
==== Front
Int J Colorectal Dis
Int J Colorectal Dis
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
0179-1958
1432-1262
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

39276232
4716
10.1007/s00384-024-04716-6
Matters Arising
Comment on “Implementing a no‑drain policy for extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis in a real‑life setting: analysis of outcomes and surgeons’ adherence”
Bhatia Mohit drbhatia711@gmail.com

Singhal Tarun
grid.412546.0 0000 0004 0398 4113 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, King’s College, London, UK
14 9 2024
14 9 2024
2024
39 1 1415 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
issue-copyright-statement© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcWith great interest, we read the informative article by Crippa et al. [1], and we would like to congratulate them for their informative article on a topic which has still got no consensus across the surgical fraternity.

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a known dreadful complication after colorectal resections which can prolong hospital stay and is often associated with increased hospital morbidity and mortality. In some cases, it can also result in delays in adjuvant treatment [2].

Incidence of AL post low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer varies between 3 and 25% and a higher incidence of sub-clinical leaks [3].

The rational for using the abdominal drains after colorectal anastomosis was for early identification of AL, preventing formation of abdominal abscess and reducing the chances of intra-abdominal sepsis [4].

It has been argued over the years if the abdominal drains (AD) are really able to identify the AL at an early stage. GRECCAR 5 trial questioned the sensitivity of AD in detecting early AL and concluded no benefit in using routine AD for low rectal anastomosis [5].

Some authors in the past had endorsed AD as an early indicator for AL and as a prophylactic tool for reducing the risk of intra-abdominal abscess formation. However, with emphasis on early discharge and practicing ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) guidelines, doubts were casted on the routine use of AD post LAR [6].

There are certain risk factors including high body mass index (BMI), low rectal anastomosis, post neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, steroid use, prolonged surgery, restorative surgery without ileostomy, emergency surgery, and male patient, which may prompt the use of AD after LAR [7].

COMPASS study (prospective, multi-central) showed no clear advantage of AD in detecting AL early; instead, they concluded AD leads to prolonged hospital stay and increases incidence of SSI (surgical site infections) [8].

A survey by Willis et al. [9] showed the reluctance in adopting the recommendations from ERAS and other evidence which suggests against the routine use of AD post colonic resections.

A randomized trial showed the negative effects of AD in diet tolerance after intra-corporeal anastomosis with right hemicolectomy [10].

We feel use of AD after colorectal anastomosis is very variable, and it depends on the surgeons experience and should be based on the merit of the case.

Even after multiple studies which have been pro and against the use of AD, we still do not have a clear consensus. We think it will require multi-institutional prospective study to determine some meaningful results which can put this debate to rest. We in our clinical practice use Yeates drain after colonic resections; therefore, we feel choice of drains should also be considered when we formulate the outcomes while assessing the usefulness of AD.

We congratulate the authors for their valuable contribution on an interesting topic.

Author contribution

MB—prepared the manuscript, data analysis, concept TS- editing, supervising.

TS- editing, supervising.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Crippa J Luberto A Magistro C Implementing a no-drain policy for extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis in a real-life setting: analysis of outcomes and surgeons’ adherence Int J Colorectal Dis 2024 39 109 10.1007/s00384-024-04681-0 39008120
Crippa J, Luberto A, Magistro C et al (2024) Implementing a no-drain policy for extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis in a real-life setting: analysis of outcomes and surgeons’ adherence. Int J Colorectal Dis 39:109. 10.1007/s00384-024-04681-039008120 10.1007/s00384-024-04681-0
2. Fouda E El Nakeeb A Magdy A Hammad EA Othman G Farid M Early detection of anastomotic leakage after elective low anterior resection J Gastrointest Surg 2011 15 1 137 144 10.1007/s11605-010-1364-y 20978948
Fouda E, El Nakeeb A, Magdy A, Hammad EA, Othman G, Farid M (2011) Early detection of anastomotic leakage after elective low anterior resection. J Gastrointest Surg 15(1):137–144. 10.1007/s11605-010-1364-y20978948 10.1007/s11605-010-1364-y
3. Nikolian VC Kamdar NS Regenbogen SE Morris AM Byrn JC Suwanabol PA Anastomotic leak after colorectal resection: a population-based study of risk factors and hospital variation Surgery 2017 161 6 1619 1627 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.033 28238345
Nikolian VC, Kamdar NS, Regenbogen SE, Morris AM, Byrn JC, Suwanabol PA et al (2017) Anastomotic leak after colorectal resection: a population-based study of risk factors and hospital variation. Surgery 161(6):1619–1627. 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.03328238345 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.033
4. Tsujinaka S Konishi F Drain vs no drain after colorectal surgery Indian J Surg Oncol 2011 2 1 3 8 10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2 22693394
Tsujinaka S, Konishi F (2011) Drain vs no drain after colorectal surgery. Indian J Surg Oncol 2(1):3–8. 10.1007/s13193-011-0041-222693394 10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2
5. Denost Q., Rouanet P., Faucheron J. L., Panis Y., Meunier B., Cotte E., Meurette G., Kirzin S., Sabbagh C., Loriau J., Benoist S., Mariette C., Sielezneff I., Lelong B., Mauvais F., Romain B., Barussaud M. L., Germain C., Picat M. Q., Rullier E., Laurent C., and French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR) To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: the GRECCAR 5 randomized trial Annal Surg 2017 265 3 474 480 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001991
Denost Q., Rouanet P., Faucheron J. L., Panis Y., Meunier B., Cotte E., Meurette G., Kirzin S., Sabbagh C., Loriau J., Benoist S., Mariette C., Sielezneff I., Lelong B., Mauvais F., Romain B., Barussaud M. L., Germain C., Picat M. Q., Rullier E., Laurent C., and French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR) (2017) To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: the GRECCAR 5 randomized trial. Annal Surg 265(3):474–480. 10.1097/SLA.000000000000199110.1097/SLA.0000000000001991
6. Gustafsson UO Scott MJ Hubner M Nygren J Demartines N Francis N Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society Recommendations: 2018 World J Surg 2019 43 659 695 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y 30426190
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N et al (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 43:659–69530426190 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y
7. Choi HK Law WL Ho JW Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors Dis Colon Rectum 2006 49 11 1719 1725 10.1007/s10350-006-0703-2 17051321
Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49(11):1719–1725. 10.1007/s10350-006-0703-217051321 10.1007/s10350-006-0703-2
8. EuroSurg Collaborative Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study Brit J Surg 2022 109 6 520 529 10.1093/bjs/znac069 35576382
EuroSurg Collaborative (2022) Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study. Brit J Surg 109(6):520–529. 10.1093/bjs/znac06935576382 10.1093/bjs/znac069
9. Willis MA Keller PS Sommer N Koch F Ritz JP Beyer K Reißfelder C Hardt J Herold A Buhr HJ Emmanuel K Kalff JC Vilz TO Adherence to fast track measures in colorectal surgery-a survey among German and Austrian surgeons Int J Colorectal Dis 2023 38 1 80 10.1007/s00384-023-04379-9.PMID:36964828;PMCID:PMC10039823 36964828
Willis MA, Keller PS, Sommer N, Koch F, Ritz JP, Beyer K, Reißfelder C, Hardt J, Herold A, Buhr HJ, Emmanuel K, Kalff JC, Vilz TO (2023) Adherence to fast track measures in colorectal surgery-a survey among German and Austrian surgeons. Int J Colorectal Dis 38(1):80. 10.1007/s00384-023-04379-9.PMID:36964828;PMCID:PMC1003982336964828 10.1007/s00384-023-04379-9.PMID:36964828;PMCID:PMC10039823
10. Sica GS Siragusa L Pirozzi BM Gastrointestinal functions after laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a pilot randomized clinical trial on effects of abdominal drain, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis, and D3 lymphadenectomy with complete mesocolic excision Int J Colorectal Dis 2024 39 102 10.1007/s00384-024-04657-0 38970713
Sica GS, Siragusa L, Pirozzi BM et al (2024) Gastrointestinal functions after laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a pilot randomized clinical trial on effects of abdominal drain, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis, and D3 lymphadenectomy with complete mesocolic excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 39:102. 10.1007/s00384-024-04657-038970713 10.1007/s00384-024-04657-0
