
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

38050551
89265
10.26603/001c.89265
Original Research
Non-Operative Rehabilitation Principles for Use in Individuals with Acetabular Dysplasia: A North American Based Delphi Study
Disantis Ashley E. 1 2
Martin RobRoy L. 2
Enseki Keelan 3
Spaid Victoria 4
McClincy Michael 5
1 Adolescent and Young Adult Hip Preservation Program UPMC Childrens Hospital of Pittsburgh
2 Rangos School of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy Duquesne University https://ror.org/02336z538
3 UPMC Freddie Fu Center for Sports Medicine UPMC Rehabilitation Institute
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh
5 Adolescent and Young Adult Hip Preservation Program UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh
Corresponding Author: Ashley Disantis, DPT, OCS Rangos School of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy Duquesne University Pittsburgh, PA USA disantisae@chp.edu 412-979-4733
2 12 2023
2023
18 6 13311345
23 6 2023
24 9 2023
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Acetabular dysplasia (AD) is defined as a structurally deficient acetabulum and is a well-recognized cause of hip pain in young adults. While treatment of severe AD with a periacetabular osteotomy has demonstrated good long-term outcomes, a trial of non-operative management is often recommended in this population. This may be especially true in patients with milder deformities. Currently, there is a paucity of research pertaining to non-operative management of individuals with AD.

Purpose

To present expert-driven non-operative rehabilitation guidelines for use in individuals with AD.

Study Design

Delphi study

Methods

A panel of 15 physiotherapists from North America who were identified as experts in non-operative rehabilitation of individuals with AD by a high-volume hip preservation surgeon participated in this Delphi study. Panelists were presented with 16 questions regarding evaluation and treatment principles of individuals with AD. A three-step Delphi method was utilized to establish consensus on non-operative rehabilitation principles for individuals presenting with AD.

Results

Total (100%) participation was achieved for all three survey rounds. Consensus, defined a piori as > 75%, was reached for 16/16 questions regarding evaluation principles, activity modifications, appropriate therapeutic exercise progression, return to activity/sport criteria, and indications for physician referral.

Conclusion

This North American based Delphi study presents expert-based consensus on non-operative rehabilitation principles for use in individuals with AD. Establishing guidelines for non-operative management in this population will help reduce practice variation and is the first step in stratifying individuals who would benefit from non-operative management. Future research should focus on patient-reported outcomes and rate of subsequent surgical intervention to determine the success of the guidelines reported in this study.

Level of Evidence

Level V

acetabular dysplasia
rehabilitation
consensus statement
return to sport
==== Body
pmcBACKGROUND

Acetabular dysplasia (AD) is defined as a structurally deficient acetabulum, both in shape and orientation, resulting in poor coverage of the femoral head and is a well-recognized cause of hip pain in young adults.1–4 As a result of poor acetabular coverage, excessive wear on the acetabular articular cartilage and labrum can occur to potentially produce degenerative changes.5–8 Without appropriate management, AD can lead to severe pain and disability.9,10

Acetabular dysplasia may result in hip osteoarthritis due to the increased shear forces and loading of the acetabulum and labrum.11,12 The labrum attenuates 1-2% of the joint load in a normal hip during gait. However, the labrum is responsible for 4-11% of the total joint load in an individual with AD secondary to increased antero-superior loading of the acetabulum.13,14 Individuals with AD have also been shown to demonstrate muscle strength deficits, as well as iliopsoas and adductor related pain 56%.15 While treatment of severe AD with a periacetabular osteotomy has demonstrated good long-term outcomes, a trial of non-operative management is often recommended in this population.16–18 This is especially true in those with mild deformities. The role of non-operative rehabilitation in an individual with AD is to re-establish strength and functional control of the lumbopelvic and hip musculature to improve dynamic stability of the hip and lower extremity in the setting of osseous instability as well as to provide activity modification strategies to reduce hip joint irritability.

Currently, there is a lack of research pertaining to non-operative management of individuals with AD. Establishing expert-based non-operative rehabilitation recommendations, including initial evaluation principles, activity modifications, therapeutic exercise progression, return to activity criteria, and indications for physician referral, will provide guidance and reduce variation in a practice area where research is lacking. Additionally, this study will set the groundwork to determine those who are most likely to benefit from non-operative rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to present expert-driven non-operative rehabilitation guidelines for use in individuals with AD.

METHODS

Delphi Panel

The panel of experts who participated in this study consisted of 15 physiotherapists who were identified as experts in the non-operative physiotherapy management of individuals with AD. To avoid bias, panelists were selected from various geographic locations across the United States and Canada. Participants were selected based on the following criteria, including (1) identification as an expert in non-operative management of individuals with AD by a high-volume hip preservation surgeon and (2) treating at least 20 patients diagnosed with AD per year. Participants were blinded for the entirety of the study.

Delphi Structure and Data Collection

A three-step classic Delphi method was used for the current study. Methods are similar to those described by Disantis et al.19 In summary, panelists were presented with three iterative survey rounds via an emailed link. For each survey round, analysis of participants responses was completed by two study members (AD and RM). Any disagreements were resolved by a third team member (MM). Survey responses were deidentified for analysis.

Panelists were presented with 16 free-response questions on 9 topics regarding non-operative rehabilitation principles for AD. The topic areas are listed below:

Initial evaluation principles

Activity limitations

Therapeutic exercise progression

Lumbopelvic and lower extremity neuromuscular control

Rehabilitation of the hip flexor complex

Muscle stretching principles

Cardiovascular fitness

Return to recreational activity/sports

Referral back to a hip specialist

During the first survey round, responses were coded for common thematic content. Common responses reported by > 50% of panelists were considered modal, while common responses reported by >35% of panelists formed a second tier of responses. During the second survey round, panelists received nine topic related questions and were asked to agree or disagree with the modal response. Those who disagreed were provided a response including the second-tier items as well as the option for free text. The same process was repeated for round three. Consensus for 15/16 questions was reached in survey round two. Consensus for 16/16 questions was reached in survey round three.

RESULTS

The expert panel in the current study consisted of 15 physiotherapists who were identified as experts in the non-operative physiotherapy management of individuals with AD. All 15 therapists (100%) participated in the three Delphi rounds. Consensus was achieved for 100% of the 16 questions provided to the expert panel regarding non-operative rehabilitation principles for AD.

Initial Evaluation Principles (Range of Motion, Muscle Strength, Special Tests, and Functional Tests)

14/15 (93%) of panelists agreed that hip flexion and hip internal (IR) and external rotation ER, in supine and prone, ROM measurements are the most important. One dissenting panelist felt that hip abduction should also be measured.

14/15 (93%) of panelists agreed that muscle strength measures for the hip abductors, hip extensors, deep rotators, and core are the most important. One dissenting panelist felt that the quadriceps strength should also be measured.

15/15 (100%) of panelists agreed that a battery of special tests, including flexion/adduction/internal rotation (FADIR), flexion/abduction/external rotation (FABER), log roll, and apprehension testing should be utilized.

15/15 (100%) of panelists agreed that SL activities should be utilized to assess functional control. Examples of functional tests included a SL stance, SL squat, and SL step down.

Activity Modifications

15/15 (100%) of panelists agreed that activities that do not increase pain should be permitted and painful activities should be modified or discontinued.

Therapeutic Exercise Progression

15/15 (100%) of panelists agreed that progression from local to global exercise should be based upon quality of movement and irritability of the hip joint. Examples of quality of movement parameters included adequate muscle activation and minimal compensatory strategies.

14/15 (93%) of panelists agreed that progression from isometric to concentric exercises should be based on reported pain level and progression from concentric to eccentric exercises should be based on quality of movement. Examples of quality of movement included adequate muscle activation through palpation and minimal compensatory strategies. One dissenting panelist thought that progression from isometrics should be initiated as soon as possible, incorporating these exercises with concentric exercises to fatigue.

Lumbopelvic and Lower extremity Neuromuscular Control

15/15 (100%) of panelists agreed these tasks should challenge both the pelvis and lower quarter with a focus on SL control. These tasks should include both static and multidirectional tasks and be progressed based on quality of movement, beginning in low level positions progression to high level positions. Exercise examples to facilitate lumbopelvic neuromuscular control should include transversus abdominis firing in various positions while exercises to facilitate lower extremity neuromuscular control should include double and SL activities. All panelists (100%) agreed progression from double to SL activities are appropriate when the patient exhibits no trunk or pelvic compensations during double leg activities and the patient can maintain pelvic and lower extremity control during a basic SL task.

Rehabilitation of the Hip Flexor Complex

15/15 (100%) of panelists agreed therapeutic exercise should begin only after the patient has demonstrated an improvement in posterolateral hip muscle strength and a reduction of hip joint irritability. These exercises should begin in a short lever (knee flexed) position, when appropriate.

14/15 (93%) of panelists agreed that these exercises may only be necessary based on sporting demands and be used only in the setting of tolerance to short lever hip flexion exercises and reduced hip irritability. Examples of sports that may require prescription of long lever exercises including dancers. One dissenting panelist thought that long lever exercises should be utilized with all patients if there is no pain with hip flexor muscle activation.

Muscle Stretching Principles

13/15 (87%) of panelists agreed muscle stretching should not be a focus of rehabilitation as hip dysplasia is a diagnosis related to joint instability. Two dissenting panelists thought that muscle stretching should be incorporated based upon findings of physical examination.

Cardiovascular Fitness

15/15 (100%) of panelists agreed low impact activities should be encouraged when pain-free. Examples of such activities include cycling and swimming (with a pool buoy if necessary). Higher impact cardiovascular activities may be initiated as strength improves and hip joint irritability decreases.

Return to Recreational Activity/Sports

14/15 (93%) of panelists agreed individuals may begin running when they demonstrate a decrease in hip joint irritability, appropriate pelvic and lower extremity neuromuscular control during SL activities, and a normal gait pattern with ambulation. One dissenting panelist recommended the use of functional testing including the Vail Sport Test and the Selective Functional Movement Assessment (SFMA) should be utilized in conjunction with these measures.

15/15 (100%) of panelists agreed individuals may begin plyometric exercises when they report minimal to no pain and appropriate pelvic and LE neuromuscular control during all running and low-level agility tasks.

15/15 (100%) of panelists agreed individuals may be cleared for full return to sports when they demonstrate adequate pelvic and LE neuromuscular control during all SL tasks, normalized strength, and tolerance to all sport specific tasks, including running and plyometrics.

Referral to a Physician Hip Specialist

13/15 panelists agreed a patient should be referred to a physician specializing in hip-related injuries if they are exhibiting no decrease in symptoms despite improved strength and neuromuscular control after 4-8 weeks of physiotherapy. Two dissenting panelists felt that individuals should undergo at least 12 weeks of therapy before referring to a physician hip specialist. The patient may be referred to a physician hip specialist for an initial or return consultation depending on the route physical therapy management was initiated.

DISCUSSION

A trial of physiotherapy to improve strength and neuromuscular control is often recommended before surgical intervention in individuals presenting with AD. Currently, there is no consensus regarding non-operative rehabilitation principles, including evaluation, therapeutic exercise and neuromuscular control recommendations, return to activity criteria, and criteria for referral back to a hip specialist, for individuals with AD. This Delphi study was conducted to establish expert-based rehabilitation principles for individuals presenting to physiotherapy for management of AD.

Initial Evaluation Principles

Range of Motion

Consensus Point: During an initial evaluation for an individual presenting for non-operative management of AD, hip flexion and hip IR and ER, in supine and prone, are the most important ranges of motion to measure.

Assessment of hip ROM is an important element of an initial physiotherapy evaluation. The panelists recommend a through side-to-side comparison of hip ROM, with a focus on hip flexion and hip IR and ER ROM. Individuals with AD have been shown to demonstrate normal or increased hip ROM.20,21 Careful attention should be paid the end of physiologic hip flexion ROM, ensuring that there are no compensatory movements of the lumbar spine during this measurement. Additionally, hip IR and ER ROM should be measured in both the supine with the hip and knee flexed to 90 degrees as well as in prone with the hip in neutral flexion/extension. Screening of hip rotation in the prone position reduces possibility of ROM restriction due to femoral head neck offset and therefore may allow for better assessment of the bony structure of the femoroacetabular articulation, specifically the presence of femoral version.22 Increased hip IR may indicate the presence of femoral anteversion, while increased hip ER may indicate the presence of femoral retroversion.23,24 Holm et al.25 reported hip rotation ROM has good reliability in screening for femoral version. Additionally, Uding et al.26 report a 20 degree difference between hip IR and ER ROM when measured prone may be suggestive of abnormal femoral version.26 Femoral anteversion in the presence of AD may further decrease the stability of the hip joint and progression of symptoms. Li et al.27 reported individuals with AD and concomitant femoral anteversion demonstrate a significantly greater incidence of OA.

Strength

Consensus Point: During an initial evaluation for an individual presenting for non-operative management of AD, the hip abductors, hip extensors, deep rotators, and core musculature are the most important muscle groups to strength test.

Decreased strength of the lumbopelvic and posterolateral hip complex may lead to a reduction in hip stability. In the setting of osseous insufficiency secondary to AD, muscular strength may plan an even larger role by providing dynamic stability to the hip joint. The gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, deep rotators, and core musculature are key stabilizers of the hip joint and should be assessed during an initial physiotherapy evaluation in an individual with AD.28

In conjunction with the gluteus maximus and deep rotators, the gluteus medius muscle controls transverse and frontal plane motion of the femur, preventing femoral adduction and internal rotation, while the core musculature assists with maintaining neutral pelvic and spinal alignment.29,30

Given their role in lumbopelvic stability, the panelists recommend strength testing of the hip abductor, hip extensor, and deep rotator muscles through manual muscle testing or handheld dynamometry. Core musculature may be evaluated through performance of a plank and side plank, assessing for inability to maintain proper form over 45-seconds. The plank and side plank exercises were chosen as they are a widely utilized measure of isometric core strength. While the strength deficits associated with other non-arthritic hip disorders, such as femoroacetabular impingement, has been shown in the literature, there is little research assessing the strength deficits associated with AD.31,32 In a study of 46 men and 49 women with symptomatic AD, Wang et al.33 reported hip abductor muscle strength was decreased compared to the contralateral, asymptomatic hip during isokinetic strength testing.

Special Tests

Consensus Point: During an initial evaluation for an individual presenting for non-operative management of AD, special tests including FADIR, FABER, log roll, and apprehension testing should be utilized.

While no single special test exists to evaluate for the presence of AD, a cluster of examination findings, along with the individuals subjective report, may indicate the presence of intra-articular hip pain and concomitant hip instability associated with AD. The FADIR and FABER tests are commonly utilized to assess for the presence of intra-articular hip pain in this population. A systematic review by Caliesch et al.34 assessed the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for femoroacetabular impingement and found the FADIR test had a sensitivity of 0.96 (0.91-0.99) and a specificity of 0.11 (0.06-0.02) and the authors also reported a sensitivity of 0.6 (0.15 to 0.95) and a specificity of 0.2 (0.10 to 0.35). Therefore, these tests should be utilized to screen for the presence of intra-articular pain, not identify a specific pathology. Following identification of intra-articular hip pain, the use of apprehension testing may assist clinicians in identifying the presence of hip joint instability. Hoppe et al.35 analyzed three physical examination maneuvers to detect the presence of instability and found the abduction-hyperextension-external rotation test was the most accurate with a sensitivity and specificity of 80.6% and 89.4%, respectively. A systematic review by Cohen et al.36 found 65% of patients with a diagnosis of hip instability reported the presence of anterior apprehension in a position of combined hip extension and external rotation.

Functional Control

Consensus Point: During an initial evaluation for an individual presenting for non-operative management of AD, SL activities such as a SL stance, SL squat, an/or step down should be utilized to assess functional control.

The relationship between lumbopelvic and postero-lateral hip muscle function and lower extremity injury has been well documented in the literature.37–42 Frontal plane pelvic motion is controlled mainly by the gluteus medius muscle, providing not only dynamic stabilization of the hip joint, but also assists with control of knee adduction moment during SL activities.43,44 The deep hip external rotators and core musculature also play a role providing control of femoral internal rotation and dynamic stability of the trunk, respectively.45 Along with muscle activation, the presence of abnormal femoral version may impact an individual’s performance during functional testing. In order to appropriately assess functional control of these muscles, the panelists recommend evaluating an individual’s performance during SL tasks, including but not limited to a SL stance, SL squat, and or/step down maneuver. Observation of static SL stance can be useful to assess for gluteus medius dysfunction through the presence of a Trendelenburg sign, defined as a contralateral pelvic drop or a shift in the trunk to keep the pelvis level.46,47 McGovern et al.48 found the SL squat and the step-down test can help identify kinematic and biomechanical deficiencies and are useful in the evaluation of an individual with non-arthritic hip pain.

Activity Modifications

Consensus Point: Recreational activities that do not increase pain should be permitted, however, activities that increase pain should be modified (ie. reduced intensity or frequency) as needed to remain symptom free.

Individuals presenting with AD are generally young and active, therefore, activity modifications while undergoing a trial of supervised physiotherapy may be indicated. The panelists recommend all recreational activities should be pain-free as a common short-term goal of non-operative physiotherapy is a reduction in pain. Continuing activities that are painful may hinder the individual’s ability to perform the necessary strength and control exercises which are crucial to improving dynamic joint stability in this population. These activities often include prolonged upright activities or activities incorporating large ranges of hip motion, especially into flexion and rotation. Therefore, activities that are painful should be modified as needed. Modifications may include discontinuation of the activity or simply a reduction in the intensity or frequency. Tolerance to these activities should be reassessed as strength and functional control improves and can be reinitiated when the individuals report improved tolerance to these activities.

Therapeutic Exercise Progression

Local to Global Exercise Progression

Consensus Point: Progression from local to globally-focused exercise should be based upon quality of movement (ie. adequate muscle activation with minimal compensatory actions) and irritability of the hip joint.

Appropriate functional control relies on coordinated activation of muscles across multiple joints. To establish functional control, however, an individual needs to first demonstrate competency in local muscle control (deep rotators, etc) as activation of global muscles in the presence of local dysfunction may reduce the ability of the local musculature to assist with basic stability tasks. Local muscle control should be assessed through an individual’s ability to perform low-load isometric exercises in varying non-weight bearing positions without compensation. Examples of these activities include gluteal bridges, clamshells, and transverse abdominis firing (Figure 1). The importance of local muscular control has been well established in patients with low back pain as the local muscles promote segmental stabilization and are superior to controlling unwanted load through the spine.49 Once an individual demonstrates adequate muscle activation with minimal compensatory actions during local exercise, the panelists recommend progression to global exercise, which may include weight bearing tasks (Figure 2). Global exercises should challenge the control of multiple muscle groups across multiple joints and should mimic an individual’s activity goals.

184656 Figure 1. Examples of local muscle control exercises including a) supine transverse abdominis contraction with palpation, b) gluteal bridge, and c) sidelying hip abduction with resistance band.

184657 Figure 2. Examples of global exercises including a) SL stance, b) SL squat, and c) lateral step down.

Isometric to Eccentric Exercise Progression

Consensus Point: Progression from isometric to concentric exercise should be based on the individuals reported pain level during exercise. Progression from concentric to eccentric exercise should be based upon quality of movement (ie. adequate muscle activation with minimal compensatory actions).

Isometric muscle activation increases muscle tension without changing muscle length or joint range of motion and these types of contractions assist with dynamic joint stability.50 Not only do isometric contractions assist with maintaining a stable posture during dynamic movements, but they have been shown to benefit both acute and chronic pain and allow for increased joint stability and strength in the presence of pain.50–54 The panelists recommend use of isometric exercise in the presence of acute pain in the hip joint to improve muscle activation and joint stability. When the individual demonstrates less irritability in the hip joint as well as adequate muscle activation during isometric exercise, clinicians should progress to concentric exercises to further assist with muscle strengthening.

Lumbopelvic and Lower Extremity Neuromuscular Control

Therapeutic Exercise for Lumbopelvic and Lower Extremity Neuromuscular Control

Consensus Point: Exercises to facilitate lumbopelvic and lower extremity neuromuscular control should challenge both the pelvis and lower quarter with a focus on SL control when appropriate. Exercises should begin in low demand positions (ie. supine, quadruped, or tall kneeling) and progress to high demand positions (ie. double and SL) as tolerated. These tasks should include both static and multidirectional tasks and be progressed based on quality of movement.

The association between adequate lumbopelvic control and lower extremity injury has been well established in the literature.30,55 The lumbopelvic region serves as the foundation for the trunk and lower extremity and poor lumbopelvic neuromuscular control can result in uncontrolled trunk movement as well as lower extremity valgus.56,57 The gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, deep external rotator, and core musculature play an important role in lumbopelvic neuromuscular control and exercises should be prescribed to challenge functional control these muscles.58–60 The panelists recommend beginning lumbopelvic control exercises in low demand positions of supine, quadruped, and tall kneeling incorporating lower and upper extremity movement based on quality of movement (Figure 3). Once adequate lumbopelvic control has been established in low demand positions, exercises should be progressed to double and SL weight bearing activities. Weight bearing exercises should begin with static tasks, progressing to dynamic, multidirectional tasks based on quality of movement (Figure 4).

184658 Figure 3. Examples of low demand lumbopelvic control exercises including a) supine march, b) supine lower extremity isometric hold with alternating upper extremity flexion, c) alternating upper extremity flexion in supine, and d) bird dog.

184659 Figure 4. High demand lumbopelvic exercise progression including a) quadruped hip extension with medial resistance, b) standing hip abduction with resistance band on unstable surface, c) lateral step down with medial resistance, and d) SL stance on unstable surface with upper extremity perturbations.

Progression from Double to SL Activities

Consensus Point: Progression from double to SL activities is appropriate when an individual exhibits no trunk or pelvic compensation during double leg activities and can maintain pelvic and lower extremity control during a basic SL stance.

Double leg activities, such as a squat, should be utilized to establish basic static and dynamic control of the pelvis in a weight bearing position. While Lubahn et al.61 found the double leg squat with a load may be effective strategy to activate the gluteus maximus, it has been well established that electromyographic (EMG) activity of the gluteus medius and gluteus maximus muscles are highest in a SL position.62 However, a study of 22 healthy females with a mean age of 22.6 + 2.5 years found the magnitude of anticipatory gluteus medius activity before toe off of the contralateral limb during a SL squat was significantly correlated with the knee abduction moment (p < .001).63 This study highlights importance of establishing appropriate gluteus medius muscle recruitment in a double leg position before progressing to SL activities.63 Therefore, the panelists recommend progression from double to SL activities only when the individual can maintain appropriate pelvic and trunk control during double leg activities and can maintain pelvic and lower extremity control during a basic SL stance. Thorough attention should also be given to sagittal plane control, specifically pelvic tilt. Individuals with AD may increase their anterior pelvic tilt to improve functional acetabular retroversion, providing improved coverage anterior-superior femoral head.64,65 Therefore, creating increased anterior pelvic tilt may be a helpful compensatory motion to encourage in this population when transitioning from double to SL activities.

Rehabilitation of the Hip Flexor Complex

Consensus Point: Therapeutic exercise directed at the hip flexor complex should begin only after the patient has demonstrated an improvement in posterolateral hip strength and a reduction in hip joint irritability. These exercises should begin in a short lever position, when/if appropriate. Long lever hip flexion exercises may only be necessary based on sporting demands (i.e. dancers). They should be incorporated only when the patient has reduced hip joint irritability and is tolerating all short lever hip flexion exercises without an increase in pain.

The iliopsoas muscle complex sits anterior to the hip joint and may compensate for the lack of osseous stability associated with AD.66–68 As a result, the iliopsoas tendon is susceptible to inflammation, overload, and/or pain. Furthermore, Philippon et al.69 reported a link between gluteus medius muscle weakness and iliopsoas tendonitis. It has been shown that gluteal weakness is present in individuals with AD and therefore may increase the likelihood of developing iliopsoas tendonitis. More recently, Jacobsen et al.70 performed an ultrasound evaluation of the iliopsoas in 100 individuals with symptomatic AD. The authors reported that 50% of individuals demonstrated abnormalities in the iliopsoas tendon, hypothesizing that these abnormalities were a result of insufficient anterior acetabular coverage and the resulting increased load placed through the iliopsoas.70 Therefore, the expert panel recommends avoiding hip flexor muscle strengthening until improved dynamic hip joint stability has been established through increased posterolateral hip strength. When appropriate, these exercises should begin in a short lever position to minimize the chance of further irritation to the iliopsoas tendon. If long lever hip flexion is a required sporting demand, strengthening of the iliopsoas in a long lever should be prescribed, but only after adequate tolerance to short lever strengthening has been established. Both short and long lever hip flexion exercises should be discontinued if the patient reports increased pain.

Muscle Stretching Principles

Consensus Point: Muscular stretching should not be a focus of physiotherapy as AD is a diagnosis of instability. The focus of physiotherapy for patients with AD should be optimizing joint stability, not increasing mobility.

As previously mentioned, the iliopsoas complex acts as a secondary stabilizer to the hip joint and may be hypertonic secondary to the lack of osseous coverage associated with AD.67,68 Other muscles, such as the hip adductors, which act to stabilize the pelvis and lower extremity during the stance phase of gait, may also exhibit hypertonicity. Evaluation of the flexibility of these muscles may indicate they muscle tightness, the authors caution against restoring flexibility to these muscles in the early stages of the rehabilitation process as these muscles are providing anterior joint stability in the setting of osseous instability. Once adequate posterolateral hip strength has been established, providing increased dynamic hip joint stability, stretching can be initiated as tolerated. It should be noted, however, that the expert panel recommends a larger focus be placed on strength and neuromuscular control training to improve joint stability.

Cardiovascular Exercise

Consensus Point: Low impact activities such as cycling, the elliptical, and swimming (with a pool buoy if necessary) should be encouraged if pain-free. High impact cardiovascular activities such as running and plyometrics may be initiated as tolerated when strength and neuromuscular control improves and hip joint irritability and decreased.

The importance of cardiovascular exercise is well established.71,72 Maintenance of cardiovascular fitness during a trial of non-operative physiotherapy for the treatment of AD is crucial to allow for re-initiation of recreational activities as pain allows. Given individuals with AD often complain of pain with upright and high impact activities, low impact activities including cycling, the elliptical trainer, and swimming should be encouraged. Modifications may need to be made, such as adjusting seat position, stride length, and swim stroke, to allow these activities to be performed without increasing symptoms. These activities should be adjunct to strength and neuromuscular control exercises. As strength and functional control improves, individuals may report improved tolerance to higher impact activities. These high impact cardiovascular activities, including running and plyometrics, should be encouraged as pain allows.

Return to Recreational Activities/Sports

Return to Straight Line Running

Consensus Point: Individuals may begin running when they demonstrate normalized strength, minimal hip joint irritability, appropriate pelvic and lower extremity neuromuscular control during SL activities, and a normal gait pattern during ambulation at faster paces (Table I).

Straight line running should be utilized as the first step in the return to sport progression as it introduces a dynamic, low load through the lower extremity and helps improve cardiovascular endurance. Utilizing objective criteria, including pain, ROM, and functional control, is crucial as running is the first sport-specific activity in the rehabilitation process. Despite the increased recognition of non-arthritic hip joint pathologies, there is a dearth of literature supporting return to run criteria for these individuals. The panelists recommend utilizing a combination of measures, including hip joint pain, lumbopelvic and lower extremity neuromuscular control during SL activities, and gait, to assess for readiness to return to straight line running. Running should be progressed in a gradual manner utilizing walk/jog intervals to allow for monitoring of hip joint irritability. If the patient demonstrates appropriate tolerance to a running progression, low-level agility drills, including ladder drills, should be initiated.

Initiation of Plyometric Activities

Consensus Point: Plyometric activities should be initiated when an individual demonstrates normalized strength, minimal to no pain, and appropriate pelvic and lower extremity neuromuscular control during all running and low-level agility tasks (Table I).

184660 Table I. Panelist recommendations for return to recreational activities/sports

Return to Straight Line Running	Initiation of Plyometric Activities	Full Return to Sports	
Reduction in hip joint irritability

Appropriate pelvic and lower extremity neuromuscular control during SL activities

Normal gait pattern during ambulation at faster paces

	Minimal to no pain and appropriate pelvic and lower extremity neuromuscular control during all running and low-level agility tasks

	Normalized, symmetrical strength

Adequate pelvic and lower extremity neuromuscular control during all SL tasks

Tolerance to all sport specific activities including running and plyometrics

	

Plyometrics exercises are crucial for return to sport progression as such activities improve power development during functional movement patterns, allowing the individual to prepare for their sporting demands.73 Along with increased power production, plyometrics increase peak force and velocity of acceleration movements and increase muscle activation.74 The panelists recommend progressing to plyometric activities when an individual is demonstrating minimal to no pain and appropriate pelvic and lower extremity neuromuscular control during straight line running and low-level agility tasks. Plyometric exercise should begin with double leg activities, progressing to SL activities when the patient demonstrates appropriate functional control with double leg tasks. Careful attention should be pain to dosing of plyometric activities, specifically contacts per session, and should be based on athletic ability or exercise volume.75

Full Return to Sport

Consensus Point: An individual should be cleared for full participation in sporting activities when they demonstrate normalized strength, adequate pelvic and lower extremity neuromuscular control during SL tasks, and tolerance to all sport specific activities including running and plyometrics (Table I).

Full return to activity is a common goal of individuals with symptomatic AD as these individuals tend to be young and athletic. Currently, there is no literature indicating return to sport rates or objective criteria that should be utilized to determine readiness to return to full participation in individuals with AD. The panelists recommend utilizing a combination of strength, lower extremity neuromuscular control, and tolerance to sport specific activities as criteria to determine readiness for full return to sport. Along with this objective criteria, psychological readiness should be taken into account as decreased psychological readiness may result in reinjury and/or decreased sport performance.76–79 In individuals with femoroacatebaular impingement syndrome (FAIS), Jochimsen et al.80 reported low self-efficacy and high kinesiophobia resulted in worse function and increased pain. Given the long-standing nature of AD and similar activity limitations seen with FAIS, an assumption can be made that these individuals will exhibit signs consistent with low confidence and fear and clinicians should recognize the importance of these factors when considering full return to sport clearance.

Referral to a Physician Hip Specialist

Consensus Point: An individual should be referred for initial or return consultation to a physician specializing in hip preservation if they are exhibiting no decrease in symptoms despite improved strength and neuromuscular control with completion of 4-8 weeks of physiotherapy.

After the initial diagnosis of AD, an individual may be referred for physiotherapy. If after 4-8 weeks of hip specific physiotherapy, the individual reports no decrease in symptoms despite improved strength and neuromuscular control, a referral to a physician specializing in hip preservation is indicated. It should also be noted that individuals with more severe disease may not be candidates for a trial of non-operative management due to the increased possibility of early onset arthritis.81 Severity of disease is often classified utilizing the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) on an anteroposterior radiograph, with an LCEA < 20 degrees considered pathologic and an LCEA between 20-25 degrees considered borderline dysplastic.82 While the LCEA is an oversimplification of the diagnosis, it may be a useful finding for physiotherapists to consider when determining timing of physician referral.83

CONCLUSION

A trial of non-operative rehabilitation is often recommended in the setting of AD. However, no physiotherapy guidelines or description of therapeutic activity progression currently exist in the literature. This Delphi study established expert based recommendations regarding initial evaluation principles, activity modifications, therapeutic exercise progression, return to activity criteria, and indications for physician referral. This study will help reduce practice variation and is the first step in determining who is appropriate for a trial of non-operative rehabilitation. Future studies need to assess patient outcomes with utilization of this protocol and determine how many patients convert to surgery despite targeted rehabilitation.

Corresponding Author

Ashley Disantis, DPT, OCS

Rangos School of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy

Duquesne University

Pittsburgh, PA USA

disantisae@chp.edu

412-979-4733

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflicts of interest

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We want to acknowledge all physiotherapists who put their time and effort into completion of the three survey rounds of this Delphi study. Their work was essential in creating this consensus statement.
==== Refs
Hip dysplasia in the young adult The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Gala Luca Clohisy John C. Beaulé Paul E. 1 2016
98 1 63 73 0021-9355 10.2106/jbjs.o.00109 10.2106/jbjs.o.00109
How are dysplastic hips different? A three-dimensional CT study Clin Orthop Relat Res van Bosse Harold Wedge John H. Babyn Paul 5 2015
473 5 1712 1723 0009-921X 10.1007/s11999-014-4103-y 10.1007/s11999-014-4103-y 25524428
Incidence and characteristics of femoral deformities in the dysplastic hip Clin Orthop Relat Res Clohisy John C. Nunley Ryan M. Carlisle Jack C. Schoenecker Perry L. 1 2009
467 1 128 134 0009-921X 10.1007/s11999-008-0481-3 10.1007/s11999-008-0481-3 19034600
The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume Klaue K Durnin CW Ganz R 5 1991
73-B 3 423 429 0301-620X 10.1302/0301-620x.73b3.1670443 10.1302/0301-620x.73b3.1670443
Patient-specific analysis of cartilage and labrum mechanics in human hips with acetabular dysplasia Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Henak C.R. Abraham C.L. Anderson A.E. Maas S.A. Ellis B.J. Peters C.L. Weiss J.A. 2 2014
22 2 210 217 1063-4584 10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.003 10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.003 24269633
Articular cartilage abnormalities in dysplastic hips without joint space narrowing Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research Nishii Takashi Sugano Nobuhiko Tanaka Hisashi Nakanishi Katsuyuki Ohzono Kenji Yoshikawa Hideki 2 2001
383 383 183 190 0009-921X 10.1097/00003086-200102000-00020 10.1097/00003086-200102000-00020
The 2007 Frank Stinchfield Award. The biomechanics of the hip labrum and the stability of the hip Clin Orthop Relat Res Crawford Matthew J Dy Christopher J Alexander Jerry W Thompson Matthew Schroder Steven J Vega Charles E Patel Rikin V Miller Andrew R McCarthy Joseph C Lowe Walter R Noble Philip C 12 2007
465 16 22 0009-921X 10.1097/blo.0b013e31815b181f 10.1097/blo.0b013e31815b181f 17906586
Arthroscopic capsular plication and labral preservation in borderline hip dysplasia: two-year clinical outcomes of a surgical approach to a challenging problem The American Journal of Sports Medicine Domb Benjamin G. Stake Christine E. Lindner Dror El-Bitar Youssef Jackson Timothy J. 16 8 2013
41 11 2591 2598 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546513499154 10.1177/0363546513499154
The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Murphy S B Ganz R Müller M E 7 1995
77 7 985 989 0021-9355 10.2106/00004623-199507000-00002 10.2106/00004623-199507000-00002 7608241
The John Charnley Award: Redefining the natural history of osteoarthritis in patients with hip dysplasia and impingement Clin Orthop Relat Res Wyles Cody C. Heidenreich Mark J. Jeng Jack Larson Dirk R. Trousdale Robert T. Sierra Rafael J. 2 2017
475 2 336 350 0009-921X 10.1007/s11999-016-4815-2 10.1007/s11999-016-4815-2 27071391
Osteoarthritis as a disease of mechanics Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Felson D.T. 1 2013
21 1 10 15 1063-4584 10.1016/j.joca.2012.09.012 10.1016/j.joca.2012.09.012 23041436
Is hip morphology a risk factor for developing hip osteoarthritis? A systematic review with meta-analysis Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Casartelli N.C. Maffiuletti N.A. Valenzuela P.L. Grassi A. Ferrari E. van Buuren M.M.A. Nevitt M.C. Leunig M. Agricola R. 9 2021
29 9 1252 1264 1063-4584 10.1016/j.joca.2021.06.007 10.1016/j.joca.2021.06.007 34171473
Acetabular edge loading during gait is elevated by the anatomical deformities of hip dysplasia Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Song Ke Pascual-Garrido Cecilia Clohisy John C. Harris Michael D. 1 7 2021
3 687419 2624-9367 10.3389/fspor.2021.687419 10.3389/fspor.2021.687419 34278299
Role of the acetabular labrum in load support across the hip joint Journal of Biomechanics Henak Corinne R. Ellis Benjamin J. Harris Michael D. Anderson Andrew E. Peters Christopher L. Weiss Jeffrey A. 8 2011
44 12 2201 2206 0021-9290 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.011 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.011 21757198
Muscle-tendon-related pain in 100 patients with hip dysplasia: prevalence and associations with self-reported hip disability and muscle strength J Hip Preserv Surg Jacobsen Julie Sandell Hölmich Per Thorborg Kristian Bolvig Lars Jakobsen Stig Storgaard Søballe Kjeld Mechlenburg Inger 2018
5 1 39 46 2054-8397 10.1093/jhps/hnx041 10.1093/jhps/hnx041 29423249
Natural history of the dysplastic hip following modern periacetabular osteotomy Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Wyles Cody C. Vargas Juan S. Heidenreich Mark J. Mara Kristin C. Peters Christopher L. Clohisy John C. Trousdale Robert T. Sierra Rafael J. 15 5 2019
101 10 932 938 0021-9355 10.2106/jbjs.18.00983 10.2106/jbjs.18.00983
14-year hip survivorship after periacetabular osteotomy: a follow-up study on 1,385 hips Acta Orthopaedica Larsen Josefine Beck Mechlenburg Inger Jakobsen Stig Storgaard Thilleman Theis Munchholm Søballe Kjeld 28 2 2020
91 3 299 305 1745-3674 10.1080/17453674.2020.1731159 10.1080/17453674.2020.1731159 32106751
Periacetabular osteotomy to treat residual dysplasia in adolescents and young adults: indications, complications, results Journal of Children's Orthopaedics Millis M. B. McClincy M. 8 2018
12 4 349 357 1863-2521 10.1302/1863-2548.12.180068 10.1302/1863-2548.12.180068 30154925
Rehabilitation guidelines for use following a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO): A North American based delphi consensus Int J Sports Phys Ther Disantis Ashley E. Ruh Ethan Martin RobRoy Enseki Keelan McClincy Michael 2 10 2022
17 6 1002 1015 2159-2896 10.26603/001c.38043 10.26603/001c.38043 36237641
Descriptive epidemiology of acetabular dysplasia: The Academic Network of Conservational Hip Outcomes Research (ANCHOR) periacetabular osteotomy Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Sankar Wudbhav N. Duncan Stephen T. Baca Geneva R. Beaulé Paul E. Millis Michael B. Kim Young-jo Peters Christopher L. Podeszwa David A. Schoenecker Perry L. Sierra Rafael J. Sink Ernest L. Sucato Daniel J. Trousdale Robert T. Zaltz Ira Clohisy John C. 2 2017
25 2 150 159 1067-151X 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00075 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00075
Clinical presentation of symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in skeletally mature patients J Bone Joint Surg Am Nunley Ryan M. Prather Heidi Hunt Devyani Schoenecker Perry L. Clohisy John C. 4 5 2011
93 Supplement_2 17 21 0021-9355 10.2106/jbjs.j.01735 10.2106/jbjs.j.01735 21543683
Femoral version abnormalities significantly outweigh effect of cam impingement on hip internal rotation Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Kraeutler Matthew J. Chadayammuri Vivek Garabekyan Tigran Mei-Dan Omer 7 2 2018
100 3 205 210 0021-9355 10.2106/jbjs.17.00376 10.2106/jbjs.17.00376
Femoral anteversion in the hip: comparison of measurement by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Botser Itamar B. Ozoude George C. Martin Dorea E. Siddiqi Aheed J. Kuppuswami Sivaraja Domb Benjamin G. 5 2012
28 5 619 627 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.021 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.021 22301362
Relationship between femoral anteversion and findings in hips with femoroacetabular impingement Orthopedics Ejnisman Leandro Philippon Marc J. Lertwanich Pisit Pennock Andrew T. Herzog Mackenzie M. Briggs Karen K. Ho Charles P. 3 2013
36 3 e293 300 0147-7447 10.3928/01477447-20130222-17 10.3928/01477447-20130222-17 23464948
Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of hip ROM in patients with osteoarthrosis Physiotherapy Research International Holm Inger Bolstad Bjørg Lütken Teresa Ervik Anne Røkkum Magne Steen Harald 11 2000
5 4 241 248 1358-2267 10.1002/pri.204 10.1002/pri.204
Clinical tests to determine femoral version category in people with chronic hip joint pain and asymptomatic controls Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Uding Alexandria Bloom Nancy J. Commean Paul K. Hillen Travis J. Patterson Jacqueline D. Clohisy John C. Harris-Hayes Marcie 2 2019
39 115 122 2468-7812 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.12.003 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.12.003 30553987
The role of femoral neck anteversion in the development of osteoarthritis in dysplastic hips The Bone & Joint Journal Li H. Wang Y. Oni J. K. Qu X. Li T. Zeng Y. Liu F. Zhu Z. 12 2014
96-B 12 1586 1593 2049-4394 10.1302/0301-620x.96b12.33983 10.1302/0301-620x.96b12.33983
Muscular activity of patella and hip stabilizers of healthy subjects during squat exercises Rev Bras Fisioter Felicio L. R. Dias L. A. Silva A. P. Oliveira A. S. Bevilaqua-Grossi D. 2011
15 3 206 11 21829984
Electromyographic activity of selected trunk and hip muscles during a squat lift. Effect of varying the lumbar posture Spine Vakos J. P. Nitz A. J. Threlkeld A. J. Shapiro R. Horn T. 3 1994
19 Supplement 687 695 0362-2436 10.1097/00007632-199403001-00008 10.1097/00007632-199403001-00008 8009334
Core stability and its relationship to lower extremity function and injury Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Willson John D. Dougherty Christopher P. Ireland Mary Lloyd Davis Irene McClay 9 2005
13 5 316 325 1067-151X 10.5435/00124635-200509000-00005 10.5435/00124635-200509000-00005 16148357
Hip Strength deficits in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Nepple Jeffrey J. Goljan Peter Briggs Karen K. Garvey Sean E. Ryan Mark Philippon Marc J. 11 2015
31 11 2106 2111 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.04.095 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.04.095
Impaired hip muscle strength in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Kierkegaard Signe Mechlenburg Inger Lund Bent Søballe Kjeld Dalgas Ulrik 12 2017
20 12 1062 1067 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.008 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.008
Asymmetry in muscle strength, dynamic balance, and range of motion in adult symptomatic hip dysplasia Symmetry Wang Haifang Yu Hailong Kim Yonghwan Chen Tingting 5 4 2022
14 4 748 2073-8994 10.3390/sym14040748 10.3390/sym14040748
Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for cam or pincer morphology in individuals with suspected FAI syndrome: a systematic review BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Caliesch Rahel Sattelmayer Martin Reichenbach Stephan Zwahlen Marcel Hilfiker Roger 4 2020
6 1 e000772 2055-7647 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000772 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000772 32411383
Diagnostic accuracy of 3 physical examination tests in the assessment of hip microinstability Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Hoppe Daniel J. Truntzer Jeremy N. Shapiro Lauren M. Abrams Geoffrey D. Safran Marc R. 11 2017
5 11 2325967117740121 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967117740121 10.1177/2325967117740121 29226163
Hip microinstability diagnosis and management: a systematic review Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Cohen Dan Jean Pierre-Olivier Patel Milin Aravinthan Neveadan Simunovic Nicole Duong Andrew Safran Marc R. Khanduja Vikas Ayeni Olufemi R. 2023
31 1 16 32 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-022-06976-7 10.1007/s00167-022-06976-7
Ankle inversion injury and hypermobility: effect on hip and ankle muscle electromyography onset latency Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Beckman Scott M. Buchanan Thomas S. 12 1995
76 12 1138 1143 0003-9993 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80123-5 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80123-5
Hip abductor weakness in distance runners with iliotibial band syndrome Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine Fredericson Michael Cookingham Curtis L. Chaudhari Ajit M. Dowdell Brian C. Oestreicher Nina Sahrmann Shirley A. 7 2000
10 3 169 175 1050-642X 10.1097/00042752-200007000-00004 10.1097/00042752-200007000-00004 10959926
Hip muscle weakness and overuse injuries in recreational runners Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine Niemuth Paul E. Johnson Robert J. Myers Marcella J. Thieman Thomas J. 1 2005
15 1 14 21 1050-642X 10.1097/00042752-200501000-00004 10.1097/00042752-200501000-00004
Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Leetun DARIN T. Ireland MARY LLOYD Willson JOHN D. Ballantyne BRYON T. Davis IRENE MCCLAY 6 2004
36 6 926 934 0195-9131 10.1249/01.mss.0000128145.75199.c3 10.1249/01.mss.0000128145.75199.c3 15179160
Hip strength in females with and without patellofemoral pain Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Ireland Mary Lloyd Willson John D. Ballantyne Bryon T. Davis Irene McClay 11 2003
33 11 671 676 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.11.671 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.11.671
Core strength and lower extremity alignment during single leg squats Med Sci Sports Exerc Willson JOHN D. Ireland MARY LLOYD Davis IRENE 5 2006
38 5 945 952 0195-9131 10.1249/01.mss.0000218140.05074.fa 10.1249/01.mss.0000218140.05074.fa 16672849
The architectural design of the gluteal muscle group: implications for movement and rehabilitation Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Ward Samuel R. Winters Taylor M. Blemker Silvia S. 2 2010
40 2 95 102 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2010.3302 10.2519/jospt.2010.3302
Anatomy of the abductor muscles of the hip as studied by computed tomography. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Clark J M Haynor D R 9 1987
69 7 1021 1031 0021-9355 10.2106/00004623-198769070-00010 10.2106/00004623-198769070-00010 3654693
Effects of lumbar extensor fatigue and fatigue rate on postural sway European Journal of Applied Physiology Davidson B. S. Madigan M. L. Nussbaum M. A. 28 7 2004
93 1-2 183 189 1439-6319 10.1007/s00421-004-1195-1 10.1007/s00421-004-1195-1
Trendelenburg's test: 1895 Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research Trendelenburg F 10 1998
355 3 7 0009-921X 10.1097/00003086-199810000-00002 10.1097/00003086-199810000-00002
The significance of the Trendelenburg test The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume Hardcastle P Nade S 11 1985
67-B 5 741 746 0301-620X 10.1302/0301-620x.67b5.4055873 10.1302/0301-620x.67b5.4055873
Evidence-based procedures for performing the single leg squat and step-down tests in evaluation of non-arthritic hip pain: A literature review International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy McGovern Ryan P. Martin RobRoy L. Christoforetti John J. Kivlan Benjamin R. 6 2018
13 3 526 536 2159-2896 10.26603/ijspt20180526 10.26603/ijspt20180526 30038839
Theraputic exercise for spinal segmental stabilization in low back pain: scientific basis and clinical approach Richardson C. Jull G. Hodges P. Hides J. Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh 1999

Effects of isokinetic passive exercise and isometric muscle contraction on passive stiffness Journal of Physical Therapy Science Terada Shigeru Miaki Hiroichi Uchiyama Keita Hayakawa Shozo Yamazaki Toshiaki 2013
25 10 1347 1352 0915-5287 10.1589/jpts.25.1347 10.1589/jpts.25.1347 24259791
The effects of isometric exercise types on pain and muscle activity in patients with low back pain Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation Rhyu Hyun-Seung Park Hun-Kyung Park Jung-Sub Park Hye-Sang 24 8 2015
11 4 211 214 2288-176X 10.12965/jer.150224 10.12965/jer.150224 26331136
Do isometric and isotonic exercise programs reduce pain in athletes with patellar tendinopathy in-season? A randomised clinical trial Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport van Ark Mathijs Cook Jill L. Docking Sean I. Zwerver Johannes Gaida James E. van den Akker-Scheek Inge Rio Ebonie 9 2016
19 9 702 706 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.11.006 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.11.006 26707957
Isometric exercise induces analgesia and reduces inhibition in patellar tendinopathy British Journal of Sports Medicine Rio Ebonie Kidgell Dawson Purdam Craig Gaida Jamie Moseley G Lorimer Pearce Alan J Cook Jill 15 5 2015
49 19 1277 1283 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094386 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094386
Efficacy of an inertial resistance training paradigm in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy in athletes: a case-series study Physical Therapy in Sport Romero-Rodriguez D. Gual G. Tesch P.A. 2 2011
12 1 43 48 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.10.003 10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.10.003
National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Prevention of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury J Athl Train Padua Darin A. DiStefano Lindsay J. Hewett Timothy E. Garrett William E. Marshall Stephen W. Golden Grace M. Shultz Sandra J. Sigward Susan M. 1 1 2018
53 1 5 19 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-99-16 10.4085/1062-6050-99-16 29314903
Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study The American Journal of Sports Medicine Hewett Timothy E. Myer Gregory D. Ford Kevin R. Heidt Robert S. Jr. Colosimo Angelo J. McLean Scott G. van den Bogert Antonie J. Paterno Mark V. Succop Paul 4 2005
33 4 492 501 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546504269591 10.1177/0363546504269591 15722287
A review of electromyographic activation levels, timing differences, and increased anterior cruciate ligament injury incidence in female athletes British Journal of Sports Medicine Hewett T E Zazulak B T Myer G D Ford K R 1 6 2005
39 6 347 350 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.2005.018572 10.1136/bjsm.2005.018572 15911605
Gluteus medius muscle activation patterns as a predictor of low back pain during standing Clinical Biomechanics Nelson-Wong Erika Gregory Diane E. Winter David A. Callaghan Jack P. 6 2008
23 5 545 553 0268-0033 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.002 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.002 18282648
Timing and relative intensity of hip extensor and abductor muscle action during level and stair ambulation. An EMG study Phys Ther Lyons Kathryn Perry Jacquelin Gronley Joanne K. Barnes Lee Antonelli Dan 1 10 1983
63 10 1597 1605 0031-9023 10.1093/ptj/63.10.1597 10.1093/ptj/63.10.1597
The role of core stability in athletic function Sports Medicine Kibler W Ben Press Joel Sciascia Aaron 2006
36 3 189 198 0112-1642 10.2165/00007256-200636030-00001 10.2165/00007256-200636030-00001 16526831
Hip muscle activation and knee frontal plane motion during weight bearing therapeutic exercises Int J Sports Phys Ther Lubahn A. J. Kernozek T. W. Tyson T. L. Merkitch K. W. Reutemann P. Chestnut J. M. 2011
6 2 92 103 21713231
Electromyographic analysis of gluteus medius and gluteus maximus during rehabilitation exercises Int J Sports Phys Ther Boren K. Conrey C. Le Coguic J. Paprocki L. Voight M. Robinson T. K. 2011
6 3 206 23 22034614
The relationship of anticipatory gluteus medius activity to pelvic and knee stability in the transition to single-leg stance PM&R Kim Daehan Unger Janelle Lanovaz Joel L. Oates Alison R. 2016
8 2 138 144 1934-1482 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.005 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.005 26079865
Does compensatory anterior pelvic tilt decrease after bilateral periacetabular osteotomy? Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research Daley Erika Nahm Nickolas Koueiter Denise Zaltz Ira 17 4 2019
477 5 1168 1175 0009-921X 10.1097/corr.0000000000000560 10.1097/corr.0000000000000560 30998635
Relationship between spinal sagittal alignment and acetabular coverage: a patient-matched control study Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Fukushima Kensuke Miyagi Masayuki Inoue Gen Shirasawa Eiki Uchiyama Katsufumi Takahira Naonobu Takaso Masashi 3 7 2018
138 11 1495 1499 0936-8051 10.1007/s00402-018-2992-z 10.1007/s00402-018-2992-z 29971509
Hip instability: a review of hip dysplasia and other contributing factors Muscle Ligaments and Tendons Journal Kraeutler M.J. Garabekyan T. Pascual-Garrido C. Mei-Dan O. 2016
6 3 343 353 2240-4554 10.32098/mltj.03.2016.10 10.32098/mltj.03.2016.10 28066739
Walking patterns and hip contact forces in patients with hip dysplasia Gait & Posture Skalshøi Ole Iversen Christian Hauskov Nielsen Dennis Brandborg Jacobsen Julie Mechlenburg Inger Søballe Kjeld Sørensen Henrik 10 2015
42 4 529 533 0966-6362 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.08.008 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.08.008
Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic psoas lengthening: the effect of femoral version Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Fabricant Peter D. Bedi Asheesh De La Torre Katrina Kelly Bryan T. 7 2012
28 7 965 971 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.028 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.028 22305298
Rehabilitation exercise progression for the gluteus medius muscle with consideration for iliopsoas tendinitis: an in vivo electromyography study The American Journal of Sports Medicine Philippon Marc J. Decker Michael J. Giphart J. Erik Torry Michael R. Wahoff Michael S. LaPrade Robert F. 12 5 2011
39 8 1777 1786 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546511406848 10.1177/0363546511406848
Muscle–tendon-related abnormalities detected by ultrasonography are common in symptomatic hip dysplasia Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Jacobsen Julie Sandell Bolvig Lars Hölmich Per Thorborg Kristian Jakobsen Stig Storgaard Søballe Kjeld Mechlenburg Inger 4 5 2018
138 8 1059 1067 0936-8051 10.1007/s00402-018-2947-4 10.1007/s00402-018-2947-4 29728835
Benefits of physical activity Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2023

Endurance exercise (aerobic) American Heart Association
Current Concepts of Plyometric Exercise Int J Sports Phys Ther Davies G. Riemann B. L. Manske R. 2015
10 6 760 86 26618058
Does plyometric training improve strength performance? A meta-analysis Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Sáez-Sáez de Villarreal Eduardo Requena Bernardo Newton Robert U. 9 2010
13 5 513 522 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.08.005 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.08.005 19897415
Plyometric exercise in the rehabilitation of athletes: physiological responses and clinical application Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Chmielewski Terese L. Myer Gregory D. Kauffman Douglas Tillman Susan M. 5 2006
36 5 308 319 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2006.2013 10.2519/jospt.2006.2013 16715831
The impact of psychological readiness to return to sport and recreational activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction British Journal of Sports Medicine Ardern Clare L Österberg Annika Tagesson Sofi Gauffin Håkan Webster Kate E Kvist Joanna 7 10 2014
48 22 1613 1619 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093842 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093842
Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery The American Journal of Sports Medicine Ardern Clare L. Taylor Nicholas F. Feller Julian A. Whitehead Timothy S. Webster Kate E. 3 6 2013
41 7 1549 1558 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546513489284 10.1177/0363546513489284 23733635
A systematic review of the psychological factors associated with returning to sport following injury British Journal of Sports Medicine Ardern Clare L Taylor Nicholas F Feller Julian A Webster Kate E 2013
47 17 1120 1126 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091203 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091203 23064083
Psychological factors are associated with return to pre-injury levels of sport and physical activity after ACL reconstruction Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Baez Shelby E. Hoch Matthew C. Hoch Johanna M. 2020
28 2 495 501 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-019-05696-9 10.1007/s00167-019-05696-9
Low self-efficacy and high kinesiophobia are associated with worse function in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome J Sport Rehabil Jochimsen Kate N. Mattacola Carl G. Noehren Brian Picha Kelsey J. Duncan Stephen T. Jacobs Cale A. 2020
30 3 445 451 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.2019-0498 10.1123/jsr.2019-0498 33027764
Subclinical deformities of the hip are significant predictors of radiographic osteoarthritis and joint replacement in women. A 20 year longitudinal cohort study Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Thomas G.E.R. Palmer A.J.R. Batra R.N. Kiran A. Hart D. Spector T. Javaid M.K. Judge A. Murray D.W. Carr A.J. Arden N.K. Glyn-Jones S. 10 2014
22 10 1504 1510 1063-4584 10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.038 10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.038
Evaluation and treatment of borderline dysplasia: Moving beyond the lateral center edge angle Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Vaudreuil Nicholas J. McClincy Michael P. 2 2020
13 1 28 37 1935-9748 10.1007/s12178-020-09599-y 10.1007/s12178-020-09599-y 32030604
Mild or borderline hip dysplasia: Are we characterizing hips with a lateral center-edge angle between 18 degrees and 25 degrees appropriately? The American Journal of Sports Medicine McClincy Michael P. Wylie James D. Yen Yi-Meng Novais Eduardo N. 2019
47 1 112 122 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546518810731 10.1177/0363546518810731 30781992
