
==== Front
Syst Rev
Syst Rev
Systematic Reviews
2046-4053
BioMed Central London

2644
10.1186/s13643-024-02644-8
Protocol
Role of sex and training characteristics on exercise effects on cardiovascular aging: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trials
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2397-8162
Ciolac Emmanuel Gomes emmanuel.ciolac@unesp.br

1
Babjakova Jana 2
de Abreu Raphael Martins 34
Mao Su-Jie 5
Qian Guoping 5
Teixeira do Amaral Vanessa 1
Wrzesinski Bartlomiej 5
Ferron Artur Junio Togneri 1
Ossowski Zbigniew 5
Francisqueti-Ferron Fabiane Valentini 16
Yeniğün Seda Cansu 7
Fernandes Bianca 1
Rodrigues Luis Monteiro 8
Gabulova Rahima 9
the PhysAgeNet (Network on Evidence-Based Physical Activity in Old Age)
1 https://ror.org/00987cb86 grid.410543.7 0000 0001 2188 478X Exercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Education, School of Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Av. Eng. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube 14-01, Bauru, Sao Paulo 17033-360 Brazil
2 https://ror.org/0587ef340 grid.7634.6 0000 0001 0940 9708 Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Institute of Hygiene, Bratislava, Slovakia
3 grid.516591.f 0000 0004 7673 0018 Department of Physiotherapy, LUNEX University, International University of Health, Exercise & Sports S.A, Differdange, Luxembourg
4 LUNEX ASBL Luxembourg Health & Sport Sciences Research Institute, Differdange, Luxembourg
5 grid.445131.6 0000 0001 1359 8636 Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland
6 https://ror.org/00987cb86 grid.410543.7 0000 0001 2188 478X Present Address: Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil
7 https://ror.org/01m59r132 grid.29906.34 0000 0001 0428 6825 Faculty of Health Sciences, Akdeniz University, Kumluca , Antalya, Turkey
8 https://ror.org/05xxfer42 grid.164242.7 0000 0000 8484 6281 Research Center for Biosciences & Health Technologies (CBIOS), Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal
9 https://ror.org/016a0n751 grid.411469.f 0000 0004 0465 321X Department of Family Medicine, Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan
14 9 2024
14 9 2024
2024
13 23424 8 2023
22 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Background

Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading global cause of mortality worldwide especially in older adults. Although it is known that regular exercise reduces cardiovascular diseases incidence, its effects on specific cardiovascular aging parameters considering the influence of sex and different exercise designs are still not fully understood. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effects of different physical exercise protocols on age-related cardiovascular outcomes in older adults.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis will be reported in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Articles will be eligible if they are randomized controlled trials with a primary objective of evaluating the chronic effects of exercise interventions on cardiovascular aging parameters. Search strategy will be performed from the inception to September 30th, 2023, in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), SCOPUS (Elsevier), Embase, Sport Discus (EBSCO), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics). Data will be extracted and managed through Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software. The Tool for the assEssment of Study qualiTy and reporting in EXercise (TESTEX) will be used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Additionally, the quality of the findings will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) profiler. Meta-analysis based on the random-effects model will be performed (if deemed suitable, considering the methodological and clinical heterogeneity of the studies) to estimate the effects of exercise training on cardiovascular aging variables (i.e., cardiac output; arterial stiffness; stroke volume; endothelial function; and carotid intima-media thickness). Heterogeneity will be assessed with the I2 statistics, while the publication bias will be assessed based on Egger’s test.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of sex and training protocols on the cardiovascular aging parameters. Moreover, the findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide evidence for health professionals in the management of elderly patients in order to optimize the exercise prescription to face the cardiovascular alterations related to the aging process, considering the effects of different protocols according to sex.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42023441015 .

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-024-02644-8.

Keyword

Cardiovascular system
Elderly
Health promotion
Physical activity
issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. In 2020, nearly 20 million deaths worldwide (95% uncertainty interval (UI), 17.53–20.24 million) were due to CVD, accounting for 37% of deaths due to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in people under 70 years of age [1]. Although the age-standardized prevalence of CVD has almost stabilized over the past decade, the crude prevalence has increased by 29.01% (95% UI, 27.73–30.38%), totaling 607.64 million (95% UI, 568.07–644.85 million) cases in 2020 [1]. This increase in crude prevalence can be explained by the increase in life expectancy, as age-related changes in the cardiovascular system are involved in the pathophysiology of all CVD [2, 3].

Cardiac aging is characterized by a decrease in systolic/diastolic ventricular function, increased ventricular stiffness, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, increased fibrosis, and other alterations [4, 5]. These age-related cardiac changes ultimately lead to a decrease in stroke volume and cardiac output and can lead to coronary artery disease and other CVDs [4, 5]. At the same time, vascular aging is characterized by changes in the functional and structural components of the arterial wall, manifested primarily in arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction, and intima thickness [6, 7]. These age-related vascular changes are associated with the development of hypertension, atherosclerosis, stroke, heart failure, and other diseases [6–9]. With the older population expected to more than double by 2050 [10], global burden of CVD will also increase in the following years [11]. Therefore, strategies to reduce the impact of aging on the cardiovascular system are of paramount importance for the prevention and treatment of CVD as well as for reducing its health and economic consequences.

It is important to note that several environmental and/or lifestyle factors may affect cardiovascular aging [2, 3]. Among lifestyle factors, regular participation in physical activity or exercise programs is well established and is inversely related to the incidence of CVD disease and mortality [1], including in older adults [12]. In this context, regular physical activity through participation in structured exercise programs (mainly aerobic and resistance training programs) is a key recommendation in several guidelines for the prevention and treatment of CVD [13–15] and for the health promotion and prevention/treatment of disease in older adults [16]. In relation to cardiovascular aging, there are several systematic reviews showing the effectiveness of exercise interventions on improving cardiac output [17, 18], stroke volume [18], arterial stiffness [17, 19–24], endothelial function [25], and carotid intima-media thickness [22]. However, only a few assessed the effects of exercise intervention in older individuals, and only on arterial stiffness [19–21, 23], which is an important bias because aging process may affect cardiovascular adaptation to exercise [26]. In addition, these systematic reviews have included only a specific population (i.e., obese) [23] and/or have not assessed the effects of important mediating and moderating variables that may influence the effect of exercise training on cardiovascular aging parameters [19–21, 23].

Among the mediating and moderating variables, the adequate representation of women, and the comparison between the sexes should be considered to minimize the under representation of women in cardiovascular disease randomized clinical trials (RCTs) [27], mainly in older age [28]. CVD is highly prevalent in women, and the burden of CVD in women has stagnated during the past decade [27]. In addition, the sex-specific mechanisms of cardiovascular aging and CVD remain poorly understood [27]. It appears that sex chromosomes and hormones influence cardiovascular function and cardiovascular risk factors throughout life [29, 30], leading to poorer outcomes in women, particularly at older ages [31]. In this context, differences between women and men in the effects of physical exercise on cardiovascular outcomes have been reported [30, 31], and sex/gender-specific studies are gaining increasing attention and highlighting crucial implications, including cardiac adaptation to exercise and CVD prevention/rehabilitation [31, 32].

The characteristics of the exercise intervention, defined by the frequency, intensity, type, and time (FITT) principle, are another factor that should be considered when systematically reviewing the effects of exercise interventions on cardiovascular aging. For example, there is limited evidence from systematic reviews with meta-analyzes suggesting that exercise type (aerobic, resistance or combined) may influence the effects of exercise on cardiac output [17] and arterial stiffness [17, 19, 24, 33, 34], while exercise intensity (low-, moderate-, or high-intensity) may influence the effects on arterial stiffness [33] and endothelial function [25]. However, only one study has systematically reviewed the effect of exercise in older adults, and arterial stiffness was the only arterial aging outcome [19]. Furthermore, exercise type cannot be reduced to aerobic, resistance, or combined interventions. There is some evidence that other types of exercise such as stretching, yoga, and dance [21, 35, 36] improve several cardiovascular risk factors in older adults, but their effects on cardiovascular aging, as well as compared with other exercise modalities, remain to be determined. Indeed, the effects of all components of the FITT principle on the effect of exercise on cardiovascular aging parameters in older women and men also remain to be determined.

Our purpose is therefore to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the effect of exercise training compared with a control intervention on cardiovascular aging parameters (i.e., cardiac output, stroke volume, arterial stiffness, endothelial function, and carotid intima-media thickness) in older individuals. Our specific aim is to quantify the moderating effects of sex (women vs. men) and exercise training characteristics (i.e., FITT principle variables) on cardiovascular aging parameters, to help identify the optimal exercise dose (frequency, intensity, type and time) required to improve cardiovascular aging in older women and men.

Methods

This systematic review will be carried out and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [37]. The present protocol is registered in the PROSPERO repository (CRD42023441015) and follows the PRISMA Protocols statement (Supplement 1) [38].

Eligibility criteria

The present review will include only full-text scientific documents of RCTs (i.e., peer-reviewed journal publications, non-peer-reviewed preprints, or PhD/MSc dissertations) investigating the effects of exercise intervention(s) on cardiovascular aging parameters in humans that were written in English, Portuguese, Spanish, Chinese, Polish, Slovak, Azerbaijani, or Turkish. The Population-Intervention-Comparator-Outcomes-Study design (PICOS) criteria will be used to select the studies eligible for inclusion in the review (Table 1). Table 1 Summary of eligibility criteria

Category	Inclusion criteria	Exclusion criteria	
Population	Men and/or women with age ≥ 60 years. With or without cardiovascular, motor or cognitive disease		
Intervention	Aerobic, resistance, combined or alternative exercise programs such as Tai Chi or Qigong, Dancing, DT, Exergaming, Balance

Whatever the duration of the intervention, but that describe exactly the type of exercise, duration, frequency, intensity, and possible progressions

	Organ-specific exercise such as respiration muscle or pelvic muscle training/relaxation, meditation and stretching interventions, flexibility/etc	
Comparator	Control group	Absence control group	
Outcome	Primary: cardiac output and arterial stiffness

Secondary: stroke volume, endothelial function, and carotid intima-media thickness

	Use of a non-validated method to measure the outcome	
study design	Randomized-controlled clinical trails	Non-randomized controlled clinical trails	

Population

We will include studies that assessed women and/or men (description of results separated by sex), healthy or with noncommunicable chronic diseases, with a mean age of ≥ 60 years (minimum age ≥ 50 years), that provided a detailed description of the participants (i.e., age, number or percentage of women/men, BMI, healthy status and comorbidities, and medication). The corresponding authors of studies including both men and women, in which participants’ characteristics and results were not presented separately by sex, will be asked to provide the data separately by sex.

Intervention

Studies should have any type of chronic exercise intervention (i.e., repeated exercise sessions during a short or long-term follow-up) to be included in the review. As defined by the American College of Sports Medicine [39], exercise comprises a planned, structured, and repetitive bodily movement done to improve or maintain one or more components of physical fitness and may include aerobic, resistance, and alternative exercise programs, such as Tai Chi, Qigong, dance, exergaming, or balance. Any organ-specific exercise intervention such as respiratory or pelvic muscle training as well as relaxation, meditation, or stretching/flexibility interventions will not be included. Studies assessing only the acute response to exercise or not describing the type, duration and frequency of exercise intervention will not be included.

Comparator

To be included in the review, studies should have a control group with no treatment/intervention, usual care with no exercise interventions (e.g., only medical treatment or healthy habits counseling), sham intervention (e.g., stretching, etc.), or non-active interventions (e.g., health education, recreational activities).

Outcomes

The primary outcomes will be changes between pre- and post-intervention in cardiac output and arterial stiffness. The secondary outcomes will be changes between pre- and post-intervention in stroke volume, endothelial function, and carotid intima-media thickness. To be eligible for this review, studies should have measured, at baseline and at the end of intervention/control follow-up, any of the primary or secondary outcomes, by using a validated method.

Study design

We will include only RCTs.

Search strategy and study selection

Search strategy will be performed from the inception to August 20th, 2024, in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), SCOPUS (Elsevier), Embase, Sport Discus (EBSCO), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics). The reference list of the major textbooks, review articles, and all included studies will be hand searched in order to identify other potentially eligible studies. Finally, we will also undertake searches on online gray literature to minimize publication bias (i.e., Google Scholar). The search strategy will include a combination of terms for the key concepts “older adults,” “exercise,” “cardiovascular system,” and “clinical trial.” The full search strategy for MEDLINE and other databases are described in Table 2 and Supplement 2, respectively. Table 2 Search strategy for MEDLINE

Category	Search terms	
Population	(((((((((((((((((((((((elder*) OR (aging)) OR (senior*)) OR (“older adults”)) OR (“older patients”)) OR (“older women”)) OR (“older people”)) OR (“older persons”)) OR (“older subjects”)) OR (“old age”)) OR (“older age”)) OR (“old people”)) OR (geriatric*)) OR (gerontolog*)) OR (“late life”)) OR (“postmenopausal women”)) OR (Alzheimer*)) OR (Parkinson*)) OR (“mean age of 60*”)) OR (“mean age of 61*”)) OR (“mean age of 62*”)) OR (“mean age of 63*”)) OR (“mean age of 64*”)) OR (“mean age of 65*”)	
AND

Intervention

	(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((exercise[Title/Abstract]) OR (“physical activity”[Title/Abstract])) OR (“physical exertion”[Title/Abstract])) OR (swim*[Title/Abstract])) OR (gym*[Title/Abstract])) OR (walk*[Title/Abstract])) OR (danc*[Title/Abstract])) OR (jog*[Title/Abstract])) OR (run*[Title/Abstract])) OR (cycl*[Title/Abstract])) OR (bicycl*[Title/Abstract])) OR (hiking[Title/Abstract])) OR (“tai ji”[Title/Abstract])) OR (tai-ji[Title/Abstract])) OR (“tai chi”[Title/Abstract])) OR (yoga[Title/Abstract])) OR (qigong[Title/Abstract])) OR (“qi gong”[Title/Abstract])) OR (sport*[Title/Abstract])) OR (“physical training”[Title/Abstract])) OR (“strength training”[Title/Abstract])) OR (“weight training”[Title/Abstract])) OR (“resistance training”[Title/Abstract])) OR (“balance training”[Title/Abstract])) OR (“aerobic training”[Title/Abstract])) OR (“anaerobic training”[Title/Abstract])) OR (“endurance training”[Title/Abstract])) OR (“muscle training”[Title/Abstract])) OR (exergame[Title/Abstract])) OR (“active video game”[Title/Abstract])) OR (Wii[Title/Abstract])) OR (Kinect[Title/Abstract])) OR (pilates[Title/Abstract])) OR (feldenkrais[Title/Abstract])) OR (“motor activity”[Title/Abstract])) OR (“cardiac rehabilitation”[Title/Abstract])	
AND

Outcome

	(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((“cardiovascular system”) OR (“cardiac output”)) OR (“cardiac rhythm output”)) OR (“heart output”)) OR (“arterial stiffness”)) OR (“vascular stiffness”)) OR (“pulse wave velocity”)) OR (PWV)) OR (“pulse wave analysis”)) OR (“waveform analysis”)) OR (“waveform reflection”)) OR (“augmentation index”)) OR (“central arterial pressure”)) OR (endothelium)) OR (“endothelial dysfunction”)) OR (“endothelial function”)) OR (“vascular function”)) OR (“endothelial reactivity”)) OR (“flow mediated dilation”)) OR (FMD)) OR (“arterial tonometry”)) OR (“artery tonometry”)) OR (“reactive hyperemia”)) OR (“reactive hyperaemia”)) OR (“stroke volume”)) OR (“systolic volume”)) OR (“systolic ejection volume”)) OR (“carotid intima media thickness”)) OR (“carotid thickness”)) OR (“carotid medial complex”)	
AND

Study Design

	((((random*) OR (RCT)) OR (“clinical trial”)) OR (“intervention study”)) OR (“interventional study”)	
*: Asterisk will be used at the root of some words to find multiple endings (e.g., elder* returns elder, elders, elderly, elderlies, etc.)

All manuscripts retrieved from each search database will be exported as “.ris” or “.nbiib” files. The files will be imported into Rayyan, a web-based application for systematic review screening (https://rayyan.qcri.org/welcome), and a single researcher will remove the duplicates and duplicates by using the application’s duplicate function. Then, at least two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts of all studies for eligibility. All studies that meet the inclusion criteria, and those with insufficient information in the abstract, will be retrieved for full text screening by two independent reviewers. Disagreements between reviewers, both at abstract or full-text screening, will be discussed with another independent reviewer (E.G.C) to obtain consensus.

Data extraction and management

After study selection, all data will be extracted and managed by using REDCap. The data extraction form will be designed by the review authors, and data extraction will be piloted with a small number of studies (at least 10). If necessary, it will be modified prior to the data extraction of all studies. Data extraction for each individual study will be performed independently by two reviewers. Any disagreement in data extraction will be solved by consensus. If consensus is not achieved, a third reviewer will independently extract the data. The data extraction will include report characteristics (title, first author, study location, year of publication/availability), characteristics of the RCT (study design [parallel group, crossover, number of arms, etc.], total study duration, sequence generation, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, intention to treat, primary and secondary outcomes), participants’ characteristics (health status, sample size at beginning and end of the study, mean age, sex, and physical activity level), intervention(s) characteristics (all FITT variables), control intervention characteristics (type, duration, orientations), outcomes (primary and secondary), and moderators. Outcomes and moderators are detailed below.

In case of missing or unclear data, the authors of the specific study will be contacted by email, up to two times, to provide the required information. If there is no response within 4 weeks, the data we will be considered unobtainable. For data presented in graphs, we will contact the authors to obtain the data or use Web Plot Digitizer (if there is no response within 4 weeks).

Outcomes

The primary outcomes will be cardiac output (both at rest and/or during exercise) and arterial stiffness. The secondary outcomes will be stroke volume (both at rest and/or during exercise), endothelial function, and carotid intima-media thickness. The primary and secondary outcomes should be measured by a validated method, which include:Cardiac output: acetylene rebreathing; bioreactance; cardiac MRI; CO2 rebreathing; echocardiography; finger photoplethysmography; impedance cardiography; inert gas rebreathing; radionuclide ventriculography; or thoracic impedance

Arterial stiffness: aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV); carotid-femoral PWV; brachial-ankle PWV; cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI); or waveform reflection (i.e., augmentation index, and/or augmentation index adjusted to 75 bpm)

Stroke volume: acetylene rebreathing; bioreactance; cardiac MRI; CO2 rebreathing; echocardiography; finger photoplethysmography; impedance cardiography; inert gas rebreathing; radionuclide ventriculography; or thoracic impedance

Endothelial function: brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD); radial artery FMD; or peripheral arterial tonometry by the reactive hyperemia index (RHI)

Carotid intima-media thickness: ultrasound data processing; or echo-tracking

Mean and standard deviation (SDs) at baseline and follow-up will be extracted from intervention(s) and control groups for each primary or secondary outcome. The effect of exercise on primary and secondary outcomes will be first examined without sex separation. Subgroup analyses by sex (women vs. men) will be then conducted to investigate the sex differences in outcomes. Any significant differences in the effects of exercise and physical activity on cardiovascular aging between males and females will be reported, and potential explanations for these differences will be explored.

Moderators

The primary moderators of the present review will be the exercise intervention characteristics (i.e., FITT principle variables). Thus, we will extract information regarding exercise interventions’ frequency (i.e., number of sessions per week), intensity (i.e., absolute and/or relative objective and/or subjective parameters of exercise intensity), type (i.e., exercise modality(ies) performed), and duration (i.e., duration of the exercise sessions, duration of each exercise modality, and duration of the exercise program) as well as about the progression of these variables throughout the follow-up. To try to identify the optimal exercise dose (frequency, intensity, type and time) required to improve cardiovascular aging, we will conduct analyses for the following potential moderators: (1) frequency of exercise sessions, (2) exercise intensity, (3) type(s) of exercise(s), (4) exercise session(s) duration, (5) workload of exercise sessions (e.g., intensity X duration, metabolic costs…), (6) program duration, (7) density of exercise sessions per week (frequency X intensity X volume), (8) progression of exercise frequency/intensity/volume, (9) type of control group, and (10) use of behavioral interventions.

We will also extract information about individual characteristics that are used in previously published systematic reviews and meta-analyses and/or are hypothesized to modulate the effect size of exercise on cardiovascular aging. Possible moderator variables related to this will include the following: (1) population type (e.g., ethnicity, health status, type of comorbidity…), (2) mean age, (3) cardiovascular aging parameters at baseline, (4) fitness and/or physical activity level at baseline, (5) prevention level (e.g., primary, secondary, tertiary…), (6) education, and (7) socioeconomic status. Other possible moderators that will be extracted from the studies will be the type of publication (e.g., peer-reviews journal article, preprint, thesis, etc.) and sample size of intervention(s) and control group.

The above-mentioned moderator variables will only be included in the meta-analysis if sufficient studies are available (at least three studies for of each level of a categorical moderator description/analysis and at least eight studies for a meta-regression).

Assessment of study quality, risk of bias, and overall quality of evidence

The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed by the Tool for the assEssment of Study qualiTy and reporting in EXercise (TESTEX) [40], which has 12 criteria (maximum score of 15 points) pertaining to study quality (i.e., eligibility criteria specified, randomization specified, allocation concealment, groups similar at baseline, and blinding of assessor for the primary outcome) and study reporting (i.e., outcome measures assessed in 85% of patients, intention-to-treat analysis, between-group statistical comparisons reported, point measures and measures of variability for all reported outcome measures, activity monitoring in control groups, relative exercise intensity remained constant, and exercise volume and energy expenditure). A higher score reflects better quality. Two reviewers will assess independently to rate each criterion, and inter-observer agreement will be determined using Kappa statistics [41]. In case of disagreement of rating, the agreement will be solved by two different reviewers. Studies will not be excluded based on their quality.

The overall quality of evidence will be reported using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) [42], which is structured in five domains: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and publication bias. Each outcome will be assessed for the overall certainty in evidence and classified into four levels: high, moderate, low, or very low.

Data analysis

Statistical analyses will be performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (CMA, version 2.2.064, Biostat, NJ, USA). Descriptive data for each of the individual studies will be reported as means ± standard deviations (SD). Continuous outcomes will be used to analyze as post-intervention changes from baseline using mean difference (MD). Standardized mean differences (SMD, i.e., mean weighted difference and its 95% confidence intervals [CI]) will be used if the outcomes were collected using different measurements across studies. Data expressed using the standard error of the mean (SEM) will be first converted to SD. For binary outcomes, the odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95% CI will be calculated. The Mantel–Haenszel method will be employed for pooled estimates in binary outcomes, with the choice between a fixed-effect or random-effects model based on the level of heterogeneity. Pooled estimates of the effect of exercise training on cardiac aging outcomes (i.e., cardiac output, arterial stiffness, stroke volume, endothelial function, and carotid intima-media thickness) will be obtained using a random-effects model with significance set at P < 0.05 (two-tailed), as we expected heterogeneity in the methodology of the studies. The random-effects model will use the DerSimonian and Laird method to estimate the heterogeneity variance (τ2), which allows for the assumption that the true effects might vary across studies.

Sub-group analyses, including sensitivity and meta-regression approaches, will be performed to explore potential moderators, such as sex differences, baseline fitness levels, and study design factors, on cardiovascular aging outcomes. Meta-regression will be conducted using a mixed-effects model, where the heterogeneity variance will be estimated using restricted maximum likelihood (REML). Covariates, including age, gender, duration of intervention, and baseline health status, will be examined as potential moderator variables Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I2 statistics where I2 values between 25 and 50% represents small amounts of inconsistency, 50 and 75% represents medium inconsistency, and above 75% represents large amounts of inconsistency [43]. Cochran’s Q test will also be performed to test for heterogeneity. If substantial heterogeneity is detected, sources of heterogeneity will be explored through subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

Publication bias will be examined by visual inspection of the different funnel plots’ asymmetry. The Egger’s test [44] will indicate the presence of a significant publication bias. Duval and Tweedie’s trim and fill procedure will be applied to estimate the effect of publication bias on the results [43]. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the results by excluding studies with high risk of bias, studies with extreme effect sizes, or studies contributing disproportionately to the heterogeneity.

Discussion

Previous systematic reviews have investigated the effects of exercise interventions on several cardiovascular aging parameters, including cardiac output [17, 18], stroke volume [18], arterial stiffness [17, 19–24], endothelial function [25], and carotid intima-media thickness [22]. However, in older individuals, there are systematic effects assessing the effect of exercise interventions only on arterial stiffness [19–21, 23]. Although these systematic reviews found positive effects of exercise interventions on arterial stiffness of older individuals, they did not investigate if the benefits are different between sexes nor investigated the impact of most moderators that will be investigated in the present review.

According to our knowledge, this is the first systematic review with meta-analysis aiming to assess the effects of chronic exercise on different cardiovascular aging parameters in older individuals. In addition, it will also be the first to investigate the role of sex (men vs. women) and training characteristics (i.e., frequency, intensity, type and time) on the effects of chronic exercise effects on cardiovascular aging. Thus, this review will contribute to the evidence base of exercise on cardiovascular aging, which may help the development of specific exercise recommendations (i.e., frequency, intensity, type and time) to improve cardiovascular aging according to sex.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1.

Supplementary Material 2. 

Acknowledgements

This publication is based upon work from EU COST Action CA20104 – Network on evidence-based physical activity in old age (PhysAgeNet), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).

Authors’ contributions

EGC coordinated and supervised all activities and participated in the study conception and design, manuscript drafting, and reviewing. JB participated in the study conception and design, manuscript drafting, and reviewing. RMA, SJM, GQ, and VTA participated in the study conception and design and manuscript drafting. BW, AJTF, ZO, FVFF, SCY, and BF participated in the study conception and manuscript drafting. LMR and RG participated in the study conception and manuscript reviewing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

The fees for the publication of the protocol are supported by COST Action CA20104. EGC was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq #310572/2021–5).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This review does not require approval from an Ethics Committee and any consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Tsao CW Aday AW Almarzooq ZI Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2023 update: a report from the American Heart Association Circulation 2023 147 8 e93 e621 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123 36695182
Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2023 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023;147(8):e93–621. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123.36695182 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123
2. Fontana L Interventions to promote cardiometabolic health and slow cardiovascular ageing Nat Rev Cardiol 2018 15 9 566 577 10.1038/s41569-018-0026-8 29795242
Fontana L. Interventions to promote cardiometabolic health and slow cardiovascular ageing. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(9):566–77. 10.1038/s41569-018-0026-8.29795242 10.1038/s41569-018-0026-8
3. Gude NA Broughton KM Firouzi F Sussman MA Cardiac ageing: extrinsic and intrinsic factors in cellular renewal and senescence Nat Rev Cardiol 2018 15 9 523 542 10.1038/s41569-018-0061-5 30054574
Gude NA, Broughton KM, Firouzi F, Sussman MA. Cardiac ageing: extrinsic and intrinsic factors in cellular renewal and senescence. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(9):523–42. 10.1038/s41569-018-0061-5.30054574 10.1038/s41569-018-0061-5
4. Nakayama H Nishida K Otsu K Macromolecular degradation systems and cardiovascular aging Circ Res 2016 118 10 1577 1592 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307495 27174951
Nakayama H, Nishida K, Otsu K. Macromolecular degradation systems and cardiovascular aging. Circ Res. 2016;118(10):1577–92. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307495.27174951 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307495
5. Pandey A Kraus WE Brubaker PH Kitzman DW Healthy aging and cardiovascular function: invasive hemodynamics during rest and exercise in 104 healthy volunteers JACC Heart Fail 2020 8 2 111 121 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.08.020 31706837
Pandey A, Kraus WE, Brubaker PH, Kitzman DW. Healthy aging and cardiovascular function: invasive hemodynamics during rest and exercise in 104 healthy volunteers. JACC Heart Fail. 2020;8(2):111–21. 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.08.020.31706837 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.08.020
6. Laurent S. Defining vascular aging and cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens. 2012;30. https://journals.lww.com/jhypertension/Fulltext/2012/06001/Defining_vascular_aging_and_cardiovascular_risk.2.aspx.
7. Climie RE Alastruey J Mayer CC Vascular ageing - moving from bench towards bedside Eur J Prev Cardiol Published online 2023 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad028
Climie RE, Alastruey J, Mayer CC, et al. Vascular ageing - moving from bench towards bedside. Eur J Prev Cardiol Published online. February 2023. 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad028.10.1093/eurjpc/zwad028
8. Alexander Y Osto E Schmidt-Trucksäss A Endothelial function in cardiovascular medicine: a consensus paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Groups on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Coronary Pathophysiology and Microcirculation, and Thr Cardiovasc Res 2021 117 1 29 42 10.1093/cvr/cvaa085 32282914
Alexander Y, Osto E, Schmidt-Trucksäss A, et al. Endothelial function in cardiovascular medicine: a consensus paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Groups on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Coronary Pathophysiology and Microcirculation, and Thr. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117(1):29–42. 10.1093/cvr/cvaa085.32282914 10.1093/cvr/cvaa085
9. Chirinos JA Segers P Hughes T Townsend R Large-artery stiffness in health and disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review J Am Coll Cardiol 2019 74 9 1237 1263 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.012 31466622
Chirinos JA, Segers P, Hughes T, Townsend R. Large-artery stiffness in health and disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(9):1237–63. 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.012.31466622 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.012
10. United Nations. World population ageing 2019 (st/esa/ser. a/444). Department of Economic and Social Affairs PD, editor New York, USA 2020. Published online 2020. Accessed April 17, 2023. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/news/world-population-ageing-2019-0.
11. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Results.; 2020. Accessed April 17, 2023. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool.
12. Cunningham C O' Sullivan R Caserotti P Tully MA Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 30 5 816 827 10.1111/sms.13616 32020713
Cunningham C, O’ Sullivan R, Caserotti P, Tully MA. Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;30(5):816–27. 10.1111/sms.13616.32020713 10.1111/sms.13616
13. Visseren FLJ MacH F Smulders YM 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice Eur Heart J 2021 42 34 3227 3337 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484 34458905
Visseren FLJ, MacH F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227–337. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484.34458905 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484
14. Williams B Mancia G Spiering W 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension Eur Heart J 2018 39 33 3021 3104 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 30165516
Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–104. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.30165516 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
15. Ambrosetti M Abreu A Corrà U Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. A position paper from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 28 5 460 495 10.1177/2047487320913379 33611446
Ambrosetti M, Abreu A, Corrà U, et al. Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. A position paper from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28(5):460–95. 10.1177/2047487320913379.33611446 10.1177/2047487320913379
16. Izquierdo M Merchant RA Morley JE International Exercise Recommendations in Older Adults (ICFSR): Expert Consensus Guidelines Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 2021 25 7 824 853 10.1007/s12603-021-1665-8
Izquierdo M, Merchant RA, Morley JE, et al. International Exercise Recommendations in Older Adults (ICFSR): Expert Consensus Guidelines. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging. 2021;25(7):824–53. 10.1007/s12603-021-1665-8.10.1007/s12603-021-1665-8
17. Zhang Y, Qi L, Xu L, et al. Effects of exercise modalities on central hemodynamics, arterial stiffness and cardiac function in cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2018;13(7). 10.1371/journal.pone.0200829.
18. Astorino TA Causer E Hazell TOMJ Arhen BB Gurd BJ Change in central cardiovascular function in response to intense interval training: a systematic review and meta-analysis Med Sci Sports Exerc 2022 54 12 1991 2004 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002993 35881924
Astorino TA, Causer E, Hazell TOMJ, Arhen BB, Gurd BJ. Change in central cardiovascular function in response to intense interval training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54(12):1991–2004. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002993.35881924 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002993
19. Lan YS, Khong TK, Yusof A. Effect of exercise on arterial stiffness in healthy young, middle-aged and older women: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2023;15(2). 10.3390/nu15020308.
20. Manojlović M, Protić-Gava B, Maksimović N, et al. Effects of combined resistance and aerobic training on arterial stiffness in postmenopausal women: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(18). 10.3390/ijerph18189450.
21. Kato M Green FN Hotta K The efficacy of stretching exercises on arterial stiffness in middle-aged and older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 17 16 1 15 10.3390/ijerph17165643
Kato M, Green FN, Hotta K, et al. The efficacy of stretching exercises on arterial stiffness in middle-aged and older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):1–15. 10.3390/ijerph17165643.10.3390/ijerph17165643
22. Huang C Wang J Deng S She Q Wu L The effects of aerobic endurance exercise on pulse wave velocity and intima media thickness in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Scand J Med Sci Sports 2016 26 5 478 487 10.1111/sms.12495 26059748
Huang C, Wang J, Deng S, She Q, Wu L. The effects of aerobic endurance exercise on pulse wave velocity and intima media thickness in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26(5):478–87. 10.1111/sms.12495.26059748 10.1111/sms.12495
23. Montero D Roberts CK Vinet A Effect of aerobic exercise training on arterial stiffness in obese populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sports Med 2014 44 6 833 843 10.1007/s40279-014-0165-y 24585152
Montero D, Roberts CK, Vinet A. Effect of aerobic exercise training on arterial stiffness in obese populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014;44(6):833–43. 10.1007/s40279-014-0165-y.24585152 10.1007/s40279-014-0165-y
24. Sardeli AV GáSpari AF Chacon-Mikahil MP Acute, short-, and long-term effects of different types of exercise in central arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2018 58 6 923 932 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07486-2 29877680
Sardeli AV, GáSpari AF, Chacon-Mikahil MP. Acute, short-, and long-term effects of different types of exercise in central arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018;58(6):923–32. 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07486-2.29877680 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07486-2
25. Ashor AW Lara J Siervo M Exercise modalities and endothelial function: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Sports Med 2015 45 2 279 296 10.1007/s40279-014-0272-9 25281334
Ashor AW, Lara J, Siervo M, et al. Exercise modalities and endothelial function: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sports Med. 2015;45(2):279–96. 10.1007/s40279-014-0272-9.25281334 10.1007/s40279-014-0272-9
26. Ciolac EG, Roberts CK, Rodrigues Da Silva JM, Guimarães GV. Age affects exercise-induced improvements in heart rate response to exercise. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35(5). 10.1055/s-0033-1351332.
27. Vogel B Acevedo M Appelman Y The Lancet women and cardiovascular disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030 Lancet 2021 397 10292 2385 2438 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00684-X 34010613
Vogel B, Acevedo M, Appelman Y, et al. The Lancet women and cardiovascular disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030. Lancet. 2021;397(10292):2385–438. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00684-X.34010613 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00684-X
28. Daitch V, Turjeman A, Poran I, et al. Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trials. 2022;23(1). 10.1186/s13063-022-07004-2.
29. Gerdts E Sudano I Brouwers S Sex differences in arterial hypertension: a scientific statement from the ESC Council on Hypertension, the European Association of Preventive Cardiology, Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions, the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice, and the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Eur Heart J 2022 43 46 4777 4788 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac470 36136303
Gerdts E, Sudano I, Brouwers S, et al. Sex differences in arterial hypertension: a scientific statement from the ESC Council on Hypertension, the European Association of Preventive Cardiology, Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions, the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice, and the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(46):4777–88. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac470.36136303 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac470
30. Seals DR Nagy EE Moreau KL Aerobic exercise training and vascular function with ageing in healthy men and women J Physiol 2019 597 19 4901 4914 10.1113/JP277764 31077372
Seals DR, Nagy EE, Moreau KL. Aerobic exercise training and vascular function with ageing in healthy men and women. J Physiol. 2019;597(19):4901–14. 10.1113/JP277764.31077372 10.1113/JP277764
31. Vaccarezza M, Papa V, Milani D, et al. Sex/gender-specific imbalance in CVD: could physical activity help to improve clinical outcome targeting CVD molecular mechanisms in women? Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(4). 10.3390/ijms21041477.
32. Ghisi GL de M, Kin R. SM, Price J, et al. Women-focused cardiovascular rehabilitation: an International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation clinical practice guideline∗. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2022;38(12):1786–1798. 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.06.021.
33. Ashor AW, Lara J, Siervo M, Celis-Morales C, Mathers JC. Effects of exercise modalities on arterial stiffness and wave reflection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014;9(10). 10.1371/journal.pone.0110034.
34. Lopes S Afreixo V Teixeira M Exercise training reduces arterial stiffness in adults with hypertension: a systematic reviewand meta-analysis J Hypertens 2021 39 2 214 222 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002619 32833924
Lopes S, Afreixo V, Teixeira M, et al. Exercise training reduces arterial stiffness in adults with hypertension: a systematic reviewand meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2021;39(2):214–22. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002619.32833924 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002619
35. Brandani JZ, Mizuno J, Ciolac EG, Monteiro HL. The hypotensive effect of Yoga’s breathing exercises: a systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2017;28. 10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.05.002.
36. Rodrigues-Krause J Farinha JB Krause M Reischak-Oliveira Á Effects of dance interventions on cardiovascular risk with ageing: Systematic review and meta-analysis Complement Ther Med 2016 29 16 28 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.09.004 27912941
Rodrigues-Krause J, Farinha JB, Krause M, Reischak-Oliveira Á. Effects of dance interventions on cardiovascular risk with ageing: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2016;29:16–28. 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.09.004.27912941 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.09.004
37. Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM The PRISMA statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews The BMJ 2020 2021 372 10.1136/bmj.n71
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, The PRISMA, et al. statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ. 2020;2021:372. 10.1136/bmj.n71.10.1136/bmj.n71
38. Moher D Shamseer L Clarke M Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica 2016 20 2 148 160 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica. 2016;20(2):148–60. 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
39. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 11th Edition. ProtoView. 2021;2021(8).
40. Smart NA Waldron M Ismail H Validation of a new tool for the assessment of study quality and reporting in exercise training studies: TESTEX Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015 13 1 9 18 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000020 25734864
Smart NA, Waldron M, Ismail H, et al. Validation of a new tool for the assessment of study quality and reporting in exercise training studies: TESTEX. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(1):9–18. 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000020.25734864 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000020
41. Viera A Garrett J Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic Fam Med 2005 37 360 363 15883903
Viera A, Garrett J. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360–3.15883903
42. Guyatt G Oxman AD Akl EA GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 64 4 383 394 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 21195583
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–94. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026.21195583 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026
43. Higgins JPT Thompson SG Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis Stat Med 2002 21 11 1539 1558 10.1002/sim.1186 12111919
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58. 10.1002/sim.1186.12111919 10.1002/sim.1186
44. Egger M Smith GD Schneider M Minder C Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 1997 315 7109 629 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 9310563
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.9310563 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
