
==== Front
Open Heart
Open Heart
openhrt
openhrt
Open Heart
2053-3624
BMJ Publishing Group BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR

39277188
10.1136/openhrt-2024-002868
openhrt-2024-002868
Original Research
Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies
1506
Intestinal fatty acid binding protein is associated with infarct size and cardiac function in acute heart failure following myocardial infarction
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2524-4389
Nendl Andraž andraz.nendl@medisin.uio.no
12
Andersen Geir Øystein uxgend@ous-hf.no
3
Seljeflot Ingebjørg UXINLJ@ous-hf.no
12
Trøseid Marius marius.troseid@medisin.uio.no
24
Awoyemi Ayodeji dejiawoyemi@hotmail.com
3
1 Oslo Center for Clinical Heart Research, Department of Cardiology Ullevaal, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
3 Department of Cardiology Ullevaal, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
4 Section of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Supplemental material: Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Additional supplemental material is published online only. To view, please visit the journal online (https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002868).

The Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal received an unrestricted educational grant from the manufacturer of levosimendan, Orion Pharma in 2005. Orion Pharma did not, however, provide study medication or participate in the design, monitoring or analyses of the present study. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Dr; andraz.nendl@medisin.uio.no
2024
13 9 2024
11 2 e00286829 7 2024
24 8 2024
Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Abstract

Background

In acute heart failure (HF), reduced cardiac output, vasoconstriction and congestion may damage the intestinal mucosa and disrupt its barrier function. This could facilitate the leakage of bacterial products into circulation and contribute to inflammation and adverse cardiac remodelling. We aimed to investigate gut leakage markers and their associations with inflammation, infarct size and cardiac function.

Methods

We examined 61 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who developed acute HF within 48 hours of successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Serial blood samples were taken to measure lipopolysaccharide (LPS), LPS-binding protein (LBP), soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14) and intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP). Cumulative areas under the curve (AUCs) from baseline to day 5 were calculated. Serial echocardiography was performed to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS) and wall motion score index (WMSI). Single-photon emission CT (SPECT) was performed at 6 weeks to determine infarct size and LVEF.

Results

I-FABPAUC correlated positively with infarct size (rs=0.45, p=0.002), GLS (rs=0.32, p=0.035) and WMSI (rs=0.45, p=0.002) and negatively with LVEF measured by SPECT (rs=−0.40, p=0.007) and echocardiography (rs=−0.33, p=0.021) at 6 weeks. LPSAUC, LBPAUC and sCD14AUC did not correlate to any cardiac function marker or infarct size. Patients, who at 6 weeks had above median GLS and WMSI, and below-median LVEF measured by SPECT, were more likely to have above median I-FABPAUC during admission (adjusted OR (aOR) 5.22, 95% CI 1.21 to 22.44; aOR 5.05, 95% CI 1.25 to 20.43; aOR 5.67, 95% CI 1.42 to 22.59, respectively). The same was observed for patients in the lowest quartile of LVEF measured by echocardiography (aOR 9.99, 95% CI 1.79 to 55.83) and three upper quartiles of infarct size (aOR 20.34, 95% CI 1.56 to 264.65).

Conclusions

In primary PCI-treated STEMI patients with acute HF, I-FABP, a marker of intestinal epithelial damage, was associated with larger infarct size and worse cardiac function after 6 weeks.

Myocardial Infarction
Heart Failure
Biomarkers
Inflammation
The Research Council of Norway N/A South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority N/A Orion Pharma N/A University of Oslo N/A The Scientific Council at Oslo University Hospital N/A The Centre for Heart Failure Research N/A The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
==== Body
pmcWHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

Haemodynamic changes in acute heart failure after a myocardial infarction can damage the intestinal mucosa and disrupt its barrier function. The subsequent leakage of bacterial products into the circulation may contribute to inflammation in the heart. The inflammatory response aids in tissue repair but also contributes to further injury to the myocardium.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

We found that intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) in the acute phase of an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by acute heart failure is associated with infarct size and several parameters of cardiac function after 6 weeks.

The relationship between I-FABP, cardiac function and infarct size is likely not mediated by the interleukin-6/C reactive protein axis.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and I-FABP are elevated early in acute heart failure.

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

The current study highlights LPS and I-FABP as potential markers of gut involvement in new-onset acute heart failure following a STEMI. Our results suggest that gut hypoperfusion in the setting of new-onset acute heart failure after a STEMI may impact cardiac remodelling. This observation underscores the necessity for additional mechanistic studies to elucidate the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

Introduction

Acute heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome related to raised intracardiac filling pressures and/or reduced cardiac output. Patients usually display a continuum of symptoms and signs, depending on the degree of congestion and/or peripheral hypoperfusion.1

The development of acute HF in the setting of an acute coronary occlusion is associated with large myocardial infarctions (MI) with substantial myocardial tissue loss and a worse prognosis.2 The necrotic debris and ischaemic condition in the myocardium, as well as reperfusion injury, trigger an inflammatory response that aids in tissue repair but also contributes to further injury to the myocardium.35 It has been proposed that persistent inflammation in acute HF may contribute to infarct expansion and adverse ventricular remodelling, ultimately leading to the poor prognosis in these patients.5 In its most severe state, namely cardiogenic shock, the resulting hypoperfusion may potentiate the inflammatory response and increase the degree of end-organ damage, which is one of the main determinants of short-term prognosis in these patients.6 7

Accumulating evidence suggests a role of gut-related inflammation in various cardiovascular diseases, however, there is a scarcity of data on this phenomenon in acute HF.8 Normally, the intestinal mucosa limits the translocation of whole bacteria or bacterial products from the gut into systemic circulation. With a breakdown in this barrier function, such as with hypoperfusion or congestion, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and other bacterial products might leak into the circulation.9 The presence of LPS in the circulation is referred to as endotoxaemia. In the blood, LPS interacts with LPS-binding protein (LBP) and cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14), which in turn activates the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and triggers downstream inflammatory pathways.10

Intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) is an intracellular protein most abundant in enterocytes of the small intestine.11 When the gut mucosa is injured, I-FABP leaks from enterocytes into the systemic circulation and can be measured in the blood as a marker of intestinal epithelial cell damage.12

We hypothesised that (1) gut leakage-related markers may be used as early markers of gut involvement in acute HF through damage of the gut wall mucosa and increased intestinal permeability and that (2) gut leakage markers are associated with systemic inflammation, infarct size and cardiac function in patients with acute HF complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Thus, the aims of the present study were (1) to examine temporal profiles of gut leakage markers (LPS, LBP, soluble CD14 (sCD14) and I-FABP) after a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated STEMI complicated with acute HF and (2) to examine whether gut leakage markers are associated with systemic inflammation, infarct size and cardiac function assessed by echocardiography, single-photon emission CT (SPECT) and cardiac biomarkers.

Materials and methods

Study design

We used data from the LEAF (LEvosimendan in Acute heart Failure following myocardial infarction) trial (NCT00324766), a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre, parallel-group trial conducted at Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål in Oslo, Norway between April 2006 and May 2011. A detailed description of the study design and main results of the trial have previously been published.13 14

Briefly, 61 adults with acute STEMI treated with primary PCI who developed clinical signs and symptoms of acute HF within 48 hours of PCI were included. Additional inclusion criteria were echocardiographic signs of decreased wall motion in at least three of the 16 segments of the left ventricle and successful revascularisation of the infarct-related artery. Additional criteria in the subgroup of patients with cardiogenic shock included both of the following: (1) systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mm Hg or SBP between 90 and 100 mm Hg in spite of inotropic support and (2) signs of organ hypoperfusion. Median time from PCI to inclusion was 22 hours. The primary endpoint was a change in the wall motion score index (WMSI) from baseline to day 5. A detailed list of inclusion and exclusion criteria has been previously published.13

Blood sampling

Blood samples were taken at the time of inclusion (baseline), after 25 hours (day 1), day 2, day 5 and at week 6 for routine analyses and for determination of LPS, LBP, sCD14, I-FABP, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C reactive protein (CRP). Blood without additives was separated within 1 hour of sampling by centrifugation at room temperature at 2500×G for 10 min, and blood containing EDTA was separated within 1 hour of sampling by centrifugation at 4°C at 2500×G for 20 min. All blood samples were stored at −80°C until analysed.

LPS levels were analysed using the Kinetic Chromogenic limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) assay (Lonza BioScience, Basel, Switzerland). Commercially available ELISAs were used for sCD14, IL-6 (R&D Systems Europe, Abingdon, Oxford, UK), LBP and I-FABP (Hycult Biotech, Uden, the Netherlands) and high-sensitivity CRP (DRG instruments, Marburg/Lahn, Germany). The interassay coefficients of variation were LPS 8.7%, sCD14 6.4%, IL-6 10.5%, LBP 12.3%, I-FABP 11.2% and high-sensitivity CRP <5%.

Echocardiography

Echocardiography was performed at inclusion, after 25 hours, on day 5 and at week 6. Examinations were performed by two experienced echocardiographers and a single observer analysed all images. The echocardiography devices used were digital ultrasonic device systems (Vivid I or Vivid 7, GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway). Images were analysed using dedicated software (Echopac, GE Vingmed Ultrasound). In the present investigation, we measured WMSI, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) as measures of contractility and cardiac function,15 and E/e’ ratio as a measure of left ventricular filling pressure.16 Note that GLS is given as a negative value, representing the percentage of deformation or shortening; therefore, less negative GLS (closer to zero) means worse cardiac function.

Measurement of infarct size

ECG-gated SPECT with 99m-tetrofosmin was performed 6 weeks after inclusion to determine LVEF and infarct size, expressed as a percentage of left ventricular mass.

Statistics

We used non-parametric statistics, as most variables were not normally distributed. Bivariate Spearman’s correlation was used for simple correlations. Mann-Whitney U-test was applied for between-group differences. Friedman test was used to check for differences in the levels of gut leakage markers across repeated samples, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to assess within-group changes from baseline to 25 hours (day 1), day 2, day 5 and week 6 in cases where Friedman’s test showed statistically significant changes. To estimate the cumulative impact of each gut leakage marker, we determined area under the curve (AUC) from baseline to day 5 using the trapezoidal rule. The AUCs were determined for 53 patients (47 without shock and 6 with shock) due to missing blood samples on day 2. Binomial logistic regression was used to further explore the relationship between gut leakage markers and selected echocardiographic and SPECT parameters. I-FABPAUC was categorised into quartiles and dichotomised into high and low levels based on natural cut-offs, as were echocardiographic and SPECT parameters. For the multiple regression analyses, we identified age and creatinine at baseline as relevant covariates, as they are known to influence levels of gut leakage markers.17 Sex was not included as a covariate, as there were no significant correlations with any gut leakage marker AUCs or any of the parameters of cardiac function and infarct size. Peak troponin T (TnT) was included due to significant correlations with LVEF, GLS, WMSI and infarct size at 6 weeks (p=0.03–0.11). A significance level of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. When testing for confounders in logistic regression models, a significance level of 0.2 was used. STATA-SE V.17.0 was used for all statistical analyses. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and took the responsibility for its integrity and the data analysis.

Results

Baseline characteristics

The population was predominantly male (70%) and median age was 65 years (table 1). Of the 61 patients in total, 9 patients developed cardiogenic shock. Only a single patient had a diagnosis of chronic HF prior to inclusion. The LEAF study randomised patients to treatment with either levosimendan or placebo. Therefore, we tested for differences in gut leakage markers between the two groups at all time points. As the only significant difference between the groups was in I-FABP levels on day 1 (p=0.03), we did not perform any further analyses with respect to the intervention groups (online supplemental file 1) and further analyses are based on the total population.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of LEAF trial participants

Characteristic	Whole populationn=61	
Age, years	65 (56, 74)	
Female sex	18 (30%)	
Hypertension	21 (34%)	
Dyslipidaemia	13 (21%)	
Diabetes mellitus	6 (10%)	
Current smokers	22 (26%)	
Previous myocardial infarction	11 (18%)	
Chronic heart failure	1 (2%)	
Cardiogenic shock	9 (15%)	
Intra-aortic balloon pump at inclusion	17 (28%)	
Hours from PCI to baseline	22 (14, 19)	
Wall motion score index	1.97 (1.83, 2.16)	
Left ventricular ejection fraction, %	42 (37, 47)	
Global longitudinal strain, %	−8.7 (−9.7, –7.2)	
E/e’ ratio	14.9 (11.6, 19.3)	
NT-proBNP, pg/mL	434 (268, 745)	
Peak troponin T, ng/L	12 730 (7964, 16 990)	
Creatinine, µmol/L	82 (68, 95)	
CRP, mg/L	54 (31, 110)	
IL-6, pg/mL	27.4 (31.3, 33.7)	
LPS, pg/mL	60 (52, 79)	
LBP, ng/mL	32 067 (24 937, 38 616)	
sCD14, ng/mL	1843 (1613, 2145)	
I-FABP, pg/mL	621 (325, 1261)	
Continuous variables are given as median [(quartile 1, quartile 3]). Proportions are given as n (%).

CRPC-reactive proteinI-FABPintestinal fatty acid binding proteinLBPlipopolysaccharide-binding proteinLEAFLEvosimendan in Acute heart Failure following myocardial infarctionLPSlipopolysaccharideNT-proBNPN-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptidePCIpercutaneous coronary interventionsCD14soluble cluster of differentiation 14

Temporal profiles of gut leakage markers

Temporal profiles of the selected gut leakage markers are shown in figure 1. In short, I-FABP levels peaked early, followed by a decrease by day 2. Notably, high levels of LPS were present both at baseline and day 5. LBP reached its peak levels on day 2 and sCD14 on day 5.

Figure 1 Time profiles of gut leakage markers lipopolysaccharide (A), lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (B), soluble cluster of differentiation 14 and intestinal fatty acid binding protein (D). Circles represent median values and whiskers show IQRs. Significant differences from baseline were obtained with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and are represented with a line and a p-value. I-FABP, intestinal fatty acid binding protein; LBP, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; sCD14, soluble cluster of differentiation 14.

We also examined the gut leakage markers separately in patients with (n=9) and without (n=52) cardiogenic shock (figure 2). The most striking profile difference was the higher baseline level of I-FABP in the shock group. However, due to the low number of patients with cardiogenic shock, all further analyses were performed in the population as a whole.

Figure 2 Time profiles of gut leakage markers lipopolysaccharide (A), lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (B), soluble cluster of differentiation 14 and intestinal fatty acid binding protein (D) according to the presence or absence of cardiogenic shock. Red denotes patients with shock and black patients without shock. Circles represent median values and whiskers show IQRs. Significant changes from baseline were obtained with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and are represented with a straight line and a p-value. Significant differences between groups with and without shock were obtained with Mann-Whitney U-tests and are indicated with a hooked line and a p-value. I-FABP, intestinal fatty acid binding protein; LBP, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; sCD14, soluble cluster of differentiation 14.

Gut leakage markers and association with troponin T and cardiac function measured by echocardiography

In order to explore associations between gut leakage markers and cardiac function during the initial acute phase (first 5 days), we explored peak values of gut leakage markers and changes in WMSI, GLS, LVEF and E/e’ ratio from baseline to day 5. We found that change in LVEF from baseline to day 5 and peak TnT correlated with peak sCD14 level on day 5 (rs=−0.32, p=0.02 and rs=0.33, p=0.01, respectively). There were no other significant correlations. A summary of the performed correlations is presented in table 2.

Table 2 Correlations between peak levels of gut leakage markers and change in echocardiographic parameters from baseline to day 5 and peak troponin T

	ΔLVEF BL-D5	ΔGLS BL-D5	ΔE/e’ ratio BL-D5	ΔWMSI BL-D5	Peak TnT	
LPSon D5	rs	0.22	0.10	0.12	−0.08	−0.17	
p-value	0.10	0.50	0.36	0.56	0.21	
LBPon D2	rs	0.06	0.20	0.07	0.13	0.11	
p-value	0.68	0.20	0.63	0.35	0.45	
sCD14on D5	rs	−0.32	−0.07	0.02	0.17	0.33	
p-value	0.02*	0.65	0.89	0.21	0.01*	
I-FABPat BL	rs	−0.05	−0.28	−0.04	−0.02	0.16	
p-value	0.70	0.055	0.78	0.89	0.21	
Statistically significant correlations are marked with an asterisk.

BLbaselineD1day 1 (25 hours)D2day 2D5day 5I-FABPintestinal fatty acid binding proteinLBPlipopolysaccharide-binding proteinLPSlipopolysaccharidePeak TnTpeak troponin TrsSpearman’s rhosCD14soluble cluster of differentiation 14ΔE/e’ ratio BL-D5change in E/e’ ratio from baseline to day 5ΔGLS BL-D5change in global longitudinal strain from baseline to day 5ΔLVEF BL-D5change in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline to day 5ΔWMSI BL-D5change in wall motion score index from baseline to day 5

Gut leakage markers and association with infarct size and cardiac function at 6 weeks

To determine the relationship between gut leakage markers measured during admission and the subsequent infarct size and cardiac function determined at 6 weeks, we computed the cumulative AUCs for all gut leakage markers and calculated the median values for infarct size and cardiac function at 6 weeks. The cumulative median AUC values for LPS were 274 pg/mL·days (231, 327), for LBP 1 73 346 ng/mL·days (154 563, 201 581), for sCD14 9911 ng/mL·days (8764, 11 793) and for I-FABP 2372 pg/mL·days (1668, 3746). At 6 weeks the median value of infarct size was 45% (36.5, 51), LVEF measured by SPECT at 46.5% (36, 54), LVEF measured by echocardiography 48.5% (40, 54), GLS −12.7% (–14.4, –10.3), WMSI 1.63 (1.5, 1.88) and E/e’ ratio 15.5 (12.8, 21.2).

I-FABPAUC correlated positively to infarct size (rs=0.45, p=0.002) and negatively to LVEF measured by SPECT (rs=−0.40, p=0.007) and by echocardiography (rs=−0.33, p=0.021) at 6 weeks. It also correlated positively to GLS and WMSI (rs=0.32, p=0.035 and rs=0.45, p=0.002, respectively), but not to E/e’ ratio (rs=0.23, p=0.13) at 6 weeks. The scatter plots for the correlations are shown in Online supplemental file 1 . LPSAUC correlated to NT-proBNP at 6 weeks (rs=−0.29, p=0.045). None of the other gut leakage marker AUCs correlated to NT-proBNP or any of the echocardiographic or SPECT parameters at 6 weeks (range: rs=–0.18 to 0.28, p=0.07 to 0.99).

We further examined the relationships between I-FABPAUC, infarct size and cardiac function using a binominal logistic regression model. The model incorporated age, creatinine at baseline and peak TnT as covariates, as detailed in the statistics section. We found that patients with above median GLS, above median WMSI and below median LVEF measured by SPECT at 6 weeks were more likely to have above median I-FABPAUC during admission. The lowest quartile of LVEF measured by echocardiography and the three upper quartiles of infarct size were also more likely to be in the above median I-FABPAUC group (table 3). Figure 3 illustrates values of I-FABPAUC in groups of infarct size and cardiac function at 6 weeks.

Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression models examining the relationships between infarct size and cardiac function at 6 weeks, and I-FABPAUC above median

	n	p-value	OR	95% CI for OR	
Lower	Upper	
LVEF by SPECT below median	44	0.014*	5.67	1.42	22.59	
LVEF by echo in quartile 1	49	0.009*	9.99	1.79	55.83	
GLS above median	43	0.027*	5.22	1.21	22.44	
WMSI above median	48	0.023*	5.05	1.25	20.43	
Infarct size in quartiles 2–4	44	0.021*	20.34	1.56	264.65	
Statistically significant p-values are marked with an asterisk.

Covariates used were age, creatinine at baseline and peak troponin T.

GLSglobal longitudinal strainLVEF by echoleft ventricular ejection fraction measured by echocardiographyLVEF by SPECTleft ventricular ejection fraction measured by single-photon emission CTnnumber of patients examined in statistical analysisWMSIwall motion score index

Figure 3 I-FABPAUC values in groups of global longitudinal strain (A), wall motion score index (B) and LVEF measured by SPECT (C) dichotomised at median, and LVEF measured by echocardiography (D) and infarct size (E) dichotomised at 25th percentile at 6 weeks. Solid horizontal line in violin plots represents median, dotted lines are 25th and 75th percentiles. I-FABPAUC, intestinal fatty acid binding protein cumulative area under the curve from baseline to day 5; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; Q1, quartile 1; Q2-4, quartiles 2–4; SPECT, single-photon emission CT.

Gut leakage markers and inflammation

In order to explore a putative mechanism underlying the interplay between gut leakage markers and cardiac function, we explored their cumulative AUCs against selected markers of inflammation at 5 days and 6 weeks.

LPSAUC correlated negatively with CRP on day 5 (rs=−0.32, p=0.02), whereas LBPAUC and sCD14AUC correlated positively with CRP (rs=0.54, p<0.001 and rs=0.32, p=0.02, respectively) and IL-6 (rs=0.39, p=0.004 and rs=0.43, p=0.001, respectively) on day 5. None of the AUCs correlated with either CRP or IL-6 at 6 weeks.

Discussion

This substudy of the LEAF trial is to our knowledge the first to report on the potential contribution of gut-related inflammation in patients who develop acute HF following an acute MI.

We found that I-FABP in the first few days following an acute HF event was associated with infarct size and cardiac function at 6 weeks. Consequently, patients with high I-FABP levels in the acute phase had lower LVEF and worse GLS and WMSI at 6 weeks. Furthermore, levels of the specific gut leakage markers LPS and I-FABP were high at baseline following a STEMI complicated by acute HF, and then decreased on days 1 and 2, whereas LBP and sCD14 increased from baseline to days 1 and 2 following the acute event.

Our results are in concordance with reports of I-FABP being associated with 30-day mortality and adverse clinical outcomes in acute HF.18 19 A possible explanation of this finding would be that I-FABP may reflect the extent of myocardial injury, degree of HF and end-organ damage. However, I-FABP did not correlate to peak TnT or NT-proBNP in our study. As I-FABP did not correlate to IL-6 or CRP, we find it less likely that I-FABP itself is mechanistically involved in a hypothesised gut-related inflammation. However, given the correlation observed between I-FABP and cardiac function and injury 6 weeks post-admission, it is reasonable to consider that I-FABP could influence these outcomes in ways that are currently unknown. In the intestines, I-FABP plays a role in fatty acid absorption and transportation. Knockout of the fatty acid binding protein 2 (FABP2) gene, the gene that encodes I-FABP, has been shown to lead to changes in both lipid and glucose metabolism in experimental animals.20 Importantly, altered lipid metabolism has been implicated in the presence and progression of HF.21 In contrast, LPS, LBP and sCD14 were moderately associated with CRP, which may indicate their involvement in the observed inflammatory response in acute HF and later possibly adverse remodelling.

The temporal profiles of gut leakage markers support our hypothesis that injury to gut wall epithelial cells occurs in the setting of acute HF and suggests subsequent leakage of bacteria or bacterial products. The late surge of LBP and sCD14 may represent the innate response to LPS and other microbial by-products from the gut, as they are produced in response to LPS, bind up LPS in the circulation and induce an acute inflammatory response.22 23 However, they may also increase in response to other sources of inflammation, as both are essentially acuete-phase proteins.

It is important to note that baseline blood samples were taken at a median time of 22 hours after PCI. Therefore, we do not know the true peak of the markers, but it is fair to assume that both LPS and I-FABP may be early markers of gut involvement in the setting of acute HF, more so than LBP and sCD14. We suggest that the release of LPS and I-FABP is most pronounced shortly after the development of acute HF when the degree of congestion and hypoperfusion is greatest, and with treatment by consequent correction of end-organ damage, the levels decline. Notably, nearly all patients in the LEAF trial (59 of 61) received intravenous diuretics, and it has been shown that diuretic treatment in patients with acute decompensated HF normalises LPS levels.24

There was a significant increase in LPS at 6 weeks in the group without cardiogenic shock, but not in the population as a whole. Previous studies have reported that MI patients have an altered gut microbiota that remains unchanged 1 week after the MI, and it has been suggested that this persists after 6 weeks and thus may contribute to increased gut leakage.25 Furthermore, our patients were highly medicated during treatment, which in turn could affect the microbiota and contribute to the observed LPS increase. For example, proton pump inhibitors are known to promote detrimental alterations of the gut microbiota.26 A final factor may be the LAL assay, which is the method most commonly used to assess endotoxaemia.27 LPS in the blood is found in biologically active (e.g., monomers or micelles) and inactive forms (e.g., bound to lipoproteins).28 The assay detects only biologically active LPS that can interact with the lysate, not the total amount of LPS in the sample and may, therefore, underestimate LPS levels in critically ill patients.29

The persistent decrease in I-FABP from baseline in the first days and a return to baseline levels at 6 weeks is somewhat in contrast to a previous report.19 It has been shown that damage to the epithelial gut barrier is completely repaired within 1 hour of reperfusion after 30 min of experimentally induced ischaemia, with I-FABP levels falling in concert.30 We, therefore, believe that with the initiation of treatment and reestablishment of splanchnic perfusion, I-FABP levels fell rapidly and had already fallen a certain degree at baseline (median 22 hours after admission), similar to LPS described above. Notably, I-FABP was significantly higher at baseline in the shock group, although with wide variation. This difference can probably be attributed to more severe ischaemic damage to enterocytes in these patients. The return to baseline levels at 6 weeks may be due to gut leakage in the setting of chronic HF.31 Additionally, a persistently altered gut microbiota and the introduction of certain drugs may contribute, as discussed above to LPS.

Our study has several limitations. First, the study population was relatively small, particularly the shock group. The LEAF trial was not designed to examine gut leakage markers and their relationship to inflammation, echocardiographic parameters or MI sequelae. The sample size may, therefore, have been too small to detect certain associations. Due to the explorative design of the study, we did not adjust for multiple comparisons. Furthermore, we have no data on microbiota composition from the trial, which would have added to the observations. Finally, due to the requirement of acute HF being manifest before inclusion, the first samples were obtained after a median time of 22 hours after PCI, which precluded us from examining the initial hours of disease development.

To conclude, in our population of primary PCI-treated STEMI patients with acute HF, LPS and I-FABP are early markers of gut involvement. I-FABP, a marker of intestinal epithelial damage, was associated with larger infarct size and worse cardiac function after 6 weeks, but not with any of our selected markers of systemic inflammation. Thus, our findings suggest that I-FABP in acute HF following a STEMI may influence cardiac function and contribute to infarct size through pathways that are not yet fully understood.

supplementary material

10.1136/openhrt-2024-002868 online supplemental file 1

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Sissel Åkra and Jeanette K. Steen for invaluable laboratory assistance, as well as other staff at the Center for Clinical Heart Research and the Coronary Intensive Care Unit at Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal for their contributions to the LEAF trial.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

Funding: This research was funded by The Centre for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, The Scientific Council at Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, The Research Council of Norway and an unrestricted educational grant from Orion Pharma.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.

Ethics approval: This study involves human participants and was approved by Regional Ethics Committee South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (reference 538-04218). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study.

Data availability free text: The data are available on request from the corresponding author, following the establishment of a material and data transfer agreement between the institutions and the approval of an amendment application to the Regional Committees for Medical Research Ethics to ensure that the aim of the planned research is covered by the participant consent forms.
==== Refs
References

1 McDonagh TA Metra M Adamo M et al 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure Eur Heart J 2021 42 3599 726 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368 34447992
2 Desta L Jernberg T Löfman I et al Incidence, temporal trends, and prognostic impact of heart failure complicating acute myocardial infarction. The SWEDEHEART Registry (Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies): a study of 199,851 patients admitted with index acute myocardial infarctions, 1996 to 2008 JACC Heart Fail 2015 3 234 42 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.10.007 25742760
3 Frangogiannis NG The inflammatory response in myocardial injury, repair, and remodelling Nat Rev Cardiol 2014 11 255 65 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.28 24663091
4 Ong S-B Hernández-Reséndiz S Crespo-Avilan GE et al Inflammation following acute myocardial infarction: Multiple players, dynamic roles, and novel therapeutic opportunities Pharmacol Ther 2018 186 73 87 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.01.001 29330085
5 Reina-Couto M Pereira-Terra P Quelhas-Santos J et al Inflammation in Human Heart Failure: Major Mediators and Therapeutic Targets Front Physiol 2021 12 746494 10.3389/fphys.2021.746494 34707513
6 Wang J Shen B Feng X et al A Review of Prognosis Model Associated With Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction Front Cardiovasc Med 2021 8 754303 10.3389/fcvm.2021.754303 34957245
7 Chioncel O Parissis J Mebazaa A et al Epidemiology, pathophysiology and contemporary management of cardiogenic shock - a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Eur J Heart Fail 2020 22 1315 41 10.1002/ejhf.1922 32469155
8 Murphy K O’Donovan AN Caplice NM et al Exploring the Gut Microbiota and Cardiovascular Disease Metabolites 2021 11 493 10.3390/metabo11080493 34436434
9 Ghosh SS Wang J Yannie PJ et al Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction, LPS Translocation, and Disease Development J Endocr Soc 2020 4 bvz039 10.1210/jendso/bvz039 32099951
10 Park BS Lee JO Recognition of lipopolysaccharide pattern by TLR4 complexes Exp Mol Med 2013 45 e66 10.1038/emm.2013.97 24310172
11 Ockner RK Manning JA Fatty acid-binding protein in small intestine. Identification, isolation, and evidence for its role in cellular fatty acid transport J Clin Invest 1974 54 326 38 10.1172/JCI107768 4211161
12 Derikx JPM Luyer MDP Heineman E et al Non-invasive markers of gut wall integrity in health and disease World J Gastroenterol 2010 16 5272 9 10.3748/wjg.v16.i42.5272 21072889
13 Husebye T Eritsland J Müller C et al Levosimendan in acute heart failure following primary percutaneous coronary intervention-treated acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Results from the LEAF trial: a randomized, placebo-controlled study Eur J Heart Fail 2013 15 565 72 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs215 23288914
14 Husebye T Eritsland J Bjørnerheim R et al Systolic mitral annulus velocity is a sensitive index for changes in left ventricular systolic function during inotropic therapy in patients with acute heart failure Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2018 7 321 9 10.1177/2048872616687114 28045338
15 Potter E Marwick TH Assessment of Left Ventricular Function by Echocardiography: The Case for Routinely Adding Global Longitudinal Strain to Ejection Fraction JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018 11 260 74 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.017 29413646
16 Mitter SS Shah SJ Thomas JD A Test in Context: E/A and E/e’ to Assess Diastolic Dysfunction and LV Filling Pressure J Am Coll Cardiol 2017 69 1451 64 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.12.037 28302294
17 Okada K Sekino M Funaoka H et al Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein levels in patients with chronic renal failure J Surg Res 2018 230 94 100 10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.057 30100046
18 Kitai T Kim Y-H Kiefer K et al Circulating intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) levels in acute decompensated heart failure Clin Biochem 2017 50 491 5 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.014 28232029
19 Kastl SP Krychtiuk KA Lenz M et al Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Protein is Associated With Mortality in Patients With Acute Heart Failure or Cardiogenic Shock Shock 2019 51 410 5 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001195 29847500
20 Huang X Zhou Y Sun Y et al Intestinal fatty acid binding protein: A rising therapeutic target in lipid metabolism Prog Lipid Res 2022 87 101178 10.1016/j.plipres.2022.101178 35780915
21 Da Dalt L Cabodevilla AG Goldberg IJ et al Cardiac lipid metabolism, mitochondrial function, and heart failure Cardiovasc Res 2023 119 1905 14 10.1093/cvr/cvad100 37392421
22 Bas S Gauthier BR Spenato U et al CD14 is an acute-phase protein J Immunol 2004 172 4470 9 10.4049/jimmunol.172.7.4470 15034063
23 Prucha M Herold I Zazula R et al Significance of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (an acute phase protein) in monitoring critically ill patients Crit Care 2003 7 R154 9 10.1186/cc2386 14624690
24 Niebauer J Volk HD Kemp M et al Endotoxin and immune activation in chronic heart failure: a prospective cohort study Lancet 1999 353 1838 42 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09286-1 10359409
25 Qian X Liu A Liang C et al Analysis of gut microbiota in patients with acute myocardial infarction by 16S rRNA sequencing Ann Transl Med 2022 10 1340 10.21037/atm-22-5671 36660636
26 Imhann F Bonder MJ Vich Vila A et al Proton pump inhibitors affect the gut microbiome Gut 2016 65 740 8 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310376 26657899
27 Nguyen M Gautier T Masson D et al Endotoxemia in Acute Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: Evidence, Mechanisms and Therapeutic Options J Clin Med 2023 12 2579 10.3390/jcm12072579 37048662
28 Page MJ Kell DB Pretorius E The Role of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Cell Signalling in Chronic Inflammation Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks) 2022 6 247054702210763 10.1177/24705470221076390
29 Pais de Barros J-P Gautier T Sali W et al Quantitative lipopolysaccharide analysis using HPLC/MS/MS and its combination with the limulus amebocyte lysate assay J Lipid Res 2015 56 1363 9 10.1194/jlr.D059725 26023073
30 Derikx JPM Matthijsen RA de Bruïne AP et al Rapid reversal of human intestinal ischemia-reperfusion induced damage by shedding of injured enterocytes and reepithelialisation PLoS One 2008 3 e3428 10.1371/journal.pone.0003428 18927609
31 Nendl A Raju SC Broch K et al Intestinal fatty acid binding protein is associated with cardiac function and gut dysbiosis in chronic heart failure Front Cardiovasc Med 2023 10 1160030 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1160030 37332580
