
==== Front
Syst Rev
Syst Rev
Systematic Reviews
2046-4053
BioMed Central London

39272135
2642
10.1186/s13643-024-02642-w
Research
Prognostic value of tumour-associated regulatory T-cells as a biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-459X
Khambholja Kapil 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5894-4106
Gehani Manish dr.manishgehani@gmail.com

2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3910-5649
Kothari Rushabh 3
Marulkar Sachin 4
1 Department of Medical Writing, Catalyst Clinical Research, 2528 Independence Blvd, Suite 100, Wilmington, NC 28412 USA
2 grid.466497.e 0000 0004 1772 3598 Department of Biological Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani-Hyderabad Campus, Jawahar Nagar, Shameerpet Mandal, Hyderabad, Telangana 500078 India
3 Medical Oncology Department, Narayana Multispecialty Hospital, Opposite Police Station, Near Chakudiya Mahadev, Rakhial, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380023 India
4 Catalyst Clinical Research, 2528 Independence Blvd, Suite 100, Wilmington, NC 28412 USA
14 9 2024
14 9 2024
2024
13 23311 2 2024
20 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Background

Tumour, nodes, and metastases (TNM) staging has been deficient in prognosticating in patients suffering from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To supplement TNM staging, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the regulatory T cells (Treg).

Methods

A keyword search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE for full-text original human studies from any region published in English during the last 12 years. Eligible for inclusion were studies evaluating the prognostic value of the number of Treg cells in NSCLC except case studies, case series, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Two reviewers (one reviewer used an automation tool) independently screened the studies and assessed risk-of-bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Meta-analysis was done for studies reporting significant multivariate hazard ratio (HR).

Results

Out of 809 retrievals, 24 studies were included in the final review. The low number of Treg cells was found significantly associated with improved overall survival (pooled log OR, 1.646; 95% CI, 1.349, 1.944; p (2-tailed) < .001; SE, 0.1217), improved recurrence-free survival (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.15, 3.46; p = .01), improved progression-free survival (pooled log OR, 2.231; 95% CI, 0.424, 4.038; p (2-tailed) .034; SE, 0.4200), and worse disease-free survival (pooled log OR, 0.992; 95% CI, 0.820, 1.163; p (2-tailed) .009; SE, 0.0135), especially when identified by forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), in any stage or non-metastatic NSCLC.

Conclusion

A low number of Treg cells indicated better survival, suggesting its potential use as a prognostic biomarker in NSCLC.

Systematic review registration

The protocol of this review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO on August 28, 2021, and was assigned the registration number CRD42021270598. The protocol can be accessed from PROSPERO website.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-024-02642-w.

Keyword

Meta-analysis
Non-small cell lung cancer
Prognosis
Regulatory T cells
Systematic review
issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

An estimated 1.8 million deaths and 2.1 million new cases occur annually due to lung cancer around the world [1]. Almost half of the patients die within 1 year of diagnosis and less than 18% survive beyond 5 years [2]. Further, among the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), around two-thirds of patients fail to survive beyond 2 years [3, 4].

The dismal prognosis is exacerbated by a lack of methods for early diagnosis and prognostication and limited access to opportune standard treatment. Historically, the clinical fraternity has relied upon the tumour, nodes, and metastases (TNM) staging as the gold standard prognostic tool for lung cancer [5], although, several researchers have raised concerns about various editions of the TNM classification [6–9]. Recently, several studies have reported a profound prognostic impact of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in malignant tumours [10–17] including lung cancer [18]. Further, immune scoring based on TILs or their ratios for differentiating prognosis within each tumour, node, and metastasis has been used to enhance the prognostic value of TNM staging [19–22].

TILs present in the immune infiltrate called the tumour microenvironment (TME) include effector T cells, which can be T helper cells (1, 2, and 17), regulatory T (Treg) cells, T follicular helper cells, and cytotoxic T cells [23–25]. These cells may be localized in the tumour parenchyma, invasive margin, or adjacent tumour stroma, where they interact with tumour cells in three phases of immuno-editing [26]. During the escape phase, tumour cells induce the production of cytokines and growth factors and facilitate the recruitment of immunosuppressive cells, thereby causing immune suppression [27–29].

Tregs are a highly immune-suppressive subset of clusters of differentiation (CD) 4+ T cells [30–32], which play an important role in the preservation of self-tolerance and modulation of the overall immune responses against tumour cells through numerous cellular and humoral mechanisms [33, 34]. Studies have shown that the composition of Tregs is altered in the TME, where the effector Treg numbers are increased in NSCLC patients as compared to healthy individuals [35, 36]. Transforming growth factor (TGF) -β1 and interleukin (IL) -2 pro-inflammatory cytokines which are present at a high level in tumour tissues of NSCLC patients promote the differentiation of naïve T-cells into Tregs [35]. Moreover, due to self-antigens released in the TME by dying cancer cells, nTregs are converted into effector Tregs by expressing a higher level of activation biomarkers [35]. In a study, Erfani et al. reported that the NSCLC patients had almost twice Treg cells than the healthy controls [37]. Further, they reported that the metastatic stages had almost two times more Treg cells than the non-metastatic stages [37]. This makes Tregs an ideal therapeutic target and candidate for prognostication of lung cancer, especially NSCLC, which comprises about 85% of all lung cancer cases [38]. While the therapeutic targeting of Treg by pathways like the blockade of immune checkpoint molecules has been studied by many authors [33], the prognostic value of measurement and localization of Treg cells has not been fully evaluated in all study populations, with various prognostic factor variables, causing individual studies to report piecemeal and mixed results.

The objective of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate whether the “number of Treg cells” has any prognostic value in predicting the survival of NSCLC patients in various study populations, considering varied prognostic factor variables and survival outcomes.

Methods

The study conducted adheres to and is in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki 1975, as revised in 2000) for experiments involving humans. The systematic review did not deal with any patient-level data or disclose any identifiable patient data; hence Institutional Review Board Approval or Informed Consent of the patients was not sought. The protocol of this review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO on August 28, 2021, and was assigned the registration number CRD42021270598. The protocol can be accessed from the PROSPERO website. This manuscript is written in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The PRISMA 2020 checklist for this submission can be found in additional files (Additional file 4).

Design and setting

The design of the current study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. An online electronic database search was conducted from July 19 to 25, 2022. An update of the systematic review was conducted from July 20 to August 5, 2024, to capture the newly published studies. Retrieved studies underwent screening, quality assessment, and extraction of the required information. The systematic review process was facilitated by an automation tool “MAIA”, an artificial intelligence-based proprietary platform developed in-house by Genpro Research Pvt Ltd. MAIA tool was used to search on PubMed and retrieve the abstract and publicly available articles through PubMed Central or respective journal portals. MAIA was further used to support screening and data extraction where MAIA’s Natural Language Processing highlighter helped to locate the relevant information quickly, thereby helping in the final decision of relevant information capture. All these steps were machine-augmented, giving the final decision to the reviewer. The tool was not equipped to search EMBASE till the time this manuscript was written.

Search strategy

To fulfil Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR) Standards, the review was conducted in two databases [39]. PubMed was used to conduct the search in the MEDLINE database, parallelly by a manual reviewer and another reviewer using the automation tool “MAIA”. Retrievals were sought for the relevant published prospective as well as retrospective studies describing the prognostic value of presence, degree, measurement, or localization of Tregs in tumour tissue or body fluids of patients with NSCLC, through histological or cytological procedures like immuno-histochemistry, flow cytometry, or quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, assessing either Treg alone or in combination with at least one biomarker out of CD4+, CD25+, CD127−, Helios+, and/or forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)+ [33]. EMBASE was searched and reviewed manually by the two reviewers.

Free full-text studies presenting original research in humans, published in English in any region were included in the review. Studies published during the last 12 years were included, so as to ensure that the recent advances in standard of care for laboratory testing were adequately represented in the review. Protocols or design papers, education literature, and meeting reports were excluded. Letters to the editor and brief communications were included only if they described original research with its results. Designs such as case studies, case series, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses were excluded. As pre-specified in the protocol submitted to PROSPERO prior to the conduct of the review, studies that failed in the quality assessment were excluded from the review. Cross-references from review articles were reviewed to ensure that no eligible article was missed. The search was not rerun before the final analysis. No unpublished study was sought so as to allow comparison of results between the manual review and the automation tool “MAIA”, which was equipped to evaluate only the published studies. The last search was done on July 20, 2024.

Using predefined eligibility criteria based on the “Population, Prognostic Factor, Outcome” (PFO) approach (Additional file 1), two reviewers screened the unblinded titles, abstracts, and full text of the studies independently in a standardized manner. One reviewer performed screening manually using Microsoft Excel (v2403), while the second reviewer used “MAIA” automation tool. The disagreements were resolved by consultation with other co-authors. Before the resolution of disagreements, the agreement analysis showed the kappa as 0.819, while after the resolution of disagreements, the kappa was 1.000 (Additional file 5).

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [40] Flow Diagram was created based on the retrieved literature, screened records, excluded studies, and included studies (Fig. 1). For the quality assessment of the studies after screening, Cochrane’s Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used. Only those studies were included for extraction of data for the final narrative synthesis and quantitative analysis that showed a low risk of bias for “study participation”, “prognostic factor measurement”, and “outcome measurement” domains, while low to moderate risk of bias for “study attrition”, “study confounding”, and “statistical analysis and reporting” domains. Data extraction was done by the first reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. The automation tool “MAIA” was used to facilitate the extraction of data. The detailed search strategy including keywords used, retrieval, eligibility criteria, risk of bias assessment, and extraction are provided in Additional file 1.Fig. 1 PRISMA 2020 diagram: flow of the studies through the review process

Statistical analysis

The primary outcome measured by this review was how the number of Treg cells affected the survival of the patients with NSCLC in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), or recurrence-free survival (RFS), with point estimates as risk and ratios such as relative risk (RR), odds ratio (OR), or hazards ratio (HR). OS was defined as the time between the first diagnosis of NSCLC and the date of death regardless of the cause. PFS, DFS, and RFS were defined as the time between the date of diagnosis and the date of progression, recurrent symptoms, and first relapse respectively. The secondary outcome of the study was to quantify recurrence and metastasis.

The data were pooled for quantitative synthesis from the individual studies through meta-analysis using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (v29.0.2.0). As per the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group review for meta-analysis, a minimum of two studies with the same type of survival outcome were required to subject them to quantitative synthesis. In case enough studies were not available for certain survival outcomes, findings from the individual studies were summarized in the narrative.

The survival analysis was reflected by the individual studies as HR, 95% confidence interval (CI), and p-value. Studies with a significant p-value (< 0.05) for multivariate HR were considered for meta-analysis to avoid bias due to confounding by co-factors. Studies having a low number of Tregs as the reference category for HR were eventually included in the meta-analysis.

For pooling HRs, a meta-analysis for binary outcomes with pre-calculated effect sizes was run in SPSS. Confidence intervals were converted to variance. Since the variables related to the study population, prognostic factor, outcome, and study design were not completely similar among the included studies, the random effect model was applied. Inverse-variance method was used to determine the weight of the studies. DerSimonian-Laird was used as the estimation method. Standard error adjustment was done using the Knapp-Hartung adjustment method. The low number of Treg became the control category for the pooled OR. A sensitivity analysis for the standard method was also run but eventually, the significant results obtained from the Knapp-Hartung adjustment method were reported in the results. The summary effect estimate (log OR) and its confidence interval were determined by generating forest plots using the HRs and associated variance for survival outcomes. The I2 statistic was calculated for determining heterogeneity where an I2 value lower than 30% was considered indicative of homogeneity. The symmetry of funnel plots generated using effect size and variance was used to assess publication bias visually. No sub-group analysis was performed. The data generated during screening, risk-of-bias assessment, and extraction process was uploaded in the online Harvard Dataverse Repository.

Results

Included studies: flow through the review and characteristics

Out of 809 retrievals obtained through automation, manual search, and cross-references, 320 studies were filtered out, 448 studies were removed by screening, and seven studies were not available in full text.

Further, ten studies failed the risk of bias assessment using the QUIPS tool of Cochrane and were excluded from the final quantitative analysis. Out of these studies, most (5/9) failed to fulfil the criteria for the study attrition domain: while four studies had low sample size reaching the analysis stage, in another study, the available data did not adequately represent the study sample. Further, two studies could not fulfil the criteria for the study participation domain as their study sample did not adequately represent the population of interest. Another two studies could not fulfil the criteria for the study confounding domain since the important potential confounding factors were not appropriately accounted for, whereas one study failed to fulfil the criteria for both study participation and study attrition domains due to low sample size and lack of representative study sample. All the studies fulfilled the criteria for the domains of prognostic factor measurement, outcome measurement, and statistical analysis and reporting. The granular details of the risk of bias assessment are shared as Additional file 6. Eventually, 24 studies (18 from MEDLINE manual search, three from EMBASE manual search, and three from cross-references) were included in the review (Fig. 1) [41–64].

Most studies had the study population as non-metastatic NSCLC (n = 7) or any NSCLC (n = 5). Most of the studies included all sub-types of NSCLC (n = 20). Six studies included patients who underwent surgery without any neo-adjuvant therapy, two studies included patients who did not receive any adjuvant therapy, one study enrolled patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy, while one study reported on patients who underwent first-line treatment with anti-PD1 with or without chemotherapy. Most studies performed tests on Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections or preserved tissue-microarray blocks, either alone or with other types of samples (n = 15), commonly using the immuno-histochemistry method (n = 14). FOXP3 (n = 9) was the commonest biomarker used. Most studies reported OS (n = 18) either as the only survival outcome or along with other outcomes. Twenty studies (83.3%) were designed as an analytical cross-sectional study with or without a comparison group. Out of the nine studies with a comparison group (Cross-sectional: 6, Cohort: 2, Controlled before-after: 1), six used healthy volunteers (three used age-matched healthy volunteers, one used both age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers, and two studies used unmatched healthy volunteers), while one used cancer-free cardiology patients matched for age, demographic characteristics, and comorbidities. No repeated measures of laboratory parameters were done in cross-sectional studies, but a longitudinal follow-up component was embedded only for survival events such as death, progression, recurrent symptoms, or first relapse. Fourteen studies were retrospective in nature, while eight were prospective, and two studies were both prospective and retrospective. Report characteristics and study characteristics of the included studies are detailed in Table 1. The study-wise details of report characteristics, population under study, prognostic factor, outcome, and study design are provided in Additional file 7. Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

Report characteristics	n	Study characteristics	n	Study characteristics	n	
Year of publication (N = 24)		Population under study (N = 24)		Biomarkers used for Treg (N = 24)		
2014	1	Any NSCLC	5	FOXP3 + 	9	
2015	1	Any stage NSCLC	1	CD4 + CD25 + / +  + CD127 − /dim	5	
2016	5	Chemotherapy-naïve any stage NSCLC	1	CD4 + FOXP3 + 	3	
2017	4	Newly diagnosed any stage NSCLC	1	CD4 + 	1	
2018	1	Stage 1 NSCLC	1	Helios + FOXP3 + 	1	
2019	4	Non-metastatic NSCLC	7	CD3 + FOXP3 + 	1	
2020	3	Chemotherapy-naïve non-metastatic NSCLC	1	Treg + TLS-DC + CD8	1	
2021	3	Metastatic NSCLC	2	CD8 + FOXP3 + 	1	
2022	1	Pulmonary recurrence-based oligometastatic NSCLC treated with SABR	1	CD3 + CD45RO + FOXP3 + 	1	
2024	1	First diagnosis and relapsed NSCLC	1	No biomarker	1	
Language (N = 24)		NSCLC with KPS > 80%	1	Outcomes (N = 24)		
English	24	Resected NSCLC without neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy	1	Overall survival	8	
Region (N = 24)		Solitary lesion in localized NSCLC	1	Disease-free survival	3	
China	9	Prognostic factor (N = 24)		Progression-free survival	3	
Japan	3	Samples for Treg assessment		Recurrence-free survival	1	
Brazil	2	FFPE sections or preserved tissue-microarray blocks	12	Both overall survival and disease-free survival	3	
Germany	2	Peripheral blood	7	Both overall survival and progression-free survival	3	
France	2	Both FFPE and peripheral blood	2	Both overall survival and recurrence-free survival	3	
Greece	1	Fresh surgical specimens	1	Study design (N = 24)		
Australia	1	FFPE and fresh tumour biopsies	1	Analytical cross-sectional design	14	
Spain	1	FFPE, fresh tumour biopsies, non-tumoral distant lung specimens, lymph nodes specimens, and blood	1	Analytical cross-sectional design with comparison group	6	
United States of America	1	Tests conducted on samples		Longitudinal	1	
Poland	1	Immuno-histochemistry	9	Controlled before after study	1	
Italy	1	Flow cytometry	6	Cohort study	2	
Species (N = 24)		Flow cytometry and immuno-histochemistry	4			
Humans	24	Multiplex immuno-fluorescence staining	2			
Article type (N = 24)		Immuno-histochemistry with FOXP3 staining	1			
Original research article	23	Flow cytometry and antibody staining	1			
Letter to the editor	1	Immuno-histochemistry and immuno-fluorescence staining	1			
CD Clusters of differentiation, FFPE Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded, FOXP3 Forkhead box P3, KPS Karnofsky Performance Status, NSCLC Non-small cell lung cancer, SABR Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy, TLS-DC Tertiary lymphoid structures-dendritic cell, Treg Regulatory T cell

Quantitative synthesis of the study results

Out of the 24 included studies, only 13 studies, reported significant (p ≤ 0.05) multivariate analysis. Among these studies, 11 studies reported 14 OS values, of which, eventually, seven OS values from seven studies were included in the meta-analysis (Fig. 2a). The population for these studies were non-metastatic NSCLC (n = 2), any stage NSCLC (n = 2), naïve NSCLC (n = 1), pulmonary recurrence-based oligometastatic NSCLC treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) (n = 1), and NSCLC with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) > 80% (n = 1). Four studies measured Treg in FFPE sections by immuno-histochemistry, while three studies measured the same in peripheral blood using flow cytometry. Four studies measured FOXP3 as the biomarker for Treg and three studies measured multiple biomarkers. All seven studies ran the Cox proportional hazards model for survival analysis. Six of them were analytical cross-sectional in design, while one was a cohort study. All seven studies had no repeated measurements of laboratory parameters and had a longitudinal follow-up component only for survival outcomes. Three of these studies were prospective and four studies were retrospective.Fig. 2 Selection of studies for quantitative synthesis. a Overall Survival (OS). b Disease-free Survival (DFS). c Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Among the 13 studies reporting significant multivariate analysis, eventually, two studies reporting two values for DFS were included in the meta-analysis (Fig. 2b) and three studies reporting three values of PFS were included in the meta-analysis (Fig. 2c). Only one study reported RFS among the ten studies reporting significant multivariate analysis. Since a minimum of two studies were required for performing a meta-analysis, quantitative synthesis could not be done for RFS.

Out of the final 24 studies included in the review, except one study which evaluated the FOXP3+ category and the FOXP3- category in non-metastatic NSCLC, all the remaining 23 studies assessed a high and low Tregs; however, the low Treg was defined differently in different studies as described in Table 2. Table 2 Definitions of low Treg used in different studies for multivariate analysis

Study population	Definition of low Treg used in different studies (n = 23)	
Only stage 1 NSCLC patients	• Low cell counts of less than 45 per high power field (n = 1)	
Only stage 1 and 2 NSCLC patients	• Not specified (although text mentions high FoxP3, but no cut-off is provided) (n = 1)	
Non-metastatic NSCLC patients	• Less than 10% of the total lymphocyte count (n = 1)

• Low area under the curve than a cut-off (n = 1)

• Lower than the median (n = 1)

• Below the optimal cutoff point according to the built-in risk scoring formula in X-tile (n = 1)

• Not specified (although text mentions low FoxP3, but no cut-off is provided) (n = 1)

• Not specified (although the text mentions the comparative frequency of Tregs in patients and healthy controls) (n = 1)

	
Only metastatic NSCLC patients	• Lower than the median (n = 1)

• Not specified (n = 1)

	
NSCLC patients irrespective of the stage	• Lower than the median (n = 2)

• Lower than mean (n = 2)

• Lower than a cut-off concerning percent of CD4 count (n = 2)

• Less than 95% of controls (n = 1)

• Low concentration in tumour tissue than a pre-specified level (n = 1)

• High score (score 2–3) and low score (score 0–1), calculated as per the proportion of positively stained cells out of the total nucleated cells (n = 1)

• Below 25 in number (n = 1)

• Unspecified (n = 2)

	
Patients with pulmonary recurrence-based oligometastatic NSCLC treated with SABR	• Lower than the median (n = 1)	

Summary estimates from the meta-analysis

The seven studies analysed for OS had a Q value less than the degree of freedom (K-1); hence, I2 was zero and the included studies had low heterogeneity. The summary log OR was 1.646; 95% CI, 1.349, 1.944; p (2-tailed) < 0.001; standard error (SE), 0.1217 (Fig. 3a). The two studies pooled for DFS had low heterogeneity (I2 = 0), and the summary log OR was 0.992; 95% CI, 0.820, 1.163; p (2-tailed) 0.009; SE, 0.0135 (Fig. 3b). The three studies pooled for PFS had low heterogeneity (I2 = 0), and the summary log OR as 2.231; 95% CI, 0.424, 4.038; p (2-tailed) = 0.034; SE, 0.4200 (Fig. 3c). The one study which evaluated RFS reported multivariate HR as 1.99; 95% CI, 1.15, 3.46; p = 0.01. The funnel plots for OS, DFS, and PFS did not show any publication bias as depicted in Additional file 3.Fig. 3 Forest plots generated by meta-analysis. a Forest Plot for Overall Survival. b Forest Plot for Disease-free Survival. c Forest Plot for Progression-free Survival

The studies included in the review also reported other results such as quantification, localization, recurrence, metastasis, and correlation of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-L1) with the level of Tregs. These results are provided in an Additional file 2.

Discussion

The results of the review indicate that the number of Treg cells was significantly associated with OS (p < 0.001), DFS (p = 0.009), and PFS (p = 0.034) in NSCLC. The pooled log OR of more than one indicates that the reference category as a low number of Treg was associated with improved OS. On the contrary, DFS was better with the high number of Tregs, although the analysis pooled only two studies and both used different biomarkers and study populations. The low number of Tregs also showed higher PFS. Based on one study that reported significant HR for RFS, a low number of Treg had significantly better RFS (p = 0.01). The log OR generated by the forest plot for OS was significant for the study population “any stage NSCLC” and FOXP3 as the biomarker, while the one generated for DFS was significant for the study population “any stage NSCLC” and “non-metastatic NSCLC” and biomarker as FOXP3 and CD4+FOXP3. The study reporting significant HR for RFS also evaluated FOXP3 in any stage NSCLC. Overall, the meta-analysis reflected that a low number of Treg cells indicated better survival, especially in any stage NSCLC or non-metastatic NSCLC, while using FOXP3 as the biomarker.

Most of the past studies reported findings similar to our study, although few studies contradicted our conclusion. Peng et al. concluded that a low number of Tregs had significantly poor DFS [42]. Kotsakis et al. found that a high number of terminal effector Tregs was associated with significantly better OS and PFS [51]. On univariate Cox regression, Muto et al. reported significantly better OS [54], while Ameratunga et al. reported significantly better DFS in patients with a high number of Treg cells [45]. None of the previous studies could highlight the role of Tregs in different study populations, considering different prognostic factor variables, outcomes, and study designs. None of the published reviews on this topic was designed as a meta-analysis and/or a systematic review[34, 65]. On the contrary, our review was designed as a systematic review and meta-analysis and was comprehensive with respect to varied study populations, prognostic factor variables, outcomes, and several other aspects.

The current study had certain limitations. Searching only two portals might have introduced bias, although the unavailability of filters appropriate for clinical studies in other search portals like Scopus and Google Scholar discouraged the authors from including them in the search strategy. Since MEDLINE and EMBASE are the biggest databases for clinical studies, the authors chose to conduct the review on the PubMed portal and the EMBASE portal.

Variations in study populations, prognostic factor variables (such as types of Tregs, biomarkers, samples, and procedures of measurement), outcomes, study designs, analytical tests, reference categories, quantification, and localization of Tregs, among the included studies may have introduced imprecision in results and may be a source of bias. Additionally, due to a lack of data in the included studies for variables such as race and ethnicity, the population heterogeneity could not be accounted for in the studies gathered from different regions.

Several factors influence the function of Tregs in the TME by acting on the development, maturation, and differentiation of Tregs, or by providing favourable conditions for the functioning of Tregs [65–74]. Moreover, multiple mechanisms of action of Tregs pose difficulty in explaining the exact mechanism contributing to the results of the individual studies [33, 34]. Since the current review did not assess any of these factors influencing the function of Tregs or the underlying mechanisms, they could have potentially confounded the results. Further, due to the low number of studies included in the final meta-analysis, sub-group analysis could not be conducted for many variables such as study population and biomarkers. Nevertheless, the present review applied meta-analysis to synthesize the best available evidence for the use of the number of Treg cells as a prognostic indicator in NSCLC.

Conclusions

Based on the results of this meta-analysis, authors recommend using the “number of Treg cells” as a prognostic biomarker, especially in any stage NSCLC or non-metastatic NSCLC, while using FOXP3 expression as the specific marker, although further experimental studies designed for various populations, biomarkers, and outcomes are needed to confirm these findings. By highlighting the significance of Treg cells in the prognosis of NSCLC, this study can pave the way for developing better prognostic tests, supplementing the TNM staging-based clinical-decision making, and formulating novel therapeutic approaches in cancer treatment.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1: Additional Note 1. Detailed Search Strategy, Risk of Bias Assessment, and Data Extraction.

Supplementary Material 2: Additional Note 2. Other Results Reported by the Studies Included in the Review.

Supplementary Material 3: Additional Figure 1. Funnel Plots. Figure 1a. Funnel Plot for Overall Survival. Figure 1b. Funnel Plot for Disease-free Survival. Figure 1c. Funnel Plot for Progression-free Survival.

Supplementary Material 4: Additional Table 1. PRISMA 2020 checklist.

Supplementary Material 5: Additional Table 2. Agreement Analysis Sheet.

Supplementary Material 6: Additional Table 3. QUIPS Assessment Results.

Supplementary Material 7: Additional Table 4. Study-wise PFO Table.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Mr. Ujjwal Das, an independent consultant from Indian Institute of Management, Udaipur for inputs in planning for statistical analysis. We also acknowledge Ms. Divya Girishbhai Patel, Senior Medical Writer and RWE Analyst from erstwhile Genpro Research Pvt Ltd (currently merged with Catalyst Clinical Research) for conducting the review in MAIA automation tool and assisting in accomplishing the study faster.

Authors’ contributions

KK contributed to concept and design, investigation, project administration, and critical revision of the manuscript. MG contributed to acquisition of data, investigation, and methodology. MG analysed the data and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. SM contributed to concept and design, critical revision of the manuscript, and supervised the review. RK contributed to interpretation of data, validation of findings of the review, and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

KK is Ph.D., MG is M.B.B.S, Ph.D., RK is D.M. Oncology, and SM is M.D.

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study during screening, risk-of-bias assessment, and extraction process are available in the online Harvard Dataverse Repository, 10.7910/DVN/JQOI9V [75].

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study conducted adheres to and is in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki 1975, as revised in 2000) for experiments involving humans. The systematic review did not deal with any patient-level data or disclose any identifiable patient data; hence Institutional Review Board Approval or Informed Consent of the patients to participate was not sought.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Kapil Khambholja, Manish Gehani, Rushabh Kothari, and Sachin Marulkar contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
==== Refs
References

1. American Cancer Society Lung Cancer The Cancer Atlas 2019
American Cancer Society. Lung Cancer. In: The Cancer Atlas. 2019.
2. Zappa C Mousa S Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances Translational Lung Cancer Research 2016 5 3 288 10.21037/tlcr.2016.06.07 27413711
Zappa C, Mousa S. Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016;5(3):288.27413711 10.21037/tlcr.2016.06.07
3. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. 2023. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/. [Cited 2023 Aug 20].
4. Howlader N Forjaz G Mooradian MJ Meza R Kong CY Cronin KA The effect of advances in lung-cancer treatment on population mortality N Engl J Med 2020 383 7 640 649 10.1056/NEJMoa1916623 32786189
Howlader N, Forjaz G, Mooradian MJ, Meza R, Kong CY, Cronin KA, et al. The effect of advances in lung-cancer treatment on population mortality. N Engl J Med. 2020Aug 13;383(7):640–9.32786189 10.1056/NEJMoa1916623
5. Goldstraw P Ball D Jett J Le Chevalier T Lim E Nicholson A Non-small-cell lung cancer Lancet (London, England) 2011 378 9804 1727 1740 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62101-0 21565398
Goldstraw P, Ball D, Jett J, Le Chevalier T, Lim E, Nicholson A, et al. Non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet (London, England). 2011;378(9804):1727–40.21565398 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62101-0
6. Kameyama K Huang CL Liu D Okamoto T Hayashi E Yamamoto Y Problems related to TNM staging: patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002 124 3 503 10 10.1067/mtc.2002.123810 12202867
Kameyama K, Huang CL, Liu D, Okamoto T, Hayashi E, Yamamoto Y, et al. Problems related to TNM staging: patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124(3):503–10.12202867 10.1067/mtc.2002.123810
7. IASLC. International association for the study of lung cancer. 2023. Available from: https://www.iaslc.org/. [Cited 2023 Aug 20].
8. Rami-Porta R Goldstraw P Strength and weakness of the new TNM classification for lung cancer Eur Respir J 2010 36 2 237 239 10.1183/09031936.00016210 20675779
Rami-Porta R, Goldstraw P. Strength and weakness of the new TNM classification for lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2010;36(2):237–9.20675779 10.1183/09031936.00016210
9. Hattori A Takamochi K Oh S Suzuki K New revisions and current issues in the eighth edition of the TNM classification for non-small cell lung cancer Jpn J Clin Oncol 2019 49 1 3 11 10.1093/jjco/hyy142 30277521
Hattori A, Takamochi K, Oh S, Suzuki K. New revisions and current issues in the eighth edition of the TNM classification for non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49(1):3–11.30277521 10.1093/jjco/hyy142
10. Bates G Fox S Han C Leek R Garcia J Harris A Quantification of regulatory T cells enables the identification of high-risk breast cancer patients and those at risk of late relapse Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 24 34 5373 5380 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.9584 17135638
Bates G, Fox S, Han C, Leek R, Garcia J, Harris A, et al. Quantification of regulatory T cells enables the identification of high-risk breast cancer patients and those at risk of late relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(34):5373–80.17135638 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.9584
11. Clemente C Mihm M Bufalino R Zurrida S Collini P Cascinelli N Prognostic value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in the vertical growth phase of primary cutaneous melanoma Cancer 1996 77 7 1303 1310 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960401)77:7<1303::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-5 8608507
Clemente C, Mihm M, Bufalino R, Zurrida S, Collini P, Cascinelli N. Prognostic value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in the vertical growth phase of primary cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 1996;77(7):1303–10.8608507 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960401)77:7<1303::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-5
12. Galon J Costes A Sanchez-Cabo F Kirilovsky A Mlecnik B Lagorce-Pagès C Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome Science (New York, NY) 2006 313 5795 1960 1964 10.1126/science.1129139
Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, Lagorce-Pagès C, et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science (New York, NY). 2006;313(5795):1960–4.10.1126/science.1129139
13. Johnson S Kerr K Chapman A Kennedy M King G Cockburn J Immune cell infiltrates and prognosis in primary carcinoma of the lung Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2000 27 1 27 35 10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00095-1 10672781
Johnson S, Kerr K, Chapman A, Kennedy M, King G, Cockburn J, et al. Immune cell infiltrates and prognosis in primary carcinoma of the lung. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2000;27(1):27–35.10672781 10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00095-1
14. Marrogi A Munshi A Merogi A Ohadike Y El-Habashi A Marrogi O Study of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and transforming growth factor-beta as prognostic factors in breast carcinoma Int J Cancer 1997 74 5 492 501 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971021)74:5<492::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-Z 9355970
Marrogi A, Munshi A, Merogi A, Ohadike Y, El-Habashi A, Marrogi O, et al. Study of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and transforming growth factor-beta as prognostic factors in breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1997;74(5):492–501.9355970 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971021)74:5<492::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-Z
15. Ropponen KM Eskelinen MJ Lipponen PK Alhava EKVM Prognostic value of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colorectal cancer-PubMed J Pathol 1997 182 3 318 324 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199707)182:3<318::AID-PATH862>3.0.CO;2-6 9349235
Ropponen KM, Eskelinen MJ, Lipponen PK, Alhava EKVM. Prognostic value of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colorectal cancer-PubMed. J Pathol. 1997;182(3):318–24.9349235 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199707)182:3<318::AID-PATH862>3.0.CO;2-6
16. Vesalainen S Lipponen P Talja M Syrjänen K Histological grade, perineural infiltration, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and apoptosis as determinants of long-term prognosis in prostatic adenocarcinoma  Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 1994 30A 12 1797 803
Vesalainen S, Lipponen P, Talja M, Syrjänen K. Histological grade, perineural infiltration, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and apoptosis as determinants of long-term prognosis in prostatic adenocarcinoma.  Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990). 1994;30A(12):1797–803.
17. Al-Shibli K Donnem TS AlSaad S Persson M Bremnes R Busund L Prognostic effect of epithelial and stromal lymphocyte infiltration in non-small cell lung cancer Clin Cancer Res 2008 14 16 5220 7 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0133 18698040
Al-Shibli K, Donnem TS, AlSaad S, Persson M, Bremnes R, Busund L. Prognostic effect of epithelial and stromal lymphocyte infiltration in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(16):5220–7.18698040 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0133
18. Fridman W Pagès F Sautès-Fridman C Galon J The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome Nat Rev Cancer 2012 12 4 298 306 10.1038/nrc3245 22419253
Fridman W, Pagès F, Sautès-Fridman C, Galon J. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(4):298–306.22419253 10.1038/nrc3245
19. Donnem T Kilvaer T Andersen S Richardsen E Paulsen E Hald S Strategies for clinical implementation of TNM-Immunoscore in resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer Ann Oncol 2016 27 2 225 232 10.1093/annonc/mdv560 26578726
Donnem T, Kilvaer T, Andersen S, Richardsen E, Paulsen E, Hald S, et al. Strategies for clinical implementation of TNM-Immunoscore in resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(2):225–32.26578726 10.1093/annonc/mdv560
20. Mlecnik B Tosolini M Kirilovsky A Berger A Bindea G Meatchi T Histopathologic-based prognostic factors of colorectal cancers are associated with the state of the local immune reaction Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2011 29 6 610 618 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.5425 21245428
Mlecnik B, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Berger A, Bindea G, Meatchi T, et al. Histopathologic-based prognostic factors of colorectal cancers are associated with the state of the local immune reaction. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):610–8.21245428 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.5425
21. Yang Y Yang X Wang Y Xu J Shen H Gou H Combined consideration of tumor-associated immune cell density and immune checkpoint expression in the peritumoral microenvironment for prognostic stratification of non-small-cell lung cancer patients Front Immunol 2022 10 13
Yang Y, Yang X, Wang Y, Xu J, Shen H, Gou H, et al. Combined consideration of tumor-associated immune cell density and immune checkpoint expression in the peritumoral microenvironment for prognostic stratification of non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Front Immunol. 2022;10:13.
22. Parra ER Behrens C Rodriguez-Canales J Lin H Mino B Blando J Image analysis-based assessment of PD-L1 and tumor-associated immune cells density supports distinct intratumoral microenvironment groups in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients Clin Cancer Res 2016 22 24 6278 6289 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2443 27252415
Parra ER, Behrens C, Rodriguez-Canales J, Lin H, Mino B, Blando J, et al. Image analysis-based assessment of PD-L1 and tumor-associated immune cells density supports distinct intratumoral microenvironment groups in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(24):6278–89.27252415 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2443
23. Fridman W Pagès F Sautès-Fridman C Galon J The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome Nat Rev Cancer 2012 12 4 298 306 10.1038/nrc3245 22419253
Fridman W, Pagès F, Sautès-Fridman C, Galon J. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(4):298–306.22419253 10.1038/nrc3245
24. Ganesan A Johansson M Ruffell B Yagui-Beltrán A Lau J Jablons D Tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells inhibit endogenous cytotoxic T cell responses to lung adenocarcinoma J Immunol 2013 191 4 2009 17 10.4049/jimmunol.1301317 23851682
Ganesan A, Johansson M, Ruffell B, Yagui-Beltrán A, Lau J, Jablons D, et al. Tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells inhibit endogenous cytotoxic T cell responses to lung adenocarcinoma. J Immunol. 2013;191(4):2009–17.23851682 10.4049/jimmunol.1301317
25. Platonova S Cherfils-Vicini J Damotte D Crozet L Vieillard V Validire P Profound coordinated alterations of intratumoral NK cell phenotype and function in lung carcinoma Can Res 2011 71 16 5412 5422 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4179
Platonova S, Cherfils-Vicini J, Damotte D, Crozet L, Vieillard V, Validire P, et al. Profound coordinated alterations of intratumoral NK cell phenotype and function in lung carcinoma. Can Res. 2011;71(16):5412–22.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4179
26. Kim R Emi M Tanabe K Cancer immunoediting from immune surveillance to immune escape Immunology 2007 121 1 1 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02587.x 17386080
Kim R, Emi M, Tanabe K. Cancer immunoediting from immune surveillance to immune escape. Immunology. 2007;121(1):1.17386080 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02587.x
27. Schreiber R Old L Smyth M Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion Science (New York, NY) 2011 331 6024 1565 1570 10.1126/science.1203486
Schreiber R, Old L, Smyth M. Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science (New York, NY). 2011;331(6024):1565–70.10.1126/science.1203486
28. Mittal D Gubin M Schreiber R Smyth M New insights into cancer immunoediting and its three component phases–elimination, equilibrium and escape Curr Opin Immunol 2014 27 1 16 25 10.1016/j.coi.2014.01.004 24531241
Mittal D, Gubin M, Schreiber R, Smyth M. New insights into cancer immunoediting and its three component phases–elimination, equilibrium and escape. Curr Opin Immunol. 2014;27(1):16–25.24531241 10.1016/j.coi.2014.01.004
29. Dunn G Old L Schreiber R The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting Immunity 2004 21 2 137 148 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.07.017 15308095
Dunn G, Old L, Schreiber R. The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. Immunity. 2004;21(2):137–48.15308095 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.07.017
30. Schreiber R Old L Smyth M Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion Science (New York, NY) 2011 331 6024 1565 1570 10.1126/science.1203486
Schreiber R, Old L, Smyth M. Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science (New York, NY). 2011;331(6024):1565–70.10.1126/science.1203486
31. Mittal D Gubin M Schreiber R Smyth M New insights into cancer immunoediting and its three component phases–elimination, equilibrium and escape Curr Opin Immunol 2014 27 1 16 25 10.1016/j.coi.2014.01.004 24531241
Mittal D, Gubin M, Schreiber R, Smyth M. New insights into cancer immunoediting and its three component phases–elimination, equilibrium and escape. Curr Opin Immunol. 2014;27(1):16–25.24531241 10.1016/j.coi.2014.01.004
32. Dunn G Old L Schreiber R The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting Immunity 2004 21 2 137 148 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.07.017 15308095
Dunn G, Old L, Schreiber R. The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. Immunity. 2004;21(2):137–48.15308095 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.07.017
33. Takeuchi Y Nishikawa H Roles of regulatory T cells in cancer immunity Int Immunol 2016 28 8 401 409 10.1093/intimm/dxw025 27160722
Takeuchi Y, Nishikawa H. Roles of regulatory T cells in cancer immunity. Int Immunol. 2016;28(8):401–9.27160722 10.1093/intimm/dxw025
34. Fantini MC Favale A Onali S Facciotti F Tumor infiltrating regulatory T cells in sporadic and colitis-associated colorectal cancer: the red little riding hood and the wolf Int J Mol Sci 2020 21 18 6744 10.3390/ijms21186744 32937953
Fantini MC, Favale A, Onali S, Facciotti F. Tumor infiltrating regulatory T cells in sporadic and colitis-associated colorectal cancer: the red little riding hood and the wolf. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6744.32937953 10.3390/ijms21186744
35. Cinier J, Hubert M, Besson L, Di Roio A, Rodriguez C, Lombardi V, et al. Recruitment and expansion of Tregs cells in the tumor environment-how to target them? Cancers. 2021;13(8):1850.
36. Kotsakis A Koinis F Katsarou A Gioulbasani M Aggouraki D Kentepozidis N Prognostic value of circulating regulatory T cell subsets in untreated non-small cell lung cancer patients Sci Rep 2016 6 1 1 11 10.1038/srep39247 28442746
Kotsakis A, Koinis F, Katsarou A, Gioulbasani M, Aggouraki D, Kentepozidis N, et al. Prognostic value of circulating regulatory T cell subsets in untreated non-small cell lung cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–11.28442746 10.1038/srep39247
37. Erfani N Mehrabadi SM Ghayumi MA Haghshenas MR Mojtahedi Z Ghaderi A Increase of regulatory T cells in metastatic stage and CTLA-4 over expression in lymphocytes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Lung Cancer 2012 77 2 306 311 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.04.011 22608141
Erfani N, Mehrabadi SM, Ghayumi MA, Haghshenas MR, Mojtahedi Z, Ghaderi A, et al. Increase of regulatory T cells in metastatic stage and CTLA-4 over expression in lymphocytes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer. 2012A 1;77(2):306–11.22608141 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.04.011
38. Basumallik N, Agarwal M. Small Cell Lung Cancer. [Updated 2023 Jul 10]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482458/.
39. Higgins J, Lasserson T, Thomas J, Flemyng E, Churchill R. Cochrane Community. 2023. Methodological expectations of cochrane intervention reviews: standards for the conduct of new Cochrane intervention reviews, and the planning and conduct of updates. Available from: https://community.cochrane.org/mecir-manual. [Cited 2024 Aug 3].
40. Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM Boutron I Hoffmann TC Mulrow CD The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews BMJ 2021 29 372
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;29:372.
41. Yang S, Liu Y, Li MY, Ng CSH, Yang S li, Wang S, et al. FOXP3 promotes tumor growth and metastasis by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and EMT in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):124.
42. Peng H Wu X Zhong R Yu T Cai X Liu J Profiling tumor immune microenvironment of non-small cell lung cancer using multiplex immunofluorescence Front Immunol 2021 4 12
Peng H, Wu X, Zhong R, Yu T, Cai X, Liu J, et al. Profiling tumor immune microenvironment of non-small cell lung cancer using multiplex immunofluorescence. Front Immunol. 2021;4:12.
43. Germain C Devi-Marulkar P Knockaert S Biton J Kaplon H Letaïef L Tertiary lymphoid structure-B cells narrow regulatory t cells impact in lung cancer patients Front Immunol 2021 8 12
Germain C, Devi-Marulkar P, Knockaert S, Biton J, Kaplon H, Letaïef L, et al. Tertiary lymphoid structure-B cells narrow regulatory t cells impact in lung cancer patients. Front Immunol. 2021;8:12.
44. Riemann D Cwikowski M Turzer S Giese T Grallert M Schütte W Blood immune cell biomarkers in lung cancer Clin Exp Immunol 2019 195 2 179 189 10.1111/cei.13219 30246868
Riemann D, Cwikowski M, Turzer S, Giese T, Grallert M, Schütte W, et al. Blood immune cell biomarkers in lung cancer. Clin Exp Immunol. 2019F 1;195(2):179–89.30246868 10.1111/cei.13219
45. Ameratunga M, Asadi K, Lin X, Walkiewicz M, Murone C, Knight S, et al. PD-L1 and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes as prognostic markers in resected NSCLC. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153954.
46. Parra ER Jiang M Machado-Rugolo J Yaegashi LB Prieto T Farhat C Variants in epithelial-mesenchymal transition and immune checkpoint genes are associated with immune cell profiles and predict survival in non-small cell lung cancer Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020 144 10 1234 1244 10.5858/arpa.2019-0419-OA 32150457
Parra ER, Jiang M, Machado-Rugolo J, Yaegashi LB, Prieto T, Farhat C, et al. Variants in epithelial-mesenchymal transition and immune checkpoint genes are associated with immune cell profiles and predict survival in non-small cell lung cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144(10):1234–44.32150457 10.5858/arpa.2019-0419-OA
47. Liu C Wu S Meng X Liu G Chen D Cong Y Predictive value of peripheral regulatory T cells in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy Oncotarget 2017 8 26 43427 43438 10.18632/oncotarget.15238 28624781
Liu C, Wu S, Meng X, Liu G, Chen D, Cong Y, et al. Predictive value of peripheral regulatory T cells in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Oncotarget. 2017;8(26):43427–38.28624781 10.18632/oncotarget.15238
48. Barua S Fang P Sharma A Fujimoto J Wistuba I Rao AUK Spatial interaction of tumor cells and regulatory T cells correlates with survival in non-small cell lung cancer Lung Cancer 2018 1 117 73 79 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.01.022
Barua S, Fang P, Sharma A, Fujimoto J, Wistuba I, Rao AUK, et al. Spatial interaction of tumor cells and regulatory T cells correlates with survival in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2018;1(117):73–9.10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.01.022
49. Yaegashi LB Baldavira CM Prieto TG Machado-Rugolo J Velosa APP da Silveira LKR In situ overexpression of matricellular mechanical proteins demands functional immune signature and mitigates non-small cell lung cancer progression Front Immunol 2021 16 12
Yaegashi LB, Baldavira CM, Prieto TG, Machado-Rugolo J, Velosa APP, da Silveira LKR, et al. In situ overexpression of matricellular mechanical proteins demands functional immune signature and mitigates non-small cell lung cancer progression. Front Immunol. 2021A;16:12.
50. Yan X Jiao SC Zhang GQ Guan Y Wang JL Tumor-associated immune factors are associated with recurrence and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer Cancer Gene Ther 2017 24 2 57 63 10.1038/cgt.2016.40 28084319
Yan X, Jiao SC, Zhang GQ, Guan Y, Wang JL. Tumor-associated immune factors are associated with recurrence and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2017;24(2):57–63.28084319 10.1038/cgt.2016.40
51. Kotsakis A Koinis F Katsarou A Gioulbasani M Aggouraki D Kentepozidis N Prognostic value of circulating regulatory T cell subsets in untreated non-small cell lung cancer patients Sci Rep 2016 15 6
Kotsakis A, Koinis F, Katsarou A, Gioulbasani M, Aggouraki D, Kentepozidis N, et al. Prognostic value of circulating regulatory T cell subsets in untreated non-small cell lung cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2016;15:6.
52. Kinoshita T Muramatsu R Fujita T Nagumo H Sakurai T Noji S Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes differs depending on histological type and smoking habit in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer Ann Oncol 2016 27 11 2117 2123 10.1093/annonc/mdw319 27502728
Kinoshita T, Muramatsu R, Fujita T, Nagumo H, Sakurai T, Noji S, et al. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes differs depending on histological type and smoking habit in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(11):2117–23.27502728 10.1093/annonc/mdw319
53. Aldarouish M, Su X, Qiao J, Gao C, Chen Y, Dai A, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of chemotherapy on blood lymphocytes and survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2019;33:1-9.
54. Muto S Owada Y Inoue T Watanabe Y Yamaura T Fukuhara M Clinical significance of expanded Foxp3+ Helios− regulatory T cells in patients with non-small cell lung cancer Int J Oncol 2015 47 6 2082 2090 10.3892/ijo.2015.3196 26460798
Muto S, Owada Y, Inoue T, Watanabe Y, Yamaura T, Fukuhara M, et al. Clinical significance of expanded Foxp3+ Helios− regulatory T cells in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Oncol. 2015;47(6):2082–90.26460798 10.3892/ijo.2015.3196
55. Hao J Wang H Song L Li S Che N Zhang S Infiltration of CD8+ FOXP3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and FOXP3+ T cells in non-small cell lung cancer microenvironment Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2020 13 5 880 32509058
Hao J, Wang H, Song L, Li S, Che N, Zhang S, et al. Infiltration of CD8+ FOXP3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and FOXP3+ T cells in non-small cell lung cancer microenvironment. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2020;13(5):880.32509058
56. Schulze AB Evers G Görlich D Mohr M Marra A Hillejan L Tumor infiltrating T cells influence prognosis in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer J Thorac Dis 2020 12 5 1824 1842 10.21037/jtd-19-3414a 32642087
Schulze AB, Evers G, Görlich D, Mohr M, Marra A, Hillejan L, et al. Tumor infiltrating T cells influence prognosis in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12(5):1824–42.32642087 10.21037/jtd-19-3414a
57. Hasegawa T Suzuki H Yamaura T Muto S Okabe N Osugi J Prognostic value of peripheral and local forkhead box P3+ regulatory T cells in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer Mol Clin Oncol 2014 2 5 685 694 10.3892/mco.2014.299 25054031
Hasegawa T, Suzuki H, Yamaura T, Muto S, Okabe N, Osugi J, et al. Prognostic value of peripheral and local forkhead box P3+ regulatory T cells in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2014;2(5):685–94.25054031 10.3892/mco.2014.299
58. Teng F Meng X Wang X Yuan J Liu S Mu D Expressions of CD8+TILs, PD-L1 and Foxp3+TILs in stage I NSCLC guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions Oncotarget 2016 7 39 64318 64329 10.18632/oncotarget.11793 27602763
Teng F, Meng X, Wang X, Yuan J, Liu S, Mu D, et al. Expressions of CD8+TILs, PD-L1 and Foxp3+TILs in stage I NSCLC guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions. Oncotarget. 2016;7(39):64318–29.27602763 10.18632/oncotarget.11793
59. Usó M Jantus-Lewintre E Bremnes RM Calabuig S Blasco A Pastor E Analysis of the immune microenvironment in resected non-small cell lung cancer: the prognostic value of different T lymphocyte markers Oncotarget 2016 7 33 52849 52861 10.18632/oncotarget.10811 27463005
Usó M, Jantus-Lewintre E, Bremnes RM, Calabuig S, Blasco A, Pastor E, et al. Analysis of the immune microenvironment in resected non-small cell lung cancer: the prognostic value of different T lymphocyte markers. Oncotarget. 2016;7(33):52849–61.27463005 10.18632/oncotarget.10811
60. Gelibter A, Asquino A, Strigari L, Zizzari IG, Tuosto L, Scirocchi F, et al. CD137+ and regulatory T cells as independent prognostic factors of survival in advanced non-oncogene addicted NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy as first-line. J Transl Med. 2024;22(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38570798/. [Cited 2024 Aug 3].
61. Devi-Marulkar P, Fastenackels S, Karapentiantz P, Goc J, Germain C, Kaplon H, et al. Regulatory T cells infiltrate the tumor-induced tertiary lymphoïd structures and are associated with poor clinical outcome in NSCLC. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36566320/. [Cited 2024 Aug 3].
62. Liu C, Sun B, Hu X, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Yue J, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for pulmonary recurrence-based oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: survival and prognostic value of regulatory T cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105(5):1055–64. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31437470/. [Cited 2024 Aug 3].
63. Meng X, Gao Y, Yang L, Jing H, Teng F, Huang Z, et al. Immune microenvironment differences between squamous and non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer and their influence on the prognosis. Clin Lung Cancer. 2019;20(1):48–58. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30341017/. [Cited 2024 Aug 3].
64. Rutkowski J, Cyman M, Ślebioda T, Bemben K, Rutkowska A, Gruchała M, et al. Evaluation of peripheral blood T lymphocyte surface activation markers and transcription factors in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Cell Immunol. 2017;322:26–33. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28939130/. [Cited 2024 Aug 3].
65. Liang J Bi G Shan G Jin X Bian Y Wang Q Tumor-associated regulatory T cells in non-small-cell lung cancer: current advances and future perspectives J Immunol Res 2022 2022 4355386 10.1155/2022/4355386 35497874
Liang J, Bi G, Shan G, Jin X, Bian Y, Wang Q. Tumor-associated regulatory T cells in non-small-cell lung cancer: current advances and future perspectives. J Immunol Res. 2022;2022:4355386.35497874 10.1155/2022/4355386
66. Mahmud SA Manlove LS Schmitz HM Xing Y Wang Y Owen DL Costimulation via the tumor-necrosis factor receptor superfamily couples TCR signal strength to the thymic differentiation of regulatory T cells Nat Immunol 2014 15 5 473 81 10.1038/ni.2849 24633226
Mahmud SA, Manlove LS, Schmitz HM, Xing Y, Wang Y, Owen DL, et al. Costimulation via the tumor-necrosis factor receptor superfamily couples TCR signal strength to the thymic differentiation of regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(5):473–81.24633226 10.1038/ni.2849
67. Speeckaert R Vermaelen K Van Geel N Autier P Lambert J Haspeslagh M Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, a new prognostic marker in sentinel lymph nodes of melanoma patients Eur J Cancer 2012 48 13 2004 2011 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.007 22033321
Speeckaert R, Vermaelen K, Van Geel N, Autier P, Lambert J, Haspeslagh M, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, a new prognostic marker in sentinel lymph nodes of melanoma patients. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(13):2004–11.22033321 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.007
68. Principe DR, Doll JA, Bauer J, Jung B, Munshi HG, Bartholin L, et al. TGF-β: duality of function between tumor prevention and carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(2):djt369.
69. Smith C Chang MY Parker KH Beury DW DuHadaway JB Flick HE IDO is a nodal pathogenic driver of lung cancer and metastasis development Cancer Discov 2012 2 8 722 735 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0014 22822050
Smith C, Chang MY, Parker KH, Beury DW, DuHadaway JB, Flick HE, et al. IDO is a nodal pathogenic driver of lung cancer and metastasis development. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(8):722–35.22822050 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0014
70. Wang H Franco F Ho PC Metabolic regulation of Tregs in cancer: opportunities for immunotherapy Trends in Cancer 2017 3 8 583 592 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.06.005 28780935
Wang H, Franco F, Ho PC. Metabolic regulation of Tregs in cancer: opportunities for immunotherapy. Trends in Cancer. 2017;3(8):583–92.28780935 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.06.005
71. Angelin A Gil-de-Gómez L Dahiya S Jiao J Guo L Levine MH Foxp3 reprograms T cell metabolism to function in low-glucose, high-lactate environments Cell Metab 2017 25 6 1282 1293.e7 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.12.018 28416194
Angelin A, Gil-de-Gómez L, Dahiya S, Jiao J, Guo L, Levine MH, et al. Foxp3 reprograms T cell metabolism to function in low-glucose, high-lactate environments. Cell Metab. 2017;25(6):1282-1293.e7.28416194 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.12.018
72. Wang S Zhang Y Wang Y Ye P Li J Li H Amphiregulin confers regulatory T cell suppressive function and tumor invasion via the EGFR/GSK-3β/Foxp3 axis J Biol Chem 2016 291 40 21085 21095 10.1074/jbc.M116.717892 27432879
Wang S, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Ye P, Li J, Li H, et al. Amphiregulin confers regulatory T cell suppressive function and tumor invasion via the EGFR/GSK-3β/Foxp3 axis. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(40):21085–95.27432879 10.1074/jbc.M116.717892
73. Zhang CY Qi Y Li XN Yang Y Liu D Zhao J The role of CCL20/CCR6 axis in recruiting Treg cells to tumor sites of NSCLC patients Biomed Pharmacother 2015 69 242 8 10.1016/j.biopha.2014.12.008 25661365
Zhang CY, Qi Y, Li XN, Yang Y, Liu D, Zhao J, et al. The role of CCL20/CCR6 axis in recruiting Treg cells to tumor sites of NSCLC patients. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;69:242–8.25661365 10.1016/j.biopha.2014.12.008
74. Zdanov S Mandapathil M Eid RA Adamson-Fadeyi S Wilson W Qian J Mutant KRAS conversion of conventional T cells into regulatory T cells Cancer Immunol Res 2016 4 4 354 365 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0241 26880715
Zdanov S, Mandapathil M, Eid RA, Adamson-Fadeyi S, Wilson W, Qian J, et al. Mutant KRAS conversion of conventional T cells into regulatory T cells. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4(4):354–65.26880715 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0241
75. Khambholja K, Gehani M, Kothari R, Marulkar S. Data for: Prognostic value of tumor-associated regulatory T-cells as a biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. V2 ed. Harvard Dataverse; 2022. 10.7910/DVN/JQOI9V.
