
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

72141
10.1038/s41598-024-72141-4
Article
Quantitative separation of CEST effect by Rex-line-fit analysis of Z-spectra
Xiao Gang 1
Zhang Xiao-Lei 2
Wang Si-Qi 3
Lai Shi-Xin 3
Nie Ting-Ting 4
Chen Yao-Wen 3
Zhuang Cai-Yu 2
Yan Gen gyan@stu.edu.cn

5
Wu Ren-Hua cjr.wurenhua@vip.163.com

2
1 https://ror.org/05tqaz865 grid.411979.3 0000 0004 1790 3396 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hanshan Normal University, Chaozhou, 521041 China
2 https://ror.org/035rs9v13 grid.452836.e 0000 0004 1798 1271 Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041 China
3 https://ror.org/01a099706 grid.263451.7 0000 0000 9927 110X College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063 China
4 grid.33199.31 0000 0004 0368 7223 Department of Radiology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430079 China
5 https://ror.org/02j5n9e16 0000 0004 9337 6655 Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, 361021 China
14 9 2024
14 9 2024
2024
14 2147115 1 2024
4 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
The process of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is quantified by evaluating a Z-spectra, where CEST signal quantification and Z-spectra fitting have been widely used to distinguish the contributions from multiple origins. Based on the exchange-dependent relaxation rate in the rotating frame (Rex), this paper introduces an additional pathway to quantitative separation of CEST effect. The proposed Rex-line-fit method is solved by a multi-pool model and presents the advantage of only being dependent of the specific parameters (solute concentration, solute‐water exchange rate, solute transverse relaxation, and irradiation power). Herein we show that both solute‐water exchange rate and solute concentration monotonously vary with Rex for Amide, Guanidino, NOE and MT, which has the potential to assist in solving quantitative separation of CEST effect. Furthermore, we achieve Rex imaging of Amide, Guanidino, NOE and MT, which may provide direct insight into the dependency of measurable CEST effects on underlying parameters such as the exchange rate and solute concentration, as well as the solute transverse relaxation.

Keywords

Chemical exchange saturation transfer
Quantitative separation
Rex-line-fit
Z-spectra
Subject terms

Medical research
Molecular medicine
Mathematics and computing
Medical Health Science and Technology Project of Shantou2022-88-16 Zhang Xiao-Lei http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809 National Natural Science Foundation of China 82020108016 Wu Ren-Hua issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a new contrast enhancement technique that indirectly measures molecules with exchangeable protons and exchange-related properties, providing high detection sensitivity1–4. In practice, the saturation transfer effects of CEST-MRI are often assessed and quantified using a Z-spectra where the water signal is plotted as a function of the applied saturation frequency. For in vivo CEST-MRI, proper parameter quantifications demand careful measurement of the CEST effects (uncontaminated and with sufficient SNR) such as solute concentration and solute‐water exchange rate, thus rendering quantitative CEST a challenging task5.

Theoretically, the CEST parameter quantification through Z-spectra fitting demonstrated by Bloch-McConnell (BM) equations could provide a feasible approach, and yet there are the common problems of slow operation speed and converging to local optimal solution. Nevertheless, scholars spent their efforts and carried on studies of CEST quantification in another way. The symmetric magnetization transfer ratio (MTRasym) that calculated from a Z-spectra is the most used CEST quantification method6–8. However, MTRasym is confounded by several types of contamination, including direct saturation (DS), semisolid macromolecular magnetization transfer (MT) and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE)9,10.

To further boost CEST specificity, Z-spectra fitting has been successfully applied to differentiate the contributions from multiple origins11, such as multiple‐pool Lorentzian fit12–14, the Lorentzian difference (LD) analysis15,16, and three‐point method11,12. For a specific solute along with overlapping signals from nearby pools, the LD analysis that employs a single Lorentzian line may not provide an accurate reference signal10,16. The same problem would still occur for a three‐point method that relies on two nearby signals as a reference. The multiple‐pool Lorentzian fit strongly relies on assumption that each CEST signal can be approximated as a Lorentzian lineshape17.

Recent advancements in the quantification methods of CEST and NOE techniques have significantly improved their application in biomedical imaging, particularly in the context of brain tumors detection18–22. For example, Glang et al. proposed a deep neural network with uncertainty quantification that can efficiently and accurately predict Lorentzian parameters from CEST MRI spectra, providing fast and reliable CEST contrast image reconstruction while indicating prediction trustworthiness18. Cui et al. proposed a new method termed as 2π-CEST to reduce the contribution from APT in detecting NOE, offering a more accurate strategy than the conventional asymmetric analysis20. The study concludes that NOE (− 3.5 ppm) serves as a highly sensitive MRI contrast for imaging membrane lipids in the brain, with lipids being the primary contributor to NOE (− 3.5 ppm) signals, rather than proteins, explaining variations in signals between tumors, gray matter, and white matter21.

Theoretically, the CEST specificity through Z-spectra rely on the pool size, exchange rate and relaxation time, as described by BM equations. Particularly, the exchange-dependent relaxation rate in the rotating frame (Rex) that solved from the BM equations by an eigenspace approach, operates independently of non‐specific tissue parameters and depends on specific parameters (solute concentration, solute‐water exchange rate, solute transverse relaxation and irradiation power), therefore it is able to make the CEST more specific2,4,16.

In this paper, a voxel-wise Rex-line-fit method is developed to improve the reliability of Z-spectra fitting and investigate the potential of quantitative separation (Fig. 1), in which the simulation of a 5-pool model is used to complement the program capabilities. Our study first elucidates the relationship between Rex and parameters such as solute concentration, solute‐water exchange rate and T2,s. Then the Rex imaging of Amide, NOE (− 3.5 ppm), Guanidino and MT is achieved by our method. Finally, we apply the Rex-line-fit to study CEST effect in a brain tumor model, and the performance of this method in fitting quality is evaluated.Fig. 1 Flow chart of data processing steps of Rex based approach.

Materials and methods

Exchange-dependent relaxation rate in the rotating frame (Rex)

The resulting solution for the Z-spectra can be described by the monoexponential decay of the z-magnetization as a function of time with the rate R1ρ21 Z(Δω,tsat)=PzeffPzZi-Zss(Δω)e-R1ρ(Δω)tsat+Zss(Δω)

where Pzeff is the projection factor on z-axis of the effective frame, tsat is saturation time.

In the case of steady-state, the resulting solution for the Z-spectra at each offset Δω simplifies to23,242 1Zss(Δω)=1cos2θR1wR1ρ(Δω)=1cos2θR1w(Reff(Δω)+Rex.1(Δω)+Rex.2(Δω)+⋯+Rex.n(Δω))

where Zss is the steady-state condition,R1w denotes the longitudinal relaxation rate of water, and θ=tan-1ω1ω1ΔωΔω where ω1=γB1 is the amplitude of the RF field. The Reff which describes the relaxation of free water in the rotating frame can be approximated by3 Reff(Δω)=R1,wcos2(θ)+R2,wsin2(θ)

Further, the Rex at a particular off-resonant frequency Δω for a general exchanging pool i is24 Rex(fi,ki,R2,i)=fikiδωi2ω12+Δω2⏟a - peakω12Γi2Γi244+Δωi2⏟b - peak⏟ki- term+fiR2,iω12Γi2Γi244+Δωi2⏟R2,i- term+fikisin2θR2,i(R2,i+ki)Γi2Γi244+Δωi2⏟corss - term

where fi is a fraction of the total proton for the ith pool,ki is its exchange rate with water in Hz,R2,i is its transversal relaxation rate,δωi is its frequency offset in Hz,Δωi is the difference in Larmor frequency between pool i and water, and the full width half maximum Γi is5 Γi=2R2,i+kikiω12+(R2,i+ki)2

Multiple-pool Lorentzian-line-fit

To estimate CEST effects from individual components, we performed the multiple-pool Lorentzian fitting of Z spectra using a non‐linear optimization algorithm25:6 S(Δω)S(Δω)S0S0=1-∑i=1NLi(Δω)

where7 Li(Δω)=Ai1+(Δω-Δi)2(0.5Wi)2

Equation (7) represents a Lorentzian line with central frequency offset from water (Δi), peak FWHM (Wi), and peak amplitude (Ai). The value of N is the number of fitted pools; S is the measured signal on the Z-spectra; and S0 is the non-irradiation control signal.

In this study, a five-pool model of Lorentzian-line-fit including Amide at 3.5 ppm (L1), Guanidyl/Amine at 2.0 ppm (L2), Water at 0 ppm (L3), MT at − 2.4 ppm (L4), and NOE at − 3.5 ppm (L5) was performed to estimate CEST effects from individual components.

In vivo MR imaging

All animal care and experimental procedures comply with the National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Shantou University Medical College (Approval ID: SUMC2022-204) and conducted in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

For our study, we used 8-week-old male SD rats (Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd.) weighing approximately 250 g to establish a tumor-bearing model. In this study, three rats were prepared, where two rats were excluded from the present study due to tumor modeling failure that could not be used during data analysis. To implant the rat glioma C6 cells, a 10 µL suspension containing approximately 2 × 106 cells was injected into the right basal ganglia of the rats using a Hamilton syringe and a 30-gauge needle. After two weeks of tumor cell implantation, the rats underwent MRI. During the MRI procedure, the rats were anesthetized with a mixture of isoflurane and O2 at a rate of 1 L/min. Anesthesia induction was achieved using 4.0% isoflurane, followed by maintenance anesthesia with 2.0–3.0% isoflurane. To monitor the breath rate, a respiratory probe was utilized throughout the MRI experiments. The rats' respiration rate and body temperature during the 7 T scan were maintained at approximately 60–70 breaths per minute and 38.5–39.5 °C, respectively.

MRI was conducted using a 7T horizontal bore small animal MRI scanner (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a surface coil (Timemedical Technologies, China) for both transmission and reception. The positioning of the rat was carefully done to ensure that the tumor was accurately centered within the magnetic field. Imaging parameters were as follows: B1 = 1 µT, repetition time (TR) = 6000 ms, echo time (TE) = 40 ms, array = frequency offsets, slice thickness = 2 mm, field of view (FOV) = 64 × 64 mm, matrix size = 64 × 64, spatial resolution = 1 × 1 mm, averages = 1. An echo planar imaging (EPI) readout sequence was employed to acquire CEST images, utilizing continuous wave (CW) RF irradiation on the scanners. The saturation time was set to 5.0 s, with 49 frequency offsets evenly distributed from − 6 to 6 ppm relative to the resonance frequency of water.

Results

To assess the performance of the proposed Rex-line-fit, simulated Z-spectra are created using 5-pool system. The Rex fitting is conducted by using a non‐linear least square constrained optimization algorithm and referencing the pool parameters1,26,27 in Table 1. Pseudo-code of our method for Rex imaging and Z-spectra fitting is shown Table 2. The proposed Rex fitting is compared experimentally to AREX28 and multiple-pool Lorentzian fit25. The AREX is a reduced form of Rex and follows a Lorentzian function28, so the same parameters listed in Table 2 is used. Table 3 lists the boundaries of the multiple-pool Lorentzian fit25.Table 1 Summary of the parameters for a general exchanging pool i when we conduct Rex and AREX fitting: solute‐water exchange rate (ki), solute concentration (fi), transverse relaxation time (T2,s), and solute resonance frequency offset (Δ).

	Amide	Guanidino	Free water	MT	NOE (− 3.5)	
ks (s-1)	LB–UB	1–250	1–1000	–	1–100	1–30	
fs (10−3)	0.1–10	1–50	–	10–400	10–100	
T2,s (10−3 s)	0.1–10	0.1–10	20–100	0.01–0.3	0.1–10	
Δ (ppm)	3.5	2	0	− 2.4	− 3.5	

Table 2 Pseudo-code of the Rex based method for Z-spectra fitting and decomposition.

Define a set of LB and UB from Table 1, and start at the point x0 = LB + (UB − LB)/2	
The pixel-wise decompositions of Reff and Rex for CEST are solved by nonlinear fitting function (lsqnonlin) in MATLAB	
Loop for Z-spectra of each pixel	
{	
compute Reff and Rex fitting parameters from Eqs. (2) and (3), respectively	
compute Z-spectra of Rex-line-fit from Eq. (1)	
}	
Obtain fitting parameters and reconstruct the Rex imaging from Z-spectra of each pixel	

Table 3 Summary of the parameters used for Lorentzian fitting: amplitude (A), width (W), and solute resonance frequency offset (Δ).

	Amide	Guanidyl/Amine	Amino	MT	NOE (− 1.6)	NOE (− 3.5)	
A	LB–UB	0–10	0–10	0–10	0–40	0–10	0–20	
W	0–3	0–3	0–3	0–35	0–3	0–10	
Δ (ppm)	3.6	2	3	− 1.5	− 1.6	− 3.5	

Parameter separation

It is worthwhile to evaluate the correlation between Rex and parameters (solute‐water exchange rate ks, solute concentration fs and solute transverse relaxation T2,s), which may assist in elucidating the Rex specificity and separating CEST parameters. For Amide, NOE (− 3.5 ppm), Guanidino and MT, Fig. 2 illustrates the correlations between parameters (ks, fs) and Rex. The surface plots demonstrate the dependence of Rex on ks and fs, where Rex is linear monotonically increasing with parameters (ks, fs) for the Amide, NOE (− 3.5 ppm) and Guanidino. For MT, its Rex is linear monotonically increasing with solute concentration fs, while a nonlinear monotonically increasing relationship between Rex and solute‐water exchange rate ks is observed. It should be noted that the Rex of Guanidino depicts a monotonically increasing trend first and then decrease corresponding to ks, while its Rex follows a monotonically increasing pattern in respect to fs. In addition, Rex is nonlinear monotonically increasing with T2,s for the Amide, NOE (-3.5 ppm) and Guanidino, while Rex shows a trend of slight monotonic decrease corresponding to T2,s for MT, as illustrated in Fig. 3. In addition, Fig. 4 illustrates an example of Rex changing with ks and R2,s (1/T2,s) for Amide, where Rex follows a increasing pattern in respect to R2,s at different ks and Rex shows a trend of decrease corresponding ks at different R2,s.Fig. 2 The correlation between Rex and parameters (ks, fs) for Amide, NOE (− 3.5 ppm), Guanidino and MT. For each subplot, the red line denotes the contour.

Fig. 3 The correlation between Rex and T2,s for Amide, NOE (− 3.5 ppm), Guanidino and MT.

Fig. 4 An example of Rex changing with ks and R2,s (1/T2,s) for Amide.

Rex, Lorentzian, and AREX imaging

Herein, we conduct an experiment of Rex, Lorentzian and AREX imaging for Amide at 3.5 ppm, Guanidino at 2.0 ppm, MT at − 2.4 ppm and NOE at − 3.5 ppm, where each pixel of imaging is obtained by computing the peaks of Rex and Lorentzian decompositions. Figure 5 illustrates the Rex, Lorentzian and AREX imaging of these CEST effects. The region of pseudo color image overlaid on anatomy image is the region of interest (ROI), where the region of tumor region is marked with solid red contour and the solid red contour denotes the contralateral region. Visually, the Rex shows different structure distributions on the Rex imaging for Amide, Guanidino, MT and NOE, this is different from Lorentzian and AREX.Fig. 5 The Rex, Lorentzian and AREX imaging of Amide at 3.5 ppm, Guanidino at 2.0 ppm, MT at − 2.4 ppm and NOE at − 3.5 ppm. The solid red contour denotes the tumor region and the dashed red contour is the contralateral region.

Figure 6 illustrate the Z-spectra fitting from the tumor region and the contralateral region using the Rex, Lorentzian and AREX approach, respectively. The results show that the satisfied accuracy and consistency are obtained by the proposed Rex-line-fit and it displays great agreement and follows the same tendency as the actual measurements. Table 4 lists the mean value and standard deviation of residual between the considered fitting approach and the experimental Z-spectra for the tumor region and its contralateral region.Fig. 6 Z-spectra fitting and decomposition from the tumor region and its contralateral region using the Rex, Lorentzian and AREX approaches.

Table 4 The mean value and standard deviation of residual between the considered fitting approach and the experimental Z-spectra for the tumor region and its contralateral region.

	Residual between Rex fitting and the experimental Z-spectra	Residual between Lorentzian fitting and the experimental Z-spectra	Residual between AREX fitting and the experimental Z-spectra	
Mean value	1.8914 × 10−4	3.8786 × 10−4	− 1.3783 × 10−5	1.7531 × 10−5	2.6252 × 10−5	1.2 × 10−3	
Standard deviation	0.0054	0.0147	0.0043	0.0070	0.0053	0.0183	
	Tumor region	Contralateral region	Tumor region	Contralateral region	Tumor region	Contralateral region	

We further applied the linear regression analysis29 to assess the general performance of the Rex, Lorentzian and AREX approach using the whole ROI data of CEST images at 49 frequency offsets. Figure 7 displays the Rex, Lorentzian and AREX for fitting CEST signal by plotting the linear regression lines between the experimentally acquired data and the fitting. The excellent performance of our Rex method is confirmed by the scatter and linear regression lines, resulting in a very high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.9937).Fig. 7 Linear regression analysis of the Rex, Lorentzian and AREX fitting when they compared with the experimentally acquired data within the ROI.

Discussion

The exchange-dependent relaxation Rex is an important parameter for CEST effects and can be used to determine the exchange rate ks of the exchangeable protons with concentration fraction fs and transverse relaxation T2,s. In this study, we proposed a method that can support reliable quantitative separation of CEST effect by Rex. This is important because specificity of in vivo CEST effect is challenging due to careful measurement of the CEST effects. Nevertheless, some discussions should be made as follows.

In the Eq. (4) of Rex, the first term named ‘ki-term’ is the dominant factor, which comprises the product of peaks for water pool (‘a-peak’) and CEST pool (‘b-peak’), respectively. The ‘R2,i-term’, together with the ‘b - peak’, denotes the exchange dependent relaxation that yields an off-resonant peak in CEST. So the Rex turns into two peaks, but unlike Lorentzian and AREX lineshape that gives only one peak. In fact, the effect of water T1 and T2 relaxation time on Lorentzian shape is described by formula in Ref.17. In contrast, Rex excludes water T1 and T2 contributions, which serves as a tool for calculating the CEST signal, offering a more representative depiction of chemical exchange processes than traditional CEST analysis methods30,31. As a reduced form of Rex, AREX is a Lorentzian function28, excluding the water pool (‘a-peak’), unlike the complete Rex expression2,28. It is interesting to study the ‘a-peak’ imaging, which will be presented in our next work.

In the Rex imaging, the tumor regions marked with solid red contour show reduced values in correspondence with the contralateral regions (Fig. 5). In practice, the exchange rate ki can be determined by analyzing the CEST signal as a function of pH: kamide = 5.57 × 10pH–6.4, kguanidyl = 5.57 × 10pH–6.432. An intuitive explanation is that the reduced exchange rate with lower pH in and around the tumor region causes the lowering of the Rex peak values (Fig. 6). In fact, the mechanism behind tumors is more complex compared with the clear process of stroke. Particularly, the Rex mechanism is considered that many factors (the exchange rate ks, the concentration fraction fs and transverse relaxation T2,s) participated in this process (Eq. 4). To some extent, the Rex imaging shows the specificity for different chemical groups, because different structure distributions on the Rex imaging for Amide, Guanidino, MT and NOE are obtained, this is different from multiple-pool Lorentzian, AREX and T1 map (Fig. 5). Nevertheless, some multi-pool models have been applied to tumor research, such as Refs.33,34.

In this study, we have made some meaningful explorations and obtained promising research results. We first determined whether parameters (solute‐water exchange rate and solute concentration) and Rex have a monotonous relationship for Amide at 3.5 ppm, Guanidino at 2.0 ppm and NOE at − 3.5 ppm (Figs. 2, 3, 4). With this knowledge in mind, this makes it possible to isolate some part parameters by extending previous approaches, where numerical simulations of Rex can be used to obtain saturation parameters for CEST effect.

We further implemented Rex as a novel model to provide high-accuracy CEST fitting and decomposition where multiple CEST saturation transfer pools are present. The proposed Rex-line-fit avoids specific selection of tissue parameters and minimizes operator bias, enabling adaptive fitting and decomposition for reliable estimation of CEST effects. The accuracy of Rex-line-fit was first validated by the test of in vivo mouse, which revealed that Rex method provided a near-perfect approximation to the experimentally acquired Z-spectra (Table 4, Figs. 6 and 7).

Conclusion

As an improvement method that only is dependent of the specific parameters (solute concentration, solute‐water exchange rate, solute transverse relaxation, and irradiation power), our Rex-line-fit can provide a simple, robust and more accurate approach for approximating CEST and further serve for quantitative separation of CEST effect. More in vivo validations and at the clinical field strength will be performed in the future.

Author contributions

GX: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software; X.-L.Z: Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft; S.-Q.W: Formal analysis, Data curation; S.-X.L: Formal analysis, Data curation; T.-T.N: Resources, Data curation; Y.-W.C: Investigation, Supervision; C.-Y.Z: Resources, Data curation; GY: Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing; R.-H.W: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant/Award Number: 82020108016), the Grant for Key Disciplinary Project of Clinical Medicine under the Guangdong High-Level University Development Program (Grant/Award Number: 002-18120302), the Functional Substances in Medicinal Edible Resources and Healthcare Products (Grant/Award Number: 2021B1212040015), the 2021 Medical Research Foundation of Guangdong (Grant/Award Number: 202011102275838), the 2021 Grant for Key Science Technology and Innovation Project under the Guangdong Jieyang Development Program (Grant/Award Number: 210517084612609), and the Medical Health Science and Technology Project of Shantou (Grant/Award Number: 2022-88-16).

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Gang Xiao and Xiao-Lei Zhang.
==== Refs
References

1. Kogan F Hariharan H Reddy R Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging: Description of technique and potential clinical applications Curr. Radiol. Rep. 2013 1 102 114 10.1007/s40134-013-0010-3 23730540
Kogan, F., Hariharan, H. & Reddy, R. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging: Description of technique and potential clinical applications. Curr. Radiol. Rep. 1, 102–114 (2013).23730540 10.1007/s40134-013-0010-3
2. Zaiss M Bachert P Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR Z-spectroscopy in vivo: A review of theoretical approaches and methods Phys. Med. Biol. 2013 58 22 R221 10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/R221 24201125
Zaiss, M. & Bachert, P. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR Z-spectroscopy in vivo: A review of theoretical approaches and methods. Phys. Med. Biol. 58(22), R221 (2013).24201125 10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/R221
3. El Mamoune K Application of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) in neuroimaging J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2021 114 101944 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2021.101944 33716103
El Mamoune, K. et al. Application of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) in neuroimaging. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 114, 101944 (2021).33716103 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2021.101944
4. Zaiss M Theory of chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI in the context of different magnetic fields NMR Biomed. 2022 35 11 e4789 10.1002/nbm.4789 35704180
Zaiss, M. et al. Theory of chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI in the context of different magnetic fields. NMR Biomed. 35(11), e4789 (2022).35704180 10.1002/nbm.4789
5. Van Zijl PC Yadav NN Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): What is in a name and what isn't? Magn. Reson. Med. 2011 65 4 927 948 10.1002/mrm.22761 21337419
Van Zijl, P. C. & Yadav, N. N. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): What is in a name and what isn’t?. Magn. Reson. Med. 65(4), 927–948 (2011).21337419 10.1002/mrm.22761
6. Song X CEST phase mapping using a length and offset varied saturation (LOVARS) scheme Magn. Reson. Med. 2012 68 4 1074 1086 10.1002/mrm.23312 22246684
Song, X. et al. CEST phase mapping using a length and offset varied saturation (LOVARS) scheme. Magn. Reson. Med. 68(4), 1074–1086 (2012).22246684 10.1002/mrm.23312
7. Liu G Nuts and bolts of chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI NMR Biomed. 2013 26 7 810 828 10.1002/nbm.2899 23303716
Liu, G. et al. Nuts and bolts of chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI. NMR Biomed. 26(7), 810–828 (2013).23303716 10.1002/nbm.2899
8. Pankowska A Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) as a new method of signal obtainment in magnetic resonance molecular imaging in clinical and research practice Pol. J. Radiol. 2019 84 e147 10.5114/pjr.2019.84242 31019609
Pankowska, A. et al. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) as a new method of signal obtainment in magnetic resonance molecular imaging in clinical and research practice. Pol. J. Radiol. 84, e147 (2019).31019609 10.5114/pjr.2019.84242
9. Zhang L Voxel-wise Optimization of Pseudo Voigt Profile (VOPVP) for Z-spectra fitting in chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2019 9 10 1714 10.21037/qims.2019.10.01 31728314
Zhang, L. et al. Voxel-wise Optimization of Pseudo Voigt Profile (VOPVP) for Z-spectra fitting in chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 9(10), 1714 (2019).31728314 10.21037/qims.2019.10.01
10. Liu Y Dual-Peak Lorentzian CEST MRI for antiretroviral drug brain distribution Neuroimmune Pharmacol. Therap. 2023 2 1 63 69
Liu, Y. et al. Dual-Peak Lorentzian CEST MRI for antiretroviral drug brain distribution. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. Therap. 2(1), 63–69 (2023).
11. Windschuh J Correction of B1-inhomogeneities for relaxation-compensated CEST imaging at 7 T NMR Biomed. 2015 28 5 529 537 10.1002/nbm.3283 25788155
Windschuh, J. et al. Correction of B1-inhomogeneities for relaxation-compensated CEST imaging at 7 T. NMR Biomed. 28(5), 529–537 (2015).25788155 10.1002/nbm.3283
12. Desmond KL Moosvi F Stanisz GJ Mapping of amide, amine, and aliphatic peaks in the CEST spectra of murine xenografts at 7 T Magn. Reson. Med. 2014 71 5 1841 1853 10.1002/mrm.24822 23801344
Desmond, K. L., Moosvi, F. & Stanisz, G. J. Mapping of amide, amine, and aliphatic peaks in the CEST spectra of murine xenografts at 7 T. Magn. Reson. Med. 71(5), 1841–1853 (2014).23801344 10.1002/mrm.24822
13. Cai K CEST signal at 2 ppm (CEST@ 2 ppm) from Z-spectral fitting correlates with creatine distribution in brain tumor NMR Biomed. 2015 28 1 1 8 10.1002/nbm.3216 25295758
Cai, K. et al. CEST signal at 2 ppm (CEST@ 2 ppm) from Z-spectral fitting correlates with creatine distribution in brain tumor. NMR Biomed. 28(1), 1–8 (2015).25295758 10.1002/nbm.3216
14. Bade AN Chemical exchange saturation transfer for detection of antiretroviral drugs in brain tissue Aids 2021 35 11 1733 1741 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002960 34049358
Bade, A. N. et al. Chemical exchange saturation transfer for detection of antiretroviral drugs in brain tissue. Aids 35(11), 1733–1741 (2021).34049358 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002960
15. Tietze A Assessment of ischemic penumbra in patients with hyperacute stroke using amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI NMR Biomed. 2014 27 2 163 174 10.1002/nbm.3048 24288260
Tietze, A. et al. Assessment of ischemic penumbra in patients with hyperacute stroke using amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. NMR Biomed. 27(2), 163–174 (2014).24288260 10.1002/nbm.3048
16. Zhang XY Accuracy in the quantification of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (rNOE) saturation transfer effects NMR Biomed. 2017 30 7 e3716 10.1002/nbm.3716
Zhang, X. Y. et al. Accuracy in the quantification of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (rNOE) saturation transfer effects. NMR Biomed. 30(7), e3716 (2017).10.1002/nbm.3716
17. Zaiß M Schmitt B Bachert P Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra J. Magnet. Resonance 2011 211 2 149 155 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.05.001
Zaiß, M., Schmitt, B. & Bachert, P. Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra. J. Magnet. Resonance 211(2), 149–155 (2011).10.1016/j.jmr.2011.05.001
18. Glang F DeepCEST 3T: Robust MRI parameter determination and uncertainty quantification with neural networks—Application to CEST imaging of the human brain at 3T Magnet. Resonance Med. 2020 84 1 450 466 10.1002/mrm.28117
Glang, F. et al. DeepCEST 3T: Robust MRI parameter determination and uncertainty quantification with neural networks—Application to CEST imaging of the human brain at 3T. Magnet. Resonance Med. 84(1), 450–466 (2020).10.1002/mrm.28117
19. Wu Y 3D APT and NOE CEST-MRI of healthy volunteers and patients with non-enhancing glioma at 3 T Magnet. Resonance Mater. Phys. Biol. Med. 2022 35 1 63 73 10.1007/s10334-021-00996-z
Wu, Y. et al. 3D APT and NOE CEST-MRI of healthy volunteers and patients with non-enhancing glioma at 3 T. Magnet. Resonance Mater. Phys. Biol. Med. 35(1), 63–73 (2022).10.1007/s10334-021-00996-z
20. Cui J Sun C Zu Z NOE-weighted imaging in tumors using low-duty-cycle 2π-CEST Magnet. Resonance Med. 2023 89 2 636 651 10.1002/mrm.29475
Cui, J., Sun, C. & Zu, Z. NOE-weighted imaging in tumors using low-duty-cycle 2π-CEST. Magnet. Resonance Med. 89(2), 636–651 (2023).10.1002/mrm.29475
21. Zhao Y Sun C Zu Z Assignment of molecular origins of NOE signal at − 3.5 ppm in the brain Magnet. Resonance Med. 2023 90 2 673 685 10.1002/mrm.29643
Zhao, Y., Sun, C. & Zu, Z. Assignment of molecular origins of NOE signal at − 3.5 ppm in the brain. Magnet. Resonance Med. 90(2), 673–685 (2023).10.1002/mrm.29643
22. Cui J Evaluation of contributors to amide proton transfer–weighted imaging and nuclear Overhauser enhancement–weighted imaging contrast in tumors at a high magnetic field Magnet. Resonance Med. 2023 90 2 596 614 10.1002/mrm.29675
Cui, J. et al. Evaluation of contributors to amide proton transfer–weighted imaging and nuclear Overhauser enhancement–weighted imaging contrast in tumors at a high magnetic field. Magnet. Resonance Med. 90(2), 596–614 (2023).10.1002/mrm.29675
23. Chen L Creatine and phosphocreatine mapping of mouse skeletal muscle by a polynomial and Lorentzian line-shape fitting CEST method Magnet. Resonance Med. 2019 81 1 69 78 10.1002/mrm.27514
Chen, L. et al. Creatine and phosphocreatine mapping of mouse skeletal muscle by a polynomial and Lorentzian line-shape fitting CEST method. Magnet. Resonance Med. 81(1), 69–78 (2019).10.1002/mrm.27514
24. Carradus AJ Measuring chemical exchange saturation transfer exchange rates in the human brain using a particle swarm optimisation algorithm NMR Biomed 2023 36 11 e5001 10.1002/nbm.5001 37452522
Carradus, A. J. et al. Measuring chemical exchange saturation transfer exchange rates in the human brain using a particle swarm optimisation algorithm. NMR Biomed. 36(11), e5001 (2023).37452522 10.1002/nbm.5001
25. Cui J Afzal A Zu Z Comparative evaluation of polynomial and Lorentzian lineshape-fitted amine CEST imaging in acute ischemic stroke Magnet. Resonance Med. 2022 87 2 837 849 10.1002/mrm.29030
Cui, J., Afzal, A. & Zu, Z. Comparative evaluation of polynomial and Lorentzian lineshape-fitted amine CEST imaging in acute ischemic stroke. Magnet. Resonance Med. 87(2), 837–849 (2022).10.1002/mrm.29030
26. Khlebnikov V On the transmit field inhomogeneity correction of relaxation-compensated amide and NOE CEST effects at 7 T NMR Biomed. 2017 30 5 e3687 10.1002/nbm.3687 28111824
Khlebnikov, V. et al. On the transmit field inhomogeneity correction of relaxation-compensated amide and NOE CEST effects at 7 T. NMR Biomed. 30(5), e3687 (2017).28111824 10.1002/nbm.3687
27. Xiao G Deep learning to reconstruct quasi-steady-state chemical exchange saturation transfer from a non-steady-state experiment NMR Biomed 2023 36 9 e4940 10.1002/nbm.4940
Xiao, G. et al. Deep learning to reconstruct quasi-steady-state chemical exchange saturation transfer from a non-steady-state experiment. NMR Biomed. 36(9), e4940 (2023).10.1002/nbm.4940
28. Zhang XY Increased CEST specificity for amide and fast-exchanging amine protons using exchange-dependent relaxation rate NMR Biomed. 2018 31 2 e3863 10.1002/nbm.3863
Zhang, X. Y. et al. Increased CEST specificity for amide and fast-exchanging amine protons using exchange-dependent relaxation rate. NMR Biomed. 31(2), e3863 (2018).10.1002/nbm.3863
29. Li Y Accelerating GluCEST imaging using deep learning for B0 correction Magnet. Resonance Med. 2020 84 4 1724 1733 10.1002/mrm.28289
Li, Y. et al. Accelerating GluCEST imaging using deep learning for B0 correction. Magnet. Resonance Med. 84(4), 1724–1733 (2020).10.1002/mrm.28289
30. Zaiss M Inverse Z-spectrum analysis for spillover-, MT-, and T1-corrected steady-state pulsed CEST-MRI-application to pH-weighted MRI of acute stroke NMR Biomed. 2014 27 3 240 252 10.1002/nbm.3054 24395553
Zaiss, M. et al. Inverse Z-spectrum analysis for spillover-, MT-, and T1-corrected steady-state pulsed CEST-MRI-application to pH-weighted MRI of acute stroke. NMR Biomed. 27(3), 240–252 (2014).24395553 10.1002/nbm.3054
31. Zaiss M Relaxation-compensated CEST-MRI of the human brain at 7 T: Unbiased insight into NOE and amide signal changes in human glioblastoma Neuroimage 2015 112 180 188 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.040 25727379
Zaiss, M. et al. Relaxation-compensated CEST-MRI of the human brain at 7 T: Unbiased insight into NOE and amide signal changes in human glioblastoma. Neuroimage 112, 180–188 (2015).25727379 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.040
32. Jin T Enhancing sensitivity of pH-weighted MRI with combination of amide and guanidyl CEST Neuroimage 2017 157 341 350 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.007 28602944
Jin, T. et al. Enhancing sensitivity of pH-weighted MRI with combination of amide and guanidyl CEST. Neuroimage 157, 341–350 (2017).28602944 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.007
33. Zhou IY Quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI of glioma using Image Downsampling Expedited Adaptive Least-squares (IDEAL) fitting Sci. Rep. 2017 7 1 84 10.1038/s41598-017-00167-y 28273886
Zhou, I. Y. et al. Quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI of glioma using Image Downsampling Expedited Adaptive Least-squares (IDEAL) fitting. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 84 (2017).28273886 10.1038/s41598-017-00167-y
34. Rivlin M Breast cancer imaging with glucosamine CEST (chemical exchange saturation transfer) MRI: First human experience Eur. Radiol. 2022 32 11 7365 7373 10.1007/s00330-022-08772-w 35420304
Rivlin, M. et al. Breast cancer imaging with glucosamine CEST (chemical exchange saturation transfer) MRI: First human experience. Eur. Radiol. 32(11), 7365–7373 (2022).35420304 10.1007/s00330-022-08772-w
