
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

34395053
25760
10.26603/001c.25760
Original Research
Overuse Injury, Substance Use, and Resilience in Collegiate Female Athlete
Martin Chelsea L PT, DPT 1
Shanley Ellen PT, PhD, OCS 1
Harnish Chris PhD 2
Knab Amy M PhD 3
Christopher Shefali PT, DPT, LAT, ATC 4
Vallabhajosula Srikant PhD 4
Bullock Garrett S PT, DPT 5
1 ATI Physical Therapy https://ror.org/00g11cc66
2 Department of Exercise Science Mary Baldwin University
3 Kinesiology Department Queens University of Charlotte https://ror.org/02nf34254
4 Department of Physical Therapy Education Elon University https://ror.org/01szgyb91
5 Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, University of Oxford; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine
Corresponding author: Chelsea L Martin, PT, DPT ATI Physical Therapy, 200 Patewood Dr C250 Greenville, SC 29615 Email: cleonard12@elon.edu Phone: (336) 309-5017
1 8 2021
2021
16 4 11041114
16 2 2021
20 5 2021
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you remix, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Background

Overuse injury is a common stressor experienced by female collegiate athletes and is often underreported. In response, athletes may develop negative coping skills such as substance use. Alternatively, resilience is a modifiable trait that may positively influence response to musculoskeletal injuries and substance use.

Purpose

To provide an updated epidemiological profile of overuse injury and substance use and examine the relationship between resilience, overuse injury, and substance use among collegiate female athletes.

Design

Cross-sectional study

Methods

Two-hundred and thirty female collegiate athletes were classified into overuse injury and resilience groups. Overuse injury, pain, and substance use incidence proportions (IP) were calculated. Kruskal-Wallis analyses were performed to investigate differences in substance use among resilience groups. Analyses of covariance were performed to evaluate differences in overuse injuries, substantial overuse injuries, and time loss injuries, among resilience groups.

Results

IP for pain was 45.0% (95% CI: 38.2-51.9); Overuse injury 52.0% (45.1-58.9); Alcohol use 35.1% (28.6-41.6); Electronic cigarette use 19.5% (14.6-24.9); Cigarette use 2.8% (6-5.1); and Drug use 3.3% (0.9-5.8). No significant differences were found between resilience groups for the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Overuse Injury Questionnaire (OSTRC) variables (Pain: p=0.102; Overuse injury: p=0.331; Substantial overuse injury: p=0.084; Not playing: p=0.058), alcohol (p=0.723), or combined substance use (p=0.069).

Conclusions

Pain and overuse injury prevalence is high among female collegiate athletes. Alcohol followed by electronic cigarette use were the most commonly utilized substances. No significant differences were identified in substance use or overuse injury presentation between resilience groups, though further investigation is warranted.

Level of Evidence

3

resilience
overuse injury
substance use
female athlete
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

The National Collegiate Athletic Association regulates and organizes sports for 1,200 colleges and universities, and consists of division one (D1), two (D2), and three (D3) programs.1 Female participation in collegiate sports has increased in recent decades, with the number of female teams now surpassing men’s teams.2 Across all divisions, sport participation exposes female collegiate athletes to a substantial amount of stress, in order to meet the demands of being a student-athlete.3,4 Stress can be defined as a state of perceived imbalance between demand and available coping mechanisms, and can come from sources such as relationships, academic responsibilities, or physical challenges such as poor performance and injury. When considering physical stressors, overuse injuries are a possible stressor resulting from progressive microtrauma with no specific identifiable event and inadequate recovery.4,5 The prolonged onset and longitudinal nature of overuse injuries expose student athletes to additional stress.4,5 Recent epidemiological data demonstrates that female collegiate athletes have a higher overuse injury rate compared to male athletes (24.6 versus 13.2 per 10,000 athlete exposures).4 In the same study, the authors reported that 50.8% of overuse injuries did not result in time loss from sport.4 Thus, using standard time loss definitions for injury surveillance, along with the higher rate of overuse injuries in females, may contribute to injury underreporting among female collegiate athletes.6

Due to current injury classification and reporting method limitations, the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre Overuse Questionnaire (OSTRC) was developed to capture the spectrum of overuse symptoms and consequence on participation, training, and performance.6 Early research has indicated that the OSTRC captures over ten times as many overuse conditions compared to time-loss definitions.6 Using the OSTRC, adolescent female gymnastic, basketball, and volleyball athletes reported 8.6 overuse injuries per 1000 athlete exposures7; in a separate study using standard injury definitions, adolescent female athletes participating in the same three sports reported substantially lower rates of injury, 1.76-2.74 per 10,000 athlete exposures.8 Among female athletes, updated injury epidemiological data that reflects the spectrum of overuse conditions is essential; thus the OSTRC may allow for improved quantification and understanding of overuse injury burden in this population.

In order to manage sport related stressors such as overuse injuries, athletes may use a variety of coping strategies.9 Traditional coping strategies employed by collegiate students include academic support,10 social support,11 leisure activities,12 sport and fitness participation13 or participation in risk prone activities (i.e. alcohol and other substance use).14,15 Injured student-athletes have fewer options to manage their stress due to participation limitations and variable social support.4,16 Substance abuse, has been identified as a negative coping strategy.17–19 Misuse of substances by athletes including alcohol, cigarettes, and illicit drugs has been documented in previous studies.14,15,20 Misuse of substances has been associated with an array of health, social, academic, and performance consequences.17,18 Acute health consequences of illicit drug and alcohol use include acute toxic effects, such as overdose, and accidental injury and harm; chronic effects from sustained use include dependence, development of chronic diseases, and increased likelihood of developing mental disorders.21 With regard to cigarettes, chronic use has demonstrated associations with cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and various cancers.22 During the 1990s, multiple studies were conducted on alcohol, tobacco, and drug use among college students, but peer-reviewed literature has been sparse in the last 20 years among collegiate athletes.14,15,20 Further, a new delivery mechanism for substance use, the electronic cigarette, has shown increased use among college adults.23,24 Although electronic cigarettes were originally marketed as a smoking cessation tool, use has increased among non-smokers despite sparse data on longitudinal health impacts.23 Epidemiological substance use data is needed to inform sports medicine, coaching, and support personnel about the negative coping strategies in female collegiate athletes.18

In contrast to negative coping skills, positive coping skills may be utilized by athletes. Resilience is a psychological property that has been associated with positive coping skills such as optimism, interconnectedness with social support systems, and higher self-esteem.25 Resilience has been conceptualized in various ways, but a common definition is the ability to bounce back despite the presence of stressors.26 Resilience is recognized as a personality trait that can change over time,27 and may be modified through intervention programs.28 Resilience has been observed to have a positive influence on the management of chronic pain,29 osteoarthritis,30 and following joint replacement surgery.31 Further, high levels of resilience are associated with decreased substance use in nonathlete populations.32 Nevertheless, research on athlete resilience has not investigated the relationship of resilience on musculoskeletal health or substance use.33 Due to stress experienced among collegiate athletes,3,4 resilience may be an important, modifiable characteristic. Specifically, resilience potentially can promote positive coping skills for in the presence of an overuse injury or to minimize negative coping skills such as substance use.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to provide an updated epidemiological profile of overuse injury and substance use and examine the relationship between resilience, overuse injury, and substance use among collegiate female athletes. Additionally, this study examined the relationship between resilience, overuse injury and substance use among this population.

METHODS

Study Design

This study was a cross-sectional design that was a subset of a larger study including male and female athletes which sought to investigate collegiate athlete health and well-being. The study included athletes participating in D1, D2 and D3 institutions. The study was approved by the Elon University Institutional Review Board (ID: 20-026).

Participants and Recruitment

The questionnaire was administered by the sports medicine staff to current collegiate athletes via email. Study consent was provided by clicking on the email link which provided a copy of the institutional review board consent form prior to completing the questionnaire with assurance of anonymity. The data were managed and de-identified to ensure anonymity using Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Provo, UT), an online survey database. Data collection occurred over eight weeks from August through September 2019. To reduce participant burden, athletes could save responses and complete the questionnaire at any time during the eight week period. Two reminder emails were sent at week two and week six, and coaches gave verbal reminders during week four to increase participation. Inclusion criteria consisted of: 1) enrollment at a participating institution; 2) listed on the official roster of their sport; 3) university email on file with the athletic department. Exclusion criteria consisted of: 1) no consent given to complete the questionnaire; 2) club or recreational collegiate athletes; or 3) no longer participating in varsity collegiate athletics.

Questionnaire Design

The questionnaire was designed to capture several aspects of health and well-being among collegiate athletes. The aspects of health and well-being investigated included: 1) athlete general health; 2) lifestyle and academics; 3) pain, injury, and surgery and 4) well-being.34 The questionnaire used in this study was adopted from a cricket health and well-being study34,35 and was refined following interviews with three collegiate athletes, two collegiate coaches, one collegiate athletic trainer, two collegiate physical therapists, and one sports medicine physician to identify health and well-being issues pertinent to collegiate athletes. The questionnaire was piloted with all the professionals and the athletes were interviewed for final format adaptations. The questionnaire inquired about demographic information including athlete age, height, weight, sports participation, injury history, alcohol and substance use, sleep habits, and health related quality of life. All data were managed and de-identified via Qualtrics software (Qualtrics, Provo, Utah).

Main Outcome Measures

Alcohol, Cigarette, Electronic Cigarette and Drug Use

Alcohol use was determined using questions from the Harvard College Alcohol Study (CAS).20 Participants were asked the following question: “Have you drank alcohol in the past 30 days?”20 If the participant answered yes, they were asked to fill out a series of questions that included the following: 1) How many occasions have you had alcohol in the past 30 days? Participants could select 1 to 2, 3 to 5, 6 to 9, 10 to 19, 20 to 39 or 40+ occasions as a response. 2) How important is getting drunk as a reason to drink? Answer choices included Very Important, Important, Somewhat Important, Not at all Important. For the remaining questions, participants typed their answers in a text box to respond: 3) How many occasions in the past 30 days did you drink enough to get drunk? 4) How many times have you missed class as a result of drinking? 5) How many occasions have you consumed alcohol in the last 7 days? 6) How many consecutive drinks did you consume during those occasions?20 Heavy drinking style was defined as 10 or more drinking occasions in the last 30 days, a motivation to drink to get drunk of somewhat to very important, getting drunk three or more times in the past 30 days, or four or more consecutive drinks in one occasion in the past week.18

To determine tobacco use, questions that captured cigarette use from the Harvard CAS were used.15 The first question was “Have you ever smoked cigarettes before?“15 If the participant answered yes, they were asked a series of follow up questions that included: 1) How old were you when you first smoked? Answers were typed in a text box. 2) When did you most recently smoke? Answer choices included Never, More than 12 months ago, More than 30 days ago but less than 12 months ago, Less than 30 days ago. 3) Do you smoke regularly? Participants responded yes or no. If the participant answered yes, they were asked 4) How many times a day? Responses were typed in a text box.15 Tobacco use questions did not cover smokeless tobacco in this study.

To determine electronic cigarette use, questions determining electronic cigarette use from the Harvard CAS were adapted.15 The participants were asked the following question: “Have you ever used e-cigarettes or a vape pen?”15 If the participant answered yes, the following series of questions were asked: 1) How old were you when you first used e-cigarettes or a vape pen? Participants typed their answer in a text box to respond. 2) When did you most recently use e-cigarettes or a vape pen? Answer choices included Never, More than 12 months ago, More than 30 days ago but less than 12 months ago, Less than 30 days ago. 3) Do you use e-cigarettes or a vape pen regularly? Participants responded yes or no. If the participant answered yes, they were asked 4) How many times a day? Responses were typed in a text box.15

Drug use was captured using the Harvard CAS drug survey questions20 with the following question: Have you used any recreational drugs within the last 30 days?20 If the participant answered yes, they were prompted in the next question to indicate frequency: How frequently do you use them? The participants typed their answers in a text box.20

The Oslo Sports Traumatic Research Center for Overuse Injury Questionnaire

The OSTRC was used to determine the presence of an overuse injury and their effect on sports performance and training.6 The OSTRC has been used in a variety of athletic populations, and demonstrates good validity and reliability with an internal consistency of α = 0.91.6 The questionnaire consists of four questions asking the patient to indicate levels of pain and the impact of pain and injury on sports participation, training volume, and performance. Each question is based on a scale of 0-25 with 0 indicating no overuse injury problem and 25 indicating a severe overuse injury problem. Questions 1 and 4 were scored on a scale of 0-8-17-25 and questions 2 and 3 were scored on a scale of 0-6-13-19-25. The values utilized indicate a score of 0 representing no problems, whereas a score of 25 represents the maximum level of problems for each question. The intermediate values are scored as such to allow an even distribution from 0-25. The questions were summated for a total score out of 100.

Participants with and without an overuse injury problem were identified by using total OSTRC score, and categorizing participants into overuse injury (total OSTRC score>0) or no overuse injury (total OSTRC score = 0) groups. Participants with and without pain were identified by calculating question 4 scores only (to what extent have you experienced pain in the last week), and categorizing participants into pain (score >0) and no pain (score = 0) groups. To identify severe overuse problems, participants were further categorized into substantial overuse injury (score = 25-39) or no substantial overuse injury (score = >0 and <25), and not playing (score ≥ 40) or playing (score < 40) groups to differentiate levels of severity of an overuse problem.6

Resilience

Resilience was assessed using the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). The BRS has previously demonstrated high test-retest reliability and validity.26 The BRS consists of six questions that are scored from 1 to 5. Questions are alternated, such that the most resilient response for odd numbered questions is 5 points and for even questions is 1 point. When scored, the even numbered questions are reversed, and all answers are summated for a total possible score of 6 (low resilience) to 30 points (high resilience). Normative data for BRS scores among athletic populations was not available in the peer reviewed literature. Therefore, to determine differences among participants with high or low resilience scores, the mean and standard deviation (SD) of BRS scores were calculated.31 Participants who scored 1 SD below the mean were classified as the low resilience group (LR), those with scores within 1 SD of the mean were classified as the normal resilience group (NR), and participants who scored greater than 1 SD above the mean were classified as the high resilience group (HR) for statistical analysis.

Statistical Analyses

Missing data were analyzed through counts, percentages, and visualization through the R package naniar (R Core Team, 2013; R: A language and environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/). Missing data was varied (Age <1%, Resilience 7%, OSTRC 12%, Alcohol last 30 days 9%, Number of alcohol occasions 69%, Importance of getting drunk 10%, Occasions of getting drunk 70%, Combined E-Cig, Cigarette, and Drug use 8-9%, Frequency of E-Cig, Cigarette, or Drug Use >70%). A complete case analysis was performed. However, due to the varied degrees of missing data, only questions with ≤10% missing data were statistically analyzed in order to reduce bias. Descriptive data were reported as mean (SD), median (interquartile range), or count (%). Sport participation was categorized as individual (cross-country, track and field, triathlon, swimming, golf, and dance), field and court (basketball, soccer, tennis, and volleyball), bat and ball (baseball and softball), and collision (football, rugby, and lacrosse36). Overuse injury, pain, alcohol, e-cigarette, cigarette and drug incidence proportions (IP) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using the following formula37:

Variable IP=No of athletes presenting with variableNo of all athletes×100

Injury and surgery history prevalence was calculated for all female athletes and for each resilience group. A series of Kruskal-Wallis analyses were performed to investigate potential differences between alcohol and amalgamated substance use and resilience groups. An analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to evaluate potential differences between current overuse injuries, substantial overuse injuries, and time loss injuries, evaluated by the OSTRC, and resilience groups. Confounders controlled for included injury in the prior four weeks and surgery history (p<0.05). All statistical analyses were performed in R version 3.5.1.

RESULTS

One thousand, two hundred and thirty-nine male and female athletes received the survey. Participant recruitment is illustrated in Figure 1. A total of 230 female athletes (38% response rate) completed the questionnaire and were included in the study (D1: n = 89, 39% response rate; D2: n = 77, 33% response rate; D3: n = 64, 28% response rate). Median age of participants were 19 years (18-20), and the greatest number of participants participated in field and court sports (43.3%). 51.9% reported a new injury but no recent surgery (14.8%). (Table 1)

65408 Figure 1. Participation Recruitment Chart

65409 Table 1. Participant Characteristics

Age (years)	19(IQR 18-20)	
Height (m)	1.7 (SD 0.1)	
Mass (kg)	67.6 (SD 11.9)	
Reported Surgery	 	
Yes	27 (14.8%)	
No	156 (85.3%)	
Reported Injury	 	
Yes	95 (51.9%)	
No	88 (48.1%)	
OSTRC Variables	 	
No Injury	97 (48.0%)	
Overuse Injury	58 (28.7%)	
Substantial Overuse	20 (9.9%)	
Not Playing	27 (13.4%)	
Sport	 	
Individual	71 (31.7%)	
Field and Court	97 (43.3%)	
Bat, Ball	40 (17.9%)	
Collision	16 (7.1%)	
Division	 	
Division 1	89 (38.7%)	
Division 2	98 (42.6%)	
Division 3	43 (18.7%)	
OSTRC= Oslo Sports Traumatic Research Center Overuse Injury Questionnaire<br>IQR=interguartile range; SD=standard deviation; m=meters; kg=kilograms

Pain and overuse injury IP were 45.0% (95% CI: 38.2 to 51.9) and 52.0% (95% CI: 45.1 - 58.9) respectively. Among all substances, self-reported alcohol use IP was 35.1% (95% CI: 28.6 - 41.6); electronic cigarette use IP was 19.5% (95% CI: 14.6 - 24.9); cigarette use IP was 2.8% (95% CI: 0.6 - 5.1); and drug use IP was 3.3 (95% CI: 0.9 - 5.8).

BRS scores ranged from 10 to 30 points, with a mean of 21.3 (4.2). 26.2% of participants (n=48) were classified as LR, 60.7% (n=111) as NR, and 13.1% (n=24) as HR. Nearly a third of all athletes reported an overuse injury (HR: 41.7%, LR: 28.7%), but fewer substantial overuse injuries (HR: 10.5%, LR: 8.3%%) or inability to play (HR: 8.3%, LR: 10.5%; Table 2). No significant differences were found between resilience groups for any OSTRC variables (Pain: p = 0.11; Overuse injury: χ2= 2.214, p = 0.34; Substantial overuse injury: χ2= 4.962, p = 0.09; Not playing: χ2= 5.667, p = 0.06).

Among substances, both groups reported similar alcohol use in the last 30 days (HR: 29.1%, LR: 35.4%) and drinking to get drunk as important (HR: 4.2%. LR: 8.3%) (Table 2). No significant differences between resilience groups for alcohol questions were found (Alcohol last 30 days: χ2= 0.652, p = 0.73; Drink to get drunk important: χ2= 5.747, p = 0.06). Electronic cigarette use was more prevalent in LR group (31.3%) versus HR group (8.3%), but cigarette and drug use prevalence were similar between groups (Cigarette- HR: 0%, LR: 2.8%; Drug- HR: 0%, LR: 4.2%; Table 2). No significant difference was found between resilience groups and overall substance use (χ2 = 5.356, p = 0.07).

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study indicate that pain and overuse injury is a common adverse event that female collegiate athletes experience. Further, alcohol and electronic cigarette use were the most common substances used. While available research indicates that resilience may play a role in decreased substance use38 and musculoskeletal health in non-athlete populations,29–31 the current study’s findings did not demonstrate this relationship.

The results of this study demonstrated that across all sports, 45 out of 100 female athletes reported pain and 52 out of 100 reported an overuse injury, representing a sizable portion of the population. This finding corroborates existing research on incidence proportion among female athletes when using the OSTRC as a measure to capture pain and overuse injuries.39 However, the OSTRC has not been widely used among intercollegiate athletes in the United States. When compared to standard methods of injury classification, such as time-loss or need for medical attention, the results of this study suggest that standard injury classification methods are not capturing the spectrum of overuse problems that are impacting athlete performance, overall health and well-being.40 Additionally, female collegiate athletes have a higher risk of overuse injuries compared to males,4 and differences in pain response have been reported among males and females,41 though the exact cause is unknown. These differences in injury presentation and pain response between male and female athletes highlights a need for further exploration among mechanisms of pain and overuse injury in the female athlete population.

65410 Table 2. Resilience and Substance Use Profile

	Overall	Low Resilience	Normal Resilience	High Resilience	
OSTRC Variables					
Pain					
Yes	91 (45.0%)	23 (47.9%)	44 (39.6%)	12 (50%)	
No	111 (55.0%)	25 (52.1%)	67 (60.4%)	12 (50%)	
Overuse Injury Severity					
No Injury	97 (48.0%)	22 (57.9%)	59 (53.2%)	9 (37.5%)	
Overuse Injury	58 (28.7%)	11 (28.9%)	31 (27.9%)	10 (41.7%)	
Substantial Overuse	20 (9.9%)	4 (10.5%)	11 (9.9%)	2 (8.3%)	
Not Playing	27 (13.4%)	11 (28.9%)	10 (9.0%)	3 (12.5%)	
Alcohol					
Last 30 days					
Yes	73 (35.1%)	17 (35.4%)	42 (37.8%)	7 (29.1%)	
No	135 (64.9%)	31 (64.6%)	69 (62.2%)	17 (70.8%)	
Number of Occasions Last 30 days					
10 or more	1 (1.5%)	1 (5.9%)	-	-	
Less than 10	65 (98.5%)	16 (94.1%)	42 (100%)	7 (100%)	
Number of Occasions Drunk Last 30 days					
3 or more	8 (13.1%)	4 (25.0%)	4 (10.5%)	-	
Less than 3	53 (86.9%)	12 (75.0%)	34 (89.5%)	7 (100%)	
Number of Consecutive Drinks Last 7 days					
4 or more drinks	22 (13.6%)	9 (19.6%)	8 (8.3%)	5 (25.0%)	
Less than 4 drinks	140 (86.4%)	37 (80.4%)	88 (91.7%)	15 (75.0%)	
Importance of Getting Drunk					
Somewhat Important - Very Important	30 (16.4%)	4 (8.3%)	2 (1.8%)	1 (4.2%)	
Not Important at All - Do Not Drink	176 (83.6%)	44 (91.7%)	109 (98.2%)	23 (95.8%)	
E-Cigarettes					
Yes	41 (19.5%)	15 (31.3%)	21 (18.9%)	2 (8.3%)	
No	169 (80.5%)	33 (68.8%)	90 (81.1%)	22 (91.7%)	
Smoking					
Yes	6 (2.8%)	3 (6.3%)	2 (1.8%)	-	
No	205 (97.2%)	45 (93.6%)	109 (98.2%)	24 (100%)	
Drugs					
Yes	7 (3.3%)	2 (4.2%)	3 (2.7%)	-	
No	203 (96.7%)	46 (95.6%)	108(97.3%)	24 (100%)	
OSTRC= Oslo Sports Traumatic Research Center Overuse Injury Questionnaire; Data are reported as a count (%)<br>Differences in count data between overall and resilience groups are due to missing data

Among substances, alcohol was the most prevalent with more than one in three athletes indicating alcohol use in the past 30 days. Comparatively, previous national surveys have asked participants to indicate alcohol use over the past year.18,42 Prevalence rates in 1997 and 2001 were 86.0% and 80.8% respectively among female athletes18; in more recent years among college aged adults, prevalence rates were 70.8% and 78% in 2001-2002 and 2012-2013, though female collegiate athlete prevalence was not determined.42 The current study’s lower prevalence compared to previous research may be due to several factors. First, this study is reflective of a smaller time frame captured; athletes in their competitive seasons are more likely to abstain from drinking, and therefore prevalence may be underestimated.3 Additionally, females have consistently demonstrated lower alcohol consumption overall compared to males, though this study did not seek to compare between males and females.42 Further, lower consumption may reflect policy changes following the Harvard CAS, including resolutions passed in Congress calling for university presidents to address heavy alcohol use, and the United States Surgeon General documented goal of reducing binge drinking by 50% in 2010.14 However, peer-reviewed research on alcohol use among collegiate athletes have been sparse since the Harvard CAS, making it difficult to confirm impact of policy changes and shift in drinking culture among collegiate athletes.

Heavy drinking style is a concern among college athletes.14,18 Collegiate athletes are more likely to experience alcohol related harms compared to non-athletes, and are uniquely at risk for sports performance consequences.18 In this study, heavy drinking style prevalence as measured independently by frequency, intensity and motivation to get drunk was lower than previous studies of all college students.14 However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the high percentage of missing data. Previous research has indicated that while college-aged males consume the most alcohol among sex and age groups, females are demonstrating a sharper increase in consumption and heavy episodic drinking, narrowing the gender gap.42 This sharp increase among females may be associated with a continued increased rate of females pursuing college level degrees and further economic opportunities, providing a framework for increased exposure and permissive attitudes for heavy drinking.43 Peer reviewed research on alcohol drinking behaviors among athletes has been sparse in the last 10 years, and substantially more data is needed to expand on our findings to determine accurate prevalence of heavy drinking style among female athletes and related health consequences.

Only 2.8% of participants reported cigarette use, a finding that demonstrates continued decrease in tobacco use among college athletes and nonathletes since the 1990s.20,44 This decrease may be attributed to research, public education, and regulation efforts highlighting the risk of cardiovascular and lung disease as well as perceived negative performance consequences.44,45 Additionally, participation in collegiate athletics has demonstrated a protective effect against tobacco use compared to non-athletes.45 Drug use was also low at 3.3% and corroborates previous research indicating that an inverse relationship between participation in sport and drug use exists.44 In 2001, marijuana use in the past 30 days among college students was 16.9% and even lower for all other illicit drugs (7.37%), much higher than what the current study demonstrates among female athletes.19 Our lower prevalence findings may be reflective of athlete awareness on the deleterious effects of drug use on performance, but given a lower response rate on drug related questions (>70%), further research is needed to confirm these findings.44 Additionally, collegiate athletes are susceptible to random drug testing throughout the year from the NCAA and individual institutions. While studies on impact of drug testing on substance use among collegiate athletes is limited, previous research among high school athletes has indicated that random notification drug testing curtailed substance use short term, and therefore may have similar effects among college athletes.46

Interestingly, prevalence of electronic cigarette use was much higher compared to cigarette and drug use; nearly one in five female athletes reported using this delivery mechanism for substances. While data on athlete use is sparse, this represents a much higher prevalence compared to recent use of adults over 18 years old from 2012 to 2013 (1.4-6.8%).24 Electronic cigarette use has not demonstrated the same inverse relationship with sports participation compared to cigarette and drug use.47 A lack of longitudinal research on adverse health and performance effects,24 a shift in marketing strategies geared towards younger consumers,23 and fewer regulations in public spaces compared to tobacco products may contribute to perceptions that the product is a safe alternative to cigarettes.39 This assumption of safety may reflect the higher prevalence among the current study’s cohort and sharp increase in use among adults since the product entered the market in 2006.24 Electronic cigarettes contain toxicants and nicotine24 and early studies indicate increased likelihood of future cigarette use to be linked with use of electronic cigarettes.47 Additionally, electronic cigarette use has been marketed as a smoking cessation tool, and early evidence indicates that a majority of electronic cigarette users have smoked cigarettes.23 Given that the vast majority of the participants in the current study did not report cigarette use, further research is needed to understand motivational factors related to electronic cigarette use in the female collegiate athlete population. Additionally, further research is needed to determine the longitudinal health effects of electronic cigarettes.

Little attention has been paid to the impact of psychometric properties such as resilience on musculoskeletal health. While pain and overuse injury represent one of many stressors an athlete faces,39 the presence of higher resilience was not associated with differences in pain and overuse injury in this study. Early research has indicated that resilience may have a positive influence on patients with chronic pain,29 osteoarthritis30 and following joint replacement surgery.31 Contrary to these results, this study demonstrated no difference in overuse injuries among different resilience levels in female collegiate athletes. Further research is needed to determine if resilience as a unitary construct is useful to monitor in female athletes, or if additional psychometric properties should be considered to influence overuse injury outcomes. Among substances, differences in use were not determined between resilience levels in the participants. Increased substance use has been cited as a potential negative coping strategy for sport-related pressure and anxiety, including coping with pain, injury, retirement, and performance.18 While substance use may be used as a coping strategy among athletes, the lack of association with resilience among the current study findings suggests other explanations may be warranted such as team social dynamics, sorority membership, substance use prior to college, or polydrug use.20 However, research on resilience and substance use is still merited given the low percentage of participants that indicated heavy episodic drinking, drug and cigarette use in this study.

This study is not without limitations. The epidemiological profile reported in this study requires further validation to determine the extent of substance use and impact of using the OSTRC to capture overuse injury data among female collegiate athletes. Secondly, this study captured data at one time point. Longitudinal studies may provide a better understanding of substance use, overuse injury, and resilience fluctuations during in-season and off-season periods to improve knowledge of physical and mental stressors and coping strategies athletes experience. Thirdly, given that this was a cross-sectional study there is the potential for recall bias, especially for substance use in the past month, and there is a possibility that athletes may have underreported their substance use. However, use of previously validated outcome measures for overuse injury, substance, and resilience use were used making the results comparable to previous literature.6,15,20 The current study response rate was 38%, however this response rate is typical for surveys administered among institutions.48 Additionally, given that collision sports were under-represented, and being that the cohort was female only, the results are not generalizable to collision sports or male collegiate athletes. Furthermore, response bias is possible given that athletes interested in study content may be more willing than other athletes to disclose information related to substance or overuse injury. Finally, single method bias is possible given that only an online survey was used to collect data.

CONCLUSION

In summary, 45 out of 100 female athletes reported pain and 52 out of 100 reported an overuse injury, representing a large portion of the population. Regarding recent substance use, alcohol was the most commonly used substance with more than 1 in 3 reporting consumption followed by e-cigarette use at nearly 1 in 5 athletes. The current study findings indicate that resilience did not have any significant associations with pain, overuse injury, or substance use, though further investigation is warranted for associations with heavy episodic drinking and increased data among electronic cigarette, drug, and cigarette use. Notably, given the novelty of electronic cigarettes and high reported use, longitudinal studies on health effects are necessary to provide health education initiatives and information on performance impact. Finally, considering the limitations of current injury definitions to capture injury data, future research should consider use of the OSTRC for further injury surveillance. By improving knowledge on overuse injuries, substance use, and coping strategies, clinicians may be better equipped to provide appropriate interventions and referrals necessary to improve the health and well-being of athletes.

Conflict of Interest

None to disclose
==== Refs
Our three divisions Association NCAA http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/media-center/ncaa-101/our-three-divisions
Number of NCAA college athletes reaches all-time high NCAA.org 2020-1-24 http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/media-center/news/number-ncaa-college-athletes-reaches-all-time-high
The use of alcohol among NCAA Division I female college basketball, softball, and volleyball athletes J Athl Train Martin M. 1998
33 2 163 167 16558505
Epidemiology of overuse and acute injuries among competitive collegiate athletes J Athl Train Yang Jingzhen Tibbetts Abigail S. Covassin Tracey Cheng Gang Nayar Saloni Heiden Erin 1 3 2012
47 2 198 204 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-47.2.198 10.4085/1062-6050-47.2.198 22488286
Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures in studies of football (soccer) injuries Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports Fuller C. W. Ekstrand J. Junge A. Andersen T. E. Bahr R. Dvorak J. Hagglund M. McCrory P. Meeuwisse W. H. Wiley 4 2006
16 2 83 92 0905-7188 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00528.x 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00528.x 16533346
Development and validation of a new method for the registration of overuse injuries in sports injury epidemiology: the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre (OSTRC) overuse injury questionnaire British Journal of Sports Medicine Clarsen Benjamin Myklebust Grethe Bahr Roald 2013
47 8 495 502 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091524 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091524 23038786
High prevalence of self-reported injuries and illnesses in talented female athletes BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Richardson A. Clarsen B. Verhagen E.A.L.M Stubbe J.H. BMJ 4 2017
3 1 e000199 2055-7647 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000199 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000199 28761701
Epidemiology of overuse injuries among high-school athletes in the United States The Journal of Pediatrics Schroeder Allison N. Comstock R. Dawn Collins Christy L. Everhart Joshua Flanigan David Best Thomas M. 3 2015
166 3 600 606 0022-3476 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.09.037 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.09.037 25444010
Coping in sport: a review Contemporary adv in sport psych Crocker P.R.E. Tamminen K.A. Gaudreau P. 2015
28 67
How College Freshmen Communicate Student Academic Support: A grounded theory study Communication Education Thompson Blair Informa UK Limited 1 2008
57 1 123 144 0363-4523 10.1080/03634520701576147 10.1080/03634520701576147
Stress, Sex differences, and coping strategies among college students Current Psychology Brougham Ruby R. Zail Christy M. Mendoza Celeste M. Miller Janine R. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 11 2 2009
28 2 85 97 1046-1310 10.1007/s12144-009-9047-0 10.1007/s12144-009-9047-0
Psychological benefits of leisure participation: A taxonomy of leisure activities based on their need-gratifying properties. Journal of Counseling Psychology Tinsley Howard E. A. Eldredge Barbara D. 1995
42 2 123 132 0022-0167 10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.123 10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.123
Self-care practices and perceived stress levels among psychology graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology Myers Shannon B. Sweeney Alison C. Popick Victoria Wesley Kimberly Bordfeld Amanda Fingerhut Randy 2 2012
6 1 55 66 1931-3926 10.1037/a0026534 10.1037/a0026534
Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study Surveys: 1993–2001 Journal of American College Health Wechsler Henry Lee Jae Eun Kuo Meichun Seibring Mark Nelson Toben F. Lee Hang 1 3 2002
50 5 203 217 0744-8481 10.1080/07448480209595713 10.1080/07448480209595713
Increased levels of cigarette use among college students: a cause for national concern Jama Wechsler Henry Rigotti Nancy A. Gledhill-Hoyt Jeana Lee Hang 18 11 1998
280 19 1673 1678 0098-7484 10.1001/jama.280.19.1673 10.1001/jama.280.19.1673
Social support patterns of collegiate athletes before and after injury J Athl Train Yang Jingzhen Peek-Asa Corinne Lowe John B. Heiden Erin Foster Danny T. 1 7 2010
45 4 372 379 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-45.4.372 10.4085/1062-6050-45.4.372 20617912
Alcohol use and related consequences among students with varying levels of involvement in college athletics Journal of American College Health Leichliter Jami S. Meilman Philip W. Presley Cheryl A. Cashin Jeffrey R. 5 1998
46 6 257 262 0744-8481 10.1080/07448489809596001 10.1080/07448489809596001 9609972
A systematic review of college student-athlete drinking: Prevalence rates, sport-related factors, and interventions Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Martens Matthew P. Dams-O'Connor Kristen Beck Niels C. 10 2006
31 3 305 316 0740-5472 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.05.004 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.05.004
Trends in marijuana and other illicit drug use among college students: results from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Surveys: 1993-2001 Journal of American College Health Mohler-Kuo Meichun Lee Jae Eun Wechsler Henry 1 7 2003
52 1 17 24 0744-8481 10.1080/07448480309595719 10.1080/07448480309595719
Binge drinking, tobacco and illicit drug use and involvement in collegiate athletics Journal of American College Health Wechsler Henry Davenport Andrea E. Dowdall George W. Grossman Susan J. Zanakos Sophia I. 1 3 1997
45 5 195 200 0744-8481 10.1080/07448481.1997.9936884 10.1080/07448481.1997.9936884
Extent of illicit drug use and dependence, and their contribution to the global burden of disease The Lancet Degenhardt Louisa Hall Wayne 1 2012
379 9810 55 70 0140-6736 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61138-0 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61138-0
Drug abuse in athletes Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Reardon Claudia Creado Shane 8 2014
595 605 1179-8467 10.2147/sar.s53784 10.2147/sar.s53784 25187752
Electronic cigarette use by college students Drug and Alcohol Dependence Sutfin Erin L. McCoy Thomas P. Morrell Holly E.R. Hoeppner Bettina B. Wolfson Mark Elsevier BV 8 2013
131 3 214 221 0376-8716 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.05.001 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.05.001 23746429
Electronic cigarettes: what are they and what do they do? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Breland Alison Soule Eric Lopez Alexa Ramôa Carolina El-Hellani Ahmad Eissenberg Thomas 15 1 2016
1394 1 5 30 0077-8923 10.1111/nyas.12977 10.1111/nyas.12977 26774031
Psychological resilience in sport performance: a review of stressors and protective factors J Sport Sci Sarkar M. Fletcher D. 2014
15 1419 1434
The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back International journal of behavioral medicine Smith Bruce W. Dalen Jeanne Wiggins Kathryn Tooley Erin Christopher Paulette Bernard Jennifer 9 2008
15 3 194 200 1070-5503 10.1080/10705500802222972 10.1080/10705500802222972 18696313
Can resilience be developed at work? A meta-analytic review of resilience-building programme effectiveness Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Vanhove Adam J. Herian Mitchel N. Perez Alycia L. U. Harms Peter D. Lester Paul B. Wiley 2016
89 2 278 307 0963-1798 10.1111/joop.12123 10.1111/joop.12123
Resilience in children and youth: A review Children and Youth Services Review Zolkoski Staci M. Bullock Lyndal M. Elsevier BV 12 2012
34 12 2295 2303 0190-7409 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009
The role of resilience in adjustment and coping with chronic pain. Rehabilitation Psychology Newton-John Toby R. O. Mason Christie Hunter Mick American Psychological Association (APA) 2014
59 3 360 365 1939-1544 10.1037/a0037023 10.1037/a0037023 25019306
A Systematic Review of Resilience in the Physically Ill Psychosomatics Stewart Donna E. Yuen Tracy Elsevier BV 5 2011
52 3 199 209 0033-3182 10.1016/j.psym.2011.01.036 10.1016/j.psym.2011.01.036 21565591
Resilience correlates with outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Tokish John M. Kissenberth Michael J. Tolan Stefan J. Salim Tariq I. Tadlock Josh Kellam Thomas Long Catherine D. Crawford Ashley Lonergan Keith T. Hawkins Richard J. Shanley Ellen 5 2017
26 5 752 756 1058-2746 10.1016/j.jse.2016.12.070 10.1016/j.jse.2016.12.070 28190668
Web-delivered CBT reduces heavy drinking in OEF-OIF veterans in primary care with symptomatic substance use and PTSD Behavior Therapy Acosta Michelle C. Possemato Kyle Maisto Stephen A. Marsch Lisa A. Barrie Kimberly Lantinga Larry Fong Chunki Xie Haiyi Grabinski Michael Rosenblum Andrew Elsevier BV 3 2017
48 2 262 276 0005-7894 10.1016/j.beth.2016.09.001 10.1016/j.beth.2016.09.001 28270335
Psychological resilience in sport: A review of the literature and implications for research and practice International J of Sport and Exercise Psychology Galli N. Gonzalez S.P. 2015
13 3 243 257
Physical activity and health-related quality of life in former elite and recreational cricketers from the UK with upper extremity or lower extremity persistent joint pain: a cross-sectional study BMJ open Bullock Garrett Scott Collins Gary Peirce Nicholas Arden Nigel K Filbay Stephanie R 11 2019
9 11 e032606 2044-6055 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032606 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032606 31719092
Joint pain and osteoarthritis in former recreational and elite cricketers Cai H. Bullock G.S. Sanchez-Santos M.T.. 2019
20 1 596
Differences in the mechanism of head impacts measured between men's and women's intercollegiate lacrosse athletes Orthop J Sports Med Le R.K. Saunders T.D. Breedlove K.M.. 2018
6 11 2325967118807678 30480018
Issues in estimating risks and rates in sports injury research Journal of athletic training Knowles S.B. Marshall S.W. Guskiewicz K.M. 2006
41 2 207 16791309
Resilience as a moderating factor between stress and alcohol-related consequences in the Army National Guard Addictive Behaviors Morgan Jessica Kelley Brown Janice Bray Robert M. Elsevier BV 5 2018
80 22 27 0306-4603 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.01.002 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.01.002 29310003
The prevalence and impact of overuse injuries in five Norwegian sports: Application of a new surveillance method Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports Clarsen B. Bahr R. Heymans M. W. Engedahl M. Midtsundstad G. Rosenlund L. Thorsen G. Myklebust G. Wiley 2015
25 3 323 330 0905-7188 10.1111/sms.12223 10.1111/sms.12223 24684525
Analysis of Injury Rates and Treatment Patterns for Time-Loss and Non-Time-Loss Injuries Among Collegiate Student-Athletes J Athl Train Powell J.W. Dompier T.P. 2004
39 1 56 70 15085213
Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report Pain Greenspan Joel D. Craft Rebecca M. LeResche Linda Arendt-Nielsen Lars Berkley Karen J. Fillingim Roger B. Gold Michael S. Holdcroft Anita Lautenbacher Stefan Mayer Emeran A. Mogil Jeffrey S. Murphy Anne Z. Traub Richard J. 11 2007
132 Supplement 1 S26 S45 0304-3959 10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.014 10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.014 17964077
Changes in alcohol consumption: United States, 2001–2002 to 2012–2013 Drug and Alcohol Dependence Dawson Deborah A. Goldstein Risë B. Saha Tulshi D. Grant Bridget F. 3 2015
148 56 61 0376-8716 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.12.016 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.12.016 25620731
Birth cohort effects and gender differences in alcohol epidemiology: a review and synthesis Alcohol Clin Exp Res Keyes Katherine M. Li Guohua Hasin Deborah S. 15 9 2011
35 12 2101 2112 0145-6008 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01562.x 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01562.x 21919918
Relationship of high school and college sports participation with alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug use: A review Addictive Behaviors Lisha Nadra E. Sussman Steve Elsevier BV 5 2010
35 5 399 407 0306-4603 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.032 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.032 20100638
Waterpipe and cigarette smoking among college athletes in the United States Journal of Adolescent Health Primack Brian A. Fertman Carl I. Rice Kristen R. Adachi-Mejia Anna M. Fine Michael J. 1 2010
46 1 45 51 1054-139X 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.05.004 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.05.004 20123257
Outcomes of a orospective trial of student-athlete drug testing: The student athlete testing using random notification (SATURN) Study Journal of Adolescent Health Goldberg Linn Elliot Diane L. MacKinnon David P. Moe Esther L. Kuehl Kerry S. Yoon Myeongsun Taylor Aaron Williams Jason 11 2007
41 5 421 429 1054-139X 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.001 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.001
Trajectories of e-cigarette and conventional cigarette use among youth Pediatrics Bold Krysten W. Kong Grace Camenga Deepa R. Simon Patricia Cavallo Dana A. Morean Meghan E. Krishnan-Sarin Suchitra American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2018
141 1 e20171832 0031-4005 10.1542/peds.2017-1832 10.1542/peds.2017-1832 29203523
Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research Human Relations Baruch Yehuda Holtom Brooks C. SAGE Publications 8 2008
61 8 1139 1160 0018-7267 10.1177/0018726708094863 10.1177/0018726708094863
