
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

38050548
89663
10.26603/001c.89663
Original Research
Safety Considerations When Dry Needling the Multifidi in the Thoracolumbar Region: A Cadaveric Study
Williams Christi L. 1
Falyar Christian R. 2
McConnell Ryan C. 1
Lindsley Stacey 1
1 Physical Therapy Belmont University https://ror.org/033vjpd42
2 Middle Tennessee School of Anesthesia
Corresponding Author: Christi L. Williams School of Physical Therapy, Belmont University, Nashville 37212, USA 615-260-0940, christi.williams@belmont.edu
1 12 2023
2023
18 6 13561363
13 7 2023
10 10 2023
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Dry needling the lumbar multifidi is a technique used by physical therapists to effectively treat low back pain. While studies have examined the safety considerations in the upper lumbar spine related to the kidneys and lungs, none have investigated the possibility of entering the spinal canal in this region.

Purpose

The purpose of this cadaveric ultrasound-guided dry needling exploration was to determine if a dry needle can penetrate the ligamentum flavum at the T12/L1 interspace and enter the spinal canal using a paramedian approach in a fresh-frozen, lightly fixed cadaver in the prone position.

Study Design

Cadaveric study.

Methods

The procedure was performed on a cadaver in the prone position. The needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to determine if a 0.30 x 50 mm dry needle inserted 1.0 cm lateral to the spinous process of T12 and directed medially at a 22-degree angle could penetrate the ligamentum flavum and enter the spinal canal.

Results

As determined via ultrasound, a dry needle can penetrate the ligamentum flavum and enter the spinal canal at the thoracolumbar junction using this technique.

Conclusion

This interprofessional collaboration demonstrates that a dry needle can penetrate the ligamentum flavum to enter the spinal canal at T12/L1 using a documented technique for dry needling the multifidus. A thorough understanding of human anatomy along with the incorporation of available technology, such as ultrasound, may decrease the risk of adverse events when dry needling the multifidi at the thoracolumbar junction.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

multifidus
ultrasound
cadaver
dry needling
safety considerations
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Dry needling is a common technique used by physical therapists to treat musculoskeletal pain,1 and needling the muscles around the lumbar spine has been shown to decrease low back pain in patients post-intervention.2–4 Significant and serious adverse events with dry needling have been published5–7; however, they are likely underreported.8 Documented adverse events from needling interventions in areas around the spine include: acute epidural hematoma,5,6,9 post-dural puncture headache,10,11 infection,12,13 lower extremity weakness,14 and numbness into an extremity.14 Other documented adverse events include bleeding, bruising, pain, aggravation of symptoms, nausea, feeling faint, and headaches.14 Currently, no national or international system is available for tracking data on adverse events related to dry needling.15 While significant and serious events from dry needling are not common, therapists should be aware of all potential risks to improve procedures, safety for the individual patients, and the overall standard of practice.

One potential factor that may contribute to the occurrence of adverse events with dry needling is the lack of a universally accepted intervention methodology. Multiple approaches are used in research and instruction of dry needling techniques, which leads to variability in practice and difficulty determining if adverse events are tied to a specific approach.8,16–18 For example, there are a variety of methods described to dry needle the lumbar multifidi, which include variations in both the location of needle placement as well as the angulation of the needle as it is directed toward the targeted tissue.

When targeting the lumbar multifidi, Rainey describes a needle placement within one finger breadth lateral to the spinous process and a needle direction that is just medial to the vertical axis.19 Wang-Price et al. used a needle placement 2.0 cm lateral to the spinous process and angled 20° medially toward the spinous process, as well as a needle placement 4.0 cm lateral to the spinous process with a 45° medial angulation, with both techniques resulting in successful placement of the needle in the lumbar multifidi confirmed on ultrasound imaging.20

Other authors report an inferomedial needle angulation when targeting the lumbar multifidi but are not consistent with all parameters. Variations in parameters include needle placements at 1.0 cm lateral to the spinous process with a 15° inferomedial angulation21 as well as 1.0 cm, or 1 finger breadth lateral placement with an inferomedial angulation without specific information related to the degree of angulation, thereby leaving the technique open to interpretation.18,22 Hannah et al. describe a 1.5 cm needle placement lateral to the spinous process with a 45° inferior and 45° medial angulation of the needle.23 In addition to the medial and inferomedial needle angulation techniques, other techniques include placing the needle 1.0-1.5 cm lateral to the spinous process with no angulation, but rather a straight posterior to anterior direction.23,24 Table 1 outlines the variability that exists related to needle position, needle length, needle angulation, depth of penetration, and patient position for dry needling the lumbar multifidus.

185650 Table 1. Variability of Techniques used by Physical Therapists when Dry Needling the Lumbar Multifidus

Reference	Target Muscle	Needle diameter	Needle length	Insertion Depth	Pt position	Needle approach	Needle angle	
								
Loizidis et al., 20202	L2-5 Para-vertebral musclesa	0.30 mm	50-75 mm	To lamina	Prone over pillowb	2 cm lateral to SPc	Inferomedial (~20°)	
Wang-Price et al., 202016	L4-S2 multifidi	0.30 mm	60-100 mm	To laminad	Prone over pillowb,e	On or near tender point	Inferomedial (~20-30°)	
Hannah et al., 201623	L4 multifidi	0.25-0.30 mmf	N/A	To lamina	Prone	1.5 cm lateral to SP	45° inferior & 45° medial	
1 cm lateral to SP	0°	
Clark et al., 202122	T12-L1 multifidi	0.30 mm	60 mm	To lamina	Not stated	1 cm lateral to SP	Inferomedial	
Koppenhaver et al., 201525	L3-L5 multifidi	0.30 mm	50-60 mm	To lamina	Prone	1.5 cm lateral to SP	Inferomedial (~20°)	
Puentedura et al., 201726	L4 multifidi	0.30 mm	40-50 mm	To lamina	Prone	1.5 cm lateral to SP	Inferomedial
(~20°)	
Wang-Price et al., 202220	L4-L5 multifidi	0.30 mm	100 mm	Bony backdropg	Prone over pillowb	2.0 cm lateral to SP	20° medial	
4.0 cm lateral to SP	45° medial	
Rainey 201319	L3 & L5 multifidi	0.25 mm	60 mm	To lamina	Prone over pillowb	Within 1 finger breadth from midline	Just medial to vertical axis	
Koppenhaver 201521	L3-L5 multifidi	.30mm	50-60 mm	To multifidus	Prone	1 cm lateral to SP	Inferomedial 15°	
aParavertebral muscles included: multifidus, erector spinae, iliocostalis lumborum, thoracolumbar fascia

bThe pillow is under the patient’s abdomen

cSP = Spinous Process

d Not specified but mentioned standardizing depth by stopping at bony lamina of vertebrae

e Not specifically stated in dry needling procedure, but was the position for other testing procedures

fResearchers used craft needle for dissection purposes but stated the typical dry needling procedure would be with 0.25-0.30mm

gTo bony backdrop or until entire shaft of needle is completely subcutaneous

Despite the variability that exists in needling technique, dry needling of the multifidi has been considered a safe technique due to the ability of the vertebral lamina to serve as a protective barrier for the spinal canal, preventing inadvertent needling into the spinal canal. Several studies have examined the accuracy of needle placement in the lumbar multifidi at L4-518,21 and the safety considerations related to nearby structures, such as the kidneys and lungs,24 but none have investigated the possibility of entering the spinal canal in the upper lumbar region. Spinal canal perforation is a risk and has been demonstrated in the upper cervical spine.27 Additionally, acute cervical epidural hematoma has occurred following dry needling5,6 and may occur in other areas as well. The cadaveric dry needling technique described in this commentary highlights one of the multiple, documented approaches for the lumbar multifidi and sought to determine if a significant safety vulnerability exists.

The idea for this collaboration between physical therapy and certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) faculty originated during a discussion on the distinctions between lumbar punctures performed by anesthesia providers and dry needling techniques executed by physical therapists on the multifidi. While the classic approaches and needle types for these two procedures differ, it raises the question of whether a dry needling procedure, when conducted in a manner described as safe and effective, can potentially breach the spinal canal.19,20 Table 2 compares a lumbar puncture technique and dry needling techniques targeting the lumbar multifidi.

185651 Table 2. Comparison of Techniques Used in a Lumbar Puncture Performed by an Anesthesia Provider and Dry Needling the Lumbar Multifidi Performed by a Physical Therapist

	Lumbar Puncture	Dry Needling Multifidi	
Needle diameter (gauge)	20-22 gauge	0.25-0.30 mm	
Needle length	9 cm	40-100 mm	
Patient position	Sitting or side-lying with flexion of the spine	Prone or
prone over pillow	
Needle approach	Midline (in the interspinous space)
In some cases, a paramedian (off midline) approach is useda	1-4 cm lateral to spinous process	
Needle angle	Slightly cephalad.
In some cases, medially and superiorlya	0-45 degrees
Medial or inferomedial	
Use of imaging to ensure proper placement	Ultrasound-assisted techniquesb	Not a standard practice	
a In certain instances, such as increased age and spinal deformity, providers may employ a paramedian approach in which the spinal needle is placed off midline and directed medially and superiorly to avoid the interspinous space

b Authors have also described ultrasound-assisted techniques to determine the interspinous level, midline, and depth to the ligamentum flavum28

The purpose of this collaborative cadaveric ultrasound-guided examination of dry needling was to determine if a dry needle can penetrate the ligamentum flavum at T12/L1 interspace and enter the spinal canal using a paramedian approach in a fresh-frozen, lightly fixed cadaver in the prone position.

METHODS

The procedure was performed at Middle Tennessee School of Anesthesia on an 88 y/o female donor by a certified registered nurse anesthetist with over 20 years of diagnostic ultrasound imaging experience and 15 years performing and teaching regional anesthesia. The fresh/lightly embalmed donor was received via the Willed Body Program at The University of North Texas Health Science Center. Exemption from Institutional Review Board approval was granted by Advarra IRB (Pro00070509).

The cadaver was placed in a prone position. A Sonosite Edge II ultrasound system with an rC60xi 5-2 MHz curvilinear array transducer (Bothell, WA) was placed in a parasagittal orientation with the orientation indicator facing cephalad. The sacrum, L5-S1 interspace, and L5 spinous process were identified. The transducer was slid cephalad until the interspace between T12 and L1 was identified. An AGUPUNT APS 0.30 x 50 mm dry needle was inserted approximately 1.0 cm lateral to the spinous process of T12 (Figure 1) and was directed medially at a 22-degree angle (Figure 2). The needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to determine if it could penetrate the ligamentum flavum to enter the spinal canal.

185652 Figure 1. Needle inclination demonstrates ~22-degree medial angle

185653 Figure 2. Ultrasound guidance set up

RESULTS

As Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate, a 0.30 x 50 mm dry needle inserted approximately 1.0 cm lateral to the spinous process of T12 and directed medially at a 22-degree angle can pass between adjacent vertebral laminae and penetrate the ligamentum flavum to enter the spinal canal. Please reference Supplemental File 1 for video evidence.

185654 Figure 3. Ultrasound image of the spine in parasagittal orientation; SP - spinous process, PLL – posterior longitudinal ligament

CONCLUSION

While adverse effects resulting from entering the spinal canal during a dry needling procedure are rare, this interprofessional collaboration demonstrates some important considerations for the clinician when performing dry needling. First, there is significant variability in the techniques described for dry needling the multifidus with no clear consensus regarding which technique is most effective and safe. Many techniques described also lack specific information regarding needle angulation, thereby leaving the exact technique open to interpretation, and this ambiguity has the potential to lead to variations in clinician needling technique and a resulting decrease in the certainty of a safe needle path and placement. This cadaveric study demonstrates that a 0.30 x 50 mm dry needle is able to penetrate the ligamentum flavum and enter the spinal canal at T12/L1 using a dry needling technique described for the multifidus, and therefore, either purposeful or inadvertent deviations in needle placement in this area of the spine have the potential to cause neurologic injury. While a comprehensive understanding of human anatomy is crucial for dry needling, the utilization of ultrasound has the potential to enhance the precision of dry needling techniques in vulnerable areas, such as the thoracolumbar junction, and may contribute to further risk reduction. The authors recommend that future studies explore various needle lengths and positions, as well as other regions of the spine and patient positions to explore the risk of a dry needle entering the spinal canal under these conditions.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Video

US Imaging
==== Refs
Dry needling in the management of musculoskeletal pain The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Kalichman L. Vulfsons S. 1 9 2010
23 5 640 646 1557-2625 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090296 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090296
The effects of dry needling on pain relief and functional balance in patients with sub-chronic low back pain Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Loizidis Theodoros Nikodelis Thomas Bakas E. Kollias I. 11 11 2020
33 6 953 959 1878-6324 10.3233/bmr-181265 10.3233/bmr-181265
Is dry needling effective for low back pain?: A systematic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis Medicine Hu Han-Tong Gao Hong Ma Rui-Jie Zhao Xiao-Feng Tian Hong-Fang Li Lu 6 2018
97 26 e11225 0025-7974 10.1097/md.0000000000011225 10.1097/md.0000000000011225 29952980
Evidence for dry needling in the management of myofascial trigger points associated with low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Liu Lin Huang Qiang-Min Liu Qing-Guang Thitham Nguyen Li Li-Hui Ma Yan-Tao Zhao Jia-Min 1 2018
99 1 144 152.e2 0003-9993 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.008 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.008
An acute cervical epidural hematoma as a complication of dry needling Spine Lee Jun-Hwan Lee Hyangsook Jo Dae-Jean 6 2011
36 13 E891 E893 0362-2436 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181fc1e38 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181fc1e38 21289580
Acute spinal epidural hematoma as a complication of dry needling: A case report PM&R Berrigan William A. Whitehair Curtis L. Zorowitz Richard D. 22 2 2019
11 3 313 316 1934-1482 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.07.009 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.07.009
Pneumothorax complication of deep dry needling demonstration Acupuncture in Medicine Cummings M Ross-Marrs R Gerwin R 12 2014
32 6 517 519 0964-5284 10.1136/acupmed-2014-010659 10.1136/acupmed-2014-010659
Lack of standardization in dry needling dosage and adverse event documentation limits outcome and safety reports: a scoping review of randomized clinical trials Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Kearns Gary A. Brismée Jean-Michel Riley Sean P. Wang-Price Sharon Denninger Thomas Vugrin Margaret 2023
31 2 72 83 1066-9817 10.1080/10669817.2022.2077516 10.1080/10669817.2022.2077516 35607259
Acute spinal epidural hematoma after acupuncture: Personal case and literature review World Neurosurgery Domenicucci Maurizio Marruzzo Daniele Pesce Alessandro Raco Antonino Missori Paolo 6 2017
102 695.e11 695.e14 1878-8750 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.125 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.125
Development of postdural puncture headache following therapeutic acupuncture using a long acupuncture needle Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society Jo Dae-Jean Lee Bong Jae Sung Joon Kyung Yi Jae-Woo 2010
47 2 140 2005-3711 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.2.140 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.2.140 20224715
Post-dural puncture headache following acupotomy using "Wonli-acupuncture needle" - A case report Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Kim Hyungtae Lee Cheol-Hyeong Kim Yeon-Dong 31 7 2018
13 3 314 318 2383-7977 10.17085/apm.2018.13.3.314 10.17085/apm.2018.13.3.314
Deep spine infection after acupuncture in the setting of spinal instrumentation Spine Deformity Callan Alexandra K. Bauer Jennifer M. Martus Jeffrey E. 3 2016
4 2 156 161 2212-134X 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.09.045 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.09.045 27927549
Paraplegia caused by spinal infection after acupuncture Spinal Cord Bang M S Lim S H 2006
44 4 258 259 1362-4393 10.1038/sj.sc.3101819 10.1038/sj.sc.3101819 16151454
Adverse events associated with therapeutic dry needling International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Boyce David Wempe Hannah Campbell Courtney Fuehne Spencer Zylstra Edo Smith Grant Wingard Christopher Jones Richard 2 2020
15 1 103 113 2159-2896 10.26603/ijspt20200103 10.26603/ijspt20200103
Dry needling in physical therapy practice: Adverse events International Journal of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Valdes Vanessa 1 11 2019
5 2 2455-7498 10.15344/2455-7498/2019/157 10.15344/2455-7498/2019/157
Short-term effects of two deep dry needling techniques on pressure pain thresholds and electromyographic amplitude of the lumbosacral multifidus in patients with low back pain - a randomized clinical trial Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Wang-Price Sharon Zafereo Jason Couch Zach Brizzolara Kelli Heins Taylor Smith Lindsey 17 1 2020
28 5 254 265 1066-9817 10.1080/10669817.2020.1714165 10.1080/10669817.2020.1714165 31960773
The effect of dry needling compared to lumbar spine mobilization on pain, functional disability, quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Research Square Mirzaie Hamide Pourahmadi Mohammad Reza Ayoubpour Mohamad Reza Firouze Bahare 5 12 2022
10.21203/rs.3.rs-2153991/v1 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2153991/v1
Trigger Point Dry Needling E-Book: Trigger Point Dry Needling E-Book Dommerholt J. de las Penas C.F. Elsevier Health Sciences 2018

The use of trigger point dry needling and intramuscular electrical stimulation for a subject with chronic low back pain: a case report Int J Sports Phys Ther Rainey C.E. 2013
8 2 145 161 23593553
Validity and reliability of dry needle placement in the deep lumbar multifidus muscle using ultrasound imaging: an in-vivo study Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Wang-Price Sharon S. Etibo Kristen N. Short Alicia P. Brizzolara Kelli J. Zafereo Jason A. 22 3 2022
30 5 284 291 1066-9817 10.1080/10669817.2022.2051239 10.1080/10669817.2022.2051239 35313787
Baseline examination factors associated with clinical improvement after dry needling in individuals with low back pain Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Koppenhaver Shane L. Walker Michael J. Smith Ryan W. Booker Jacquelynn M. Walkup Isaac D. Su Jonathan Hebert Jeffrey J. Flynn Timothy 8 2015
45 8 604 612 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2015.5801 10.2519/jospt.2015.5801 26110549
The effects of dry needling to the thoracolumbar junction multifidi on measures of regional and remote flexibility and pain sensitivity: A randomized controlled trial Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Clark Nicole G. Hill Cheryl J. Koppenhaver Shane L. Massie Thomas Cleland Joshua A. 6 2021
53 102366 2468-7812 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102366 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102366 33831698
Comparison of two angles of approach for trigger point dry needling of the lumbar multifidus in human donors (cadavers) Manual Therapy Hannah Mary C. Cope Janet Palermo Alec Smith Walker Wacker Valerie 12 2016
26 160 164 1356-689X 10.1016/j.math.2016.08.008 10.1016/j.math.2016.08.008
Safety of dry needling to the upper lumbar spine: a pilot cadaver study Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Mansfield C J Harr M Briggs M Onate J Boucher L C 2020
28 2 111 118 1066-9817 10.1080/10669817.2019.1708593 10.1080/10669817.2019.1708593 31875462
Changes in lumbar multifidus muscle function and nociceptive sensitivity in low back pain patient responders versus non-responders after dry needling treatment Manual Therapy Koppenhaver Shane L. Walker Michael J. Su Jonathan McGowen Jared M. Umlauf Lindsey Harris Kevin D. Ross Michael D. 12 2015
20 6 769 776 1356-689X 10.1016/j.math.2015.03.003 10.1016/j.math.2015.03.003
Immediate changes in resting and contracted thickness of transversus abdominis after dry needling of lumbar multifidus in healthy participants: A randomized controlled crossover trial Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics Puentedura Emilio J. Buckingham Sarah J. Morton Daniella Montoya Crystal Fernandez de las Penas Cesar 10 2017
40 8 615 623 0161-4754 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.06.013 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.06.013
Influence of clinical experience on accuracy and safety of obliquus capitus inferior dry needling in unembalmed cadavers Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Kearns Gary A. Hooper Troy L. Brismée Jean-Michel Allen Brad Lierly Micah Gilbert Kerry K. Pendergrass Timothy J. Edwards Deborah 2022
38 12 2052 2061 0959-3985 10.1080/09593985.2021.1901326 10.1080/09593985.2021.1901326 33719823
Ultrasound-facilitated epidurals and spinals in obstetrics Anesthesiology Clinics Carvalho Jose Carlos Almeida 3 2008
26 1 145 158 1932-2275 10.1016/j.anclin.2007.11.007 10.1016/j.anclin.2007.11.007 18319185
