3047 10.2519/jospt.2010.3047 20118524
Effect of the HamSprint Drills training programme on lower limb neuromuscular control in Australian football players Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Cameron Matthew L. Adams Roger D. Maher Chris G. Misson David 1 2009
12 1 24 30 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.09.003 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.09.003
Prevention of hamstring strains in elite soccer: an intervention study Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports Arnason A. Andersen T. E. Holme I. Engebretsen L. Bahr R. 2008
18 1 40 48 0905-7188 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00634.x 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00634.x 17355322
A survey of flexibility training protocols and hamstring strains in professional football clubs in England British Journal of Sports Medicine Dadebo B White J George K P 1 8 2004
38 4 388 394 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.2002.000044 10.1136/bjsm.2002.000044 15273168
Prevention of soccer injuries. Supervision by doctor and physiotherapist The American Journal of Sports Medicine Ekstrand Jan Gillquist Jan Liljedahl Sten-Otto 5 1983
11 3 116 120 0363-5465 10.1177/036354658301100302 10.1177/036354658301100302 6346912
The efficacy of stretching for prevention of exercise-related injury: a systematic review of the literature Manual Therapy Weldon S.M Hill R.H 8 2003
8 3 141 150 1356-689X 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00010-9 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00010-9 12909434
The effect of sports specific training on reducing the incidence of hamstring injuries in professional Australian rules football players British Journal of Sports Medicine Verrall G M Slavotinek J P Barnes P G 1 6 2005
39 6 363 368 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.2005.018697 10.1136/bjsm.2005.018697 15911608
Reliability of the active and passive knee extension test in acute hamstring injuries The American Journal of Sports Medicine Reurink Gustaaf Goudswaard Gert Jan Oomen Henricus G. Moen Maarten H. Tol Johannes L. Verhaar Jan A.N. Weir Adam SAGE Publications 4 6 2013
41 8 1757 1761 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546513490650 10.1177/0363546513490650 23735425
Supersonic shear imaging: A new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Bercoff J. Tanter M. Fink M. 4 2004
51 4 396 409 0885-3010 10.1109/tuffc.2004.1295425 10.1109/tuffc.2004.1295425
Association of low back pain with muscle stiffness and muscle mass of the lumbar back muscles, and sagittal spinal alignment in young and middle-aged medical workers Clinical Biomechanics Masaki Mitsuhiro Aoyama Tomoki Murakami Takashi Yanase Ko Ji Xiang Tateuchi Hiroshige Ichihashi Noriaki 11 2017
49 128 133 0268-0033 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.09.008 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.09.008
Evaluation of musculotendinous stiffness in prepubertal children and adults, taking into account muscle activity Journal of Applied Physiology Lambertz Daniel Mora Isabelle Grosset Jean-Francois Pérot Chantal 7 2003
95 1 64 72 8750-7587 10.1152/japplphysiol.00885.2002 10.1152/japplphysiol.00885.2002 12626487
Muscle function in children European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology Davies C. T. White M. J. Young K. 11 1983
52 1 111 114 0301-5548 10.1007/bf00429036 10.1007/bf00429036
Muscle strength in boys of different ages Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry McComas A. J. Sica R. E. Petito F. 1 4 1973
36 2 171 173 0022-3050 10.1136/jnnp.36.2.171 10.1136/jnnp.36.2.171 4708451
Musculo-tendinous and joint elastic characteristics during elbow flexion in children Clinical Biomechanics Cornu Christophe Goubel Francis 11 2001
16 9 758 764 0268-0033 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00076-6 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00076-6
Stiffness of knee extensors in Duchenne muscular dystrophy Muscle & Nerve Cornu Christophe Goubel Francis Fardeau Michel Wiley 12 1998
21 12 1772 1774 0148-639X 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199812)21:12 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199812)21:12
The influence of chronological age on periods of accelerated adaptation of stretch-shortening cycle performance in pre and postpubescent boys Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Lloyd Rhodri S Oliver Jon L Hughes Michael G Williams Craig A 7 2011
25 7 1889 1897 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181e7faa8 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181e7faa8 21499135
The first decade of web-based sports injury surveillance: Descriptive epidemiology of injuries in us high school girls' basketball (2005-2006 through 2013-2014) and National Collegiate Athletic Association women's basketball (2004-2005 Through 2013-2014) Journal of Athletic Training Clifton Daniel R. Hertel Jay Onate James A. Currie Dustin W. Pierpoint Lauren A. Wasserman Erin B. Knowles Sarah B. Dompier Thomas P. Comstock R. Dawn Marshall Stephen W. Kerr Zachary Y. 1 11 2018
53 11 1037 1048 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-150-17 10.4085/1062-6050-150-17 30715913
The effect of Nordic hamstring strength training on muscle architecture, stiffness, and strength European Journal of Applied Physiology Seymore Kayla D. Domire Zachary J. DeVita Paul Rider Patrick M. Kulas Anthony S. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 9 3 2017
117 5 943 953 1439-6319 10.1007/s00421-017-3583-3 10.1007/s00421-017-3583-3 28280975
Four weeks of Nordic hamstring exercise reduce muscle injury risk factors in young adults Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Ribeiro-Alvares João Breno Marques Vanessa B. Vaz Marco A. Baroni Bruno M. 5 2018
32 5 1254 1262 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001975 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001975 28459795
An evidence-based framework for strengthening exercises to prevent hamstring injury Sports Medicine Bourne Matthew N. Timmins Ryan G. Opar David A. Pizzari Tania Ruddy Joshua D. Sims Casey Williams Morgan D. Shield Anthony J. 2018
48 2 251 267 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-017-0796-x 10.1007/s40279-017-0796-x 29116573
Sex comparison of hamstring structural and material properties Clinical Biomechanics Blackburn J. Troy Bell David R. Norcross Marc F. Hudson Jeff D. Kimsey Megan H. 1 2009
24 1 65 70 0268-0033 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.10.001 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.10.001
Endpoint selection and relative (versus absolute) risk reporting in published medication trials Journal of General Internal Medicine Hochman Michael McCormick Danny 13 8 2011
26 11 1246 1252 0884-8734 10.1007/s11606-011-1813-7 10.1007/s11606-011-1813-7 21842324
High school male basketball athletes exhibit greater hamstring muscle stiffness than females as assessed with shear wave elastography Skeletal Radiology McPherson April L. Nagai Takashi Schilaty Nathan D. Hale Rena Hewett Timothy E. Bates Nathaniel A. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 3 3 2020
49 8 1231 1237 0364-2348 10.1007/s00256-020-03397-w 10.1007/s00256-020-03397-w 32123955
