
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

38313664
92014
10.26603/001c.92014
Original Research
The Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) Performance in Elite Team Handball Players Playing with Shoulder Pain, Previous Pain, or No Pain
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1550-7408
Torabi Tina Piil 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-6994
Bencke Jesper 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4481-4490
van den Tillaar Roland 1
1 Department of Sports Sciences Nord University https://ror.org/030mwrt98
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Hvidovre Hospital https://ror.org/00edrn755
Corresponding Author: Tina Piil Torabi, PT, CMP, MSc. Department of Sport Science and Physical Education Nord University 7600 Levanger Phone: +47 74 02 26 22 Email: tina.p.torabi@nord.no
1 2 2024
2024
19 2 189198
25 8 2023
4 12 2023
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Physical therapists use tests that could determine strength and weaknesses of the shoulder for overhead throwing athletes to enhance performance, prevent injury, and safely progress rehabilitation. The Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) has been proposed to assess muscular capacity and dynamic shoulder stability in overhead athletes, which could provide information to determine a risk of injury.

Purpose

To investigate if the CKCUEST is an appropriate test to implement within team elite handball players to evaluate dynamic shoulder stability across sexes and in the screening of shoulder pain.

Study design

Cross-sectional study

Methods

Elite team handball players were recruited and performed the CKCUEST from which three different scores (raw, touch, and power) were calculated and compared among handball players playing with shoulder pain, previous pain, and no pain.

Results

A total of 106 handball players were included: 49 females (1.74±0.03 m, 70.4±6.7 kg, and 22±4.9 years) and 57 males (1.90±0.08 m, 91.6±11.4 kg, and 22±5.4 years), A significant difference was found between the female and male handball players when comparing all three CKCUEST scores (p<0.01). No significant differences were found in the CKCUEST scores among the three different groups (F≤1.23, p≥0.30, η2≤0.03). Among the female participants, no significant differences were found between performing the CKCUEST and the modified test. A significant correlation was found between height and the power score for men (r=0.661, p≤0.001) and women (r=0.434, p=0.01).

Conclusion

A comparison of scores across sexes appears unsuitable, due to the possible positive influence of height on the final score. But within the female group, performances of the CKCUEST and the modified CKCUEST were comparable. Additionally, the CKCUEST was not able to differentiate among elite handball players who are playing with shoulder pain, previous shoulder pain, and no pain.

Level of evidence

3

Handball
Shoulder injuries
CKUEST
Overhead afhlete
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Team handball is an Olympic sport, and it is known for its complexity of high technical demands in both the lower and upper extremities, together with high speed and physical contact. Repeated throws are primarily performed with the hand above shoulder height with maximal and submaximal throwing velocity. The shoulder-specific loads vary with the total number of throws, playing position, and type of training, and shoulder pain is one of the most common injuries.1,2 Shoulder pain affects athletes’ performance, training, and daily life.3–5 In Norway, 44–75% of all senior handball players have experienced shoulder pain at some point, and 12–40% were still participating in training and matches, but with modifications.4,6 Several authors have identified deficits in glenohumeral range of motion, strength imbalances, increasing training load, and scapular dyskinesis as risk factors for developing shoulder pain in adolescents and senior elite team handball players.7–10 With the high prevalence and persistence of shoulder pain in adolescents and senior elite handball players, there is a need for high-quality assessment tools to evaluate upper-body strength and stability. A clinical assessment tool should be easy to implement in the field and at a low cost, but most importantly, it should be a tool that could assist the coach, athlete, and medical team in discerning injury risk and return to play for athletes with and without a history of shoulder injury. Several sport-specific functional tests are presented in the literature to assess performance in throwing athletes. Even though the tests do not include throwing, they involve the entire kinetic chain in the test performance: the Posterior Shoulder Endurance Test (PSET),11 the Shoulder Endurance Test (SET),12 the Y-Balance Test for upper extremities,13 the seated medicine-ball throw,14 and the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST).5,15–18

The CKCUEST was originally described by Goldbeck and Davies19 to provide objective data on muscle capacity and neuromuscular control that could assist the clinician in determining the patient’s readiness to return to activities, resume competition, or continue further rehabilitation. The CKCUEST requires the proximal segments to stabilize the upper extremity, while the trunk moves freely, and the center of mass is transferred between arms, to single arm stabilization, alternately. Athletes’ ability to transfer forces and shift the center of mass over the base of support could perhaps provide information to determine if an athlete is at risk of injury.20 Furthermore, the test has been presented to be easy to understand and to implement, be cost-efficient, and take up minimal space in the clinic or in the training facility.19,20

The original test protocol was developed for male athletes, who were placed in a push-up position with their toes on the ground and their hands 91.4 cm (36 inches) apart. Previous studies on the CKCUEST have investigated reliability and validity18,19,21–23 in persons with and without shoulder impingement syndrome, and indicate that the CKCUEST scores differ between players with previous injury/pain history compared with healthy players.20,24–26 Tucci et al.24 determined that the CKCUEST was reliable for both healthy adults and individuals with shoulder impingement syndrome. One preliminary study investigated differences between healthy and previously injured/in-pain baseball pitchers from high school and college.27 Sex differences in height, weight, and arm length have also been discussed in several studies, and modified CKCUEST variations of arm position and knee position have been validated.15,28–32

In previous studies, mostly baseball athletes have been investigated. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no studies have investigated the CKCUEST performance in elite team handball players, including those playing with or without shoulder pain or a history of shoulder pain. Since many elite handball players with shoulder pain still compete on the highest national and international levels, the question therefore arises whether the level of perceived shoulder pain causes less dynamic shoulder instability within this group of athletes, and whether current and previous pain affects performance in the CKCUEST. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate if the CKCUEST is an appropriate test to implement within team elite handball players to evaluate dynamic shoulder stability across sexes and in the screening of shoulder pain. The first aim was to investigate if performance on the CKCUEST and the modified CKCUEST varies among elite handball players playing with shoulder pain, previous pain, or no pain. The second aim was to investigate if the performance varies between male and female elite handball players and to evaluate if height may influence performance, as the distance between the lines is constant (91.4 cm) and thereby not compensating for height. The hypothesis was that male athletes would achieve a higher number of touches compared to female athletes, and that athletes playing with shoulder pain would have lower scores compared with the two other groups due to less dynamic shoulder stability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants

Elite team handball players were recruited from clubs in the top two divisions in Denmark and Norway, together with the top division in Romania and the Netherlands. The total group was divided into three groups: playing handball with shoulder pain, playing with previous shoulder pain, and healthy subjects and all completed a version of the CKCUEST. All players volunteered for the project after providing written and oral consent. Ethical approval was obtained from the Norwegian ethics committee REK Midt in September 2019 (ref. 7189).

All 106 players replied to a medical questionnaire regarding pain, pain history, injury history, training, and match exposure. The medical questionnaire was used to divide the players into three groups: 1) playing with shoulder pain, 2) playing with previous shoulder pain, and 3) healthy subjects. Participants included in the pain group played with shoulder pain that had been present for a minimum of four weeks and developed over time.33 The participants included with previous shoulder pain had to report no current pain and when they last registered shoulder pain (start and stop of previous shoulder pain). The participants in the healthy group never had experienced shoulder pain. Included players were required to take part in both offensive and defensive parts of the game during training and match. Players were excluded if they were recovering from musculoskeletal injuries, had been excluded from participation in the prior six weeks, or presented with pain/previous shoulder pain which was associated with a traumatic event or surgery. The presence of pain was established by the validated Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center questionnaire.33 An oral interview performed by a physical therapist was carried out to determine whether the pain registered in the group with pain and previous pain had a non-traumatic occurrence.

Test procedure

First, the player was given an oral introduction. The subject started in a push-up position, with the hands placed outside each line (3.8 cm of tape) distanced 91.4 cm (36 inches) between the lines with the feet at shoulder width. During the CKCUEST, subjects reached with alternating hands across their body to touch the athletic tape by the opposing hand as many times as possible within 15 seconds (Figure 1). The test started when the tester said “go” and ended when the tester said “stop.” To ensure correct timing, an app with a predefined time setting at 4 x 15/45 seconds was placed in front of the player. The test was performed four times with a 45-second pause in between: one submaximal test and three maximal tests. The first submaximal performance was used as a test run for the participant, with the purpose of introducing the test. The final three test performances were used in the analysis.

All elite team handball players were selected to participate in the CKCUEST, but 15 female players were not able to perform the original CKCUEST due to the wide distance between the hands compared with body anthropometrics, so they were allowed to perform the modified CKCUEST (Figure 1).19,34 The modified CKCUEST was completed with the subject starting in a push-up position on their knees and the hands placed outside the tapeline with a distance of 91.4 cm.32,34–36

191558 Figure 1. Starting position of the CKCUEST, modified CKUEST, and procedure

The CKCUEST raw score was calculated as an average of the touches performed during the final three maximal tests.25 The test was administered by the same experienced tester, who had 10 years of experience in physical therapy and physical testing in team handball.

Data analysis

The average score of the final three maximal tests was calculated as recommended by Goldbeck and Davies.19,24 The CKCUEST has been provided with three different calculation scores to compensate for differences in body composition: 1) the raw touch score represents the number of touches the subject can perform within 15 seconds; 2) the touch score represents the number of touches performed divided by the height of the subject; and 3) the power score represents the number of touches multiplying 68% of the subject’s body weight in kilograms divided by 15 (power = 68% body mass [kg] x average number of touches / 15). The 68% corresponds to the combined body mass of the subject’s arms, head, and trunk.24

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). All data distributions were tested for normality with the Shapiro–Wilk test, histogram, and qq plots. Means and standard deviations (SDs) were calculated for all data, and p-values of ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A sample size calculation was based on previously published estimations containing people with and without pain in the upper limbs.20,26,27 The target participants were 88 subjects, based on an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.80.

All descriptive statistics and distributions of status of shoulder pain are presented with mean and SD. Correlations between the subjects’ height and the three CKCUEST scores (raw, touch, and power score) were made using Pearson’s correlation test. The interpretation of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient was made as recommended by Portney.37 A coefficient ≤0.25 was considered trivial, 0.25–0.50 low to fair, 0.50–0.75 moderate to good, and ≥ 0.75 a strong relationship. A one-way ANOVA was used to identify any statistical differences between the female participants performing the CKCUEST and the modified CKCUEST.

A two-way ANOVA was performed to identify statistical differences in the CKCUEST scores between players with shoulder pain, those with previous pain, and healthy subjects and the whole group, and between men and women. An effect size calculation was used to determine the magnitude of the effect. Effect size was evaluated with η2 (partial eta square), where 0.01<η2<0.06 constitutes a small effect, 0.06<η2<0.14 a moderate effect, and η2>0.14 a large effect.38

RESULTS

A total of 106 elite team handball players, 49 females (174 ± 3 cm, 70.4 ± 6.7 kg, and 22±4.9 years) and 57 males (190±7.5 cm, 91.6±11.4 kg, and 22 ± 5.4 years), participated in this cross-sectional study of the CKCUEST. All 106 included elite handball players were able to complete the tests: 23 playing with shoulder pain, 34 with previous pain, and 49 with no pain. A total of 91 players performed the CKCUEST, 34 females (175 ± 5 cm, 72 ± 6.8 kg, and 22.7±4 years) and 57 males, and a total of 15 female players (172 ± 6 cm, 66.8 ± 4.6 kg, and 20.3±6 years) performed the modified CKCUEST.

Performance among players with pain, previous pain, and no pain

Across sexes, no significant differences between pain groups were found in any of the CKCUEST scores: raw score (F=0.651, p=0.52, η2 =0.02), touch score (F=1.23, p=0.30, η2=0.03), and power score (F=0.71, p=0.50, η2=0.02), all with small effect sizes. No significant differences were found within the female group: raw score (F=0.913, p=0.41, η2=0.06), touch score (F=1.20, p=0.31, η2=0.07), and power score (F=0.41, p=0.67, η2=0.03). Also, no significant differences were found within the male group: raw score (F=0.835, p=0.44, η2=0.03), touch score (F=1.47 p=0.24, η2 = 0.05), and power score (F=2.18, p=0.12, η2=0.08). (Table 1).

191559 Table 1. Mean (SD) and minimum and maximum CKCUEST scores for all players with pain, previous pain and no pain.

Score /
Category		All		Men		Female	
n	Mean±SD	Min–⁠max	n	Mean±SD	Min–⁠max	n	Mean±SD	Min–⁠max	
Raw										
Pain	21	18.7±4.4	8.7–26.4	11	21.6±2.7	16.6–26.6	10	15.3±3.4	8.6–20	
Previous pain	31	19.9±5.4	7–26.7	21	22.8±2.6	16.0–26.3	10	13.6±4.3	7–19.3	
No pain	39	20.1±4.5	7.8–26.3	25	22.5±2.5	9.5–13.5	14	20.1±7.9	8.6–21	
Touch										
Pain	21	10.0±2.0	5.2–13.5	11	11.3±1.3	9.5–13.5	10	8.6±1.8	5.2–11.4	
Previous pain	31	10.5±2.7	3.8–14.2	21	11.9±1.4	8.7–14.2	10	10.5±2.7	3.8–10.5	
No pain	39	11.0±2.3	4.8–13.8	25	12.1±1.3	9.1–13.8	14	11.0±2.3	4.8–12.2	
Power										
Pain	21	73.5±25.6	27.5–121.7	11	93.4±15.2	76.6–121.7	10	51.6±12.4	27.5–69.8	
Previous pain	31	81.3±28.5	22.4–126.7	21	98.2±12.4	79.3–126.7	10	45.8±16.8	22.4–69.9	
No pain	39	75.2±24.4	26.3–⁠117.6	25	89.2±15.8	52.9–⁠117.6	14	50.1±15.2	26.3–⁠77.1	

Performance between men and women

Significant differences and large effect sizes were found between the female and male team handball players when comparing all three CKCUEST scores (p<0.01): raw score (F=125, p<0.01, η2=0.59), touch score (F=107, p<0.01, η2=0.71), and power score (F=82.6, p <0.01, η2=0.48) (Table 2).

191560 Table 2. Mean (SD) and minimum and maximum CKCUEST scores for all participants and per sex

	Raw score	Touch score	Power score	
	Male
(n=57)	Female
(n=34)	All
(n=91)	Male
(n=57)	Female
(n=34)	All
(n=91)	Male
(n=57)	Female
(n=34)	All
(n=91)	
Mean	22.5	15*	19.7	11.9	8.5*	10.6	93.3	49.3*	76.1	
SD	2.5	3.8	4.8	1.4	2.2	2.3	15	14.7	26	
Maximum	26.7	21	26.7	14.2	12.2	14.2	126.7	77.1	126.7	
Minimum	16.0	7	7.0	8.7	3.8	3.8	52.9	22.4	22.4	
* Indicates a significant difference between men and women on a p < 0.05 level

Performance in the modified and original CKCUEST

The female athletes performing the modified test had an average height of 1.72.±0.06 m compared to 1.75±0.05 m for the females in the regular test, but no significant differences were found in any of the CKCUEST scores between the females performing the CKCUEST and the modified test in any of the scores: raw score (F=1.39, p=0.244, η2=0.03), touch score (F=2.55, p=0.12, η2=0.05), and power score (F=0.09, p=0.76, η2<0.01), all with small effect sizes. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the CKCUEST scores in the three groups: pain, previous pain, and healthy players performing the modified CKCUEST (Table 3).

191561 Table 3. Mean (SD) and minimum and maximum scores in the modified and original CKCUEST

	Raw score	Touch score	Power score	
	Pain (n=2)	Previous pain (n=3)	No pain (n=10)	Pain (n=2)	Previous pain (n=3)	No pain (n=10)	Pain (n=2)	Previous pain (n=3)	No pain (n=10)	
Mean	15.8	15	17.4	9.2	8.9	10	50.2	44.6	52.6	
SD	6.8	7.7	4.1	3.6	4.3	2.4	25.8	22.3	12.6	
Maximum	20.7	22.3	22.7	11.7	12.9	13.7	68.4	64.8	65.5	
Minimum	11	7	10.3	6.6	4.4	6	31.9	20.6	30.6	

Correlation between performance and height

Significant correlations were found in both the male and female groups between height and the power score. Males had a significant moderately positive correlation (r=0.661, p≤0.001) compared to the female athletes, who presented a significant fair correlation (r=0.434, p=0.01). A fair, non-significant correlation (r=0.332, p=0.06) was found in the female group between the raw score and height. In the modified CKCUEST, a significant moderate correlation was found between height and power score (r=0.55, p=0.03), while no significant correlations were found with the raw (r=0.49, p=0.07) and touch scores (r=0.40, p=0.14) (Figure 2).

191562 Figure 2. Correlation between height and the power score

DISCUSSION

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the CKCUEST and the modified CKCUEST are appropriate clinical assessment tools for dynamic shoulder stability in male and female elite handball players. Furthermore, the study sought to evaluate if variation is detectable in the performance of the CKCUEST between players performing with shoulder pain, previous pain, and no pain, and if performance varies across gender and height. The main findings were that significant differences were found in the raw and touch CKCUEST scores between male and female participants, but not among the players playing with shoulder pain, previous pain, and no pain. A significant correlation between height and the power score was found in both groups.

In the current study, the male athletes achieved a significantly higher score compared to the female elite athletes. A higher number of touches indicates the athlete found it easier to stabilize and move the center of mass from one arm to another, which demands high-power neuromuscular activity, motor control, and proprioception. The current findings are consistent with the study by Borms and Cools17 in which the male players had a higher number of touches compared to female players. However, Borms and Cools17 presented a higher number of touches than in the present study in both men (27.4±2.7) and women (20.8±2.7). Additionally, higher scores were found in college baseball in the studies by Taylor et al.39 at 25±4.5 and Roush et al.40 at 30.4±3.9, while Schilling and Elazzazi34 presented scores from college baseball, where the pitchers scored 19.1±4.5 and the other positions scored 18.8±3.5.

Prior studies have performed the CKCUEST with small differences in the test setting. Cogley et al.41 showed that a different hand placement during a push-up alters upper-body muscle activity and therefore changes the muscle work. Furthermore, Schilling and Elazzazi34 performed the test with a distance of 36 inches, where the middle of the hands was placed on top of the two pieces of tape, not outside the tape. Negrete et al.42 had the push-up position with the hands within the two pieces of tape, and Taylor et al.39 started with the arms in a push-up under the shoulders. The combination of small differences in test setting and different population groups may influence the variety in number of touches observed; therefore, making a comparison of the performance across sexes and sports can be difficult.

This study observed higher numbers of touches performed by the male athletes compared with the female elite handball players. The differences in performance may be explained by the anthropometric differences measured between the male and female subjects. Powell et al.16 found that the length of the arm has a significant positive effect on the CKCUEST score. Unfortunately, Powell et al. did not measure the length of the participants’ arms but found a fair to moderate significant correlation between height and sex within the elite team handball players. Taking an anthropometric perspective, a person with longer arms has a shorter distance of transfer in the body and an advantage in performing the CKCUEST. Furthermore, Callaway et al.28 argued that the distance of 91.44 cm has not been justified, and they therefore investigated the CKCUEST with modified test settings in healthy male subjects and compared them to the original CKCUEST. They recommended clinicians to use a width matching 50% of the individual’s height, which showed excellent repeated measures reliability and the smallest minimal detectable change. This recommendation was used in the present study with the modified CKCUEST. The female athletes were instructed to perform the CKCUEST but could choose to perform the modified test if they were unable to perform the original CKCUEST (Figure 1). In general, the shorter female athletes (1.72±0.06 m vs. 1.75±0.05 m) chose the modified CKCUEST, with similar results between the two groups, indicating that perhaps the CKUEST needs to be modified for arm length or height, due to the unfavorably long hand-to-hand distance.16 Based on these findings, it cannot be recommended to use scores from the original CKCUEST to evaluate performance across sexes in team elite handball players, even though the touch and power scores try to compensate for differences in weight and height within and across genders. However, more studies are needed to confirm these findings.

The current study did not find any significant differences in performance within the three groups measured by the numbers of touches performed. Previous literature19,43 has presented the CKUEST as an option to evaluate the dynamic stability of the shoulder and upper body by moving the center of mass from side to side. It was expected by the authors that this dynamic shoulder and upper body stability would be affected by shoulder pain. The painful shoulder would cause more time spent on the injured side together with other compensating movement patterns, as shown by Barfield et al.27 They showed that high school and collegiate baseball pitchers who were previously injured had less pelvic rotation and dominant hip abduction during the touch of the non-dominant hand compared to the healthy group. This indicates kinematic changes that could affect the CKUEST scores between the groups. The fact that no differences were found between the groups can be explained by several possibilities. Firstly, it is not known if decreased dynamic stability is the cause of shoulder pain in the pain and previous-pain groups. Forty-four to 75% of senior players have experienced shoulder pain, and 12–40% are playing with modifications, but studies have not presented the distribution of diagnosed reasons for pain. This group of elite athletes presented with a high level of physical fitness but may have experienced challenges when performing a bilateral closed kinetic exercise when their specialized movement pattern is a unilateral open kinetic chain. Furthermore, the included athletes were all still active participants in handball. If the shoulder pain kept them from playing, a difference in score may have been observed, as Tucci et al.24 observed in players with shoulder impingement syndrome who scored only 10–12 touches.

The question of whether the CKCUEST can be used as a screening tool in elite handball players playing with pain, previous pain, or no pain can be answered in the negative. However, the CKCUEST might be used to identify the risk for in-season shoulder injury, as has been suggested by Pontillo et al.20 In a prospective study on American college football players, they found a trend in the athletes developing a shoulder injury during the season. The authors suggested that a score of fewer than 21 touches in male athletes would indicate a higher risk of developing a shoulder injury. However, they used a small cohort design including 26 male athletes; they did not report whether the injury stopped the American football athletes from participating completely; and the CKCUEST was included as a functional test but was only performed two times with a one-minute break, in contrast to the recommendations of Goldbeck and Davies.19 When comparing their recommendation to the findings of the current study, all included elite handball players performed more than 21 raw touches (Table 1). Therefore, the suggestion of 21 raw touches is perhaps a little conservative for the group of team elite handball athletes investigated in this study.

The CKCUEST did not show any statistically significant differences between the players playing with shoulder pain, previous pain, and no pain, which raises the question of the relevance of the test as part of a test battery or screening tool to detect shoulder pain among handball players who are still playing. The cause of shoulder pain among overhead athletes is often a combination of several risk factors. To prevent shoulder injuries in pre- and in-season athletes, the use of a test battery of strength, fatigue, and functional testing may be helpful in identifying who is at higher risk for sustaining a shoulder injury.6,7,44 But few non-professional handball clubs have the possibility to create such a medical setting; therefore, it is important to continue using easily implemented clinical tools that could help in screening risks for shoulder injuries.

LIMITATIONS

A growing number of performance assessments are available for clinicians to use to screen and evaluate throwing athletes. The CKCUEST has been presented with moderate to strong reliability.18,45,46 But the interpretation of the current results must still be viewed within the limitations of the study. Only a small sample performed the modified CKUEST test, and an uneven group size in the number of participants with previous or current shoulder pain compared to healthy subjects must be considered. Finally, this study has reported performance in the CKCUEST with a cross-sectional design, and it has not been assessed whether the CKCUEST can be a relevant test regarding use for injury prevention and return to performance decision-making. Future studies should include the CKCUEST in longitudinal study designs and investigate the ability to predict shoulder pain and the readiness to return to activities, resume competition, or continue further rehabilitation in elite team handball players.

CONCLUSION

The results of the current study provide novel data on CKCUEST performance in team elite handball players playing with shoulder pain, previous shoulder pain, and no shoulder pain. A significant difference between male and female athletes indicates that a comparison in performance across sexes is not suitable, due to the possible positive influence of height in the test setup. But within the female group, performances of the CKCUEST and the modified CKCUEST were comparable. Additionally, the CKCUEST was not able to differentiate among elite handball players who are still playing with shoulder pain, previous shoulder pain, and no pain.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Many have contributed to this project. The authors would particularly like to thank the medical staff in the clubs and Olympic Centers and all the elite handball players for supporting and participating in the project.
==== Refs
Female adolescent elite handball players are more susceptible to shoulder problems than their male counterparts Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Asker Martin Holm Lena W. Källberg Henrik Waldén Markus Skillgate Eva Wiley 10 2 2018
26 7 1892 1900 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-018-4857-y 10.1007/s00167-018-4857-y 29427220
Handball load and shoulder injury rate: a 31-week cohort study of 679 elite youth handball players British Journal of Sports Medicine Møller M Nielsen R O Attermann J Wedderkopp N Lind M Sørensen H Myklebust G BMJ 19 1 2017
51 4 231 237 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096927 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096927
Shoulder pain in Iranian elite athletes: the prevalence and risk factors Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics Mohseni-Bandpei Mohammad A. Keshavarz Roshanak Minoonejhad Hooman Mohsenifar Holakoo Shakeri Hassan 9 2012
35 7 541 548 0161-4754 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.07.011 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.07.011 22921331
High prevalence of shoulder pain among elite Norwegian female handball players Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports Myklebust G. Hasslan L. Bahr R. Steffen K. 2013
23 3 288 294 0905-7188 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01398.x 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01398.x 22092886
2022 Bern consensus statement on shoulder injury prevention, rehabilitation, and return to sport for athletes at all participation levels Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Schwank Ariane Blazey Paul Asker Martin Møller Merete Hägglund Martin Gard Suzanne Skazalski Christopher Haugsbø Andersson Stig Horsley Ian Whiteley Rod Cools Ann M. Bizzini Mario Ardern Clare L. 1 2022
52 1 11 28 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2022.10952 10.2519/jospt.2022.10952 34972489
Reduced glenohumeral rotation, external rotation weakness and scapular dyskinesis are risk factors for shoulder injuries among elite male handball players: a prospective cohort study British Journal of Sports Medicine Clarsen Benjamin Bahr Roald Andersson Stig Haugsboe Munk Rikke Myklebust Grethe BMJ 19 6 2014
48 17 1327 1333 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093702 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093702
Preventing overuse shoulder injuries among throwing athletes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in 660 elite handball players British Journal of Sports Medicine Andersson Stig Haugsboe Bahr Roald Clarsen Benjamin Myklebust Grethe 2017
51 14 1073 1080 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096226 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096226 27313171
Shoulder strength imbalances as injury risk in handball International Journal of Sports Medicine Edouard P. Degache F. Oullion R. Plessis J.-Y. Gleizes-Cervera S. Calmels P. 26 2 2013
34 7 654 660 0172-4622 10.1055/s-0032-1312587 10.1055/s-0032-1312587
Prevalence and burden of overuse injuries in elite junior handball BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Aasheim Christer Stavenes Håvard Andersson Stig Haugsbø Engbretsen Lars Clarsen Benjamin BMJ 6 2018
4 1 e000391 2055-7647 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000391 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000391 30018791
Complex systems approach for sports injuries: moving from risk factor identification to injury pattern recognition—narrative review and new concept British Journal of Sports Medicine Bittencourt N F N Meeuwisse W H Mendonça L D Nettel-Aguirre A Ocarino J M Fonseca S T BMJ 21 7 2016
50 21 1309 1314 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095850 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095850
Reproducibility and discriminant validity of the Posterior Shoulder Endurance Test in healthy and painful populations Physical Therapy in Sport Evans Neil A. Konz Suzanne Nitz Arthur Uhl Tim L. 1 2021
47 66 71 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.10.014 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.10.014
The Shoulder Endurance Test (SET): A reliability and validity and comparison study on healthy overhead athletes and sedentary adults Physical Therapy in Sport Declève P. Van Cant J. Attar T. Urbain E. Marcel M. Borms D. Cools Ann M. 1 2021
47 201 207 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.12.005 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.12.005
Upper Quarter Y Balance Test: Reliability and performance comparison between genders in active adults Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Gorman Paul P. Butler Robert J. Plisky Phillip J. Kiesel Kyle B. 11 2012
26 11 3043 3048 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182472fdb 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182472fdb
The “upper limb rotation test”: Reliability and validity study of a new upper extremity physical performance test Physical Therapy in Sport Decleve Ph Attar T. Benameur T. Gaspar V. Van Cant J. Cools Ann M. 3 2020
42 118 123 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.01.009 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.01.009 31982796
Reliability of the Modified CKCUEST and correlation with shoulder strength in adolescent basketball and volleyball players Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy Declève Philippe Van Cant Joachim Cools Ann M. 9 2021
25 5 536 543 1413-3555 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.02.002 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.02.002 33642120
Investigation of the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test in elite canoe/kayak slalom athletes Physical Therapy in Sport Powell Andrew Williamson Samuel Heneghan Nicola R. Horsley Ian 11 2020
46 220 225 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.09.001 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.09.001
Upper-extremity functional performance tests: reference values for overhead athletes International Journal of Sports Medicine Borms Dorien Cools Ann 21 3 2018
39 6 433 441 0172-4622 10.1055/a-0573-1388 10.1055/a-0573-1388
Development, reliability and validity of the Closed Kinetic Chain Lower Extremity Stability Test (CKCLEST): a new clinical performance test Research in Sports Medicine Arikan Halime Maras Gokhan Akaras Esedullah Citaker Seyit Kafa Nihan 2022
30 5 475 490 1543-8627 10.1080/15438627.2021.1906674 10.1080/15438627.2021.1906674 33759654
Test-retest reliability of the closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test: A clinical field test Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Goldbeck Todd G. Davies George J. 2 2000
9 1 35 45 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.9.1.35 10.1123/jsr.9.1.35
Prediction of in-season shoulder injury from preseason testing in Division I collegiate football players Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Pontillo Marisa Spinelli Bryan A. Sennett Brian J. SAGE Publications 7 3 2014
6 6 497 503 1941-7381 10.1177/1941738114523239 10.1177/1941738114523239 25364482
Relationship between closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test and isokinetic shoulder flexion and elbow extension work Athletic Training & Sports Health Care Collins Bradley K. Watson Matthew D. Davies George J. Riemann Bryan L. 11 2021
13 6 e1 e5 1942-5864 10.3928/19425864-20210401-03 10.3928/19425864-20210401-03
Test-retest reliability of lower extremity functional tests after a closed kinetic chain isokinetic testing bout Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Manske Robert C. Smith Barbara Wyatt Frank 5 2003
12 2 119 132 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.12.2.119 10.1123/jsr.12.2.119
Reliability and validity of the closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test Journal of Physical Therapy Science Lee Dong-Rour Kim Laurentius Jongsoon Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
27 4 1071 1073 0915-5287 10.1589/jpts.27.1071 10.1589/jpts.27.1071 25995559
Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability test (CKCUES test): a reliability study in persons with and without shoulder impingement syndrome BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Tucci Helga Tatiana Martins Jaqueline Sposito Guilherme de Carvalho Camarini Paula Maria Ferreira de Oliveira Anamaria Siriani 3 1 2014
15 1 1471-2474 10.1186/1471-2474-15-1 10.1186/1471-2474-15-1 24387196
Reliability and validity of the closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test Journal of Physical Therapy Science Lee Dong-Rour Kim Laurentius Jongsoon Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
27 4 1071 1073 0915-5287 10.1589/jpts.27.1071 10.1589/jpts.27.1071 25995559
Reliability of strength and performance testing measures and their ability to differentiate persons with and without shoulder symptoms Int J Sports Phys Ther Sciascia A. Uhl T. 2015
10 5 655 66 26491616
Preliminary analysis of closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test differences between healthy and previously injured/in-pain baseball pitchers Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Barfield Jeff W. Bordelon Nicole M. Wasserberger Kyle W. Oliver Gretchen D. 20 4 2022
15 2 290 294 1941-7381 10.1177/19417381221083316 10.1177/19417381221083316 35441548
A randomised observational study of individualised variations in the start position of the closed-kinetic chain upper extremity stability test Physical Therapy in Sport Callaway Andrew Peck Joshua Ellis Shelley Williams Jonathan 1 2020
41 16 22 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.10.007 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.10.007
Intrarater reliability and agreement of a modified Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test Physical Therapy in Sport Degot Matthieu Blache Yoann Vigne Grégory Juré Dimitri Borel Florent Neyton Lionel Rogowski Isabelle 7 2019
38 44 48 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.04.017 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.04.017 31051427
Test-retest reliability of the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) in a modified test position in Division I collegiate basketball players International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Hollstadt Kayla Boland Mark Mulligan Ivan 4 2020
15 2 203 209 2159-2896 10.26603/ijspt20200203 10.26603/ijspt20200203 32269853
Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) in DIII collegiate baseball and softball players: AM Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Mallace Aaron Schilling David Elazzazi Ashraf 5 2018
50 5 Suppl 1 607 0195-9131 10.1249/01.mss.0000537088.23233.f4 10.1249/01.mss.0000537088.23233.f4
Test-retest reliability of the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) in adolescents: reliability of CKCUEST in adolescents Int J Sports Phys Ther de Oliveira V M A Pitangui A C R Nascimento V Y S da Silva H A Dos Passos M H P de Araújo R C 2017
12 1 125 132 28217423
Development and validation of a new method for the registration of overuse injuries in sports injury epidemiology: the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre (OSTRC) Overuse Injury Questionnaire British Journal of Sports Medicine Clarsen Benjamin Myklebust Grethe Bahr Roald 2013
47 8 495 502 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091524 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091524 23038786
Shoulder strength and closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test performance in Division III collegiate baseball and softball players International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Schilling David T. Elazzazi Ashraf M. 1 6 2021
16 3 844 853 2159-2896 10.26603/001c.24244 10.26603/001c.24244 34123536
A comparison of resting scapular posture and the Davies closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Heick John D Haggerty Jenna Manske Robert C 1 6 2021
16 3 835 843 2159-2896 10.26603/001c.23425 10.26603/001c.23425 34123535
Biomechanical analysis of the closed kinetic chain upper-extremity stability test Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Tucci Helga T. Felicio Lilian R. McQuade Kevin J. Bevilaqua-Grossi Debora Camarini Paula Maria Ferreira Oliveira Anamaria S. 1 2017
26 1 42 50 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.2015-0071 10.1123/jsr.2015-0071
Correlation Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice Portney L FA Davis 2000
428 432
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Cohen J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1988

Upper-extremity physical-performance tests in college athletes Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Taylor Jeffrey B. Wright Alexis A. Smoliga James M. DePew J. Tyler Hegedus Eric J. 5 2016
25 2 146 154 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.2014-0296 10.1123/jsr.2014-0296 25611827
Reference values for the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) for collegiate baseball players N Am J Sports Phys Ther Roush J R Kitamura J Waits M.C. 2007
2 3 159 163 21522211
Comparison of muscle activation using various hand positions during the push-up exercise The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Cogley Robert M. Archambault Teasha A. Fibeger Jon F. Koverman Mandy M. Youdas James W. Hollman John H. 2005
19 3 628 33 1064-8011 10.1519/15094.1 10.1519/15094.1 16095413
Can upper extremity functional tests predict the softball throw for distance: a predictive validity investigation Int J Sports Phys Ther Negrete R.J. Hanney W.J. Kolber M.J. Davies G.J. Riemann B. 2011
6 2 104 111 21712942
Test retest reliability of the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Goldbeck Todd G. Davies George J. 2 2000
9 1 35 45 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.9.1.35 10.1123/jsr.9.1.35
Risk factors for overuse shoulder injuries in a mixed-sex cohort of 329 elite handball players: previous findings could not be confirmed British Journal of Sports Medicine Andersson Stig Haugsboe Bahr Roald Clarsen Benjamin Myklebust Grethe 2018
52 18 1191 1198 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097648 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097648 28784621
Clinician-friendly physical performance tests in athletes part 3: a systematic review of measurement properties and correlations to injury for tests in the upper extremity British Journal of Sports Medicine Tarara Daniel T Fogaca Lucas K Taylor Jeffrey B Hegedus Eric J 2016
50 9 545 551 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095198 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095198 26701926
Reference values, intrarater reliability, and measurement error for the closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test and upper quarter y balance test in young adults Motriz: Revista de Educação Física Teixeira Anna Luiza Oliveira Anamaria Siriani de Rodrigues Nathália Alves Bueno Guilherme Augusto Santos Novais Maria Eduarda Oliveira Moreira Rayanne de Paula Lemos Thiago Vilela Matheus João Paulo Chieregato Souza Júnior José Roberto de 2021
28 1980-6574 10.1590/s1980-657420220009921 10.1590/s1980-657420220009921
