
==== Front
Heliyon
Heliyon
Heliyon
2405-8440
Elsevier

S2405-8440(24)13026-5
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36995
e36995
Research Article
Research on the energy saving behaviors of university students based on TPB in a hot summer–cold winter area in China
Li Jiasheng 1
Zeng Yinxin 1
Gu Zhipan guzhipan418@126.com
⁎
Chen Hongyao
Chen Xiao
Zou Dongjin
Liu Yudie
Deng Liyuan
School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314001, China
⁎ Corresponding author. guzhipan418@126.com
1 These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

27 8 2024
15 9 2024
27 8 2024
10 17 e369953 1 2024
21 8 2024
26 8 2024
© 2024 The Authors
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Energy saving in higher education institutions holds significant importance in the establishment of environmentally friendly and low-carbon societies, with the energy-saving behaviors of university students playing a pivotal role in the development of sustainable campuses. However, there is a clear need for customized strategies to encourage energy-saving habits among university students in areas of China with extreme weather conditions, such as hot summers and cold winters. This study offers a thorough examination of the literature regarding energy-saving behaviors among college students and presents a new theoretical framework based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). A survey questionnaire is conducted at universities in regions with hot summers and cold winters across China, with the goal of identifying the main factors that influence students' intentions and actions regarding campus energy conservation. From July to August 2022, we collected 512 survey responses from different university campuses in China's hot summer-cold winter weather zone. The survey asked about subjective norms, understanding of energy conservation, and the importance of saving energy. Utilizing the Structural Equation Model (SEM), we examined how influencing factors are associated with energy conservation behaviors. Our findings indicate that (1) both the significance of energy conservation and subjective norms significantly drive energy-saving actions; (2) distinct factors impact different forms of energy-saving practices; and (3) the inclination to save energy partially mediates the relationship between comfort choices and the significance of energy conservation. This study presents a validated behavioral model tailored for regions experiencing hot summers and cold winters, offering valuable insights for college administrators in managing energy usage while also serving as a theoretical reference for establishing environmentally sustainable campuses.

Highlights

• The theory of planned behaviour (TPB) explaining the energy saving behaviors of university students in hot summer and cold winter areas.

• Energy-saving intention and values of energy saving exerted positive effect on habitual energy saving behaviors.

• Values of energy saving and subjective norms positively influenced constrained energy saving behaviors.

• Subjective norms exerted a positive impact on interpersonal energy saving behaviors.

• Intention of energy saving played a partially mediating role in the relationship between comfort preference and values of energy saving.

Keywords

Energy saving behaviors
Theory of planned behavior
University students
Structural equation model
==== Body
pmc Abbreviations

ESBs	Energy-saving behaviors	TPB	Theory of Planned Behavior	
CP	Comfort preference	KES	Knowledge of energy saving	
VES	Value of energy saving	PSE	Perceived self-efficacy	
SN	Subjective norms	IES	Intention of energy saving	
HESBs	Habitual ESB	CESBs	Constrained ESBs	
IESBs	Interpersonal ESBs	SEM	Structural equation model	

1 Introduction

Energy has been a constant companion throughout human history, serving as an indispensable resource for human production and sustenance [1]. The rapid growth of the global population and the progress of society have led to a significant increase in the demand for energy [2]. Although fossil fuel energy has contributes to economic development, it also has raise to serious environmental and health problems [3]. Buildings consume approximately 3060 Mtoe of energy annually, accounting for roughly 36 % of global energy consumption and 28 % of CO2 emissions related to energy use [4]. China has set ambitious targets to peak its CO2 emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. China's efforts to reduce carbon emissions are crucial to the sustainable development of the global environment and energy. The country's efforts in reducing carbon emissions are pivotal for the sustainable development of the global environment and energy. According to a report titled “National Education Development Situation in 2021″ by the Ministry of Education in China, there are a total of 3,012 colleges and universities with an enrollment of 44.3 million students in higher education, representing approximately 3.3 % of China's total population—close to that of Spain but surpassing that of Canada. Campus energy consumption in China accounts for approximately 8 % of national energy consumption. Energy usage in educational institutions emerges as a significant aspect of China's end-use energy consumption, which is socially vital and cannot be disregarded. The establishment of a sustainable green campus with high efficiency, wisdom, low-carbon consumption, and humanity has become an urgent and necessary component of campus development [1]. As major energy consumers in colleges and universities, the ESBs (Energy-Saving Behaviors) of university students can reduce building energy consumption on college campuses and contribute to achieve the goal of low-carbon emission for society [5].

Boosting the performance of energy-saving products and optimizing energy utilization, along with advancing energy-efficient technologies, can effectively reduce carbon emissions [6]. However, it is essential to carefully analyze the impact of building occupants or users, namely human influence [7]. Several studies have shown that the diverse behaviors of occupants can result in up to a 20 % variance in energy consumption within buildings [8]; Thus, it is imperative to study the energy-saving actions (ESBs) of contemporary university students [9] in order to expedite China's transition to a low-carbon future and achieve the goal of rapidly peaking carbon emissions. There exists a significant disparity between the energy-saving behavior of contemporary university students and the requirements for constructing a low-carbon society [2], necessitating further research and exploration.

The varied manifestations of ESBs among contemporary college students necessitate meticulous observation and investigation. In recent years, many researchers have conducted studies on the effects of differences in social characteristics on ESBs, such as gender [10], income [11], age [12], level of education [13], and family member structure [14]. In addition, other researchers have explored the factors influencing energy-saving behaviors, including attitudes [15], subjective norms [16], intentions [17], and awareness of consequences [18]. However, only a limited number of studies have delved into the differences in energy-saving behaviors across groups [19], which remain substantial. Some researchers posit that occupants' ESBs are associated with building type, particularly university students residing within campus dormitories. The majority of these students are housed in dormitory buildings with 4–6 students per dormitory unit within an area of 32–72 m2. The behavior pattern of university students inhabit dormitory buildings with 4–6 individuals per unit spanning an area of 32–72 m2. The behavioral patterns exhibited by university students on campus are largely homogeneous due to their collective living or classroom environment. While residents primarily engage in independent activities, university students are more susceptible to influence from the communal atmosphere [20]. In a similar manner, the energy-saving behaviors of university students may significantly vary from those of residents [21]. Calderon [22] predicts that 377 million students worldwide will enter university by 2030. Thus, diverse climate regions have an impact on energy consumption and energy-saving practices. However, previous research on university students' ESBs have not addressed the influence of climatic regions they reside in, particularly within the context of China. When considering areas with hot summers and cold winters, Deng and collagues [5] analyzed monthly electricity usage data for appliances in two large university dormitory structures. Alternatively, Ge et al. [23] measured cooling, window opening, and energy consumption for 15 months in a university research building. Wang et al. [24] assessed the energy-saving behaviors of college students in China's region characterized by hot summers and mild winters. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate the energy-saving behaviors of college students in regions of China characterized by hot summers and cold winters, specifically focusing on areas near the middle and lower parts of the Yangtze River, including Shanghai, Hubei, Hunan, Chongqing, and Zhejiang [25]. The average temperature in this region ranges from 0 °C to 10 °C during the coldest month and from 25 °C to 35 °C during the hottest month. With a summer period lasting approximately 3–4 months and an average indoor temperature ranging between 30°C and 33 °C with around 80 % humidity, as well as a cold period lasting for about 2–3 months with a mean indoor temperature of only 0°C-6°C in the coldest month. These unique climatic characteristics necessitate both cooling rooms in summer and heating them in winter. In addition, the heating method is not centralized [26]. In this climate region, leading to longer periods of heating and air conditioning throughout the year and subsequently higher building energy consumption [33]. However, there is limited research on the energy-saving habits of college students in hot summer and cold winter areas, as well as the factors influencing their behavior. Therefore, this study aims to explore the energy saving behavior and influencing factors of college students in such climatic zones. The three objectives of this study are to define the influencing factors of ESBs among college students in hot summer and cold winter areas, develop a theoretical model of energy-saving behavior, and uncover the cause and effect relationship of different ESBs.

This study builds a theoretical model based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to investigate the determinants of energy-saving behaviors among college students residing in regions of China characterized by extreme temperatures. In this context, ESBs are defined as actions taken to conserve energy within buildings. ESBs can be divided into habitual energy saving behaviors (HESBs), constrained energy saving behaviors (CESBs), and interpersonal energy saving behaviors (IESBs) [24]. HESBs involve reducing excessive energy consumption in daily activities, such as using energy-efficient bulbs and switching off lights when exiting a room, without affecting the quality of life. CESBs entail making lifestyle adjustments to achieve desired energy savings, for example, maintaining air conditioning at no lower than 26 °C during summer months. IESBs promote energy conservation in others through leading by example and identifying non-energy-saving behaviors among peers. This research contributes to reducing campus building's carbon footprint and aligns with China's objective of cutting down carbon dioxide emissions.

The study's contributions can be summarized in three aspects. Firstly, a hypothetical model was established based on the TPB theory, comprehensively considering the characteristics of hot summer and cold winter regions. Secondly, the SEM model was utilized to uncover the direct relationship between energy-saving behavior and influencing factors in universities. Finally, this article proposes focused measures through empirical analysis, which can serve as a reference for energy-saving management strategies in universities and the construction of low-carbon and green university campuses.

The thesis is organized in a systematic way: Part 2 discusses the theory of planned behavior and presents the hypotheses. Part 3 explains the research methods and the process of data collection. Data analysis and its outcomes are highlighted in Part 4. Part 5 explore the results, their significance, and proposes policy guidelines. Finally, Part 6 highlights the academic contributions of the study, draws conclusions, and acknowledges its limitations.

2 Literature review and research hypotheses

2.1 Literature review

Energy saving behavior does not occur in isolation among individuals, and there is extensive research on various factors influencing energy saving behavior. Gender disparities in energy-saving concepts and behaviors have been noted by Du et al. [28], while Schulz et al. [29] and Saleem et al. [30] found that women are more inclined to engage in environmental protection behaviors than men. Additionally, Shrestha et al. [31] summarized global studies indicating that women generally have a positive attitude towards energy conservation compared to men. Additionally, Fan et al. [32] highlighted the fact that women have more motivated emotions and adherence to social norms when dealing with e-waste behavior. Age has been found to be an important factor in energy-saving behavior. Piao et al. [33] found that as people age, people tend to reduce their energy use and adopt an attitude towards using efficient technologies. Furthermore, attitudes [15], subjective norms [34,35], intentions [9,36] and perceived behavioral control [37,38], environmental knowledge [39,40] have all been shown to significantly impact ESBs according to the literature; however, the ordering of effect sizes remains contradictory across studies. The impact of attitudes, subjective norms, intentions, perceived behavioral control and environmental knowledge on energy-saving behaviors (ESBs) has been extensively studied [9,37,40], However, the literature presents contradictory findings regarding the ordering of effect sizes. For example, Babatunde et al. [41] concluded that social norms and perceived behavioral control are the primary important factors influencing energy saving behavior, while Qalati [37] argued that only perceived behavioral control has the most significant impact on energy saving behavior. However, Du et al. [28] confirms that energy-saving behavior is strongly influenced by behavioral intention. In summary, a more comprehensive understanding of energy-saving behaviors and intentions can be achieved through analysis using psychosocial indicators. Moreover, literature [37] has also confirmed the indirect mediating effect of energy-saving intention on attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and energy-saving behavior. From an academic perspective, a number of studies have evaluated the performance of energy-saving behaviors among college students, these studies are summarized in Table 1. Hansmann et al. [14] conducted a study on environmentally beneficial behaviors and the potential influence of students at the Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, Switzerland. The researchers discovered that green self-identity merged as a primary predictor in the model. Other predictors, such as willingness to sacrifice, gender, and perceived environmental control, also had significant influence on the model. Rasool et al. [42] examined energy saving among university students in Karachi, Pakistan, and mentioned that subjective norms, attitudes, responsibility, awareness of consequences, and individual standards exhibited a favorable correlation with actions aimed at conserving energy. Similarly, Boca et al. [43] explored the environmental education and ESBs of Romanian university students and identified a positive relationship among perceived, attitudinal, and behavioral variables. Paço and colleagues [44] found no direct link between knowledge and attitudes but observed only a faint connection between attitudes and actions. Meanwhile Janmaimool et al. [45] undertook research at King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi in Bangkok, where they found that perceived advantages of energy-saving actions, worries about global warming were more effective in encouraging ESBs in college students than other factors like self-efficacy.Table 1 Review of energy saving researches in the literature.

Table 1Researcher	The year of publication	Research object	Factor	
Levine et al. [46]	2012	Washington University undergraduate students	Demographics (age, gender), knowledge, Attitude, Intention	
Lee et al. [47]	2016	University students in Malaysia	Attitude, Subjective Norms, Self-efficacy, Intention	
Paço et al. [44]	2017	University students in Portugal	Demographics (age, gender), knowledge, Attitude	
Rasool et al. [42]	2019	University students in Karachi, Pakistan	Demographics (age, gender, education, income), Awareness of Consequences, Sense of responsibility, Personal norm, Attitude, Subjective Norms, Perceived behavioral control, Intention	
Boca et al. [43]	2019	University students in Baia-Mare, Romania	Environmental education, perception, Attitude, Intention	
Hansmann et al. [14]	2020	Swiss University students	Demographics (age, gender), green self-identity, Subjective Norms, Perceived behavioral control, psychological variables, Intention	
Janmaimool et al. [45]	2021	University students in Thailand	Environmental concern, Perceived self-efficacy, Self-responsibility, Action knowledge, Perceived benefits	
Wang et al. [15]	2021	University students in China	Gender, Grade, Discipline, Comfort preference, Energy conservation value, Knowledge, Perceived self efficacy, Intention	
Du et al. [28]	2022	university students in Hong Kong	Attitude, Subjective Norms, Perceived behavioral control, Personal moral norm, Intention	
Wang et al. [48]	2022	University students in China	attitude, perceived responsibility, perceived behavior control, subjective norms, energy-saving intention,	
Majdi et al. [49]	2022	University students in Kuwait	Attitude, Subjective norms, Perceived behavior control、Environmental Knowledge, Awareness of Consequences	
Babatunde et al. [41]	2023	University students in Malaysia	Social norms, Perceived control, Environmental awareness, Energy literacy, Personal attitudes	
Liu et al. [50]	2023	University students in China	Attitude, Perceived behavioral control, Subjective norms, Personal norms	
Heib Liu et al. [51]	2023	University students in Germany	Personal norm, Energy saving intention, Perceived behavior control, Personal norm	
Wang Liu et al. [52]	2024	University students in China	Attitude, Subjective norms, Perceived behavioral control, Personal norms	
Duong Liu et al. [53]	2024	University students in Vietnam	Subjective norms, Perceived behavioral control, Scription of responsibility, AAwareness of consequences	
Heib Liu et al. [54]	2024	University students in Germany	Descriptive social norm, Injunctive social norm, Personal norm, Perceived behavioral control, Energy saving intention, Attitude	

2.2 Research hypotheses

The Theory of planned behavior (TPB) is a well-developed theoretical framework, originating from the theory of justified action proposed theoretical framework, originating from the theory of justified action proposed by Ajzen [34]. Building upon the theory of reasoned action, behavioral intention directly influences behavior and is shaped by perceptions about the behavior and related subjective norms. While the theory of reasoned action posits that volition governs individual behavior, Fishbein et al. [56] proposed that behavioral attitude plays a primary role in influencing behavioral intention. They also underscored the importance of subjective norms and perceived control over behavior as key factors. In contrast, the five elements of the TPB are general, and the theory enables significant extensions and modifications to meet practical needs [37]. Conversely, many researchers have adopted TPB as a foundational framework for studying energy conservation behaviors. For instance, Qalati et al. [37] demonstrated how household willingness and moral responsibility to save energy play an important mediating and moderating role in household energy saving intentions and behaviour. Yang et al. [21] explored how perceived information intervention influences college students' readiness to embrace energy-saving behaviors. Wang et al. [25] explore the factors that influence HESBs by distinguishing between altruism and selfishness. Furthermore, in their research, Liu et al. [26] engage in an in-depth examination of energy-conservation practices within domestic settings. Conversely, Xu et al. [27] scrutinize the determinants that impact individual energy-saving conduct. Finally, Wang et al. [15] stress the impact of individual characteristics on the adoption of energy-conservation practices within domestic settings. Thus, the research current extends the TPB with a model of energy saving behaviors. Table 2 shows the individual variables, measurement units and descriptions used in the hypothetical TPB model.Table 2 Description and representation of the variables.

Table 2Variable Name	Unit	Description and representation of the variables	
Dependent Variables	
Energy Saving Behaviors	Impact factor	Energy saving behaviour is controlled by energy saving intentions to reduce energy consumption. In this study, the main categories are habitual energy saving behaviors, constrained energy saving behaviors and interpersonal energy saving behaviors. Path analyses were conducted using a Likert scale with structural equation modelling for this latent variable. Same for the following unit-consistent variablestors for each pathway was made.	
Mediating variables	
Intention of Energy Saving	Impact factor	Intention of Energy Saving to save energy refers to people's drive to save energy that is transformed by the influence of external factors.	
Independent Variables	
Gender	Binary	Gender of university students interviewed.(Male or Female)	
Grade	Multiple-choice	Grade level of university students interviewed.(Freshman
Sophomore、Junior、Senior or Postgraduate)	
Discipline	Multiple-choice	Disciplines studied by university students interviewed.(Art、Economy、Education、Engineering、History、Law、Literature、Management or Medical Science)	
Comfort Preference	Impact factor	Comfort preference is the internal psychological pursuit of people to satisfy their comfort needs through energy consumption behavior.	
Value of Energy Saving	Impact factor	The energy-saving values that people respond to when they form energy-saving behavioural intentions and engage in corresponding energy-saving behaviours	
Subjective Norms	Impact factor	Subjective norms reflect the social pressures that individuals feel when deciding whether or not to engage in a particular behaviour. In this study, the social pressure on students to save energy mainly comes from social morality, the energy-saving system of the university, and the atmosphere created by the people around them in their lives and studies.	
Knowledge of Energy Saving	Impact factor	Knowledge of energy saving, as reflected in this study, is the value of energy efficiency that is reflected in the process of driving the formation of energy efficiency behaviours after people have formed an intention to do so, and the perceived advantages that come from the implementation of energy efficiency behaviours	
Perceived Self-efficacy	Impact factor	Perceived self-efficacy in this study refers to college students' perceptions and implementation of daily energy-saving behaviours and their influence on the energy-saving behaviours of others	

Comfort preference is the intrinsic psychological pursuit of people to enable themselves to satisfy their comfort needs through energy consumption behavior. Sintov et al. [57] argued that comfort significantly influences the energy-saving behaviors (ESBs) of household members. Rouleau et al. [58] also cited that comfort exerts an impact on the ESBs of occupants in buildings. In addition, Xu et al. [59] mentioned that workers with a firm conviction in energy-saving are ready to forgo some level of comfort to conserve energy. This study presents the following subsequent assumptions:H1 Desire for comfort contributes positively to the intention to save energy.

Energy efficiency is a reflection of the outcomes of ESBs and is broadly defined as the values associated with energy conservation. Nguyen et al. [60] suggest that individuals who hold sustainable or eco-friendly beliefs often perceive themselves as environmentally responsible, aligning their actions with their principles. Furthermore, Abrahamse et al. [61] conclude that there exists a significant connection between self-transcendent values (e.g., tradition/security and power/achievement) and household energy consumption. Additionally, there is a positive association between the intention to decrease household energy use and the importance placed on energy conservation. Chan [62] notes that in societies with pronounced cultural and socio-ecological limits, the link between self-transcendent values and pro-environmental actions promoting self-enhancement was tenuous. (e.g., low levels of self-expressive values and economic development). Respondents demonstrating higher levels of altruism and a strong focus on the biosphere exhibit greater commitment to taking action for the benefit of the environment. Furthermore, De Groot et al. [63] discovered that individuals who prioritize egoistic values tend to display less self-determined environmental behavior. The presence of strong self-determined motivation is also crucial in explaining intention when altruism, particularly with regard to biosphere values, serves as a significant predictor of pro-environmental intention. In essence, it can be concluded that different values lead to varying levels of environmentally sustainable behaviors (ESBs). As such, this study puts forth an additional hypothesis:

H2 The value of energy saving exerts a positive effect on the intention to save energy.

Subjective norms pertain to the societal influence and pressure perceived by individuals to conform to a specific behavior. The social pressure on university students to save energy is mainly derived from energy saving norms in school facilities, ESBs of peers, and their knowledge of energy conservation. According to Dolan et al. [64] subjective norms are believed to impact the intention of saving energy. Dixon et al. [65] have a significant influence on ESBs. Furthermore, Chen et al.[66 [][][]explore the energy-saving intention of low-income households in the United States and obtain the conclusion that the influence of subjective norms was beneficial for promoting the inclination to conserve energy. Therefore, this study hypothesizes that:

H3 The intention to save energy is positively influenced by subjective norms.

The comprehension of energy-saving knowledge by individuals pertains to the objective principles of energy conservation as applied in both professional and personal contexts. Chen et al. [67] indicate that domestic users of university building lack knowledge about building energy efficiency and that the majority of building users are unable to fully understand or even partially understand feedback on the energy-saving design and operation of their buildings, which, thus, fails to provide reasonable guidance on their energy-using behavior. Dursun et al. [68] have categorized knowledge about energy saving into subjective and objective forms, demonstrating that objective environmental knowledge can help identify psychological barriers to energy-saving behaviors. However, Kaplowitz et al. [69] have found that despite possessing extensive knowledge about energy conservation, laboratory management and personnel do not necessarily exhibit a positive intention to conserve energy. To sum up, understanding energy conservation typically boosts the motivation to save energy. Therefore, the study proposes the following hypothesis:

H4 Knowledge of energy saving exerts a positive impact on the intention of energy saving.

Self-efficacy is the assumption and judgment of individuals about their behavioral capacity. In this regard, Bandura [70] suggested that the abilities and skills required vary widely across activity areas. Lee et al. [47] have investigated how self-efficacy positively influenced intentions related to energy conservation. Therefore, the research hypothesis is as follows:

H5 Perceived self-efficacy has a positive impact on the intention to save energy.

In relation to the TPB, Ajzen [55] suggests that when control variables related to perception of behavior are taken into account, there is a strong intention to save energy, particularly under partial willpower control. Energy-saving intention represents an individual's preparedness to adopt a specific behavior, reflecting their perceived likelihood of embracing that particular action. The TPB model [55] proposes that Behavioral intent has a notable positive impact on behavior and that factors, for instance, subjective norms, perceptual behavior control and attitude, indirectly influence behavior mainly through behavioral intention. In their study, Rizzi et al. [71] delve into the determinants affecting consumers' willingness findings confirm the impact of energy-saving intention on ESBs. Therefore, the current study presents the assumptions:

H6 Intention of energy saving exerts a positive impact on (a) HESBs, (b) CESBs, and (c) IESBs.

Building on the aforementioned considerations regarding the influence of energy-saving intention and behavioral intention on behavior, the study has constructed a simplified model based on the energy-saving behaviors of university students [24]. This model is grounded in previous research [24] and is depicted in Fig. 1, representing the conceptual framework that will be examined in this paper.Fig. 1 Research theoretical framework for energy-saving behaviours.

Fig. 1

3 Research methods

This study was conducted among college students in in regions of China experiencing hot summers and cold winters. Firstly, TPB was designated as the theoretical energy-saving behavior model to demonstrate the decision-making process of daily energy-saving behavior among college students. Then, corresponding measures were selected to evaluate each variable in the model. Subsequently, appropriate measures were selected to assess each variable within the model. An extensive online survey questionnaire was then designed and administered to the target population in order to gather information and descriptive characteristics of the sample, followed by data analysis including testing for direct and indirect effects as well as diversity analysis. Reliability analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) were utilized in this study, enabling conclusions to be drawn regarding reliability, validity, bias within the general methodology, and factors influencing energy-saving behavior.

3.1 Data collection

For data collection, the study chose to employ the questionnaire previously developed by Wang and colleagues [24] in order to create a formal questionnaire (the completed questionnaire can be accessed at the website: https://www.wjx.cn/vm/YDTrYbS.aspx#). The author sets a limitation in the survey, and respondents could only submit a single response, so that each respondent represents himself. That way, this can avoid sampling bias. The questionnaire had two principal sections. The first section captured participants' demographic details like gender, study field, and academic year. The second section zeroed in on determinants affecting students' energy-saving habits, gauging aspects like comfort preference, subjective norms, energy-saving value and awareness, conservation intention, and perceived self-efficacy. For each indicator in the questionnaire weighting, the respondents were given the following options: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, and 4 = strongly agree.

This questionnaire was distributed to university students in Hangzhou, Jiaxing, Nanchang, Shanghai, and Wuhan, which are typical cities with hot summers and cold winters. These cities have similar climate characteristics, and the university students participating in the survey have similar behavior patterns, which all help to ensure the validity, scientificalness and availability of the questionnaire. The questionnaire period for this paper was from July to August 2022, which lasted approximately 2 months, and 512 valid questionnaires were returned. The sample size adheres to the n/q guideline mandated by SEM, with n representing the case count and q denoting the parameters awaiting estimation. Hair et al. [52] suggests that the ratio value is 10, while Kline et al. [73] suggests that the ratio value is between 5 and 20. The final questionnaire validated the theoretical framework and addresses issues related to the field of energy-saving behaviours among university students. All data were obtained from the popular Chinese professional survey website Wenjuanxing (https://www.wjx.cn).

3.2 Data analyses

Data analyses included descriptive, reliability, and valid factor analyses and assessment of both the immediate and mediated effects. The stability of the sample data will directly influence the stability of the analysis results; thus, the study tested the stability of the scales using Cronbach's alpha coefficient based on the mean correlation between items using SPSS Statistics 25 software.

The study employed latent variable models to investigate the connections among various variables including regression analysis, multiple correlation analysis, factor analysis, and pass-through analyses (multiple regression analysis) [72,74]. SEM is an increasingly popular latent variable model for investigating the relationships between environmental behaviors and influencing factors [21,[75], [76], [77], [78]]. Alternatively, Mplus software can availably integrate mathematical statistics with practical questionnaire research and greatly accelerate the application of latent variable modeling and analysis, which surpasses other modeling software such as Amos and Lisrel. Therefore, this study used the modeling software Mplus for variable reliability and validation factor analyses while testing for general method bias to ensure the availability of the SEM model and enhance its structural suitability. Finally, direct path coefficients were calculated and causal relationships were analyzed.

The nonparametric percentile bootstrap method currently used is more exact and robust than the Sobel test and the causal step method [79,80], which was used in the study to verify the mediation analysis of latent variables.

Wen et al.'s research [81] delves into the intricate dynamics of variable relationships. They reveal that when an independent variable significantly influences an intermediate variable (a) (a) and subsequent significant impact of (a) on the dependent variable (b) suggests a potential mediating effect between the independent and dependent variables (a × b). An important consideration arises when either the independent or dependent variable lacks statistical significance. In such cases, it becomes crucial to examine the 95 % Bootstrap confidence interval of (a × b). If this interval excludes 0 and the direct effect (c') is also insignificant, it implies a full mediating effect. This research offers valuable insights into complex statistical relationships, aiding researchers in understanding these nuanced pathways of influence. These findings offer insights into the interplay between independent and dependent variables. Meanwhile, the direct effect(c') was significant when the mediating effect was partial. Besides, the insignificant mediating effect may be caused when the 95 % Bootstrap confidence interval of (a × b) includes 0 when at least (a) or (b) is not significant.

4 Results and analyses

4.1 Respondent profile

Table 3 presents the basic characteristics of the respondents, demonstrating a reasonable gender ratio and no significant disparity in ratios among different grade groups. These findings serve to mitigate the influence of gender and class factors on the data, thereby ensuring the objectivity of the questionnaire survey. Additionally, the distribution of academic subjects aligns closely with the distribution of high school examinees in 2022.Table 3 Participants’ demographics.

Table 3Data Class	Quantity	Proportion(%)	
Gender	Male	246	48.0	
Female	266	52.0	
Grade	Freshman	129	25.2	
Sophomore	183	35.7	
Junior	127	24.8	
Senior	65	12.7	
Postgraduate	8	1.6	
Discipline	Art	16	3.1	
Economy	53	10.4	
Education	34	6.6	
Engineering	158	30.9	
History	16	3.1	
Law	20	3.9	
Literature	26	5.1	
Management	77	15.0	
Medical	45	8.8	
Science	67	13.1	

4.2 Outliers analysis

During the data collation and inventory process, outliers in the collected counts were discriminated and cleaned using Z-scores, where Z-scores exceeding ±3 were excluded from the dataset(Table 4). In addition, incompletely completed questionnaires were excluded from the dataset. Overall, out of 520 questionnaires, 512 questionnaires were included in this study, and the response rate was 98.46 %.Table 4 Sample data outliers analysis table.

Table 4Main Constructs	Items	N	Max	Min	Mean	1	2	3	4	5	Standard Deviation	ZMAX	
Comfort preference (CP)	CP1	512	1	5	3.44	7.03 %	16.80 %	18.36 %	41.02 %	16.80 %	1.159	−2.103	
CP2	512	1	5	3.51	6.05 %	15.82 %	16.02 %	45.51 %	16.60 %	1.124	−2.230	
CP3	512	1	5	3.49	6.45 %	15.04 %	18.55 %	43.16 %	16.80 %	1.130	−2.203	
Value of energy saving (VES)	VES1	512	1	5	3.90	2.34 %	8.01 %	15.82 %	45.31 %	28.52 %	0.983	−2.947	
VES2	512	1	5	3.70	2.93 %	8.79 %	21.29 %	49.22 %	17.77 %	0.958	−2.819	
VES3	512	1	5	3.79	1.76 %	9.77 %	17.58 %	50.00 %	20.90 %	0.943	−2.954	
VES4	512	1	5	3.72	2.34 %	11.52 %	18.75 %	46.68 %	20.70 %	0.995	−2.734	
VES5	512	1	5	3.83	2.73 %	7.03 %	18.75 %	47.85 %	23.63 %	0.961	−2.942	
Subjective norms (SN)	SN1	512	1	5	3.59	3.71 %	12.89 %	22.85 %	41.41 %	19.14 %	1.052	−2.466	
SN2	512	1	5	3.38	8.59 %	13.87 %	24.61 %	36.33 %	16.60 %	1.168	−2.042	
SN3	512	1	5	3.50	3.13 %	14.65 %	24.61 %	44.14 %	13.48 %	1.001	−2.500	
Knowledge of energy saving (KES)	KES1	512	1	5	2.96	6.45 %	31.05 %	28.91 %	26.95 %	6.64 %	1.051	1.939	
KES2	512	1	5	3.16	5.86 %	25.59 %	26.76 %	30.47 %	11.33 %	1.107	−1.950	
KES3	512	1	5	3.26	5.47 %	22.66 %	26.37 %	31.84 %	13.67 %	1.117	−2.020	
KES4	512	1	5	3.31	5.66 %	19.53 %	26.17 %	34.96 %	13.67 %	1.105	−2.094	
Perceived self-efficacy (PSE)	PSE1	512	1	5	3.39	5.08 %	19.73 %	21.88 %	37.30 %	16.02 %	1.123	−2.132	
PSE2	512	1	5	3.34	3.91 %	22.66 %	25.00 %	32.81 %	15.63 %	1.107	−2.110	
PSE3	512	1	5	3.38	2.54 %	21.29 %	27.93 %	32.62 %	15.63 %	1.062	−2.237	
PSE4	512	1	5	3.45	3.32 %	21.09 %	20.31 %	38.09 %	17.19 %	1.102	−2.221	
Intention of energy saving (IES)	IES1	512	1	5	3.71	4.10 %	11.72 %	19.14 %	39.45 %	25.59 %	1.096	−2.469	
IES2	512	1	5	3.71	3.91 %	9.96 %	22.66 %	38.67 %	24.80 %	1.068	−2.534	
IES3	512	1	5	3.63	3.13 %	15.63 %	20.31 %	37.11 %	23.83 %	1.101	−2.388	
IES4	512	1	5	3.72	3.52 %	12.70 %	19.34 %	37.50 %	26.95 %	1.100	−2.471	
IES5	512	1	5	3.72	3.91 %	12.11 %	17.97 %	40.04 %	25.98 %	1.095	−2.484	
Habitual ESB (HESBs)	HESBs1	512	1	5	3.84	4.69 %	13.09 %	15.82 %	26.17 %	40.23 %	1.218	−2.333	
HESBs2	512	1	5	3.68	4.30 %	11.13 %	25.59 %	30.08 %	28.91 %	1.131	−2.372	
HESBs3	512	1	5	4.01	2.93 %	8.01 %	16.41 %	30.27 %	42.38 %	1.131	−2.780	
Constrained ESBs (CESBs)	CESBs1	512	1	5	3.44	8.01 %	13.87 %	26.76 %	29.10 %	22.27 %	1.205	−2.023	
CESBs2	512	1	5	3.52	5.27 %	12.70 %	27.73 %	33.20 %	21.09 %	1.115	−2.261	
CESBs3	512	1	5	3.40	8.59 %	14.84 %	25.59 %	30.08 %	20.90 %	1.214	−1.976	
Interpersonal ESBs (IESBs)	IESBs1	512	1	5	3.24	9.96 %	17.77 %	27.73 %	26.95 %	17.58 %	1.222	−1.837	
IESBs2	512	1	5	3.39	5.86 %	15.04 %	30.66 %	30.86 %	17.58 %	1.116	−2.144	
IESBs3	512	1	5	3.27	10.16 %	16.21 %	28.13 %	27.93 %	17.58 %	1.218	−1.860	

4.3 Dependability, availability, and common methodological biases

To assess the reliability of the measurement model, a variety of criteria were utilized, including Cronbach's alpha coefficients and composite reliability. Convergent validity was evaluated using the average variance extraction approach, while discriminant validity was assessed through both the Fornell–Larcker criterion and the heterotrait–monotrait (HTMT) ratio. The details regarding convergent validity, discriminant validity, and indicator reliability are provided in Table 5 of the study. It is evident from Table 5 that the Cronbach's alpha coefficient values for each latent variable of the model are >0.73, which indicate that the scale's reliability falls within the acceptable boundaries. Additionally, the overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient for all variables stood at 0.896, surpassing the suggested 0.6 threshold proposed by Robinson et al. [82] These findings demonstrate commendable overall reliability of the scale. The maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method is widely used for parameter estimation method in confirmatory factor analysis [83], The results of the validated factor analysis, which involved a model with 9 factors and 32 items using MLE, demonstrated that the majority of the measured variables produced standardized factor loadings >0.6. Several measured variables with standardized factor loadings >0.45 (0.551) were also acceptable [84]. The component reliability exceeded the threshold of 0.70 [85], further attesting to its strong internal consistency. Convergent validity was assessed using average variance extracted for each structure, all of which yielded AVE values > 0.36, indicating acceptable convergent validity [86,87].Table 5 Dependability and availability measure of correlations, reliability coefficients, and average variance extracted (AVE).

Table 5Main Constructs	Items	Loadings	Cronbach's Alpha	Average variance extracted	Combined reliability	
Comfort preference (CP)	CP1	0.803	0.884	0.719	0.885	
CP2	0.901	
CP3	0.837	
Value of energy saving (VES)	VES1	0.723	0.811	0.466	0.813	
VES2	0.613	
VES3	0.616	
VES4	0.725	
VES5	0.725	
Subjective norms (SN)	SN1	0.676	0.737	0.486	0.739	
SN2	0.717	
SN3	0.698	
Knowledge of energy saving (KES)	KES1	0.617	0.757	0.442	0.759	
KES2	0.693	
KES3	0.739	
KES4	0.601	
Perceived self-efficacy (PSE)	PSE1	0.764	0.890	0.673	0.891	
PSE2	0.763	
PSE3	0.792	
PSE4	0.949	
Intention of energy saving (IES)	IES1	0.755	0.862	0.558	0.863	
IES2	0.744	
IES3	0.679	
IES4	0.754	
IES5	0.798	
Habitual ESB (HESBs)	HESBs1	0.832	0.754	0.528	0.766	
HESBs2	0.551	
HESBs3	0.767	
Constrained ESBs (CESBs)	CESBs1	0.774	0.864	0.699	0.872	
CESBs2	0.999	
CESBs3	0.706	
Interpersonal ESBs (IESBs)	IESBs1	0.642	0.808	0.622	0.826	
IESBs2	0.997	
IESBs3	0.678	

The validity of the study was assessed using the Fornell–Larcker criterion and HTMT ratio. According to the Fornell–Larcker criterion, discriminant validity can be measured using the square root of the AVE (i.e., diagonal values) and should be higher than the highest correlation with other structures (non-diagonal values). Results are presented in Table 6, indicated that the lowest square root value for the nine factors (0.665) surpasses the highest inter-factor correlation coefficient, which stands at 0.523 [74,88,89]. Additionally, we employed the HTMT ratio as another criterion to address potential insensitivity issues introduced by the Fornell–Larcker criterion [90]. Henseler et al. [89] proposed that the HTMT ratio is a more robust and superior method. According to Kline [74], the threshold for HTMT must be < 0.85. The results obtained in this study show that all HTMT values were lower than the conservative threshold of 0.85 (as shown in Table 7). This suggests strong discriminant validity among the factors.Table 6 Measurement of the overall discriminant validity.

Table 6Latent variable	CP	VES	SN	KES	PSE	IES	HESBs	CESBs	IESBs	
CP	0.848									
VES	0.373**	0.683								
SN	0.165**	0.421**	0.697							
KES	0.079	0.094*	0.127**	0.665						
PSE	0.083	0.338**	0.557**	0.119**	0.820					
IES	0.377**	0.523**	0.305**	0.086	0.193**	0.747				
HESBs	0.390**	0.505**	0.233**	0.000	0.172**	0.459**	0.727			
CESBs	0.111*	0.291**	0.354**	−0.002	0.232**	0.221**	0.348**	0.836		
IESBs	0.091*	0.274**	0.408**	0.115**	0.352**	0.213**	0.169**	0.280**	0.789	
Note: ** indicates P < 0.01, * indicates P < 0.05. Diagonal values show the square root of the AVE, whereas off-diagonal values depict Pearson correlations.

Table 7 Ratio between different-trait and same-trait measurements.

Table 7Latent variable	CP	VES	SN	KES	PSE	IES	HESBs	CESBs	IESBs	
CP	–									
VES	0.351	–								
SN	0.050	0.434	–							
KES	0.134	0.243	0.371	–						
PSE	0.001	0.326	0.680	0.279	–					
IES	0.231	0.447	0.171	0.146	0.198	–				
HESBs	0.335	0.546	0.111	0.021	0.024	0.279	–			
CESBs	0.063	0.261	0.447	0.042	0.19	0.108	0.356	–		
IESBs	0.068	0.419	0.770	0.275	0.546	0.357	0.257	0.315	–	

To control or reduce common method variance [91] or common method bias [92], scholars typically adopted program and statistical controls [92,93]. Our study used Harman's simple test for the presence of common method bias in the data [94]. Common method bias were tested for all scale items using the one-way validated Harman's factor analysis. The results demonstrated a good model fit: NORM CHI-SQR = 1.252, RMSEA = 0.022, SRMR = 0.036, GFI = 0.932, AGFI = 0.917 and TLI = 0.983. Therefore, the methods and procedures mentioned above signal a lack of substantial common method bias.

4.4 Structural equation modeling

Various fit indices are used to assess how well structural equation models (SEMs) match up with real-world data, with the chi-squared test being the most commonly used. Table 8 shows the SEM fit indices. Previous research suggests that the chi-squared to degrees of freedom ratio (CHI-SQR/DF) typically falls between 1 and 3 [24]. The Coefficient of Fit Index (CFI) values usually range from 0 to 1, with a threshold of ≥0.9 considered acceptable. However, some researchers argue for CFI values above 0.95 [95], Bentler suggested TLI >0.90 [96], and Henseler recommended that RMSEA and SRMR should be < 0.08 [89]. The model was considered to fit well within the abovementioned ranges. Based on the chi-squared values in Table 8, it can be concluded that the model fits within recommended parameters adequately.Table 8 Revised structural equation model fit indices.

Table 8Fit index	Standards	Study framework	Fit assessment	
CHI-SQR	Smaller is better.	574.645	–	
DF	Larger is better	459	–	
CHI-SQR/DF	3>NORM CHI-SQR>1	1.252	Ideal	
P-VALUE	<0.05	0.0002	Ideal	
CFI	>0.90	0.985	Ideal	
TLI	>0.90	0.983	Ideal	
RMSEA	<0.08	0.022	Ideal	
SRMR	<0.08	0.036	Ideal	

The standardized model fit and structural coefficients are shown in Table 9, the value of energy saving and SN exert a positive influence on constrained ESBs in which SN (0.400) ranks first in terms of importance followed by VES (0.277). The influence of SN and PSE in interpersonal relationships is significant, and that of SN (0.349) on energy-saving behavior is greater than PSE (0.143). Both comfort preference and value of energy saving had a positive influence on IES, and VES (0.489) was greater than CP (0.184). Furthermore, the positive effect of IES on HESBs is particularly significant, with a pathway effect value of 0.255. Nevertheless, our study found that the rest of the paths are non-significant. Therefore, the study concluded that H1, H2, and H6a are encouraged, whereas H3, H4, H5, H6b, and H6c are refused.Table 9 Coefficient estimates of model parameters.

Table 9Regression relationships	approximation	S.E.	Est./S.E.	P	
CP→HESBs	0.196	0.050	3.934	0.000	
VES→HESBs	0.450	0.071	6.328	0.000	
SN→HESBs	−0.087	0.084	−1.039	0.299	
KES→HESBs	−0.095	0.046	−2.038	0.042	
PSE→HESBs	−0.013	0.068	−0.190	0.850	
CP→CESBs	−0.025	0.051	−0.492	0.623	
VES→CESBs	0.227	0.074	3.044	0.002	
SN→CESBs	0.400	0.085	4.679	0.000	
KES→CESBs	−0.067	0.048	−1.410	0.161	
PSE→CESBs	−0.087	0.070	−1.241	0.215	
CP→IESBs	−0.039	0.049	−0.782	0.434	
VES→IESBs	0.060	0.072	0.830	0.406	
SN→IESBs	0.349	0.083	4.222	0.000	
KES→IESBs	0.051	0.046	1.115	0.265	
PSE→IESBs	0.143	0.067	2.138	0.033	
CP→IES	0.184	0.049	3.799	0.000	
VES→IES	0.489	0.059	8.497	0.000	
SN→IES	0.132	0.082	1.599	0.110	
KES→IES	0.024	0.046	0.511	0.609	
PSE→IES	−0.071	0.067	−1.064	0.287	
IES→HESBs	0.255	0.061	4.159	0.000	
IES→CESBs	−0.028	0.064	−0.434	0.664	
IES→IESBs	0.045	0.061	0.738	0.461	

4.5 Mediating effects

Mediation effect analysis is a crucial statistical approach in multivariate research, elucidating the impact of independent variables on dependent variables through mediator variables [97]. Tests for the mediator effect were categorized into coefficient difference and product examinations [97]. However, due to its high original dummy error rate, the study omitted the coefficient difference test [98]. The coefficient product test includes the Sobel test, asymmetric confidence interval test, bootstrap method, and the Bayesian approach. The Sobel test assumed that the mediating effects were distributed using a standard normal distribution, and the confidence intervals obtained were often large, resulting in the Sobel test being statistically inefficient [99]. Meanwhile, the Bayesian approach relied on the selection of appropriate prior distributions for the model parameters [100], and the asymmetric confidence interval test proposed by Keenan et al. used the critical values of confidence limits to obtain approximate results, which were frequently less precise [101]. Thus, the majority of researchers acknowledged that using the bootstrap method for mediation analysis was a better approach [102,103].

Following the mentioned notion, the current study uses the bootstrap method in Mplus software. (self-sampling 2000 times) to analyze the mediating effects. In this case, If the coefficient c 'is not significant, then the mediating effect is considered complete; however, if the regression coefficient c′ is significant, but c′ < c, then it is considered that the mediation effect is partial. Bootstrap test outcomes are detailed in Table 10. The table indicates that in the paths “CP→ IES → HESBs” and “VES → IES → HESBs,” Our analysis reveals significant relationships: the independent variable impacts (a) significantly, (a) influences (b) significantly, and the direct effect (c') is also significant. Bootstrap sampling confirms these findings with 95 % confidence intervals consistently excluding zero. Therefore, power saving intention is partially mediated by two paths, namely, “CP→ IES → HESBs” and “VES → IES→ HESBs.”Table 10 Results of bootstrap test.

Table 10Items	c (Total effect)	a	b	a × b (Mediation effect)	a × b (95 % Bootstrap confidence interval)	c' (Immediate impact)	Summary of findings	
CP→IES→HESBs	0.243	0.184	0.255	0.047	0.025–0.091	0.196	Partial mediation	
VES→IES→HESBs	0.575	0.489	0.255	0.125	0.103–0.281	0.45	Partial mediation	
SN→IES→HESBs	−0.053	0.132	0.255	0.034	−0.002∼0.126	−0.087	Insignificant	
KES→IES→HESBs	−0.089	0.024	0.255	0.006	−0.023∼0.045	−0.095	Insignificant	
PSE→IES→HESBs	−0.031	−0.071	0.255	−0.018	−0.069∼0.011	−0.013	Insignificant	
CP→IES→CESBs	−0.030	0.184	−0.028	−0.005	−0.030∼0.014	−0.025	Insignificant	
VES→IES→CESBs	0.213	0.489	−0.028	−0.014	−0.090∼0.062	0.227	Insignificant	
SN→IES→CESBs	0.396	0.132	−0.028	−0.004	−0.044∼0.011	0.4	Insignificant	
KES→IES→CESBs	−0.068	0.024	−0.028	−0.001	−0.016∼-0.005	−0.067	Insignificant	
PSE→IES→CESBs	−0.085	−0.071	−0.028	0.002	−0.006∼0.025	−0.087	Insignificant	
CP→IES→IESBs	−0.031	0.184	0.045	0.008	−0.009∼0.028	−0.039	Insignificant	
VES→IES→IESBs	0.082	0.489	0.045	0.022	−0.039∼0.093	0.06	Insignificant	
SN→IES→IESBs	0.355	0.132	0.045	0.006	−0.006∼0.040	0.349	Insignificant	
KES→IES→IESBs	0.052	0.024	0.045	0.001	−0.003∼0.017	0.051	Insignificant	
PSE→IES→IESBs	0.140	−0.071	0.045	−0.003	−0.023∼0.003	0.143	Insignificant	

In other words, energy-saving behaviors (ESBs) are not solely shaped by the direct impacts of CP and VES but are also influenced by the mediating effects of IES. It is also influenced by the mediating effect of IES, that is, CP and VES partially act on HESBs through IES. The comprehensive effect of factors that influence HESBs (c) is ranked as “VES > CP.” Fig. 2 illustrates the model for testing the partial mediation effect.Fig. 2 The mediation effect test model.

Fig. 2

4.6 Diagnostic test

Based on the data in Table 11 below, it was determined that there is no evidence of normality and homoscedasticity as the null hypothesis was rejected for all p-values. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is no issue of heteroskedasticity in the variables and that all variables adhere to a normal distribution. Additionally, the model demonstrates both normality and absence of heteroskedasticity.Table 11 The results of diagnostic tests.

Table 11Diagnostic tests	Statistical Value	P-value	
Jarque-Bera test	301.345	0.6784	
White test	1.742	0.1623	
Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey test	1.7646	0.1574	

5 Discussion and policy implications

5.1 Discussion on energy-saving behavior of college students in hot summer and cold winter areas

This study examines the factors that impact the perceived environmental stressors by college students in regions of China characterized by hot summers and cold winters. The findings are subsequently discussed in relation to prior research and the current situation.

5.1.1 Values

Values are key variables that influence human psychology, attitudes, and behaviors. Li et al. [104] identified a notable positive link between students' values and actions. ESBs influenced by energy-saving values can aid in sustaining the ESBs [105]. Zhang et al. found that personal values and knowledge about energy play a pivotal role in determining household energy-conservation actions, highlighting the significance of individual convictions and understanding in advancing sustainable habits. Additionally, research has indicated that the impact of energy-saving values remains consistent across various regions such as Asia, Europe, and the United States [106]. This underscores the pivotal role of values in deciding the adoption of enduring energy-saving practices. Furthermore, fostering a value for energy conservation can enhance university students' awareness of positive energy-saving practices and lead them to incorporate these practices into their daily lives while cultivating enduring habits related to saving energy.

5.1.2 Comfort preference

In addition, comfort preference positively influenced HESBs; the majority of the students believed that the living environment was as important as saving energy and comfortable learning, but they were inclined to sacrifice comfort for the sake of energy conservation and foster beneficial energy-saving routines. The results indicated that the students will acquire positive energy-saving habits if they value energy savinghighly, enabling them to make sacrifices in exchange for a comfortable environment to pursue the value of energy saving.

5.1.3 Knowledge of energy saving

HESBs were evident in terms of adapting work and life performance to sustainable development. Moreover, knowledge of energy saving influenced HESBs according to Haron et al. [107], who confirmed that knowledge was positively related to environmental attitudes, behaviours, and participation. In other words, the more the knowledge acquired about energy saving, the more likely that individuals engage in energy saving. Conversely, the poorer the knowledge about energy saving, the more difficult the development of energy-saving behaviors. Most scholars have neglected the direct link between energy-saving knowledge and HESBs [49]. Extensive environmental education to increase knowledge of energy saving may help to increase awareness of energy conservation, but it does not directly lead to HESBs. Hence, it is also plausible that knowledge about energy conservation solely raises awareness of energy conservation without necessarily resulting in the adoption of energy-saving behaviors (HESBs).

5.1.4 Subjective norms

Subjective norms exerted a greater effect on CESBs than did the value of energy conservation, subjective norms are considered a direct determinant of behavior [108]. However, will and norms do not entirely control human behavior, because it also hinges on external factors like resources, opportunities, and abilities. In this study, the questionnaire reflected that approximately 57.6 % (295/512) of the students perceived that many of their classmates adapted energy-saving and that they were significantly influenced by the people around them in terms of energy-saving behaviors. Although the TPB only partially explained why subjective norms are formed in humans, social psychological theory believed that subjective norms exert a greater impact on behavior than do attitudes on behavior. Generally, if individuals possess a favorable subjective norm, their drive to partake in the behavior intensifies. Additionally, individuals with robust intentions often partake in such behavior when presented with the chance [92]. Therefore, strengthening norms toward energy saving in colleges and universities can be a positive direction for students in developing energy-saving behaviours.

5.1.5 Perceived self-efficacy

Subjective norms and perceived self-efficacy influenced IESBs in which subjective norms exerted a greater impact on IESBs than did perceived self-efficacy, which suggests that the more socially compliant the students, the more likely they are to positively guide the development of energy-saving behaviors in others. In addition, Chinese university students tended to live in group dormitories on campus and participate in group living. As such, students who maintain non-energy-efficient behaviors may be rejected en masse. Other students may consciously hide their non-energy-efficient values with a focus on self-enjoyment. The survey highlighted their self-centered values, showing that the significance of energy conservation and understanding about energy saving didn't notably influence Individual Energy-Saving Behaviors (IESBs). Additionally, the prevalent lack of awareness on energy conservation and inadequate emphasis on the importance of energy saving in Chinese universities might lead many students to view the adoption of Individual Energy-Saving Behaviors (IESBs) as less meaningful.

5.1.6 Intention of saving energy

The intention to save energy partially served as a mediator in the connection between comfort preference and HESBs, as well as between the value attributed to energy conservation and HESBs. Additionally, the intention to save energy was crucial in connecting comfort preference and the value of energy conservation to HESBs. The intention to conserve energy also acted as a mediator between comfort preference and energy-saving value in relation to HESBs. The present study's outcomes align with previous research findings [46,49], further affirming the mediating effect of the intention to conserve energy. In other words, the intention of energy saving is influenced HESBs, CESBs, and helped to convert comfort preference to HESBs and CESBs. However, other scholars [27] argued that intention exerted a finite influence on ESBs.

5.2 Policy implications

According to the abovementioned behavioral causality conclusions and united the features of university students, our current study puts forward policy implications for university administrators for promoting the positive growth of ESBs among students.

5.2.1 Optimize equipment energy management and establish reasonable energy management policies to meet the flexible energy needs of college students and create an external environment that promotes energy conservation

Comfort preference exerts a significant impact on HESBs and is a factor that cannot be overlooked. Thus, the study concluded that university students have a high demand for comfort, which makes it difficult for them to accept energy savings at the expense of comfort [109]. Du [110] found that students perceive that the overheating of the room will moderate energy-saving behavior, such that the arrangement of equipment in existing school environments should be enhanced to accommodate the unique climatic characteristics of the region, experiencing both hot summers and cold winters. Additionally, this arrangement should consider variations in energy demand throughout the year. For instance, indoor air conditioning temperatures should not be set below 26 °C in summer and above 20 °C in winter to align with energy-saving and environmental protection requirements.

Students who experience greater satisfaction with their indoor environment are more inclined to conserve energy and are more likely to engage in energy-saving actions. In response to the comfort needs of students, it is essential to establish an indoor environment that aligns with human comfort standards, including the implementation of humidity and temperature regulators in rooms, reasonably arranged ventilation systems, and lighting systems. Extremely temperatures and humidity levels not only discourage energy-saving behaviors among students but also have a negative impact on their learning efficiency.

5.2.2 Establish energy-saving incentive policies to encourage energy conservation from an institutional perspective

In order to promote the transition of college students towards energy-saving behavior, more effective incentive policies should be considered for college students to reduce carbon emissions. Both material and spiritual rewards will have different motivational effects. Our questionnaire survey demonstrated that 60.94 %(312/512) of the students have willingness to conserve electricity if incentives are given for energy-saving activities. Qalati et al. [111] found that the energy use of participants can be reduced when incentives are adopted. A few universities previously initiated the implementation of incentive systems for energy-efficient dormitories. For example, excellent energy-saving dormitories or groups may be awarded through a review to receive a comprehensive test credit award or other forms of incentives.

5.2.3 Energy saving publicity and education policies should be formulated to strengthen the promotion of carbon reduction and energy saving

At present, the majority of energy-saving campaigns and educational efforts by universities are largely in textual format, which has limited impact on fostering energy-saving habits in students. From the survey results, 333 of the 512 students believe that institutions should intensify energy-saving advocacy, and 64.45 % (330/512) expressing a willingness to participate in related events. Consequently, it is imperative for universities to enhance their advocacy and education efforts pertaining to energy conservation, organize relevant activities, and offer courses on energy management for sustainable development.

Colleges should focus on teaching knowledge about systematic energy saving to students. Universities that can do so can offer courses on energy saving management such as environmental management, environmental economics, resource economics, development economics, and development sociology.

Engaging in a variety of energy-saving activities on campus and participating in related social initiatives can inspire students to conduct surveys and field studies on campus energy conservation. Additionally, they can mobilize youth volunteers to collaborate with the community in organizing promotional and educational events. Through active involvement in these social activities, students are motivated to acquire knowledge about energy conservation, thereby gaining an understanding of its significance and value. This will help them grasp the importance and value of energy saving and become effective contributors to an energy-efficient campus. The main force behind building an “energy efficient” campus.

Using a wide range of resources to promote relevant campaigns should fully utilize the modern means of publicity, such as school newspapers, billboards, radio, and websites, to promote national energy policies and knowledge about energy saving. For example, the current study established a dedicated section on university forums aimed at guiding students towards adopting sustainable energy-saving practices.

6 Conclusion

This study focused on university students residing in the region of China known for its hot summers and cold winters. Its objective was to explore the determinants of their energy-saving actions, employing the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) framework within the context of their current environment. The factors considered are comfort preference, values of energy saving, subjective norms, knowledge of energy saving, and perceived self-efficacy. Drawing from a comprehensive literature review and previous research, a simplified model of Energy-Saving Behaviors (ESBs) for university students was formulated and influencing factors were defined. A questionnaire survey is conducted on universities in hot summer and cold winter regions of China, aiming to understand the important factors that affect students' campus energy-saving behaviors and behavioral intentions. From July to August 2022, 512 survey responses were collected from various university campuses situated in the hot summer-cold winter weather zone of China. The survey included questions on subjective norms, understanding of energy conservation, and the importance of saving energy. Through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis, paths of influence regarding factors impacting energy-saving behaviors were examined. The primary conclusions can be outlined as follows.(1) Comfort preference, values of energy saving, subjective norms, knowledge of energy saving, and perceived self-efficacy exerted different effects on ESBs. In particular, the values related to energy conservation and subjective norms emerge as significant drivers. Values associated with energy conservation and subjective norms displayed positive effects on CESBs. Additionally, values of energy saving positively influenced HESBs, while subjective norms had a positive impact on IESBs.

(2) The influencing factors of ESBs of college students showed different influences under different energy-saving behaviors. The intention of energy saving played a partial intermediary effect in the path of “comfort preference → intention of energy saving → HESBs” and “values of energy saving → intention of energy saving → HESBs”, whereas the impact on CESBs and IESBs is not clearly evident.

(3) ESBs are influenced not only by the direct effects of comfort preference and value of energy saving but also by the mediating effects of intention to conserve energy.

This research focus on examining the varying impacts of factors affecting the ESBs of university students, which enriches the research on the energy-saving behaviors of this group. At the same time, based on the research results, corresponding policy recommendations have been proposed, such as suggesting that universities and government management departments should optimize equipment energy management and designate reasonable energy management policies to meet the flexible energy needs of college students, establish energy-saving incentive policies, encourage energy conservation from an institutional perspective, formulate energy-saving publicity and education policies, and strengthen the promotion of carbon reduction and energy conservation. The research results can help college administrators in formulate develop effective plans for energy management and provide theoretical references for creating sustainable campuses.

7 Limitations and perspectives

This study has its limitations that should be addressed in the future research. The first pertains to the areas in which the questionnaire is distributed. The effective sample of the questionnaire is 512. While this study includes a notable array of provinces and major cities situated in China's region characterized by hot summers and cold winters, it is essential to note that these areas may not fully represent all similar regions. Therefore, a deficiency is noted in regional distribution. In future studies, two potential avenues for addressing this limitation are identified. Firstly, there is a need for an increased number of data samples from cities located in regions characterized by hot summers and cold winters in order to enhance the generalizability of the findings. Secondly, it is essential to further categorize different climatic zones based on the indoor thermal comfort requirements of various regions within these hot-summer and cold-winter areas, thus enabling more comprehensive investigations. Additionally, consideration should be given to the demographic composition of the surveyed population; while university students from regions with hot summers and cold winters were specifically targeted for this study, it is possible that some individuals may originate from outside of these climatic zones. As such, they will be influenced by the living habits and characteristics of their regions, which could lead to certain deviations in the results. It means that different people from different provinces in China have been influenced by a specific cultural background and they couldn't change their energy saving customs immediately. Future studies need to conduct in-depth surveys and increase in-depth one-on-one interviews with individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds in order to thoroughly investigate the variations in energy-saving behaviors and their impact on energy consumption across cultures. This will contribute to enhancing the findings can be extrapolated to similar climate zones in the future, such as those with hot summers and mild winters, thereby promoting energy conservation and emission reduction among college students.

Data availability statement

Data will be made available on request.

Ethics statement

Approval by an ethics committee was not required for this study as per applicable institutional and national guidelines and regulations. That is, why we cannot provide a formal approval by the institutional ethics committee. Participating students fill out the questionnaire anonymously and without privacy concerns. If students did not want to participate, they could abandon filling out the questionnaire. All participating students expressed their willingness to participate in this activity.

Funding

This work was supported by Jiaxing Municipal Science and Technology Plan Project(NO: 2023AD31074 ), The Open Foundation for Key Laboratory of Clean Energy and Carbon Neutrality of Zhejiang Province(NO: 204022023002A ), National College Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program Project (202410354055 ), Jiaxing University College Student Science and Technology Training (SRT) Project(NO: 8517231339 , 8517231343 , 8517231347 ).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jiasheng Li: Writing – original draft, Software, Investigation, Data curation. Yinxin Zeng: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Formal analysis. Zhipan Gu: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Hongyao Chen: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation. Xiao Chen: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation. Dongjin Zou: Investigation, Data curation. Yudie Liu: Resources, Funding acquisition. Liyuan Deng: Writing – original draft.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:Multimedia component 1

Multimedia component 1

Appendix A Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36995.
==== Refs
References

1 Paramati S.R. Shahzad U. Doğan B. The role of environmental technology for energy demand and energy efficiency: evidence from OECD countries Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 153 2022 111735 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111735
2 Chen L. Matloob S. Sunlei Y. Qalati S.A. Raza A. Limón M.L.S. A moderated–mediated model for eco-conscious consumer behavior Sustainability 15 2 2023 897 10.3390/su15020897
3 Ruan Y. Liang Z. Qian F. Operation strategy optimization of combined cooling, heating, and power systems with energy storage and renewable energy based on deep reinforcement learning J. Build. Eng. 65 2023 105682 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105682
4 Guan X. Guo S. Xiong J. Energy-related CO2 emissions of urban and rural residential buildings in China: a provincial analysis based on end-use activities J. Build. Eng. 64 2023 105686 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105686
5 Deng Y. Gou Z. Gui X. Energy consumption characteristics and influential use behaviors in university dormitory buildings in China's hot summer-cold winter climate region J. Build. Eng. 33 2021 101870 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101870
6 Khalil M. Mcgough A.S. Pourmirza Z. Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Statistical Analysis for forecasting building energy consumption — a systematic review Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 115 2022 105287 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105287
7 Qin H. Pan W. Energy use of subtropical high-rise public residential buildings and impacts of energy saving measures J. Clean. Prod. 254 2020 120041 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120041
8 Sun K. Hong T. A framework for quantifying the impact of occupant behavior on energy savings of energy conservation measures Energy Build. 146 2017 383 396 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.065
9 Chen X. Gou Z. Bridging the knowledge gap between energy-saving intentions and behaviours of young people in residential buildings J. Build. Eng. 57 2022 104932 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104932
10 Trotta G. Factors affecting energy-saving behaviours and energy efficiency investments in British households Energy Pol. 114 2018 529 539 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.042
11 Liu X. Wang Q. Wei H.-H. Psychological and demographic factors affecting household energy-saving intentions: a TPB-based study in Northwest China 12 3 2020 10.3390/su12030836
12 Zhang Y. Bai X. Mills F.P. Examining the attitude-behavior gap in residential energy use: empirical evidence from a large-scale survey in Beijing, China J. Clean. Prod. 295 2021 126510 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126510
13 Thomas R.E.W. Teel T. Bruyere B. Metrics and outcomes of conservation education: a quarter century of lessons learned Environ. Educ. Res. 25 2 2019 172 192 10.1080/13504622.2018.1450849
14 Hansmann R. Laurenti R. Mehdi T. Determinants of pro-environmental behavior: a comparison of university students and staff from diverse faculties at a Swiss University J. Clean. Prod. 268 2020 121864 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121864
15 Wang Q.-C. Chang R. Xu Q. The impact of personality traits on household energy conservation behavioral intentions – an empirical study based on theory of planned behavior in Xi'an Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 43 2021 100949 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100949
16 Wang S. Wang J. Ru X. Understanding employee's electricity conservation behavior in workplace: do normative, emotional and habitual factors matter? J. Clean. Prod. 215 2019 1070 1077 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.173
17 Ateş H. Merging theory of planned behavior and value identity personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors Sustain. Prod. Consum. 24 2020 169 180 10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.006
18 Song Y. Zhao C. Zhang M. Does haze pollution promote the consumption of energy-saving appliances in China? An empirical study based on norm activation model Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 145 2019 220 229 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.041
19 Bautista R.A. Green behavior and generation: a multi-group analysis using structural equation modeling Asia-Pacific Social Science Review 19 1 2019 1
20 Finlay J. Massey J. Eco‐campus: applying the ecocity model to develop green university and college campuses Int. J. Sustain. High Educ. 13 2 2012 150 165 10.1108/14676371211211836
21 Yang R. Yue C. Li J. The Influence of Information Intervention Cognition on College Students’ Energy-Saving Behavior Intentions 17 5 2020 10.3390/ijerph17051659 https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1659
22 Calderon A. Massification of Higher Education Revisited 2018 RMIT University Melbourne
23 Ge J. Wu J. Chen S. Energy efficiency optimization strategies for university research buildings with hot summer and cold winter climate of China based on the adaptive thermal comfort J. Build. Eng. 18 2018 321 330 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.022
24 Wang J. Yi F. Zhong Z. Diversity and causality of university students' energy-conservation behavior: evidence in hot summer and warm winter area of China J. Clean. Prod. 326 2021 129352 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129352
25 Wang B. Wang X. Guo D. Analysis of factors influencing residents' habitual energy-saving behaviour based on NAM and TPB models: egoism or altruism? Energy Pol. 116 2018 68 77 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.055
26 Liu X. Wang Q.-C. Jian I.Y. Are you an energy saver at home? The personality insights of household energy conservation behaviors based on theory of planned behavior Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 174 2021 105823 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105823
27 Xu X. Xiao B. Li C.Z. Analysis of critical factors and their interactions influencing individual's energy conservation behavior in the workplace: a case study in China J. Clean. Prod. 286 2021 124955 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124955
28 Du J. Pan W. Gender differences in reasoning energy-saving behaviors of university students Energy Build. 275 2022 112458 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112458
29 Schulz P. Nicolai S. Tomczyk S. Gender and socioeconomic influences on ten pro-environmental behavior intentions: a German comparative study 16 7 2024 10.3390/su16072816
30 Saleem S. Zhang Y. Impact of knowledge and trust on households' solar energy consumption behavior: do social influence and gender matter? Energy 293 2024 130719 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130719
31 Shrestha B. Tiwari S.R. Bajracharya S.B. Review on the importance of gender perspective in household energy-saving behavior and energy transition for sustainability 14 22 2021 10.3390/en14227571
32 Fan M. Khalique A. Qalati S.A. Antecedents of sustainable e-waste disposal behavior: the moderating role of gender Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 29 14 2022 20878 20891 10.1007/s11356-021-17275-y
33 Piao X. Managi S. Household energy-saving behavior, its consumption, and life satisfaction in 37 countries Sci. Rep. 13 1 2023 1382 10.1038/s41598-023-28368-8 36697440
34 Le-Anh T. Nguyen M.D. Nguyen T.T. Energy saving intention and behavior under behavioral reasoning perspectives Energy Efficiency 16 2 2023 8 10.1007/s12053-023-10092-x
35 Aziz N. Raza A. Sui H. Empowering women for embracing energy-efficient appliances: unraveling factors and driving change in Pakistan's residential sector Appl. Energy 353 2024 122156 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122156
36 Xing M. Luo X. Liu X. HOW different types of knowledge affect the energy-saving intention of college students—evidence from eye-tracking experiments Journal of Green Building 2024 10.3992/jgb.19.1.307
37 Qalati S.A. Qureshi N.A. Ostic D. An extension of the theory of planned behavior to understand factors influencing Pakistani households' energy-saving intentions and behavior: a mediated–moderated model Energy Efficiency 15 6 2022 40 10.1007/s12053-022-10050-z 35966953
38 Kurokawa H. Igei K. Kitsuki A. Improvement impact of nudges incorporated in environmental education on students' environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors J. Environ. Manag. 325 2023 116612 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116612
39 Mansoor M. Wijaksana T.I. Predictors of pro-environmental behavior: moderating role of knowledge sharing and mediatory role of perceived environmental responsibility J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 66 5 2023 1089 1107 10.1080/09640568.2021.2016380
40 Yang Y.-R. Zuo J. Pan M. Analysis of stakeholder-associated factors and their interactions in energy conservation behaviour of occupants: evidence from network analysis Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024 10.1007/s10668-024-04782-4
41 Babatunde K.A. Wakimin N.F. Zakaria S.H.B. Determinants of sustainable energy saving behavior among university students in Malaysia: a case study of Management & Science University (MSU) Inf. Manag. Bus. Rev. 15 3 2023 253 264
42 Rasool F. Zuberi N.A. Siddiqui N.U. Using the theory of plan behavior and norm activation model to understand individual energy conservation behavior in Karachi, Pakistan International Journal of Economic and Environmental Geology 10 1 2019 93 99 10.46660/ijeeg.Vol10.Iss1.2019.223
43 Boca G.D. SaraçLı S. Environmental education and student's perception, for sustainability Sustainability 11 6 2019 1553 10.3390/su11061553
44 PaçO A. Lavrador T. Environmental knowledge and attitudes and behaviours towards energy consumption J. Environ. Manag. 197 2017 384 392 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.100
45 Janmaimool P. Chontanawat J. Do university students base decisions to engage in sustainable energy behaviors on affective or cognitive attitudes? 13 19 2021 10.3390/su131910883
46 Levine D.S. Strube M.J. Environmental attitudes, knowledge, intentions and behaviors among college students J. Soc. Psychol. 152 3 2012 308 326 10.1080/00224545.2011.604363 22558826
47 Lee J.W.C. Tanusia A. Energy conservation behavioural intention: attitudes, subjective norm and self-efficacy IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 40 1 2016 012087 10.1088/1755-1315/40/1/012087
48 Wang Y. Zhang W. A study about the impact of energy saving climate on college students' energy saving behavior: based on analysis using the hierarchical linear model J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 66 14 2023 2943 2961 10.1080/09640568.2022.2093172
49 Alomari M.M. El-Kanj H. Topal A. Energy conservation behavior of university occupants in Kuwait: a multigroup analysis Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 52 2022 102198 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102198
50 Liu N. Luo X. Liu X. Impacts of normative information on college students' energy-saving intentions and behaviors in the dormitory Energy and Built Environment 2023 10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.12.001
51 Heib S. Hildebrand J. Kortsch T. Energy saving behavior in university organizations: the value of norm constructions in a “rational choice” action model Front. Psychol. 14 2023 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1082061
52 Wang X. Lin B. Managing the energy-saving of college students J. Global Inf. Manag. 32 2024 1 33 10.4018/JGIM.339238
53 Duong C.D. Using a unified model of TPB, NAM and SOBC to understand students' energy-saving behaviors: moderation role of group-level factors and media publicity Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 18 1 2024 71 93 10.1108/IJESM-09-2022-0017
54 Heib S, Kortsch T, Hildebrand J. A question of norms and control—factors shaping sustainable energy behavior: a study among various university stakeholders. Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisation.
55 Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 2 1991 179 211 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
56 Fishbein M. Ajzen I. Theory of reasoned action/Theory of planned behavior. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior An Introduction to Theory and Research 1980
57 Sintov N.D. White L.V. Walpole H. Thermostat wars? The roles of gender and thermal comfort negotiations in household energy use behavior PLoS One 14 11 2019 e0224198 10.1371/journal.pone.0224198
58 Rouleau J. Gosselin L. Blanchet P. Robustness of energy consumption and comfort in high-performance residential building with respect to occupant behavior Energy 188 2019 115978 10.1016/j.energy.2019.115978
59 Xu X. Maki A. Chen C.-F. Investigating willingness to save energy and communication about energy use in the American workplace with the attitude-behavior-context model Energy Res. Social Sci. 32 2017 13 22 10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.011
60 Nguyen T.N. Lobo A. Greenland S. Pro-environmental purchase behaviour: the role of consumers' biospheric values J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 33 2016 98 108 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.010
61 Abrahamse W. Steg L. Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: the role of psychological and socio-demographic variables Hum. Ecol. Rev. 18 1 2011 30 40
62 Chan H.-W. When do values promote pro-environmental behaviors? Multilevel evidence on the self-expression hypothesis J. Environ. Psychol. 71 2020 101361 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101361
63 De Groot J.I.M. Steg L. Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions J. Environ. Psychol. 30 4 2010 368 378 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002
64 Dolan P. Metcalfe R. Neighbors, Knowledge, and Nuggets: Two Natural Field Experiments on the Role of Incentives on Energy Conservation 2015 Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics Working Paper 2589269 10.2139/ssrn.2589269
65 Dixon G.N. Deline M.B. Mccomas K. Saving energy at the workplace: the salience of behavioral antecedents and sense of community Energy Res. Social Sci. 6 2015 121 127 10.1016/j.erss.2015.01.004
66 Chen C.-F. Xu X. Day J.K. Thermal comfort or money saving? Exploring intentions to conserve energy among low-income households in the United States Energy Res. Social Sci. 26 2017 61 71 10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.009
67 Chen S. Wang Z. Liao H. Energy use behavior and its causes in campus buildings at home and abroad Journal of Building Energy Efficiency 42 11 2014 64 67 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7237.2014.11.25
68 Dursun İ. Psychological barriers to environmentally responsible consumption//ALTINBASAK-FARINA I, BURNAZ S. Ethics Social Responsibility and Sustainability in Marketing 2019 Springer Singapore Singapore 103 128
69 Kaplowitz M.D. Thorp L. Coleman K. Energy conservation attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors in science laboratories Energy Pol. 50 2012 581 591 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.060
70 Bandura A. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning Educ. Psychol. 28 2 1993 117 148 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
71 Rizzi F. Annunziata E. Contini M. On the effect of exposure to information and self-benefit appeals on consumer's intention to perform pro-environmental behaviours: a focus on energy conservation behaviours J. Clean. Prod. 270 2020 122039 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122039
72 Hair J.R.J.F. Hult G.T.M. Ringle C.M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) 2021 Sage publications
73 Kline R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling 2015 Guilford publications
74 Hair J.F. Sarstedt M. Ringle C.M. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research J. Acad. Market. Sci. 40 3 2012 414 433 10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
75 Wahab M A.B. Relationships between religious work values, sustainable work behaviours and sustainable energy consumptions Manag. Decis. 55 9 2017 1854 1867 10.1108/MD-01-2017-0039
76 Estiri H. The impacts of household behaviors and housing choice on residential energy consumption 2014 10.1007/978-981-13-7924-6_6 [D]
77 Zhang Y. Wang Z. Zhou G. Determinants and implications of employee electricity saving habit: an empirical study in China Appl. Energy 112 2013 1529 1535 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.006
78 Mo Y. Occupant Behavior Prediction Model Based on Energy Consumption Using Machine Learning Approaches 2018 Michigan State University
79 Williams J. Mackinnon D.P. Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models Struct. Equ. Model.: A Multidiscip. J. 15 1 2008 23 51 10.1080/10705510701758166
80 Mackinnon D.P. Fairchild A.J. Fritz M.S. Mediation analysis Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58 2007 593 614 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 16968208
81 Zhonglin W. Baojuan Y. Analyses of mediating effects: the development of methods and models Adv. Psychol. Sci. 22 5 2014 731 745 10.3724/sp.J.1042.2014.00731
82 Robinson J.P. Shaver P.R. Wrightsman L.S. Criteria for scale selection and evaluation Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes 1 1991 1 16
83 Nejati M. Farsi A. Moteshareie E. The Persian irrational performance beliefs inventory (iPBI-Persian): translation, confirmatory factor analysis, and test–retest reliability, in Iranian athletes J. Ration. Emot. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 40 2 2022 191 205 10.1007/s10942-021-00395-2
84 Le C. Guttersrud Ø. SøRENSEN K. Developing the HLS19-YP12 for measuring health literacy in young people: a latent trait analysis using Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis BMC Health Serv. Res. 22 1 2022 1485 10.1186/s12913-022-08831-4 36474283
85 Devellis R.F. Thorpe C.T. Scale Development: Theory and Applications 2021 Sage publications
86 JöRESKOG K. Modeling development: using covariance structure models in longitudinal research Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. 5 1 1996 8 10 10.1007/BF00538536
87 Barr S. Gilg A.W. A conceptual framework for understanding and analyzing attitudes towards environmental behaviour Geogr. Ann. Ser. B Hum. Geogr. 89 4 2007 361 379 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00266.x
88 METHODOLOGICAL RESEARCH ON MEDIATION EFFECTS IN CHINA'S MAINLANDMALHOTRA NHall J. Shaw M. Marketing Research: an Applied Orientation 2006 Pearson Education Australia
89 Henseler J. Ringle C.M. Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling J. Acad. Market. Sci. 43 1 2015 115 135 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
90 Kabir I. Abdullahi Y.A. Naqshbandi M.M. Measuring entrepreneurial orientation and institutional theory for informal enterprises: scale validation Qual. Quantity 2022 10.1007/s11135-022-01357-1
91 Kaltsonoudi K. Tsigilis N. Karteroliotis K. Critical review of the literature and current tendencies of the common method variance in sport management research Meas. Phys. Educ. Exerc. Sci. 26 2 2022 103 115 10.1080/1091367X.2021.1949322
92 Kock F. Berbekova A. Assaf A.G. Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: detection, prevention and control Tourism Manag. 86 2021 104330 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330
93 Podsakoff P.M. Mackenzie S.B. Lee J.-Y. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies J. Appl. Psychol. 88 5 2003 879 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 14516251
94 Podsakoff P.M. Organ D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects J. Manag. 12 4 1986 531 544 10.1177/014920638601200408
95 Tehranchi A. Neshat Doost H.T. Amiri S. The role of character strengths in depression: a structural equation model Front. Psychol. 9 2018 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01609
96 Bentler P.M. Bonett D.G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures Psychol. Bull. 88 1980 588 606 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
97 Liu H. Yuan K.-H. Wen Z. Two-level moderated mediation models with single-level data and new measures of effect sizes Behav. Res. Methods 54 2 2022 574 596 10.3758/s13428-021-01578-6 34327674
98 Serang S. Jacobucci R. Exploratory mediation analysis of dichotomous outcomes via regularization Multivariate Behav. Res. 55 1 2020 69 86 10.1080/00273171.2019.1608145 31066588
99 Mackinnon D.P. Lockwood C.M. Hoffman J.M. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects Psychol. Methods 7 1 2002 83 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83 11928892
100 Song X.-Y. Pan D. Liu P.-F. Bayesian analysis of transformation latent variable models with multivariate censored data Stat. Methods Med. Res. 25 5 2016 2337 2358 10.1177/0962280214522786 24535555
101 Pituch K.A. Whittaker T.A. Stapleton L.M. A comparison of methods to test for mediation in multisite experiments Multivariate Behav. Res. 40 1 2005 1 23 10.1207/s15327906mbr4001_1 26822271
102 Rijnhart J.J.M. Lamp S.J. Valente M.J. Mediation analysis methods used in observational research: a scoping review and recommendations BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 21 1 2021 226 10.1186/s12874-021-01426-3 34689754
103 Alfons A. Ateş N.Y. Groenen P.J. A robust bootstrap test for mediation analysis Organ. Res. Methods 25 3 2022 591 617 10.1177/1094428121999096
104 Li J. Ernst J. Exploring value orientations toward the human–nature relationship: a comparison of urban youth in Minnesota, USA and Guangdong, China Environ. Educ. Res. 21 4 2015 556 585 10.1080/13504622.2014.910499
105 Rokeach M. The Nature of Human Values 1973 Free press
106 Steg L. De Groot J.I.M. Environmental Values. The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology 2012 Oxford University Press 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0005
107 Haron S.A. Paim L. Yahaya N. Towards sustainable consumption: an examination of environmental knowledge among Malaysians Int. J. Consum. Stud. 29 5 2005 426 436 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00460.x
108 Shi D. Wang L. Wang Z. What affects individual energy conservation behavior: personal habits, external conditions or values? An empirical study based on a survey of college students Energy Pol. 128 2019 150 161 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.061
109 Hwang R.-L. Cheng M.-J. Lin T.-P. Thermal perceptions, general adaptation methods and occupant's idea about the trade-off between thermal comfort and energy saving in hot–humid regions Build. Environ. 44 6 2009 1128 1134 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.08.001
110 Du J. Pan W. Examining energy saving behaviors in student dormitories using an expanded theory of planned behavior Habitat Int. 107 2021 102308 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102308
111 Qalati S.A. Barbosa B. Ibrahim B. Factors influencing employees' eco-friendly innovation capabilities and behavior: the role of green culture and employees' motivations Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023 10.1007/s10668-023-03982-8
