
==== Front
J Cutan Med Surg
J Cutan Med Surg
CMS
spcms
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
1203-4754
1615-7109
SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA

38651556
10.1177/12034754241247521
10.1177_12034754241247521
Review Articles
Solutions for Addressing the Dermatologist Shortage in Rural Canada: A Review of the Literature
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-7999
McMullen Eric MD 1
Kirshen Carly MD 23
1 Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
2 Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
3 Faculty of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Eric McMullen, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, 90 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8P 1H6, Canada. Email: eric.mcmullen@medportal.ca
23 4 2024
Jul-Aug 2024
28 4 365369
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
Canadian Dermatology Association
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
In Canada, there is a maldistribution of dermatologists, with as many as 5.6 dermatologists per 100,000 population in urban areas and as low as 0.6 per 100,000 in rural areas. Considering trends of dermatologists to work in group practices in urban areas, and the low number of rural dermatologists, one solution may be to incentivize dermatologists to practice rurally. Several solutions using the following themes are discussed: dermatology program-specific incentives, dermatology practice-specific incentives, and other indirect incentives. The low number of dermatologists in rural areas in Canada is concerning and has negative consequences for access to care for patients in rural areas, ultimately resulting in worse patient outcomes. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact of these initiatives and assess future access to dermatological care.

dermatology
rural
residency
medical education
healthcare access
healthcare disparity
typesetterts1
cover-dateJuly/August 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Access to dermatology is a barrier to care in rural communities. In Canada, there is a maldistribution of dermatologists, with as high as 5.6 dermatologists per 100,000 in urban areas, and only 0.6 per 100,000 in rural/remote areas. 1 Definitions of rurality vary greatly within the literature, but are consistently distinguished by a lower population size, degree of urbanization, and proximity to metropolitan areas. Existing literature on the number of dermatologists needed to service the needs of Canadians estimates an ideal 4 per 100,000. 2 However, previous to this, the Royal College’s 1998 National Specialty Physician Review reported that the catchment area of each dermatologist in Canada was expected to be a population of at least 62,650. 3

For those living in rural and remote communities, the nearest dermatologist may be hours to days away. Diagnoses such as melanoma may be delayed which can have devastating consequences on mortality and quality of life. 4 A study in Ireland found that patients living greater than 90 km away from the nearest dermatologist had median Breslow thicknesses 127% greater than those living less than 3 km away (2.5 mm vs 1.1 mm of median Breslow thickness, respectively). 5 Demographic data indicate that 17.8% of Canadians live in rural areas, with over half identifying as Indigenous. 6 Given the disparities in healthcare resource allocation within rural and Indigenous communities, health outcomes of individuals in rural areas often fall short of those in urban environments. This inequity can be seen in Canadian literature, where the 1 year prevalence of atopic dermatitis in children living on mostly rural First Nations reserves reached as high as 16.5%, with most cases being deemed “moderate to severe.” 7 The present need for rural and remote dermatology should not be understated.

Considering the increased burden of care placed on an already low number of rural dermatologists, alongside an ever-increasing distribution favouring urban and suburban communities, solutions are needed. 8 Table 1 summarizes some of the proposed solutions within the literature for increasing the number of rural dermatologists. Existing reviews have discussed rural incentives in medicine broadly9,10; this review will focus on incentives for rural dermatologists.

Table 1. Proposed Solutions for Rural Dermatologist Recruitment and Retention.

Have residency programs equitably value intended focus on underserved rural dermatology care when compared to research publications and/or experiences.15,16	
Offer rural clinical exposure longitudinally to increase rural retention.11,12	
Create rural mentorship programs.36,47	
Hire multiple dermatologists at once in rural areas.	
Consider financial incentives for rural recruitment and retention, as they have strong evidence for short-term efficacy; however, long-term efficacy remains debated.9,53	
Partner with rural communities and offer childcare programs, maternity/paternity leave, high-quality housing, and opportunities for spousal employment. 15	
Address distributive justice through debt forgiveness programs and offer incentives proportional to identified needs. 60	

Dermatology Program-Specific Proposed Solutions

Targeted admission policies

There is strong evidence to support targeted admission policies for those with rural backgrounds, as these students are more inclined to return to their own communities to practice.11,12 An example of this is the Northern Ontario School of Medicine, whereby graduates from their undergraduate medicine program, the majority of which grew up in northern Ontario and/or rural areas were 2.57 times more likely [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21, 5.44; P = .014] to have practices in rural Ontario. 13 A cross-sectional study of graduates from the Queen’s University family medicine residency program found that physicians raised in rural communities were 2.3 times more likely (95% CI 1.43, 3.69; P = .001) to practice in a rural community, and also 2.5 times more likely (95% CI 1.53, 4.01; P = .001) to be continuing to practice in a rural community at the end of the 4 year study. 14 During dermatology admissions, having programs equitably value intended focus on underserved rural care when compared to research publications may be a solution.15,16

Rural dermatology clinical exposure

Educating and training medical students and residents in rural areas has routinely been a suggested method for rural physician recruitment.17-20 A compelling body of literature supports rural clinical exposure in increasing the likelihood of rural retention.21-30 A survey of 89 primarily family physicians practicing in northern Ontario found that while length of stay and intent to stay were correlated with strong family ties to a rural area, 65.3% of respondents did not have strong family ties and 57.3% did not grow up in a rural setting. 31 While family ties and growing up in a rural area are often important and predictive for future rural practice, other intrinsic motivations to practice rurally can be fostered through rural training track initiatives. 31 Studies have shown that the resultant benefit of establishing rural track training programs can be an immediate and direct positive impact on the health of rural communities.32-34 In the United States, those from medical schools with rural tracks were 1.57 times more likely (95% CI 1.07, 2.26; P = .01) to pursue rural dermatology practice. 35 In a 2023 survey of 11 Canadian dermatology residency programs, 2 had mandatory rural rotations, 2 offered rural electives, and 5 offered both; leaving 2 programs which did not offer any direct opportunities for rural experience. However, in Canadian residency programs, rural electives remain limited, have unknown retention efficacy, and added financial, personal, and educational challenges for dermatology residents. 36

Rural mentorship programs

Mentoring relationships in dermatology play an important role in stimulating interest among residents in a variety of career tracks and leadership pursuits. 37 Mentoring is frequently discussed as having the potential to guide the career direction of a resident. 38 In a survey of 53 dermatology program directors of American residency programs, 81% of respondents deemed mentorship to play a “somewhat” or “very important” role in their own career development. 37 In the same 2009 study, 50% of program directors identified a need for a more structured mentorship program in their residency program. 37 Overall, 85% of program directors noted that a mentorship program had the potential to increase the number of residents pursuing more leadership roles, 37 which are undoubtedly important in rural dermatology.

Rural mentorship has shown promising results in enabling more individuals to consider practicing in a rural area.38-46 As mentorship in dermatology is an important part of becoming a physician, mentorship may be warranted, and virtual rural mentorship considered.36,47 Compared with older dermatologists favouring solo practice, younger dermatologists are more likely to practice in group practices. 48 This may be due to the added level of reassurance of being able to discuss cases with colleagues and establishing mentorship in early practice. An example of existing programs in ancillary specialties to dermatology includes the British Columbia program, Sustaining Pediatrics in Rural and Underserved Communities, a pediatrician-led clinician network offering a network of mentorship opportunities, and rural education to pediatricians. 52

Dermatology Practice Specific Incentives

Group practice hiring

There is a trend toward solo practice dermatologists in rural areas, 48 and group practice dermatologists in urban areas,2,48 and so, hiring more than 1 dermatologist at a time could be a solution to increasing the number of rural dermatologists, particularly in areas with a catchment area large enough for multiple dermatologists. Encouraging retired dermatologists to practice even part-time in rural communities may be a solution, as encouraged in rheumatology. 49 Some dermatologists travel to rural and remote areas for short stays and provide care. A rural locum program to provide care to rural areas of Canada may be warranted, and has shown positive results in pediatrics and otolaryngology.50,51 Dermatologist practice models generally consist of either primarily operating out of an academic centre, solo practice, small group practice (with 1 to 2 other dermatologists), or interprofessional group practice. 2 Each practice type has unique advantages, with solo and small group practices offering increased autonomy, allowing quick decision-making and the ability to modify practice, but with the added burdens of time commitment in running and operating a small business often with high overhead costs. 2 Encouraging various levels of the government to set up a program whose aim was to guide dermatologists toward essential business resources and services (eg, financing, grants, venders, realtors, contractors, etc) could lessen the burden of working in solo or small group practice in rural areas and could be an important step in incentivizing dermatologists to practice rurally.

Financial incentives

Financial incentives may also play a role in increasing the number of rural dermatologists, and as previously discussed, financial incentives to lower overhead costs for dermatologists in rural areas could be a solution. While blanket financial retention incentives have shown to be ineffective for rural family physicians, 52 short-term financial incentives have proven successful in short-term rural physician recruitment. 9 Literature from Québec has found some positive effects from financial incentives in family physicians 53 ; however, Québec’s Plan Régional d’Effectifs Médicaux (PEM) program aimed at increasing staffing in medical specialties based on expressed need, has poor uptake in dermatology, especially in rural areas. 54 Public outpatient dermatology practice in Québec does not only require PEM but also excludes many dermatologists from obtaining hospital privileges, however limited. 55

Other Indirect Incentives

Supporting families of dermatologists

Factors in a dermatologist’s decision to practically rurally may include spouses with independent careers, which constrain their ability to locate in rural areas. 56 A cross-sectional study of American physicians found that compared with other married physicians, physicians with a highly educated spouse were significantly less likely to work in a rural area (4.2% vs 7.2% respectively; 95% CI 2.4, 3.4; P < .001). 56 However, given this small absolute difference, opportunities for spouses of dermatologists may help, but will likely not increase the number of rural dermatologists as much as other solutions. 56

Other ways which could incentivize the families of dermatologists reported in the literature include offering housing, access to education, implementation of childcare programs, and maternity/paternity leave. 15

This review does not discuss teledermatology, which while effective and necessary in providing care to patients in rural areas, 57 contains several clinical, economic, technological, legal, and ethical limitations, which can make it less ideal than an in-person visit.58,59

Upstream solutions

The most upstream solution to this maldistributive inequity is to address the underlying causes of so few rural dermatologists, through a combination of both financial and grassroots efforts aimed at empowering and supporting dermatologists to practice rurally. 60 At a policy level, this may look like debt forgiveness programs, increased investment in allied healthcare professionals in rural areas, and providing incentives which are proportional to the unique needs of each community. 60 Addressing Canada’s rural dermatological care issue is not solely the responsibility of dermatologists, and will require a multidisciplinary approach.

Conclusion

The shortage of dermatologists in rural areas of Canada is a pressing issue that requires urgent attention. Limited access to care in rural areas is associated with increased morbidity, 61 and when applied to dermatology, emphasizes the need for more dermatologists practicing in rural areas. There are a number of ways to address the rural dermatologist shortage. At a residency program level, these changes may include targeted solutions such as equitably valuing intended focus on underserved rural care in residency program admissions, and offering rural-focused electives and rural mentorship programs. Other indirect incentives such as loan forgiveness programs, increased funding for allied healthcare professionals, and the creation of multidisciplinary teams help bridge the gap in access to care, and improve health equity among Canadians. Future studies are needed to evaluate the impact of these initiatives and assess future access to dermatological care.

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD: Eric McMullen https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-7999
==== Refs
References

1. Yadav G Goldberg HR Barense MD Bell CM . A cross-sectional survey of population-wide wait times for patients seeking medical vs. cosmetic dermatologic care. PLoS One. 2016;11 (9 ):e0162767. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162767
2. Mydlarski PR Parsons LM Pierscianowski TA , et al . Dermatologic training and practice in Canada: a historical overview. J Cutan Med Surg. 2019;23 (3 ):307-318. doi:10.1177/1203475419840630 30999785
3. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. National Specialty Physicians Review. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 1988.
4. Voss RK Woods TN Cromwell KD Nelson KC Cormier JN . Improving outcomes in patients with melanoma: strategies to ensure an early diagnosis. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015;6 :229-242. doi:10.2147/PROM.S69351 26609248
5. Bowe SB Gallagher CG O’Connell MOC Paul LP . To assess the relationship between distance travelled to dermatology clinic and Breslow thickness of melanoma at diagnosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35 (12 ):e875-e876. doi:10.1111/jdv.17515
6. Government of Canada SC. Population growth in Canada’s rural areas, 2016 to 2021. 2022. Accessed December 17, 2023. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/as-sa/98-200-x/2021002/98-200-x2021002-eng.cfm
7. Asiniwasis RN Heck E Ali AA Ogunyemi B Hardin J . Atopic dermatitis and skin infections are a poorly documented crisis in Canada’s Indigenous pediatric population: it’s time to start the conversation. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38 (suppl 2 ):188-189. doi:10.1111/pde.14759 34850439
8. Chow EY Searles GE . The amazing vanishing Canadian dermatologist: results from the 2006 Canadian Dermatology Association member survey. J Cutan Med Surg. 2010;14 (2 ):71-79. doi:10.2310/7750.2010.09025 20338122
9. Sempowski IP . Effectiveness of financial incentives in exchange for rural and underserviced area return-of-service commitments: systematic review of the literature. Can J Rural Med. 2004;9 (2 ):82-88.15603680
10. Koebisch SH Rix J Holmes MM . Recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals in rural Canada: a systematic review. Can J Rural Med. 2020;25 (2 ):67-78. doi:10.4103/CJRM.CJRM_43_19 32235108
11. Russell D Mathew S Fitts M , et al . Interventions for health workforce retention in rural and remote areas: a systematic review. Hum Resour Health. 2021;19 (1 ):103. doi:10.1186/s12960-021-00643-7 34446042
12. Chen AJ Schwartz J Kimball AB . There’s no place like home: an analysis of migration patterns of dermatology residents prior to, during, and after their training. Dermatol Online J. 2016;22 (6 ):13030/qt3sf6z3pn. doi:10.5070/D3226031334
13. Wenghofer EF Hogenbirk JC Timony PE . Impact of the rural pipeline in medical education: practice locations of recently graduated family physicians in Ontario. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15 (1 ):16. doi:10.1186/s12960-017-0191-6 28219401
14. Easterbrook M Godwin M Wilson R , et al . Rural background and clinical rural rotations during medical training: effect on practice location. CMAJ. 1999;160 (8 ):1159-1163.10234346
15. Fulk TS Rypka KJ Wessman LL , et al . Demographic characteristics, factors influencing specialty choice, and intended career goals of graduating medical students pursuing careers in rural dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88 (3 ):708-711. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2022.09.007 36116585
16. Chen A Shinkai K . Rethinking how we select dermatology applicants—turning the tide. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153 (3 ):259-260. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4683 28030657
17. Pong RW . Strategies to overcome physician shortages in northern Ontario: a study of policy implementation over 35 years. Hum Resour Health. 2008;6 (1 ):24. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-24 19014455
18. Brooks RG Walsh M Mardon RE Lewis M Clawson A . The roles of nature and nurture in the recruitment and retention of primary care physicians in rural areas: a review of the literature. Acad Med. 2002;77 (8 ):790-798. Accessed December 17, 2023. https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/fulltext/2002/08000/the_roles_of_nature_and_nurture_in_the_recruitment.8.aspx 12176692
19. Grobler L Marais BJ Mabunda S . Interventions for increasing the proportion of health professionals practising in rural and other underserved areas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015 (6 ):CD005314. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005314.pub3
20. Wilson NW Couper ID De Vries E Reid S Fish T Marais BJ . A critical review of interventions to redress the inequitable distribution of healthcare professionals to rural and remote areas. Rural Remote Health. 2009;9 (2 ):1060.19530891
21. Goodfellow A Ulloa JG Dowling PT , et al . Predictors of primary care physician practice location in underserved urban or rural areas in the United States: a systematic literature review. Acad Med. 2016;91 (9 ):1313-1321. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001203 27119328
22. Jones MP Bushnell JA Humphreys JS . Are rural placements positively associated with rural intentions in medical graduates? Med Educ. 2014;48 (4 ):405-416. doi:10.1111/medu.12399 24606624
23. Heng D Pong RW Chan BTB , et al . Graduates of northern Ontario family medicine residency programs practise where they train. Can J Rural Med. 2007;12 (3 ):146-152.17662174
24. Hogenbirk JC Mian O Pong RW . Postgraduate specialty training in northeastern Ontario and subsequent practice location. Rural Remote Health. 2011;11 (2 ):1603.21381861
25. Barrett FA Lipsky MS Lutfiyya MN . The impact of rural training experiences on medical students: a critical review. Acad Med. 2011;86 (2 ):259-263. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182046387 21169781
26. Woolley T Gupta TS Bellei M . Predictors of remote practice location in the first seven cohorts of James Cook University MBBS graduates. Rural Remote Health. 2017;17 (1 ):3992. doi:10.22605/RRH3992 28190366
27. Mathews M Ryan D Samarasena A . Work locations in 2014 of medical graduates of Memorial University of Newfoundland: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open. 2015;3 (2 ):E217-E222. doi:10.9778/cmajo.20140109
28. Shires L Allen P Cheek C Deb W . Regional universities and rural clinical schools contribute to rural medical workforce, a cohort study of 2002 to 2013 graduates. Rural Remote Health. 2015;15 (3 ):3219.26245841
29. Farmer J Kenny A McKinstry C Huysmans RD . A scoping review of the association between rural medical education and rural practice location. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13 (1 ):27. doi:10.1186/s12960-015-0017-3 25943870
30. Jensen CC DeWitt DE . The reported value of rural internal medicine residency electives and factors that influence rural career choice. J Rural Health. 2002;18 (1 ):25-30. doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.2002.tb00872.x 12043752
31. Orrantia E Cousins M Bruce P Nutbrown L . Northern Ontario’s rural physician teams: who, why and for how long. Can J Rural Med. 2022;27 (4 ):135-142. doi:10.4103/cjrm.cjrm_1_21 36254936
32. Krupa LK Chan BTB . Canadian rural family medicine training programs: growth and variation in recruitment. Can Fam Physician. 2005;51 (6 ):852-853.16926955
33. Russell DJ Wilkinson E Petterson S Chen C Bazemore A . Family medicine residencies: how rural training exposure in GME is associated with subsequent rural practice. J Grad Med Educ. 2022;14 (4 ):441-450. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-21-01143.1 35991106
34. Rosenthal TC McGuigan MH Anderson G . Rural residency tracks in family practice: graduate outcomes. Fam Med. 2000;32 (3 ):174-177.10726217
35. Ashrafzadeh S Peters GA Shi CR Nambudiri VE . Demographic and medical school characteristics associated with urban versus rural dermatology practice: a national cross-sectional study. Dermatol Online J. 2021;27 (1 ):13030/qt4bn5t4b3.
36. Li A Toy J Purdy K Kirshen C Liu C . Rural educational opportunities in dermatology residency programs: the solution to geographic maldistribution and shortage of dermatologists in Canada? J Cutan Med Surg. 2023;27 (2 ):174-175. doi:10.1177/12034754221149653 36653960
37. Donovan JC . A survey of dermatology residency program directors’ views on mentorship. Dermatol Online J. 2009;15 (9 ):1.
38. Sambunjak D Straus SE Marušić A . Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296 (9 ):1103-1115. doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1103 16954490
39. Waslowski J Paton M Freymond M , et al . Evaluation of a pilot rural mentorship programme for and by pre-clerkship medical students. Can J Rural Med. 2021;26 (4 ):176-185. doi:10.4103/cjrm.cjrm_82_20 34643557
40. Wilson CR . Access for all. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53 (12 ):2217-2218.18077762
41. Barondess JA . On mentoring. J R Soc Med. 1997;90 (6 ):347-349. doi:10.1177/014107689709000617 9227389
42. Birch DW Asiri AH de Gara CJ . The impact of a formal mentoring program for minimally invasive surgery on surgeon practice and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 2007;193 (5 ):589-591; discussion 591-592. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.003 17434361
43. Coddington CC Satin AJ . Mentorship: discovering a key to the future. Fertil Steril. 2008;90 (5 ):1571-1573. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.051 18249375
44. Gutkin C . Family physician shortages. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54 (3 ):480. Accessed December 17, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2278367/ 18337542
45. Heaton CJ . Making it personal; mentoring future family docs. Fam Med. 2007;39 (1 ):11-12.17186438
46. Leslie K Lingard L Whyte S . Junior faculty experiences with informal mentoring. Med Teach. 2005;27 (8 ):693-698. doi:10.1080/01421590500271217 16451889
47. Sarkar R Deoghare S Katoch S . Virtual mentorship in dermatology: the beginning of a new era of dermatology training in India. JAAD Int. 2023;11 :112-114. doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2023.01.015 36950266
48. Ehrlich A Kostecki J Olkaba H . Trends in dermatology practices and the implications for the workforce. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77 (4 ):746-752. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.06.030 28784330
49. Engelbrecht D . Letter to the Editor: A Workforce Shortage Solution. The Rheumatologist. 2023. Accessed January 6, 2024. https://www.the-rheumatologist.org/article/letter-to-the-editor-a-workforce-shortage-solution/
50. Miller K Benny A Retallack J . Supporting consulting paediatrics in rural, remote, or vulnerable communities in British Columbia: time for national collaboration. Paediatr Child Health. 2021;26 (8 ):451-455. doi:10.1093/pch/pxab043 34992698
51. Gruca TS Nam I Tracy R . Reaching rural patients through otolaryngology visiting consultant clinics. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2014;151 (6 ):895-898. doi:10.1177/0194599814553398
52. Yong J Scott A Gravelle H Sivey P McGrail M . Do rural incentives payments affect entries and exits of general practitioners? Soc Sci Med. 2018;214 :197-205. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.014 30177362
53. Bilodeau H Leduc N van Schendel N . Analyse des facteurs d’attraction, d’installation et de maintien de la pratique médi-cale dans les régions éloignées du Québec. Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé; 2006. Accessed January 6, 2024. http://www.santecom.qc.ca/bibliothequevirtuelle/gris/2921954958.pdf
54. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux. Plans d’effectifs médicaux (PEM) en spécialité. 2020. Accessed December 17, 2023. https://www.msss.gouv.qc.ca/professionnels/medecine-au-quebec/plans-d-effectifs-medicaux-pem-en-specialite/
55. FMRQ. Bulletin guide to practice 2022-2023.pdf. 2022. Accessed December 17, 2023. https://fmrq.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FMRQ-Bulletin-Guide-to-Practice-2022-2023.pdf
56. Staiger DO Marshall SM Goodman DC Auerbach DI Buerhaus PI . Association between having a highly educated spouse and physician practice in rural underserved areas. JAMA. 2016;315 (9 ):939-941. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.16972 26934264
57. Pala P Bergler-Czop BS Gwiżdż JM . Teledermatology: idea, benefits and risks of modern age—a systematic review based on melanoma. Adv Dermatol Allergol. 2020;37 (2 ):159-167. doi:10.5114/ada.2020.94834
58. Coates SJ Kvedar J Granstein RD . Teledermatology: from historical perspective to emerging techniques of the modern era: part I: history, rationale, and current practice. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72 (4 ):563-574; quiz 575-576. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.061 25773407
59. Coates SJ Kvedar J Granstein RD . Teledermatology: from historical perspective to emerging techniques of the modern era: part II: emerging technologies in teledermatology, limitations and future directions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72 (4 ):577-586; quiz 587-588. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.08.014 25773408
60. Ferreira A Gotschall JW Grant-Kels JM . Dermatologists’ ethical obligation to underserved populations. J Am Acad Dermatol. Published online April 11, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2023.04.007
61. Blake KD Moss JL Gaysynsky A Srinivasan S Croyle RT . Making the case for investment in rural cancer control: an analysis of rural cancer incidence, mortality, and funding trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26 (7 ):992-997. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0092 28600296
