
==== Front
JSES Int
JSES Int
JSES International
2666-6383
Elsevier

S2666-6383(24)00137-3
10.1016/j.jseint.2024.05.014
Elbow
A case of pediatric medial epicondyle fracture with medial and lateral collateral ligament injury
Yanai Koichiro MD a
Tajika Tsuyoshi MD, PhD tajika@gunma-u.ac.jp
b∗
Ito Takashi MD a
Negishi Ryosuke MD a
Hatori Yuhei MD a
Shitara Hitoshi MD, PhD a
Chikuda Hirotaka MD, PhD a
a Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
b Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
∗ Corresponding author: Tsuyoshi Tajika, MD, PhD, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8514, Japan. tajika@gunma-u.ac.jp
10 6 2024
9 2024
10 6 2024
8 5 11451149
© 2024 The Author(s)
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords

Medial epicondyle fracture
Elbow dislocation
Lateral collateral ligament injury
Medial collateral ligament injury
Elbow instability
==== Body
pmcMedial epicondyle fractures account for approximately 10% of pediatric elbow periarticular fractures, with the peak incidence occurring at around 11–12 years of age.1,3,10 It has been reported that they develop due to various injury mechanisms such as a direct blow, avulsion, and dislocation, and that the applied external force causes characteristic lesions such as radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, and ligament injury.2,13

Conservative approaches have traditionally been favored for the treatment of medial epicondyle fractures due to the fact that pseudarthrosis typically does not result in significant symptoms.5,13 However, in recent years, there have been reports recommending surgery to facilitate early return to sports and prevent delayed ulnar nerve paralysis.1,3,4,10,13 Nevertheless, the choice of treatment remains controversial, and decisions are often made on a case-by-case basis, with consideration of the patient’s activity level.

Few reports have focused on the complications of medial epicondyle fractures and their treatment.7,8 Dislocation is a relatively common mechanism of injury in medial epicondyle fractures, but there is a risk that elbow joint instability associated with complications such as collateral ligament injuries may be overlooked if the dislocation is spontaneously reduced. This report describes a case of medial epicondyle fracture with elbow instability, complicated by bilateral ligamentous injuries.

Case report

The patient was a 14-year-old male who was injured by putting his hand out when thrown during a judo match. He visited a local hospital with the chief complaint of right elbow pain and was diagnosed with a medial epicondyle fracture. The patient was referred to our hospital for further treatment. There was swelling of the entire elbow and tenderness at the medial and lateral humeral condyles, but no motor or sensory deficits distal to the elbow joint. Imaging studies revealed a medial epicondyle fracture and subluxation of the humeroulnar joint (Fig. 1 A–D). The physical and imaging findings suggested a medial epicondyle fracture combined with a medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injury that would have caused elbow instability.Figure 1 (A) Plain X-ray anteroposterior view. (B) Plain X-ray lateral view. (C) 3D CT anteroposterior view. (D) 3D CT lateral view. 3D, three dimensional; CT, computed tomography.

Surgery was performed on the fourth day postinjury under general anesthesia in the supine position. Initially, elbow joint stability was assessed. The elbow joint was dislocated posteriorly with extension beyond 45°, and during valgus and varus stress tests, both the humeroulnar and humeroradial joints opened more than 20° (Fig. 2 A-D). Valgus and varus stress tests both revealed no clear endpoint, indicating a high degree of instability. The flexor muscles were found to be attached to the medial epicondyle bone fragments, and inversion of the bone fragment revealed a bare medial condyle of the humerus with detachment of the MCL (Fig. 3A). We considered that there was a complication of MCL injury, but due to the high degree of instability of the elbow joint, we prioritized bone fragment fixation, which allows firm stabilization. The medial epicondyle fragment was reduced while being pulled centrally and fixed with tension band wiring (0.07 inches Kirschner wire × 2, and 0.03-inches soft wire × 1). Instability associated with elbow extension persisted after osteosynthesis. In addition, a valgus stress test revealed that the humeroulnar joint opened approximately 20° and there was no endpoint, indicating that valgus instability remained (Fig. 3B). Therefore, LCL and MCL repairs were performed. The extensor muscles and LCL were detached from the lateral condyle of the humerus, and the lateral condyle of the humerus was bare, similar to the medial side [Fig. 4A]. The extensor muscles and LCL were repaired using a ϕ0.06 inches JuggerKnot (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA). After LCL repair, the instability in elbow extension and varus stress improved (Fig. 4B). For MCL repair, the flexor muscles attached to the medial epicondyle fragment were carefully divided in the direction of the flexor fibers. The MCL, detached from the humeral side, was identified [Fig. 5A]. Similar to the LCL, repair was performed using a ϕ0.06 inches JuggerKnot (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA). After MCL repair, instability against valgus stress improved (Fig. 5B). Postoperative radiography showed good reduction (Fig. 6 A, B).Figure 2 (A) Elbow extension. (B) No stress. (C) Varus stress. (D) Valgus stress.

Figure 3 (A) Medial humeral condyle without muscle or ligament attachment. Arrow indicates the ulnar nerve. Arrowhead indicates the medial epicondyle fragment. (B) Valgus stress after osteosynthesis.

Figure 4 (A) The extensor muscles and LCL were detached from the lateral condyle of the humerus. (B) Varus stress after LCL repair. LCL, lateral collateral ligament.

Figure 5 (A) The flexor muscles were divided in the direction of the fibers. Arrow indicates the MCL detached from the humerus. (B) Valgus stress during after MCL repair. MCL, medial collateral ligament.

Figure 6 (A) Plain X-ray, anteroposterior view. (B) Plain X-ray lateral view.

Postoperatively, joint mobilization exercises were conducted under elbow joint extension restriction to −20° using an elbow joint orthosis. The orthosis was discontinued 6 weeks after surgery, and the extension restriction was lifted. Four months postsurgery, bone union was confirmed, and the implants used for osteosynthesis were removed. Elbow joint stability was evaluated at the time of implant removal. Good stability was obtained with elbow extension, valgus, and varus stress (Fig. 7A-C). At 6 months postoperatively, the automatic range of motion of the elbow joint was extension 0°/flexion 135° (5°/135° on the healthy side) with mild residual extension restriction. The patient was able to resume judo activities daily and successfully, despite a slight difference in grip strength between the affected and unaffected sides. At 10 months after surgery, the grip strength of the affected side was 61.7 pounds, while that on the unaffected side was 70.5 pounds.Figure 7 (A) Elbow extension. (B) Valgus stress. (C) Varus stress.

Discussion

Three injury mechanisms have been reported for medial epicondyle fractures: direct blow, avulsion, and dislocation.2,13 A direct blow is considered to be a rare mechanism of injury.13 Avulsion is the most common mechanism and typically occurs because of valgus stress on an outstretched hand, although arm wrestling and throwing are thought to involve similar mechanisms.6,9 Dislocation is also frequent, occurring in 30%–55% of medial epicondyle fractures, and cadaveric biomechanical studies have reported that it occurs when rotational force is accompanied by valgus or varus stress.8,13 The pathology of this case was initially inferred from the physical and imaging findings, but later a video of the judo match was provided by the parents. It was confirmed from the video that when the patient placed his hand on the floor with his elbow extended, the opponent's weight was applied to his upper extremity, applying a strong force in the direction of elbow valgus and hyperextension, which led to dislocation.

Medial epicondyle fractures can be complicated by periarticular elbow fractures and ligamentous injuries, and it is important not to overlook them during the diagnosis. Complications of radial head fracture and MCL injury have been reported in avulsion, while complications of coronoid fracture, radial head fracture, and MCL or LCL injury have been reported in dislocation.2,7,8,13 However, in case of spontaneous reduction of dislocation such as in this case, it should be noted that complications such as ligamentous injuries may be overlooked. Magnetic resonance imaging is sometimes required to diagnose ligamentous injuries, which are difficult to evaluate by X-ray or CT. However, this procedure is time-consuming and may require sedation in young patients. Although magnetic resonance imaging was not performed in this case, we inferred a complication of ligamentous injury based on the physical findings and subluxation of the elbow joint on computed tomography. CT was performed with the shoulder joint flexed and in external rotation, which may have induced elbow instability.

However, the treatment of medial epicondyle fractures remains controversial. Pseudarthrosis is a concern in cases of bone-fragment displacement. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the amount of displacement suitable for surgery (e.g., 0.08 inches, 0.20 inches, or ≥0.40 inches).11,13 Many reports support conservative treatment because most cases are not symptomatic, although approximately 70% show pseudarthrosis when treated conservatively.1,3,4,11,13 On the other hand, there are some reports recommending surgery to speed up return to sports and to prevent delayed ulnar neuropathy in cases of pseudarthrosis.1,3,4,11,13 However, at present, there is little consensus regarding the indications for surgery, except for fractures with intra-articular incarceration.1,3,11,13 Similarly, there is no clear treatment strategy for collateral ligament injuries associated with medial epicondyle fractures. Some reports recommend repair surgery, as residual instability can lead to functional impairment in daily life and sports activities, and ligaments that have healed with conservative treatment can easily fail.5,12 However, some reports have raised the concern that surgery may result in a limited range of motion of the elbow joint.5,12 This patient underwent bilateral ligament repair due to a high degree of elbow joint instability and a desire to return to contact sports. The degree of joint instability caused by ligamentous injuries associated with avulsion and dislocation varies widely, and fluoroscopic assessment of instability, as in this case, is extremely useful in evaluating the pathophysiology and selecting treatment. Elbow instability was evaluated throughout the treatment stages (presurgery, postosteosynthesis, and after ligament repair), allowing for a thorough and balanced treatment approach while confirming the effectiveness of each stage of treatment.

Conclusion

We encountered a case of medial epicondyle fracture with MCL and LCL injury. When diagnosing medial epicondyle fractures, it is crucial to consider the possibility of concomitant injury. The evaluation of elbow joint instability using fluoroscopy during surgery proved to be valuable for both understanding the pathology and assessing the effectiveness of treatments.

Disclaimers:

Funding: No funding was disclosed by the authors.

Conflicts of interest: The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine Institutional Review Board approved this study.
==== Refs
References

1 Beck J.J. Bowen R.E. Silva M. What’s new in pediatric medial epicondyle fractures? J Pediatr Orthop 38 2018 e202 e206 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000902 27861213
2 Fowles J.V. Slimane N. Kassab M.T. Elbow dislocation with avulsion of the medial humeral epicondyle J Bone Joint Surg Br 72 1990 102 104 2298765
3 Gottschalk H.P. Eisner E. Hosalkar H.S. Medial epicondyle fractures in the pediatric population J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20 2012 223 232 10.5435/JAAOS-20-04-223 22474092
4 Kamath A.F. Cody S.R. Hosalkar H.S. Open reduction of medial epicondyle fractures: operative tips for technical ease J Child Orthop 3 2009 331 336 10.1007/s11832-009-0185-6 19506930
5 Kim B.S. Park K.H. Song H.S. Park S.Y. Ligamentous repair of acute lateral collateral ligament rupture of the elbow J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22 2013 1469 1473 10.1016/j.jse.2013.06.018 24007649
6 Lokiec F. Velkes S. Engel J. Avulsion of the medial epicondyle of the humerus in arm wrestlers: a report of five cases and a review of the literature Injury 22 1991 69 70 2030041
7 Mitchelson A.J. Gabriel K.R. Medial epicondyle fracture with concomitant flexor-Pronator Mass avulsion from the fracture fragment A case report JBJS Case Connect 10 2020 e0417 10.2106/JBJS.CC.19.00417
8 Morimoto T. Izumi M. Ueba H. Ikeuchi M. Humeral avulsion of the lateral collateral ligament of the elbow concomitant with the medial epicondyle fracture of a Child with general joint Laxity Case Rep Orthop 4 2019 1965343 10.1155/2019/1965343
9 Osbahr D.C. Chalmers P.N. Frank J.S. Williams R.J. III Widmann R.F. Green D.W. Acute, avulsion fractures of the medial epicondyle while throwing in youth baseball players: a variant of Little League elbow J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19 2010 951 957 10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.038 20688542
10 Pathy R. Dodwell E.R. Medial epicondyle fractures in children Curr Opin Pediatr 27 2015 58 66 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000181 25564187
11 Pezzutti D. Lin J.S. Singh S. Rowan M. Samora J.B. Pediatric medial epicondyle fracture management: a systematic review J Pediatr Orthop 40 2020 e697 e702 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001532 32080057
12 Shemesh S. Loebenberg M.L. Kosasahvilli Y. Sidon E. Velkes S. Iordache S.D. Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow Harefuah 153 2014 261 265 25112117
13 Stans A.A. Lawrence J.T.R. Rockwood and Wilkins’ fractures in children 8th ed. 2015 Wolters Kluwer Philadelphia, PA 651 700
