
==== Front
Plant Divers
Plant Divers
Plant Diversity
2096-2703
2468-2659
Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences

S2468-2659(24)00079-9
10.1016/j.pld.2024.05.001
Review Article
A review of ethnobotanical studies reveals over 500 medicinal plants in Mindanao, Philippines
Meñiza Joeime F.
Pasco Monica M.
Alimbon Jemer A. jemer_alimbon@umindanao.edu.ph
⁎
Department of Teacher Education, UM Tagum College, Tagum City, 8100, Davao del Norte Philippines
⁎ Corresponding author. jemer_alimbon@umindanao.edu.ph
15 5 2024
9 2024
15 5 2024
46 5 551564
2 12 2023
6 5 2024
8 5 2024
© 2024 Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2024
Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Medicinal plants have long been used to treat various diseases in both indigenous and non-indigenous populations of Mindanao, Philippines. Here, we extracted data from ethnobotanical studies to compile a comprehensive list of these medicinal plants and identify how and for what purpose they are most commonly used. We identified 530 verified medicinal plant species across 372 genera in 118 families. The two most frequently cited species were Euphorbia hirta and Psidium guajava. The most represented family was Fabaceae and the most represented genus was Ficus. A total of 28 medicinal plant species are designated as threatened at the national or global level; of these, 11 are endemic to the Philippines. Medicinal plant preparations most commonly use leaves for oral administration to treat various diseases such as digestive issues, including diarrhea. This study underscores the need for further ethnobotanical investigations, particularly in areas lacking records. It also emphasizes the need for conservation of threatened and endemic medicinal plants to ensure sustainable utilization of this valuable resource.

Highlights

• This review provides an overview of ethnobotanical knowledge of medicinal plants in Mindanao, Philippines.

• Mindanao has at least 530 medicinal plant species belonging to 372 genera across 118 families.

• The two species most frequently cited as medicinal plants are Euphorbia hirta L. and Psidium guajava L.

• Of these medicinal plant species, 28, including 11 endemic to the Philippines, are threatened nationally or globally.

Keywords

Ethnobotany
Medicinal plants
Mindanao
Philippines
==== Body
pmc1 Introduction

Plants provide important resources for humans, including food, timber, and textiles. Plants have also been utilized since the earliest civilizations to cure various illnesses (Petrovska, 2012). In some regions (e.g., Africa, Asia, and Latin America), plants are the source of herbal medicines that treat illnesses for an estimated 85% of the human population (Jamshidi-Kia et al., 2018). For example, traditional medical practitioners in Nigeria treat malaria with Mangifera indica, Enantia chlorantha, Alstonia boonei, and Cymbopogon citratus (Evbuomwan et al., 2023). In rural communities in India, cuts and wounds are treated with Curcuma longa and Ocimum tenuiflorum (Gogoi and Sen, 2023). The Buyi communities in Yunnan, China medicate rheumatism with Paederia scandens and Sargentodoxa cuneata (Xiong et al., 2020). Cashinahua herbalists in the Peruvian Amazon reportedly utilize Pseuderanthemum congestum to treat herpes, snake bites, and cataracts (Horackova et al., 2023). Indeed, the vital role of plants as sources of medicines has been recognized by various scientific disciplines, including pharmacy and natural products chemistry (Gurib-Fakim, 2006).

The Philippines is considered one of the most biodiverse hotspots in the world (Myers et al., 2000). Home to 1.9% of the endemic plants around the globe, the Philippines has 10,078 species of vascular plants belonging to 1962 genera across 287 families (Pelser et al., 2011 onwards; https://www.philippineplants.org). Many of these plants are used to treat various diseases, as demonstrated in ethnobotanical documentation around the country. For instance, the Kalanguya tribe in Tinoc, Ifugao has been shown to use 125 plant species to treat illnesses such as stomachache, cough and colds, and sore eyes (Balangcod and Balangcod, 2011). In addition, communities in Talacogon, Agusan del Sur are known to use 25 plant species to treat diarrhea (Arquion, 2016). More recently, a study has reported that the indigenous Panay Bukidnon in Lambunao, Iloilo use a total of 131 medicinal species to address 91 diseases (Cordero et al., 2022a). The Philippines Department of Health (DOH) has released a list of scientifically validated medicinal plants that includes Allium sativum, Blumea balsamifera, Cassia alata (syn. of Senna alata), Clinopodium douglasii (syn. of Micromeria douglasii), Ehretia microphylla, Momordica charantia, Peperomia pellucida, Psidium guajava, Quisqualis indica (syn. of Combretum indicum), and Vitex negundo (Boy et al., 2018).

The use of medicinal plants in the Philippines can be traced back to the precolonial period (Zaide and Zaide, 2013). The earliest records of medicinal plants in the country were documented during the Spanish regime by missionaries, such as Father Francisco Ignacio Alcina in 1669, Father Pablo Clain in 1712, and Father Juan Delgado from 1751 to 1754 (Bantug, 1953). In the 19th century, Trinidad H. Pardo de Tavera (1892) published his book Plantas Medicinales de Filipinas, which described the medicinal properties of 214 plant species (Bantug, 1953). Even during the American occupation, scholars remained keen on this area of study. Two significant publications during this time were William H. Brown's (1921) Official Philippine Medicinal Plants and Leon Maria Guerrero's (1921) Medicinal Uses of Philippine Plants. Further, during the post-colonial era, Eduardo Quisumbing (1951) published his work titled Medicinal Plants of the Philippines. This valuable document contained information about the medicinal importance of 858 floral species (Bantug, 1953). In 1974, the National Integrated Research Program on Medicinal Plants (NIRPROMP) was formed to document plants used by over a thousand folk healers in the Philippines (Eusebio and Umali, 2004; World Intellectual Property Organization, 2013; United Nations Development Programme [UNDP], 2023). The results have eventually been translated to various medicinal plant formulations, such as Vitex negundo tablet and syrup for asthma and cough, Blumea balsamifera tablet for urolithiasis, and Senna alata lotion for cutaneous fungal infections (Maramba-Lazarte, 2020).

In recent years, ethnobotanical surveys have documented the use of medicinal plants in various indigenous groups in the country, including the Ayta (Ragragio et al., 2013; Tantengco et al., 2018) and Kalanguya (Balangcod and Balangcod, 2011) tribes in Luzon, the Ati tribe (Ong and Kim, 2014; Cordero et al., 2020, 2022b; Cordero and Alejandro, 2021) in Visayas, and the Manobo tribe (Dapar et al., 2020a, 2020b, 2020c, 2020d; Paraguison et al., 2020; Cabugatan et al., 2022; Ilagan et al., 2022) in Mindanao. Medicinal plants have also been inventoried based on the knowledge of other groups, such as herbalists (Caunca and Balinado, 2021), traditional healers (Miano et al., 2011; Del Fierro and Nolasco, 2013; Fiscal, 2017; Rubio and Naive, 2018; Fabie-Agapin, 2020), vendors (Barcelo et al., 2022) and the locals (Arquion, 2016; Calangi et al., 2019; Belgica et al., 2021; Omac et al., 2021; Docot et al., 2022). Although several empirical studies have been published, synthesis of this body of knowledge in the country remains scarce. Recent reviews have focused on medicinal plants used by Filipinos for anemia prevention and treatment, gynecologic care, and obstetric care (Magtalas et al., 2023a, 2023b, 2023c). Lim et al. (2022) stated that performing a literature review would be valuable as it may synthesize the current state of knowledge in the field and identify noteworthy gaps that could inform further research.

Mindanao, a major island group in the Philippines, is home to several human populations: Muslim Filipinos, Indigenous Peoples (IPs) (locally known as Lumads), and the Christian majority (Abubakar, 2019). Historically, Muslim Filipinos and Indigenous Peoples were the islands’ original inhabitants, with Christian settlers arriving during the American regime (Abubakar, 2019). The largest ethnic groups are the Bisaya, Cebuano, and Ilonggo, respectively (Philippine Statistics Authority [PSA], 2023a). Mindanao harbors rich floral diversity (see Amoroso et al., 2012; Polizon and Amoroso, 2014; Lillo et al., 2019; Coritico et al., 2020; Medecilo-Guiang et al., 2021). However, many species on the island group are threatened (see Aribal and Buot, 2009; Lumista et al., 2016; Coritico et al., 2022). Previous reports have noted that both indigenous and non-indigenous people on Mindanao rely on locally available plants to address various health issues (e.g., Gruyal et al., 2014; Pizon et al., 2016; Pucot and Demayo, 2021; Palero et al., 2023). Even so, a comprehensive list of medicinal plant species that these people use or know has yet to be made available. Only a compilation of plant species used specifically for treating cancer or tumors by selected groups has been published (Pucot et al., 2019).

In this review, we collate data from ethnobotanical fieldwork on medicinal plants of Mindanao, Philippines. Specifically, we sought to determine the (1) patterns, trends, and profiles of ethnobotanical studies in the region; (2) diversity and conservation status of identified medicinal plants; (3) commonly used plant parts and modes of preparation and administration; and (4) disease categories treated with documented plant species. Similar to other scholars (e.g., De Boer and Cotingting, 2014; Phumthum et al., 2018), we argue that the compilation arising from this review may inform further drug discovery not just locally but also globally, particularly in regions with shared plant resources. Additionally, it might contribute valuable data to the global database of medicinally valuable plant species.

2 Methods

2.1 Study area

Mindanao, the second-largest group of islands in the southern Philippines, spans 97,530 km2, accounting for approximately 33% of the country's total land area of 300,000 km2. Positioned between latitudes 04° to 11°N and longitudes 118° to 127°E, it is bordered by the Bohol Sea to the north, the Philippine Sea to the east, the Celebes Sea to the south, and the Sulu Sea to the west. Its complex topography ranges from the lowlands of Agusan and Cotabato provinces to the summit of Mt. Apo National Park at 2954 m above sea level, the highest point in the entire country. According to the modified Coronas climate classification (Coronas, 1920; Kintanar, 1984), Mindanao experiences a varied climate. Most provinces exhibit a Type IV climate, characterized by a relatively uniform distribution of rainfall throughout the year. Conversely, certain areas, particularly the northeastern part, feature a Type II climate, with no dry season and very pronounced maximum rainfall from December to February. Meanwhile, other parts, such as most of the Zamboanga Peninsula, have a Type III climate, where seasonal variations are less pronounced, and a relatively dry period persists for one to three months. These topographic and climatic variations have certainly shaped Mindanao's ecological features with its rich and diverse vegetation. For example, Lillo et al. (2019) documented a staggering 432 native plant species within the various forest habitats of Dinagat Island. Among these are the country's endemic species, such as Greeniopsis euphlebia Merr. and Nepenthes truncata Macfarl. Similarly, Zapanta et al. (2019) conducted a survey among disturbed habitats within the Mt. Apo Natural Park, revealing 136 tree species, including endemic and threatened species, such as Cinnamomum mercadoi S.Vidal.

Comprising six regions, 28 provinces, 33 cities, 422 municipalities, and 10,087 villages Mindanao serves as home to over 26 million Filipinos (PSA, 2023b). The majority (≈ 70%) are non-indigenous Christian settlers (Abubakar, 2019). Despite being a minority, about 60% (UNDP, 2013) of the country's total population of Indigenous People (9.84 million people as of 2020) reside in Mindanao (PSA, 2023a). Notably, certain groups in the region, like the Sama and Yakan tribes of Isabela City, Basilan, are identified as both Muslim tribes and indigenous (PSA, 2023a), reflecting the intricate cultural mosaic of the area.

2.2 Study selection

This study systematically searched for extant literature on ethnobotanical surveys of medicinal plants in Mindanao, Philippines. In doing so, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] 2020 Statement (Page et al., 2021) was followed. Database searches were conducted in Scopus and Web of Science on 2 August 2023. The search terms, including the Boolean operators and truncations, utilized in the identification of studies via databases are shown in Table S1. The titles from the two databases were then compared, and duplicates were removed. Citation (forward and backward) searching and manual searching via Google Scholar were also done on 3 August 2023. A two-stage screening process (review of titles and abstracts, and full-text assessment) was employed. This study only included papers that present ethnobotanical fieldwork conducted in Mindanao, Philippines, and are published in English or Filipino in peer-reviewed journals or conference proceedings. Reviews, errata, and inaccessible documents were excluded from this study. Ethnobotanical studies with incomplete or unspecified data were also excluded. All three authors independently performed the screening of each identified record. Disagreements were then resolved through discussion. The PRISMA flow diagram (Fig. 1) shows the result of the search process.Fig. 1 PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process.

Fig. 1

2.3 Data extraction and classification

All included studies were profiled. The following data were extracted from each of the included studies: title, author(s), publication year, study area(s), data collection method(s), sampling technique(s), survey date, participants, ethnobotanical index used, plant species, plant part(s) used, and modes of preparation and administration. Extracted data on modes of preparation and administration were classified according to the categories presented by Alamgir (2017) and Fakchich and Elachouri (2021), respectively.

2.4 Taxonomic validation

The scientific names declared in this review were validated and updated to reflect the latest accepted names per World Flora Online [WFO] (2023a; http://www.worldfloraonline.org). Only accepted botanical names were included and reported in this review. Those scientific names marked as synonyms were merged with their accepted names. For example, the synonyms Citrus decumana L. and Sansevieria trifasciata Prain were merged with their accepted names, Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr. and Dracaena trifasciata (Prain) Mabb., respectively. Names marked as unchecked, such as Artemisia coarctata Forselles and Citrofortunella microcarpa (Bunge) Wijnands, were excluded. Unspecified scientific names, such Agave sp. and Ficus sp., were also excluded. Family names were verified with the Angiosperm Phylogeny Website, version 14 (Stevens, 2017). Verification of both scientific names and family names was done on 27 August 2023.

2.5 Conservation status

This study used the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2022-2 (2023; https://www.iucnredlist.org) to determine species conservation status. It also utilized the Department of Environment and Natural Resources Administrative Order No. 2017-11 [DAO 2017-11] (DENR, 2017) to identify threatened plant species at the national level.

2.6 Classification of diseases

We standardized data on classification of diseases by adopting the International Classification of Primary Care, 2nd edition (ICPC-2), a WHO-accepted classification system. The ICPC was used because its categorization system is patient-informed and closer to ethnomedical reality (Staub et al., 2015).

2.7 Data analysis

This study employed descriptive statistics, mainly frequency, and percentage, to quantitatively analyze extracted data. We also used ethnobotanical indices, such as relative frequency of citation (RFC) and informant consensus factor (ICF). RFC was obtained by using the following formula: RFC = FC/N, where FC is the frequency of citation or the number of informants that mentioned the use of species, and N is the total number of informants (Tardio and Pardo-de-Santayana, 2008). In this review, each study included was treated as a single informant. ICF, on the other hand, was calculated using the following formula: ICF = (nur – nt)/(nur – 1), where nur is the number of use-reports for each disease category and nt is the number of species used (Heinrich et al., 1998). To determine use-reports, this study adopted the methodology of Abe and Ohtani (2013). A single-use report was recorded when a study cited a species for a specific disease or mentioned a species used for multiple diseases within the same category. Conversely, multiple-use reports were noted when at least two studies cited a species for the same disease or when a study cited a species being used for diseases across different categories.

3 Results

Our initial search identified a total of 126 studies on medicinal plants of Mindanao, Philippines. Of these, 91 were from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, whereas 35 were obtained through citation searching and manual searching via Google Scholar. After the removal of duplicates and review of titles and abstracts, 53 studies were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Full-text assessment revealed that only 40 studies met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Section 2.2 presents the selection criteria employed, while Table 1 shows the summary of included studies.Table 1 Profile of the included studies.

Table 1Study Code	Author(s) and year	Study Area (i.e., province/s)	Data collection methoda	Sampling techniqueb	Date of survey	Informants	Sample size	Ethnobotanical index usedc	No. of plant species	
S1	Yen and Gutierrez (1974)	South Cotabato	I	Not stated	July–December 2023	Tasaday	Not stated	None	2d	
S2	Olowa et al. (2012)	Lanao del Norte	I, Q	Not stated	January–March 2012	Higaonon	65	None	62	
S3	Gruyal et al. (2014)	Surigao del Sur	I, Q	Ps	March–October 2013	Residents	50	None	65	
S4	Morilla et al. (2014)	Zamboanga del Sur	D, I, Q	Ss	April–May 2013	Subanen	27	None	60	
S5	Olowa and Demayo (2015)	Lanao del Norte	I, Q	Not stated	January–May 2014	Muslim-Maranao	228	None	122	
S6	Arquion (2016)	Agusan del Sur	I	Ps	November 2014–March 2015	Local dwellers and herbalists	50	None	25	
S7	Aya-ay (2016)	Davao del Sur	I	Not stated	August 2003	Community members	Not stated	None	71	
S8	Cabanting and Perez (2016)	North Cotabato, Zamboanga del Norte, Zamboanga del Sur	I	Ss	2014–2015	Not stated	27	None	1	
S9	Pizon et al. (2016)	Zamboanga del Sur	D, I	Not stated	Not stated	Subanen	7	None	89	
S10	Dapar and Demayo (2017)	Agusan del Sur	I	Ss	Not stated	Manobo, traditional healers, and residents	9	None	1	
S11	Malawani et al. (2017)	Lanao del Sur	D, I	Not stated	Not stated	Maranao	90	None	68	
S12	Odchimar et al. (2017)	Bukidnon	I	Not stated	Not stated	Talaandig	Not stated	None	66	
S13	Cruz et al. (2018)	Surigao del Sur	I, Q	Not stated	mid–2017	Manobo	4	None	19	
S14	Rubio and Naive (2018)	North Cotabato	D, I, Q	Ps	Not stated	Traditional healers	20	None	63	
S15	Alduhisa and Demayo (2019)	Misamis Occidental	I, Q	Not stated	November 2013–March 2014	Subanen	83	None	113	
S16	Campilan et al. (2019)	South Cotabato	D, I, Q	Not stated	July 10, 2014	T'boli	7	RFC, UV	28	
S17	Morilla and Demayo (2019)	Zamboanga del Sur	D, I, Q	Ps	Not stated	Traditional practitioners	6	RF	42	
S18	Dapar et al. (2020a)	Agusan del Sur	D, I	Ps, Ss	March 2018–April 2019	Manobo and Higaonon	145	FIV, RFC	43	
S19	Dapar et al. (2020b)	Agusan del Sur	D, I	Ps, Ss	March 2018–May 2019	Manobo	335	CI, FL, ICF, UD, UR, UV	122	
S20	Dapar et al. (2020c)	Agusan del Sur	D, I, Q	Ps, Ss	October 2018–February 2019	Manobo	50	FIV, RFC	48	
S21	Dapar et al. (2020d)	Agusan del Sur	D, I	Ps, Ss	March 2018 –April 2019	Manobo	95	FIV, RFC	90	
S22	de Guzman et al. (2020)	Zamboanga Sibugay	I, Q	Ss	Not stated	Visayan	31	None	50	
S23	Fabie-Agapin (2020)	Zamboanga del Sur	Q	Ss	December 2018–February 2019	Traditional healers	11	None	71	
S24	Molina et al. (2020)	Zamboanga del Sur	I	Ps	Not stated	Traditional healers	3	None	16	
S25	Olandag (2020)	Misamis Occidental	I, Q	Not stated	Not stated	Subanen	Not stated	None	60	
S26	Paraguison et al. (2020)	Agusan del Sur	D, I	Ps, Ss	November 2019	Manobo	144	FIV, RFC	40	
S27	Peneciba (2020)	Surigao del Sur	D, I	Ps	Not stated	Traditional healers	15	None	45	
S28	Gruyal et al. (2021)	Surigao del Sur	I, Q	Not stated	September –October 2020	Residents	50	ICF	35	
S29	Madjos and Ramos (2021a)	Basilan, Zamboanga del Norte, Zamboanga del Sur, Zamboanga Sibugay	I, Q	Ss	Not stated	Bajau, Chavacano, Sama, Subanen, Subanon, Tausug, Visayan, and Yakan	330	None	208	
S30	Madjos and Ramos (2021b)	Zamboanga del Sur	I	Ss	June–October 2019	Bajau	30	FL, ICF, UR, UV	36	
S31	Montero and Geducos (2021)	Surigao del Sur	I, Q	Not stated	December 2019–January 2020	Local folks	30	None	46	
S32	Naive et al. (2021)	Bukidnon	D, I, Q	Ss	August 2018–March 2019	Talaandig	19	UV	97	
S33	Nuñeza et al. (2021)	Agusan del Norte, Surigao del Norte	I, Q, GC	Not stated	July 11 – November 15, 2019	Mamanwa	143	None	78	
S34	Omac et al. (2021)	Agusan del Norte	Q, PRA	Not stated	Not stated	Local communities	120	RFC	125	
S35	Pucot and Demayo (2021)	Zamboanga del Sur	I, Q	Ps, Ss	August 2020–March 2021	Traditional healers, masseur/masseuse, community members	23	None	56	
S36	Alinsug et al. (2022)	South Cotabato	D, I	Not stated	Not stated	B'laan	30	FL, ICF, UV	101	
S37	Cabugatan et al. (2022)	Davao Occidental	I, Q	Ps	Not stated	Manobo	30	RFC, UV	41	
S38	Dapar and Amoroso (2022)	Bukidnon	I	Not stated	Not stated	Tigwahon-Manobo	Not stated	None	23	
S39	Ilagan et al. (2022)	Surigao del Sur	I	Not stated	Not stated	Manobo and Mamanwa	127	FIV, FL, ICF, UV	48	
S40	Palero et al. (2023)	Agusan del Norte	I	Ss	January –March 2022	Traditional healers	40	FL, RFC, UV	34	
Note. The studies included herein are arranged chronologically, then alphabetically according to the first author's surname.

a Data collection method – D: discussion, GC: group conversation, I: interview, PRA: participatory rural appraisal, Q: questionnaire.

b Sampling technique – Ps: purposive sampling, Ss: snowball sampling.

c Ethnobotanical index used – CI: cultural importance index/value, FIV: family importance value, FL: fidelity level, ICF: informant consensus factor, RF: relative frequency, RFC: relative frequency of citation, UD: use diversity, UR: use-report, UV: use value.

d Number of medicinal species reported.

3.1 Ethnobotanical studies on Mindanao

The geographical distribution of ethnobotanical studies in Mindanao, Philippines, is shown in Fig. 2. Results revealed that ethnobotanical documentation was done in 16 of the 28 Mindanao provinces. Among them, Zamboanga del Sur had the highest number, with nine studies. This was followed by Agusan del Sur and Surigao del Sur with seven and six publications, respectively. Bukidnon and South Cotabato had three studies each, while Agusan del Norte, Lanao del Norte, Misamis Occidental, North Cotabato, Zamboanga del Norte, and Zamboanga Sibugay had two studies each. Further, each of the provinces of Basilan, Davao del Sur, Davao Occidental, Lanao del Sur, and Surigao del Norte had one published paper.Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of ethnobotanical studies in Mindanao, Philippines.

Fig. 2

Over the years, there has been a gradual accumulation of ethnobotanical studies in Mindanao, with the majority (n = 26, 65.0%) being published in the last five years, 2019 to 2023. The oldest identified record included in this review was of Yen and Gutierrez (1974). We found no studies conducted between 1975 and 2011. The number of publications peaked in 2020 at 10 (25.0%). Fig. 3 shows the temporal trend of ethnobotanical publications in Mindanao, Philippines.Fig. 3 Number of ethnobotanical publications on Mindanao (1974–2023).

Fig. 3

All included studies were published in English. The majority were journal articles (n = 38, 95.0%), while the remainder were conference papers. Most studies (n = 26, 65.0%) surveyed certain tribes in Mindanao, while other studies collected data from non-indigenous groups. Informants of each of the included studies ranged from 3 to 335 individuals. They were primarily recruited through purposive (n = 13, 32.5%) or snowball (n = 15, 37.5%) sampling. Eighteen studies (45%) did not state the sampling technique employed, while five studies (12.5%) did not disclose their sample sizes.

The most utilized method of data collection was interview (n = 38, 95.0%). This was followed by using questionnaires (n = 21, 52.5%) and holding discussions (n = 14, 35.0%). Other methods included group conversation and participatory rural appraisal. In terms of analysis, only 15 studies (37.5%) used indices to quantify ethnobotanical data. Relative frequency of citation and use value were the most utilized indices, with eight studies using each of them. Five studies employed family importance value, fidelity level, and informant consensus factor indices. Other ethnobotanical indices used were the cultural importance index, relative frequency, use diversity, and use-report.

3.2 Medicinal plant families, genera and species and their conservation status

This review found that all included studies documented a total of 661 species with medicinal uses. Verification and updating in the WFO excluded those unlisted and unchecked species. Unspecified species were also excluded, while synonyms were merged with their accepted names. As a result, a total of 530 verified and updated medicinal plant species are reported in this review. They belong to 372 genera in 118 families. Table S2 presents the list of medicinal plants in Mindanao, Philippines.

Among all plant families reported, Fabaceae was the most represented with 37 species (Fig. 4a). This was followed by Asteraceae (32 species), Lamiaceae (29 species), Moraceae (24 species), and Malvaceae (23 species), respectively. The number of species representing other families ranged from 1 to 19 species. Further, the most represented genera were Ficus of Moraceae (20 species), Allium of Amaryllidaceae (8 species), Phyllanthus of Phyllanthaceae (6 species), Solanum of Solanaceae (7 species), and Piper of Piperaceae (6 species) (Fig. 4b). Other genera were represented by 1–4 species.Fig. 4 Most represented families (a) and genera (b) of medicinal plants in Mindanao, Philippines.

Fig. 4

Table 2 shows the 15 most cited species in ethnobotanical studies of Mindanao. Euphorbia hirta L. topped the list with 26 mentions. Psidium guajava L. followed this with 25 mentions. Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC. and Vitex negundo came next with 24 mentions each. Following them were Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf, Eleusine indica Gaertn., Jatropha curcas L., Mimosa pudica L., and Tinospora crispa (L.) Hook.f. & Thomson with 23 mentions each, and Annona muricata L., Artemisia vulgaris L., Carica papaya L., Persea americana Mill., Plectranthus scutellarioides R.Br., and Kalanchoe pinnata (Lam.) Pers. with 21 mentions each.Table 2 Most cited medicinal plant species in Mindanao, Philippines.

Table 2Rank	Species	Family	No. of citations	Relative frequency of citations	
1	Euphorbia hirta L.	Euphorbiaceae	26	0.650	
2	Psidium guajava L.	Myrtaceae	25	0.625	
3	Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC.	Asteraceae	24	0.600	
Vitex negundo L.	Lamiaceae	24	0.600	
4	Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf	Poaceae	23	0.575	
Eleusine indica Gaertn.	Poaceae	23	0.575	
Jatropha curcas L.	Euphorbiaceae	23	0.575	
Mimosa pudica L.	Fabaceae	23	0.575	
Tinospora crispa (L.) Hook.f. & Thomson	Menispermaceae	23	0.575	
5	Annona muricata L.	Annonaceae	21	0.525	
Artemisia vulgaris L.	Asteraceae	21	0.525	
Carica papaya L.	Caricaceae	21	0.525	
Persea americana Mill.	Lauraceae	21	0.525	
Plectranthus scutellarioides R.Br.	Lamiaceae	21	0.525	
Kalanchoe pinnata (Lam.) Pers.	Crassulaceae	21	0.525	
Note: There were 40 included studies that served as informants in this review.

Further, this review reveals that 28 medicinal plant species belonging to 21 families found in Mindanao are threatened at the global or national level (Table 3). Of these species, 17 are listed in the IUCN Red List (2023), while 18 are in DAO 2017-11 (DENR, 2017). At the global level, one species is categorized as critically endangered, eight are endangered, and another eight are vulnerable. At the national level, two species are critically endangered, nine are endangered, five are vulnerable, and two are categorized as other threatened species. They accounted for 5.28% of the 530 species included in this review. Additionally, 11 out of 28 threatened species are classified as endemic to the Philippines (DENR, 2017).Table 3 Threatened medicinal plant species of Mindanao, Philippines.

Table 3Family	Species	Status	
IUCNa	DAO 2017-11b	
Annonaceae	Drepananthus apoensis Elmer	VU		
Apocynaceae	Voacanga megacarpa Merr.	VU		
Araceae	Alocasia zebrina Schott ex Van Houtte∗		VU	
Rhaphidophora korthalsii Schott∗		OTS	
Araucariaceae	Agathis dammara (Lamb.) Rich	VU	VU	
Cardiopteridaceae	Citronella mucronata (Ruiz & Pav.) D. Don	VU		
Dipterocarpaceae	Shorea astylosa Foxw.∗	EN	CR	
Shorea negrosensis Foxw.∗		VU	
Euphorbiaceae	Jatropha mcvaughii Dehgan & G.L. Webster	EN		
Fabaceae	Afzelia rhomboidea (Blanco) Fern.-Villi.	VU	EN	
Clianthus puniceus (G. Don) Sol. ex Lindl.	EN		
Pterocarpus indicus Willd.	EN	VU	
Lauraceae	Cinnamomum mercadoi S. Vidal∗		OTS	
Lycopodiaceae	Huperzia squarrosa (G. Forst.) Trevis		EN	
Malvaceae	Gossypium hirsutum L.	VU		
Melastomataceae	Medinilla surigaoensis Regalado∗		EN	
Meliaceae	Swietenia macrophylla King in Hook.	VU		
Nepenthaceae	Nepenthes saranganiensis Sh. Kurata∗		EN	
Nepenthes truncata Macfarl.∗	EN	EN	
Ophioglossaceae	Ophioglossum pendulum L.		EN	
Orchidaceae	Phalaenopsis amabilis (L.) Blume		EN	
Phalaenopsis stuartiana Rchb.f.∗		EN	
Pandanaceae	Pandanus mindanaensis Martelli	EN		
Rubiaceae	Coffea arabica L.	EN		
Greeniopsis euphlebia Merr.∗	VU	CR	
Thymelaeaceae	Aquilaria malaccensis Lam.	CR	EN	
Urticaceae	Dendrocnide venosa (Elmer) Chew	EN		
Zingiberaceae	Alpinia elegans (C. Presl) K. Schum∗		VU	
Note: Species marked with an asterisk (∗) are endemic to the Philippines (DENR, 2017).

a IUCN categories – CR: critically endangered, EN: endangered, VU: vulnerable.

b National categories – CR: critically endangered, EN: endangered, VU: vulnerable, OTS: other threatened species.

3.3 Plant parts used and modes of preparation and administration

This review reveals that in Mindanao either the whole or parts of medicinal plants are used to treat various diseases. Even so, the leaf of the majority of species (n = 356, 67.2%) is the most commonly used part (Fig. 5a). This is followed by the root (184 species, 34.7%), bark (92 species, 17.4%), stem (90 species, 17.0%), and fruit (67 species, 12.6%). Following the classification of Alamgir (2017), the modes of preparation were categorized as dry, external, and internal. Records show that internal preparation is the most preferred for many species (n = 416, 78.5%) (Fig. 5b). This is followed by external (293 species, 55.3%) and dry (15 species, 2.83%) preparations. The mode of administration followed the classification used by Fakchich and Elachouri (2021). As shown (Fig. 5c), preparations from 408 species (77.0%) are administered orally. A total of 301 species (56.8%) are administered externally. Only five species (0.94%) were reported to be administered in other ways, such as gargling and inhalation.Fig. 5 Most common parts used (a), modes of preparation (b), and modes of administration (c) of medicinal plants in Mindanao, Philippines.

Fig. 5

3.4 Disease categories and informant consensus factor

Table 4 presents the number of use-reports, number of species used, and ICFs for various disease categories. This study reveals that use-reports ranged from 5 to 764, with ear diseases having the fewest and digestive diseases the most. Similarly, the ear disease category had the lowest number of species (n = 5), while the digestive disease category had the highest (n = 279). Further, ICFs ranged from 0 to 0.636. Among all categories, the digestive disease category had the highest ICF. Other categories that had ICFs of at least 0.500 included general and unspecified diseases (0.587), respiratory diseases (0.582), skin diseases (0.579), and endocrine/metabolic and nutritional diseases (0.503). On the other hand, the ear disease category had only five use-reports and five species used. Hence, it yielded an ICF of 0, the lowest among all disease categories.Table 4 Use reports and informant consensus factors for various disease categories.

Table 4Disease categories	Number of use reports	Number of species used	ICF	
General and unspecified	672	278	0.587	
Blood, blood forming organs, and immune mechanism	52	38	0.275	
Digestive	764	279	0.636	
Eye	27	21	0.231	
Ear	5	5	0.000	
Cardiovascular	183	94	0.489	
Musculoskeletal	342	175	0.490	
Neurological	151	106	0.300	
Psychological	9	7	0.250	
Respiratory	439	184	0.582	
Skin	509	215	0.579	
Endocrine/metabolic and nutritional	152	76	0.503	
Urological	184	97	0.475	
Pregnancy, childbearing, family planning	144	95	0.343	
Female genital	74	52	0.301	
Male genital	17	11	0.375	

4 Discussion

4.1 Ethnobotanical studies on Mindanao

In this study, we reviewed ethnobotanical surveys conducted in Mindanao, Philippines. We collated data on medicinal plants known or used by the indigenous and non-indigenous groups in the region. Ethnobotanical fieldwork in Mindanao has been geographically concentrated, given that only three provinces had more than five publications while the rest had none to three. This could be due to the limited number of researchers and institutions working on this topic, which would skew their efforts to a few areas. As such, more studies should be conducted, especially in provinces that remain un(der)studied, such as Davao Oriental, Davao del Norte, Sulu, and Tawi–Tawi, among others. Nonetheless, the field has definitely gained interest, as demonstrated by the number of publications post-2010. Before 2010, only one study was published (Yen and Gutierrez, 1974). This study accounted for plants deemed useful by Tasadays of South Cotabato, including two medicinal plants. The increase in ethnobotanical documentation in recent years has also been observed in other parts of the world, such as Morocco (Fakchich and Elachouri, 2021), Nepal (Poudel et al., 2022), and Southwest China (Liu et al., 2016), possibly due to the growing interest of the scientific community in this topic (Fakchich and Elachouri, 2021).

Many of the studies included in our review inventoried the ethnobotanical knowledge of several indigenous and ethnolinguistic groups, including the Bajau, B'laan, Chavacano, Higaonon, Mamanwa, Manobo, Maranao, Muslim-Maranao, Sama, Subanen, Subanon, Talaandig, Tasaday, Tausug, T'boli, Tigwahon-Manobo, Visayan, and Yakan. Other studies collected data from residents, traditional healers/practitioners, herbalists, masseurs/masseuses, and other community members. Despite the number of ethnobotanical investigations, knowledge of medicinal plants of most tribes in Mindanao remains undocumented. Dapar and Alejandro (2020) found that only 36% of the indigenous populations in this island group had been surveyed. Further profiling revealed that a certain proportion of studies did not specify their sampling technique nor sample size. The lack of this crucial information hinders a thorough grasp of the study and its alignment with existing literature and hampers the ability to make a sound assessment regarding the generalizability of the study's findings and conclusions (Turner, 2020). This review also found that many studies employed multiple data collection methods, of which, interviews were the most utilized. This may be because doing interviews, especially semi-structured ones, efficiently captures extensive information from many individuals in a short time while keeping the interviewees at ease to answer questions (Albuquerque et al., 2006). In addition, ethnobotanical indices have only been employed in recent studies, affirming the conclusion of Medeiros et al. (2011) that ethnobotanists are increasingly using quantitative indices.

4.2 Medicinal plant families, genera and species and their conservation status

This comprehensive review has identified and documented 530 verified and updated medicinal plant species belonging to 372 genera across 118 families. This figure constitutes 5% of the total flora in the country (Pelser et al., 2011 onwards). This proportion aligns with the global average, where about 5% of the estimated 391,000 plant species worldwide have been shown to have medicinal uses (Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, 2016). The number of medicinal plant species reported in this review is relatively higher than those documented in diverse regions worldwide, e.g., Barak Valley, India (216 species; Barbhuiya et al., 2022), and Sarawak, Malaysia (166 species; Abu Bakar et al., 2023).

Among the medicinal plant families occurring in Mindanao, Fabaceae, and Asteraceae were the two most represented. This could be due to a high number of species that belong to these families. In fact, they are two of the largest plant families not just in the country but also worldwide. In the Philippines, they were represented by at least 379 and 158 species, respectively (Pelser et al., 2011 onwards). Worldwide, they have approximately 19,500 and 24,700 species, respectively (Christenhusz and Byng, 2016). Previous research has indicated that plant families that have high species richness have more useful species (Palchetti et al., 2023). Previous reviews also revealed that these two plant families registered a high number of medicinal plant species (Fakchich and Elachouri, 2021; Palchetti et al., 2023). Further, we found that Ficus was the most represented genus. With at least 101 species known to occur in the country, it is one of the largest genera (Pelser et al., 2011 onwards). Ficus species are known to have antioxidant properties (Sirisha et al., 2010). For example, Ficus elastica Roxb. ex Hornem., which was reportedly used against cancer (Fabie-Agapin, 2020; Madjos and Ramos, 2021a), was found to contain compounds with potent anti-proliferative activity (Mbosso Teinkela et al., 2016).

The most frequently cited species used for medicinal purposes was Euphorbia hirta. Belonging to family Euphorbiaceae, this herb grows in various parts of the world, especially in tropical and subtropical regions (WFO, 2023b). Several studies included in this review (e.g., Olowa et al., 2012; Dapar et al., 2020b; Cabugatan et al., 2022) reported that decoction of the whole of this plant or its part(s) can be used against dengue fever. Experimental evidence has even shown that E. hirta contains compounds with antiviral activity against the dengue virus (Tayone et al., 2014). Despite this, further investigations have been recommended to establish its potential and validate its clinical utility (Mir et al., 2012; Perera et al., 2018), given that adverse effects have also been reported in the literature (see Capule, 2013). In addition, E. hirta, which was reportedly used against tumors (Madjos and Ramos, 2021a), was found to contain kaemferol, a bioactive compound displaying anti-breast cancer activity (Widyananda et al., 2023).

Interestingly, among the ten scientifically validated medicinal plants in the country, only three were mentioned in the majority of the studies. These are Psidium guajava, Blumea balsamifera and Vitex negundo. These species have been approved for use in treating tooth decay and gum infection, cough, and urinary stones, respectively (Zarsuelo et al., 2018). Although further validation by the country's health authorities is required, global experimental evidence indicates that other important species also show potential biological activities. For example, Cymbopogon citratus, reportedly used against cancer (Omac et al., 2021), showed that its extract has significant antiproliferative properties, particularly against liver cancer (Rahhal et al., 2024). Rahhal et al. (2024) also revealed that C. citratus extract contains phytoconstituents like flavonoids and saponins, contributing to its antioxidant and anti-diabetic properties. Similarly, Annona muricata, reportedly used for diabetes (Madjos and Ramos, 2021a), is rich in polyphenols, making it potentially effective in managing diabetes mellitus and its complications (Justino et al., 2018). Furthermore, Jatropha curcas, known to manage wounds (Dapar et al., 2020c; Naive et al., 2021), contains alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, saponins, steroids, and tannins in its stem extract, indicating its broad-spectrum antimicrobial potential (Igbinosa et al., 2009).

Having more than 500 species, Mindanao is indeed rich in medicinal plant resources. However, there exist various threats, such as agricultural development and expansion, deforestation, and mining (Agduma et al., 2023). Even in a protected area like Mt. Apo Natural Park, destruction of certain habitats has been noted and is imminent in some areas due to agriculture and settlements (Zapanta et al., 2019). All these may adversely impact this rich floral diversity. In fact, this review found that a few identified plants are already categorized as threatened at a global and country level. For instance, Aquilaria malaccensis Lam., known for cancer treatment (Omac et al., 2021) and addressing body pain, cough, and stomachache (Dapar and Amoroso, 2022), is critically endangered according to IUCN (2023) and endangered according to DENR (2017). In addition, the Philippine endemic trees Greeniopsis euphlebia Merr., cited for treating stomachache (Ilagan et al., 2022), and Shorea astylosa Foxw., for addressing physical relapse (Madjos and Ramos, 2021a), are both critically endangered according to DENR (2017). The IUCN (2023) classifies these plants as globally vulnerable and endangered, respectively. As such, it is essential to consider conservation strategies and resource management to ensure the sustainable utilization of these medicinal plant resources (Chen et al., 2016). Additionally, certain species listed in this review have been identified as non-native within the country, with some posing a threat as invasive species. Notable examples include Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M. King & H. Rob., Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit, and Piper aduncum L. (Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Biodiversity Management Bureau, 2020). These species are known for treating wounds (Madjos and Ramos, 2021a), managing parasitic worms (Fabie-Agapin, 2020), and remedying snake bites (Alinsug et al., 2022), respectively. Despite being medicinally valuable, these species need constant monitoring to prevent their spread and adverse impacts on native floral diversity.

4.3 Plant parts used and modes of preparation and administration

Of all plant parts, leaves are commonly utilized in preparing herbal remedies. The reliance on leaves may be due to its availability and accessibility compared to other parts (Cordero and Alejandro, 2021). Leaves can also be harvested more abundantly (Mbuni et al., 2020) and regenerate quickly, unlike other parts, such as roots and stems (Fabie-Agapin, 2020). The preferential use of leaves has also been practiced in other countries, e.g., China (Xiong et al., 2020), Turkey (Karaköse, 2022), and Nigeria (Evbuomwan et al., 2023).

Preparation of herbal remedies is a critical process as it determines how the medicinal properties of plants are released to best alleviate the intended ailment (Alamgir, 2017). This review reveals that most species are prepared for internal use. Examples of internal preparations include decoction, infusion, and ingestion. In fact, decoction has been the most preferred method among different groups in Mindanao (see Naive et al., 2021; Nuñeza et al., 2021; Alinsug et al., 2022; Cabugatan et al., 2022). We also found that the most common mode of administration for most species was oral. This mode of administration may be due to the method by which plants are prepared. Even so, Fakchich and Elachouri (2021) argued that both oral and external administration allow fast physiological action. The prominence of internal preparation and oral administration being reported in ethnobotanical studies may be because plant healing agents are more effective if taken internally (Alamgir, 2017).

4.4 Disease categories and informant consensus factor

This review found that the highest number of use-reports among all disease categories was digestive disease. This finding suggests that many of the reviewed studies mentioned the use of various plant species in treating ailment(s) within this category (Amiguet et al., 2005). Further we found that the highest consensus reported in ethnobotanical studies of Mindanao was for plants used to treat digestive problems, despite documenting the greatest number of species used. A higher ICF indicates homogeneity of ethnobotanical information (Medeiros et al., 2011). It also means that a relatively large proportion of informants have reported a few species in addressing this disease category (Heinrich et al., 1998). A frequently identified digestive disease among studies is diarrhea, one of the leading causes of death not just in the Philippines (PSA, 2023c) but on a global scale as well (World Health Organization, 2020). Among the reported species, Psidium guajava was frequently cited as a treatment for diarrhea (Arquion, 2016; Dapar et al., 2020b; Omac et al., 2021). Various studies (e.g., Abbas et al., 2020; Ibeh et al., 2021; Charla et al., 2023) have demonstrated that P. guajava leaves contain bioactive compounds that have antidiarrheal potential. The use of P. guajava leaves against diarrhea has also been reported in other countries, such as French Polynesia (Chassagne et al., 2022) and Tanzania (Liheluka et al., 2023). The lowest ICF score was reported for ear diseases. This indicates that informants disagree on what species to use in the treatment of this ear diseases (Heinrich et al., 1998). Even so, ethnobotanical studies of indigenous groups in the Philippines has reported that the highest ICF is for ear diseases (e.g., Abe and Ohtani, 2013; Ong and Kim, 2014). As Caunca and Balinado (2021) argued, ICF values can differ across cultures, highlighting variations in the availability and utilization of medicinal plants unique to each region, as well as the specific health conditions for which these plants are used.

4.5 Limitations

This review provides an overview of ethnobotanical knowledge of medicinal plants in Mindanao, serving as a valuable resource for future researchers. However, the findings presented here should be approached with caution due to certain limitations. Firstly, the studies included were limited to journal articles and conference papers indexed in three databases (i.e., Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science), potentially overlooking ethnobotanical data from other sources like gray literature. Future reviews could explore these additional sources to ensure a more comprehensive representation of ethnobotanical studies in the region. Secondly, although the scientific names of plants in this review have been verified and updated, they are solely based on the reported names in the included studies. Lastly, information on parts used, modes of preparation and administration, and diseases treated rely on the data provided in the reviewed studies. Therefore, any inaccuracies in taxonomic identification or errors in reporting within these studies may impact the reliability of the data presented in this review.

5 Conclusion and future directions

This study presents data on medicinal plants known or used by both indigenous and non-indigenous populations in Mindanao, Philippines. Mostly published post-2010, 40 ethnobotanical studies conducted in 16 of its 28 provinces are included in this review. Data show that Mindanao has at least 530 medicinal plant species used to treat various diseases in 16 categories. These species belong to 372 genera of 118 families. Fabaceae is the most represented plant family, while Ficus is the most represented genus. The most cited species is Euphorbia hirta. Among all species, 28 are classified as threatened globally and nationally. The commonly used plant part for various herbal preparations is the leaf. The majority of the medicinal plants are prepared for internal use and are administered orally. Among the identified categories, digestive diseases exhibit the highest informant consensus factor, while ear diseases have the lowest.

It is hoped that this study will provide some guidance to future researchers conducting ethnobotanical fieldwork in the Philippines, especially in unexplored areas and among unstudied tribes. While this focuses on Mindanao, subsequent reviews may explore other island groups like Luzon and Visayas, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of Philippine ethnobotany. This review also underscores the importance of transparent reporting, emphasizing the need for future researchers to disclose sampling techniques and sample sizes for clearer interpretation of findings. Additionally, this study highlights the necessity of conducting phytochemical and pharmacological investigations on the most frequently cited plants, especially those not yet scientifically validated by the Philippines’ Department of Health. Finally, it is recommended that similar studies be conducted every five or ten years to stay current with ethnobotanical research trends, identifying and addressing new gaps in knowledge.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Joeime F. Meñiza: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - Original Draft. Monica M. Pasco: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - Original Draft. Jemer A. Alimbon: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal Analysis, Visualization, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review and Editing, Supervision.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A Supplementary data

The following is/are the supplementary data to this article:Multimedia component 1

Multimedia component 1

Acknowledgement

The authors extend their sincerest gratitude to the reviewers, whose comments and suggestions have greatly improved this paper.

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Office of Plant Diversity.

Appendix A Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2024.05.001.
==== Refs
References

Abbas M. Ansari M.T. Alvi M.N. Insight on the fractionations and structural characterizations of innovative antidiarrheal compounds screened from leaves of Psidium guajava of local origin in Pakistan Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 33 2020 2323 2329 10.36721/PJPS.2020.33.5.SUP.2323-2329.1 33832907
Abe R. Ohtani K. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants and traditional therapies on Batan Island, the Philippines J. Ethnopharmacol. 145 2013 554 565 10.1016/j.jep.2012.11.029 23183086
Abubakar A.U. The study area: Mindanao and the Bangsamoro conflict communities Peacebuilding and Sustainable Human Development: the Pursuit of the Bangsamoro Right to Self-Determination. The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science vol. 16 2019 Springer Cham 87 123 10.1007/978-3-319-53387-2_3
Abu Bakar F. Razzaq K.W. Ahmad K.I. Diversity and utilization of ethnomedicinal plants in Sarawak, Borneo Malays. For. 86 2023 125 152
Agduma A.R. Garcia F.G. Cabasan M.T. Overview of priorities, threats, and challenges to biodiversity conservation in the southern Philippines Reg. Sustain 4 2023 203 213 10.1016/j.regsus.2023.05.003
Alamgir A.N.M. Herbal drugs: their collection, preservation, and preparation; evaluation, quality control, and standardization of herbal drugs Therapeutic Use of Medicinal Plants and Their Extracts: Volume 1. Progress in Drug Research vol. 73 2017 Springer Cham 453 495 10.1007/978-3-319-63862-1_10
Albuquerque U.P. Lucena R.F.P. Monteiro J.M. Evaluating two quantitative ethnobotanical techniques Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 4 2006 51 60
Alduhisa G.U. Demayo C.G. Ethnomedicinal plants used by the Subanen tribe in two villages in Ozamis City, Mindanao, Philippines Pharmacophore 10 2019 28 42
Alinsug M.V. Estandarte M.H.G. Somodio E.M.N. Biodiversity of ethnomedicinal plants from the B’laan tribe in mount Matutum protected landscape, southern Mindanao, Philippines. Biodiversitas 23 2022 554 563 10.13057/biodiv/d230160
Amiguet V.T. Arnason J.T. Maquin P. A consensus ethnobotany of the Q’eqchi’ Maya of southern Belize Econ. Bot. 59 2005 29 42 10.1663/0013-0001(2005)059[0029:ACEOTQ]2.0.CO;2
Amoroso V.B. Amoroso C.B. Coritico F.B. Diversity and status of plants in three mountain ecosystems in southern Mindanao, Philippines Asian J. Biodivers. 3 2012 50 73 10.7828/ajob.v3i1.83
Aribal L.G. Buot Jr I.E. The threatened plants species in various regions in Mindanao Island, Philippines J. Nat. Stud. 8 2009 23 33
Arquion R.D. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants for diarrhea in Agusan del Sur, Philippines IAMURE Int. J. Ecol. Conserv. 18 2016 138 162 10.7718/ijec.v18i1.1115
Aya-ay A. Ethnobotany of ferns and fern allies in mount Macabol, Marilog district, Davao city, Philippines IJABER 14 2016 1127 1137
Balangcod T.D. Balangcod A.K.D. Ethnomedical knowledge of plants and healthcare practices among the Kalanguya tribe in Tinoc, Ifugao, Luzon, Philippines Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 10 2011 227 238
Bantug J.P. A Short History of Medicine in the Philippines during the Spanish Regime 1565-1898 1953 Colegio Medico-Farmaceutico de Filipinas, Inc. Manila
Barbhuiya P.A. Laskar A.M. Mazumdar H. Ethnomedicinal practices and traditional medicinal plants of Barak Valley, Assam: a systematic review J. Pharmacopunct. 25 2022 149 185 10.3831/KPI.2022.25.3.149
Barcelo R.C. Gallao II M.G.S. Balocnit R.G. Traditional medicinal knowledge of vendors and their contribution toward community healthcare in Baguio City, Philippines Franco F.M. Knudsen M. Hassan N.H. Case Studies in Biocultural Diversity from Southeast Asia. Asia in Transition, volume 19 2022 Springer Singapore 125 165 10.1007/978-981-16-6719-0_6
Belgica T.H. Suba M.D. Alejandro G.J.D. Quantitative ethnobotanical study of medicinal flora used by local inhabitants in selected barangay of Malinao, Albay, Philippines Biodiversitas 22 2021 2711 2721 10.13057/biodiv/d220720
Boy H.I.A. Rutilla A.J.H. Santos K.A. Recommended medicinal plants as source of natural products: a review Dig. Chin. Med. 1 2018 131 142 10.1016/S2589-3777(19)30018-7
Brown W.H. Official Philippine medicinal plants Brown W.H. Minor Products of Philippine Forests vol. 3 1921 Bureau of Printing Manila 63 78
Cabanting R.M.F. Perez L.M. An ethnobotanical study of traditional rice landraces (Oryza sativa L.) used for medical treatment in selected local communities of the Philippines J. Ethnopharmacol. 194 2016 767 773 10.1016/j.jep.2016.10.021 27742407
Cabugatan M.A.D. Ong R.L.J.T. Mancao L.S. Ethnobotanical survey on medicinal plants used by the Manobo tribe of Don Marcelino, Davao Occidental, Philippines Asian J. Biol. Life Sci. 11 2022 492 504 10.5530/ajbls.2022.11.67
Calangi A.M. Enriquez A.L. Lacno B.R. Ethnobotanical study of some useful medicinal flora used by the locals of Mount Manunggal, Barangay Sunog, Balamban, Cebu Island, Philippines Thail. Nat. Hist. Mus. J. 13 2019 11 25
Campilan J.R.H. Tumamac M.C. Dorado E.L. Quantitative ethnobotanical study, phytochemical screening and antibacterial assay of ethnomedicinal plants of T’boli in Lemsnolon, Tboli, South Cotabato Int. J. Pharmacol. Phytochem. Ethnomed. 13 2019 45 61 10.18052/www.scipress.com/IJPPE.13.45
Capule F.R. Acute oral toxicity of the crude aqueous extract of the whole plant of Euphorbia hirta L. (Family Euphorbiaceae) Acta Med. Philipp. 47 2013 23 29 10.47895/amp.v47i4.1255
Caunca E.S. Balinado L.O. Determination of use-value, informant consensus factor, and fidelity level of medicinal plants used in Cavite, Philippines Asian J. Biol. Life Sci. 10 2021 443 453 10.5530/ajbls.2021.10.59
Charla R. Patil P.P. Patil V.S. Anti-cholera toxin activity of selected polyphenols from Careya arborea, Punica granatum, and Psidium guajava Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13 2023 1106293 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1106293
Chassagne F. Butaud J.-F. Torrente F. Polynesian medicine used to treat diarrhea and ciguatera: an ethnobotanical survey in six islands from French Polynesia J. Ethnopharmacol. 292 2022 115186 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115186
Chen S.-L. Yu H. Luo H.-M. Conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants: problems, progress, and prospects Chin. Med. 11 2016 37 10.1186/s13020-016-0108-7 27478496
Christenhusz M.J.M. Byng J.W. The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase Phytotaxa 261 2016 201 217 10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1
Cordero C.S. Alejandro G.J.D. Medicinal plants used by the indigenous Ati tribe in Tobias Fornier, Antique, Philippines Biodiversitas 22 2021 521 536 10.13057/biodiv/d220203
Cordero C.S. Ligsay A. Alejandro G.J.D. Ethnobotanical documentation of medicinal plants used by the Ati tribe in Malay, Aklan, Philippines J. Complement. Med. Reserve 11 2020 170 198 10.5455/jcmr.2020.11.01.20
Cordero C.S. Meve U. Alejandro G.J.D. Ethnobotanical documentation of medicinal plants used by the indigenous Panay Bukidnon in Lambunao, Iloilo, Philippines Front. Pharmacol. 12 2022 790567 10.3389/fphar.2021.790567
Cordero C.S. Meve U. Alejandro G.J.D. Quantitative ethnobotanical documentation of medicinal plants used by the indigenous Ati tribes in Panay Island, Philippines Malays. J. Sustain. Environ. 9 2022 143 170 10.24191/myse.v9i2.18832
Coritico F.P. Lagunday N.E. Galindon J.M.M. Diversity of trees and structure of forest habitat types in Mt. Tago Range, Mindanao, Philippines Philipp. J. Syst. Biol. 14 2020 1 11 10.26757/pjsb2020c14006
Coritico F.P. Legaspi M.L. Lagunday N.E. Threatened and endemic seed plants of Mt. Pantaron Range, Mindanao, Philippines Philipp. J. Sci. 151 2022 2433 2445 10.56899/151.6B.09
Coronas J. The Climate and Weather of the Philippines, 1903–1918 1920 Bureau of Printing Manila
Cruz M.B. Buenafe K.J. De Ocampo K.S. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by Manobo tribe in Surigao del Sur, Philippines 2018
Dapar M.L.G. Alejandro G.J.D. Ethnobotanical studies on indigenous communities in the Philippines: current status, challenges, recommendations and future perspectives J. Complement. Med. Res. 11 2020 432 446 10.5455/jcmr.2020.11.01.51
Dapar M.L.G. Alejandro G.J.D. Meve U. Ethnomedicinal importance and conservation status of medicinal trees among indigenous communities in Esperanza, Agusan del Sur, Philippines J. Complement. Med. Res. 11 2020 59 71 10.5455/jcmr.2020.11.01.08
Dapar M.L.G. Alejandro G.J.D. Meve U. Quantitative ethnopharmacological documentation and molecular confirmation of medicinal plants used by the Manobo tribe of Agusan del Sur, Philippines J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 16 2020 14 10.1186/s13002-020-00363-7 32138749
Dapar M.L.G. Amoroso V.B. Ethnobotanical study and conservation status of plants used by the Tigwahanon-Manobo in Mt. Malimumu, San Fernando, Bukidnon, Philippines J. Trop. Life Sci. 12 2022 163 172 10.11594/jtls.12.02.02
Dapar M.L.G. Demayo C.G. Folk medical uses of lunas Lunasia amara Blanco by the Manobo people, traditional healers and residents of Agusan del Sur, Philippines Sci. Int. (Lahore) 29 2017 823 826
Dapar M.L.G. Meve U. Liede-Schumann S. Ethnomedicinal plants used for the treatment of cuts and wounds by the Agusan Manobo of Sibagat, Agusan del Sur, Philippines Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 19 2020 1 18 10.32859/era.19.31.1-18
Dapar M.L.G. Meve U. Liede-Schumann S. Ethnomedicinal appraisal and conservation status of medicinal plants among the Manobo tribe of Bayugan City, Philippines Biodivers. J. Biol. Divers. 21 2020 3843 3855 10.13057/biodiv/d210854
De Boer H.J. Cotingting C. Medicinal plants for women’s healthcare in southeast Asia: a meta-analysis of their traditional use, chemical constituents, and pharmacology J. Ethnopharmacol. 151 2014 747 767 10.1016/j.jep.2013.11.030 24269772
De Guzman A.A. Jamanulla C.E.V. Sabturani S.A. Ethnobotany and physiological review on folkloric medicinal plants of the Visayans in Ipil and Siay, Zamboanga Sibugay, Philippines Int. J. Herb. Med. 8 2020 8 16
Del Fierro R.S. Nolasco F.A. An exploration of the ethno-medicinal practices among traditional healers in southwest Cebu, Philippines ARPN J. Sci. Technol. 3 2013 1182 1188
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Administrative Order No. 2017–11 2017
Department of Environment and Natural Resources – Biodiversity Management Bureau The National Invasive Species Strategy and Action Plan 2020-2030 (Philippines) 2020 Department of Environment and Natural Resources – Biodiversity Management Bureau and Natural Resources Quezon City https://www.philchm.ph/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/NISSAP-2020-2030.pdf
Docot R.V.A. Sohal A.S. Dela Cruz C.G. A quantitative ethnobotanical study of plants used by the locals in Camiguin Island, Calayan, Cagayan, Philippines J. Trop. Life Sci. 12 2022 141 154 10.11594/jtls.12.01.15
Eusebio J.E. Umali B.E. Inventory and documentation of medicinal plants in the Philippines Batugal P.A. Kanniah J. Lee S.Y. Medicinal Plants Research in Asia, Volume 1: the Framework and Project Workplans. International Plant Genetic Research Institute-Regional Office of Asia, the Pacific and Oceania (IPGRI-APO), Selangor 2004 68 70
Evbuomwan I.O. Stephen Adeyemi O.S. Oluba O.M. Indigenous medicinal plants used in folk medicine for malaria treatment in Kwara State, Nigeria: an ethnobotanical study BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 23 2023 324 10.1186/s12906-023-04131-4 37716985
Fabie-Agapin J.S. Medicinal plants used by traditional healers in Pagadian City, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines Philipp. J. Sci. 149 2020 83 89 10.56899/149.01.08
Fakchich J. Elachouri M. An overview on ethnobotanico-pharmacological studies carried out in Morocco, from 1991 to 2015: systematic review (part 1) J. Ethnopharmacol. 267 2021 113200 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113200
Fiscal R.R. Ethnomedicinal plants used by traditional healers in Laguna, Philippines Asia Pac. J. Multidiscip. Res. 5 2017 132 137
Gogoi P. Sen S. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used traditionally for managing cuts and wounds by the rural people of Kailashpur, Assam, India Ind. J. Pharm. Edu. Res. 57 2023 s678 s689 10.5530/ijper.57.3s.77
Gruyal G.A. Del Roasario R. Palmes N.D. Ethnomedicinal plants used by residents in Northern Surigao del Sur, Philippines Nat. Prod. Chem. Res. 2 2014 1000140 10.4172/2329-6836.1000140
Gruyal G.A. Patero J. Alas M.T.A. Ethnomedicinal plant identification and utilization in Ayoke Island, Cantilan Surigao del Sur, Philippines Int. J. Adv. Eng. Manag. 3 2021 346 360 10.35629/5252-0310346360
Guerrero L.M. Medicinal uses of Philippine plants Brown W.H. Minor Products of Philippine Forests vol. 3 1921 Bureau of Printing Manila 149 246
Gurib-Fakim A. Medicinal plants: traditions of yesterday and drugs of tomorrow Mol. Aspect. Med. 27 2006 1 93 10.1016/j.mam.2005.07.008
Heinrich M. Ankli A. Frei B. Medicinal plants in Mexico: healers’ consensus and cultural importance Soc. Sci. Med. 47 1998 1859 1871 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00181-6 9877354
Horackova J. Chuspe Zans M.E. Kokoska L. Ethnobotanical inventory of medicinal plants used by Cashinahua (Huni Kuin) herbalists in Purus province, Peruvian Amazon J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 19 2023 16 10.1186/s13002-023-00586-4 37170108
Ibeh L.N. Ijioma S.N. Emmanuel O. Psidium guajava leaf extract improves gastrointestinal functions in rats and rabbits: an implication for ulcer and diarrhoea management Biomarkers 26 2021 737 746 10.1080/1354750X.2021.1992651 34634977
Igbinosa O.O. Igbinosa E.O. Aiyegoro O.A. Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical screening of stem bark extracts from Jatropha curcas (Linn) Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 3 2009 58 62
Ilagan V.A.D. Alejandro G.J.D. Paraguison D.J.B. Ethnopharmacological documentation and molecular authentication of medicinal plants used by the Manobo and Mamanwa tribes of Surigao del Sur, Philippines Biodiversitas 23 2022 3185 3202 10.13057/biodiv/d230646
IUCN The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2023 Version 2022–2 https://www.iucnredlist.org
Jamshidi-Kia F. Lorigooini Z. Amini-Khoei H. Medicinal plants: past history and future perspective J. Herbmed Pharmacol. 7 2018 1 7 10.15171/jhp.2018.01
Justino A.B. Miranda N.C. Franco R.R. Annona muricata Linn. leaf as a source of antioxidant compounds with in vitro antidiabetic and inhibitory potential against α-amylase, α-glucosidase, lipase, non-enzymatic glycation and lipid peroxidation Biomed. Pharmacother. 100 2018 83 92 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.01.172 29425747
Karaköse M. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Güce district, north-eastern Turkey Plant Divers. 44 2022 577 597 10.1016/j.pld.2022.03.005 36540712
Kintanar R.L. Climate of the Philippines. Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration 1984
Liheluka E. Gibore N.S. Lusingu J.P.A. Medicinal plants for treatment of diarrhoeal diseases among under-five children: experience from traditional healers in North-eastern Tanzania BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 23 2023 379 10.1186/s12906-023-04216-0 37880735
Lillo E.P. Fernando E.S. Lillo M.J.R. Plant diversity and structure of forest habitat types on Dinagat Island, Philippines J. Asia-Pacific Biodivers. 12 2019 83 105 10.1016/j.japb.2018.07.003
Lim W.M. Kumar S. Ali F. Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘what’,‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’ Serv. Ind. J. 42 2022 481 513 10.1080/02642069.2022.2047941
Liu B. Guo Z.-Y. Bussmann R. Ethnobotanical approaches of traditional medicine studies in Southwest China: a literature review J. Ethnopharmacol. 186 2016 343 350 10.1016/j.jep.2016.02.040 26997553
Lumista H.P. Dela Cruz R.Y. Acma F.M. Occurrence of threatened, endemic, and economic seed plants in selected mountains in Mindanao, Philippines CMU J. Sci. 20 2016 2 13
Madjos G.G. Ramos K.P. Ethnobotany, systematic review and field mapping on folkloric medicinal plants in the Zamboanga Peninsula, Mindanao, Philippines J. Complement. Med. Reserve 12 2021 21 61 10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.01.05
Madjos G.G. Ramos K.P. Ethnobotanical indigenous knowledge, systems and practices (IKSP) in Western Mindanao, Philippines: the sea nomads “Bajau” of Zamboanga City Int. J. Bot. Stud. 6 5 2021 819 825
Magtalas M.C. Balbin P.T. Cruz E.C. Ethnomedicinal plants used for the prevention and treatment of anemia in the Philippines: a systematic review Trop. Med. Health 51 2023 27 10.1186/s41182-023-00515-x 37170350
Magtalas M.C. Balbin P.T. Cruz E.C. A systematic review of medicinal plants used in the treatment of gynecologic diseases in the Philippines Phytomed. Plus 3 2023 100462 10.1016/j.phyplu.2023.100462
Magtalas M.C. Balbin P.T. Cruz E.C. A systematic review of ethnomedicinal plants used for pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum care in the Philippines Phytomed. Plus 3 2023 100407 10.1016/j.phyplu.2023.100407
Malawani A.D. Nuneza O.M. Uy M.M. Ethnobotanical survey of the medicinal plants used by the Maranaos in Pualas, Lanao del Sur, Philippines Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 6 2017 45 53
Maramba-Lazarte C.C. Benefits of mainstreaming herbal medicine in the Philippine healthcare system Acta Med. Philipp. 54 2020 3 4 10.47895/amp.v54i1.1078
Mbosso Teinkela J.E. Siwe Noundou X. Nguemfo E.L. Identification of compounds with anti-proliferative activity from the wood of Ficus elastica Roxb. ex Hornem. aerial roots Fitoterapia 112 2016 65 73 10.1016/j.fitote.2016.05.002 27167182
Mbuni Y.M. Wang S. Mwangi B.N. Medicinal plants and their traditional uses in local communities around Cherangani Hills, Western Kenya Plants 9 2020 331 10.3390/plants9030331 32150955
Medecilo-Guiang M.M.P. Coritico F.P. Nobleza J.C. Tree species inventory and their economic uses in Mt. Agad-Agad, Iligan city, Philippines Philipp. J. Syst. Biol. 15 2021 1 20 10.26757/pjsb2021a15013
Medeiros M.F.T. da Silva O.S. de Albuquerque U.P. Quantification in ethnobotanical research: an overview of indices used from 1995 to 2009 Sitientibus série Ciênc. Biol. 11 2011 211 230 10.13102/scb108
Miano R.S. Picardal J.P. Alonso C.A.G. Ethnobotanical inventory and assessment of medically-important plant roots in Cebu Island, Philippines Asian J. Biodivers. 2 2011 81 102 10.7828/ajob.v2i1.93
Mir M. Khurshid R. Aftab R. Management of thrombocytopenia and flu-like symptoms in dengue patients with herbal water of Euphorbia hirta J. Ayub Med. Coll. Abbottabad 24 2012 6 9 24669596
Molina R.A. Esperat P.E.L. Gracia Jr. A.A. Traditional healing practices in Zamboanga city, Philippines EPRA Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. 6 2020 81 87 10.36713/epra2013
Montero J.C. Geducos D.T. Ethnomedicinal plants used by the local folks in two selected villages of San Miguel, Surigao del Sur, Mindanao, Philippines Int. J. Agric.Technol. 17 2021 193 212
Morilla L.J.G. Demayo C.G. Medicinal plants used by traditional practitioners in two selected villages of Ramon Magsaysay, Zamboanga Del Sur Pharmacophore 10 2019 84 92
Morilla L.J.G. Sumaya N.H.N. Rivero H.I. Medicinal plants of the Subanens in Dumingag, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines Int. Conf. Food Biol. Med. Sci. 2014 38 43 10.15242/iicbe.c0114577
Myers N. Mittermeier R.A. Mittermeier C.G. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities Nature 403 2000 853 858 10.1038/35002501 10706275
Naive M.A.K. Binag S.D.A. Alejandro G.J.D. Plants with benefits: ethnomedicinal plants used by the Talaandig tribe in Portulin, Pangantucan, Bukidnon, Philippines Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 20 2021 754 766 10.56042/ijtk.v20i3.26584
Nuñeza O.M. Rodriguez B.C. Nasiad J.G.M. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used by the Mamanwa tribe of Surigao del Norte and Agusan del Norte, Mindanao, Philippines Biodiversitas 22 2021 3284 3296 10.13057/biodiv/d220634
Odchimar N.M.O. Nuñeza O.M. Uy M.M. Ethnobotany of medicinal plants used by the Talaandig tribe in Brgy. Lilingayon, Valencia city, Bukidnon, Philippines Asian J. Biol. Life Sci. 6 2017 358 364
Olandag M.F.L. Ethnobotany of medicinal plants used by the Subanen healers of Mamalad, Calamba, Misamis Occidental J. Multidiscip. Stud. 9 2020 37 59 10.7828/jmds.v9i2.1485
Olowa L.F. Demayo C.G. Ethnobotanical uses of medicinal plants among the Muslim Maranaos in Iligan city, Mindanao, Philippines Adv. Environ. Biol. 9 2015 204 215
Olowa L.F. Torres M.A.J. Aranico E.C. Medicinal plants used by the Higaonon tribe of Rogongon, Iligan city, Mindanao, Philippines Adv. Environ. Biol. 6 2012 1442 1450
Omac M.G. Along A.A. Ligalig R.J. Medicinal plants used by the local communities of Sitio Lomboyan, Barangay Guinabsan, Buenavista, Agusan del Norte, Philippines Ann. Stud. Sci. Hum. 3 2021 1 14
Ong H.G. Kim Y.-D. Quantitative ethnobotanical study of the medicinal plants used by the Ati Negrito indigenous group in Guimaras island, Philippines J. Ethnopharmacol. 157 2014 228 242 10.1016/j.jep.2014.09.015 25240586
Page M.J. McKenzie J.E. Bossuyt P.M. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Int. J. Surg. 88 2021 105906 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
Palchetti M.V. Zamudio F. Zeballos S. Large-scale patterns of useful native plants based on a systematic review of ethnobotanical studies in Argentina Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 21 2023 93 100 10.1016/j.pecon.2023.04.001
Palero P.K.V. Solloso F.M.J. Trinidad M.G. Medicinal plants as treatment for common symptoms of COVID-19 in Maibu Village, Butuan City, Philippines East Asian J. Multidiscip. Res. 2 2023 2759 2776 10.55927/eajmr.v2i7.4222
Paraguison L.D.R. Tandang D.N. Alejandro G.J.D. Medicinal plants used by the Manobo tribe of Prosperidad, Agusan del Sur, Philippines: an ethnobotanical survey Asian J. Biol. Life Sci. 9 2020 326 333 10.5530/ajbls.2020.9.49
Pardo de Tavera T.H. Plantas Medicinales de Filipinas 1892 Bernardo Rico Madrid
Pelser P.B. Barcelona J.F. Nickrent D.L. Onwards. Co's Digital Flora of the Philippines 2011 www.philippineplants.org
Peneciba E.P. Ethnomedicinal plants used by traditional healers in Barobo, Surigao del Sur, Philippines Asian J. Basic Appl. Sci. 7 2020 30 39
Perera S.D. Jayawardena U.A. Jayasinghe C.D. Potential use of Euphorbia hirta for dengue: a systematic review of scientific evidence J. Trop. Med. 2018 2018 2048530 10.1155/2018/2048530
Petrovska B.B. Historical review of medicinal plants’ usage Pharmacogn. Rev. 6 2012 1 5 10.4103/0973-7847.95849 22654398
Philippine Statistics Authority Ethnicity in the Philippines (2020 census of population and housing) 2023 https://psa.gov.ph/content/ethnicity-philippines-2020-census-population-and-housing
Philippine Statistics Authority Philippine standard geographic code: Mindanao 2023 https://psa.gov.ph/classification/psgc/mindanao
Philippine Statistics Authority 2023 Causes of deaths in the Philippines (preliminary as of 31 July 2023) 2023 https://psa.gov.ph/content/2023-causes-deaths-philippines-preliminary-31-july-2023
Phumthum M. Srithi K. Inta A. Ethnomedicinal plant diversity in Thailand J. Ethnopharmacol. 214 2018 90 98 10.1016/j.jep.2017.12.003 29241674
Polizon J.J.A. Amoroso V.B. Diversity of trees and shrubs along different vegetation types in Mt. Hamiguitan range, Davao Oriental, Mindanao Island, Philippines SDSSU Multidiscip. Res. J. 2 2014 147 155
Poudel A. Gurung S. Bhandari J. Ethnobotany in Annapurna conservation area (ACA), Nepal: a review Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 24 2022 1 14 10.32859/era.24.39.1-14
Pizon J.R.L. Nuñeza O.M. Uy M.M. Ethnobotany of medicinal plants used by the Subanen tribe of Lapuyan, Zamboanga del Sur Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 5 2016 53 67 10.13140/RG.2.1.4828.1121
Pucot J.R. Demayo C.G. Ethnomedicinal documentation of polyherbal formulations and other folk medicines in Aurora, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines Biodiversitas 22 2021 5331 5343 10.13057/biodiv/d221214
Pucot J.R. Manting M.M.E. Demayo C.G. Ethnobotanical plants used by selected indigenous peoples of Mindanao, the Philippines as cancer therapeutics Pharmacophore 10 2019 61 69
Quisumbing E. Medicinal Plants of the Philippines 1951 Bureau of Print Manila
Ragragio E.M. Zayas C.N. Obico J.J.A. Useful plants of selected Ayta communities from Porac, Pampanga, twenty years after the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo Philipp. J. Sci. 142 2013 169 181
Rahhal B. Qneibi M. Jaradat N. Multi-biological activity assessment and phytochemical characterization of an aqueous extract of the Cymbopogon citratus grown in Palestine BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 24 2024 27 10.1186/s12906-024-04338-z 38195607
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew State of the World's plants 2016 https://ceiba.org.mx/publicaciones/plantsreport2016.pdf
Rubio M.M. Naive M.A.K. Ethnomedicinal plants used by traditional healers in North Cotabato, Mindanao, Philippines J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci. 13 2018 74 82
Sirisha N. Sreenivasulu M. Sangeeta K. Antioxidant properties of Ficus species-a review Int. J. PharmTech Res. 2 2010 2174 2182
Staub P.O. Geck M.S. Weckerle C.S. Classifying diseases and remedies in ethnomedicine and ethnopharmacology J. Ethnopharmacol. 174 2015 514 519 10.1016/j.jep.2015.08.051 26342522
Stevens P.F. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website 2017 Version 14 http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/
Tantengco O.A.G. Condes M.L.C. Estadilla H.H.T. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used by Ayta communities in Dinalupihan, Bataan, Philippines Pharmacogn. J. 10 2018 859 870 10.5530/pj.2018.5.145
Tardío J. Pardo-de-Santayana M. Cultural importance indices: a comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain) Econ. Bot. 62 2008 24 39 10.1007/s12231-007-9004-5
Tayone W.C. Tayone J.C. Hashimoto M. Isolation and structure elucidation of potential anti-dengue metabolites from tawa-tawa (Euphorbia hirta Linn.) Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 11 2014 825 832 10.14456/wjst.2014.65
Turner D.P. Sampling methods in research design Headache 60 2020 8 12 10.1111/head.13707 31913516
United Nations Development Programme Fast facts: indigenous peoples in the Philippines 2013 https://www.undp.org/philippines/publications/fast-facts-indigenous-peoples-philippines
United Nations Development Programme Is access and benefit sharing a sustainable cure to biodiversity loss? 2023 https://www.undp.org/philippines/blog/access-and-benefit-sharing-sustainable-cure-biodiversity-loss
WFO World Flora Online 2023 http://www.worldfloraonline.org
WFO Euphorbia hirta L 2023 http://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000962575
WHO The Top 10 Causes of Death 2020 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death
Widyananda M.H. Fatchiyah F. Muflikhah L. Ulfa Computational examination to reveal kaempferol as the most potent active compound from Euphorbia hirta against breast cancer by targeting AKT1 and ERα Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 10 2023 753 767 10.1080/2314808X.2023.2272385
World Intellectual Property Organization From herbal folklore to modern medicine 2013 https://www.wipo.int/en/web/ip-advantage/w/stories/from-herbal-folklore-to-modern-medicine#en
Xiong Y. Sui X. Ahmed S. Ethnobotany and diversity of medicinal plants used by the Buyi in eastern Yunnan, China Plant Divers. 42 2020 401 414 10.1016/j.pld.2020.09.004 33733008
Yen D.E. Gutierrez H.G. The ethnobotany of the Tasaday: the useful plants Philipp. J. Sci. 103 1974 97 139
Zaide G.F. Zaide S.M. Philippine History and Government sixth ed. 2013 All-Nations Publishing Quezon
Zapanta B.R. Achondo M.J.M.M. Raganas A.F.M. Species richness of trees in disturbed habitats within a protected area and its implications for conservation: the case of Mt. Apo Natural Park, Mindanao Island, Philippines Biodiversitas 20 2019 2081 2091 10.13057/biodiv/d200740
Zarsuelo M.-A.M. Zordilla Z.D. Anacio D.B. Review of regulatory policies on and benefits of herbal medicine in the Philippines Acta Med. Philipp. 52 2018 473 479 10.47895/amp.v52i5.334
