
==== Front
Anim Nutr
Anim Nutr
Animal Nutrition
2405-6545
2405-6383
KeAi Publishing

S2405-6545(24)00083-0
10.1016/j.aninu.2024.04.019
Original Research Article
Secondary bile acids are associated with body lipid accumulation in obese pigs
Hu Yaolian
Wu Aimin
Yan Hui
Pu Junning
Luo Junqiu
Zheng Ping
Luo Yuheng
Yu Jie
He Jun
Yu Bing ybingtian@163.com
⁎
Chen Daiwen dwchen@sicau.edu.cn
⁎
Key Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an 625014, China
⁎ Corresponding authors. ybingtian@163.comdwchen@sicau.edu.cn
22 6 2024
9 2024
22 6 2024
18 246256
10 9 2023
22 2 2024
3 4 2024
© 2024 The Authors
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
The aim of this study was to investigate the reasons for the differences in lipid accumulation between lean and obese pigs. The bile acids with varying levels within two types of pigs were found and then in vitro experiments were conducted to identify whether these bile acids can directly affect lipid accumulation. Fourteen pigs, including seven lean and seven obese pigs with body weights of approximately 80 kg, were fed the same diet at an amount approximately equivalent to 3% of their respective body weights daily for 42 d. In vitro, 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were cultured in medium with high glucose levels and were differentiated into mature adipocytes using differentiation medium. Then, bile acids were added to mature adipocytes for 4 d. The results showed that there was a difference in body lipids levels and gut microbiota composition between obese and lean pigs (P < 0.05). According to the results of gut microbial function prediction, the bile acid biosynthesis in colonic digesta of obese pigs were different from that in lean pig. Sixty-five bile acids were further screened by metabolomics, of which 4 were upregulated (P < 0.05) and 2 were downregulated (P < 0.05) in obese pigs compared to lean pigs. The results of the correlation analysis demonstrated that chenodeoxycholic acid-3-β-D-glucuronide (CDCA-3Gln) and ω-muricholic acid (ω-MCA) had a negative correlation with abdominal fat weight and abdominal fat rate, while isoallolithocholic acid (IALCA) was positively associated with crude fat in the liver and abdominal fat rate. There was a positive correlation between loin muscle area and CDCA-3Gln and ω-MCA (P < 0.05), however, IALCA and 3-oxodeoxycholic acid (3-oxo-DCA) were negatively associated with loin eye muscle area (P < 0.05). Isoallolithocholic acid increased the gene expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG) and the number of lipid droplets (P < 0.05), promoting the lipid storage when IALCA was added to 3T3-L1 mature adipocytes in vitro. In conclusion, the concentration of bile acids, especially gut microbiota related-secondary bile acids, in obese pigs was different from that in lean pigs, which may contribute to lipid accumulation within obese pigs.

Keywords

Lean or obese pig
Lipid accumulation
Bile acid profile
Gut microbiota
==== Body
pmc1 Introduction

The swine industry comprises different breeds of pigs, such as lean and obese pigs, which exhibit significant variations in phenotypic indicators such as growth performance and carcass traits (Quinious et al., 1995). Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire) pigs (DLY pigs), as lean crossbred pigs, show a high lean percentage and slaughter weight, while Chenghua pigs, an obese local breed originating in Sichuan Province, are characterized by a low lean percentage, high lipid storage and low slaughter rate (Jiang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2022). A high level of body lipids and a low slaughter rate are known risk factors causing economic losses in the swine industry (Marcon et al., 2019; Pettigrew et al., 2001). Previous studies suggested that the variation in phenotypic indicators between lean pigs and obese pigs was mainly attributed to differences in genetic background (Jiang et al., 2012). However, recent research indicates that diet and gut microbiota have a more prominent influence than genetics in explaining the differences in metabolism among individuals (Chen et al., 2022). Backhed et al. (2007) noted that germ-free mice were resistant to obesity when they were fed a high-fat diet. Fecal microbiota transplantation has the ability to transfer obesity-associated characteristics from donors to recipients (Duca et al., 2014). Dietary supplementation can reduce body lipid deposition and improve obesity by altering the structure and composition of gut microbiota (David et al., 2014; Genco et al., 2013; Waubant et al., 2019). These results show that gut microbiota plays key roles in body lipid accumulation.

The gut microbiota communicates to the host via microbial metabolites (Mithieux, 2018). Bile acid, one of the metabolites in the gut, is involved in fat digestion and lipid metabolism (Ahmad et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2019). Bile acids (BA) can be classified into primary BA and secondary BA (Di Ciaula et al., 2018). Primary BA are synthesized in the liver via the enzyme cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) or sterol 27-hydroxylase (CYP27A1), while secondary BA are produced in the gut as microbial metabolites of primary BA (Di Ciaula et al., 2018; Poland et al., 2021). Gut microorganisms have the ability to modify the hydroxyl groups of BA through processes such as oxidation, dehydroxylation, and isomerization (Doden et al., 2021). For example, 6α-hydroxylated BA including hyodeoxycholic acid (HDCA) and ω-muricholic acid (ω-MCA) are produced by the gut microbiota (Lin et al., 2020). Zheng observed that humans with obesity had lower levels of 6α-hydroxylated BA compared to lean humans (Zheng et al., 2021b). ω-MCA has been shown to improve glucose homeostasis, and HDCA can alleviate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through the bile acid receptor farnesoid X receptor (FXR) (Kuang et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2021a). In contrast to 6α-hydroxylated BA, Louca observed that elevated levels of isoursodeoxycholic acid (isoUDCA), as a secondary bile acid, were associated with hypertriglyceridemia and increased appetite (Louca et al., 2023). The decreased levels of iso-UDCA may play a role in promoting satiety and improving lipid regulation after bariatric surgery (Louca et al., 2023). These findings imply that gut microbiota related-secondary BA may promote or inhibit body lipid storage. However, the composition and concentration of BA in obese pigs and whether certain BA are related to lipid accumulation remain unclear. Thus, we conducted a comparative experiment to compare the differences in body fat storage, gut microbial structure, and bile acids profile between lean pigs (DLY pigs) and obese pigs (Chenghua pigs). The relationship between BA profile and lipid accumulation in finishing pigs was studied in this experiment. The deposition of body lipid in finishing pigs has been consider as a process of the enlargement of mature adipocytes, which are differentiated from preadipocytes (Anderson et al., 1973). Previous studies have demonstrated that the 3T3-L1 cell lines are easily cultured and the mature 3T3-L1 adipocytes can serve as an In vitro model to simulate lipid deposition in finishing pigs (Kim et al., 2019; Poulos et al., 2010). Therefore, in this study, the 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were cultured and differentiated to mature adipocytes in vitro. The 3T3-L1 mature adipocytes were used to investigate whether the BA can directly affect the lipid accumulation, following the screening of differential BA between lean and obese pigs, in order to provide additional evidence for the role of BA in lipid deposition of obese pigs.

2 Materials and methods

All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (20211028).

2.1 Animals, experimental design and sample collection

Fourteen pigs, consisting of seven lean pigs (DLY pigs) and seven obese pigs (Chenghua pigs), with body weights of approximately 80 kg, were individually housed in fourteen pens within an environmentally controlled room. All pigs had free access to water and were fed 3 times per day at 08:00, 14:00 and 20:00 o'clock. Notably, according to the National Research Council (NRC, 2012) and the Chinese National Feeding Standard (GB/T 39235-2020), there are inconsistencies across the energy requirements of lean and obese pigs. To minimize the influence of food or energy intake on experimental results, both types of pigs in this experiment were provided the diet with identical nutrient composition, and the experiment also referred to the standard operating procedures of digestion and metabolism trials. All pigs were fed the diet with an amount approximately equivalent to 3% of their respective body weights daily, allowing them to engage in their normal activities without receiving excessive energy. The chemical compositions of the basal diet are listed in Table S1 and the nutrient levels are calculated levels. The corn, soybean meal, wheat bran and others utilized in the formulation were consistent with the raw materials listed in the Chinese feed database (2020). Based on the nutritional parameters of these raw materials in the database and their proportions in the formula, the nutrient levels were calculated. The trial lasted for 42 d. On d 1 and 43 of the trial, all pigs were weighed. The average daily weight gain and the ratio of weight gain to feed were calculated.

At the end of the trial, all pigs were fasted overnight, and blood was collected in vacutainers. Serum samples were obtained after centrifugation (3500 × g, 10 min) and stored at −20 °C. The pigs were slaughtered via electrical stunning and exsanguinated according to standard commercial procedures. The tissue of left lateral liver lobe and the digesta from the middle part of colon were collected and then stored at −80 °C.

2.2 Reagents, cell culture and differentiation

The 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cell line was obtained from American type culture collection (CL-173, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, USA). Isoallolithocholic acid was obtained from MedChemExpress (MedChemExpress, Shanghai, China). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), penicillin–streptomycin solution and foetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Thermo Scientific (Thermo Scientific, Shanghai, China). Dexamethasone (Dex) and 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) were purchased from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Recombinant human insulin was purchased from Yuanye (Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). All the reagents used in this study were of analytical grade.

The 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin‒streptomycin solution until they had achieved confluence. To induce differentiation, 100% confluent cells were maintained for 2 d and then placed in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 10 μg/mL insulin, 1 μmol/L dexamethasone, and 0.5 mmol/L IBMX (day 0) for 2 d (Green et al., 2016). The cell medium was changed to DMEM containing 10% FBS and 10 μg/mL insulin, and two days later, the cell medium was replaced with DMEM containing 10% FBS and cells were incubated in this medium for 6 d. Isoallolithocholic acid (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 μmol/L) was added to the cell medium after pre-adipocytes were differentiated into the mature adipocytes.

2.3 Carcass traits measurement and analysis of serum lipid metabolism-related indexes

Carcass weight was measured and used to calculate dressing percentage. The abdominal fat was stripped and weighed, and the abdominal fat rate was calculated by the abdominal fat weight and carcass weight. The formula for estimating lean meat percentage (%) = 60.30-0.847x + 0.147y, where x = fat depth (mm) and y = muscle depth (mm) (Giblin et al., 2015). The loin eye muscle area at the 10th rib was measured according to the following equation: loin eye muscle area (cm2) = loin eye muscle width (cm) × loin eye muscle height (cm) × 0.7. The content of crude fat in the longissimus dorsi and liver was determined according to the Soxhlet extraction method (Khoddami et al., 2011).

The concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in serum were measured by commercial assay kits from Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).

2.4 Analysis of BA in colonic digesta by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC‒MS/MS)

The BA in the samples were analysed using targeted metabolomics at a commercial company (MetWare Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China). Liquid samples (50 μL) were mixed with 10 μL of internal standard mixed liquid (concentration: 1 μg/mL) and 200 μL of 20% methanol acetonitrile. The mixture was shaken for 10 min at 2500 revolutions per minute and then placed in a refrigerator at −20 °C for 10 min. Centrifugation was performed at 13,523 × g at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and concentrated. The concentrate was then dissolved in 50% methanol water, and the sample was analysed using UPLC‒MS/MS for BA profile analysis (Huang et al., 2011).

MetWare Database (Wuhan Metware Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) is constructed based on standard products, and allows for qualitative analysis of mass spectrometry data to be carried out. Quantification was performed using multiple reaction monitoring by triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. After obtaining the mass spectrometry data for different samples, the chromatographic peaks of all target compounds were integrated, and quantitative analysis was conducted using standard curves. Standard solutions with various concentrations (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 1, 2, 4, 10, 20, 40, 100, 200, 400 and 1000 ng/mL) were prepared, and the peak intensity data of quantitative signals corresponding to each concentration of the standard compounds were obtained. Sixty-five substances, including taurolithocholic acid-3-sulfate (Toronto Research Chemicals, NY, Canada), dehydrolithocholic acid (zzstandard, Shanghai, China), isoallolithocholic acid (zzstandard), 3-oxodeoxycholic acid (TRC), and others, were used as external standards for quantification. The internal bile acid standards, such as Cholic acid-d4 (IR-14894), Glycolithocholic acid-d4 (IR-14913), Deoxycholic acid-d4 (IR-14896), and others were obtained from Isoreag (Shanghai ZZBio Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) or Scrbio (Shanghai, China).

The concentration ratio of the external standard and the internal standard was used as the horizontal coordinate, while the peak area ratio of the external standard and the internal standard was used as the vertical coordinate to draw the standard curves for different BA (García-Cañaveras et al., 2012; John et al., 2014; Perwaiz et al., 2001).

2.5 16S rRNA gene sequencing

The microbial DNA of colonic digesta was isolated with an E.Z.N.A. Stool DNA Kit (Omega, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The DNA samples were sent to the Novogene Company (Novogene, Beijing, China), and the DNA concentration and purity were monitored on 1% agarose gels. Using the obtained concentration, DNA was diluted to l µg/μL with sterile water. The V3–V4 variable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene were amplified to analyse the gut microbiota. PCRs were conducted using 15 μL of Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, USA), along with 0.2 μmol/L of forward and reverse primers and approximately 10 ng of template DNA.

Paired-end reads were assigned to samples based on their unique barcodes and were truncated by removing the barcode and primer sequences. Quality filtering was performed on the raw tags using specific filtering conditions to obtain high-quality clean tags, following the QIIME quality control process. The tags were compared to the reference database (Silva database) using the UCHIME algorithm to identify and remove chimeric sequences (Bokulich et al., 2013; Caporaso et al., 2010; Magoc et al., 2011).

2.6 Cell viability assay, oil red O staining and lipid levels determination

3T3-L1 cells were differentiated into mature adipocytes and then treated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; 80 μmol/L) or IALCA (2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 μmol/L) for 4 d. To identify the effect of IALCA on adipocyte survival, cell viability was determined using a Cell Counting Kit-8 cell assay (Beyotime Biotechnology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Mature adipocytes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by staining with Oil red O solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China) for 1 h. Stained lipid droplets were observed and photographed using an inverted contrast microscope at 20× magnification. Then, 1 mL of isopropanol was added to extract the Oil red O dye, and the optical density (OD) value of the extracted solution was measured at a wavelength of 530 nm using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop spectrophotometer; Thermo Scientific, Fremont, CA, USA).

2.7 Measurement of lipid metabolism-related genes by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Liver tissue was homogenized, and RNA was extracted using RNAiso Reagent (TaKaRa Biotechnology, Dalian, China). Total RNA was isolated from 3T3-L1 adipocytes using TRIzol Reagent (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was prepared using the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit, and RT‒qPCR was carried out using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (EZBioscience, Roseville, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. The primer sequences used are listed in Table S2. The cycle threshold (Ct) values of the experimental genes were normalized against those of the stably expressed housekeeping gene β-actin.

2.8 Statistical analysis

The data were analysed by Student's t test or one-way ANOVA using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 software, and the data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). For the microbiota analysis, alpha diversity was assessed using Chao1 and Shannon indexes, which were calculated using QIIME (version 1.9.1). LEfSe was applied to identify microbes of different taxa using the default parameters (linear discriminant analysis [LDA] score >3 and P < 0.05). Microbial function analysis was performed using phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt 2). The predicted genes and their respective functions were aligned to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database, and the differences between groups were analysed using R software (v3.5.1). Student's t-test was used to assess the differences between groups for the pathways with data conforming to normal distribution. For the pathways with data not conforming to normal distribution, the Wilcoxon test was used to assess the differences between groups, with FDR correction performed on the P-value. The difference was considered significant when the P-value is less than 0.05 and the difference was considered highly significant when the P-value is less than 0.01.

For the BA profiles analysis, the orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) model was constructed to distinguish colonic digesta with different BA and to discover potential biomarkers. The reliability of the OPLS-DA model was evaluated by R2Y (explained Y variation), R2X (explained X variation) and Q2 (predicted Y variation) (Kang et al., 2022). Based on the results of OPLS-DA, the multivariate analysis of variable importance in projection was used to screen the bile acids with varying levels between groups, and the differential BA were further screened by combining the P-value or fold change in univariate analysis. Spearman's correlation analysis and linear regression analysis were conducted to clarify the relationship between colonic BA profiles and lipid levels in the body.

3 Results

3.1 Obese pigs showed a high level of body lipids

From Table 1, Obese pigs showed lower final weight, average daily gain and gain to feed ratio than that of lean pigs. There was low lean meat percentage and loin eye muscle area in obese pigs, while the abdominal fat weight and abdominal fat rate were higher than those of lean pigs (Table 2). Compared with lean pigs, obese pigs exhibited higher intramuscular and liver crude fat content (Table 2). From Table 2, obese pigs tended to have an increased concentration of serum LDL-C compared with lean pigs (P = 0.09).Table 1 Differences in growth performance between lean and obese pigs.1

Table 1Items	Lean pigs	Obese pigs	
1–42 d	
 Initial weight, kg	81.00 ± 5.10	82.29 ± 3.55	
 Final weight, kg	118.71 ± 6.40A	105.29 ± 7.43B	
 ADFI, g/d	3000 ± 115A	2569 ± 73B	
 ADG, g/d	898 ± 54A	548 ± 110B	
 G/F	0.30 ± 0.02A	0.21 ± 0.04B	
ADFI = average daily feed intake; ADG = average daily gain; G/F = gain-to-feed ratio.

Within a row, different uppercase letter superscripts indicate highly significant differences (P < 0.01).

1 Seven pigs per group.

Table 2 Differences in the body fat level and the serum lipid metabolism-related parameters between lean and obese pigs.1

Table 2Items	Lean pigs	Obese pigs	
Body fat level	
Carcass weight, kg	86.39 ± 5.60A	73.34 ± 4.92B	
Loin muscle area, cm2	56.71 ± 13.20A	28.84 ± 6.16B	
Lean meat percentage, %	52.47 ± 3.66a	45.60 ± 2.04b	
Abdominal fat weight, kg	1.63 ± 0.48b	2.75 ± 0.90a	
Abdominal fat rate, %	1.91 ± 0.64B	3.71 ± 1.00A	
Intramuscular crude fat, %	1.73 ± 0.51b	2.52 ± 0.73a	
Liver crude fat, %	2.04 ± 0.67B	3.81 ± 1.32A	
Serum lipid metabolism-related parameters	
TC, mmol/L	2.84 ± 0.55	3.05 ± 0.37	
TG, mmol/L	0.32 ± 0.17	0.34 ± 0.09	
HDL-C, mmol/L	2.04 ± 0.38	1.78 ± 0.47	
LDL-C, mmol/L	2.60 ± 0.49	3.18 ± 0.66	
TBA, μmol/L	12.15 ± 6.85	7.25 ± 6.08	
TC = total cholesterol; TG = total triglyceride; HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C =low density lipoprotein cholesterol; TBA = total bile acids.

Within a row, different lowercase letter superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) and different uppercase letter superscripts indicate highly significant differences (P < 0.01).

1 Seven pigs per group.

3.2 The composition and function of gut microbiota in obese pigs were different from those in lean pigs

The colonic digesta of obese pigs tended to have an increased Shannon index (P = 0.07) (Fig. 1B). As shown in Fig. 1C, obese pigs showed a high relative abundance of Spirochaetota and a low relative abundance of Cyanobacteria at the phylum level. At the genus level, in Fig. 1D-E, the relative abundances of Treponem, Christensenellaceae_R-7_group and UCG-002 were higher in obese pigs than in lean pigs. Microbial function prediction revealed that the primary and secondary BA biosynthesis pathways were predicted to be inhibited in obese pigs compared to lean pigs, and there were no significant differences in other predicted pathways between lean and obese pigs (Fig. 1F).Fig. 1 Differences in composition and function of colonic microbiota between lean and obese pigs. (A-B) Differences in α-diversity (Chao1 and Shannon indexes) of colon between lean and obese pigs. (C) Differences in microbial abundance at the phylum level of colon between lean and obese pigs. (D) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) analysis revealed significant bacterial differences in colonic microbiota between lean and obese pigs. (E) Cladogram representation of gut microbiota taxa differences between lean and obese pigs. (F) Differences in lipid metabolism-related pathway between lean and obese pigs. LP = lean pigs; OP = obese pigs.

Fig. 1

3.3 BA profiles in obese pigs differed from those in lean pigs

There was a clear separation of BA profiles between the samples from lean pigs and obese pigs (Fig. 2A). The R2X, R2Y and Q2 values were 0.652, 0.994 and 0.772, respectively, as shown in Fig. 2B, representing the high prediction ability of OPLS-DA. As shown in Fig. 2C, obese pigs exhibited high levels of IALCA (P < 0.01), 6,7-diketolithocholic acid (6,7-DKLCA), dehydrolithocholic acid (DLCA) and 3-oxo-DCA, while low levels of CDCA-3Gln and ω-MCA (P < 0.01) were observed in obese pigs compared with lean pigs.Fig. 2 The differential bile acids in colonic digesta between lean and obese pigs (ng/g). (A and B) OPLS-DA score and OPLS-Permutation. OPLS-DA = orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis; R2Y = explained Y variation; R2X = explained X variation; Q2 = predicted Y variation. (C) The differential bile acids in colonic digesta between lean and obese pigs. IALCA = isoallolithocholic acid; 3-oxo-DCA = 3-oxodeoxycholic acid; CDCA-3Gln = chenodeoxycholic acid-3-β-D-glucuronide; ω-MCA = ω-muricholic acid; 6,7-DKLCA = 6,7-diketolithocholic acid; DLCA = dehydrolithocholic acid; LP = lean pigs; OP = obese pigs.

Fig. 2

3.4 Lipid accumulation in obese pigs strongly correlated with BA

As shown in Fig. 3, IALCA was positively associated with abdominal fat rate and the crude fat in the liver and longissimus dorsi, but it was significantly negatively associated with loin eye muscle area. The loin eye muscle area also negatively correlated with 3-oxo-DCA. Chenodeoxycholic acid-3-β-D-glucuronide and ω-MCA were significantly negatively associated with the crude fat of the liver, abdominal fat weight and abdominal fat rate, and there was a significant positive correlation between eye muscle area and CDCA-3Gln and ω-MCA.Fig. 3 The correlation between bile acids and metabolic indexes. (A) The correlation between bile acids, abdominal fat rate, abdominal fat weight, eye muscle area and the crude fat in liver and longissimus dorsi. ∗, P < 0.05; ∗∗, P < 0.01; ∗∗∗, P < 0.001. (B-E) The linear-regression model between bile acids and metabolic indexes. r = the linear correlation coefficient; IALCA = isoallolithocholic acid; 3-oxo-DCA = 3-oxodeoxycholic acid; CDCA-3Gln = chenodeoxycholic acid-3-β-D-glucuronide; ω-MCA = ω-muricholic acid; 6,7-DKLCA = 6,7-diketolithocholic acid; TCA = taurocholic acid; GCDCA = glycochenodeoxycholic acid; THCA = taurohyocholic acid; CDCA = chenodeoxycholic acid; HCA = hyocholic acid; GHDCA = glycohyodeoxycholic acid; HDCA = hyodeoxycholic acid; 12-KLCA = 12-ketolithocholic acid.

Fig. 3

3.5 IALCA promoted adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes

From Fig. S1, successful adipogenic differentiation was characterized by the presence of lipid droplets in adipocyte cells and a more rounded cell morphology. Cell survival was tested using the CCK8 assay, and the results showed that IALCA (2.5, 5, 10, 20 or 40 μmol/L) had no effect on adipocyte survival (Fig. 4A). Oil red O staining was used to detect intracellular lipid droplets in 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with IALCA. Isoallolithocholic acid (2.5 and 5 μmol/L) had no significant effect on the formation of lipid droplets, but adipocytes treated with 10, 20 and 40 μmol/L IALCA for 4 d showed a clear increase in lipid accumulation (Fig. 4 B–F and Fig. S2).Fig. 4 Effect of isoallolithocholic acid (IALCA; 0, 10, 20, and 40 μmol/L) on lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. (A) Effect of IALCA on the cell viability of 3T3-L1 adipocytes. 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with different doses (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 μmol/L) of IALCA for 96 h; n = 6. ∗∗, P < 0.01. (B) The determination of lipid level by isopropanol extraction; n = 3. Bars without a common superscript differ at P < 0.05. (C–F) The lipid droplets stained with Oil red O staining and subsequently photographed using an inverted contrast microscope at 20× magnification; n = 3.

Fig. 4

3.6 The BA receptor pathway in obese pigs differed from that in lean pigs

Obese pigs showed lower relative CYP27A1 and FXR gene expression and tended to decrease sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (ChREBP) gene expression (P = 0.079) in the liver than lean pigs (Fig. 5). In vitro, IALCA increased the gene expression of PPARG and decreased leptin gene expression in adipocytes (Fig. 6).Fig. 5 Differences in lipid metabolism-related genes expression levels of liver between lean and obese pigs. ChREBP = carbohydrate response element binding protein; SREBP-1c = sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c; CYP27A1 = sterol 27-hydroxylase; FXR = farnesoid X receptor. ∗, P < 0.05; LP = lean pigs; OP = obese pigs.

Fig. 5

Fig. 6 Effects of IALCA (0, 10, 20, and 40 μmol/L) on lipid metabolism in adipocytes. ACC = acetyl-CoA-carboxylase; C/EBPα = enhancer binding proteins alpha; FXR = farnesoid X receptor; TGR5 = Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5; SREBP-1c = sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c; FABP4 = fatty acid binding protein 4; PPARG = peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; IALCA = isoallolithocholic acid. a,b,cBars without a common superscript differ at P < 0.05.

Fig. 6

4 Discussion

Chinese indigenous pig breeds, such as Chenghua or Min pigs (obese pigs), are unattractive to many farmers due to their poor growth performance and low lean meat percentage (Li et al., 2022). It is necessary to find measures to reduce the body lipid storage of obese pigs. In this study, compared to lean pigs, obese pigs showed low average daily gain and lean meat percentage but high abdominal fat weight and abdominal fat rate. Current evidence demonstrates that the higher the loin muscle area is, the higher the lean meat percentage in pigs (Honeyman et al., 2003). The data on lipid accumulation-related indexes show that obese pigs have a low loin muscle area, and a high intramuscular and liver crude fat contents. These results indicated that obese pigs had a higher body lipid level than lean pigs, which is consistent with previous findings.

The differences in body lipid accumulation between lean and obese pigs was thought to be caused by several factors such as genetic background, diet and gut microbiota (Jiang et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2015). A new study was conducted to investigate the factors contributing to inter-individual variability in metabolism (Chen et al., 2022). The study involved 1,368 extensively phenotyped individuals, and the researchers analyzed 1,183 plasma metabolites (Chen et al., 2022). The findings revealed that diet and the gut microbiome have a more significant impact on metabolism variability than genetics (Chen et al., 2022). Gut microbiota, as an important influencing factor, has been considered a key target in regulating lipid metabolism (He et al., 2017). In addition, the gut microbiota is more readily identified and is more controllable than are genetic factors (David et al., 2014). In this study, we analysed the colonic microbial composition of lean and obese pigs. Alpha-diversity indexes, including the Shannon and Chao1 indexes, reflect the abundance and consistency of gut microbiota. Xie noted that there was a high Chao1 index in Laiwu pigs, an indigenous pig breeds of China, compared with lean pigs (Xie et al., 2022). Similar to Xie's results, obese pigs showed a higher Shannon index and gut microbiota species richness than did lean pigs. Analyzing the gut microbes at the phylum or genus level can aid in learning the ecological functions and metabolic levels of gut microbiota (Adak et al., 2019). Zhou reported that Spirochaetota, which is mainly involved in carbohydrate fermentation, was enriched in Chinese native pig breeds (Zhou et al., 2020). Consistent with previous studies, we also found a higher relative abundance of Spirochaetota in obese pigs than in lean pigs. Chen demonstrated a strong positive correlation between the lipids in the brain of rats and the presence of Spirochaetes in the gut (Chen et al., 2018). Hallowell noted a higher abundance of Spirochaetes in pigs that were fed a high-fat diet compared to those in the ad libitum and limit fed groups (Hallowell et al., 2021). This suggests that Spirochaetes at the phylum level may be associated with lipid storage. At the genus level, the relative abundance of Christensenellaceae_R-7_group and UCG-002 was higher in obese pigs, and the evolutionary branching diagram showed that Christensenellaceae_R-7_group and UCG-002 belong to the same Clostridia order. Gut microbiota has been considered to regulate host physiology via microbial metabolites (Mithieux, 2018). To further identify the function of gut microbiota, we conducted PICRUSt 2 analysis and found that there were significant differences in primary and secondary BA biosynthesis in lean and obese pigs.

Bile acids, which are steroid substances derived from hepatic cholesterol and metabolized by gut microbiota, can be categorized into primary and secondary BA (Guzior et al., 2021; Li et al., 2012). In this study, we compared the differences in BA concentration between lean and obese pigs. The BA profile data from lean and obese pigs showed significant differences in OPLS-DA scores, and the differential metabolites in the 65 BA identified in the pigs were identified by combining the OPLS-DA results and the fold change or P-value of the single variable analysis. Compared with lean pigs, obese pigs showed low levels of CDCA-3Gln and ω-MCA in the colonic digesta and high levels of several BA, including IALCA, 6,7-DKLCA, DLCA and 3-oxo-DCA. The PubChem database was applied to obtain the chemical structure of BA, and we further analysed the structure of these BA. Chenodeoxycholic acid-3-β-D-glucuronide, in which chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) is linked with glutamic acid, is a conjugated BA, and the remaining six BA are secondary and unconjugated BA (Guzior et al., 2021). Numerous studies have shown that Clostridia can secrete bile salt hydrolase (BSH), which is involved in the conversion of conjugated BA to secondary BA (Staley et al., 2017). In this study, we found that obese pigs exhibited a higher relative abundance of microorganisms belonging to the Clostridia order. ω-MCA, as secondary BA, is converted from CDCA, and hydroxylation occurs at the C6 position of ω-MCA (Jia et al., 2018; Thakare et al., 2018). Makki found that oligofructose can enrich bacteria involved in 6α-hydroxylated BA production (ω-MCA) and elevated the level of 6α-hydroxylated BA, subsequently improving body weight in mice fed a Western-style diet (Makki et al., 2022). In this study, obese pigs demonstrated lower 6α-hydroxylated BA levels and higher levels of IALCA, 6,7-DKLCA and DLCA than lean pigs. Isoallolithocholic acid, 6,7-DKLCA and DLCA are derivatives of the secondary BA lithocholic acid (LCA), and 3-oxo-DCA is converted from deoxycholic acid (DCA) by gut microbiota (Jia et al., 2018; Wei et al., 2020). These results suggest that the difference in BA profile between lean and obese pigs is due to gut microbiota.

It is unclear whether the gut microbiota related-bile acids participate in lipid accumulation in obese pig. Chen et al. (2020) found that the hepatic lipid levels in subjects with obesity is positively associated with DCA and taurodeoxycholic acid. Jiao et al. (2018) presented that the absolute concentration or percent quantity of serum DCA was higher in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) than in healthy controls. Smirnova et al. (2022) further noted that the level of DCA derivatives (dehydrocholic and 7,12-diketolithocholic acid) increased with increasing NAFLD severity. In addition to DCA, the concentration of LCA was reported to be enriched in adolescents with obesity (Liu et al., 2022). On the other hand, 6α-hydroxylated BA has been reported to improve lipid storage and obesity as mentioned above (Makki et al., 2022). To clarify the relationship between BA and the levels of body lipids, correlation analysis and in vitro cell culture experiments were conducted in this study. The results showed that ω-MCA and CDCA-3Gln negatively correlate with the crude lipid content of the longissimus dorsi, abdominal fat weight and abdominal fat rate, and a significant positive correlation was observed between eye muscle area and CDCA-3Gln and ω-MCA. In contrast, the loin eye muscle area was negatively correlated with 3-oxo-DCA. Isoallolithocholic acid was also significantly negatively associated with loin eye muscle area, but it was positively correlated with abdominal fat rate and the crude fat in the liver and longissimus dorsi. Notably, correlation analysis does not mean causation, and previous studies showed secondary bile acids in the colon can diffuse passively across the colonic epithelium and reach the portal circulation (Gillard et al., 2023). In order to explore whether there is a direct connection between bile acids and lipid accumulation, we conducted the in vitro experiments to add bile acids in adipocytes. Mature adipocytes, which are capable of storing lipids, were obtained from 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, and then IALCA was added to them. More lipid droplets were found after IALCA treatment than after control treatment. PPARG, a nuclear receptor, is responsible for the formation of lipid droplets in adipocytes (Burstein, 2005). Leptin, secreted by adipose tissue, can inhibit adipogenesis (Gimeno et al., 2005). We found that IALCA enhanced the gene expression PPARG and reduced the gene expression of leptin in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. These results suggest that secondary BA in obese pigs may contribute to the body lipid accumulation.

This raises the question of how these secondary BA affect host lipid metabolism. Many studies have found that BA can regulate lipid metabolism via nonreceptor and receptor-mediated mechanisms (Fuchs et al., 2022). For example, FXR and Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) are recognized as classic bile acid receptors (Fuchs et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2016). The activation of hepatic FXR can reduce liver fat accumulation by inhibiting the activity of ChREBP and sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c), and TGR5 activation has abilities to enhance energy expenditure (Fuchs et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2016). In this study, the high levels of DCA and LCA derivatives and a low CDCA-3Gln level were observed in obese pigs. Bile acids are differentiated mainly by hydroxylation at the C positions, and the activation or suppression of FXR is determined by the number and position of hydroxyl groups on a BA molecule (Ahmad et al., 2019). Existing evidence supports that CDCA is able to activate FXR, whereas DCA becomes an inhibitor of FXR in the presence of CDCA (Ahmad et al., 2019; Jiao et al., 2018). Fu et al. (2019) observed that DCA antagonized FXR function, which can lead to uncontrolled proliferation of stem cells and DNA damage in intestinal stem cells. Jiao et al. (2018) noted that the occurrence of NAFLD was associated with an elevated level of serum DCA and the inhibited activity of hepatic FXR. Schmid et al. (2019) also found that DCA and CA had inhibitory effects on lipolysis in vitro . Interestingly, some studies showed that CDCA can promote adipocyte differentiation and lipogenesis by the FXR-PPARG pathway in 3T3-L1 cells (Shinohara et al., 2020). A contrary result was reported by Chen et al. (2017) and the researchers noted that CDCA inhibited the PPARG activity and lipid accumulation during adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells by TGR5. In this study, obese pigs exhibited a high level of crude fat in liver and a relatively low expression of hepatic FXR and ChREBP genes, and a high gene expression of PPARG was observed in 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with IALCA. These results demonstrate that the derivatives of DCA and LCA may regulate lipid accumulation via BA-related signalling pathways, but it is still unclear that how these BA regulate lipid storage in obese pigs via BA receptor and it needs further study.

5 Conclusion

In this study, compared with lean pigs, obese pigs had a higher lipid level within the body, and our results show that the gut microbiota and its derived secondary bile acids are related to body lipid metabolism. Specifically, the derivatives of lithocholic acid and deoxycholic acid in colonic digesta may contribute to the high level of body lipids in obese pigs.

Author contributions

Yaolian Hu: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. Aimin Wu: Resources. Hui Yan: Resources. Junning Pu: Resources. Junqiu Luo: Formal analysis. Ping Zheng: Formal analysis. Yuheng Luo: Formal analysis. Jie Yu: Formal analysis. Jun He: Formal analysis. Bing Yu: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Daiwen Chen: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:Multimedia component 1

Multimedia component 1

Acknowledgments

This study was financially funded by 10.13039/501100001809 National Natural Science Foundation of China (31730091 ).

Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine.

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2024.04.019.
==== Refs
References

Adak A. Khan M.R. An insight into gut microbiota and its functionalities Cell Mol Life Sci 76 2019 473 493 30317530
Ahmad T.R. Haeusler RA Bile acids in glucose metabolism and insulin signalling — mechanisms and research needs Nat Rev Endocrinol 15 2019 701 712 31616073
Anderson D.B. Kauffman R. Cellular and enzymatic changes in porcine adipose tissue during growth J Lipid Res 14 1973 160 168 4698264
Backhed F. Manchester J.K. Semenkovich C.F. Gordon J.I. Mechanisms underlying the resistance to diet-induced obesity in germ-free mice Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 2007 979 984 17210919
Bokulich N.A. Subramanian S. Faith J.J. Gevers D. Gordon J.I. Knight R. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing Nat Methods 10 2013 57-U11
Burstein S. PPAR-gamma: a nuclear receptor with affinity for cannabinoids Life Sci 77 2005 1674 1684 16005906
Caporaso J.G. Kuczynski J. Stombaugh J. Bittinger K. Bushman F.D. Costello E.K. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data Nat Methods 7 2010 335 336 20383131
Chen L. van den Munckhof I.C. Schraa K. Ter Horst R. Koehorst M. van Faassen M. Genetic and microbial associations to plasma and fecal bile acids in obesity relate to plasma lipids and liver fat content Cell Rep 33 2020 108212
Chen L. Zhernakova D.V. Kurilshikov A. Andreu-Sánchez S. Wang D. Augustijn H.E. Influence of the microbiome, diet and genetics on inter-individual variation in the human plasma metabolome Nat Med 28 2022 2333 2343 36216932
Chen T. You Y. Xie G. Zheng X. Zhao A. Liu J. Strategy for an association study of the intestinal microbiome and brain metabolome across the lifespan of rats Anal Chem 90 2018 2475 2483 29353471
Chen X. Yan L. Guo Z. Chen Y. Li M. Huang C. Chenodeoxycholic acid attenuates high-fat diet-induced obesity and hyperglycemia via the G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 and proliferator-activated receptor γ pathway Exp Ther Med 14 2017 5305 5312 29285057
China National Standard Nutrient requirements of swine (GB/T 39235-2020) 2020 Standards Press of China Beijing
David L.A. Maurice C.F. Carmody R.N. Gootenberg D.B. Button J.E. Wolfe B.E. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome Nature 505 2014 559-+ 24336217
Di Ciaula A. Garruti G. Baccetto R.L. Molina-Molina E. Bonfrate L. Portincasa P. Bile acid physiology Ann Hepatol 16 2018 4 14
Doden H.L. Ridlon J.M. Microbial hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases: from alpha to omega Microorganisms 9 2021
Duca F.A. Sakar Y. Lepage P. Devime F. Langelier B. Doré J. Replication of obesity and associated signaling pathways through transfer of microbiota from obese-prone rats Diabetes 63 2014 1624 1636 24430437
Feed Database in China Tables of feed composition and nutritive values in China [in Chinese] https://www.chinafeeddata.org.cn/admin/Login/slcfb 2020
Fu T. Coulter S. Yoshihara E. Oh T.G. Fang S. Cayabyab F. FXR regulates intestinal cancer stem cell proliferation Cell 176 2019 1098 1112.e18 30794774
Fuchs C.D. Trauner M Role of bile acids and their receptors in gastrointestinal and hepatic pathophysiology Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022 1 19 34707259
García-Cañaveras J.C. Donato M.T. Castell J.V. Lahoz A. Targeted profiling of circulating and hepatic bile acids in human, mouse, and rat using a UPLC-MRM-MS-validated method J Lipid Res 53 2012 2231 2241 22822028
Genco R.J. Borgnakke W.S. Risk factors for periodontal disease Periodontol 2000 62 2013 59 94 23574464
Giblin L. Darimont C. Leone P. McNamara L.B. Blancher F. Berry D. Offspring subcutaneous adipose markers are sensitive to the timing of maternal gestational weight gain Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13 2015
Gillard J. Leclercq I.A. Biological tuners to reshape the bile acid pool for therapeutic purposes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Clin Sci 137 2023 65 85
Gimeno R.E. Klaman LD Adipose tissue as an active endocrine organ: recent advances Curr Opin Pharmacol 5 2005
Green C.R. Wallace M. Divakaruni A.S. Phillips S.A. Murphy A.N. Ciaraldi T.P. Branched-chain amino acid catabolism fuels adipocyte differentiation and lipogenesis Nat Chem Biol 12 2016 15 21 26571352
Guzior D.V. Quinn R.A. Review: microbial transformations of human bile acids Microbiome 9 2021 140 34127070
Hallowell H.A. Higgins K.V. Roberts M. Johnson R.M. Bayne J. Maxwell H.S. Longitudinal analysis of the intestinal microbiota in the obese mangalica pig reveals alterations in bacteria and bacteriophage populations associated with changes in body composition and diet Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11 2021 698657
He M. Shi B. Gut microbiota as a potential target of metabolic syndrome: the role of probiotics and prebiotics Cell Biosci 7 2017
Honeyman M.S. Harmon J.D. Performance of finishing pigs in hoop structures and confinement during winter and summer J Anim Sci 81 2003 1663 1670 12854801
Huang J. Bathena S.P.R. Csanaky I.L. Alnouti Y. Simultaneous characterization of bile acids and their sulfate metabolites in mouse liver, plasma, bile, and urine using LC–MS/MS J Pharm Biomed Anal 55 2011 1111 1119 21530128
Jia W. Xie G. Jia W. Bile acid–microbiota crosstalk in gastrointestinal inflammation and carcinogenesis Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 15 2018 111 29018272
Jiang Y. Zhu L. Tang G. Li M. Jiang A. Cen W. Carcass and meat quality traits of four commercial pig crossbreeds in China Genet Mol Res 11 2012 4447 4455 23079983
Jiao N. Baker S.S. Chapa-Rodriguez A. Liu W. Nugent C.A. Tsompana M. Suppressed hepatic bile acid signalling despite elevated production of primary and secondary bile acids in NAFLD Gut 67 2018 1881 1891 28774887
John C. Werner P. Worthmann A. Wegner K. Todter K. Scheja L. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based method for the simultaneous determination of hydroxy sterols and bile acids J Chromatogr A 1371 2014 184 195 25456597
Kang C. Zhang Y. Zhang M. Qi J. Zhao W. Gu J. Screening of specific quantitative peptides of beef by LC–MS/MS coupled with OPLS-DA Food Chem 387 2022 132932
Khoddami A. Ghazali H.M. Yassoralipour A. Ramakrishnan Y. Ganjloo A. Physicochemical characteristics of nigella seed (Nigella sativa L.) oil as affected by different extraction methods J Am Oil Chem Soc 88 2011 533 540
Kim Y. Kim J. Kim J. Kim S. Eun J.-S. Hong S PSVIII-17 in vitro and in vivo investigations of effects of natural phytogenic compounds on muscle cell gene expressions and growth performance and carcass composition of finishing pigs J Anim Sci 97 2019 303 304
Kuang J. Wang J. Li Y. Li M. Zhao M. Ge K. Hyodeoxycholic acid alleviates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through modulating the gut-liver axis Cell Metabol 35 2023 1752 1766. e8
Li T. Chiang J.Y. Bile acid signaling in liver metabolism and diseases J Lipids 2012 2012
Li Y. Yuan R. Gong Z. Zou Q. Wang Y. Tang G. Evaluation of coat color inheritance and production performance for crossbreed from Chinese indigenous Chenghua pig crossbred with Berkshire Anim Biosci 35 2022 1479 1488 35240015
Lin Q. Tan X. Wang W. Zeng W. Gui L. Su M. Species differences of bile acid redox metabolism: tertiary oxidation of deoxycholate is conserved in preclinical animals Drug Metabol Dispos 48 2020 499 507
Liu Y. Chen L. Liu L. Zhao S.-S. You J.-Q. Zhao X.-J. Interplay between dietary intake, gut microbiota, and metabolic profile in obese adolescents: sex-dependent differential patterns Clin Nutr 41 2022 2706 2719 36351362
Louca P. Meijnikman A.S. Nogal A. Asnicar F. Attaye I. Vijay A. The secondary bile acid isoursodeoxycholate correlates with post-prandial lipemia, inflammation, and appetite and changes post-bariatric surgery Cell Reports Medicine 4 2023
Magoc T. Salzberg S.L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies Bioinformatics 27 2011 2957 2963 21903629
Makki K. Brolin H. Petersen N. Henricsson M. Christensen D.P. Khan M.T. 6α-hydroxylated bile acids mediate TGR5 signalling to improve glucose metabolism upon dietary fiber supplementation in mice Gut 72 2 2022 314 324 35697422
Marcon A.V. Caldara F.R. de Oliveira G.F. Gonçalves L.M. Garcia R.G. Paz I.C. Pork quality after electrical or carbon dioxide stunning at slaughter Meat Sci 156 2019 93 97 31150938
Mithieux G. Gut microbiota and host metabolism: what relationship? Neuroendocrinology 106 2018 352 356 29065411
NRC (National Research Council) Nutrient requirements of swine 11th ed. 2012 National Academy Press Washington (DC)
Perwaiz S. Tuchweber B. Mignault D. Gilat T. Yousef I.M. Determination of bile acids in biological fluids by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry J Lipid Res 42 2001 114 119 11160372
Pettigrew J. Esnaola M. Swine nutrition and pork quality: a review J Anim Sci 79 2001 E316 E342
Poland J.C. Flynn C.R. Bile acids, their receptors, and the gut microbiota Physiology 36 2021 235 245 34159805
Poulos S.P. Dodson M.V. Hausman GJ Cell line models for differentiation: preadipocytes and adipocytes Exp Biol Med 235 2010 1185 1193
Quinious N. Noblet J. Prediction of tissular body composition from protein and lipid deposition in growing pigs J Anim Sci 73 1995 1567 1575 7673050
Schmid A. Schlegel J. Thomalla M. Karrasch T and Schäffler A Evidence of functional bile acid signaling pathways in adipocytes Mol Cell Endocrinol 483 2019 1 10 30543876
Shinohara S. Fujimori K. Promotion of lipogenesis by PPARγ-activated FXR expression in adipocytes Biochem Biophys Res Commun 527 2020 49 55 32446390
Smirnova E. Muthiah M.D. Narayan N. Siddiqui M.S. Puri P. Luketic V.A. Metabolic reprogramming of the intestinal microbiome with functional bile acid changes underlie the development of NAFLD Hepatology 2022
Staley C. Weingarden A.R. Khoruts A. Sadowsky M.J. Interaction of gut microbiota with bile acid metabolism and its influence on disease states Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101 2017 47 64 27888332
Thakare R. Alamoudi J.A. Gautam N. Rodrigues A.D. Alnouti Y. Species differences in bile acids II. Bile acid metabolism J Appl Toxicol 38 2018 1336 1352 29845631
Waubant E. Lucas R. Mowry E. Graves J. Olsson T. Alfredsson L. Environmental and genetic risk factors for MS: an integrated review Annals of clinical and translational neurology 6 2019 1905 1922 31392849
Wei M. Huang F. Zhao L. Zhang Y. Yang W. Wang S. A dysregulated bile acid-gut microbiota axis contributes to obesity susceptibility EBioMedicine 55 2020 102766
Xie C. Zhu X. Xu B. Niu Y. Zhang X. Ma L. Integrated analysis of multi-tissues lipidome and gut microbiome reveals microbiota-induced shifts on lipid metabolism in pigs Anim Nutr 2022
Yang X. Yu B. Mao X. Zheng P. He J. Yu J. Lean and obese pig breeds exhibit differences in prenatal gene expression profiles of muscle development Animal 9 2015 28 34 25229314
Yu Y.J. Raka F. Adeli K. The role of the gut microbiota in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism J Clin Med 8 2019
Zhang L. Xie C. Nichols R.G. Chan S.H. Jiang C. Hao R. Farnesoid X receptor signaling shapes the gut microbiota and controls hepatic lipid metabolism mSystems 1 2016 e00070-16
Zheng X. Chen T. Jiang R. Zhao A. Wu Q. Kuang J. Hyocholic acid species improve glucose homeostasis through a distinct TGR5 and FXR signaling mechanism Cell Metabol 33 2021 791 803. e7
Zheng X. Chen T. Zhao A. Ning Z. Kuang J. Wang S. Hyocholic acid species as novel biomarkers for metabolic disorders Nat Commun 12 2021 1 11 33397941
Zhou S. Luo R. Gong G. Wang Y. Gesang Z. Wang K. Characterization of metagenome-assembled genomes and carbohydrate-degrading genes in the gut microbiota of Tibetan pig Front Microbiol 11 2020 595066
