
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

35693852
35593
10.26603/001c.35593
Original Research
Research Dominance Definitions May Not Identify Higher Risk Limb for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in NCAA D3 Student-Athletes
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5514-0516
Cacolice Paul A. https://www.westfield.ma.edu/people/paul-cacolice
1
Starkey Brianna E. 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4168-3739
Carcia Christopher R. https://www.coloradomesa.edu/directory/kinesiology/christopher-carcia.html
3
Higgins Paul E. https://www.westfield.ma.edu/people/paul-higgins
1
1 Sports Medicine and Human Performance Westfield State University https://ror.org/05pjd6b26
2 University of Massachusetts Boston https://ror.org/04ydmy275
3 Kinesiology Colorado Mesa University https://ror.org/0451s5g67
Corresponding author: Paul A. Cacolice, PhD., LAT, ATC, CSCS Sports Medicine and Human Performance 214 Woodward Center Westfield State University Westfield, MA 01085 Telephone 413.572.5450 Email pcacolice@westfield.ma.edu
1 6 2022
2022
17 4 622627
26 10 2021
8 2 2022
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background/Purpose

Recent work has identified non-significant correlations of established limb dominance to the lower extremity (LE) at greater risk for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury in an active, non-athletic sample. The most common LE dominance definition is preferred leg to kick a ball. Athletes develop a unilaterality pattern different from their active, non-athlete peers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the correlation between the LE used to kick a ball with and the limb identified at greater risk of ACL injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division III athletes.

Design

An Observational Descriptive study design

Methods

Forty-six student-athletes that were active on their NCAA Division III football, field hockey, volleyball, and soccer team rosters were recruited. Upon completing consent, participants performed two tasks (kicking a ball; unilateral land) in a counterbalanced order. Data were entered into and analyzed with a commercial statistical software package where a phi coefficient and Chi-squared analysis were performed.

Results

Of the 46 student athletes who participated (Female=32, Male=14, 19.48±1.26years, 171.75±10.47cm, 77.26±18.74kg), 25 participants kicked and landed with the same limb. Twenty participants chose kicking and landing with different limbs. The Phi Coefficient (Φ= 0.001; P= 0.97) indicated little to no relationship between the LE a participant kicked and landed with. Likewise, the Chi-square statistic revealed no statistical differences between observed and expected frequencies (χ2= 0.001; p= 0.97).

Discussion/Conclusion

NCAA Division III athletes display a statistical absence of preferred limb predictability utilizing the most common dominance definition (kicking a ball) as it relates to identifying LE at risk of ACL injury. The results suggest that the prevalent LE dominance definition is problematic when exploring ACL injury risk in this population.

Athlete
Dominant limb
Intercollegiate
kicking
landing
lower extremity
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Decades of focused investigations have been conducted to better understand anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk factors.1 Despite this, ACL injuries remain common,2–6 costly,7 and debilitating.8 It has been estimated that 80,000 to 250,000 ACL injuries occur in the US each year,3,9,10 with an appropriated total annual cost of between $8 and $18 billion.11 ACL injury increases the likelihood of re-injury,12,13 and the risk of developing knee osteoarthritis.12 Furthermore, individuals often face psycho-sociological challenges during their time away from regular activity.14,15 A preferred strategy then, would be to prevent rather than treat ACL injuries.

Injury prevention requires a precise understanding of the causal risk factor(s).16 It has been established that ACL injuries occur more frequently with non-contact mechanisms,2,4 and with single LE deceleration activities such as changing direction or landing from a jump.17 These suggest that lower extremity (LE) biomechanics are affected at ground contact to increase injury risk. As such, unilateral landing tasks are commonly utilized to study non-contact ACL risk factors.18,19

Investigation of unilateral landing behaviors commonly collects data from the participant’s dominant LE. Limb dominance is most frequently defined as the preferred LE to kick a ball.20–23 The majority of ACL injuries however occur to the plant or landing LE.21,24 It is unknown if the preferred leg to kick a ball is the lower extremity most commonly injured. Unless the preferred kicking LE is also the preferred plant or landing LE, this operational definition of LE dominance is potentially problematic. Given the epidemiological data, costs and long-term medical impacts, it is apparent choosing the appropriate LE for testing is imperative.

To date, only one investigation has been published exploring the relationship between the preferred kicking LE and the preferred landing LE.25 This investigation indicated that there were weak correlations between these two measures of LE dominance in a sample of healthy, active college students. For a number of reasons explored in the literature, athletes demonstrate an elevated risk of orthopedic injury, than their healthy, but non-athlete peers.26–29 In athletes however, the strength of correlation between LE dominance measures remains unknown. Optimal prediction of LE dominance for injury risk would benefit athletes even more than the values in a general, healthy population.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the correlation between the LE used to kick a ball with and the limb identified at greater risk of ACL injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division III athletes. The hypothesis was that these measures will indicate stronger correlations in athletes than reported in healthy non-athletes.25

METHODS

The authors utilized an observational, descriptive investigation design30,31 with counterbalanced, repeated measures. This investigation was granted Institutional Review Board approval. Inclusion Criteria required participants to be 1) between the ages of 18-25 and 2) currently active on their NCAA Division III football, soccer, field hockey, volleyball, basketball, or lacrosse team roster. Athletes from the included sports were recruited to participate as they are at increased risk for non-contact ACL injury.27–29,32,33 Participants were excluded from the study if within the prior six months they had: 1) utilized crutches for any LE injury or 2) missed a regularly scheduled intercollegiate competition due to a LE injury, 3) engaged in a rehabilitation program for a LE injury or 4) inability to demonstrate any of the required physical activities in the study. These exclusions were to assure unbiased LE function, and optimize participant safety.

An a-priori power analysis using publicly available freeware (G*Power v 3.1.9.2, Düsseldorf, Germany) indicated that a minimum sample size of 34 was needed to achieve a power of 0.80. To ensure that a Type II error was not committed, forty-six student-athletes healthy, NCAA D-III participants between the age of 18 and 25 were recruited for this investigation. Data were collected during a single session in the Westfield State University Biomechanics laboratory. Upon receiving written informed consent, height, weight, age, and sport team were recorded. The participant then performed two tasks (kicking a ball; unilateral landing) in a counterbalanced order.

Kicking Task

Participants were asked to jog 300cm (3 meters) to kick a stationary soccer ball through a 100cm (1 meter) wide target, 300cm (3 meters) away. Each individual completed five trials of this activity. The LE the participant chose to kick a ball with three out of five trials was defined as their preferred kicking LE.25 Participants were asked to jog and kick the ball rather than kick it from a stationary position as we felt this methodology more realistically represented how the activity would take place.

Landing Task

Participants were asked to stand on a box 30cm in height, and instructed to lean forward and drop from the box, landing on their preferred leg. Each individual completed five trials of this activity. The LE the participant chose to land with three out of five trials was defined as their preferred landing LE and is consistent with previous investigations.25,34,35

Statistical Analyses

Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated (SPSS v26, IBM, Armonk, NY) to determine the relationship between preferred landing LE and preferred kicking LE. A Chi-square value was calculated to explore for observed and expected frequencies.

RESULTS

The forty-five participants represented six sports (football= 11, men’s soccer= 1, women’s soccer= 8, women’s lacrosse= 1, women’s volleyball= 10, field hockey= 14). Thirty-three female, and 12 male participants completed the study (19.48±1.23years, 171.75±10.47cm, 77.26±18.74kg). Twenty-five participants kicked and landed with the same limb. Twenty participants chose kicking and landing with different limbs (Table 1). The Phi Coefficient (Φ= 0.001; p= 0.97) indicated little to no relationship between the LE a participant kicked and landed with. Likewise, the Chi-square statistic revealed no differences between observed and expected frequencies (χ2= 0.001; p= 0.97).

89793 Table 1. Frequencies of preferred dominance

		Preferred Kicking LE	
		Left	Right	
Preferred Landing LE	Left	3	16	
Right	4	22	

DISCUSSION

The purpose of this investigation was to correlate the preferred LE in kicking a ball, and the LE preferred from a drop landing in athletes. The investigators hypothesized the correlations would be stronger in athletes than the previous findings in healthy, active, non-athletes. The findings of this study did not support the stated hypothesis, as weaker correlations were seen in these athletes than in previous descriptions of healthy, active non-athletes.

There is little discrepancy for defining upper extremity dominance.36,37 In contrast, previous investigations have utilized various definitions for LE dominance. Among the various singular strategies have been utilization of stance or weight-bearing LE,19 the preferred single LE for landing task,38 or through a battery of tests.39 The most common operational definition in the literature however, involves the preferred LE for kicking a ball.20–23

The utilization of a consistent and task specific LE selection is essential for application of any research finding. Epidemiological evidence on ACL injury incidence contrasts with the rationale for LE selection in the majority of investigations. Data show ACL injuries occur more frequently with a unilateral landing,24 during a non-contact mechanism,1–4 and do not occur as frequently to the kicking LE.17 The most frequent strategy for LE dominance selection then, seemingly is potentially problematic when attempting to understand ACL injury risk.

The hypothesis was generated from the understanding that athletes demonstrate a high level of motor skills as they perform at ever higher levels of competition. These motor skills often necessitate incredible unilateral control. Indeed, prior work in dancers has suggested level of expertise may affect preferred LE for skill performance, even where bilateralism is expected.24 Previous work from two of the current investigation’s authors (PAC, CRC)25 explored the same correlation analysis in a group of healthy and active, but non-athletes. The results of that study indicated weak correlations between the preferred kicking and landing LE. The data in this study indicate even weaker, and statistically insignificant correlations in athletes. Given this, previous injury risk identification investigations may have obtained results from the LE less likely to be injured as a result.

Among the premises of this investigation are that athletes differ from healthy, active non-athlete individuals of a similar age. Of greater concern is that athletes demonstrate an elevated risk of ACL injury than their healthy, active, but non-athlete peers.26–29 Another study limitation is that due to the selection of sport teams, data were collected on a higher number of females versus males. As females have demonstrated a greater incidence of ACL injury in the literature,33,40,41 the authors feel that the data remain consistent with the purpose of this study. Finally, the exclusion criteria were selected to investigate these skills in only those who are currently performing at high levels of function and competition. Including individuals who had returned to a full function from LE surgery is more representative of a realistic scenario in the collegiate population, and has been previously utilized for that effort.35,42 This is however, may be considered a limitation of this investigation.

The findings in this investigation raise several areas of interest for future investigations. Among these are exploring any connection between upper and lower extremity dominance. Additionally, exploration of the relationship of the lower extremity with greater likelihood of injury to the operational dominance definitions as seen in sports with an elevated need for bilateralism such as lacrosse and soccer is warranted.

CONCLUSION

NCAA Division III athletes display a statistical absence of predictability in definitions of LE dominance. Even though athletes develop greater unilaterality as level of competition increases, the results suggest that the most prevalent dominance definition (the limb with which one kicks a ball) may be problematic when exploring ACL injury risk in this population. As ACL injury risk is elevated in the preferred planting versus kicking limb, careful consideration should be given to the operational definition of LE limb dominance in future injury risk studies.

DISCLOSURES

There are no author disclosures regarding this investigation or preparation of this manuscript. There were no funding sources for this investigation.
==== Refs
The unhappy triad: etiology, diagnosis and treatment American Journal of Orthopedics O'Donoghue Don H 1964
6 242 256 14237439
Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury Orthopedics Boden Barry P Dean G Scott Feagin Jr John A Garrett Jr William E 6 2000
23 6 573 578 00661 10875418
Understanding and preventing noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a review of the Hunt Valley II meeting, January 2005 American Journal of Sports Medicine Griffin L. Y. Albohm Marjorie J Arendt Elizabeth A Bahr Roald Beynnon Bruce D DeMaio Marlene Dick Randall W Engebretsen Lars Garrett Jr William E 26 6 2006
34 9 1512 1532 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546506286866
Intraarticular injuries associated with anterior cruciate ligament tear: findings at ligament reconstruction in high school and recreational athletes The American Journal of Sports Medicine Piasecki D.P. Spindler K.P. Warren T.A. Andrish J.T. Parker R.D. 2003
31 4 601 605 12860552
Epidemiology of Knee Injuries among U.S. High School Athletes, 2005/2006–2010/2011 Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Swenson David M. Collins Christy L. Best Thomas M. Flanigan David C. Fields Sarah K. Comstock R. Dawn 3 2013
45 3 462 469 0195-9131 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318277acca 00003
The incidence of knee ligament injuries in the general population The American Journal of Knee Surgery Miyasaka Kenji C Daniel Dale M Stone Mary Lou Hirshman Paul 1 1991
4 3 8
Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the female athlete Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® Huston Laura J Greenfield Mary Lou VH Wojtys Edward M 3 2000
372 50 63 10.1097/00003086-200003000-00007
The Role of ACL Injury in the Development of Posttraumatic Knee Osteoarthritis Clinics in Sports Medicine Friel Nicole A. Chu Constance R. 1 2013
32 1 12 0278-5919 10.1016/j.csm.2012.08.017 00007
Increase in outpatient knee arthroscopy in the United States: a comparison of National Surveys of Ambulatory Surgery, 1996 and 2006. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume Kim S Bosque J Meehan JP Jamali A Marder R 2011
93 11 994 1000 10.2106/JBJS.I.01618 00095
Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States The American Journal of Sports Medicine Mall N. A. Chalmers P. N. Moric M. Tanaka M. J. Cole B. J. Bach B. R. Paletta G. A. 1 8 2014
42 10 2363 2370 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546514542796 00000
Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) Mather Richard C. Koenig Lane Kocher Mininder S Dall Timothy M Gallo Paul Scott Daniel J Bach Jr Bernard B Spindler Kurt P 2 10 2013
95 19 1751 0021-9355 10.2106/JBJS.L.01705 00004
Minimum 10-Year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: How the loss of normal knee motion compounds other factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery The American Journal of Sports Medicine Shelbourne K. D. Gray T. 1 3 2009
37 3 471 480 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546508326709 00078
Current concepts for injury prevention in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction The American Journal of Sports Medicine Hewett T. E. Di Stasi S. L. Myer G. D. 5 10 2012
41 216 224 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546512459638 00000
Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Kvist Joanna Ek Anna Sporrstedt Katja Good Lars 10 2 2005
13 5 393 397 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-004-0591-8 00181
Ways of experiencing participation and factors affecting the activity level after nonreconstructed anterior cruciate ligament injury: a qualitative study Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Österberg Annika Kvist Joanna Dahlgren Madeleine Abrandt 3 2013
43 3 172 183 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2013.4278 00000 23160240
Sports injury surveillance systems, 'One size fits all?' Sports Medicine van Mechelen Willem 1997
24 3 164–168 10.2165/00007256-199724030-00003 00002 9327530
Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury in basketball: video analysis of 39 cases The American Journal of Sports Medicine Krosshaug T. Nakamae A. Boden B. P. Engebretsen L. Smith G. Slauterbeck J. R. Hewett T. E. Bahr R. 7 11 2006
35 3 359 367 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546506293899 00000
The Relationship Between Lower Extremity Closed Kinetic Chain Strength & Sagittal Plane Landing Kinematics in Female Athletes International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Carcia C. R Kivlan B. Scibek J. S 2011
6 1 9 21655453
ACL Research Retreat V: An update on ACL risk and prevention, March 25-27, 2010, Greensboro, NC Journal of Athletic Training Shultz Sandra J Schmitz Randy J Nguyen Anh-Dung Chaudhari Ajit M Padua Darin A McLean Scott G Sigward Susan M 2010
45 5 499 508
Sex differences in eccentric hip-abductor strength and knee-joint kinematics when landing from a jump Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Jacobs C. Mattacola C. 2005
14 4 346 355
Lower-limb dominance as a possible etiologic factor in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament tears The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research Negrete Rodney J. Schick Elizabeth A. Cooper Joshua P. 2007
21 270–273 00021 17313288
Limb Dominance as a potential etiological factor in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament tears Journal of Knee Surgery Matava Matthew J Freehill Angela K Grutzner Sally Shannon William 2002
15 11 16 00000 11829328
Eccentric hip adduction and abduction strength in elite soccer players and matched controls: a cross-sectional study British Journal of Sports Medicine Thorborg K. Couppe C. Petersen J. Magnusson S. P. Holmich P. 22 10 2009
45 10 13 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.2009.061762 00000
Gender influences: the role of leg dominance in ACL injury among soccer players British Journal of Sports Medicine Brophy R. Silvers H. J. Gonzales T. Mandelbaum B. R. 6 2010
44 10 694 697 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.2008.051243 20542974
Defining Lower Extremity Dominance: The Relationship Between Preferred Lower Extremity and Two Functional Tasks International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Carcia Christopher R. Cacolice Paul A. McGeary Scott 4 2019
14 2 188 191 2159-2896 10.26603/ijspt20190188 30997271
Anterior cruciate ligament injury patterns among collegiate men and women Journal of Athletic Training Arendt E.A. Agel J. Dick R. 1999
34 2 86 92 16558564
Anterior cruciate ligament injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association basketball and soccer: a 13-year review American Journal of Sports Medicine Agel J. Arendt Elizabeth A Bershadsky Boris 8 2 2005
33 4 524 531 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546504269937
Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate women's basketball injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988–1989 through 2003–2004 Journal of athletic training Agel Julie Olson David E. Dick Randall Arendt Elizabeth A. Marshall Stephen W. Sikka Robby S. 2007
42 2 202 00099
Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate men's football injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System 1988-1989 through 2003-2004 Journal of Athletic Training Dick Randall Ferrara Michael S Agel Julie Courson Ron Marshall Stephen W. Hanley Michael J Reifsteck Fred 2007
42 2 221 233
Foundations of clinical research: applications to evidence-based practice Portney Leslie Gross F.A. Davis Philadelphia 2020
Philadelphia 9780803661165
An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land The Lancet Grimes David A Schulz Kenneth F 1 2002
359 9300 57 61 0140-6736 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07283-5
Comparing the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury in collegiate lacrosse, soccer, and basketball players: implications for anterior cruciate ligament mechanism and prevention American Journal of Sports Medicine Mihata L. C. S. 1 2 2006
34 6 899 904 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546505285582
Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegiate basketball and soccer NCAA data and review of literature The American Journal of Sports Medicine Arendt Elizabeth Dick Randall 1995
23 6 694–701 10.1177/036354659502300611 01244 8600737
Research Dominance Definitions May Not Identify Higher Risk Limb for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Journal of Athletic Training Cacolice Paul A Starkey Brianna E Carcia Christopher R Higgins Paul E. 6 2020
55 6S S 95 10.4085/1062-6050-55.6s.S-1
The Use of Function Tests to Predict Sagittal Plane Knee Kinematics In NCAA-D1 Female Athletes International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Cacolice Paul A Carcia Christopher R Scibek Jason S Phelps Amy L 8 2015
10 4 493 504 26346734
The effects of age, gender and shoulder dominance on range of motion at the shoulder Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Barnes Christopher J Van Steyn Scott J Fischer Richard A 5 2001
10 3 242 246 11408905
The acute effects of sleeper stretches on shoulder range of motion Journal of Athletic Training Laudner K. G. Sipes R. C. Wilson J. T. 2008
43 4 359 18668168
Gender differences in leg stiffness and stiffness recruitment strategy during two-legged hopping Journal of Motor Behavior Padua D. A. Carcia C. R. Arnold B. L. Granata K. P. 2005
37 2 111–126 10.3200/JMBR.37.2.111-126 15730945
Determination of functional strength imbalance of the lower extremities The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research Newton Robert U. Gerber Aimee Nimphius Sophia Shim Jae K. Doan Brandon K. Robertson Mike Pearson David R. Craig Bruce W. Häkkinen Keijo Kraemer William J. 2006
20 4 971–977 00089 17194256
Anterior cruciate ligament injury in female athletes: epidemiology Journal of Athletic Training Ireland M.L. 1999
34 2 150 154 16558558
The relative incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury in men and women at the United States Naval Academy The American Journal of Sports Medicine Gwinn David E. Wilckens John H. McDevitt Edward R. Ross Glen Kao Tzu-Cheg 2000
28 98–102 10.1177/03635465000280012901 00261 10653551
Ground reaction forces are predicted with functional and clinical tests in healthy collegiate students Journal of Clinical Medicine Cacolice Paul A Carcia Christopher R Scibek Jason S Phelps Amy L 2020
9 9 2907 10.3390/jcm9092907 32916814
