
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

116585
10.26603/001c.116585
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor Concerning: “An Interval Throwing Program for Baseball Pitchers Based upon Workload Data”
Wong Regan PT, DPT, CSCS 1
Evans Daniel PT, MSPT, CSCS 2
Meister Keith MD 1 2
1 Texas Rangers Baseball Club
2 TMI Sports Medicine & Orthopedic Surgery
Corresponding Author: rwong@texasrangers.com
2 5 2024
2024
19 5 649652
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
==== Body
pmcDear Editor:

This letter is written in response to the article “An Interval Throwing Program for Baseball Pitchers Based upon Workload Data” by Reinold et al.1 The authors should be applauded for their attempt to design an interval throwing program (ITP) with the goal of providing a gradual workload buildup. The researchers had good intentions of designing a program to allow healing of the ulnar collateral ligament after elbow reconstruction without experiencing setbacks. However, we would like to raise our own concerns of the study’s methodology that have led to false conclusions, which are: the newly created ITP was able to achieve a gradual buildup in chronic workload, returns pitchers back to competition safely and efficiently with potentially less risk of setbacks or reinjury, and is the new modern throwing program after Tommy John surgery.1

We agree when progressing an athlete performing an ITP coming back from an upper extremity injury, the program should progressively apply load to the healing tissue in which the clinician carefully monitors the thrower’s mechanics, throwing intensity, distances, and volume.1–4

However, Reinold et al.1 utilized in their methodology an unvalidated inertial measurement unit (IMU) device, the motusBaseball (Motus Global now Driveline Pulse; Driveline Baseball, Kent, WA), to propose an ITP based on a workload formula that factors in elbow varus torque and number of throws at a particular distance in a given day. The workload formula was modeled after the work of co-author Dowling et al.5 that insinuated the IMU was able to produce precise and reproducible data. Both studies reference an index paper6 that was not originally designed to validate the IMU. In fact, one of the co-authors Fleisig et al.7 publicly acknowledged the index study6 was not designed to be a validation study. Fleisig et al.7 agreed with Driggers et al.8 that several rigorous studies are required to validate this particular IMU device. Furthermore, there are multiple scientific publications that have clearly demonstrated that this particular IMU device is not valid for accurately measuring elbow arm stress in the absence of the gold standard motion capture system.8–10 When looking at Figure 1. showing 2nd order polynomial regression model to classify relationship between throwing distance (ft) and peak elbow varus torque (Nm), Reinold et al.1 report peak elbow torque means of 45-48 Nm between 175 ft and 300 ft in their throw analysis. The values are not consistent with the literature of reported values of 90 Nm at 120 ft and 95 Nm at 180 ft as reported using motion capture.11 One explanation for the difference is explained by Driggers et al. that the accuracy of the IMU decreases as torques increase in their Bland-Altman plot for elbow torques indicating a bias in the torques estimated.8

We agree with Reinold et al.1 that throws being carried out during an interval throwing program should be thrown with a slight arc through the majority of the program to the intended target using distance as the guide. Similar to our clinical experience, athlete’s should be instructed to initially “throw to the target and not through the target” with a slight arc and not on a line during the majority of the program to properly apply controlled stresses to the reconstructed elbow ligament.2–4 Given that this is an important concept, there is no way of knowing what throwing technique (arc vs on-line throws) were captured and data mined retrospectively in the throwing data analyzed by Reinold et al.1 Daily workload was calculated by taking the accumulation of elbow torque from every throw in a given day in their study.1 Without knowing the throwing technique for each distance is not sound methodology. The authors acknowledge in their limitations section that the relationship between elbow torque and workload will vary for pitchers and their throwing technique!1

Reliability is not the same as validity. For example, possessing a ruler that states one foot equals fourteen inches can reliably measure fourteen inches repeatedly between multiple points very predictably. However, it is not valid because one foot is equal to twelve inches. Camp et al.10 demonstrated that the IMU reliably produces untrustworthy numbers within the same subject. In our extensive experience using the IMU, we have found that the IMU indiscriminately records all sudden movement as pitches thus making it difficult to review retrospectively, the sleeve that contains the IMU tended to slip down the throwing arm thus skewing measurements over time, and required another person to stand behind the thrower in close proximity while using the phone app to accurately tag the distance that is thrown to match up with the IMU elbow torque data. Driggers et al.8 brought to light the flaw in the manufacturer claiming accuracy of data collected as long as a 2-inch radius of movement from the correct placement of the IMU device was allowed by conducting a pilot study examining a sleeve outfitted with 3 IMUs in succession 3.5 cm medial or lateral to the recommended placement. Testing results showed low agreement with the reference IMU, displacing the notion the sensor movement of less than a 2-inch radius would provide meaningful data. Other researchers have described a protocol to conduct live charting of thrower’s distance with each throw and to recheck sleeve IMU placement every 3-4 throws to minimize device error.12 None of these standards were incorporated in the methods when they data mined retrospectively 111,196 throws.1 This is an additional source of measurement error, making the study lacking reliability. Despite all this, Reinold et al.1 proceeded to use this methodology and submit for publication believing their overall findings were accurate.

Reinold et al.1 referenced papers reporting acute:chronic workload concepts as related to injury risk in pitchers.13,14 A closer inspection of these referenced papers show they erroneously used the same unvalidated IMU in their methods to create injury statistics. This is a huge problem when studies are building off the work of other researchers who are using an unvalidated device to create erroneous statements and conclusions.5,6,13–22 For example, in their discussion, Reinold et al.1 stated they do not suggest using radar guns to monitor intensity during ITP because it doesn’t match actual elbow load. Unfortunately, this is a completely inaccurate statement because they referenced a study that utilized the IMU to draw those conclusions.20 Careful inspection of their other cited reference23 to substantiate their additional claim that velocity does not correlate with elbow varus torque is inaccurate because they failed to acknowledge that the researchers demonstrated that within an individual pitcher, higher ball velocity was strongly associated with higher elbow varus torque. It has been shown in the literature that velocity is directly correlated to the rate of elbow injuries and ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions in Major League baseball pitchers.24–27 Biomechanical studies demonstrate that higher velocity pitches, such as the fastball and slider, are highly correlated with increased shoulder and elbow torques during the pitching motion.28,29 Using this evidence from the literature, we carefully monitor the throwing intensity of the rehabbing athlete by utilizing a radar gun to measure the velocity at each of the distances of the throwing program to help control and monitor intensity to ensure that appropriate and gradual loads to the elbow are applied throughout the program. This method of monitoring throwing intensity has proven to be highly successful in our clinical practice.

In summary, Reinold et al.1 utilized an unvalidated device in their study methodology to calculate elbow torque, did not control for technique of throws (arc vs on-line throws), had no accountability of appropriately tagging throwing distance with elbow torque data, and no control of whether the IMU sleeve was worn correctly in their retrospective analysis to calculate workload. This presents with issues of both validity and reliability in the methods of their study. Therefore, the notion of being able to calculate elbow workload and claim to have devised a more modern and safer interval throwing program is very much flawed and inaccurate. We advise the medical community to be wary of conclusions and statements from studies1,5,6,13–22 that continue using this unvalidated IMU device before making changes to existing interval throwing programs.

Regan Wong, PT, DPT, CSCS

Texas Rangers Baseball Club

Arlington, Texas, USA

Daniel Evans, PT, MSPT, CSCS

TMI Sports Medicine & Orthopedic Surgery

Arlington, Texas, USA

Keith Meister, MD

TMI Sports Medicine & Orthopedic Surgery

Texas Rangers Baseball Club

Arlington, Texas, USA
==== Refs
An Interval Throwing Program for Baseball Pitchers Based upon Workload Data Int J Sports Phys Ther Reinold Michael M. Dowling Brittany Fleisig Glenn S. Macrina Leonard C. Wilk Kevin E. Streepy John T. Andrews James R. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 1 3 2024
19 3 326 336 2159-2896 10.26603/001c.94146 10.26603/001c.94146 38439773
Interval sport programs: guidelines for baseball, tennis, and golf Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Reinold Michael M. Wilk Kevin E. Reed Jamie Crenshaw Ken Andrews James R. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 6 2002
32 6 293 298 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2002.32.6.293 10.2519/jospt.2002.32.6.293 12061709
The Effect of the Crow Hop on Elbow Stress During an Interval Throwing Program: letter to the editor The American Journal of Sports Medicine Wong Regan Laudner Kevin Evans Daniel Meister Keith SAGE Publications 30 6 2021
49 8 NP31 NP32 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465211021409 10.1177/03635465211021409 34190645
Interval throwing program and baseball pitching: letter to the editor The American Journal of Sports Medicine Wong Regan Meister Keith SAGE Publications 30 5 2014
42 6 NP37 NP38 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546514536692 10.1177/0363546514536692 24879677
Workload Comparison of Contemporary Interval Throwing Programs and a Novel Optimized Program for Baseball Pitchers Int J Sports Phys Ther Dowling Brittany Brusalis Christopher M Streepy John T Hodakowski Alexander Pauley Patrick J Heidloff Dave Garrigues Grant E Verma Nikhil N Fleisig Glenn S International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 1 2 2024
19 2 176 188 2159-2896 10.26603/001c.92016 10.26603/001c.92016 38313666
The relationship of throwing arm mechanics and elbow varus torque: within-subject variation for professional baseball pitchers across 82,000 throws The American Journal of Sports Medicine Camp Christopher L. Tubbs Travis G. Fleisig Glenn S. Dines Joshua S. Dines David M. Altchek David W. Dowling Brittany SAGE Publications 14 8 2017
45 13 3030 3035 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546517719047 10.1177/0363546517719047
The Relationship of Throwing Arm Mechanics and Elbow Varus Torque: Response The American Journal of Sports Medicine Fleisig Glenn S. Camp Christopher L. Tubbs Travis G. Dines Joshua S. Dines David M. Altchek David W. Dowling Brittany SAGE Publications 2019
47 1 NP4 NP5 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546518809064 10.1177/0363546518809064 30781990
The relationship of throwing arm mechanics and elbow varus torque: letter to the editor The American Journal of Sports Medicine Driggers Austin R. Bingham Garett E. Bailey Christopher A. SAGE Publications 2019
47 1 NP1 NP5 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546518809061 10.1177/0363546518809061 30781995
Exploring wearable sensors as an alternative to marker-based motion capture in the pitching delivery PeerJ Boddy Kyle J. Marsh Joseph A. Caravan Alex Lindley Kyle E. Scheffey John O. O’Connell Michael E. PeerJ 24 1 2019
7 e6365 2167-8359 10.7717/peerj.6365 10.7717/peerj.6365 30697497
Are Wearable Sensors Valid and Reliable for Studying the Baseball Pitching Motion? An Independent Comparison with Marker-Based Motion Capture The American Journal of Sports Medicine Camp Christopher L. Loushin Stacy Nezlek Stuart Fiegen Anthony P. Christoffer Dan Kaufman Kenton SAGE Publications 2 8 2021
49 11 3094 3101 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465211029017 10.1177/03635465211029017
Biomechanical comparison of baseball pitching and long-toss: implications for training and rehabilitation Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Fleisig Glenn S. Bolt Becky Fortenbaugh Dave Wilk Kevin E. Andrews James R. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 5 2011
41 5 296 303 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2011.3568 10.2519/jospt.2011.3568 21212502
Using Wearable Technology to Evaluate the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Overhead Throwing Motion in Baseball Players Arthroscopy Techniques Lizzio Vincent A. Cross Austin G. Guo Eric W. Makhni Eric C. Elsevier BV 9 2020
9 9 e1429 e1431 2212-6287 10.1016/j.eats.2020.06.003 10.1016/j.eats.2020.06.003 33024687
Relationship Between Workload and Throwing Injury in Varsity Baseball Players Physical Therapy in Sport Mehta Sameer Elsevier BV 11 2019
40 66 70 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.08.001 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.08.001
Chronic Workload, Subjective Arm Health, and Throwing Injury in High School Baseball Players: 3-Year Retrospective Pilot Study Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Mehta Sameer Tang Sisi Rajapakse Chamith Juzwak Scott Dowling Brittany SAGE Publications 2022
14 1 119 126 1941-7381 10.1177/19417381211055142 10.1177/19417381211055142 34781777
Effects of mound versus flat-ground pitching and distance on arm mechanics and elbow torque in high school pitchers Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Dowling Brittany McElheny Kathryn D. Camp Christopher L. Ling Daphne I. Dines Joshua S. SAGE Publications 1 12 2020
8 12 1 6 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967120969245 10.1177/2325967120969245 33354584
Changes in throwing arm mechanics at increased throwing distances during structured long-toss The American Journal of Sports Medicine Dowling Brittany McNally Michael P. Laughlin Walter A. Onate James A. SAGE Publications 14 9 2018
46 12 3002 3006 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546518795892 10.1177/0363546518795892
Do mound height and pitching distance affect youth baseball pitching biomechanics? The American Journal of Sports Medicine Fleisig Glenn S. Diffendaffer Alek Z. Ivey Brett Oi Takanori SAGE Publications 12 9 2018
46 12 2996 3001 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546518795890 10.1177/0363546518795890
Variability in baseball throwing metrics during a structured long-toss program: does one size fit all or should programs be individualized? Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Leafblad Nels D. Larson Dirk R. Fleisig Glenn S. Conte Stan Fealy Stephen A. Dines Joshua S. D’Angelo John Camp Christopher L. SAGE Publications 3 9 2019
11 6 535 542 1941-7381 10.1177/1941738119869945 10.1177/1941738119869945 31478791
The effect of the crow hop on elbow stress during an interval throwing program The American Journal of Sports Medicine Lizzio Vincent A. Smith D. Grace Guo Eric W. Cross Austin G. Gulledge Caleb M. Koolmees Dylan S. Chalmers Peter N. Makhni Eric C. SAGE Publications 2021
49 2 359 363 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546520976629 10.1177/0363546520976629 33378223
Importance of radar gun inclusion during return-to-throwing rehabilitation following ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in baseball pitchers: a simulation study Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Lizzio Vincent A. Smith D. Grace Jildeh Toufic R. Gulledge Caleb M. Swantek Alexander J. Stephens Jeffrey P. Schulz Brian M. Makhni Eric C. Elsevier BV 3 2020
29 3 587 592 1058-2746 10.1016/j.jse.2019.08.014 10.1016/j.jse.2019.08.014 31859036
Baseball pitchers’ perceived effort does not match actual measured effort during a structured long-toss throwing program The American Journal of Sports Medicine Melugin Heath P. Larson Dirk R. Fleisig Glenn S. Conte Stan Fealy Stephen A. Dines Joshua S. D’Angelo John Camp Christopher L. SAGE Publications 31 5 2019
47 8 1949 1954 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546519850560 10.1177/0363546519850560
Effect of fatigue on medial elbow torque in baseball pitchers: A simulated game analysis The American Journal of Sports Medicine Okoroha Kelechi R. Meldau Jason E. Lizzio Vincent A. Meta Fabien Stephens Jeffrey P. Moutzouros Vasilious Makhni Eric C. SAGE Publications 28 6 2018
46 10 2509 2513 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546518782451 10.1177/0363546518782451
Fastball Velocity and Elbow-Varus Torque in Professional Baseball Pitchers J Ath Train Slowik Jonathan S. Aune Kyle T. Diffendaffer Alek Z. Cain E. Lyle Dugas Jeffrey R. Fleisig Glenn S. Journal of Athletic Training/NATA 1 3 2019
54 3 296 301 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-558-17 10.4085/1062-6050-558-17 30721094
Association of maximum pitch velocity and elbow injury in professional baseball pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Bushnell Brandon D. Anz Adam W. Noonan Thomas J. Torry Michael R. Hawkins Richard J. SAGE Publications 21 1 2010
38 4 728 732 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546509350067 10.1177/0363546509350067
Fastball pitch velocity helps predict ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in major league baseball pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Chalmers Peter N. Erickson Brandon J. Ball Brian Romeo Anthony A. Verma Nikhil N. SAGE Publications 20 7 2016
44 8 2130 2135 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546516634305 10.1177/0363546516634305
Major league baseball pitch velocity and pitch type associated with risk of ulnar collateral ligament injury Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Keller Robert A. Marshall Nathan E. Guest John-Michael Okoroha Kelechi R. Jung Edward K. Moutzouros Vasilios Elsevier BV 4 2016
25 4 671 675 1058-2746 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.027 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.027 26995458
Predictors of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in major league baseball pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Whiteside David Martini Douglas N. Lepley Adam S. Zernicke Ronald F. Goulet Grant C. SAGE Publications 20 7 2016
44 9 2202 2209 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546516643812 10.1177/0363546516643812
Kinetic comparison among the fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider in collegiate baseball pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Fleisig Glenn S. Kingsley David S. Loftice Jeremy W. Dinnen Kenneth P. Ranganathan Rajiv Dun Shouchen Escamilla Rafael F. Andrews James R. SAGE Publications 3 2006
34 3 423 430 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546505280431 10.1177/0363546505280431 16260466
Differences among fastball, curveball, and change-up pitching biomechanics across various levels of baseball Sports Biomechanics Fleisig Glenn S. Laughlin Walter A. Aune Kyle T. Cain E. Lyle Dugas Jeffrey R. Andrews James R. Informa UK Limited 2 4 2016
15 2 128 138 1476-3141 10.1080/14763141.2016.1159319 10.1080/14763141.2016.1159319
