
==== Front
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther
WJGPT
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics
2150-5349
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

jWJGPT.v15.i5.eid97350
10.4292/wjgpt.v15.i5.97350
97350
Minireviews
Drugs used for pain management in gastrointestinal surgery and their implications
Shukla A et al. Pain management in gastrointestinal surgery
Shukla Ankit Department of Surgery, Dr Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra 176001, Himachal Pradesh, India. nkitshukla@yahoo.com

Chaudhary Rajesh Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Dr Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra 176001, India

Nayyar Nishant Department of Radiology, Dr Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra 176001, Himachal Pradesh, India

Gupta Bhanu Department of Anaesthesia, Dr Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Tanda, Kangra 176001, Himachal Pradesh, India

Author contributions: Shukla A wrote the first draft of the review; Chaudhary R, Gupta B, and Nayyar N conceptualized the work, supervised the writing, and gave intellectual inputs; All the authors critically revised the manuscript and contributed to the literature search.

Corresponding author: Ankit Shukla, DNB, MCh, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Dr Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Tanda at Kangra Himachal Pradesh, Kangra 176001, Himachal Pradesh, India. nkitshukla@yahoo.com

5 9 2024
5 9 2024
15 5 9735029 5 2024
28 7 2024
31 7 2024
©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
Pain is the predominant symptom troubling patients. Pain management is one of the most important aspects in the management of surgical patients leading to early recovery from surgical procedures or in patients with chronic diseases or malignancy. Various groups of drugs are used for dealing with this; however, they have their own implications in the form of adverse effects and dependence. In this article, we review the concerns of different pain-relieving medicines used postoperatively in gastrointestinal surgery and for malignant and chronic diseases.

Acute pain
Acute post operative pain
Pain score
Pain after GI surgery
Analgesia
Spinal anaesthesia
Epidural anaesthesia
Intravenous anaesthesia
Regional anaesthesia
Pain management
==== Body
pmc Core Tip: Pain is the most common symptom encountered by patients and their physicians. In the present era, there has been a change in the understanding of pain, its causes, assessment and management. Patient education and preoperative intervention are an integral part of pain management. Post-operative pain management is also an integral part of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in today's era. Management of pain can be pharmacological or non-pharmacological.

INTRODUCTION

Pain is the most common symptom with which patients usually present to the emergency room[1]. Previously, it was thought to be a subjective term that could only be quantified by the patient experiencing the pain. As the 20th century advanced, there has been a change in the understanding of pain, its causes, assessment and management. The International Association for the study of pain defines it as,” An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage”[2]. Acute pain that was once thought to be of short duration is a more complex and unpleasant experience having cognitive, emotional and sensory response to tissue trauma caused after surgery[3], which is reported by nearly 80% people in the post-operative period. Most of these patients report moderate pain, and severe or extreme pain is reported by about 20%-40% patients[4,5]. There was a time when the surgeons were afraid to conduct surgeries because of the pain it caused patients, making them apprehensive, so much so that patients feared the scalpels and avoided the dreadful yet sometimes life-saving surgeries.

CHRONICLE OF PAIN MANAGEMENT

As modern scientific knowledge brought improvement in the surgical techniques, pain management also became an area of interest. For thousands of years hashish, mandrake, opium and alcohol have been used to produce analgesia during surgical procedures. In a failed attempt in 1845, Horace Wells brought to the limelight the use of Nitrous Oxide as an anaesthetic agent. William TH Warren successfully removed a soft tissue tumour without pain from a young man’s neck in 1846, making use of Ether. Soon, chloroform and ether were being used worldwide for painless surgeries. William Halsted made use of regional anaesthesia to produce field blocks for painless surgery, which was followed by the development of spinal and epidural anaesthesia by 1920. Sodium Thiopental was used to produce a similar pain-free experience by 1934. The progress in pain management became more and more significant in the coming times, making surgery a painless and pleasant experience to the patients.

Despite the advances in this field and numerous studies showing the superiority of one approach over the other, pain management in surgical patients is still not absolute, but evolving[6,7]. Acute pain must subside once the obnoxious stimulus is stopped and healing occurs, but poorly managed pain can lead to loss of function, poor mobility & recovery, increased risk of post operative complications and chronicity. Evidence based studies have led to formulation of guidelines that have been periodically updated; the guidelines include preoperative planning and patient education and perioperative pain management using pharmacological and nonpharmacological methods, while emphasizing that pain management is a complex process with significant implications over the patient’s quality of life[8]. Despite all the advancements in this field, the incidence of severe acute postoperative pain has remained unchanged over the last 30 years, at about 20%[9]. Opioid use for pain management has led to an opioid abuse epidemic such as chronic pancreatitis, malignancy etc, thus making it even more important to make use of alternative multiple modalities in pain management. This can include non-opioid medications, neuraxial analgesic techniques, and intravenous lignocaine. Besides this, minimally invasive techniques are supposed to cause less pain compared to traditional open surgery. But the studies have not produced any consistent results favouring a particular approach[10]. The World Health Organisation has developed an analgesic step ladder where non-opioid plus optional adjuvant is used for mild pain; weak opioid plus non-opioid and adjuvant analgesic is used for mild to moderate pain; a strong opioid plus non-opioid and adjuvant analgesic is used for moderate to severe pain. It advises to move one step up when pain is intense.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The authors performed an online search on PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Database for relevant articles. Further, the articles’ reference lists were also searched for additional appropriate studies. The keywords used for searching were “post operative pain”; “pain management”; “Analgesia”; “acute pain”; “pain score”; “pain after GI surgery”; “spinal anaesthesia”; “epidural anaesthesia”; “intra venous anaesthesia”; “regional anaesthesia”. The search was limited to publications in English. All authors agreed that the articles selected for the minireview were relevant.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF PAIN

The central nervous system receives the information about tissue damage after the nociceptors are activated due to trauma[11]. The classical mechanism of pain involves conversion of the energy from noxious stimulus into sensory receptors called signal transduction[11]. These signals are then transmitted to the spinal cord and brain where these signals are perceived as pain[12]. This results in modulation of the nociceptive response at the spinal cord level through the inhibitory or facilitatory response from the brain[13]. The neurotransmitters released, such as enkephalins and endorphins, inhibit the release of neurotransmitters involved in pain transmission. The pharmacological agents act at these different steps to produce the analgesic effects[14]. Pain management should begin before surgery with a thorough assessment of the patients, allowing the optimal pain management techniques to be used and to help to alleviate the patient’s anxiety and fears about post-operative pain, as some of them might be using opioids preoperatively for complex pain syndromes[15].

PAIN ASSESSMENT

Thorough patient education and perioperative intervention (Tables 1 and 2) allows advanced planning, especially for patients with comorbidities, which could subject the patients to significant side effects of the drugs used[16]. It allays the fear of post-operative pain in the patient and allows healthcare professionals to predict the types of patients who are about to have significant pain problems after surgery. Young females who smoke and have anxiety or depression and people already using opioids before surgery are particularly at risk of having significant post-operative pain[17]. Major emergency abdominal surgeries are also a risk factor for significant post-operative pain[18]. Studies have demonstrated that all of these factors are associated with persistent post-operative pain[19].

Table 1 Preoperative assessment and education of patient[20]

Establish good relationship with patients’ relatives	
Take pain history	
Teach patient about pain assessment and management plan	
Inspect concerns and handle misinterpretations regarding pain medications, adverse effects and dependence	
Create a plan for postoperative analgesia in alliance with patient depending on type of surgery, anticipated severity of postoperative pain, co morbidities, the risk-benefit and expense of techniques, patient’s preferences	
Patient selected appropriate pain assessment tool (e.g., Numeric Rating Scale, Visual Analog Scale)	
Mention the patient’s selected pain assessment tool	
Teach patient and relatives about their responsibilities	

Table 2 Postoperative assessment and education of patient[20,21]

Examine multiple indicators of pain, including (1) Patient perceptions; (2) Cognitive attempts to address pain; (3) Behavioural responses (e.g., reduced mobility, sleeplessness, anxiety, depression); and (4) Physiological changes (vital signs: Tachycardia, hypertension)	
Accept patients self-report, and only replace behaviour and/or physiological changes when he is unable to communicate	
Assess pain at rest and during activity (e.g., moving, coughing)	
Measure pain frequently during the early post operative period: At regular intervals, consistent with type of surgery and severity	
Document pain intensity and its response to any interventions and adverse effects	
Promptly assess instances of sudden intense pain	
Think of reasons or any disparities between patients’ self-report of pain and behaviour. As patient may be denying pain due to casualness or worry of inadequate pain relief	
Special attention to special populations, and be aware of hurdles of effective communication (e.g., language issues, mental, cognitive or hearing impairments, etc)	
Revisit the management plan, if needed	
Before discharging patient, review interventions implied and their efficiency; give specific and detailed discharge instructions for pain management at home	

Underassessment of the pain has been found to be the leading cause of undertreatment of pain. Therefore, the American Pain Society has included, “Pain as the 5th vital sign”[20,21]. Thus, it is as important to assess pain as the other four vital signs. Pain has also been included as the 5th vital sign in the National Pain Management Strategy by the Veterans Health Administration[22]. Various one-dimensional and multidimensional tools for pain assessment have been developed to be used in different situations. One-dimensional tools like Numeric Rating Scale, Visual Analog Scale and Categorical Scales using simple visual or verbal descriptors of pain are good for assessing the acute pain of fixed origins like post-operative pain[23]. Multidimensional tools like Initial Pain Assessment tool, Brief Pain Inventory[24] and McGill Pain Questionnaire are important tools for assessing more complex and chronic pain[25]. Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment includes comfort, change in pain, pain control, functioning and sleep, and thus can be used in the perioperative period. Pain assessment in mentally disabled people, people suffering from dementia and those unable to verbalize can be assessed with Pain in Advanced Dementia, Dolopus-2, Critical care Pain Observation Tool and Behavioural Pain Scale[26-28]. Patients should be continuously monitored for any pain worse than mild, which needs priority treatment.

PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT

Post-operative pain management is an integral part of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. Traditionally for abdominal surgery, Epidural Analgesia (EA) or Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IVPCA) based on opioids has been used. It has good pain control but has a significant drug associated morbidity, which hampers the achievement of the goal of early Drinking, Eating and Moving (DrEaMing)[29]. There is no single drug with the ideal pain management properties, hence a multimodal approach towards reaching a perfect analgesia is favoured. It involves the use of various drugs acting at different levels of the pain pathway to achieve better control[30]. As in evidence-based PROcedure-SPECific Pain ManagemenT (PROSPECT) guidelines, these different drugs can be used to effectively lower the total analgesic dose and the associated side effects[31].

Pain treatment can be pharmacological or nonpharmacological in the multimodal treatment strategy[32]. Commonly used pharmacological agents are as follows:

Non opioid analgesics

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including aspirin and other salicylic acid derivatives, work by inhibiting prostaglandin production responsible for pain and inflammation[33]. They could be selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors like celecoxib or, nonspecific cyclooxygenase inhibitors like aspirin, Ibuprofen and Naproxen[34-36]. The major concerns are renal toxicity and gastritis. Paracetamol is another NSAID used for mild to moderate pain management. It has a significant opioid sparing effect in multimodal analgesia approach. When used intravenously for pain prophylaxis, it lowers the incidence of pain-associated nausea and vomiting. It has been proven safe at the therapeutic dosage in different studies[37,38]. A major concern is hepatotoxicity at higher dosages[39].

Opioid analgesics

Mu opioid agonists (morphine like agonists) and agonist-antagonist opioids are the cornerstone of treating moderate to severe pain. They can be further classified as natural, synthetic or semi-synthetic opioids. Many people report opioid-related adverse effects (ORADE) in the immediate post-operative period, like dizziness, vomiting, nausea, constipation, dry mouth, dependence, pruritus, etc. Development of ORADE leads to a prolonged hospital stay. When drugs are prescribed beyond the recommended post-operative period, they can be misused and sold to other people[40]. These patients need continuous monitoring as they are liable to develop respiratory depression, drug tolerance, drug dependence and addiction when used over a long period. Patients who have a preoperative history of prolonged pain, use of benzodiazepines, anxious personality and history of drug addiction are more liable to develop drug dependence and addiction[41]. Such types of patients are liable to have withdrawal effects in the post-operative period so they should be maintained on minimal opioid dosage and supplemented with other types of analgesics and use of regional anaesthesia techniques[42].

Adjuvant analgesics or co-analgesics include a wide variety of drugs mainly used for purposes other than pain relief, but with some analgesic properties. Commonly used ones are gabapantenoids, magnesium, lignocaine IV, Ketamine, antidepressants like Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and anti-epileptic drugs[32].

Ketamine is a dissociative anaesthetic, which when used for acute pain relief in perioperative settings may reduce morphine consumption and pain intensity[43]. It prevents the development of persistent post-surgical pain in patients. Although it is not a part of the ERAS protocols, it may reduce morphine consumption when used in multimodal analgesia[44]. Adverse effects include amnesia, psychosis, hypertension, depression, impaired coordination and judgement, depression, respiratory complications, etc.

Gabapantenoids act on the ascending as well as descending pathway of pain perception by decreasing nociception[45]. They have been found to be effective in post-operative pain management and have a morphine sparing effect in multimodal analgesia[43,46]. They prevent the development of persistent post-surgical pain but they have an abuse potential and can lead to addiction and death. Various other side effects include ataxia, angioedema, suicidal tendency, viral infections, nystagmus, constipation, weight gain, etc. They should be used with caution in patients with previous history of drug abuse or addiction[47].

Alpha-2 agonists

Drugs like Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine can be used to decrease opiate use in the perioperative period either orally, intravenously, intrathecally, or as a transdermal patch[48]. When they are used for nerve blocks, they produce prolonged analgesic effect, but they are associated with hypotension and sedation. Therefore, patients require strict perioperative monitoring when these drugs are used[49].

Lignocaine infusion

Although the current ERAS guidelines included intravenous lignocaine infusion for post-operative pain relief in colorectal surgery, there has not been sufficient evidence to support this practice anymore[50]. Studies have found insufficient evidence that it helps in post-operative pain, ileus, nausea or vomiting[51].

Magnesium

Intravenous magnesium has been found to be useful in post-operative pain management and has a morphine sparing effect under multimodal post-operative analgesia protocols[52]. It has been demonstrated to prolong the effect of nerve blocks and spinal anaesthesia[53].

Neuraxial blocks

EA uses local anaesthetics along with adjuncts, such as morphine, buprenorphine, tramadol, fentanyl, hydroxymorphine, clonidine, dexmedetomidine or diamorphine. Drugs like clonidine and dexmedetomidine prolong the effect of the nerve block[54]. EA provides better analgesia after GI surgery with low incidence of ileus, pulmonary complications and analgesic requirements. It improves ileus and promotes food tolerance by reducing nausea and vomiting, thus helping the patient to achieve an early state of DrEaMing[55]. EA is associated with high failure rate as compared to IVPCA and has a high complication rates like hematoma formation, hypotension, permanent harm in about 17.4 per 100000 patients with death reported in about 6.1 per 100000 patients[56,57]. ERAS guidelines also support the use of EA in esophagectomy and colorectal surgery[58,59].

Intrathecal analgesia

A process in which the local anaesthetic agent, sometimes mixed with adjuncts, is instilled into the subarachnoid space to produce anaesthetic/analgesic effect, which can last up to 24 hours. It has high efficacy and a low complication rate compared to EA with permanent damage in about 2.2 per 100000 and death in about 1.2 per 100000 patients[57]. It reduces the opioid consumption and has low pain scores in laparoscopic colorectal surgery[58]. It can lead to respiratory depression, hence will require strict monitoring. It has been included in the ERAS protocols for colorectal surgery[60].

Abdominal wall blocks

They provide analgesia in abdominal surgery. Previously blind techniques were used but now ultrasonogram (USG) guidance has increased their popularity. They avoid the adverse effects of epidural and spinal analgesia like hypotension, motor block and the risk of neurological damage. USG should eliminate the complications, but studies have failed to demonstrate this[61]. They could be of particular importance when the neuraxial blockade is contraindicated like in sepsis, coagulopathy, preexisting neurological deficit or when the patients decide against it. Catheters for infusion can be used to prolong the blockade.

Transversus Abdominis Plane block (TAP) can be performed blindly but USG guidance increases the precision (Figure 1A and B). It can be used in a wide variety of surgeries including abdominal, urological, gynaecological, and obstetric surgeries. It has the opioid sparing effect in multimodal analgesic approach[62]. It blocks the T7-L1 nerves. The subcostal TAP block aims to block the lower thoracic nerves including T6-T9. A study has found the USG-guided posterior TAP block to be superior compared to the lateral TAP block in lower abdomen incisions[63].

Figure 1 Transversus abdominis plane block can be performed blindly but ultrasonogram guidance increases precision. A: Ultrasonogram (USG) anatomy of abdominis plane block (TAP) block (arrows); B: USG-guided TAP block view (arrows). EO: External oblique; IO: Internal oblique; LA: Local anaesthetic; TA: Transversus abdominis.

Quadratus lumborum block: USG-guided quadratus lumborum block has been used in providing analgesia in midline laparotomy and laparoscopic procedures. It is a newer technique about which there is little evidence about efficacy in abdominal surgery[64].

Transversalis fascia plane: It blocks the lateral cutaneous branches of T12-L1, which are commonly missed by the TAP block. It has been successfully used in open appendectomy and inguinal hernia surgeries[65].

Erector Spinae Plane block: ESP is a new technique where the LA is injected around the tip of T5 transverse process level depositing the drug deep to the erector spinae muscle. It can have analgesic effect in laparotomies. Recently it has been reported to be used successfully in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair[66].

USG guided blocks are supposed to be safe, as the needle tip can be directly visualised while injecting the drug, but studies have found peritoneal breech while the needle tip was being visualised during the attempt to infiltrate around the nerve bundles. Thus, the needle should aim for the fascial planes rather than the nerve bundles. Systemic LA toxicity is a concern due to a large volume of the drug being used to infiltrate. The abdomen is well vascularised, so absorption is fast. Thus, less cardiotoxic alternatives should be used[67].

Nonpharmacological techniques

They have been used successfully for the management of chronic pain but recently they have been used in the acute postoperative period also. Cognitive behavioural therapy distraction techniques like music, aromatherapy, canine therapy and virtual reality have been used effectively in perioperative pain management. They decrease anxiety and help the patients in self-management[9,67]. These measures can be an area of future research for developing better methods of pain relief.

CONCLUSION

Pain is the main symptom troubling patients and its management is one of the most important aspect for better outcomes and early recovery after surgery. Numerous drugs and procedures are used for the purpose of managing pain. The World Health Organisation has advocated simple and valuable use of analgesic step ladder for pain management. However, despite advances in this field and various studies, pain management in surgical patients is still not absolute and is still evolving.

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: India

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade D

Novelty: Grade D

Creativity or Innovation: Grade D

Scientific Significance: Grade D

P-Reviewer: Yuan HJ S-Editor: Liu JH L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Zheng XM
==== Refs
1 Swieboda P Filip R Prystupa A Drozd M Assessment of pain: types, mechanism and treatment Ann Agric Environ Med 2013 Spec no. 1 2 7
2 Scholz J Finnerup NB Attal N Aziz Q Baron R Bennett MI Benoliel R Cohen M Cruccu G Davis KD Evers S First M Giamberardino MA Hansson P Kaasa S Korwisi B Kosek E Lavand'homme P Nicholas M Nurmikko T Perrot S Raja SN Rice ASC Rowbotham MC Schug S Simpson DM Smith BH Svensson P Vlaeyen JWS Wang SJ Barke A Rief W Treede RD Classification Committee of the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group (NeuPSIG) The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic neuropathic pain Pain 2019 160 53 59 30586071
3 Ashburn MA Ready LB Postoperative pain. In: Loeser JD, Butler SH, Chapman CR, et al, eds. Bonica's Management of Pain. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001: 765-779
4 Apfelbaum JL Chen C Mehta SS Gan TJ Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged Anesth Analg 2003 97 534 540 12873949
5 Gerbershagen HJ Aduckathil S van Wijck AJ Peelen LM Kalkman CJ Meissner W Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures Anesthesiology 2013 118 934 944 23392233
6 Rutkow IM Origins of Modern Surgery Surgery 2008
7 Collier R A short history of pain management CMAJ 2018 190 E26 E27 29311105
8 Chou R Gordon DB de Leon-Casasola OA Rosenberg JM Bickler S Brennan T Carter T Cassidy CL Chittenden EH Degenhardt E Griffith S Manworren R McCarberg B Montgomery R Murphy J Perkal MF Suresh S Sluka K Strassels S Thirlby R Viscusi E Walco GA Warner L Weisman SJ Wu CL Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council J Pain 2016 17 131 157 26827847
9 Small C Laycock H Acute postoperative pain management Br J Surg 2020 107 e70 e80 31903595
10 Pirie K Traer E Finniss D Myles PS Riedel B Current approaches to acute postoperative pain management after major abdominal surgery: a narrative review and future directions Br J Anaesth 2022 129 378 393 35803751
11 Dubin AE Patapoutian A Nociceptors: the sensors of the pain pathway J Clin Invest 2010 120 3760 3772 21041958
12 Ahmad AH Abdul Aziz CB The brain in pain Malays J Med Sci 2014 21 46 25941463
13 Hill RG Molecular basis for the perception of pain Neuroscientist 2001 7 282 292 11488394
14 Pasero C Paice JA McCaffery M Basic mechanisms underlying the causes and effects of pain. In: McCaffery M, Pasero C, eds. Pain Clinical Manual. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Inc; 1999: 15-34
15 Gan TJ Habib AS Miller TE White W Apfelbaum JL Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical pain: results from a US national survey Curr Med Res Opin 2014 30 149 160 24237004
16 Sultana A Torres D Schumann R Special indications for Opioid Free Anaesthesia and Analgesia, patient and procedure related: Including obesity, sleep apnoea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, complex regional pain syndromes, opioid addiction and cancer surgery Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2017 31 547 560 29739543
17 Tumber PS Optimizing perioperative analgesia for the complex pain patient: medical and interventional strategies Can J Anaesth 2014 61 131 140 24242954
18 Ip HY Abrishami A Peng PW Wong J Chung F Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review Anesthesiology 2009 111 657 677 19672167
19 Chapman CR Vierck CJ The Transition of Acute Postoperative Pain to Chronic Pain: An Integrative Overview of Research on Mechanisms J Pain 2017 18 359.e1 359.e38
20 Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pain Management, Acute Pain Section Anesthesiology 1995 82 1071 1081 7717542
21 Jacox AK Carr DB Chapman CR Ferrell B Field HL Heidrich G Acute Pain Management: Operative or Medical Procedures and Trauma Clinical Practice Guideline No. 1. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1992. AHCPR publication 92-0032. DIANE Publishing; 1997
22 Kerns RD Philip EJ Lee AW Rosenberger PH Implementation of the veterans health administration national pain management strategy Transl Behav Med 2011 1 635 643 24073088
23 Breivik H Borchgrevink PC Allen SM Rosseland LA Romundstad L Hals EK Kvarstein G Stubhaug A Assessment of pain Br J Anaesth 2008 101 17 24 18487245
24 Cleeland CS Ryan KM Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory Ann Acad Med Singap 1994 23 129 138 8080219
25 Melzack R The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire Pain 1987 30 191 197 3670870
26 Twining J Padula C Pilot Testing the Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment (CAPA) Measure Pain Manag Nurs 2019 20 462 467 31103512
27 Schofield P The Assessment of Pain in Older People: UK National Guidelines Age Ageing 2018 47 i1 i22 29579142
28 Devlin JW Skrobik Y Gélinas C Needham DM Slooter AJC Pandharipande PP Watson PL Weinhouse GL Nunnally ME Rochwerg B Balas MC van den Boogaard M Bosma KJ Brummel NE Chanques G Denehy L Drouot X Fraser GL Harris JE Joffe AM Kho ME Kress JP Lanphere JA McKinley S Neufeld KJ Pisani MA Payen JF Pun BT Puntillo KA Riker RR Robinson BRH Shehabi Y Szumita PM Winkelman C Centofanti JE Price C Nikayin S Misak CJ Flood PD Kiedrowski K Alhazzani W Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU Crit Care Med 2018 46 e825 e873 30113379
29 Levy N Mills P Mythen M Is the pursuit of DREAMing (drinking, eating and mobilising) the ultimate goal of anaesthesia? Anaesthesia 2016 71 1008 1012 27079158
30 Hughes MJ Ventham NT McNally S Harrison E Wigmore S Analgesia after open abdominal surgery in the setting of enhanced recovery surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis JAMA Surg 2014 149 1224 1230 25317633
31 Lee B Schug SA Joshi GP Kehlet H PROSPECT Working Group Procedure-Specific Pain Management (PROSPECT) - An update Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2018 32 101 111 30322452
32 Alorfi NM Ashour AM Algarni AS Alsolami FA Alansari AM Tobaiqy M Assessment of the Community Pharmacists' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Pain and Pain Management in Saudi Arabia Int J Gen Med 2022 15 8527 8537 36514744
33 Ghlichloo I Gerriets V Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs). In: Treatment of Chronic Pain Conditions: A Comprehensive Handbook. Springer; 2023: 77-79
34 Pountos I Theodora Georgouli Howard Bird Giannoudis P Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: prostaglandins, indications, and side effects IJICMR 2011
35 Green GA Understanding NSAIDs: from aspirin to COX-2 Clin Cornerstone 2001 3 50 60 11464731
36 Labianca R Sarzi-Puttini P Zuccaro SM Cherubino P Vellucci R Fornasari D Adverse effects associated with non-opioid and opioid treatment in patients with chronic pain Clin Drug Investig 2012 32 Suppl 1 53 63
37 Maund E McDaid C Rice S Wright K Jenkins B Woolacott N Paracetamol and selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the reduction in morphine-related side-effects after major surgery: a systematic review Br J Anaesth 2011 106 292 297 21285082
38 Moore RA Derry S Aldington D Wiffen PJ Single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults - an overview of Cochrane reviews Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 2015 CD008659 26414123
39 Dart RC Bailey E Does therapeutic use of acetaminophen cause acute liver failure? Pharmacotherapy 2007 27 1219 1230 17723075
40 Shafi S Collinsworth AW Copeland LA Ogola GO Qiu T Kouznetsova M Liao IC Mears N Pham AT Wan GJ Masica AL Association of Opioid-Related Adverse Drug Events With Clinical and Cost Outcomes Among Surgical Patients in a Large Integrated Health Care Delivery System JAMA Surg 2018 153 757 763 29799927
41 Callinan CE Neuman MD Lacy KE Gabison C Ashburn MA The Initiation of Chronic Opioids: A Survey of Chronic Pain Patients J Pain 2017 18 360 365 27919771
42 Kumar K Kirksey MA Duong S Wu CL A Review of Opioid-Sparing Modalities in Perioperative Pain Management: Methods to Decrease Opioid Use Postoperatively Anesth Analg 2017 125 1749 1760 29049119
43 Brinck EC Tiippana E Heesen M Bell RF Straube S Moore RA Kontinen V Perioperative intravenous ketamine for acute postoperative pain in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018 12 CD012033 30570761
44 Chaparro LE Smith SA Moore RA Wiffen PJ Gilron I Pharmacotherapy for the prevention of chronic pain after surgery in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 2013 CD008307 23881791
45 Chincholkar M Analgesic mechanisms of gabapentinoids and effects in experimental pain models: a narrative review Br J Anaesth 2018 120 1315 1334 29793598
46 Clarke H Bonin RP Orser BA Englesakis M Wijeysundera DN Katz J The prevention of chronic postsurgical pain using gabapentin and pregabalin: a combined systematic review and meta-analysis Anesth Analg 2012 115 428 442 22415535
47 Mayor S Pregabalin and gabapentin become controlled drugs to cut deaths from misuse BMJ 2018 363 k4364 30327316
48 Grape S Kirkham KR Frauenknecht J Albrecht E Intra-operative analgesia with remifentanil vs. dexmedetomidine: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis Anaesthesia 2019 74 793 800 30950522
49 McEvoy MD Scott MJ Gordon DB Grant SA Thacker JKM Wu CL Gan TJ Mythen MG Shaw AD Miller TE Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) I Workgroup American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on optimal analgesia within an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery: part 1-from the preoperative period to PACU Perioper Med (Lond) 2017 6 8 28413629
50 Weibel S Jelting Y Pace NL Helf A Eberhart LH Hahnenkamp K Hollmann MW Poepping DM Schnabel A Kranke P Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018 6 CD009642 29864216
51 Kranke P Jokinen J Pace NL Schnabel A Hollmann MW Hahnenkamp K Eberhart LH Poepping DM Weibel S Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 CD009642 26184397
52 Kumar M Dayal N Rautela RS Sethi AK Effect of intravenous magnesium sulphate on postoperative pain following spinal anesthesia. A randomized double blind controlled study Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2013 22 251 256 24649780
53 Kahraman F Eroglu A The effect of intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion on sensory spinal block and postoperative pain score in abdominal hysterectomy Biomed Res Int 2014 2014 236024 24772415
54 Nimmo SM Harrington LS What is the role of epidural analgesia in abdominal surgery? BJA Education 2014 14 224 229
55 Emelife PI Eng MR Menard BL Myers AS Cornett EM Urman RD Kaye AD Adjunct medications for peripheral and neuraxial anesthesia Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2018 32 83 99 30322466
56 Guay J Nishimori M Kopp S Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 7 CD001893 27419911
57 Cook TM Counsell D Wildsmith JA Royal College of Anaesthetists Third National Audit Project Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists Br J Anaesth 2009 102 179 190 19139027
58 Gustafsson UO Scott MJ Hubner M Nygren J Demartines N Francis N Rockall TA Young-Fadok TM Hill AG Soop M de Boer HD Urman RD Chang GJ Fichera A Kessler H Grass F Whang EE Fawcett WJ Carli F Lobo DN Rollins KE Balfour A Baldini G Riedel B Ljungqvist O Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society Recommendations: 2018 World J Surg 2019 43 659 695 30426190
59 Low DE Allum W De Manzoni G Ferri L Immanuel A Kuppusamy M Law S Lindblad M Maynard N Neal J Pramesh CS Scott M Mark Smithers B Addor V Ljungqvist O Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society Recommendations World J Surg 2019 43 299 330 30276441
60 Wongyingsinn M Baldini G Stein B Charlebois P Liberman S Carli F Spinal analgesia for laparoscopic colonic resection using an enhanced recovery after surgery programme: better analgesia, but no benefits on postoperative recovery: a randomized controlled trial Br J Anaesth 2012 108 850 856 22408272
61 Onwochei DN Børglum J Pawa A Abdominal wall blocks for intra-abdominal surgery BJA Educ 2018 18 317 322 33456796
62 Baeriswyl M Kirkham KR Kern C Albrecht E The Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Adult Patients: A Meta-Analysis Anesth Analg 2015 121 1640 1654 26397443
63 Abdallah FW Laffey JG Halpern SH Brull R Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis Br J Anaesth 2013 111 721 735 23811424
64 Chin KJ McDonnell JG Carvalho B Sharkey A Pawa A Gadsden J Essentials of Our Current Understanding: Abdominal Wall Blocks Reg Anesth Pain Med 2017 42 133 183 28085788
65 Chin KJ Chan V Hebbard P Tan JS Harris M Factor D Ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block provides analgesia for anterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting Can J Anaesth 2012 59 122 123 22009659
66 Chin KJ Adhikary S Sarwani N Forero M The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair Anaesthesia 2017 72 452 460 28188621
67 Komann M Weinmann C Schwenkglenks M Meissner W Non-Pharmacological Methods and Post-Operative Pain Relief: An Observational Study Anesth Pain Med 2019 9 e84674 31341822
