
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

35693858
35574
10.26603/001c.35574
IFSPT International Perspective
Return to Play After a Shoulder Injury: Let’s Not Put the Cart Before the Horse!
Policastro Pablo Oscar PT 1
Camargo Paula Rezende PT, PhD 2
1 Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos; KINÉ- Kinesiología Deportiva y Funcional Sports Clinic
2 Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Department of Physical Therapy Universidade Federal de São Carlos
1 6 2022
2022
17 4 548550
1 4 2022
4 5 2022
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

return to sport
reinjury
overhead sports
collision sports
==== Body
pmcShoulder disorders are common in athletes who practice overhead and collision sports,1,2 and represent an important clinical problem with a high rate of recurrence.3 Return-to-sport decision-making after a shoulder injury is a significant challenge and should be a shared decision among all stakeholders due to the complexity of the process.4,5 There are currently no evidence-based criteria to be followed during the process of return-to-sport following shoulder injuries, unlike published guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction,6 for example. Athletes should also be aware that they may be unable to return to the same level as previous to injury.

Despite the lack of evidence to define return-to-play guidelines, a recent consensus statement has provided important guidance to support decision-making during the return-to-sport process after a shoulder injury.7 The authors outlined 6 domains to consider for the athlete who is in the process of returning to sport after a shoulder injury: pain, active shoulder range of motion, strength, power and endurance, the kinetic chain, psychology, and return-to-sport specific activities. This consensus may be helpful for clinicians and athletes to start gathering information to optimize the plan to return to sport. Still, additional support should be created in the near future. For now, this consensus may be used as a template for clinicians to remember that athletes with a shoulder injury should also have the other segments of the kinetic chain assessed (not only the shoulder) as well as psychological and social aspects.

Shoulder functional performance tests are suggested to assess strength, power, and endurance, not only of the shoulder but also of the entire kinetic chain.8 Although several shoulder functional performance tests have been described in the literature to help in the understanding of the physical condition of the athlete, there is no battery of valid shoulder tests to guide the decision-making for return-to-sport. In addition, many tests may not be specific to the functional demands of the shoulder in the athlete’s sport.

The reference values for shoulder functional performance tests that are available in the current literature are not sport-specific, which makes interpretation difficult. For instance, the Y-Balance Test – Upper Quarter (YBT-UQ) is described as a quantitative analysis of an athlete’s ability to reach with the free hand while maintaining weight bearing on the contralateral upper limb.9 The performance of the athlete in the YBT-UQ may make sense for some sports like rugby or American football where the shoulder works in open and closed kinetic chains. However, the YBT-UQ may not be relevant for overhead sports (e.g. volleyball), where the gestures are predominantly in open kinetic chain. Due to the lack of normative values, clinicians commonly use the contralateral shoulder as a reference to compare the injured shoulder. Depending on the sport, this comparison may not be appropriate if we consider the arm dominance and level of activity of the athlete.

Another example is the drop catches test, which is highly influenced by the arm dominance, especially in unilateral sports. This test quantifies the number of repetitions to drop a tennis ball and quickly catch it by twisting the shoulder from an externally rotated position to an internally rotated position with 90° of arm abduction and elbow flexion.10 Therefore, it is reasonable to consider that shoulder functional performance tests may not always bring valuable information about the status of the shoulder to decide on return-to-sport readiness.

Other factors should also be considered and further investigated in the return-to-play process, such as biopsychosocial context. Athletes with similar shoulder injuries and results of functional performance tests may not fully return to sports activity, especially at the same time and level.11 Factors such as fear of reinjury, apprehension during training, being involved in contact sports, and motivation may influence this process. In addition, self-report questionnaires are not enough to fully understand the athlete’s condition and context.

In comparison to other body regions, we are clearly a few steps behind on decision making for the return-to-play after a shoulder injury. The scientific sports community should focus on improving the evidence to guide clinicians and all stakeholders for return-to-sport after a shoulder injury. More research exploring and combining shoulder performance tests, biopsychosocial context, sport-specific tasks and clinical information could be useful as well as high-quality longitudinal studies to determine a cluster of shoulder functional tests to guide the decision for return-to-play. Finally, we should now try to understand the value of the available performance tests instead of creating new ones. Let’s not put the cart before the horse!

The process of return-to-play after an injury is challenging for both athletes and clinicians. Considering the lack of robust information to support the decision making for shoulder injuries, the process of return-to-play is difficult and can place increased psychological pressure on athletes and sports physical therapists. As members of the sports science community, we must continue to work together to change this reality.
==== Refs
Prevalence and patterns of shoulder injuries in Major League Baseball The Physician and Sportsmedicine Fares Mohamad Y. Fares Jawad Baydoun Hasan Fares Youssef 2020
48 1 63 67 0091-3847 10.1080/00913847.2019.1629705 10.1080/00913847.2019.1629705 31173695
Shoulder injury incidence and severity through identification of risk factors in rugby union players Pakistan J Med Sci Lynch E. Lombard A.J.J. Coopoo Y. Shaw I. Shaw B.S. 2013
29 1400 1405
Return to competition, re-injury, and impact on performance of preseason shoulder injuries in major league baseball pitchers The Physician and Sportsmedicine Makhni Eric C. Lee Randall W. Nwosu Ekene O. Steinhaus Michael E. Ahmad Christopher S. 29 6 2015
43 3 300 306 0091-3847 10.1080/00913847.2015.1050952 10.1080/00913847.2015.1050952
The challenge of the sporting shoulder: From injury prevention through sport-specific rehabilitation toward return to play Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Cools Ann M. Maenhout Annelies G. Vanderstukken Fran Declève Philippe Johansson Fredrik R. Borms Dorien 7 2021
64 4 101384 1877-0657 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.009 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.009 32320753
Return to Sport After Shoulder Stabilization Procedures: A Criteria-Based Testing Continuum to Guide Rehabilitation and Inform Return-to-Play Decision Making Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation Otley Thomas Myers Heather Lau Brian C. Taylor Dean C. 1 2022
4 1 e237 e246 2666-061X 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.039 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.039 35141557
Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: The Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study British Journal of Sports Medicine Grindem Hege Snyder-Mackler Lynn Moksnes Håvard Engebretsen Lars Risberg May Arna BMJ 9 5 2016
50 13 804 808 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096031 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096031 27162233
Bern Consensus Statement on Shoulder Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Return to Sport for Athletes at All Participation Levels J. Orthop. Sport. Phys. Ther Schwank A.. 2022
52 11 28
Return to sport participation criteria following shoulder injury: a clinical commentary J Sports Phys Ther Wilk K.E. Bagwell M.S. Davies G.J. Arrigo C.A. 8 2020
15 4 624 642
Upper quarter y balance test: Reliability and performance comparison between genders in active adults J. Strength Cond. Res Gorman P.P. Butler R.J. Plisky P.J. Kiesel K.B. 2012
26 3043 3048 22228174
Reliability of a shoulder arm return to sport test battery Physical Therapy in Sport Olds Margie Coulter Cade Marant Dan Uhl Tim 9 2019
39 16 22 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.06.001 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.06.001 31203142
Professional Athlete Return to Play and Performance After Shoulder Arthroscopy Varies by Sport Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation Higgins Margaret J. DeFroda Steven Yang Daniel S. Brown Symone M. Mulcahey Mary K. 4 2021
3 2 e391 e397 2666-061X 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.10.001 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.10.001 34027447
