
==== Front
Am J Sports Med
Am J Sports Med
AJS
amjsports
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
0363-5465
1552-3365
SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA

39165177
10.1177/03635465241270139
10.1177_03635465241270139
Articles
Hip and Thigh
Surgical Treatment of Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Injuries Compared With Nonsurgical Treatment: A Matched Comparative Study With a Mean Follow-up of >4 Years From the Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Surgery Cohort Study
Lefèvre Nicolas MD *
Moussa Mohamad K. MD, MSc *
El Otmani Laila MD *
Valentin Eugénie MSc *
Meyer Alain MD *
Grimaud Olivier MD *
Bohu Yoann MD *
Hardy Alexandre MD, MSc *†
* Clinique du Sport, Paris, France
Investigation performed at Clinique du Sport, Paris, France
† Alexandre Hardy, MD, Clinique du Sport, 28 Bd Saint-Marcel, 75005 Paris, France (email: ahardy@chirurgiedusport.com).
21 8 2024
9 2024
52 11 27182727
21 1 2024
3 6 2024
© 2024 The Author(s)
2024
American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Background:

Surgical outcomes for proximal hamstring avulsion injury (PHAI) are well documented, yet comparative analyses with nonsurgical approaches remain scarce.

Purpose:

To compare the functional outcomes between surgical and nonsurgical interventions for PHAI.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

This comparative study, conducted at a sports surgery center between January 2012 and July 2021, focused on patients with primary PHAI. The study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Group selection involved utilizing propensity score matching to compare an arm of patients who were surgically treated (indications included patients with complete injury, patients with partial injury with >2 cm of retraction, and patients for whom 6 months of nonsurgical treatment failed) with another arm of patients who refused surgery. The primary outcome was evaluated using the Parisian Hamstring Avulsion Score (PHAS). The secondary outcomes included the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) score; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score; rate and quality of return to sport (RTS); and patient satisfaction.

Results:

The study included 32 patients (mean age, 55.8 years [SD, 8.4 years]) in the nonsurgical treatment arm and 95 patients in the surgical treatment arm (mean age, 53.4 years [SD, 7.7 years]) (P > .05). The interval from injury to treatment was 5.7 months (SD, 9.6 months) for the surgical group and 12.7 months (SD, 25.9 months) for the nonsurgical group (P > .05). At the final follow-up (nonsurgical group: mean, 56.5 months [SD, 28.2 months]; surgical group: mean, 50.7 months [SD, 33.1 months]), the PHAS was significantly higher in the surgical group (mean, 86.3 [SD, 13.7]) compared with the nonsurgical group (mean, 69.8 [SD, 15.1]) (P < .0001). Higher activity scores were also observed in the surgical group for the TAS and UCLA scores (P = .0224 and P = .0026, respectively). A higher percentage of the surgical group (68.4%) returned to sports compared with the nonsurgical group (46.9%) (P = .0354), with a greater proportion in the surgical group returning at the same or higher level (67.7% vs 26.7%) (P = .0069). Additionally, a higher satisfaction level was reported by patients in the surgical group (89.5%) in contrast to the nonsurgical group (25%) (P < .0001). Three patients in the surgical group experienced complications (2 reruptures and 1 hyperesthesia at the pudendal nerve territories). Odds ratios (ORs) indicated that patients in the surgical group were significantly more likely to achieve or exceed median scores for the PHAS (OR, 6.79; P < .001), TAS score (OR, 2.29; P = .045), and UCLA score (OR, 3.63; P = .003), as well as to RTS at any level (OR, 2.46; P = .031) or at the preinjury level or higher (OR, 6.04; P < .001).

Conclusion:

This study demonstrated that surgical treatment of PHAI significantly enhances long-term functional scores, including the PHAS, TAS score, UCLA score, satisfaction, and RTS, at a mean follow-up of >4 years compared with nonsurgical treatment.

Registration:

NCT02906865 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)

proximal hamstring avulsion injury
hip
PHAI repair
nonsurgical treatment
sports
typesetterts1
==== Body
pmcProximal hamstring avulsion injuries (PHAIs) are debilitating injuries affecting primarily the young athletic population.7,8,18 Because of the increased sports activity among the older population, these injuries are increasingly being seen. 4 The treatment choice for PHAI is influenced by the degree of retraction, type of tear (partial or total), lesion chronicity, and associated symptoms. 13 The accepted indication for nonsurgical treatment of PHAI is a partial tear with <2 cm of retraction or patients with low functional demand.3,14,15

The outcomes of surgical treatment for PHAI have been widely reported in the literature, demonstrating benefits in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sport (RTS), and patient satisfaction.4,6,9,12,18 These studies have reported overall complication rates ranging from 0% to 50%, as documented in the systematic review by Jokela et al. 6 Additionally, specific complications such as rerupture and sciatic nerve irritation have been reported at rates of 1.2% and 3.5%, respectively.4,10 However, most of the existing literature involves descriptive studies without a control group, making these results susceptible to publication bias, and there is a significant lack of reports on nonoperative treatment outcomes or comparisons between these treatment modalities.3,4,6,18 A 2018 systematic review by Bodendorfer et al 3 highlighted this gap, noting that among the identified studies, 22 exclusively addressed operative management of PHAI, 1 study focused solely on nonoperative treatment, 5 and only 1 included both operative and nonoperative treatment groups, although it was an abstract presentation. In the same year, 2 retrospective case-control studies were published by the same research team, advocating improved outcomes with surgical treatment of complete injuries, 15 along with a 40% conversion-to-surgery rate for partial injuries of <2 cm. 14 In contrast, a recent prospective nonrandomized, nonmatched study by van der Made et al 17 reported comparable results at 1 year postoperatively between both modalities after a shared decision-making process, challenging the existing literature that advocates surgery for its benefits.

The primary aim of the study was to compare the functional outcomes of patients treated for PHAI with surgery or nonsurgically, particularly focusing on patients who opted for nonsurgical treatments despite meeting the surgical indications, as measured using the Parisian Hamstring Avulsion Score (PHAS). 11

The secondary aim involved the evaluation of additional outcome parameters including the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) score, 16 the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score,1,21 and the rate and quality of RTS, as well as patient satisfaction and perception of improvement.

Methods

Study Design

This was a single-center case-control study, conducted at a sport surgery center between January 2012 and July 2021. It is part of the French Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Surgery Cohort Study (PHAS; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02906865).

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

All consecutive patients who were evaluated for the first time with primary PHAI, were indicated for surgical treatment, and chose either surgical or nonsurgical management (refused surgery) were eligible for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria included patients <18 years of age, those with a follow-up period of <1 year since treatment, patients evaluated with a bony avulsion of the ischial tuberosity, patients requiring a reconstruction using allograft augmentation, those who had undergone previous surgeries on the hamstrings, and those who were unwilling to participate in the study.

Decision-Making and Indication

A decision-making algorithm was used to guide the management strategy. Initial surgical management was offered to patients evaluated with complete avulsions or partial avulsions in which tendon retraction exceeded 2 cm or those who had persistent significant pain and weakness after 6 months of nonsurgical treatment. Patients refusing surgery were followed and treated nonsurgically.

Partial avulsion was defined as the involvement of either the conjoint tendon or the semimembranosus tendon, and complete avulsion referred to the involvement of both the conjoint tendon and the semimembranosus tendon. 4

Throughout the treatment process, a shared decision-making approach was adopted involving the patient, allowing for continuous reassessment of treatment effectiveness and adjustments based on clinical progression and patient feedback.

Technique of Nonsurgical Treatment

Nonsurgical management included resting, applying ice, undergoing physical therapy, and occasionally undergoing platelet-rich plasma injections, followed by gradually returning to normal activities over roughly 4 months. Each patient in this group followed a uniform rehabilitation protocol, beginning with early mobilization and gentle range of motion and flexibility exercises, advancing to strengthening exercises, and advancing to RTS activities within a 6- to 12-week time frame. Regular 6-week assessments were conducted to monitor the progress of rehabilitation and overall recovery. Surgical treatment was offered each time when the criteria for surgical indication were met.

Surgical Technique and Postoperative Rehabilitation Protocol

All surgical procedures were conducted under spinal anesthesia by the senior surgeon (N.L.), adhering to the method outlined by Lefevre et al. 7 After the operation, patients were equipped with an articulated knee brace adjusted to 40° of extension for the initial 3 weeks. The postoperative rehabilitation followed the protocol established by Lefevre et al, 7 starting with isometric exercises aimed at strengthening the quadriceps and hamstring muscles, maintaining a knee flexion of 30° to 45°. Gradually, an additional 10° of extension was incorporated each week. Full weightbearing activities were introduced at the 6-week mark. The rehabilitation program began with passive exercises, transitioning to active exercises after 6 weeks. By the end of this period, patients progressed to dynamic quadriceps exercises within a closed kinetic chain and active-assisted hamstring exercises. In the 12th- to 16th-week window, patients were encouraged to start brisk walking and possibly light jogging, focusing on building hamstring strength through isokinetic exercises before shifting to eccentric exercises. Typically, from the 16th to the 32nd week, athletes were able to resume their usual sports activities.

Outcome Measures and Evaluation

The primary outcome measurement was the PHAS 11 at the last follow-up after PHAI treatment as compared between both groups of the study. The PHAS is a 36-item score, grouped in 9 categories, designed to assess the functional status of patients with PHAI. It has a scale ranging from 0 to 200, which is then converted to a 100-point scale for ease of interpretation and comparison. 11

The secondary outcome measures included other outcome parameters including the TAS score 16 and the UCLA score,1,21 the rate and quality of RTS (based on patient perception), and the complication rate, as well as patient satisfaction and perception of improvement. The TAS and the UCLA activity scale are both 10-point scales used to evaluate a patient’s level of sports activity.

When significant differences emerged between the 2 groups, we determined the odds of each treatment method delivering superior outcomes. For continuous variables (PHAS, UCLA score, and TAS score), a better outcome was defined as exceeding the highest median value for each score, and the odds ratio for surpassing this threshold was computed.

For categorical variables (RTS), patients were categorized into 2 groups: those returning to sports at the same level and those who did not return or returned at a lower level. The study then determined the odds of each treatment strategy enabling a return to the same sports level.

Data Collection

Data were collected prospectively using the internet-based software WebSurvey that was accessed and filled out by both surgeons or fellows (for physical examination, imaging, and surgical findings) and patients (for descriptive characteristics and scores).

The collected data included the characteristics of the study population, such as age, sex, body mass index, level of sport, accident circumstances, time to surgery, type of rupture, and tendon retraction on MRI scans.

Acute injuries were defined as an injury presentation delay of <28 days.

Ethics Consideration

After the decision for nonsurgical versus surgical treatment, each patient provided informed consent to participate in the study. The study was approved by the local institutional ethics committee.

Participants and Sample Size

During the study time frame, 624 patients were treated surgically, and 34 were treated nonsurgically; of them, 98 were excluded (18 bony avulsion, 35 revision surgery, and 45 allograft). Of the 526 remaining patients, 105 (19.9%) were lost to follow-up. Application of the propensity score matching technique at a 3:1 ratio yielded 32 patients in the nonsurgical treatment arm and 95 patients in the surgical treatment arm (Figure 1). One patient in the nonsurgical group did not have a corresponding third match among the patients who underwent operation.

Figure 1. Flowchart of the study. PHAI, proximal hamstring avulsion injury.

Statistical Analysis

The study population was matched using a propensity score to minimize selection bias in the 2 groups of reconstruction techniques. Matching was performed using a logit scale with a caliper width of 0.2. The matched variables included age, sex, TAS score before injury, acute or chronic injury, type of rupture (complete or partial), and delay of follow-up.

Categorical variables, presented as frequency and percentage, were compared using the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher exact test, depending on group sizes. Continuous data, presented as mean and standard deviation, were compared using appropriate statistical tests, either the Student t test or the Mann-Whitney U test.

The functional scores were dichotomized based on their respective medians. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the odds ratio of achieving the median scores and RTS within the group of patients who received an operation as opposed to the group that did not.

A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (Version 4.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Results

Patient Characteristics

In the surgical group, the mean age was 53.4 years (SD, 7.7 years), marginally lower than in the nonsurgical group, in which it was 55.8 years (SD, 8.4 years) (P > .05). The preinjury TAS and UCLA scores were similar in both groups (P > .05). The interval from injury to treatment was 5.7 months (SD, 9.6 months) for the surgical group and 12.7 months (SD, 25.9 months) for the nonsurgical group (P > .05). Chronic injuries were prevalent in both groups (Table 1). The mean follow-up period was 50.7 months (SD, 31.1 months) for the surgical group and 56.5 months (SD, 28.2 months) for the nonsurgical group (P > .05). Four patients in the surgical group initially decided on nonsurgical treatment, which failed, and then decided on surgical treatment.

Table 1 Characteristics of the Study Population a

	Surgical Group, n = 95	Nonsurgical Group, n = 32	P Value	
Age, y, mean (SD) [min; max]	53.4 (7.7) [32; 69]	55.8 (8.4) [34; 71]	.1377	
Sex			>.9999	
 Female	53 (55.8)	18 (56.3)		
 Male	42 (44.2)	14 (43.8)		
Side of the injury		.2989	
 Right	36 (37.9)	16 (50.0)		
 Left	59 (62.1)	16 (50.0)		
Accident circumstances		.6632	
 Public road accident	9 (9.5)	5 (15.6)		
 Work incident	12 (12.6)	4 (12.5)		
 Domestic incident	19 (20.0)	4 (12.5)		
 Sport incident	55 (57.9)	19 (59.4)		
Level of sport			.7413	
 Professional	3 (3.2)	00 (0.0)		
 Competition	17 (17.9)	5 (15.6)		
 Regular leisure	61 (64.2)	20 (62.5)		
 Occasional leisure	14 (14.7)	7 (21.9)		
Type of sport			.9525	
 Pivot contact (football, handball, rugby, basketball, judo)	11 (11.6)	4 (12.5)		
 Pivot without contact (tennis, skiing, badminton, volleyball)	21 (22.1)	6 (18.8)		
 Without pivot (jogging, biking, swimming)	63 (66.3)	22 (68.8)		
Preinjury activity scores	
 Tegner Activity Scale score, mean (SD)	5.0 (1.6)	5.0 (1.3)	.9524	
 UCLA score, mean (SD)	8.3 (2.0)	7.8 (1.8)	.1277	
Type of rupture			>.9999	
 Complete	81 (85.3)	27 (84.4)		
 Partial	14 (14.7)	5 (15.6)		
  Conjoint tendon	5 (36)	2 (40)		
  Semimembranosus tendon	9 (64)	3 (60)		
Retraction as measured on MRI scans, cm, Mean (SD)	5.0 (2.8)	6.0 (4.6)	.50	
 Complete	4.9 (2.8)	5.7 (4.1)	.52	
 Partial	5.6 (3.1)	7.6 (7.2)	.82	
Lesion type			>.9999	
 Acute	18 (18.9)	6 (18.8)		
 Chronic	77 (81.1)	26 (81.3)		
Injury treatment delay, mo, mean (SD) [median; IQR]	5.7 (9.6) [1.8; 1.1-4.5]	12.7 (25.9) [4.6; 1.3-10.2]	.1559	
Follow-up, mo, mean (SD) [min; max]	50.7 (31.1) [12; 131.8]	56.5 (28.2) [12; 127.2]	.1745	
a Data are presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated. IQR, interquartile range; max, maximum; min, minimum; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles.

PHAS Values at the Final Follow-up

At the last follow-up, the PHAS was markedly higher in the surgical group (mean, 86.3 [SD, 13.7]) compared with the nonsurgical group (mean, 69.8 [SD, 15.1]; P < .0001). For complete injuries, the surgical group again had higher PHAS values (mean, 85.8 [SD, 14.4]) versus the nonsurgical group (mean, 68.3 [SD, 13.5]) (P < .0001). For partial injuries, there was a trend favoring surgical treatment, with the surgical group showing a higher mean PHAS of 89.4 (SD, 8.9) compared with 77.8 (SD, 21.8) in the nonsurgical group, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = .49) (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Functional outcomes at the last follow-up. PHAS, Parisian Hamstring Avulsion Score; UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles.

Other Functional Scores and Outcomes

Activity Scores

The TAS score was significantly higher in the surgical group, with a mean of 4.2 (SD, 1.8) compared with 3.4 (SD, 1.7) in the nonsurgical group (P = .0224). Similarly, the UCLA score of the surgical group was higher (mean, 7.2 [SD, 2.4]) than that of the nonsurgical group (mean, 5.7 [SD, 2.0]) (P = .02) (Figure 2). For complete injuries, surgical group had higher TAS (mean, 4.0 vs 3.3; P = .03) and UCLA (mean, 6.9 vs 5.5; P = .009) scores compared with nonsurgical group. For partial injuries, the differences in TAS (mean, 5.1 vs 4.2; P = .89) and UCLA (mean, 8.8 vs 6.6; P = .12) scores were not statistically significant (Figure 2).

Return to Sport

The study found that 68.4% (65/95) of patients in the surgical group were able to RTS, compared with 46.9% (15/32) in the nonsurgical group (P = .0354) (Table 2). In terms of quality of RTS, 67.7% (44/65) of those who returned to sports in the surgical group were able to perform at the same or a higher level, but only 26.7% (4/15) of the nonsurgical group who returned to sports achieved the same level (P = .0069).

Table 2 Return to Sport, Satisfaction, and Personal Perception of Improvement at the Last Follow-up a

	Surgical Group	Nonsurgical Group	P Value	
Return to Sport	
All patients	n = 95	n = 32	.0354	
 Yes	65 (68.4)	15 (46.9)		
 No	30 (31.6)	17 (53.1)		
Complete rupture	n = 81	n = 27	.1124	
 Yes	52 (64.2)	12 (44.4)		
 No	29 (35.8)	15 (55.6)		
Partial rupture	n = 14	n = 5	.1548	
 Yes	13 (92.9)	3 (60.0)		
 No	1 (7.1)	2 (40.0)		
If Yes, Level of Sport	
All patients	n = 95	n = 32	.0069	
 Same or higher	44 (67.7) (46.3% from total)	4 (26.7) (12.5% from total)		
 Lower	21 (32.3) (22.1% from total)	11 (73.3) (34.4% from total)		
Complete rupture	n = 81	n = 27	.0077	
 Same or higher	36 (69.2) (44.4% from total)	3 (25.0) (11.1% from total)		
 Lower	16 (30.8) (19.7% from total)	9 (75.0) (33.3% from total)		
Partial rupture	n = 14	n = 5	.55	
 Same or higher	8 (61.5) (57.1% from total)	1 (33.3) (20.0% from total)		
 Lower	5 (38.5) (35.7% from total)	2 (66.7) (40.0% from total)		
Satisfaction	
All patients	n = 95	n = 32	<.0001	
 Yes	85 (89.5)	8 (25.0)		
 No	10 (10.5)	24 (75.0)		
Complete rupture	n = 81	n = 27	<.0001	
 Yes	72 (88.9)	6 (22.2)		
 No	9 (11.1)	21 (77.8)		
Partial rupture	n = 14	n = 5	.0374	
 Yes	13 (92.9)	2 (40.0)		
 No	1 (7.1)	3 (60.0)		
Perception of Improvement Compared With Preoperative State	
All patients	n = 95	n = 32	<.0001	
 Very improved	38 (40.0)	2 (6.3)		
 Improved	32 (33.7)	5 (15.6)		
 Slightly improved	7 (7.4)	8 (25.0)		
 No change	16 (16.8)	13 (40.6)		
 Worse	2 (2.1)	4 (12.5)		
Complete rupture	n = 81	n = 27	<.0001	
 Very improved	32 (39.5)	2 (7.4)		
 Improved	28 (34.6)	4 (14.8)		
 Slightly improved	6 (7.4)	7 (25.9)		
 No change	13 (16.0)	10 (37.0)		
 Worse	2 (2.5)	4 (14.8)		
Partial rupture	n = 14	n = 5	.2144	
 Very improved	6 (42.9)	00 (0)		
 Improved	4 (28.6)	1 (20.0)		
 Slightly improved	1 (7.1)	1 (20.0)		
 No change	3 (21.4)	3 (60.0)		
 Worse	00 (0)	00 (0)		
a Data are presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Satisfaction

In the surgical group, a high level of satisfaction was reported by 89.5% (85/95) of the patients, compared with only 25% (8/32) in the nonsurgical group (P < .0001). Notably, a significantly larger proportion of the surgical group felt “very improved” (40.0%) or “improved” (33.7%) compared with the nonsurgical group, where only 6.3% felt “very improved” and 15.6% “improved” (P < .0001).

The details for both partial and complete injuries regarding these outcomes are delineated in Table 2. Notably, for partial ruptures, patient satisfaction emerged as the only variable with a statistically significant difference; 92.9% of the surgical group (13/14) reported satisfaction, compared with the 40.0% (2/5) of the nonsurgical group (P = .0374).

Complications

Three patients in the surgical group experienced complications: one developed a compressive hematoma that was complicated by a rerupture necessitating revision surgery; another experienced a rerupture complicated by a pulmonary embolism, which responded to nonsurgical treatment; and the third experienced pudendal nerve paresthesia, manifesting as ipsilateral hyperesthesia that resolved after 45 days of symptoms.

Odds Ratio of Achieving or Exceeding the Highest Median Scores of the PHAS, TAS Score, and UCLA Score

For the PHAS, the highest median score observed was 87.0 in the surgical group. Patients in this group had 6.79 times the odds of surpassing this score (95% CI, 2.70-19.7; P < .001) compared with those in the nonsurgical group.

Similarly, in the case of the TAS score, where the highest median score for the surgical group was 4.0, these patients had 2.29 times the odds of achieving or exceeding this median (95% CI, 1.02-5.34; P = .045) compared with the nonsurgical group.

In addition, for the UCLA score, with the surgical group having a median of 6.0, the odds of achieving or exceeding this median was 3.63 times higher in the surgical group (95% CI, 1.53-9.38; P = .003) than in the nonsurgical group.

Odds Ratio of RTS in Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Groups

The surgical group was 2.46 times more likely to return to any level of sport (95% CI, 1.09-5.64; P = .031) compared with the nonsurgical group. Furthermore, the operated group had 6.04 times the odds of returning to sport at the same or a higher level (95% CI, 2.16-21.6; P < .001) compared with the nonoperated group.

Discussion

The main finding of this study is that surgical treatment of patients with PHAIs offers better functional outcomes, as measured using the PHAS, compared with nonsurgical treatment.

This study stands out as one of the first case-control PHAI studies to use a matching technique to robustly compare outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical treatments. To our knowledge, it appears to be based on the largest sample size per treatment arm compared with existing studies.

These findings align with those of previous studies advocating surgical treatment for PHAI.2-4,7,8,19,20 Yet, the majority of the literature on this topic is composed of noncomparative studies, which tend to provide descriptive results that lack robustness, with only a handful of articles offering comparative analysis3,14,15,17 (Table 3). Interestingly, our data involved a cohort predominantly characterized by chronic PHAI, with approximately 81.7% of patients undergoing treatment a mean of 5.7 months after injury. This aspect is crucial to highlight, as it demonstrates the efficacy of surgical intervention even in a primarily chronic setting, outperforming nonsurgical treatment.

Table 3 Comparative Studies Available in the Literature Comparing Surgical With Nonsurgical Treatment of PHAI a

Authors and Year	Study Type	Selection	Surgical Group Sample Size	Nonsurgical Group Sample Size	Results	
Bodendorfer et al, 2018 3	Systematic review	Complete and partial PHAI	22 surgical study	1 nonsurgical study; 1 abstract comparative study that was published afterward by Shambaugh et al, 2017 15	Operative treatment showed significantly higher patient satisfaction, hamstring strength, and functional scale scores, with a higher complication rate compared with nonoperative treatment	
Shambaugh et al, 2017 15	Retrospective cohort	Only complete PHAI	14	11	Operative group showed higher mean LEFS scores, better single-leg hop performance, and a 100% return to preinjury activities, compared with the nonoperative group	
Piposar et al, 2017 14	Retrospective review	Only partial PHAIs that have retraction <2 cm	10	15	Operative treatment resulted in higher LEFS and Short Form-12 Physical Component scores compared with nonoperative treatment but no significant difference in single-leg hop distance and torque deficit	
van der Made et al, 2022 17	Prospective evaluation	Partial and complete PHAI	26	33	Both operative and nonoperative treatments resulted in comparable clinical outcomes at 1-y follow-up; operative patients had substantial improvements in PHAT scores, aligning with patients with nonoperative treatment at follow-up	
Current study, 2024	Retrospective cohort	Partial and complete PHAI + matching of patients surgically treated with those who refused surgery with the following indications: complete avulsion, partial tear with >2 cm of retraction, failure of 6 mo of nonsurgical treatment	95	32	Surgical treatment offers higher PHAS, UCLA score, TAS score, RTS, satisfaction, and perception of improvement	
a LEFS, Lower Extremity Functional Scale; PHAI, proximal hamstring avulsion injury; PHAS, Parisian Hamstring Avulsion Score; PHAT, Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool; RTS, return to sport; TAS, Tegner Activity Scale; UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles.

One of the earliest comparative studies on this topic was a nonmatched case series by Shambaugh et al 15 in 2017, focusing on patients with complete PHAIs. They compared outcomes between 14 surgically treated and 11 nonsurgically treated patients, finding higher mean Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores (74.71 vs 68.50) and greater strength recovery in the surgical group over a mean follow-up of 3.65 years (SD, 2.11 years). 15 In our study, predominantly involving complete PHAIs and using the PHAS, a similar trend was observed; after matching patients based on age, sex, preinjury TAS score, injury type (acute/chronic, complete/partial), and follow-up delay, the surgical treatment’s superiority was again evident. In a study by Piposar et al, 14 patients with partial PHAI tears and <2-cm retractions were evaluated (15 nonsurgical vs 10 surgical). The study found significantly better subjective PROMs (LEFS and Short Form-12 scores) in the surgical group, although objective measures like single-leg hop distance and torque deficit showed no significant difference. Notably, 40% of the nonsurgically treated patients eventually needed surgery because of persistent symptoms. The authors concluded that both treatment modalities can be offered in a similar scenario. 14

Both studies14,15 were limited by sample size and low level of evidence. Furthermore, RTS rate and quality and activity scores such as the TAS and UCLA scale were not reported. In our study, featuring a larger sample size, superior outcomes were consistently demonstrated in the surgical group across all parameters, including higher TAS and UCLA scores, along with improved rates and quality of RTS and satisfaction scores. However, the analysis of partial tears was less robust, as challenges were encountered in matching an adequate number of partial tear cases in the surgical group during the propensity score matching process. Despite this, our data did demonstrate higher satisfaction rates in patients with surgically treated partial tears.

Interestingly, our study’s findings can be contrasted with those of van der Made et al, 17 who conducted a prospective evaluation over a 1-year period including both partial and complete PHAIs and found comparable results when a shared decision-making process was utilized. However, it is important to note that their follow-up duration was limited to 1 year, and the study included 26 patients in the surgical group and 33 patients in the nonsurgical group. Their study showed no significant difference in 1-year Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool scores between groups (surgical group: mean, 80 [SD, 19]; nonsurgical group: mean, 80 [SD, 17]). It is noteworthy that they included patients without restriction to the type of injury, essentially comparing the outcomes of their decision-making strategy (eg, patients not indicated for surgery per their protocol were compared with those indicated for surgery). Contrarily, our data showed that, even when shared decision-making was applied and when patients were informed about the potential for inferior clinical outcomes with nonsurgical treatment, patients in the nonsurgical group had significantly worse results at the long-term follow-up (at the mean 3-year follow-up).

Existing indications for the treatment of PHAI are often based on isolated descriptive reports that compare their results with the existing literature. For example, Hofmann et al 5 in 2014 reported outcomes from 19 patients who underwent nonsurgical treatment for complete PHAI. Their findings showed moderate LEFS scores, reduced hamstring strength, and a slight decline in single-leg hop test performance. Despite this, the authors suggested that patients with complete injury can be treated nonsurgically initially if they accept a decline in strength. 5 Our study builds on these results, as patients in our study who refused surgery were found to have lower satisfaction scores in the long term and consistently lower PROMs.

Our study revealed a significant difference in RTS capabilities between both groups, in favor of surgical treatment (68.4% compared with 46.9%). The rate of RTS after surgery is slightly lower than that reported in literature series, with a cumulative rate of 84.5%, as reported by Hillier-Smith and Paton. 4 This may be attributable to the older mean age of our study population. Additionally, the predominance of chronic injuries in our cohort, which are traditionally linked to less favorable outcomes, 4 could further explain the lower rate of RTS observed in our study. Conversely, the literature reports less frequently on RTS after nonsurgical treatment; for instance, Hofmann et al 5 reported an RTS rate of 70.6% (12/17 patients). van der Made et al 17 reported that 33% (11/33) of patients returned to sports at the same level, but 12% (4/33) did not, with 48.48% (16/33) returning at a lower level and 6% (2/33) not having engaged in sports before surgery. Similarly, the lower rates in our study may be attributed to the older age of our study population and the extended follow-up period, which could be seen as a barrier to sports engagement in this age group.

It is noteworthy that surgical intervention carries an additional 3% risk of complications, which in this study included issues such as rerupture and paresthesia. This rate is comparable with the rate reported in the literature.4,12

Limitations

The limitations of our study include a relatively small sample size and the retrospective nature of the analysis. The lack of randomization is another limitation; however, we mitigated this through the use of matching techniques. Additionally, there was a predominance of chronic and complete injuries in this cohort, which may limit the generalizability of our findings. This suggests a need for future research that includes a broader spectrum of injuries, particularly more acute cases and more partial injuries, to enhance the applicability of the results across different patient scenarios.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that surgical treatment of patients with complete PHAI injury and those with partial injuries and retraction of >2 cm significantly enhances long-term functional scores, including the PHAS, TAS score, UCLA score, satisfaction, and RTS, at a mean follow-up of >4 years compared with nonsurgical treatment.

Submitted January 21, 2024; accepted June 3, 2024.

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: N.L. is a consultant for WebSurvey Society, Paris, France. A.H. is a consultant for Arthrex and DePuy. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Data Accessibility Statement: Data are available on reasonable request.
==== Refs
References

1 Amstutz HC Thomas BJ Jinnah R Kim W Grogan T Yale C . Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66 (2 ):228-241.6693450
2 Belk JW Kraeutler MJ Mei-Dan O Houck DA McCarty EC Mulcahey MK . Return to sport after proximal hamstring tendon repair: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7 (6 ):2325967119853218.
3 Bodendorfer BM Curley AJ Kotler JA , et al . Outcomes after operative and nonoperative treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46 (11 ):2798-2808.29016194
4 Hillier-Smith R Paton B . Outcomes following surgical management of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Jt Open. 2022;3 (5 ):415-422.35549447
5 Hofmann KJ Paggi A Connors D Miller SL . Complete avulsion of the proximal hamstring insertion: functional outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96 (12 ):1022-1025.24951738
6 Jokela A Stenroos A Kosola J Valle X Lempainen L . A systematic review of surgical intervention in the treatment of hamstring tendon ruptures: current evidence on the impact on patient outcomes. Ann Med. 2022;54 (1 ):978-988.35416097
7 Lefevre N Bohu Y Klouche S Herman S . Surgical technique for repair of acute proximal hamstring tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99 (2 ):235-240.22926295
8 Lefevre N Bohu Y Naouri JF Klouche S Herman S . Returning to sports after surgical repair of acute proximal hamstring ruptures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21 (3 ):534-539.22972314
9 Lefèvre N Coughlan A Valentin E , et al . Magnetic resonance imaging should be the first-line imaging modality for investigating suspected proximal hamstring avulsion injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024;32 (7 ):1862-1870.38769849
10 Lefèvre N Freiha K Moussa MK , et al . Risk factors for rerupture after proximal hamstring avulsion injury including the optimal timing for surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52 (5 ):1173-1182.38482843
11 Lefevre N Kassab Hassan S Valentin E , et al . Validation of the Parisian Hamstring Avulsion Score (PHAS) in the evaluation and follow-up of patients operated for proximal hamstring avulsion. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52 (4 ):1014-1021.38353118
12 Lefèvre N Moussa MK Valentin E , et al . Predictors of early return to sport after surgical repair of proximal hamstring complex injuries in professional athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52 (4 ):1005-1013.38353018
13 Mica L Schwaller A Stoupis C Penka I Vomela J Vollenweider A . Avulsion of the hamstring muscle group: a follow-up of 6 adult non-athletes with early operative treatment: a brief report. World J Surg. 2009;33 (8 ):1605-1610.19533218
14 Piposar JR Vinod AV Olsen JR Lacerte E Miller SL . High-grade partial and retracted (<2 cm) proximal hamstring ruptures: nonsurgical treatment revisited. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5 (2 ):2325967117692507.28321428
15 Shambaugh BC Olsen JR Lacerte E Kellum E Miller SL . A comparison of nonoperative and operative treatment of complete proximal hamstring ruptures. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5 (11 ):2325967117738551.29201925
16 Tegner Y Lysholm J . Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;198 :43-49.
17 van der Made AD Peters RW Verheul C , et al . Proximal hamstring tendon avulsions: comparable clinical outcomes of operative and non-operative treatment at 1-year follow-up using a shared decision-making model. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56 (6 ):340-348.34996751
18 van der Made AD Reurink G Gouttebarge V Tol JL Kerkhoffs GM . Outcome after surgical repair of proximal hamstring avulsions: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43 (11 ):2841-2851.25384502
19 Wood D French SR Munir S Kaila R . The surgical repair of proximal hamstring avulsions: does the timing of surgery or injury classification influence long-term patient outcomes? Bone Joint J. 2020;102 (10 ):1419-1427.32993341
20 Wood DG Packham I Trikha SP Linklater J . Avulsion of the proximal hamstring origin. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90 (11 ):2365-2374.18978405
21 Zahiri CA Schmalzried TP Szuszczewicz ES Amstutz HC . Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13 (8 ):890-895.9880181
