
==== Front
Pain
Pain
JPAIN
JOP
Pain
0304-3959
1872-6623
Wolters Kluwer Philadelphia, PA

38743558
PAIN-D-23-01294
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003267
00009
3
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
The prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review update and meta-analysis
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7138-916X
Chambers Christine T. abc*
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8928-7647
Dol Justine ajustine.dol@dal.ca

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6013-7402
Tutelman Perri R. abperri.tutelman@ucalgary.ca

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-8734
Langley Charlotte L. aCharlotte.Langley@dal.ca

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9900-4703
Parker Jennifer A. ajennifera.parker@iwk.nshealth.ca

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6692-8399
Cormier Brittany T. abrittany.cormier@iwk.nshealth.ca

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2322-3314
Macfarlane Gary J. dg.j.macfarlane@abdn.ac.uk

Jones Gareth T. dgareth.jones@abdn.ac.uk

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3163-4025
Chapman Darlene edarlene.chapman@iwk.nshealth.ca

Proudfoot Nicole anicole.proudfoot@gmail.com

Grant Amy fAmyK.Grant@nshealth.ca

Marianayagam Justina gjustina.marianayagam@gmail.com

a Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health, Halifax, Canada
b Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
c Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
d Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
e Health Sciences Library, IWK Health, Halifax, Canada
f Maritime SPOR Support Unit, Halifax, Canada
g Patient Partner and Resident Physician, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
* Corresponding author. Address: Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health (K8536), 5850/5980 University Avenue, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada. Tel.: 902-470-8877; fax: 902-470-7118. E-mail address: christine.chambers@dal.ca (C. T. Chambers).
10 2024
15 5 2024
165 10 22152234
19 12 2023
28 2 2024
18 3 2024
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

A meta-analysis of 119 studies found that approximately 1 in 5 children/adolescents experience chronic pain. There is a higher prevalence of chronic pain among girls than among boys.

Abstract

Chronic pain, defined as persistent or recurring pain or pain lasting longer than 3 months, is a common childhood problem. The objective of this study was to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of chronic pain (ie, overall, headache, abdominal pain, back pain, musculoskeletal pain, multisite/general pain, and other) in children and adolescents. EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for publications between January 1, 2009, and June 30, 2023. Studies reporting population-based estimates of chronic nondisease related pain prevalence in children or adolescents (age ≤ 19 years) were included. Two independent reviewers screened articles based on a priori protocol. One hundred nineteen studies with a total of 1,043,878 children (52.0% female, mean age 13.4 years [SD 2.4]) were included. Seventy different countries were represented, with the highest number of data points of prevalence estimates coming from Finland and Germany (n = 19 each, 4.3%). The overall prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents was 20.8%, with the highest prevalence for headache and musculoskeletal pain (25.7%). Overall, and for all types of pain except for back pain and musculoskeletal pain, there were significant differences in the prevalence between boys and girls, with girls having a higher prevalence of pain. There was high heterogeneity (I2 99.9%). Overall risk of bias was low to moderate. In summary, approximately 1 in 5 children and adolescents experience chronic pain and prevalence varies by pain type; for most types, there is higher pain prevalence among girls than among boys. Findings echo and expand upon the systematic review conducted in 2011.

Keywords:

Epidemiology
Paediatrics
Pain
Chronic pain
Prevalence
Headache
Back pain
Musculoskeletal pain
Canadian Institutes of Health Research167902 Not ApplicableOPEN-ACCESSTRUE
SDCT
==== Body
pmc1. Introduction

Chronic pain, defined as persistent or recurring pain or pain lasting longer than 3 months,143 is a common problem in childhood and adolescence. Chronic pain in childhood is associated with significant functional impairment that often carries through to adulthood; children who experience chronic pain are at an increased risk for developing depression and anxiety,128,133 experiencing social isolation,95 have more school absences,90 and are more likely to have a poorer quality of life.53 Children with chronic pain often become adults with chronic pain, leading to significant stress on the person, family, and healthcare system.60,86,153 In 2019, an estimated $40B was spent on chronic pain in Canada alone.26 Given the significant individual, social, and economic burden of pediatric chronic pain from childhood through adulthood, it is important to understand the epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents.

In recent years, there has been a substantial effort towards improving the diagnosis and management of pediatric pain. In a 2020 Lancet Commission on children's pain, which involved individuals with lived experiences, 4 transformative goals were proposed: make pain matter, make pain understood, make pain visible, and make pain better.43 According to the Lancet Commission, if achieved, the goals will transform the lives of children with pain and their families.43 In 2020, the World Health Organization released a guideline on the physical, psychological, and pharmacological interventions for the management of primary and secondary chronic pain in children aged 0 to 19 years.160 In addition, chronic primary pain was recognized as a primary pain type in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) in 2019.106 Chronic primary pain is defined as “pain in 1 or more anatomic regions that persists or recurs for longer than 3 months and is associated with significant emotional distress or significant functional disability (interference with activities of daily life and participation in social roles) and that cannot be better explained by another chronic pain condition.”143 (p.1004) Chronic secondary pain is pain that is associated with another condition, such as chronic cancer pain, chronic postsurgical and posttraumatic pain, chronic neuropathic pain, chronic headache and orofacial pain, chronic visceral pain, and chronic musculoskeletal pain.143 However, there remains a need for a pediatric emphasis as the current criteria are focused on adults, and thus might not be relevant for children and adolescents.152 To reach the Lancet Commission goals, combined with the exponential growth in pediatric pain literature over the past few decades,23 an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the overall prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents worldwide is essential. This knowledge is essential to facilitate early diagnosis and improve treatment, ultimately reducing the impact that chronic pain has on the lives of children, adolescents, their families, and society.

The last comprehensive systematic review on the epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents was published over a decade ago by King et al.79 The review estimated that the median prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents ranged from 11% to 38% depending on the pain type.79 However, the prevalence varied substantially across studies and no meta-analysis was conducted at the time. The review also found that the prevalence of chronic pain was higher in girls and the prevalence increased with age.79 The review of King et al. built on the first narrative review on this topic by Goodman et al.,54 who found that significant methodological limitations substantially affected the ability to establish a prevalence of chronic pain. Although a number of other reviews on pediatric pain have been published since the King et al. review, they focused on specific types of pain (eg, functional abdominal pain,82 headache),2,158 did not focus on chronic pain,25 or focused only on adolescents.103 Furthermore, at the time of the 2011 review, the quality of included studies was generally low to moderate and had methodological limitations, such as inconsistent definitions of pain between the studies.79 As the field of systematic reviews and definitions of chronic pain have evolved and standardized over time,106 it is important to explore whether prevalence estimates and study quality remained the same or if any changes in the prevalence and quality of studies have changed over time to advance knowledge in this area.

Therefore, the objectives of this review are to (1) provide updated estimates of the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents overall and by pain type (ie, headache, abdominal pain, back pain, musculoskeletal pain, multisite/general pain, and other pain); (2) compare the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents by sex; and (3) assess study quality and identify gaps in the literature and areas for future research.

2. Methods

This systematic review follows an a priori published protocol.145 In keeping with best practices in patient-oriented research, this review was designed and conducted in collaboration with a patient partner and coauthor (J.M.).

2.1. Inclusion criteria

2.1.1. Population

This review considered studies that included population-based samples of children and/or adolescents aged ≤19 years. This cutoff follows the World Health Organization definition of adolescent, which is ages 10 to 19 years.159 Studies that used a non-population-based sampling approach were excluded. Studies that reported on participants beyond 20 years of age were excluded, unless estimates for younger age groups were able to be calculated separately. No limitations were placed based on geography. Studies that reported on the prevalence of chronic pain in specific subpopulations, such as children and adolescents with chronic illnesses (eg, cancer, arthritis) or other health conditions (eg, cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy), were excluded.

2.1.2. Condition

This review sought to summarize existing evidence on the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents. In the protocol, chronic pain was defined as “pain with a minimum duration of at least 3 months or pain that is described as chronic, persistent, or recurrent.”145 For further clarity, the final definition of chronic pain used in this review was as follows: (1) pain with a minimum duration of at least 3 months; or (2) pain that is described as chronic, persistent, or recurrent with no timeframe reported. If a study included pain measured over a time frame of less than 3 months (eg, participants were asked about recurrent pain over the past 2 months), these were excluded as non-chronic pain. In addition, if a study did not separate chronic pain data from other diagnoses, it was excluded (eg, studies that reported on diagnosis of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders using the ROME criteria141 but did not separately report on the overall abdominal pain subtype were excluded).

2.1.3. Outcomes

The primary outcome of this review is the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents. The original systematic review79 used the following pain types: headache, abdominal pain, back pain, musculoskeletal pain, multiple pain, general pain (eg, any pain, not specified), and other pain (eg, fibromyalgia). For the current review, multiple site pain and general pain were collapsed based on similarity of reporting, and general and other were separated. Furthermore, for the current review, these broad types were defined to capture all relevant and reported outcomes according to the International Association of Study of Pain (IASP) classification of chronic primary pain for ICD-11.106 Thus, although fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain also reflect pain across multiple sites, they are separate primary pain conditions.106 Therefore, these diagnoses were kept separate from multisite/general pain, which is a broader category. Table 1 outlines the pain conditions reported on within each overarching pain type.

Table 1 Included pain types within each overarching chronic pain type.

Chronic pain type	Definition	
Headache	1. Any (not specified)
2. Multisite (migraine, tension, etc)
3. Chronic migraine
4. Chronic tension
5. Not classifiable/other
6. Chronic temporomandibular pain	
Abdominal	1. Any (not specified)
2. Abdominal migraine
3. Irritable bowel syndrome
4. Functional dyspepsia
5. Functional abdominal pain
6. Functional abdominal pain syndrome
7. Abdominal pain—Functional gastrointestinal disorder (AP-FGID)	
Back	1. Any (not specified)
2. Multisite/general
3. Lower back pain (LBP) only
4. Spinal column only	
Musculoskeletal	1. Any (not specified)
2. Multisite/general
3. Neck and shoulder (NSP)
4. Neck pain only
5. Lower limb (leg)	
Multisite/general	1. Any/multisite/combined/general
2. Back and musculoskeletal pain	
Other	1. Fibromyalgia
2. Chronic widespread pain (CWP)
3. CWP and chronic regional pain (CRP) combined	

Additional outcomes collected included pain frequency (ie, daily or several times weekly, weekly or at least weekly, monthly or at least monthly, recurring or not otherwise defined, or met ROME diagnostic criteria for functional abdominal pain disorder) and sociodemographic information (ie, age, sex, and country of data collection). These data are reported at the study level and are available in Table 2.

Table 2 Characteristics of included studies (n = 119).

Study	Study design	Pain type	Pain report	Pain frequency	Sample*
N	Age in y
Mean (range)	Sex
% female	Country	
Adegoke 20151	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Recurring	571	14.2 (10-19)	52.2	Nigeria	
Albuquerque 20093	Cross-sectional	Headache	Parent	Monthly, weekly, daily	5179	NR (6-18)	53.3	Brazil	
Al-Hashel 20194	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	3423	12.5 (6-17)	49.3	Kuwait	
Al-Khotani 20165	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	456	NR (10-18)	59.6	Saudi Arabia	
Alp 20106	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	1385	13.5 (11-18)	39.2	Turkey	
Altamimi 20147	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	451	12.7 (11-15)	49.2	Jordan	
Al-Tulaihi 20098	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	1447	NR (16-19)	47.0	Saudi Arabia	
Arruda 201010	Cross-sectional	Headache, abdominal, musculoskeletal	Parent	Recurring	1906	NR (5-12)	47.6	Brazil	
Ayanniyi 201111	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Recurring	3185	NR (10-19)	54.3	Nigeria	
Ayonrinde 202012	Longitudinal	Abdominal	Child	Weekly	1281	17 (17)	52.8	Australia	
Azevedo 202314	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Recurring	1463	NR (9-19)	49.1	Portugal	
Barack 201515	Cross-sectional	Other	Child, HCP	Recurring	437	NR (11-18)	47.8	Turkey	
Bhatia 201616	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	1115	NR (10-17)	NR	India	
Bouzios 201721	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Parent, child	ROME III	1658	12.9 (6-17)	51.8	Greece	
Buse 201222	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	13,951	NR (12-17)	48.6	United States	
Çagliyan Türk 202024	Cross-sectional	Other	HCP	Recurring	476	13.8 (9-17)	48.5	Turkey	
Castro 201327	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	750	10.4 (7-14)	56.1	Brazil	
Cavestro 201428	Cross-sectional	Headache, abdominal	Parent	Monthly	649	NR (3-11)	49.2	Italy	
Chiwaridzo 201431	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	Recurring	532	16 (13-19)	46.2	Zimbabwe	
Chong 201032	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	2873	NR (6-16)	55.2	Singapore	
Cvetkovic 201434	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	2057	17.2 (14-18)	50.2	Croatia	
da Silva Jr 2019132	Cross-sectional	Headache	HCP	Weekly	284	NR (10-19)	NR	Brazil	
Dantas 202135	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Monthly, weekly	520	NR (10-16)	57.5	Brazil	
de Melo Junior 201998	Cross-sectional	Headache	HCP	Recurring	1342	NR (10-17)	68.7	Brazil	
Devanarayana 201136	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	427	14.4 (12-16)	49.9	Sri Lanka	
Devanarayana 201137	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	2163	13.4 (10-16)	45	Sri Lanka	
Dhroove 201738	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	362	11.6 (8-18)	53.5	Mexico	
Dissing 201739	Longitudinal	Back	Parent	Weekly	1077	NR (10-16)	52	Denmark	
Drozda 201140	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Child	Monthly, weekly	426	NR (13-17)	50	Poland	
Du 201141	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Child, parent	Recurring	14,836	NR (3-17)	49	Germany	
Durmaz 201342	Cross-sectional	Other	Child	Recurring	1109	14.8 (12-18)	50.5	Turkey	
Erdoğan 202144	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Monthly	4151	16.6 (15-19)	48.5	Turkey	
Fabricant 202045	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Recurring	3669	14.0 (10-18)	50.6	New Zealand	
Farrant 202346	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Child	Recurring	7721	NR (12-19)	NR	United States	
Franco-Micheloni 201547	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	1307	12.7 (12-14)	56.8	Brazil	
Franz 201448	Longitudinal	Back	Parent	Weekly	1171	NR (6-11)	53.0	Denmark	
Fuglkjaer 201749	Longitudinal	Musculoskeletal	Parent	Weekly	1033	12.5 (10-16)	52.0	Denmark	
Genizi 201350	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	2019	NR (15-16)	56.7	Israel	
Gobina 201552	Cross-sectional	Headache, abdominal, back	Child	Weekly	36,762	15 (15)	50.3	Multiple countries	
Gobina 201951	Cross-sectional	Headache, abdominal, back, multisite/general	Child	Weekly	214,283	13.6 (11-15)	50.7	Multiple countries	
Gulewitsch 201355	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Parent	ROME II	1537	8.8 (5-12)	51.1	Germany	
Gupta 200956	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	2563	NR (12-19)	38.3	India	
Gustafsson 201857	Longitudinal	Back, musculoskeletal	Child	Weekly, monthly, daily	568	15 (15)	52.8	Finland	
Haraldstad 201158	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Child	Recurring	1238	NR (12-18)	53.0	Norway	
Harrison 201659	Cross-sectional	Other, musculoskeletal	Child	Recurring	3568	NR (17)	58.2	United Kingdom	
Heinrich 200961	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Monthly, weekly	3833	11.4 (14-19)	50.1	Germany	
Hoftun 201163	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Child	Weekly	7373	15.8 (13-19)	50.8	Norway	
Holstein 202065	Time-trend	Abdominal	Child	Recurring	2981	NR (11-15)	51.6	Denmark	
Holstein 202264	Time-trend	Back	Child	Daily	2953	NR (11-15)	51.6	Denmark	
Ivanova 202269	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Child	Recurring	5910	16.2 (14-18)	64.0	Russia	
Játiva 201670	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	417	12.0 (8-15)	49.2	Ecuador	
Kadim 202172	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	396	12.7 (NR)	59.8	Indonesia	
Kaltseis 202273	Cross-sectional	Headache	HCP	Monthly, weekly, daily	1923	17.0 (14-19)	57.3	Austria & Italy	
Katsuki 202374	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Monthly, daily	2489	NR (6-17)	48.0	Japan	
Kedra 201375	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Monthly	1089	NR (10-19)	50.2	Poland	
Kedra 201976	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Recurring	11,424	NR (10-19)	53.8	Poland	
Kemta Lekpa 202177	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Recurring	1075	11 (8-14)	49.5	Cameroon	
Khayat 202178	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Parent	ROME IV	317	NR (3-18)	50.8	Saudi Arabia	
Knezevic-Pogancev 201080	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child, parent, HCP	Monthly	30,636	9.2 (3-17)	49.6	Serbia	
Kolb 202281	Cross-sectional	Headache, back	Child	Recurring	1516	14.4 (11-17)	50.8	Germany	
Krogh 201583	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	488	NR (12-18)	56.6	Norway	
Kroner-Herwig 201184	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Child	Recurring	2219	13.3 (7-14)	50.3	Germany	
Kumar 201785	Cross-sectional	Musculoskeletal	Child	Recurring	1018	11.0 (5-16)	44.8	India	
Lipton 201189	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Daily	24,712	NR (12-19)	49.5	United States	
Lu 201691	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	321	10.0 (8-14)	61.1	Panama	
Lucas 202192	Longitudinal	Multisite/general	Parent	Recurring	4036	10.0 (10)	49.1	Portugal	
Lukaszewska 201393	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Monthly, weekly	2676	16.3 (13-19)	54.1	Poland	
Luntamo 201294	Cross-sectional	Headache, abdominal	Child	Monthly	2215	14.4 (13-18)	50.0	Finland	
Malik 201296	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	5000	NR (8-18)	54.5	India	
Masiero 201097	Cross-sectional	Musculoskeletal	Child	Recurring	7542	15.0 (12-16)	49.9	Italy	
Meziat Filho 201599	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Recurring	989	16.8 (14-17)	53.3	Brazil	
Meziat Filho 2017100	Cross-sectional	Musculoskeletal	Child	Recurring	989	NR (14-17)	NR	Brazil	
Mingels 2022101	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Weekly, daily	424	NR (5-18)	NR	Belgium	
Miro 2023102	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Child	Weekly	1115	11.7 (8-18)	56.0	Spain	
Myrtveit 2014104	Cross-sectional	Musculoskeletal	Child	Weekly	8990	17.8 (17-19)	53.7	Norway	
Nieswand 2019107	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Monthly	2706	NR (6-19)	50.3	Germany	
Noll 2016108	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Monthly, weekly	1374	NR (11-16)	46.8	Brazil	
Nyame 2010109	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Weekly	237	11.8 (8-15)	55.3	United States	
Østeras 2015110	Cross-sectional	Musculoskeletal	Child	Recurring	422	NR (16-17)	51.5	Norway	
O'Sullivan 2012111	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Recurring	1288	17.0 (17)	52.6	Australia	
Oswari 2019112	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	1813	13.5 (10-17)	59.2	Indonesia	
Perera 2016115	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	606	13.0 (11-16)	50.7	Sri Lanka	
Poyrazoğlu 2015117	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	10,584	NR (7-17)	55.7	Turkey	
Rau 2021118	Longitudinal	Multisite/general	Child	Weekly	777	12.9 (9-17)	53.3	Germany	
Rho 2012119	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	5039	NR (6-18)	52.3	South Korea	
Saha 2017120	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	1499	13.1 (11-15)	33.0	Bangladesh	
Santinello 2009121	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Weekly	4386	NR (11-15)	51.6	Italy	
Saps 2009124	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	Weekly	237	11.8 (8-15)	57.0	United States	
Saps 2014123	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	373	10.0 (NR)	50.7	Colombia	
Saps 2017122	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	4394	11.9 (8-18)	48.1	Colombia	
Saps 2018125	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME IV	3567	13.7 (8-18)	56.6	Colombia	
Shan 2013126	Cross-sectional	Back, musculoskeletal	Child	Weekly	3016	NR (15-19)	44.5	China	
Shaygan 2020127	Cross-sectional	Headache, abdominal, back, musculoskeletal, multisite/general	Child	Recurring	734	15.0 (12-19)	62.5	Iran	
Shuaibi 2021129	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Recurring	1089	11.5 (7-16)	61.4	Kuwait	
Siajunboriboon 2022130	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME IV	1700	16.1 (4-18)	55.5	Thailand	
Sillanpaa 2018131	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child, parent, HCP	Recurring	1185	14 (14)	NR	Finland	
Siu 2012134	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Child	Recurring	1518	NR (11-19)	42.9	Hong Kong	
Sjölund 2021135	Longitudinal	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	2374	16.0 (16)	50.6	Sweden	
Sollerhed 2013136	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Child	Recurring	206	NR (8-12)	44.7	Sweden	
Somayajula 2022137	Cross-sectional	Other	HCP	Recurring	8507	NR (8-18)	48.9	United Kingdom	
Sperotto 2014138	Cross-sectional	Musculoskeletal	Child	Recurring	289	10.6 (8-13)	75.7	Italy	
Stahl 2014139	Time-trend	Back, musculoskeletal, multisite/general	Child	Weekly	4436	NR (12-18)	58.9	Finland	
Swain 2014140	Cross-sectional	Headache, abdominal, back	Child	Monthly	404,206	13.6 (9-17)	51.2	Multiple countries	
Torres-Ferrus 2019142	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Monthly, weekly, daily	1619	14.4 (12-18)	51.9	Spain	
Tumin 2018144	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Parent	Recurring	43,712	NR (0-17)	NR	United States	
Udoh 2016146	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	818	14.6 (10-18)	50.0	Nigeria	
van den Heuvel 202062	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Parent	Recurring	6200	6.0 (6)	49.7	Netherlands	
Van Gessel 2011147	Longitudinal	Headache, abdominal, back	Child	Monthly, recurring	2025	NR (12-18)	50.3	Germany	
Vierola 2012149	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Parent	Weekly	424	7.9 (6-8)	48.5	Finland	
Vila 2012150	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	Weekly	1173	13.0 (11-17)	51.0	United Kingdom	
Wager 2020151	Cross-sectional	Multisite/general	Child	Weekly	2280	13.0 (10-18)	52.2	Germany	
Walter 2014155	Cross-sectional	Headache	Child	Weekly	13,570	NR (11-17)	51.3	United States	
Wijga 2021156	Longitudinal	Headache	Child	Recurring	2083	17 (17)	51.6	Netherlands	
Wilkes 2021157	Cross-sectional	Headache	Parent	Recurring	7933	NR (10-11)	48.8	Australia	
Wurm 2018161	Longitudinal	Multisite/general	Child	Monthly	1181	NR (14-16)	46.1	Sweden	
Yao 2011162	Cross-sectional	Back	Child	Recurring	2083	14.4 (10-18)	53.1	China	
Zablah 2015163	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME III	399	11.8 (8-15)	58.7	El Salvador	
Zeevenhooven 2020165	Cross-sectional	Abdominal	Child	ROME IV	782	14.7 (11-18)	61.7	Curacao	
Zhang 2015166	Cross-sectional	Headache, abdominal, back, musculoskeletal	Child	Weekly	2587	NR (16-18)	51.5	China	
* Sample after exclusion, NR = not reported.

Originally, an examination of sociodemographic (eg, age, sex, race) and psychosocial (eg, anxiety, depression, sleep) factors related to the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents was to be undertaken. However, because of difference in reporting and lack of available aggregated data, subanalyses were not possible based on any sociodemographic variables other than sex. In addition, no subanalyses were possible based on psychosocial factors as the measurement tools and reporting varied significantly and was not able to be meta-analyzed in a meaningful way.

2.1.4. Types of studies

This review considered observational or cohort studies that provided prevalence estimates for chronic pain in adolescents and children. Studies must have been published in peer-reviewed journals in English. Case studies, conference abstracts, dissertations, reviews, book chapters, and qualitative studies were excluded. All studies published after January 2009 were eligible because the prior systematic review79 included studies published up until 2009.

2.2. Search strategy

The search strategy was created in consultation with a health research librarian, D.C. The following electronic databases were searched: EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. The searches were restricted to English language articles, human studies, and manuscripts published between January 2009 and June 2023. The original search was conducted on July 7, 2020, with updated searches occurring on June 24, 2021, and June 30, 2023. Forward and backward searches of citation lists of included studies were also conducted.

The search terms were composed of 3 conceptual blocks: (1) pain terms (eg, musculoskeletal pain, back pain, headache, abdominal pain, recurrent pain); (2) pediatric terms (eg, child, adolescent, boy, girl); and (3) epidemiological terms (eg, epidemiology, prevalence, frequency). The full search strategy is in eTable 1, http://links.lww.com/PAIN/C50 in the Supplement.

2.3. Study selection

Records were transferred to Covidence systematic review management software,148 and duplicates were removed through the automation process. Studies manually identified as duplicates were marked as such in the Covidence software. Two reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts and excluded records that did not meet inclusion criteria. The full-text articles were retrieved for the remaining records and 2 independent reviewers, blinded to each other's decisions, determined if the article met the inclusion criteria and recorded reasons for exclusion. Agreement between reviewers was required, and disagreements between reviewers at all stages were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. All reasons for exclusion at full-text stage were recorded and are reported in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) figure.113

2.4. Data extraction and synthesis

Data were extracted from studies by one reviewer and verified by another using a data extraction sheet developed by the authors, which was modified and revised through pilot testing before final data extraction. Any disagreements in the data extraction process were verified through discussion. No authors were contacted for missing or clarification of data, and only data available in the published studies were included. If studies used the same exact population as another study, only one study was used to provide data for this review with other studies being marked as duplicate. If studies used the same database, but at different times of data collection or different pain types, both studies were included. Studies that reported on data from multiple countries within one report were extracted at the country level, when possible.

For all studies, the number of participants (N) and prevalence (%) and/or number of participants with chronic pain (n) were extracted. When a study reported only the prevalence or the number of participants with chronic pain, the other variable was calculated manually. When studies reported duplicate data (ie, time-series design, longitudinal studies), the most recent time point of eligible participant data was extracted. Data were categorized into the broad pain type (headache, abdominal pain, back pain, musculoskeletal pain, multisite/general pain, and other pain).

When studies reported on the prevalence of more than one pain type within one report, data for each pain type were extracted (eg, headache and back pain). However, if a study reported on many subsites of pain within a pain type where the prevalence of the overall pain could not be calculated, then this study was excluded. For example, if a study reported on multiple sites of musculoskeletal pain with participants selecting more than one area, an overall musculoskeletal prevalence could not be calculated without overcounting prevalence, thus was excluded.

2.5. Quality assessment

Risk of bias was determined for each study using a validated 10-item tool developed by Hoy et al.66 designed to assess external and internal validity of prevalence studies. Each item was coded as “0” (low risk) or “1” (high risk) by a reviewer. A second independent reviewer coded each item for 20% of the articles to ensure interrater reliability in using the risk of bias tool. Scores across the 10 items were summed, and each study was categorized with an overall risk of bias as low (0-2), moderate (3-4), or high (5-10).

2.6. Statistical analysis

A meta-analysis was conducted on the overall prevalence of pediatric chronic pain, grouped by pain type: headache, abdominal pain, back pain, musculoskeletal pain, multisite/general pain, and other pain. A second meta-analysis comparing the prevalence of chronic pain between male/female sex was conducted using a subgroup analysis.

Meta-analysis was performed using the meta command in Stata SE 18.0 for single proportion (prevalence) outcomes. Random effects models with restricted maximum likelihood method were carried out. Proportions were calculated using the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation, of which the inverse (ie, the proportion) was reported in the result. Heterogeneity of studies was estimated using I2 to represent the amount of variability in study prevalence that is attributable to heterogeneity across studies rather than chance.

3. Results

3.1. Search results

The combined searches yielded 18,636 citations. After removal of duplicates, 16,063 titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility, of which 346 were screened in full-text review. An additional 20 records were identified through backward and forward citation searching. A total of 119 studies were included in the review. Figure 1 shows the PRISMA diagram with the flow of studies in the review.

Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram.

3.2. Study characteristics

In total, 1,043,878 children (52.0% female) ranging from 0 to 19 years of age (mean age = 13.4 years, SD = 2.4 years) were included in the meta-analysis. There were 70 different countries represented, with the highest number of data points coming from Finland and Germany (n = 19 each, 4.3%). Four studies reported on multiple countries, with each country reported separately, except for Kaltseis et al.73 who reported on Austria and Italy combined. Fourteen studies (11.8%) reported on more than one pain type with the remaining studies only reporting on one pain type, which, when separated out by country when applicable, resulted in a total of 446 data points of prevalence estimates included in the meta-analysis. The total number of data points on each of the following pain types were headache (n = 133, 29.8%), abdominal pain (n = 120, 26.9%), back pain (n = 115, 25.8%), musculoskeletal pain (n = 13, 2.9%), multisite/general pain (n = 60, 13.5%), and other pain (n = 5, 1.1%).

One hundred four (87.4%) of the 119 included studies were cross-sectional in design, 12 (10.1%) were longitudinal studies, and 3 (2.5%) were repeated, time-trend designs. Most studies collected chronic pain data through child report (n = 96, 80.7%) with the remaining assessed through parent (n = 13, 10.9%), healthcare provider proxy (n = 5, 4.2%), or multiple sources (n = 5, 4.2%). Several studies used data from the same project/cohort, including but not limited to the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC),51,52,64,65,121,140 Functional International Digestive Epidemiological Research Survey (FINDERS),38,70,91,122,163 and Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study Denmark (CHAMPS).39,48,49

Chronic pain prevalence was reported daily (n = 8, 5.9%), weekly (n = 31, 23.0%), monthly (n = 19, 14.1%), and recurring (unspecified) (n = 57, 42.2%). In addition, 20 studies (14.8%) reported on the prevalence of pain-related functional abdominal pain disorders as defined by the ROME criteria.

In terms of psychosocial outcomes, 25 studies (21.0%) reported on depression, 20 (16.8%) on anxiety, 16 (13.4%) on sleep, and 11 (9.2%) on stress. Seventeen studies coreported on both anxiety and depression (14.3%). Table 3 provides a detailed breakdown of the psychosocial outcomes by chronic pain types. Because of variation in reporting, no meta-analysis was possible on these outcomes.

Table 3 Summary table of psychosocial outcomes by pain type.

Pain type	Depression	Anxiety	Stress	Sleep	
Headache	5 [35,48,75,155,156]	5 [35,48,84,110,156]	3 [32,84,97]	7 [32,51,95,118,142,155,166]	
Abdominal	3 [12,123,150]	4 [12,73,84,123]	5 [38,84,113,146,165]	2 [95,166]	
Back	3 [58,105,127]	2 [58,84]	1 [84]	2 [58,166]	
Musculoskeletal	4 [58,60,85,127]	2 [58,60]	1 [111]	4 [58,60,85,166]	
Multisite/general	9 [47,63,70,103,119,134,144,152,161]	8 [63,70,84,103,119,144,152,161]	3 [84,134,161]	3 [63,134,152]	
Other	4 [24,43,60,137]	4 [24,43,60,137]	1 [43]	4 [24,43,60,137]	
Total	28	25	14	22	
N.B. Totals do not add up to numbers reported in the table because of multiple studies reporting on different pain types and psychosocial outcomes.

3.3. Prevalence of chronic pain

Overall, across all studies, the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents was 20.8% (95% CI: 19.2-22.4), which equates to 1 in 5 children and adolescents experiencing chronic pain. There is a high proportion of total variability in this estimate due to between-study heterogeneity, with the overall I2 = 99.9%. As seen in Table 4, among the types, the prevalence of headache pain was 25.7% (95% CI: 22.2-29.3), back pain was 19.1% (95% CI: 16.6-21.7), abdominal pain was 17.3% (95% CI: 14.3-20.5), musculoskeletal pain was 25.7% (95% CI: 17.3-35.1), multisite/general pain was 21.0% (95% CI: 18.5-23.6), and other pain was 6.9% (95% CI: 4.4-10.0).

Table 4 Summary table of pooled prevalence estimate by pain type.

Pain type	Prevalence estimate (95% CI)	
Headache (n = 133)	25.7 (22.2, 29.3)	
Abdominal (n = 120)	17.3 (14.3, 20.5)	
Back (n = 115)	19.1 (16.6, 21.7)	
Musculoskeletal (n = 13)	25.7 (17.3, 35.1)	
Multisite/general (n = 60)	21.0 (18.5, 23.6)	
Other (n = 5)	6.9 (4.4, 10.0)	
Total (n = 446)	20.8 (19.2, 22.4)	

3.4. Sex differences in the prevalence of chronic pain

Girls have a higher prevalence of chronic pain (18.3%) compared with boys (12.7%). Among all types and overall, except for back pain and musculoskeletal pain, there were significant differences between boys and girls, with girls having a higher prevalence of pain (Table 5). The largest discrepancies in the prevalence of pain by sex was among musculoskeletal pain, with girls having a prevalence of 43.1% (95% CI: 26.0-61.2), whereas boys had a prevalence of 26.8% (95% CI: 11.8-45.3). However, this difference was not significant, most likely due to low statistical power because only 10 studies were able to be included in this meta-analysis. The largest significant difference was for multisite/general pain with girls having a prevalence of 24.5% (95% CI: 21.7-27.4), whereas boys had a prevalence of 15.1% (95% CI: 13.2-17.0).

Table 5 Summary of pooled prevalence estimates by pain type and sex.

	Pooled proportion (95% CI)	
Males	Females	Overall	
Headache (n = 170)	15.1 (12.7, 17.6)	23.5 (19.9, 21.4)	19.1 (1.69, 21.4)	
Abdominal (n = 138)	7.1 (5.8, 8.4)	11.3 (9.0, 13.8)	9.1 (7.8, 10.5)	
Back (n = 154)	13.9 (11.9, 16.0)	15.1 (12.5, 17.9)	14.5 (12.9, 16.2)	
Musculoskeletal (n = 10)	26.8 (11.8, 45.3)	43.1 (26.0, 61.2)	34.8 (22.4, 48.3)	
Multisite/general (n = 96)	15.1 (13.2, 17.0)	24.5 (21.7, 27.4)	19.6 (17.7, 21.5)	
Other (n = 10)	5.1 (3.7, 6.7)	9.7 (8.6, 10.9)	7.0 (4.9, 9.4)	
Total (n = 574)	12.7 (11.6, 13.8)	18.3 (16.6, 20.0)	15.4 (14.4, 16.4)	

3.5. Risk of bias assessment

Most included studies were categorized as having either low (n = 57, 47.9%) or moderate (n = 55, 46.2%) overall risk of bias, with only 7 studies (5.9%) categorized as high risk (Table 6). The most common areas of bias across studies were lack of national representation (n = 97, 81.5%) and nonresponse bias (n = 74, 62.2%), whereas the least common areas of bias were inconsistent data collection methods (n = 0, 0%), sampling frame (n = 2, 1.7%), appropriate numerators and denominators (n = 14, 11.8%), and inadequate length of prevalence period (n = 14, 11.8%).

Table 6 Risk of bias summary scores (n = 119)*†

Study (first author, year)	Item 1‡
Target population	Item 2§
Sampling frame	Item 3‖
Random selection	Item 4¶
Nonresponse bias	Item 5#
Data collection	Item 6**
Case definition	Item 7††
Reliability and validity	Item 8‡‡
Mode data collection	Item 9§§
Prevalence period	Item 10‖‖
Parameter calculations	Summary score (/10)	Overall category	
Adegoke, 20151	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Albuquerque, 20093	1	0	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Al-Hashel, 20194	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Al-Khotani, 20165	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Alp, 20106	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Altamimi, 20147	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Al-Tulaihi, 20098	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Arruda, 201010	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Ayanniyi, 201111	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Ayonrinde, 202012	1	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Azabagic, 201613	1	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Barçak, 201515	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	2	Low	
Bhatia, 201616	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Bouzios, 201721	1	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Buse, 201222	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Çagliyan Türk, 202024	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Castro, 201327	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Cavestro, 201428	1	0	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Chiwaridzo, 201431	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	Low	
Chong, 201032	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	2	Low	
Cvetkovic, 201434	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	3	Moderate	
da Silva Jr, 2010132	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	2	Low	
Dantas, 202135	1	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
de Melo Junior, 201998	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Devanarayana, 201136	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Devanarayana, 201137	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Dhroove, 201738	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	Low	
Dissing, 201739	0	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Drozda, 201140	1	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Du, 201141	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Durmaz, 201342	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	2	Low	
Erdoğan, 202144	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Fabricant, 202045	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Farrant, 202346	1	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	1	1	6	High	
Franco-Micheloni, 201547	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Franz, 201448	0	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Fuglkjaer, 201749	0	0	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Genizi, 201350	1	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Gobina, 201552	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	Low	
Gobina, 201951	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	Low	
Gulewitsch, 201355	1	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	1	0	5	High	
Gupta, 200956	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Gustafsson, 201857	1	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	1	5	High	
Haraldstad, 201158	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Harrison, 201659	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Heinrich, 200961	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Hoftun, 201163	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Holstein, 202065	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	Low	
Holstein, 202264	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	Low	
Ivanova, 202269	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	0	1	0	6	High	
Jativa, 201670	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Kadim, 202172	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Kaltseis, 202273	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Katsuki, 202374	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	2	Low	
Kedra, 201375	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Kedra, 201976	1	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Khayat, 202178	1	0	0	1	1	0	1	0	1	0	5	High	
Knezevic-Pogancev, 201080	1	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	0	4	Moderate	
Kolb, 202281	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	Low	
Krogh, 201583	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Kroner-Herwig 201184	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Kumar, 201785	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Lipton, 201189	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Kemta Lekpa, 202177	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Lu, 201691	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Lucas, 202192	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	5	High	
Lukaszewska, 201393	1	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Luntamo, 201294	1	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	1	4	Moderate	
Malik, 201296	1	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	0	4	Moderate	
Masiero, 201097	1	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Meziat Filho, 201599	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Meziat Filho, 2017100	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Mingels, 2022101	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Miró, 2023102	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Myrtveit, 2014104	1	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Nieswand, 2019107	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Noll, 2016108	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Nyame, 2010109	1	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Østeras, 2015110	1	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
O'Sullivan, 2012111	1	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Oswari, 2019112	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Perera, 2016115	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	2	Low	
Poyrazoglu, 2015117	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Rau, 2021118	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Rho, 2012119	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	Low	
Saha, 2017120	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Santinello, 2009121	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Saps, 2009124	1	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Saps, 2014123	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	3	Moderate	
Saps, 2017122	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Saps, 2018125	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Shan, 2013126	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Shaygan, 2020127	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Shuaibi, 2021129	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Sillanpaa, 2018131	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	4	Moderate	
Siu, 2012134	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Sjölund, 2021135	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Sollerhed, 2013136	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	1	4	Moderate	
Somayajula, 2022137	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	3	Moderate	
Sperotto, 2014138	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	4	Moderate	
Stahl, 2014139	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	1	3	Moderate	
Swain, 2014140	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	Low	
Torres-Ferrus, 2019142	1	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	4	Moderate	
Tumin, 2018144	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Udoh, 2016146	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
van den Heuvel, 202062	1	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Van Gessel, 2011147	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Vierola, 2012149	1	0	1	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	6	High	
Vila, 2012150	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
Wager, 2020151	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Walter, 2014155	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	3	Moderate	
Wijga, 2021156	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	2	Low	
Wilkes, 2021157	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	4	Moderate	
Wurm, 2018161	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	2	Low	
Yao, 2011162	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Zablah, 2015163	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	Low	
Zeevenhooven, 2020165	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	3	Moderate	
Zhang, 2015166	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	Low	
* “0” = low risk, “1” = high risk.

† 0 to 2 = low risk (further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate); 3 to 4 = moderate risk (further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate and may change the estimate); 5 to 10 = high risk (further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate and is likely to change the estimate).

‡ Item 1: Was the study's target population a close representation of the national population in relation to relevant variables, eg, age, sex, occupation?

§ Item 2: Was the sampling frame a true or close representation of the target population?

‖ Item 3: Was some form of random selection used to select the sample, OR, was a census undertaken?

¶ Item 4: Was the likelihood of nonresponse bias minimal?

# Item 5: Were data collected directly from the subjects (as opposed to a proxy)?

** Item 6: Was an acceptable case definition used in the study?

†† Item 7: Was the study instrument that measured the parameter of interest (eg, prevalence of low back pain) shown to have reliability and validity (if necessary)?

‡‡ Item 8: Was the same mode of data collection used for all subjects?

§§ Item 9: Was the length of the shortest prevalence period for the parameter of interest appropriate?

‖‖ Item 10: Were the numerator(s) and denominator(s) for the parameter of interest appropriate?

4. Discussion

This systematic review provides updated estimates of the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents based on the literature published since 2009. Based on 119 studies and 446 data points across 70 countries, the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents was estimated at 20.8%, which is equivalent to 1 in 5 children worldwide experiencing chronic pain. Given the high degree of heterogeneity, which demonstrates the variability among the results of individual studies, the pooled prevalence should be interpreted with caution. However, the risk of bias for the included studies was predominantly low or moderate, suggesting that the evidence at the study level is reliable. Girls have a higher prevalence of chronic pain than boys, among all types and overall, except for back pain and musculoskeletal pain.

The prevalence estimates yielded in this study are in line with those reported in the last comprehensive systematic review on the epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents over a decade ago.79 The previous review published in 2011 was not a meta-analysis but instead reported that the median prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents ranged from 11% to 38% depending on pain type.79 They similarly found that the prevalence of chronic pain was higher in girls than in boys but were not able to provide meta-analysis prevalence estimates. Thus, as an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents, the current review was able to provide reliable evidence on the prevalence of chronic pain that has been published since 2009.

Our findings suggest that chronic pain in children and adolescents continues to be a common health issue and despite advances in pain prevention and management33,160 and calls for transformative action in the field,43 there are still significant numbers of children and adolescents experiencing chronic pain. Furthermore, a few recent studies of chronic pain in children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic found a decrease in the prevalence compared with a prepandemic cohort.9,118 Other studies suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on children and adolescents with chronic pain,105 which could potentially set back any progress made. The current review was not able to compare any differences in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic due to limited number of studies collecting data during this period. However, this potential issue should continue to be explored to determine whether any changes in prevalence occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the mechanism by which this may or may not be occurring.

Although there are other systematic reviews on the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents, the current review is the most comprehensive, examining chronic pain in children from 0 to 19 years from all countries. Other reviews are limited by pain type,20,30 age ranges,20 and geographical locations.30,88 These differences may help explain variation in the prevalence of chronic pain reported. For instance, in the current review, the prevalence of abdominal pain was found to be 17.3%, yet in other systematic reviews, the prevalence has ranged from 8.4%30 to 13.5%.82 These differences are likely related to different definitions of chronic pain or differences in populations studied, including geographical location. Thus, the current review offers a broad picture of the evidence on the prevalence of chronic pain as defined by the ICD-11, in children and adolescents aged 0 through 19 years worldwide.

Girls had a higher prevalence of chronic headaches, multisite/general pain, and overall pain than boys. This is a similar finding to Liao et al.88 who found that headache, abdominal, and multisite/general pain were also more prevalent in girls than in boys in their meta-analysis on pediatric chronic pain in low-income and middle-income countries. The higher pain prevalence in girls in comparison to boys may be related to pubertal development, as it has been established that sex differences in pain often emerge during adolescence87 and differences in pain experienced during experimental pain tasks start to differ around 12 years of age.17 The lack of sex differences in back and musculoskeletal pain are of note and worthy of future research. Furthermore, there is an important distinction between sex (biological) and gender (social constructed roles and expression), yet gender is rarely studied directly.18 As research continues to expand in this area, specific research into sex and gender differences among children and adolescents with chronic pain is recommended to understand the biopsychosocial factors that influence this difference. Furthermore, it is important to consider potential differences between sex and gender and its impact on pediatric chronic pain, as gender is increasingly recognized as a more fluid entity and there is a paucity of evidence in transgender and gender-diverse adolescents.19 Although there is evidence on the increased risk of pain experiences in gender-diverse youth,19 there is a lack of evidence on the prevalence in this population, suggesting an important area for future exploration.

The continued high prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents underscores the need for continued research and knowledge mobilization to prevent and manage pain in children and improve early diagnosis. In a recent review, the current knowledge around pediatric chronic pain was unsatisfactory among healthcare providers, especially for assessment and management.116 Given the substantial evidence around pediatric pain, there is an increased need for knowledge mobilization of this evidence to not only healthcare providers but also parents, who act as advocates for their children.29 For example, Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP) is a Canadian knowledge mobilization network that seeks to bridge the gap between evidence-based solutions and current treatment practices.68 To move the needle on chronic pain in children and adolescents, new and innovative ways to disseminate knowledge are needed.

Despite an attempt to explore differences in the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents because of sociodemographic (eg, age, race) and psychosocial (eg, anxiety, depression, sleep) factors, only differences due to sex were able to be analyzed. Analysis based on age was not possible due to substantial variation in the range of ages that were included in studies and variation in how age comparison was reported within each study. In addition, analysis based on race was not possible as no studies reported differences in chronic pain prevalence by race. The lack of consistent or available data is a significant limitation in the field, as this limits the ability to understand the impact of chronic pain based on equity, diversity, and inclusivity (EDI) variables. The experience of chronic pain has been shown to be interconnected with social inequities and structural violence154 with certain populations, such as indigenous populations71 and people of color164 experiencing higher pain symptoms than the general population. Therefore, more work is needed to understand the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents from Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) populations.

Furthermore, because of differences in measurement tools used and timing of when data was collected, no meta-analysis on psychosocial variables was possible. Further research should consider using similar standardized measures of psychosocial factors,114 which would facilitate a greater ability to consider how psychosocial variables are related to chronic pain in children and adolescents.

4.1. Strengths and limitations

This systematic review has several identified strengths. First, a comprehensive literature search was used to identify eligible studies, and a meta-analysis was conducted to determine the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents. This is an improvement over the last systematic review, which did not include a meta-analysis. The current review ensured that included studies were similar in definition and methodological approaches, which allowed for meta-analyses to be performed, thus strengthening the estimates on the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents. Second, all the studies included in this review underwent critical appraisal and were predominantly considered low-to-moderate risk of bias, suggesting that the quality of data included is much improved since previous iterations of this review.54,79 Third, a clear definition of chronic pain that is consistent with the literature106 was used to determine which studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. This resulted in some studies being deemed ineligible because of the use of definitions that were unclear or that did not meet the IASP106 definition of chronic pain, such as asking participants about their pain over the past month, rather than over 3 months.

Despite these strengths, this review does have some limitations. First, there was significant between-study heterogeneity in the meta-analysis with the I2 at 99.9%, and thus, the prevalence estimates should be interpreted with caution. This can be related to the fact that a variety of chronic pain types were included, as well as different time points of measurement (eg, weekly, monthly, recurring), different ages (ie, 0-19 years), and different definitions of chronic pain types (eg, using the ROME criteria to determine the presence of abdominal pain). Despite this limitation, the significant number of studies included in the meta-analysis lends strength to the general findings.

In addition, because of reporting in the original articles, the number of cases in a study was often calculated from reported prevalence and vice versa. Although this did not have a major impact on the overall prevalence calculation for the current study, it did result in some discrepancies between the overall and sex-based analyses, where the number of cases in the sex analysis did not always match the overall prevalence cases. This resulted in different prevalence estimates for the pain types overall in studies included in the sex analysis and those included in the full analysis. Furthermore, as not all studies provided a comparison by sex, not all studies were able to be included in the sex meta-analysis, leading to different overall prevalence estimates for each pain type. Nevertheless, the difference in cases and prevalence was not substantial and is unlikely to have significantly affected the findings. Furthermore, because of the lack of consistent reporting or splitting of age groups in analysis, no analysis was possible related to age, despite evidence suggesting that chronic pain can vary based on age.

Another limitation is that as an updated systematic review, the search was limited to articles published between 2009 and 2023. Although results are likely an indication of prevalence estimates during that time, this review did not explore the relation between time of data collection and prevalence.

A final limitation is the original articles used self-reported and parent-reported data, which can be influenced by recall bias. However, using a chronic pain definition that includes a time frame of having chronic pain for at least the past 3 months is likely to minimize this limitation as the time point is a recent recall period.

4.2. Future directions and recommendations

This review highlights several areas of recommendations related to the future of research on the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents. First, it is important to ensure that the definition of chronic pain used in future prevalence studies is consistent with the IASP and ICD-11's definition of chronic primary pain67,106 and any future definitions specific to children and adolescents. Second, improved reporting on the prevalence of chronic pain based on age, race, and psychosocial outcomes is recommended, including provision of prevalence at the granular level (eg, by each age, by race) when possible. Third, consideration of how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the prevalence of chronic pain is recommended for future exploration, including a consideration of the impacts of long COVID and the unknown impact on children. Fourth, it is important to expand beyond the boy–girl dichotomy with enhanced nuance needed in the field to allow for a broader sex-based and gender-based analysis to better understand how chronic pain may vary in these populations.

5. Conclusions

Although the prevalence of chronic pain varies by pain type, approximately 1 in 5 children and adolescents experience chronic pain, with girls often experiencing a higher prevalence than boys overall and in headache, back pain, and other pain. The findings of this review enhance our understanding of the current burden of pediatric chronic pain, which may help inform the treatment and allocation of clinical resources for this population.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Appendix A. Supplemental digital content

Supplemental digital content associated with this article can be found online at http://links.lww.com/PAIN/C50.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. G. Allen Finley (Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management & Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University & Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health) for his clinical perspective at the early stages of this project. They also thank Dr. Samuel Stewart (Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University) who provided data analytical support at the early stages of this project and Jessica Savoie (Research Assistant, IWK Health) and Alicia Reil (Research Assistant, IWK Health) for assisting with data verification.

Sources of funding and support: This work was supported by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; FRN167902) awarded to C.T.C. C.T.C. is the senior author and is supported by a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair with infrastructure support from the Canada Foundation for Innovation. C.L. was supported by an IWK Health Summer Studentship [1025420]. P.R.T. was supported by a Scholars Award from Research Nova Scotia, a Nova Scotia Graduate Scholarship, and an IWK Graduate Studentship Award. J.D. was supported by a CIHR Fellowship (FRN181869).

Data transparency and sharing: As this is a review, no new data have been generated.

Authorship: C.T.C. had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. C.T.C. conceived the study idea. C.L., P.R.T., and J.A.P. designed the study protocol. N.P. and J.D. led the data extraction. C.L. and B.C. led the quality appraisal. A.G. led the meta-analysis. J.D., J.A.P., P.R.T., C.T.C., and B.C. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors provided critical insights at all stages. All authors approved and contributed to the final manuscript. Authorship decisions were guided by the ICMJE guidelines.

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020198690.

Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.painjournalonline.com).
==== Refs
References

[1] Adegoke B Odole A Adeyinka A . Adolescent low back pain among secondary school students in Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci 2015;15 :429–37.26124788
[2] Albers L von Kries R Heinen F Straube A . Headache in school children: is the prevalence increasing? Curr Pain Headache Rep 2015;19 :4.25754597
[3] Albuquerque RPD Santos AB Tognola WA Arruda MA . An epidemiologic study of headaches in Brazilian schoolchildren with a focus on pain frequency. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2009;67 :798–803.19838506
[4] Al-Hashel JY Ahmed SF Alroughani R . Prevalence and burden of primary headache disorders in Kuwaiti children and adolescents: a community based study. Front Neurol 2019;10 :793–7.31417482
[5] Al-Khotani A Naimi-Akbar A Albadawi E Ernberg M Hedenberg-Magnusson B Christidis N . Prevalence of diagnosed temporomandibular disorders among Saudi Arabian children and adolescents. J Headache Pain 2016;17 :41.27102118
[6] Alp R Alp SI Palanci Y Sur H Boru UT Ozge A Yapici Z . Use of the international classification of headache disorders, Second Edition, criteria in the diagnosis of primary headache in schoolchildren: epidemiology study from Eastern Turkey. Cephalalgia 2010;30 :868–77.20647179
[7] Altamimi EM Al-Safadi MH . Abdominal pain-predominant functional gastrointestinal disorders in Jordanian school children. Gastroenterol Res 2014;7 :137–42.
[8] Al-Tulaihi BA Al-Jumah MA . Prevalence of migraine and non-migraine headache among high school students at the National Guard Housing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2009;30 :120–4.19139785
[9] Aluko B Mitchell AN Tumin D Zeldin E . Nation-wide decrease in the prevalence of pediatric chronic pain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scand J Pain 2023;23 :608–12.36450241
[10] Arruda MA Guidetti V Galli F Albuquerque RCAP Bigal ME . Childhood periodic syndromes: a population-based study. Pediatr Neurol 2010;43 :420–4.21093733
[11] Ayanniyi O Mbada CE Muolokwu CA . Prevalence and profile of back pain in Nigerian adolescents. Med Princ Pract 2011;20 :368–73.21576999
[12] Ayonrinde OT Ayonrinde OA Adams LA Sanfilippo FM O’ Sullivan TA Robinson M Oddy WH Olynyk JK . The relationship between abdominal pain and emotional wellbeing in children and adolescents in the Raine Study. Sci Rep 2020;10 :1646.32015372
[13] Azabagic S Spahic R Pranjic N Mulic M . Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders in primary school children in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Mater Sociomed 2016;28 :164–7.27482154
[14] Azevedo N Ribeiro JC Machado L . Back pain in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Eur Spine J 2023;32 :3280–9.37156852
[15] Barack ÖF Karkucak M pkin E KaragÜZel G Dilber B . Sex differences in experimental pain among healthy children SS. Prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility and fibromyalgia syndrome in the children population of Trabzon: a Turkish study. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 2015;61 :6–11.
[16] Bhatia V Deswal S Seth S Kapoor A Sibal A Gopalan S . Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders among adolescents in Delhi based on Rome III criteria: a school-based survey. Indian J Gastroenterol 2016;35 :294–8.27554498
[17] Boerner KE Birnie KA Caes L Schinkel M Chambers CT . Sex differences in experimental pain among healthy children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PAIN 2014;155 :983–93.24508752
[18] Boerner KE Chambers CT Gahagan J Keogh E Fillingim RB Mogil JS . Conceptual complexity of gender and its relevance to pain. PAIN 2018;159 :2137–41.29781962
[19] Boerner KE Harrison LE Battison EAJ Murphy C Wilson AC . Topical review: acute and chronic pain experiences in transgender and gender-diverse youth. J Pediatr Psychol 2023;48 :984–91.37886804
[20] Boronat AC Ferreira-Maia AP Matijasevich A Wang Y-P . Epidemiology of functional gastrointestinal disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2017;23 :3915–27.28638232
[21] Bouzios I Chouliaras G Chrousos GP Roma E Gemou-Engesaeth V . Functional gastrointestinal disorders in Greek Children based on ROME III criteria: identifying the child at risk. Neurogastroenterology Motil 2017;29 :1–8.
[22] Buse DC Manack AN Fanning KM Serrano D Reed ML Turkel CC Lipton RB . Chronic migraine prevalence, disability, and sociodemographic factors: results from the American migraine prevalence and prevention study. Headache 2012;52 :1456–70.22830411
[23] Caes L Boerner KE Chambers CT Campbell-Yeo M Stinson J Birnie KA Parker JA Huguet A Jordan A Maclaren Chorney J Schinkel M Dol J . A comprehensive categorical and bibliometric analysis of published research articles on pediatric pain from 1975 to 2010. PAIN 2016;157 :302–13.26529270
[24] Cagliyan Turk A Sahin F . Prevalence of juvenile fibromyalgia syndrome among children and adolescents and its relationship with academic success, depression and quality of life, Çorum Province, Turkey. Arch Rheumatol 2020;35 :68–77.32637922
[25] Calvo-Muñoz I Gómez-Conesa A Sánchez-Meca J . Prevalence of low back pain in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr 2013;13 :14.23351394
[26] Canada H . Canadian pain task force report: September 2020, 2020. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/about-health-canada/public-engagement/external-advisory-bodies/canadian-pain-task-force/report-2020.html. Accessed November 24, 2023.
[27] Castro K Rockett F Billo M Oliveira G Klein L Parizotti C Perla A Perry I . Lifestyle, quality of life, nutritional status, and headache in school age children. Nutr Hosp 2013;28 :1546–51.24160214
[28] Cavestro C Montrucchio F Benci P Pompilio D Mandrino S Cencio PG Frigeri MC Di Pietrantonj C . Headache prevalence and related symptoms, family history, and treatment habits in a representative population of children in Alba, Italy. Pediatr Neurol 2014;51 :348–53.24993247
[29] Chambers CT . From evidence to influence: dissemination and implementation of scientific knowledge for improved pain research and management. PAIN 2018;159 (suppl 1 ):S56–64.30113948
[30] Chitkara DK Rawat DJ Talley NJ . The epidemiology of childhood recurrent abdominal pain in Western countries: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100 :1868–75.16086724
[31] Chiwaridzo M Naidoo N . Prevalence and associated characteristics of recurrent non-specific low back pain in Zimbabwean adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15 :381.25406690
[32] Chong SC Chan YH Ong HT Low PS Tay SKH . Headache diagnosis, disability and co-morbidities in a multi-ethnic, heterogeneous paediatric Asian population. Cephalalgia 2010;30 :953–61.20656706
[33] Cohen SP Vase L Hooten WM . Chronic pain: an update on burden, best practices, and new advances. Lancet (London, England) 2021;397 :2082–97.34062143
[34] Cvetković VV Plavec D Lovrenčić-Huzjan A Strineka M Ažman D Bene R . Prevalence and clinical characteristics of headache in adolescents: a Croatian epidemiological study. Cephalalgia 2014;34 :289–97.24126946
[35] Dantas MG Aquino AN Correia HJ Ferreira K Nascimento BB Silva L Da Silva APS Penha P Joao SM . Prevalence of back pain and idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents from the semiarid region of Brazil: a cross-sectional study. J Chiropr Med 2021;20 :97–107.35463838
[36] Devanarayana NM Adhikari C Pannala W Rajindrajith S . Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal diseases in a cohort of Sri Lankan adolescents: comparison between Rome II and Rome III criteria. J Trop Pediatr 2011;57 :34–9.20525779
[37] Devanarayana NM Mettananda S Liyanarachchi C Nanayakkara N Mendis N Perera N Rajindrajith S . Abdominal pain-predominant functional gastrointestinal diseases in children and adolescents: prevalence, symptomatology, and association with emotional stress. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011;53 :659–65.21697745
[38] Dhroove G Saps M Garcia-Bueno C Leyva Jiménez A Rodriguez-Reynosa LL Velasco-Benítez CA . Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in Mexican schoolchildren. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2017;82 :13–8.27546626
[39] Dissing KB Hestbaek L Williams C Kamper S Boyle E Wedderkopp N . Spinal Pain in Danish School children—how often and how long? The CHAMPS Study-DK. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18 :1–13.28052768
[40] Drozda K Lewandowski J Górski P . Back pain in lower and upper secondary school pupils living in urban areas of Poland. The case of Poznań. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2011;13 :489–503.22147438
[41] Du Y Knopf H Zhuang W Ellert U . Pain perceived in a national community sample of German children and adolescents. Eur J Pain 2011;15 :649–57.21177129
[42] Durmaz Y Alayli G Canbaz S Zahiroglu Y Bilgici A Ilhanli I Kuru O . Prevalence of juvenile fibromyalgia syndrome in an urban population of Turkish adolescents: impact on depressive symptoms, quality of life and school performance. Chin Med J (Engl) 2013;126 :3705–11.24112168
[43] Eccleston C Fisher E Howard RF Slater R Forgeron P Palermo TM Birnie KA Anderson BJ Chambers CT Crombez G Ljungman G Jordan I Jordan Z Roberts C Schechter N Sieberg CB Tibboel D Walker SM Wilkinson D Wood C . Delivering transformative action in paediatric pain: a Lancet child & adolescent health commission. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2020;4642 :1–41.
[44] Erdoğan A Tuncel D Işikay S Okyay RA . Restless legs syndrome and headache cause sleepiness and consequent poor school performance: a community-based study from Turkey. Minerva Pediatr (Torino) 2021. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5276.21.06303-5
[45] Fabricant PD Heath MR Schachne JM Doyle SM Green DW Widmann RF . The epidemiology of back pain in American children and adolescents. Spine 2020;45 :1135–42.32097269
[46] Farrant B Denny S Vroegop P Fenaughty J Clark TC . Prevalence, severity and impact of chronic pain among a representative cross‐sectional study of New Zealand high school students. J Paediatr Child Health 2023;59 :144–52.36334005
[47] Franco-Micheloni AL Fernandes G Goncalves D Camparis C . Temporomandibular disorders in a young adolescent Brazilian population: epidemiologic characterization and associated factors. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2015;29 :242–9.26244432
[48] Franz C Wedderkopp N Jespersen E Rexen CT Leboeuf-Yde C . Back pain in children surveyed with weekly text messages - a 2.5 year prospective school cohort study. Chiropractic Man Therap 2014;22 :35.
[49] Fuglkjær S Hartvigsen J Wedderkopp N Boyle E Jespersen E Junge T Larsen LR Hestbæk L . Musculoskeletal extremity pain in Danish school children—how often and for how long? the CHAMPS study-DK. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18 :492.29178864
[50] Genizi J Srugo I Kerem NC . The cross- ethnic variations in the prevalence of headache and other somatic complaints among adolescents in Northern Israel. J Headache Pain 2013;14 :21.23566020
[51] Gobina I Villberg J Valimaa R Tynjala J Whitehead R Cosma A Brooks F Cavallo F Ng K de Matos M Villerusa A . Prevalence of self-reported chronic pain among adolescents: evidence from 42 countries and regions. Eur J Pain 2019;23 :316–6.30098106
[52] Gobina I Villberg J Villerusa A Välimaa R Tynjälä J Ottova-Jordan V Ravens-Sieberer U Levin K Cavallo F Borraccino A Sigmund E Andersen A Holstein B . Self-reported recurrent pain and medicine use behaviours among 15-year olds: results from the international study. Eur J Pain 2015;19 :77–84.24807819
[53] Gold JI Yetwin AK Mahrer NE Carson MC Griffin AT Palmer SN Joseph MH . Pediatric chronic pain and health-related quality of life. J Pediatr Nurs 2009;24 :141–50.19268235
[54] Goodman JE McGrath PJ . The epidemiology of pain in children and adolescents: a review. PAIN 1991;46 :247–64.1758709
[55] Gulewitsch MD Enck P Schwille-Kiuntke J Weimer K Schlarb AA . Rome III criteria in parents' hands: pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in community children and associations with somatic complaints and mental health. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;25 :1223–9.24002016
[56] Gupta R Bhatia MS Dahiya D Sharma S Sapra R Semalti K Dua RPS . Recurrent headache in Indian adolescents. Indian J Pediatr 2009;76 :733–7.19381508
[57] Gustafsson ML Laaksonen C Aromaa M Löyttyniemi E Salanterä S . The prevalence of neck-shoulder pain, back pain and psychological symptoms in association with daytime sleepiness—a prospective follow-up study of school children aged 10 to 15. Scand J Pain 2018;18 :389–97.29794264
[58] Haraldstad K Sørum R Eide H Natvig GK Helseth S . Pain in children and adolescents: prevalence, impact on daily life, and parents' perception, a school survey. Scand J Caring Sci 2011;25 :27–36.20409061
[59] Harrison L Wilson S Munafò MR . Pain-related and psychological symptoms in adolescents with musculoskeletal and sleep problems. Clin J Pain 2016;32 :246–53.25974623
[60] Hassett AL Hilliard PE Goesling J Clauw DJ Harte SE Brummett CM . Reports of chronic pain in childhood and adolescence among patients at a tertiary care pain clinic. J Pain 2013;14 :1390–7.24021576
[61] Heinrich M Morris L Kröner-Herwig B . Self-report of headache in children and adolescents in Germany: possibilities and confines of questionnaire data for headache classification. Cephalalgia 2009;29 :864–72.19250286
[62] van den Heuvel MM Jansen PW Bindels PJE Bierma-Zeinstra SMA van Middelkoop M . Musculoskeletal pain in 6-year-old children: the generation R study. PAIN 2020;161 :1278–85.31917774
[63] Hoftun GB Romundstad PR Zwart JA Rygg M . Chronic idiopathic pain in adolescence - high prevalence and disability: the young HUNT study 2008. PAIN 2011;152 :2259–66.21683528
[64] Holstein B Damsgaard M Madsen K Pedersen T Toftager M . Chronic backpain among adolescents in Denmark: trends 1991 - 2018 and association with socioeconomic status. Eur J Pediatr 2022;181 :691–9.34529135
[65] Holstein BE Damsgaard MT Ammitzbøll J Madsen KR Pedersen TP Rasmussen M . Recurrent abdominal pain among adolescents: trends and social inequality 1991-2018. Scand J Pain 2020;21 :95–102.32892190
[66] Hoy D Brooks P Woolf A Blyth F March L Bain C Baker P Smith E Buchbinder R . Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65 :934–9.22742910
[67] ICD-11. Available at: https://icd.who.int/en. Accessed February 12, 2024.
[68] Introducing… Solutions for kids in pain—ProQuest. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2453887134?pq-origsite=primo. Accessed November 27 2023.
[69] Ivanova T Pisklakov AV Lubenitskaya AN Pavlenko NI Sitko LA . Chronic pain syndrome in adolescents. Med News North Caucasus 2022;17 :153–7.
[70] Játiva E Velasco-Benítez CA Koppen IJN Jativa-Cabezas Z Saps M . Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in schoolchildren in Ecuador. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2016;63 :25–8.26771768
[71] Jimenez N Garroutte E Kundu A Morales L Buchwald D . A review of the experience, epidemiology, and management of pain among American Indian, Alaska native, and aboriginal Canadian peoples. J Pain 2011;12 :511–22.21330217
[72] Kadim M Setiani A Hendarto A . Risk Factors of recurrent abdominal pain in adolescents. Paediatr Indonesiana 2021;61 :141–8.
[73] Kaltseis K Frank F Bernar B Kiechl S Winder B Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U Knoflach M Broessner G , Early Vascular Ageing EVA Tyrol Study Group. Primary headache disorders in adolescents in north- and south- Tyrol: findings of the EVA- Tyrol-study. Cephalalgia 2022;42 :993–1004.35331020
[74] Katsuki M Matsumori Y Kawahara J Yamagishi C Koh A Kawamura S Kashiwagi K Kito T Oguri M Mizuno S Nakamura K Hayakawa K Ohta O Kubota N Nakamura H Aoyama J Yamazaki I Mizusawa S Ueki Y Ikeda T Yamagishi F . School-based online survey on chronic headache, migraine, and medication-overuse headache prevalence among children and adolescents in Japanese one city—Itoigawa Benizuwaigani study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2023;226 :107610.36724587
[75] Kedra A Czaprowski D . Epidemiology of back pain in children and youth aged 10-19 from the area of the South East of Poland. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013 :506823.23984375
[76] Kędra A Kolwicz-Gańko A Sitarski D Kędra P Czaprowski D . Prevalence of back pain and the knowledge of preventive measures in a cohort of 11619 Polish school-age children and youth-an epidemiological study. Medicine 2019;98 :e15729.31145287
[77] Kemta Lekpa F Enyama D Noukeu Njinkui D Ngongang Chiedjio A Simeni Njonnou SR Ngongang Ouankou C Namme Luma H Choukem S . Prevalence and factors associated with low back pain in schoolchildren in Cameroon, sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Rheum Dis 2021;24 :1186–91.34235853
[78] Khayat A Algethami G Baik S Alhajori M Banjar D . The effect of using Rome IV criteria on the prevalence of functional abdominal pain disorders and functional constipation among children of the western region of Saudi arabia. Glob Pediatr Health 2021;8 :2333794X211022265.
[79] King S Chambers CT Huguet A MacNevin RC McGrath PJ Parker L MacDonald AJ . The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review. PAIN 2011;152 :2729–38.22078064
[80] Knezevic-Pogancev M Jovic N Katanic D Mikov A Stojadinovic . Migraine in children-migraine syndrome in children of Vojvodina. Med Arh 2010;64 :348–53.21218753
[81] Kolb S Burchartz A Krause L Klos L Schmidt S Woll A Niessner C . Physical activity and recurrent pain in children and adolescents in Germany—results from the MoMo study. Children 2022;9 :1645–9.36360373
[82] Korterink JJ Diederen K Benninga MA Tabbers MM . Epidemiology of pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10 :e0126982.25992621
[83] Krogh AB Larsson B Linde M . Prevalence and disability of headache among Norwegian adolescents: a cross-sectional school-based study. Cephalalgia 2015;35 :1181–91.25720767
[84] Kröner-Herwig B Gassmann J Van Gessel H Vath N . Multiple pains in children and adolescents: a risk factor analysis in a longitudinal study. J Pediatr Psychol 2011;36 :420–32.21349906
[85] Kumar G Chhabra A Dewan V Yadav TP . Idiopathic musculoskeletal pain in Indian children-prevalence and impact on daily routine. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed 2017;57 :8–14.28137406
[86] Larsson B Sigurdson JF Sund AM . Long-term follow-up of a community sample of adolescents with frequent headaches. J Headache Pain 2018;19 :79.30182167
[87] Li R Lopez DA Gupta M Palermo TM . Pubertal development and pain incidence and characteristics in children: a 1-year prospective cohort study of a national sample. PAIN 2023;164 :2725–36.37343155
[88] Liao ZW Le C Kynes JM Niconchuk JA Pinto E Laferriere HE Walters CB . Paediatric chronic pain prevalence in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2022;45 :101296.35198925
[89] Lipton RB Manack A Ricci JA Chee E Turkel CC Winner P . Prevalence and burden of chronic migraine in adolescents: results of the chronic daily headache in adolescents study (C-dAS). Headache 2011;51 :693–706.21521206
[90] Logan DE Gray LS Iversen CN Kim S . School self-concept in adolescents with chronic pain. J Pediatr Psychol 2017;42 :892–901.28402494
[91] Lu PL Saps M Chanis RA Velasco-Benítez CA . The prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in children in Panama: a school-based study. Acta Paediatr 2016;105 :e232–6.26933798
[92] Lucas R Talih M Monjardino T Guimarāes S Barros H . Mother-reported pain experience between ages 7 and 10: a prospective study in a population-based birth cohort. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2021;35 :359–70.33226646
[93] Lukaszewska K Lewandowski J . Back pain in Polish adolescents aged 13 to 19 years. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2013;15 :479–93.24431258
[94] Luntamo T Sourander A Rihko M Aromaa M Helenius H Koskelainen M McGrath PJ . Psychosocial determinants of headache, abdominal pain, and sleep problems in a community sample of Finnish adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2012;21 :301–13.22350133
[95] Maes M Van den Noortgate W Fustolo-Gunnink SF Rassart J Luyckx K Goossens L . Loneliness in children and adolescents with chronic physical conditions: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol 2017;42 :622–35.28340072
[96] Malik A Shah P Yaseen Y . Prevalence of primary headache disorders in school-going children in Kashmir Valley (North-west India). Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2012;15 (suppl 1 ):S100–3.23024557
[97] Masiero S Carraro E Sarto D Bonaldo L Ferraro C . Healthcare service use in adolescents with non-specific musculoskeletal pain. Acta Paediatr 2010;99 :1224–8.20219047
[98] de Melo Junior P Aroucha J Arnaud M Lima MGdS Gomes S Ximenes R Rosenblatt A Caldas AdF . Prevalence of TMD and level of chronic pain in a group of Brazilian adolescents. PLoS One 2019;14 :e0205874.30735506
[99] Meziat Filho N Coutinho ES Azevedo e Silva G . Association between home posture habits and low back pain in high school adolescents. Eur Spine J 2015;24 :425–33.25212451
[100] Meziat Filho N Azevedo E Silva G Coutinho ES Mendonça R Santos V . Association between home posture habits and neck pain in high school adolescents. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2017;30 :467–75.27858676
[101] Mingels S Granitzer M . Cross-sectional study of headache in flemish children and adolescents. Child Neurol Open 2022;9 :2329048X221140783.
[102] Miró J Roman-Juan J Sánchez-Rodríguez E Solé E Castarlenas E Jensen MP . Chronic pain and high impact chronic pain in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study. J Pain 2023;24 :812–23.36577459
[103] Murray CB De La Vega R Murphy LK Kashikar-Zuck S Palermo TM . The prevalence of chronic pain in young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PAIN 2022;163 :e972–84.34817439
[104] Myrtveit SM Sivertsen B Skogen JC Frostholm L Stormark KM Hysing M . Adolescent neck and shoulder pain - the association with depression, physical activity, screen-based activities, and use of health care services. J Adolesc Health 2014;55 :366–72.24746679
[105] Neville A Lund T Soltani S Jordan A Stinson J Killackey T Birnie KA Noel M . Pediatric chronic pain in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: lived experiences of youth and parents. J Pain 2022;23 :841–51.34915200
[106] Nicholas M Vlaeyen JWS Rief W Barke A Aziz Q Benoliel R Cohen M Evers S Giamberardino MA Goebel A Korwisi B Perrot S Svensson P Wang S-J Treede R-D , IASP Taskforce for the Classification of Chronic Pain. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic primary pain. PAIN 2019;160 :28–37.30586068
[107] Nieswand V Richter M Berner R von der Hagen M Klimova A Roeder I Koch T Sabatowski R Gossrau G . The prevalence of headache in German pupils of different ages and school types. Cephalalgia 2019;39 :1030–40.30884960
[108] Noll M Candotti CT Rosa BNda Loss JF . Back pain prevalence and associated factors in children and adolescents: an epidemiological population study. Rev Saude Publica 2016;50 :31.27305406
[109] Nyame YA Ambrosy AP Saps M Adams PN Dhroove GN Suresh S . Recurrent headaches in children: an epidemiological survey of two middle schools in inner city Chicago. Pain Pract 2010;10 :214–21.20070550
[110] Østerås B Sigmundsson H Haga M . Perceived stress and musculoskeletal pain are prevalent and significantly associated in adolescents: an epidemiological cross-sectional study Chronic Disease Epidemiology. BMC Public Health 2015;15 :1–11.25563658
[111] O'Sullivan P Beales D Smith A Straker L . Low back pain in 17 year olds has substantial impact and represents an important public health disorder: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2012;12 :100–8.22304903
[112] Oswari H Alatas FS Hegar B Cheng W Pramadyani A Benninga MA Rajindrajith S . Functional abdominal pain disorders in adolescents in Indonesia and their association with family related stress. BMC Pediatr 2019;19 :342–9.31554509
[113] Page MJM McKenzie JEJ Bossuyt PM Boutron I Hoffmann TC Mulrow CDC Shamseer L Tetzlaff JMJ Akl EAE Brennan SES Chou R Glanville J Grimshaw JMJ Hróbjartsson A Lalu MMM Li T Loder EW Mayo-Wilson E McDonald S McGuinness LAL Stewart LAL Thomas J Tricco AAC Tricco AC Whiting P Moher D Hoffman T Mulrow CDC Shamseer L Tetzlaff JMJ Akl EAE Brennan SES Chou R Glanville J Grimshaw JMJ Hróbjartsson A Lalu MMM Li T Loder EEW Mayo-Wilson E McDonald S McGuinness LAL Stewart LAL Thomas J Tricco AAC Welch VA Whiting P Moher D . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372 :n71.33782057
[114] Palermo TM Walco GA Paladhi UR Birnie KA Crombez G de la Vega R Eccleston C Kashikar-Zuck S Stone AL . Core outcome set for pediatric chronic pain clinical trials: results from a Delphi poll and consensus meeting. PAIN 2021;162 :2539–47.33625074
[115] Perera K Wanigasinghe J Agampodi S De Silva U . Prevalence of headache among school children in Polonnaruwa educational zone. Sri Lanka J Child Health 2016;45 :199–203.
[116] Pico M Matey-Rodriquez C Dominguez-Garcia A Menendez H Lista S Santo-Lozano A . Healthcare professionals'; knowledge about pediatric chronic pain: a systematic review. Children 2023;10 :1–322.
[117] Poyrazoğlu HG Kumandas S Canpolat M Gümüs H Elmali F Kara A Per H . The prevalence of migraine and tension-type headache among schoolchildren in Kayseri, Turkey: an evaluation of sensitivity and specificity using multivariate analysis. J Child Neurol 2015;30 :889–95.25296924
[118] Rau L-M Grothus S Sommer A Grochowska K Claus B Zernikow B Wager J . Chronic pain in schoolchildren and its association with psychological wellbeing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Adolesc Health 2021;69 :721–8.34521577
[119] Rho YI Chung HJ Lee KH Eun BL Eun SH Nam SO Kim WS Kim YO Park HJ Kim HS . Prevalence and clinical characteristics of primary headaches among school children in South Korea: a nationwide survey. Headache 2012;52 :592–9.21929660
[120] Saha N Anwar K Mollah A Akhter S Amin M Mollah A . Age and gender-dependent correlates as risk factors of recurrent headache among Bangladeshi secondary school children. Mymensingh Med J 2017;26 :831–9.29208872
[121] Santinello M Vieno A De Vogli R . Primary headache in Italian early adolescents: the role of perceived teacher unfairness. Headache 2009;49 :366–74.18651853
[122] Saps M Moreno-Gomez JE Ramírez-Hernández CR Rosen JM Velasco-Benitez CA . A nationwide study on the prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in school-children. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2017;74 :407–12.29382524
[123] Saps M Nichols-Vinueza DX Rosen JM Velasco-Benítez CA . Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in Colombian school children. J Pediatr 2014;164 :542–5.e1.24332822
[124] Saps M Seshadri R Sztainberg M Schaffer G Marshall BM Di Lorenzo C . A prospective school-based study of abdominal pain and other common somatic complaints in children. J Pediatr 2009;154 :322–6.19038403
[125] Saps M Velasco-Benitez CA Langshaw AH Ramírez-Hernández CR . Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in children and adolescents: comparison between Rome III and Rome IV criteria. J Pediatr 2018;199 :212–6.29747935
[126] Shan Z Deng G Li J Li Y Zhang Y Zhao Q . Correlational analysis of neck/shoulder pain and low back pain with the use of digital products, physical activity and psychological status among adolescents in Shanghai. PLoS One 2013;8 :e78109.24147114
[127] Shaygan M Karami Z . Chronic pain in adolescents: the predictive role of emotional intelligence, self-esteem and parenting style. Int J Commun Based Nurs Midwifery 2020;8 :253–63.
[128] Shelby GD Shirkey KC Sherman AL Beck JE Haman K Shears AR Horst SN Smith CA Garber J Walker LS . Functional abdominal pain in childhood and long-term vulnerability to anxiety disorders. Pediatrics 2013;132 :475–82.23940244
[129] Shuaibi S AlAshqar A Ahmed SF Alroughani R AlThufairi H Owayed S AlHamdan F Al-Hashel J . Primary headache disorder among school students in Kuwait. Front Neurol 2021;12 :621017.33603711
[130] Siajunboriboon S Tanpowpong P Empremsilapa S Lertudomphonwanit C Nuntnarumit P Treepongkaruna S . Prevalence of functional abdominal pain disorders and functional constipation in adolescents. J Paediatr Child Health 2022;58 :1209–14.35348253
[131] Sillanpää M Saarinen MM . Long term outcome of childhood onset headache: a prospective community study. Cephalalgia 2018;38 :1159–66.28828903
[132] da Silva A Costa EC Gomes JB Leite FM Gomez RS Vasconcelos LP Krymchantowski A Moreira P Teixeira AL . Chronic headache and comorbidities: a two-phase, population-based, cross-sectional study. Headache 2010;50 :1306–12.20163479
[133] Simons LE Sieberg CB Claar RL . Anxiety and impairment in a large sample of children and adolescents with chronic pain. Pain Res Manag 2012;17 :93–7.22518371
[134] Siu YF Chan S Wong KM Wong WS . The comorbidity of chronic pain and sleep disturbances in a community adolescent sample: prevalence and association with sociodemographic and psychosocial factors. Pain Med 2012;13 :1292–303.22925527
[135] Sjölund J Uusijärvi A Tornkvist NT Kull I Bergström A Alm J Törnblom H Olén O Simrén M . Prevalence and progression of recurrent abdominal pain, from early childhood to adolescence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;19 :930–8.e8.32344151
[136] Sollerhed AC Andersson I Ejlertsson G . Recurrent pain and discomfort in relation to fitness and physical activity among young school children. Eur J Sport Sci 2013;13 :591–8.24050478
[137] Somayajula GG Campbell P Protheroe J Lacey RJ Dunn KM . Chronic widespread pain in children and adolescents presenting in primary care: prevalence and associated risk factors. PAIN 2022;163 :e333–41.34108433
[138] Sperotto F Balzarin M Parolin M Monteforte N Vittadello F Zulian F . Joint hypermobility, growing pain and obesity are mutually exclusive as causes of musculoskeletal pain in schoolchildren. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2014;32 :131–6.24093536
[139] Ståhl MK El-Metwally AAS Rimpelä AH . Time trends in single versus concomitant neck and back pain in Finnish adolescents: results from national cross-sectional surveys from 1991 to 2011. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15 :296–8.25192809
[140] Swain MS Henschke N Kamper SJ Gobina I Ottová-Jordan V Maher CG . An international survey of pain in adolescents. BMC Public Health 2014;14 :447–8.24885027
[141] The ROME Foundation. Rome IV diagnostic criteria for Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), 2016. Available at: https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/4007/rome-iv-diagnostic-criteria-irritable-bowel-syndrome-ibs. Accessed September 26, 2023.
[142] Torres-Ferrus M Vila-Sala C Quintana M Ajanovic S Gallardo VJ Gomez JB Alvarez-Sabin J Macaya A Pozo-Rosich P . Headache, comorbidities and lifestyle in an adolescent population (The TEENs Study). Cephalalgia 2019;39 :91–9.29771141
[143] Treede R-D Rief W Barke A Aziz Q Bennett MI Benoliel R Cohen M Evers S Finnerup NB First MB Giamberardino MA Kaasa S Kosek E Lavand'homme P Nicholas M Perrot S Scholz J Schug S Smith BH Svensson P Vlaeyen JWS Wang S-J . A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. PAIN 2015;156 :1003–7.25844555
[144] Tumin D Drees D Miller R Wrona S Hayes D Jr Tobias JD Bhalla T . Health care utilization and costs associated with pediatric chronic pain. J Pain 2018;19 :973–82.29608973
[145] Tutelman PR Langley CL Chambers CT Parker JA Finley GA Chapman D Jones GT Macfarlane GJ Marianayagam J . Epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review update. BMJ Open 2021;11 :e043675.
[146] Udoh E Devanarayana NM Rajindrajith S Meremikwu M Benninga MA . Abdominal pain-predominant functional gastrointestinal disorders in adolescent Nigerians. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2016;62 :588–93.26465793
[147] Van Gessel H Gaßmann J Kröner-Herwig B . Children in pain: recurrent back pain, abdominal pain, and headache in children and adolescents in a four-year-period. J Pediatr 2011;158 :977–83.e9832.21232770
[148] Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. Available at: www.covidence.org. Accessed April 19, 2024.
[149] Vierola A Suominen AL Ikavalko T Lintu N Lindi V Lakka HM Kellokoski J Närhi M Lakka TA . Clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders and various pain conditions among children 6 to 8 years of age: the PANIC study. J Orofac Pain 2012;26 :17–25.22292136
[150] Vila M Kramer T Obiols JE Garralda ME . Abdominal pain in British young people: associations, impairment and health care use. J Psychosom Res 2012;73 :437–42.23148811
[151] Wager J Brown D Kupitz A Rosenthal N Zernikow B . Prevalence and associated psychosocial and health factors of chronic pain in adolescents: differences by sex and age. Eur J Pain 2020;24 :761–72.31889351
[152] Wager J Fabrizi L Tham SW . Need for pediatric specifications for chronic pain diagnoses in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). PAIN 2023;164 :1705–8.37278641
[153] Walker LS Dengler-Crish CM Rippel S Bruehl S . Functional abdominal pain in childhood and adolescence increases risk for chronic pain in adulthood. PAIN 2010;150 :568–72.20615615
[154] Wallace B Varcoe C Holmes C Moosa-Mitha M Moor G Hudspith M Craig KD . Towards health equity for people experiencing chronic pain and social marginalization. Int J Equity Health 2021;20 :53.33531018
[155] Walter S . Lifestyle behaviors and illness-related factors as predictors of recurrent headache in U.S. adolescents. J Neurosci Nurs 2014;46 :337–50.25365048
[156] Wijga AH Gehring U van de Putte EM Koppelman GH Vader S Schmits RJH van der Wouden JC Picavet HSJ . Headache in girls and boys growing up from age 11 to 20 years: the Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy birth cohort study. PAIN 2021;162 :1449–56.33230003
[157] Wilkes MJ Mendis MD Bisset L Leung FT Sexton CT Hides JA . The prevalence and burden of recurrent headache in Australian adolescents: findings from the longitudinal study of Australian children. J Headache Pain 2021;22 :49.34074243
[158] Wöber-Bingöl Ç . Epidemiology of migraine and headache in children and adolescents topical collection on childhood and adolescent headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2013;17 :1–11.
[159] World Health Organization. Adolescent health. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health. Accessed February 12, 2024.
[160] World Health Organization. Guidelines on the management of chronic pain in children, 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240017870. Accessed November 24, 2023.
[161] Wurm M Anniko M Tillfors M Flink I Boersma K . Musculoskeletal pain in early adolescence: a longitudinal examination of pain prevalence and the role of peer-related stress, worry, and gender. J Psychosom Res 2018;111 :76–82.29935758
[162] Yao W Mai X Luo C Ai F Chen Q . A cross-sectional survey of nonspecific low back pain among 2083 schoolchildren in China. Spine 2011;36 :1885–90.21270687
[163] Zablah R Velasco-Benítez CA Merlos I Bonilla S Saps M . Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in school-aged children in El Salvador. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2015;80 :186–91.26297182
[164] Zajacova A Grol-Prokopczyk H Fillingim R . Beyond Black vs White: racial/ethnic disparities in chronic pain including Hispanic, Asian, Native American, and multiracial US adults. PAIN 2022;163 :1688–99.35250011
[165] Zeevenhooven J van der Heijden S Devanarayana NM Rajindrajith S Benninga MA . Epidemiology of functional abdominal pain disorders and functional defecation disorders in adolescents in curacao. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2020;70 :e71–6.32213782
[166] Zhang Y Deng G Zhang Z Zhou Q Gao X Di L Che Q Du X Cai Y Han X Zhao Q . A cross sectional study between the prevalence of chronic pain and academic pressure in adolescents in China (Shanghai). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015;16 :219.26296558
